Recent posts

#1
Men's soccer / Re: Neumann Leaving the Atlant...
Last post by Hopkins92 - Today at 02:23:51 PM
I don't claim to be a historian or anything, but doesn't it seem like there are a lot more of these going on than ever before? By a significant amount?

And I don't think you can just point to closures.

Thoughts?
#2
Section 20.9 deals with conference membership in the NCAA - this is where the change from seven to six comes into play.  This only governs whether or not a conference is recognized as a member conference by the NCAA.  When it comes to membership, there's no sport specific or gender specific delineation.  Because Mount Mary has been a core member through 2024-25, the C2C grace period for membership doesn't start until this summer - with JWU-Charlotte and Regent coming on line, there's no danger of losing conference membership status.

However, Section 31.3.3 deals with eligibility for Pool A in individual sports.  This requires conferences to maintain six active member institutions, participating in the sport, that are eligible for the NCAA championship - which means Regent and JWU-Charlotte won't begin counting until they are full members, not once they achieve year 3 (that's only for conference membership in the NCAA).

There is one exception, though - conferences can avoid the waiting period for reinstatement (according to 31.3.3.1.1.1) if they have: 1) six core members sponsoring the sport, 2) each of those six has been in the conference for two years, and 3) all six are eligible for NCAA championships.

If nothing changes, the C2C is set to lose the AQ in men's sports in 2026-27 and in women's sports in 27-28 - however, if JWU-Charlotte and Regent progress to full membership in 2028-29, all the C2C AQs will be automatically restored.

The other scenario is simply to poach a school in the next 14 months for membership in 2026-27 and everything remains as it is now.
#3
Quote from: ICAlum16 on March 13, 2025, 09:28:19 AMDoes anyone know if there have been any FBS or FCS transfers into any of the LL teams? I feel like there are usually a few in any given offseason which I always find interesting. Curious if anyone is up to speed on this.
RPI has been posting their recruits over the past two weeks on X.  I noticed one grad transfer from FCS Penn and one soph D2 transfer from Franklin Pierce.  The first is a defensive lineman and the second is a linebacker. Both are local Capital District kids. Neither saw much playing time at their former schools.
#4
Might as well do what D1 fans figured out a couple years ago. Don't even fret over a roster until it's set and the players show up in August.

Most D3 players at some point dreamed about playing D1 or getting a football scholarship, but odds of that happening were small prior to the portal. Hoards of G5 and FCS players moving up and/or out via the portal are leaving roster spots to fill. There's more opportunity now for the best players. 
#5
Millsaps hires former Southwestern coach Connor Kuykendall, 39-90 in five seasons there, as their new men's HC. 
#6
Quote from: cubs on Yesterday at 01:37:50 PM
Quote from: PauldingLightUP on April 15, 2025, 10:59:34 PM
Quote from: Greek Tragedy on April 15, 2025, 10:28:50 PMOther sites, including his own X account has him at 6'10"!

Yeah, I saw 6'8, 6'9, and 6'10. I went the lowest I guess to not oversell it.
I'll take the middle at 6'9," but after watching him multiple times (both in person and via streams,) he doesn't play anywhere close to his size in my opinion...  Likes to sit outside but doesn't have the footspeed to stay in front of wing type players.  I see him as a "project" type recruit where Lewis and company try to develop him and see if he can be productive as an upperclassmen.

Coach Lewis is willing to develop players, as I understand that others coaches have troves of cash to buy a team instantly. But he also plays a lot of young players.  Clearly cash options must not be the case in Point WBB, I am chagrined by that. But chicken market is tight, bird flu is an issue. Someday I will be a donor.
#7
Multi-Regional Topics / Re: Conference changes
Last post by KnightSlappy - Today at 12:51:54 PM
Slightly off topic, but as I'm updating some of my personal conference tracking info, I still have C2C as being on track to lose their AQ in Men's basketball in 2026-27 if they do not add an additional member. The conference as a whole was saved from restricted status by approval of their request in for immediate application of new bylaw 20.9.1.2 (6 member minimum) in February's membership committee meeting, but I do not think this helps MBB.

This past season, 2024-25, they had 5 members: (Chris. Newport, Mary Washington, Salisbury, UC Santa Cruz, Warren Wilson). Grace year 1.

Next season, 2025-26, they will add two provisional members: Johnson and Wales (NC) and Regent, but these should not count toward minimums (until Year 3 provisional status). Grace year 2.

2026-27, C2C loses the AQ in MBB.

2027-28, Regent and J&W (NC) reach Year 3 and begin counting. Waiting year 1.

2028-29, Regent and J&W (NC) are full members. Waiting year 2.

2029-30, C2C regains MBB AQ.

Please let me know if I am not correct on this or if I am missing something.
#8
General Division III issues / Re: Future of Division III
Last post by Kuiper - Today at 12:42:41 PM
"Many more Schools will Eventually Drop from Division 1 to Division III Non-Scholarship Athletics"

QuoteAs hinted at earlier, it's expensive. Adding a $20 million revenue-sharing bill to an athletic department's budget is no small matter. Schools don't have to contribute the full amount—but even a modest $2.5 million payout has to come from somewhere. Combine that with the loss of walk-ons, and you're facing a double whammy.

Gone are the tuition, housing, and fees that walk-ons provided.

One administrator told me they expect 50 fewer student-athletes next year after opting in. They added, "We were always encouraged by the president's office to bring on walk-ons—they filled dorms and paid tuition and fees."

That same school estimates a loss of $19,000 per walk-on. Multiply that by 50, and it's close to a million-dollar hit.

A private FCS athletic director shared their concerns with me: "We're struggling to keep the lights on and pay our bills. Now we're expected to cut student-athletes and pay them?"

Oh, and that school's tuition is over $25,000. Do the math.

And as if that weren't enough, have you Googled the term enrollment cliff lately?

College leaders and athletics administrators are now asking the hard questions:

Who are we? What do we want to be? What are we trying to accomplish here?

Those are valuable conversations—and necessary for institutional alignment. However, these factors also lead to some tough decisions, especially in smaller public and private schools.

As I said at the beginning, it's just a numbers game.

#10
Basketball Open Dates / Re: Men's single games
Last post by ssenthi1 - Today at 12:16:39 PM
Oberlin College has filled it's schedule. Thank you!