NCAA Tournament

Started by David Collinge, February 23, 2009, 05:35:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

bballfan13

Here is my shot at it.  Sorry it's a little messy, but you can see who I picked..  Just a copy paste from Excel and didn't have time to clean up.  I included the SOS listed on D3hoops and also the Results VS Regionally Ranked Opponents (vRRO).  These are mostly up to date but could be a little off.

Round 1      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6        0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   DePauw   24-2        0.923   0.523   2-0
South   Texas-Tyler   26-2   0.929   0.536   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   Scranton   24-3   0.889   0.572   3-1
West   Puget Sound   22-4   0.846   0.584   5-4
East   NYU   21-4   0.84   0.572   3-3
NE   Bowdoin   22-4   0.846   0.590   3-4
               
               
Round 2      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6   0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   DePauw   24-2   0.923   0.523   2-0
South   Texas-Tyler   26-2   0.929   0.536   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   Scranton   24-3   0.889   0.572   3-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   NYU   21-4   0.84   0.572   3-3
NE   Bowdoin   22-4   0.846   0.590   3-4
               
               
Round 3      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6   0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   DePauw   24-2   0.923   0.523   2-0
South   Texas-Tyler   26-2   0.929   0.536   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   Scranton   24-3   0.889   0.572   3-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   NYU   21-4   0.84   0.572   3-3
NE   Amherst   23-3   0.885   0.605   5-3
               
               
Round 4      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6   0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   DePauw   24-2   0.923   0.523   2-0
South   Texas-Tyler   26-2   0.929   0.536   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   NYU   21-4   0.84   0.572   3-3
NE   Amherst   23-3   0.885   0.605   5-3
               
               
Round 5      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6   0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   John Carroll   22-4   0.846   0.523   4-2
South   Texas-Tyler   26-2   0.929   0.536   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   NYU   21-4   0.84   0.572   3-3
NE   Amherst   23-3   0.885   0.605   5-3
               
               
Round 6      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6   0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   John Carroll   22-4   0.846   0.523   4-2
South   Texas-Tyler   26-2   0.929   0.536   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   NYU   21-4   0.84   0.572   3-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 7      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6   0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   John Carroll   22-4   0.846   0.523   4-2
South   Eastern Mennonite   21-3   0.875   0.527   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   NYU   21-4   0.84   0.572   3-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 8      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Stockton   21-6   0.778   0.608   3-6
GL   John Carroll   22-4   0.846   0.523   4-2
South   Eastern Mennonite   21-3   0.875   0.527   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   Ithaca   22-5   0.815   0.546   5-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 9      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Eastern   20-5   0.8   0.580   3-4
GL   John Carroll   22-4   0.846   0.523   4-2
South   Eastern Mennonite   21-3   0.875   0.527   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   Ithaca   22-5   0.815   0.546   5-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 10      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Eastern   20-5   0.8   0.580   3-4
GL   Hope   23-4   0.852   0.562   1-4
South   Eastern Mennonite   21-3   0.875   0.527   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   Ithaca   22-5   0.815   0.546   5-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 11      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Eastern   20-5   0.8   0.580   3-4
GL   Hope   23-4   0.852   0.562   1-4
South   Eastern Mennonite   21-3   0.875   0.527   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   Stevens   22-4   0.846   0.543   4-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 12      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Eastern   20-5   0.8   0.580   3-4
GL   Hope   23-4   0.852   0.562   1-4
South   Maryville   25-3   0.893   0.519   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   Stevens   22-4   0.846   0.543   4-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 13      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Eastern   20-5   0.8   0.580   3-4
GL   Hope   23-4   0.852   0.562   1-4
South   Maryville   25-3   0.893   0.519   3-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 14      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Eastern   20-5   0.8   0.580   3-4
GL   Hope   23-4   0.852   0.562   1-4
South   Randolph-Macon   20-4   0.833   0.538   2-2
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 15      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Eastern   20-5   0.8   0.580   3-4
GL   Transylvania   24-2   0.923   0.499   1-1
South   Randolph-Macon   20-4   0.833   0.538   2-2
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 16      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Brooklyn   20-7   741   0.513   0-5
GL   Transylvania   24-2   0.923   0.499   1-1
South   Randolph-Macon   20-4   0.833   0.538   2-2
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 17      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Brooklyn   20-7   741   0.513   0-5
GL   Transylvania   24-2   0.923   0.499   1-1
South   Trinity (TX)   20-6   0.769   0.507   1-1
Central   North Central   21-5   0.808   0.575   0-3
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 18      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Brooklyn   20-7   741   0.513   0-5
GL   Transylvania   24-2   0.923   0.499   1-1
South   Trinity (TX)   20-6   0.769   0.507   1-1
Central   Chicago   16-7   0.696   0.613   3-4
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Williams   20-6   0.769   0.634   5-6
               
               
Round 19      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Brooklyn   20-7   741   0.513   0-5
GL   Transylvania   24-2   0.923   0.499   1-1
South   Trinity (TX)   20-6   0.769   0.507   1-1
Central   Chicago   16-7   0.696   0.613   3-4
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Whitworth   15-5   0.75   0.584   2-5
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Westfield State   22-5   0.815   0.51   1-0
               
               
Round 20      Record vs D3   Win %   SOS   vRRO
AT   Brooklyn   20-7   741   0.513   0-5
GL   Transylvania   24-2   0.923   0.499   1-1
South   Trinity (TX)   20-6   0.769   0.507   1-1
Central   Chicago   16-7   0.696   0.613   3-4
Mid AT   McDaniel   24-3   0.889   0.485   1-1
West   Bether (MN)   21-5   0.808   0.527   0-2
East   SUNY Cortland   21-6   0.778   0.521   1-3
NE   Westfield State   22-5   0.815   0.51   1-0

BruinFan

Bethel must have jumped over Whitworth in the final rankings for the West region. Otherwise, I can't explain why Bethel was selected and Whitworth was left out.

The last published rankings had Whitworth at #5 and Bethel at #7. Seems a bit harsh for Bethel to jump over Whitworth on the basis of a semi-final conference playoff loss to Puget Sound on the road. Oh well, the committee would have just put them in the same pod as Puget Sound and George Fox.

ronk

 Inferior camera location from the Calvin sectional - probably 70 feet above the court; players look like miniatures; doesn't bode well for the Final 4.

bballfan13

Quote from: ronk on March 13, 2015, 10:43:29 PM
Inferior camera location from the Calvin sectional - probably 70 feet above the court; players look like miniatures; doesn't bode well for the Final 4.

Turner Sports does the Final Four video so it will be different. Calvins camera is mounted at the top of the arena on a side and controlled from a video room. When the guys play Hope they bring in the local TV crew and setup at a great spot like a normal arena TV broadcast. I'm guessing that's what it will be for the Final Four. Should be really nice.

ronk

Quote from: bballfan13 on March 14, 2015, 12:36:50 AM
Quote from: ronk on March 13, 2015, 10:43:29 PM
Inferior camera location from the Calvin sectional - probably 70 feet above the court; players look like miniatures; doesn't bode well for the Final 4.

Turner Sports does the Final Four video so it will be different. Calvins camera is mounted at the top of the arena on a side and controlled from a video room. When the guys play Hope they bring in the local TV crew and setup at a great spot like a normal arena TV broadcast. I'm guessing that's what it will be for the Final Four. Should be really nice.

Hope so - thanks

gordonmann

Yeah, Turner doesn't cover the Final Four (or at least they haven't in the past) but it's a very strong contractor with a really impressive video set up: Multiple cameras, professional broadcasters, etc.

Pat Coleman

Alright, folks -- the NCAA's first women's basketball regional rankings are posted. Check out the full list from D3hoops.com:
http://www.d3blogs.com/d3hoops/2016/02/10/first-2016-regional-rankings-released-today/
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for D3f, D3h.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 PMLet's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.

Roundball999

Anyone know dates for this years NCAA WBB first round?  I assume March 4,5 but can't find confirmation of that.

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

Yes - first weekend of March. 4th and 5th.

And to clarify since this is a different season:
- 1st Weekend - March 4 & 5 - 1st and 2nd Rounds (school hosts)
- 2nd Weekend - March 11 & 12 - Sweet 16/Quarters (school hosts)
- 3rd Weekend - March 19 - Semifinals (Capital University)
- 4th "Weekend" - Championship - Monday, April 4 - Bankers Life Fieldhouse, Indianapolis
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

Roundball999

Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on February 19, 2016, 10:29:27 AM
Yes - first weekend of March. 4th and 5th.

And to clarify since this is a different season:
- 1st Weekend - March 4 & 5 - 1st and 2nd Rounds (school hosts)
- 2nd Weekend - March 11 & 12 - Sweet 16/Quarters (school hosts)
- 3rd Weekend - March 19 - Semifinals (Capital University)
- 4th "Weekend" - Championship - Monday, April 4 - Bankers Life Fieldhouse, Indianapolis

Thank you Dave

7express

Quote from: Dave 'd-mac' McHugh on February 19, 2016, 10:29:27 AM
Yes - first weekend of March. 4th and 5th.

And to clarify since this is a different season:
- 1st Weekend - March 4 & 5 - 1st and 2nd Rounds (school hosts)
- 2nd Weekend - March 11 & 12 - Sweet 16/Quarters (school hosts)
- 3rd Weekend - March 19 - Semifinals (Capital University)
- 4th "Weekend" - Championship - Monday, April 4 - Bankers Life Fieldhouse, Indianapolis

Why have the 2 week break in between the semifinals and championship game??  I think playing the division 2 & division 3 championship games at the site of the division 1 final 4 is stupid (and on a Monday no less which happens to be MLB's opening day!  Who thought up this genius idea??), but if you are going that route why not take the men's approach from a couple years ago where they played 1 round each weekend so at least you still have teams playing weekly instead of 2 teams sitting around for 2 weeks doing nothing, and because of it, the championship game ends up being a 42-40 brickfest because the 2 teams playing in the game haven't played a competitive game in 16 days.

JMO, but whoever thought of this should be fired!

Dave 'd-mac' McHugh

Well 7express.. there are a few things in your argument that aren't true this time around.

First off, the women are doing this because the men did it in 2013. It is only fair. You can complain all you want that is is on opening day, but since when did that stop the Division I men from playing that same day? It happens more times than it doesn't. Also, the DII and DIII women have no choice but to play on that Monday since the D1 women play Sunday/Tuesday. Sure there could be an argument made for the women to play Friday/Sunday... but we aren't in control of those TV contracts and scheduling.

Also, the DII and DIII women could easily say they aren't interested in such an idea. And in fact, the DII women did indicate they were not interested until about an year ago or less. But all parties, including the presidents that actually do run things in the NCAA, approved and here we are allowing the women to have the same experience the men had. I don't understand why you would be against that.

To your point that it is a dumb idea, you might be surprised to find yourself in the minority. A vast majority of people came out of 2013 praising the idea of playing on the same weekend as the D1 Final Four (the only allowed use of the words Final Four, by the way) despite the challenges. They have actually been working hard to do it again, but there are plenty of hurdles and challenges to overcome to repeat the experience. However, there isn't a conversation I have with coaches, ADs, commissioners, etc. who don't talk about that experience and the conversation about doing it again.

Now to the comparison to the men's tournament... you are comparing apples and oranges when you compare the two schedules. Let's start with the fact that NO ONE liked the schedule the men were forced to play with. In fact, Amherst and UMHB both ended up having two weeks between games in that schedule TWICE. Once to start and once to finish. One of the BIGGEST hurdles to keep from having the Final Four experience repeated is the scheduled. The presidents hated it because of how long it made the season and how much more time students missed of school (even if it was two out of 419 teams) and since they control most of the decisions, especially one that big, it isn't going anywhere.

The other problem is it created a horrible men's bracket. We had single-round games for three weeks leading up to the round of eight and semifinals in Salem. Because the committee couldn't create pods with schools coming to one site... it created all kinds of travel problems that cut down on creativity and created a ton of "bracket of death" scenarios. We had top teams facing each other in those first two weeks that normally would not be forced to play one another in a normal pod. When you can't send three different teams from 500 miles or less away to a site, but rather can only look at two teams and make sure they are with 500 miles of each other - your ability to be creative is gone. No one liked the bracket in that design and the women tried to avoid it at all costs so they could have as fair a bracket as possible.

But here is where things are different between 2013 and now. In 2013, there was some quirk with the calendar. I believe it was the Masters that caused the quirk by scheduling their event a week later than it usually would reside in April. One could argue it wasn't exactly a week later, but it was slightly later than normal. Because CBS likes to have the Final Four be the week prior to the Masters, they moved (because they can) the Final Four a week later in the calendar. Basically, it was the first FULL weekend of April versus the prior weekend which split March and April. That resulted in a strange SIX week time frame between when the D3 tournament started and what would have been the Final Four.

Let me give you another comparison. Every year the D3 final four is the same weekend of the opening weekend for the D1 tournament. That results in the D3 title decided the first weekend, the D2 title the second weekend, and the D1 title decided the third weekend. Works nicely. HOWEVER in 2013 if the schedule had never been changed to accommodate the Final Four, the D3 title weekend would have been conference championship weekend in Division I - they would have started the NCAA tournament the following weekend.

That resulted in an extra week D3 had to adjust to especially since the Final Four plan was finalized far too late to adjust the regular season accordingly (start later than Nov. 15, etc.). If they had played two games the opening weekend... what would they have done with four more rounds and five weeks? So they played a single round, single round, single round, elite eight and final four at Salem (who was lucky enough to be able to move the venue availability a week later than normal - that place is very busy, believe it or not) to respect the fact Salem was losing the title game despite what their awarded bid indicated... which left them 15 days for the two teams left.

This year... there is the normal FIVE weeks between the start of the D3 tournament and the D1 title weekend. It is a normal year. To avoid the problems that plagued the men's tournament... and to allow a better bracket and a situation the presidents rather have... they are playing 2, 2, and 1... with just two teams waiting 16 days between games. Remember, Amherst and UMHB waited 14 days at the beginning of the season between their conference tournament title games and their second round games (first round byes) and then waited 15 days between the semis and the championship.

By the way, the 14 days at the beginning and the 15 days at the end did not hurt Amherst and UMHB's shooting performances in their second round or championship games. You have nothing to prove the D3 game will be a brick-fest. That is just conjecture and spin.
Host of Hoopsville. USBWA Executive Board member. Broadcast Director for D3sports.com. Broadcaster for NCAA.com & several colleges. PA Announcer for Gophers & Brigade. Follow me on Twitter: @davemchugh or @d3hoopsville.

fantastic50

I was asked to post some bubble info, like I have on the men's Pool C board.  After a couple of hours behind a spreadsheet, I am finding it much harder than for the men's tournament, because of inconsistent WP vs SOS comparisons across regions, and huge depth disparities across regions.  For example, the NESCAC has a half-dozen teams that are at least arguably deserving, but several are unranked.

It's tough to even try to figure out who MIGHT be in consideration, so my hat's off to Dave, Hugh, etc.  Here's what I could get...

Seemingly locks (18)
Tufts 22-2 (NESCAC, Pool A) 0.917/0.619, NE#1
Scranton 26-0 (LAND, Pool A) 1.000/0.570, MA#1
Amherst 24-1 (NESCAC, Pool C) 0.960/0.580, NE#2
Washington U. 20-4 (UAA, Pool A) 0.833/0.612, CE#1
St. Thomas 23-3 (MIAC, Pool A) 0.885/0.581, WE#2
George Fox 25-0 (NWC, Pool A) 1.000/0.535, WE#1
Rochester 19-5 (UAA, Pool C) 0.792/0.610, EA#1
New York University 17-6 (UAA, Pool C) 0.739/0.615, EA#2
Thomas More 24-0 (PrAC, Pool A) 1.000/0.511, GL#1
Texas-Tyler 21-1 (ASC, Pool A) 0.955/0.523, SO#1
Muhlenberg 22-2 (CC, Pool A) 0.917/0.525, MA#2
Albright 24-2 (MACC, Pool A) 0.923/0.571, MA#3
Marymount 22-4 (CAC, Pool A) 0.846/0.548, MA#4
UW-River Falls 21-4 (WIAC, Pool A) 0.840/0.550, CE#2
University of New England 24-3 (CCC, Pool A) 0.889/0.527, NE#3
Stockton 21-6 (NJAC, Pool C) 0.778/0.567, AT#1
Bowdoin 20-5 (NESCAC, Pool C) 0.800/0.625, NE#4
Hope 23-1 (MIAA, Pool A) 0.958/0.456, GL#2

Likely in (13)
Ohio Northern 22-4 (OAC, Pool C) 0.846/0.542, GL#3
Denison 23-3 (NCAC, Pool A) 0.885/0.534, GL#4
Montclair State 20-6 (NJAC, Pool A) 0.769/0.563, AT#2
Eastern Connecticut 21-6 (LE, Pool A) 0.778/0.580, NE#6
Rowan 22-4 (NJAC, Pool C) 0.846/0.548, AT#3
UW-Stevens Point 20-7 (WIAC, Pool C) 0.741/0.574, CE#3
DeSales 20-6 (MAFC, Pool A) 0.769/0.559, AT#4
Wheaton (Ill.) 19-5 (CCIW, Pool A) 0.792/0.546, CE#6
Maryville (Tenn.) 22-3 (USAC, Pool A) 0.880/0.528, SO#4
Carnegie Mellon 18-6 (UAA, Pool C) 0.750/0.576, GL#5
UW-Oshkosh 20-5 (WIAC, Pool C) 0.800/0.547, CE#4
Stevens 19-6 (E8, Pool A) 0.760/0.561, EA#3
Keene State 22-4 (LE, Pool C) 0.846/0.529, NE#7

Bubble teams (8)
Christopher Newport 22-4 (CAC, Pool C) 0.846/0.514, MA#5
SUNY Geneseo 20-5 (SUNYAC, Pool C) 0.800/0.536, EA#4
Moravian 19-7 (LAND, Pool C) 0.731/0.588, MA#6
Mary Washington 23-4 (CAC, Pool C) 0.852/0.517, MA#7
Babson 20-5 (NEWMAC, Pool A) 0.800/0.537, NE#8
Lynchburg 22-4 (ODAC, Pool A) 0.846/0.522, SO#3
Emmanuel 21-6 (GNAC, Pool C) 0.778/0.556, NE#9
St. John Fisher 22-2 (E8, Pool C) 0.917/0.491, EA#5

Longshots for Pool C (in no particular order)
Williams 17-8 (NESCAC, Pool C) 0.680/0.607, #UNR
Connecticut College 17-6 (NESCAC, Pool A) 0.739/0.577, #UNR
Messiah 19-7 (MACC, Pool A) 0.731/0.573, #UNR
Johnson and Wales 23-3 (GNAC, Pool C) 0.885/0.499, NE#5
St. Joseph's (Maine) 21-5 (GNAC, Pool A) 0.808/0.527, NE#11
Chicago 13-9 (UAA, Pool C) 0.591/0.607, #UNR
Elizabethtown 15-8 (LAND, Pool A) 0.652/0.584, #UNR
Washington and Jefferson 21-4 (PrAC, Pool C) 0.840/0.513, #UNR
Birmingham-Southern 21-3 (SAA, Pool C) 0.875/0.497, SO#5
UW-Whitewater 16-7 (WIAC, Pool C) 0.696/0.564, CE#5
Puget Sound 17-7 (NWC, Pool C) 0.708/0.559, #UNR
Susquehanna 16-8 (LAND, Pool C) 0.667/0.572, #UNR
Mass-Dartmouth 18-9 (LE, Pool C) 0.667/0.571, #UNR
SUNY New Paltz 19-6 (SUNYAC, Pool C) 0.760/0.536, EA#6
Catholic 17-8 (LAND, Pool A) 0.680/0.566, #UNR
St. Norbert 19-4 (MWC, Pool C) 0.826/0.511, CE#9
Colby 14-9 (NESCAC, Pool C) 0.609/0.592, #UNR
Rochester Tech 20-6 (LL, Pool C) 0.769/0.530, #UNR
Guilford 20-4 (ODAC, Pool C) 0.833/0.505, SO#2
Gustavus Adolphus 19-7 (MIAC, Pool C) 0.731/0.543, WE#7
Loras 18-7 (IIAC, Pool C) 0.720/0.546, #UNR
Mount Union 19-7 (OAC, Pool C) 0.731/0.541, #UNR
Rose-Hulman 20-3 (HCAC, Pool C) 0.870/0.487, GL#8
St. Mary's (Minn.) 21-5 (MIAC, Pool C) 0.808/0.510, WE#5
Concordia (Wis.) 20-5 (NACC, Pool C) 0.800/0.513, CE#7
Wartburg 17-7 (IIAC, Pool C) 0.708/0.547, WE#3
Luther 18-6 (IIAC, Pool C) 0.750/0.531, WE#6
Bluffton 21-2 (HCAC, Pool C) 0.913/0.468, GL#6
Clarkson 21-5 (LL, Pool A) 0.808/0.506, EA#7
Regis (Mass.) 22-3 (NECC, Pool C) 0.880/0.478, NE#10
La Roche 22-3 (AMCC, Pool C) 0.880/0.477, GL#9
Husson 20-6 (NAC, Pool C) 0.769/0.515, NE#12
Capital 19-7 (OAC, Pool C) 0.731/0.529, GL#7
Claremont-Mudd-Scripps 21-4 (SCIAC, Pool C) 0.840/0.488, WE#4
Westminster (Mo.) 19-2 (SLIAC, Pool C) 0.905/0.463, CE#8
UW-Superior 23-3 (UMAC, Pool C) 0.885/0.466, WE#8
Hendrix 19-6 (SAA, Pool C) 0.760/0.510, SO#7
Gwynedd Mercy 20-6 (CSAC, Pool C) 0.769/0.506, AT#8
Fredonia 18-8 (SUNYAC, Pool C) 0.692/0.533, EA#8
Trinity (Texas) 17-4 (SCAC, Pool C) 0.810/0.488, SO#6
Gettysburg 19-5 (, Pool C) 0.792/0.485, MA#8
FDU-Florham 19-6 (, Pool C) 0.760/0.490, AT#5
Austin 18-7 (SCAC, Pool C) 0.720/0.504, SO#8
Manhattanville 18-8 (, Pool C) 0.692/0.508, AT#6
Emory and Henry 19-7 (, Pool C) 0.731/0.489, SO#9
Marywood 17-7 (CSAC, Pool A) 0.708/0.480, AT#7

Clearly, I'm not the person to be predicting this bracket!

ronk

Fantastic50,
  Appreciate the effort; very nice to have all this in one place. My 1st +1 to you!!

pg04

I agree. +k for even making the effort. Well done.