Author Topic: ECACs  (Read 102908 times)

Offline AUKaz00

  • All-Region
  • *****
  • Posts: 1570
  • Karma: +362/-36
    • View Profile
ECACs
« on: November 16, 2008, 09:41:59 am »
So, what will the matchups be?

Looking at the North it seems the top teams are Husson, RPI, Wick and Alfred.  Without knowing who is still declared, I'm going with the following matchups:

MIT at Husson
Fisher at RPI
WPI at Wick
Union at Alfred

Any thoughts on the South?
Check out the official card game of the AU Pep Band - Str8 Eight!

Offline Bombers798891

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 3907
  • Karma: +477/-119
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2008, 09:51:18 am »
So, what will the matchups be?

Looking at the North it seems the top teams are Husson, RPI, Wick and Alfred.  Without knowing who is still declared, I'm going with the following matchups:

MIT at Husson
Fisher at RPI
WPI at Wick
Union at Alfred

Aww...I was hoping for a "Team Boltus vs. SJF" matchup, just to get the fans going on the boards

Any thoughts on the South?

theoriginalupstate

  • Guest
Re: ECACs
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2008, 09:57:21 am »
IMO a 6-4 SJF doesnt deserve an ECAC bid...

Offline Bombers798891

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 3907
  • Karma: +477/-119
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2008, 10:11:03 am »
IMO a 6-4 SJF doesnt deserve an ECAC bid...

Yeah, but they'd get one I imagine, no? Heck, Cortland took one at 5-4 one year I think

Offline HHawks

  • Second-stringer
  • **
  • Posts: 159
  • Karma: +15/-21
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2008, 10:44:55 am »
I would love a Wick-RPI match up

Offline Jonny "Utes" Utah

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 7787
  • Karma: +1310/-490
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2008, 10:46:11 am »
I think Frank said MIT did not declare for the ECAC (or withdrew their bid)

Offline XREDDRAGON77

  • Starter
  • ***
  • Posts: 468
  • Karma: +58/-50
  • We love high end exotics!
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2008, 11:48:27 am »
Cortland was 5-3 when the took one against Fisher.  8 game schedule that year.
Taste It!

theoriginalupstate

  • Guest
Re: ECACs
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2008, 11:50:31 am »
So, what will the matchups be?

Looking at the North it seems the top teams are Husson, RPI, Wick and Alfred.  Without knowing who is still declared, I'm going with the following matchups:

MIT at Husson
Fisher at RPI
WPI at Wick
Union at Alfred

Any thoughts on the South?

Wick at RPI
Union at Alfred
WPI at Husson

Offline HHawks

  • Second-stringer
  • **
  • Posts: 159
  • Karma: +15/-21
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2008, 12:19:48 pm »
So, what will the matchups be?

Looking at the North it seems the top teams are Husson, RPI, Wick and Alfred.  Without knowing who is still declared, I'm going with the following matchups:

MIT at Husson
Fisher at RPI
WPI at Wick
Union at Alfred

Any thoughts on the South?

Wick at RPI
Union at Alfred
WPI at Husson

Why not RPI at Wick? Not complaining just curious.

Offline DVCFan11

  • Second-stringer
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2008, 12:22:15 pm »
how about Rowan vs DVC in the east ECAC

Offline sjfcards

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 2721
  • Karma: +152/-50
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2008, 12:27:43 pm »
IMO a 6-4 SJF doesnt deserve an ECAC bid...

I understand the argument, but after playing that schedule, I think they should/will get one. Fisher can salvage some of the season with a win against an RPI, or another quality team. Get them going in the right direction for next year.
GO FISHER!!!

Offline Bombers798891

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 3907
  • Karma: +477/-119
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2008, 12:32:18 pm »
Cortland was 5-3 when the took one against Fisher.  8 game schedule that year.

No, in 2003, you were 5-4

Offline dewcrew88

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 2099
  • Karma: +363/-166
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #12 on: November 16, 2008, 01:15:11 pm »
So, what will the matchups be?

Looking at the North it seems the top teams are Husson, RPI, Wick and Alfred.  Without knowing who is still declared, I'm going with the following matchups:

MIT at Husson
Fisher at RPI
WPI at Wick
Union at Alfred

Any thoughts on the South?

Wick at RPI
Union at Alfred
WPI at Husson

I think there will be a Maine Maritime in their somewhere. Possibly a Curry?

Offline Jonny "Utes" Utah

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 7787
  • Karma: +1310/-490
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #13 on: November 16, 2008, 01:16:31 pm »
bridgewater st?

Can Maine Maritime even go?

Offline pg04

  • All-American
  • ******
  • Posts: 7479
  • Karma: +929/-344
    • View Profile
Re: ECACs
« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2008, 01:23:38 pm »
IMO a 6-4 SJF doesnt deserve an ECAC bid...

What about a 6-4 Brockport vs. 6-4 Fisher...