@OshDude: I very much appreciate the analysis on your blog. You had a much more positive assessment of Washington University than I did. I was working today, and missed the 8 or 9 point run in the first set and much of the last set. I may have missed some of the best action.
I also flipped back and forth between work and the Hope match and most of what I had seen was Hope College playing well.
I am going to go in to work early tomorrow so I can watch the entire match in the afternoon.
I am with you...I appreciate the webcast, but the announcer needed to study his information beforehand.
Thanks. Just one dude's opinion. I believe in the big tent. Awesome if I see things differently than others. It leads to better conversation.
Brandt went on a huge service run in Set 1. If she has an ice pack tomorrow, her right shoulder is probably sore from repetitive motion. About a 50/50 split in terms of Bears points earned and received there. Set 4 was meh. Total domination. Looked like Wash U decided it was time to end it.
Hope today compared to other D-III teams I have ever seen would grade out just fine. But comparing Hope to Hope, this match didn't do it for me. The hitting percentage wound up much higher than I thought it would when I was watching. Didn't have live stats up for that one, and I write as I watch to have the stuff up a minute or two after the final point. But there were so many errors. I credit Hope for winning, but 37 errors in four sets isn't great. If I would have guessed at the number of Hope errors without a box score, I would have said 45. You may be right in that I was too tough on Hope. The overall stats suggest that, but it wasn't the feeling I had just watching it.