Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
September 08, 2010, 08:34:38 pm
News:
New to the site, want to post?
Don't forget to register!
D3boards.com
|
Post Patterns (Division III football)
|
South Region football
| Topic:
Presidents' Athletic Conference
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
184
185
[
186
]
187
188
...
200
Author
Topic: Presidents' Athletic Conference (Read 211000 times)
mikefln
Junior Varsity
Karma: 0
Offline
Posts: 2
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2775 on:
November 03, 2009, 11:48:50 am »
Thanks Cleveland, I thought GCC was inexpensive to go to? I am a ST. Vincent grad from before they were PAC and before football (which i am bitter about. I orginally went to Robert Morris for football and got injured and thought my days of ball were over. I transfered and when I healed I wish I went to a D3 school that had a team. Then a few year later SVC gets a team).
Anyways how does the PAC football conference stack up with other confernces?
Logged
Ralph Turner
Hall of Fame
All-American
Karma: 939
Offline
Posts: 21288
Hall of Famer
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2776 on:
November 03, 2009, 12:34:50 pm »
Quote from: mikefln on November 03, 2009, 11:48:50 am
...
Anyways
how does the PAC football conference stack up with other confernces
?
Keith McMillan's Around the Nation
column from Oct 8th ha his assessment.
Logged
McMurry University (
www.mcm.edu
).
NCAA Champions -- Men's Outdoor Track 2008.
the_burghboy
Second-stringer
Karma: 9
Offline
Posts: 98
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2777 on:
November 03, 2009, 12:58:58 pm »
CMU was in the PAC, their last season was 1989.
As to why they left, it probably depends on who you ask. I believe their official position at the time was similar to reasoning CC gave with other programs.
Of course, we thought they wanted out of playing us in football, though the last game they beat W&J and ended up sharing the PAC title that year.
Logged
Bob.Gregg
All-Region
Karma: 52
Offline
Posts: 1050
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2778 on:
November 03, 2009, 02:22:55 pm »
Quote from: the_burghboy on November 03, 2009, 12:58:58 pm
CMU was in the PAC, their last season was 1989.
As to why they left, it probably depends on who you ask. I believe their official position at the time was similar to reasoning CC gave with other programs.
Of course, we thought they wanted out of playing us in football, though the last game they beat W&J and ended up sharing the PAC title that year.
CMU was in the PAC. And their official statement about leaving was that CMU and the member schools of the PAC were heading in different directions. I note that it took CMU about 20 years to make the NCAA playoffs in football...
Allegheny was also a member of the PAC. I believe 1983 was the Gators last year in the conference. W&J and Allegheny squared off in the 1987 Snow Bowl playoff game with Rick France thundering in from about 8 yards out in overtime to move the Presidents to the South Region Final. The two didn't play again until 1998 when the started a string of 9 straight meetings (W&J 8-1 in those games).
Then, of course, there is the rumor/gossip/talk that W&J is leaving the PAC for the NCAC. Observer-Reporter's Joe Tuscano published that this summer, I believe.
Logged
Been wrong before. Will be wrong again.
footballfan12
Junior Varsity
Karma: 1
Offline
Posts: 9
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2779 on:
November 03, 2009, 02:41:24 pm »
I believe that there is no doubt the W&J will be out of the PAC over the next couple of years. I believe this change is another one of those "INSTITUTIONALLY THINGS".
Does W&J make the playoffs if they win out?
Where does Thomas More get seeded?
Is there a possible Thomas More/W&J rematch in the playoffs?
Bob, have you ever seen that type of defense game like the one on Saturday at W&J?
Logged
Sho-nuff
All-American
Karma: 376
Offline
Posts: 4069
Ron Mexico
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2780 on:
November 03, 2009, 02:49:45 pm »
will W&J apply for the ECAC Playoffs before the deadline this week?? You know, just in case...
FF12 ---
Alot about TMC's seeding will be based on how they finish. They have Geneva and Mount St Joe left. MSJ is somehow ranked in the Top 5 Regionally (North). Wins against these two would help make them a #2 in North or South, IMO. A loss.... and you'll see them treated like last year, when they were a #8 in the North and went to Chicago to be executed.
I don't think there will be a re-match in the playoffs. I think if W&J AND Thomas More make it, one will be moved to a neighboring region (W&J could go east, south or north ---depending on distances) and TMC, as I said could be in the South or North (as they were last year).
FYI -- Thomas More loses only 2 LB's off that defense for 2010 (and All- PAC LB Matt Clark was moved to FB/TE this year because of the talent). Its a very young defense and they have some freshman/sophomores who got some PT at W&J this weekend who will figure more prominently next season. The PAC is going to have to contend with that strong defense for next few years. The only time someone in the PAC seemed to score on TMC's defense was the result of a very short field from a turnover (Waynesburg) or a trick play (Grove City). Most of the points scored on them this year was the result of a 1st team offense playing against a bunch of freshman back ups--- but it got those backups some experience. They are loaded for next year. They'll have to replace Stellman and Collier on offense. Both will be missed, but it should be able to be done--- over time.
«
Last Edit: November 03, 2009, 02:59:08 pm by SaintsFAN
»
Logged
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs: 2008, 2009
Bridge Bowl Champs: 1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009
the_burghboy
Second-stringer
Karma: 9
Offline
Posts: 98
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2781 on:
November 03, 2009, 03:20:15 pm »
Quote from: footballfan12 on November 03, 2009, 02:41:24 pm
I believe that there is no doubt the W&J will be out of the PAC over the next couple of years. I believe this change is another one of those "INSTITUTIONALLY THINGS".
Just curious, but can you give more detail of why you think this?
Logged
Sho-nuff
All-American
Karma: 376
Offline
Posts: 4069
Ron Mexico
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2782 on:
November 03, 2009, 03:29:01 pm »
Welcome, BlueRebel94... its good to see you on these boards.
Your input is welcomed. Get some more of your teammates on here, please.
To everyone else:
Blue Rebels
is the nickname TMC used previous to being forced to change to
Saints
Logged
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs: 2008, 2009
Bridge Bowl Champs: 1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009
BlueRebel94
Second-stringer
Karma: 15
Offline
Posts: 61
Defense wins Championships
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2783 on:
November 03, 2009, 03:38:58 pm »
What do you mean by W& J being "out of the PAC over the next couple of years?" Not leaving the conference?
Logged
"Everyone has a plan till they get hit."
BlueRebel94
Second-stringer
Karma: 15
Offline
Posts: 61
Defense wins Championships
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2784 on:
November 03, 2009, 04:09:44 pm »
Was it that tough of a question or am I just stupid for asking? It appears that rumors surfaced this summer and the discussion seems to be whispers of W&J bolting the PAC. As a Saints fan, I would certainly be disappointed if that were to come to pass, given that the TMC/W&J matchup was gaining national attention. With the entrance of Geneva and the possibilities of Waynesburg regaining form, the PAC would certainly be better than the 13th best conference in D-III.
Logged
"Everyone has a plan till they get hit."
Sho-nuff
All-American
Karma: 376
Offline
Posts: 4069
Ron Mexico
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2785 on:
November 03, 2009, 04:18:11 pm »
Quote from: BlueRebel94 on November 03, 2009, 04:09:44 pm
Was it that tough of a question or am I just stupid for asking? It appears that rumors surfaced this summer and the discussion seems to be whispers of W&J bolting the PAC. As a Saints fan, I would certainly be disappointed if that were to come to pass, given that the TMC/W&J matchup was gaining national attention. With the entrance of Geneva and the possibilities of Waynesburg regaining form, the PAC would certainly be better than the 13th best conference in D-III.
I don't think he's been back to give an answer to that --- it would indeed be a serious blow to the PAC to lose the Presidents. I only think its been rumor at this point --- I don't see the Presidents leaving the conference that was named after them (presumably because of their dominance in it) --- tongue planted firmly in cheek on that.
I'd be very interested to see why he thinks that/what he's heard... on W&J going to the North Coast Athletic Conference. Meanwhile, the NCAC isn't in a position to do very much, by all accounts they are a man down on the committee there and I don't think they'd be taking on any new teams in that it would add some work to their plates. Besides, DePauw seems to be a great fit.. They also have some screwy things they are looking for in an institution such as a Chapter of a Certain Fraternity.
With the scheduling agreement in place between the NCAC and UAA, they have more than enough games they can schedule. NCAC doesn't HAVE TO add anyone at this point.
Logged
AMC Champs: 1991-1992-1993-1994-1995
HCAC Champs: 2000, 2001
PAC Champs: 2008, 2009
Bridge Bowl Champs: 1990-1991-1992-1993-1994-1995-2002-2003-2006-2008-2009
Undefeated: 1991, 1995, 2001, 2009
the_burghboy
Second-stringer
Karma: 9
Offline
Posts: 98
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2786 on:
November 03, 2009, 05:31:31 pm »
There has been whispers like that for years. No disrespect to 'footballfan' and his post, but I wouldn't buy it unless I saw something official.
As much as we are all engaged with football, it's a conference that supports all the other sports from a logistic standpoint as well as other facets. Under this president and athletic department, I would be surpised to see any movement.
Logged
Ralph Turner
Hall of Fame
All-American
Karma: 939
Offline
Posts: 21288
Hall of Famer
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2787 on:
November 03, 2009, 05:48:52 pm »
There is a lot to be said for traveling no more than 100 miles for the great majority of your soccer, volleyball, softball, tennis, baseball, etc. contests as W&J does now.
Logged
McMurry University (
www.mcm.edu
).
NCAA Champions -- Men's Outdoor Track 2008.
Cleveland Cartel
Starter
Karma: 2
Offline
Posts: 365
Never Turn Your Back On The Family
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2788 on:
November 03, 2009, 08:41:28 pm »
Blue Rebels,
I like tBlue Rebels better than the Saints! Talk about going from one end of the spectrum to the other. I guess thats similar to what the Washington Bullets did years ago..Went to Washington WIzards (NBA) Bringing back the old school flavor I will have to give you some Good Karma for it.
WJ leaving the conference would be hard on the PAC. I know they have expanded it and this football conference will be more competitive goign forward. As we mentioned WJ, Tmore, Geneva, and i think either Waynesburg and THiel can step it up from year to year. Look out for St. VIncent as they remind me of Thiel years ago. New coaching staff brought in over a150 freshmen and 3, 4, and 5 years later they were a great squad which won the PAC. From an institutional sense, what advantages could WJ get from going to the NCAC.
Ralph you mentioned mileage as a factor for athletics with WJ. But the mileage would have to be further for the NCAC. NCAC foes include Ohio Weslayen which is near columbus in Delaware,Ohio, ALlegheny in Meadville, PA. Also, Denison, Wooster, Hiram, and I believe Wabash in Indiana. This is just off memory here. MOst of those schools are in eastern and southern Ohio. Which would be much further than GCC, Thiel,Waynesburg, Bethany, Geneva, St. Vincent.
Just courious as this is news to me, but this would send shockwaves through the football community.
Conversations in this have been greatly lately lets keep this going.
Logged
Pat Coleman
D3sports.com Guru
Administrator
All-American
Karma: 1130
Offline
Posts: 26321
Check the front page or FAQs before you ask.
Re: Presidents' Athletic Conference
«
Reply #2789 on:
November 03, 2009, 11:27:09 pm »
Quote from: the_burghboy on November 02, 2009, 05:34:13 pm
Quote from: SaintsFAN on November 02, 2009, 05:01:30 pm
I remember in 1999 Carnegie Mellon swore we were running up the score on them ---- it wasn't that, even our back ups were inspired and frankly, CMU wasn't as good as they felt they were.
Running up the score on those guys is a good thing.
I remember CMU running up the score on my alma mater back in the early '90s. Didn't help them get into the playoffs.
Logged
Publisher. Questions? Check our FAQ for
D3f
,
D3h
.
Quote from: old 40 on September 25, 2007, 08:23:57 pm
Let's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect.
Pages:
1
...
184
185
[
186
]
187
188
...
200
D3boards.com
|
Post Patterns (Division III football)
|
South Region football
| Topic:
Presidents' Athletic Conference
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> What sport should we add boards for?
=> Terms of Service
=> General Division III issues
-----------------------------
Post Patterns (Division III football)
-----------------------------
=> East Region football
=> North Region football
=> South Region football
=> West Region football
=> General football
-----------------------------
Posting Up (Division III basketball)
-----------------------------
=> Men's Basketball
===> Northeast Region
===> East Region
===> Atlantic Region
===> Mid-Atlantic Region
===> Great Lakes Region
===> South Region
===> Midwest Region
===> West Region
===> Multi-Regional Topics
=> Women's Basketball
===> Northeast Region
===> East Region
===> Atlantic Region
===> Middle Atlantic Region
===> South Region
===> Great Lakes Region
===> Central Region
===> West Region
===> Multi-Regional Topics
=> General Basketball
=> Who's the best ... ?
=> Basketball Open Dates
-----------------------------
D3baseball.com
-----------------------------
=> Conferences by region
===> New England Region
===> New York Region
===> South Region
===> West Region
===> Multi-region conferences
===> Midwest Region
===> Mid-East Region
===> Mid-Atlantic Region
===> Central Region
=> National topics
=> Open Dates
-----------------------------
D3soccer.com
-----------------------------
=> Men's soccer
===> Central Region
===> Great Lakes Region
===> South Atlantic
===> New England Region
===> North Region
===> East Region
===> South Region
===> West Region
===> Multi-Region Topics
=> Women's soccer
===> Central Region
===> Great Lakes
===> Mid-Atlantic Region
===> New England Region
===> New York Region
===> South Region
===> West Region
===> Multi-Region Topics
-----------------------------
Division III volleyball
-----------------------------
=> Women's volleyball discussion
===> Central Region
===> Great Lakes Region
===> Mid Atlantic Region
===> Midwest Region
===> New England Region
===> New York Region
===> South Region
===> West Region
-----------------------------
Other Division III sports
-----------------------------
=> Track, cross country, softball
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.11
|
SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.134 seconds with 20 queries.
Loading...