Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Christan Shirk

#16
Men's soccer / Re: Go WEST young man (and NORTH)
November 01, 2023, 04:16:04 PM
REGION X - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Colorado College
13-2-1
0.570
4-1-1
13-2-1
1
2.
Trinity (Texas)
11-2-1
0.552
2-2-0
11-2-2
4
3.
Texas Lutheran
14-3-0
0.541
2-2-0
14-3-0
2
4.
St. Thomas (Texas)
11-3-0
0.537
2-2-0
12-3-1
3
5.
Southwestern
10-2-3
0.529
2-2-0
10-2-3
--
6.
Occidental
10-3-3
0.522
2-1-0
11-3-3
--
7.
Redlands
9-2-2
0.540
--
12-2-2
5
#17
Men's soccer / Re: 2023 NCAA Regional Rankings
November 01, 2023, 04:15:14 PM
REGION VI - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Mary Washington
14-1-2
0.640
4-1-2
14-1-2
1
2.
Christopher Newport
10-3-2
0.642
3-2-1
10-3-2
2
3.
Emory
11-2-3
0.605
2-2-2
11-2-3
3
4.
Washington and Lee
11-3-4
0.602
2-2-3
11-3-4
4
5.
Lynchburg
13-3-2
0.545
1-3-1
13-3-2
5
6.
Virginia Wesleyan
12-2-2
0.528
1-1-0
13-2-2
7
7.
Oglethorpe
12-2-2
0.517
1-1-1
12-2-2
6

REGION VII - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Kenyon
14-3-0
0.565
2-2-0
14-3-0
1
2.
Ohio Wesleyan
12-4-1
0.592
3-3-1
12-4-1
2
3.
Ohio Northern
11-5-2
0.590
2-4-2
11-5-2
4
4.
Case Western Reserve
8-3-3
0.597
1-2-3
8-3-3
5
5.
John Carroll
12-5-1
0.564
3-3-1
12-5-1
3
6.
Otterbein
12-2-3
0.547
2-2-2
12-2-3
6
7.
Mount Union
15-2-1
0.521
3-2-0
15-2-1
7

REGION VIII - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Calvin
12-2-1
0.570
4-1-1
14-2-1
1
2.
Chicago
8-2-5
0.628
4-1-2
8-2-5
3
3.
North Central (Ill.)
15-1-2
0.559
2-1-1
15-1-2
2
4.
Carthage
10-5-2
0.563
1-4-1
10-5-2
--
5.
Wheaton (Ill.)
11-5-1
0.566
1-3-1
11-5-1
5
6.
MSOE
15-1-3
0.528
1-1-2
15-1-3
4
7.
Trine
7-5-3
0.579
2-4-1
7-6-3
--

REGION IX - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
St. Olaf
13-3-2
0.599
2-3-1
13-3-2
1
2.
UW-Platteville
12-1-4
0.588
2-1-3
12-1-4
2
3.
Carleton
14-1-1
0.543
2-1-0
15-1-1
3
4.
Wartburg
10-1-6
0.564
1-1-3
10-1-6
4
5.
Macalester
10-2-5
0.576
0-1-2
10-2-5
5
6.
UW-Whitewater
13-1-4
0.534
0-1-2
13-1-4
6
7.
Loras
11-3-4
0.547
1-1-2
11-3-4
7

REGION X - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Colorado College
13-2-1
0.570
4-1-1
13-2-1
1
2.
Trinity (Texas)
11-2-1
0.552
2-2-0
11-2-2
4
3.
Texas Lutheran
14-3-0
0.541
2-2-0
14-3-0
2
4.
St. Thomas (Texas)
11-3-0
0.537
2-2-0
12-3-1
3
5.
Southwestern
10-2-3
0.529
2-2-0
10-2-3
--
6.
Occidental
10-3-3
0.522
2-1-0
11-3-3
--
7.
Redlands
9-2-2
0.540
--
12-2-2
5

#18
Men's soccer / Re: 2023 NCAA Regional Rankings
November 01, 2023, 04:14:36 PM
REGION I - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Connecticut College
10-0-5
0.588
4-0-4
11-0-5
1
2.
Middlebury
12-0-4
0.581
4-0-3
12-0-4
3
3.
Amherst
11-2-3
0.623
5-2-2
11-2-3
2
4.
Tufts
11-2-3
0.605
6-2-2
11-2-3
4
5.
Bowdoin
9-3-4
0.572
1-3-4
9-3-4
5
6.
Williams
8-6-2
0.609
2-5-1
8-6-2
6
7.
St. Joseph (Conn.)
13-1-3
0.519
--
13-1-3
--

REGION II - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Babson
10-3-6
0.579
5-3-2
10-3-6
1
2.
Wheaton (Mass.)
7-4-6
0.548
2-2-2
7-4-6
2
3.
Suffolk
9-4-3
0.504
1-1-1
10-5-3
5
4.
WPI
8-3-6
0.510
2-2-1
8-3-6
6
5.
Endicott
7-7-4
0.552
1-5-1
8-7-4
--
6.
Salem State
11-4-2
0.495
1-2-0
11-4-3
--

REGION III - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Cortland State
13-2-2
0.596
4-1-2
13-2-2
1
2.
Oneonta State
13-2-3
0.582
1-2-3
13-2-3
2
3.
Brockport State
9-2-5
0.580
2-1-3
9-2-5
3
4.
Rochester
8-2-5
0.579
1-1-2
8-2-5
5
5.
Buffalo State
11-4-3
0.563
2-3-1
11-4-3
6
6.
New Paltz State
9-3-4
0.584
1-3-2
9-3-4
4
7.
Hobart
10-5-2
0.571
1-4-0
10-5-2
--

REGION IV - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Montclair State
15-2-1
0.564
4-1-0
15-2-1
1
2.
Stevens
9-2-5
0.555
1-2-2
9-2-5
3
3.
Stockton
11-3-5
0.568
1-3-3
11-3-5
2
4.
Lebanon Valley
12-1-4
0.545
1-1-1
12-1-4
4
5.
Rowan
8-3-5
0.562
1-3-2
8-3-5
6
6.
Kean
11-1-6
0.537
2-1-1
11-1-6
5
7.
Penn State-Harrisburg
7-4-7
0.559
0-3-1
7-4-7
7

REGION V - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - November 01, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Messiah
17-0-1
0.570
5-0-0
17-0-1
1
2.
Franklin and Marshall
13-2-2
0.617
5-2-0
13-2-2
2
3.
Washington College
11-1-5
0.576
3-1-1
11-1-5
4
4.
Johns Hopkins
9-4-4
0.605
2-2-2
9-4-4
3
5.
Alvernia
10-6-1
0.588
2-5-1
10-6-1
--
6.
Muhlenberg
11-3-2
0.550
0-2-1
11-3-2
5
7.
Widener
12-3-2
0.532
1-2-0
12-3-2
6

#19
At present, the NCAA considers ties to be one-half win, one-half loss.  All their winning percentages and the derivative OWP and OOWP are based on this approach. 

Quote from: Freddyfud on October 29, 2023, 08:00:11 PM
Just did the math for Albertus Magnus since they were first on the Region 1 data sheet.  From the latest sheet, a record of 9-2-5, in division win loss of .719, and in division SOS of .471.  For in division W/L using .5 for a tie you get 11.5/16 or .719, easy enough.  As for SoS I noticed if you take 2/3 of .719 you get .479, which exceeds the SoS without even adding the cumulative OOWP.  So .5 for a tie cannot be used.

How the NCAA is treating ties (as one-half win, one-half loss) isn't what's tripping you up with trying to compute SOS.  I'll try to guide you through it.

SOS is 2/3 OWP + 1/3 OOWP.  But you are taking 2/3 of Albert Magnus' winning percentage (see red underlined portion of quote above), not 2/3 of their opponents' cumulative winning percentage (OWP), which still wouldn't be completely correct, but much closer.  What's precisely needed is their opponents' cumulative winning percentage with results against Albertus Magnus removed.  I'll illustrate this below.

Quote
Went ahead and grabbed AM's opponent records:


OpponentOpp recordOpp WinsOpp TiesOpp total games
Springfield4-6-54515
Casleton4-11-14116
New Eng Coll8-5-48417
Colby-Saw3-10-43417
Mitchell2-10-22214
Norwich6-2-76716
Anna Maria4-9-14114
St Joe's CT11-1-311315
Westfield6-7-16114
Regis MA6-9-06015
Lasell3-8-33314
Emman MA5-10-15116
Elms2-11-32316
St Joes ME10-3-310316
JWU RI10-2-410416
River3-8-53516
Totals8747247

Assuming these numbers are correct, Albertus Magnus' opponents have a cumulative W-L-T record of 87-113-47 (.447).  However, that includes the results that each of those opponents had against Albert Magnus.  Albert Magnus and Springfield tied, so Springfield's W-L-T record to be used is 4-6-4 (with the head-to-head tie removed).  Castleton lost to Albertus Magnus, so their W-L-T record needs to be adjusted to 4-10-1 (removing the head-to-head loss).  And so on. Removing the opponents' results against Albertus Magnus would put their cumulative record at 85-104-42 (removing 2 wins, 9 loses, and 5 ties).  So Albertus Magnus' OWP is .459.

QuoteBy taking different multipliers for ties and based on 2/3 for OWP and 1/3 for OOWP, I calculated:


Tie multiplierWeighted OWPWeighted OOWPSoS
50%.479.149.628
33%.444.138.583
none.375.117.492

And of course I couldn't recalc the .471 on the data sheet.  FAIL.  Could be I misapplied one of the opponent names as I'm not familiar with the schools or abbreviations or my math is just off somewhere.    But it seems to me any factor of a tie is too great for SoS, at least in this one example.

As I pointed out above, you took 2/3 of Albert Magnus' winning percentage, not of their OWP.  And then you used 1/3 of their OWP instead of their OOWP. 

Their OWP as I showed above is .459 after removing the head-to-head results.  So the first part of the SOS is 2/3 OWP = 2/3 (.459) = .306

That much is pretty easy to calculate reasonably quickly.  However, OOWP is where this gets laborious.  You need to collect the W-L-T records for all the opponents of each one of Albertus Magnus' 16 opponents.  In other words, the W-L-T records of over 250 teams (some may be repeats). Now, the Manual doesn't explicitly address one question, but it appears that for this step, head-to-head results do not have to be removed.  Well, I'm not going to try to do this step to confirm the NCAA's SOS for Albertus Magnus, but my guess is that cumulative winning percentage of Albertus Magnus' opponents' opponents (all 250+ of them) is .495.

If that's correct, the second part of the SOS is 1/3 OOWP = 1/3 (.495) = 0.165

Putting it all together:

SOS = 2/3 OWP + 1/3 OOWP = 2/3 (.459) + 1/3 (.495) = .306 + .165 = .471


As you can see, you can't calculate SOS quite as easily and quickly as you were trying to do. The math isn't hard in and of itself, but the volume of numbers you need to collect after first compiling the list of each opponents' list of opponents makes it a bit of work.  At D3osccer.com, we would run the numbers for the regionally ranked teams so, when we were trying to predict the at-large berths, we knew the SOS values that the committee had in front of them.
#20
From the 2023 Division III Soccer Pre-Championships Manual, the RvR criterion is as follows:


  • Results versus ranked Division III teams as established by the final ranking and the ranking preceding the final ranking.

NOTE: It does not say W-L-T records versus ranked teams. It does not say winning percentage versus ranked teams. It merely says results versus ranked teams. That gives the Regional Advisory Committees (RACs) and the men's soccer committee a lot of latitude and room for subjectivity.

The data sheets provide the W-L-T record versus ranked teams as a piece of data which is part of this criterion, but not the whole of it. What more could the data sheets provide?  How would you concisely capture which wins came against teams highly ranked versus lowly ranked?  You can't. Just like the data sheets can't provide information on head-to-head competition and results versus common Division III opponents.  The data sheets only capture the quantifiable/numerical criteria.

I'm pretty sure that committee members for basketball and for soccer have confirmed that they do consider things like whether results/wins came against highly ranked teams or lowly ranked teams.  The W-L-T record is a starting point, but the committees can and apparently do dig deeper than that as needed to compare teams.

I think it would follow that, if the committee can and does weigh some results/wins greater based on opponents' ranking within the same region, than the committee could also, and likely does at times, consider results/wins versus teams ranked in one region as having more weight than results/wins versus teams ranked in another region.  I don't recall this specifically being confirmed by a committee member, but the criterion, written so general and broad as it is, wouldn't prohibit it.
#21
Men's soccer / Re: NESCAC
October 25, 2023, 04:08:12 PM
Quote from: College Soccer Observer on October 25, 2023, 03:58:23 PM
Note:  Writing this after seeing the rankings.  At some point, the games have to matter.  Midd finished 4 points in front of Conn and 3 points in front of Amherst in the best conference in the country for D3 soccer.  They have not lost a game all season.  If the rankings have Conn in front this week because the Wesleyan game does not count for this week, fair enough.  But at some point, weight should be given to where teams finished in the league table.

Conference finish is NOT one of the criteria for the NCAA rankings/selections.  So, no, theoretically it is not intended to factor it, and observation of the rankings and selections for many years indicates that in practice it does not factor in.  It is a team's full body of work, not just conference play, that is used for establishing the data (D-III winning pct., results vs. ranked opponents, strength-of-schedule, overall winning pct., etc.) by which each team is considered.
#22
Men's soccer / Re: NESCAC
October 25, 2023, 03:54:54 PM
Quote from: FanofNescac on October 25, 2023, 03:46:39 PM
So which committee decides on NCAA selections? United Soccer Coaches or D3Soccer.com?

I am not understanding the difference between the regional rankings on both platforms. Why would Midd be #1 on USC but #3 on D3Soccer

Neither.  The NCAA Regional Rankings and the NCAA Tournament At-Large Selection are done by the NCAA Division III Men's Soccer Committee with the help of their Regional Advisory Committees (RACs).

I suggest reading the following articles on D3soccer.com.  They are a year old so some of the dates and numbers are different for this year, but otherwise they will get you up to speed on the NCAA Regional Rankings and their role and significance.

     D3soccer.com: Coming Wednesday: the rankings that matter

     D3soccer.com: 2022 NCAA Regional Rankings

The United Soccer Coaches (USC) regional polls and national ranking and the now defunct D3soccer.com Top 25 ranking are independent from the NCAA and have no bearing on the NCAA rankings or at-large tournament selections.  They are done to recognize the top teams and promote D-III soccer.
#23
Men's soccer / Re: SUNYAC 2022
October 25, 2023, 03:22:10 PM
REGION III - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Cortland State
13-2-2
0.597
5-1-2
13-2-2
Y
2.
Oneonta State
12-2-2
0.586
1-2-2
12-2-2
Y
3.
Brockport State
9-2-5
0.579
2-1-3
9-2-5
Y
4.
New Paltz State
9-2-4
0.584
1-2-2
9-2-4
Y
5.
Rochester
7-2-5
0.581
1-1-2
7-2-5
Y
6.
Buffalo State
10-3-3
0.556
1-3-1
10-3-3
Y
7.
Plattsburgh State
7-3-5
0.559
0-2-3
7-3-5
Y
#24
Men's soccer / Re: Go WEST young man (and NORTH)
October 25, 2023, 03:21:30 PM
REGION X - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Colorado College
11-2-1
0.598
4-1-1
11-2-1
Y
2.
Texas Lutheran
14-2-0
0.536
2-2-0
14-2-0
Y
3.
St. Thomas (Texas)
10-2-0
0.544
2-1-0
11-2-1
Y
4.
Trinity (Texas)
9-2-1
0.554
1-2-0
9-2-2
Y
5.
Redlands
8-1-2
0.536
-0
11-1-2
Y
6.
Mary Hardin-Baylor
9-3-1
0.536
0-3-0
9-3-2
Y
7.
Pacific Lutheran
11-1-4
0.517
1-1-0
11-1-4
Y
#25
REGION VII - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Kenyon
13-3-0
0.568
3-2-0
11-3-0
Y
2.
Ohio Wesleyan
11-3-1
0.588
2-3-1
11-3-1
Y
3.
John Carroll
11-4-1
0.574
4-2-1
11-4-1
Y
4.
Ohio Northern
9-5-2
0.613
3-4-1
9-5-2
Y
5.
Case Western Reserve
7-3-3
0.609
1-2-3
7-3-3
Y
6.
Otterbein
10-2-3
0.535
2-2-2
10-2-3
--
7.
Mount Union
14-1-1
0.501
2-1-0
14-1-1
Y
#26
Men's soccer / Re: Liberty League
October 25, 2023, 03:19:17 PM
REGION III - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Cortland State
13-2-2
0.597
5-1-2
13-2-2
Y
2.
Oneonta State
12-2-2
0.586
1-2-2
12-2-2
Y
3.
Brockport State
9-2-5
0.579
2-1-3
9-2-5
Y
4.
New Paltz State
9-2-4
0.584
1-2-2
9-2-4
Y
5.
Rochester
7-2-5
0.581
1-1-2
7-2-5
Y
6.
Buffalo State
10-3-3
0.556
1-3-1
10-3-3
Y
7.
Plattsburgh State
7-3-5
0.559
0-2-3
7-3-5
Y
#27
Men's soccer / Re: Mid-Atlantic Region
October 25, 2023, 03:18:10 PM
REGION IV - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Montclair State
14-2-1
0.554
3-1-0
14-2-1
Y
2.
Stockton
10-2-5
0.574
1-2-3
10-2-5
Y
3.
Stevens
8-2-4
0.561
1-2-1
8-2-4
Y
4.
Lebanon Valley
11-1-3
0.539
1-1-0
11-1-3
Y
5.
Kean
10-0-6
0.525
2-0-1
10-0-6
Y
6.
Rowan
7-3-5
0.557
0-3-2
7-3-5
Y
7.
Penn State-Harrisburg
6-4-7
0.573
0-3-0
6-4-7
Y

REGION V - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Messiah
15-0-1
0.584
5-0-0
15-0-1
Y
2.
Franklin and Marshall
13-1-2
0.607
5-1-0
13-1-2
Y
3.
Johns Hopkins
9-3-4
0.603
1-2-2
9-3-4
Y
4.
Washington College
10-1-5
0.556
2-1-1
10-1-5
Y
5.
Muhlenberg
9-3-2
0.563
0-2-1
9-3-2
Y
6.
Widener
12-2-1
0.533
1-2-0
12-2-1
Y
7.
Lycoming
10-3-4
0.554
0-3-2
10-3-4
--
#28
Men's soccer / Re: NESCAC
October 25, 2023, 03:17:07 PM
REGION I - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Connecticut College
9-0-4
0.600
3-0-4
10-0-4
Y
2.
Amherst
9-2-3
0.645
5-2-2
9-2-3
Y
3.
Middlebury
10-0-4
0.579
2-0-3
10-0-4
Y
4.
Tufts
9-2-3
0.607
4-2-2
9-2-3
Y
5.
Bowdoin
9-1-4
0.555
1-1-3
9-1-4
Y
6.
Williams
8-4-2
0.588
1-3-1
8-4-2
Y
7.
Hamilton
6-4-4
0.593
0-4-2
6-4-4
Y
#29
Men's soccer / Re: 2023 NCAA Regional Rankings
October 25, 2023, 03:06:51 PM
REGION VI - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Mary Washington
12-1-2
0.636
2-1-2
12-1-2
Y
2.
Christopher Newport
10-2-2
0.627
3-1-1
10-2-2
Y
3.
Emory
11-1-3
0.600
3-1-2
11-1-3
Y
4.
Washington and Lee
9-3-4
0.598
1-2-2
9-3-4
Y
5.
Lynchburg
12-2-2
0.533
1-2-1
12-2-2
Y
6.
Oglethorpe
11-2-2
0.541
1-1-1
11-2-2
Y
7.
Virginia Wesleyan
11-2-2
0.530
1-1-0
12-2-2
Y

REGION VII - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Kenyon
13-3-0
0.568
3-2-0
11-3-0
Y
2.
Ohio Wesleyan
11-3-1
0.588
2-3-1
11-3-1
Y
3.
John Carroll
11-4-1
0.574
4-2-1
11-4-1
Y
4.
Ohio Northern
9-5-2
0.613
3-4-1
9-5-2
Y
5.
Case Western Reserve
7-3-3
0.609
1-2-3
7-3-3
Y
6.
Otterbein
10-2-3
0.535
2-2-2
10-2-3
--
7.
Mount Union
14-1-1
0.501
2-1-0
14-1-1
Y

REGION VIII - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Calvin
11-2-1
0.576
4-1-1
13-2-1
Y
2.
North Central (Ill.)
14-1-2
0.580
1-1-2
14-1-2
Y
3.
Chicago
7-2-5
0.625
5-1-2
7-2-5
Y
4.
MSOE
13-1-3
0.529
1-1-1
13-1-3
Y
5.
Wheaton (Ill.)
11-4-1
0.571
1-3-1
11-4-1
Y
6.
Hope
9-3-3
0.544
1-1-1
10-3-3
Y
7.
Aurora
12-2-3
0.509
0-1-1
12-2-3
--

REGION IX - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
St. Olaf
12-3-1
0.618
3-3-1
12-3-1
Y
2.
UW-Platteville
10-1-4
0.609
2-1-2
10-1-4
Y
3.
Carleton
13-1-1
0.550
2-1-0
14-1-1
Y
4.
Wartburg
9-1-6
0.592
1-0-4
9-1-6
Y
5.
Macalester
9-2-4
0.585
0-1-3
9-2-4
Y
6.
UW-Whitewater
12-1-4
0.543
1-1-1
12-1-4
Y
7.
Loras
10-3-4
0.558
1-1-2
10-3-4
--

REGION X - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Colorado College
11-2-1
0.598
4-1-1
11-2-1
Y
2.
Texas Lutheran
14-2-0
0.536
2-2-0
14-2-0
Y
3.
St. Thomas (Texas)
10-2-0
0.544
2-1-0
11-2-1
Y
4.
Trinity (Texas)
9-2-1
0.554
1-2-0
9-2-2
Y
5.
Redlands
8-1-2
0.536
-0
11-1-2
Y
6.
Mary Hardin-Baylor
9-3-1
0.536
0-3-0
9-3-2
Y
7.
Pacific Lutheran
11-1-4
0.517
1-1-0
11-1-4
Y

#30
Men's soccer / Re: 2023 NCAA Regional Rankings
October 25, 2023, 03:05:59 PM
REGION I - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Connecticut College
9-0-4
0.600
3-0-4
10-0-4
Y
2.
Amherst
9-2-3
0.645
5-2-2
9-2-3
Y
3.
Middlebury
10-0-4
0.579
2-0-3
10-0-4
Y
4.
Tufts
9-2-3
0.607
4-2-2
9-2-3
Y
5.
Bowdoin
9-1-4
0.555
1-1-3
9-1-4
Y
6.
Williams
8-4-2
0.588
1-3-1
8-4-2
Y
7.
Hamilton
6-4-4
0.593
0-4-2
6-4-4
Y

REGION II - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Babson
10-3-4
0.601
4-3-2
10-3-4
Y
2.
Wheaton (Mass.)
5-4-6
0.563
1-2-2
5-4-6
--
3.
Emerson
7-5-4
0.534
1-3-1
7-5-4
Y
4.
MIT
6-5-2
0.532
0-3-1
6-5-2
Y
5.
Suffolk
8-4-2
0.500
1-1-1
9-5-2
Y
6.
WPI
7-3-6
0.509
1-2-0
7-3-6
Y

REGION III - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Cortland State
13-2-2
0.597
5-1-2
13-2-2
Y
2.
Oneonta State
12-2-2
0.586
1-2-2
12-2-2
Y
3.
Brockport State
9-2-5
0.579
2-1-3
9-2-5
Y
4.
New Paltz State
9-2-4
0.584
1-2-2
9-2-4
Y
5.
Rochester
7-2-5
0.581
1-1-2
7-2-5
Y
6.
Buffalo State
10-3-3
0.556
1-3-1
10-3-3
Y
7.
Plattsburgh State
7-3-5
0.559
0-2-3
7-3-5
Y

REGION IV - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Montclair State
14-2-1
0.554
3-1-0
14-2-1
Y
2.
Stockton
10-2-5
0.574
1-2-3
10-2-5
Y
3.
Stevens
8-2-4
0.561
1-2-1
8-2-4
Y
4.
Lebanon Valley
11-1-3
0.539
1-1-0
11-1-3
Y
5.
Kean
10-0-6
0.525
2-0-1
10-0-6
Y
6.
Rowan
7-3-5
0.557
0-3-2
7-3-5
Y
7.
Penn State-Harrisburg
6-4-7
0.573
0-3-0
6-4-7
Y

REGION V - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 25, 2023

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Messiah
15-0-1
0.584
5-0-0
15-0-1
Y
2.
Franklin and Marshall
13-1-2
0.607
5-1-0
13-1-2
Y
3.
Johns Hopkins
9-3-4
0.603
1-2-2
9-3-4
Y
4.
Washington College
10-1-5
0.556
2-1-1
10-1-5
Y
5.
Muhlenberg
9-3-2
0.563
0-2-1
9-3-2
Y
6.
Widener
12-2-1
0.533
1-2-0
12-2-1
Y
7.
Lycoming
10-3-4
0.554
0-3-2
10-3-4
--