For example, the MIAC. If SJU and BU win out and then BU lose again to the Johnnies in the conference championship, I don't think BU has a good chance at a pool C with two losses when competing against one loss considerations in all the other regions. On the flip side, if (God forbid) SJU loses to BU in the conference championship then SJU is probably the first pool C selection or maybe the second after the WIAC runner up (those two would be competing for 1st and 2cd pool C selection in that scenario, I reckon). HSU wins out and there are three pool C selections from region six in that second scenario. Otherwise I see one or at best two.
We'll see come end of the year.
EDIT: It would be a perverse unintended consequence of the MIAC championship format if it ends up virtually guaranteeing two post-season positions on a split and virtually guaranteeing only one with an undefeated team. I suspect it may make the odds of two MIAC teams in the post-season significantly less than they were before. But it improves the playability of the MIAC for the bottom teams. So, tradeoffs.