I was at the Clark v. MIT game. It was a dousy for Clark as they could just not make a shot in the second half--they were leading by 13 with 5 minutes to go in the first half. When you lose a game with 9 team turnovers, compared to MIT's 21, you know shots were just not going in.
With that said, MIT definitely has talent, but the #9 team in the country? When I was at Clark, a #9 Amherst would have demolished a now #9 MIT. It says more about D3 than it does about MIT, but I was very surprised to read the program and see that MIT was #9.
I think the rematch in a few weeks will be a war of a game.
With that said, MIT definitely has talent, but the #9 team in the country? When I was at Clark, a #9 Amherst would have demolished a now #9 MIT. It says more about D3 than it does about MIT, but I was very surprised to read the program and see that MIT was #9.
I think the rematch in a few weeks will be a war of a game.