D-3 Women 2019

Started by 2xfaux, August 25, 2019, 04:26:02 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

discnerd

Discnerd's top 25


RankRank.diffTeamConferenceRatingRating.diff
11Pomona-PitzerSCIAC13.241.854
2-1ArcadiaMACC12.94-0.625
31MessiahMACC12.892.457
45MITNEWMAC10.42.528
52William SmithLL8.7030.769
610HaverfordCC7.9952.568
78TuftsNESCAC7.6431.759
8-3Washington U.UAA7.54-1.644
93Johns HopkinsCC7.4690.405
10-2Wheaton (Ill.)CCIW7.42-0.458
11-5TCNJNJAC7.282-1.648
125CentreSAA6.8281.624
13-2GettysburgCC6.756-0.325
14-11Christopher NewportCAC6.37-4.338
15-1ChicagoUAA5.929-0.365
16-6DickinsonCC5.722-1.49
171Geneseo StateSUNYAC5.6560.51
1812Washington and LeeODAC5.4082.039
1915MiddleburyNESCAC5.2872.011
20-7Randolph-MaconODAC4.993-1.472
2116SalisburyCAC4.9872.029
22-2Claremont-Mudd-ScrippsSCIAC4.9320.164
2310StevensMACF4.8191.503
24-1McDanielCC4.8020.501
25-6ChapmanSCIAC4.629-0.447

2xfaux

My goodness.  No one seems to want to be #1.  The regional rankings on Wednesday should be interesting.  I am planning a trip to Greensboro to see some great soccer (no matter who shows up).  I hope the rumors that the venue has been moved to Trump National Doral are fake news. ;) 

discnerd

discnerd's top 25


RankRank.diffTeamConferenceRatingRating.diff
12MessiahMACC13.290.392
20ArcadiaMACC10.68-2.252
31MITNEWMAC9.581-0.822
4-3Pomona-PitzerSCIAC9.38-3.861
51HaverfordCC8.1280.133
63Johns HopkinsCC8.0240.556
7-2William SmithLL7.519-1.184
84CentreSAA7.4220.595
92TCNJNJAC7.129-0.154
104Christopher NewportCAC7.0950.726
11-4TuftsNESCAC6.679-0.963
124DickinsonCC6.6360.914
13-5Washington U.UAA6.49-1.05
14-4Wheaton (Ill.)CCIW6.32-1.1
1517Cal LutheranSCIAC5.9042.53
164Randolph-MaconODAC5.6040.611
174SalisburyCAC5.3910.404
180Washington and LeeODAC5.176-0.231
19-4ChicagoUAA5.143-0.786
20-7GettysburgCC5.129-1.627
211Claremont-Mudd-ScrippsSCIAC5.0630.131
223ChapmanSCIAC4.618-0.011
231McDanielCC4.594-0.208
24-7Geneseo StateSUNYAC4.581-1.075
25-2StevensMACF4.364-0.455

Christan Shirk

#18
NEW ENGLAND REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Tufts
10-1-2
0.638
--
10-1-2
--
2.
MIT
13-1-2
0.594
--
13-1-2
--
3.
Middlebury
10-1-2
0.568
--
10-1-2
--
4.
Wesleyan
8-2-2
0.593
--
8-2-2
--
5.
Williams
8-3-1
0.630
--
8-3-1
--
6.
Connecticut College
9-3-1
0.563
--
9-3-1
--
7.
Amherst
9-3-1
0.594
--
9-3-1
--
8.
Brandeis
9-5-0
0.640
--
9-5-0
--
9.
Springfield
10-3-1
0.532
--
10-3-1
--
10.
Hamilton
8-4-1
0.568
--
8-4-1
--
11.
Emerson
10-4-0
0.561
--
10-4-0
--
12.
Wheaton (Mass.)
7-3-3
0.594
--
7-3-3
--

EAST REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
William Smith
11-1-1
0.667
--
11-1-1
--
2.
Geneseo State
13-2-1
0.556
--
13-2-1
--
3.
RIT
10-3-0
0.613
--
10-3-0
--
4.
Rochester
8-4-1
0.623
--
8-4-1
--
5.
Nazareth
8-3-2
0.588
--
8-3-2
--
6.
St. Lawrence
9-3-0
0.567
--
9-3-0
--
7.
New York University
9-5-0
0.627
--
9-5-0
--

MID-ATLANTIC REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Messiah
13-1-1
0.638
--
13-1-1
--
2.
Johns Hopkins
10-1-4
0.689
--
10-1-4
--
3.
Arcadia
12-2-2
0.616
--
12-2-2
--
4.
Haverford
11-1-2
0.591
--
11-1-2
--
5.
Dickinson
10-1-4
0.600
--
10-1-4
--
6.
Stevens
9-3-1
0.644
--
9-3-1
--
7.
McDaniel
11-4-0
0.595
--
11-4-0
--
8.
Swarthmore
9-4-0
0.611
--
9-4-0
--
9.
Gettysburg
9-2-1
0.564
--
9-2-1
--
10.
Misericordia
7-4-2
0.620
--
7-4-2
--

SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
TCNJ
12-1-0
0.569
--
12-1-0
--
2.
Christopher Newport
13-1-2
0.569
--
13-1-2
--
3.
Centre
16-0-0
0.522
--
17-0-0
--
4.
Emory
9-4-0
0.699
--
9-4-0
--
5.
Randolph-Macon
14-0-0
0.527
--
14-0-0
--
6.
Roanoke
11-3-1
0.611
--
11-3-1
--
7.
Montclair State
10-4-2
0.603
--
10-4-2
--
8.
Lynchburg
9-4-1
0.621
--
9-4-1
--
Christan Shirk
Special Consultant and Advisor
D3soccer.com

Christan Shirk

#19
GREAT LAKES REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Carnegie Mellon
9-3-1
0.630
--
9-3-1
--
2.
Case Western Reserve
11-3-0
0.576
--
11-3-0
--
3.
Ohio Northern
10-2-2
0.557
--
11-2-2
--
4.
Otterbein
12-1-1
0.537
--
12-1-1
--
5.
Denison
6-4-4
0.660
--
6-4-4
--
6.
Wooster
9-2-2
0.537
--
9-2-2
--
7.
Capital
11-4-0
0.556
--
11-4-0
--
8.
DePauw
8-5-2
0.567
--
8-5-2
--

CENTRAL REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Washington U.
13-1-1
0.626
--
13-1-1
--
2.
Wheaton (Ill.)
13-1-1
0.668
--
13-1-1
--
3.
Chicago
10-1-2
0.643
--
10-1-2
--
4.
Illinois Wesleyan
8-5-0
0.602
--
8-5-0
--
5.
Adrian
9-4-2
0.563
--
11-4-2
--
6.
Webster
9-4-1
0.523
--
9-4-1
--

NORTH REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
St. Thomas
10-2-2
0.613
--
10-2-2
--
2.
Wartburg
10-2-3
0.605
--
10-2-3
--
3.
Augsburg
10-3-1
0.582
--
10-3-1
--
4.
UW-Stevens Point
9-3-2
0.581
--
9-3-2
--
5.
UW-La Crosse
10-4-2
0.583
--
10-4-2
--
6.
Dubuque
9-3-2
0.566
--
9-3-2
--
7.
Saint Benedict
8-3-2
0.571
--
8-3-2
--
8.
Carleton
8-2-3
0.552
--
8-2-3
--

WEST REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 23, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Pomona-Pitzer
11-1-1
0.622
--
12-1-1
--
2.
Trinity (Texas)
10-2-0
0.620
--
11-2-0
--
3.
Cal Lutheran
8-1-3
0.541
--
8-1-3
--
4.
Hardin-Simmons
10-2-1
0.565
--
11-2-1
--
5.
Texas-Dallas
13-1-2
0.533
--
13-1-2
--
6.
Claremont-Mudd-Scripps
7-3-3
0.602
--
8-3-3
--
Christan Shirk
Special Consultant and Advisor
D3soccer.com

discnerd

discnerd's top 25


RankRank.diffTeamConferenceRatingRating.diff
10MessiahMACC12.47-0.82
21MITNEWMAC10.010.432
31Pomona-PitzerSCIAC9.7130.333
4-2ArcadiaMACC9.276-1.409
55Christopher NewportCAC7.5690.474
61William SmithLL7.5490.03
71CentreSAA7.5190.097
87Cal LutheranSCIAC7.3831.478
9-4HaverfordCC7.15-0.978
10-4Johns HopkinsCC7.076-0.949
111DickinsonCC6.9420.306
12-3TCNJNJAC6.795-0.333
131Wheaton (Ill.)CCIW6.18-0.141
147Claremont-Mudd-ScrippsSCIAC6.1741.111
155GettysburgCC5.9950.866
16-3Washington U.UAA5.781-0.709
17-1Randolph-MaconODAC5.7240.119
18-7TuftsNESCAC5.515-1.164
19-2SalisburyCAC5.364-0.026
202ChapmanSCIAC5.1150.497
212McDanielCC5.0830.488
22-4Washington and LeeODAC4.83-0.346
23-4ChicagoUAA4.745-0.398
241StevensMACF4.219-0.145
251OtterbeinOAC4.1750.223

Christan Shirk

NEW ENGLAND REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
MIT
15-1-2
0.585
4-0-2
15-1-2
2
2.
Middlebury
11-1-2
0.586
4-1-1
11-1-2
3
3.
Tufts
10-2-2
0.641
5-2-2
10-2-2
1
4.
Wesleyan
9-3-2
0.562
4-2-1
9-3-2
4
5.
Williams
8-4-1
0.622
4-2-1
8-4-1
5
6.
Amherst
10-3-1
0.568
3-3-1
10-3-1
7
7.
Hamilton
10-4-1
0.564
1-4-1
10-4-1
10
8.
Connecticut College
9-4-1
0.566
1-3-1
9-4-1
6
9.
Brandeis
10-5-0
0.623
1-5-0
10-5-0
8
10.
Springfield
11-4-1
0.536
1-3-1
11-4-1
9
11.
Emerson
10-4-2
0.549
1-3-0
10-4-2
11
12.
Trinity (Conn.)
6-6-2
0.602
3-2-2
6-6-2
--

EAST REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
William Smith
13-1-1
0.631
4-1-1
13-1-1
1
2.
Geneseo State
14-2-1
0.559
3-2-0
14-2-1
2
3.
RIT
10-3-2
0.608
2-3-1
10-3-2
3
4.
Rochester
8-4-2
0.634
1-4-2
8-4-2
4
5.
Nazareth
9-4-2
0.592
1-3-0
9-4-2
5
6.
St. Lawrence
10-3-0
0.567
1-2-0
10-3-0
6
7.
New York University
10-5-0
0.626
1-4-0
10-5-0
7

MID-ATLANTIC REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Messiah
15-1-1
0.634
6-1-1
15-1-1
1
2.
Johns Hopkins
11-1-4
0.669
6-1-3
11-1-4
2
3.
Arcadia
14-2-2
0.615
4-1-1
14-2-2
3
4.
Dickinson
11-1-4
0.606
2-1-2
11-1-4
5
5.
Stevens
11-3-1
0.630
2-3-1
11-3-1
6
6.
Haverford
11-2-2
0.599
2-2-1
11-2-2
4
7.
Gettysburg
11-2-1
0.574
2-1-0
11-2-1
9
8.
McDaniel
13-4-0
0.591
2-3-0
13-4-0
7
9.
Swarthmore
10-5-0
0.616
1-5-0
10-5-0
8
10.
Misericordia
9-4-2
0.608
0-3-1
9-4-2
10

SOUTH ATLANTIC REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
TCNJ
13-1-0
0.574
3-1-0
13-1-1
--
2.
Christopher Newport
15-1-2
0.545
2-0-2
15-1-2
2
3.
Centre
17-0-0
0.529
3-0-0
18-0-0
3
4.
Emory
10-4-0
0.681
3-4-0
10-4-0
4
5.
Randolph-Macon
16-0-0
0.523
2-0-0
16-0-0
5
6.
Roanoke
12-4-1
0.624
1-3-0
12-4-1
6
7.
Montclair State
15-5-2
0.602
0-3-0
11-5-2
7
8.
Salisbury
13-2-2
0.519
1-2-0
13-2-2
--
Christan Shirk
Special Consultant and Advisor
D3soccer.com

Christan Shirk

GREAT LAKES REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Carnegie Mellon
10-3-1
0.640
4-3-1
10-3-1
1
2.
Case Western Reserve
12-3-0
0.568
3-3-0
12-3-0
2
3.
Ohio Northern
12-2-2
0.557
2-2-1
13-2-2
3
4.
Otterbein
14-1-1
0.531
2-0-1
14-1-1
4
5.
Denison
7-5-4
0.634
2-3-3
7-5-4
5
6.
Wooster
10-2-3
0.530
0-1-2
10-2-3
6
7.
Capital
12-5-0
0.553
1-3-0
12-5-0
7
8.
DePauw
10-5-2
0.556
0-3-2
10-5-2
8

CENTRAL REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Washington U.
13-1-1
0.628
7-1-0
13-1-1
1
2.
Wheaton (Ill.)
14-1-1
0.649
5-1-1
14-1-1
2
3.
Chicago
11-1-2
0.649
4-1-2
11-1-2
3
4.
Illinois Wesleyan
10-5-0
0.601
2-4-0
10-5-0
4
5.
Adrian
11-4-2
0.541
0-3-2
13-4-2
5
6.
North Central (Ill.)
9-7-1
0.557
1-3-0
9-7-1
--

NORTH REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
St. Thomas
12-2-2
0.598
3-2-2
12-2-2
1
2.
Wartburg
11-2-3
0.594
2-2-2
11-2-3
2
3.
Augsburg
11-3-1
0.594
3-1-0
11-3-1
3
4.
UW-La Crosse
11-5-2
0.577
2-2-1
11-5-2
5
5.
UW-Stevens Point
10-4-2
0.558
2-2-0
10-4-2
4
6.
Saint Benedict
8-5-2
0.591
1-3-0
8-5-2
7
7.
Loras
13-4-0
0.556
1-4-0
13-4-0
--
8.
UW-Whitewater
11-4-3
0.547
1-2-1
11-4-3
--

WEST REGION - NCAA REGIONAL RANKINGS - October 30, 2019

Rank

School
. Div. III .
Record
. Div. III .
SOS

 . R-v-R .
. Overall .
Record
. Prev. .
Rank
1.
Pomona-Pitzer
12-1-2001
0.630
3-1-1
13-1-1
1
2.
Cal Lutheran
10-2-3
0.562
2-1-2
10-2-3
3
3.
Claremont-Mudd-Scripps
9-3-3
0.587
2-2-1
10-3-3
--
4.
Trinity (Texas)
10-3-0
0.625
1-2-0
12-3-0
2
5.
Hardin-Simmons
11-2-1
0.547
1-2-1
12-2-1
4
6.
Chapman
10-3-3
0.532
1-3-1
10-3-3
--
Christan Shirk
Special Consultant and Advisor
D3soccer.com

PlaySimple

Two big upsets last night -

Augustana and #5 Wheaton played to a 0-0 draw through 2 OT periods. Augustana advances to the CCIW final on PKs, 4-2, where they will face Illinois Wesleyan for the title and the AQ for the CCIW to the NCAA. Wheaton had a 30-4 shot advantage with 16 on frame. Got to put those chances away!

Wheaton will still get an at-large bid so this is probably taking an at-large from another school. IWU had a slim chance to advance to the NCAA as an at-large without winning the title game if they had faced Wheaton and lost. Now they really need to beat Augie because there is no way that that the CCIW will get three bids.

Mary Washington beat #8 Christopher Newport, 1-0, in the CAC semifinal. Mary Washington, with a record of 10-10, now plays York, 9-12 record, in the CAC final. As with the CCIW, this is probably taking an at-large from someone. Christopher Newport will more than likely get an at-large and the CAC winner the AQ. Additionally, as with the CCIW, I just don't see the CAC getting three bids so Salisbury is probably going to be the odd man out.

In another game, Otterbein, of the Ohio Athletic Conference (OAC), needed 2 OT periods to overcome 8-9-1 Wilmington. Unless Otterbein advances to the OAC final and wins, they may be playing themselves out of a bid. Last week Otterbein lost to a fairly average Capital team, 2-0. The OAC is not a particularly strong conference and usually only gets the AQ with no at-larges. The best bet for the OAC to get two bids would be if a team other than Ohio Northern get the AQ in which case ONU would have a chance at an at-large.

2xfaux

I am pretty sure that the CCIW AQ is determined by the regular season.  So Wheaton was already through to the NCAA Tournament. 

I know there are a bunch of Conferences that choose the AQ that way.  I understand why the UAA does it that way, being spread out from Boston to Georgia to Missouri but I don't really understand why, if you are having a tournament, the AQ goes to the regular season champ/winner/top seed?  Perhaps, "The Shadow Knows".   

jknezek

Quote from: 2xfaux on November 07, 2019, 11:06:17 AM
I am pretty sure that the CCIW AQ is determined by the regular season.  So Wheaton was already through to the NCAA Tournament. 

I know there are a bunch of Conferences that choose the AQ that way.  I understand why the UAA does it that way, being spread out from Boston to Georgia to Missouri but I don't really understand why, if you are having a tournament, the AQ goes to the regular season champ/winner/top seed?  Perhaps, "The Shadow Knows".

Personally I'd prefer if the AQ went to the regular season champion PROVIDED you have a full round robin. For conferences like the ODAC, with ridiculously unbalanced schedules, the tournament makes sense. Otherwise, I wish the season mattered more. Soccer makes for a relatively poor tournament sport. Low scoring sports are too fluky. I get why the NCAA has to crown a champion that way, but I dislike the conferences (and MLS and the NWSL for that matter) putting the emphasis on tournaments.

PlaySimple

Quote from: 2xfaux on November 07, 2019, 11:06:17 AM
I am pretty sure that the CCIW AQ is determined by the regular season.  So Wheaton was already through to the NCAA Tournament. 

Actually the CCIW doesn't determine the AQ by the regular season. It is determined by the conference tournament champion. From the 2019 Conference Championship Central page at this website this is what is stated about the CCIW: "Tournament awards automatic berth (AQ) only; 2019 conference champion based on regular season." I know that might seem a little confusing but if you scroll down on the page, you'll find this: CCIW (T).

Here's the legend and what (T) means:
(R) - automatic berth awarded to regular season champion
(T) - automatic berth awarded to post-season tournament winner

The above came from this page - https://d3soccer.com/playoffs/2019-conference-championship-central

Also, BJ Pheasant of this website, had these comments about Wheaton:

"The Thunder dominated play to finish the CCIW schedule undefeated. They secured their 21st title in 25 years showing the CCIW to be a one team league. They will get an at-large bid if they are upset in the conference tourney and don't secure the AQ."

Those comments show that the AQ is the CCIW tournament. As an aside, I had to laugh at his "showing the CCIW to be a one team league" comment. The guy really does not know what he is talking about and is one of the lamest contributors here. He regularly makes baseless comments, good or bad, about teams.

Over the course of probably the last 15 years, Wheaton and Illinois Wesleyan both make the NCAAs more often than not. IWU was the conference tournament champion last year over Wheaton so they got the AQ while Wheaton was the at-large. If IWU had not beaten Wheaton last year in the tournament it was doubtful that they would have made the tournament. The new coach started last season and things were a bit rough. In most years both teams are good enough that if they don't win the conference tournament, they get an at-large.

IWU had a pretty rough start to this year but have since become a decent side. IWU actually may have had a better chance to make the tournament if Wheaton had beaten Augustana because if they were then to lose to Wheaton in the conference finals, they had a good chance to make the tournament as an at-large. Above I said that they had a "slim chance" but after reevaluating things I believe that their chances were good even with a loss to Wheaton in the tournament. As I said in my other post, IWU really needs to beat Augie now because there will not be three CCIW teams in the tournament.


2xfaux

My goodness, I did not read the fine print.  Thanks for the clarification.

I never read "terms of service" either.  I need to pay more attention to detail.

Thanks again and good luck to the Titans.

Flying Weasel

Yes, about 2/3 of conferences determine their official champion by their post-season tournament and give them the automatic berth to the NCAA tournament.  In these cases, "regular season champion" is an unofficial title. 

About 1/3 of conferences determine their official champion by regular season finish, but award their NCAA automatic berth to their post-season tournament "champion".

And then there are the UAA and NWC that do not hold a post-season tournament and determine their official champion by regular season finish and give them the automatic berth to the NCAA tournament.

PlaySimple

Quote from: 2xfaux on November 07, 2019, 01:49:57 PM
My goodness, I did not read the fine print.  Thanks for the clarification.

I never read "terms of service" either.  I need to pay more attention to detail.

Thanks again and good luck to the Titans.

I'm actually not a Titan supporter and I have no ties to the school other than someone I know that was/is looking at it. I'm also just a fan of the game. I watch just about any game and keep up with many teams - from my local high school boys and girls teams, various college teams, national teams of different countries, and multiple men's professional leagues (though generally not the MLS).

I hope I didn't violate the "terms of service" with my comment about the columnist here, BJ Pheasant. I didn't know if that was your way of telling me that I may have.  ;)

Anyway, Pheasant has rubbed me the wrong way more than once with comments that he has made about various teams. Pertaining to IWU in particular, a few weeks ago he stated that Wheaton had a "dominating" performance against IWU. I happened to watch the game that he referred to. If he had, he would not have said the performance was dominating. While Wheaton had a big shot advantage, IWU created just as many chances. Wheaton's goal was actually an own goal scored by IWU. 

The comment stating that the CCIW is a one team league is totally baseless and untrue. I knew that IWU contended often so I looked up their post season record going back about 15 years.

- CCIW champions in 2008, 2015, 2016, and 2018 and a good chance this season. I assume that those are the playoff championships since last season Wheatopn was regular season champ.

- They've made 11 NCAA appearance since 2005 with a good chance to do so again.

- NCAA Final 4 in 2014.

That seems a like more than a one team league to me.

As I stated, there are other teams that he has made inaccurate comments about in the past. His comments are disrespectful. If he doesn't know what he is talking about, he should keep comments to himself.