Quote from: pg04 on July 05, 2007, 09:44:54 PM
Another idea from the South Region...
They have 5 of the most prominent posters of that region vote for the top ten teams in the region each week of the season. I'm figuring that we can do the same over here in the East Region, starting with a preseason ranking. Please PM me if you'd like to be part of the "ranking" committee.
I'm not going to limit it to 5, however I only want serious people that will be part of it each week. If you miss a week or your voting indicates that you are not taking it seriously, I will not include your ballot and you will not be allowed to do it again. It's only fair.
So, let me know. I hope to have a Pre-season poll by the beginning of August!!
Quote from: JoseQViper on July 06, 2007, 04:32:47 PM
You should try to limit it to one poster per school, like the SID poll.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on July 07, 2007, 03:37:24 PM
Greetings pg04,
Matt Barnhart put the poll together.
He ran the poll and compiled the balloting. He selected 2 posters from the Virginia area, 2 from Texas and one poster who had recent exposure in Pennsylvania and Texas, living in both areas.
It worked very well. I believe that all of the South Region fans benefited in discussing the rankings in ways that were probably being discussed on the national level, while preserving the anonymity of Pat's process. I don't think five is a magic number. If you are happy with the quality of the voter, then we out-of-region fans will read it with great interest.
Good luck.
Quote from: Knightstalker on July 07, 2007, 11:28:27 PM
I would be willing to do it. After all I can pretty much be unbiased, I have no football team to root for.
Quote from: Union89 on July 07, 2007, 02:04:27 PM
I would like to be involved in the voting process if possible.......sounds like an interesting idea.
Quote from: Union89 on July 08, 2007, 03:23:22 PMQuote from: Union89 on July 07, 2007, 02:04:27 PM
I would like to be involved in the voting process if possible.......sounds like an interesting idea.
Am I the invisible man...or simply unwanted.... ;D
Quote from: Ralph Turner on July 08, 2007, 04:26:21 PM
Over on the D3Hoops.com poster poll last season, Mr Ypsi, the person in charge of the data, would list the rankings anonymously. That published record of the rankings of the teams (e.g, SJF getting these rankings: 2,2,2,3,3,3,7) tends to bring the outliers back to the consensus. The person putting SJF 7th either knows something that no one else does, or has a grudge, or is just trying to manipulate poll position.
Sample Posters' Poll (http://www.d3sports.com/post/index.php?topic=4188.796)
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 08, 2007, 04:29:17 PM
Pep might be interested if it doesn't take too much time...
The Harmon Football Forecast, at one time operated by Bob Harmon out of Circleville, NY and was about the only forecast out there that cared about the small colleges like Alfred, was a regular feature in the ALFRED SUN. Since the founder's death and its subsequent sale to CBS.Sportsline.com, it has abandoned the small colleges. Thus, Pep produces pigskin prognostications for D3football.com's Top 25 in addition to Upstate NY games, to complement Harmon's major college predictions.
Thus, Pep attempts to keep up on what the D3 schools are doing and, despite his loyal support of the Saxons, Pep tries to maintain objectivity in posting and rankings. However, Pep would not object to AUKaz00 serving in his place, provided he practices his clarinet!
Quote from: pg04 on July 08, 2007, 02:31:53 PM
This is still a pretty small list of people, I thought there would be more interest. Anyone else....We do need one MAC rep at least, and also would like a person From the NEFC and NESCAC. Plus more from E8 and LL would be wanted too.
Quote from: Capt. Partridge on July 09, 2007, 12:34:15 PM
The NESCAC is de facto excluded, and you pretty much said no NESCAC team will ever show up in the Top 25 while the playoff ban is in place:
http://www.d3football.com/dailydose/2006/09/23/looking-ahead-to-week-4/
The effect is the same...I'm not saying I disagree with your logic, but a NESCAC poster will fall on deaf ears in something like this.
Quote from: budcrew08 on July 09, 2007, 02:16:40 PMQuote from: Capt. Partridge on July 09, 2007, 12:34:15 PM
The NESCAC is de facto excluded, and you pretty much said no NESCAC team will ever show up in the Top 25 while the playoff ban is in place:
http://www.d3football.com/dailydose/2006/09/23/looking-ahead-to-week-4/
The effect is the same...I'm not saying I disagree with your logic, but a NESCAC poster will fall on deaf ears in something like this.
Just to clarify: Is this the East in the sense that the ATR East column is. As in, the conferences included are just the Liberty League, the Empire 8, the ACFC and the NJAC? Because if that's the case, NORTHEAST conferences such as the NEFC and the NESCAC would not count in this poll.
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 08, 2007, 04:29:17 PM
Pep attempts to keep up on what the D3 schools are doing and, despite his loyal support of the Saxons, Pep tries to maintain objectivity in posting and rankings. However, Pep would not object to AUKaz00 serving in his place, provided he practices his clarinet!
Quote from: Union89 on July 09, 2007, 02:45:57 PMQuote from: budcrew08 on July 09, 2007, 02:16:40 PMQuote from: Capt. Partridge on July 09, 2007, 12:34:15 PM
The NESCAC is de facto excluded, and you pretty much said no NESCAC team will ever show up in the Top 25 while the playoff ban is in place:
http://www.d3football.com/dailydose/2006/09/23/looking-ahead-to-week-4/
The effect is the same...I'm not saying I disagree with your logic, but a NESCAC poster will fall on deaf ears in something like this.
Just to clarify: Is this the East in the sense that the ATR East column is. As in, the conferences included are just the Liberty League, the Empire 8, the ACFC and the NJAC? Because if that's the case, NORTHEAST conferences such as the NEFC and the NESCAC would not count in this poll.
Had to smite you for that one Crew....let's not reinvent the wheel here....why would the rankings be based off a literary breakdown?? Four Regions, based off the breakdown on the main page.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 09, 2007, 12:47:52 PM
DUCK.... INCOMING!!!
Quote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:50:39 PM
These are the people I have thusfar (Let me know if I missed any of you!!):
Budcrew Utica
Superman/Upstate Fisher
KnightStalker NJAC/Unaffiliated
Lewdogg RPI
PG04 Brockport
Union 89 Union
AuPep/Kazoo AU
Realistic Ithaca
TGP Hobart
Quote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:01:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Maybe I can be the NEFC wildcard. Im not sure how many games I can see but I always pick up a couple of them.
Quote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 09:03:46 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:01:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Maybe I can be the NEFC wildcard. Im not sure how many games I can see but I always pick up a couple of them.
Ok you are in. You post in all the boards so you are well rounded enough for me to not think you are biased :P
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:06:09 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 09:03:46 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:01:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Maybe I can be the NEFC wildcard. Im not sure how many games I can see but I always pick up a couple of them.
Ok you are in. You post in all the boards so you are well rounded enough for me to not think you are biased :P
I mean Im sure Ithaca will be in the top 5 in the d3football.com preseason poll, so yea, Im not biased.
Quote from: Capt. Partridge on July 09, 2007, 12:34:15 PM
The NESCAC is de facto excluded, and you pretty much said no NESCAC team will ever show up in the Top 25 while the playoff ban is in place:
http://www.d3football.com/dailydose/2006/09/23/looking-ahead-to-week-4/
The effect is the same...I'm not saying I disagree with your logic, but a NESCAC poster will fall on deaf ears in something like this.
Quote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 07:08:44 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 09, 2007, 12:47:52 PM
DUCK.... INCOMING!!!
Would you like to represent the MAC in the poll, or are you passing on this opportunity :)
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 09, 2007, 09:58:46 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 07:08:44 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 09, 2007, 12:47:52 PM
DUCK.... INCOMING!!!
Would you like to represent the MAC in the poll, or are you passing on this opportunity :)
pg i would like to do it but i am not sure of my fall travel schedule yet and i dont want to commit to it and have to miss a week or two due to schedules/deadlines/travel...
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:01:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Maybe I can be the NEFC wildcard. Im not sure how many games I can see but I always pick up a couple of them.
Quote from: Union89 on July 09, 2007, 10:03:25 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:01:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Maybe I can be the NEFC wildcard. Im not sure how many games I can see but I always pick up a couple of them.
Utah is a fair dude......he's a jackass from Ithaca......but a fair dude.
Quote from: Tags on July 09, 2007, 11:02:05 PM
PG- Just so I'm understanding the premise of this correctly, each week a poster from each school will rank the region?
Quote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 11:16:14 PMQuote from: Tags on July 09, 2007, 11:02:05 PM
PG- Just so I'm understanding the premise of this correctly, each week a poster from each school will rank the region?
Each week the same posters, which have volunteered, will vote on who they think the top 10 teams in the region are (in order). We will start out with a preseason one later in the month to see if anyone strays from legitimate voting and to work out kinks.
Basically a vote for a team in 1st place gets them 10 points, 2nd place 9 points, etc.... compile the totals and order the teams.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 11:19:15 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 11:16:14 PMQuote from: Tags on July 09, 2007, 11:02:05 PM
PG- Just so I'm understanding the premise of this correctly, each week a poster from each school will rank the region?
Each week the same posters, which have volunteered, will vote on who they think the top 10 teams in the region are (in order). We will start out with a preseason one later in the month to see if anyone strays from legitimate voting and to work out kinks.
Basically a vote for a team in 1st place gets them 10 points, 2nd place 9 points, etc.... compile the totals and order the teams.
thats gonna be tough. I mean after Ithaca, its a huge tossup !
Quote from: Tags on July 09, 2007, 11:26:15 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 11:19:15 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 11:16:14 PMQuote from: Tags on July 09, 2007, 11:02:05 PM
PG- Just so I'm understanding the premise of this correctly, each week a poster from each school will rank the region?
Each week the same posters, which have volunteered, will vote on who they think the top 10 teams in the region are (in order). We will start out with a preseason one later in the month to see if anyone strays from legitimate voting and to work out kinks.
Basically a vote for a team in 1st place gets them 10 points, 2nd place 9 points, etc.... compile the totals and order the teams.
thats gonna be tough. I mean after Ithaca, its a huge tossup !
Don't worry about that, JU's been drinking all night and is unaware of what he's saying :)
Quote from: Tags on July 09, 2007, 11:29:32 PM
Ha, ouch.
AUPep will no doubt be here to defend the Saxon honor!
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 10:57:49 PMQuote from: Union89 on July 09, 2007, 10:03:25 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:01:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Maybe I can be the NEFC wildcard. Im not sure how many games I can see but I always pick up a couple of them.
Utah is a fair dude......he's a jackass from Ithaca......but a fair dude.
And imagine if I didn't get into Ithaca and had to go to Union! Imagine what kind of jackass Id be then?
Quote from: Union89 on July 10, 2007, 01:10:54 AMWait a minute! That's an oxymoron, like a polite New Yorker.Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 10:57:49 PMQuote from: Union89 on July 09, 2007, 10:03:25 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 09:01:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 09, 2007, 08:54:45 PM
It's kind of pushing the rules a little bit, though. Maybe I should put it up for debate? lol.
Maybe I can be the NEFC wildcard. Im not sure how many games I can see but I always pick up a couple of them.
Utah is a fair dude......he's a jackass from Ithaca......but a fair dude.
And imagine if I didn't get into Ithaca and had to go to Union! Imagine what kind of jackass Id be then?
A fine young respectable Bostonian you would be......ahhhh, what could have been.....
Quote from: AUKaz00 on July 09, 2007, 04:08:03 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on July 08, 2007, 04:29:17 PM
Pep attempts to keep up on what the D3 schools are doing and, despite his loyal support of the Saxons, Pep tries to maintain objectivity in posting and rankings. However, Pep would not object to AUKaz00 serving in his place, provided he practices his clarinet!
An Alfred consensus can be provided each week by AUPB and me. That way if either of us are unavaible, a ranking can still make it to PG08 each week.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 09, 2007, 11:28:02 PM
If I were drinking all night, Id have Alfred in the top spot.....
Quote from: Tags on July 09, 2007, 11:29:32 PM
Ha, ouch.
AUPep will no doubt be here to defend the Saxon honor!
Quote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:20:46 PM
Well if you actually read the entire topic you'd know that Pep and Kazoo are together representing Alfred (meaning only one ballot) and Superman/Upstate are representing Fisher (only one ballot between the two of them).
This has been up for a week or so and others had their opportunity to tell me they wanted to be involved, but these are the ones who asked. Neither you or Jose PMed me to be involved... I don't think Jose wanted to be involved...
The point is, There will not be more than one Ballot from any one school.
Quote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:20:46 PM
The point is, There will not be more than one Ballot from any one school.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 11, 2007, 08:26:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:20:46 PM
The point is, There will not be more than one Ballot from any one school.
[/quote
JU smirks in the corner......
Maybe I'll mysteriously lose your ballot in the corner. ;)
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 11, 2007, 08:26:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:20:46 PM
The point is, There will not be more than one Ballot from any one school.
[/quote
JU smirks in the corner......
Damn you JU!
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftbn0.google.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AiUxQbCRwPhjASM%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fz.about.com%2Fd%2Ftvcomedies%2F1%2F0%2FY%2F0%2F-%2F-%2Fstewie_evil.jpg&hash=0c4f07088e8826e539f14e461c645b6036b5fcf3)
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 11, 2007, 08:30:27 PM
Nah I think I messed it up by erasing the ] by accident in my first post there and it screwed the rest of them up.
I actually think the [ was left in the post and that thing screws up other quoted posts. If that makes any sense.
Quote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:34:45 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 11, 2007, 08:30:27 PM
Nah I think I messed it up by erasing the ] by accident in my first post there and it screwed the rest of them up.
I actually think the [ was left in the post and that thing screws up other quoted posts. If that makes any sense.
Ah yes, the hanging bracket...
Quote from: Upstate on July 11, 2007, 08:38:21 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:34:45 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 11, 2007, 08:30:27 PM
Nah I think I messed it up by erasing the ] by accident in my first post there and it screwed the rest of them up.
I actually think the [ was left in the post and that thing screws up other quoted posts. If that makes any sense.
Ah yes, the hanging bracket...
Thats what she said....
Quote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:43:46 PMQuote from: Upstate on July 11, 2007, 08:38:21 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:34:45 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 11, 2007, 08:30:27 PM
Nah I think I messed it up by erasing the ] by accident in my first post there and it screwed the rest of them up.
I actually think the [ was left in the post and that thing screws up other quoted posts. If that makes any sense.
Ah yes, the hanging bracket...
Thats what she said....
oh how elementary, you can do better!!
Quote from: pg04 on July 11, 2007, 08:20:46 PMI don't think Jose wanted to be involved...
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 17, 2007, 07:24:40 AM
AUKaz00 and Pep have collaboratively deliberated, and, no matter how we look at it, Alfred always seems to emerge as the top team in the East Region. ;)
Quote from: Trin8-0 on July 18, 2007, 09:41:27 AM
I'm curious as to whether any of the "fan pollsters" will see any NESCAC games this year. There is clearly a bias against NESCAC teams because they don't compete against out of conference opponents (to be clear I'm NOT saying there is anything wrong with this... I don't want to start any fights on this topic again). ;D
Though, it seems that the NESCAC would be at a disadvatage in this polling process since we have no representation in voting and I assume very few (if any) voters will see a team in our league play a game.
Incidentally, if you are able to make a NESCAC game (more specifically a Trinity game) send me a message. I'll likely make 7 of the 8 Trinity games this year as I'm now working at the school and would enjoy a face to face with a fellow D3football.com poster.
Quote from: Trin8-0 on July 18, 2007, 09:41:27 AM
I'm curious as to whether any of the "fan pollsters" will see any NESCAC games this year. There is clearly a bias against NESCAC teams because they don't compete against out of conference opponents (to be clear I'm NOT saying there is anything wrong with this... I don't want to start any fights on this topic again). ;D
Though, it seems that the NESCAC would be at a disadvatage in this polling process since we have no representation in voting and I assume very few (if any) voters will see a team in our league play a game.
Incidentally, if you are able to make a NESCAC game (more specifically a Trinity game) send me a message. I'll likely make 7 of the 8 Trinity games this year as I'm now working at the school and would enjoy a face to face with a fellow D3football.com poster.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on July 18, 2007, 10:51:55 AM
I thought they decided to leave the NESCAC out entirely.
Quote from: pg04 on July 17, 2007, 12:47:02 AM
Hey All, a couple of early rankings have come in (plus my own!), but we are still awaiting a majority of the pollsters.
As I said there is no rush but for all pollsters I will be setting a deadline of next Wednesday, July 25th for the poll, giving us more than a month to debate the poll etc!
Remember, Private Message me the poll.
Thanks and Have fun!
Quote from: pg04 on July 22, 2007, 09:43:22 PM
Plus everyone that said they would be involved has not gotten me their poll yet.
Quote from: Union89 on July 23, 2007, 02:31:53 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 22, 2007, 09:43:22 PM
Plus everyone that said they would be involved has not gotten me their poll yet.
PG....you have mine, correct?
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 23, 2007, 09:01:36 PM
Did Kaz00 get you Alfred's #1 poll?
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 23, 2007, 09:01:36 PM
Did Kaz00 get you Alfred's #1 poll?
Quote from: Upstate on July 23, 2007, 09:18:45 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on July 23, 2007, 09:01:36 PM
Did Kaz00 get you Alfred's #1 poll?
An AU Top 10...
1) Alfred University
2) Gentlemen Jim's
3) Alex's
4) Uni-Mart
5) The Klan (not the KKK either)
6) Sure-Fine
7) Hornell (A.K.A-Wal-Martville)
8) Alfred State Women
9) Tinkertown
10) Alfred Station (FYI it isnt a train station)
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 24, 2007, 10:21:11 AMQuote from: Upstate on July 23, 2007, 09:18:45 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on July 23, 2007, 09:01:36 PM
Did Kaz00 get you Alfred's #1 poll?
An AU Top 10...
1) Alfred University
2) Gentlemen Jim's
3) Alex's
4) Uni-Mart
5) The Klan (not the KKK either)
6) Sure-Fine
7) Hornell (A.K.A-Wal-Martville)
8) Alfred State Women
9) Tinkertown
10) Alfred Station (FYI it isnt a train station)
Pep needs to update Upstate on a few things from Mayberry:
Old West Food Co. should be in the Top Ten...great place to tip a few while watching the Yankees in their second-half-of-the-season resurgence.
The Klan...aka Klan Alpine is sitting empty. Pep went to a Halloween Party or two there as a lad. (No, that's not where Pep had his first beer.)
Shurfine Food Mart has long since closed and has been replaced by Dollar General.
Tinkertown should be moved up to at least 4....that's where Pep lives!
Alfred Station, formerly known as Baker's Bridge, WAS Alfred's train station but only freight trains whisk by nowadays.
You've nailed everything else, Upstate.
P.S. Alfred's DP Dough is history, Main Street Video is closed....any aspiring entrepreneur's want to go into business in downtown? Pep can get you decent ad rates with the Alfred Sun!
Quote from: Union89 on July 24, 2007, 11:32:41 PM
Makes sense.........he's the NEFC rep......
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 25, 2007, 09:27:37 AMQuote from: Union89 on July 24, 2007, 11:32:41 PM
Makes sense.........he's the NEFC rep......
Yea. Ive taken the last two weeks off to do some research. I just got back from MIT where I inspected the new goal posts and interviewed the video cooridinator and backup QB. Im now off to MA Maritime to interview the TE coach so when i get back Ill give you my report.
Quote from: rams1102 on July 25, 2007, 10:39:53 AM
I'm off for a few days, preping and painting, installing some new doors and now catching up on my D3 football reading. What a way to spend a few vacation days :( with the exception of D3 Football. :)
Here is my thought of what the Poll may look like tonight :
#1 Fisher
#2 Springfield
#3 Rowan
#4 Wilkes
#5 Hobart
#6 Alfred
#7 RPI
#8 Ithaca
#9 Union
#10Cortland
Fisher clearly must be #1, you can reverse Springfield & Rowan the same for Hobart and Wilkes, and Alfred & RPI.
8 of my Top 10 will be tested in the first 3 weeks. 2 will get sort of a pass, but make it up in the next 7 games.
After all the discussion we should come up with 5 dark horses who may enter the top 10 during the season.
pg04 - Thanks for the fun !!!
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 25, 2007, 03:43:13 PMQuote from: rams1102 on July 25, 2007, 10:39:53 AM
I'm off for a few days, preping and painting, installing some new doors and now catching up on my D3 football reading. What a way to spend a few vacation days :( with the exception of D3 Football. :)
Here is my thought of what the Poll may look like tonight :
#1 Fisher
#2 Springfield
#3 Rowan
#4 Wilkes
#5 Hobart
#6 Alfred
#7 RPI
#8 Ithaca
#9 Union
#10Cortland
Fisher clearly must be #1, you can reverse Springfield & Rowan the same for Hobart and Wilkes, and Alfred & RPI.
8 of my Top 10 will be tested in the first 3 weeks. 2 will get sort of a pass, but make it up in the next 7 games.
After all the discussion we should come up with 5 dark horses who may enter the top 10 during the season.
pg04 - Thanks for the fun !!!
yea that was tough to pick. Although I felt it was my duty to put an NEFC team in there at 10, I think from 2-9 are all basically equal.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 25, 2007, 04:05:06 PM
U89 dvc has a ton of top players to replace...they have a nice young qb who started all games as a freshmen last year but they graduated all their wr's. they have a good rb returning and have to plug a few holes on the OL. They need to replace a 2 time AA at def. end and lost both corners thats just off the top of my head. they have a lot of ? at positions and its show time for a lot of new players this year.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 25, 2007, 04:05:06 PM
U89 dvc has a ton of top players to replace...they have a nice young qb who started all games as a freshmen last year but they graduated all their wr's. they have a good rb returning and have to plug a few holes on the OL. They need to replace a 2 time AA at def. end and lost both corners thats just off the top of my head. they have a lot of ? at positions and its show time for a lot of new players this year.
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on July 25, 2007, 07:07:33 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 25, 2007, 04:05:06 PM
U89 dvc has a ton of top players to replace...they have a nice young qb who started all games as a freshmen last year but they graduated all their wr's. they have a good rb returning and have to plug a few holes on the OL. They need to replace a 2 time AA at def. end and lost both corners thats just off the top of my head. they have a lot of ? at positions and its show time for a lot of new players this year.
really? damn. tgp didn't do enough homework. though dvc would be a lot stronger so tgp ranked them on the high side in his preseason poll. oh well. so it goes when you are on the west coast trying to follow the east region.
Quote from: pg04 on July 24, 2007, 11:29:50 PM
Got everyone's poll but one... (JU COUGH JU! -- Still time) and will be posting tomorrow night after 9 or so
Quote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 08:37:24 PM
Do you people read at all? lol. I just got out of work.Quote from: pg04 on July 24, 2007, 11:29:50 PM
Got everyone's poll but one... (JU COUGH JU! -- Still time) and will be posting tomorrow night after 9 or so
I'm waiting for a clarification on something before I release.
Quote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 09:12:53 PM
P.S Upstate, do you want to run the show here? geeeeeeeesh
Quote from: Upstate on July 25, 2007, 09:17:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 09:12:53 PM
P.S Upstate, do you want to run the show here? geeeeeeeesh
God no....you're doing a fantastic job.
For a Newfane grad, that is.
Quote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 09:22:17 PMQuote from: Upstate on July 25, 2007, 09:17:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 09:12:53 PM
P.S Upstate, do you want to run the show here? geeeeeeeesh
God no....you're doing a fantastic job.
For a Newfane grad, that is.
Why thank you :D. Anyway, As Expected Fisher rules the chart. Less expected was the huge gap between 4th and 5th and a wide array of opinions on where Cortland should be.
Quote from: Upstate on July 25, 2007, 07:17:19 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on July 25, 2007, 07:07:33 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 25, 2007, 04:05:06 PM
U89 dvc has a ton of top players to replace...they have a nice young qb who started all games as a freshmen last year but they graduated all their wr's. they have a good rb returning and have to plug a few holes on the OL. They need to replace a 2 time AA at def. end and lost both corners thats just off the top of my head. they have a lot of ? at positions and its show time for a lot of new players this year.
really? damn. tgp didn't do enough homework. though dvc would be a lot stronger so tgp ranked them on the high side in his preseason poll. oh well. so it goes when you are on the west coast trying to follow the east region.
I had them on the low end..
Nice pic of Poz PBR, He just signed today and Im totally pumped to see what he can do!
Quote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 09:50:10 PM
can I ask who put Del Valley 2...I mean sorry but I can't find my self justifying them being any higher than 5...
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 25, 2007, 09:34:00 PM
moving him back outside will be key and shed some weight and use his speed again
Quote from: Knightstalker on July 25, 2007, 09:40:40 PM
I have to admit I totally overlooked Rochester.
Quote from: Knightstalker on July 25, 2007, 10:09:20 PM
I was thinking of the top teams from conferences and totally forgot they were in the LL for football. I was thinking UAA for them.
Quote from: rams1102 on July 25, 2007, 09:54:48 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 09:50:10 PM
can I ask who put Del Valley 2...I mean sorry but I can't find my self justifying them being any higher than 5...
How can you justify them at 5 ???
Quote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:29:25 PM
their
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on July 25, 2007, 10:33:40 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:29:25 PM
their
uh oh, does professor RT need to school young Superman on the difference btw:
There
Their
and
They're
?
Quote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 09:50:10 PM
can I ask who put Del Valley 2...I mean sorry but I can't find my self justifying them being any higher than 5...
Quote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:40:57 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on July 25, 2007, 10:33:40 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:29:25 PM
their
uh oh, does professor RT need to school young Superman on the difference btw:
There
Their
and
They're
?
wats b tis nglish tat u be talkn bout
Quote from: Upstate on July 25, 2007, 10:03:13 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 25, 2007, 09:34:00 PM
moving him back outside will be key and shed some weight and use his speed again
He's going to start at MLB for Buffalo
Quote from: rams1102 on July 25, 2007, 09:54:48 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 09:50:10 PM
can I ask who put Del Valley 2...I mean sorry but I can't find my self justifying them being any higher than 5...
How can you justify them at 5 ???
Quote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:47:30 PM
well first off isn't the reason that you put the rankings that each person had to call bs...
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on July 25, 2007, 10:58:18 PMQuote from: rams1102 on July 25, 2007, 09:54:48 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 09:50:10 PM
can I ask who put Del Valley 2...I mean sorry but I can't find my self justifying them being any higher than 5...
How can you justify them at 5 ???
hey easy on the smackdown of pbr's team....them there (correct form tgp?) is fightin' words!!!
Quote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 11:02:44 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:47:30 PM
well first off isn't the reason that you put the rankings that each person had to call bs...
huh?
Quote from: budcrew08 on July 25, 2007, 11:05:45 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 11:02:44 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:47:30 PM
well first off isn't the reason that you put the rankings that each person had to call bs...
huh?
He's saying that people have to say who put who where because you broke down the vote.
Quote from: budcrew08 on July 25, 2007, 11:05:45 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 11:02:44 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:47:30 PM
well first off isn't the reason that you put the rankings that each person had to call bs...
huh?
He's saying that people have to say who put who where because you broke down the vote.
Quote from: budcrew08 on July 25, 2007, 11:05:45 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 11:02:44 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:47:30 PM
well first off isn't the reason that you put the rankings that each person had to call bs...
huh?
He's saying that people have to say who put who where because you broke down the vote.
Quote from: budcrew08 on July 25, 2007, 09:25:45 PM
It shouldn't be. Cortland loses a LOT this year. Plus, they have two quarterbacks who are still learning on a trial-by-fire basis.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on July 26, 2007, 01:04:42 AMOK, I guess I can't think of a better use of a 1,000th post then to tell PC he's correct as usual. ;DQuote from: budcrew08 on July 25, 2007, 09:25:45 PM
It shouldn't be. Cortland loses a LOT this year. Plus, they have two quarterbacks who are still learning on a trial-by-fire basis.
Don't they get Alex Smith back?
Quote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 03:44:43 AM
I'll own up....I'm the guy in the #2 spot.....the only real thing I struggled with was leaving Hobart as the #11 team. I think they are 3rd best in the LL and are just on the outside looking in. That being said, Union opens up with Springfield....that game will give us a great early indication of how the East might shake out.
BTW, whoever had Delaware Valley at #2, also had Rowan at #8....we need to question this persons intentions...... ::)
Quote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 11:22:45 PMQuote from: budcrew08 on July 25, 2007, 11:05:45 PMQuote from: pg04 on July 25, 2007, 11:02:44 PMQuote from: Superman57 on July 25, 2007, 10:47:30 PM
well first off isn't the reason that you put the rankings that each person had to call bs...
huh?
He's saying that people have to say who put who where because you broke down the vote.
It's just a way to keep people honest per se and a way to show how each team got votes and another thing to discuss, ie how there was such a disparity of Cortland votes as discussed earlier. No one actually needs to say who they picked unless they want to.
Quote from: realistic on July 26, 2007, 09:30:04 AM
as for my picks... I really went more with gut feelings, returners, past success, etc. I didn't consider schedules because I didn't want to get into XXXX will probably lose to YYYY on 9/8 so I am not going to rank them.
Overall very interesting poll, and I am pleased that my picks ended up in the similar vicinity as others with only a few big variations.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on July 26, 2007, 11:01:40 AM
On behalf of the Saxons, I'd like to thank the pollster who ranked us 5th in the East. While the Alfred consensus is consistent with your optomism, we chose to be a little more realistic in our rankings. Mystery pollster, whoever you are, keep up the good work and stop by the Pep Band this fall for a Pep Bandana on the house!
Quote from: realistic on July 26, 2007, 11:12:14 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on July 26, 2007, 11:01:40 AM
On behalf of the Saxons, I'd like to thank the pollster who ranked us 5th in the East. While the Alfred consensus is consistent with your optomism, we chose to be a little more realistic in our rankings. Mystery pollster, whoever you are, keep up the good work and stop by the Pep Band this fall for a Pep Bandana on the house!
haha - Kaz00...you had a little ESP working there. I'll own up, and I guess give away all my picks. I didn't want to be the Ithaca guy who picks Ithaca and I think Alfred has a shot this year. That being said, in this case I hope I'm worng and the Bombers make a run throught the E8.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on July 26, 2007, 04:30:02 AMQuote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 03:44:43 AM
I'll own up....I'm the guy in the #2 spot.....the only real thing I struggled with was leaving Hobart as the #11 team. I think they are 3rd best in the LL and are just on the outside looking in. That being said, Union opens up with Springfield....that game will give us a great early indication of how the East might shake out.
BTW, whoever had Delaware Valley at #2, also had Rowan at #8....we need to question this persons intentions...... ::)
I don't understand how people can bitch. Maybe U89 is trying for his end of the season poll in the preseason, as opposed to the typical, 'how did they finish last year'...Secretly, U89 could be a genius...or a donkey. It's a preseason poll, so who can say?
And all the Rochester stuff...Well, this DOES have to do with last year, but they weren't anywhere near my poll,(maybe 12-13) strictly because, although they got 3rd in the LL last year, they lost to Alfred in the ECAC. RPI beat Cortland. I honestly felt Cortland might hand it to RPI, but they didn't get it done and RPI finished on a good note. That also affected my Cortland vote. ROchester had a chance to finally make a statement and they dropped the ball. And let's face it, Rochester has had moments of potential brilliance in the past, and then haven't followed up, so until they can win consistently, how is there any faith in them?
Quote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 02:36:15 PMHEEEEEEHAWWWWW
I just feel that Hobart lost too much last year to contend in '07.....we'll see. I think Robertson will be the difference in the LL. Union has a very athletic kid from Nawlin's at QB...our version of the D3 Michael Vick......minus the herpes and dog murdering.....
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on July 26, 2007, 02:48:42 PMQuote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 02:36:15 PMHEEEEEEHAWWWWW
I just feel that Hobart lost too much last year to contend in '07.....we'll see. I think Robertson will be the difference in the LL. Union has a very athletic kid from Nawlin's at QB...our version of the D3 Michael Vick......minus the herpes and dog murdering.....
that is pretty funny. actually us pumpkins may not be in as bad a shape as TGP initially thought. working on an unofficial TGP bart preview. will post asap.
Union has a kind from NOLA?
Dat's right brah (as TGP's best from NOLA would say)
Quote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 02:53:03 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on July 26, 2007, 02:48:42 PMQuote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 02:36:15 PMHEEEEEEHAWWWWW
I just feel that Hobart lost too much last year to contend in '07.....we'll see. I think Robertson will be the difference in the LL. Union has a very athletic kid from Nawlin's at QB...our version of the D3 Michael Vick......minus the herpes and dog murdering.....
that is pretty funny. actually us pumpkins may not be in as bad a shape as TGP initially thought. working on an unofficial TGP bart preview. will post asap.
Union has a kind from NOLA?
Dat's right brah (as TGP's best from NOLA would say)
Yup, kids name is Jared Gourrier, from the Big Easy via Northfield Mount-Herman....I think.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on August 25, 2007, 08:32:13 PM
+1, pg04. It looks good. :)
I like that you are listing the votes. The 6th place for Springfield makes no sense, as does the 2nd place for Del Valley. ???
You have a Rowan hater, too.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on August 25, 2007, 08:57:26 PM
If I read the numbers right, the Del Val lover and Rowan hater are the same person?
Quote from: pg04 on August 26, 2007, 04:23:25 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on August 25, 2007, 08:57:26 PM
If I read the numbers right, the Del Val lover and Rowan hater are the same person?
Someone's good with the math! ;) Yes, you are correct, although the voter will remain nameless! (other than it wasn't me haha).
Edit: Actually not good with math, good with lining up simple sequences :D
Quote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 03:44:43 AM
I'll own up....I'm the guy in the #2 spot.....the only real thing I struggled with was leaving Hobart as the #11 team. I think they are 3rd best in the LL and are just on the outside looking in. That being said, Union opens up with Springfield....that game will give us a great early indication of how the East might shake out.
BTW, whoever had Delaware Valley at #2, also had Rowan at #8....we need to question this persons intentions...... ::)
Quote from: Garnet on August 27, 2007, 01:46:30 PMQuote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 03:44:43 AM
I'll own up....I'm the guy in the #2 spot.....the only real thing I struggled with was leaving Hobart as the #11 team. I think they are 3rd best in the LL and are just on the outside looking in. That being said, Union opens up with Springfield....that game will give us a great early indication of how the East might shake out.
BTW, whoever had Delaware Valley at #2, also had Rowan at #8....we need to question this persons intentions...... ::)
LD,
Looks like he was trying to call him out. It doesn't look like U89 claimed to put DVC at 2 and Rowan at 8. In fact it is the opposite.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 27, 2007, 06:35:39 PMQuote from: Garnet on August 27, 2007, 01:46:30 PMQuote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 03:44:43 AM
I'll own up....I'm the guy in the #2 spot.....the only real thing I struggled with was leaving Hobart as the #11 team. I think they are 3rd best in the LL and are just on the outside looking in. That being said, Union opens up with Springfield....that game will give us a great early indication of how the East might shake out.
BTW, whoever had Delaware Valley at #2, also had Rowan at #8....we need to question this persons intentions...... ::)
LD,
Looks like he was trying to call him out. It doesn't look like U89 claimed to put DVC at 2 and Rowan at 8. In fact it is the opposite.
I don't care. I still blame U89....and Canada.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on July 26, 2007, 04:30:02 AMQuote from: Union89 on July 26, 2007, 03:44:43 AM
I'll own up....I'm the guy in the #2 spot.....the only real thing I struggled with was leaving Hobart as the #11 team. I think they are 3rd best in the LL and are just on the outside looking in. That being said, Union opens up with Springfield....that game will give us a great early indication of how the East might shake out.
BTW, whoever had Delaware Valley at #2, also had Rowan at #8....we need to question this persons intentions...... ::)
I don't understand how people can bitch. Maybe U89 is trying for his end of the season poll in the preseason, as opposed to the typical, 'how did they finish last year'...Secretly, U89 could be a genius...or a donkey. It's a preseason poll, so who can say?
And all the Rochester stuff...Well, this DOES have to do with last year, but they weren't anywhere near my poll,(maybe 12-13) strictly because, although they got 3rd in the LL last year, they lost to Alfred in the ECAC. RPI beat Cortland. I honestly felt Cortland might hand it to RPI, but they didn't get it done and RPI finished on a good note. That also affected my Cortland vote. ROchester had a chance to finally make a statement and they dropped the ball. And let's face it, Rochester has had moments of potential brilliance in the past, and then haven't followed up, so until they can win consistently, how is there any faith in them?
Quote from: pg04 on September 01, 2007, 09:34:28 PM
Well with the activity this week, it should be an interesting poll for this week...
Remember, get the polls in before Monday at 8 so I can put together the poll that night.
Should be interesting!
Quote from: Cortland_Football on September 02, 2007, 06:40:24 PM
I wouldn't drop Rowan too far. It was a close loss to a strong program, on the road. In fact, I might not drop them at all. The team which has to get body slammed is Wilkes.
Quote from: Superman57 on September 03, 2007, 04:23:37 PM
Knightstalker... I would say even though they may suck in terms of FCS they still have scholarships which in anycase to me would be reason enough to hold off on judging delaware valley till they play a diii team
Quote from: 'gro on September 03, 2007, 04:39:47 PM
The MAAC is a non scholarship conference, the level of play is comparable to D3 and in some cases a lot worse. That's why many MAAC schools have dropped football in recent years. I know Siena is one of those teams, terrible football team back when they played/scrimmaged RPI.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 8 ) | 1-0 | 89 | 1 | @ Buffalo State |
2 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) ( 1 ) | 0-0 | 79 | 2 | @ #7 Union |
3 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 1-0 | 57 | 9 | vs. King's |
4 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) | 0-0 | 48 | 7 | vs. Endicott |
5 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 0-0 | 46 | 5 | @ Dickinson |
6 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 0-0 | 43 | 6 | vs. Morrisville State |
7 | Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2007) | 0-0 | 37 | 8 | vs. #2 Springfield |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 0-1 | 32 | 4 | Idle |
9 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 0-0 | 22 | NR | @ Thiel |
10 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2007) | 1-0 | 20 | NR | @ Albright |
Quote from: pg04 on September 03, 2007, 08:19:56 PMQuote from: Tags on September 03, 2007, 08:18:08 PM
+k for a nice job PG.
Am I reading that right, someone did not give Fisher a vote for the top 10?
Also am anxious to see how the poll reads after next week - Ithaca may very well be well rounded on both sides of the football, with two convincing wins will that be enough to trump a loaded Springfield offense?Quote from: pg04 on September 03, 2007, 08:07:59 PM
Please note that one of the posters did not get their poll in, therefore there are only 9 voters this week (the dash in the second to last position in the strings above represents that person).
Quote from: Tags on September 03, 2007, 08:18:08 PM
+k for a nice job PG.
I'm anxious to see how the poll reads after next week - Ithaca may very well be well rounded on both sides of the football, with two convincing wins will that be enough to trump a loaded Springfield offense?
Quote from: pg04 on September 03, 2007, 08:07:59 PM
Also, Notice that RPI seemed to jump for no good reason at all, while Hobart and Cortland stayed in the same spots.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 03, 2007, 08:22:26 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 03, 2007, 08:07:59 PM
Also, Notice that RPI seemed to jump for no good reason at all, while Hobart and Cortland stayed in the same spots.
Everyone ranked that was previously behind Rowan and Wilkes in my ranks moved ahead. The only team that made moves this week for me were Ithaca and Kean. Fisher did what Fisher was expected to do...
Quote from: pg04 on September 03, 2007, 04:25:34 PMQuote from: Superman57 on September 03, 2007, 04:23:37 PM
Knightstalker... I would say even though they may suck in terms of FCS they still have scholarships which in anycase to me would be reason enough to hold off on judging delaware valley till they play a diii team
Actually, they don't have scholarships.
[/quot
You are correct about scholorships. Guys seem to forget that Iona is a very tough team. They are beatable, but no no walk in the park. If you take them lightly, you may go down.They are at the bottom of the MAAC though.
Quote from: pg04 on September 03, 2007, 08:07:59 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 1 (9/2/07)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 8 ) 1-0 89 1@ Buffalo State 2 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) ( 1 ) 0-0 79 2@ #7 Union 3 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) 1-0 57 9vs. King's 4 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) 0-0 48 7vs. Endicott 5 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) 0-0 46 5@ Dickinson 6 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) 0-0 43 6vs. Morrisville State 7 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2007) 0-0 37 8vs. #2 Springfield 8 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) 0-1 32 4Idle 9 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) 0-0 22 NR@ Thiel 10 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2007) 1-0 20 NR@ Albright
Other receiving votes: Delaware Valley 13, William Paterson 5, Wilkes 2, Western New England 1, Widener 1
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 8 ) | 1-0 | 89 | 1 | @ Buffalo State |
2 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) ( 1 ) | 0-0 | 79 | 2 | @ #7 Union |
3 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 1-0 | 57 | 9 | vs. King's |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 0-0 | 48 | 5 | @ Dickinson |
5 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) | 0-0 | 46 | 7 | vs. Endicott |
6 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 0-0 | 43 | 6 | vs. Morrisville State |
7 | Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2007) | 0-0 | 37 | 8 | vs. #2 Springfield |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 0-1 | 32 | 4 | Idle |
9 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 0-0 | 22 | NR | @ Thiel |
10 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2007) | 1-0 | 20 | NR | @ Albright |
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 05, 2007, 12:14:29 PM
Yea, my fault on that one. But you had one more mistake in there. I wanted Union (KY) in there, not Union (NY). They suck.
Quote from: gordonmann on September 05, 2007, 07:42:09 PM
Looks fantastic, pg.
Quote from: pg04 on September 05, 2007, 01:31:27 AM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 1 (9/2/07) MODIFIED!!!
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 8 ) 1-0 89 1@ Buffalo State 2 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) ( 1 ) 0-0 79 2@ #7 Union 3 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) 1-0 57 9vs. King's 4 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) 0-0 48 5@ Dickinson 5 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) 0-0 46 7vs. Endicott 6 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) 0-0 43 6vs. Morrisville State 7 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2007) 0-0 37 8vs. #2 Springfield 8 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) 0-1 32 4Idle 9 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) 0-0 22 NR@ Thiel 10 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2007) 1-0 20 NR@ Albright
Other receiving votes: Delaware Valley 13, William Paterson 5, Wilkes 2, Western New England 1, Widener 1
Voting distribution by team for the week one poll...
Fisher (1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,-,1)
Springfield (2,1,4,2,2,2,2,3,-,2)
Ithaca (4,5,6,4,5,4,4,2,-,8)
RPI (6,4,8,5,7,3,5,4,-,-)
Hobart (7,3,3,-,4,9,3,5,-,6)
Cortland State (-,7,2,3,3,8,8,9,-,5)
Union (3,8,9,-,8,6,6,8,-,3)
Rowan (9,9,7,10,6,5,7,10,-,4)
Alfred (10,6,-,6,10,7,9,-,-,7)
Kean (8,10,5,7,9,-,-,7,-,-)
Delaware Valley (5,-,-,9,-,-,-,6,-,-)
William Paterson (-,-,-,8,-,-,-,-,-,9)
Wilkes (-,-,10,-,-,-,-,-,-,10)
Western New England (-,-,-,-,-,-,10,-,-,-)
Widener (-,-,-,-,-,10,-,-,-,-)
This modification was due to a pollster putting Hobart in the 3rd and 5th position on accident, when he meant to put RPI in one of the positions. I did not get a response in time and I incorrectly assumed which position RPI was to go in (3rd). Instead he wanted them in 5th. Therefore Hobart and RPI switch in position and number of points.
Thanks for listening ;). Still getting all the kinks out of this poll thing
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 09, 2007, 10:17:39 AM
Still too early, but there were some things I noticed about this weeks poll
1) Should Cortland winning 71-7 mean anything at all? Mo'ville too young to make a judgement about Cortland.
2) Union loses to one of the best teams in the country while RPI beats their regular cupcake non-league game....does RPI still deserve to be a few notches higher? Hobart will be the test, and since they lost to dickinson RPI will probably stay the same (put cortland at #4, Alfred could move up too)
3) Although I dont see them being there at the end of the season, does William Patterson deserve a spot just because of one win? Wilkes is 0-2 now...
4) When is a MAC team going to impress me enough to get back in the poll? Not yet.
Quote from: pg04 on September 10, 2007, 09:10:42 PM
Newfane football hasn't been good, well since ever so that doesn't really affect me haha.
Quote from: Upstate on September 10, 2007, 09:14:07 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 10, 2007, 09:10:42 PM
Newfane football hasn't been good, well since ever so that doesn't really affect me haha.
My boy rushed for 385 (25 carries) our senior year vs Newfane, so thats all that matters....
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 7 ) | 2-0 | 97 | 1 | vs. Rochester |
2 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) ( 3 ) | 1-0 | 92 | 2 | @ Montclair State |
3 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 2-0 | 71 | 3 | @ Hartwick |
4 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) | 1-0 | 64 | 5 | vs. Utica |
5 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 1-0 | 63 | 6 | @ Brockport state |
6 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 1-0 | 48 | 9 | vs. St. Lawrence |
7 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 0-1 | 32 | 8 | @ Wilkes |
8 | Widener (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Widener&year=2007) | 1-0 | 20 | NR | vs. Wesley |
9 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 0-1 | 19 | 4 | vs. Carnegie Mellon |
10 | Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2007) | 0-1 | 13 | 7 | @Muhlenberg |
Quote from: pg04 on September 10, 2007, 09:22:59 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/10/07)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 7 ) 2-0 97 1vs. Rochester 2 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) ( 3 ) 1-0 92 2@ Montclair State 3 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) 2-0 71 3@ Hartwick 4 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) 1-0 64 5vs. Utica 5 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) 1-0 63 6@ Brockport state 6 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) 1-0 48 9vs. St. Lawrence 7 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) 0-1 32 8@ Wilkes 8 Widener (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Widener&year=2007) 1-0 20 NRvs. Wesley 9 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) 0-1 19 4vs. Carnegie Mellon 10 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2007) 0-1 13 7@Muhlenberg
Other receiving votes: Montclair State 11, Delaware Valley 7, William Paterson 6, Curry 1, WPI 1
Fisher (2,2,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1)
Springfield (1,1,3,2,1,2,2,2,2,2)
Ithaca (3,4,4,4,5,4,3,3,3,6)
RPI (4,3,5,6,4,3,4,5,5,7)
Cortland State (10,6,2,3,3,7,5,4,4,3)
Alfred (8,5,6,5,7,5,7,8,6,5)
Rowan (9,7,7,8,6,6,-,-,9,4)
Widener (-,9,9,9,8,8,-,6,-,8)
Hobart (7,-,10,10,9,-,6,9,8,10)
Union (6,-,-,-,-,10,8,10,7,-)
Montclair State (-,8,8,-,10,9,-,-,-,9)
Delaware Valley (5,-,-,-,-,-,-,-,10,-)
William Paterson (-,-,-,7,-,-,9,-,-,-)
Curry (-,-,-,-,-,-,10,-,-,-)
WPI (-,10,-,-,-,-,-,-,-,-)
Enjoy!
Quote from: budcrew08 on September 10, 2007, 09:29:15 PM
I usually don't do this, but who put Cortland at Number 2? They beat up Morrisville, but they lost Alex Smith again. They aren't worthy of that high of a ranking.
Quote from: Superman57 on September 10, 2007, 09:29:43 PM
ok who is voting Union at 6 hobart at 7 and del val at 5 but alfred at 8 and cortland @ 10
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 10, 2007, 09:51:11 PM
I had Cortland at 2, that is where they were on my poll last week and with the triple monkeystomp being delivered I wasn't going to drop them. I kept Rowan at 7 because they didn't play and after only two weeks it is too early to drop teams because of injury or an off week. I also voted Montclair in at 8 this week. Personally I don't understand Union still in the top ten, they got pounded into next week by Springfield.
Quote from: pg04 on September 10, 2007, 11:13:12 PM
Yeah #10 for someone's poll has been designated NEFC country :D
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 10, 2007, 09:51:11 PM
I had Cortland at 2, that is where they were on my poll last week and with the triple monkeystomp being delivered I wasn't going to drop them. I kept Rowan at 7 because they didn't play and after only two weeks it is too early to drop teams because of injury or an off week. I also voted Montclair in at 8 this week. Personally I don't understand Union still in the top ten, they got pounded into next week by Springfield.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 11, 2007, 08:56:09 AM
Anyway...Money Cash Hoes, WPI 2-0????
Quote from: Cortland_Football on September 15, 2007, 07:42:58 PM
I told you not to jump too soon on Cortland... ::)
Nice win today by Brockport. They ran the ball hard and played solid defense. Cortland has some major issues on offense, which weren't so obvious against a team like Morrisville. I'm still thinking around 6 wins for the season, maybe an ECAC bid. But this not a top Eastern team at the moment.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 16, 2007, 10:19:27 AM
Yea I had 3 drop out this week....
Quote from: rams1102 on September 15, 2007, 10:07:42 PM
Maybe Montclair can break the Top 10 for the East.
pg04 - where were your picks this week?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 16, 2007, 10:19:27 AM
Yea I had 3 drop out this week....
Quote from: Cortland_Football on September 17, 2007, 04:21:07 PM
Do any of you have Albright on your radar yet? That opening season loss to Salisbury doesn't look so bad in retrospect.
12-42 Salisbury
42-17 Kean
30-7 Shenandoah
Next vs FDU-Florham
Quote from: Union89 on September 17, 2007, 04:50:59 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 16, 2007, 10:19:27 AM
Yea I had 3 drop out this week....
I'm with Utah....I dropped 3 teams out...
Quote from: pg04 on September 17, 2007, 07:55:21 PM
Important Programming Note: Due to the fact that I am still doing work, I will have to push back the posting of the poll. It should be out late tonight, early tommorrow... Thanks!!
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 10 ) | 3-0 | 100 | 1 | at #9 Ithaca |
2 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 2-0 | 80 | 6 | vs. #5 Springfield |
RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) | 2-0 | 80 | 4 | at #7 Hobart | |
4 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 2-0 | 65 | NR | at South Region #1 Wesley |
5 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) | 1-1 | 58 | 2 | at #2 Alfred |
6 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 1-1 | 51 | 7 | vs. Widener |
7 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 1-1 | 48 | 9 | vs. 2 RPI |
8 | William Paterson (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=William+Paterson&year=2007) | 2-0 | 15 | NR | vs. FDU-Florham |
9 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 2-1 | 14 | 3 | vs. #1 St. John fisher |
WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=WPI&year=2007) | 3-0 | 14 | NR | vs. Merchant Marine |
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 10 ) | 3-0 | 100 | 1 | at #9 Ithaca |
2 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 2-0 | 80 | 6 | vs. #5 Springfield |
RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) | 2-0 | 80 | 4 | at #7 Hobart | |
4 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 2-0 | 65 | NR | at South Region #1 Wesley |
5 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) | 1-1 | 58 | 2 | at #2 Alfred |
6 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 1-1 | 51 | 7 | vs. Widener |
7 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 1-1 | 48 | 9 | vs. 2 RPI |
8 | William Paterson (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=William+Paterson&year=2007) | 2-0 | 15 | NR | vs. FDU-Florham |
9 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 2-1 | 14 | 3 | vs. #1 St. John fisher |
WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=WPI&year=2007) | 3-0 | 14 | NR | vs. Merchant Marine |
Quote from: 'gro on September 17, 2007, 09:44:12 PM
Nobody's heard of Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007)?
I have no idea if they are good, but they are on top of the MAC right now.
Quote from: Superman57 on September 17, 2007, 09:40:50 PM
I have to give props to who ever gave Hartwick a vote...but if we're giving hartwick a vote shouldn't WNEC be up there too...
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 17, 2007, 09:50:04 PM
Allright boys.........who jumped on JU's Curry bandwagon....?
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thechestnut.com%2Fpotty%2Fcolonel.jpg&hash=7bab389536b10b2e1975e19357064901c2351089)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 17, 2007, 10:56:07 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 17, 2007, 09:50:04 PM
Allright boys.........who jumped on JU's Curry bandwagon....?
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thechestnut.com%2Fpotty%2Fcolonel.jpg&hash=7bab389536b10b2e1975e19357064901c2351089)
I'll own up to that one. It's hard to keep people in the top 10 after last week. I feel like no one has played anyone, and anyone who has played anyone has lost. Does that make any sense?
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 17, 2007, 11:18:03 PMOk, While I don't agree with your logic I will give you +k for steping up and giving reason why you voted the way you did
I am the one who voted for Hartwick, I did a mental coin flip between Hartwick, WPU, Albright and Bport. Hartwick ended up in my poll due to two factors. I already had MSU, Rowan and Cortland in my top ten and I felt if I added WPU I would be accused of being a home for the NJAC. The second factor was they beat the team that I had previously at #4 and was ranked 24th nationally going into the weekend. I am trying to get my poll done before looking at the new top 25. I use the top 25 from the previous week as part of my ranking criteria.
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 17, 2007, 11:18:03 PM
I am the one who voted for Hartwick, I did a mental coin flip between Hartwick, WPU, Albright and Bport. Hartwick ended up in my poll due to two factors. I already had MSU, Rowan and Cortland in my top ten and I felt if I added WPU I would be accused of being a homer for the NJAC. The second factor was they beat the team that I had previously at #4 and was ranked 24th nationally going into the weekend. I am trying to get my poll done before looking at the new top 25. I use the top 25 from the previous week as part of my ranking criteria.
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 18, 2007, 12:16:07 AM
I was refering to Ithaca being ranked 24 last week. I do not look at the new poll until I do my poll.
Quote from: pg04 on September 17, 2007, 09:56:11 PM
Reposting since it scrolled off...
East Region Fan Poll - Week 3 (9/17/07)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 10 ) 3-0 100 1at #9 Ithaca 2 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) 2-0 80 6vs. #5 Springfield RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) 2-0 80 4at #7 Hobart 4 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) 2-0 65 NRat South Region #1 Wesley 5 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) 1-1 58 2at #2 Alfred 6 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) 1-1 51 7vs. Widener 7 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) 1-1 48 9vs. 2 RPI 8 William Paterson (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=William+Paterson&year=2007) 2-0 15 NRvs. FDU-Florham 9 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) 2-1 14 3vs. #1 St. John fisher WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=WPI&year=2007) 3-0 14 NRvs. Merchant Marine
Other receiving votes: Curry 6, Delaware Valley 6, Widener 5, Cortland State 4, Hartwick 1
Fisher (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)
Alfred (2,3,2,2,2,4,4,5,3,3)
RPI (3,5,3,3,4,2,2,4,2,2)
Montclair State (4,2,4,4,3,6,8,2,8,4)
Springfield (6,6,6,5,6,3,6,3,6,5)
Rowan (8,4,8,7,5,5,5,7,4,6)
Hobart (5,7,5,8,7,7,3,6,5,9)
William Paterson (-,-,-,6,8,8,10,-,-,8)
Ithaca (9,9,7,-,-,9,-,8,10,-)
WPI (7,8,-,-,10,10,9,-,-,7)
Curry (10,10,-,10,9,-,-,-,-,10)
Delaware Valley (-,-,-,-,-,-,7,-,9,-)
Widener (-,-,-,-,-,-,-,10,7,-)
Cortland State (-,-,9,-,-,-,-,9,-,-)
Hartwick (-,-,10,-,-,-,-,-,-,-)
Enjoy! I got it done sooner than I thought as I got finished with my other stuff...
Quote from: pg04 on September 18, 2007, 12:40:43 AMI voted for RPI.
Other Talking points could be:
- RPI, Montclair, or Alfred...who is the 2nd best team in the region?
- Does William Paterson have staying power, or do we think they will drop out once the NJAC season starts?
- Rowan squeaked to a victory this weekend. At the end of the season, where do they fit in the East Region?
- Is WPI really worth a spot in the top 10, even with the 3-0 record?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 18, 2007, 02:01:40 AM
Just because he was the backup doesn't mean he was second-best.
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 18, 2007, 07:26:41 AM
One thing I have learned over the years regarding Rowan is the backup at any position is as good as the starters in most programs in the region. When a team consistantly does that they will maintain a high level of success. Unfortunately they seem to always run into a team whose third string is as good as Rowans starters.
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2007, 09:30:10 PM
Rowan looked very very good as well. The NJAC and the E8 control the east right now, with LL fitting RPI in their somewhere. The MAC is really in shambles right now. They might not get a team in for awhile.
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2007, 09:35:04 PM
Hartwick barely beats Husson ( ???) 35-27
Quote from: Upstate on September 22, 2007, 09:37:56 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2007, 09:35:04 PM
Hartwick barely beats Husson ( ???) 35-27
they were so overlooking Husson.....maybe.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 22, 2007, 09:47:41 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 22, 2007, 09:37:56 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2007, 09:35:04 PM
Hartwick barely beats Husson ( ???) 35-27
they were so overlooking Husson.....maybe.
Husson is no slouch. New program, yes. Slouch, no.
Quote from: Upstate on September 22, 2007, 11:01:48 PM
What are the collective thoughts on brockport? Worthy enough to sneak in?
Quote from: pg04 on September 17, 2007, 09:56:11 PM
Reposting since it scrolled off...
East Region Fan Poll - Week 3 (9/17/07)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 10 ) 3-0 100 1at #9 Ithaca 2 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) 2-0 80 6vs. #5 Springfield RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) 2-0 80 4at #7 Hobart 4 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) 2-0 65 NRat South Region #1 Wesley 5 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) 1-1 58 2at #2 Alfred 6 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) 1-1 51 7vs. Widener 7 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) 1-1 48 9vs. 2 RPI 8 William Paterson (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=William+Paterson&year=2007) 2-0 15 NRvs. FDU-Florham 9 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) 2-1 14 3vs. #1 St. John fisher WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=WPI&year=2007) 3-0 14 NRvs. Merchant Marine
Other receiving votes: Curry 6, Delaware Valley 6, Widener 5, Cortland State 4, Hartwick 1
Fisher (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1)
Alfred (2,3,2,2,2,4,4,5,3,3)
RPI (3,5,3,3,4,2,2,4,2,2)
Montclair State (4,2,4,4,3,6,8,2,8,4)
Springfield (6,6,6,5,6,3,6,3,6,5)
Rowan (8,4,8,7,5,5,5,7,4,6)
Hobart (5,7,5,8,7,7,3,6,5,9)
William Paterson (-,-,-,6,8,8,10,-,-,8)
Ithaca (9,9,7,-,-,9,-,8,10,-)
WPI (7,8,-,-,10,10,9,-,-,7)
Curry (10,10,-,10,9,-,-,-,-,10)
Delaware Valley (-,-,-,-,-,-,7,-,9,-)
Widener (-,-,-,-,-,-,-,10,7,-)
Cortland State (-,-,9,-,-,-,-,9,-,-)
Hartwick (-,-,10,-,-,-,-,-,-,-)
Enjoy! I got it done sooner than I thought as I got finished with my other stuff...
Quote from: Superman57 on September 23, 2007, 12:17:54 AM
the fact of the matter is both teams still have huge games coming up...Fisher was able to exerocise some huge demons today...maybe superman will finally be able to sleep with out seeing bill struzzi streaking back to the end zone...although the image of rob kramer taking it 31 yards to the house is quite distrubing
Quote from: AUKazooTwo on September 23, 2007, 09:28:30 AM
New here... but uh, I'm thinking Alfred is #1.
And where can I read a recap of the Saxons dismantling Springfield?
Quote from: Upstate on September 23, 2007, 09:42:58 AMQuote from: AUKazooTwo on September 23, 2007, 09:28:30 AM
New here... but uh, I'm thinking Alfred is #1.
And where can I read a recap of the Saxons dismantling Springfield?
besides being a homer, whats your logic behind that?
Dont just come on here proclaiming to be #1 in a poll w/o any reasoning behind that...
Quote from: AUKazooTwo on September 23, 2007, 09:28:30 AM
New here... but uh, I'm thinking Alfred is #1.
And where can I read a recap of the Saxons dismantling Springfield?
Quote from: Superman57 on September 23, 2007, 10:58:37 AM
first off, I believe that the new poster is Kazoo's former college roomate from Oregon who hated the winters...
secondly, whoever does the scheudling for alfred should be fired...how can you let 3 road games like that at the end of the season be there...and the fact is even if they beat Bart and Ithaca which is entirely possible...how much left in the tank will they have for the battle at growney
Quote from: Upstate on September 23, 2007, 09:42:58 AMQuote from: AUKazooTwo on September 23, 2007, 09:28:30 AM
New here... but uh, I'm thinking Alfred is #1.
And where can I read a recap of the Saxons dismantling Springfield?
besides being a homer, whats your logic behind that?
Dont just come on here proclaiming to be #1 in a poll w/o any reasoning behind that...
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 23, 2007, 02:35:02 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 23, 2007, 09:42:58 AMQuote from: AUKazooTwo on September 23, 2007, 09:28:30 AM
New here... but uh, I'm thinking Alfred is #1.
And where can I read a recap of the Saxons dismantling Springfield?
besides being a homer, whats your logic behind that?
Dont just come on here proclaiming to be #1 in a poll w/o any reasoning behind that...
Welcome to the board AUKazooTwo. I'll be blunt and to the point. Fisher is still number 1 until they are knocked off the top of the mountain.
Quote from: Cortland_Football on September 23, 2007, 11:41:21 PM
Fisher has to be the #1 until proven otherwise. But I will say this about Alfred...their scores have impressed me more than any other team in Eastern Region so far. I consider these teams to be #1 and #1A, with Montclair and RPI probably in a dead heat right behind them.
And me thinks Rowan is back in a big way with this freshman QB. Don't be surprised if they beat Montclair and win the NJAC when all is said and done.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 10 ) | 4-0 | 100 | 1 | at Hartwick |
2 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 3-0 | 84 | T2 | at Norwich |
3 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) | 3-0 | 77 | T2 | at Susquehanna |
Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 3-0 | 77 | 4 | at TCNJ | |
5 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 2-1 | 61 | 6 | at Western Connecticut |
6 | WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=WPI&year=2007) | 4-0 | 35 | T9 | vs. #7 Hobart |
7 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 1-2 | 30 | 7 | at #6 WPI |
8 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 4-0 | 25 | NR | vs. Salve Regina |
9 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 2-1 | 17 | NR | at William Paterson |
10 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) | 1-2 | 13 | 5 | at Utica |
Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 09:26:01 PM
I guess my overwhelming thought was of Montclair's total first 3 games, all of which as a whole are tougher than the Alfred Schedule.
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 22, 2007, 11:15:36 PM
I am thinking that Montclair may deserve the #2 spot, they knocked a top ten ranked Springfield off last week and this week did the same to Wesley. I think they have played a tougher schedule than Alfred so far. That said, Alfred is right behind them in my opinion, almost like 2 and 2A.
Quote from: Union89 on September 24, 2007, 10:20:03 PM
U89 was wondering if Plymouth St. would get any love....even the NEFC rep. wouldn't throw them 1 vote??
Did we decide that the NESCAC was not included in this? I can't bring myself to give them a vote, but I'm surprised no one else did.
Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 09:12:47 PM
Montclair did just beat the #7 team on the road. I think that is worthy of putting them in the 2 spot.
The D3football.com poll also has Montclair ahead of Alfred.
Score Comparison does not work. Haven't we seen that in the past?
Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
Do you think Alfred could beat Springfield on the road? How about Montclair?
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher. I probably wont see Alfred or Montclair live this year. In fact, I will probably only see 2 non-nefc/nescac games live this year. So comparative scores is all someone like me has to go on. (and Im assuming most people in this poll will be the same)
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 11:09:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
Do you think Alfred could beat Springfield on the road? How about Montclair?
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher. I probably wont see Alfred or Montclair live this year. In fact, I will probably only see 2 non-nefc/nescac games live this year. So comparative scores is all someone like me has to go on. (and Im assuming most people in this poll will be the same)
You aren't saying who is better or not? I sure as hell thought that was the point. Fine since Carnegie Mellon the road beat U of R by more points than Fisher did, I guess CMU would probably beat Fisher and if in the East would be Ranked higher than Fisher, right?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:09:59 PM??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? Huh, App St was not ranked higher tahn Michigan because they are neither better nor did they deserve to be ranked higher!Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Not always. Sometimes teams have bad games, or luck doesnt go their way. Thats why appalachian st wasnt ranked ahead of michigan after week 1.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:13:51 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:09:59 PM??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PMHuh, App. St wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan because they are neither better nor did they deserve a higher ranking
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Not always. Sometimes teams have bad games, or luck doesnt go their way. Thats why appalachian st wasnt ranked ahead of michigan after week 1.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:14:35 PMBecause it was a fluke, however your statement suggested that teams deserve to be ranked higher not because of their strength, but perhaps because of them "deserving it" Then I pose the same question to you under your faulty logic: Why wasnt App St ranked higher than Michigan after beating them?Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:13:51 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:09:59 PM??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PMHuh, App. St wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan because they are neither better nor did they deserve a higher ranking
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Not always. Sometimes teams have bad games, or luck doesnt go their way. Thats why appalachian st wasnt ranked ahead of michigan after week 1.
Ok. Tell me why App St. wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan after week 1?
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:20:03 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:14:35 PMBecause it was a fluke, however your statement suggested that teams deserve to be ranked higher not because of their strength, but perhaps because of them "deserving it" Then I pose the same question to you under your faulty logic: Why wasnt App St ranked higher than Michigan after beating them?Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:13:51 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:09:59 PM??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PMHuh, App. St wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan because they are neither better nor did they deserve a higher ranking
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Not always. Sometimes teams have bad games, or luck doesnt go their way. Thats why appalachian st wasnt ranked ahead of michigan after week 1.
Ok. Tell me why App St. wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan after week 1?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
Do you think Alfred could beat Springfield on the road? How about Montclair?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 24, 2007, 11:27:14 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PM
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
Do you think Alfred could beat Springfield on the road? How about Montclair?
Is it Alfred's third straight week on the road in your scenario, like it was for Springfield?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:26:30 PMGotcha...sometimes its hard to get a point across when we are just typing random thoughts...so App St should be ahead of Michigan then....right.... ;DQuote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:20:03 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:14:35 PMBecause it was a fluke, however your statement suggested that teams deserve to be ranked higher not because of their strength, but perhaps because of them "deserving it" Then I pose the same question to you under your faulty logic: Why wasnt App St ranked higher than Michigan after beating them?Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:13:51 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:09:59 PM??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PMHuh, App. St wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan because they are neither better nor did they deserve a higher ranking
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Not always. Sometimes teams have bad games, or luck doesnt go their way. Thats why appalachian st wasnt ranked ahead of michigan after week 1.
Ok. Tell me why App St. wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan after week 1?
Well thats why I used the horribly worded phrase "arent really". What my whole point is that sometimes a head to head competition is what really matters. App. St isnt really a great example in the long run, because they dont play a schedule even close to what Michigan does. But if they both went 9-1 and were the last two teams left to go to "bowl A" (And app st was d1), I would say App St deserved to go, (or be ranked higher) because they beat Michigan head to head. Even though you and I know Michigan is better than App St., App St beat them and would deserve to get a spot over them if they both contended for one.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:29:21 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:26:30 PMGotcha...sometimes its hard to get a point across when we are just typing random thoughts...so App St should be ahead of Michigan then....right.... ;DQuote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:20:03 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:14:35 PMBecause it was a fluke, however your statement suggested that teams deserve to be ranked higher not because of their strength, but perhaps because of them "deserving it" Then I pose the same question to you under your faulty logic: Why wasnt App St ranked higher than Michigan after beating them?Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:13:51 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:09:59 PM??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???Quote from: SJFF82 on September 24, 2007, 11:07:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 24, 2007, 11:00:14 PMThat statement (by Utah) is rather 'circular' in logic and otherwise makes no sense at all...isnt it presumed that if a team "deserves to be ranked higher" that they are better?Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2007, 10:56:44 PMHuh, App. St wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan because they are neither better nor did they deserve a higher ranking
If we want to use the "neutral field" cliche...
I think Montclair would beat Alfred on a neutral field. Should Montclair Fall or Alfred impress in the upcoming weeks, I may change my tune.
The thing about these polls is that you arent really saying who is better or not. But its who deserves to be ranked higher.
Not always. Sometimes teams have bad games, or luck doesnt go their way. Thats why appalachian st wasnt ranked ahead of michigan after week 1.
Ok. Tell me why App St. wasnt ranked ahead of Michigan after week 1?
Well thats why I used the horribly worded phrase "arent really". What my whole point is that sometimes a head to head competition is what really matters. App. St isnt really a great example in the long run, because they dont play a schedule even close to what Michigan does. But if they both went 9-1 and were the last two teams left to go to "bowl A" (And app st was d1), I would say App St deserved to go, (or be ranked higher) because they beat Michigan head to head. Even though you and I know Michigan is better than App St., App St beat them and would deserve to get a spot over them if they both contended for one.
Quote from: pg04 on August 24, 2007, 10:02:29 PM
EAST REGION PRESEASON FAN POLL!!!
Team(#1 Votes) Points
1 Fisher(9) 99
2 Springfield(1) 79
3 Wilkes 76
4 Rowan 74
5 Hobart 38
6 Cortland State 37
7 RPI 34
8 Union 32
9 Ithaca 27
10 Delaware Valley 25
Also Receiving Points: Alfred 22, Rochester 2, Curry 2, Montclair State 1, Kean 1, Bridgewater State 1
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 25, 2007, 09:25:37 AMQuote from: pg04 on August 24, 2007, 10:02:29 PM
EAST REGION PRESEASON FAN POLL!!!
Team(#1 Votes) Points
1 Fisher(9) 99
2 Springfield(1) 79
3 Wilkes 76
4 Rowan 74
5 Hobart 38
6 Cortland State 37
7 RPI 34
8 Union 32
9 Ithaca 27
10 Delaware Valley 25
Also Receiving Points: Alfred 22, Rochester 2, Curry 2, Montclair State 1, Kean 1, Bridgewater State 1
I just wanted to give props to Pep for convincing me to put Montclair on our preseason ballot. This is why he's worthy of being E8PP Chairman!
Also notice how only 4 of the top 10 still remain.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 26, 2007, 09:19:12 PM
lookin at the poll it seems someone left curry out of their top ten but had hartwick at 8... dont see the logic in that when Wnec beats hartwick 48-21 and Curry just beat Wnec this past week 48-3...wondering if anyone else thinks Hartwick would beat Curry on a neutral site?
# | School (1st votes) | Previous Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 10 ) | 4-0 | 100 | 1 | LOSS TO HARTWICK 31-28 |
2 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 3-0 | 84 | T2 | DEF NORWICH 45-21 |
3 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) | 3-0 | 77 | T2 | DEF SUSQUEHANNA 37-14 |
Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 3-0 | 77 | 4 | LOSS TO TCNJ 19-9 | |
5 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 2-1 | 61 | 6 | DEF WEST CONN 40-18 |
6 | WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=WPI&year=2007) | 4-0 | 35 | T9 | LOSS TO #7 HOBART 35-45 |
7 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 1-2 | 30 | 7 | DEF #6 WPI 45-35 |
8 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 4-0 | 25 | NR | DEF SALVE REGINA 38-7 |
9 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 2-1 | 17 | NR | DEF WILLY P 42-0 |
10 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2007) | 1-2 | 13 | 5 | DEF UTICA 49-12 |
Quote from: 'gro on September 30, 2007, 09:47:02 AMI would...
I don't have a vote, but I wouldn't drop SJF down past #2.
Quote from: 'gro on September 30, 2007, 09:47:02 AM
I don't have a vote, but I wouldn't drop SJF down past #2. Still have no idea what they are drinking down in Hartwick, but they have beat 2 good teams.
There's a big cluster at the top with SJF, Alfred, RPI, and Rowan. Montclair and WPI should drop some, and give some votes to Hobart and 'Wick.
Quote from: Cortland_Football on September 30, 2007, 02:12:04 PM
While RPI is undefeated, I think an argument can be made for Rowan at #2. A close road loss to open the season at a very good CNU team is nothing that should anchor them indefinitely. Look at what they have done since. 41-0 over Widener? 40-18 over West Conn? They are getting scary again.
I cannot help but wonder if Alfred is undefeated only because they haven't played Fisher, IC, and Hartwick yet. Their scores have been convincing, but the real season is still ahead of them.
Time to introduce TCNJ into the conversation? 3-1 overall, 19-9 over Montclair.
Without question Hartwick has to be ranked, but I cannot wait to see where y'all put them.
Especially with the WNEC-Hartwick score likely to be trumpeted by the NEFC all season, how far does Curry move up the poll since they are obviously the class of the conference?
The wild, wild East! 2007 is shaping up to be a lot of fun.
Quote from: Cortland_Football on September 30, 2007, 02:12:04 PM
While RPI is undefeated, I think an argument can be made for Rowan at #2. A close road loss to open the season at a very good CNU team is nothing that should anchor them indefinitely. Look at what they have done since. 41-0 over Widener? 40-18 over West Conn? They are getting scary again.
I cannot help but wonder if Alfred is undefeated only because they haven't played Fisher, IC, and Hartwick yet. Their scores have been convincing, but the real season is still ahead of them.
Time to introduce TCNJ into the conversation? 3-1 overall, 19-9 over Montclair.
Without question Hartwick has to be ranked, but I cannot wait to see where y'all put them.
Especially with the WNEC-Hartwick score likely to be trumpeted by the NEFC all season, how far does Curry move up the poll since they are obviously the class of the conference?
The wild, wild East! 2007 is shaping up to be a lot of fun.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 26, 2007, 09:19:12 PM
lookin at the poll it seems someone left curry out of their top ten but had hartwick at 8... dont see the logic in that when Wnec beats hartwick 48-21 and Curry just beat Wnec this past week 48-3...wondering if anyone else thinks Hartwick would beat Curry on a neutral site?
Quote from: Tags on September 30, 2007, 09:15:20 PM
Anyone dare put Alfred #1 yet?
In my mind they should be awful close, and they have been tested - let's not forget the trouncing of Springfield.
On the flip side, I don't think they'll make it through IC and Fisher without losing one of those.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 30, 2007, 09:19:47 PM
Alfred's always been #1 in my book -- no matter what their record. ;)
Quote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 12:58:04 AM
If we were to hash out the Eastern Region top 10, using the D3football.com top 25, it would look like this:
1. Fisher #10
2. Rowan #19
3. Alfred #20
4. Montclair State #22
5. RPI (25 Votes)
6. Hartwick (3 votes)
7. TCNJ (2 votes)
There are no other Eastern teams receiving votes.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 01, 2007, 09:05:13 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 12:58:04 AM
If we were to hash out the Eastern Region top 10, using the D3football.com top 25, it would look like this:
1. Fisher #10
2. Rowan #19
3. Alfred #20
4. Montclair State #22
5. RPI (25 Votes)
6. Hartwick (3 votes)
7. TCNJ (2 votes)
There are no other Eastern teams receiving votes.
I'm amazed how the poll voters have such a hard time letting go of their early votes...Montclair finally broke into the pollsters minds, and then they go and lose to TCNJ, and Montclair is still up at #22, but TCNJ receives 2 votes? That makes sense.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 01, 2007, 11:48:45 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 01, 2007, 09:05:13 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 12:58:04 AM
If we were to hash out the Eastern Region top 10, using the D3football.com top 25, it would look like this:
1. Fisher #10
2. Rowan #19
3. Alfred #20
4. Montclair State #22
5. RPI (25 Votes)
6. Hartwick (3 votes)
7. TCNJ (2 votes)
There are no other Eastern teams receiving votes.
I'm amazed how the poll voters have such a hard time letting go of their early votes...Montclair finally broke into the pollsters minds, and then they go and lose to TCNJ, and Montclair is still up at #22, but TCNJ receives 2 votes? That makes sense.
TCNJ got two votes too many, considering Muhlenberg didn't get any.
Sometimes results are just flukes. What we're not sure as voters is which one -- is Montclair/Wesley the fluke or is Montclair/TCNJ? They can't both be truly representative of Montclair State.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 01, 2007, 12:10:11 PM
Ithaca could use one or two votes, but as you pointed out, only seven teams in the East actually got votes.
If I had been the person who voted for TCNJ and needed to throw votes at someone in the East, it'd have been Ithaca instead.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 01, 2007, 11:48:45 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 01, 2007, 09:05:13 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 12:58:04 AM
If we were to hash out the Eastern Region top 10, using the D3football.com top 25, it would look like this:
1. Fisher #10
2. Rowan #19
3. Alfred #20
4. Montclair State #22
5. RPI (25 Votes)
6. Hartwick (3 votes)
7. TCNJ (2 votes)
There are no other Eastern teams receiving votes.
I'm amazed how the poll voters have such a hard time letting go of their early votes...Montclair finally broke into the pollsters minds, and then they go and lose to TCNJ, and Montclair is still up at #22, but TCNJ receives 2 votes? That makes sense.
TCNJ got two votes too many, considering Muhlenberg didn't get any.
Sometimes results are just flukes. What we're not sure as voters is which one -- is Montclair/Wesley the fluke or is Montclair/TCNJ? They can't both be truly representative of Montclair State.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 01, 2007, 03:10:07 PM
Easily. What has any Centennial team done since, say, 1999 to merit inclusion?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 01, 2007, 03:10:07 PM
Easily. What has any Centennial team done since, say, 1999 to merit inclusion?
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) ( 7 ) | 4-0 | 97 | 2 | vs. #6 Hartwick |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 3 ) | 4-0 | 89 | T3 | vs. St. Lawrence |
3 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 3-1 | 79 | 5 | vs. #7 TCNJ |
4 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) | 4-1 | 66 | 1 | vs. Brockport State |
5 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 2-2 | 46 | 7 | at Susquehanna |
6 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) | 3-1 | 33 | NR | at #1 Alfred |
7 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) | 3-1 | 28 | NR | at #3 Rowan |
8 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 5-0 | 25 | 8 | at MIT |
9 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 3-1 | 24 | T3 | vs. Buffalo State |
10 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 3-1 | 23 | 9 | at Kean |
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 08:45:55 PM
who dropped the number 1 team clear out of the poll after one close loss on the road...seriously
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 01, 2007, 09:06:31 PMWhy is it odd that 'they' have IC at 7?Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 08:45:55 PM
who dropped the number 1 team clear out of the poll after one close loss on the road...seriously
I agree with you. Plus they have Ithaca at 7th. They should either come forward and admit they made a mistake (could easily happen if they forgot) or else they should have their voting rights revoked.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 01, 2007, 09:55:55 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 01, 2007, 09:06:31 PMWhy is it odd that 'they' have IC at 7?Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 08:45:55 PM
who dropped the number 1 team clear out of the poll after one close loss on the road...seriously
I agree with you. Plus they have Ithaca at 7th. They should either come forward and admit they made a mistake (could easily happen if they forgot) or else they should have their voting rights revoked.
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 09:57:23 PMMaybe his F-I-S-H-E-R keys were stolen off his keyboard and in their place the thief left the I-T-H-A-C-A keys...and maybe the thief is a disgruntled IC posterQuote from: SJFF82 on October 01, 2007, 09:55:55 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 01, 2007, 09:06:31 PMWhy is it odd that 'they' have IC at 7?Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 08:45:55 PM
who dropped the number 1 team clear out of the poll after one close loss on the road...seriously
I agree with you. Plus they have Ithaca at 7th. They should either come forward and admit they made a mistake (could easily happen if they forgot) or else they should have their voting rights revoked.
because fisher is not in the poll at all
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 08:45:55 PM
who dropped the number 1 team clear out of the poll after one close loss on the road...seriously
Quote from: Union89 on October 01, 2007, 10:31:33 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 08:45:55 PM
who dropped the number 1 team clear out of the poll after one close loss on the road...seriously
Most likely caused Fisher to be 4 instead of 3.........
Quote from: pg04 on July 05, 2007, 09:44:54 PM
Another idea from the South Region...
They have 5 of the most prominent posters of that region vote for the top ten teams in the region each week of the season. I'm figuring that we can do the same over here in the East Region, starting with a preseason ranking. Please PM me if you'd like to be part of the "ranking" committee.
I'm not going to limit it to 5, however I only want serious people that will be part of it each week. If you miss a week or your voting indicates that you are not taking it seriously, I will not include your ballot and you will not be allowed to do it again. It's only fair.
So, let me know. I hope to have a Pre-season poll by the beginning of August!!
Quote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 10:53:24 PM
I believe this person is taking it seriously, and I have not noticed any strange voting in the past. It could be a mistake, So perhaps I should investigate. Honestly I didn't even notice it as I was dumping things in my spreadsheet in earlier.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) ( 7 ) | 4-0 | 97 | 2 | vs. #6 Hartwick |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 3 ) | 4-0 | 89 | T3 | vs. St. Lawrence |
3 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 3-1 | 79 | 5 | vs. #6 TCNJ |
4 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) | 4-1 | 73 | 1 | vs. Brockport State |
5 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 2-2 | 46 | 7 | at Susquehanna |
6 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) | 3-1 | 28 | NR | at #3 Rowan |
7 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) | 3-1 | 26 | NR | at #1 Alfred |
8 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 5-0 | 25 | 8 | at MIT |
9 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 3-1 | 24 | T3 | vs. Buffalo State |
10 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 3-1 | 23 | 9 | at Kean |
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 01, 2007, 11:19:20 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 10:53:24 PM
I believe this person is taking it seriously, and I have not noticed any strange voting in the past. It could be a mistake, So perhaps I should investigate. Honestly I didn't even notice it as I was dumping things in my spreadsheet in earlier.
It was a mistake. I was very busy at work today and honestly rushed through trying to post it. If an honest mistake is against the rules, then you can kick me out of the poll if you want. I had SJF as my #4 but the D3 website wouldn't let me PM it to pg (kept crashing everytime I clicked enter to submit), so I had to copy and paste into excel then resend via regular email.
for whatever reason when the cells were copied, it didn't grab #4 and made it look like #4 was hartwick.
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 01, 2007, 11:19:20 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 10:53:24 PM
I believe this person is taking it seriously, and I have not noticed any strange voting in the past. It could be a mistake, So perhaps I should investigate. Honestly I didn't even notice it as I was dumping things in my spreadsheet in earlier.
It was a mistake. I was very busy at work today and honestly rushed through trying to post it. If an honest mistake is against the rules, then you can kick me out of the poll if you want. I had SJF as my #4 but the D3 website wouldn't let me PM it to pg (kept crashing everytime I clicked enter to submit), so I had to copy and paste into excel then resend via regular email.
for whatever reason when the cells were copied, it didn't grab #4 and made it look like #4 was hartwick.
Quote from: pg04 on October 01, 2007, 10:41:17 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 01, 2007, 10:31:33 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 08:45:55 PM
who dropped the number 1 team clear out of the poll after one close loss on the road...seriously
Most likely caused Fisher to be 4 instead of 3.........
No it didn't, the most any vote can be worth is 10 points, for #1.. Fisher is more than 10 points behind Rowan. Either way, Fisher's gonna be 4.
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 10:37:10 PM
honestly even the person who put fisher at 6 has a lot to explain... 3 or 4 is a perfect spot for fisher
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 02, 2007, 05:59:55 AMJust Ithaca on the road and a decent Buff State....Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 01, 2007, 10:37:10 PM
honestly even the person who put fisher at 6 has a lot to explain... 3 or 4 is a perfect spot for fisher
Dude! They lost to Hartwick! Is it a surprise they dropped in some people's polls? When they beat Alfred, I'm sure they will be right back up there. This is a weekly poll, and ranks are bound to change based on a teams performance that week. If Albright and TCNJ lose now, they probably won't exist on the poll, just like WPI, Springfield, Ithaca, etc...
TCNJ lost to an undefeated team, then beat the team that beat Springfield, Wilkes, and Wesley. This isn't the nation's 'Top 25', it's the East, and with this wacky East this year, it's gonna change. Your beloved Fisher lost to a team not many hold in high regard, so boo hoo, they friggin drop. Get over it for Christ's sake.
And lastly, after just now revisiting SJF's schedule, who have they beat so far this year, that should make one think the Hartwick loss was a fluke???
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 02, 2007, 07:29:17 AM
a decent Buff State....
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 02, 2007, 07:57:13 AMpoint well taken... ;DQuote from: SJFF82 on October 02, 2007, 07:29:17 AM
a decent Buff State....
Having to use an adjective in front of a team is a dead spin giveaway. :)
Just let Buff State's name stand on its own.
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 02, 2007, 09:49:23 AM
I'm not as upset about the 6...as I was when they weren't their at all...but the issues I have with them at 6 is who is infront of them in 4 and 5...TCNJ and Albright
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 02, 2007, 10:21:58 AM
who left Hobart off there ballot? i also believe Hartwick is getting a bad rep from soopafifty7...they have one bad loss but have beat an array of quality teams...i know they have been a doormat in the past but lets give credit where credit is due...i dont think anyone should have left them off a their ballot
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 02, 2007, 10:39:02 AMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 02, 2007, 09:49:23 AM
I'm not as upset about the 6...as I was when they weren't their at all...but the issues I have with them at 6 is who is infront of them in 4 and 5...TCNJ and Albright
Well, after this week, TCNJ and Rowan will most likely work themselves out. Albright might be in the wrong spot, but they are also the lone rep out of the MAC right now, and their only loss is to a Salisbury team that looks loaded this year, so time will tell on them.
And Buff St looks no better than mediocre, as does Ithaca at this point, so they do not impress me that much on Fisher's win list this year. I'm not putting Fisher down, because if they win out, they will be right back towards the top, but when you get knocked down, you have to get back up and prove that you are worthy. Springfield got knocked down, then they got knocked off, and didn't redeem themselves.
It's a long season, and the only teams that so far haven't had much of an opportunity to move anywhere but up, are RPI and Alfred(and maybe Curry, but they do this every year in that pathetic conference)and until they lose, that will be the case.
My favorite thing is that Husson got a vote.
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 02, 2007, 11:36:41 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 02, 2007, 10:21:58 AM
who left Hobart off there ballot? i also believe Hartwick is getting a bad rep from soopafifty7...they have one bad loss but have beat an array of quality teams...i know they have been a doormat in the past but lets give credit where credit is due...i dont think anyone should have left them off a their ballot
Valid question. Hobart actually has 2 losses (both on last second, game ending plays), but Hobart could have won either game. Also, both the teams that barely beat Hobart are a combined 9-0 on the season.
I would challenge anyone who thinks Hobart is a "doormat". That was certainly true for prior to the mid 90's, but since then Bart's program has been very strong. In 2006, Bart was coming off its fifth consecutive postseason appearance (and sixth in the past seven seasons). Hobart also boasts the highest winning perc
entage of any Division III team in New York State since the start of the 2000 season. The Statesmen have won 77.1% of the time during that time frame, logging an impressive 54-16 mark (keep in mind this stat was before the 2007 started - regardless, even a 56-18 mark is still a very solid 75.6% since 2000).
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 02, 2007, 11:42:27 AMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 02, 2007, 11:36:41 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 02, 2007, 10:21:58 AM
who left Hobart off there ballot? i also believe Hartwick is getting a bad rep from soopafifty7...they have one bad loss but have beat an array of quality teams...i know they have been a doormat in the past but lets give credit where credit is due...i dont think anyone should have left them off a their ballot
Valid question. Hobart actually has 2 losses (both on last second, game ending plays), but Hobart could have won either game. Also, both the teams that barely beat Hobart are a combined 9-0 on the season.
I would challenge anyone who thinks Hobart is a "doormat". That was certainly true for prior to the mid 90's, but since then Bart's program has been very strong. In 2006, Bart was coming off its fifth consecutive postseason appearance (and sixth in the past seven seasons). Hobart also boasts the highest winning perc
entage of any Division III team in New York State since the start of the 2000 season. The Statesmen have won 77.1% of the time during that time frame, logging an impressive 54-16 mark (keep in mind this stat was before the 2007 started - regardless, even a 56-18 mark is still a very solid 75.6% since 2000).
I would argue that Hobart was pretty good in the early 1990s. (I think the #1 defense in the country in 1993........I guess that could be considered mid-nineties too)
But whats more interesting about the guy who left Hobart out, is that they had RPI at #1.
But I would also argue that nothing Hobart has done prior to last year should really be considered in this poll. (which I had them in the middle of the pack)
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 02, 2007, 11:55:40 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 02, 2007, 11:42:27 AMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 02, 2007, 11:36:41 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 02, 2007, 10:21:58 AM
who left Hobart off there ballot? i also believe Hartwick is getting a bad rep from soopafifty7...they have one bad loss but have beat an array of quality teams...i know they have been a doormat in the past but lets give credit where credit is due...i dont think anyone should have left them off a their ballot
Valid question. Hobart actually has 2 losses (both on last second, game ending plays), but Hobart could have won either game. Also, both the teams that barely beat Hobart are a combined 9-0 on the season.
I would challenge anyone who thinks Hobart is a "doormat". That was certainly true for prior to the mid 90's, but since then Bart's program has been very strong. In 2006, Bart was coming off its fifth consecutive postseason appearance (and sixth in the past seven seasons). Hobart also boasts the highest winning perc
entage of any Division III team in New York State since the start of the 2000 season. The Statesmen have won 77.1% of the time during that time frame, logging an impressive 54-16 mark (keep in mind this stat was before the 2007 started - regardless, even a 56-18 mark is still a very solid 75.6% since 2000).
I would argue that Hobart was pretty good in the early 1990s. (I think the #1 defense in the country in 1993........I guess that could be considered mid-nineties too)
But whats more interesting about the guy who left Hobart out, is that they had RPI at #1.
But I would also argue that nothing Hobart has done prior to last year should really be considered in this poll. (which I had them in the middle of the pack)
We did have the #1 D in 93 and should have had our first NCAA playoff appearance if not for those damn RPI Engineers. That 20-15 loss was crushing. Especially after we had shut out the #2 team in the Country the week before 10-0.
Bart struggled a bit from 94-96 (going a combined 12-18), but starting having winning seasons in 97.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 02, 2007, 11:42:27 AMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 02, 2007, 11:36:41 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 02, 2007, 10:21:58 AM
who left Hobart off there ballot? i also believe Hartwick is getting a bad rep from soopafifty7...they have one bad loss but have beat an array of quality teams...i know they have been a doormat in the past but lets give credit where credit is due...i dont think anyone should have left them off a their ballot
Valid question. Hobart actually has 2 losses (both on last second, game ending plays), but Hobart could have won either game. Also, both the teams that barely beat Hobart are a combined 9-0 on the season.
I would challenge anyone who thinks Hobart is a "doormat". That was certainly true for prior to the mid 90's, but since then Bart's program has been very strong. In 2006, Bart was coming off its fifth consecutive postseason appearance (and sixth in the past seven seasons). Hobart also boasts the highest winning perc
entage of any Division III team in New York State since the start of the 2000 season. The Statesmen have won 77.1% of the time during that time frame, logging an impressive 54-16 mark (keep in mind this stat was before the 2007 started - regardless, even a 56-18 mark is still a very solid 75.6% since 2000).
I would argue that Hobart was pretty good in the early 1990s. (I think the #1 defense in the country in 1993........I guess that could be considered mid-nineties too)
But whats more interesting about the guy who left Hobart out, is that they had RPI at #1.
But I would also argue that nothing Hobart has done prior to last year should really be considered in this poll. (which I had them in the middle of the pack)
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 02, 2007, 04:48:43 PM
Given the history between Bart and Union, I am not surprised that a Union alum would leave Bart off their list - probably the same reason that I left Union off my list too :D
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 02, 2007, 03:43:41 PMIt's RPI that is the doormat... just kidding
I think there was some miscommunication where someone called Hartwick a doormat, and it got mistaken as Hobart because there was a comment about Hobart int he same paragraph.
i don't think anyone thinks of Hobart as a doormat.
Quote from: Union89 on October 02, 2007, 05:09:53 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 02, 2007, 04:48:43 PM
Given the history between Bart and Union, I am not surprised that a Union alum would leave Bart off their list - probably the same reason that I left Union off my list too :D
Hobart is far ahead of Union my friend....hopefully both will be there late in the season.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 03, 2007, 11:09:50 AM
Does anyone in the poll believe that Hartwick will go to Alfred this weekend or win?
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 03, 2007, 01:50:06 PM
I think it would help Fisher and Alfred leaving their matchup as the other berth...but most likely Hartwick will lose this weekend...even with a loss this weekend they have a reasonable chance to win the rest of their games which could make for the potential of three teams with 1 loss inside the conference.
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 03, 2007, 11:51:36 AM
AU's stats are really impressive.
http://www.alfred.edu/athletics/football/TEAMCUME_013.HTM
Keeley's efficiency rating is 208!! Wow.
The only achilles heel I could find with the Saxons is that they are averaging 100 yds a game in penalties. That could come back to bite them if they are not careful.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 03, 2007, 07:11:12 PMI think Soopahman 57 has a new challenger for illiteracy
i think Hartwick can get passed Springfield and Sharpe...it will be the last test for hartwick after Alfred...i bet the Hartwick vs Alfred will be alot closer then ppl think ...Hartwick has faced alot more quality opponnets then Alfred...lets see how they do
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 04, 2007, 09:44:29 AM
Any chance they had ours on Monday or Tuesday? We come out more than 60 hours earlier, so it may have gotten in before.
If not, I'll see what I can do, but AP hasn't carried our poll yet.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 04, 2007, 10:23:16 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 04, 2007, 09:44:29 AM
Any chance they had ours on Monday or Tuesday? We come out more than 60 hours earlier, so it may have gotten in before.
If not, I'll see what I can do, but AP hasn't carried our poll yet.
I didn't look this week but I have seen it in there. But the globe tends to put college rankings that have New England teams in them.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 07, 2007, 08:49:12 AM
I know that it creates more discussion and drama when teams lose and these rankings shuffle each and every week, but why is it that SJF is nationally ranked far ahead of any of the three teams that 'our' poll ranks "1", "2" and "3".
What is the criteria or main factors for the wekly poll? Is it how you played on the most recent Saterday...as evidenced by SJF's fall 3 spots last week? Or is it who are the Top ten teams period?
RPI and AU are undefeated and are obviously good teams. RPI's victories are against teams with a combined record of 9-17 (and 2 of those 9 wins are by Utica against Becker and Mt. Ida). I didnt take the time to check the corresponding stats for AU, however, SJF's victories are against a combined 11-15 (not much better), but wins against IC, Rochester, and Buff St.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 07, 2007, 11:01:17 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 07, 2007, 08:49:12 AM
I know that it creates more discussion and drama when teams lose and these rankings shuffle each and every week, but why is it that SJF is nationally ranked far ahead of any of the three teams that 'our' poll ranks "1", "2" and "3".
What is the criteria or main factors for the wekly poll? Is it how you played on the most recent Saterday...as evidenced by SJF's fall 3 spots last week? Or is it who are the Top ten teams period?
RPI and AU are undefeated and are obviously good teams. RPI's victories are against teams with a combined record of 9-17 (and 2 of those 9 wins are by Utica against Becker and Mt. Ida). I didnt take the time to check the corresponding stats for AU, however, SJF's victories are against a combined 11-15 (not much better), but wins against IC, Rochester, and Buff St.
And I think last years performance still rings in a lot of voters ears when it comes to voting time. Plus the fact that Hartwick isnt a total fluke with their win vs. IC.
When AU beats SJF, then AU will be ranked ahead of SJF. And I think the pollsters know it too.
But it kind of brings me back to my point before about polls (deserving v. better teams) Now Boston College will be ranked probably 10 spots ahead of Florida. What do you think the point spread would be if they played at a neutral site? (Im gonna say gators -4) Not that point spreads mean that much but it still is interesting.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 07, 2007, 11:01:17 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 07, 2007, 08:49:12 AM
I know that it creates more discussion and drama when teams lose and these rankings shuffle each and every week, but why is it that SJF is nationally ranked far ahead of any of the three teams that 'our' poll ranks "1", "2" and "3".
What is the criteria or main factors for the wekly poll? Is it how you played on the most recent Saterday...as evidenced by SJF's fall 3 spots last week? Or is it who are the Top ten teams period?
RPI and AU are undefeated and are obviously good teams. RPI's victories are against teams with a combined record of 9-17 (and 2 of those 9 wins are by Utica against Becker and Mt. Ida). I didnt take the time to check the corresponding stats for AU, however, SJF's victories are against a combined 11-15 (not much better), but wins against IC, Rochester, and Buff St.
When AU beats SJF, then AU will be ranked ahead of SJF. And I think the pollsters know it too.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) ( 7 ) | 5-0 | 97 | 1 | vs. Utica |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 2 ) | 5-0 | 87 | 2 | Idle |
3 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 1 ) | 5-1 | 82 | 4 | vs. Norwich |
4 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) | 4-1 | 67 | 6 | at William Paterson |
5 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 3-2 | 42 | 5 | vs. Merchant Marine |
6 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 4-1 | 37 | 9 | vs. Kean |
7 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 3-2 | 32 | 3 | vs. Buffalo State |
8 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 6-0 | 25 | 8 | vs. Endicott |
Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 4-1 | 25 | 10 | vs Western Connecticut | |
10 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007) | 4-1 | 20 | NR | vs. King's |
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Quote from: Union89 on October 09, 2007, 06:14:49 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
#8 seems like alot of love for a team who has played no one....
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:01:16 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Curry and the NEFC will get their yearly shot in the playoffs and be the lucky draw for some other east team who rolls and wins by 40. It's not that Curry can compete, it's that the rest of the NEFC sucks THAT much worse.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 09, 2007, 09:05:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 09, 2007, 06:14:49 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
#8 seems like alot of love for a team who has played no one....
How do you go 6-0 and not play against anyone?
Quote from: Upstate on October 09, 2007, 09:06:02 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:01:16 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Curry and the NEFC will get their yearly shot in the playoffs and be the lucky draw for some other east team who rolls and wins by 40. It's not that Curry can compete, it's that the rest of the NEFC sucks THAT much worse.
Since the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC are all kicking the crap out of each other the NEFC could possibly get a pretty high seed....
Quote from: Upstate on October 09, 2007, 09:06:38 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 09, 2007, 09:05:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 09, 2007, 06:14:49 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
#8 seems like alot of love for a team who has played no one....
How do you go 6-0 and not play against anyone?
6 forefits?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:11:00 PM
Worcester St.
Fitchburg St.
Westfield St.
WNE
Salve Regina
MIT
....
That's as close to 6 forfeits as I have seen.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:01:16 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Curry and the NEFC will get their yearly shot in the playoffs and be the lucky draw for some other east team who rolls and wins by 40. It's not that Curry can compete, it's that the rest of the NEFC sucks THAT much worse.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:11:00 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 09, 2007, 09:06:38 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 09, 2007, 09:05:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 09, 2007, 06:14:49 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
#8 seems like alot of love for a team who has played no one....
How do you go 6-0 and not play against anyone?
6 forefits?
Worcester St.
Fitchburg St.
Westfield St.
WNE
Salve Regina
MIT
....
That's as close to 6 forfeits as I have seen.
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 09, 2007, 11:18:35 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:11:00 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 09, 2007, 09:06:38 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 09, 2007, 09:05:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 09, 2007, 06:14:49 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
#8 seems like alot of love for a team who has played no one....
How do you go 6-0 and not play against anyone?
6 forefits?
Worcester St.
Fitchburg St.
Westfield St.
WNE
Salve Regina
MIT
....
That's as close to 6 forfeits as I have seen.
WNEC crushed Hartwick...
Quote from: 'gro on October 09, 2007, 09:58:32 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:01:16 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Curry and the NEFC will get their yearly shot in the playoffs and be the lucky draw for some other east team who rolls and wins by 40. It's not that Curry can compete, it's that the rest of the NEFC sucks THAT much worse.
And Gro wants to know how husson is getting these cats from florida to come up to EBF, ME.
Quote from: 'gro on October 09, 2007, 09:58:32 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:01:16 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Curry and the NEFC will get their yearly shot in the playoffs and be the lucky draw for some other east team who rolls and wins by 40. It's not that Curry can compete, it's that the rest of the NEFC sucks THAT much worse.
That's why I said keep an eye on Plymouth State. Before the wheels fell off they were a decent program. If any team is going to give the NEFC some credit come playoff time it's either PSC or coast guard (coast guard?) in a few years.
And Gro wants to know how husson is getting these cats from florida to come up to EBF, ME.
Quote from: Union89 on October 10, 2007, 09:30:24 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 09, 2007, 09:58:32 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:01:16 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
Curry and the NEFC will get their yearly shot in the playoffs and be the lucky draw for some other east team who rolls and wins by 40. It's not that Curry can compete, it's that the rest of the NEFC sucks THAT much worse.
That's why I said keep an eye on Plymouth State. Before the wheels fell off they were a decent program. If any team is going to give the NEFC some credit come playoff time it's either PSC or coast guard (coast guard?) in a few years.
And Gro wants to know how husson is getting these cats from florida to come up to EBF, ME.
Just for clarification....wouldn't Husson be considered, North BF??
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 10, 2007, 08:57:10 AMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 09, 2007, 11:18:35 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 09, 2007, 09:11:00 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 09, 2007, 09:06:38 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 09, 2007, 09:05:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 09, 2007, 06:14:49 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2007, 05:48:44 PM
no love for Curry...i wished they scheduled more teams out of conference because i think they could compete
#8 seems like alot of love for a team who has played no one....
How do you go 6-0 and not play against anyone?
6 forefits?
Worcester St.
Fitchburg St.
Westfield St.
WNE
Salve Regina
MIT
....
That's as close to 6 forfeits as I have seen.
WNEC crushed Hartwick...
I guess with all of your bonehead logic, it means SJF and Ithaca royally suck then.
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 09, 2007, 11:25:02 PM
A little self-promotion...
My ATR East column is up and live.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 10, 2007, 03:36:35 PM
WNEC did crush Hartwick and Curry killed WNEC 49-3...but comparative scores mean nothing i know that, i just feel that Curry is better than Norwich and Utica... that is no cheap shot at SJF and Ithaca who Hartwick beat but i believe Curry this year could make a push for thier first win in the NCAA's if they get that far...remember Springfield was 13th in the country last year when Curry had them in the playoffs...i dont think they are good enough to beat a top 20 program in the nation but i think they could beat and be competitive with Hartwick, Ithaca and Utica
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 10, 2007, 10:56:55 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 09, 2007, 11:25:02 PM
A little self-promotion...
My ATR East column is up and live.
Nice job.
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 10, 2007, 07:21:53 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 10, 2007, 10:56:55 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 09, 2007, 11:25:02 PM
A little self-promotion...
My ATR East column is up and live.
Nice job.
Gracias.
Quote from: Upstate on October 10, 2007, 07:24:33 PMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 10, 2007, 07:21:53 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 10, 2007, 10:56:55 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 09, 2007, 11:25:02 PM
A little self-promotion...
My ATR East column is up and live.
Nice job.
Gracias.
Way too much NJAC talk on it though....
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 10, 2007, 04:06:03 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 10, 2007, 03:36:35 PM
WNEC did crush Hartwick and Curry killed WNEC 49-3...but comparative scores mean nothing i know that, i just feel that Curry is better than Norwich and Utica... that is no cheap shot at SJF and Ithaca who Hartwick beat but i believe Curry this year could make a push for thier first win in the NCAA's if they get that far...remember Springfield was 13th in the country last year when Curry had them in the playoffs...i dont think they are good enough to beat a top 20 program in the nation but i think they could beat and be competitive with Hartwick, Ithaca and Utica
NEFC in the postseason(out of conference) in the last 5 years...(Hopefully i didn't miss any...)
2006
Springfield 42
Curry 14
2005
Delaware Valley 37
Curry 22
2004
Hobart 35
Curry 16
Ithaca 36
UMD 19
Springfield 53
Fitchburg St 7
2003
RPI 34
Curry 20
2002
Hartwick 69
Curry 14
RPI 55
Worcester St 29
Cortland St 30
Westfield St 7
Muhlenburg 56
UMD 6
I'm no math major or anything, but that equates to:
Total Points
Non-NEFC 447
NEFC 154
Average Score
Non-NEFC 44.7
NEFC 15.4
Smallest Deficit 14
Largest Deficit 50
Now, I know Springfield was ranked high last year and all, but does it really make a difference? If they prove me wrong, all the power to them. But history shows a lot in this case...
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 10, 2007, 07:29:27 PM
Ha. If I don't get it from one side, I get it from the other ... :o
Quote from: Upstate on October 10, 2007, 08:56:54 PMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 10, 2007, 07:29:27 PM
Ha. If I don't get it from one side, I get it from the other ... :o
Ha, im just playing off the NJAC's bitterness....
I've always saw that you try to get every conferences important tidbits mentioned....
Good work as always....
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2007, 05:59:13 PMPat are you going to get up here for any of the big 3 games that last weekend (RPI @ Union, Cortland@ Ithaca, Alfred @ Fisher)
I think Alfred's schedule is fairly backloaded and I'd be glad to vote them higher if they perform like the best team in the region down the stretch.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2007, 05:59:13 PM
I think Alfred's schedule is fairly backloaded and I'd be glad to vote them higher if they perform like the best team in the region down the stretch.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 15, 2007, 03:05:37 PM
Undefeated Plymouth State and Curry play this weekend ...if Curry wins will you pollsters give them any love in your polls next week?
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 15, 2007, 03:05:37 PM
Undefeated Plymouth State and Curry play this weekend ...if Curry wins will you pollsters give them any love in your polls next week?
Quote from: pg04 on October 15, 2007, 09:52:01 PM
Sorry Soopah. I was watching the Sabres plus giving someone an extra chance, but it looks like we'll be one poll short this week as someone forgot to vote. Will be out momentarily.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) ( 4 ) | 6-0 | 85 | 1 | vs. Husson |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 2 ) | 5-0 | 78 | 2 | vs. Merchant Marine |
3 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 3 ) | 6-1 | 77 | 3 | at Springfield |
4 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) | 5-1 | 59 | 4 | vs. Western Connecticut |
5 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 5-1 | 43 | 6 | at #7 Cortland State |
6 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 4-2 | 41 | 5 | vs. St. Lawrence |
7 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 5-1 | 31 | T8 | vs. #5 Montclair State |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 4-2 | 30 | 7 | at Kean |
9 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) | 4-2 | 19 | NR | vs. Mount Ida |
10 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007) | 5-1 | 15 | 10 | at Wilkes |
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 15, 2007, 10:30:26 PM
the only real beef I have with the poll is when you compare common opponents of wick and Curry...wick lost to WNEC and curry beat them
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 15, 2007, 10:25:53 PM
I see there is a 'great-divide' with Cortland...I tend to agree with those voters who have them "4", "5" and "5".
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:29:59 AM
Well when you lose to Hartwick you lose my respect. :D
As one of the people that had TCNJ over FIsher, I think their entire body of work is better than that of Fisher's up to this point of the season (i.e they have beaten the #5 and #8 team on this poll, while Fisher has beaten, well no one on this poll). And TCNJ's one loss? to undefeated Muhlenberg. I think this puts them ahead of The cardinals.
Fisher's season last year can only take them so far this year, IMHO..
I will say, however that RPI would IMO probably lose to both FIsher and TCNJ, but at this point they are still undefeated and have been locked in at 2 on my voting for a few weeks.
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 16, 2007, 12:01:34 AM
when you lose to Brockport you lose my respect...TGP I know that you are a Hobart fan...but how are Ithaca's loses different than Hobarts two losses...Ithaca got beat by one of the best teams in the nation in fisher and they lost a two point game on the road to a team that has suprised everyone...While hobarts two losses are two close losses but I think you put RPI and Fisher on the same field at this point in time fisher is a two touchdown favorite...
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 16, 2007, 12:01:34 AM
when you lose to Brockport you lose my respect...TGP I know that you are a Hobart fan...but how are Ithaca's loses different than Hobarts two losses...Ithaca got beat by one of the best teams in the nation in fisher and they lost a two point game on the road to a team that has suprised everyone...While hobarts two losses are two close losses but I think you put RPI and Fisher on the same field at this point in time fisher is a two touchdown favorite...
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:37:20 AM
DId anyone notice how Curry dropped from 8 clear out of the poll? I thought that was quite weird. I think the winner between Curry and PSU should probably get into the top 10 next week though...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 16, 2007, 09:24:41 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:37:20 AM
DId anyone notice how Curry dropped from 8 clear out of the poll? I thought that was quite weird. I think the winner between Curry and PSU should probably get into the top 10 next week though...
Well, 3 pollsters didn't vote for Curry in week 6 and 3 didn't vote for them in week 7. Assuming those were the same 3 voters in both weeks, then Curry lost out on points from our missing pollster. If they received a 9th place or higher vote then Curry would be in the top 10 again, though dropping from 8th to 10th.
On a side note this is my 200th post. I now have the power to + or - Kaz00 any poster! So, +Kaz00 to pg04 for running this poll.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 16, 2007, 01:21:54 AM
Springfield is installing new field turf. I think thats why they were on the road early in the season.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 07:41:12 AMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 16, 2007, 12:01:34 AM
when you lose to Brockport you lose my respect...TGP I know that you are a Hobart fan...but how are Ithaca's loses different than Hobarts two losses...Ithaca got beat by one of the best teams in the nation in fisher and they lost a two point game on the road to a team that has suprised everyone...While hobarts two losses are two close losses but I think you put RPI and Fisher on the same field at this point in time fisher is a two touchdown favorite...
That's a big surprise that you feel that way beaing a Fisher fan. Don't overlook RPI. They tend to play down to the level of their opponents int he regular season, and a lot of times it bites them in the ass. I wouldn't be so sure about that 'two touchdown' scenario. That would mean you have to score 2 MORE touchdowns than the RPI offense. Not an easy feat. I mean, you lost to Hartwick?
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 16, 2007, 09:58:13 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 07:41:12 AMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 16, 2007, 12:01:34 AM
when you lose to Brockport you lose my respect...TGP I know that you are a Hobart fan...but how are Ithaca's loses different than Hobarts two losses...Ithaca got beat by one of the best teams in the nation in fisher and they lost a two point game on the road to a team that has suprised everyone...While hobarts two losses are two close losses but I think you put RPI and Fisher on the same field at this point in time fisher is a two touchdown favorite...
That's a big surprise that you feel that way beaing a Fisher fan. Don't overlook RPI. They tend to play down to the level of their opponents int he regular season, and a lot of times it bites them in the ass. I wouldn't be so sure about that 'two touchdown' scenario. That would mean you have to score 2 MORE touchdowns than the RPI offense. Not an easy feat. I mean, you lost to Hartwick?
Lew, I know that you don't play the game on paper, but RPI has yet to impress me.... and people were saying the same stuff about Union last year...and look what happened to the dutch when they came walkin up to Rochacha
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 10:31:26 AMniiiicee....+kQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 16, 2007, 09:58:13 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 07:41:12 AMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 16, 2007, 12:01:34 AM
when you lose to Brockport you lose my respect...TGP I know that you are a Hobart fan...but how are Ithaca's loses different than Hobarts two losses...Ithaca got beat by one of the best teams in the nation in fisher and they lost a two point game on the road to a team that has suprised everyone...While hobarts two losses are two close losses but I think you put RPI and Fisher on the same field at this point in time fisher is a two touchdown favorite...
That's a big surprise that you feel that way beaing a Fisher fan. Don't overlook RPI. They tend to play down to the level of their opponents int he regular season, and a lot of times it bites them in the ass. I wouldn't be so sure about that 'two touchdown' scenario. That would mean you have to score 2 MORE touchdowns than the RPI offense. Not an easy feat. I mean, you lost to Hartwick?
Lew, I know that you don't play the game on paper, but RPI has yet to impress me.... and people were saying the same stuff about Union last year...and look what happened to the dutch when they came walkin up to Rochacha
That's because Union sucks.
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:29:59 AMWhy is it that a few posters feel that Fisher is somehow only as good as last year's run and that, that fact is important to their so-called ranking this year.
Well when you lose to Hartwick you lose my respect. :D
As one of the people that had TCNJ over FIsher, I think their entire body of work is better than that of Fisher's up to this point of the season (i.e they have beaten the #5 and #8 team on this poll, while Fisher has beaten, well no one on this poll). And TCNJ's one loss? to undefeated Muhlenberg. I think this puts them ahead of The cardinals.
Fisher's season last year can only take them so far this year, IMHO..
I will say, however that RPI would IMO probably lose to both FIsher and TCNJ, but at this point they are still undefeated and have been locked in at 2 on my voting for a few weeks.
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:29:59 AM
I will say, however that RPI would IMO probably lose to both FIsher and TCNJ, but at this point they are still undefeated and have been locked in at 2 on my voting for a few weeks.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 01:03:24 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:29:59 AM
I will say, however that RPI would IMO probably lose to both FIsher and TCNJ, but at this point they are still undefeated and have been locked in at 2 on my voting for a few weeks.
So let me get this straight....you are acknowledging that SJF and TCNJ are better than RPI, but you still rank the 'lower' team higher???????? Somebody revoke his voting rights please.... I do respect that ranking teams that most of us do not get the benefit of actually watching play is difficult but to say that one team beats the other, but the other is ranked higher when all else is essentially equal, is kind of odd.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 01:03:24 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:29:59 AM
I will say, however that RPI would IMO probably lose to both FIsher and TCNJ, but at this point they are still undefeated and have been locked in at 2 on my voting for a few weeks.
So let me get this straight....you are acknowledging that SJF and TCNJ are better than RPI, but you still rank the 'lower' team higher???????? Somebody revoke his voting rights please.... I do respect that ranking teams that most of us do not get the benefit of actually watching play is difficult but to say that one team beats the other, but the other is ranked higher when all else is essentially equal, is kind of odd.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 01:16:10 PMYou obviously did not read my post with any sort of comprehension. I said nothing of Fisher being ranked lower than TCNJ (indeed they are not)...rather, I collectively wondered how one (PG04) could in the same sentence state that SJF and TCNJ are better than RPI, but that RPI is 'ranked' higher.Quote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 01:03:24 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:29:59 AM
I will say, however that RPI would IMO probably lose to both FIsher and TCNJ, but at this point they are still undefeated and have been locked in at 2 on my voting for a few weeks.
So let me get this straight....you are acknowledging that SJF and TCNJ are better than RPI, but you still rank the 'lower' team higher???????? Somebody revoke his voting rights please.... I do respect that ranking teams that most of us do not get the benefit of actually watching play is difficult but to say that one team beats the other, but the other is ranked higher when all else is essentially equal, is kind of odd.
Dude, get over it! If Fisher beat Hartwick, there would be no discussion. They lost to Hartwick and now they are a question in a lot of people's eyes. TCNJ lost, but in week 1, to a team that is obviously much better than Hartwick. IF FIsher wins out, they will move up in EVERYONE's polls. I think Fisher is better than Alfred, but until they beat Alfred, I can't rank them higher.
You Fisher guys are impossible to please...and a little hard-headed.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 16, 2007, 01:21:14 PM...or like suggesting that the AUpepband go on without the Pep ;)Quote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 01:03:24 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 12:29:59 AM
I will say, however that RPI would IMO probably lose to both FIsher and TCNJ, but at this point they are still undefeated and have been locked in at 2 on my voting for a few weeks.
So let me get this straight....you are acknowledging that SJF and TCNJ are better than RPI, but you still rank the 'lower' team higher???????? Somebody revoke his voting rights please.... I do respect that ranking teams that most of us do not get the benefit of actually watching play is difficult but to say that one team beats the other, but the other is ranked higher when all else is essentially equal, is kind of odd.
You have the audacity to suggest the East Region Fan Poll could go on without pg04?
It's like the Gallup without George, the Harris Poll without Lou, or the Quinnipiac Poll without Mr. Quinnipiac....
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
BTW, PG04: I do not want your voting rights revoked...I appreciate the time it takes all the voters to analyze and vote...just have the stomach (LewDogg) to hear and process some critical responses...is not that why the poll gets published...or are we just supposed to stare at it and not comment
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 05:23:20 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
BTW, PG04: I do not want your voting rights revoked...I appreciate the time it takes all the voters to analyze and vote...just have the stomach (LewDogg) to hear and process some critical responses...is not that why the poll gets published...or are we just supposed to stare at it and not comment
Alright buddy, you want critical???
Hartwick 31
St. John Fisher 28
Alfred 46
Hartwick 36
Alfred 6-0
RPI 5-0
St. John Fisher 6-1
Hartwick 4-2
At THIS POINT(as this IS a weekly poll) in the season, Alfred deserves to be ranked ABOVE St. John Fisher. I believe RPI is better than Alfred AND St. John Fisher, and the rest of the teams in the poll for that matter. Therefore:
1. RPI
2. Alfred
3. TCNJ
4. St. John Fisher
Will Fisher beat Alfred? Maybe. If they do, they will rank above them. Is Alfred better than TCNJ? I don't know. We might have a better idea in a few weeks. Is RPI better than all 3? I don't know, but at this point in the year, I think so, and until proven otherwise, that is how it is.
At the beginning of the year, I had Springfield ranked #1. They proved us all wrong. Then Fisher was 1st, and they lost. They didn't lose to Ithaca, or Alfred, or even Springfield, but to Hartwick. SO, if your comprehending all of that, they dropped, for the time being. They still have the world in their hands if they win, and if deserving, they will get a number 1 vote from me at the end of the year. But at this very moment in time, they are the 4th best team in the Region.
Quote from: 'gro on October 16, 2007, 06:19:44 PM
lewdogg... YO MOMMA has never been ranked before this year, and they are #5 already!! Kinda like USF, congrats.
This article gives some insight to polls, team performance, and team reputation...
SI.com power rankings (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/stewart_mandel/10/16/power.rankings8/index.html?eref=T1)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
BTW, PG04: I do not want your voting rights revoked...I appreciate the time it takes all the voters to analyze and vote...just have the stomach (LewDogg) to hear and process some critical responses...is not that why the poll gets published...or are we just supposed to stare at it and not comment
Quote from: 'gro on October 16, 2007, 06:19:44 PM
This article gives some insight to polls, team performance, and team reputation...
SI.com power rankings (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/stewart_mandel/10/16/power.rankings8/index.html?eref=T1)
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 07:46:45 PM
I thought my argument against Fisher was well thought-out. Even Soopah agreed!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 06:32:18 PMQuote from: 'gro on October 16, 2007, 06:19:44 PM
lewdogg... YO MOMMA has never been ranked before this year, and they are #5 already!! Kinda like USF, congrats.
This article gives some insight to polls, team performance, and team reputation...
SI.com power rankings (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/stewart_mandel/10/16/power.rankings8/index.html?eref=T1)
That's crap though, cause my mom shoul db ranked WAYYYY higher than that. I change my poll....
1. My momma
2. RPI
3. Alfred
4. TCNJ
5. Fish Sticks
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 05:23:20 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
BTW, PG04: I do not want your voting rights revoked...I appreciate the time it takes all the voters to analyze and vote...just have the stomach (LewDogg) to hear and process some critical responses...is not that why the poll gets published...or are we just supposed to stare at it and not comment
Alright buddy, you want critical???
Hartwick 31
St. John Fisher 28
Alfred 46
Hartwick 36
Alfred 6-0
RPI 5-0
St. John Fisher 6-1
Hartwick 4-2
At THIS POINT(as this IS a weekly poll) in the season, Alfred deserves to be ranked ABOVE St. John Fisher. I believe RPI is better than Alfred AND St. John Fisher, and the rest of the teams in the poll for that matter. Therefore:
1. RPI
2. Alfred
3. TCNJ
4. St. John Fisher
Will Fisher beat Alfred? Maybe. If they do, they will rank above them. Is Alfred better than TCNJ? I don't know. We might have a better idea in a few weeks. Is RPI better than all 3? I don't know, but at this point in the year, I think so, and until proven otherwise, that is how it is.
At the beginning of the year, I had Springfield ranked #1. They proved us all wrong. Then Fisher was 1st, and they lost. They didn't lose to Ithaca, or Alfred, or even Springfield, but to Hartwick. SO, if your comprehending all of that, they dropped, for the time being. They still have the world in their hands if they win, and if deserving, they will get a number 1 vote from me at the end of the year. But at this very moment in time, they are the 4th best team in the Region.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 16, 2007, 05:23:20 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
BTW, PG04: I do not want your voting rights revoked...I appreciate the time it takes all the voters to analyze and vote...just have the stomach (LewDogg) to hear and process some critical responses...is not that why the poll gets published...or are we just supposed to stare at it and not comment
Alright buddy, you want critical???
Hartwick 31
St. John Fisher 28
Alfred 46
Hartwick 36
Alfred 6-0
RPI 5-0
St. John Fisher 6-1
Hartwick 4-2
At THIS POINT(as this IS a weekly poll) in the season, Alfred deserves to be ranked ABOVE St. John Fisher. I believe RPI is better than Alfred AND St. John Fisher, and the rest of the teams in the poll for that matter. Therefore:
1. RPI
2. Alfred
3. TCNJ
4. St. John Fisher
Will Fisher beat Alfred? Maybe. If they do, they will rank above them. Is Alfred better than TCNJ? I don't know. We might have a better idea in a few weeks. Is RPI better than all 3? I don't know, but at this point in the year, I think so, and until proven otherwise, that is how it is.
At the beginning of the year, I had Springfield ranked #1. They proved us all wrong. Then Fisher was 1st, and they lost. They didn't lose to Ithaca, or Alfred, or even Springfield, but to Hartwick. SO, if your comprehending all of that, they dropped, for the time being. They still have the world in their hands if they win, and if deserving, they will get a number 1 vote from me at the end of the year. But at this very moment in time, they are the 4th best team in the Region.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 17, 2007, 01:44:51 AM
Its so hard to buy into RPI. I realize they are 5-0. But the LL is weak once again this season. . . . .
If Hobart can beat Alfred, the LL will gain more respect in my book. This will also bode well for RPI since they beat the Statesmen.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 17, 2007, 01:44:51 AM
Just to back up my argument against RPI a few posts back:
Its so hard to buy into RPI. I realize they are 5-0. But the LL is weak once again this season. RPI was up only 14-0 on Utica in the 4th quarter. RPI was down 10-7 against St. Lawrence and had to rally in the 4th quarter to win that one. Look at what Alfred did to Utica and St. Lawrence. They were up 35-0 on Utica at halftime, then called off the dogs. They blew St. Lawrence out very badly.
If Hobart can beat Alfred, the LL will gain more respect in my book. This will also bode well for RPI since they beat the Statesmen.
Quote from: Union89 on October 17, 2007, 08:20:34 AMFisher guys hate to be called a flash in the pan program, but then have the balls to make statements like these.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 17, 2007, 02:59:36 AM
- ??? Upstart Hartwick beat Stagg Bowler SJF and suddenly mediocre Springfield, but what's with the monkey stomp by 2-5 Western New England? ???
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 17, 2007, 08:48:52 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 17, 2007, 08:20:34 AMFisher guys hate to be called a flash in the pan program, but then have the balls to make statements like these.
Most of these Fisher guys don't know how to handle their success. FA05 was on the Fisher team that got pounded 52-0 by IC's backups in 2001 and then he coached there.
Outside of the disoriented Fisher posters, I don't think anyone is bashing the LL. In fact, I think the LL and E8 are pretty even over the last two or three years.
Quote from: Union89 on October 17, 2007, 09:05:10 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on October 17, 2007, 08:48:52 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 17, 2007, 08:20:34 AMFisher guys hate to be called a flash in the pan program, but then have the balls to make statements like these.
Most of these Fisher guys don't know how to handle their success. FA05 was on the Fisher team that got pounded 52-0 by IC's backups in 2001 and then he coached there.
Outside of the disoriented Fisher posters, I don't think anyone is bashing the LL. In fact, I think the LL and E8 are pretty even over the last two or three years.
U89, no bashing the LL here...just as Lew is gonna be a LL homer, I am gonna think that Alfred or Fisher could easily beat Union or RPI or Hobart, I guess we will know soon enough.....
I hear 'ya........for the most part it's the Fisher guys.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2007, 08:53:30 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 17, 2007, 02:59:36 AM
- ??? Upstart Hartwick beat Stagg Bowler SJF and suddenly mediocre Springfield, but what's with the monkey stomp by 2-5 Western New England? ???
Hartwick hasn't faced Springfield yet; they beat Fisher and Ithaca. And I'm not sure "mediocre" would then be the right word for a 4-2 Ithaca team. The WNE loss is a real mind-bender though...
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 17, 2007, 08:48:52 AMPretty low to bash a guy's hard work...what team were you on Q?Quote from: Union89 on October 17, 2007, 08:20:34 AMFisher guys hate to be called a flash in the pan program, but then have the balls to make statements like these.
Most of these Fisher guys don't know how to handle their success. FA05 was on the Fisher team that got pounded 52-0 by IC's backups in 2001 and then he coached there.
Outside of the disoriented Fisher posters, I don't think anyone is bashing the LL. In fact, I think the LL and E8 are pretty even over the last two or three years.
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 07:46:45 PMPG: Sorry you misunderstood my post...I was actually "taking-back" my comment about "revoking your voting rights" that was just in jest in the first place, but since Lew Dogg got defensive for you I thought I would apologize in advance...the balance of that post was not aimed at you...it was aimed at Lew Dogg....for whatever it is now worth a day laterQuote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
BTW, PG04: I do not want your voting rights revoked...I appreciate the time it takes all the voters to analyze and vote...just have the stomach (LewDogg) to hear and process some critical responses...is not that why the poll gets published...or are we just supposed to stare at it and not comment
When did I ever get defensive about anything? I haven't been on all day! You are the one calling for people to have their votes revoked.
I thought my argument against Fisher was well thought-out. Even Soopah agreed!
As for RPI... I think they would probably be beaten by Fisher and TCNJ. However, I have no proof to say that is the case. Therefore, because of being undefeated and gliding through games, they have earned the 2 spot.
I think you are the one who needs to cool down.
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 17, 2007, 08:48:52 AMIt is well recognized by several posters that this rant by you is a recurring theme of yours...so either you keep forgetting that you have said it a million times or deep down it is your inability to cope with our success that is the real issue here....or maybe a little of both?Quote from: Union89 on October 17, 2007, 08:20:34 AMFisher guys hate to be called a flash in the pan program, but then have the balls to make statements like these.
Most of these Fisher guys don't know how to handle their success.
Quote from: Union89 on October 17, 2007, 08:20:34 AMQuote from: FisherAlum05 on October 17, 2007, 01:44:51 AM
Just to back up my argument against RPI a few posts back:
Its so hard to buy into RPI. I realize they are 5-0. But the LL is weak once again this season. RPI was up only 14-0 on Utica in the 4th quarter. RPI was down 10-7 against St. Lawrence and had to rally in the 4th quarter to win that one. Look at what Alfred did to Utica and St. Lawrence. They were up 35-0 on Utica at halftime, then called off the dogs. They blew St. Lawrence out very badly.
If Hobart can beat Alfred, the LL will gain more respect in my book. This will also bode well for RPI since they beat the Statesmen.
"But the LL is weak once again this season."
Explain this one for me?? Last year, Union played the majority of the season without their #1 receiver (Angiletta) and with a very banged up #1 running back. Hobart on the other hand lost by 2 to Rowan in the 1st round. The year before, Union & Hobart both won 1st round games while RPI beat the E8's new flagship team SJF in the ECAC game.
Fisher guys hate to be called a flash in the pan program, but then have the balls to make statements like these.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 17, 2007, 10:28:33 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2007, 07:46:45 PMPG: Sorry you misunderstood my post...I was actually "taking-back" my comment about "revoking your voting rights" that was just in jest in the first place, but since Lew Dogg got defensive for you I thought I would apologize in advance...the balance of that post was not aimed at you...it was aimed at Lew Dogg....for whatever it is now worth a day laterQuote from: SJFF82 on October 16, 2007, 04:47:08 PM
BTW, PG04: I do not want your voting rights revoked...I appreciate the time it takes all the voters to analyze and vote...just have the stomach (LewDogg) to hear and process some critical responses...is not that why the poll gets published...or are we just supposed to stare at it and not comment
When did I ever get defensive about anything? I haven't been on all day! You are the one calling for people to have their votes revoked.
I thought my argument against Fisher was well thought-out. Even Soopah agreed!
As for RPI... I think they would probably be beaten by Fisher and TCNJ. However, I have no proof to say that is the case. Therefore, because of being undefeated and gliding through games, they have earned the 2 spot.
I think you are the one who needs to cool down.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) ( 4 ) | 6-0 | 85 | 1 | vs. Husson |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 2 ) | 5-0 | 78 | 2 | vs. Merchant Marine |
3 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 3 ) | 6-1 | 77 | 3 | at Springfield |
4 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) | 5-1 | 59 | 4 | vs. Western Connecticut |
5 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2007) | 5-1 | 43 | 6 | at #7 Cortland State |
6 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 4-2 | 41 | 5 | vs. St. Lawrence |
7 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 5-1 | 31 | T8 | vs. #5 Montclair State |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2007) | 4-2 | 30 | 7 | at Kean |
9 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) | 4-2 | 19 | NR | vs. Mount Ida |
10 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007) | 5-1 | 15 | 10 | at Wilkes |
Quote from: pg04 on October 18, 2007, 02:09:45 AM
Thanks, swarm.
Haven't seen you around here much before this week, but you seem to have quite the karma !
Quote from: pg04 on October 18, 2007, 02:09:45 AMNo problem, '04.
Thanks, swarm.
Haven't seen you around here much before this week, but you seem to have quite the karma !
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AM
which team this week do you think should be on upset alert, maybe hartwick or st johns fisher, or maybe even the number 1 team Alfred, Husson is an up and coming program they might give Alfred a scare
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AM
which team this week do you think should be on upset alert, maybe hartwick or st johns fisher, or maybe even the number 1 team Alfred, Husson is an up and coming program they might give Alfred a scare
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:41:59 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AM
which team this week do you think should be on upset alert, maybe hartwick or st johns fisher, or maybe even the number 1 team Alfred, Husson is an up and coming program they might give Alfred a scare
Boxer, Fisher losing to springfield is not much of an upset...springfield is still a great team no matter what their record shows
I think the mighty Saxons need to be weary...Husson will be up for it...and it is very easy to look ahead to the next 3 weeks for the mighty saxons
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 18, 2007, 02:45:39 PMPatriots no, MUC maybe... ;)Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:41:59 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AM
which team this week do you think should be on upset alert, maybe hartwick or st johns fisher, or maybe even the number 1 team Alfred, Husson is an up and coming program they might give Alfred a scare
Boxer, Fisher losing to springfield is not much of an upset...springfield is still a great team no matter what their record shows
I think the mighty Saxons need to be weary...Husson will be up for it...and it is very easy to look ahead to the next 3 weeks for the mighty saxons
How is it not an upset? I thought Fisher was taking on the Patriots in a few weeks?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 18, 2007, 02:45:39 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:41:59 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AM
which team this week do you think should be on upset alert, maybe hartwick or st johns fisher, or maybe even the number 1 team Alfred, Husson is an up and coming program they might give Alfred a scare
Boxer, Fisher losing to springfield is not much of an upset...springfield is still a great team no matter what their record shows
I think the mighty Saxons need to be weary...Husson will be up for it...and it is very easy to look ahead to the next 3 weeks for the mighty saxons
How is it not an upset? I thought Fisher was taking on the Patriots in a few weeks?
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:49:34 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 18, 2007, 02:45:39 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:41:59 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AM
which team this week do you think should be on upset alert, maybe hartwick or st johns fisher, or maybe even the number 1 team Alfred, Husson is an up and coming program they might give Alfred a scare
Boxer, Fisher losing to springfield is not much of an upset...springfield is still a great team no matter what their record shows
I think the mighty Saxons need to be weary...Husson will be up for it...and it is very easy to look ahead to the next 3 weeks for the mighty saxons
How is it not an upset? I thought Fisher was taking on the Patriots in a few weeks?
Never said it was not an upset...not as large as everyone thinks...This is only Springfield's second home game they are still a team to be reckoned with...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 18, 2007, 02:56:52 PMwhat do you think? Why dont you tell us where exactly Fisher ranks then... Tell us what you think they will do against SC...Tell us what you think they will do in the play-offs, provided they make it there... Then tell us what your predictions were for them in the '06 play-offs about this time last year so we no what kind of credibility your predictions have... Do all of this please instead of creating positions that no one is really taking just so you can justify your attitude about Fisher...Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:49:34 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 18, 2007, 02:45:39 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:41:59 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AM
which team this week do you think should be on upset alert, maybe hartwick or st johns fisher, or maybe even the number 1 team Alfred, Husson is an up and coming program they might give Alfred a scare
Boxer, Fisher losing to springfield is not much of an upset...springfield is still a great team no matter what their record shows
I think the mighty Saxons need to be weary...Husson will be up for it...and it is very easy to look ahead to the next 3 weeks for the mighty saxons
How is it not an upset? I thought Fisher was taking on the Patriots in a few weeks?
Never said it was not an upset...not as large as everyone thinks...This is only Springfield's second home game they are still a team to be reckoned with...
I thought Fisher was head and shoulders above everyone else and Hartiwck wasn't a fluke?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 18, 2007, 02:47:17 PM
Patriots no, MUC maybe... ;)
Quote from: JT on October 18, 2007, 03:42:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 18, 2007, 02:47:17 PM
Patriots no, MUC maybe... ;)
MUC's looking like they'd hang 50+ on the East Region winner at this point.
Quote from: JT on October 18, 2007, 03:42:32 PMthat is funny....that is exactly what RT said MUC would do to Fisher last year before the play-offs even started...Quote from: SJFF82 on October 18, 2007, 02:47:17 PM
Patriots no, MUC maybe... ;)
MUC's looking like they'd hang 50+ on the East Region winner at this point.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 18, 2007, 02:56:52 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:49:34 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 18, 2007, 02:45:39 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:41:59 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 18, 2007, 11:53:51 AMthe loss already makes sense...'Wick beat IC and hung with AU at AU
if they DO lose to Springfield, the loss to Hartwick makes sense.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 18, 2007, 04:35:08 PMQuote from: JT on October 18, 2007, 03:42:32 PMthat is funny....that is exactly what RT said MUC would do to Fisher last year before the play-offs even started...Quote from: SJFF82 on October 18, 2007, 02:47:17 PM
Patriots no, MUC maybe... ;)
MUC's looking like they'd hang 50+ on the East Region winner at this point.
Quote from: JT on October 18, 2007, 04:55:29 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 18, 2007, 04:35:08 PMQuote from: JT on October 18, 2007, 03:42:32 PMthat is funny....that is exactly what RT said MUC would do to Fisher last year before the play-offs even started...Quote from: SJFF82 on October 18, 2007, 02:47:17 PMCan't argue with that assessment...
Patriots no, MUC maybe... ;)
MUC's looking like they'd hang 50+ on the East Region winner at this point.
Some years Mount's the best, but beatable even though you rarely beat them. On special years they just smoke everybody. It doesn't happen all the time, but when it does look out.
Last year I thought Fisher would hang like Rowan hung in 2005. If Mount smokes Capital, hope the East goes West, and that's no bargain either, but the East would have a better shot.
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 18, 2007, 02:59:54 PM
Lew...go look up what springfield was ranked in the begining of the season, go look up who they lost too...Hartwick is better than I want to admit...but springfield still has an All-American QB...
QuoteLast year I thought Fisher would hang like Rowan hung in 2005. If Mount smokes Capital, hope the East goes West, and that's no bargain either, but the East would have a better shot.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 18, 2007, 05:39:20 PMQuoteLast year I thought Fisher would hang like Rowan hung in 2005. If Mount smokes Capital, hope the East goes West, and that's no bargain either, but the East would have a better shot.
How about this scenario?
UW-Stevens Point beats UW-Whitewater. Someone beats St. John's and Central.
UW-Whitewater beats UMHB. Wesley beats Salisbury.
North (Mount Union) and South are the higher seeded brackets. And the South's top seed is...drum roll...Muhlenberg! That's drivable for all the East region teams.
Alright, probably not going to happen, but it would give the East a much better chance of playing in the Stagg Bowl. :)
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 06:00:39 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 18, 2007, 05:39:20 PMMuch better chance? How about an automatic chance....QuoteLast year I thought Fisher would hang like Rowan hung in 2005. If Mount smokes Capital, hope the East goes West, and that's no bargain either, but the East would have a better shot.
How about this scenario?
UW-Stevens Point beats UW-Whitewater. Someone beats St. John's and Central.
UW-Whitewater beats UMHB. Wesley beats Salisbury.
North (Mount Union) and South are the higher seeded brackets. And the South's top seed is...drum roll...Muhlenberg! That's drivable for all the East region teams.
Alright, probably not going to happen, but it would give the East a much better chance of playing in the Stagg Bowl. :)
Any East team wouldnt have too much trouble getting past the offensively challenged Mules....
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 18, 2007, 06:03:33 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 06:00:39 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 18, 2007, 05:39:20 PMMuch better chance? How about an automatic chance....QuoteLast year I thought Fisher would hang like Rowan hung in 2005. If Mount smokes Capital, hope the East goes West, and that's no bargain either, but the East would have a better shot.
How about this scenario?
UW-Stevens Point beats UW-Whitewater. Someone beats St. John's and Central.
UW-Whitewater beats UMHB. Wesley beats Salisbury.
North (Mount Union) and South are the higher seeded brackets. And the South's top seed is...drum roll...Muhlenberg! That's drivable for all the East region teams.
Alright, probably not going to happen, but it would give the East a much better chance of playing in the Stagg Bowl. :)
Any East team wouldnt have too much trouble getting past the offensively challenged Mules....
Just ask TCNJ.
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 06:10:18 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 18, 2007, 06:03:33 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 06:00:39 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 18, 2007, 05:39:20 PMMuch better chance? How about an automatic chance....QuoteLast year I thought Fisher would hang like Rowan hung in 2005. If Mount smokes Capital, hope the East goes West, and that's no bargain either, but the East would have a better shot.
How about this scenario?
UW-Stevens Point beats UW-Whitewater. Someone beats St. John's and Central.
UW-Whitewater beats UMHB. Wesley beats Salisbury.
North (Mount Union) and South are the higher seeded brackets. And the South's top seed is...drum roll...Muhlenberg! That's drivable for all the East region teams.
Alright, probably not going to happen, but it would give the East a much better chance of playing in the Stagg Bowl. :)
Any East team wouldnt have too much trouble getting past the offensively challenged Mules....
Just ask TCNJ.
Come on pat we all know that TCNJ belongs in the CC....
Their offense is "offensive"....
Quote from: Union89 on October 18, 2007, 07:39:49 PM
Muhlenberg looks pretty impressive to me.....if the were in the East right now, I'd have to look at them long and hard as the current #1 seed.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 18, 2007, 06:03:33 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 06:00:39 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 18, 2007, 05:39:20 PMMuch better chance? How about an automatic chance....QuoteLast year I thought Fisher would hang like Rowan hung in 2005. If Mount smokes Capital, hope the East goes West, and that's no bargain either, but the East would have a better shot.
How about this scenario?
UW-Stevens Point beats UW-Whitewater. Someone beats St. John's and Central.
UW-Whitewater beats UMHB. Wesley beats Salisbury.
North (Mount Union) and South are the higher seeded brackets. And the South's top seed is...drum roll...Muhlenberg! That's drivable for all the East region teams.
Alright, probably not going to happen, but it would give the East a much better chance of playing in the Stagg Bowl. :)
Any East team wouldnt have too much trouble getting past the offensively challenged Mules....
Just ask TCNJ.
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 09:00:09 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 18, 2007, 07:39:49 PM
Muhlenberg looks pretty impressive to me.....if the were in the East right now, I'd have to look at them long and hard as the current #1 seed.
RPI, AU and SJF would easily handle the CC rep....
Last time the Mules came into the East, boasting the #1 D in the NCAA, they were blown out of the first round as SJF rushed for over 200yds and put up 31 pts in a 31-3 win.
Quote from: pg04 on October 18, 2007, 09:48:17 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 09:00:09 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 18, 2007, 07:39:49 PM
Muhlenberg looks pretty impressive to me.....if the were in the East right now, I'd have to look at them long and hard as the current #1 seed.
RPI, AU and SJF would easily handle the CC rep....
Last time the Mules came into the East, boasting the #1 D in the NCAA, they were blown out of the first round as SJF rushed for over 200yds and put up 31 pts in a 31-3 win.
You can't say because it happened then, it would happen now.
Quote from: phil on October 18, 2007, 06:44:52 PM
. . . if the penultimate mismatch against MUC is all this entire year is about (no matter what lucky team is the fodder in Salem) perhaps we're missing a bit of what this division is about.
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2007, 09:00:09 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 18, 2007, 07:39:49 PM
Muhlenberg looks pretty impressive to me.....if the were in the East right now, I'd have to look at them long and hard as the current #1 seed.
RPI, AU and SJF would easily handle the CC rep....
Last time the Mules came into the East, boasting the #1 D in the NCAA, they were blown out of the first round as SJF rushed for over 200yds and put up 31 pts in a 31-3 win.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 21, 2007, 07:47:33 PM
is Curry going to get any notice after their win over plymouth state... both teams were undefeated and Curry was up 42-7 at the half... i think they deserve just a little bit of consideration to be in the East top ten
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 21, 2007, 09:45:41 PM
There's precedent for Plymouth State staying home at 9-1. In 2005, three two-loss Pool C teams went ahead of 8-1 Bridgewater State and Cal Lutheran. Similarly, Monmouth stayed home at 9-1 in 2004 in favor of 8-2 Christopher Newport.
Winning percentage isn't the only thing. I think the regional rankings will show that this week.
It's not an oddity coming together, it's a non-story.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 22, 2007, 01:39:55 PM
If Plymouth State gets a Pool C at 9-1, over an 8-2 runner up from the E8 NJAC or LL, that would be crazy. Going 8-2 in these conferences is tough. I'm not bashing the NEFC, just praising the parity that exists in the big East region conferences. If Plymouth State at 9-1 got in over, say, 8-2 Fisher or 8-2 Hobart or 8-2 New Jersey or 8-2 Cortland, I would be very surprised. But not that surprised I guess since crazier things have happened.
All I know is that things are turning out to be very exciting in the East and I think it tells us just how competitive the football is in our region. We should be proud!
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 22, 2007, 02:27:47 PM
Ehh, we used to use OWP and OOWP in the past and the committee knew how to deal with teams in closed conferences. Those OOWPs almost always revert to .500 because there are little to no outside games.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 22, 2007, 02:34:20 PM
Yeah, I think I point out how the OOWP looks like baseball standings -- with very few teams outside the .425 to .575 thresholds. Plymouth State's biggest schedule anomaly is that it has a non-conference game...against Coast Guard. Love that one.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 22, 2007, 02:38:25 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 22, 2007, 02:34:20 PM
Yeah, I think I point out how the OOWP looks like baseball standings -- with very few teams outside the .425 to .575 thresholds. Plymouth State's biggest schedule anomaly is that it has a non-conference game...against Coast Guard. Love that one.
That's actually not an anomaly. All of the NEFC teams play a crossover game. Plymouth has an non-conference game, but it's against Mount Ida.
Also remember Plymouth State can only go 8-1.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 22, 2007, 07:35:34 PM
PG,
I would have done the poll. If people aren't doing it, why did they volunteer in the first place? Let me know if you need me to do it. Unless its too late. After work, D3 football and this board is basically my life. Sad, I know.
Quote from: Union89 on October 22, 2007, 07:56:01 PMQuote from: FisherAlum05 on October 22, 2007, 07:35:34 PM
PG,
I would have done the poll. If people aren't doing it, why did they volunteer in the first place? Let me know if you need me to do it. Unless its too late. After work, D3 football and this board is basically my life. Sad, I know.
Can we all relax a bit....due by 8 pm....
Quote from: Union89 on October 22, 2007, 07:56:01 PMQuote from: FisherAlum05 on October 22, 2007, 07:35:34 PM
PG,
I would have done the poll. If people aren't doing it, why did they volunteer in the first place? Let me know if you need me to do it. Unless its too late. After work, D3 football and this board is basically my life. Sad, I know.
Can we all relax a bit....due by 8 pm....
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 22, 2007, 08:04:45 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 22, 2007, 07:56:01 PMQuote from: FisherAlum05 on October 22, 2007, 07:35:34 PM
PG,
I would have done the poll. If people aren't doing it, why did they volunteer in the first place? Let me know if you need me to do it. Unless its too late. After work, D3 football and this board is basically my life. Sad, I know.
Can we all relax a bit....due by 8 pm....
Heres my top 10.....
1- The Boston Red Sox
2- Randy Moss' hands
3- Tom Brady's arm
4- The 1994 Ithaca College Football team
5- The Boston Celtics
6- Josh Beckett
7- Bill Belichick's evil brain
6- Coco Crisp's spot on the bench
7- Manny Ramirez's post-game interviews
8- The choking throats of every New York Yankee
9- Eric Mangini's defensive signals
10- Eric Gagne's last inning of his Red Sox career.....
11- My first grade teacher who taught me to count to 11......
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 22, 2007, 08:00:49 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 22, 2007, 07:56:01 PMQuote from: FisherAlum05 on October 22, 2007, 07:35:34 PM
PG,
I would have done the poll. If people aren't doing it, why did they volunteer in the first place? Let me know if you need me to do it. Unless its too late. After work, D3 football and this board is basically my life. Sad, I know.
Can we all relax a bit....due by 8 pm....
Seriously, relax. We don't need more guys ranking SJF 1, 2, AND 3.
Quote from: Union89 on October 22, 2007, 07:56:01 PMQuote from: FisherAlum05 on October 22, 2007, 07:35:34 PM
PG,
I would have done the poll. If people aren't doing it, why did they volunteer in the first place? Let me know if you need me to do it. Unless its too late. After work, D3 football and this board is basically my life. Sad, I know.
Can we all relax a bit....due by 8 pm....
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 22, 2007, 08:24:55 PM
Lew, if you would like to know how the fisher voters voted I will be happy to post our top 10...
Quote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 22, 2007, 08:48:51 PM
I am stating this for anyone who might question how I vote in my top 10...if you have a question I will be happy to post my top 10
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 22, 2007, 08:56:49 PMQuote from: Soopahmhanfifffty7 on October 22, 2007, 08:48:51 PM
I am stating this for anyone who might question how I vote in my top 10...if you have a question I will be happy to post my top 10
Never mind, Ill post it for you.......
1- Sainte joan fiesher
2- Al n' Fred
3- Arrh Pee Eye
4- Hoe-bart
5- Courtland
6- All-Bright
7- Currie
8- Roan
9- Tee See Nnn Jay
10- Ithica
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) ( 5 ) | 7-0 | 86 | 1 | at #6 Hobart |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 2 ) | 6-0 | 76 | 2 | at WPI |
St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 2 ) | 7-1 | 76 | 3 | vs. Utica | |
4 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) | 6-1 | 59 | 4 | vs. #5 Cortland State |
5 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 6-1 | 57 | 7 | at # 4 TCNJ |
6 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 5-2 | 44 | 6 | vs. #1 Alfred |
7 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007) | 6-1 | 29 | 10 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
8 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) | 5-2 | 21 | 9 | at Norwich |
9 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 8-0 | 18 | NR | at Nichols |
10 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 5-2 | 11 | NR | at Springfield |
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 22, 2007, 09:27:00 PM
Interesting poll this week, I did not think that MSU would drop all the way out.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 22, 2007, 09:27:00 PM
Interesting poll this week, I did not think that MSU would drop all the way out. I also thought that Rowan may stick around another week. I still have not been able to vote for Curry, I still feel that they would lose to MSU and Rowan on a Neutral field, hell I think they would lose to Rowan and Montclair on Curries home field. I think Curry would lose to Ithaca, Springfield, Union, Rochester, SLU, Kean, West Conn, Willy P, Widenor, Wilkes and Del Val on a neutral field.
I considered Ithaca but they haven't beaten anyone significant in my opinion and lost to the only decent teams they played. Again I thought Rowan and MSU were slightly ahead of Ithaca, not by much but slightly. I also looked at Widenor again but the stomping they took OOC, especially the loss to Rowan kept them out. I had Cortland passing RPI for 3rd in my poll based on their schedule, I think Cortland beating Montclair pushed them past RPI, but they are probably fairly even.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 22, 2007, 11:42:17 PM
knightstalker, i think your a little harsh on Curry this year...once the playoffs come i think they will prove to be a lot tougher game than you think ...im not saying they are going to win since they will most likely play the top seed in the east, but i think they are better than what your giving them credit for
Quote from: Cortland_Football on October 23, 2007, 04:11:22 AM
I've long wondered why they (the NEFC) can't get it together. I mean, they do play high school ball, right? And don't say "high academic requirements." There are plenty of schools with high academic requirements which play darn good football.
Maybe the NESCAC, and Springfield, hog all of the good D3 talent?
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 23, 2007, 11:24:20 AM
I watched some of the D3Cast between Curry and Endicott. Honestly, Curry looked pretty good to me. I don't think they are at the level of Alfred, Fisher, or RPI. But I do think they will be more competitive than in the past. We'll see in a few weeks.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 23, 2007, 08:05:24 PM
the most notable reason i believe it will be tough for the NEFC to get its first win in the NCAA is bases on thier pairings, if every year they are paired up against the number 1 seed in the east it will be alot tougher for them to get the win,
none the less in years pass the NEFC has gotten some favorable pairings and lost as Westfield did and Bridgewater to Ursinus in 1999 who got blown out 55-0 or something the next week... but if somehow this year Curry gets a favorable pairing not against a top seed like Alfred, Fisher, or RPI, i think they stand a good chance at winning one for the NEFC
Quote from: 'gro on October 23, 2007, 08:30:45 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 23, 2007, 08:05:24 PM
the most notable reason i believe it will be tough for the NEFC to get its first win in the NCAA is bases on thier pairings, if every year they are paired up against the number 1 seed in the east it will be alot tougher for them to get the win,
none the less in years pass the NEFC has gotten some favorable pairings and lost as Westfield did and Bridgewater to Ursinus in 1999 who got blown out 55-0 or something the next week... but if somehow this year Curry gets a favorable pairing not against a top seed like Alfred, Fisher, or RPI, i think they stand a good chance at winning one for the NEFC
Curry was the #4 seed in 2003, but had to play at #5 RPI and lost 34-20. Curry did put up a good showing against #1 Del Val in 2005.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 23, 2007, 08:35:50 PMIt was 28 bids from 1999 to 2004. :)Quote from: 'gro on October 23, 2007, 08:30:45 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 23, 2007, 08:05:24 PM
the most notable reason i believe it will be tough for the NEFC to get its first win in the NCAA is bases on thier pairings, if every year they are paired up against the number 1 seed in the east it will be alot tougher for them to get the win,
none the less in years pass the NEFC has gotten some favorable pairings and lost as Westfield did and Bridgewater to Ursinus in 1999 who got blown out 55-0 or something the next week... but if somehow this year Curry gets a favorable pairing not against a top seed like Alfred, Fisher, or RPI, i think they stand a good chance at winning one for the NEFC
Curry was the #4 seed in 2003, but had to play at #5 RPI and lost 34-20. Curry did put up a good showing against #1 Del Val in 2005.
Was the field 28 or 32 then?
Quote from: Stalker of the Knight
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 23, 2007, 07:23:51 AM
1) They dont have the full time or part time opportunities for coaches. So while a Cortland can spend millions of dollars on a new stadium and have 10-12 coaches that get some kind of benefit (free school, salaries, room and board), the NEFC teams dont get anything
Quote from: Cortland_Football on October 25, 2007, 12:52:38 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 23, 2007, 07:23:51 AM
1) They dont have the full time or part time opportunities for coaches. So while a Cortland can spend millions of dollars on a new stadium and have 10-12 coaches that get some kind of benefit (free school, salaries, room and board), the NEFC teams dont get anything
Trust me Jonny, Cortland cannot spend millions of dollars on anything. That was a one-time grant deal, one we are very fortunate to have gotten from the state. Cortland was chosen for its central location. You can hold everything there from the state lacrosse championships to events from the Empire and Senior Games. If Brockport or Geneseo had been dead center in the state, they would have gotten it.
As far as paying coaches goes, Cortland is very lucky to have someone like Dan MacNeill who wants to be there. I seriously doubt he is there for the money. A SUNY school cannot afford to hire top coaches or outbid a private school, so let's be realistic here. You are certainly aware of what went down with our head lacrosse coaching position recently. We couldn't afford to pay Barnes a salary which would justify his giving up a teaching job, and hence he went to LeMoyne and we started searching all over again. Can you imagine that happening at Ithaca? You win the national championship in lacrosse, and the head coach leaves because he cannot afford to give up his day job?
When I was at Cortland, and a few years later at Oneonta finishing up a dual major, there was non-stop talk about programs being cut, aid being cut, etc. SUNY schools don't have money to throw around. Never have, and never will. Or at least not for anything as trivial as athletics.
Quote from: Cortland_Football on October 25, 2007, 09:20:36 PM
It's too bad Springfield is having such a bad year. Can you imagine Springfield at Curry in round 1? That would be off the charts.
Quote from: Union89 on October 27, 2007, 05:22:28 PM
Will be interesting with Alfred losing and RPI squeeking by WPI.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2007, 10:54:44 PM
AU was ranked 1 because they had not lossed...look what happened, now why should RPI be 1 because they have not lossed...how' bout the best team being number 1.... the Red Sox
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 28, 2007, 12:58:52 AMI will not make nearly as many excuses you make for the Rockies for my spelling blunder...BTW, do the Red Sox have finger warmers, or bats with heating coils?Quote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2007, 10:54:44 PM
AU was ranked 1 because they had not lossed...look what happened, now why should RPI be 1 because they have not lossed...how' bout the best team being number 1.... the Red Sox
Lossed?
As for the Red Sox, a couple of points about the World Not-Very-Serious: First, I'd rather have seen the Red Sox play the Flying Squirrels when the Flying Squirrels were having one of the ten best streaks in Major League history, not nine days after the Flying Squirrels were having one of the ten best streaks in Major League history.
Second, baseball wasn't meant to be played in sub-40 degree weather, or in the rain for that matter. Pitchers need to have warm fingers in order to grip a dry ball securely, in order to throw a pitch with decent control. Batters need to have warm fingers, so that foul balls won't sting so much, so that they can control the bat carefully when trying to hit 90+ mph pitches. Fielders need warm fingers and a dry field, so that they can field the ball without slipping on icy turf, for example, and furthermore so that they can field and throw balls accurately.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 28, 2007, 12:58:52 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2007, 10:54:44 PM
AU was ranked 1 because they had not lossed...look what happened, now why should RPI be 1 because they have not lossed...how' bout the best team being number 1.... the Red Sox
Lossed?
As for the Red Sox, a couple of points about the World Not-Very-Serious: First, I'd rather have seen the Red Sox play the Flying Squirrels when the Flying Squirrels were having one of the ten best streaks in Major League history, not nine days after the Flying Squirrels were having one of the ten best streaks in Major League history.
Second, baseball wasn't meant to be played in sub-40 degree weather, or in the rain for that matter. Pitchers need to have warm fingers in order to grip a dry ball securely, in order to throw a pitch with decent control. Batters need to have warm fingers, so that foul balls won't sting so much, so that they can control the bat carefully when trying to hit 90+ mph pitches. Fielders need warm fingers and a dry field, so that they can field the ball without slipping on icy turf, for example, and furthermore so that they can field and throw balls accurately.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2007, 10:57:30 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 28, 2007, 12:58:52 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2007, 10:54:44 PM
AU was ranked 1 because they had not lossed...look what happened, now why should RPI be 1 because they have not lossed...how' bout the best team being number 1.... the Red Sox
Lossed?
As for the Red Sox, a couple of points about the World Not-Very-Serious: First, I'd rather have seen the Red Sox play the Flying Squirrels when the Flying Squirrels were having one of the ten best streaks in Major League history, not nine days after the Flying Squirrels were having one of the ten best streaks in Major League history.
Second, baseball wasn't meant to be played in sub-40 degree weather, or in the rain for that matter. Pitchers need to have warm fingers in order to grip a dry ball securely, in order to throw a pitch with decent control. Batters need to have warm fingers, so that foul balls won't sting so much, so that they can control the bat carefully when trying to hit 90+ mph pitches. Fielders need warm fingers and a dry field, so that they can field the ball without slipping on icy turf, for example, and furthermore so that they can field and throw balls accurately.
How about starting at a normal time so everyone and anyone can watch the games instead of being so greedy with tv revenue. Thats the major problem I see. Especially on the weekends! I mean, start the games at 6 or 7. Everyone should be home from work by then.
As for the cold weather.....I think they can suck it up for that one...
Quote from: Tags on October 28, 2007, 12:17:09 PM
I say they should shorten the ridiculously long season so they can get the series in at a reasonable date. 162 games is entirely too long.
That's one of my biggest problems with MLB, I think if you shorten the season, and to someone else's point start games at a reasonable hour, it would probably generate more interest... or at least retain what interest it does have.
Quote from: met_fan on October 28, 2007, 03:21:15 PM
Not sure what this discussion has to do with east region football. Anyway, baseball is doing just fine for itself. It sets new attendance records every year and is about to surpass the NFL in revenue generated. I agree games start too late, but the long regular season is part of what makes baseball great.
Quotegreat point UPSTATE...the later the games are the less kids get to watch the game and that is only going to hurt the MLB in future generations...They've been saying that for a generation
Quote162 games vs 16 games....Considering that the NFL was blowing MLB away in revenues just a few years ago, it's quite a turnaround
Not hard to generate more revenue....
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 28, 2007, 02:08:38 PM
The World Series was an early fall classic, not a late fall classic. Thru 1968, the World Series matched the American League winner with the National League winner, no ALCS, no NLCS, no night games, nothing else.
The season was over by October 10th, and our teachers let us keep our earpieces to our transistors going, if we got our work done while the World Series was being played in the daytime!
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 09:44:43 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 28, 2007, 02:08:38 PM
The World Series was an early fall classic, not a late fall classic. Thru 1968, the World Series matched the American League winner with the National League winner, no ALCS, no NLCS, no night games, nothing else.
The season was over by October 10th, and our teachers let us keep our earpieces to our transistors going, if we got our work done while the World Series was being played in the daytime!
First, the token East Region football throwaway: Given the previously exalted status of Al Fred (# 11 in the d3football.com poll), and the Hobart/Upstart boot-on-the-neck subduing of the Saxons, the Pumpkinheads' stock value oughta be higher than Hartwick's, don'tcha think? I mean, they have identical records, and although Hartwick beat SJFisher, they also lost to W(TF?)NEC. Hobart's 2 losses were both by less than a TD, to 6-2 Dickinson and 7-0 RPI.
Now the real meat: Ralph, you are so right. We also learned in those days who had the coolest dads, since they were the ones who were allowed to stay home from school to watch the World Series--how cool is that?
The logical reason that there is a long season in baseball is not to preserve records (that argument was lost 46 years ago, when MLBaseball put an asterisk next to Roger Maris' 61 home runs), but rather to determine with certainty which team finishes first. Now that we have Wild Card teams, finishing first isn't a requirement, so there is no need for a superlong season to filter the teams.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 29, 2007, 12:53:29 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 09:44:43 AM
The logical reason that there is a long season in baseball is not to preserve records (that argument was lost 46 years ago, when MLBaseball put an asterisk next to Roger Maris' 61 home runs), but rather to determine with certainty which team finishes first. Now that we have Wild Card teams, finishing first isn't a requirement, so there is no need for a superlong season to filter the teams.
I think records have a HUGE part as to why they keep playing the long season. And money is the other issue.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 02:38:48 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 29, 2007, 12:53:29 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 09:44:43 AM
The logical reason that there is a long season in baseball is not to preserve records (that argument was lost 46 years ago, when MLBaseball put an asterisk next to Roger Maris' 61 home runs), but rather to determine with certainty which team finishes first. Now that we have Wild Card teams, finishing first isn't a requirement, so there is no need for a superlong season to filter the teams.
I think records have a HUGE part as to why they keep playing the long season. And money is the other issue.
First, let's be realistic. It's ALL about the money, there's no other rational explanation. And that reason is a logical reason, but it places the economics ahead of athletics. The question I'm addressing is focused on the athletics: what is the logical, athletics-based justification of a long regular season?
I know that you and a lot of others think that records are a justification, but I haven't heard much of a logical explanation for the "preservation of season-long records" defense of 162 game seasons. If preserving season-long records were so important to MLBaseball, why haven't they put an asterisk next to every variation? Some examples:
- Most home runs in a strike year
- Most home runs in a season including a management lockout
If preserving season long records were so important to MLBaseball--and to its fans, why was there no criticism of steroid abusers McGwire and Sosa in 1998?
If MLBaseball wants to preserve season-long records, why do they permit interleague play? Why do they permit Wildcard teams, a playoff structure that encourages, even demands that teams and players ease up when they are leading their divisions?
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 29, 2007, 02:41:31 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 02:38:48 PM
First, let's be realistic. It's ALL about the money, there's no other rational explanation. And that reason is a logical reason, but it places the economics ahead of athletics. The question I'm addressing is focused on the athletics: what is the logical, athletics-based justification of a long regular season?
If preserving season long records were so important to MLBaseball--and to its fans, why was there no criticism of steroid abusers McGwire and Sosa in 1998?
There was no criticism of Sosa, McGwire, etc. because MLB lost SO many fans after the lockout in 1994 and canceling the World Series and everything that they needed fans badly, so they figured fans liked offense and that was the way to get it.
That home run chase brought a lot of fans (read: money) back to baseball, so Bud and the rest of his cronies turned a blind eye to who was being shot in the a$$ with a syringe full of drugs.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 03:40:23 PMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 29, 2007, 02:41:31 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 02:38:48 PM
First, let's be realistic. It's ALL about the money, there's no other rational explanation. And that reason is a logical reason, but it places the economics ahead of athletics. The question I'm addressing is focused on the athletics: what is the logical, athletics-based justification of a long regular season?
If preserving season long records were so important to MLBaseball--and to its fans, why was there no criticism of steroid abusers McGwire and Sosa in 1998?
There was no criticism of Sosa, McGwire, etc. because MLB lost SO many fans after the lockout in 1994 and canceling the World Series and everything that they needed fans badly, so they figured fans liked offense and that was the way to get it.
That home run chase brought a lot of fans (read: money) back to baseball, so Bud and the rest of his cronies turned a blind eye to who was being shot in the a$$ with a syringe full of drugs.
I agree for the most part--again, it's all about the Benjamins.
In their "defense," Bud Selig and his cronies have hardly changed their attitudes--they're still doing their best to see nothing. But there's logic behind their conscious blindness, since steroid-enhanced performance is "good for business." (I just flashed on Bud Selig as Tony Soprano--but Bud Selig is too much like Vito Spattafore to make the analogy work :D )
Technically, the 1994 and 1995 shortened seasons were due to strike, not a lockout.
Good work, Jimmy Olson of "Around the East."
Oh yeah, East Region football. Can anyone make sense of the Erratic8? If SJFisher wins out, why should anyone rank them higher than an undefeated RPI? RPI didn't lose to Hartwick, after all--although I think a case can be made that Hartwick is the most underrated team in the East.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 07:16:37 PM
Redswarm I'll tell you why RPI is not and should not be ranked ahead of Fisher...Look at their schedule. They have only beaten one good team in Hobart and if they played again right now I think Hobart would take them just like they took Alfred. RPI this year looks alot like Union did last year winning games (I'll give them credit they are winning) against weak teams by slim margins. This catches up to you towards the end of the season. We will see how RPI does in the next two weeks. They are clearly better than Rochester and are the favorite against the Dutchmen. I guess all I am saying is settle down. RPI's season starts this Saturday (with the exception of the Hobart game), lets see how they do. Higher than Fisher come on. Soon you'll be saying that RPI should be ranked in the top 20 in hockey after a tough win over Sacred Heart in OT. They got outplayed by Union last week and Union doesen't even give scholarships (aide to canadians does not equal 38,000 free rides). RPI fans always wanting to conquer the world.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 07:16:37 PM
Redswarm I'll tell you why RPI is not and should not be ranked ahead of Fisher...Look at their schedule. They have only beaten one good team in Hobart and if they played again right now I think Hobart would take them just like they took Alfred.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 07:16:37 PM
RPI this year looks alot like Union did last year winning games (I'll give them credit they are winning) against weak teams by slim margins. This catches up to you towards the end of the season.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 07:16:37 PM
We will see how RPI does in the next two weeks. They are clearly better than [5-3] Rochester and are the favorite against the [6-2] Dutchmen.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 07:16:37 PM
I guess all I am saying is settle down. RPI's season starts this Saturday (with the exception of the Hobart game), lets see how they do.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 07:16:37 PM
Higher than Fisher come on. Soon you'll be saying that RPI should be ranked in the top 20 in hockey after a tough win over Sacred Heart in OT. They got outplayed by Union last week and Union doesen't even give scholarships (aide to canadians does not equal 38,000 free rides). RPI fans always wanting to conquer the world.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 29, 2007, 08:06:29 PM
Yeah Fisher did lose a game they shouldn't have, but look at all the other games they have played....They are all blowouts. The U of R managed to keep it within 16 but Fisher vs. U of R is always a tough one, a rivalry game of sorts. Nobody else besides U of R and obviously Hartwick has been able to stay within 3 touchdowns of Fisher. Pretty sure RPI can't say the same. Butttt I'm not saying RPI is a slouch either, just think how the conversations would go if Fisher did convert that 4th and goal at Hartwick or kicked the field goal and won it in overtime. I don't think people would be questioning them at all as the number 1.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 5 ) | 8-1 | 84 | T2 | Idle |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 3 ) | 7-0 | 83 | T2 | vs. Rochester |
3 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) ( 1 ) | 7-1 | 74 | 4 | at Buffalo State |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 6-2 | 60 | 6 | at Union |
5 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 7-1 | 54 | 1 | at #7 Ithaca |
6 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007) | 7-1 | 29 | 7 | at Widener |
7 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 6-2 | 26 | 10 | vs. #5 Alfred |
8 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) | 6-2 | 24 | 8 | vs. Springfield |
9 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 9-0 | 22 | 9 | vs. Mass-Dartmouth |
10 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 6-2 | 14 | 5 | vs. Rowan |
Quote from: pg04 on October 29, 2007, 08:45:04 PM
A disturbing trend of 1 person not voting (it has not been the same person) each week continues. Hence, once again there are only 9 votes this week
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 5 ) | 8-1 | 92 | T2 | Idle |
RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 3 ) | 7-0 | 92 | T2 | vs. Rochester | |
3 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) ( 2 ) | 7-1 | 84 | 4 | at Buffalo State |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) | 6-2 | 67 | 6 | at Union |
5 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) | 7-1 | 58 | 1 | at #7 Ithaca |
6 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007) | 7-1 | 35 | 7 | at Widener |
7 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) | 6-2 | 31 | 10 | vs. #5 Alfred |
8 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) | 6-2 | 24 | 8 | vs. Springfield |
9 | Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) | 9-0 | 22 | 9 | vs. Mass-Dartmouth |
10 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) | 6-2 | 15 | 5 | vs. Rowan |
Quote from: pg04 on October 29, 2007, 10:41:06 PM
MODIFIED East Region Fan Poll - Week 9 (10/29/07)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2007) ( 5 ) 8-1 92 T2Idle RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2007) ( 3 ) 7-0 92 T2vs. Rochester 3 New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2007) ( 2 ) 7-1 84 4at Buffalo State 4 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2007) 6-2 67 6at Union 5 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2007) 7-1 58 1at #7 Ithaca 6 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2007) 7-1 35 7at Widener 7 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2007) 6-2 31 10vs. #5 Alfred 8 Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2007) 6-2 24 8vs. Springfield 9 Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2007) 9-0 22 9vs. Mass-Dartmouth 10 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2007) 6-2 15 5vs. Rowan
Other receiving votes: Union 12, Montclair State 7, Rochester 5, Middlebury 3, Widener 1
Dropped Out: None
Voting Breakdown:
Fisher (2,1,1,2,1,3,1,3,3,1)
RPI (1,2,2,1,2,2,2,1,2,3)
TCNJ (5,3,3,3,3,1,3,2,1,2)
Hobart (3,4,4,4,4,4,4,5,4,7)
Alfred (4,5,5,5,5,5,5,7,7,4)
Albright (-,7,8,7,-,6,6,4,5,10)
Ithaca (6,-,9,8,7,9,7,8,6,8)
Hartwick (-,6,6,6,8,8,8,-,-,-)
Curry (9,-,7,10,6,7,9,9,-,9)
Cortland State (10,8,-,9,9,-,-,10,10,6)
Union (-,9,10,-,-,-,10,6,8,-)
Montclair State (-,-,-,-,10,-,-,-,-,5)
Rochester (7,-,-,-,-,10,-,-,-,-)
Middlebury (8,-,-,-,-,-,-,-,-,-)
Widener (-,10,-,-,-,-,-,-,-,-)
Here it is after an interesting week in the East.
The 10th person got their vote in, so we have a complete poll, now/
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 09:23:22 PM
I still stand by that RPI should not be ahead of SJF in any poll. I think the d3 poll makes that clear with RPI still only ranked at 20 and SJF at 7. Well see what happens in the next two weeks.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 09:23:22 PM
I still stand by that RPI should not be ahead of SJF in any poll. I think the d3 poll makes that clear with RPI still only ranked at 20 and SJF at 7.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 10:54:53 PMActually, that result just suggests that the voters think that TCNJ is better than the Mules. If the Colts hand the Patriots their only loss next week does that automatically or even logically mean that the Colts are better? I certainly would understand the argument, just would not necessarily agree with it. There is no logic in ranking football teams....just opinions that are hopefully well substantiated ;)Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 09:23:22 PM
I still stand by that RPI should not be ahead of SJF in any poll. I think the d3 poll makes that clear with RPI still only ranked at 20 and SJF at 7.
That result defies logic.
Quote from: phil on October 29, 2007, 11:19:34 PMLike I said....an opinion that is well substantiated :)
Seven wins in a row for New Jersey while beating three nationally ranked teams along the way will get you noticed in the polls. They've only played one team with a losing record. Muhlenberg hasn't played a team that was nationally ranked at the time all season ? and the win against TCNJ back in August hasn't become very impressive until recently. I'd also hazard a guess that a few voters might think New Jersey has improved a bit during the last two months.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 29, 2007, 11:12:15 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2007, 10:54:53 PMThere is no logic in ranking football teams....just opinions that are hopefully well substantiated ;)Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2007, 09:23:22 PM
I still stand by that RPI should not be ahead of SJF in any poll. I think the d3 poll makes that clear with RPI still only ranked at 20 and SJF at 7.
That result defies logic.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 29, 2007, 07:54:09 PM
RedSwarm,
I haven't seen RPI play this year, but are they better than Fisher? I'm not so sure. Hopefully we will find out in 3 or 4 weeks in the NCAA tournament.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on October 29, 2007, 07:54:09 PMAlso, I'm not so sure the U of R game will be easy for RPI. They are a well coached team . . . For Fisher's sake I hope RPI wins, but U of R should give them a good game.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 30, 2007, 07:43:51 AM
I have SJF ranked ahead of RPI due to the fact that SJF in my view has played a tougher schedule. They lost to one of three teams that were off everyones radar before the season started. No one expected anything from Hartwick, TCNJ and possibly Alfred.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 30, 2007, 12:50:51 AM
I have noticed from my streaming audio experiences is that RPI can be very slow starting, and has a tendency to play to the level of its competition.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 30, 2007, 12:26:38 PM
The more I look at the east and how it has played out thus far I am really surprised. Redswarm made a good point somewhere earlier regarding SJF losing to Hartwick who lost to WNEC. When I think about this it is simply crazy how this happens. How does it happen? I know that the parity between D3 teams is maybe closer than we tend to think but how does or did Hartwick lose to WNEC adn beat SJF? I still think SJF is the top team in the region but...redswarm you made sense to me, if WNEC on anyday on earth beat SJF that means that RPI could definetly beat SJF. With a 7-0 record (again with only one quality win so far) RPI should be at #2. Yet I feel to show anyone including myself that they are a top team they must win the next two games. A loss at Rochester or Union would end the discussion of RPI being the best in the east or in my mind deserving of a pool C bid (unless it works out that they win the LL outright). Yet if they win both games in the next two weeks they must be given the consideration as number #1 in the east, they will have earned it. I hope they lose but if they win my hat will go off to them! ;)
Quote from: dlippiel on October 31, 2007, 07:42:34 AM
No, here is a hint, if you start at the beginning and finish at the end of what I wrote you will see where I am going. Come on I expect more from a fellow Union fan.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 31, 2007, 07:42:34 AM
No, here is a hint, if you start at the beginning and finish at the end of what I wrote you will see where I am going. Come on I expect more from a fellow Union fan. Gourrier or Catellier who do you start on Sat?
Quote from: Union89 on October 31, 2007, 04:36:45 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 31, 2007, 07:42:34 AM
No, here is a hint, if you start at the beginning and finish at the end of what I wrote you will see where I am going. Come on I expect more from a fellow Union fan. Gourrier or Catellier who do you start on Sat?
Good question, I think there are concerns with both, but I like Gourrier more......yourself?
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on October 31, 2007, 05:57:47 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 31, 2007, 04:36:45 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 31, 2007, 07:42:34 AM
No, here is a hint, if you start at the beginning and finish at the end of what I wrote you will see where I am going. Come on I expect more from a fellow Union fan. Gourrier or Catellier who do you start on Sat?
Good question, I think there are concerns with both, but I like Gourrier more......yourself?
I think Gourrier will have success if he can run. Bart had a tough time containing 2 running QBs earlier in the year (Dickinson and CMU's). Seems like the Hobart D has improved their rush defense, but AU's Hendrix's did rush for about 135 last week (albeit 46 of those yards came on 1 play about a minute into the game).
I think if Gourrier is forced to beat Hobart with his arm, Union is in trouble. Bart has a strong defensive secondary (basically all experienced seniors with a knack for getting INTs) and Gourrier struggled passing (only 100 or so yards and 2 INTs) against a SLU passing defense that ranks 6th in the LL.
Quote from: the_silly_goat on November 03, 2007, 02:00:13 AMu drunks?!
u sucks
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on November 03, 2007, 06:44:09 PM
Congrats to TCNJ on winning the NJAC and the AQ. Got my #1 vote.
Quote from: ClarkKentCan'tSpell57 on November 03, 2007, 07:24:23 PM
how can wick be above alfred...when wick got smacked around by the saxons
QuoteStill not too impressed with what has gone on within the NJAC this year.
Quote from: phil on November 03, 2007, 07:29:26 PMQuoteStill not too impressed with what has gone on within the NJAC this year.
Why? Because Rowan isn't at the top leaving everybody wondering who's number two in the East?
TCNJ is a great story this year after being picked to finish next to last in the NJAC. Rowan, despite their worst record in anyone's memory, still did a number on Widener. Then there was Montclair's victory at Wesley...
I'm not assuming TCNJ is a match for MUC or Whitewater — but I wouldn't discount the NJAC when compared to the other eastern conferences.
Quote from: Cortland_Football on November 03, 2007, 07:54:57 PM
You guys are selectively comparing scores. Here are some other interesting selective scores:
Rowan 41 Widener 0
Western New England 48 Hartwick 21
Hartwick 17 Norwich 13
Brockport 21 Springfield 20
William Paterson 17 Wilkes 16
So I'm not sold on the Empire 8, particularly the potential champion to be, Hartwick. And I'm not sold on the MAC winner being any better than the NEFC winner this season. Don't forget Widener also lost convincingly to Wesley, who lost to Montclair (the 3rd place team in the NJAC).
Quote from: phil on November 03, 2007, 08:04:31 PM
Buffalo St. stayed close to TCNJ because TCNJ turned the ball over 4 times in the first half and still got away with a 7-0 lead — before dropping 20 on Buff St. in the 3rd Q. The Lions went into the game at +8 in the turnover department. It takes a decent team to lay a stinker like that on the road and still win by two TD's. TCNJ isn't going to blow people away with their offense. It's strictly ball control, field position and leave it up to the defense. This team won't play well from behind.
I actually wasn't inferring that the NJAC was the superior conference. I just took away from your post that you thought the NJAC might be a notch or two below the other eastern conferences this season — which I don't believe is the case.
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on November 03, 2007, 09:06:09 PM
In general I think the East Region is showing parity across the board. Any given Saturday and pretty much any top team from the LL, E8, NJAC, MAC, etc could beat the other.
Makes the playoff prospects very interesting. Unfortunately I don't see the East Region Champ hanging with anyone once the Regionals or Semis roll around. I think that Wesley (MSU loss not withstanding) and/or Muhlenberg from the CC would still be favored by a TD if not 10 pts against any of the LL, E8, NJAC, or MAC champs. It's just one of those years.
I am still not buying SJF as a "Tier 1". Of course the 2 TD win at IC is impressive, but the loss to Wick shows that this year's SJF squad is not on the same level as the 2006 team. Robinson was once in 20 yrs type of players and even with a lot of returning starters, losing him does make SJF a little less extraordinary.
At this stage I'd lump everyone except for TCNJ in Tier 2. The fact that they've wrapped up the NJAC with a week to play is impressive no matter how you slice it. The contenders in the LL and E8 races should be so lucky.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 09:10:28 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on November 03, 2007, 09:06:09 PM
In general I think the East Region is showing parity across the board. Any given Saturday and pretty much any top team from the LL, E8, NJAC, MAC, etc could beat the other.
Makes the playoff prospects very interesting. Unfortunately I don't see the East Region Champ hanging with anyone once the Regionals or Semis roll around. I think that Wesley (MSU loss not withstanding) and/or Muhlenberg from the CC would still be favored by a TD if not 10 pts against any of the LL, E8, NJAC, or MAC champs. It's just one of those years.
I am still not buying SJF as a "Tier 1". Of course the 2 TD win at IC is impressive, but the loss to Wick shows that this year's SJF squad is not on the same level as the 2006 team. Robinson was once in 20 yrs type of players and even with a lot of returning starters, losing him does make SJF a little less extraordinary.
At this stage I'd lump everyone except for TCNJ in Tier 2. The fact that they've wrapped up the NJAC with a week to play is impressive no matter how you slice it. The contenders in the LL and E8 races should be so lucky.
Yea but if you put 2 points the other way (sjf/wick), we would still be talking about SJF being one of the best teams in the country right now. TCNJ has a loss too, as well as 6 close games to all sorts of teams....
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on November 03, 2007, 09:14:55 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 09:10:28 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on November 03, 2007, 09:06:09 PM
In general I think the East Region is showing parity across the board. Any given Saturday and pretty much any top team from the LL, E8, NJAC, MAC, etc could beat the other.
Makes the playoff prospects very interesting. Unfortunately I don't see the East Region Champ hanging with anyone once the Regionals or Semis roll around. I think that Wesley (MSU loss not withstanding) and/or Muhlenberg from the CC would still be favored by a TD if not 10 pts against any of the LL, E8, NJAC, or MAC champs. It's just one of those years.
I am still not buying SJF as a "Tier 1". Of course the 2 TD win at IC is impressive, but the loss to Wick shows that this year's SJF squad is not on the same level as the 2006 team. Robinson was once in 20 yrs type of players and even with a lot of returning starters, losing him does make SJF a little less extraordinary.
At this stage I'd lump everyone except for TCNJ in Tier 2. The fact that they've wrapped up the NJAC with a week to play is impressive no matter how you slice it. The contenders in the LL and E8 races should be so lucky.
Yea but if you put 2 points the other way (sjf/wick), we would still be talking about SJF being one of the best teams in the country right now. TCNJ has a loss too, as well as 6 close games to all sorts of teams....
True to an extent, but even if they didn't lose to Wick I still wouldn't be on the SJF wagon. Don't get me wrong, I think the Cardinals are a very good team, but one of the best the country? Not this season. Losing Robinson was huge. I never believed the #5 ranking in the preseason and still don't believe the SJF hype. Maybe they will prove me wrong, but until then I will remain a skeptic.
Quote from: The Great Pumpkin on November 03, 2007, 09:14:55 PMI think that there are over 300 D3 teams in the country...how many do you think are better than SJF? Nonetheless I do agree with what I believe to be your overall point that they are not as good as last year. Bottom line is that they are still the consensus choice to represent the East in the final 4...Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 09:10:28 PMQuote from: The Great Pumpkin on November 03, 2007, 09:06:09 PM
In general I think the East Region is showing parity across the board. Any given Saturday and pretty much any top team from the LL, E8, NJAC, MAC, etc could beat the other.
Makes the playoff prospects very interesting. Unfortunately I don't see the East Region Champ hanging with anyone once the Regionals or Semis roll around. I think that Wesley (MSU loss not withstanding) and/or Muhlenberg from the CC would still be favored by a TD if not 10 pts against any of the LL, E8, NJAC, or MAC champs. It's just one of those years.
I am still not buying SJF as a "Tier 1". Of course the 2 TD win at IC is impressive, but the loss to Wick shows that this year's SJF squad is not on the same level as the 2006 team. Robinson was once in 20 yrs type of players and even with a lot of returning starters, losing him does make SJF a little less extraordinary.
At this stage I'd lump everyone except for TCNJ in Tier 2. The fact that they've wrapped up the NJAC with a week to play is impressive no matter how you slice it. The contenders in the LL and E8 races should be so lucky.
Yea but if you put 2 points the other way (sjf/wick), we would still be talking about SJF being one of the best teams in the country right now. TCNJ has a loss too, as well as 6 close games to all sorts of teams....
True to an extent, but even if they didn't lose to Wick I still wouldn't be on the SJF wagon. Don't get me wrong, I think the Cardinals are a very good team, but one of the best the country? Not this season. Losing Robinson was huge. I never believed the #5 ranking in the preseason and still don't believe the SJF hype. Maybe they will prove me wrong, but until then I will remain a skeptic.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 08:00:56 PM
Yea but I dont think anyone is saying that Hartwick is the best team in the league. In fact, if you took a poll, Im sure most people would say Hartwick is the 4th best team in the league ahead of 5th best Springfield.
Quote from: Cortland_Football on November 04, 2007, 01:37:53 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 08:00:56 PM
Yea but I dont think anyone is saying that Hartwick is the best team in the league. In fact, if you took a poll, Im sure most people would say Hartwick is the 4th best team in the league ahead of 5th best Springfield.
I have a hard time resolving that, since they beat SJF and Ithaca head-to-head. Also, I think Ithaca is playing a lot better now than they were at the beginning of the year. I'm not sure Fisher could win convincingly at Butterfield in Week 11.
I really have no feel for how this is going to play out Jonny. My guess is Cortland gets left out even if they win Cortaca, because the TCNJ loss was so convincing, and the Brockport loss is rather ugly in retrospect. I haven't seen quite this much parity in the East in a long time. In some ways, that is not a good thing. Because there may not be a team good enough to win out of region once we hit the semi finals.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 04, 2007, 04:28:08 PMQuote from: Cortland_Football on November 04, 2007, 01:37:53 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 08:00:56 PMIt's not what people think, its what happens on the field. Wick beat IC: Wick beat SJF: Wick beat SC: - only loss on the to AU after a killer early schedule. Wick deserves to be the E8 champ or co-champ. It is not a fluke - give them some well earned respect.
Yea but I dont think anyone is saying that Hartwick is the best team in the league. In fact, if you took a poll, Im sure most people would say Hartwick is the 4th best team in the league ahead of 5th best Springfield.
By the way, I would not want to play them in the playoffs. Ask IC or SJF.
I have a hard time resolving that, since they beat SJF and Ithaca head-to-head. Also, I think Ithaca is playing a lot better now than they were at the beginning of the year. I'm not sure Fisher could win convincingly at Butterfield in Week 11.
I really have no feel for how this is going to play out Jonny. My guess is Cortland gets left out even if they win Cortaca, because the TCNJ loss was so convincing, and the Brockport loss is rather ugly in retrospect. I haven't seen quite this much parity in the East in a long time. In some ways, that is not a good thing. Because there may not be a team good enough to win out of region once we hit the semi finals.
Yea I think Cortland or Ithaca needs to blow out each other in order for either to make it. Utica beating Hartwick seems like the biggest help IC could get.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 04, 2007, 04:28:08 PMQuote from: Cortland_Football on November 04, 2007, 01:37:53 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 08:00:56 PM
Yea but I dont think anyone is saying that Hartwick is the best team in the league. In fact, if you took a poll, Im sure most people would say Hartwick is the 4th best team in the league ahead of 5th best Springfield.
I have a hard time resolving that, since they beat SJF and Ithaca head-to-head. Also, I think Ithaca is playing a lot better now than they were at the beginning of the year. I'm not sure Fisher could win convincingly at Butterfield in Week 11.
I really have no feel for how this is going to play out Jonny. My guess is Cortland gets left out even if they win Cortaca, because the TCNJ loss was so convincing, and the Brockport loss is rather ugly in retrospect. I haven't seen quite this much parity in the East in a long time. In some ways, that is not a good thing. Because there may not be a team good enough to win out of region once we hit the semi finals.
Yea I think Cortland or Ithaca needs to blow out each other in order for either to make it. Utica beating Hartwick seems like the biggest help IC could get.
Quote from: mpf1975 on November 04, 2007, 07:56:46 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 04, 2007, 04:28:08 PMQuote from: Cortland_Football on November 04, 2007, 01:37:53 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 08:00:56 PMIt's not what people think, its what happens on the field. Wick beat IC: Wick beat SJF: Wick beat SC: - only loss on the to AU after a killer early schedule. Wick deserves to be the E8 champ or co-champ. It is not a fluke - give them some well earned respect.
Yea but I dont think anyone is saying that Hartwick is the best team in the league. In fact, if you took a poll, Im sure most people would say Hartwick is the 4th best team in the league ahead of 5th best Springfield.
By the way, I would not want to play them in the playoffs. Ask IC or SJF.
I have a hard time resolving that, since they beat SJF and Ithaca head-to-head. Also, I think Ithaca is playing a lot better now than they were at the beginning of the year. I'm not sure Fisher could win convincingly at Butterfield in Week 11.
I really have no feel for how this is going to play out Jonny. My guess is Cortland gets left out even if they win Cortaca, because the TCNJ loss was so convincing, and the Brockport loss is rather ugly in retrospect. I haven't seen quite this much parity in the East in a long time. In some ways, that is not a good thing. Because there may not be a team good enough to win out of region once we hit the semi finals.
Yea I think Cortland or Ithaca needs to blow out each other in order for either to make it. Utica beating Hartwick seems like the biggest help IC could get.
Quote from: Cortland_Football on November 04, 2007, 01:37:53 PMI agree...I have posted this same position on E8 board. I do not see a 'Rowanesque' power this year that can compete at the national level. The East's only hope is that a strong SJF, TCNJ, RPI, or the like takes the monentum of 3 straight play-off victories and turns it into an upset win over a Whitewater or MUC, etc...Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 03, 2007, 08:00:56 PM
Yea but I dont think anyone is saying that Hartwick is the best team in the league. In fact, if you took a poll, Im sure most people would say Hartwick is the 4th best team in the league ahead of 5th best Springfield.
I haven't seen quite this much parity in the East in a long time. In some ways, that is not a good thing. Because there may not be a team good enough to win out of region once we hit the semi finals.
Quote from: FisherAlum05 on November 05, 2007, 07:45:21 PM
Hopefully the East Region champ can meet the South or West champ in the semi-finals. That would give us a better chance to meet Mount Union in the Stagg Bowl. Cause I don't think anybody from the East can beat Mount this season. BUT I hope I'm wrong!
Quote from: pg04 on November 06, 2007, 09:51:40 PM
Been a bad week or so... Don't have the time, or the resources (i.e. my previous files which are on the defunct computer) to make this look pretty right now, but here is the non-pretty version of the poll...without the stuff like last week's ranking and who they play this week...To boot, only 9 polls again this week.
East Region Fan Poll:
1 Fisher (6) 87
2 TCNJ (3) 83
3 Hobart 69
4 RPI 57
5 Ithaca 42
6 Hartwick 35
7 Cortland State 25
8 Alfred 22
9 Curry 19
10 Widener 17
Others Receiving Votes: Rochester 12, Union 12, Montclair State 11
Quote from: pg04 on November 06, 2007, 09:51:40 PMInteresting: 'Wick is behind the 2 'big' teams it beat (SJF and IC), but ahead of AU who they lost to fairly handily...
Been a bad week or so... Don't have the time, or the resources (i.e. my previous files which are on the defunct computer) to make this look pretty right now, but here is the non-pretty version of the poll...without the stuff like last week's ranking and who they play this week...To boot, only 9 polls again this week.
East Region Fan Poll:
1 Fisher (6) 87
2 TCNJ (3) 83
3 Hobart 69
4 RPI 57
5 Ithaca 42
6 Hartwick 35
7 Cortland State 25
8 Alfred 22
9 Curry 19
10 Widener 17
Others Receiving Votes: Rochester 12, Union 12, Montclair State 11
Quote from: pg04 on November 06, 2007, 09:51:40 PM
Been a bad week or so... Don't have the time, or the resources (i.e. my previous files which are on the defunct computer) to make this look pretty right now, but here is the non-pretty version of the poll...without the stuff like last week's ranking and who they play this week...To boot, only 9 polls again this week.
East Region Fan Poll:
1 Fisher (6) 87
2 TCNJ (3) 83
3 Hobart 69
4 RPI 57
5 Ithaca 42
6 Hartwick 35
7 Cortland State 25
8 Alfred 22
9 Curry 19
10 Widener 17
Others Receiving Votes: Rochester 12, Union 12, Montclair State 11
Quote from: pg04 on August 24, 2008, 12:29:18 PM
OK, I'm going to want get a poll out by next weekend but to get to my goal of 10 people I need 1 more. I have 10 people but 2 are from the same school.
A Breakdown of schools represented so far is as follows:
Hartwick
RPI
Brockport
Alfred
Hobart
Union
Utica
Unaffiliated
Fisher (2)
As one can see we are a little short on the NJAC. If we could get 1 more in that conference, or if someone from the NEFC actually exists (or the MAC for that matter!) and wants to join that would be even better.. The MAC and NEFC are not represented at all and creates a balance issue However, it's tough with lower post participation in those conferences.
Quote from: pg04 on August 30, 2008, 11:41:23 AM
4 are in so far, including mine. Should be some close races for positions...
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) ( 6 ) | 0-0 | 96 | NA | vs. Lycoming |
2 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) ( 4 ) | 0-0 | 94 | NA | at Mount Union |
3 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) | 0-0 | 75 | NA | at Morrisville State |
4 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) | 0-0 | 63 | NA | Open Date |
5 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 0-0 | 46 | NA | Open Date |
6 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 0-0 | 44 | NA | Open Date |
7 | New Jersey (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=New+Jersey&year=2008) | 0-0 | 26 | NA | at FDU-Florham |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 0-0 | 23 | NA | at Bridgewater State |
9 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 0-0 | 19 | NA | vs. Salisbury |
10 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) | 0-0 | 18 | NA | vs. Iona |
Quote from: superman57 on September 01, 2008, 12:49:07 AM
Ok well I am gonna state the obvious, I have an issue not putting fisher 1...until the prove that their not the #1 team in the region, I will put them #1
Quote from: superman57 on September 01, 2008, 12:49:07 AM
Ok well I am gonna state the obvious, I have an issue not putting fisher 1...until the prove that their not the #1 team in the region, I will put them #1
Quote from: phil on September 01, 2008, 11:09:20 AM
Rams
I would have a hard time creating a top ten without TCNJ when all they did was go 4-0 against teams 3,4,5 and 8 in the poll last year. While I would expect the poll to be shaken out within the first few weeks of play, you should at least give some respect based on the previous season — especially with the 30-0 beating of Cortland. Rowan seems to get plenty of respect based on past performance. I would expect the same for TCNJ — at least for a week or two!
Quote from: phil on September 01, 2008, 11:09:20 AM
Rams
I would have a hard time creating a top ten without TCNJ when all they did was go 4-0 against teams 3,4,5 and 8 in the poll last year. While I would expect the poll to be shaken out within the first few weeks of play, you should at least give some respect based on the previous season — especially with the 30-0 beating of Cortland. Rowan seems to get plenty of respect based on past performance. I would expect the same for TCNJ — at least for a week or two!
Quote from: Cortland_Football on September 02, 2008, 05:29:56 AM
No sense in getting worked up about preseason polls. Especially highly unofficial preseason polls from unstable individuals. :P
Last season TCNJ wasn't on a single radar, including Phil's, and they almost made it to the Regional final. I also remember Kean being a favorite choice for a break through season. None of this means anything. Let's digest a few weeks of games before we start arguing over the polls.
Quote from: pg04 on September 07, 2008, 05:48:04 PM
Should be interesting... 4 more people need to send their's in but I can tell this week has caused some uncertainty for sure... Should be interesting to see who ends up #1!
Quote from: TGP on September 08, 2008, 01:18:01 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 07, 2008, 05:48:04 PM
Should be interesting... 4 more people need to send their's in but I can tell this week has caused some uncertainty for sure... Should be interesting to see who ends up #1!
it's after 1 PM est and no poll?
Quote from: TGP on September 08, 2008, 01:18:01 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 07, 2008, 05:48:04 PM
Should be interesting... 4 more people need to send their's in but I can tell this week has caused some uncertainty for sure... Should be interesting to see who ends up #1!
it's after 1 PM est and no poll?
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) ( 4 ) | 1-0 | 93 | 1 | at King's |
2 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) ( 3 ) | 0-1 | 87 | 2 | vs. Buffalo State |
3 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 2 ) | 1-0 | 81 | 3 | Open Date |
4 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 0-0 | 68 | 4 | at Endicott |
5 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 0-0 | 55 | 6 | vs. Dickinson |
6 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 0-0 | 52 | 5 | vs. Wilkes |
7 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 1-0 | 28 | 8 | Open Date |
Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 1-0 | 28 | NR | Open Date | |
9 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 0-1 | 26 | 9 | at Western Connecticut |
10 | Widener (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Widener&year=2008) | 0-0 | 12 | NR | vs. North Carolina Wesleyan |
Quote from: SJFF82 a/k/a "Chad Ocho Dos" on September 09, 2008, 04:29:57 PM
I think 'Wick is going to rise again as well. They will be tested on the road this year, but their offense is not a fluke.
IC by1 at home overtakes SJF who loses by a relatively modest 30 at MUC...OK fine for now...just trying to rile things up around these desolate boards ;D
Quote from: TGP on September 09, 2008, 04:38:00 PMQuote from: SJFF82 a/k/a "Chad Ocho Dos" on September 09, 2008, 04:29:57 PM
I think 'Wick is going to rise again as well. They will be tested on the road this year, but their offense is not a fluke.
IC by1 at home overtakes SJF who loses by a relatively modest 30 at MUC...OK fine for now...just trying to rile things up around these desolate boards ;D
Personally I think MUC called off the dogs in last week (showed class in doing so IMO).
Kmic was pretty rushing untouched and MUC could have scored again b/f the end of the first half but called a bunch of passes instead.
Regardless, the general impression is that the East is not up to snuff in comparison to our mid-west counterparts. Still, the region will be entertaining to us as usual.
Quote from: SJFF82 a/k/a "Chad Ocho Dos" on September 09, 2008, 04:53:04 PM
Huh? I was at the game and MUC hardly called off any dogs at any point. They did finally bring in second string offense late in 4th Q, and the back-up QB promptly launched a deep pass down the middle that was a good tackle away from 6 more.
I cannot believe that you think that Larry K. actually tried not to score at the end of the first half only up by 20. Now granted, no team has probably ever overcome a 3 score deficit against Mount (has MUC ever even lost a game before?) but I am pretty confident that LK takes nothing for granted, especially in the first half. Besides, you note the passing as the evidence of stalling at the end of the first half. Not so....MUC was in the air with success as much if not more than on the ground in the first half. If they wanted to sit on it, they could have and taken a knee.
In any event, I didnt want to get into justifying the result. I have already posted that SJF was dominated. I also posted that the score could have been much closer (despite the statistical and actual domination) as even some MUC fans that I attended the game with agreed.Quote from: TGP on September 09, 2008, 04:38:00 PMQuote from: SJFF82 a/k/a "Chad Ocho Dos" on September 09, 2008, 04:29:57 PM
I think 'Wick is going to rise again as well. They will be tested on the road this year, but their offense is not a fluke.
IC by1 at home overtakes SJF who loses by a relatively modest 30 at MUC...OK fine for now...just trying to rile things up around these desolate boards ;D
Personally I think MUC called off the dogs in last week (showed class in doing so IMO).
Kmic was pretty rushing untouched and MUC could have scored again b/f the end of the first half but called a bunch of passes instead.
Regardless, the general impression is that the East is not up to snuff in comparison to our mid-west counterparts. Still, the region will be entertaining to us as usual.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 09, 2008, 05:13:44 PMI guess they are somewhere in between. There is no question that they had no chance of winning. It is just that it was 20-0 at the half, yet they were just 3 plays from being 0-0. One incredible 3 and long scramble by Micheli that led to score 1, 1 fumble by Bailey (SJF QB) deep in own zone and pick six with 1 min to go.
I was hoping deep down that SJF would have kept the score closer and had a better showing. It is good to hear that at least they "could have" kept it closer. I am waiting for the day when the East will rise to be taken very seriously on a yearly basis when it comes to competing for a national title. Did SJF look outclassed or respectable overall? Or maybe somewhere in between? It seems as if some of you were there. It just really would be nice for the east to finally be able to play with the big dogs.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 09, 2008, 02:00:19 PM
I agree ... Bridewater is a good NEFC team but Rowan didnt look all that impressive... also i believe the team in the NEFC who should be getting votes in the poll is not Curry but should be Plymouth State who had an impressive win against St. Anselm a Div. 2 school... but i understand the logic in some people selecting Curry because of their dominance over the conference the past 5 years.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 13, 2008, 06:49:55 PMIve seen these guys practice (mt ida). They arent notre dame, but they have some talent there.........Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 09, 2008, 02:00:19 PM
I agree ... Bridewater is a good NEFC team but Rowan didnt look all that impressive... also i believe the team in the NEFC who should be getting votes in the poll is not Curry but should be Plymouth State who had an impressive win against St. Anselm a Div. 2 school... but i understand the logic in some people selecting Curry because of their dominance over the conference the past 5 years.
Woops....
Plymouth State 7 Mount Ida 24
Quote from: superman57 on September 14, 2008, 01:00:02 AM
to me this is tough... who do you put at #1 Ithaca is 2-0 but has not yet been impressive against average opponents , and Fisher is 1-1 but lacked the ability to put Buff State away....
and did auburn REALLY only beat Miss State 3-2.... are we playing hockey
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2008, 11:18:11 AM
-Mt. Ida should win the national championship this year.
Quote from: superman57 on September 14, 2008, 01:00:02 AM
to me this is tough... who do you put at #1 Ithaca is 2-0 but has not yet been impressive against average opponents , and Fisher is 1-1 but lacked the ability to put Buff State away....
and did auburn REALLY only beat Miss State 3-2.... are we playing hockey
Quote from: pg04 on September 14, 2008, 10:16:55 PM
I have to say, some people's polls shock me a little bit...I won't elaborate quite yet since not all are in. It looks like the poll won't be out until tomorrow.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) ( 5 ) | 2-0 | 93 | 1 | vs. #8 Hartwick |
2 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) ( 2 ) | 1-1 | 85 | 2 | at Rochester |
3 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 1-0 | 74 | 3 | at #9 Rowan |
4 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 1-0 | 72 | 4 | at Utica |
5 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 1-0 | 53 | 5 | at Carnegie Mellon |
6 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 1-1 | 47 | NR | Open Date |
7 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 1-0 | 43 | 6 | at Morrisville State |
8 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 1-0 | 23 | T7 | at #1 Ithaca |
9 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 1-0 | 20 | T7 | at #3 Cortland State |
10 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 1-1 | 16 | 9 | vs. Shenandoah |
Quote from: dlippiel on September 15, 2008, 06:03:39 PM
Not to sound stupid but what is the deal with the east region poll? I have been around the site for years now but only on PP (mostly LLPP) since the end of last year. Any way to get involved in the east poll situation? I would love to! I don't pretend to be the most knowledgable d3 fan but I am learning and usually am quite rational. I have watched D3 football for over 20 years and have been an avid spectator for at least 12. I feel like this is an interview...? Anyway I would love to contribute and be a part :)
Quote from: superman57 on September 16, 2008, 12:10:31 AM
I voted for Norwich at 10... frankly because they beat mt. ida who beat Plymouth state and they smoked the Larries... so I thought I would give them a bone at 10
Quote from: rams1102 on September 16, 2008, 07:33:26 AM
Dan : I hope your sense of smell is way off. ;D
Quote from: DanPadavona on September 16, 2008, 07:11:51 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 16, 2008, 07:33:26 AM
Dan : I hope your sense of smell is way off. ;D
It wouldn't be the first time Dave. ;)
Quote from: dlippiel on September 21, 2008, 07:54:13 PM
I agree upstate I think Ithaca should be #1 and Cortland at #2. Although I think Cortland has some work to do on D. I don't know what exactly to say about SJF. I know the courage bowl is a rivaly and during rivalry games anything can happen but...If they can't beat up on Rochester I do not think they will be making it out of the first round of the NCAA's again. At this point I really think IC is the clear favortie in the E8. Granted I could be mistaken because I have not seen SJF play in person yet this year. It is going to be an interesting year here in the east.
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 21, 2008, 08:04:29 PM
I work Sunday nights. Sorry for the lateness, but my poll is in.
If Ithaca doesn't have all 10 first place votes in the poll, I will be very surprised.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2008, 08:39:08 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 21, 2008, 07:54:13 PM
I agree upstate I think Ithaca should be #1 and Cortland at #2. Although I think Cortland has some work to do on D. I don't know what exactly to say about SJF. I know the courage bowl is a rivaly and during rivalry games anything can happen but...If they can't beat up on Rochester I do not think they will be making it out of the first round of the NCAA's again. At this point I really think IC is the clear favortie in the E8. Granted I could be mistaken because I have not seen SJF play in person yet this year. It is going to be an interesting year here in the east.
U of R has been within a touchdown in the 4th quarter against Fisher each of the past 3 years, this was just the first time Fisher didn't put it away, although they had their chances. So I wouldn't use the fact that it was a close game as a barometer for Fisher.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 22, 2008, 07:21:38 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2008, 08:39:08 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 21, 2008, 07:54:13 PM
I agree upstate I think Ithaca should be #1 and Cortland at #2. Although I think Cortland has some work to do on D. I don't know what exactly to say about SJF. I know the courage bowl is a rivaly and during rivalry games anything can happen but...If they can't beat up on Rochester I do not think they will be making it out of the first round of the NCAA's again. At this point I really think IC is the clear favortie in the E8. Granted I could be mistaken because I have not seen SJF play in person yet this year. It is going to be an interesting year here in the east.
U of R has been within a touchdown in the 4th quarter against Fisher each of the past 3 years, this was just the first time Fisher didn't put it away, although they had their chances. So I wouldn't use the fact that it was a close game as a barometer for Fisher.
Why not? My point exactly, in the past Fisher has put them and other teams away, this year they are not. Hence they do not deserve to be in the top 2.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 22, 2008, 07:45:53 PM
Yes I agree on this weekend though, the game will tell us a lot about Ithaca.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) ( 8 ) | 3-0 | 98 | 1 | vs. #3 St. John Fisher |
2 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 2-0 | 82 | 3 | at #10 Kean |
3 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) | 2-1 | 81 | 2 | at #1 Ithaca |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 2-0 | 64 | 5 | vs. Susquehanna |
5 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 2-0 | 62 | 4 | vs. WPI |
6 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) | 1-1 | 48 | 6 | vs. Salisbury |
7 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 2-0 | 41 | 7 | vs. Brockport State |
8 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 2-1 | 26 | 10 | open date |
9 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 1-1 | 13 | 9 | vs. William Paterson |
10 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2008) | 2-0 | 11 | NR | vs. #2 Cortland State |
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2008, 10:08:11 PM
Although the ordering didn't change in my ballot, I can see that the Rowan win would seem "more impressive" based on comparing Rowan and Rochester. The points are so close that one poll would change it the other way, and that's basically what happened.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 22, 2008, 10:12:56 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2008, 10:08:11 PM
Although the ordering didn't change in my ballot, I can see that the Rowan win would seem "more impressive" based on comparing Rowan and Rochester. The points are so close that one poll would change it the other way, and that's basically what happened.
I dont see how you could possible vote Cortland over Ithaca. Its clear that Rowan is not a power anymore (toughing it out with an average NEFC team) and the other win is against a newer program....
And RPI battling with Utica would also stop me from putting them in the top spot.
ah well.....
Quote from: superman57 on September 22, 2008, 10:12:06 PM
My biggest thing is I can't see voting RPI 1.... they struggled with UTICA!!!!!!!
Quote from: Caz Bombers on September 22, 2008, 10:31:43 PMQuote from: superman57 on September 22, 2008, 10:12:06 PM
My biggest thing is I can't see voting RPI 1.... they struggled with UTICA!!!!!!!
Agree, supah. Also, I bet it's difficult for the fan poll voters to get their minds around the concept that Rowan isn't "Rowan" anymore - I know it is for me. Are Del Val and maybe Kean too low? DVC beating newjack superpower Wesley stunned me. Does the poll have a subconscious upstate bias?
Quote from: Caz Bombers on September 22, 2008, 10:31:43 PMnewjack superpower Wesley
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 22, 2008, 10:25:01 PM
It's easy to figure out JU.
RPI voter = hater
Cortland voter = C-State alum that is confused by the concept of a top ten list and attempted to rank it IC, Cortland, et al. PG needs to account for these things...
Quote from: DanPadavona on September 22, 2008, 11:37:38 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 22, 2008, 10:25:01 PM
It's easy to figure out JU.
RPI voter = hater
Cortland voter = C-State alum that is confused by the concept of a top ten list and attempted to rank it IC, Cortland, et al. PG needs to account for these things...
Thanks for the vote of confidence Jose. I ranked IC #1.
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2008, 10:37:37 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on September 22, 2008, 10:31:43 PMQuote from: superman57 on September 22, 2008, 10:12:06 PM
My biggest thing is I can't see voting RPI 1.... they struggled with UTICA!!!!!!!
Agree, supah. Also, I bet it's difficult for the fan poll voters to get their minds around the concept that Rowan isn't "Rowan" anymore - I know it is for me. Are Del Val and maybe Kean too low? DVC beating newjack superpower Wesley stunned me. Does the poll have a subconscious upstate bias?
I think the biggest snub is Delaware Valley...
2 Voters don't even have Del Val in the poll. That definitely confuses me. I have them 4th. They could even be highter.
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 23, 2008, 07:41:46 AM
I didn't give Del Val a vote yet. They were not in my preseason top 10, most teams have still only played 2 games and I really don't have enough to go on yet. Del Val beat a 1-AA team but it was Iona and they are 1-AA in name only. MSU used to beat them yearly, they are on a par with the middle of the pack East region D-III teams, to me not a big test. The Wesley game was a big test, this week is a big test and will show where Del Val belongs.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on September 23, 2008, 08:13:19 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on September 23, 2008, 07:41:46 AM
I didn't give Del Val a vote yet. They were not in my preseason top 10, most teams have still only played 2 games and I really don't have enough to go on yet. Del Val beat a 1-AA team but it was Iona and they are 1-AA in name only. MSU used to beat them yearly, they are on a par with the middle of the pack East region D-III teams, to me not a big test. The Wesley game was a big test, this week is a big test and will show where Del Val belongs.
fyi dvc didnt beat iona... also IF dvc beats salisbury where would you rank them (roughly since it would partly be based on how other teams do?)
Quote from: pg04 on September 23, 2008, 09:37:21 AMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on September 23, 2008, 08:13:19 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on September 23, 2008, 07:41:46 AM
I didn't give Del Val a vote yet. They were not in my preseason top 10, most teams have still only played 2 games and I really don't have enough to go on yet. Del Val beat a 1-AA team but it was Iona and they are 1-AA in name only. MSU used to beat them yearly, they are on a par with the middle of the pack East region D-III teams, to me not a big test. The Wesley game was a big test, this week is a big test and will show where Del Val belongs.
fyi dvc didnt beat iona... also IF dvc beats salisbury where would you rank them (roughly since it would partly be based on how other teams do?)
I think the winner of Ithaca/Fisher will clearly be the #1 team next week, but then if Del Val wins against Salisbury they should be put at #2 -- and it could be said they should be #1 because Salisbury and Wesley would both be higher ranked than Ithaca/Fisher.
Quote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AMu89 is still suffering from alcohol poisoning from this weekend... so he will be excused today...
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
Quote from: superman57 on September 22, 2008, 10:03:09 PM
So fisher wins a close game... in its rivalry game and gets dropped a slot... Cortland does the same thing and goes up a spot...
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 23, 2008, 01:55:02 PM
That said, how many Courage Bowl games have been played? Is it in fact a big rivalry game? I mean, do both teams get super-stoked about it? Geographically, it makes sense that it might be a solid rivalry, since St. John FishChester have the same address, right? It's a non-con game, does that figure in? Hmmm, . . . the Cortaca Jug game is non-conference, but you don't get many better rivalry games than that (right, K-Mack?).
Quote from: Upstate on September 23, 2008, 02:08:17 PMAsk All-american Noah Ferhenbach about his freshman year. At the end of the first half he had a deep bomb bounce right off his facemask and the student section for UR went nuts. They rode him the rest of the game with chancts and the bronx cheer when he caught a pass. He wanted to get back at them big time and did so his senior year with 11rec, 200yds and 3 tds.
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 23, 2008, 02:30:10 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 23, 2008, 02:08:17 PMAsk All-american Noah Ferhenbach about his freshman year. At the end of the first half he had a deep bomb bounce right off his facemask and the student section for UR went nuts. They rode him the rest of the game with chancts and the bronx cheer when he caught a pass. He wanted to get back at them big time and did so his senior year with 11rec, 200yds and 3 tds.
He was so mad he took a job coaching their WRs after graduating. That will show them...
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 23, 2008, 03:04:31 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 23, 2008, 02:30:10 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 23, 2008, 02:08:17 PMAsk All-american Noah Ferhenbach about his freshman year. At the end of the first half he had a deep bomb bounce right off his facemask and the student section for UR went nuts. They rode him the rest of the game with chancts and the bronx cheer when he caught a pass. He wanted to get back at them big time and did so his senior year with 11rec, 200yds and 3 tds.
He was so mad he took a job coaching their WRs after graduating. That will show them...
Who are they?
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 23, 2008, 04:49:16 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 23, 2008, 03:04:31 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 23, 2008, 02:30:10 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 23, 2008, 02:08:17 PMAsk All-american Noah Ferhenbach about his freshman year. At the end of the first half he had a deep bomb bounce right off his facemask and the student section for UR went nuts. They rode him the rest of the game with chancts and the bronx cheer when he caught a pass. He wanted to get back at them big time and did so his senior year with 11rec, 200yds and 3 tds.
He was so mad he took a job coaching their WRs after graduating. That will show them...
Who are they?
They would be the University of Rochester football team.
Quote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 23, 2008, 06:35:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
If RPI didnt struggle with 2 of the worst teams in the country I might agree with you.....dumbass.
Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 07:24:13 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 23, 2008, 06:35:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
If RPI didnt struggle with 2 of the worst teams in the country I might agree with you.....dumbass.
EVERYONE has struggled though....who did you have at #1.....Homer.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 23, 2008, 08:10:00 PM
JU loves poles.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 23, 2008, 08:59:07 PM
I just can't see RPI even being considered above a #4 spot right now. I think the thing with them is that once they beat/ if they beat Union or Hobart that gives an indication of where they may belong in comparison to the rest of the east. Yet Hobart may or may not be all that strong either this season (although I am impressed with their first 2 wins) and this year you have a possibly weaker Union team then usual (maybe on par with last season) so really it comes down to RPI having to beat Hobart to show anyone anything that they can use to classify them as a serious contender compared to other "solid" teams in the region. Also take into account the LL was shut out last year in the NCAA and ECAC's and even an RPI win over Union or Bart doesn't make them a lock as a solid east team. I like this discussion because it can be beaten to a dead horse. For some of us that is actually enjoyable.
Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2008, 12:33:30 AM
I would say that name calling does not have to be involved, it's all in good fun...
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on September 24, 2008, 07:01:42 AMQuote from: pg04 on September 24, 2008, 12:33:30 AM
I would say that name calling does not have to be involved, it's all in good fun...
pbr cant tell if your jokin' or not but its all good w/ these doods, they all know each other and no offense is taken when 1 calls another dumbazz etc...
Quote from: pg04 on September 24, 2008, 12:33:30 AM
I would say that name calling does not have to be involved, it's all in good fun...
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 24, 2008, 08:12:47 AMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on September 24, 2008, 07:01:42 AMQuote from: pg04 on September 24, 2008, 12:33:30 AM
I would say that name calling does not have to be involved, it's all in good fun...
pbr cant tell if your jokin' or not but its all good w/ these doods, they all know each other and no offense is taken when 1 calls another dumbazz etc...
Now, Now kids, no more name-calling, just insert this image if you think someone is a dumbass.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eckernet.com%2Fimages%2FRed_Forman_Award.jpg&hash=8bc7dcfedcac9c71a157a1fa97000a31f2036f38)
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 23, 2008, 06:35:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
If RPI didnt struggle with 2 of the worst teams in the country I might agree with you.....dumbass.
Quote from: Union89 on September 24, 2008, 10:16:22 AMQuote from: pg04 on September 24, 2008, 12:33:30 AM
I would say that name calling does not have to be involved, it's all in good fun...
JU and I are friends....no problem with that, he was joking around.
Quote from: stimulator on September 24, 2008, 12:00:22 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 23, 2008, 06:35:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
If RPI didnt struggle with 2 of the worst teams in the country I might agree with you.....dumbass.
Sorry only half of that statement is true... Went to both games and while they did struggle with Utica, they did not struggle with Endicott, Certainly not mid-season sharp but not a game that was in doubt at any point. 36-7 is not a struggle..
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 23, 2008, 02:30:10 PMnice QViper +kQuote from: Upstate on September 23, 2008, 02:08:17 PMAsk All-american Noah Ferhenbach about his freshman year. At the end of the first half he had a deep bomb bounce right off his facemask and the student section for UR went nuts. They rode him the rest of the game with chancts and the bronx cheer when he caught a pass. He wanted to get back at them big time and did so his senior year with 11rec, 200yds and 3 tds.
He was so mad he took a job coaching their WRs after graduating. That will show them...
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 23, 2008, 06:35:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
If RPI didnt struggle with 2 of the worst teams in the country I might agree with you.....dumbass.
Quote from: Upstate on September 28, 2008, 07:03:53 PM
1) SJF
2) DVC
3) Cortland
is what we had at the top....
Quote from: 'gro on September 29, 2008, 01:19:35 PM
I didn't do the poll last year so this has been interesting. My top 3 this week was SJF-DV-CORT. The whole time I was trying to justify putting Del Val at #1. They clearly have the best resume so far this year. On the flip side, I didn't want to punish SJF who's only loss is the mount union... and they clearly handled Ithaca on saturday (is it saterday in this room?). But then I got to thinking about SJF's close game with Rochester, and the room started to get blurry and I blacked out. I woke up this morning with a level 2 hangover and wing sauce stains on my fingers. 8)
true story.
Quote from: 'gro on September 29, 2008, 01:19:35 PM
I didn't do the poll last year so this has been interesting. My top 3 this week was SJF-DV-CORT. The whole time I was trying to justify putting Del Val at #1. They clearly have the best resume so far this year. On the flip side, I didn't want to punish SJF who's only loss is the mount union... and they clearly handled Ithaca on saturday (is it saterday in this room?). But then I got to thinking about SJF's close game with Rochester, and the room started to get blurry and I blacked out. I woke up this morning with a level 2 hangover and wing sauce stains on my fingers. 8)
true story.
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 27, 2008, 07:59:53 PMQuote from: Cardinal 4 Life on September 27, 2008, 07:50:12 PM
anybody else think it's weird that it's only week 4 and everyone in the E8 has a loss already?
I had exactly that initial reaction, but then it occurred to me that SJFisher's one loss is to Mount Union, so maybe their one loss gets an asterisk.
But then I thought some more, and I remembered what a tough time SJF had putting away the UofR last week, so maybe the parity in upstate NY and especially in the E8 isn't all that surprising.
Then I noticed that UofR knocked off Union in Schenehecktady, so maybe UofR is a force to be reckoned with in 2008. . . . Strange upstate days indeed. Most peculiar, mama. (Those of you who can't recognize that bit of pop culture ought to take a night class).
So yeah. E8, everyone has at least one loss. Weird--leads to weirder stuff, even.
Quote from: DanPadavona on September 29, 2008, 04:35:54 PM
It's interesting being on field level and getting to see these teams up close. I wish I could get a look at SJF and Del Valley right now. I can tell you Kean is really, really good and deserves Top 10 consideration. They aren't missing AJ Roque at all. The new QB D'Ambrisi is just as good if not better, and he's a redshirt freshman. Durell Dukes is the best receiver in the NJAC. Defensively they are hit and miss, but I wouldn't be shocked to see them end up #2 or #3 in the NJAC standings. If Cortland, TCNJ, and Montclair all knock each other off, maybe Kean slips back into the picture.
Another team which bears watching for the future is Morrisville. They are loaded at the offensive skill positions. Give them a few impact defenders and they will start winning these close games they have been losing. Their coach is doing a helluva recruiting job. As far as the Kickoff report that they had 30 players in camp...Don't Believe the Hype. They had 100.
Regarding Cortland and Montclair, they both look strong, but I consider them incomplete packages at the moment. Cortland has defensive deficiencies which were first exploited by TCNJ late last season, and then again by Ithaca. This year has been a disappointment. Montclair is obviously struggling offensively (12 versus Morrisville, 13 versus Kean). Generally it takes a high degree of power on both sides of the ball to win Eastern Region. So until I see different, I have a hard time voting either team higher than #3.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) ( 6 ) | 3-1 | 86 | 3 | vs. Hartwick |
2 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) ( 2 ) | 2-1 | 78 | 6 | at King's |
3 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) | 3-0 | 74 | 2 | vs. Buffalo State |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 3-0 | 58 | 4 | at St. Lawrence |
5 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 3-0 | 54 | 5 | at Rochester |
6 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 3-1 | 45 | 1 | Open Date |
7 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 3-0 | 39 | 7 | at William Paterson |
8 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 2-1 | 26 | 8 | vs. FDU-Florham |
9 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2008) | 2-1 | 14 | 10 | at New Jersey |
10 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=alfred&year=2008) | 3-1 | 8 | NR | vs. Norwich |
Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
Quote from: pg04 on September 30, 2008, 01:44:03 PM
Actually, I will... here you go. I assume the same holds true now...Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
Quote from: TGP on September 30, 2008, 02:03:39 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 30, 2008, 01:44:03 PM
Actually, I will... here you go. I assume the same holds true now...Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
about as clear as mud so far this season in the east. thx again pg for running point on these polls.
Quote from: pg04 on September 30, 2008, 01:44:03 PMwell after SJF's monkey stomp of IC, i feel that U89 owes us an updated explanation ;)
Actually, I will... here you go. I assume the same holds true now...Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2008, 03:19:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 30, 2008, 01:44:03 PMwell after SJF's monkey stomp of IC, i feel that U89 owes us an updated explanation ;)
Actually, I will... here you go. I assume the same holds true now...Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
Quote from: pg04 on September 30, 2008, 03:29:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2008, 03:19:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 30, 2008, 01:44:03 PMwell after SJF's monkey stomp of IC, i feel that U89 owes us an updated explanation ;)
Actually, I will... here you go. I assume the same holds true now...Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
I have a tendency to agree with you. But I'm pretty sure sure he's not going to move RPI from 1 if they keep winning.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2008, 03:19:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 30, 2008, 01:44:03 PMwell after SJF's monkey stomp of IC, i feel that U89 owes us an updated explanation ;)
Actually, I will... here you go. I assume the same holds true now...Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2008, 05:14:37 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 23, 2008, 11:04:28 AM
based on U89 admitting he has IC @ 2 and that he dropped SJF from 3 to 4, one can see that he is the one ranking RPI @ 1.
My question to U89 is, WTF??
That's me....had RPI at #2 Pre-Season and Fisher #1....dropped Fisher to #3 after loss to MUC and moved RPI to #1.....they have been there since.
Who should be at #1?
~ Ithaca which struggled at home (17-16) with a marginal Lyco team then beat King's 38-28?
~ Fisher which struggled (24-17) to beat a team that got totally crushed by Case Reserve the previous week?
I had said earlier that RPI is not a clear-cut #1, but you can poke holes in everyone, including Cortland. The season is young, it will all work itself out.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 30, 2008, 04:31:18 PM
People keep referencing U of R losing to Case Western Reserve but they fail to mention how Rochester just defeated Union this past week. You people act like U of R will finish the season with only one win. Or are they not allowed to improve after a week 1 loss?
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 30, 2008, 04:34:00 PM
Well they defeated Springfield and then lost by 17 to a top 10 team. I don't know if that makes them a bottom feeder this year.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2008, 04:35:49 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 30, 2008, 04:34:00 PM
Well they defeated Springfield and then lost by 17 to a top 10 team. I don't know if that makes them a bottom feeder this year.
Name recognition is way too heavy here. Springfield doesn't look so good either.
Quote from: DanPadavona on September 30, 2008, 04:36:08 PM
Re: Rochester over Union
Agreed Booby, I noticed that score linkage too. The Buffalo State score still leaves me a little wary, but I was convinced enough after the IC win to put SJF back at #1. I'm not thoroughly convinced of any of my Top 5 selections yet. This season seems more balanced than the past few.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2008, 04:32:37 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 30, 2008, 04:31:18 PM
People keep referencing U of R losing to Case Western Reserve but they fail to mention how Rochester just defeated Union this past week. You people act like U of R will finish the season with only one win. Or are they not allowed to improve after a week 1 loss?
Union may finish with about 3 wins.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 30, 2008, 04:41:04 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2008, 04:35:49 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 30, 2008, 04:34:00 PM
Well they defeated Springfield and then lost by 17 to a top 10 team. I don't know if that makes them a bottom feeder this year.
Name recognition is way too heavy here. Springfield doesn't look so good either.
Nah I wasn't implying that Springfield was a top flight team, they will probably be an average team. But Union was able to defeat them, and then hang with a Top 10 team, so I think Union will probably finish with 6 wins. That is a Booby prediction special!
I also think U of R will finish with 7 wins just so you know.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2008, 06:13:46 PM
U of R deserves at least a vote in my mind. I just don't think RPI can be #1 this early any year, especially this one because of their dismal schedule and non convincing performances. I said it before, unless they are blowing teams away (which they are not) we never know they are for real until they beat a Union, Hobart, or U of R. They were losing to Utica in the 4th Q. To me that is not a top 3 team in the region espcially one who could even be considered for a #1 vote.
Quote from: Union89 on September 30, 2008, 06:21:59 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2008, 06:13:46 PM
U of R deserves at least a vote in my mind. I just don't think RPI can be #1 this early any year, especially this one because of their dismal schedule and non convincing performances. I said it before, unless they are blowing teams away (which they are not) we never know they are for real until they beat a Union, Hobart, or U of R. They were losing to Utica in the 4th Q. To me that is not a top 3 team in the region espcially one who could even be considered for a #1 vote.
Guys, if USC pulls out a last second win over Oregon St (a 24 point underdog), do you think they would have remained #1? I believe so....with the return of Robinson at QB and favorable scheduling, I can't bring myself to drop RPI after taking care of business the first 3 weeks of the season. A loss in the next couple weeks could drop them considerably, but 3-0 is 3-0 if they are ranked highly early....
Quote from: superman57 on September 30, 2008, 08:28:04 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 30, 2008, 06:21:59 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2008, 06:13:46 PM
U of R deserves at least a vote in my mind. I just don't think RPI can be #1 this early any year, especially this one because of their dismal schedule and non convincing performances. I said it before, unless they are blowing teams away (which they are not) we never know they are for real until they beat a Union, Hobart, or U of R. They were losing to Utica in the 4th Q. To me that is not a top 3 team in the region espcially one who could even be considered for a #1 vote.
Guys, if USC pulls out a last second win over Oregon St (a 24 point underdog), do you think they would have remained #1? I believe so....with the return of Robinson at QB and favorable scheduling, I can't bring myself to drop RPI after taking care of business the first 3 weeks of the season. A loss in the next couple weeks could drop them considerably, but 3-0 is 3-0 if they are ranked highly early....
Ok your arguement their makes EVERYONE hypocritical, for dropping fisher down spots because they struggled with Buff State and UofR
Quote from: Union89 on September 30, 2008, 08:39:51 PMQuote from: superman57 on September 30, 2008, 08:28:04 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 30, 2008, 06:21:59 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2008, 06:13:46 PM
U of R deserves at least a vote in my mind. I just don't think RPI can be #1 this early any year, especially this one because of their dismal schedule and non convincing performances. I said it before, unless they are blowing teams away (which they are not) we never know they are for real until they beat a Union, Hobart, or U of R. They were losing to Utica in the 4th Q. To me that is not a top 3 team in the region espcially one who could even be considered for a #1 vote.
Guys, if USC pulls out a last second win over Oregon St (a 24 point underdog), do you think they would have remained #1? I believe so....with the return of Robinson at QB and favorable scheduling, I can't bring myself to drop RPI after taking care of business the first 3 weeks of the season. A loss in the next couple weeks could drop them considerably, but 3-0 is 3-0 if they are ranked highly early....
Ok your arguement their makes EVERYONE hypocritical, for dropping fisher down spots because they struggled with Buff State and UofR
I dropped them from #1 to #3 when they got smoked by MUC......I didn't drop them at all for their games with Buff St or U of R.....
Quote from: superman57 on September 30, 2008, 08:47:49 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 30, 2008, 08:39:51 PMQuote from: superman57 on September 30, 2008, 08:28:04 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 30, 2008, 06:21:59 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2008, 06:13:46 PM
U of R deserves at least a vote in my mind. I just don't think RPI can be #1 this early any year, especially this one because of their dismal schedule and non convincing performances. I said it before, unless they are blowing teams away (which they are not) we never know they are for real until they beat a Union, Hobart, or U of R. They were losing to Utica in the 4th Q. To me that is not a top 3 team in the region espcially one who could even be considered for a #1 vote.
Guys, if USC pulls out a last second win over Oregon St (a 24 point underdog), do you think they would have remained #1? I believe so....with the return of Robinson at QB and favorable scheduling, I can't bring myself to drop RPI after taking care of business the first 3 weeks of the season. A loss in the next couple weeks could drop them considerably, but 3-0 is 3-0 if they are ranked highly early....
Ok your arguement their makes EVERYONE hypocritical, for dropping fisher down spots because they struggled with Buff State and UofR
I dropped them from #1 to #3 when they got smoked by MUC......I didn't drop them at all for their games with Buff St or U of R.....
I wouldn't say dropping them much for a loss to MUC... and I would say that Fisher has still been more impressive than RPI... A loss to MUC in my mind is more impressive than a win vs. Utica or Endicott
Quote from: pg04 on September 29, 2008, 08:12:50 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 4 (9/29/08)
One person did not get their vote in so the point totals will only signify 9 people. If the last pollster gets it in I will add it to this
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) ( 6 ) 3-1 86 3vs. Hartwick 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) ( 2 ) 2-1 78 6at King's 3 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) 3-0 74 2vs. Buffalo State 4 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) 3-0 58 4at St. Lawrence 5 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) 3-0 54 5at Rochester 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) 3-1 45 1Open Date 7 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) 3-0 39 7at William Paterson 8 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) 2-1 26 8vs. FDU-Florham 9 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2008) 2-1 14 10at New Jersey 10 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=alfred&year=2008) 3-1 8 NRvs. Norwich
Others Receiving votes:
Rowan 5,
New Jersey 3,
Curry 3,
Widener 1,
Hartwick 1
Dropping out: #9 Rowan
Voting Breakdown:
St. John Fisher (2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, -)
Delaware Valley (1, 2, 1, 3, 3, 2, 3, 2, 4, -)
Cortland State (3, 3, 5, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, -)
Hobart (4, 4, 3, 5, 6, 5, 4, 5, 5, -)
RPI (5, 5, 7, 7, 4, 4, 6, 6, 1, -)
Ithaca (7, 6, 4, 6, 5, 6, 8, 4, 8, -)
Montclair State (6, 8, 6, 4, -, 7, 5, 7, 6, -)
Albright (8, 7, 8, 9, 7, 8, 7, 10, 9, -)
Kean (9, -, 9, 10, 9, -, -, 8, 7, -)
Alfred (-, 9, 10, -, -, 10, 9, 9, -, -)
Rowan (-, -, -, -, 8, 9, -, -, -, -)
Curry (10, 10, -, -, -, -, -, -, 10, -)
New Jersey (-, -, -, 8, -, -, -, -, -, -)
Widener (-, -, -, -, -, -, 10, -, -, -)
Hartwick (-, -, -, -, 10, -, -, -, -, -)
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2008, 09:41:28 PM
Sorry about not getting my poll in....
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) ( 6 ) | 3-1 | 94 | 3 | vs. Hartwick |
2 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) ( 2 ) | 2-1 | 87 | 6 | at King's |
3 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 3-0 | 84 | 2 | vs. Buffalo State |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 3-0 | 64 | 4 | at St. Lawrence |
5 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 3-0 | 61 | 5 | at Rochester |
6 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 3-1 | 50 | 1 | Open Date |
7 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 3-0 | 42 | 7 | at William Paterson |
8 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 2-1 | 30 | 8 | vs. FDU-Florham |
9 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2008) | 2-1 | 14 | 10 | at New Jersey |
10 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=alfred&year=2008) | 3-1 | 8 | NR | vs. Norwich |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2008, 10:10:23 PMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2008, 09:41:28 PM
Sorry about not getting my poll in....
hhehehehhahahhahahhhhhhahahahahahah.....pole in....hahahahhahhehehehehehee
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.chron.com%2Fspecialfeatures%2Farchives%2Fbeavis.jpg&hash=b27b8e4090fb480996d01caea0972c9ea66cc5f0)
Quote from: wildcat11 on July 30, 2008, 05:04:34 PM
I think we have winner....Meet North Carolina Frosh Wrestler Long Wang (http://tarheelblue.cstv.com/sports/m-wrestl/mtt/wang_long00.html)
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2008, 10:28:50 PM
Gracias. Sorry about that. Thanks for the updated poll... you do a really nice job on the poll.
(huh, huh, huh.. poll)
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 30, 2008, 10:34:15 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2008, 10:10:23 PMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2008, 09:41:28 PM
Sorry about not getting my poll in....
hhehehehhahahhahahhhhhhahahahahahah.....pole in....hahahahhahhehehehehehee
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.chron.com%2Fspecialfeatures%2Farchives%2Fbeavis.jpg&hash=b27b8e4090fb480996d01caea0972c9ea66cc5f0)
How does one go about modifying one's pole? Guess that calls for this guy:Quote from: wildcat11 on July 30, 2008, 05:04:34 PM
I think we have winner....Meet North Carolina Frosh Wrestler Long Wang (http://tarheelblue.cstv.com/sports/m-wrestl/mtt/wang_long00.html)
This guy's pursuing medical school and has a promising future in phalloplasty.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2008, 05:34:35 PM
So is everyone calm now about U89's poll?
Things talked about this past week:
Union beating Springfield...
Well that's obviously nothing too special since Utica beat Springfield today.
RPI's struggle with Utica...
Atleast Utica is showing they have a pulse.
Union lost to Rochester...
Well, Rochester was climbing, but I guess now we know where they are with their loss to RPI.
RPI defeating WPI was ho-hum...
WPI is a healthy 4-1.
SJF is the beast of the east...
Not anymore...
Hartwick can only win at home...
Not anymore...Maybe it's the turf?
What we did learn was that U89 having RPI at 1 is horribly off base. Fisher is definately beatable. The Empire 8 is absolutely insanely bizzarre. I really have no clue about that league. The LL is a little easier in that obviously Hobart and RPI are the 2 top teams. Hobart is still a bit of a wild card in my mind. The next tier is Rochester, Union, WPI. Then everyone else.
The E8 is a toss up. Alfred looks solid, and then you throw in Fisher, Ithaca, and Hartwick, and who knows how this league will pan out.
My thoughts on Cortland are that I don't have thoughts on Cortland. I think the NJAC is very much down. I think Corltand is over-rated and over-ranked every year. Until they prove otherwise, I can't change my thinking.
Then you have Delaware Valley. I'd have to say righ tnow, Delaware Valley looks like the bestof the bunch. If I were voting again this year, right now, my tiny poll would be:
1. Delaware Valley
2. RPI
3. Cortland
4. Hobart
5. Alfred
6. Montclair
7. Hartwick
8. Fisher
9. Ithaca
10. WPI
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2008, 05:34:35 PM
So is everyone calm now about U89's poll?
. . .
What we did learn was that U89 having RPI at 1 is horribly off base. . . . The Empire 8 is absolutely insanely bizzarre. I really have no clue about that league. The LL is a little easier in that obviously Hobart and RPI are the 2 top teams. Hobart is still a bit of a wild card in my mind. The next tier is Rochester, Union, WPI. Then everyone else.
The E8 is a toss up. Alfred looks solid, and then you throw in Fisher, Ithaca, and Hartwick, and who knows how this league will pan out. . . .
If I were voting again this year, right now, my tiny poll would be:
1. Delaware Valley
2. RPI
3. Cortland
4. Hobart
5. Alfred
6. Montclair
7. Hartwick
8. Fisher
9. Ithaca
10. WPI
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 04, 2008, 07:20:10 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2008, 05:34:35 PM
So is everyone calm now about U89's poll?
. . .
What we did learn was that U89 having RPI at 1 is horribly off base. . . . The Empire 8 is absolutely insanely bizzarre. I really have no clue about that league. The LL is a little easier in that obviously Hobart and RPI are the 2 top teams. Hobart is still a bit of a wild card in my mind. The next tier is Rochester, Union, WPI. Then everyone else.
The E8 is a toss up. Alfred looks solid, and then you throw in Fisher, Ithaca, and Hartwick, and who knows how this league will pan out. . . .
If I were voting again this year, right now, my tiny poll would be:
1. Delaware Valley
2. RPI
3. Cortland
4. Hobart
5. Alfred
6. Montclair
7. Hartwick
8. Fisher
9. Ithaca
10. WPI
I don't understand the part about " U89 having RPI at 1 is horribly off base."
I totally understand the part about the E8 being "absolutely insanely bizzarre." I'd even consider throwing in a few more adverbs--such as oh, I don't know--freakishly, alien-abductedly, . . .
Boltus is damned good. Alfred has a hell of a gauntlet to run, with wounded tigers Hartwick, SJF, and Ithaca all upcoming. What is it with Utica, anyway? They win at Springfield, but lose to Becker and Husson? Is it possible that Springfield is just that bad? The Pride isn't losing by huge margins, so they can't really be all that bad, can they?
I think based purely on record and opponents' records, I'd have to put Hobart an rch higher than RPI--but I don't see how to put much separation between them.
Weird, wild stuff in the E8. I guess things are insanely bizarre in the MIAC this year, too.
Quote from: 'gro on October 04, 2008, 07:24:03 PM
I don't want to nit pick the middle of the pack... but Montclair hasn't shown me anything. Great defense, but here are their points scored so far: 13, 12, 16, 14 against sub par competition (combined record 2-14). I wouldn't rank them ahead of Hobart or Hartwick for that matter.
they play Cortland next week so the NJAC will clear up a little.
Quote from: 'gro on October 05, 2008, 12:42:34 PM
I know of Lycoming, and went through the same steps you listed above before I did my ballot. The week 4 win vs Bridgewater caught my eye until I saw their record this year which downgraded the win to "meh". The one thing about the MAC so far is that none of the 3-1 teams have played each other yet. D-Val/L-Val and Lycoming/Albright next week. Cortland/Montclair will also clear the air.
Quote from: pg04 on October 05, 2008, 10:21:18 PM
No problemo... I understand your issues :) . Anyway, not all 10 are in even with yours .
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2008, 11:21:36 AM
It seems to me that Kean is getting very little respect here.....a close loss to Cortland and pretty convincing wins over both WConn and TCNJ have forced me to put them at #5.....I know NOTHING about them outside of scores and what I've read though....
Quote from: 'gro on October 06, 2008, 12:03:58 PMtgp also has kean on the ballot but in the 8 range......Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2008, 11:21:36 AM
It seems to me that Kean is getting very little respect here.....a close loss to Cortland and pretty convincing wins over both WConn and TCNJ have forced me to put them at #5.....I know NOTHING about them outside of scores and what I've read though....
whoa now, let's not go crazy with cougar love, unless its the kind of cougar that likes botox and lots of perfume ;D Kean is on my ballot (I can't call it a poll anymore) but not that high.
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2008, 11:21:36 AM
It seems to me that Kean is getting very little respect here.....a close loss to Cortland and pretty convincing wins over both WConn and TCNJ have forced me to put them at #5.....I know NOTHING about them outside of scores and what I've read though....
Quote from: 'gro on October 06, 2008, 12:03:58 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2008, 11:21:36 AM
It seems to me that Kean is getting very little respect here.....a close loss to Cortland and pretty convincing wins over both WConn and TCNJ have forced me to put them at #5.....I know NOTHING about them outside of scores and what I've read though....
whoa now, let's not go crazy with cougar love, unless its the kind of cougar that likes botox and lots of perfume ;D Kean is on my ballot (I can't call it a poll anymore) but not that high.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2008, 12:29:13 PMQuote from: 'gro on October 06, 2008, 12:03:58 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2008, 11:21:36 AM
It seems to me that Kean is getting very little respect here.....a close loss to Cortland and pretty convincing wins over both WConn and TCNJ have forced me to put them at #5.....I know NOTHING about them outside of scores and what I've read though....
whoa now, let's not go crazy with cougar love, unless its the kind of cougar that likes botox and lots of perfume ;D Kean is on my ballot (I can't call it a poll anymore) but not that high.
Gro, you have the Cougars on your poll?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2008, 12:29:13 PMQuote from: 'gro on October 06, 2008, 12:03:58 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2008, 11:21:36 AM
It seems to me that Kean is getting very little respect here.....a close loss to Cortland and pretty convincing wins over both WConn and TCNJ have forced me to put them at #5.....I know NOTHING about them outside of scores and what I've read though....
whoa now, let's not go crazy with cougar love, unless its the kind of cougar that likes botox and lots of perfume ;D Kean is on my ballot (I can't call it a poll anymore) but not that high.
Gro, you have the Cougars on your poll?
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) ( 7 ) | 3-1 | 96 | 2 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
2 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 2 ) | 4-0 | 91 | 3 | vs. #7 Montclair State |
3 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 4-0 | 74 | 5 | Open Date |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 4-0 | 62 | 4 | vs. Union |
5 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) | 3-2 | 61 | 1 | vs. Salisbury |
6 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 3-1 | 41 | 6 | at Norwich |
7 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 4-0 | 33 | 7 | at #2 Cortland State |
8 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 2-1 | 32 | NR | vs. Alfred |
9 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2008) | 3-1 | 23 | 9 | at Buffalo State |
10 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 3-1 | 17 | 8 | at Lycoming |
Quote from: pg04 on October 06, 2008, 07:51:39 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 5 (10/5/08)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) ( 7 ) 3-1 96 2vs. Lebanon Valley 2 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 2 ) 4-0 91 3vs. #7 Montclair State 3 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) 4-0 74 5Open Date 4 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) 4-0 62 4vs. Union 5 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) 3-2 61 1vs. Salisbury 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) 3-1 41 6at Norwich 7 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) 4-0 33 7at #2 Cortland State 8 Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) 2-1 32 NRvs. Alfred 9 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2008) 3-1 23 9at Buffalo State 10 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) 3-1 17 8at Lycoming
Others Receiving votes:
Alfred 13,
Lycoming 5,
Rowan 2
Dropping out: #10 Alfred
Voting Breakdown:
Delaware Valley (1, 1, 1, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1)
Cortland State (2, 2, 3, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2)
RPI (4, 6, 2, 1, 3, 3, 6, 5, 3, 3)
Hobart (3, 5, 7, 4, 5, 9, 3, 3, 5, 4)
St. John Fisher (5, 4, 4, 8, 6, 4, 4, 4, 4, 6)
Ithaca (6, 8, 6, 9, 7, 6, 8, 6, 6, 7)
Montclair State (9, 3, 8, 6, 10, 10, 5, 8, 7, -)
Hartwick (7, 10, 5, 7, 4, 8, -, 10, -, 5)
Kean (8, 9, 9, 5, -, 5, 10, -, 9, 10)
Albright (-, 7, -, 10, 8, -, 7, 7, 10, -)
Alfred (-, -, 10, -, 9, -, 9, 9, 8, 8 )
Lycoming (10, -, -, -, -, 7, -, -, -, -)
Rowan (-, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, 9)
Quote from: pg04 on October 06, 2008, 08:30:54 PM
From what I've read on the ACFC board, In salisbury, the injury bug is going around and also I believe some were involved in an altercation saturday night. There is a link on that board.
I expect Fisher to win.
Quote from: jam40jeff on October 07, 2008, 12:08:54 AM
How did Case Western Reserve and Cortland State switch positions this week? Case was ahead of Cortland, and they both played similar teams (Case played Denison, who lost by 14 to No. 7 Wabash and was 1-2 going into the game, and Cortland played Buffalo State, who lost by 13 to No. 20 St. John Fisher and was 0-3 going into the game, so you may even be able to make the case that Case played a bit tougher team, but I digress).
After 3 quarters, Case was up 45-0 and pulled their starters. Cortland State was only up 14-7 after 3 quarters and needed a big 4th quarter to win by 21. So I really don't see how Cortland State is justified in passing up Case.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 07, 2008, 12:16:50 AM
Appreciate the question, and welcome to the board. I don't think your base assumption is correct. I think Buff State is a better team than Denison.
But more importantly [than deleted Massey ratings], it's important to remember that the entire season resume can be re-evaluated each week. (We make sure the voters see this data so they can decide whether to use it.)
Here's the entire season resume for both teams:
No. 15 Case Western Reserve (4-0):
Sep 06 AWAY Kenyon (1-4) W 26-62
Sep 13 HOME Rochester (1-3) W 38-6
Sep 20 AWAY Oberlin (1-3) W 21-48
Oct 04 HOME Denison (1-3) W 45-14
Case Western "SoS" - (4-13)
Ave. Margin of Victory: 31.5
No. 14 Cortland State (4-0):
Sep 06 AWAY Morrisville State (0-4) W 37-51
Sep 20 AWAY Rowan (3-1) W 20-27
Sep 27 AWAY Kean (3-1) W 28-32
Oct 04 HOME Buffalo State (0-4) W 35-14
Case Western "SoS" - (6-10)
Ave. Margin of Victory: 11.5
Case has been pounding teams, yes, but all they've proven is that they're better than four bad teams. Cortland has proven it's better than Rowan, and that's a road game as well.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 08, 2008, 12:08:16 AM
That's why when I do SOS calculations for my own use, I eliminate the games against said team. So Cortland's SOS would be 6-6, Case's 4-9, Ithaca's 9-4.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 12, 2008, 08:31:52 PM
what are you thoughts on Hartwick... they are 4-1 right now but the rest of thier schedule sets up nicely as they should be double digit favorites in every game ... for all the flack Hartwick gets they could end up 9-1 this season and E8 champions
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 12, 2008, 08:31:52 PM
what are you thoughts on Hartwick... they are 4-1 right now but the rest of thier schedule sets up nicely as they should be double digit favorites in every game ... for all the flack Hartwick gets they could end up 9-1 this season and E8 champions
Quote from: Upstate on October 12, 2008, 08:39:12 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 12, 2008, 08:31:52 PM
what are you thoughts on Hartwick... they are 4-1 right now but the rest of thier schedule sets up nicely as they should be double digit favorites in every game ... for all the flack Hartwick gets they could end up 9-1 this season and E8 champions
At least they are getting everything out of the talent they have on their roster...
They only have 9 games this year so they'll be going 8-1, lose out to IC for the auto and miss out on the NCAAs as they get passed over for the pool C by teams like Kean/Montclair/LL runner up...
Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on October 12, 2008, 08:42:12 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 12, 2008, 08:39:12 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 12, 2008, 08:31:52 PM
what are you thoughts on Hartwick... they are 4-1 right now but the rest of thier schedule sets up nicely as they should be double digit favorites in every game ... for all the flack Hartwick gets they could end up 9-1 this season and E8 champions
At least they are getting everything out of the talent they have on their roster...
They only have 9 games this year so they'll be going 8-1, lose out to IC for the auto and miss out on the NCAAs as they get passed over for the pool C by teams like Kean/Montclair/LL runner up...
Ithaca has a tougher road to the title than Hartwick does.
Quote from: Upstate on October 12, 2008, 08:45:27 PMQuote from: HHawksE8Champs on October 12, 2008, 08:42:12 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 12, 2008, 08:39:12 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 12, 2008, 08:31:52 PM
what are you thoughts on Hartwick... they are 4-1 right now but the rest of thier schedule sets up nicely as they should be double digit favorites in every game ... for all the flack Hartwick gets they could end up 9-1 this season and E8 champions
At least they are getting everything out of the talent they have on their roster...
They only have 9 games this year so they'll be going 8-1, lose out to IC for the auto and miss out on the NCAAs as they get passed over for the pool C by teams like Kean/Montclair/LL runner up...
Ithaca has a tougher road to the title than Hartwick does.
Ithaca can finish out 8-2 (loss to cortland) and still have the AQ over Wick...
I dont see AU taking out IC this year...
Quote from: superman57 on October 12, 2008, 09:29:17 PM
the fact of the matter is that I have not yet been impressed by any of the teams in the e8 with the exception of maybe Utica... and at this point in time I would not be entirely suprised if Utica won the e8... just kidding... but Hartwick's decision to go to a 9 game schedule and Fisher's over agressive schedule could cost them both dearly... as they can't keep up with the Ithaca, balanced schedule
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 12, 2008, 10:07:34 PM
Anxiously awaiting the pontifications... :)
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 12, 2008, 10:07:34 PM
Anxiously awaiting the pontifications... :)
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 12, 2008, 10:38:59 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 12, 2008, 10:07:34 PM
Anxiously awaiting the pontifications... :)
Well I for one am back to being baffled.
Here we are today, left with an ordinary three-way tie between Ithaca, SJF and Hartwick, all behind Utica. I had expected Alfred to throw a monkey wrench into things by beating Hartwick, who I figured was going to be Alfred's best shot among the SJF/Wick/Ithaca trinity. That would have put SJF in the driver's seat, with their 3-3 overall record. Gotta love that scenario, but it was not to be.
So maybe Alfred wasn't quite as strong as I had hoped--I might have overestimated their offensive strength when I saw that 42 they laid on Norwich.
So what's it all mean, if Alfred's spoiler role is less potent/likely? Maybe Ithaca's better than I thought they were--and yet Ithaca was beaten handily by SJFisher, who's now lost two in a row--granted, by gnat's a**hole margins, but I think the dismay is warranted over SJF's inability to beat Salisbury, the very week that the Seagulls lost 3 defensive starters to Barney Fife.
So, if Ithaca's star is dimmed by a loss to a Fisher team that was less than early evaluations indicated, does that mean that Hartwick--who just this weekend successfully avoided an ambush by Alfred--is all that? But wait--look at that sixty-freaking-nine points allowed against Ithaca!
??? I'm so confused. ???
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 07, 2008, 12:16:50 AM
But more importantly [than deleted Massey ratings], it's important to remember that the entire season resume can be re-evaluated each week. (We make sure the voters see this data so they can decide whether to use it.)
Here's the updated entire season resume for both teams (using the modified SoS system where games against the opponent are removed for SoS evaluation):
No. 15 Case Western Reserve (5-0):
Sep 06 AWAY Kenyon (1-4) W 26-62
Sep 13 HOME Rochester (1-3) W 38-6
Sep 20 AWAY Oberlin (1-3) W 21-48
Oct 04 HOME Denison (2-2) W 45-14
Oct 11 HOME Wooster (3-2) W 28-7
Case Western "SoS" - (8-13)
Ave. Margin of Victory: 29.4
No. 13 Cortland State (5-0):
Sep 06 AWAY Morrisville State (0-4) W 37-51
Sep 20 AWAY Rowan (3-1) W 20-27
Sep 27 AWAY Kean (3-1) W 28-32
Oct 04 HOME Buffalo State (0-4) W 35-14
Oct. 11 HOME Montclair State 4-0) W 23-17
Cortland "SoS" - (12-8)
Ave. Margin of Victory: 10.4
Case has been pounding teams, yes, but all they've proven is that they're better than four bad teams and one good team. Cortland has proven it's better than Montclair State (marquee win?) and Rowan (marquee win), and that's a road game as well.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 13, 2008, 06:35:14 PM
The only questions I have are
Does RPI's larger margin of victory close the gap at all between RPI and Cortland, when Cortland is clearly ahead on SoS and marquee wins?
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 13, 2008, 06:35:14 PM
Do Curry's SIX wins earn it any bonus points, when compared to Cortland an RPI, with 5 wins and 4 wins, respectively?
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 13, 2008, 06:35:14 PM
Does anyone besides RedSwarm81 regard OT victories differently than victories in regulation?
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) ( 6 ) | 4-1 | 95 | 1 | at FDU-Florham |
2 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 3 ) | 5-0 | 93 | 2 | at Western Connecticut |
3 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 4-0 | 81 | 3 | vs. Susquehanna |
4 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 4-1 | 55 | 6 | vs. Frostburg State |
5 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2008) | 4-1 | 52 | 9 | vs. Brockport State |
6 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 3-1 | 38 | 8 | vs. Becker |
7 | Lycoming (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lycoming&year=2008) | 4-1 | 35 | NR | at Wilkes |
8 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) | 3-3 | 28 | 5 | at Norwich |
9 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 4-1 | 25 | 7 | vs. Buffalo State |
10 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 4-1 | 24 | 4 | Open Date |
Quote from: pg04 on October 13, 2008, 08:58:39 PM
One disclaimer, A 3-way tie with SJF/Ithaca/Hartwick does not give Ithaca the Pool A bid...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2008, 06:45:13 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 13, 2008, 06:35:14 PM
The only questions I have are
Does RPI's larger margin of victory close the gap at all between RPI and Cortland, when Cortland is clearly ahead on SoS and marquee wins?
No, because in this case, you need to look also at whether those margins of victory of note were posted against good or bad teams. Using this to review, Cortland has the edge since RPI's 14-point win against WPI doesn't bolster the case much for them.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2008, 06:45:13 PM
. . . We're almost to the point at which all teams should be measured strictly by their performace in 2008 games -- Curry [and WPI?] might be there already with the 6 games under its belt.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 13, 2008, 06:35:14 PM
Does anyone besides RedSwarm81 regard OT victories differently than victories in regulation?Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2008, 06:45:13 PM
The most I could see doing with those is calling them a "0-point win" for purposes of average margins of victory. However, the narrow margin will already be statistically measured in the average when enough results exist -- also, some might argue that OT wins show character in a team drawn to the wire in such fashion. It's almost like the points should be counted to somehow count for that type of intangible, in their view. I'm on the fence in this one -- I think OT wins should be viewed as wins, but if there is a second or third OT game in their resume, I would begin to place an intangible asterisk on their analysis. One OT game, though? I think a team gets the free pass for that with the average margin already being affected.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 13, 2008, 09:17:54 PM
I love the lack of respect for Montclair. 110-60 and "Keep Pounding".
Quote from: Upstate on October 13, 2008, 09:00:15 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2008, 08:58:39 PM
One disclaimer, A 3-way tie with SJF/Ithaca/Hartwick does not give Ithaca the Pool A bid...
who does it give then...
Quote from: rams1102 on October 13, 2008, 09:17:54 PM
I love the lack of respect for Montclair. 110-60 and "Keep Pounding".
Quote from: pg04 on October 13, 2008, 09:39:53 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 13, 2008, 09:00:15 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2008, 08:58:39 PM
One disclaimer, A 3-way tie with SJF/Ithaca/Hartwick does not give Ithaca the Pool A bid...
who does it give then...
I meant to put in "not necessarily" I'm not going through all the mathematics involved ;)
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 13, 2008, 08:47:39 PM
Thanks! For the sake of us "out-of-region" folk who are following this as a proxy for the Regional Rankings until the official "Regional Rankings" come out...
1) Del Valley MAC
2) Cortland St NJAC
3) RPI LL
4) Ithaca E8
5) Kean NJAC
6) Hartwick E8
7) Lycoming MAC
8 ) SJF E8
9) Montclair St NJAC
10) Hobart LL
Pool C begins at #5 if the post-season began today!
Quote from: pg04 on October 13, 2008, 08:58:39 PMThanks!
One disclaimer, A 3-way tie with SJF/Ithaca/Hartwick does not give Ithaca the Pool A bid...
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 13, 2008, 10:10:33 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 13, 2008, 08:47:39 PM
Thanks! For the sake of us "out-of-region" folk who are following this as a proxy for the Regional Rankings until the official "Regional Rankings" come out...
1) Del Valley MAC
2) Cortland St NJAC
3) RPI LL
4) Ithaca E8
5) Kean NJAC
6) Hartwick E8
7) Lycoming MAC
8 ) SJF E8
9) Montclair St NJAC
10) Hobart LL
Pool C begins at #5 if the post-season began today!Quote from: pg04 on October 13, 2008, 08:58:39 PMThanks!
One disclaimer, A 3-way tie with SJF/Ithaca/Hartwick does not give Ithaca the Pool A bid...
What #5 means is that there are some teams on the tourney selection table that are very good.
With only 6 Pool C bids to give, it will be tough to get that bid if you are not the first "at-large" at the table.
The old Linfield motto applies again..."Leave no doubt".
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 13, 2008, 10:34:34 PM
:D :D :D
You caught your error before I could get the link to the podcast!
Podcast (http://www.d3football.com/dailydose/2008/10/13/444/)
Quote from: Upstate on October 13, 2008, 09:34:03 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 13, 2008, 09:17:54 PM
I love the lack of respect for Montclair. 110-60 and "Keep Pounding".
won by 7 vs a 1-4 wilkes (13-6)
won by 5 vs a 0-5 Mo St (12-7)
won by 2 vs a 2-3 Port (16-14)
won by 1 vs a 2-3 Wil P (14-13)
Yes they have a great D, but they were squeaking by some pretty inferior competition...
Quote from: DanPadavona on October 14, 2008, 03:29:47 AM
Great job everyone, and thanks again PG04 for providing this. It's fantastic that people who follow D3 nationally are reading our opinions on Eastern Region.
Some interesting match-ups the next few weeks could throw the poll into even more of a funk. The very real possibility of Del Valley being upset at Lycoming in 2 weeks would shake things up considerably.
RPI may end up our consensus #1. It's going to be tough for Cortland to go undefeated in the NJAC, and also defeat Ithaca. Odds say at some point you are bound to lose one. Del Valley still has its toughest in conference foes to play. And RPI has both Union and Hobart in Troy this season. That's a very nice setup for the Engineers. If they play it right, they could conceivably be a #1 NCAA seed.
Quote from: DanPadavona on October 14, 2008, 03:29:47 AM
Great job everyone, and thanks again PG04 for providing this. It's fantastic that people who follow D3 nationally are reading our opinions on Eastern Region.
Some interesting match-ups the next few weeks could throw the poll into even more of a funk. The very real possibility of Del Valley being upset at Lycoming in 2 weeks would shake things up considerably.
RPI may end up our consensus #1. It's going to be tough for Cortland to go undefeated in the NJAC, and also defeat Ithaca. Odds say at some point you are bound to lose one. Del Valley still has its toughest in conference foes to play. And RPI has both Union and Hobart in Troy this season. That's a very nice setup for the Engineers. If they play it right, they could conceivably be a #1 NCAA seed.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 14, 2008, 08:17:23 AMQuote from: DanPadavona on October 14, 2008, 03:29:47 AM
Great job everyone, and thanks again PG04 for providing this. It's fantastic that people who follow D3 nationally are reading our opinions on Eastern Region.
Some interesting match-ups the next few weeks could throw the poll into even more of a funk. The very real possibility of Del Valley being upset at Lycoming in 2 weeks would shake things up considerably.
RPI may end up our consensus #1. It's going to be tough for Cortland to go undefeated in the NJAC, and also defeat Ithaca. Odds say at some point you are bound to lose one. Del Valley still has its toughest in conference foes to play. And RPI has both Union and Hobart in Troy this season. That's a very nice setup for the Engineers. If they play it right, they could conceivably be a #1 NCAA seed.
This shows why this is a strange year in footsball. RPI is only supposed to be good in odd numbered years.
Dave, I have had MSU in the middle of the pack all season. I feel that is exactly what they are, a good team that is playing great defense right now but not impressing with the O. That said, they are doing what is ultimately important and winning the games. Kean and Rowan games will show a lot, TCNJ showed last year that you can make it playing great D with no O, but you need to put up points in the postseason.
In my opinion Cortland, Del Val and RPI have started to separate themselves from the pack, of course all it takes is a loss to be right back with the pack.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 13, 2008, 08:47:39 PM
Thanks! For the sake of us "out-of-region" folk who are following this as a proxy for the Regional Rankings until the official "Regional Rankings" come out...
1) Del Valley MAC Lost to FDU-Florham 14-19
2) Cortland St NJAC Beat WCSU 41-14
3) RPI LL Beat Susquehanna 35-14
4) Ithaca E8 Beat FSU 51-24
5) Kean NJAC Lost to Brockport St 34-36
6) Hartwick E8 Beat Becker 49-12
7) Lycoming MAC Lost to Wilkes 13-27
8 ) SJF E8 Beat Norwich 45-6
9) Montclair St NJAC Beat Buff State 45-28
10) Hobart LL Open date
Pool C begins at #5 if the post-season began today!
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 18, 2008, 11:31:08 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 13, 2008, 08:47:39 PM
Thanks! For the sake of us "out-of-region" folk who are following this as a proxy for the Regional Rankings until the official "Regional Rankings" come out...
1) Del Valley MAC Lost to FDU-Florham 14-19
2) Cortland St NJAC Beat WCSU 41-14
3) RPI LL Beat Susquehanna 35-14
4) Ithaca E8 Beat FSU 51-24
5) Kean NJAC Lost to Brockport St 34-36
6) Hartwick E8 Beat Becker 49-12
7) Lycoming MAC Lost to Wilkes 13-27
8 ) SJF E8 Beat Norwich 45-6
9) Montclair St NJAC Beat Buff State 45-28
10) Hobart LL Open date
Pool C begins at #5 if the post-season began today!
We Pool C followers love that carnage in the MAC... ;)
Now we need the 2-loss Kean to bounce back against Rowan and Montclair State.
Quote from: Upstate on October 19, 2008, 10:24:30 AM
If Cortland goes 10-0 do they get the #1 seed in the "East" and keep MUC in the "North"?
Quote from: TGP on October 19, 2008, 10:45:50 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 19, 2008, 10:24:30 AM
If Cortland goes 10-0 do they get the #1 seed in the "East" and keep MUC in the "North"?
Most likely - there'd be more of a possibility (slim) that Muhlenburg would get the #1 in the East than MUC this season.
Quote from: Upstate on October 19, 2008, 10:24:30 AM
This is such a weird season in the east. Basically you can describe the east as something that starts with the word cluster and then ends with the word...well you can figure it out from there.
If Cortland goes 10-0 do they get the #1 seed in the "East" and keep MUC in the "North"?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 19, 2008, 12:08:50 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 18, 2008, 11:31:08 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 13, 2008, 08:47:39 PM
Thanks! For the sake of us "out-of-region" folk who are following this as a proxy for the Regional Rankings until the official "Regional Rankings" come out...
1) Del Valley MAC Lost to FDU-Florham 14-19
2) Cortland St NJAC Beat WCSU 41-14
3) RPI LL Beat Susquehanna 35-14
4) Ithaca E8 Beat FSU 51-24
5) Kean NJAC Lost to Brockport St 34-36
6) Hartwick E8 Beat Becker 49-12
7) Lycoming MAC Lost to Wilkes 13-27
8 ) SJF E8 Beat Norwich 45-6
9) Montclair St NJAC Beat Buff State 45-28
10) Hobart LL Open date
Pool C begins at #5 if the post-season began today!
We Pool C followers love that carnage in the MAC... ;)
Now we need the 2-loss Kean to bounce back against Rowan and Montclair State.
I'd start to look toward WPI, who only has Hobart left in terms of the 0- and 1-loss teams left in the LL. This could get very interesting... or should I say... BIZARRO...
Quote from: Upstate on October 19, 2008, 12:18:38 PM
I dont know if they'll throw 2 south region teams in the east, but i can see them throwing in Salisbury or Muhlenburgh in to give the bracket some muscle.
IE: Cortland Bracket
1. Cortland
2. Salisbury
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. Rowan
6. E8 Winner
7. Curry
8. Albright
IE: Muhlenburgh Bracket
1. Muhlenburgh
2. Cortland
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. Rowan
6. E8 Winner
7. Curry
8. Albright
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 19, 2008, 12:28:53 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 19, 2008, 12:18:38 PM
I dont know if they'll throw 2 south region teams in the east, but i can see them throwing in Salisbury or Muhlenburgh in to give the bracket some muscle.
IE: Cortland Bracket
1. Cortland
2. Salisbury
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. Rowan
6. E8 Winner
7. Curry
8. Albright
IE: Muhlenburgh Bracket
1. Muhlenburgh
2. Cortland
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. Rowan
6. E8 Winner
7. Curry
8. Albright
Or Wesley!!
Quote from: Upstate on October 19, 2008, 12:18:38 PMThanks for trying to fill out the brackets.
I don't know if they'll throw 2 south region teams in the east, but I can see them throwing in Salisbury or Muhlenburg in to give the bracket some muscle.
IE: Cortland Bracket
1. Cortland NJAC A
2. Salisbury Pool B
3. RPI LL A
4. DVC MAC A
5. Rowan Pool C?
6. E8 Winner "A"
7. Curry NEFC A
8. Albright Pool C?
IE: Muhlenburg Bracket
1. Muhlenburg CC Pool A
2. Cortland NJAC A
3. RPI LL
4. DVC MAC A
5. Rowan Pool C?
6. E8 Winner A
7. Curry NEFC A
8. Albright Pool C?
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 19, 2008, 01:30:03 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 19, 2008, 12:18:38 PMThanks for trying to fill out the brackets.
I don't know if they'll throw 2 south region teams in the east, but I can see them throwing in Salisbury or Muhlenburg in to give the bracket some muscle.
IE: Cortland Bracket
1. Cortland NJAC A
2. Salisbury Pool B
3. RPI LL A
4. DVC MAC A
5. Rowan Pool C?
6. E8 Winner "A"
7. Curry NEFC A
8. Albright Pool C?
IE: Muhlenburg Bracket
1. Muhlenburg CC Pool A
2. Cortland NJAC A
3. RPI LL
4. DVC MAC A
5. Rowan Pool C?
6. E8 Winner A
7. Curry NEFC A
8. Albright Pool C?
At this time, I can give 1-loss Rowan a Pool C bid if they run the table, but I think that the committee moves two teams into the "East" bracket. I don't think that the MAC gets a Pool C bid.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 19, 2008, 01:52:22 PM
There's still a few other options. Ithaca or Hartwick could get in with one loss and Hobart or WPI (or RPI is Bart runs the table and RPI finishes with one loss) could be in the mix, but it just seems like the east isn't getting four or five from the E8 and LL like they have the past couple of years. With five conference champs in region, it only leaves, at best, three pool B/C's, so if they move a Muhlenburg conference champ East and then a Pool B (Wesley/Salisbury - probably not Case, though JCU came over in 2002) there's one or two Pool C's left for four (or five if you include NEFC) conferences and the MAC and NJAC are stronger than they've been the last few years.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 19, 2008, 02:10:08 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 19, 2008, 01:52:22 PM
There's still a few other options. Ithaca or Hartwick could get in with one loss and Hobart or WPI (or RPI is Bart runs the table and RPI finishes with one loss) could be in the mix, but it just seems like the east isn't getting four or five from the E8 and LL like they have the past couple of years. With five conference champs in region, it only leaves, at best, three pool B/C's, so if they move a Muhlenburg conference champ East and then a Pool B (Wesley/Salisbury - probably not Case, though JCU came over in 2002) there's one or two Pool C's left for four (or five if you include NEFC) conferences and the MAC and NJAC are stronger than they've been the last few years.
Husson could provide an East issue if a collapse occurs for 1- and 2-loss Pool C contenders.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 19, 2008, 01:47:21 PM
Pool B update for Week #7
1) CWRU beat Ohio Wesleyan 35-7; plays at Hiram next.
2a) Salisbury beat lake Erie 35-19; plays at Becker next.
2b) Wesley beat NNA 48-0; plays at Webber International.
3a) Huntingdon beat Blackburn 45-0; plays at Westminster MO.
3b) LaGrange beat Westminster MO 37-20; plays at Principia.
On the radar...
Northwestern MN (6-1/6-1 in-region) beat 35-14 St Scholastica; plays at MN-Morris.
Husson (5-2/5-0 in-region); Plays (in-region) Gallaudet next Saturday.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 8 ) | 6-0 | 98 | 2 | vs. William Paterson |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 2 ) | 5-0 | 90 | 3 | at St. Lawrence |
3 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 5-1 | 74 | 4 | vs, Utica |
4 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 4-1 | 54 | 6 | at Mount Ida |
5 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2008) | 4-2 | 53 | 1 | at Lycoming |
6 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 5-1 | 47 | 9 | vs. New Jersey |
7 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) | 4-3 | 41 | 8 | vs. Springfield |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 5-1 | 35 | NR | at Buffalo State |
9 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 4-1 | 28 | 10 | at Merchant Marine |
10 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2008) | 5-2 | 8 | NR | Open Date |
WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Worcester+Polytech&year=2008) | 5-1 | 8 | NR | vs. Rochester |
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 20, 2008, 08:41:05 PM
I just noticed that Frostburg beat Brockport this year by two touchdowns and that Brockport has been fairly competitive in the NJAC.
Kind of makes Ithacas win versus Frostburg a little more impressive in my mind.
Quote from: superman57 on October 20, 2008, 08:27:46 PM
can't really argue with this poll.... though I have a hard time with RPI who has yet to show me anything...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 20, 2008, 08:43:17 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 20, 2008, 08:27:46 PM
can't really argue with this poll.... though I have a hard time with RPI who has yet to show me anything...
Already beat two second-tier LL teams (Susquehanna and WPI) this season. They're undefeated. What more do you want? They've beaten their opponents, and now some decent ones.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 20, 2008, 08:42:10 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 20, 2008, 08:41:05 PM
I just noticed that Frostburg beat Brockport this year by two touchdowns and that Brockport has been fairly competitive in the NJAC.
Kind of makes Ithacas win versus Frostburg a little more impressive in my mind.
It's out of region. It will be a nullity for Pool C purposes.
Quote from: superman57 on October 20, 2008, 08:27:46 PM
can't really argue with this poll.... though I have a hard time with RPI who has yet to show me anything...
Quote from: superman57 on October 20, 2008, 08:45:57 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 20, 2008, 08:43:17 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 20, 2008, 08:27:46 PM
can't really argue with this poll.... though I have a hard time with RPI who has yet to show me anything...
Already beat two second-tier LL teams (Susquehanna and WPI) this season. They're undefeated. What more do you want? They've beaten their opponents, and now some decent ones.
Frank you tell me that you think Susq and WPI could hang with Fisher, Wick, Ithaca... lets see them blow out some teams....
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2008, 11:13:24 PM
Oh....why do I do this...Just curious as to what the thinking is behind the present rankings of IC-'WICK-SJF? Obviously, IC BEAT 'Wick in a shootout, so they go ahead of them...right! And 'Wick snuck past SJF at SJF on homecoming, so 'Wick gets the nod over SJF....but in the only pure thumping (definition: alot to a little) SJF whacked IC....so obviously ;) IC gets the big nod over SJF? I do understand that in a 3-way like this, there is no ranking that can account for the head-to-head results...but I am just sayin...had IC played MUC, certainly they would be 4-2 instead of 5-1 and with a loss to SJF by many, many points, do the voters still give such a big nod (33 fan poll pts?) to IC over SJF?
Seriously, I am not criticizing the present poll, and I in fact agree with it...I am just wondering....
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2008, 11:13:24 PM
Oh....why do I do this...Just curious as to what the thinking is behind the present rankings of IC-'WICK-SJF? Obviously, IC BEAT 'Wick in a shootout, so they go ahead of them...right! And 'Wick snuck past SJF at SJF on homecoming, so 'Wick gets the nod over SJF....but in the only pure thumping (definition: alot to a little) SJF whacked IC....so obviously ;) IC gets the big nod over SJF? I do understand that in a 3-way like this, there is no ranking that can account for the head-to-head results...but I am just sayin...had IC played MUC, certainly they would be 4-2 instead of 5-1 and with a loss to SJF by many, many points, do the voters still give such a big nod (33 fan poll pts?) to IC over SJF?
Seriously, I am not criticizing the present poll, and I in fact agree with it...I am just wondering....
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2008, 06:53:12 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2008, 11:13:24 PM
Oh....why do I do this...Just curious as to what the thinking is behind the present rankings of IC-'WICK-SJF? Obviously, IC BEAT 'Wick in a shootout, so they go ahead of them...right! And 'Wick snuck past SJF at SJF on homecoming, so 'Wick gets the nod over SJF....but in the only pure thumping (definition: alot to a little) SJF whacked IC....so obviously ;) IC gets the big nod over SJF? I do understand that in a 3-way like this, there is no ranking that can account for the head-to-head results...but I am just sayin...had IC played MUC, certainly they would be 4-2 instead of 5-1 and with a loss to SJF by many, many points, do the voters still give such a big nod (33 fan poll pts?) to IC over SJF?
Seriously, I am not criticizing the present poll, and I in fact agree with it...I am just wondering....
I think SJFs loss against Salsbury hurt them as well. Ithaca didn't play a team like Salsbury so that is probably helping Ithaca a little too. SJF also lost to Hartwick at home, while the IC/Wick game wasn't close at any point during that game, even though it might not have appeared to have been as bad as the SJF/IC game.
I could see more of a case for SJF if SJF had beaten Salsbury, or if IC had some closer games in the past few weeks.
Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on October 21, 2008, 03:56:19 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2008, 06:53:12 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2008, 11:13:24 PM
Oh....why do I do this...Just curious as to what the thinking is behind the present rankings of IC-'WICK-SJF? Obviously, IC BEAT 'Wick in a shootout, so they go ahead of them...right! And 'Wick snuck past SJF at SJF on homecoming, so 'Wick gets the nod over SJF....but in the only pure thumping (definition: alot to a little) SJF whacked IC....so obviously ;) IC gets the big nod over SJF? I do understand that in a 3-way like this, there is no ranking that can account for the head-to-head results...but I am just sayin...had IC played MUC, certainly they would be 4-2 instead of 5-1 and with a loss to SJF by many, many points, do the voters still give such a big nod (33 fan poll pts?) to IC over SJF?
Seriously, I am not criticizing the present poll, and I in fact agree with it...I am just wondering....
I think SJFs loss against Salsbury hurt them as well. Ithaca didn't play a team like Salsbury so that is probably helping Ithaca a little too. SJF also lost to Hartwick at home, while the IC/Wick game wasn't close at any point during that game, even though it might not have appeared to have been as bad as the SJF/IC game.
I could see more of a case for SJF if SJF had beaten Salsbury, or if IC had some closer games in the past few weeks.
With 11:04 left in the 3rd quarter, Ithaca was only up 41-35. If a couple breaks had went hartwick's way we have a much much closer game.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2008, 06:06:54 PMQuote from: HHawksE8Champs on October 21, 2008, 03:56:19 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2008, 06:53:12 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2008, 11:13:24 PM
Oh....why do I do this...Just curious as to what the thinking is behind the present rankings of IC-'WICK-SJF? Obviously, IC BEAT 'Wick in a shootout, so they go ahead of them...right! And 'Wick snuck past SJF at SJF on homecoming, so 'Wick gets the nod over SJF....but in the only pure thumping (definition: alot to a little) SJF whacked IC....so obviously ;) IC gets the big nod over SJF? I do understand that in a 3-way like this, there is no ranking that can account for the head-to-head results...but I am just sayin...had IC played MUC, certainly they would be 4-2 instead of 5-1 and with a loss to SJF by many, many points, do the voters still give such a big nod (33 fan poll pts?) to IC over SJF?
Seriously, I am not criticizing the present poll, and I in fact agree with it...I am just wondering....
I think SJFs loss against Salsbury hurt them as well. Ithaca didn't play a team like Salsbury so that is probably helping Ithaca a little too. SJF also lost to Hartwick at home, while the IC/Wick game wasn't close at any point during that game, even though it might not have appeared to have been as bad as the SJF/IC game.
I could see more of a case for SJF if SJF had beaten Salsbury, or if IC had some closer games in the past few weeks.
With 11:04 left in the 3rd quarter, Ithaca was only up 41-35. If a couple breaks had went hartwick's way we have a much much closer game.
Yea you are right the score was close at that point. But if you saw the game like I did, Hartwick had a horrible game for the most part and their defense was embarrassing.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 20, 2008, 08:41:05 PM
I just noticed that Frostburg beat Brockport this year by two touchdowns and that Brockport has been fairly competitive in the NJAC.
Kind of makes Ithacas win versus Frostburg a little more impressive in my mind.
Quote from: DanPadavona on October 22, 2008, 12:14:39 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 20, 2008, 08:41:05 PM
I just noticed that Frostburg beat Brockport this year by two touchdowns and that Brockport has been fairly competitive in the NJAC.
Kind of makes Ithacas win versus Frostburg a little more impressive in my mind.
I don't know Jonny. It's difficult to say, because there are so many contrasting variables. The first which comes to mind is that Brockport is obviously playing better now than they were at the start of the season.
But also, Montclair beat Wilkes, and Albright and a mediocre NJAC West Conn basically were a stalemate. Lycoming, Wilkes, and Albright all appear to be about the same in overall quality, yet IC struggled to get by Lycoming. Should we then draw the conclusion that IC and West Conn would be a stalemate?
At this point there is so much parity in the East in 2008 that you have to stop over analyzing all of the linkages and just assess the overall body of work. This will get more confusing if and when Cortland loses a game, which is a strong possibility given Cortaca remains, as does TCNJ and Brockport which each have winning records against Cortland over the last decade+.
Quote from: DanPadavona on October 22, 2008, 12:14:39 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 20, 2008, 08:41:05 PM
I just noticed that Frostburg beat Brockport this year by two touchdowns and that Brockport has been fairly competitive in the NJAC.
Kind of makes Ithacas win versus Frostburg a little more impressive in my mind.
I don't know Jonny. It's difficult to say, because there are so many contrasting variables. The first which comes to mind is that Brockport is obviously playing better now than they were at the start of the season.
But also, Montclair beat Wilkes, and Albright and a mediocre NJAC West Conn basically were a stalemate. Lycoming, Wilkes, and Albright all appear to be about the same in overall quality, yet IC struggled to get by Lycoming. Should we then draw the conclusion that IC and West Conn would be a stalemate?
At this point there is so much parity in the East in 2008 that you have to stop over analyzing all of the linkages and just assess the overall body of work. This will get more confusing if and when Cortland loses a game, which is a strong possibility given Cortaca remains, as does TCNJ and Brockport which each have winning records against Cortland over the last decade+.
Quote from: gobombers15 on October 25, 2008, 05:53:37 PM
Hawks, trotting out the "it was 41-35 in the 3rd qtr" argument is the definiton of misleading. Yes, that was the score after Hartwick scored on their first possession of the 2nd half, but anybody at that game knew Hartwick's D was not coming close to stopping Ithaca's attack while IC's defense was making some plays. I was certainly never worried.
To borrow an analogy from tennis, Hartwick was still down a break at that point. Problem is, Ithaca's offense, with help from a porous Hartwick defense, looked like Rafael Nadal on clay that game. In other words, Hartwick's defense wasn't going to break Ithaca's offense and you knew Hartwick's offense would have some empty possessions since they were turning it over so much. I think the final result was sufficiently representative of the ebbs and flows of that game.
Re: Why is Ithaca so far ahead of Fisher since Fisher beat Ithaca?
1) Because Fisher has lost two games, on their home field no less, since the Ithaca game. Ithaca has lost no games since that day.
2) Fisher is 5-3, Ithaca is 6-1.
3) Ithaca's loss came on the road, Fisher has lost two games at home.
Look, I respect the hell out of Fisher for scheduling MUC and Salisbury. But they lost those games. If they won them, it would have been reflected in the poll. You just can't ignore losses because they were against tough teams. And arguing "well, we proved we were better than them on the field" is pointless, too, since that would get us all three sets of fans saying "well, we beat _____, and they beat you."
And equally flawed is the argument that "if Ithaca played ____, they would've lost that game." Yeah, and if Penn State scheduled Oklahoma, Texas and USC, they'd have three losses right now. But they didn't, so they don't. Bad argument.
Quote from: Union89 on October 26, 2008, 11:55:03 AM
I haven't voted for Husson, but when do the enter on our radar.....if ever??
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 26, 2008, 06:16:53 PM
No guarantee Mount Union will be brought in.
Quote from: TGP on October 26, 2008, 08:47:48 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 26, 2008, 06:16:53 PM
No guarantee Mount Union will be brought in.
that's exactly right. my best guess is that either cortland or muhlenberg will be the #1 in the east.
Quote from: TGP on October 26, 2008, 08:47:48 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 26, 2008, 06:16:53 PM
No guarantee Mount Union will be brought in.
that's exactly right. my best guess is that either cortland or muhlenberg will be the #1 in the east.
Quote from: DanPadavona on October 27, 2008, 01:13:31 AM
Husson is on my radar too. I did not rank them this week but am impressed by the big win over Springfield. The rest of the resume is pretty weak however...close call wins over Norwich, Mt Ida, and Utica. With only a horrible Becker team left to play, it looks like they will run the table against D3 competition. That may get them into the playoffs where they will have an opportunity to earn some respect.
Let's be honest about Springfield 2008 though. I know they gave Fisher a game, but they are 2-5 with a loss to Utica.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) | 7-0 | 99 | 1 | at New Jersey |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 6-0 | 89 | 2 | vs. Union |
3 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 6-1 | 78 | 3 | vs, Springfield |
4 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 5-1 | 59 | 4 | vs. Norwich |
5 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 6-1 | 49 | 8 | vs. Kean |
6 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 6-1 | 48 | 6 | at Western Connecticut |
7 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) | 5-3 | 42 | 7 | at Utica |
8 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 5-1 | 32 | 9 | vs. #9 WPI |
9 | WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Worcester+Polytech&year=2008) | 6-1 | 19 | T10 | at #8 Hobart |
10 | Lycoming (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lycoming&year=2008) | 5-2 | 12 | NR | at FDU-Florham |
Quote from: superman57 on October 27, 2008, 09:40:12 PM
listen I have no issue having fisher low on the poll... but who didn't put them on the poll at all
Quote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:43:42 PM
nevermind...I checked for you 49-12 over 5 full seasons...trips to at least second round of national play-offs 3 out of 5 seasons and 1 ECAC bowl win. Only non play-off win season was loss to RPI in ECAC after AU whacked us in season finale at Growney (for you AU posters ;))
I know nobody likes when I boast about SJF , because I am supposed to be neutral....oops, i did it again as Brittney Spears would say
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 01:42:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
Dood, I'm not going to keep going back and forth with you on this....I have never had an exchange with you previously, but your reputation on this site is that of a guy who sees everything SJF's way...good for you, I just don't see it that way.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 01:45:36 PMIt doesnt, nor did I state or imply that it does. You continue to incorrectly state that they "had 2 good seaons" but you are not going to give them cred for it this year. I agree, you should not, however I was simply correcting the statement that they had "2 good seasons" that's all.Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:43:42 PM
nevermind...I checked for you 49-12 over 5 full seasons...trips to at least second round of national play-offs 3 out of 5 seasons and 1 ECAC bowl win. Only non play-off win season was loss to RPI in ECAC after AU whacked us in season finale at Growney (for you AU posters ;))
I know nobody likes when I boast about SJF , because I am supposed to be neutral....oops, i did it again as Brittney Spears would say
That has to do with the '08 Fisher team, how??
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2008, 01:47:42 PM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trophies2go.com%2Fimages%2Fproductimages%2FHorses-Rear-Bobble-Butt-Trophies.jpg&hash=372e2a2b1b72c639687979a087f13fd8741727de)
The 2008 Trophy for going 49-12 in the 5 seasons leading up to 2008
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:51:47 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 01:45:36 PMIt doesnt, nor did I state or imply that it does. You continue to incorrectly state that they "had 2 good seaons" but you are not going to give them cred for it this year. I agree, you should not, however I was simply correcting the statement that they had "2 good seasons" that's all.Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:43:42 PM
nevermind...I checked for you 49-12 over 5 full seasons...trips to at least second round of national play-offs 3 out of 5 seasons and 1 ECAC bowl win. Only non play-off win season was loss to RPI in ECAC after AU whacked us in season finale at Growney (for you AU posters ;))
I know nobody likes when I boast about SJF , because I am supposed to be neutral....oops, i did it again as Brittney Spears would say
That has to do with the '08 Fisher team, how??
Dont put incorrect words in my mouth, so that you can turn around and correct me.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 28, 2008, 01:54:46 PM
Sep. 6 1:30 PM at Mount Union L, 33-3
Sep. 13 6:00 PM Buffalo State • W, 20-7
Sep. 20 7:00 PM at Rochester • W, 24-17
Sep. 27 1:00 PM Ithaca * • W, 37-6
Oct. 4 1:00 PM Hartwick * • L, 31-28
Oct. 11 12:00 PM Salisbury L, 58-52 Final - 4OT
Oct. 18 1:30 PM at Norwich * • W, 45-6
Oct. 25 1:00 PM Springfield * • W, 38-35
Nov. 1 1:30 PM at Utica * •
Nov. 15 1:00 PM at Alfred * •
I have Fisher at 7 right now in the region, they have not impressed me as much as they did the last two years. The losses to Hartwick and Salisbury at home have hurt them also the recent struggle against a Springfield team that has not played well in conference this season has put some questions in my mind. Right now I consider Cortland and RPI as a clear but interchangable 1 and 2 and then the rest are all about even.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 02:04:12 PM
...they had the same sort of results last year, in squeaking by UR, losing to Wick, crushing IC and taking care of business ag. everyone else. The difference of course is adding MUC automatic loss and the highly ranked Salisbury squad to the schedule. Now a team with 3 losses suddenly doesnt get the benefit of the doubt that a 9-1 team gets, even though it might be the same team. Right or wrong is each's opinion, its just how I see it.
They certainly didnt turn the ball over and committ so many penalties last year though...
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:48:52 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 01:42:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
Dood, I'm not going to keep going back and forth with you on this....I have never had an exchange with you previously, but your reputation on this site is that of a guy who sees everything SJF's way...good for you, I just don't see it that way.
convenient, but not true...I have on numerous occassions been objectively critical of Fisher and have laid out bluntly when and where they are flawed and what their 'prognosis' is. If you are going to state things like that to make me the scapegoat for all passionate fans of their teams...then back it up with some of my posts, otherwise dont make such generalizations. You are confusing my fan support for "always seeing it SJF's way" BTW, is that wrong, if it is true?
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:58:44 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
I agree. Even in my original statement I feel like they could be too high, but then again, I do believe they are better than the teams that are below them like Montclair, Hobart, WPI, etc..
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 03:04:41 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:58:44 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
I agree. Even in my original statement I feel like they could be too high, but then again, I do believe they are better than the teams that are below them like Montclair, Hobart, WPI, etc..
I appreciate your feedback, but in doing that aren't you ranking them based on reputation?
I'm honestly not busting your chops...I'm interested in others outlooks which I can't get my mind around. I can't see Fisher being at #7, yet the majority of people seem to be dead against me on this 1.
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 03:07:21 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 03:04:41 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:58:44 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
I agree. Even in my original statement I feel like they could be too high, but then again, I do believe they are better than the teams that are below them like Montclair, Hobart, WPI, etc..
I appreciate your feedback, but in doing that aren't you ranking them based on reputation?
I'm honestly not busting your chops...I'm interested in others outlooks which I can't get my mind around. I can't see Fisher being at #7, yet the majority of people seem to be dead against me on this 1.
I actually see both sides of the argument. That's why I have such a hard time ranking them.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:25:09 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:48:52 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 01:42:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
Dood, I'm not going to keep going back and forth with you on this....I have never had an exchange with you previously, but your reputation on this site is that of a guy who sees everything SJF's way...good for you, I just don't see it that way.
convenient, but not true...I have on numerous occassions been objectively critical of Fisher and have laid out bluntly when and where they are flawed and what their 'prognosis' is. If you are going to state things like that to make me the scapegoat for all passionate fans of their teams...then back it up with some of my posts, otherwise dont make such generalizations. You are confusing my fan support for "always seeing it SJF's way" BTW, is that wrong, if it is true?
That's why I said 'good for you'......let's say Utica had SJF's '08 resume of wins and losses. Would you be asking why UC is only ranked 7th on the fan pool?? You seem to expect people to 'respect' this years Fisher team more because of what they have done the last 6 years....you continue to bring up this timeframe....
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 03:34:33 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
My bad, I thought you were siding with Supes about my omission of SJF from above.....if that was not your intent, I was wrong.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 03:46:34 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 03:34:33 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
My bad, I thought you were siding with Supes about my omission of SJF from above.....if that was not your intent, I was wrong.
I do agree with Supes, and question how you dont have SJF ranked. I however do not have a problem with the 7 ranking that the overall voters came up with. I suspect not many people in the nation (d3 nation that is) could agree with your assessment that "SJF is just not that good this year" They certainly are not SJF '06 or '07, yet play the same schedule as 06-07, and they probably have the same to date record of 7-1 interestingly enough.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 28, 2008, 03:56:19 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
I love how you are making the Salisbury team sound worse and worse everytime. They had 5 players that were kicked off, only 2 defensive starters I believe and another that played a decent amount. However what goes under the radar is how they got their all american best defender back for that game and how Fisher held out 2 of their defensive starters for that game via coaches decision. I would say things were about equal as far as the defenses were concerned.
First half against U of R was a struggle, but they maintained control in the 2nd half. Buff State was never in question, their offense did nothing against Fisher but they did score on a garbage time TD on their last possession. Springfield was also a struggle no doubt, should have won that one by more.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 28, 2008, 03:56:19 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
I love how you are making the Salisbury team sound worse and worse everytime. They had 5 players that were kicked off, only 2 defensive starters I believe and another that played a decent amount. However what goes under the radar is how they got their all american best defender back for that game and how Fisher held out 2 of their defensive starters for that game via coaches decision. I would say things were about equal as far as the defenses were concerned.
First half against U of R was a struggle, but they maintained control in the 2nd half. Buff State was never in question, their offense did nothing against Fisher but they did score on a garbage time TD on their last possession. Springfield was also a struggle no doubt, should have won that one by more.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 03:50:53 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 03:46:34 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 03:34:33 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 12:02:06 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:06:00 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 27, 2008, 09:57:47 PM
I give Fisher credit for their big win vs. Ithaca.
How do SJF's performances vs. MUC, Salisbury, Hartwick and Springfield warrant my vote?? I don't see it...
lets see they've given MUC their best game to date... they went 4 overtimes with the #15 team in the country, they played within 3 of the defending conference champions and they came from behind a springfield team that at times can be dangerous...
The MUC argument is rediculous....Fisher lost by 30 and was outgained 2 to 1. I don't slam them for that loss, but on the other hand I don't give them any credit for getting smoked like any other Eastern team would have. Losing to Salisbury when Salisbury had a bunch of suspensions does not hold up well either. As for Springfield, my Union team beat them handily this year....does that mean that Union should be ranked above Fisher also?
Fisher had 2 great years and I think they will return to similar status. I am not voting for them this year due to their reputation over the last 2. SJF is simply not that good this year IMO.
silly rabbit...I told you already that you are confused....check SJF's record since 2003, including how many consecutive trips to the play-offs.
Also go back and reread Supes post a few back re: actual game results for this year, and as much as everyone wants to continue to pay lip service to SJF having played MUC, they (especially you) also immediately use their modest 30 pt loss against them...even though you say you are not.
My bad, I thought you were siding with Supes about my omission of SJF from above.....if that was not your intent, I was wrong.
I do agree with Supes, and question how you dont have SJF ranked. I however do not have a problem with the 7 ranking that the overall voters came up with. I suspect not many people in the nation (d3 nation that is) could agree with your assessment that "SJF is just not that good this year" They certainly are not SJF '06 or '07, yet play the same schedule as 06-07, and they probably have the same to date record of 7-1 interestingly enough.
I give up....you are all over the place.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2008, 04:05:48 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 28, 2008, 03:56:19 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
I love how you are making the Salisbury team sound worse and worse everytime. They had 5 players that were kicked off, only 2 defensive starters I believe and another that played a decent amount. However what goes under the radar is how they got their all american best defender back for that game and how Fisher held out 2 of their defensive starters for that game via coaches decision. I would say things were about equal as far as the defenses were concerned.
First half against U of R was a struggle, but they maintained control in the 2nd half. Buff State was never in question, their offense did nothing against Fisher but they did score on a garbage time TD on their last possession. Springfield was also a struggle no doubt, should have won that one by more.
We should just rank Fisher #1 and be done with it...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2008, 04:05:48 PM
We should just rank Fisher #1 and be done with it...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2008, 04:05:48 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 28, 2008, 03:56:19 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:55:25 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:42:50 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 02:38:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 02:33:29 PM
I have Fisher at #5, which is probably too high, but with the way the teams have been losing and the way my poll changes from week to week, they maneuvered their way back up to that spot.
Even if you throw out the MUC loss...outside of the Ithaca win, what performances have impressed you from a 5-2 Fisher this year?
Well if we want to use this argument than I could say the same thing about RPI... At least St. John Fisher has that Ithaca win.
Good point, but what about the Salisbury and Hartwick losses. The Salisbury loss was to an extremely depleted squad and the Hartwick game in '07 was looked at as a fluke and STF had that game circled in '08. Even in win's vs. Rochester and Springfield, Fisher struggled mightily.
I love how you are making the Salisbury team sound worse and worse everytime. They had 5 players that were kicked off, only 2 defensive starters I believe and another that played a decent amount. However what goes under the radar is how they got their all american best defender back for that game and how Fisher held out 2 of their defensive starters for that game via coaches decision. I would say things were about equal as far as the defenses were concerned.
First half against U of R was a struggle, but they maintained control in the 2nd half. Buff State was never in question, their offense did nothing against Fisher but they did score on a garbage time TD on their last possession. Springfield was also a struggle no doubt, should have won that one by more.
We should just rank Fisher #1 and be done with it...
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 09:37:35 PM
I think you are not understanding where I am coming from... Fisher has the best win of the season in the E8 by routing Ithaca..., and their two loses not to the #1 team in the nation were by 9 points combined, to the #15 team in the country and the reining e8 champs... they should be 6 7, 8 or 9... I mean U89 did you not notice you were the only one who did not rank fisher....
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:30:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
Trinity over fisher... to me that seems like you are searching for anyone to put ahead of fisher... you criticze fisher for not putting away springfield but it took over time for Trinity to beat a 3-3 tufts team, they also struggled vs a 1-5 Bates team and struggled with an average middelbury team... So I respect your right to vote and all... but you are being hypocritical... Trinity has yet to be impressive... so the least you could do is put fisher over Trinity... because I guarantee you that fisher beats trinity this year
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:39:44 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:30:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
Trinity over fisher... to me that seems like you are searching for anyone to put ahead of fisher... you criticze fisher for not putting away springfield but it took over time for Trinity to beat a 3-3 tufts team, they also struggled vs a 1-5 Bates team and struggled with an average middelbury team... So I respect your right to vote and all... but you are being hypocritical... Trinity has yet to be impressive... so the least you could do is put fisher over Trinity... because I guarantee you that fisher beats trinity this year
You can guarantee Fisher would beat Trinity?
What is Springfields record (which Fisher struggled with)?? This conversation could go on forever....just my opinion and I've tried to explain to you my thought process.....at I said earlier, #'s 8, 9 & 10 were a crap-shoot for me.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 10:38:15 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
And here we go again...I never expressed any frustration with your not ranking a 5-3 team with 1 loss to MUC, 1 loss to #16 Salisury in 4ot and 1 loss by three to 'Wick...in the EAST....AT ALL! Never said it! You cannot find that post. My first comment in this 'thread' was to point out that Fisher has had more than 2 good (or "great" for those keeping tabs on every word typed....JU) contrary to your assertion. It wasnt until several posts later that it occurred to me that you had misunderstood me and felt that I had a big problem with the poll. I did not, and in fact have previously (last week) expressed that I agree with SJF's ranking. At that point I felt compelled to comment that yeah, your not ranking SJF is a bit suspect, as even you now understand cannot really be supported by OBJECTIVE criteria. I guess my feeling is that I dont want you to feel like I had a big prob with your voting, because until you pointed it out to me, I hadnt even noticed that you snubbed them ;D
BTW....there always comes a point in the season when I wonder if we all take this stuff a bit too serious, or perhaps, it just comes off as too serious because words on a screen are taken out of context from the individuals typing them...I would like to think that most posters can sit back, talk to their fellow fans of their respective teams or their former teammates and have a laugh about how we go at it on here...and its not that 'we' actually harbor any ill will towards eachother's opinions. We all have something in common on here and most of it is towards the same positive end...the best for the individual teams that we support.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 28, 2008, 10:44:08 PM
I am not on crack, I am on Jack and I don't think Hartwick deserves a top 10 vote, they are on the bubble.
Sep. 6 2:00 PM Western New England • W, 63-37
Sep. 20 1:00 PM at Ithaca * • L, 69-42
Oct. 4 1:00 PM at St. John Fisher * • W, 31-28
Oct. 11 2:00 PM Alfred * • W, 24-19
Oct. 18 1:00 PM Becker • W, 49-12
Oct. 25 1:00 PM at Mount Ida • W, 58-27
Nov. 1 2:00 PM Norwich * •
Nov. 8 12:00 PM at Springfield * •
Nov. 15 1:00 PM Utica * •
Two decent wins and a monkey-stomping at the hands of Ithaca, otherwise they have beaten up on Mother Marys School for the Blind. I have two MAC teams that would be top ten before Hartwick.
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:39:44 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:30:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
Trinity over fisher... to me that seems like you are searching for anyone to put ahead of fisher... you criticze fisher for not putting away springfield but it took over time for Trinity to beat a 3-3 tufts team, they also struggled vs a 1-5 Bates team and struggled with an average middelbury team... So I respect your right to vote and all... but you are being hypocritical... Trinity has yet to be impressive... so the least you could do is put fisher over Trinity... because I guarantee you that fisher beats trinity this year
You can guarantee Fisher would beat Trinity?
What is Springfields record (which Fisher struggled with)?? This conversation could go on forever....just my opinion and I've tried to explain to you my thought process.....at I said earlier, #'s 8, 9 & 10 were a crap-shoot for me.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 28, 2008, 10:44:08 PM
I am not on crack, I am on Jack and I don't think Hartwick deserves a top 10 vote, they are on the bubble.
Sep. 6 2:00 PM Western New England • W, 63-37
Sep. 20 1:00 PM at Ithaca * • L, 69-42
Oct. 4 1:00 PM at St. John Fisher * • W, 31-28
Oct. 11 2:00 PM Alfred * • W, 24-19
Oct. 18 1:00 PM Becker • W, 49-12
Oct. 25 1:00 PM at Mount Ida • W, 58-27
Nov. 1 2:00 PM Norwich * •
Nov. 8 12:00 PM at Springfield * •
Nov. 15 1:00 PM Utica * •
Two decent wins and a monkey-stomping at the hands of Ithaca, otherwise they have beaten up on Mother Marys School for the Blind. I have two MAC teams that would be top ten before Hartwick.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 10:47:13 PM
....but #11 was easy...ST. JOHN FISHER CARDINALS....the laughing stock of the East for giving MUC their toughest game in 2 years since the last time they gave MUC their toughest game in the 2006 semis (other than the Stagg last year of course)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 10:47:13 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:39:44 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:30:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
Trinity over fisher... to me that seems like you are searching for anyone to put ahead of fisher... you criticze fisher for not putting away springfield but it took over time for Trinity to beat a 3-3 tufts team, they also struggled vs a 1-5 Bates team and struggled with an average middelbury team... So I respect your right to vote and all... but you are being hypocritical... Trinity has yet to be impressive... so the least you could do is put fisher over Trinity... because I guarantee you that fisher beats trinity this year
You can guarantee Fisher would beat Trinity?
What is Springfields record (which Fisher struggled with)?? This conversation could go on forever....just my opinion and I've tried to explain to you my thought process.....at I said earlier, #'s 8, 9 & 10 were a crap-shoot for me.
....but #11 was easy...ST. JOHN FISHER CARDINALS....the laughing stock of the East for giving MUC their toughest game in 2 years since the last time they gave MUC their toughest game in the 2006 semis (other than the Stagg last year of course)
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:51:41 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 10:47:13 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:39:44 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:30:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 10:16:28 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:10:44 PM
I agree that whoever did not vote for Rowan is on crack.. as is the voter who did not vote for wick... you've given me the reasons that you did not vote for fisher but you've yet to give me who you voted for over fisher and what victories they had that were more impressive than fisher
It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out what my Poll was....you can do that homework. I think I've been more than fair to both you and SJF82 in addressing your frustrations with my omission of Fisher.
Trinity over fisher... to me that seems like you are searching for anyone to put ahead of fisher... you criticze fisher for not putting away springfield but it took over time for Trinity to beat a 3-3 tufts team, they also struggled vs a 1-5 Bates team and struggled with an average middelbury team... So I respect your right to vote and all... but you are being hypocritical... Trinity has yet to be impressive... so the least you could do is put fisher over Trinity... because I guarantee you that fisher beats trinity this year
You can guarantee Fisher would beat Trinity?
What is Springfields record (which Fisher struggled with)?? This conversation could go on forever....just my opinion and I've tried to explain to you my thought process.....at I said earlier, #'s 8, 9 & 10 were a crap-shoot for me.
....but #11 was easy...ST. JOHN FISHER CARDINALS....the laughing stock of the East for giving MUC their toughest game in 2 years since the last time they gave MUC their toughest game in the 2006 semis (other than the Stagg last year of course)
There you go talking about '06 again in an '08 Fan Poll Board....irrelevant to this.
Also, are you calling Fisher a laughing stock? I never have, nor would I state that.
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 11:04:05 PM
I think it's become more intense in here than it is in the top 25 discussion board! :D
Quote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:03:55 PM
I think we all need a little bit of the crack and jack that KS is taking
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:08:19 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 11:03:55 PM
I think we all need a little bit of the crack and jack that KS is taking
I had a couple of glasses of Pinot Noir red wine....i know, it sounds like I am a LLPPer...back to the beer come Saterday though
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Certainly...you might consider Galludet or Theil at #10 next week before SJF, or maybe Union's JV squad...
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:13:11 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Certainly...you might consider Galludet or Theil at #10 next week before SJF, or maybe Union's JV squad...
The research I do is quite intense, but I'm not sure I would rank Union's JV's over the big fellas.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Certainly...you might consider Galludet or Theil at #10 next week before SJF, or maybe Union's JV squad...
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 11:18:28 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Certainly...you might consider Galludet or Theil at #10 next week before SJF, or maybe Union's JV squad...
Galludet and Thiel are not in the east, I would reject the poll immediately :P
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:22:13 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 11:18:28 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Certainly...you might consider Galludet or Theil at #10 next week before SJF, or maybe Union's JV squad...
Galludet and Thiel are not in the east, I would reject the poll immediately :P
Then he might consider the Golden Eagles over SJF....JUST KIDDIN PG04...you did beat us 18 straight before 'Hail Katherine' landed in Noah's hands
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 11:26:44 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:22:13 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 11:18:28 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Certainly...you might consider Galludet or Theil at #10 next week before SJF, or maybe Union's JV squad...
Galludet and Thiel are not in the east, I would reject the poll immediately :P
Then he might consider the Golden Eagles over SJF....JUST KIDDIN PG04...you did beat us 18 straight before 'Hail Katherine' landed in Noah's hands
That was the year I moved down to Florida. I would have liked to have been there even with the result.
I was there Broadcasting the 2003 game at Fisher when we won with a last second field goal 38-35. That was one of the more exciting games I've ever seen.
Unfortunately, for now the series is on hiatus. I guess The Golden Eagles will have to start playing better and make a run at the playoffs again one of these years.. (I've always wanted to have them getting votes in the poll too!)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:33:39 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 11:26:44 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:22:13 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2008, 11:18:28 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 28, 2008, 11:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 28, 2008, 11:01:34 PMQuote from: superman57 on October 28, 2008, 10:53:32 PM
This conversation is over to me...u89 you have made yourself clear... and I am over it
I see where you are coming and hopefully you see where I am coming from...
I totally do....the bottom 1/3 of my Poll could have gone in any number of directions.
Certainly...you might consider Galludet or Theil at #10 next week before SJF, or maybe Union's JV squad...
Galludet and Thiel are not in the east, I would reject the poll immediately :P
Then he might consider the Golden Eagles over SJF....JUST KIDDIN PG04...you did beat us 18 straight before 'Hail Katherine' landed in Noah's hands
That was the year I moved down to Florida. I would have liked to have been there even with the result.
I was there Broadcasting the 2003 game at Fisher when we won with a last second field goal 38-35. That was one of the more exciting games I've ever seen.
Unfortunately, for now the series is on hiatus. I guess The Golden Eagles will have to start playing better and make a run at the playoffs again one of these years.. (I've always wanted to have them getting votes in the poll too!)
good stuff...it pains me to recall a less 'exciting' moment in the SJF-'PORT rivalry...in 1995 at 6-0, and up by 2 with 1 and change to go (we kicked a FG), 'Port returns the ensuing KO for a TD and the win...I always forget the kid's name (for good reason), but he was the RB and he was from Greece Olympia. I went a combined 0-6 against 'Port between JV and Varsity games from 92-95...I have no prob not seeing them in the polls ;)
Quote from: Upstate on October 29, 2008, 08:32:10 AM
Port had a rough start this year but seem to be climbing back to respectability with 3 straight wins. They'll likely make themselves eligible for the ECAC's this year.
Port vs SJF in the ECAC's anyone???
Two teams separated by 30 miles could equal big time numbers at the gate...
Quote from: Upstate on October 29, 2008, 08:32:10 AM
Port had a rough start this year but seem to be climbing back to respectability with 3 straight wins. They'll likely make themselves eligible for the ECAC's this year.
Port vs SJF in the ECAC's anyone???
Two teams separated by 30 miles could equal big time numbers at the gate...
Quote from: Commish Kaz00 on October 29, 2008, 11:16:36 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 29, 2008, 08:32:10 AM
Port had a rough start this year but seem to be climbing back to respectability with 3 straight wins. They'll likely make themselves eligible for the ECAC's this year.
Port vs SJF in the ECAC's anyone???
Two teams separated by 30 miles could equal big time numbers at the gate...
ECAC bowls are like minor league playoffs - nobody knows about them, everyone has previous plans, and the seats are half full.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 12:01:28 PMQuote from: Commish Kaz00 on October 29, 2008, 11:16:36 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 29, 2008, 08:32:10 AM
Port had a rough start this year but seem to be climbing back to respectability with 3 straight wins. They'll likely make themselves eligible for the ECAC's this year.
Port vs SJF in the ECAC's anyone???
Two teams separated by 30 miles could equal big time numbers at the gate...
ECAC bowls are like minor league playoffs - nobody knows about them, everyone has previous plans, and the seats are half full.
I agree. I posted this on the E8 board, but I've always hated them. They're often played during Thanksgiving break, so a lot of kids aren't there. Half the time, you've got a disinterested team who's so dissappointed by the regular season, they phone it in.The other half of the time, one team is so angry and being left out of the NCAA's they obliterate their opponent. I've yet to see IC play a moderately entertaining ECAC game. 1998 and 2004 they were angry and destroyed people and in 1999 they had no desire to play and lost. Cortland also famously phoned one in one season after missing out following a 9-1 season.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 12:01:28 PMQuote from: Commish Kaz00 on October 29, 2008, 11:16:36 AM
ECAC bowls are like minor league playoffs - nobody knows about them, everyone has previous plans, and the seats are half full.
I agree. I posted this on the E8 board, but I've always hated them. They're often played during Thanksgiving break, so a lot of kids aren't there. Half the time, you've got a disinterested team who's so dissappointed by the regular season, they phone it in.The other half of the time, one team is so angry and being left out of the NCAA's they obliterate their opponent. I've yet to see IC play a moderately entertaining ECAC game...
Quote from: pg04 on October 27, 2008, 08:46:16 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 8 (10/27/08)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) 7-0 99 1at New Jersey 2 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) 6-0 89 2vs. Union 3 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) 6-1 78 3vs, Springfield 4 Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) 5-1 59 4vs. Norwich 5 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) 6-1 49 8vs. Kean 6 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) 6-1 48 6at Western Connecticut 7 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) 5-3 42 7at Utica 8 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) 5-1 32 9vs. #9 WPI 9 WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Worcester+Polytech&year=2008) 6-1 19 T10at #8 Hobart 10 Lycoming (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lycoming&year=2008) 5-2 12 NRat FDU-Florham
Others Receiving votes:
Alfred 8,
Albright 5,
Kean 4,
Delaware Valley 3,
Lebanon Valley 2,
Trinity 1
Dropping out: Delaware Valley #5, Alfred #10
Voting Breakdown:
Cortland State (1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1)
RPI (2, 4, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2)
Ithaca (3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4)
Hartwick (4, 6, 4, 3, 5, 5, -, 5, 5, 3)
Rowan (7, 5, 8, 7, -, 4, 6, 4, 4, 5)
Montclair State (6, 2, 5, 5, 10, 7, 4, 10, 6, 7)
St. John Fisher (5, 8, 6, -, 4, 6, 7, 6, 7, 8 )
Hobart (8, 7, 7, 6, 6, -, 5, -, -, 6)
WPI (9, 9, 9, 8, 7, -, 9, -, 9, 9)
Lycoming (-, -, -, 9, -, 8, -, 8, 8, 10)
Alfred (10, 10, 10, -, 8, 9, -, -, -, -)
Albright (-, -, -, -, -, -, -, 7, 10, -)
Kean (-, -, -, -, -, 10, 8, -, -, -)
Delaware Valley (-, -, -, -, -, -, 10, 9, -, -)
Lebanon Valley (-, -, -, -, 9, -, -, -, -, -)
Trinity (-, -, -, 10, -, -, -, -, -, -)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 29, 2008, 02:03:52 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 12:01:28 PMQuote from: Commish Kaz00 on October 29, 2008, 11:16:36 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 29, 2008, 08:32:10 AM
Port had a rough start this year but seem to be climbing back to respectability with 3 straight wins. They'll likely make themselves eligible for the ECAC's this year.
Port vs SJF in the ECAC's anyone???
Two teams separated by 30 miles could equal big time numbers at the gate...
ECAC bowls are like minor league playoffs - nobody knows about them, everyone has previous plans, and the seats are half full.
I agree. I posted this on the E8 board, but I've always hated them. They're often played during Thanksgiving break, so a lot of kids aren't there. Half the time, you've got a disinterested team who's so dissappointed by the regular season, they phone it in.The other half of the time, one team is so angry and being left out of the NCAA's they obliterate their opponent. I've yet to see IC play a moderately entertaining ECAC game. 1998 and 2004 they were angry and destroyed people and in 1999 they had no desire to play and lost. Cortland also famously phoned one in one season after missing out following a 9-1 season.
You referring to the SJF-CORT ECAC game of 2003? There is a 3rd scenario...a team on the rise embraces the opportunity for a ECAC game and blasts the stuffin out of a perennial powerhouse. That was sweet as many Cortland fans were so very rowdy and cocky sitting on Fisher 'side' in the 1st qu....they had a good fan base there as I recall.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 05:26:41 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 29, 2008, 02:03:52 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 12:01:28 PMQuote from: Commish Kaz00 on October 29, 2008, 11:16:36 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 29, 2008, 08:32:10 AM
Port had a rough start this year but seem to be climbing back to respectability with 3 straight wins. They'll likely make themselves eligible for the ECAC's this year.
Port vs SJF in the ECAC's anyone???
Two teams separated by 30 miles could equal big time numbers at the gate...
ECAC bowls are like minor league playoffs - nobody knows about them, everyone has previous plans, and the seats are half full.
I agree. I posted this on the E8 board, but I've always hated them. They're often played during Thanksgiving break, so a lot of kids aren't there. Half the time, you've got a disinterested team who's so dissappointed by the regular season, they phone it in.The other half of the time, one team is so angry and being left out of the NCAA's they obliterate their opponent. I've yet to see IC play a moderately entertaining ECAC game. 1998 and 2004 they were angry and destroyed people and in 1999 they had no desire to play and lost. Cortland also famously phoned one in one season after missing out following a 9-1 season.
You referring to the SJF-CORT ECAC game of 2003? There is a 3rd scenario...a team on the rise embraces the opportunity for a ECAC game and blasts the stuffin out of a perennial powerhouse. That was sweet as many Cortland fans were so very rowdy and cocky sitting on Fisher 'side' in the 1st qu....they had a good fan base there as I recall.
I was actually refering to the 2006 game (I think) where Cortland lost to RPI 26-7
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 07:21:43 PM
I know they were down to their 18th string QB in that game...but at the same time
1) Seven turnovers (5 Picks, 2 Fumbles)
2) Outgained 398-211.
3) 291 yards allowed on only 14 completions
4) Yes, RPI kicked a bunch of FG's, but...
A) The first one came from the Cortland 4
B) The second came from the Cortland 8
C) The third came from the 10 after being pushed back from the 6
D) The 4th came from the 12, after a holding penalty pushed them back from the 2
All of RPI Scoring drives took them inside the Cortland 10. If anything, Cortland was lucky this thing wasn;t worse. This RPI squad was a team that finished FOURTH in their own conference. Cortland was an overtime away from going 10-0 and was ranked 15th in the country and they were at home. RPI wasn't even getting votes. I'm sorry, but I can't believe RPI was better than Cortland that season
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 07:21:43 PM
I know they were down to their 18th string QB in that game...but at the same time
1) Seven turnovers (5 Picks, 2 Fumbles)
2) Outgained 398-211.
3) 291 yards allowed on only 14 completions
4) Yes, RPI kicked a bunch of FG's, but...
A) The first one came from the Cortland 4
B) The second came from the Cortland 8
C) The third came from the 10 after being pushed back from the 6
D) The 4th came from the 12, after a holding penalty pushed them back from the 2
All of RPI Scoring drives took them inside the Cortland 10. If anything, Cortland was lucky this thing wasn;t worse. This RPI squad was a team that finished FOURTH in their own conference. Cortland was an overtime away from going 10-0 and was ranked 15th in the country and they were at home. RPI wasn't even getting votes. I'm sorry, but I can't believe RPI was better than Cortland that season
Quote from: 'gro on October 29, 2008, 09:37:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2008, 07:21:43 PM
I know they were down to their 18th string QB in that game...but at the same time
1) Seven turnovers (5 Picks, 2 Fumbles)
2) Outgained 398-211.
3) 291 yards allowed on only 14 completions
4) Yes, RPI kicked a bunch of FG's, but...
A) The first one came from the Cortland 4
B) The second came from the Cortland 8
C) The third came from the 10 after being pushed back from the 6
D) The 4th came from the 12, after a holding penalty pushed them back from the 2
All of RPI Scoring drives took them inside the Cortland 10. If anything, Cortland was lucky this thing wasn;t worse. This RPI squad was a team that finished FOURTH in their own conference. Cortland was an overtime away from going 10-0 and was ranked 15th in the country and they were at home. RPI wasn't even getting votes. I'm sorry, but I can't believe RPI was better than Cortland that season
I hate it when the better team doesn't win.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 30, 2008, 10:35:32 AM
Congrats U89...your ranking, or lack thereof, of SJF has been vindicated by the braintrust that thinks Husson and Plymouth St. are worthy of East Top 10 rankings ;D
Quote from: Union89 on October 30, 2008, 11:26:21 AMObviously you didn't vote for Fisher either......LOLQuote from: SJFF82 on October 30, 2008, 10:35:32 AM
Congrats U89...your ranking, or lack thereof, of SJF has been vindicated by the braintrust that thinks Husson and Plymouth St. are worthy of East Top 10 rankings ;D
Thanks SJF82, but I wasn't smart enough to vote for Plymouth St. or Husson.
Quote from: nolinenoglory on October 30, 2008, 06:38:18 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 30, 2008, 11:26:21 AMObviously you didn't vote for Fisher either......LOLQuote from: SJFF82 on October 30, 2008, 10:35:32 AM
Congrats U89...your ranking, or lack thereof, of SJF has been vindicated by the braintrust that thinks Husson and Plymouth St. are worthy of East Top 10 rankings ;D
Thanks SJF82, but I wasn't smart enough to vote for Plymouth St. or Husson.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 29, 2008, 05:54:06 PM
Have we heard from anyone at Cortland on this? I can't believe that any Red Dragons would admit to being okay with letting the Engineers pound them.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2008, 11:13:45 PM
Based on that assessment, i would say the NJAC sucks, RPI should have KILLED Cortland, and basically, Cortland was the most over ranked team of all time. I don't care if i'm playing Gro's grandma in checkers, i'm gonna beat that woman til her nose bleeds...Maybe the Cortland guys were looking forward to their future gym teacher careers instead.....
Quote from: DanPadavona on November 02, 2008, 07:25:30 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2008, 11:13:45 PM
Based on that assessment, i would say the NJAC sucks, RPI should have KILLED Cortland, and basically, Cortland was the most over ranked team of all time. I don't care if i'm playing Gro's grandma in checkers, i'm gonna beat that woman til her nose bleeds...Maybe the Cortland guys were looking forward to their future gym teacher careers instead.....
Don't you have a roller coaster to design or something?
Quote from: DanPadavona on November 02, 2008, 07:24:17 AM
Redswarm -
The East is viewed as the weakest of all the regions, so we will only send a few teams out of B/C to the tournament. Immediately, I would eliminate the Rowan-Montclair loser. WPI isn't getting in (or at least, only 1 team between WPI and Hobart gets in), and I would be surprised if Husson was given a birth based on their lack of meaningful games.
I see a Wesley (or someone bigger) being imported into the East Region to fill out the bracket.
Quote from: DanPadavona on November 02, 2008, 01:02:08 PM
Lewdogg,
I saw your post before it was deleted. We're just having some fun here. If "designing roller coasters" upset you, I truly am sorry. It was meant as a joke and nothing else. I doubt 'Gro thought I was serious. Lighten up, it's Sunday.
By the way I haven't been in the press booth for about 20 years. I photograph from the field, I'm not an announcer. And I did play football in school, though I was never big or athletic enough to play thereafter. I'm not certain why you brought it up though.
Quote from: DanPadavona on November 02, 2008, 05:19:30 PM
No problem man. Get your poll in...errr...
Quote from: TGP on November 02, 2008, 10:28:26 AMQuote from: DanPadavona on November 02, 2008, 07:24:17 AM
Redswarm -
The East is viewed as the weakest of all the regions, so we will only send a few teams out of B/C to the tournament. Immediately, I would eliminate the Rowan-Montclair loser. WPI isn't getting in (or at least, only 1 team between WPI and Hobart gets in), and I would be surprised if Husson was given a birth based on their lack of meaningful games.
I see a Wesley (or someone bigger) being imported into the East Region to fill out the bracket.
I agree. East will get their 5 Pool A (LL, E8, NEFC, NJAC and MAC) bids and probably 1 Pool C (my best guess would be Montclair if they win out since their only loss would be to Cortland - still a big IF since Rowan is no push over) bid.
Husson getting a B is a crap shoot. No idea whether or not they will impress the committee? If not, then the East possibly gets 1 one C (2nd place E8 team) and then the bracket is likely filled up by an incoming Muhlenberg or other conference champ (Wesley).
Speaking of the Mules, Dickinson almost knocked them off last Saturday (31-25). If Muhlenberg does end up in the east, the score of yesterday's game should give the rest of the east bracket some hope.
Quote from: redswarm81 on November 02, 2008, 08:40:36 PMQuote from: TGP on November 02, 2008, 10:28:26 AMQuote from: DanPadavona on November 02, 2008, 07:24:17 AM
Redswarm -
The East is viewed as the weakest of all the regions, so we will only send a few teams out of B/C to the tournament. Immediately, I would eliminate the Rowan-Montclair loser. WPI isn't getting in (or at least, only 1 team between WPI and Hobart gets in), and I would be surprised if Husson was given a birth based on their lack of meaningful games.
I see a Wesley (or someone bigger) being imported into the East Region to fill out the bracket.
I agree. East will get their 5 Pool A (LL, E8, NEFC, NJAC and MAC) bids and probably 1 Pool C (my best guess would be Montclair if they win out since their only loss would be to Cortland - still a big IF since Rowan is no push over) bid.
Husson getting a B is a crap shoot. No idea whether or not they will impress the committee? If not, then the East possibly gets 1 one C (2nd place E8 team) and then the bracket is likely filled up by an incoming Muhlenberg or other conference champ (Wesley).
Speaking of the Mules, Dickinson almost knocked them off last Saturday (31-25). If Muhlenberg does end up in the east, the score of yesterday's game should give the rest of the east bracket some hope.
The latest thinking on the Pool C board has the Montclair/Rowan winner AND Hartwick getting Pool C bids. That, and the other thinking that Thomas More is moved to the North from the South, means Muhlenberg is more likely to stay in the South. That leaves only one available spot in the East bracket. Wesley could be moved in fairly easily, but they'd not be a high seed.
I would think that a first round game between RPI and Hartwick could be highly entertaining.
Quote from: TGP on October 29, 2008, 03:14:50 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 27, 2008, 08:46:16 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 8 (10/27/08)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) 7-0 99 1at New Jersey 2 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) 6-0 89 2vs. Union 3 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) 6-1 78 3vs, Springfield 4 Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) 5-1 59 4vs. Norwich 5 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) 6-1 49 8vs. Kean 6 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) 6-1 48 6at Western Connecticut 7 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) 5-3 42 7at Utica 8 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) 5-1 32 9vs. #9 WPI 9 WPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Worcester+Polytech&year=2008) 6-1 19 T10at #8 Hobart 10 Lycoming (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lycoming&year=2008) 5-2 12 NRat FDU-Florham
as a point of comparison - note the NCAA East Region rankings:
EAST REGION
1. Cortland State 7-0 7-0
2. RPI 5-0 6-0
3. Ithaca 5-1 6-1
4. Montclair State 6-1 6-1
5. Rowan 6-1 6-1
6. Hartwick 5-1 5-1
7. Worcester Polytech 6-1 6-1
8. Hobart 5-1 5-1
9. Plymouth State 5-1 7-1
10. Husson 6-0 6-2
Quote from: TGP on November 02, 2008, 09:34:07 PM
but ithaca is 18 and rpi is 20...that's not a big difference in my opinion. nice to see some east region schools getting into the top 20.
Quote from: redswarm81 on November 02, 2008, 09:58:19 PMQuote from: TGP on November 02, 2008, 09:34:07 PM
but ithaca is 18 and rpi is 20...that's not a big difference in my opinion. nice to see some east region schools getting into the top 20.
Well, of course Cortland St. has been at no. 7 for a couple of weeks now, but it's interesting how in the East Region Fan Poll, there's a wider gap between RPI and Ithaca than the gap between Cortland and RPI.
The d3football.com poll voters not only have the order reversed, but they have that reverse order gap widening.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2008, 10:21:51 PM
The voters must have some huge rods for Salisbury too. 7-2, lost to Delaware Valley and Wesley, and SJF took them 4OTs, but they are still holding a 17 ranking with no real notable wins other than Christopher Newport who has beaten no one.
Quote from: redswarm81 on November 02, 2008, 11:25:59 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2008, 10:21:51 PM
The voters must have some huge rods for Salisbury too. 7-2, lost to Delaware Valley and Wesley, and SJF took them 4OTs, but they are still holding a 17 ranking with no real notable wins other than Christopher Newport who has beaten no one.
I hear lots of SoS/OWP/OOWP explanations for poll votes. By those standards the no. 9 ranking of Washington & Jefferson, and the no. 14 for Trinity (TX) were insane--both W&J and Trinity had lower OWP/OOWP numbers than Husson (6-0 in D-III), who didn't get a single vote.
Quote from: pg04 on November 03, 2008, 12:45:12 AM
Still one more ranking to get in but compiling the data through 9 posters, I can't say I've seen a bigger drop ever for a team that actually won their game... Amazing!
Quote from: superman57 on November 03, 2008, 02:38:15 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 03, 2008, 12:45:12 AM
Still one more ranking to get in but compiling the data through 9 posters, I can't say I've seen a bigger drop ever for a team that actually won their game... Amazing!
in the SJF ranking I was against dropping fisher as far as we did for winning, but in the end I got something I wanted in the poll and upstate got his...
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 03, 2008, 07:58:48 AM
upstate i think that horrible is a bit of a stretch
Quote from: 'gro on November 02, 2008, 10:22:16 PM
Case Western still floating in the middle of the poll. Gro thinks there are plenty of teams ranked below them that could beat them (Ithaca, RPI, hell probably Hobart). If Case gets a pool B bid, import them to the east!
Quote from: pg04 on November 03, 2008, 01:44:54 PM
I could be home late tonight, so the poll may not be available til the late hours of the night. Sorry guys! I don't have the data here at work.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 03, 2008, 08:43:19 AMamen
upstate -that was where i was going was on the d side of the ball.
their talent kept them in this game and allowed very few chances to uc.
on a side note--- no excuses no bias-- because calls were going both ways that nobody could understand--
the officiating crew was as bad as ive seen in years-- they just looked lost
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) | 8-0 | 99 | 1 | vs. Brockport state |
2 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) | 7-0 | 88 | 2 | vs. #7 Hobart |
3 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 7-1 | 80 | 3 | at #10 Alfred |
4 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 6-1 | 59 | 4 | at Springfield |
5 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 7-1 | 53 | 5 | at #6 Montclair State |
6 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 7-1 | 50 | 6 | vs. #5 Rowan |
7 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 6-1 | 45 | 8 | at #2 RPI |
8 | Lycoming (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lycoming&year=2008) | 6-2 | 29 | 10 | at King's |
9 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 6-2 | 17 | NR | vs. Widener |
10 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2008) | 6-2 | 15 | NR | vs. #3 Ithaca |
Quote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 12:49:35 AM
wow I have a hard time seeing fisher dropping completely out of the poll for winning a game... and lets remember they played bad... but it was against an old coach... and HELLO they won the fing game...
Quote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 12:49:35 AM
wow I have a hard time seeing fisher dropping completely out of the poll for winning a game... and lets remember they played bad... but it was against an old coach... and HELLO they won the fing game...
Quote from: pg04 on November 04, 2008, 12:42:57 AM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 9 (11/3/08)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) 8-0 99 1vs. Brockport state 2 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) 7-0 88 2vs. #7 Hobart 3 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) 7-1 80 3at #10 Alfred 4 Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) 6-1 59 4at Springfield 5 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) 7-1 53 5at #6 Montclair State 6 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) 7-1 50 6vs. #5 Rowan 7 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) 6-1 45 8at #2 RPI 8 Lycoming (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lycoming&year=2008) 6-2 29 10at King's 9 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) 6-2 17 NRvs. Widener 10 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2008) 6-2 15 NRvs. #3 Ithaca
Others Receiving votes:
St. John Fisher 9,
Delaware Valley 2,
Trinity 2,
WPI 1,
Brockport State 1
Dropping out: St. John Fisher #7, WPI #9
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 04, 2008, 07:23:00 AM
A couple people have Hartwick ranked over Ithaca.
I respectfully disagree with these morons.
Quote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 12:49:35 AM
wow I have a hard time seeing fisher dropping completely out of the poll for winning a game... and lets remember they played bad... but it was against an old coach... and HELLO they won the fing game...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2008, 04:16:10 AMQuote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 12:49:35 AM
wow I have a hard time seeing fisher dropping completely out of the poll for winning a game... and lets remember they played bad... but it was against an old coach... and HELLO they won the fing game...
Why is that every time Fisher wins a game, all that matters is that they won, and we are supposed to ignore who they played and how they played, but every time they lose, we have to ignore the actual loss and give them a pass because it was against a good team and it was close?
You can't have it both ways. If you want credit for giving Mount Union their closest game of the year, and taking Salisbury to 4 OT's--which a lot of you do--then you have to be held accountable for having a difficult time putting away Utica, Rochester and Springfield, all of whom are horrible
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2008, 04:16:10 AMQuote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 12:49:35 AM
wow I have a hard time seeing fisher dropping completely out of the poll for winning a game... and lets remember they played bad... but it was against an old coach... and HELLO they won the fing game...
Why is that every time Fisher wins a game, all that matters is that they won, and we are supposed to ignore who they played and how they played, but every time they lose, we have to ignore the actual loss and give them a pass because it was against a good team and it was close?
You can't have it both ways. If you want credit for giving Mount Union their closest game of the year, and taking Salisbury to 4 OT's--which a lot of you do--then you have to be held accountable for having a difficult time putting away Utica, Rochester and Springfield, all of whom are horrible
Quote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 08:57:12 AM
I have no problem dropping fisher to 10 or 9 after that win, but guess what the object is to fing win the game.. doesn't matter if it's pretty or not win the fing game
Ithaca fans would be calling the same sheninigans as would alfred fans if it happend to them
I mean how do you rank Alfred above Fisher... who has Alfred beaten... Alfred and fisher share a loss, and Alfreds other loss is to Uri whatever...
Quote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 08:57:12 AM
I have no problem dropping fisher to 10 or 9 after that win, but guess what the object is to fing win the game.. doesn't matter if it's pretty or not win the fing game
Ithaca fans would be calling the same sheninigans as would alfred fans if it happend to them
I mean how do you rank Alfred above Fisher... who has Alfred beaten... Alfred and fisher share a loss, and Alfreds other loss is to Uri whatever...
Quote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 08:57:12 AMAfter seeing Hartwick play both Fisher and Alfred, i would definitely Rank Alfred above Fisher this season. They play much better defense and is way more disciplined.
I have no problem dropping fisher to 10 or 9 after that win, but guess what the object is to fing win the game.. doesn't matter if it's pretty or not win the fing game
Ithaca fans would be calling the same sheninigans as would alfred fans if it happend to them
I mean how do you rank Alfred above Fisher... who has Alfred beaten... Alfred and fisher share a loss, and Alfreds other loss is to Uri whatever...
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2008, 11:32:54 AM
I had SJF at 7 last week, they dropped off my poll this week. In fact my 7, 8 and 9 teams all dropped off, SJF, Kean and WPI. I also don't have Team Boltus ranked. I thought the Fisher win was impressive, I no longer think it is impressive. TB got MS'ed by Ithaca and have not impressed outside the win against Alfred which was a close game. I have Lyco, Albright and B-Port debutting in my poll this week. I feel that the 4th place MAC, LL and NJAC teams are better than SJF or TB this season. My number 10 came down to B-Port and Alfred and I decided that B-Port was slightly more deserving at this point, of course after playing Cortland it could change.
Quote from: redswarm81 on November 04, 2008, 11:41:41 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2008, 11:32:54 AM
I had SJF at 7 last week, they dropped off my poll this week. In fact my 7, 8 and 9 teams all dropped off, SJF, Kean and WPI. I also don't have Team Boltus ranked. I thought the Fisher win was impressive, I no longer think it is impressive. TB got MS'ed by Ithaca and have not impressed outside the win against Alfred which was a close game. I have Lyco, Albright and B-Port debutting in my poll this week. I feel that the 4th place MAC, LL and NJAC teams are better than SJF or TB this season. My number 10 came down to B-Port and Alfred and I decided that B-Port was slightly more deserving at this point, of course after playing Cortland it could change.
I don't disagree with anything you wrote.
How do you explain SJF's domination of Ithaca?
Quote from: TGP on November 04, 2008, 12:01:56 PM
TGP can't speak for KS but here's a take from this voter's POV (I also dropped SJF out this week and actually moved IC up to #2 in my poll):
SJF and IC played 5 weeks ago.
Since then, SJF has gone 3-2 and IC 4-0. IC has dominated every game since falling apart mid-3rd qtr on against Fisher.
IC has averaged close to 43 PPG on offense while holding their opponents to about 10 pts a game on D.
While IC has stomped their opposition and is on course to win the E8, SJF has struggled to defeat mediocre teams like Springfield (by 3) and Utica (by 7). IC has better OWP and is should get some credit for beating team's like 'Wick and Lyco (both potentally NCAA Pool A and C teams).
That was my thought process, for what it's worth.
Quote from: TGP on November 04, 2008, 12:01:56 PM
TGP can't speak for KS but here's a take from this voter's POV (I also dropped SJF out this week and actually moved IC up to #2 in my poll):
SJF and IC played 5 weeks ago.
Since then, SJF has gone 3-2 and IC 4-0. IC has dominated every game since falling apart mid-3rd qtr on against Fisher.
IC has averaged close to 43 PPG on offense while holding their opponents to about 10 pts a game on D.
While IC has stomped their opposition and is on course to win the E8, SJF has struggled to defeat mediocre teams like Springfield (by 3) and Utica (by 7). IC has better OWP and is should get some credit for beating team's like 'Wick and Lyco (both potentally NCAA Pool A and C teams).
That was my thought process, for what it's worth.
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2008, 11:32:54 AM
they dropped off my poll this week.
I have Lyco, Albright and B-Port debutting in my poll this week.
Quote from: 'gro on November 04, 2008, 01:36:01 PM
that was too friggen funny LD, is that Marge Simpson with the blue hair?
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 02:39:45 PM
ok- if they beat au then do they get back in the top ten?
One division loss and they dont even get a top ten nod.
I have been very honest about the team- and that next year may be the year- but to have tied for first in the league and not get a nod in the to ten regionally?
thats crazy.
plz- thenhand curry or ply the trophy since they obviously deserve it-- wait i for got husson
what a load
Quote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 02:20:49 PM
Regarding the actuall ERFP;
After their performance vs Utica I coulnt picture them any higher than 10th and that was probably just because they bitchslapped Ithaca again...
If it wasnt for the IC win they wouldnt even be on the radar....
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 02:39:45 PM
ok- if they beat au then do they get back in the top ten?
One division loss and they dont even get a top ten nod.
I have been very honest about the team- and that next year may be the year- but to have tied for first in the league and not get a nod in the to ten regionally?
thats crazy.
plz- thenhand curry or ply the trophy since they obviously deserve it-- wait i for got husson
what a load
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 02:39:45 PM
ok- if they beat au then do they get back in the top ten?
One division loss and they dont even get a top ten nod.
I have been very honest about the team- and that next year may be the year- but to have tied for first in the league and not get a nod in the to ten regionally?
thats crazy.
plz- thenhand curry or ply the trophy since they obviously deserve it-- wait i for got husson
what a load
Quote from: maxpower on November 04, 2008, 03:34:24 PM
Okay, I said I didn't get it, so maybe I need it re-explained.
Hartwick was an embarrassing loss, and I know Salisbury is pushing it because they are a good team, but from what I heard Fisher had numerous chances to close out that game. I just think instead of all this crowing about how Fisher gets no respect I'd like to hear more about what specifically makes them better than any of the ten teams on the poll.
Quote from: superman57 on November 04, 2008, 04:23:18 PM
The object is to win the game... it shouldn't matter how you win a game as long as you win it... Look at the Titans, they are not winning pretty, but no one is saying they suck because they are winning the games...
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 05:32:05 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Im sorry, i know MU is like the greatest team since the 72 dolphins, but anytime you lose 33-3 that counts as an embarrassing loss in my book.
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2008, 05:34:10 PMQuote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 05:32:05 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Im sorry, i know MU is like the greatest team since the 72 dolphins, but anytime you lose 33-3 that counts as an embarrassing loss in my book.
True a Monkeystomp is a Monkeystomp.
Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 05:32:05 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Im sorry, i know MU is like the greatest team since the 72 dolphins, but anytime you lose 33-3 that counts as an embarrassing loss in my book.
Quote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 06:08:59 PMOK so next year lets schedule USC, Florida, and Texas Tech and cry about not getting sympathy when we get monkey stomped. If the score was like 33-17 or something then maybe but come on 33-3, including 20-0 at half time? Im sorry but You don't get credit for that. Thats an old fashioned Blow Out as far as im concerned.Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 05:32:05 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Im sorry, i know MU is like the greatest team since the 72 dolphins, but anytime you lose 33-3 that counts as an embarrassing loss in my book.
And a Wick (or anyone in the East) vs MUC game would turn out different?
Sorry we had the stones to play them this year while you were playing your NEFC teams.
Quote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 06:08:59 PMQuote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 05:32:05 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Im sorry, i know MU is like the greatest team since the 72 dolphins, but anytime you lose 33-3 that counts as an embarrassing loss in my book.
And a Wick (or anyone in the East) vs MUC game would turn out different?
Sorry we had the stones to play them this year while you were playing your NEFC teams.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 04, 2008, 06:18:22 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 06:08:59 PMQuote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 05:32:05 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Im sorry, i know MU is like the greatest team since the 72 dolphins, but anytime you lose 33-3 that counts as an embarrassing loss in my book.
And a Wick (or anyone in the East) vs MUC game would turn out different?
Sorry we had the stones to play them this year while you were playing your NEFC teams.
I don't have a problem with Fisher scheduling Mount Union...or Salisbury...BUT...I don't think both should have been scheduled in the same year. It's a great guage to see where your program is, sure, but the E8 is tough enough...1 tough OOC game is probably enough for a single season, then maybe go middle of the pack. You don't have to play Mt. Ida, but how bout a Coast Guard, or a William Patterson, or even a WPI or St. lawrence. Mount Union has been the best for a long time, and Salisbury has been a top tier program for a while now. Overdoing your schedule gives your players no time to recover, and not much room for error, which Fisher is experiencing now.
I think Fisher probably is one of the 10 best in the East, but because they are so beat down with their schedule, crawling by the Utica's and Springfield's of the world won't buy any votes.
Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 06:17:30 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 06:08:59 PMOK so next year lets schedule USC, Florida, and Texas Tech and cry about not getting sympathy when we get monkey stomped. If the score was like 33-17 or something then maybe but come on 33-3, including 20-0 at half time? Im sorry but You don't get credit for that. Thats an old fashioned Blow Out as far as im concerned.Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 05:32:05 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 04, 2008, 03:32:30 PM
max which loss(s) was(were) the embarassing one(s)
wick?
salisbury?
because i know that you werent talking about MUC
and you have missed the point of the ooc about ply etc.
lot of animosity on here today.
Im sorry, i know MU is like the greatest team since the 72 dolphins, but anytime you lose 33-3 that counts as an embarrassing loss in my book.
And a Wick (or anyone in the East) vs MUC game would turn out different?
Sorry we had the stones to play them this year while you were playing your NEFC teams.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2008, 06:36:57 PM
I love how '57 keeps touting the "the only object is to win games" argument while trying to promote a 3-loss team...
Quote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 06:17:30 PM
OK so next year lets schedule USC, Florida, and Texas Tech and cry about not getting sympathy when we get monkey stomped. If the score was like 33-17 or something then maybe but come on 33-3, including 20-0 at half time? Im sorry but You don't get credit for that. Thats an old fashioned Blow Out as far as im concerned.
Quote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 07:05:40 PMQuote from: HHawksE8Champs on November 04, 2008, 06:17:30 PM
OK so next year lets schedule USC, Florida, and Texas Tech and cry about not getting sympathy when we get monkey stomped. If the score was like 33-17 or something then maybe but come on 33-3, including 20-0 at half time? Im sorry but You don't get credit for that. Thats an old fashioned Blow Out as far as im concerned.
Im not crying about getting sympathy, im saying you wouldnt do any better and your defense would allow 20 in the first 5 minutes...
Quote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 06:58:49 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2008, 06:36:57 PM
I love how '57 keeps touting the "the only object is to win games" argument while trying to promote a 3-loss team...
Yeah i didnt even try to go down that road to promote or stick up for the team because of their 3 losses but im not going to sit idle when a fan of a team that only has 9 games and their schedule includes Mt Ida and other NEFC cupcakes starts railing on SJF for losing to MUC by 30....
IC do us all a favor and knock off Cortland so MUC gets imported and knocks Team Boltus around by 60...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 04, 2008, 10:01:10 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 06:58:49 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2008, 06:36:57 PM
I love how '57 keeps touting the "the only object is to win games" argument while trying to promote a 3-loss team...
Yeah i didnt even try to go down that road to promote or stick up for the team because of their 3 losses but im not going to sit idle when a fan of a team that only has 9 games and their schedule includes Mt Ida and other NEFC cupcakes starts railing on SJF for losing to MUC by 30....
IC do us all a favor and knock off Cortland so MUC gets imported and knocks Team Boltus around by 60...
Uh oh...Upstate is sounding bitter again. Fisher has one more game then us...it isn't like it is 3 or 4. And cry all you want...we won the head to head. I will say this...even if we do have this misfortune of playing MUC in the first round...I will still be pleased with the season, as it means we made the playoffs. That would also mean that you would be watching the game after your ECAC game...Zing!!!
Quote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 10:26:19 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 04, 2008, 10:01:10 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 04, 2008, 06:58:49 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2008, 06:36:57 PM
I love how '57 keeps touting the "the only object is to win games" argument while trying to promote a 3-loss team...
Yeah i didnt even try to go down that road to promote or stick up for the team because of their 3 losses but im not going to sit idle when a fan of a team that only has 9 games and their schedule includes Mt Ida and other NEFC cupcakes starts railing on SJF for losing to MUC by 30....
IC do us all a favor and knock off Cortland so MUC gets imported and knocks Team Boltus around by 60...
Uh oh...Upstate is sounding bitter again. Fisher has one more game then us...it isn't like it is 3 or 4. And cry all you want...we won the head to head. I will say this...even if we do have this misfortune of playing MUC in the first round...I will still be pleased with the season, as it means we made the playoffs. That would also mean that you would be watching the game after your ECAC game...Zing!!!
at least we didnt lose to curry... no matter what you've done this year or may do in the future games you'll always be known as the scrubs that gave Curry their first NCAA win...
Congrats...
Meanwhile while Team Boltus disintegrates next year SJF will reload and make a run again while Team Boltus wins 4 games...
You had your run, congrats, good luck in the playoffs and lets hope for the E8's sake you dont draw another NEFC team...
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 05, 2008, 08:07:47 AM
hell guys- i am still hoping that springfield beats wick :P
what...........it could happen
what?
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 05, 2008, 01:09:19 PM
Courtesy of Ron Boerger in Playoff scenarios page.
http://www.ncaa.com/photos/schools/ncaa/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/Nov.pdf
EAST REGION
1. Cortland State 8-0 8-0
2. Rensselaer 7-0 7-0
3. Ithaca 6-1 7-1
4. Montclair State 7-1 7-1
5. Rowan 7-1 7-1
6. Hartwick 6-1 6-1
7. Hobart 6-1 6-1
8. Plymouth State 7-1 8-1
9. Husson 6-0 6-2
10. Curry 7-1 8-1
MAC is still out of a C bid as it stands.
Quote from: Union89 on November 05, 2008, 01:26:10 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 05, 2008, 01:09:19 PM
Courtesy of Ron Boerger in Playoff scenarios page.
http://www.ncaa.com/photos/schools/ncaa/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/Nov.pdf
EAST REGION
1. Cortland State 8-0 8-0
2. Rensselaer 7-0 7-0
3. Ithaca 6-1 7-1
4. Montclair State 7-1 7-1
5. Rowan 7-1 7-1
6. Hartwick 6-1 6-1
7. Hobart 6-1 6-1
8. Plymouth State 7-1 8-1
9. Husson 6-0 6-2
10. Curry 7-1 8-1
MAC is still out of a C bid as it stands.
Plymouth, Husson & Curry............YIKES......... :o
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 05, 2008, 01:09:19 PM
Courtesy of Ron Boerger in Playoff scenarios page.
http://www.ncaa.com/photos/schools/ncaa/sports/m-footbl/auto_pdf/Nov.pdf
EAST REGION
1. Cortland State 8-0 8-0
2. Rensselaer 7-0 7-0
3. Ithaca 6-1 7-1
4. Montclair State 7-1 7-1
5. Rowan 7-1 7-1
6. Hartwick 6-1 6-1
7. Hobart 6-1 6-1
8. Plymouth State 7-1 8-1
9. Husson 6-0 6-2
10. Curry 7-1 8-1
MAC is still out of a C bid as it stands.
Quote from: pg04 on November 04, 2008, 12:42:57 AM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 9 (11/3/08)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) 8-0 99 1vs. Brockport state 2 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) ( 1 ) 7-0 88 2vs. #7 Hobart 3 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) 7-1 80 3at #10 Alfred 4 Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) 6-1 59 4at Springfield 5 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) 7-1 53 5at #6 Montclair State 6 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) 7-1 50 6vs. #5 Rowan 7 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) 6-1 45 8at #2 RPI 8 Lycoming (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lycoming&year=2008) 6-2 29 10at King's 9 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) 6-2 17 NRvs. Widener 10 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2008) 6-2 15 NRvs. #3 Ithaca
Others Receiving votes:
St. John Fisher 9,
Delaware Valley 2,
Trinity 2,
WPI 1,
Brockport State 1
Dropping out: St. John Fisher #7, WPI #9
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2008, 04:43:41 PM
I actually feel that SJF is a middle of the pack team in the east and would have a hard time with Kean, Union, B-Port, WPI, FDU, Widener etc this season.
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 05, 2008, 01:50:19 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2008, 04:43:41 PM
I actually feel that SJF is a middle of the pack team in the east and would have a hard time with Kean, Union, B-Port, WPI, FDU, Widener etc this season.
This is precisely what I implied in a post a couple weeks ago....that an 8-1 SJF team with even 1 pt wins over any of those teams mentioned above (a struggle correct?), and there present less than stellar game results ag. Springfield, Roch and Utica, would, rightly or wrongly, still have them sitting high up the East rankings following back to back Final Four and Final 8 teams. So my question still is.....assuming they would beat 'Port by 1 or WPI by 1 instead of losing to #1 by 30 and #16 by 3 in 4ot, explain their ranking. My explanation is: 3 losses with struggles against other weak teams means the benefit of the doubt afforded a 8-1 team with struggles is lost...consequently...SJF has sufficiently earned their lack of ranking...to date.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 05, 2008, 03:00:10 PM
If it weren't for the two shady performances against Springfield and especially Utica I would still be defending to the death that this Fisher team is getting unjustly slammed...But they have been very unimpressive as of late. I do however think that in the playoffs they could give any team in the East a run for their money. People are acting as if Fisher is a run of the mill average team and that somebody like Cortland would run through them. Well outside of Mount Union which is in another region and on another level, there is no team in the East that could blow out Fisher by say more than 2 touchdowns. Just wouldn't happen....They would be close games and I'd venture to say Fisher would come out on the winning end more times than not against these other Eastern Region playoff teams. I mean it's not like Salisbury and Hartwick buried us, it took phenomenal efforts on their part combined with Fisher mistakes to actually pull out the wins.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 05, 2008, 03:23:31 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 05, 2008, 03:00:10 PM
If it weren't for the two shady performances against Springfield and especially Utica I would still be defending to the death that this Fisher team is getting unjustly slammed...But they have been very unimpressive as of late. I do however think that in the playoffs they could give any team in the East a run for their money. People are acting as if Fisher is a run of the mill average team and that somebody like Cortland would run through them. Well outside of Mount Union which is in another region and on another level, there is no team in the East that could blow out Fisher by say more than 2 touchdowns. Just wouldn't happen....They would be close games and I'd venture to say Fisher would come out on the winning end more times than not against these other Eastern Region playoff teams. I mean it's not like Salisbury and Hartwick buried us, it took phenomenal efforts on their part combined with Fisher mistakes to actually pull out the wins.
Of course, if Utica, Rochester--and even to some degree Buffalo State, had the kind of QB play you're going to encounter in the East playoffs, you'd have lost those games.
To me, there's no defining victory for this SJF team...you could argue the IC game, but it was like 5 weeks ago and since then, SJF has looked so unimpressive, I wonder if that game was as much about IC and Juvan having a sort of mental disadvantage against SJF as it was the talent level of the teams. Remember, this game was close for about 40 minutes, but then IC crumbled. If they were to play again on Saturday, I would feel good about IC;s chances
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 05, 2008, 03:23:31 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 05, 2008, 03:00:10 PM
Of course, if Utica, Rochester--and even to some degree Buffalo State, had the kind of QB play you're going to encounter in the East playoffs, you'd have lost those games.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 05, 2008, 04:27:27 PM
Look, i think Fisher fans are just getting a taste of what they have dished out for the past few years. It's bitter sweet for some other posters to bash Fisher. Since SJF has turned the corner, some of the posters on these boards have put down every other team as being inferior to them, whether it was their weak schedules, or their playoff losses, or their slim margin of victory over lesser quality opponents, it was dished out pretty heavily. And through this, Fisher continued to produce on the field, so there wasn't much anyone could say otherwise.
This year, the shoe is on the other foot. We can ignore the Mount Union and Salisbury losses. Barely beating weak teams has traditionally been trashed on these boards, and Fisher is in that seat this year. I agree, that most likely, they can compete with anyone in the East, but unfortunately, other than in an ECAC game, they probably won't get that chance. But while they can compete, they definately aren't BETTER than everyone else. You can't be on top every year, so some of you extreme Fisher fans need to realize that as soon as there is an opening to bash someone who has been on top for a while, the ooportunity will be taken advantage of. Next year is a new year, but this year, you just aren't THAT good and the results have shown that. It's not a shot at your program, it's a shot at this year's team and their results.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 05, 2008, 04:27:27 PM
Look, i think Fisher fans are just getting a taste of what they have dished out for the past few years. It's bitter sweet for some other posters to bash Fisher. Since SJF has turned the corner, some of the posters on these boards have put down every other team as being inferior to them, whether it was their weak schedules, or their playoff losses, or their slim margin of victory over lesser quality opponents, it was dished out pretty heavily. And through this, Fisher continued to produce on the field, so there wasn't much anyone could say otherwise.
This year, the shoe is on the other foot. We can ignore the Mount Union and Salisbury losses. Barely beating weak teams has traditionally been trashed on these boards, and Fisher is in that seat this year. I agree, that most likely, they can compete with anyone in the East, but unfortunately, other than in an ECAC game, they probably won't get that chance. But while they can compete, they definately aren't BETTER than everyone else. You can't be on top every year, so some of you extreme Fisher fans need to realize that as soon as there is an opening to bash someone who has been on top for a while, the ooportunity will be taken advantage of. Next year is a new year, but this year, you just aren't THAT good and the results have shown that. It's not a shot at your program, it's a shot at this year's team and their results.
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 05, 2008, 04:18:40 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 05, 2008, 03:23:31 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 05, 2008, 03:00:10 PM
If it weren't for the two shady performances against Springfield and especially Utica I would still be defending to the death that this Fisher team is getting unjustly slammed...But they have been very unimpressive as of late. I do however think that in the playoffs they could give any team in the East a run for their money. People are acting as if Fisher is a run of the mill average team and that somebody like Cortland would run through them. Well outside of Mount Union which is in another region and on another level, there is no team in the East that could blow out Fisher by say more than 2 touchdowns. Just wouldn't happen....They would be close games and I'd venture to say Fisher would come out on the winning end more times than not against these other Eastern Region playoff teams. I mean it's not like Salisbury and Hartwick buried us, it took phenomenal efforts on their part combined with Fisher mistakes to actually pull out the wins.
Of course, if Utica, Rochester--and even to some degree Buffalo State, had the kind of QB play you're going to encounter in the East playoffs, you'd have lost those games.
To me, there's no defining victory for this SJF team...you could argue the IC game, but it was like 5 weeks ago and since then, SJF has looked so unimpressive, I wonder if that game was as much about IC and Juvan having a sort of mental disadvantage against SJF as it was the talent level of the teams. Remember, this game was close for about 40 minutes, but then IC crumbled. If they were to play again on Saturday, I would feel good about IC;s chances
Are you suggesting that the East Region play-off teams are Buff St, UR and Utica...but with a good QB? I think I get your point and perhaps agree with it, but if you meant that throw a good QB on Utica and suddenly they are IC or Cortland like some sort of magic trick then I disagree.
BTW, did IC crumble after 40 min, or did the cream rise to the top in the 4th? Depends on how you look at it right? Certainly that cream is now getting moldy, but at the time it was Cream nonetheless :D Also, would that hypothetical rematch on Saterday happen to be at Growney again or at Butterfield? I would like to go....to see the 4th quarter again
Quote from: Upstate on November 05, 2008, 06:37:44 PM
"The problem I've had with some of your friends posts is that, when you talk about how good SJF is, we never discuss how poorly the team plays. We're only supposed to look at the good, (The 4th quarter against IC, "Almost" beating Salisbury, "Almost" beating Hartwick, "Giving Mt Union their closest game of the season.")"
So Bombers, still think that the SJF offense is fine and my gripes are not substantiated. If you question how they only score 28 on wick when you scored 69 and why they only scored 10 offensive points vs Utica obviously there's something wrong...
Im not here looking at the good at the season, if there has been any besides the IC game! Their problem is that they're trying to reinvent themselves on offense with the wrong personnel vs a wicked schedule. Not a smart move...
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 06, 2008, 01:16:18 PM
Many of us would like to know where that 'fire' went...
You say IC hasnt played like the 4th qu ag. SJF since....have they played SJF since or a team as good as SJF was that afternoon since? I guess we will see this Saterday and next...I happen to believe you are correct although I do see IC losing 1 of the 2....hopefully they beat AU, so if it matters for SJF (depending on what Wick does) AU wont be all fired up playing for an NCAA berth
Quote from: pg04 on November 09, 2008, 08:04:03 PM
Only 3 polls so far? How disappointing!
Quote from: pg04 on November 09, 2008, 08:04:03 PM
Only 3 polls so far? How disappointing!
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 09, 2008, 09:12:16 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 09, 2008, 08:04:03 PM
Only 3 polls so far? How disappointing!
E8 Fan Poll By Law 9-3.2 "If less than 5 polls are submitted by 9pm Sun., then Fisher is automatically #1"
Quote from: Commish Kaz00 on November 10, 2008, 08:57:08 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 09, 2008, 08:04:03 PM
Only 3 polls so far? How disappointing!
It's a mess this week. I think we know who the top four will be, but after that it is a complete jumble.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) | 9-0 | 90 | 1 | vs. #2 Ithaca |
2 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) | 8-1 | 80 | 3 | at #1 Cortland |
3 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) | 8-1 | 73 | 6 | at Kean |
4 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) | 7-1 | 62 | 7 | vs. Rochester |
5 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) | 7-1 | 52 | 2 | at Merchant Marine |
6 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) | 7-2 | 37 | 5 | at New Jersey |
7 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) | 7-2 | 36 | 9 | at Delaware Valley |
8 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) | 6-3 | 24 | NR | at #10 Alfred |
9 | Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) | 6-2 | 12 | 4 | vs. Utica |
10 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2008) | 6-3 | 8 | 10 | vs. #8 St. John Fisher |
Quote from: superman57 on November 11, 2008, 10:10:16 PM
wait somethings wrong U89 didn't vote for RPI to be #1 and Fisher is actually about where they should be...
It's The apocalypse everyone run
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.djapocalypse.net%2Fimages%2Fapocalypse_logo_invert3.jpg&hash=0cf689bfaae36af2720e6ecb6378ba9897f1d179)
Quote from: Union89 on November 11, 2008, 10:24:15 PMQuote from: superman57 on November 11, 2008, 10:10:16 PM
wait somethings wrong U89 didn't vote for RPI to be #1 and Fisher is actually about where they should be...
It's The apocalypse everyone run
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.djapocalypse.net%2Fimages%2Fapocalypse_logo_invert3.jpg&hash=0cf689bfaae36af2720e6ecb6378ba9897f1d179)
I have RPI at 5 and Fisher at 8........
Quote from: superman57 on November 11, 2008, 10:27:51 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 11, 2008, 10:24:15 PMQuote from: superman57 on November 11, 2008, 10:10:16 PM
wait somethings wrong U89 didn't vote for RPI to be #1 and Fisher is actually about where they should be...
It's The apocalypse everyone run
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.djapocalypse.net%2Fimages%2Fapocalypse_logo_invert3.jpg&hash=0cf689bfaae36af2720e6ecb6378ba9897f1d179)
I have RPI at 5 and Fisher at 8........
omg it's like we're bff's that's what I had [insert cyinide pill here :o ]
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 12, 2008, 01:49:04 AM
So gotta play devil's advocate ag. my own team. Wick beat SJF at SJF. SJF barely beat Springfield at home and Wick lost to them on the road. You would think the head to head win for Wick on the road would carry more weight than a comparison game of SC. Of course, if you use the comparison of their respective play against IC, then SJF more clearly comes out on top, but then why wasnt that takin into into consideration in previous weeks by the voters in their comparative ranking of Wick-sjf?
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 12, 2008, 01:40:04 PM
I do not see the SC loss as so brutal. Afterall SC almost won on the road against the 7th ranked team that was #1 at one point this season I believe
Quote from: pg04 on November 11, 2008, 09:42:31 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 10 (11/10/08)
Finally I am posting this!! We have one absent ballot this week so highest point total is 90.
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2008) ( 9 ) 9-0 90 1vs. #2 Ithaca 2 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2008) 8-1 80 3at #1 Cortland 3 Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2008) 8-1 73 6at Kean 4 Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2008) 7-1 62 7vs. Rochester 5 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2008) 7-1 52 2at Merchant Marine 6 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2008) 7-2 37 5at New Jersey 7 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2008) 7-2 36 9at Delaware Valley 8 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher&year=2008) 6-3 24 NRat #10 Alfred 9 Hartwick (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hartwick&year=2008) 6-2 12 4vs. Utica 10 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2008) 6-3 8 10vs. #8 St. John Fisher
As a comparison.
East Region
1. Cortland State 9-0 9-0
2. Ithaca 7-1 8-1
3. Montclair State 8-1 8-1
4. Hobart 7-1 7-1
5. RPI 7-1 7-1
6. Hartwick 6-2 6-2
7. Plymouth State 8-1 9-1
8. Rowan 7-2 7-2
9. Curry 8-1 9-1
10. Albright 6-1 7-2
Quote from: pg04 on November 17, 2008, 12:15:03 AM
I guess I should have mentioned this prior but I would like to have one last regular season poll this week then one at the end of the Eastern Region Playoffs.
If anyone doesn't want to do this just let me know...
Quote from: TGP on November 17, 2008, 12:55:12 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 17, 2008, 12:15:03 AM
I guess I should have mentioned this prior but I would like to have one last regular season poll this week then one at the end of the Eastern Region Playoffs.
If anyone doesn't want to do this just let me know...
sent mine in but i think i've forgotten the poll line up already - damn vino!
thx again and k+ for coordinating thru - out the season!
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2008, 01:03:31 AM
Thanks for running the fan poll! It has been insightful! :)
Quote from: pg04 on November 17, 2008, 01:07:19 AMRespectfully, it seems as tho' most of the pollsters are living in some timewarp that has not allowed them to see the changes in D-III.Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2008, 01:03:31 AM
Thanks for running the fan poll! It has been insightful! :)
Thanks for reading ;).
I find it VERY interesting that only the #1,#2, and #4 teams from the Week 10 poll made the playoffs while Lycoming, Plymouth, and Curry make it in outside of the poll...
I almost think that these teams will hardly make it into the season ending poll too... Very interesting to compare People's perception vs. the Raw numeric data that the NCAA uses.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2008, 01:24:20 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 17, 2008, 01:07:19 AMRespectfully, it seems as tho' most of the pollsters are living in some timewarp that has not allowed them to see the changes in D-III.Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2008, 01:03:31 AM
Thanks for running the fan poll! It has been insightful! :)
Thanks for reading ;).
I find it VERY interesting that only the #1,#2, and #4 teams from the Week 10 poll made the playoffs while Lycoming, Plymouth, and Curry make it in outside of the poll...
I almost think that these teams will hardly make it into the season ending poll too... Very interesting to compare People's perception vs. the Raw numeric data that the NCAA uses.
In the last 10 years, the NWC has joined D-III and taken home 2 Staggs!
Quote from: DanPadavona on November 17, 2008, 02:43:43 AM
I'm not sure if Ralph was referring to our pollsters, or the NCAA's, with that quip. I assumed he was talking about the NCAA but I could be wrong.
No question the other 3 regions are much stronger than the East, as Ralph alludes to. I would not have sent another Eastern team into Pool C this season, much less an unproven team like Curry. Salisbury would beat Curry by at least 4 touchdowns. Any one of a myriad of Southern or Northern region teams could have filled our final bracket position.
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 17, 2008, 08:26:54 AM
I will get you my poll in later today if I have time or by 9:00 9:30 this evening.
Quote from: DanPadavona on November 17, 2008, 07:57:15 AM
Ralph,
I try to support my understanding of other conferences other than our NJAC by closely following a lot of the computer algorithm polls like Massey, Laz, etc. I also run my own ratings system (actually there are 3 I've written) coded in C++. I don't think any of these polls are nearly robust enough to absolutely solve rankings or determine playoff participants.
But what they do all provide is unbiased generalized information about teams. If a Cinderella team is coming in with a "high power rating," I might not have the confidence to rank them absolutely, but I am comfortable in believing that they are a lot better than people realize. Computer ratings were the first signal I received 2 years ago that Kean was pretty good, and no longer a door mat. I'm certainly open to the belief that Husson could be very good down the road...though right now they rate out as a mid pack E8 team. If you go back through my posts from one year ago, I picked Curry to beat Hartwick in the playoffs. My rating system believed in Curry, and my own analysis of the game scores and stats supported it.
What do the ratings tell me these days? They tell me that the MAC is solid, top to bottom, if not dominant. And that Del Valley is really, really good. You won't find a NY/NJ bias in me, other than to say I am a fan of football in NY and NJ.
They also tell me that even the best teams in the East would have a hard time finishing better than third in the OAC, or fifth in the WIAC. And that UMHB, Millsaps, St John's, and in other years Linfield, offer a whole other level of competition.
We've theorized elsewhere what is wrong with Eastern football. I don't think anyone knows for sure, though my belief is the density of NY teams is to blame. If you asked me to rank the top 25 teams in D3, I'd have Ithaca in there, and maybe Cortland or Del Valley at the bottom. Nobody else. That's the current reality as I see it.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2008, 09:52:00 AM
Dan, TGP, East Region readers,
Thanks for the comments and the discussion.
I had an early (7am meeting CST) and had have the chance to review my remarks since posting them.
After some reflection, I conclude that my remarks were not appropriate for a regional forum, and I am sorry.
Dan, thanks for the insight on the NJAC. I get the impression that the East Region has a couple of teams that break out of the pack every year, but there are a whole bunch of schools that are in the #30-#80 range. If you don't bring your "A" game every weekend, then you are "gonna get beat".
Thanks. :)
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2008, 07:24:40 AM
Good morning, gentlemen. :)
Thanks for the comments. +1!
TGP and Dan, this poll really helps me understand the interesting nature of "East Region Football".
Dan's comment about Del Valley is reassuring. I was impressed with their play as well. The FDU-Florham loss really knocked them back. The MAC Pool A bid was theirs, if they had won that game.
The Salisbury team also is still getting votes on our South Region poll. I think they would beat Curry, too. There is a "big log jam" in the middle of the region.
Thanks for running the poll. It brings out more constructive discussion to assist us fans in learning about your Region of D-III. :)
Quote from: superman57 on November 17, 2008, 10:20:46 PM
Ok now I am deciding to post my thoughts... By giving Curry a pool c they are basicly saying it doesn't matter who you play during the season as long as you win your games...
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on November 17, 2008, 10:23:57 PMQuote from: superman57 on November 17, 2008, 10:20:46 PM
Ok now I am deciding to post my thoughts... By giving Curry a pool c they are basicly saying it doesn't matter who you play during the season as long as you win your games...
that is what pbr is reading....screw playing tough ooc opponents...schedule cupcakes and post a handsome record and your in
Quote from: superman57 on November 17, 2008, 11:31:00 PM
Listen Montclair St. got robbed and they deserve to be upset, both Montclair and Dem Spicy Boyz both lost to conference champs, so by saying the Dem Spicy Boyz were better than Montclair you are saying that Plymouth state is better than Cortland, so in that case why is Plymouth state not hosting the first round NCAA game...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2008, 10:54:02 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on November 17, 2008, 10:23:57 PMQuote from: superman57 on November 17, 2008, 10:20:46 PM
Ok now I am deciding to post my thoughts... By giving Curry a pool c they are basicly saying it doesn't matter who you play during the season as long as you win your games...
that is what pbr is reading....screw playing tough ooc opponents...schedule cupcakes and post a handsome record and your in
There's a balance to strike...look at SJF...they're probably better than Curry, but if, for example, an independent team played all of the Top 10 teams in the country and went 0-10, would they get in? What if they went 5-5? 7-3? 8-2? Where's the invisible line?
Quote from: superman57 on November 17, 2008, 11:31:00 PM
Listen Montclair St. got robbed and they deserve to be upset, both Montclair and Dem Spicy Boyz both lost to conference champs, so by saying the Dem Spicy Boyz were better than Montclair you are saying that Plymouth state is better than Cortland, so in that case why is Plymouth state not hosting the first round NCAA game...
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 18, 2008, 07:01:49 AMQuote from: superman57 on November 17, 2008, 11:31:00 PM
Listen Montclair St. got robbed and they deserve to be upset, both Montclair and Dem Spicy Boyz both lost to conference champs, so by saying the Dem Spicy Boyz were better than Montclair you are saying that Plymouth state is better than Cortland, so in that case why is Plymouth state not hosting the first round NCAA game...
Montclair State would have easily been the Pool C had they not blown their game at Kean. It's not like BOTH teams were 9-1. Curry didn't lose to the Ivy League wannabe Mass-Dartmouth.
Quote from: Union89 on November 19, 2008, 10:09:51 PM
PG04,
Are we done here?? Just curious, maybe I misunderstood and wasn't supposed to put in the Poll on Sunday.....if so, thanks for your work on this.
Quote from: pg04 on November 09, 2008, 08:04:03 PM
Only 3 polls so far? How disappointing!
Quote from: Union89 on November 21, 2008, 11:58:10 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 09, 2008, 08:04:03 PM
Only 3 polls so far? How disappointing!
What's disappointing?
I appreciate the work you do, but you have a tendency to bust our balls.......here's my ball busting back at you....
Quote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:05:16 AM
U89... I wish you'd respond, I'd like to know what "ball busting" is being done.
Quote from: Union89 on November 23, 2008, 10:58:46 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:05:16 AM
U89... I wish you'd respond, I'd like to know what "ball busting" is being done.
Was there ever a final regular season Poll posted? When Polls aren't in on time, you bust our balls. We had been waiting on the final tally for a week.....just turning the tables.
Quote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:40:32 PMI have to throw props to the other four voters. They will let me know if their ballot is late.Quote from: Union89 on November 23, 2008, 10:58:46 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:05:16 AM
U89... I wish you'd respond, I'd like to know what "ball busting" is being done.
Was there ever a final regular season Poll posted? When Polls aren't in on time, you bust our balls. We had been waiting on the final tally for a week.....just turning the tables.
In fairness, I never got all of the polls this past week, so I could never post it. Secondly, If you look at the South Region, they always have theirs out by Sunday night. I feel I was actually much nicer than the people over there :). At the beginning of the season I said I wanted them by Sunday night or they wouldn't be included. However I thought that would be unfair so I just let it go...
Quote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:40:32 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 23, 2008, 10:58:46 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:05:16 AM
U89... I wish you'd respond, I'd like to know what "ball busting" is being done.
Was there ever a final regular season Poll posted? When Polls aren't in on time, you bust our balls. We had been waiting on the final tally for a week.....just turning the tables.
In fairness, I never got all of the polls this past week, so I could never post it. Secondly, If you look at the South Region, they always have theirs out by Sunday night. I feel I was actually much nicer than the people over there :). At the beginning of the season I said I wanted them by Sunday night or they wouldn't be included. However I thought that would be unfair so I just let it go...
Quote from: Union89 on November 23, 2008, 07:58:45 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:40:32 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 23, 2008, 10:58:46 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:05:16 AM
U89... I wish you'd respond, I'd like to know what "ball busting" is being done.
Was there ever a final regular season Poll posted? When Polls aren't in on time, you bust our balls. We had been waiting on the final tally for a week.....just turning the tables.
In fairness, I never got all of the polls this past week, so I could never post it. Secondly, If you look at the South Region, they always have theirs out by Sunday night. I feel I was actually much nicer than the people over there :). At the beginning of the season I said I wanted them by Sunday night or they wouldn't be included. However I thought that would be unfair so I just let it go...
As I have said from the beginning you did a great job, you said there was going to be a Poll BEFORE the 1st round and you rushed us to get it in.......am I lying???
Quote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 09:27:04 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 23, 2008, 07:58:45 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:40:32 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 23, 2008, 10:58:46 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 23, 2008, 12:05:16 AM
U89... I wish you'd respond, I'd like to know what "ball busting" is being done.
Was there ever a final regular season Poll posted? When Polls aren't in on time, you bust our balls. We had been waiting on the final tally for a week.....just turning the tables.
In fairness, I never got all of the polls this past week, so I could never post it. Secondly, If you look at the South Region, they always have theirs out by Sunday night. I feel I was actually much nicer than the people over there :). At the beginning of the season I said I wanted them by Sunday night or they wouldn't be included. However I thought that would be unfair so I just let it go...
As I have said from the beginning you did a great job, you said there was going to be a Poll BEFORE the 1st round and you rushed us to get it in.......am I lying???
Please re-read the first sentence in my post.
Quote from: pg04 on December 11, 2008, 01:17:09 PMWith all of the parity in the East, your pollsters are most qualified to sort this stuff out.
If all are interested in putting their polls in (teehee), I can definitely put it together as a final one for 2008!
Quote from: dlippiel on June 15, 2009, 06:05:56 PM
Hey fellas curious if there is any room for another pollster? I would love to contribute!
Quote from: Union89 on June 15, 2009, 07:44:17 PMQuote from: dlippiel on June 15, 2009, 06:05:56 PM
Hey fellas curious if there is any room for another pollster? I would love to contribute!
dlip.....as far as I'm concerned, you can take my representation of 'da 'U'.
Quote from: AUPepBand on June 16, 2009, 09:05:28 AM
Given the title of this thread, Pep was curious as to what D3 Eastern Region football programs had accumulated the most wins since 1999. Thanks to d3football.com, that information was easy to find, particularly for a library assistant!
Top 20 Eastern Regional Teams By Wins Since 1999:
1) Curry (91)
2) Rowan (89)
3) Ithaca (83)
4) Widener (77)
Hobart (77)
6) RPI (75)
7) Montclair (72)
8 Union (71)
9) Bridgewater State (69)
Brockport State (69)
11) Cortland State (68)
12) St. John Fisher (67)
Springfield (67)
14) Trinity (65)
15) Delaware Valley (64)
Western Connecticut (64)
Wilkes (64)
18) Alfred (63) :o
19) Lycoming (62)
Massachusetts-Dartmouth (62)
Pep knows that this will certainly be cause for discussion as "strength of schedule" may have something to do with win production. Nevertheless, these are the "facts" pertaining to the matter.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on June 16, 2009, 02:58:59 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on June 16, 2009, 09:05:28 AM
Given the title of this thread, Pep was curious as to what D3 Eastern Region football programs had accumulated the most wins since 1999. Thanks to d3football.com, that information was easy to find, particularly for a library assistant!
Top 20 Eastern Regional Teams By Wins Since 1999:
1) Curry (91)
2) Rowan (89)
3) Ithaca (83)
4) Widener (77)
Hobart (77)
6) RPI (75)
7) Montclair (72)
8 Union (71)
9) Bridgewater State (69)
Brockport State (69)
11) Cortland State (68)
12) St. John Fisher (67)
Springfield (67)
14) Trinity (65)
15) Delaware Valley (64)
Western Connecticut (64)
Wilkes (64)
18) Alfred (63) :o
19) Lycoming (62)
Massachusetts-Dartmouth (62)
Pep knows that this will certainly be cause for discussion as "strength of schedule" may have something to do with win production. Nevertheless, these are the "facts" pertaining to the matter.
That's not bad for Fisher considering how terrible they were from '99-'01. If they would have even played slightly below average and finished with 4-6 or 5-5 type seasons they would have ranked right up there in the RPI/Hobart Range.
Quote from: slick on June 16, 2009, 04:48:09 PM
Trinity with 65 wins only can play a 8 game season due to NESCAC rules. Thats a .8125 winning pct over last 10 yrs. I would like to see the winning pct rankings for the last 5 yrs, and I am not suggesting thst they are in the same category as a Cortland or St John Fisher or NJAC schools. But they have dominated the NESCAC.
Quote from: slick on June 16, 2009, 04:48:09 PM
Trinity with 65 wins only can play a 8 game season due to NESCAC rules. Thats a .8125 winning pct over last 10 yrs. I would like to see the winning pct rankings for the last 5 yrs, and I am not suggesting thst they are in the same category as a Cortland or St John Fisher or NJAC schools. But they have dominated the NESCAC.
Quote from: kirasdad on June 16, 2009, 04:56:11 PMQuote from: slick on June 16, 2009, 04:48:09 PM
Trinity with 65 wins only can play a 8 game season due to NESCAC rules. Thats a .8125 winning pct over last 10 yrs. I would like to see the winning pct rankings for the last 5 yrs, and I am not suggesting thst they are in the same category as a Cortland or St John Fisher or NJAC schools. But they have dominated the NESCAC.
Remind me again why the NESCAC prevents their football teams from playing more than 8 games/year when the Trinity Baseball team went 33-7 this year and participated in the DIII playoffs? Don't throw the academic card at me because how many classes did the BB team miss playing 40 games this past year...
Quote from: Upstate on June 16, 2009, 05:17:02 PMQuote from: slick on June 16, 2009, 04:48:09 PM
Trinity with 65 wins only can play a 8 game season due to NESCAC rules. Thats a .8125 winning pct over last 10 yrs. I would like to see the winning pct rankings for the last 5 yrs, and I am not suggesting thst they are in the same category as a Cortland or St John Fisher or NJAC schools. But they have dominated the NESCAC.
SJF has a .78 winning percentage over the past 5 years (48-13)...
Of course it's not vs the vaunted NESCAC but they've played some decent unknown teams like Mount Union, Ithaca, RPI, Hobart and Alfred.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on June 16, 2009, 07:01:45 PM
It's because November is when the finest wool sweaters are made, and all of the NESCACers have to get together, sip scotch, and rub wool elbows.
Quote from: Trin8-0 on July 15, 2009, 12:21:44 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on June 16, 2009, 07:01:45 PM
It's because November is when the finest wool sweaters are made, and all of the NESCACers have to get together, sip scotch, and rub wool elbows.
It is the decision of the NESCAC school presidents to prevent football from competing in non-conference games and/or the NCAA playoffs. This will not change anytime soon. They are afraid that any change toward expanding football will appear contradictory to the academic focus of the member institutions.
I personally think it is discriminatory to deny football players the same opportunities that ALL other NESCAC student athletes are provided.
Do not assume that all NESCAC football players/coaches/ fans approve of the leagues exclusionary practices in regards to football. If I were to estimate the vast majority of NESCAC football players would love the opportunity to prove themselves against the rest of Division III's best, just as their classmates have.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on June 16, 2009, 07:01:45 PMQuote from: kirasdad on June 16, 2009, 04:56:11 PMQuote from: slick on June 16, 2009, 04:48:09 PM
Trinity with 65 wins only can play a 8 game season due to NESCAC rules. Thats a .8125 winning pct over last 10 yrs. I would like to see the winning pct rankings for the last 5 yrs, and I am not suggesting thst they are in the same category as a Cortland or St John Fisher or NJAC schools. But they have dominated the NESCAC.
Remind me again why the NESCAC prevents their football teams from playing more than 8 games/year when the Trinity Baseball team went 33-7 this year and participated in the DIII playoffs? Don't throw the academic card at me because how many classes did the BB team miss playing 40 games this past year...
It's because November is when the finest wool sweaters are made, and all of the NESCACers have to get together, sip scotch, and rub wool elbows.
Quote from: SJFF82 on July 15, 2009, 01:26:50 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on June 16, 2009, 07:01:45 PMQuote from: kirasdad on June 16, 2009, 04:56:11 PMQuote from: slick on June 16, 2009, 04:48:09 PM
Trinity with 65 wins only can play a 8 game season due to NESCAC rules. Thats a .8125 winning pct over last 10 yrs. I would like to see the winning pct rankings for the last 5 yrs, and I am not suggesting thst they are in the same category as a Cortland or St John Fisher or NJAC schools. But they have dominated the NESCAC.
Remind me again why the NESCAC prevents their football teams from playing more than 8 games/year when the Trinity Baseball team went 33-7 this year and participated in the DIII playoffs? Don't throw the academic card at me because how many classes did the BB team miss playing 40 games this past year...
It's because November is when the finest wool sweaters are made, and all of the NESCACers have to get together, sip scotch, and rub wool elbows.
this coming from an LLer? :D
Quote from: pg04 on July 15, 2009, 12:15:38 AM
This kinda died off. Please Private Message me if you want to be involved this season.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on July 15, 2009, 08:28:04 PM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.careersserviceni.com%2FNR%2Frdonlyres%2F40A01EF2-D33C-4767-8D39-7755CCDAA8DF%2F0%2Fmechanic_del1.jpg&hash=c9fca761cc3511cb741b6e054b3c77bb0636df93)
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcolonialauto.biz%2Fservice%2Fimages%2Fmechanic.jpg&hash=66f33ea33d86b9d0ac3e9bee5320828fc3ad103e)
E8 Grads hard at work
Quote from: Jonny Utah on July 15, 2009, 12:43:33 PM
Trin8-0, Its my understanding that although the 'contradiction to acadamic focus' may be an issue to some presidents, the tradition of nescac football is the main reason why they don't go to the playoffs.
Quote from: Trin8-0 on July 16, 2009, 10:18:05 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 15, 2009, 12:43:33 PM
Trin8-0, Its my understanding that although the 'contradiction to acadamic focus' may be an issue to some presidents, the tradition of nescac football is the main reason why they don't go to the playoffs.
Both of the explanations are terrible excuses. However, the idea that the "tradition of NESCAC football" is what's perpetuating their exclusion is even more of a joke. The NESCAC-only football schedule only dates back to the early 1990s.
The only reasons NESCAC presidents care about the football team is because former football players are historically among their most philanthropic alumni. Are they scared that allowing their football teams to play non-conference games and or play in the NCAA playoffs will result in fewer or smaller donations?
My guess is that it would have the opposite effect. I work in Development at Trinity and have seen first-hand how donations increased when the Trinity baseball team won the DIII National Championship.
(And before you all go crazy I'm not insinuating that's the football team would have the same level of success in the DIII playoffs).
Quote from: Trin8-0 on July 16, 2009, 10:18:05 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on July 15, 2009, 12:43:33 PM
Trin8-0, Its my understanding that although the 'contradiction to acadamic focus' may be an issue to some presidents, the tradition of nescac football is the main reason why they don't go to the playoffs.
Both of the explanations are terrible excuses. However, the idea that the "tradition of NESCAC football" is what's perpetuating their exclusion is even more of a joke. The NESCAC-only football schedule only dates back to the early 1990s.
The only reasons NESCAC presidents care about the football team is because former football players are historically among their most philanthropic alumni. Are they scared that allowing their football teams to play non-conference games and or play in the NCAA playoffs will result in fewer or smaller donations?
My guess is that it would have the opposite effect. I work in Development at Trinity and have seen first-hand how donations increased when the Trinity baseball team won the DIII National Championship.
(And before you all go crazy I'm not insinuating that's the football team would have the same level of success in the DIII playoffs).
Quote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
I don't know about that -- I think the NESCAC winner would go better than .500 in the first round in the East bracket. Unless that winner is 6-2 and sent to Mount Union.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
I don't know about that -- I think the NESCAC winner would go better than .500 in the first round in the East bracket. Unless that winner is 6-2 and sent to Mount Union.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on July 17, 2009, 04:12:00 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
I don't know about that -- I think the NESCAC winner would go better than .500 in the first round in the East bracket. Unless that winner is 6-2 and sent to Mount Union.
Prove it...
Quote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 08:16:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on July 17, 2009, 04:12:00 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
I don't know about that -- I think the NESCAC winner would go better than .500 in the first round in the East bracket. Unless that winner is 6-2 and sent to Mount Union.
Prove it...
Can't, clearly. Nor can anyone prove otherwise. But an unbeaten NESCAC team getting one of the top three seeds can't possibly win one playoff game more often than it loses in the first round?
Quote from: dlippiel on July 16, 2009, 08:06:47 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on July 15, 2009, 08:28:04 PM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.careersserviceni.com%2FNR%2Frdonlyres%2F40A01EF2-D33C-4767-8D39-7755CCDAA8DF%2F0%2Fmechanic_del1.jpg&hash=c9fca761cc3511cb741b6e054b3c77bb0636df93)
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcolonialauto.biz%2Fservice%2Fimages%2Fmechanic.jpg&hash=66f33ea33d86b9d0ac3e9bee5320828fc3ad103e)
E8 Grads hard at work
Keep your heads up E8ers, it is still very admirable work to use your hands for a living ;D!
Quote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 08:16:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on July 17, 2009, 04:12:00 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
I don't know about that -- I think the NESCAC winner would go better than .500 in the first round in the East bracket. Unless that winner is 6-2 and sent to Mount Union.
Prove it...
Can't, clearly. Nor can anyone prove otherwise. But an unbeaten NESCAC team getting one of the top three seeds can't possibly win one playoff game more often than it loses in the first round?
Quote from: met_fan on July 19, 2009, 10:28:58 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 08:16:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on July 17, 2009, 04:12:00 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
I don't know about that -- I think the NESCAC winner would go better than .500 in the first round in the East bracket. Unless that winner is 6-2 and sent to Mount Union.
Prove it...
Can't, clearly. Nor can anyone prove otherwise. But an unbeaten NESCAC team getting one of the top three seeds can't possibly win one playoff game more often than it loses in the first round?
But it's easier to go unbeaten when you only play 8 games and don't go out of conference. Would that be taken into consideration during the seeding process?
Quote from: met_fan on July 19, 2009, 10:28:58 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 08:16:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on July 17, 2009, 04:12:00 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on July 17, 2009, 03:31:25 PM
I don't know about that -- I think the NESCAC winner would go better than .500 in the first round in the East bracket. Unless that winner is 6-2 and sent to Mount Union.
Prove it...
Can't, clearly. Nor can anyone prove otherwise. But an unbeaten NESCAC team getting one of the top three seeds can't possibly win one playoff game more often than it loses in the first round?
But it's easier to go unbeaten when you only play 8 games and don't go out of conference. Would that be taken into consideration during the seeding process?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on July 19, 2009, 12:19:24 PM
Why is the NESCAC even D3 in football? Why don't they just create their own NESCAC division? Then in the NESCAC national polls, Trinity can be #1, and Williams #2, etc etc...
I thought that it was science.
Quote from: Knightstalker on August 05, 2009, 02:12:56 PM
So when do you want preseason ballots or should we wait until the season starts?
Quote from: TGP on August 05, 2009, 02:34:01 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on August 05, 2009, 02:12:56 PM
So when do you want preseason ballots or should we wait until the season starts?
TGP (assuming TGP is still the "Hobart rep" unless PA wants it) votes for Sunday, Sept 13 be the first poll deadline. Let's wait until teams either start out 1-0 or 0-1 before we start ranking them.
Quote from: TGP on August 05, 2009, 02:34:01 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on August 05, 2009, 02:12:56 PM
So when do you want preseason ballots or should we wait until the season starts?
TGP (assuming TGP is still the "Hobart rep" unless PA wants it) votes for Sunday, Sept 13 be the first poll deadline. Let's wait until teams either start out 1-0 or 0-1 before we start ranking them.
Quote from: pg04 on August 08, 2009, 01:40:05 PMI would be willing to participate in the polls.
As of Right now, I have the following interest:
dlippiel -- Union
Knightstalker -- no affiliation
AuKaz00 -- Alfred
PG04 -- Brockport
TGP -- Hobart
Is there any other interest (or did I forget someone)? I'd like to have 10 again if possible. If not, we'll have to go with less.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 10, 2009, 11:35:44 AM
Are you guys kidding me? There HAS to be a preseason poll. Who cares if it isn't even close by the end of the season. Isn't that the idea?
[/qu
dlippiel has no problems with that. ****, reading some CFB info online this morning he is all amped up for FB! Again dlippiel would be coo wit whateva!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 10, 2009, 11:35:44 AM
Are you guys kidding me? There HAS to be a preseason poll. Who cares if it isn't even close by the end of the season. Isn't that the idea?
Quote from: Knightstalker on August 10, 2009, 12:59:57 PM
I am with the Banana Hammock, we should do a preseason poll, come on voters let PG know if you are in. I say we submit a preseason poll by beginning to middle of next week.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 10, 2009, 02:08:48 PM
PG, I don't mind doing it again if you need a guy. Lemme know.
Quote from: pg04 on August 10, 2009, 06:52:41 PM
Looks like we have 9... I'd be willing for one more but 9 would be fine too.
PG04 -- Brockport
Upstate -- Fisher
Dlippiel -- Union
LD11 -- RPI
Knightstalker -- No alliance
Jonny Utah -- Ithaca/NEFC
TGP -- Hobart
HHawksE8Champs -- Hartwick
AuKaz00 -- Alfred
As usual it seems we are lacking on MAC posters... If there are any lurking out there, I'd give them a priority just so we have at least one representative from the conference.
Should be a fun year!
Quote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 10:34:27 AM
Wow, the fan poll is movin on up! I have no problem with that, as long as the audience will know that we are indeed "fans" and alums of east region schools and not necessarily media. However, I think we are more knowledgeable than most polls out there that don't even pay attention to D3 but make an attempt at forming a top 25. :)
Quote from: AUPepBand on August 11, 2009, 11:49:12 AMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 10:34:27 AM
Wow, the fan poll is movin on up! I have no problem with that, as long as the audience will know that we are indeed "fans" and alums of east region schools and not necessarily media. However, I think we are more knowledgeable than most polls out there that don't even pay attention to D3 but make an attempt at forming a top 25. :)
Pep will take that to mean it's okay. The title itself reveals the source as a "Fan" Poll. Pep certainly agrees that the East Region fans who are regular posters on D3football.com DO have a better grasp on the world of D3 football than media folks who don't necessarily follow the "little guys."
Now...about the newspapers subscription campaign... ;)
Quote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 03:51:38 PM
Hmph. I think there should be an agreement that if you give negative karma you should just be big enough to say why if you have a beef. I don't know how I lose karma for just posting about the poll!!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 11, 2009, 03:56:28 PMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 03:51:38 PM
Hmph. I think there should be an agreement that if you give negative karma you should just be big enough to say why if you have a beef. I don't know how I lose karma for just posting about the poll!!
It's the sniper man. +K to negate theloser. He'll never come out of the closet...literally.
Quote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 11:59:04 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 11, 2009, 11:49:12 AMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 10:34:27 AM
Wow, the fan poll is movin on up! I have no problem with that, as long as the audience will know that we are indeed "fans" and alums of east region schools and not necessarily media. However, I think we are more knowledgeable than most polls out there that don't even pay attention to D3 but make an attempt at forming a top 25. :)
Pep will take that to mean it's okay. The title itself reveals the source as a "Fan" Poll. Pep certainly agrees that the East Region fans who are regular posters on D3football.com DO have a better grasp on the world of D3 football than media folks who don't necessarily follow the "little guys."
Now...about the newspapers subscription campaign... ;)
Sorry, I never actually gave my approval in the e-mail... I babbled on and on... Yes indeed you can use it. The preseason one should be interesting to start off with. I think there are at LEAST 4 teams you could slot in at number 1.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 11, 2009, 04:19:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 11:59:04 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 11, 2009, 11:49:12 AMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 10:34:27 AM
Wow, the fan poll is movin on up! I have no problem with that, as long as the audience will know that we are indeed "fans" and alums of east region schools and not necessarily media. However, I think we are more knowledgeable than most polls out there that don't even pay attention to D3 but make an attempt at forming a top 25. :)
Pep will take that to mean it's okay. The title itself reveals the source as a "Fan" Poll. Pep certainly agrees that the East Region fans who are regular posters on D3football.com DO have a better grasp on the world of D3 football than media folks who don't necessarily follow the "little guys."
Now...about the newspapers subscription campaign... ;)
Sorry, I never actually gave my approval in the e-mail... I babbled on and on... Yes indeed you can use it. The preseason one should be interesting to start off with. I think there are at LEAST 4 teams you could slot in at number 1.
That will make a nice addition to the Moonlighter section, Pep! So, when are we submitting our preseason polls? We need to make sure Pep has enough time to get it to press for the September 3rd edition of the Sun.
Quote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 04:44:20 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on August 11, 2009, 04:19:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 11:59:04 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 11, 2009, 11:49:12 AMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 10:34:27 AM
Wow, the fan poll is movin on up! I have no problem with that, as long as the audience will know that we are indeed "fans" and alums of east region schools and not necessarily media. However, I think we are more knowledgeable than most polls out there that don't even pay attention to D3 but make an attempt at forming a top 25. :)
Pep will take that to mean it's okay. The title itself reveals the source as a "Fan" Poll. Pep certainly agrees that the East Region fans who are regular posters on D3football.com DO have a better grasp on the world of D3 football than media folks who don't necessarily follow the "little guys."
Now...about the newspapers subscription campaign... ;)
Sorry, I never actually gave my approval in the e-mail... I babbled on and on... Yes indeed you can use it. The preseason one should be interesting to start off with. I think there are at LEAST 4 teams you could slot in at number 1.
That will make a nice addition to the Moonlighter section, Pep! So, when are we submitting our preseason polls? We need to make sure Pep has enough time to get it to press for the September 3rd edition of the Sun.
I guess we should just start sending them in as soon as possible. In fact, 3 polls are already in. The sooner they're in, the sooner that I can post :)
During the regular season, I think by Sunday Night should be the deadline.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on August 12, 2009, 09:09:48 PM
I'm mostly a poster on the NEFC board but i have to say there must be a preseason poll - whats the fun in evaluating after watching them play one week... lets see which poster makes the best predictions
Quote from: Boxer7806 on August 13, 2009, 04:20:43 PM
pg04 - sounds good to me, I just hope the few NEFC posters, who all seem to be Plymouth State fans, dont kill me when their team is not in the top ten
Quote from: pg04 on August 13, 2009, 07:41:30 PM
I have 6 polls in (not including mine) -- and there are already 5 different #1 teams...
Quote from: Upstate on August 13, 2009, 07:48:19 PMQuote from: pg04 on August 13, 2009, 07:41:30 PM
I have 6 polls in (not including mine) -- and there are already 5 different #1 teams...
Too many questions for teams all over the place...
Quote from: pg04 on August 13, 2009, 08:06:23 PM
There are too many polls in my inbox... ;)
Quote from: Knightstalker on August 14, 2009, 12:22:16 AM
I have almost the same breakdown.
NJAC 3
E8 3
LL 2
MAC 2
Curry was right there, but they lost the mental coin toss.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 08:59:51 AM
If it makes anyone feel better, I had Curry at 5.
Quote from: AUPepBand on August 14, 2009, 09:06:24 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 08:59:51 AM
If it makes anyone feel better, I had Curry at 5.
Pep feels much better now...Pep had the spicy boys at #8. Thanks, LD.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 09:08:17 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 14, 2009, 09:06:24 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 08:59:51 AM
If it makes anyone feel better, I had Curry at 5.
Pep feels much better now...Pep had the spicy boys at #8. Thanks, LD.
Pre-Season polls must take last year's end into account. The LL folded and Curry flourished so I had to not only have them in the poll but rank them relatively highly. It was only fair and they deserve it. 1 loss and they are banished forever.
Quote from: pg04 on August 14, 2009, 09:25:02 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 09:08:17 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 14, 2009, 09:06:24 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 08:59:51 AM
If it makes anyone feel better, I had Curry at 5.
Pep feels much better now...Pep had the spicy boys at #8. Thanks, LD.
Pre-Season polls must take last year's end into account. The LL folded and Curry flourished so I had to not only have them in the poll but rank them relatively highly. It was only fair and they deserve it. 1 loss and they are banished forever.
Yeah, I think Curry should get some level of respect for beating Ithaca. We'll see if they can trample through the NEFC again this year.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on August 14, 2009, 10:15:05 AM
One more thing on Curry and NEFC teams in general..
I think when a decent team like Curry makes the playoffs, there is this huge emotional swing and feeling of disrespect that fuels the team in that first game. Im sure the coaches use this as a tool to fire that team up.
I saw it in an ECAC game I played with against Worcester State in 1996. I don't want to go into the whole ECAC thing again, but basically we were spent as a team. We just missed the playoffs in the last game (lost to Buff State) and now had to play a game that didnt matter to us (again, I dont want to into the excuse thing again). Most of us on that team were a part of the 1994 run that was one catch away from the Stagg Bowl. Anyway, Worcester State was more fired up than any team I had ever seen. We could hear them at halftime and it sounded like a gangbusters strike busting rally in the next room.
Anyway, I have this feeling that after that first game Curry has won in the playoffs the last 2 years (wins versus Hartwick and Ithaca in 2007 and 2008) were followed up by bad losses in the next game (SJF and Cortland, 37-6 and 42-0) in that next round. I believe that emotion was spent going into that 2nd round.
No excuses but I have a feeling Ithaca was looking past Curry and Cortland last year to that Mt. Union game again.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 10:24:17 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on August 14, 2009, 10:15:05 AM
One more thing on Curry and NEFC teams in general..
I think when a decent team like Curry makes the playoffs, there is this huge emotional swing and feeling of disrespect that fuels the team in that first game. Im sure the coaches use this as a tool to fire that team up.
I saw it in an ECAC game I played with against Worcester State in 1996. I don't want to go into the whole ECAC thing again, but basically we were spent as a team. We just missed the playoffs in the last game (lost to Buff State) and now had to play a game that didnt matter to us (again, I dont want to into the excuse thing again). Most of us on that team were a part of the 1994 run that was one catch away from the Stagg Bowl. Anyway, Worcester State was more fired up than any team I had ever seen. We could hear them at halftime and it sounded like a gangbusters strike busting rally in the next room.
Anyway, I have this feeling that after that first game Curry has won in the playoffs the last 2 years (wins versus Hartwick and Ithaca in 2007 and 2008) were followed up by bad losses in the next game (SJF and Cortland, 37-6 and 42-0) in that next round. I believe that emotion was spent going into that 2nd round.
No excuses but I have a feeling Ithaca was looking past Curry and Cortland last year to that Mt. Union game again.
EXCUSES EXCUSES
Quote from: pumkinattack on August 14, 2009, 11:36:40 AM
If the LL has two going in, I'm guessing it's primarily Hobart and RPI, but I think Union (or the LL #3) will be as strong as the #3 from either the E8 (SJF or AU) or NJAC this year (Montclair or Rowan). I can undrestand the problem with the lack of info, but Union has a lot of talent returning (their D was shaky last year and they lose their best OL, but there's a lot returning on O). Their biggest problem is going to be schedule with Ithaca, Muhlenburg (road) and Salisbury (road). Given that, plus Bart and RPI (and anyone else who might be a challenge in the LL), it's hard to see Union having less than one or two losses this year.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 14, 2009, 11:51:11 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on August 14, 2009, 11:36:40 AM
If the LL has two going in, I'm guessing it's primarily Hobart and RPI, but I think Union (or the LL #3) will be as strong as the #3 from either the E8 (SJF or AU) or NJAC this year (Montclair or Rowan). I can undrestand the problem with the lack of info, but Union has a lot of talent returning (their D was shaky last year and they lose their best OL, but there's a lot returning on O). Their biggest problem is going to be schedule with Ithaca, Muhlenburg (road) and Salisbury (road). Given that, plus Bart and RPI (and anyone else who might be a challenge in the LL), it's hard to see Union having less than one or two losses this year.
Based on the last few years, I have Hobart and RPI in, no Union. Obviously, as we've mentioned, pre-season polls take last year into account more than speculation for this year. I don't know if Union will be strong, but I have a feeling they might have a tough year.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on August 14, 2009, 10:15:05 AM
One more thing on Curry and NEFC teams in general..
I think when a decent team like Curry makes the playoffs, there is this huge emotional swing and feeling of disrespect that fuels the team in that first game. Im sure the coaches use this as a tool to fire that team up.
I saw it in an ECAC game I played with against Worcester State in 1996. I don't want to go into the whole ECAC thing again, but basically we were spent as a team. We just missed the playoffs in the last game (lost to Buff State) and now had to play a game that didnt matter to us (again, I dont want to into the excuse thing again). Most of us on that team were a part of the 1994 run that was one catch away from the Stagg Bowl. Anyway, Worcester State was more fired up than any team I had ever seen. We could hear them at halftime and it sounded like a gangbusters strike busting rally in the next room.
Anyway, I have this feeling that after that first game Curry has won in the playoffs the last 2 years (wins versus Hartwick and Ithaca in 2007 and 2008) were followed up by bad losses in the next game (SJF and Cortland, 37-6 and 42-0) in that next round. I believe that emotion was spent going into that 2nd round.
No excuses but I have a feeling Ithaca was looking past Curry and Cortland last year to that Mt. Union game again.
Quote from: TGP on August 15, 2009, 10:45:45 AMdlippiel had:
Off the top of TGP's head TGP had:
3 NJAC
2 MAC
2 LL
2 E8
1 DSB*
* Curry in the top 10 and may have even given Union a #9 or 10 (can't remember).
Per PA, Connolly is an entire season wiser and the U's RB is the best in the LL. Guess we'll see whether the U is improved in week 1 when they face IC.
Although it sounds like most think RPI is "better" going into the season, TGP dinged the Enginegros a) their weak OOC sked vs. U's, b) last year's MMA game and most importantly c) the grad of Robinson, Svensli (sp? their ALL WR), etc (TGP realizes that RPI's D will be back in force, but w/o any color on how good their QB's are coming in TGP went with Connolly and U as the "#2 pre-season LL team").
Quote from: pumkinattack on August 16, 2009, 08:22:37 AM
Looks like you can bracket them with the top 3, next 2, third 3 and last two, so there's some symmetry there even if individual teams have widen dispersions amongst votes.
For the uneducated, and ideally from people not affiliated with these schools, what's the thesis for SJF being a top team this year and same for Cortland?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on August 16, 2009, 08:56:10 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on August 16, 2009, 08:22:37 AM
Looks like you can bracket them with the top 3, next 2, third 3 and last two, so there's some symmetry there even if individual teams have widen dispersions amongst votes.
For the uneducated, and ideally from people not affiliated with these schools, what's the thesis for SJF being a top team this year and same for Cortland?
Just by looking at what they did last year I can see you putting Cortland up top. But the NJAC last year really did less than any other conference I would say. No big wins for anyone in that conference. And correct me if Im wrong, but isn't Cortland graduating every single player on offense from last year except for the fullback? And 5 defenseive starters graduated? I still put them in the top 10 but I see I put them lower than anyone else did. I don't see how you can't rank Montclair ahead of them given all of the circumstances.
As for SJF, they had a lot of close ones last year, but only really had one great game or win (vs. Ithaca). But their recent success deserves them at least a decent spot on the poll.
Quote from: TGP on August 15, 2009, 10:45:45 AM
Off the top of TGP's head TGP had:
3 NJAC
2 MAC
2 LL
2 E8
1 DSB*
* Curry in the top 10 and may have even given Union a #9 or 10 (can't remember).
Per PA, Connolly is an entire season wiser and the U's RB is the best in the LL. Guess we'll see whether the U is improved in week 1 when they face IC.
Although it sounds like most think RPI is "better" going into the season, TGP dinged the Enginegros a) their weak OOC sked vs. U's, b) last year's MMA game and most importantly c) the grad of Robinson, Svensli (sp? their ALL WR), etc (TGP realizes that RPI's D will be back in force, but w/o any color on how good their QB's are coming in TGP went with Connolly and U as the "#2 pre-season LL team").
Quote from: pumkinattack on August 16, 2009, 08:22:37 AM
Looks like you can bracket them with the top 3, next 2, third 3 and last two, so there's some symmetry there even if individual teams have widen dispersions amongst votes.
For the uneducated, and ideally from people not affiliated with these schools, what's the thesis for SJF being a top team this year and same for Cortland?
Quote from: stimulator on August 17, 2009, 12:19:23 PM
Just sayin'....
Interested that in reviewing the preseason prognistications of the Lindy's, Sporting News et.al, that the East Preseason poll has the 10th ranked team in the country (in one poll) tied for 9th in their regional poll.
That would be Curry... Not sure if any of the "experts" really understand what they have coming back (or not) but while I do respect their program and what they have accomplished, 10th nationally seems a bit unrealistic. They will end up with a respectable if not spotless NEFC record but I'm not sure they would be quite as appealing with a regular season schedule in the NJAC or E8..
10th in the nation?
Quote from: stimulator on August 17, 2009, 12:19:23 PM
Just sayin'....
Interested that in reviewing the preseason prognistications of the Lindy's, Sporting News et.al, that the East Preseason poll has the 10th ranked team in the country (in one poll) tied for 9th in their regional poll.
That would be Curry... Not sure if any of the "experts" really understand what they have coming back (or not) but while I do respect their program and what they have accomplished, 10th nationally seems a bit unrealistic. They will end up with a respectable if not spotless NEFC record but I'm not sure they would be quite as appealing with a regular season schedule in the NJAC or E8..
10th in the nation?
Quote from: pumkinattack on August 17, 2009, 09:38:31 AM
I meant it seriously. I thought Montclair returned a lot, but Cortland lost a lot and got a little too much credit for beating up two NEFC teams (irrespective of Curry's win inthe playoffs since Ithaca beat Cortland the week before by three touchdowns) and losing a pretty similar game as Hobart to Mt. Union notwithstanding what should have been a superior and healthier offense. With Fisher, they finished 6-4 against a tough schedule, but had some pretty uninspiring wins against Utica and Husson at the end of the season (someone here will make the argument that they meant less at that point, but its the end of the season, if you're going to throw stinker wins in you do it earlier on in the season and improve towards the end).
I really don't know the personnel of Fisher and NJAC schools, which is why I was asking from people who were informed, but not homers. That being said, based on the last five years and the fact that they had a winning record against a reasonably tough schedule, I would still include Fisher, but why would they be ahead of DelVal, Lyco, RPI or Rowan is kind of what I was getting at.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on August 17, 2009, 02:59:15 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on August 17, 2009, 09:38:31 AM
I meant it seriously. I thought Montclair returned a lot, but Cortland lost a lot and got a little too much credit for beating up two NEFC teams (irrespective of Curry's win inthe playoffs since Ithaca beat Cortland the week before by three touchdowns) and losing a pretty similar game as Hobart to Mt. Union notwithstanding what should have been a superior and healthier offense. With Fisher, they finished 6-4 against a tough schedule, but had some pretty uninspiring wins against Utica and Husson at the end of the season (someone here will make the argument that they meant less at that point, but its the end of the season, if you're going to throw stinker wins in you do it earlier on in the season and improve towards the end).
I really don't know the personnel of Fisher and NJAC schools, which is why I was asking from people who were informed, but not homers. That being said, based on the last five years and the fact that they had a winning record against a reasonably tough schedule, I would still include Fisher, but why would they be ahead of DelVal, Lyco, RPI or Rowan is kind of what I was getting at.
Nothing for nothing PA but if you are going to count Husson as one of their uninspired wins last season than their record was 7-4 not 6-4. For some reason the 7-4 record just seems so much better to me. Personally I don't think Fisher will have a great year this year....Maybe they will prove me wrong but I can see this year being quite similar to last year in terms of record and those "close but no cigar" type losses...maybe with 1 statement win at Salisbury this year in place of the statement win of dismantling Ithaca last year.
With that being said, I hope Fisher can put up a show the first week against Mount Union. I remember last year, and while Fisher lost by 30 that was still the 2nd best point differential against Mount Union in the regular season (Otterbein lost to them by 29)...Fisher moved the ball on them but I swear once you get inside their 25 yard line or so that defense decides they've had enough and they just shut you down. If we can find ways to break through and if our QB doesn't fumble snaps like he did a few times against them last year....Not calling the upset but I think we could make a decent game of it.
Quote from: dlippiel on August 17, 2009, 01:43:39 PMQuote from: stimulator on August 17, 2009, 12:19:23 PM
Just sayin'....
Interested that in reviewing the preseason prognistications of the Lindy's, Sporting News et.al, that the East Preseason poll has the 10th ranked team in the country (in one poll) tied for 9th in their regional poll.
That would be Curry... Not sure if any of the "experts" really understand what they have coming back (or not) but while I do respect their program and what they have accomplished, 10th nationally seems a bit unrealistic. They will end up with a respectable if not spotless NEFC record but I'm not sure they would be quite as appealing with a regular season schedule in the NJAC or E8..
10th in the nation?
Stop it....are you ****ting me stim? 10th in the nation? Oh boy here we go. Give the purple drank a little love and now everything is getting out of control. Respect their program: yes 10th in the nation: no
Quote from: TGP on August 17, 2009, 06:15:08 PM
Any insights from the Cortland followers as to why folks would indicate Cortland has "lost a lot" and yet ends up as the #10 team in the preseason D3 poll?
TGP admits he assumed that if Pat/Keith thought they were deserving of the top 10 nationally (and in effect, the highest ranking in the east), they merited equal consideration for #1 in the East fan poll.
Quote from: TGP on August 17, 2009, 06:15:08 PM
Any insights from the Cortland followers as to why folks would indicate Cortland has "lost a lot" and yet ends up as the #10 team in the preseason D3 poll?
TGP admits he assumed that if Pat/Keith thought they were deserving of the top 10 nationally (and in effect, the highest ranking in the east), they merited equal consideration for #1 in the East fan poll.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on August 18, 2009, 09:54:21 PMQuote from: TGP on August 17, 2009, 06:15:08 PM
Any insights from the Cortland followers as to why folks would indicate Cortland has "lost a lot" and yet ends up as the #10 team in the preseason D3 poll?
TGP admits he assumed that if Pat/Keith thought they were deserving of the top 10 nationally (and in effect, the highest ranking in the east), they merited equal consideration for #1 in the East fan poll.
I wouldn't assume that's where Keith and I had them on our ballots. There are 23 other voters.
HSC: That was Touchdown Illustrated, not Sports Illustrated.
http://www.d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/2004-09-08/Saturday+was+not+Witt%27s+end
Quote from: Pat Coleman on August 18, 2009, 09:54:21 PMQuote from: TGP on August 17, 2009, 06:15:08 PM
Any insights from the Cortland followers as to why folks would indicate Cortland has "lost a lot" and yet ends up as the #10 team in the preseason D3 poll?
TGP admits he assumed that if Pat/Keith thought they were deserving of the top 10 nationally (and in effect, the highest ranking in the east), they merited equal consideration for #1 in the East fan poll.
I wouldn't assume that's where Keith and I had them on our ballots. There are 23 other voters.
HSC: That was Touchdown Illustrated, not Sports Illustrated.
http://www.d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/2004-09-08/Saturday+was+not+Witt%27s+end
Quote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 11:59:04 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 11, 2009, 11:49:12 AMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 10:34:27 AM
Wow, the fan poll is movin on up! I have no problem with that, as long as the audience will know that we are indeed "fans" and alums of east region schools and not necessarily media. However, I think we are more knowledgeable than most polls out there that don't even pay attention to D3 but make an attempt at forming a top 25. :)
Pep will take that to mean it's okay. The title itself reveals the source as a "Fan" Poll. Pep certainly agrees that the East Region fans who are regular posters on D3football.com DO have a better grasp on the world of D3 football than media folks who don't necessarily follow the "little guys."
Now...about the newspapers subscription campaign... ;)
Sorry, I never actually gave my approval in the e-mail... I babbled on and on... Yes indeed you can use it. The preseason one should be interesting to start off with. I think there are at LEAST 4 teams you could slot in at number 1.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 20, 2009, 08:59:31 PMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 11:59:04 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 11, 2009, 11:49:12 AMQuote from: pg04 on August 11, 2009, 10:34:27 AM
Wow, the fan poll is movin on up! I have no problem with that, as long as the audience will know that we are indeed "fans" and alums of east region schools and not necessarily media. However, I think we are more knowledgeable than most polls out there that don't even pay attention to D3 but make an attempt at forming a top 25. :)
Pep will take that to mean it's okay. The title itself reveals the source as a "Fan" Poll. Pep certainly agrees that the East Region fans who are regular posters on D3football.com DO have a better grasp on the world of D3 football than media folks who don't necessarily follow the "little guys."
Now...about the newspapers subscription campaign... ;)
Sorry, I never actually gave my approval in the e-mail... I babbled on and on... Yes indeed you can use it. The preseason one should be interesting to start off with. I think there are at LEAST 4 teams you could slot in at number 1.
This week's Alfred Sun arrived today and I immediately opened it to the middle only to be disappointed when the East Region Fan Poll was not there. I flipped through every page twice looking for it elsewhere before resigning myself to its exclusion and began reading the news of the week...
QuoteCurry in the top ten is a bit unrealistic...
Quote from: pg04 on August 22, 2009, 01:57:59 PMamen
By the way 3rd person talk is not necessary here...
Quote from: pumkinattack on August 22, 2009, 07:03:49 PM
Not necessary, but accepted.
Quote from: dlippiel on August 22, 2009, 07:40:35 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on August 22, 2009, 07:03:49 PM
Not necessary, but accepted.
ab-so-****ing-lutly accepted ;D
Quote from: Knightstalker on August 23, 2009, 09:23:15 AMQuote from: dlippiel on August 22, 2009, 07:40:35 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on August 22, 2009, 07:03:49 PM
Not necessary, but accepted.
ab-so-****ing-lutly accepted ;D
KS agrees.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on August 26, 2009, 12:18:47 PM
no love for the NEFC
Quote from: pg04 on September 07, 2009, 01:39:35 AM
Got most of them, A few stragglers out there.. ;)
Quote from: Upstate on September 07, 2009, 07:47:28 AMQuote from: pg04 on September 07, 2009, 01:39:35 AM
Got most of them, A few stragglers out there.. ;)
Mine is in correct?
Quote from: 'gro on September 07, 2009, 04:48:44 PM
(insert "get your poll in" joke here)
on the national top 25 there's a bit a WTF moment... Ohio Northern goes from unranked with zero votes to #9 in the country after beating previously #4 North Central Ill. Really? how does that happen?
Quote from: 'gro on September 07, 2009, 04:48:44 PM
(insert "get your poll in" joke here)
Quote from: pg04 on September 07, 2009, 10:09:33 PM
Yikes! :o I'm still waiting for one poll to be put in...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2009, 10:08:10 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 07, 2009, 04:48:44 PM
(insert "get your poll in" joke here)
I waited until it was dark out before I put my poll into PG. I'm a little bit self-conscious...
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 08, 2009, 12:11:23 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2009, 10:08:10 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 07, 2009, 04:48:44 PM
(insert "get your poll in" joke here)
I waited until it was dark out before I put my poll into PG. I'm a little bit self-conscious...
Pep is wondering whether this poll should really appear in the newspaper. It is a family newspaper, after all...
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) ( 5 ) | 1-0 | 81 | 1 | vs. Union |
T2 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2009)( 1 ) | 0-0 | 76 | 2 | at Dickinson |
T2 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 2 ) | 0-0 | 76 | 3 | vs. Morrisville State |
4 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2009) | 0-0 | 53 | 4 | at Wilkes |
5 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) | 1-0 | 50 | T7 | at Kean |
6 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 1 ) | 1-0 | 46 | 5 | at FDU-Florham |
7 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009) | 0-0 | 34 | T7 | at Lycoming |
8 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) | 0-0 | 23 | T9 | vs. Endicott |
9 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) | 0-1 | 17 | 6 | vs. Buffalo State |
10 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) | 1-0 | 11 | NR | at King's |
Quote from: 'gro on September 07, 2009, 04:48:44 PM
(insert "get your poll in" joke here)
on the national top 25 there's a bit a WTF moment... Ohio Northern goes from unranked with zero votes to #9 in the country after beating previously #4 North Central Ill. Really? how does that happen?
EDIT: more top 25 issues... lots of teams with open dates in week 1. Cortland moves down from 11 to 12, Wabash moves up from 18 to 16, and Hobart goes from 15 to 17. It's all a guessing game fellas.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 08, 2009, 12:09:04 PM
RPI getting a vote at 4? Wow those new QB's must be good! Unfortunately dlip seems to think deep down this may actually be the case here in 09.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2009, 01:13:36 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 08, 2009, 12:09:04 PM
RPI getting a vote at 4? Wow those new QB's must be good! Unfortunately dlip seems to think deep down this may actually be the case here in 09.
Yea I don't see how you can't have them ranked with all those returning starters. Add that to the fact that the last 4 years they have been a top 10 team in the east easy.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) ( 5 ) | 1-0 | 90 | 1 | vs. Union |
2 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2009)( 1 ) | 0-0 | 84 | 2 | at Dickinson |
3 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 2 ) | 0-0 | 82 | 3 | vs. Morrisville State |
4 | Montclair State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Montclair+State&year=2009) | 0-0 | 60 | 4 | at Wilkes |
5 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) | 1-0 | 56 | 5 | at FDU-Florham |
6 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) | 1-0 | 55 | T7 | at Kean |
7 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009) | 0-0 | 38 | T7 | at Lycoming |
8 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) | 0-0 | 23 | T9 | vs. Endicott |
9 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) | 0-1 | 20 | 6 | vs. Buffalo State |
10 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) | 1-0 | 11 | NR | at King's |
Curry (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Curry&year=2009) | 0-1 | 11 | 9 | vs. Widener |
Quote from: sjfcards on September 13, 2009, 11:17:20 AM
I just listend to the game, but that is an impressive win for Union. I really thought IC had the inside track for the top spot in the East Region this year, but that is a tough loss. Union should definatly jump in the East Region polls.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) | 1-0 | 87 | 3 | vs. #3 Rowan |
2 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) | 2-0 | 80 | 6 | vs. Wesley |
3 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) | 1-0 | 70 | 7 | at #1 Cortland State |
4 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) | 2-0 | 67 | 5 | vs. St. Lawrence |
5 | Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) | 1-0 | 47 | NR | at Muhlenberg |
6 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) | 1-1 | 39 | 1 | vs. Widener |
7 | Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) | 2-0 | 36 | NR | Open Date |
8 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) | 1-0 | 35 | 8 | vs. Utica |
9 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) | 1-1 | 33 | 9 | vs. Rochester |
10 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) | 2-0 | 28 | 10 | Open Date |
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 09:55:19 AM
Still probably way to early to know anything this year. There is no clear cut top 10 or 5 or even 2 I dont think.
You have like 5 mac teams that all could be #1 or #20.
Then you have Ithaca and SJF and Alfred that could all come up big down the strecth.
Then you have Springfield. Who knows what the hell they have going there.
Utica!
RPI, Union and Hobart will all be there at the end.
The NJAC is always a crapshoot it seems. Although it looks like Cortland and Rowan will be the easy favorites there.
Hartwick might suprise a few teams down the stretch as well.
Then theres the unknown Nefc and other new england teams.
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:06:39 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
maybe they think that Union is not a top ten team and IC is.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 09:41:08 AM
couple quick thoughts for now:
Hobart: dropping all the way out over a seemingly bad loss is a bit of stretch. There must be a reason they were ranked so high in the 1st place right? I know Dickinson is not MUC, but 'Bart only beat them by 3 in '06, and by 7 in '08. Dickinson won in OT in '07. Must be a good matchup and perhaps Bart will bounce back.
SJF: I remember thinking they were underrated in the poll last year after week 2...SO I WILL SHUT MY MOUTH FOR A FEW WEEKS....because they promptly justified their ranking ;D But that offense SURE looked dangerous on Sat.
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:09:59 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:06:39 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
maybe they think that Union is not a top ten team and IC is.
If Union is that poor of a team, Ithaca should not be a #3 after losing to them.....correct??
Quote from: TGP on September 14, 2009, 12:15:38 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 09:41:08 AM
couple quick thoughts for now:
Hobart: dropping all the way out over a seemingly bad loss is a bit of stretch. There must be a reason they were ranked so high in the 1st place right? I know Dickinson is not MUC, but 'Bart only beat them by 3 in '06, and by 7 in '08. Dickinson won in OT in '07. Must be a good matchup and perhaps Bart will bounce back.
SJF: I remember thinking they were underrated in the poll last year after week 2...SO I WILL SHUT MY MOUTH FOR A FEW WEEKS....because they promptly justified their ranking ;D But that offense SURE looked dangerous on Sat.
I had Hobart as my 10 in this week's polls. I think they probably still do deserve to be in the Top 10 but have a lot to prove after their worst offensive performance since 1993.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:17:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:09:59 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:06:39 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
maybe they think that Union is not a top ten team and IC is.
If Union is that poor of a team, Ithaca should not be a #3 after losing to them.....correct??
You dont have to be a team, undeserving of a high rank, to lose to a decent, non-top 10 team, on the road in a last second game do you??
If SJF had beaten MUC, does MUC drop all that far in the rankings?
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:26:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:17:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:09:59 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:06:39 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
maybe they think that Union is not a top ten team and IC is.
If Union is that poor of a team, Ithaca should not be a #3 after losing to them.....correct??
You dont have to be a team, undeserving of a high rank, to lose to a decent, non-top 10 team, on the road in a last second game do you??
If SJF had beaten MUC, does MUC drop all that far in the rankings?
No, but in your MUC scenario, I would expect Fisher to jump up with the win.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:45:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:26:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:17:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:09:59 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:06:39 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
maybe they think that Union is not a top ten team and IC is.
If Union is that poor of a team, Ithaca should not be a #3 after losing to them.....correct??
You dont have to be a team, undeserving of a high rank, to lose to a decent, non-top 10 team, on the road in a last second game do you??
If SJF had beaten MUC, does MUC drop all that far in the rankings?
No, but in your MUC scenario, I would expect Fisher to jump up with the win.
I hear ya....but apparently the pollsters dont...if you figure Union was a decent team going in, and they beat IC they become top 10 material. Makes sense, but screw the polls (no offense PGO4....i like the poll) cuz everytime i get worked up over them, they prove me wrong anyway. Last year I was pissin and moanin about SJF after week 2 figuring the MUC loss shouldnt hurt them that much and then they go out and finish 6-4 justifying their 'poor' ranking.
Just gloat on the inside about beating IC and hope that Union keeps it going is my advice
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
Quote from: Upstate on September 14, 2009, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
I had IC at 6 and Union unranked...
I have Union at 11 right now...
I didn't even have them in my top 15 in my preseason poll after two straight 5 win seasons, I had IC at #4...
I just need to see more of them, I think the last second victory was impressive, but there are really a lot of teams in the east that are in the discussion for the best in the region so someone has to be left out early in the year until stuff gets settled...
If this happened in the middle to later portions of the season I can see your gripe, but there is just too much undecided at the moment...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 14, 2009, 01:05:19 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 14, 2009, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
I had IC at 6 and Union unranked...
I have Union at 11 right now...
I didn't even have them in my top 15 in my preseason poll after two straight 5 win seasons, I had IC at #4...
I just need to see more of them, I think the last second victory was impressive, but there are really a lot of teams in the east that are in the discussion for the best in the region so someone has to be left out early in the year until stuff gets settled...
If this happened in the middle to later portions of the season I can see your gripe, but there is just too much undecided at the moment...
Well, throwing EVERYTHING out the window other than this year, Union is better than Ithaca right now, because they played them, and beat them, and there is nothing else to judge anything on. SO, if you still have Ithaca ranked, they should be behind Union, ,or you are potentially a little retarded.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 14, 2009, 01:14:31 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 14, 2009, 01:05:19 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 14, 2009, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
I had IC at 6 and Union unranked...
I have Union at 11 right now...
I didn't even have them in my top 15 in my preseason poll after two straight 5 win seasons, I had IC at #4...
I just need to see more of them, I think the last second victory was impressive, but there are really a lot of teams in the east that are in the discussion for the best in the region so someone has to be left out early in the year until stuff gets settled...
If this happened in the middle to later portions of the season I can see your gripe, but there is just too much undecided at the moment...
Well, throwing EVERYTHING out the window other than this year, Union is better than Ithaca right now, because they played them, and beat them, and there is nothing else to judge anything on. SO, if you still have Ithaca ranked, they should be behind Union, ,or you are potentially a little retarded.
Everything other than this year also still needs to include the remaining unplayed games of this year and your expectations for those games for all teams. So, while Union beat Ithaca (and kudos to the Dutchmen) that doesn't automatically mean that they will have a better season than the Bombers and thus doesn't necessitate them being ranked higher than Ithaca.
For the record, the Alfred contingent has had both Union and Ithaca ranked sinced the preseason and taking away an arbitrary 3 points for home field advantage I think that both teams are essentially equally talented this year. The first few polls are definitely a moving target as everything starts to settle in for the year. I'd say as long as your team is in the discussion at this point, that's all you can ask for. I don't think Alfred has played like the 4th best team in the region and if they continue to play this way that will be reflected in future polls.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:19:04 PMQuote from: TGP on September 14, 2009, 12:15:38 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 09:41:08 AM
couple quick thoughts for now:
Hobart: dropping all the way out over a seemingly bad loss is a bit of stretch. There must be a reason they were ranked so high in the 1st place right? I know Dickinson is not MUC, but 'Bart only beat them by 3 in '06, and by 7 in '08. Dickinson won in OT in '07. Must be a good matchup and perhaps Bart will bounce back.
SJF: I remember thinking they were underrated in the poll last year after week 2...SO I WILL SHUT MY MOUTH FOR A FEW WEEKS....because they promptly justified their ranking ;D But that offense SURE looked dangerous on Sat.
I had Hobart as my 10 in this week's polls. I think they probably still do deserve to be in the Top 10 but have a lot to prove after their worst offensive performance since 1993.
ahh...'93....are you referring to a certain 10-7 (if I recall) win against my Cardinals?
Quote from: Upstate on September 14, 2009, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
I had IC at 6 and Union unranked...
I have Union at 11 right now...
I didn't even have them in my top 15 in my preseason poll after two straight 5 win seasons, I had IC at #4...
I just need to see more of them, I think the last second victory was impressive, but there are really a lot of teams in the east that are in the discussion for the best in the region so someone has to be left out early in the year until stuff gets settled...
If this happened in the middle to later portions of the season I can see your gripe, but there is just too much undecided at the moment...
Quote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
Quote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2009, 02:04:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
I'm shocked that Montclair even got (5) points after the way they played on Saturday. >:(
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:52:40 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:45:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:26:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:17:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:09:59 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:06:39 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
maybe they think that Union is not a top ten team and IC is.
If Union is that poor of a team, Ithaca should not be a #3 after losing to them.....correct??
You dont have to be a team, undeserving of a high rank, to lose to a decent, non-top 10 team, on the road in a last second game do you??
If SJF had beaten MUC, does MUC drop all that far in the rankings?
No, but in your MUC scenario, I would expect Fisher to jump up with the win.
I hear ya....but apparently the pollsters dont...if you figure Union was a decent team going in, and they beat IC they become top 10 material. Makes sense, but screw the polls (no offense PGO4....i like the poll) cuz everytime i get worked up over them, they prove me wrong anyway. Last year I was pissin and moanin about SJF after week 2 figuring the MUC loss shouldnt hurt them that much and then they go out and finish 6-4 justifying their 'poor' ranking.
Just gloat on the inside about beating IC and hope that Union keeps it going is my advice
Dude,
Never gloated once and I don't have a problem with the vast majority of pollsters. You are twisting this back to your frustration from last year. I simply wondered how Ithaca could be #3 and Union be unranked.....that's really the extent of it.....
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:06:30 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2009, 02:04:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
I'm shocked that Montclair even got (5) points after the way they played on Saturday. >:(
That is the same crazy ass poll that I have been inquiring about.......AND has Wilkes unranked.
Ithaca #3...........Union: Unranked
Montclair #6.......Wilkes: Unranked
Hmmmmm......
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
It should be clear to anyone that saw Union on Saturday, or knows the fact that they 4 very good returning skill guys (QB, RB, 2WRs, and some dlinemen) that the win of Ithaca was not an upset. Union outplayed them the whole game and was the better team.
I would not be shocked if they played again and Ithaca beat them by 4 Td's, as I think Ithaca may have the potential to have an explosive offense this year if they mix it up, but the fact remains that Union had a much better running game, and better run defense, and better WRs than Ithacas defensive backs.
In my opinion, in d3, if you beat another team, you get ranked higher than the other team.
I can see USC being ranked higher than Stanford if they get upset, as you know USC is going to be better than Stanford, but Union and Ithaca, as well as 12-15 other d3 eastern d3 teams aren't that far apart.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:30:29 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:52:40 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:45:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:26:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:17:25 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 12:09:59 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 12:06:39 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
maybe they think that Union is not a top ten team and IC is.
If Union is that poor of a team, Ithaca should not be a #3 after losing to them.....correct??
You dont have to be a team, undeserving of a high rank, to lose to a decent, non-top 10 team, on the road in a last second game do you??
If SJF had beaten MUC, does MUC drop all that far in the rankings?
No, but in your MUC scenario, I would expect Fisher to jump up with the win.
I hear ya....but apparently the pollsters dont...if you figure Union was a decent team going in, and they beat IC they become top 10 material. Makes sense, but screw the polls (no offense PGO4....i like the poll) cuz everytime i get worked up over them, they prove me wrong anyway. Last year I was pissin and moanin about SJF after week 2 figuring the MUC loss shouldnt hurt them that much and then they go out and finish 6-4 justifying their 'poor' ranking.
Just gloat on the inside about beating IC and hope that Union keeps it going is my advice
Dude,
Never gloated once and I don't have a problem with the vast majority of pollsters. You are twisting this back to your frustration from last year. I simply wondered how Ithaca could be #3 and Union be unranked.....that's really the extent of it.....
U89...slow down...i aint mad at ya. I did not accuse you of gloating....I was actually suggesting that you SHOULD gloat. There is nothing wrong with boasting a big win by your program. You completely misunderstood the tenor of my post. I understand your frustration, and I was merely poking fun at myself for the frustration I had about the poll last year. Calm down now and re-read my earlier post. It was actually meant to be empathetic to your POV...
BTW....i did offer my simple answer to your self-claimed simple question about the IC-Union relative ranking. The pollsters believe that IC, despite a close loss on the road, is still top 10 material....AND they think that Union, even with a great home win, still has much to prove. One game cannot ALWAYS prove or disprove a prior week's ranking is the extent of my view.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:42:21 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
It should be clear to anyone that saw Union on Saturday, or knows the fact that they 4 very good returning skill guys (QB, RB, 2WRs, and some dlinemen) that the win of Ithaca was not an upset. Union outplayed them the whole game and was the better team.
I would not be shocked if they played again and Ithaca beat them by 4 Td's, as I think Ithaca may have the potential to have an explosive offense this year if they mix it up, but the fact remains that Union had a much better running game, and better run defense, and better WRs than Ithacas defensive backs.
In my opinion, in d3, if you beat another team, you get ranked higher than the other team.
I can see USC being ranked higher than Stanford if they get upset, as you know USC is going to be better than Stanford, but Union and Ithaca, as well as 12-15 other d3 eastern d3 teams aren't that far apart.
JU I disagree. The poll has to be somewhat subjective, taking into account what hopefully are educated football people's (fellow east posters) opinions about the quality of the teams. Otherwise, why bother voting. Could not a computer simply figure out rankings based upon who beats who every week. As you know, this theory doesnt work, because for example, SJF beats IC, IC beats Wick, and Wick beats SJF....happens every year. How do you rank em now without using your subjective football mind?
You cant tell me that if UR knocks off SJF this week, that UR gets ranked ahead of them. SJF beats them every year and clearly still has more talent based upon this year's results.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:35:55 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:06:30 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2009, 02:04:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
I'm shocked that Montclair even got (5) points after the way they played on Saturday. >:(
That is the same crazy ass poll that I have been inquiring about.......AND has Wilkes unranked.
Ithaca #3...........Union: Unranked
Montclair #6.......Wilkes: Unranked
Hmmmmm......
....and you just got done posting in response to me that you have no problem with the majority of pollsters, yet you go right back at "the crazy ass poll"....which way you want it?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 02:49:53 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:42:21 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
It should be clear to anyone that saw Union on Saturday, or knows the fact that they 4 very good returning skill guys (QB, RB, 2WRs, and some dlinemen) that the win of Ithaca was not an upset. Union outplayed them the whole game and was the better team.
I would not be shocked if they played again and Ithaca beat them by 4 Td's, as I think Ithaca may have the potential to have an explosive offense this year if they mix it up, but the fact remains that Union had a much better running game, and better run defense, and better WRs than Ithacas defensive backs.
In my opinion, in d3, if you beat another team, you get ranked higher than the other team.
I can see USC being ranked higher than Stanford if they get upset, as you know USC is going to be better than Stanford, but Union and Ithaca, as well as 12-15 other d3 eastern d3 teams aren't that far apart.
JU I disagree. The poll has to be somewhat subjective, taking into account what hopefully are educated football people's (fellow east posters) opinions about the quality of the teams. Otherwise, why bother voting. Could not a computer simply figure out rankings based upon who beats who every week. As you know, this theory doesnt work, because for example, SJF beats IC, IC beats Wick, and Wick beats SJF....happens every year. How do you rank em now without using your subjective football mind?
You cant tell me that if UR knocks off SJF this week, that UR gets ranked ahead of them. SJF beats them every year and clearly still has more talent based upon this year's results.
Like I said, it depends on if you are in the top 10-12 teams or not. Union is in the top 10-12, UR is not. So if UR beat SJF, it may be considered a fluke this early in the season, and SJF might be still deserving of a higher rank. But Union was not really a fluke, and that should be based on the game itself, Unions returning players, Unions history, and Ithacas lost players from last year.
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:50:07 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:35:55 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:06:30 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2009, 02:04:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
I'm shocked that Montclair even got (5) points after the way they played on Saturday. >:(
That is the same crazy ass poll that I have been inquiring about.......AND has Wilkes unranked.
Ithaca #3...........Union: Unranked
Montclair #6.......Wilkes: Unranked
Hmmmmm......
....and you just got done posting in response to me that you have no problem with the majority of pollsters, yet you go right back at "the crazy ass poll"....which way you want it?
As previously stated.....this is the ONLY poll I have a problem with.....Upstate explained his rationale and it made sense to me.
82, do you agree with this poll??
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 03:01:10 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:50:07 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:35:55 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:06:30 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2009, 02:04:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
I'm shocked that Montclair even got (5) points after the way they played on Saturday. >:(
That is the same crazy ass poll that I have been inquiring about.......AND has Wilkes unranked.
Ithaca #3...........Union: Unranked
Montclair #6.......Wilkes: Unranked
Hmmmmm......
....and you just got done posting in response to me that you have no problem with the majority of pollsters, yet you go right back at "the crazy ass poll"....which way you want it?
As previously stated.....this is the ONLY poll I have a problem with.....Upstate explained his rationale and it made sense to me.
82, do you agree with this poll??
Absolutely, unqualified, 100% agreement.....EXCEPT, the Fisher ranking ;D
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 14, 2009, 01:05:19 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 14, 2009, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 11:55:14 AM
Funny how 2 Pollsters can have Union unranked and have Ithaca at #3 & #6.
Anyone care to explain that rationale??
I had IC at 6 and Union unranked...
I have Union at 11 right now...
I didn't even have them in my top 15 in my preseason poll after two straight 5 win seasons, I had IC at #4...
I just need to see more of them, I think the last second victory was impressive, but there are really a lot of teams in the east that are in the discussion for the best in the region so someone has to be left out early in the year until stuff gets settled...
If this happened in the middle to later portions of the season I can see your gripe, but there is just too much undecided at the moment...
Well, throwing EVERYTHING out the window other than this year, Union is better than Ithaca right now, because they played them, and beat them, and there is nothing else to judge anything on. SO, if you still have Ithaca ranked, they should be behind Union, ,or you are potentially a little retarded.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 03:09:12 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 03:01:10 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:50:07 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:35:55 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:06:30 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2009, 02:04:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
I'm shocked that Montclair even got (5) points after the way they played on Saturday. >:(
That is the same crazy ass poll that I have been inquiring about.......AND has Wilkes unranked.
Ithaca #3...........Union: Unranked
Montclair #6.......Wilkes: Unranked
Hmmmmm......
....and you just got done posting in response to me that you have no problem with the majority of pollsters, yet you go right back at "the crazy ass poll"....which way you want it?
As previously stated.....this is the ONLY poll I have a problem with.....Upstate explained his rationale and it made sense to me.
82, do you agree with this poll??
Absolutely, unqualified, 100% agreement.....EXCEPT, the Fisher ranking ;D
did you mean the entire poll or just the IC-uNION ASPECT OF IT?
Quote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 04:00:24 PM
dlip is sorry here and it not being a homer but the Union IC question is getting ****ing stupid. The U returned a **** load of skill players on O, returned at least 8 on D, and was totally underated (understandably though if one is just looking at the past two seasons when judging) from the start of 09. In many cases if a non-ranked team upsets a ranked team the ranked team will still and should be ranked ahead of them, ex. two years ago WNEC beat ****ing Wick and Boltus and later that year Wick was in the top ten and if one even mentioned WNEC in that poll they would be laughed at. Yet here it is not the case. Will U run the table, maybe, maybe not, BUT if one were to look at their roster, player potential and performance they would see U have been underrated. Anyone who knows anything about U football new this one was going to be very very close. Not tooting horns here but U89 and myself picked U to win. We are not ****in idiots or total homers. When the two teams played did Union totally dominate? No, but U was definitly the better team. Hence they now deserve a higher ranking. dlip had U fifth or sixth this week with Ithaca coming in at like 9 or 10 (****ty memory now I am at work).
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 04:08:58 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 04:00:24 PM
dlip is sorry here and it not being a homer but the Union IC question is getting ****ing stupid. The U returned a **** load of skill players on O, returned at least 8 on D, and was totally underated (understandably though if one is just looking at the past two seasons when judging) from the start of 09. In many cases if a non-ranked team upsets a ranked team the ranked team will still and should be ranked ahead of them, ex. two years ago WNEC beat ****ing Wick and Boltus and later that year Wick was in the top ten and if one even mentioned WNEC in that poll they would be laughed at. Yet here it is not the case. Will U run the table, maybe, maybe not, BUT if one were to look at their roster, player potential and performance they would see U have been underrated. Anyone who knows anything about U football new this one was going to be very very close. Not tooting horns here but U89 and myself picked U to win. We are not ****in idiots or total homers. When the two teams played did Union totally dominate? No, but U was definitly the better team. Hence they now deserve a higher ranking. dlip had U fifth or sixth this week with Ithaca coming in at like 9 or 10 (****ty memory now I am at work).
Not that people would know (or should for that matter), but Union lost 2 games last year due to brutal FG kicking....mostly extra points. With even an average performance from the kicking game, Union would have been 7-2. Now granted, a loss is a loss, but with the amount of experienced seniors on both lines and quality skill positions, Union is poised this year for a good season.
As I said on the LL board last week, Union NEEDS this to be a very strong year. The Dutchmen lose a huge portion of their core to graduation in '10.
Quote from: TGP on September 14, 2009, 05:32:18 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 04:08:58 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 04:00:24 PM
dlip is sorry here and it not being a homer but the Union IC question is getting ****ing stupid. The U returned a **** load of skill players on O, returned at least 8 on D, and was totally underated (understandably though if one is just looking at the past two seasons when judging) from the start of 09. In many cases if a non-ranked team upsets a ranked team the ranked team will still and should be ranked ahead of them, ex. two years ago WNEC beat ****ing Wick and Boltus and later that year Wick was in the top ten and if one even mentioned WNEC in that poll they would be laughed at. Yet here it is not the case. Will U run the table, maybe, maybe not, BUT if one were to look at their roster, player potential and performance they would see U have been underrated. Anyone who knows anything about U football new this one was going to be very very close. Not tooting horns here but U89 and myself picked U to win. We are not ****in idiots or total homers. When the two teams played did Union totally dominate? No, but U was definitly the better team. Hence they now deserve a higher ranking. dlip had U fifth or sixth this week with Ithaca coming in at like 9 or 10 (****ty memory now I am at work).
Not that people would know (or should for that matter), but Union lost 2 games last year due to brutal FG kicking....mostly extra points. With even an average performance from the kicking game, Union would have been 7-2. Now granted, a loss is a loss, but with the amount of experienced seniors on both lines and quality skill positions, Union is poised this year for a good season.
As I said on the LL board last week, Union NEEDS this to be a very strong year. The Dutchmen lose a huge portion of their core to graduation in '10.
Not necessarily - actually if Hobart converted three of their FGs (Bart's kicker went 0 for 3) the Statesmen would have beaten Union last year.
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 14, 2009, 05:41:49 PMQuote from: TGP on September 14, 2009, 05:32:18 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 04:08:58 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 04:00:24 PM
dlip is sorry here and it not being a homer but the Union IC question is getting ****ing stupid. The U returned a **** load of skill players on O, returned at least 8 on D, and was totally underated (understandably though if one is just looking at the past two seasons when judging) from the start of 09. In many cases if a non-ranked team upsets a ranked team the ranked team will still and should be ranked ahead of them, ex. two years ago WNEC beat ****ing Wick and Boltus and later that year Wick was in the top ten and if one even mentioned WNEC in that poll they would be laughed at. Yet here it is not the case. Will U run the table, maybe, maybe not, BUT if one were to look at their roster, player potential and performance they would see U have been underrated. Anyone who knows anything about U football new this one was going to be very very close. Not tooting horns here but U89 and myself picked U to win. We are not ****in idiots or total homers. When the two teams played did Union totally dominate? No, but U was definitly the better team. Hence they now deserve a higher ranking. dlip had U fifth or sixth this week with Ithaca coming in at like 9 or 10 (****ty memory now I am at work).
Not that people would know (or should for that matter), but Union lost 2 games last year due to brutal FG kicking....mostly extra points. With even an average performance from the kicking game, Union would have been 7-2. Now granted, a loss is a loss, but with the amount of experienced seniors on both lines and quality skill positions, Union is poised this year for a good season.
As I said on the LL board last week, Union NEEDS this to be a very strong year. The Dutchmen lose a huge portion of their core to graduation in '10.
Not necessarily - actually if Hobart converted three of their FGs (Bart's kicker went 0 for 3) the Statesmen would have beaten Union last year.
And if your Aunt had balls she would be your Uncle. :D
Quote from: TGP on September 14, 2009, 05:32:18 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 04:08:58 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 04:00:24 PM
dlip is sorry here and it not being a homer but the Union IC question is getting ****ing stupid. The U returned a **** load of skill players on O, returned at least 8 on D, and was totally underated (understandably though if one is just looking at the past two seasons when judging) from the start of 09. In many cases if a non-ranked team upsets a ranked team the ranked team will still and should be ranked ahead of them, ex. two years ago WNEC beat ****ing Wick and Boltus and later that year Wick was in the top ten and if one even mentioned WNEC in that poll they would be laughed at. Yet here it is not the case. Will U run the table, maybe, maybe not, BUT if one were to look at their roster, player potential and performance they would see U have been underrated. Anyone who knows anything about U football new this one was going to be very very close. Not tooting horns here but U89 and myself picked U to win. We are not ****in idiots or total homers. When the two teams played did Union totally dominate? No, but U was definitly the better team. Hence they now deserve a higher ranking. dlip had U fifth or sixth this week with Ithaca coming in at like 9 or 10 (****ty memory now I am at work).
Not that people would know (or should for that matter), but Union lost 2 games last year due to brutal FG kicking....mostly extra points. With even an average performance from the kicking game, Union would have been 7-2. Now granted, a loss is a loss, but with the amount of experienced seniors on both lines and quality skill positions, Union is poised this year for a good season.
As I said on the LL board last week, Union NEEDS this to be a very strong year. The Dutchmen lose a huge portion of their core to graduation in '10.
Not necessarily - actually if Hobart converted three of their FGs (Bart's kicker went 0 for 3) the Statesmen would have beaten Union last year.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
It should be clear to anyone that saw Union on Saturday, or knows the fact that they 4 very good returning skill guys (QB, RB, 2WRs, and some dlinemen) that the win of Ithaca was not an upset. Union outplayed them the whole game and was the better team.
I would not be shocked if they played again and Ithaca beat them by 4 Td's, as I think Ithaca may have the potential to have an explosive offense this year if they mix it up, but the fact remains that Union had a much better running game, and better run defense, and better WRs than Ithacas defensive backs.
In my opinion, in d3, if you beat another team, you get ranked higher than the other team.
I can see USC being ranked higher than Stanford if they get upset, as you know USC is going to be better than Stanford, but Union and Ithaca, as well as 12-15 other d3 eastern d3 teams aren't that far apart.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:59:06 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 02:49:53 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:42:21 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
It should be clear to anyone that saw Union on Saturday, or knows the fact that they 4 very good returning skill guys (QB, RB, 2WRs, and some dlinemen) that the win of Ithaca was not an upset. Union outplayed them the whole game and was the better team.
I would not be shocked if they played again and Ithaca beat them by 4 Td's, as I think Ithaca may have the potential to have an explosive offense this year if they mix it up, but the fact remains that Union had a much better running game, and better run defense, and better WRs than Ithacas defensive backs.
In my opinion, in d3, if you beat another team, you get ranked higher than the other team.
I can see USC being ranked higher than Stanford if they get upset, as you know USC is going to be better than Stanford, but Union and Ithaca, as well as 12-15 other d3 eastern d3 teams aren't that far apart.
JU I disagree. The poll has to be somewhat subjective, taking into account what hopefully are educated football people's (fellow east posters) opinions about the quality of the teams. Otherwise, why bother voting. Could not a computer simply figure out rankings based upon who beats who every week. As you know, this theory doesnt work, because for example, SJF beats IC, IC beats Wick, and Wick beats SJF....happens every year. How do you rank em now without using your subjective football mind?
You cant tell me that if UR knocks off SJF this week, that UR gets ranked ahead of them. SJF beats them every year and clearly still has more talent based upon this year's results.
Like I said, it depends on if you are in the top 10-12 teams or not. Union is in the top 10-12, UR is not. So if UR beat SJF, it may be considered a fluke this early in the season, and SJF might be still deserving of a higher rank. But Union was not really a fluke, and that should be based on the game itself, Unions returning players, Unions history, and Ithacas lost players from last year.
I agree with the Union-IC aspect perhaps. You did state however, "12-15" teams and made the blanket statement that if you beat a team in d-3 you should be ranked higher. I didnt think you really meant that and your last post seems to clarify with what I can agree with. Top teams get the benefit of the doubt in a close loss to third tier teams.
QuoteThat said, I'm sure that the d3football.com poll voters and the Kickoff '09 editorial staff had that same roster information, yet in preseason and Week 1, Union got zero poll votes. I find that odd.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 08:30:03 PMQuoteThat said, I'm sure that the d3football.com poll voters and the Kickoff '09 editorial staff had that same roster information, yet in preseason and Week 1, Union got zero poll votes. I find that odd.
dlip looks at it like this. . . . blah blah blah . . . over 200 teams . . . blah blah blah . . . personel developments, growth, and potential that, . . . blah blah blah . . . you would realistically look at # of returning starters, recruits (preseason info on recruits is also not always easy to come by in D3), and recent team records going back 1 to 2 seasons. . . . blah blah blah . . . U is highly highly skilled on the O side of the ball. Deep as **** at wide out, Chris Coney nasty at RB, an O line with something to prove, and a pissed off D that needs to prove itself for an entire season before anyone buys them as being better than avg.
Quote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 04:01:31 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 03:09:12 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 03:01:10 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:50:07 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 14, 2009, 02:35:55 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 14, 2009, 02:06:30 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2009, 02:04:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 13, 2009, 10:59:28 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 2 (9/12/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 5 ) 1-0 87 3vs. #3 Rowan 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009)( 1 ) 2-0 80 6vs. Wesley 3 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009)( 2 ) 1-0 70 7at #1 Cortland State 4 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) 2-0 67 5vs. St. Lawrence 5 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Union&year=2009) 1-0 47 NRat Muhlenberg 6 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 1-1 39 1vs. Widener 7 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 2-0 36 NROpen Date 8 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 1-0 35 8vs. Utica 9 St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) 1-1 33 9vs. Rochester 10 Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) 2-0 28 10Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Hobart 11
Albright 8
Montclair State 5
Widener 4
Dropping out: #2 Hobart, #4 Montclair State
Voting Breakdown
Cortland State (4,1,1,2,1,4,1,1,2,6,)
Delaware Valley (5,3,2,5,4,2,3,3,1,2,)
Rowan (1,4,4,3,2,1,4,2,8,NR,)
Alfred (6,2,5,1,8,3,6,6,5,1,)
Union (2,NR,NR,4,3,6,8,7,6,5,)
Ithaca (9,6,3,10,6,9,10,8,3,7,)
Wilkes (3,10,NR,6,5,8,9,9,9,4,)
RPI (7,5,9,8,NR,7,2,5,NR,10,)
St. John Fisher (10,8,8,9,9,10,7,4,4,8,)
Springfield (8,9,10,7,10,5,5,10,7,NR,)
Hobart (NR,7,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,)
Montclair State (NR,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Widener (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#1 Cortland State vs. #3 Rowan
#2 Delaware Valley vs. Wesley
#5 Union vs. Muhlenberg
#6 Ithaca vs. Widener
I'm shocked that Montclair even got (5) points after the way they played on Saturday. >:(
That is the same crazy ass poll that I have been inquiring about.......AND has Wilkes unranked.
Ithaca #3...........Union: Unranked
Montclair #6.......Wilkes: Unranked
Hmmmmm......
....and you just got done posting in response to me that you have no problem with the majority of pollsters, yet you go right back at "the crazy ass poll"....which way you want it?
As previously stated.....this is the ONLY poll I have a problem with.....Upstate explained his rationale and it made sense to me.
82, do you agree with this poll??
Absolutely, unqualified, 100% agreement.....EXCEPT, the Fisher ranking ;D
did you mean the entire poll or just the IC-uNION ASPECT OF IT?
82,
Are pulling my chain? Look at the previous posts in this thread.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 09:50:41 PM
I was just thinking though....what if Ithaca had won that game? One play would have decided how many notches in the poll for both teams?
I dont know anything about m-burg, but I bet Union wins and then ends up going 8-2 or even 9-1.
Quote from: Union89 on September 15, 2009, 12:58:23 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 14, 2009, 09:50:41 PM
I was just thinking though....what if Ithaca had won that game? One play would have decided how many notches in the poll for both teams?
I dont know anything about m-burg, but I bet Union wins and then ends up going 8-2 or even 9-1.
I hope you are right......I'm very nervous about this 1.
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 14, 2009, 09:24:04 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 08:30:03 PMQuoteThat said, I'm sure that the d3football.com poll voters and the Kickoff '09 editorial staff had that same roster information, yet in preseason and Week 1, Union got zero poll votes. I find that odd.
dlip looks at it like this. . . . blah blah blah . . . over 200 teams . . . blah blah blah . . . personel developments, growth, and potential that, . . . blah blah blah . . . you would realistically look at # of returning starters, recruits (preseason info on recruits is also not always easy to come by in D3), and recent team records going back 1 to 2 seasons. . . . blah blah blah . . . U is highly highly skilled on the O side of the ball. Deep as **** at wide out, Chris Coney nasty at RB, an O line with something to prove, and a pissed off D that needs to prove itself for an entire season before anyone buys them as being better than avg.
I understand that's the way you would do it if you were a d3football.com poll voter or a Kickoff '09 editor. I suppose I'd follow a similar strategy. Have we heard from any d3football.com poll voters or Kickoff '09 editors on how they actually did it?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 15, 2009, 10:17:48 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 14, 2009, 09:24:04 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 08:30:03 PMQuoteThat said, I'm sure that the d3football.com poll voters and the Kickoff '09 editorial staff had that same roster information, yet in preseason and Week 1, Union got zero poll votes. I find that odd.
dlip looks at it like this. . . . blah blah blah . . . over 200 teams . . . blah blah blah . . . personel developments, growth, and potential that, . . . blah blah blah . . . you would realistically look at # of returning starters, recruits (preseason info on recruits is also not always easy to come by in D3), and recent team records going back 1 to 2 seasons. . . . blah blah blah . . . U is highly highly skilled on the O side of the ball. Deep as **** at wide out, Chris Coney nasty at RB, an O line with something to prove, and a pissed off D that needs to prove itself for an entire season before anyone buys them as being better than avg.
I understand that's the way you would do it if you were a d3football.com poll voter or a Kickoff '09 editor. I suppose I'd follow a similar strategy. Have we heard from any d3football.com poll voters or Kickoff '09 editors on how they actually did it?
Keith and I did a podcast about it in August.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 15, 2009, 11:06:22 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 15, 2009, 10:17:48 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 14, 2009, 09:24:04 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 14, 2009, 08:30:03 PMQuoteThat said, I'm sure that the d3football.com poll voters and the Kickoff '09 editorial staff had that same roster information, yet in preseason and Week 1, Union got zero poll votes. I find that odd.
dlip looks at it like this. . . . blah blah blah . . . over 200 teams . . . blah blah blah . . . personel developments, growth, and potential that, . . . blah blah blah . . . you would realistically look at # of returning starters, recruits (preseason info on recruits is also not always easy to come by in D3), and recent team records going back 1 to 2 seasons. . . . blah blah blah . . . U is highly highly skilled on the O side of the ball. Deep as **** at wide out, Chris Coney nasty at RB, an O line with something to prove, and a pissed off D that needs to prove itself for an entire season before anyone buys them as being better than avg.
I understand that's the way you would do it if you were a d3football.com poll voter or a Kickoff '09 editor. I suppose I'd follow a similar strategy. Have we heard from any d3football.com poll voters or Kickoff '09 editors on how they actually did it?
Keith and I did a podcast about it in August.
Where the **** did the ...blah...blah....blah **** come from? dlip never put that in his post! dlip was basically making it clear that he understood why U did not recieve the appropriate preseason love and making it clear that it is next to impossible for anyone to preview and guess exactly how well each team will play thoughout the year because of the multiple reasons he stated. He was defending the D3 staff and making it clear that unless one was very close to the program they most likely would have underestimated U. dlip does not like people ****ing with his stuff.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 20, 2009, 12:44:52 PM
This week did nothing to help my poll. I have 12 teams I feel deserve a spot in the top ten. RPI barely got by UTICA. Union lays an egg against Muhlengberg and SJF barely gets by Rochester. Springfield hasn't played anyone of substance but at least they have Alfred this week. Deleware Valley was outmatched by Wesley but I thought that would be the case and can't drop them drastically in the rankings just like you can't drop SJF for losing to MUC.
At least Cortland beat Rowan.
Does anyone else feel New Jersey could be pushing for a spot in the top ten?
Quote from: TGP on September 22, 2009, 12:27:23 PM
Are there still voters holding out on submitting the Week 3 ballots?
Or is pg04 just busy?
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 03:38:56 PMQuote from: TGP on September 22, 2009, 12:27:23 PM
Are there still voters holding out on submitting the Week 3 ballots?
Or is pg04 just busy?
Sorry, I've been busy. Not been able to compile the vote yet. However, everyone was in yesterday.
Next week I probably will not get them out until Monday or Tuesday as well since I am out of town from tomorrow until next Monday (Although interestingly enough out of town means I'll be in the Rochester area).
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 7 ) | 2-0 | 95 | 1 | vs. Kean |
2 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) | 3-0 | 77 | 4 | vs. Springfield |
3 | Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009)( 1 ) | 2-0 | 63 | 7 | at Christopher Newport |
4 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) | 2-1 | 48 | 6 | at Utica |
RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) | 2-0 | 48 | 8 | at WPI | |
6 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) | 2-1 | 47 | 2 | Open Date |
7 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) | 2-1 | 42 | 9 | at Salisbury |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009) | 1-1 | 39 | 3 | at William Paterson |
9 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) | 2-0 | 42 | 10 | at Alfred |
10 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2009) | 1-1 | 17 | NR | at Susquehanna |
Quote from: maxpower on September 22, 2009, 08:03:57 PM
Union is in a pinball machine... way off, way on, way off....
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009)( 7 ) | 2-0 | 95 | 1 | vs. Kean |
2 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 2 ) | 3-0 | 77 | 4 | vs. Springfield |
3 | Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009)( 1 ) | 2-0 | 63 | 7 | at Christopher Newport |
4 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) | 2-1 | 48 | 6 | at Utica |
RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) | 2-0 | 48 | 8 | at WPI | |
6 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) | 2-1 | 47 | 2 | Open Date |
7 | St. John Fisher (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=St.+John+Fisher%20&year=2009) | 2-1 | 42 | 9 | at Salisbury |
8 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan&year=2009) | 1-1 | 39 | 3 | at William Paterson |
9 | Springfield (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Springfield&year=2009) | 2-0 | 36 | 10 | at Alfred |
10 | Hobart (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Hobart&year=2009) | 1-1 | 17 | NR | at Susquehanna |
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 22, 2009, 08:40:36 PMI think the Roch-SJF score is a bit misleading. IMO the Cards took their foot off the pedal after being up 35-13 at the start of the 4th qtr. That said you do have to give the Jackets some credit for the comeback.
Fair enough. Obviously five of the ten best teams in the east aren't all in the E8 (not picking a fight here, but this is a stretch even for the most loyal) this year, or probably any year. Especially when Union beat IC and SJF had to survive UofR who'll be fighting MMA and SLU at the bottom of the LL. The IC win over Widener was pretty nice bounce back though.
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 22, 2009, 08:40:36 PM
Fair enough. Obviously five of the ten best teams in the east aren't all in the E8 (not picking a fight here, but this is a stretch even for the most loyal) this year, or probably any year. Especially when Union beat IC and SJF had to survive UofR who'll be fighting MMA and SLU at the bottom of the LL. The IC win over Widener was pretty nice bounce back though.
Quote from: TGP on September 22, 2009, 09:28:03 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 22, 2009, 08:40:36 PMI think the Roch-SJF score is a bit misleading. IMO the Cards took their foot off the pedal after being up 35-13 at the start of the 4th qtr. That said you do have to give the Jackets some credit for the comeback.
Fair enough. Obviously five of the ten best teams in the east aren't all in the E8 (not picking a fight here, but this is a stretch even for the most loyal) this year, or probably any year. Especially when Union beat IC and SJF had to survive UofR who'll be fighting MMA and SLU at the bottom of the LL. The IC win over Widener was pretty nice bounce back though.
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 22, 2009, 09:49:08 PM
I've heard fisher people talk about a rivalry for a handful of years, but I don't know, Hobart has played them 101 times since 1892, has a trophy that is far older and is considered by both the primary rivalry as far as I've ever known. We blasted them a number of times in rivalry games in the 90's when I was there and Geneva's only about 40 minutes to UofR's campus.
I guess I just don't buy the "it's a rivarly and that justifies a close game" arugment, plus IC and Cortland have had their share of blowouts, as have, I believe, RPI-Union.
On the fact that UofR was put away and came back, that may be true, but it was a few inches from being a tie game on a just missed two point conversion.
All this wasn't a critique of SJF, but rather that to have five teams from the E8 in the eastern top ten is questionable. One or more of them shouldn't and won't be there at the end of the year. I believe Fisher will be there, but I know nothing about them based on a blowout loss to MUC, blowout win over Buff St. and nearly escaping UofR who got destroyed by Case Western.
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 22, 2009, 09:59:39 PM
Maybe it's changed as I haven't played this decade. I personally thought Union was our main rival (that's also 100 years + old), but I know they have their RPI issues. I was involved in a scrape on the field up in Schenectady.
Was Sosa referring to the rivalry or the fact that SJF has become a strong program this decade? I haven't seen the quote before.
Still doesn't explain the IC/Cortland blowout example though.
Quote from: maxpower on September 22, 2009, 11:28:42 PM
What about Alfred State? Do they have football? If so, how? If not, why not?
Quote from: maxpower on September 22, 2009, 11:28:42 PM
What about Alfred State? Do they have football? If so, how? If not, why not?
Quote from: phil on September 22, 2009, 11:41:37 PM
Alfred at #2 while TCNJ is off all ballots except one...
I'm not much for comparing scores, but Alfred beat FDU with a TD in the last 27 seconds while TCNJ was up on FDU 48-7 in the first half. That scoring disparity is pretty hard to ignore ... or so I thought.
Quote from: phil on September 22, 2009, 11:41:37 PM
Alfred at #2 while TCNJ is off all ballots except one...
I'm not much for comparing scores, but Alfred beat FDU with a TD in the last 27 seconds while TCNJ was up on FDU 48-7 in the first half. That scoring disparity is pretty hard to ignore ... or so I thought.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 22, 2009, 11:43:40 PMQuote from: phil on September 22, 2009, 11:41:37 PM
Alfred at #2 while TCNJ is off all ballots except one...
I'm not much for comparing scores, but Alfred beat FDU with a TD in the last 27 seconds while TCNJ was up on FDU 48-7 in the first half. That scoring disparity is pretty hard to ignore ... or so I thought.
Pep would have to agree....not sure where the Alfred #1 votes are coming from. ;) ...but Pep knows who voted for TCNJ!
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 11:46:57 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 22, 2009, 11:43:40 PMQuote from: phil on September 22, 2009, 11:41:37 PM
Alfred at #2 while TCNJ is off all ballots except one...
I'm not much for comparing scores, but Alfred beat FDU with a TD in the last 27 seconds while TCNJ was up on FDU 48-7 in the first half. That scoring disparity is pretty hard to ignore ... or so I thought.
Pep would have to agree....not sure where the Alfred #1 votes are coming from. ;) ...but Pep knows who voted for TCNJ!
Oh goodness don't seed the doubt for being biased :P
Quote from: phil on September 22, 2009, 11:41:37 PM
Alfred at #2 while TCNJ is off all ballots except one...
I'm not much for comparing scores, but Alfred beat FDU with a TD in the last 27 seconds while TCNJ was up on FDU 48-7 in the first half. That scoring disparity is pretty hard to ignore ... or so I thought.
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 11:45:39 PM
You make a very valid argument. They are my number 11 team right now. Alfred is 4... but that's mainly because they started near the top to begin with. Unfortunately that's probably true in most cases. If Alfred is unfairly ranked, I think we'll see this week vs. Springfield.
Quote from: pg04 on September 23, 2009, 12:13:50 AM
I think an interesting question is... What will it take for an ECFC team to receive votes in this poll? Will it need a couple years for a team to establish itself? I highly doubt one of the teams will make the playoffs this year.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 22, 2009, 11:43:40 PMQuote from: phil on September 22, 2009, 11:41:37 PM
Alfred at #2 while TCNJ is off all ballots except one...
I'm not much for comparing scores, but Alfred beat FDU with a TD in the last 27 seconds while TCNJ was up on FDU 48-7 in the first half. That scoring disparity is pretty hard to ignore ... or so I thought.
Pep would have to agree....not sure where the Alfred #1 votes are coming from. ;) ...but Pep knows who voted for TCNJ!
Quote from: dlippiel on September 23, 2009, 07:12:45 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 22, 2009, 11:43:40 PMQuote from: phil on September 22, 2009, 11:41:37 PM
Alfred at #2 while TCNJ is off all ballots except one...
I'm not much for comparing scores, but Alfred beat FDU with a TD in the last 27 seconds while TCNJ was up on FDU 48-7 in the first half. That scoring disparity is pretty hard to ignore ... or so I thought.
Pep would have to agree....not sure where the Alfred #1 votes are coming from. ;) ...but Pep knows who voted for TCNJ!
dlip achknowledges the NY bias and feels he needs to consider that in future polls. dlip does ont think it is a concious bias but a bias none the less.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 23, 2009, 07:52:01 AM
What may happen with a lot of these newer programs is what happend to Mt. Ida a few years back. From what I heard, Mt. Ida pressed the admissions office and basically let in anyone and everyone that wanted to play football and filled out the proper paperwork. Then, in their first year had actually one hell of a football team. Then in year two, 85 of the 100 freshman football players flunked out of school.
I wouldn't be suprised if you see similar resluts in other schools
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 22, 2009, 11:15:00 PM
Speaking of rivalries, Alfred has none. Nada. Zilch. Aught. It's a wonder AU can muster a schedule of nine or ten games.
Quote from: pg04 on September 23, 2009, 12:13:50 AM
I think an interesting question is... What will it take for an ECFC team to receive votes in this poll? Will it need a couple years for a team to establish itself? I highly doubt one of the teams will make the playoffs this year.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 23, 2009, 12:22:21 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 23, 2009, 12:13:50 AM
I think an interesting question is... What will it take for an ECFC team to receive votes in this poll? Will it need a couple years for a team to establish itself? I highly doubt one of the teams will make the playoffs this year.
dlip thinks it will take a while, maybe a season or more for the ECFC to get in our coconuts. That is unless an ECFC team runs the table, puts up nasty numbers, and seems simply unbeatable compared to the rest of the conference. Husson is on dlips radar though, he's watching.
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
Quote from: Union89 on September 23, 2009, 02:04:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
To a degree I agree....I also think that AGAIN this year pollsters are over-ranking SJF.
In comparing Fisher to Union, how is a blowout of Buff. St. and a squeaker vs. Rochester that much better than a win over Ithaca and a close loss to Muhlenburg on the road?
Quote from: Upstate on September 22, 2009, 09:29:56 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 22, 2009, 08:40:36 PM
Fair enough. Obviously five of the ten best teams in the east aren't all in the E8 (not picking a fight here, but this is a stretch even for the most loyal) this year, or probably any year. Especially when Union beat IC and SJF had to survive UofR who'll be fighting MMA and SLU at the bottom of the LL. The IC win over Widener was pretty nice bounce back though.
Dont we say this every year?
UR always plays SJF close, hell when SJF went to the Semi's and played MUC tough in 2006 the Courage Bowl SJF was only leading UR 16-10 with 10 minutes left in the 4th QTR...
SJF was ahead by 22 midway through the 3rd quarter this year, they decided to take out their QB and RB then turned the ball over twice to allow UR to get within 8. Then they put him back in after sitting almost an entire quarter and turn it over again. It was a bit premature and it almost came back to bite them hard in the ass...
If they don't take out their QB until midway through the 4th it's a very decisive win...
Quote from: 'gro on September 23, 2009, 02:11:48 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2009, 02:04:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
To a degree I agree....I also think that AGAIN this year pollsters are over-ranking SJF.
In comparing Fisher to Union, how is a blowout of Buff. St. and a squeaker vs. Rochester that much better than a win over Ithaca and a close loss to Muhlenburg on the road?
Word. Fisher is like St. John's in the national top 25
yeah I said it.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 23, 2009, 04:50:51 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 23, 2009, 02:11:48 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2009, 02:04:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
To a degree I agree....I also think that AGAIN this year pollsters are over-ranking SJF.
In comparing Fisher to Union, how is a blowout of Buff. St. and a squeaker vs. Rochester that much better than a win over Ithaca and a close loss to Muhlenburg on the road?
Word. Fisher is like St. John's in the national top 25
yeah I said it.
I hear ya, and I've seen St. John's play this year and they're pretty decent. But in the absence of teams that are awesome other than the usual three, who belongs up there?
There seems to be a gigantic gap between the top three and everyone else. We run out of awesome teams very quickly. But someone has to be No. 4 ... and down through about No. 11 or 12. :)
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 23, 2009, 04:50:51 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 23, 2009, 02:11:48 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2009, 02:04:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
To a degree I agree....I also think that AGAIN this year pollsters are over-ranking SJF.
In comparing Fisher to Union, how is a blowout of Buff. St. and a squeaker vs. Rochester that much better than a win over Ithaca and a close loss to Muhlenburg on the road?
Word. Fisher is like St. John's in the national top 25
yeah I said it.
I hear ya, and I've seen St. John's play this year and they're pretty decent. But in the absence of teams that are awesome other than the usual three, who belongs up there?
There seems to be a gigantic gap between the top three and everyone else. We run out of awesome teams very quickly. But someone has to be No. 4 ... and down through about No. 11 or 12. :)
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 23, 2009, 05:02:51 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 23, 2009, 04:50:51 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 23, 2009, 02:11:48 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2009, 02:04:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
To a degree I agree....I also think that AGAIN this year pollsters are over-ranking SJF.
In comparing Fisher to Union, how is a blowout of Buff. St. and a squeaker vs. Rochester that much better than a win over Ithaca and a close loss to Muhlenburg on the road?
Word. Fisher is like St. John's in the national top 25
yeah I said it.
I hear ya, and I've seen St. John's play this year and they're pretty decent. But in the absence of teams that are awesome other than the usual three, who belongs up there?
There seems to be a gigantic gap between the top three and everyone else. We run out of awesome teams very quickly. But someone has to be No. 4 ... and down through about No. 11 or 12. :)
Speaking of Top 25, I understand people not wanting to cast a vote for RPI after last week's sneak by a traditionally poor team, who had put up 60+ 2 weeks in a row...but...
Hobart - Smoked by Dickinson...Hobart - 18 votes
Union - Beat up by Muhlenburg - 15 votes (while Muhlenburg(2-point loss to Wilkes) gets 3 votes)
SJF lays down and gets mopped by Mt. Union then squeezes by Rochester(0-2)...11 votes
What have you done for me lately?
Quote from: 'gro on September 23, 2009, 05:24:17 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 23, 2009, 04:50:51 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 23, 2009, 02:11:48 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 23, 2009, 02:04:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2009, 08:22:44 PM
The out of region team was Muhlenberg.
Overall, I think Ithaca is overrated and Union is underrated. Somehow, Ithaca lost to Union and didn't drop far at all. However, Union loses and falls right off the map. I don't really understand this.
To a degree I agree....I also think that AGAIN this year pollsters are over-ranking SJF.
In comparing Fisher to Union, how is a blowout of Buff. St. and a squeaker vs. Rochester that much better than a win over Ithaca and a close loss to Muhlenburg on the road?
Word. Fisher is like St. John's in the national top 25
yeah I said it.
I hear ya, and I've seen St. John's play this year and they're pretty decent. But in the absence of teams that are awesome other than the usual three, who belongs up there?
There seems to be a gigantic gap between the top three and everyone else. We run out of awesome teams very quickly. But someone has to be No. 4 ... and down through about No. 11 or 12. :)
exactly. Is St. Johns (or SJF in the east) good? Sure they are. But are they getting a little bump in the polls due to name recognition, gro thinks so.
Dr. Doggenstein,
RPI is not allowed to receive votes until it is at least 5-0, and can not crack the top 25 until 7-0.
Regards,
Groseph G. Groberson III
Quote from: 'gro on September 23, 2009, 05:24:17 PM
Dr. Doggenstein,
RPI is not allowed to receive votes until it is at least 5-0, and can not crack the top 25 until 7-0.
Regards,
Groseph G. Groberson III
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 23, 2009, 08:01:04 PM
Groberson III:
Golly, gee, Groseph G. Groberson...good gridders get garnishment galore given glorious gains. Garnet grabbed good glint given grace 'gainst groggy grenaders. Gridiron gladiators, grilling good gridders, garner grand grades.
GrandPep
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 24, 2009, 09:47:14 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 23, 2009, 08:01:04 PM
Groberson III:
Golly, gee, Groseph G. Groberson...good gridders get garnishment galore given glorious gains. Garnet grabbed good glint given grace 'gainst groggy grenaders. Gridiron gladiators, grilling good gridders, garner grand grades.
GrandPep
October 24th and the Saxons' trip to Growney can't get here soon enough. Pep clearly needs to get out of Mayberry and I shutter to imagine his mental state in another month!
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2009, 11:34:02 PM
Updating the d3Football.com Top 25 Poll Week 3 (http://www.d3football.com/top25/2009/week-3) "wildcard" candidates, mostly in spots 26+.
No. 20 Ithaca 2-1 98 (lost to Union) Won @ (2-2) Utica 27 - 24
No. 29 Dickinson 3-0 41 (beat Hobart) Won v. (2-2) Western McMaryland 35 - 7
No. 32 Wilkes 2-0 30 (beat Muhlenberg) Won @ (1-2) Chrisopher Newport 24 - 17
No. 38 Hobart 1-1 18 (lost to Dickinson) Lost @ (3-1) Susquehanna 20 - 10
No. 40 Union 1-1 15 (beat Ithaca, lost to Muhlenberg) Won @ (0-3) UofRochester 28 - 21
No. 42 SJF 2-1 11 (lost to 1985 Chicago Bears) Lost @ (2-2) Salisbury 38 - 20
No. 45 Alfred 3-0 4 Won v. (2-1) Springfield 49 - 28
No. 50 Muhlenberg 1-1 3 (beat Union, lost to Wilkes) Lost @ (1-3) Gettysburg 20 - 3
My predictions:
- Ithaca will not be ranked lower than No. 20 nationally in the Week 4 Poll;
- Union's vote total will increase, as will Alfred's, but (2-1) Union polls ahead of (4-0) Alfred;
- SJFisher gets at least one vote in the Week 4 Poll, but Kean gets more votes than SJF;
- Dickinson cracks the Top 25 in the Week 4 Poll, but not Wilkes;
- 4-0 Hartwick (OWP = .250) gets twice as many Week 4 Poll votes as 3-0 RPI;
- Hobart and Muhlenberg, it's been nice knowing you.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 27, 2009, 05:56:52 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2009, 11:34:02 PM
Updating the d3Football.com Top 25 Poll Week 3 (http://www.d3football.com/top25/2009/week-3) "wildcard" candidates, mostly in spots 26+.
No. 20 Ithaca 2-1 98 (lost to Union) Won @ (2-2) Utica 27 - 24
No. 29 Dickinson 3-0 41 (beat Hobart) Won v. (2-2) Western McMaryland 35 - 7
No. 32 Wilkes 2-0 30 (beat Muhlenberg) Won @ (1-2) Chrisopher Newport 24 - 17
No. 38 Hobart 1-1 18 (lost to Dickinson) Lost @ (3-1) Susquehanna 20 - 10
No. 40 Union 1-1 15 (beat Ithaca, lost to Muhlenberg) Won @ (0-3) UofRochester 28 - 21
No. 42 SJF 2-1 11 (lost to 1985 Chicago Bears) Lost @ (2-2) Salisbury 38 - 20
No. 45 Alfred 3-0 4 Won v. (2-1) Springfield 49 - 28
No. 50 Muhlenberg 1-1 3 (beat Union, lost to Wilkes) Lost @ (1-3) Gettysburg 20 - 3
My predictions:
- Ithaca will not be ranked lower than No. 20 nationally in the Week 4 Poll;
- Union's vote total will increase, as will Alfred's, but (2-1) Union polls ahead of (4-0) Alfred;
- SJFisher gets at least one vote in the Week 4 Poll, but Kean gets more votes than SJF;
- Dickinson cracks the Top 25 in the Week 4 Poll, but not Wilkes;
- 4-0 Hartwick (OWP = .250) gets twice as many Week 4 Poll votes as 3-0 RPI;
- Hobart and Muhlenberg, it's been nice knowing you.
I have Cortland, Trine and the Pointers out and Wilkes, Franklin and Dickinson in. We will see later tonight. Maybe 2 of 3, but Wilkes definitely in.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 27, 2009, 05:56:52 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2009, 11:34:02 PM
Updating the d3Football.com Top 25 Poll Week 3 (http://www.d3football.com/top25/2009/week-3) "wildcard" candidates, mostly in spots 26+.
No. 20 Ithaca 2-1 98 (lost to Union) Won @ (2-2) Utica 27 - 24
No. 29 Dickinson 3-0 41 (beat Hobart) Won v. (2-2) Western McMaryland 35 - 7
No. 32 Wilkes 2-0 30 (beat Muhlenberg) Won @ (1-2) Chrisopher Newport 24 - 17
No. 38 Hobart 1-1 18 (lost to Dickinson) Lost @ (3-1) Susquehanna 20 - 10
No. 40 Union 1-1 15 (beat Ithaca, lost to Muhlenberg) Won @ (0-3) UofRochester 28 - 21
No. 42 SJF 2-1 11 (lost to 1985 Chicago Bears) Lost @ (2-2) Salisbury 38 - 20
No. 45 Alfred 3-0 4 Won v. (2-1) Springfield 49 - 28
No. 50 Muhlenberg 1-1 3 (beat Union, lost to Wilkes) Lost @ (1-3) Gettysburg 20 - 3
My predictions:
- Ithaca will not be ranked lower than No. 20 nationally in the Week 4 Poll;
- Union's vote total will increase, as will Alfred's, but (2-1) Union polls ahead of (4-0) Alfred;
- SJFisher gets at least one vote in the Week 4 Poll, but Kean gets more votes than SJF;
- Dickinson cracks the Top 25 in the Week 4 Poll, but not Wilkes;
- 4-0 Hartwick (OWP = .250) gets twice as many Week 4 Poll votes as 3-0 RPI;
- Hobart and Muhlenberg, it's been nice knowing you.
I have Cortland, Trine and the Pointers out and Wilkes, Franklin and Dickinson in. We will see later tonight. Maybe 2 of 3, but Wilkes definitely in.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 27, 2009, 07:29:47 PM
I did the same thing. Starting all over again. Minus the top 2, this is a complete guessing game.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 08:30:58 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on September 27, 2009, 07:29:47 PM
I did the same thing. Starting all over again. Minus the top 2, this is a complete guessing game.
ummmm, RPI is at 3-0...and now with Ithaca struggling vs. Utica, that game doesn't look so bad anymore. And they beat a pretty good WPI team this weekend as well.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 08:51:47 PM
I'm still absolutely scratching my head that RPI doesn't have 1 vote in the Top-25 poll, yet Ithaca is still ranked 20. How does this make ANY sense? Seriously? Not 1? Trine? Trine?
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on September 27, 2009, 09:28:05 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 08:51:47 PM
I'm still absolutely scratching my head that RPI doesn't have 1 vote in the Top-25 poll, yet Ithaca is still ranked 20. How does this make ANY sense? Seriously? Not 1? Trine? Trine?
I have no ties to Trine, but why single them out? They went 10-0 last year, before losing to final 4 team Wheaton in the playoffs. This year they were 2-0 before losing by one point AT Franklin (who lost to Wheaton in the Elite Eight last year). They hardly seem to be the most obvious candidate for being over-rated! ;)
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 10:18:57 PMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on September 27, 2009, 09:28:05 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 08:51:47 PM
I'm still absolutely scratching my head that RPI doesn't have 1 vote in the Top-25 poll, yet Ithaca is still ranked 20. How does this make ANY sense? Seriously? Not 1? Trine? Trine?
I have no ties to Trine, but why single them out? They went 10-0 last year, before losing to final 4 team Wheaton in the playoffs. This year they were 2-0 before losing by one point AT Franklin (who lost to Wheaton in the Elite Eight last year). They hardly seem to be the most obvious candidate for being over-rated! ;)
I single them out because i've never even heard of any of the teams on their schedule.
Trine going undefeated last year holds about as much water to me as Husson winning all of their d3 games last year before the ECAC game.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 10:18:57 PMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on September 27, 2009, 09:28:05 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 08:51:47 PM
I'm still absolutely scratching my head that RPI doesn't have 1 vote in the Top-25 poll, yet Ithaca is still ranked 20. How does this make ANY sense? Seriously? Not 1? Trine? Trine?
I have no ties to Trine, but why single them out? They went 10-0 last year, before losing to final 4 team Wheaton in the playoffs. This year they were 2-0 before losing by one point AT Franklin (who lost to Wheaton in the Elite Eight last year). They hardly seem to be the most obvious candidate for being over-rated! ;)
I single them out because i've never even heard of any of the teams on their schedule.
Trine going undefeated last year holds about as much water to me as Husson winning all of their d3 games last year before the ECAC game.
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2009, 11:34:02 PM
Updating the d3Football.com Top 25 Poll Week 3 (http://www.d3football.com/top25/2009/week-3) "wildcard" candidates, mostly in spots 26+.
No. 20 Ithaca 2-1 98 (lost to Union) Won @ (2-2) Utica 27 - 24
No. 29 Dickinson 3-0 41 (beat Hobart) Won v. (2-2) Western McMaryland 35 - 7
No. 32 Wilkes 2-0 30 (beat Muhlenberg) Won @ (1-2) Chrisopher Newport 24 - 17
No. 38 Hobart 1-1 18 (lost to Dickinson) Lost @ (3-1) Susquehanna 20 - 10
No. 40 Union 1-1 15 (beat Ithaca, lost to Muhlenberg) Won @ (0-3) UofRochester 28 - 21
No. 42 SJF 2-1 11 (lost to 1985 Chicago Bears) Lost @ (2-2) Salisbury 38 - 20
No. 45 Alfred 3-0 4 Won v. (2-1) Springfield 49 - 28
No. 50 Muhlenberg 1-1 3 (beat Union, lost to Wilkes) Lost @ (1-3) Gettysburg 20 - 3
My predictions:
- Ithaca will not be ranked lower than No. 20 nationally in the Week 4 Poll;
- Union's vote total will increase, as will Alfred's, but (2-1) Union polls ahead of (4-0) Alfred;
- SJFisher gets at least one vote in the Week 4 Poll, but Kean gets more votes than SJF;
- Dickinson cracks the Top 25 in the Week 4 Poll, but not Wilkes;
- 4-0 Hartwick (OWP = .250) gets twice as many Week 4 Poll votes as 3-0 RPI;
- Hobart and Muhlenberg, it's been nice knowing you.
Quote from: Union89 on September 27, 2009, 11:19:03 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2009, 11:34:02 PM
Updating the d3Football.com Top 25 Poll Week 3 (http://www.d3football.com/top25/2009/week-3) "wildcard" candidates, mostly in spots 26+.
No. 20 Ithaca 2-1 98 (lost to Union) Won @ (2-2) Utica 27 - 24
No. 29 Dickinson 3-0 41 (beat Hobart) Won v. (2-2) Western McMaryland 35 - 7
No. 32 Wilkes 2-0 30 (beat Muhlenberg) Won @ (1-2) Chrisopher Newport 24 - 17
No. 38 Hobart 1-1 18 (lost to Dickinson) Lost @ (3-1) Susquehanna 20 - 10
No. 40 Union 1-1 15 (beat Ithaca, lost to Muhlenberg) Won @ (0-3) UofRochester 28 - 21
No. 42 SJF 2-1 11 (lost to 1985 Chicago Bears) Lost @ (2-2) Salisbury 38 - 20
No. 45 Alfred 3-0 4 Won v. (2-1) Springfield 49 - 28
No. 50 Muhlenberg 1-1 3 (beat Union, lost to Wilkes) Lost @ (1-3) Gettysburg 20 - 3
My predictions:
- Ithaca will not be ranked lower than No. 20 nationally in the Week 4 Poll;
- Union's vote total will increase, as will Alfred's, but (2-1) Union polls ahead of (4-0) Alfred;
- SJFisher gets at least one vote in the Week 4 Poll, but Kean gets more votes than SJF;
- Dickinson cracks the Top 25 in the Week 4 Poll, but not Wilkes;
- 4-0 Hartwick (OWP = .250) gets twice as many Week 4 Poll votes as 3-0 RPI;
- Hobart and Muhlenberg, it's been nice knowing you.
You should leave the predicting up to DewCrew.....
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on September 27, 2009, 09:28:05 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 27, 2009, 08:51:47 PM
I'm still absolutely scratching my head that RPI doesn't have 1 vote in the Top-25 poll, yet Ithaca is still ranked 20. How does this make ANY sense? Seriously? Not 1? Trine? Trine?
I have no ties to Trine, but why single them out? They went 10-0 last year, before losing to final 4 team Wheaton in the playoffs. This year they were 2-0 before losing by one point AT Franklin (who lost to Wheaton in the Elite Eight last year). They hardly seem to be the most obvious candidate for being over-rated! ;)
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 28, 2009, 12:46:50 AM
If you want standings, we have a separate page for that. If you want rankings, though, then the Top 25 is where you need to be.
We're not in the business of listing every unbeaten team. If that's what you need, the AFCA has a poll just for you. That's the one that values W-L% far more than strength of schedule, and it's those kinds of overratings of teams in weak conferences that spurred us to start our own poll.
Who has RPI played? Anyone? What's a voter supposed to believe in from that string of games? You guys all know this already. Nothing's changed except Utica appears to be a little better. As a voter, I'm still going to measure them against Union and Hobart, and yes, to get to Union that's game 7 and that's 7-0. Play a 10-game schedule, schedule with a little chutzpah and you might get somewhere.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 28, 2009, 12:46:50 AM
If you want standings, we have a separate page for that. If you want rankings, though, then the Top 25 is where you need to be.
We're not in the business of listing every unbeaten team. If that's what you need, the AFCA has a poll just for you. That's the one that values W-L% far more than strength of schedule, and it's those kinds of overratings of teams in weak conferences that spurred us to start our own poll.
Who has RPI played? Anyone? What's a voter supposed to believe in from that string of games? You guys all know this already. Nothing's changed except Utica appears to be a little better. As a voter, I'm still going to measure them against Union and Hobart, and yes, to get to Union that's game 7 and that's 7-0. Play a 10-game schedule, schedule with a little chutzpah and you might get somewhere.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AM
Name. Brand. Recognition.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AMAnd who has Ithaca played?
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:02:18 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AMAnd who has Ithaca played?
Wittenberg in '79
Central in '88
and Dayton in '91
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 10:04:41 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:02:18 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AMAnd who has Ithaca played?
Wittenberg in '79
Central in '88
and Dayton in '91
Who have the played this millennium?
Curry '08
Union '05
RPI '03
Rowan '01
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:20:36 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 10:04:41 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:02:18 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AMAnd who has Ithaca played?
Wittenberg in '79
Central in '88
and Dayton in '91
Who have the played this millennium?
Curry '08
Union '05
RPI '03
Rowan '01
Odd how someone as detail-oriented as an engineer would overlook that RPI's 2001 home-playoff game as the East Region's #1 seed...
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:20:36 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 10:04:41 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:02:18 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AMAnd who has Ithaca played?
Wittenberg in '79
Central in '88
and Dayton in '91
Who have the played this millennium?
Curry '08
Union '05
RPI '03
Rowan '01
Odd how someone as detail-oriented as an engineer would overlook that RPI's 2001 home-playoff game as the East Region's #1 seed...
Quote from: gordonmann on September 28, 2009, 10:39:06 AM
If Wilkes is 1a (or b or c) on your ballot, then you should keep an eye on Leb Val and Albright. Both are undefeated, albeit against less impressive foes. And both play big games this week - Wilkes at Albright, Leb Val hosting Del Val.
Quote from: gordonmann on September 28, 2009, 10:39:06 AM
If Wilkes is 1a (or b or c) on your ballot, then you should keep an eye on Leb Val and Albright. Both are undefeated, albeit against less impressive foes. And both play big games this week - Wilkes at Albright, Leb Val hosting Del Val.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on September 28, 2009, 10:55:07 AMQuote from: gordonmann on September 28, 2009, 10:39:06 AM
If Wilkes is 1a (or b or c) on your ballot, then you should keep an eye on Leb Val and Albright. Both are undefeated, albeit against less impressive foes. And both play big games this week - Wilkes at Albright, Leb Val hosting Del Val.
leb val goes down this week (sorry warren thompson ;D ) ... albright is the team that scares pbr...they have a good coach and are flying beneath everyones radar...dvc beat a good kean team (who took delivered a beatdown to cortland) and only loss is to the #5 ranked team in the nation. in fact pbr kinda likes everyone focused on wilkes and lets dvc and albright fly under the radar...
Quote from: Dr. Lew "Bones" Von Doggenstein McCoy on September 28, 2009, 10:29:50 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:20:36 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 10:04:41 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:02:18 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AMAnd who has Ithaca played?
Wittenberg in '79
Central in '88
and Dayton in '91
Who have the played this millennium?
Curry '08
Union '05
RPI '03
Rowan '01
Odd how someone as detail-oriented as an engineer would overlook that RPI's 2001 home-playoff game as the East Region's #1 seed...
And dammit Jim, i'm just a country Dr., not an Engineer.
Quote from: gordonmann on September 28, 2009, 10:39:06 AM
If Wilkes is 1a (or b or c) on your ballot, then you should keep an eye on Leb Val and Albright. Both are undefeated, albeit against less impressive foes. And both play big games this week - Wilkes at Albright, Leb Val hosting Del Val.
Quote from: Upstate on September 28, 2009, 11:57:39 AMQuote from: gordonmann on September 28, 2009, 10:39:06 AM
If Wilkes is 1a (or b or c) on your ballot, then you should keep an eye on Leb Val and Albright. Both are undefeated, albeit against less impressive foes. And both play big games this week - Wilkes at Albright, Leb Val hosting Del Val.
I've got at least 3 MAC teams on my ballot...
Maybe 4, I can't remember off the top of my head...
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 01:45:54 PM
I have 3 E8, 3 MAC, 3 NJAC, and 1 LL. Brutal.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 28, 2009, 01:56:43 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 01:45:54 PM
I have 3 E8, 3 MAC, 3 NJAC, and 1 LL. Brutal.
Dr. our LLPPFFL match-up is turning out to be closer than a bye week ;)! Granted another L for Dr. Rosen..... but with his **** ass team he'll take close games here in 09. Maybe in 10 his head will be out of his ass during the draft! Looking at his line-up he was feeling Flacco and sat Manning ****! Those 12 extra points could have helped. ****ing 4TDs and dlip sits him. Figures.... :'(
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 10:29:30 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:20:36 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 10:04:41 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 28, 2009, 10:02:18 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 08:32:29 AMAnd who has Ithaca played?
Wittenberg in '79
Central in '88
and Dayton in '91
Who have the played this millennium?
Curry '08
Union '05
RPI '03
Rowan '01
Odd how someone as detail-oriented as an engineer would overlook that RPI's 2001 home-playoff game as the East Region's #1 seed...
Not overlooked, just simply showing that Ithaca is not superhuman, yet somehow their reputation always proceeds them.
I'm not taking anything away from the Ithaca program at all. Just pointing out how they are one of many teams that get more recognition based on their past rather than their current situation.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Quote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
Quote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
Quote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 02:43:15 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
meh?? meh?? Come on 'Gro.....hopefully that's tongue in cheek.
Quote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:49:32 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 02:43:15 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
meh?? meh?? Come on 'Gro.....hopefully that's tongue in cheek.
Did I st-stutter?
M-E-H!!
Quote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
Quote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 05:02:49 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
'Gro,
Do you have an actual point here, or did you light your own personal drinking lamp at 2:22:44pm on a Monday??
Are you actually comparing RPI's OOC schedule to Ithaca's over the past few years?? I have not been one to come on here and bash RPI's scheduling practices, but what in the Wide, Wide World of Sports are you talking about??
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 05:07:31 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 05:02:49 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
'Gro,
Do you have an actual point here, or did you light your own personal drinking lamp at 2:22:44pm on a Monday??
Are you actually comparing RPI's OOC schedule to Ithaca's over the past few years?? I have not been one to come on here and bash RPI's scheduling practices, but what in the Wide, Wide World of Sports are you talking about??
I think it's pretty simple science. Union ****in blows.
Quote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 06:01:19 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 05:07:31 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 05:02:49 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
'Gro,
Do you have an actual point here, or did you light your own personal drinking lamp at 2:22:44pm on a Monday??
Are you actually comparing RPI's OOC schedule to Ithaca's over the past few years?? I have not been one to come on here and bash RPI's scheduling practices, but what in the Wide, Wide World of Sports are you talking about??
I think it's pretty simple science. Union ****in blows.
I understand that part.....but this is really between Ithaca and RPI....
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 06:25:12 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 06:01:19 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 05:07:31 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 05:02:49 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 02:22:44 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 28, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
I think some people might have a bias against RPI because they seem to go out of their way to play a weak non league schedule. Ithaca does not do that and I think people give them an edge in the early polls because of that. And again, early polls dont mean much.
Really? Cortland game aside (they are going to play each year) St. Lawrence and Frostburg aren't top notch competition. Union and Widener are meh. And they lost to Union.
'Gro,
Do you have an actual point here, or did you light your own personal drinking lamp at 2:22:44pm on a Monday??
Are you actually comparing RPI's OOC schedule to Ithaca's over the past few years?? I have not been one to come on here and bash RPI's scheduling practices, but what in the Wide, Wide World of Sports are you talking about??
I think it's pretty simple science. Union ****in blows.
I understand that part.....but this is really between Ithaca and RPI....
What do we know about both teams? Ithaca beat up on St. Lawrence which everyone expects then loses to Union. Union was supposed to be so-so, but now we think they are good...and they lose to Muhlenburg(1-2) who we think is really strong, but then who gets killed by Gettysburg(1-3). Ithaca then goes and beats Widener(2-1), who was really good in 2001 and 2002, but struggled to beat Curry, who also looks dookie...
RPI shuts out Endicott as expected. Sneaks by Utica, and beats a previously undefeated WPI.
So, that brings us to the common opponent theory...Utica...RPI beats Utica by 3...the masses say 'RPI sucks, they only beat them by 3'. Then Ithaca wins by the same margin, and it turns into 'Utica must be much improved'.
Pour me that blue kool-aid.
Quote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 07:41:33 PM
Gro's point is that some people look at the D3 landscape with bomber blue shaded glasses (they sound cool and if you guys have any extra pairs let me know).
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.streetbikerider.com%2Fmedia%2Fproducts%2Fbomber-eyewear%2Fapparel-bomber-eyewear-casual-sunglasses-safety-z-bomb-light-blue-light-blue.jpg&hash=3200e02a62dd4674ef61f4ff88e147ec940276dc)
Best Seller Since 1979
Gro will not deny that their OOC schedule is weak, and they don't play a 10th game i.e. a 3rd OOC game. But like Gro said before besides Cortland IC's schedule isn't all that great... Dr. Lew does a good explanation of that. Union is "Meh" because they beat Ithaca (no longer as grand an accomplishment as they like to think) then lose to the Mules, then pull a win against U of R out of their arse. And U of R hung with SJF the week before, but no one knows how good SJF is this year either.
I guess "Meh" means "can't tell a god damn thing about this team"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_wb8bAl1P-N0%2FSAy_3RiBOuI%2FAAAAAAAACEE%2FcQ3Gc5jTp3E%2Fs1600%2Fsniffing%252Bglue.jpg&hash=2d5cbfea20c68f6959b2b9aaff4ae73d684b9cb6)
Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue
Quote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 08:14:02 PM
So last year still counts? If that's the case RPI beat Alfred, and therefore should be the #1 team in the east
Like I said, RPI's schedule is not great. Utica actually helps. All I'm trying to say is St. Lawrence and Frostberg are dookie.
Quote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 08:02:04 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 07:41:33 PM
Gro's point is that some people look at the D3 landscape with bomber blue shaded glasses (they sound cool and if you guys have any extra pairs let me know).
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.streetbikerider.com%2Fmedia%2Fproducts%2Fbomber-eyewear%2Fapparel-bomber-eyewear-casual-sunglasses-safety-z-bomb-light-blue-light-blue.jpg&hash=3200e02a62dd4674ef61f4ff88e147ec940276dc)
Best Seller Since 1979
Gro will not deny that their OOC schedule is weak, and they don't play a 10th game i.e. a 3rd OOC game. But like Gro said before besides Cortland IC's schedule isn't all that great... Dr. Lew does a good explanation of that. Union is "Meh" because they beat Ithaca (no longer as grand an accomplishment as they like to think) then lose to the Mules, then pull a win against U of R out of their arse. And U of R hung with SJF the week before, but no one knows how good SJF is this year either.
I guess "Meh" means "can't tell a god damn thing about this team"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F_wb8bAl1P-N0%2FSAy_3RiBOuI%2FAAAAAAAACEE%2FcQ3Gc5jTp3E%2Fs1600%2Fsniffing%252Bglue.jpg&hash=2d5cbfea20c68f6959b2b9aaff4ae73d684b9cb6)
Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue
Union & Widener are still much better than Endicott & Utica on a consistent basis. Most years, I would say that St. Lawrence is better than RPI's two opponents as well.
I totally agree with Utah, even for an RPI guy........to compare these two OOC schedules over the past few years is very 'homerish'.
Quote from: maxpower on September 28, 2009, 09:43:30 PM
Is it just the schedule Upstate? Last year you had losses to Mount and Salisbury, sure, but without losses to Hartwick (for the 2nd year in a row) and Alfred you're still in the playoffs.
Quote from: Upstate on September 28, 2009, 09:39:39 PM
Question RPI all you want but look at what happened to SJF when they took their schedule from "OK" to "challenging"...
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 06:25:12 PM
So, that brings us to the common opponent theory...Utica...RPI beats Utica by 3...the masses say 'RPI sucks, they only beat them by 3'. Then Ithaca wins by the same margin, and it turns into 'Utica must be much improved'.
Pour me that blue kool-aid.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 07:29:13 AM
You cannot call RPI's OOC schedule anything but weak year in and year out. This year being a bit of an exception because of Utica coming in as a much improved team then in the past. Dlip believes that Utica will continue to improve year in and year out which will help with RPI's SOS. Yet the question seems to be does this schedule help or hurt them? Seemingly dlip feels it has done a little bit of both. Overall though RPI is undefeated in 09 with W's over pitifull Endicott, pulling one out of their arse against Utica, and an impressive W on the road at WPI. For dlip, if RPI wins on Sat they will definitely be in his top 2 in his week #6 poll, with heavy consideration for #1.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 29, 2009, 01:47:08 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 06:25:12 PM
So, that brings us to the common opponent theory...Utica...RPI beats Utica by 3...the masses say 'RPI sucks, they only beat them by 3'. Then Ithaca wins by the same margin, and it turns into 'Utica must be much improved'.
Pour me that blue kool-aid.
You may want to consider that it wasn't the fact that they did it to Ithaca, but the fact that they did it twice in a row.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:34:58 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 29, 2009, 01:47:08 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 06:25:12 PM
So, that brings us to the common opponent theory...Utica...RPI beats Utica by 3...the masses say 'RPI sucks, they only beat them by 3'. Then Ithaca wins by the same margin, and it turns into 'Utica must be much improved'.
Pour me that blue kool-aid.
You may want to consider that it wasn't the fact that they did it to Ithaca, but the fact that they did it twice in a row.
Where the games were played should also factor in a little bit. RPI pulled it out at home by 3 while Ithaca overcame their deficit in Utica and won by 3. If I'm doing the common opponent comparison then I mentally like to arbitrarily factor in 3 points for home field. By that logic, Utica and RPI are equal on a neutral field while Ithaca is 6 points better. What does that tell us about the relative strength of any of those three against the rest of the East Region? I don't really know, but time will tell.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:41:29 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:34:58 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 29, 2009, 01:47:08 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 06:25:12 PM
So, that brings us to the common opponent theory...Utica...RPI beats Utica by 3...the masses say 'RPI sucks, they only beat them by 3'. Then Ithaca wins by the same margin, and it turns into 'Utica must be much improved'.
Pour me that blue kool-aid.
You may want to consider that it wasn't the fact that they did it to Ithaca, but the fact that they did it twice in a row.
Where the games were played should also factor in a little bit. RPI pulled it out at home by 3 while Ithaca overcame their deficit in Utica and won by 3. If I'm doing the common opponent comparison then I mentally like to arbitrarily factor in 3 points for home field. By that logic, Utica and RPI are equal on a neutral field while Ithaca is 6 points better. What does that tell us about the relative strength of any of those three against the rest of the East Region? I don't really know, but time will tell.
Come on, this is d3 football. It's not like walking into the confines of USC, or Notre Dame, or Michigan. Home Field advantage isn't that big a deal. Especially when RPI's home field is brand new to them as well. They don't know where the soft spots on the parquet floor are yet.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2009, 09:45:30 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:41:29 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:34:58 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 29, 2009, 01:47:08 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 06:25:12 PM
So, that brings us to the common opponent theory...Utica...RPI beats Utica by 3...the masses say 'RPI sucks, they only beat them by 3'. Then Ithaca wins by the same margin, and it turns into 'Utica must be much improved'.
Pour me that blue kool-aid.
You may want to consider that it wasn't the fact that they did it to Ithaca, but the fact that they did it twice in a row.
Where the games were played should also factor in a little bit. RPI pulled it out at home by 3 while Ithaca overcame their deficit in Utica and won by 3. If I'm doing the common opponent comparison then I mentally like to arbitrarily factor in 3 points for home field. By that logic, Utica and RPI are equal on a neutral field while Ithaca is 6 points better. What does that tell us about the relative strength of any of those three against the rest of the East Region? I don't really know, but time will tell.
Come on, this is d3 football. It's not like walking into the confines of USC, or Notre Dame, or Michigan. Home Field advantage isn't that big a deal. Especially when RPI's home field is brand new to them as well. They don't know where the soft spots on the parquet floor are yet.
Seriously....Springfield playing at Butterfield where they douse the "turf" with Rapid-Gro?
That's not worth something? Fans aren't of any value? Heck, AU Pep Band, according to players and coaches, is worth anywhere from 5 to 7 points for the Saxons, depending on the band's performance.... :-[
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2009, 09:49:17 AM
Dr. Lew: What about playing in the cage at Hartwick? That's not been a kind place for Ithaca and St. John Fisher of late.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:46:54 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2009, 09:45:30 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:41:29 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:34:58 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 29, 2009, 01:47:08 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 28, 2009, 06:25:12 PM
So, that brings us to the common opponent theory...Utica...RPI beats Utica by 3...the masses say 'RPI sucks, they only beat them by 3'. Then Ithaca wins by the same margin, and it turns into 'Utica must be much improved'.
Pour me that blue kool-aid.
You may want to consider that it wasn't the fact that they did it to Ithaca, but the fact that they did it twice in a row.
Where the games were played should also factor in a little bit. RPI pulled it out at home by 3 while Ithaca overcame their deficit in Utica and won by 3. If I'm doing the common opponent comparison then I mentally like to arbitrarily factor in 3 points for home field. By that logic, Utica and RPI are equal on a neutral field while Ithaca is 6 points better. What does that tell us about the relative strength of any of those three against the rest of the East Region? I don't really know, but time will tell.
Come on, this is d3 football. It's not like walking into the confines of USC, or Notre Dame, or Michigan. Home Field advantage isn't that big a deal. Especially when RPI's home field is brand new to them as well. They don't know where the soft spots on the parquet floor are yet.
Seriously....Springfield playing at Butterfield where they douse the "turf" with Rapid-Gro?
That's not worth something? Fans aren't of any value? Heck, AU Pep Band, according to players and coaches, is worth anywhere from 5 to 7 points for the Saxons, depending on the band's performance.... :-[
Springfield and Hartwick not playing on their turf are the only 2 i'd let slide.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 29, 2009, 10:01:51 AM
upstate- i hate to even ask- but who is down??
that many starters?
Quote from: Upstate on September 29, 2009, 10:05:14 AMQuote from: fisheralum91 on September 29, 2009, 10:01:51 AM
upstate- i hate to even ask- but who is down??
that many starters?
Check your inbox...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:58:03 AMWhile the venues aren't as big as D-I, the athletes aren't as polished either. Regardless of whether home field advantage is more or less pronounced at this level than another, the home team doesn't have to stay in a hotel the night before or travel the day of plus they are playing in front of the bigger crowd while the visiting team is supported by the parents and girlfriends that choose to travel. There has to be some effect and I don't claim to know the extent, so using 3 points is just as arbitrary as anything in my mind.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:46:54 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2009, 09:45:30 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:41:29 AM
Come on, this is d3 football. It's not like walking into the confines of USC, or Notre Dame, or Michigan. Home Field advantage isn't that big a deal. Especially when RPI's home field is brand new to them as well. They don't know where the soft spots on the parquet floor are yet.
Seriously....Springfield playing at Butterfield where they douse the "turf" with Rapid-Gro?
That's not worth something? Fans aren't of any value? Heck, AU Pep Band, according to players and coaches, is worth anywhere from 5 to 7 points for the Saxons, depending on the band's performance.... :-[
Springfield and Hartwick not playing on their turf are the only 2 i'd let slide.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2009, 09:49:17 AM
Dr. Lew: What about playing in the cage at Hartwick? That's not been a kind place for Ithaca and St. John Fisher of late.
Pep will give you the point on the new digs at RPI being somewhat new to the Engineers, albeit they've no doubt had plenty of practice there. 'Tis a far cry from the frozen cat turd surface of Ye Olde '86 Field where AU's cleats never broke the surface in the field's last hurrah, a hard-fought 3-pt. RPI win, attended arguably by as many Saxon fans as folks dressed in red.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:58:03 AM
While the venues aren't as big as D-I, the athletes aren't as polished either. Regardless of whether home field advantage is more or less pronounced at this level than another, the home team doesn't have to stay in a hotel the night before or travel the day of plus they are playing in front of the bigger crowd while the visiting team is supported by the parents and girlfriends that choose to travel. There has to be some effect and I don't claim to know the extent, so using 3 points is just as arbitrary as anything in my mind.
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 29, 2009, 10:09:16 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:58:03 AMWhile the venues aren't as big as D-I, the athletes aren't as polished either. Regardless of whether home field advantage is more or less pronounced at this level than another, the home team doesn't have to stay in a hotel the night before or travel the day of plus they are playing in front of the bigger crowd while the visiting team is supported by the parents and girlfriends that choose to travel. There has to be some effect and I don't claim to know the extent, so using 3 points is just as arbitrary as anything in my mind.
I gotta agree. I think it is the travel that gives a homefield advantage in D3. The swamp is a tough place to play but at least you get to fly in on a charter Thursday night, spend Friday in Tampa or Ocala, then drive up an hour for the game. No long bus rides. (Plus, if you have the resources UF has, you can take two separate charters so your healthy players don't catch the respiratory infection your sick players have during the flight)
Plus, if homefield advantage doesn't exist, why does IC have a winning percentage in the .900s at Butterfield Stadium and why did they go 20 or so years between losses to a private school there?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 10:20:08 AMQuote from: JoseQViper on September 29, 2009, 10:09:16 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 09:58:03 AMWhile the venues aren't as big as D-I, the athletes aren't as polished either. Regardless of whether home field advantage is more or less pronounced at this level than another, the home team doesn't have to stay in a hotel the night before or travel the day of plus they are playing in front of the bigger crowd while the visiting team is supported by the parents and girlfriends that choose to travel. There has to be some effect and I don't claim to know the extent, so using 3 points is just as arbitrary as anything in my mind.
I gotta agree. I think it is the travel that gives a homefield advantage in D3. The swamp is a tough place to play but at least you get to fly in on a charter Thursday night, spend Friday in Tampa or Ocala, then drive up an hour for the game. No long bus rides. (Plus, if you have the resources UF has, you can take two separate charters so your healthy players don't catch the respiratory infection your sick players have during the flight)
Plus, if homefield advantage doesn't exist, why does IC have a winning percentage in the .900s at Butterfield Stadium and why did they go 20 or so years between losses to a private school there?
What is there overall winning percentage through those years? This is a question that I don't know the answer to. just curious.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 10:48:28 AM
Looking across the D3 scoreboard for the first 4 weeks of this year, home teams have gone 224-197 for a .532 winning percentage.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 10:49:53 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 10:48:28 AM
Looking across the D3 scoreboard for the first 4 weeks of this year, home teams have gone 224-197 for a .532 winning percentage.
Hardly a home-field advantage?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 10:53:13 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 10:49:53 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 10:48:28 AM
Looking across the D3 scoreboard for the first 4 weeks of this year, home teams have gone 224-197 for a .532 winning percentage.
Hardly a home-field advantage?
It's worth something and displaces the notion that there is an away field advantage. How much is that 6 out of 100 differential worth? I say 3 points, but don't declare that gospel.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 10:42:11 AM
In the interest of science, I just crunched RPI's home vs. Away #'s since 2001(Including Playoffs)(not Including 2009 games)
Home Record - 31-8 (.794872)
Away Record - 32-10(.761905)
We have a Delta of 3.297%
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 10:53:13 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 10:49:53 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 10:48:28 AM
Looking across the D3 scoreboard for the first 4 weeks of this year, home teams have gone 224-197 for a .532 winning percentage.
Hardly a home-field advantage?
It's worth something and displaces the notion that there is an away field advantage. How much is that 6 out of 100 differential worth? I say 3 points, but don't declare that gospel.
Quote from: 'gro on September 29, 2009, 11:03:49 AM
Gro will add his 2 cents by saying that Dr. Von Doggenstein is 100% correct in everything he's posted about schedules, homefield advantage, etc.
In fact, its only a matter of time before he blacks out and wakes up as the original LD11 with a wing sauce goatee and empty bottles of all the ingredients to make irish car bombs scattered around the room.
Take advantage of this knowledge people.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 10:42:11 AM
In the interest of science, I just crunched RPI's home vs. Away #'s since 2001(Including Playoffs)(not Including 2009 games)
Home Record - 31-8 (.794872)
Away Record - 32-10(.761905)
We have a Delta of 3.297%
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 11:06:34 AM
Well, conventional gambling wisdom in the NFL is that home field advantage is worth 3 points (which is why I arbitrarily apply it to D3). Looking at the first 3 weeks of the pro season (I know, SSS) the home team is 25-23 for a winning percentage of .521 which isn't all that different than D3's .532 advantage. There is some advantage to playing at home, so if you're arguing in relation to a common opponent with the same margin of victory where the game was played should also factor into the discussion.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on September 29, 2009, 11:15:18 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2009, 11:06:34 AM
Well, conventional gambling wisdom in the NFL is that home field advantage is worth 3 points (which is why I arbitrarily apply it to D3). Looking at the first 3 weeks of the pro season (I know, SSS) the home team is 25-23 for a winning percentage of .521 which isn't all that different than D3's .532 advantage. There is some advantage to playing at home, so if you're arguing in relation to a common opponent with the same margin of victory where the game was played should also factor into the discussion.
that used to ring true but most professional odds makers now will tell you that number of +3 for home field was way too large and it is much more along the lines of .5/1 pt like LD stated. home field is factored in the line but it doesnt carry near as much weight as it used to....
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 29, 2009, 11:10:59 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 10:42:11 AM
In the interest of science, I just crunched RPI's home vs. Away #'s since 2001(Including Playoffs)(not Including 2009 games)
Home Record - 31-8 (.794872)
Away Record - 32-10(.761905)
We have a Delta of 3.297%
I like this. Here are the numbers for IC since 2001
Home 38-5 (.883720)
Away 29-15 (659090)
Maybe the answer is that just some teams in D3 have a home-field advantage.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 07:29:13 AM
You cannot call RPI's OOC schedule anything but weak year in and year out. This year being a bit of an exception because of Utica coming in as a much improved team then in the past. Dlip believes that Utica will continue to improve year in and year out which will help with RPI's SOS. Yet the question seems to be does this schedule help or hurt them? Seemingly dlip feels it has done a little bit of both. Overall though RPI is undefeated in 09 with W's over pitifull Endicott, pulling one out of their arse against Utica, and an impressive W on the road at WPI. For dlip, if RPI wins on Sat they will definitely be in his top 2 in his week #6 poll, with heavy consideration for #1.
Quote from: Union89 on September 29, 2009, 11:51:42 AMQuote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 07:29:13 AM
You cannot call RPI's OOC schedule anything but weak year in and year out. This year being a bit of an exception because of Utica coming in as a much improved team then in the past. Dlip believes that Utica will continue to improve year in and year out which will help with RPI's SOS. Yet the question seems to be does this schedule help or hurt them? Seemingly dlip feels it has done a little bit of both. Overall though RPI is undefeated in 09 with W's over pitifull Endicott, pulling one out of their arse against Utica, and an impressive W on the road at WPI. For dlip, if RPI wins on Sat they will definitely be in his top 2 in his week #6 poll, with heavy consideration for #1.
If RPI knew in advance that Utica was going to be this good in '09....probably wouldn't have scheduled them years ago.
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 29, 2009, 11:57:15 AM
This discussion inadvertently raises an interesting question. Does scheduling in D3 work like scheduling in D1?
What incentive do Endicott or Mount Ida have to play a road game against a team they can never beat? Do they get some cash like Florida's first two opponents? I cannot imagine that is the case. So if it isn't money, why don't they just stay away? That would force RPI, Utica, and everyone else to schedule OOC opponents on their level. Right?
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 29, 2009, 11:57:15 AM
This discussion inadvertently raises an interesting question. Does scheduling in D3 work like scheduling in D1?
What incentive do Endicott or Mount Ida have to play a road game against a team they can never beat? Do they get some cash like Florida's first two opponents? I cannot imagine that is the case. So if it isn't money, why don't they just stay away? That would force RPI, Utica, and everyone else to schedule OOC opponents on their level. Right?
Quote from: Union89 on September 28, 2009, 08:02:04 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 28, 2009, 07:41:33 PM
Gro will not deny that [RPI's] OOC schedule is weak, and they don't play a 10th game i.e. a 3rd OOC game. But like Gro said before besides Cortland IC's schedule isn't all that great... Dr. Lew does a good explanation of that. Union is "Meh" because they beat Ithaca (no longer as grand an accomplishment as they like to think) then lose to the Mules, then pull a win against U of R out of their arse. And U of R hung with SJF the week before, but no one knows how good SJF is this year either.
I guess "Meh" means "can't tell a god damn thing about this team"
Union & Widener are still much better than Endicott & Utica on a consistent basis. Most years, I would say that St. Lawrence is better than RPI's two opponents as well.
I totally agree with Utah, even for an RPI guy........to compare these two OOC schedules over the past few years is very 'homerish'.
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 29, 2009, 12:58:12 PM
Alfred's win over Springfield rated a mention on Game Day as a battle of unbeatens, while RPI's win over previously unbeaten WPI was not mentioned.
Quote from: JoseQViper on September 29, 2009, 11:57:15 AM
This discussion inadvertently raises an interesting question. Does scheduling in D3 work like scheduling in D1?
What incentive do Endicott or Mount Ida have to play a road game against a team they can never beat? Do they get some cash like Florida's first two opponents? I cannot imagine that is the case. So if it isn't money, why don't they just stay away? That would force RPI, Utica, and everyone else to schedule OOC opponents on their level. Right?
Quote from: maxpower on September 29, 2009, 03:04:18 PM
It's Tuesday! PG, where's the poll?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 03:28:58 PMQuote from: maxpower on September 29, 2009, 03:04:18 PM
It's Tuesday! PG, where's the poll?
He said last week he was out of town or something and it would be late this week. Cut the dude a little slack.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 03:28:58 PMQuote from: maxpower on September 29, 2009, 03:04:18 PM
It's Tuesday! PG, where's the poll?
He said last week he was out of town or something and it would be late this week. Cut the dude a little slack.
Quote from: 'gro on September 29, 2009, 07:53:57 PM
bunch of ignoramuses put together this poll, even had the audacity to put Alfred and RPI in there...
http://www.afca.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=9300&ATCLID=204803233
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2009, 08:01:32 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 29, 2009, 07:53:57 PM
bunch of ignoramuses put together this poll, even had the audacity to put Alfred and RPI in there...
http://www.afca.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=9300&ATCLID=204803233
Who ARE these guys?
QuoteTrinity (Conn.), 22; Trinity (Texas), 21;
Quote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation? No offense to the Bombers a program dlip respects but going by performance here in 09...****.
Quote from: 'gro on September 29, 2009, 07:53:57 PM
bunch of ignoramuses put together this poll, even had the audacity to put Alfred and RPI in there...
http://www.afca.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=9300&ATCLID=204803233
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 29, 2009, 08:19:46 PMQuote from: 'gro on September 29, 2009, 07:53:57 PM
bunch of ignoramuses put together this poll, even had the audacity to put Alfred and RPI in there...
http://www.afca.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=9300&ATCLID=204803233
Come on, everybody knows those hacks at the AFCA just crunch numbers without looking at statistically nuanced sophiticatia, which is why teams such as 4-0 Hartwick and 3-1 get so many votes on the AFCA poll.
Quote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them and that I was a ************ for even asking questions about the poll. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation???? No offense to the Bombers, a program dlip deeply respects, but going by performance here in 09...****.
Quote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 08:24:46 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them and that I was a ************ for even asking questions about the poll. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation???? No offense to the Bombers, a program dlip deeply respects, but going by performance here in 09...****.
You star out other words but write out ************?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:18:36 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation? No offense to the Bombers a program dlip respects but going by performance here in 09...****.
Hey they're 20 on this sites poll, which are usually much more informed and pretty good for the most part, other than the lazy pollsters who just pick popular names and teams in their conferences...and Trinity(Conn).
Quote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 08:24:46 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them and that I was a ************ for even asking questions about the poll. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation???? No offense to the Bombers, a program dlip deeply respects, but going by performance here in 09...****.
You star out other words but write out ************?
Quote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 08:24:46 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them and that I was a ************ for even asking questions about the poll. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation???? No offense to the Bombers, a program dlip deeply respects, but going by performance here in 09...****.
You star out other words but write out ************?
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009)( 4 ) | 4-0 | 93 | 2 | Open Date |
2 | Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009)( 4 ) | 3-0 | 90 | 3 | at #9 Albright |
3 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009)( 2 ) | 3-0 | 63 | T4 | vs. Rochester |
4 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) | 3-1 | 55 | T4 | at Hartwick |
5 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009) | 2-1 | 45 | 1 | at Buffalo State |
6 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) | 2-1 | 43 | 6 | at #10 Lebanon Valley |
7 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan%20&year=2009) | 2-1 | 38 | 8 | vs. Brockport State |
8 | TCNJ (http://www.d3football.com/school/TCNJ/2009) | 3-0 | 31 | NR | at Kean |
9 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2009) | 3-0 | 27 | NR | vs. #2 Wilkes |
10 | Lebanon Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Lebanon+Valley&year=2009) | 3-0 | 20 | NR | vs. #6 Delaware Valley |
Quote from: maxpower on September 29, 2009, 08:54:41 PM
Man, check out that voting distribution..... all over the map!
RPI: two #1 votes, two NRs
Fisher: hilarious. way to go, last guy.
IC, Cortland: No one knows what to think.
Rowan, TCNJ: People just guessing because no one's really paying attention.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
Quote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 09:02:50 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
I'm sure there is some reasoning. Let's see if that person wants to defend it. I definitely don't think they are playing favorites. As for RPI, I think it's fishy not to have them in the top 10.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 29, 2009, 09:10:06 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 09:02:50 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
I'm sure there is some reasoning. Let's see if that person wants to defend it. I definitely don't think they are playing favorites. As for RPI, I think it's fishy not to have them in the top 10.
Yea that was me.
But thats more me having an AFCA moment than thinking they deserve being #5. Then again, if they played Endicott and St. Lawrence (like Ithaca and RPI played), instead of Mt. Union and Salisbury, they would be an automatic 4-0 and where would people have them in this poll?
And again, I was being lazy when I put them there and dont want to pretend I am defending the pick, but in all seriousness, I dont think they are that far off from the rest of the top 10.
Quote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 09:18:24 PM
I was hoping for a better explanation :-[
Quote from: 'gro on September 29, 2009, 08:38:26 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 08:24:46 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them and that I was a ************ for even asking questions about the poll. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation???? No offense to the Bombers, a program dlip deeply respects, but going by performance here in 09...****.
You star out other words but write out ************?
Oh no, Dlip types everything without edits... for some reason csucker is allowed... probably because in a recent front page poll 78% of Union grads listed that as their occupation. HEY-OHHHH!!
Quote from: 'gro on September 29, 2009, 08:38:26 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 08:24:46 PMQuote from: dlippiel on September 29, 2009, 08:16:02 PM
Last year dlip e-mailed one of the guys who puts this poll together and asked him some serious questions regarding his rationales on poll placement and how exactly the poll is put together. His response was that I should call all the D3 coaches who put it together and question them and that I was a ************ for even asking questions about the poll. He made it out to be very reliable and appropriate. One question: Ithaca #19 in the nation???? No offense to the Bombers, a program dlip deeply respects, but going by performance here in 09...****.
You star out other words but write out ************?
Oh no, Dlip types everything without edits... for some reason csucker is allowed... probably because in a recent front page poll 78% of Union grads listed that as their occupation. HEY-OHHHH!!
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
Quote from: Union89 on September 29, 2009, 10:12:02 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
Agreed on all fronts....all the way to the point of Lebanon Valley out and Hartwick in at #10......All around, pretty well done this week boys.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 29, 2009, 09:10:06 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 09:02:50 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
I'm sure there is some reasoning. Let's see if that person wants to defend it. I definitely don't think they are playing favorites. As for RPI, I think it's fishy not to have them in the top 10.
Yea that was me.
But thats more me having an AFCA moment than thinking they deserve being #5. Then again, if they played Endicott and St. Lawrence (like Ithaca and RPI played), instead of Mt. Union and Salisbury, they would be an automatic 4-0 and where would people have them in this poll?
And again, I was being lazy when I put them there and dont want to pretend I am defending the pick, but in all seriousness, I dont think they are that far off from the rest of the top 10.
Quote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 10:13:57 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 29, 2009, 10:12:02 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
Agreed on all fronts....all the way to the point of Lebanon Valley out and Hartwick in at #10......All around, pretty well done this week boys.
The MAC teams should work each other out this week as Wilkes plays Albright and Del Val plays Leb Val
Quote from: maxpower on September 29, 2009, 08:54:41 PM
Man, check out that voting distribution..... all over the map!
RPI: two #1 votes, two NRs
Quote from: maxpower on September 29, 2009, 08:54:41 PM
Fisher: hilarious. way to go, last guy.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
Quote from: maxpower on September 29, 2009, 10:16:46 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 29, 2009, 10:13:57 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 29, 2009, 10:12:02 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 08:59:49 PM
I hit 9 of the top 10. My problem is that I don't think 4 MAC teams should be in the top 10. I just don't see it. But who do you leave out? Right now for me it's Lebanon Valley. But they snuck in there. I think Hartwick deserves just as much recognition as them.
And who the hell has Fisher at 5? Seriously? That voter should be banned because obviously they are picking favorites.
Agreed on all fronts....all the way to the point of Lebanon Valley out and Hartwick in at #10......All around, pretty well done this week boys.
The MAC teams should work each other out this week as Wilkes plays Albright and Del Val plays Leb Val
Battle of the Vals.....
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_3SN-z066kRU%2FSSlHWLCoDfI%2FAAAAAAAAAHc%2FsImQf4ET9uk%2Fs320%2Fclueless86.jpeg&hash=ec1df5b622ad710beeb5c00be88a36ac86819737)
Right, TGP??
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 01:29:16 PMIf Ithaca is expecting to come to oneonta this Saturday and just take a walk in the park they got another thing coming...Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
That was the funniest thing anyone's said about Hartwick since someone threw down the "Team Boltus" comment last season. +K.
Quote from: HHawks on September 30, 2009, 10:06:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 01:29:16 PMIf Ithaca is expecting to come to oneonta this Saturday and just take a walk in the park they got another thing coming...Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
That was the funniest thing anyone's said about Hartwick since someone threw down the "Team Boltus" comment last season. +K.
Quote from: HHawks on September 30, 2009, 10:06:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 01:29:16 PMIf Ithaca is expecting to come to oneonta this Saturday and just take a walk in the park they got another thing coming...Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
That was the funniest thing anyone's said about Hartwick since someone threw down the "Team Boltus" comment last season. +K.
Quote from: HHawks on September 30, 2009, 10:06:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 01:29:16 PMIf Ithaca is expecting to come to oneonta this Saturday and just take a walk in the park they got another thing coming...Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
That was the funniest thing anyone's said about Hartwick since someone threw down the "Team Boltus" comment last season. +K.
Quote from: HHawks on September 30, 2009, 10:06:16 PMthey got another thing coming...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 10:43:06 PMLast time I remember seeing Ithaca this confident they ended up leaving the cage with a LOSS...they better not underestimate Hartwick...This is a much better team than people think...Quote from: HHawks on September 30, 2009, 10:06:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 01:29:16 PMIf Ithaca is expecting to come to oneonta this Saturday and just take a walk in the park they got another thing coming...Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
That was the funniest thing anyone's said about Hartwick since someone threw down the "Team Boltus" comment last season. +K.
You're not playing Becker this week. It's easy to be confident when you play a bunch of nobodies and accumulate a meaningless 4-0. Let's see how you do when you're playing a team that can actually play football.
Quote from: HHawks on October 01, 2009, 12:27:03 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 10:43:06 PMLast time I remember seeing Ithaca this confident they ended up leaving the cage with a LOSS...they better not underestimate Hartwick...This is a much better team than people think...Quote from: HHawks on September 30, 2009, 10:06:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 01:29:16 PMIf Ithaca is expecting to come to oneonta this Saturday and just take a walk in the park they got another thing coming...Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
That was the funniest thing anyone's said about Hartwick since someone threw down the "Team Boltus" comment last season. +K.
You're not playing Becker this week. It's easy to be confident when you play a bunch of nobodies and accumulate a meaningless 4-0. Let's see how you do when you're playing a team that can actually play football.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 01, 2009, 07:02:21 AM
Hartwick plays a tough schedule. Who did they play again last week though?
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mundoplus.tv%2Fzonaseries%2Fimagenes%2Ffichas%2Fbecker.jpg&hash=eca99ca0d24a74f609208e287cc617998e5b6e7d)or(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joesportsfan.com%2Fmediaspace%2Fcommon%2Fpeople%2FbeekerMuppets.jpg&hash=b9666af210ef98fab5e1c1cd4fbd516e06b32caa)
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 01, 2009, 08:23:27 AM
Dlip,
We all know Hartwick's schedule has been poor, but I wouldn't throw Salve in the same category as WNEC. The year WNEC beat Hartwick they were downright terrible. Salve has put together a respectable team this year that might even challenge Plymouth St or Curry in the division. In hindsight, if Hartwick lost to Salve, which they should of, then the loss would of hurt, but my no means crippled their credibility like the WNEC loss did a few years ago. My point could become stronger if Salve beats Curry this weekend.
Quote from: Union89 on September 30, 2009, 10:17:16 PMQuote from: HHawks on September 30, 2009, 10:06:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2009, 01:29:16 PMIf Ithaca is expecting to come to oneonta this Saturday and just take a walk in the park they got another thing coming...Quote from: dlippiel on September 30, 2009, 07:04:34 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on September 29, 2009, 09:01:51 PM
And how can RPI not be ranked on the East Region top 10 right now at 3-0? I know people hate them and their schedule, but they finish in the top 10 in the region pretty much every year. Get with it!
By the way, dlip has not been all that impressed with IC in 09 but Wick wakes up from their happy time this weekend.
That was the funniest thing anyone's said about Hartwick since someone threw down the "Team Boltus" comment last season. +K.
They're brinin' Tinny Tim with 'em to, "Tiptoe throoooough the Tuliiiiiiiip's" in Oneonta........
Ithaca by 17.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 02, 2009, 12:17:27 PM
mewah is a park in oneonta...
and please--- the cage----god
give me a break--just an absolutely terrible place to watch a game.
dump
you figure with all that money on the hill- they would have a decent facility
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 02, 2009, 01:17:12 PM
did they put seating at that end of the field?
Granted i havent been there in 2 years-- just figured they would have a class facility.
room is at a premium up there- but cmon-- that seating was aweful.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 02, 2009, 01:17:12 PM
did they put seating at that end of the field?
Granted i havent been there in 2 years-- just figured they would have a class facility.
room is at a premium up there- but cmon-- that seating was aweful.
Quote from: maxpower on October 02, 2009, 01:58:50 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on October 02, 2009, 01:17:12 PM
did they put seating at that end of the field?
Granted i havent been there in 2 years-- just figured they would have a class facility.
room is at a premium up there- but cmon-- that seating was aweful.
FA, I think you have to start using caps, or maybe putting more than one sentence on a line. Your posts always sound like emo poetry.
Quote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Quote from: Union89 on October 02, 2009, 09:46:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Other side of the argument.............how about Kean being for real??
Quote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:49:00 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 02, 2009, 09:46:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Other side of the argument.............how about Kean being for real??
Yes I would buy that too.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 03, 2009, 12:48:24 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:49:00 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 02, 2009, 09:46:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Other side of the argument.............how about Kean being for real??
Yes I would buy that too.
There was also some talk about the voters who pickedTrenton St.TCNJ as #3 and #4, didn't have so much as a #10 vote for RPI.
I could buy Kean being for real. That might mean that Wesley is really real.
Quote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 03, 2009, 09:49:52 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Congrats to Kean on the impressive W. TCNJ was hard to read so dlip knows he was going by the high offensive numbers. Anyway great win for Kean and dlip eats a little crow on Saturday morning. ;D
Quote from: rams1102 on October 03, 2009, 02:02:53 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 03, 2009, 12:48:24 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:49:00 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 02, 2009, 09:46:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Other side of the argument.............how about Kean being for real??
Yes I would buy that too.
There was also some talk about the voters who pickedTrenton St.TCNJ as #3 and #4, didn't have so much as a #10 vote for RPI.
I could buy Kean being for real. That might mean that Wesley is really real.
The NJAC is a crap shoot. It makes for good talk, but until Montclair, Cortland, Rowan, TCNJ and Kean play each other anything can happen. If everyone else does what they have to, Kean has to be the top dog in the NJAC this weekend. Montclair and Rowan could get bit in the arse tomorrow if they don't pay attention. Thats why you gotta love the game. ;)
Quote from: dlippiel on October 03, 2009, 09:49:52 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 02, 2009, 09:43:36 PM
The first casualty of the weekend!
#8 TCNJ loses to Kean 28-7. There was a lot of talk about TCNJ being not as good as their record was. I guess it was true.
Congrats to Kean on the impressive W. TCNJ was hard to read so dlip knows he was going by the high offensive numbers. Anyway great win for Kean and dlip eats a little crow on Saturday morning. ;D
Quote from: pg04 on October 03, 2009, 03:37:09 PM
#3 RPI, loses at home to U of R 16-10.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 03, 2009, 03:51:24 PM
UofR did have 420 yards of offense, 41+ min TOP and Costa only had 21 yards rushing (granted UofR could've been keying on the run game, but McCarthy is supposed to be a legit receiving threat if he's in man coverage). It's also a home game against a 0-3 team (although a team that's played a very tough first three games in Case Western, SJF and Union). I thought the WPI win was a nice one, particularly because no one in the east has really had a good road win, but we don't know who WPI really is since their firsts three games were against a Hartwick-esque schedule, Utica just got blown up by Springfield (who was handled the week before by AU) and IC isn't blowing Hartwick away (so far). I guess the point is that yes, the starting QB is out, but we didn't really know much about RPI going into this game. Not to say RPI isn't in the mix or that they won't be a top team at the end of the year.
Right now I think you have to have AU, DelVal or Albright as #1. I'm not ready to declare Kean the top dog in the east and suspect that the NJAC is having as many problems as the LL and E8. For the LL, depending on what happens tonight at Union, next week will start to shake teams out in the LL, I think. If Palazzi is out for a while, SU is in trouble too, because the backup isn't at the same level (SU had two TD's against Bart and 7 pts in the second half basically on a big pass play to Ritter or Moran, I forget).
Quote from: dlippiel on October 03, 2009, 03:56:10 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 03, 2009, 03:51:24 PM
UofR did have 420 yards of offense, 41+ min TOP and Costa only had 21 yards rushing (granted UofR could've been keying on the run game, but McCarthy is supposed to be a legit receiving threat if he's in man coverage). It's also a home game against a 0-3 team (although a team that's played a very tough first three games in Case Western, SJF and Union). I thought the WPI win was a nice one, particularly because no one in the east has really had a good road win, but we don't know who WPI really is since their firsts three games were against a Hartwick-esque schedule, Utica just got blown up by Springfield (who was handled the week before by AU) and IC isn't blowing Hartwick away (so far). I guess the point is that yes, the starting QB is out, but we didn't really know much about RPI going into this game. Not to say RPI isn't in the mix or that they won't be a top team at the end of the year.
Right now I think you have to have AU, DelVal or Albright as #1. I'm not ready to declare Kean the top dog in the east and suspect that the NJAC is having as many problems as the LL and E8. For the LL, depending on what happens tonight at Union, next week will start to shake teams out in the LL, I think. If Palazzi is out for a while, SU is in trouble too, because the backup isn't at the same level (SU had two TD's against Bart and 7 pts in the second half basically on a big pass play to Ritter or Moran, I forget).
dlip will give Kean some love this week but looking at the top one has to consider Albright, Alfred, and Del Val. After this week dlip is think Rowan may be back high on his radar and remember Cortland has Smith back. Unless IC wakes up and blows out Wick dlip is still not going to be impressed with them. Also Springfield showed its true colors today against a good Utica team. dlip feels they **** the bed on D against Alfred but showed they are not to be taken lightly and are worthy of ERFP recognition.
Quote from: Union89 on October 03, 2009, 04:09:57 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 03, 2009, 03:56:10 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 03, 2009, 03:51:24 PM
UofR did have 420 yards of offense, 41+ min TOP and Costa only had 21 yards rushing (granted UofR could've been keying on the run game, but McCarthy is supposed to be a legit receiving threat if he's in man coverage). It's also a home game against a 0-3 team (although a team that's played a very tough first three games in Case Western, SJF and Union). I thought the WPI win was a nice one, particularly because no one in the east has really had a good road win, but we don't know who WPI really is since their firsts three games were against a Hartwick-esque schedule, Utica just got blown up by Springfield (who was handled the week before by AU) and IC isn't blowing Hartwick away (so far). I guess the point is that yes, the starting QB is out, but we didn't really know much about RPI going into this game. Not to say RPI isn't in the mix or that they won't be a top team at the end of the year.
Right now I think you have to have AU, DelVal or Albright as #1. I'm not ready to declare Kean the top dog in the east and suspect that the NJAC is having as many problems as the LL and E8. For the LL, depending on what happens tonight at Union, next week will start to shake teams out in the LL, I think. If Palazzi is out for a while, SU is in trouble too, because the backup isn't at the same level (SU had two TD's against Bart and 7 pts in the second half basically on a big pass play to Ritter or Moran, I forget).
dlip will give Kean some love this week but looking at the top one has to consider Albright, Alfred, and Del Val. After this week dlip is think Rowan may be back high on his radar and remember Cortland has Smith back. Unless IC wakes up and blows out Wick dlip is still not going to be impressed with them. Also Springfield showed its true colors today against a good Utica team. dlip feels they **** the bed on D against Alfred but showed they are not to be taken lightly and are worthy of ERFP recognition.
Honestly, what has either team (Springfield & Utica) done to warrant ANY respect?? Neither program has beaten a .500 team yet in '09. Springfield got mashed by another team (Alfred) which we still know little about.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 03, 2009, 04:17:52 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 03, 2009, 04:09:57 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 03, 2009, 03:56:10 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 03, 2009, 03:51:24 PM
UofR did have 420 yards of offense, 41+ min TOP and Costa only had 21 yards rushing (granted UofR could've been keying on the run game, but McCarthy is supposed to be a legit receiving threat if he's in man coverage). It's also a home game against a 0-3 team (although a team that's played a very tough first three games in Case Western, SJF and Union). I thought the WPI win was a nice one, particularly because no one in the east has really had a good road win, but we don't know who WPI really is since their firsts three games were against a Hartwick-esque schedule, Utica just got blown up by Springfield (who was handled the week before by AU) and IC isn't blowing Hartwick away (so far). I guess the point is that yes, the starting QB is out, but we didn't really know much about RPI going into this game. Not to say RPI isn't in the mix or that they won't be a top team at the end of the year.
Right now I think you have to have AU, DelVal or Albright as #1. I'm not ready to declare Kean the top dog in the east and suspect that the NJAC is having as many problems as the LL and E8. For the LL, depending on what happens tonight at Union, next week will start to shake teams out in the LL, I think. If Palazzi is out for a while, SU is in trouble too, because the backup isn't at the same level (SU had two TD's against Bart and 7 pts in the second half basically on a big pass play to Ritter or Moran, I forget).
dlip will give Kean some love this week but looking at the top one has to consider Albright, Alfred, and Del Val. After this week dlip is think Rowan may be back high on his radar and remember Cortland has Smith back. Unless IC wakes up and blows out Wick dlip is still not going to be impressed with them. Also Springfield showed its true colors today against a good Utica team. dlip feels they **** the bed on D against Alfred but showed they are not to be taken lightly and are worthy of ERFP recognition.
Honestly, what has either team (Springfield & Utica) done to warrant ANY respect?? Neither program has beaten a .500 team yet in '09. Springfield got mashed by another team (Alfred) which we still know little about.
dlip sees your point but Utica has played well against RPI (who is not a bad team), IC (who is still ranked #20 nationally and is not a bad team), and has shown glimpses of offensive improvement from previous years. With this said dlip does not feel Utica is in any way a top tier team, but a team that is decent and really middle of the road in the region right now. To dlip if Springfield got **** on today it would have answered all questions about the Pride. Yet the Pride handed Uticas ass to them, on the road, and won convinvingly, which tells dlip they are a team worthy of ERFP consideration. Plus that ****in offense can be nightmarish for teams and seems to be clicking on all cylinders in 09. Even in the loss to Alfred (who dlip feels is a top tier ER team this season) they put up 29 points.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 03, 2009, 06:31:46 PM
LD11 no longer has any ties in d3 football. If Union wins, I may put them at 1 in this weeks poll.
Quote from: Union89 on October 03, 2009, 06:52:46 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 03, 2009, 06:31:46 PM
LD11 no longer has any ties in d3 football. If Union wins, I may put them at 1 in this weeks poll.
I felt this way after the Union loss to Muhlenburg......you will feel a bit better around Wednesday.
Quote from: pg04 on October 03, 2009, 03:37:09 PM
#3 RPI, loses at home to U of R 16-10.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 03, 2009, 07:57:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 03, 2009, 03:37:09 PM
#3 RPI, loses at home to U of R 16-10.
Well hopefully now the RPI fans won't be so vocal about the "lack of respect" their team is getting this year.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 03, 2009, 09:56:52 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 03, 2009, 07:57:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 03, 2009, 03:37:09 PM
#3 RPI, loses at home to U of R 16-10.
Well hopefully now the RPI fans won't be so vocal about the "lack of respect" their team is getting this year.
Shut up loser. you suck too. Go Cortland.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 03, 2009, 07:57:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 03, 2009, 03:37:09 PM
#3 RPI, loses at home to U of R 16-10.
Well hopefully now the RPI fans won't be so vocal about the "lack of respect" their team is getting this year.
Quote from: 'gro on October 04, 2009, 09:51:44 AM
RPI:Searching for respect
is to
SJF:Yearns to be called a 'national power'
See ya in the ECAC's cardinal fans!
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 04, 2009, 04:35:21 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 03, 2009, 07:57:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 03, 2009, 03:37:09 PM
#3 RPI, loses at home to U of R 16-10.
Well hopefully now the RPI fans won't be so vocal about the "lack of respect" their team is getting this year.
Its funny how UR plays SJF tough every year....many posters point to the score as a potential sign of SJF weakness....then UR usually plays pretty decent in the LL....then they knock of RPI....then SJF gets ridiculed for RPI's loss to UR....Now that is some twisted logic LLPP style.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 07:06:58 PM
What about a CC champ coming here, especially if Dickinson goes undefeated? Could they slip in to a #1 seed in the east? That might be the best case scenario for the East?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 04, 2009, 07:42:01 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 07:06:58 PM
What about a CC champ coming here, especially if Dickinson goes undefeated? Could they slip in to a #1 seed in the east? That might be the best case scenario for the East?
I still like seeing Mt. Union in the east. Although eastern teams have not beaten Mt. Union yet, I think having them in the east gives eastern teams more of a chance to knock them off. I also think the east has done pretty well against them for the most part, especially seeing that the east has been considered "weak" the last 5 years or so. The only negative by having Mt. Union in the east is that the chance of seeing an east team in the Stagg Bowl is much lower.
But I could see Dickinson in the east. Or even a pool C bid from that conference as well.
Has anyone looked at Wesley's schedule? Very strange:
Christopher Newport • W, 34-0
Sep. 12 7:00 PM at North Greenville W, 28-3
Sep. 19 1:00 PM at Delaware Valley • W, 31-13
Sep. 26 1:00 PM at LaGrange • W, 56-7
Oct. 3 1:00 PM Frostburg State * • W, 44-19
Oct. 17 1:00 PM at Newport News *
Oct. 24 1:00 PM Webber Int'l
Oct. 31 1:00 PM Salisbury * •
Nov. 7 1:00 PM Lake Erie
Nov. 14 1:00 PM Ohio Dominican
What happens to those guys if they go undefeated? Only 6 d3 games on that schedule.
And I just did my top 10 teams in the east. Still early to say who the clear cut best teams are, but I think you can break them down into tiers and rank all the teams in each tier however you want.
tier 1
-Alfred
-Albright
-Del Val
tier 2
Entire LL except for St. Lawrence
Entire E8 except for Alfred
Entire MAC except for FDU and Kings
Kean
Cortland
Rowan
Montclair
TCNJ
tier 3
St. Lawrence
FDU
Kings
Brockport
Buff St.
Morrisville
West Conn
William Patterson
Id put all the NEFC teams in tier 3 for right now. Im sure 2-3 are tier 2 teams but we never know about those birds untill the end of the season.
And just by looking back, I think there is a much bigger gap between the second and third tier than there is between the first and second.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 07:06:58 PM
What about a CC champ coming here, especially if Dickinson goes undefeated? Could they slip in to a #1 seed in the east? That might be the best case scenario for the East?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 04, 2009, 08:47:05 PM
Yea I was kind of just sorting out the teams on paper as I thought out the top 10 teams in the east.
But there were a few things I thought out in my head:
-Union has to be ranked over Ithaca
-Rochester cannot be ranked with 3 losses
-SJF will be ranked over RPI with common opponent Rochester
-I have Alfred in that top tier now, only because they smoked Springfield who smoked Utica. Utica gave IC and RPI a good game.
-Hartwick may need to be in the playoff discussion
-NJAC teams have not really done anything except beat the crappy teams in the conference, and lost to the top teams once.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 06:15:10 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 04, 2009, 04:35:21 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 03, 2009, 07:57:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 03, 2009, 03:37:09 PM
#3 RPI, loses at home to U of R 16-10.
Well hopefully now the RPI fans won't be so vocal about the "lack of respect" their team is getting this year.
Its funny how UR plays SJF tough every year....many posters point to the score as a potential sign of SJF weakness....then UR usually plays pretty decent in the LL....then they knock of RPI....then SJF gets ridiculed for RPI's loss to UR....Now that is some twisted logic LLPP style.
Who is knocking "SJF" for RPI's loss to UofR?
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 05, 2009, 12:57:14 PM
nobody is more important than me :P
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 09:53:03 PM
Hopkins should be tough, I'm not convinced they will have problems with Muhlenburg. Grove City's put up a lot of pts this year (40 against CMU also) and based on the little I know F&M had brought back a lot of talent on O. I'm not saying they are a top 10 team or anything, but there's precedent with Muhlenburg being sent East in the past and you could have three undefeated teams in the south (MHB, Wesley and, potentially a CC school). If that's the case and you've got someone as close as MUC to move from that region and no one else in the North makes a more compelling case for a 1 seed, it might actually make sense to move one of the south undefeateds to reward going undefeated.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 05, 2009, 12:55:00 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 06:15:10 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 04, 2009, 04:35:21 PM
Its funny how UR plays SJF tough every year....many posters point to the score as a potential sign of SJF weakness....then UR usually plays pretty decent in the LL....then they knock of RPI....then SJF gets ridiculed for RPI's loss to UR....Now that is some twisted logic LLPP style.
Who is knocking "SJF" for RPI's loss to UofR?
Gro was....you rebuked him also.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 05, 2009, 01:43:42 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 05, 2009, 12:55:00 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 06:15:10 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 04, 2009, 04:35:21 PM
Its funny how UR plays SJF tough every year....many posters point to the score as a potential sign of SJF weakness....then UR usually plays pretty decent in the LL....then they knock of RPI....then SJF gets ridiculed for RPI's loss to UR....Now that is some twisted logic LLPP style.
Who is knocking "SJF" for RPI's loss to UofR?
Gro was....you rebuked him also.
And what is the relationship between Gro's comment and RPI's loss to U of R? Specifcally, what background information leads you to believe his comment is specific to RPI's loss and not any other exogenous events (specifically on this board, to which Booby clarified later and covered that).
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 05, 2009, 01:43:42 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 05, 2009, 12:55:00 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 04, 2009, 06:15:10 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 04, 2009, 04:35:21 PM
Its funny how UR plays SJF tough every year....many posters point to the score as a potential sign of SJF weakness....then UR usually plays pretty decent in the LL....then they knock of RPI....then SJF gets ridiculed for RPI's loss to UR....Now that is some twisted logic LLPP style.
Who is knocking "SJF" for RPI's loss to UofR?
Gro was....you rebuked him also.
And what is the relationship between Gro's comment and RPI's loss to U of R? Specifcally, what background information leads you to believe his comment is specific to RPI's loss and not any other exogenous events (specifically on this board, to which Booby clarified later and covered that).
Quote from: maxpower on October 04, 2009, 10:09:19 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 04, 2009, 08:47:05 PM
Yea I was kind of just sorting out the teams on paper as I thought out the top 10 teams in the east.
But there were a few things I thought out in my head:
-Union has to be ranked over Ithaca
-Rochester cannot be ranked with 3 losses
-SJF will be ranked over RPI with common opponent Rochester
-I have Alfred in that top tier now, only because they smoked Springfield who smoked Utica. Utica gave IC and RPI a good game.
-Hartwick may need to be in the playoff discussion
-NJAC teams have not really done anything except beat the crappy teams in the conference, and lost to the top teams once.
Why? They may have given ithaca a game, but everything else you say indicates Ithaca ain't that good....
Quote from: dlippiel on October 05, 2009, 03:51:59 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 04, 2009, 10:09:19 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 04, 2009, 08:47:05 PM
Yea I was kind of just sorting out the teams on paper as I thought out the top 10 teams in the east.
But there were a few things I thought out in my head:
-Union has to be ranked over Ithaca
-Rochester cannot be ranked with 3 losses
-SJF will be ranked over RPI with common opponent Rochester
-I have Alfred in that top tier now, only because they smoked Springfield who smoked Utica. Utica gave IC and RPI a good game.
-Hartwick may need to be in the playoff discussion
-NJAC teams have not really done anything except beat the crappy teams in the conference, and lost to the top teams once.
Why? They may have given ithaca a game, but everything else you say indicates Ithaca ain't that good....
Well first, Ithaca isn't that good but they are not that bad either.
Quote from: Upstate on October 05, 2009, 06:41:57 PM
Obviously the clear choice is Alfred...
I've never seen a poster so narcissistic, self centered and easily rattled as Pep...
obviously this is a joke, just like this current poll is
Quote from: dlippiel on October 05, 2009, 03:51:59 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 04, 2009, 10:09:19 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 04, 2009, 08:47:05 PM
Yea I was kind of just sorting out the teams on paper as I thought out the top 10 teams in the east.
But there were a few things I thought out in my head:
-Union has to be ranked over Ithaca
-Rochester cannot be ranked with 3 losses
-SJF will be ranked over RPI with common opponent Rochester
-I have Alfred in that top tier now, only because they smoked Springfield who smoked Utica. Utica gave IC and RPI a good game.
-Hartwick may need to be in the playoff discussion
-NJAC teams have not really done anything except beat the crappy teams in the conference, and lost to the top teams once.
Why? They may have given ithaca a game, but everything else you say indicates Ithaca ain't that good....
Well first, Ithaca isn't that good but they are not that bad either. When looking at Wick's schedule you have ABSOLUTELY nothing to gage them by because they play the likes of Pop Warner and Flag Football teams each year before going into E8 play. Hence the only gage any of us have for them is that they played a close, tough game with Ithaca, who, many of us know isn't all that good, but still is literally an E8 contender who D3.com has as # ****in 20 in their national poll. So If you mention Wick in any type of respect or light one must talk about the Ithaca game.
# | School (1st votes) | Record | Pts | Prev. | This Week |
1 | Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009) ( 9 ) | 4-0 | 97 | 1 | vs. Hartwick |
2 | Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) | 3-1 | 75 | 6 | vs. FDU-Florham |
3 | Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2009) ( 1 ) | 4-0 | 71 | 9 | at Lycoming |
4 | Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) | 4-1 | 62 | 4 | vs. St. John Fisher |
5 | Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2009) | 3-1 | 53 | NR | vs. Buffalo State |
6 | Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009) | 3-1 | 52 | 5 | at Montclair State |
7 | Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan%20&year=2009) | 3-1 | 49 | 7 | vs. Western Connecticut |
8 | Union (http://www.d3football.com/school/Union/2009) | 3-1 | 31 | NR | vs. Hobart |
9 | Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) | 3-1 | 25 | 2 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
10 | RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) | 3-1 | 15 | 3 | Open Date |
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 05, 2009, 09:01:43 PM
Am I counting right or do 3 people have Cortland ranked over Kean?
Quote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 08:32:16 PM>:(
East Region Fan Poll - Week 5 (10/5/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009) ( 9 ) 4-0 97 1vs. Hartwick 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) 3-1 75 6vs. FDU-Florham 3 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2009) ( 1 ) 4-0 71 9at Lycoming 4 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 4-1 62 4vs. St. John Fisher 5 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2009) 3-1 53 NRvs. Buffalo State 6 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009) 3-1 52 5at Montclair State 7 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan%20&year=2009) 3-1 49 7vs. Western Connecticut 8 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school/Union/2009) 3-1 31 NRvs. Hobart 9 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 3-1 25 2vs. Lebanon Valley 10 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 3-1 15 3Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Springfield 9
Hartwick 4
Hobart 3
TCNJ 2
St. John Fisher 2
Dropping out: #8 TCNJ, #10 Lebanon Valley
Voting Breakdown
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,4,1,1,1,1,)
Delaware Valley (3,2,3,4,4,5,3,5,3,3,)
Albright (2,8,2,2,5,1,2,2,6,9,)
Ithaca (8,5,6,7,3,2,7,4,2,4,)
Kean (9,7,4,6,6,3,4,3,4,NR,)
Cortland State (5,3,8,8,7,6,5,7,7,2,)
Rowan (4,4,NR,3,2,7,6,NR,8,5,)
Union (7,10,5,5,NR,8,NR,6,5,NR,)
Wilkes (6,9,NR,9,8,10,8,8,9,7,)
RPI (10,6,10,10,10,NR,NR,NR,10,6,)
Springfield (NR,NR,7,NR,9,9,10,NR,NR,NR,)
Hartwick (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,10,NR,10,)
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,8,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,)
St. John Fisher (NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#4 Ithaca vs. St. John Fisher
#6 Cortland State @ Montclair State
#1 Alfred vs. Hartwick
#3 Albright @ Lycoming
Quote from: RJ on October 05, 2009, 10:04:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 08:32:16 PM>:(
East Region Fan Poll - Week 5 (10/5/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009) ( 9 ) 4-0 97 1vs. Hartwick 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) 3-1 75 6vs. FDU-Florham 3 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2009) ( 1 ) 4-0 71 9at Lycoming 4 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 4-1 62 4vs. St. John Fisher 5 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2009) 3-1 53 NRvs. Buffalo State 6 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009) 3-1 52 5at Montclair State 7 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan%20&year=2009) 3-1 49 7vs. Western Connecticut 8 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school/Union/2009) 3-1 31 NRvs. Hobart 9 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 3-1 25 2vs. Lebanon Valley 10 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 3-1 15 3Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Springfield 9
Hartwick 4
Hobart 3
TCNJ 2
St. John Fisher 2
Dropping out: #8 TCNJ, #10 Lebanon Valley
Voting Breakdown
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,4,1,1,1,1,)
Delaware Valley (3,2,3,4,4,5,3,5,3,3,)
Albright (2,8,2,2,5,1,2,2,6,9,)
Ithaca (8,5,6,7,3,2,7,4,2,4,)
Kean (9,7,4,6,6,3,4,3,4,NR,)
Cortland State (5,3,8,8,7,6,5,7,7,2,)
Rowan (4,4,NR,3,2,7,6,NR,8,5,)
Union (7,10,5,5,NR,8,NR,6,5,NR,)
Wilkes (6,9,NR,9,8,10,8,8,9,7,)
RPI (10,6,10,10,10,NR,NR,NR,10,6,)
Springfield (NR,NR,7,NR,9,9,10,NR,NR,NR,)
Hartwick (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,10,NR,10,)
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,8,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,)
St. John Fisher (NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#4 Ithaca vs. St. John Fisher
#6 Cortland State @ Montclair State
#1 Alfred vs. Hartwick
#3 Albright @ Lycoming
How can Alfred be #1 with this SOS sof afr this year ...
Sep. 5 12:00 PM at Mass-Dartmouth • W, 35-6 0-5
Sep. 12 1:00 PM at FDU-Florham • W, 33-28 1-3
Sep. 19 1:00 PM St. Lawrence • W, 38-16 2-3
Sep. 26 1:00 PM Springfield * • W, 49-28 3-1
weak ????
Quote from: Union89 on October 05, 2009, 10:07:30 PM
I found the final pollster quite entertaining:
#9 Albright beat # 7 Wilkes (43-21).........this week, mind you
Unranked Kean beat # 2 Cortland St. (24-10)
Unranked Union beat #4 Ithaca (24-21)
The rankings are this particular Pollsters seedings.
I can see this happening once in your Poll, but why volunteer for this if you don't care about the process??
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 05, 2009, 10:09:43 PM
I still have Cortland above Kean. Yes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher. Cortland has also been a proven contender and is still pretty strong. Kean has started out strong before and proven to be a tease. Basically I gave Cortland the benefit of doubt so far.
Quote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 10:10:30 PMAnd whoever put the smarta$$ 6th choice in the poll, there are more than 10 fans in the eastern region, I'd like to know what everyone thinks.Quote from: Union89 on October 05, 2009, 10:07:30 PM
I found the final pollster quite entertaining:
#9 Albright beat # 7 Wilkes (43-21).........this week, mind you
Unranked Kean beat # 2 Cortland St. (24-10)
Unranked Union beat #4 Ithaca (24-21)
The rankings are this particular Pollsters seedings.
I can see this happening once in your Poll, but why volunteer for this if you don't care about the process??
All I'm going to say to avoid any drama is, I agree.
Quote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 10:10:30 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 05, 2009, 10:07:30 PM
I found the final pollster quite entertaining:
#9 Albright beat # 7 Wilkes (43-21).........this week, mind you
Unranked Kean beat # 2 Cortland St. (24-10)
Unranked Union beat #4 Ithaca (24-21)
The rankings are this particular Pollsters seedings.
I can see this happening once in your Poll, but why volunteer for this if you don't care about the process??
All I'm going to say to avoid any drama is, I agree.
Quote from: Union89 on October 05, 2009, 10:15:40 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 10:10:30 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 05, 2009, 10:07:30 PM
I found the final pollster quite entertaining:
#9 Albright beat # 7 Wilkes (43-21).........this week, mind you
Unranked Kean beat # 2 Cortland St. (24-10)
Unranked Union beat #4 Ithaca (24-21)
The rankings are this particular Pollsters seedings.
I can see this happening once in your Poll, but why volunteer for this if you don't care about the process??
All I'm going to say to avoid any drama is, I agree.
IMO, you have a Poll like this for debate and discussion.........should not be drama.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 05, 2009, 10:09:43 PM
I still have Cortland above Kean. Yes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher. Cortland has also been a proven contender and is still pretty strong. Kean has started out strong before and proven to be a tease. Basically I gave Cortland the benefit of doubt so far.
Quote from: Upstate on October 05, 2009, 06:41:57 PM
Obviously the clear choice is Alfred...
I've never seen a poster so narcissistic, self centered and easily rattled as Pep...
obviously this is a joke, just like this current poll is
Quote from: RJ on October 05, 2009, 10:04:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 08:32:16 PM>:(
East Region Fan Poll - Week 5 (10/5/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009) ( 9 ) 4-0 97 1vs. Hartwick 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) 3-1 75 6vs. FDU-Florham 3 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2009) ( 1 ) 4-0 71 9at Lycoming 4 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 4-1 62 4vs. St. John Fisher 5 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2009) 3-1 53 NRvs. Buffalo State 6 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009) 3-1 52 5at Montclair State 7 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan%20&year=2009) 3-1 49 7vs. Western Connecticut 8 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school/Union/2009) 3-1 31 NRvs. Hobart 9 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 3-1 25 2vs. Lebanon Valley 10 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 3-1 15 3Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Springfield 9
Hartwick 4
Hobart 3
TCNJ 2
St. John Fisher 2
Dropping out: #8 TCNJ, #10 Lebanon Valley
Voting Breakdown
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,4,1,1,1,1,)
Delaware Valley (3,2,3,4,4,5,3,5,3,3,)
Albright (2,8,2,2,5,1,2,2,6,9,)
Ithaca (8,5,6,7,3,2,7,4,2,4,)
Kean (9,7,4,6,6,3,4,3,4,NR,)
Cortland State (5,3,8,8,7,6,5,7,7,2,)
Rowan (4,4,NR,3,2,7,6,NR,8,5,)
Union (7,10,5,5,NR,8,NR,6,5,NR,)
Wilkes (6,9,NR,9,8,10,8,8,9,7,)
RPI (10,6,10,10,10,NR,NR,NR,10,6,)
Springfield (NR,NR,7,NR,9,9,10,NR,NR,NR,)
Hartwick (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,10,NR,10,)
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,8,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,)
St. John Fisher (NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#4 Ithaca vs. St. John Fisher
#6 Cortland State @ Montclair State
#1 Alfred vs. Hartwick
#3 Albright @ Lycoming
How can Alfred be #1 with this SOS sof afr this year ...
Sep. 5 12:00 PM at Mass-Dartmouth • W, 35-6 0-5
Sep. 12 1:00 PM at FDU-Florham • W, 33-28 1-3
Sep. 19 1:00 PM St. Lawrence • W, 38-16 2-3
Sep. 26 1:00 PM Springfield * • W, 49-28 3-1
weak ????
Quote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 10:06:44 PMQuote from: RJ on October 05, 2009, 10:04:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 08:32:16 PM>:(
East Region Fan Poll - Week 5 (10/5/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009) ( 9 ) 4-0 97 1vs. Hartwick 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) 3-1 75 6vs. FDU-Florham 3 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2009) ( 1 ) 4-0 71 9at Lycoming 4 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 4-1 62 4vs. St. John Fisher 5 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2009) 3-1 53 NRvs. Buffalo State 6 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009) 3-1 52 5at Montclair State 7 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan%20&year=2009) 3-1 49 7vs. Western Connecticut 8 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school/Union/2009) 3-1 31 NRvs. Hobart 9 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 3-1 25 2vs. Lebanon Valley 10 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 3-1 15 3Open Date
Others Receiving votes:
Springfield 9
Hartwick 4
Hobart 3
TCNJ 2
St. John Fisher 2
Dropping out: #8 TCNJ, #10 Lebanon Valley
Voting Breakdown
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,4,1,1,1,1,)
Delaware Valley (3,2,3,4,4,5,3,5,3,3,)
Albright (2,8,2,2,5,1,2,2,6,9,)
Ithaca (8,5,6,7,3,2,7,4,2,4,)
Kean (9,7,4,6,6,3,4,3,4,NR,)
Cortland State (5,3,8,8,7,6,5,7,7,2,)
Rowan (4,4,NR,3,2,7,6,NR,8,5,)
Union (7,10,5,5,NR,8,NR,6,5,NR,)
Wilkes (6,9,NR,9,8,10,8,8,9,7,)
RPI (10,6,10,10,10,NR,NR,NR,10,6,)
Springfield (NR,NR,7,NR,9,9,10,NR,NR,NR,)
Hartwick (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,10,NR,10,)
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,8,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,)
St. John Fisher (NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Key Regional Games This Week:
#4 Ithaca vs. St. John Fisher
#6 Cortland State @ Montclair State
#1 Alfred vs. Hartwick
#3 Albright @ Lycoming
How can Alfred be #1 with this SOS sof afr this year ...
Sep. 5 12:00 PM at Mass-Dartmouth • W, 35-6 0-5
Sep. 12 1:00 PM at FDU-Florham • W, 33-28 1-3
Sep. 19 1:00 PM St. Lawrence • W, 38-16 2-3
Sep. 26 1:00 PM Springfield * • W, 49-28 3-1
weak ????
Name a team outside of Albright that should be number 1?
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 05, 2009, 10:44:34 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 05, 2009, 10:09:43 PM
I still have Cortland above Kean. Yes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher. Cortland has also been a proven contender and is still pretty strong. Kean has started out strong before and proven to be a tease. Basically I gave Cortland the benefit of doubt so far.
You gave Cortland the benefit of what doubt, relative to 3-1 Kean? Kean beat Cortland head-to-head. There is no doubting that. Kean's only loss is to 3-1 Del Val, whose only loss is to unbeaten Wesley.
I don't understand poll voter psychology.
QuoteI don't understand poll voter psychology.
QuoteYes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher.
QuoteI have had Alfred #1 from week 1, simply because they had the most coming back from a good team in the E8 last year. So I ranked them ahead of Ithaca, who isn't that much worse than Union.
I also rank the E8 and LL higher than the NJAC and MAC slightly going into the season.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 06, 2009, 08:19:10 AM
Pep wants to know why St. Lawrence isn't getting any votes in this poll. After all, the Saints, according to this "Transitive Property Weekly Poll," are better than Tim Tebow and the Florida Gators. Granted, it's from 2008, but Pep thinks this proves that most any arguments about polls can be supported with "facts." Here's the proof:
http://www.myteamisbetterthanyourteam.com/default.asp?winner=St+Lawrence&loser=Florida&year=2008&method=2
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 08:31:57 AM
dlip also has Alfred #1, not from the beginning, but for awhile now. Schedule can't be everything especially when a team has skill players that performed well against solid competition the previous year. Alfred sports a very good Qb surrounded by some talented players and a decent defense. So far in 09 it is quite difficult to have a clear #1, hence dlip clearly understands the debate about a couple others (1 or 2) possibly being number 1 as well. Remember it is still early in 09 and there is a lot more football to come that will tell us a lot about the teams many of us feel are the front runners as of now. dlip feels though to say that Alfred is not one of the top choices for the #1 spot right now is not valid when comparing them (not just their 09 schedule thus far) to other top possibilities. Kean still needs to show dlip more, Albright and Del Val are right there (remember Del Vals only L isto a ****in nasty Wesley team #5 nationally) we haven't seen Rowans best yet, Union needs to win on Saturday to show dlip Mulhenburg was a total fluke loss. There is just so much out there to consider. Overall dlip feels the poll is coming out O.K.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 05, 2009, 02:27:22 PM
Oh boy...I had typed that "you took my post too seriously" in my original reply....but removed it...suffice it to say, I shoulda left it in.
What da hell does your post say? Cmon....I was just bustin balls about Gro's comment....and you go freakin analytical on me. Here is some k....lighten up.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 08:13:16 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 05, 2009, 10:44:34 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 05, 2009, 10:09:43 PM
I still have Cortland above Kean. Yes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher. Cortland has also been a proven contender and is still pretty strong. Kean has started out strong before and proven to be a tease. Basically I gave Cortland the benefit of doubt so far.
You gave Cortland the benefit of what doubt, relative to 3-1 Kean? Kean beat Cortland head-to-head. There is no doubting that. Kean's only loss is to 3-1 Del Val, whose only loss is to unbeaten Wesley.
I don't understand poll voter psychology.
Thought:QuoteI don't understand poll voter psychology.
Answer:QuoteYes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher.
dlip does, and this was his reasoning as well ;). KS is right on.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 09:42:47 AM
Kean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beatTrenton St.TCNJ?
QuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 10:36:13 AM
Dlip, ignore RS he likes to start this ****, he thinks everything is cut and dried like a basic engineering problem, he does not give any credit to intangibles. I sent in my poll, I have my rankings and if he doesn't like it KS really does not give a ****.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 06, 2009, 09:21:51 AM
BTW, PG, I'm surprised you didn't include the Hobart-Union game as a key matchup. Bart's got a vote, though maybe they shouldn't (the SU loss may look worse down the road, but bear in mind Bart knocked out SU's starting QB who's been the difference - last year teams could stop Paveletz), but if they win plus a win against a CMU team that's 4-1 (4-0 not coutning the Hobart matchup) they should be in the top ten and the LL is totally open. In fact, if you don't have a dog in the hunt this week or at a different time, I would suggest people tune in. No matter the outcome, the history (both long term and short term including ruining Bart's otherwise undefeated season last year at home) and the meaning of the game I think means this will be a bloodfest. There was some hitting last year when it wasn't as significant with Union having losses to UofR and WPI, so I'm thinking you'll see some nastiness, which is always intersting. If Bart loses you'll probably not hear from them again in 2009.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 05, 2009, 10:44:34 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 05, 2009, 10:09:43 PM
I still have Cortland above Kean. Yes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher. Cortland has also been a proven contender and is still pretty strong. Kean has started out strong before and proven to be a tease. Basically I gave Cortland the benefit of doubt so far.
You gave Cortland the benefit of what doubt, relative to 3-1 Kean? Kean beat Cortland head-to-head. There is no doubting that. Kean's only loss is to 3-1 Del Val, whose only loss is to unbeaten Wesley.
I don't understand poll voter psychology.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 06, 2009, 12:34:58 PM
Ithaca did not attempt to run the ball outside against Union. Therefore, they were without their outside run game. Therefore, Ithaca is better than Union.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 06, 2009, 01:00:38 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
pbr agrees w/ KS...it aint easy that is why everyone is seeing so much debate. stick to your guns you voted that was for a reason so stay w/ it. its actually good to see how everyone ranks teams and what weightings/reasons they give for a teams rankings. gives much more transparency.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 01:04:51 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
I think the key though is the teams records. In this case...the Kean/Cortland State arguement...if both teams have the same record, I don't know how you could with the team that lost the H2H match up. If Cortland was say...6-1, and Kean was 3-3, then of course you would go with CS. But to simply say they had a player out doesn't make sense...especially when you argue that Kean wasn't ranked high in "previous" polls...who cares...we are only in Week #4.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 01:04:51 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
I think the key though is the teams records. In this case...the Kean/Cortland State arguement...if both teams have the same record, I don't know how you could with the team that lost the H2H match up. If Cortland was say...6-1, and Kean was 3-3, then of course you would go with CS. But to simply say they had a player out doesn't make sense...especially when you argue that Kean wasn't ranked high in "previous" polls...who cares...we are only in Week #4.
A: KS cares and it is week 5 plus a preseason so this is my sixth poll and previous rankings matter.
B: If only records mattered I would have Framingham St and other NEFC teams at the top of my poll.
C: You don't throw out everything based on one game, this a cumulative process and Kean has to earn a higher spot. My top 5 teams have been fairly consistant with their performances and that is why they are the top 5. Kean is moving up, but has to prove more to KS.
D: KS has previously stated that he is tougher when ranking the NJ teams to avoid any bias. They are held to a higher standard because KS is more familiar with them and probably reads more about them than other teams.
E: As KS father used to say, Don't like it, too damn bad.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 01:29:08 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 01:04:51 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
I think the key though is the teams records. In this case...the Kean/Cortland State arguement...if both teams have the same record, I don't know how you could with the team that lost the H2H match up. If Cortland was say...6-1, and Kean was 3-3, then of course you would go with CS. But to simply say they had a player out doesn't make sense...especially when you argue that Kean wasn't ranked high in "previous" polls...who cares...we are only in Week #4.
A: KS cares and it is week 5 plus a preseason so this is my sixth poll and previous rankings matter.
B: If only records mattered I would have Framingham St and other NEFC teams at the top of my poll.
C: You don't throw out everything based on one game, this a cumulative process and Kean has to earn a higher spot. My top 5 teams have been fairly consistant with their performances and that is why they are the top 5. Kean is moving up, but has to prove more to KS.
D: KS has previously stated that he is tougher when ranking the NJ teams to avoid any bias. They are held to a higher standard because KS is more familiar with them and probably reads more about them than other teams.
E: As KS father used to say, Don't like it, too damn bad.
Easy KS...this is why drinking isn't promoted before noon...I don't care who you pick...you could have Norwich ranked number one an I wouldn't care. I was just arguing why Team-A who has the same record of Team-B and beat Team-B head to head (and at Team-B's home field) should be ranked higher.
I am not even a Kean fan...but if you are going to argue that they beat CS without their best player...you could argue that Kean beat CS without their best player in Jason Gwaltney.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 06, 2009, 12:34:58 PM
Ithaca did not attempt to run the ball outside against Union. Therefore, they were without their outside run game. Therefore, Ithaca is better than Union.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 06, 2009, 12:40:44 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 05, 2009, 10:44:34 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 05, 2009, 10:09:43 PM
I still have Cortland above Kean. Yes Kean beat Cortland but that was the first week w/out Pitcher. Cortland has also been a proven contender and is still pretty strong. Kean has started out strong before and proven to be a tease. Basically I gave Cortland the benefit of doubt so far.
You gave Cortland the benefit of what doubt, relative to 3-1 Kean? Kean beat Cortland head-to-head. There is no doubting that. Kean's only loss is to 3-1 Del Val, whose only loss is to unbeaten Wesley.
I don't understand poll voter psychology.
And Fisher's only losses are to God and a good Salisbury team on the road whose only losses are to Christopher Newport in 3 ot and a higher division team in Carolina......this 'he' beat him, and him beat her, so we beat them next logic doesnt work and you know that....
Having not read the poll comments I ranked Cortland ahead of Kean as well knowing the head to head result. Isnt it possible for the better team to lose?
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 01:04:51 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
I think the key though is the teams records. In this case...the Kean/Cortland State arguement...if both teams have the same record, I don't know how you could with the team that lost the H2H match up. If Cortland was say...6-1, and Kean was 3-3, then of course you would go with CS. But to simply say they had a player out doesn't make sense...especially when you argue that Kean wasn't ranked high in "previous" polls...who cares...we are only in Week #4.
A: KS cares and it is week 5 plus a preseason so this is my sixth poll and previous rankings matter.
B: If only records mattered I would have Framingham St and other NEFC teams at the top of my poll.
C: You don't throw out everything based on one game, this a cumulative process and Kean has to earn a higher spot. My top 5 teams have been fairly consistant with their performances and that is why they are the top 5. Kean is moving up, but has to prove more to KS.
D: KS has previously stated that he is tougher when ranking the NJ teams to avoid any bias. They are held to a higher standard because KS is more familiar with them and probably reads more about them than other teams.
E: As KS father used to say, Don't like it, too damn bad.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 02:16:32 PM
dlip thinks this is a very cool ****in discussion and still agrees with KS but from other posts sees both sides. dlip just feels a pollster must take into account as much information that is relavant to each teams W's and L's as possible. Seeing here that some of us come up with our polls using lots of criteria and looking deep into everything that is happening makes dlip feel very proud to be a part of this poll with everyone here. dlip honestly uses this poll as THE East region poll even ingnoring d3's rankings some times because he feels here we have so many knowledgeable passionate people working really hard to produce the most accurate reflection fo our region. ****, great discussion here
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 06, 2009, 02:29:00 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
why albright ahead of dvc?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:36:01 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 06, 2009, 02:29:00 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
why albright ahead of dvc?
I had Albright at 9 last week and Wilkes ranked at 3. I feel like a blowout win over Wilkes gave them more quality wins than Delaware Valley.
I had Kean at 11 last week, so I think at this point, the Albright win over Wilkes impressed me more than the Del Valley win over Kean. For crying out loud, they are at 2 and 3. It's not like I have 1 of them at 10 and the other at 2. Time will tell with those 2.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 06, 2009, 02:45:31 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:36:01 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 06, 2009, 02:29:00 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
why albright ahead of dvc?
I had Albright at 9 last week and Wilkes ranked at 3. I feel like a blowout win over Wilkes gave them more quality wins than Delaware Valley.
I had Kean at 11 last week, so I think at this point, the Albright win over Wilkes impressed me more than the Del Valley win over Kean. For crying out loud, they are at 2 and 3. It's not like I have 1 of them at 10 and the other at 2. Time will tell with those 2.
BOL! LD didnt notice the sarcasm in pbr's post...just bustin' your stones...he he he said stones...
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 02:22:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 02:16:32 PM
dlip thinks this is a very cool ****in discussion and still agrees with KS but from other posts sees both sides. dlip just feels a pollster must take into account as much information that is relavant to each teams W's and L's as possible. Seeing here that some of us come up with our polls using lots of criteria and looking deep into everything that is happening makes dlip feel very proud to be a part of this poll with everyone here. dlip honestly uses this poll as THE East region poll even ingnoring d3's rankings some times because he feels here we have so many knowledgeable passionate people working really hard to produce the most accurate reflection fo our region. ****, great discussion here
It lets you know that people are interested and take it relatively seriously.
I think that is a good thing.....all pollsters should continue to do what they think is right in their own minds. I just don't understand why some get so defensive when someone asks for reasoning.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beatTrenton St.TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 02:56:14 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
OK, I'll wade into this pizz warm water....looks solid all around except....
You already know where I'm going.....why 4 E8's and zero LL's? I can understand your poll through the Top 8....I would have Union at 8 or 9, but can understand even Hartwick at 9, BUT how can you put Springfield at 10 over Union or even RPI for that matter?
Quote from: Doid23 on October 06, 2009, 03:17:12 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 02:56:14 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
OK, I'll wade into this pizz warm water....looks solid all around except....
You already know where I'm going.....why 4 E8's and zero LL's? I can understand your poll through the Top 8....I would have Union at 8 or 9, but can understand even Hartwick at 9, BUT how can you put Springfield at 10 over Union or even RPI for that matter?
You understand Hartwick? Really? They don't have a "good" win, and they lost to a team the Union beat. I guess a "good loss" beats a very good win? Union's loss to the Mules is why they are in the 8,9,10, HM range, but no way should they be behind Hartwick.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 03:30:26 PMQuote from: Doid23 on October 06, 2009, 03:17:12 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 02:56:14 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
OK, I'll wade into this pizz warm water....looks solid all around except....
You already know where I'm going.....why 4 E8's and zero LL's? I can understand your poll through the Top 8....I would have Union at 8 or 9, but can understand even Hartwick at 9, BUT how can you put Springfield at 10 over Union or even RPI for that matter?
You understand Hartwick? Really? They don't have a "good" win, and they lost to a team the Union beat. I guess a "good loss" beats a very good win? Union's loss to the Mules is why they are in the 8,9,10, HM range, but no way should they be behind Hartwick.
Bottom line is I didn't count how many teams there were from each conference. It's not a charity game here to make sure everyone gets a piece of the pie.
My thoughts are that the Union loss to 1-3 Muhlenburg looks almost as bad as RPI's loss to 1-3 Rochester. Muhlenburg is usually better, but so far this season, the losses are similar. Union is knocking on the door, but at this point, Springfield's win over Utica 43-16, makes a bigger statement than their blowout loss to Alfred who I have at 1. RPI AND Ithaca struggled with Utica and Springfield blew them out.
YES, Ithaca lost to Union. I know this, BUT their schedule so far has been a little tougher than Union's overall, and Union limped by Rochester and WPI. They were wins, but not extremely convincing. Right now, RPI and Union aren't looking that different except for Union's 1 quality win, 1 horrible loss, and RPI's 0 quality wins, and 1 even more horrible loss.
At this rate, the LL looks pitiful to me. I didn't even realize that I didn't have an LL team in there, but right now, who deserves it? If Union beats Hobart, then they might get a crack, but Hobart seems kinda sucky too.
The LL winner this year could be 6-3 on the season.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 06, 2009, 03:37:46 PM
OK, but my point was about Hartwick. When isa good loss and no good wins better than Union beating the team Hartwick lost to?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 03:30:26 PM
YES, Ithaca lost to Union. I know this, BUT their schedule so far has been a little tougher than Union's overall, and Union limped by Rochester and WPI. They were wins, but not extremely convincing. Right now, RPI and Union aren't looking that different except for Union's 1 quality win, 1 horrible loss, and RPI's 0 quality wins, and 1 even more horrible loss.
At this rate, the LL looks pitiful to me. I didn't even realize that I didn't have an LL team in there, but right now, who deserves it? If Union beats Hobart, then they might get a crack, but Hobart seems kinda sucky too.
The LL winner this year could be 6-3 on the season.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 06, 2009, 03:50:33 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 03:30:26 PM
YES, Ithaca lost to Union. I know this, BUT their schedule so far has been a little tougher than Union's overall, and Union limped by Rochester and WPI. They were wins, but not extremely convincing. Right now, RPI and Union aren't looking that different except for Union's 1 quality win, 1 horrible loss, and RPI's 0 quality wins, and 1 even more horrible loss.
At this rate, the LL looks pitiful to me. I didn't even realize that I didn't have an LL team in there, but right now, who deserves it? If Union beats Hobart, then they might get a crack, but Hobart seems kinda sucky too.
The LL winner this year could be 6-3 on the season.
This sadly is true compared with most of this decade. My question is this, where does Hobart fit in right now? The Dickinson loss was atrocious as was SU (the injury to Palazzi in that game could end up helping Hobart later in the season though - like last year the Union loss didn't have an impact on the LL outcome) mainly because of bad playcalling and a QB figuring out how to play on the job. That being said, CMU is 4-0 outside of the Hobart game, 4-1 overall. Question is, if they beat Union do they shoot up the ranks into the top 10?
Quote from: pg04 on October 05, 2009, 08:32:16 PM
East Region Fan Poll - Week 5 (10/5/09)
# School (1st votes) Record Pts Prev. This Week 1 Alfred (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Alfred&year=2009) ( 9 ) 4-0 97 1vs. Hartwick 2 Delaware Valley (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Delaware+Valley&year=2009) 3-1 75 6vs. FDU-Florham 3 Albright (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Albright&year=2009) ( 1 ) 4-0 71 9at Lycoming 4 Ithaca (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Ithaca&year=2009) 4-1 62 4vs. St. John Fisher 5 Kean (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Kean&year=2009) 3-1 53 NRvs. Buffalo State 6 Cortland State (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Cortland+State&year=2009) 3-1 52 5at Montclair State 7 Rowan (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Rowan%20&year=2009) 3-1 49 7vs. Western Connecticut 8 Union (http://www.d3football.com/school/Union/2009) 3-1 31 NRvs. Hobart 9 Wilkes (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=Wilkes&year=2009) 3-1 25 2vs. Lebanon Valley 10 RPI (http://www.d3football.com/school_info.php?school=RPI&year=2009) 3-1 15 3Open Date
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 03:42:51 PMQuote from: Doid23 on October 06, 2009, 03:37:46 PM
OK, but my point was about Hartwick. When isa good loss and no good wins better than Union beating the team Hartwick lost to?
Well, we're kind of kicking mud around here. We're talking about 9 and 10 in Week 5. As the season goes on, and more games get played, we'll see where everyone stands. At this point, that is my Top 10, and i'm sticking to it. A close Hartwick loss to a 4-1 Ithaca hurts them less than a 10 point loss to a 1-3 Muhlenburg in my eyes. I am not playing ANY favorites. It pains me to see Hartwick there especially since i'm a Union fan now. Just where I thought they stand at this point in the season.
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 02:22:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 02:16:32 PM
dlip thinks this is a very cool ****in discussion and still agrees with KS but from other posts sees both sides. dlip just feels a pollster must take into account as much information that is relavant to each teams W's and L's as possible. Seeing here that some of us come up with our polls using lots of criteria and looking deep into everything that is happening makes dlip feel very proud to be a part of this poll with everyone here. dlip honestly uses this poll as THE East region poll even ingnoring d3's rankings some times because he feels here we have so many knowledgeable passionate people working really hard to produce the most accurate reflection fo our region. ****, great discussion here
It lets you know that people are interested and take it relatively seriously.
I think that is a good thing.....all pollsters should continue to do what they think is right in their own minds. I just don't understand why some get so defensive when someone asks for reasoning.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 06, 2009, 03:17:12 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 02:56:14 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
I won't hide behind my poll..hehe...
1. Alfred
2. Albright
3. Delaware Valley
4. Kean
5. Cortland
6. Rowan
7. Ithaca
8. Wilkes
9. Hartwick
10. Springfield
I actually have put a lot of thought into it each week and will be happy to defend any rankings.
OK, I'll wade into this pizz warm water....looks solid all around except....
You already know where I'm going.....why 4 E8's and zero LL's? I can understand your poll through the Top 8....I would have Union at 8 or 9, but can understand even Hartwick at 9, BUT how can you put Springfield at 10 over Union or even RPI for that matter?
You understand Hartwick? Really? They don't have a "good" win, and they lost to a team the Union beat. I guess a "good loss" beats a very good win? Union's loss to the Mules is why they are in the 8,9,10, HM range, but no way should they be behind Hartwick.
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 06, 2009, 12:42:15 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
this is good debate stuff.... just to play devils advocate here...what about settling it on the field rather than the polls? bottom line is kean beat them on the field and injuries are part of the game. what if cortlands qb rather than getting hurt had a bad game and throws 5 ints? what if weather was a factor? what would u do then? there are lots of ifs/ands/buts...to pbr if cortland is a good team they overcome injuries. i.e. see florida w/ tebow out they won last weekend and may have to play lsu this weekend w/o him.
pbr is just sayin.... guess the question is yes cortland lost a good player but they still settled it on the field so how much weight does a pollster give to not having a good player? imho chances are you would see a lot of different weightings by different pollsters and what your seeing right here now
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 03:57:02 PM
Personally for me no. I just can't justify the Sasquatch loss. Kinda like i can't justify RPI losing to Rochester. Both teams would need to win out in my eyes.
Quote from: Upstate on October 06, 2009, 05:35:05 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Either does losing to UR but I still have RPI in my top 10 (at number 10)...
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:47:47 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2009, 05:35:05 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Either does losing to UR but I still have RPI in my top 10 (at number 10)...
Which is a worse loss:
- 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10;
- 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7;
- 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21: or
- 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3?
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:47:47 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2009, 05:35:05 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Either does losing to UR but I still have RPI in my top 10 (at number 10)...
Which is a worse loss:
- 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10;
- 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7;
- 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21: or
- 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 05:55:53 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:47:47 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2009, 05:35:05 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Either does losing to UR but I still have RPI in my top 10 (at number 10)...
Which is a worse loss:
- 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10;
- 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7;
- 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21: or
- 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3?
I dont think this is much of a question. I would say 'What are the losses ranked?'(1 being the worst)
1. 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10; [/li][/list]
2. 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7
3. 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3
4. 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 06:04:27 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 05:55:53 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:47:47 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2009, 05:35:05 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Either does losing to UR but I still have RPI in my top 10 (at number 10)...
Which is a worse loss:
- 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10;
- 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7;
- 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21: or
- 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3?
I dont think this is much of a question. I would say 'What are the losses ranked?'(1 being the worst)
1. 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10; [/li][/list]
2. 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7
3. 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3
4. 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21
I kind of agree with LD. Looking at worst loss is just a part of the overall picture.
Quote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 06:04:27 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 05:55:53 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:47:47 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2009, 05:35:05 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Either does losing to UR but I still have RPI in my top 10 (at number 10)...
Which is a worse loss:
- 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10;
- 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7;
- 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21: or
- 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3?
I would say 'What are the losses ranked?'(1 being the worst)
1. 3-1 RPI losing at home to (now) 1-3 UofR by a score of 16-10;
2. 3-1 Union losing at (now) 1-3 Muhlenberg by a score of 17-7
3. 1-3 Muhlenberg losing at (now) 1-4 Gettysburg by a score of 20-3
4. 3-1 Ithaca losing at (now) 3-1 Union by a score of 24-21
I kind of agree with LD. Looking at worst loss is just a part of the overall picture.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 05:23:53 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 06, 2009, 05:02:20 PM
Win's over Fitchburg St., Kings & Utica coupled with a MonkeyStomping at the hands of Alfred do not warrant Top 10 consideration IMO.
Plus Muhlenburg 'aint that bad....
Opened the season with 14-12 loss to Wilkes.
Gettysburg is a bad loss.
Hopkins is 4-1 with their only loss in the season opener to Delaware Valley.
Wilkes, Union & Hopkins in 3 of first 4 games.....quite a gauntlet.
Ill just put Plymouth St in next week.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:37:07 PM
A poll should "accurately" predict the outcome of a hypothetical game between differently ranked opponents,
- despite the outcome of an actual contest between those same differently ranked opponents;
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 06:13:38 PM
To RPI's benefit, they can still win the LL, make the NCAA's and lose in the first round, OR
go 6-3 or 7-2, go to the ECACs, and beat Salve Regina.
Ho-hum...heard this all before.
Quote from: maxpower on October 06, 2009, 07:43:28 PM
Also sorry I missed a great discussion.... I think this post was the best:Quote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:37:07 PM
A poll should "accurately" predict the outcome of a hypothetical game between differently ranked opponents,
- despite the outcome of an actual contest between those same differently ranked opponents;
The rest of it was sarcastic, but this is a great litmus. To use Cortland and Kean as an example, a poll might be a conglomerate of opinions about whether the game was a fluke.
Sorry for the rambling....
Quote from: 'gro on October 06, 2009, 07:56:07 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 06:13:38 PM
To RPI's benefit, they can still win the LL, make the NCAA's and lose in the first round, OR
go 6-3 or 7-2, go to the ECACs, and beat Salve Regina.
Ho-hum...heard this all before.
Oh you went there. I must say the playoff loss to TCNJ (at home) was a huge blow to the program. I'll give them a pass for the Rowan game in 99 and that's it. The other 2 first round exits are just embarrassing.
On the flip side, I must be the only one that thinks that ECAC wins matter. RPI has beaten some previously "Good" teams in the ECAC's, most of them on the road.
So to recap
NCAA's - lose at home
ECAC's - win on the road
Quote from: 'gro on October 06, 2009, 07:56:07 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 06, 2009, 06:13:38 PM
To RPI's benefit, they can still win the LL, make the NCAA's and lose in the first round, OR
go 6-3 or 7-2, go to the ECACs, and beat Salve Regina.
Ho-hum...heard this all before.
Oh you went there. I must say the playoff loss to TCNJ (at home) was a huge blow to the program. I'll give them a pass for the Rowan game in 99 and that's it. The other 2 first round exits are just embarrassing.
On the flip side, I must be the only one that thinks that ECAC wins matter. RPI has beaten some previously "Good" teams in the ECAC's, most of them on the road.
So to recap
NCAA's - lose at home
ECAC's - win on the road
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 08:06:46 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 06, 2009, 07:43:28 PM
Also sorry I missed a great discussion.... I think this post was the best:Quote from: redswarm81 on October 06, 2009, 05:37:07 PM
A poll should "accurately" predict the outcome of a hypothetical game between differently ranked opponents,
- despite the outcome of an actual contest between those same differently ranked opponents;
The rest of it was sarcastic, but this is a great litmus. To use Cortland and Kean as an example, a poll might be a conglomerate of opinions about whether the game was a fluke.
Sorry for the rambling....
Actually, the quoted part was supposed to be sarcastic too.
The term "accurately" was intended in jest, since (e.g., in the case of Kean-Cortland) the "accurately" predicted outcome is the opposite of the actual outcome. I don't know how to define the word "accurately" so that it makes any sense in that formulation.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 01:29:08 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 01:20:52 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 01:04:51 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2009, 12:50:47 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 12:31:29 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2009, 12:17:30 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Not sure I agree with the arguement that head to head match ups only matters if you beat someone with all of the players. A win is a win...everyone goes through injuries. As bad as Wick's defense was last year in the Brockport game...Wick doesn't get a pass simply because Tomaino and the starting ILB and FS were all out by the second series of the first quarter.
If I came on here and argued that it didn't really matter because we put up 68 points...and that the 70 points shouldn't count as we had "guys out", I would get destroyed...and rightfully so. I believe we would have won the game going away if everyone was healthy and playing all 4 quarters...and that we would have given up far fewer points as we obviously weren't that deep. But the problem is they weren't in the game...and we gave up 70. Injuries are part of the game...and head to head match ups should count above and beyond everything else.
Again, it is not that the W does not ****in count, dlip does not recall KS, dlip, or anyone else saying that. When you are ranking teams you are reviewing SOS, W's and L's, as well as any other factors that have to do with a teams performance, and/or lack there of. All dlip is saying (maybe KS too, dlip does not want to speak for him) is that if a key player, or players miss a game you MUST take that into account not only regarding that teams performance but also in weighing the W by the oppoisng team. dlip is baffled that this seems to be a hard ****ing concept for others to understand. If you simply rank teams by W's and L's and nothing else you are missing the bus. **** an NEFC team may be in the top five then of national polls.
KS agrees with Dlipp regarding a key player missing a game. Yes head to head matters but is not the only criteria, if it was the poll would change completely almost every week and we would basically be using the Poll that Pep linked to. KS also did not hit Rowan as hard for their loss to Cortland because Rowans starting QB was out that game. With him KS thinks Rowan may be the best team in the NJAC. Also KS did not have Kean in his top ten last week and Cortland was still high in the rankings, I am not going to drop a team down far enough to put a previously unranked team ahead based on a head to head victory two or three weeks before. Kean got in because of the way they shut down the TCNJ offense last week, they were KS number 13 team previously. This is the same reason Albright did not leap way up in the rankings.
Finally, plenty of people criticizing, but how many are taking the time to do a poll weekly? KS wl always come on and defend his rankings and say where KS ranked teams. This weeks poll shows KS picks in the second column.
I think the key though is the teams records. In this case...the Kean/Cortland State arguement...if both teams have the same record, I don't know how you could with the team that lost the H2H match up. If Cortland was say...6-1, and Kean was 3-3, then of course you would go with CS. But to simply say they had a player out doesn't make sense...especially when you argue that Kean wasn't ranked high in "previous" polls...who cares...we are only in Week #4.
A: KS cares and it is week 5 plus a preseason so this is my sixth poll and previous rankings matter.
B: If only records mattered I would have Framingham St and other NEFC teams at the top of my poll.
C: You don't throw out everything based on one game, this a cumulative process and Kean has to earn a higher spot. My top 5 teams have been fairly consistant with their performances and that is why they are the top 5. Kean is moving up, but has to prove more to KS.
D: KS has previously stated that he is tougher when ranking the NJ teams to avoid any bias. They are held to a higher standard because KS is more familiar with them and probably reads more about them than other teams.
E: As KS father used to say, Don't like it, too damn bad.
Easy KS...this is why drinking isn't promoted before noon...I don't care who you pick...you could have Norwich ranked number one an I wouldn't care. I was just arguing why Team-A who has the same record of Team-B and beat Team-B head to head (and at Team-B's home field) should be ranked higher.
I am not even a Kean fan...but if you are going to argue that they beat CS without their best player...you could argue that Kean beat CS without their best player in Jason Gwaltney.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
Quote from: NJACRules on October 07, 2009, 07:48:26 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
I was at the Rowan Cortland State Game and Pitcher was the difference in that game. Cortland State kept getting into 3rd and long situations and Pitcher kept making plays to get the first down. He is a terrific player and he will be missed by Cortland. Pitcher not playing in the Kean game had to have made a big difference in the outcome of that game. By pointing this out I am not taking anything away from Kean's win. What I would like to point out is that Rowan played Cortland without their starting Quarterback and that also made a huge difference in that game. If Rowan's QB had played in that game the result would have been different.
Quote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
Quote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:45:16 PMDamn right the argument is silly. But if you are going to make that argument be fair about it. Do not take away from Kean's win because Cortland's quarterback did not play while not recognizing that Cortland's win came against a Rowan team without their quarterback.Quote from: NJACRules on October 07, 2009, 07:48:26 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 06, 2009, 10:31:35 AMQuoteKean didn't really beat Cortland, in other words. Did Kean really beat Trenton St. TCNJ?
Kean did beat Cortland, but they beat Cortland without their best ****in player. That means something and should be accounted for regarding a teams actual strength vs their strength without their star player. Maybe dlip took it into consideration too much, point taken, but it deserved consideration none the less. And if one feels a team is at the same strength when they are playing without their star player than they are not dipping both ****in oars into the water when trying to paddle up stream. Hence if one were to say Rochester is clearly a better overall team than RPI without Herman, dlip would agree because that was taken care of on the field. Yet, if you came to dlip and said Rochester would have still won even if RPI had Herman, one could disagree, because they haven't beaten RPI when Herman (a 3 time LL rookie of the week) was playing. So dlip feels injuries and missing players must be accounted for, especially when those players are returning to the line-up that same year.
I was at the Rowan Cortland State Game and Pitcher was the difference in that game. Cortland State kept getting into 3rd and long situations and Pitcher kept making plays to get the first down. He is a terrific player and he will be missed by Cortland. Pitcher not playing in the Kean game had to have made a big difference in the outcome of that game. By pointing this out I am not taking anything away from Kean's win. What I would like to point out is that Rowan played Cortland without their starting Quarterback and that also made a huge difference in that game. If Rowan's QB had played in that game the result would have been different.
Not trying to be argumentative here but, Union lost 5......FIVE starters in the Muhlenburg game......3 possibly for the season, the other 2 for multiple weeks. If Union loses a game they should drop with no regard for the injured.....the team needs to overcome.
This is 11 man football...........not tennis or golf......damn it, this argument is silly.
Quote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:45:16 PM
Not trying to be argumentative here but, Union lost 5......FIVE starters in the Muhlenburg game......3 possibly for the season, the other 2 for multiple weeks. If Union loses a game they should drop with no regard for the injured.....the team needs to overcome.
This is 11 man football...........not tennis or golf......damn it, this argument is silly.
Quote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 08, 2009, 08:18:43 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
Say South Carolina beats the Florida Gators, does SC then jump higher than Florida due to the head to head matchup or does Florida drop but still remain ranked higher? I may have Cortland ahead of Kean but Cortland was my 1 at the time, they dropped down and have since moved back up. I don't think Kean is a better team at this time, they need to prove themselves. Couple of more good wins against top NJAC teams and they will have proven themselves.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 08:30:51 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 08, 2009, 08:18:43 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
Say South Carolina beats the Florida Gators, does SC then jump higher than Florida due to the head to head matchup or does Florida drop but still remain ranked higher? I may have Cortland ahead of Kean but Cortland was my 1 at the time, they dropped down and have since moved back up. I don't think Kean is a better team at this time, they need to prove themselves. Couple of more good wins against top NJAC teams and they will have proven themselves.
Yea good point, although I think Cortland needs to prove themselves as well. I think Kean beating those other NJAC teams and only losing to Del Val shows me that they deserve a higher ranking than Cortland.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
Quote from: 'gro on October 08, 2009, 08:39:22 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
no seriously, who is this tebow character you speak of? Never heard of him.
Quote from: 'gro on October 08, 2009, 08:39:22 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
no seriously, who is this tebow character you speak of? Never heard of him.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 08, 2009, 10:14:37 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 08, 2009, 08:39:22 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
no seriously, who is this tebow character you speak of? Never heard of him.
well according to espn "tim tebow is able to walk on water and part the red sea..." espn now reporting he is working on something called the big bang...
seriously can espn do any more to promote tebow? its almost like tebow has pictures of them all w/ farm animals...
Quote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 08, 2009, 10:30:29 AM
Here is a picture of former Dawson's Creek star James Vanderbeek playing Tim Tebow in Varsity Blues. Few people know that Tebow actually wrote the script to that movie years ago, and has been practicing his '30 minutes for 30 years' speech since he was in the womb.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 08, 2009, 10:30:29 AM
QuoteThe whipped cream bikini seen is based on actual events. Only Tim Tebow could turn something like this down. He WAS conceived by a virgin after all...
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 08, 2009, 08:18:43 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
Say South Carolina beats the Florida Gators, does SC then jump higher than Florida due to the head to head matchup or does Florida drop but still remain ranked higher? I may have Cortland ahead of Kean but Cortland was my 1 at the time, they dropped down and have since moved back up. I don't think Kean is a better team at this time, they need to prove themselves. Couple of more good wins against top NJAC teams and they will have proven themselves.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 08, 2009, 12:12:41 PMThe ****in kid can't throw the ball longer than 20 yards.
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 01:11:38 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 08, 2009, 12:12:41 PMThe ****in kid can't throw the ball longer than 20 yards.
Really? He already has TD passes of 68, 38, and 44 this season .
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 08, 2009, 11:03:35 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 08, 2009, 10:30:29 AM
Here is a picture of former Dawson's Creek star James Vanderbeek playing Tim Tebow in Varsity Blues. Few people know that Tebow actually wrote the script to that movie years ago, and has been practicing his '30 minutes for 30 years' speech since he was in the womb.
+K... SF was wondering if he was the only one who noticed that...
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 08, 2009, 01:06:31 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 08, 2009, 08:18:43 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AMQuote from: 'gro on October 07, 2009, 10:09:03 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2009, 09:49:48 PM
Florida losses this week to LSU without Tebow............do they drop??
Hell yes they drop....and they should.
what's a tebow?
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
Say South Carolina beats the Florida Gators, does SC then jump higher than Florida due to the head to head matchup or does Florida drop but still remain ranked higher? I may have Cortland ahead of Kean but Cortland was my 1 at the time, they dropped down and have since moved back up. I don't think Kean is a better team at this time, they need to prove themselves. Couple of more good wins against top NJAC teams and they will have proven themselves.
Good point. Kean needs to prove themselves. They need to prove that they can beat Cortland St. . . . by a couple of touchdowns, maybe. . . . at Cortland, to boot. Until they do that, there's no way anyone could figure Kean's a better team than Cortland St.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 01:25:31 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 01:11:38 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 08, 2009, 12:12:41 PMThe ****in kid can't throw the ball longer than 20 yards.
Really? He already has TD passes of 68, 38, and 44 this season .
All screen passes.
Im joking of course, but we did talk about this 2 years ago when we were arguing who was a better college QB, Matt Ryan or Tim Tebow. I saw a lot of Matt Ryan, and could see that his 15-30 out passes were some of the best passes I have ever seen at the college level (granted I haven't seen too much college football live.) But my season tickets were in the upper endzone where you can really see what a great QB can do.
Tebow is going to need to throw those 15-25 yard out patterns if he is going to make it at the next level. I haven't really noticed if he can make those throws or not.
You go to those games Jose, how does he compare to Stafford or other great SEC qbs you have seen? (Jamarcus Russell excluded for obvious reasons)
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 02:08:14 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 01:25:31 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 01:11:38 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 08, 2009, 12:12:41 PMThe ****in kid can't throw the ball longer than 20 yards.
Really? He already has TD passes of 68, 38, and 44 this season .
All screen passes.
Im joking of course, but we did talk about this 2 years ago when we were arguing who was a better college QB, Matt Ryan or Tim Tebow. I saw a lot of Matt Ryan, and could see that his 15-30 out passes were some of the best passes I have ever seen at the college level (granted I haven't seen too much college football live.) But my season tickets were in the upper endzone where you can really see what a great QB can do.
Tebow is going to need to throw those 15-25 yard out patterns if he is going to make it at the next level. I haven't really noticed if he can make those throws or not.
You go to those games Jose, how does he compare to Stafford or other great SEC qbs you have seen? (Jamarcus Russell excluded for obvious reasons)
I think Tebow's arm strength is underrated because of all the other praise that gets dumped on him. Based on the games I have seen, he has as good or better arm strength than alomst every other SEC quarterback in recent memory accept for Stafford. (Side note, at Florida-Georgia two years ago, Stafford threw three amazing deep balls off his back foot while being smoked by Brandon Spikes. His TE dropped all three. Crazy.) Urb's offense makes it a little difficult to gague Tebow's arm strength but, you have to see them live to realize how wide they line up and how quick he gets the ball all the way to the far sideline.
I think he has three potential problems as a NFL QB:
1) His release. He has great arm strength but it takes a long time for the damn thing to come out. Kind of like Russell. The deception of the offense holds the defensive players' reaction times an extra beat which erases the problems caused by Timmy's long delivery. Obviously, that won't be the case in the NFL.
2) Though it uses some funky formations and some different motion, Urb's offense is remarkably simple by all accounts. I am not sure Tebow has been required to make the kind of reads and decisions a NFL offense wil require him to make. Look how Alex Smith struggled after thriving under Urb.
3) Tebow has bad pocket presence, in part because he loves to run so damn much. Also, as that blindside hit makes clear, he often has no idea where the pressure is coming from and if you can somehow keep him in the pocket, you can sack him. This is sort of related to #2.
I still think he will be the best pro quarterback ever to come out of Florida but, that really isn't much of an honor at this point. I guess the current leader would have to either be John Reaves or Shane Matthews. I suppose you could also throw Rex Grossman into the mix since he made it to a Super Bowl.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 08, 2009, 01:59:59 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 08, 2009, 01:06:31 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 08, 2009, 08:18:43 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 06:55:00 AM
Sometimes its not the question on whether or not a team should drop in the rankings if a key player is injured, but it is how you might rank them once that player comes back at the end of the season. For instance, what if Florida loses to LSU 14-10 without Tebow. Then runs the table and goes 11-1 and blows out everyone else while LSU goes 11-1 and squeaks by all the teams Florida blows out, and loses to a team that Florida blows out. Then you might rank Florida over LSU at the end of the season, since Florida is a better team with Tebow than without him.
Its science.
Say South Carolina beats the Florida Gators, does SC then jump higher than Florida due to the head to head matchup or does Florida drop but still remain ranked higher? I may have Cortland ahead of Kean but Cortland was my 1 at the time, they dropped down and have since moved back up. I don't think Kean is a better team at this time, they need to prove themselves. Couple of more good wins against top NJAC teams and they will have proven themselves.
Good point. Kean needs to prove themselves. They need to prove that they can beat Cortland St. . . . by a couple of touchdowns, maybe. . . . at Cortland, to boot. Until they do that, there's no way anyone could figure Kean's a better team than Cortland St.
sarcasm aside, you clearly agree with KS's post then because you didnt answer his simple analogy of SC-FL. Kean is SC and Cortland is FL.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 08, 2009, 02:22:06 PMThe release and pocket presence were two critiques of Elway when he was coming out, but everything else made up for them and coaching fixed the problems.
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 02:08:14 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 01:25:31 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 01:11:38 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 08, 2009, 12:12:41 PMThe ****in kid can't throw the ball longer than 20 yards.
Really? He already has TD passes of 68, 38, and 44 this season .
All screen passes.
Im joking of course, but we did talk about this 2 years ago when we were arguing who was a better college QB, Matt Ryan or Tim Tebow. I saw a lot of Matt Ryan, and could see that his 15-30 out passes were some of the best passes I have ever seen at the college level (granted I haven't seen too much college football live.) But my season tickets were in the upper endzone where you can really see what a great QB can do.
Tebow is going to need to throw those 15-25 yard out patterns if he is going to make it at the next level. I haven't really noticed if he can make those throws or not.
You go to those games Jose, how does he compare to Stafford or other great SEC qbs you have seen? (Jamarcus Russell excluded for obvious reasons)
I think Tebow's arm strength is underrated because of all the other praise that gets dumped on him. Based on the games I have seen, he has as good or better arm strength than alomst every other SEC quarterback in recent memory accept for Stafford. (Side note, at Florida-Georgia two years ago, Stafford threw three amazing deep balls off his back foot while being smoked by Brandon Spikes. His TE dropped all three. Crazy.) Urb's offense makes it a little difficult to gague Tebow's arm strength but, you have to see them live to realize how wide they line up and how quick he gets the ball all the way to the far sideline.
I think he has three potential problems as a NFL QB:
1) His release. He has great arm strength but it takes a long time for the damn thing to come out. Kind of like Russell. The deception of the offense holds the defensive players' reaction times an extra beat which erases the problems caused by Timmy's long delivery. Obviously, that won't be the case in the NFL.
2) Though it uses some funky formations and some different motion, Urb's offense is remarkably simple by all accounts. I am not sure Tebow has been required to make the kind of reads and decisions a NFL offense wil require him to make. Look how Alex Smith struggled after thriving under Urb.
3) Tebow has bad pocket presence, in part because he loves to run so damn much. Also, as that blindside hit makes clear, he often has no idea where the pressure is coming from and if you can somehow keep him in the pocket, you can sack him. This is sort of related to #2.
I still think he will be the best pro quarterback ever to come out of Florida but, that really isn't much of an honor at this point. I guess the current leader would have to either be John Reaves or Shane Matthews. I suppose you could also throw Rex Grossman into the mix since he made it to a Super Bowl.
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 02:21:15 PM
OLine moved the protection to the right. The end was supposed to be left unblocked and picked up by someone from the strong side. Tebow was supposed to slide with the protection then decide whether to throw to a receiver in the flat on the strong side or pull it down and run back into the blitz. They run that play all the time but, apparently, the TE looked like he was going to slip free over the middle so he froze for a second and got clobbered.
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 03:26:10 PM
Why not? Just because he is also a good runner?
If the Jags don't pick Tebow I think the team most likely to take him is your beloved Pats Lew. Will you change your tune then?
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 01:11:38 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 08, 2009, 12:12:41 PMThe ****in kid can't throw the ball longer than 20 yards.
Really? He already has TD passes of 68, 38, and 44 this season .
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 02:08:14 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 08, 2009, 01:25:31 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on October 08, 2009, 01:11:38 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 08, 2009, 12:12:41 PMThe ****in kid can't throw the ball longer than 20 yards.
Really? He already has TD passes of 68, 38, and 44 this season .
All screen passes.
Im joking of course, but we did talk about this 2 years ago when we were arguing who was a better college QB, Matt Ryan or Tim Tebow. I saw a lot of Matt Ryan, and could see that his 15-30 out passes were some of the best passes I have ever seen at the college level (granted I haven't seen too much college football live.) But my season tickets were in the upper endzone where you can really see what a great QB can do.
Tebow is going to need to throw those 15-25 yard out patterns if he is going to make it at the next level. I haven't really noticed if he can make those throws or not.
You go to those games Jose, how does he compare to Stafford or other great SEC qbs you have seen? (Jamarcus Russell excluded for obvious reasons)
I think Tebow's arm strength is underrated because of all the other praise that gets dumped on him. Based on the games I have seen, he has as good or better arm strength than alomst every other SEC quarterback in recent memory accept for Stafford. (Side note, at Florida-Georgia two years ago, Stafford threw three amazing deep balls off his back foot while being smoked by Brandon Spikes. His TE dropped all three. Crazy.) Urb's offense makes it a little difficult to gague Tebow's arm strength but, you have to see them live to realize how wide they line up and how quick he gets the ball all the way to the far sideline.
I think he has three potential problems as a NFL QB:
1) His release. He has great arm strength but it takes a long time for the damn thing to come out. Kind of like Russell. The deception of the offense holds the defensive players' reaction times an extra beat which erases the problems caused by Timmy's long delivery. Obviously, that won't be the case in the NFL.
2) Though it uses some funky formations and some different motion, Urb's offense is remarkably simple by all accounts. I am not sure Tebow has been required to make the kind of reads and decisions a NFL offense wil require him to make. Look how Alex Smith struggled after thriving under Urb.
3) Tebow has bad pocket presence, in part because he loves to run so damn much. Also, as that blindside hit makes clear, he often has no idea where the pressure is coming from and if you can somehow keep him in the pocket, you can sack him. This is sort of related to #2.
I still think he will be the best pro quarterback ever to come out of Florida but, that really isn't much of an honor at this point. I guess the current leader would have to either be John Reaves or Shane Matthews. I suppose you could also throw Rex Grossman into the mix since he made it to a Super Bowl.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2009, 09:58:54 AM
I'm thinking Montclair is going to beat Cortland this weekend and just to make a total mess of our polls once again.
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 09, 2009, 11:34:09 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2009, 09:58:54 AM
I'm thinking Montclair is going to beat Cortland this weekend and just to make a total mess of our polls once again.
does Tebow play for Montclair or Cortland?? SF can't remember...
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2009, 09:58:54 AM
I'm thinking Montclair is going to beat Cortland this weekend and just to make a total mess of our polls once again.
Quote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
Quote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
Quote from: rams1102 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:16 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
As an independent observer :
#1 Alfred
#2 Kean
#3 Rowan
#4 Albright
#5 Del Val
#6 Union
#7 Fisher
#8 TCNJ
#9 Leb Val
Then it's anyones guess.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:08 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
Why RPI out? Because Sasquatch beat Rochacha?
Where's your Kean (who didn't really beat Cortland St., and who really really didn't beatTrenton St.TCNJ)?
Did anyone else notice that FDU-Florham gave Delaware Valley a good fight for a half?
I've said it before, but Albright is scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.cleveland.com%2Frealtimenews%2F2008%2F09%2Flarge_madeleine-albright.jpg&hash=b64e2e729e381012705b692c6e47716a29708b4b) Really scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.moonbattery.com%2Fmadeleine-albright.jpg&hash=0ba5bb197a2af716f1f9b9ffef440b3e60b94f66)
Quote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:35:54 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:08 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
Why RPI out? Because Sasquatch beat Rochacha?
Where's your Kean (who didn't really beat Cortland St., and who really really didn't beatTrenton St.TCNJ)?
Did anyone else notice that FDU-Florham gave Delaware Valley a good fight for a half?
I've said it before, but Albright is scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.cleveland.com%2Frealtimenews%2F2008%2F09%2Flarge_madeleine-albright.jpg&hash=b64e2e729e381012705b692c6e47716a29708b4b) Really scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.moonbattery.com%2Fmadeleine-albright.jpg&hash=0ba5bb197a2af716f1f9b9ffef440b3e60b94f66)
RPI's out because the LL is a mess right now and Union has the better resume with wins over IC and Hobart (in other words, didn't lose to UR)...
Kean I have at #5...
Also I have Rowan at #2...
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 10, 2009, 09:23:27 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:35:54 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:08 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
Why RPI out? Because Sasquatch beat Rochacha?
Where's your Kean (who didn't really beat Cortland St., and who really really didn't beatTrenton St.TCNJ)?
Did anyone else notice that FDU-Florham gave Delaware Valley a good fight for a half?
I've said it before, but Albright is scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.cleveland.com%2Frealtimenews%2F2008%2F09%2Flarge_madeleine-albright.jpg&hash=b64e2e729e381012705b692c6e47716a29708b4b) Really scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.moonbattery.com%2Fmadeleine-albright.jpg&hash=0ba5bb197a2af716f1f9b9ffef440b3e60b94f66)
RPI's out because the LL is a mess right now and Union has the better resume with wins over IC and Hobart (in other words, didn't lose to UR)...
Kean I have at #5...
Also I have Rowan at #2...
LL is indeed a mess right now.
But look at the last 3 weeks of the NJAC season for Kean, Rowan, Montclair St., andTrenton St.TCNJ:
Oct. 31
1:00 PM New Jersey Cortland State
1:00 PM Rowan Kean
6:00 PM Western Connecticut Montclair State
Nov. 7
12:00 PM Western Connecticut New Jersey
1:00 PM Kean William Paterson
1:00 PM Montclair State Rowan
Nov. 14
1:00 PM Kean Montclair State
1:00 PM New Jersey Rowan
I'd forgotten how the entire NJAC can be like a bunch of crazy Russians in the Pine Barrens (~1:30+) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guBnSe-ponQ&feature=related).
Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 09:51:33 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 10, 2009, 09:23:27 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:35:54 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:08 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
Why RPI out? Because Sasquatch beat Rochacha?
Where's your Kean (who didn't really beat Cortland St., and who really really didn't beatTrenton St.TCNJ)?
Did anyone else notice that FDU-Florham gave Delaware Valley a good fight for a half?
I've said it before, but Albright is scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.cleveland.com%2Frealtimenews%2F2008%2F09%2Flarge_madeleine-albright.jpg&hash=b64e2e729e381012705b692c6e47716a29708b4b) Really scary. (https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.moonbattery.com%2Fmadeleine-albright.jpg&hash=0ba5bb197a2af716f1f9b9ffef440b3e60b94f66)
RPI's out because the LL is a mess right now and Union has the better resume with wins over IC and Hobart (in other words, didn't lose to UR)...
Kean I have at #5...
Also I have Rowan at #2...
LL is indeed a mess right now.
But look at the last 3 weeks of the NJAC season for Kean, Rowan, Montclair St., andTrenton St.TCNJ:
Oct. 31
1:00 PM New Jersey Cortland State
1:00 PM Rowan Kean
6:00 PM Western Connecticut Montclair State
Nov. 7
12:00 PM Western Connecticut New Jersey
1:00 PM Kean William Paterson
1:00 PM Montclair State Rowan
Nov. 14
1:00 PM Kean Montclair State
1:00 PM New Jersey Rowan
I'd forgotten how the entire NJAC can be like a bunch of crazy Russians in the Pine Barrens (~1:30+) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guBnSe-ponQ&feature=related).
I totally get what you're saying, but are you suggesting I base my ballot on what is likely to happen the last three weeks of the year?
I said the LL is a mess, I didn't say that the LL is going to end up a mess...
RPI was @ #10 last week for me due to the UR loss. Union was just on the outside looking in for me, with a solid win over Hobart they leapfrogged RPI...
Quote from: rams1102 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:16 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
As an independent observer :
#1 Alfred
#2 Kean
#3 Rowan
#4 Albright
#5 Del Val
#6 Union
#7 Fisher
#8 TCNJ
#9 Leb Val
Then it's anyones guess.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:16 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
As an independent observer :
#1 Alfred
#2 Kean
#3 Rowan
#4 Albright
#5 Del Val
#6 Union
#7 Fisher
#8 TCNJ
#9 Leb Val
Then it's anyones guess.
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 11, 2009, 03:57:09 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:16 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
As an independent observer :
#1 Alfred
#2 Kean
#3 Rowan
#4 Albright
#5 Del Val
#6 Union
#7 Fisher
#8 TCNJ
#9 Leb Val
Then it's anyones guess.
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Good point, but you left out the rest. Ithaca has lived up to their billing in the (very distant) past, so Ithaca is the Number 1 team in the East.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 11, 2009, 03:57:09 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 10, 2009, 08:30:16 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 10, 2009, 08:14:31 PM
This week (for me anyways)...
Ithaca, Cortland, Wilkes and RPI out...
SJF, Union, TCNJ and Leb. Valley in...
As an independent observer :
#1 Alfred
#2 Kean
#3 Rowan
#4 Albright
#5 Del Val
#6 Union
#7 Fisher
#8 TCNJ
#9 Leb Val
Then it's anyones guess.
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Good point, but you left out the rest. Ithaca has lived up to their billing in the (very distant) past, so Ithaca is the Number 1 team in the East.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PM
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
Quote from: rams1102 on October 11, 2009, 08:02:46 PM
I'm surprised to see Montclair and Cortland getting more votes then Rowan in the D3 Top 25, others receiving votes. I'm no Rowan fan, but to me it does not make sense.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 08:15:41 PM
Sounds like SJFF82 is having a 'small' day looking at himself naked in the mirror today.
Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:43:10 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 08:15:41 PM
Sounds like SJFF82 is having a 'small' day looking at himself naked in the mirror today.
I was small in the first half of the IC game up on the hill as it was quite brisk....but then it warmed up, we whoooped some IC butt and 82 has been large ever since.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't. It's the same sh!t every year. <yawn>
As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise. There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise.
And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't. It's the same sh!t every year. <yawn>
As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise. There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise.
And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't. It's the same sh!t every year. <yawn>
As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise. There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise.
And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't. It's the same sh!t every year. <yawn>
As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise. There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise.
And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
I hope you meant interlude...
If not I'm totally lost...
Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 10:50:58 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't. It's the same sh!t every year. <yawn>
As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise. There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise.
And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
I hope you meant interlude...
If not I'm totally lost...
When you think about it though, repetitive intercourse can be exhausting......fun, but exhausting.
Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't. It's the same sh!t every year. <yawn>
As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise. There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise.
And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
I hope you meant interlude...
If not I'm totally lost...
Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
I hope you meant interlude...
If not I'm totally lost...
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 11:11:41 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
I hope you meant interlude...
If not I'm totally lost...
Upstae,
Sorry for the vernacular of previous generations. I wrote without thinking that educated individuals would understand more than sexual conotations. Being probably at least a few generations older I just typed what I thought (or learned) years ago.
Intercourse can mean discussion or social dealings between individuals. I understand as some posters in the past have commented on my "too correct" writings. Sorry for the confusion.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 11, 2009, 11:41:44 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.
Could SJF be the "beast of the east" and Alfred mediocre? Yup. But the only thing you've got to base it on is what's happened in years past, certainly not on what's happened this year.
Quote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 09:17:37 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.
....I bet the competition now is alot better than when you played as well.....you should be proud.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 07:14:21 AM
Clearly you Fisher haters out there were waiting for this point in the season to find a reason to start this feud.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 11, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Fisher fans have historically been loud when they do well, and sheepish when they don't. It's the same sh!t every year. <yawn>
As far as this poll is concerned, Alfred and Albright deserve to be 1 and 2 at this point, in either order, without discussion otherwise. There is no sense in bitching about anything otherwise.
And 82, don't fool yourself, it's still really small.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 07:33:10 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 09:17:37 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.
....I bet the competition now is alot better than when you played as well.....you should be proud.
Not really. Except for the 2 MUC games. We played RPI, BUFF ST, Brockport and a decent UR team every year. Its all relative of course.
Am I supposed to care about people's posts to you in private because they are too worried about their 'Image' out in the open? Hmmm...that seems to reflect some good wholesome character.
Seriously though, what BS? That I made the simple statement that I disagree with AU's #1?
I will play along though with this fire you Fisher haters are starting.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 12, 2009, 09:10:16 AM
I've intimated this before, but the East is down this year. Admittedly, I don't know jack squat about the MAC or NJAC, but I'll take PBR's word that DVC is legit this year. I'm still down on the MAC after I watched Hobart pound out Lyco in the first round last year (after growing up on the NY/PA border when Berwick was really good and thinking all PA kids were strong) and the NJAC doesn't look like they have anyone who could beat a top 10-15 team nationally. This could be a year where the "top" east team takes a Randolph Macon like beating from MUC in the playoffs. I'd like to see Wesley or another geographically close team come over rather than MUC more to see some different programs, but the east doesn't have anyone ready to step up this year.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 12, 2009, 09:00:35 AM
Ithaca's big loss to SJF is very surprising to dlip. SJF is just kind of hard to figure out right now. dlip thinks Unions result vs Salisbury may give us some more insight into how good SJF may be. WHo knows maybe they are starting to find their rhythm now??? dlip feels they have a lot of talent and coming into 09 felt they would only have one loss at this point. Who the **** knows? dlip has them at a respectful #6 this week. Maybe a bit high, but time will tell.
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 10:08:59 AM
'Member the discussion in here about whether a loss should just be a loss in the polls? Anyone else notice that Capital lost to MUC by 7 and moved up five places in the top 25?
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 12, 2009, 12:12:38 AMQuote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 11:11:41 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 11, 2009, 10:40:33 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on October 11, 2009, 10:18:47 PM
Dear DR,
You are truly refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse.
I hope you meant interlude...
If not I'm totally lost...
Upstae,
Sorry for the vernacular of previous generations. I wrote without thinking that educated individuals would understand more than sexual conotations. Being probably at least a few generations older I just typed what I thought (or learned) years ago.
Intercourse can mean discussion or social dealings between individuals. I understand as some posters in the past have commented on my "too correct" writings. Sorry for the confusion.
73, I am of previous generations, and I (an engineer, even!) have acquired beaucoup negative karma for commenting on such trite subjects as lack of number and gender agreement in poster's sentences.
Nonetheless, even though I understand the intended meaning of "intercourse," the phrase "refreshing to an exhaustingly repetitive intercourse" makes no sense to me.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 12, 2009, 10:39:30 AMQuote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 10:08:59 AM
'Member the discussion in here about whether a loss should just be a loss in the polls? Anyone else notice that Capital lost to MUC by 7 and moved up five places in the top 25?
Yeah, somebody else (http://www.d3boards.com/index.php?topic=5930.msg1107847#msg1107847) noticed.
Quote from: Union89 on October 12, 2009, 10:12:34 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 07:33:10 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 09:17:37 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
And since you have no idea when I played, you talk out your ass about my team that went 21-19 in my 4 years.
....I bet the competition now is alot better than when you played as well.....you should be proud.
Not really. Except for the 2 MUC games. We played RPI, BUFF ST, Brockport and a decent UR team every year. Its all relative of course.
Am I supposed to care about people's posts to you in private because they are too worried about their 'Image' out in the open? Hmmm...that seems to reflect some good wholesome character.
Seriously though, what BS? That I made the simple statement that I disagree with AU's #1?
I will play along though with this fire you Fisher haters are starting.
You could make it easy and just say what year you graduated....to be open, I graduated in '89.
Quote from: Union89 on October 12, 2009, 12:35:12 PM
Maybe I'm strange....I enjoy knowing when guys played. I know when every poster in the LLPP graduated, along with a number of E8 guys.......makes it interesting for me as a point of reference.
Sorry if my query got you all self conscious. Thanks for the reply.
Quote from: tecmobowler on October 12, 2009, 09:06:22 AM
I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year. They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.
I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:45:27 PMQuote from: tecmobowler on October 12, 2009, 09:06:22 AM
I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year. They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.
I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.
did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?
"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17. Did the second half count?
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 01:47:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:45:27 PMQuote from: tecmobowler on October 12, 2009, 09:06:22 AM
I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year. They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.
I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.
did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?
"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17. Did the second half count?
Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 01:47:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:45:27 PMQuote from: tecmobowler on October 12, 2009, 09:06:22 AM
I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year. They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.
I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.
did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?
"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17. Did the second half count?
Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:45:27 PMQuote from: tecmobowler on October 12, 2009, 09:06:22 AM
I think fisher fans are fooling themselves if they believe to be an elite team this year. They tried every way possible to keep a horrendous Ithaca effort in the game for the first half on Saturday.
I couldn't help but think during the game how fans on both sides must yearn for the talent that was on the field four or five years back.
did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?
"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17. Did the second half count?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:52:12 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 01:47:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:45:27 PM
did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?
"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17. Did the second half count?
Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?
What??? No, I am not saying anything except responding to the prior post. How the hell do you go from beating the #20 team in the Country at their Homecoming by 23 points (shoulda been 40pts) to a comparison to Utica's results. Except that you almost lost to them as well.
I never said Fisher was a "very good team"...those are your words. "Elite team" those were tecmobowler's words....why do these words keep getting imputed to Fisher posters
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 02:58:34 PM
Dude can you really not see connections? Stop blowing up about the plight of "Fisher fans", the only one anyone in here has a gripe with is YOU.
Look:Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:52:12 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 01:47:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:45:27 PM
did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?
"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17. Did the second half count?
Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?
What??? No, I am not saying anything except responding to the prior post. How the hell do you go from beating the #20 team in the Country at their Homecoming by 23 points (shoulda been 40pts) to a comparison to Utica's results. Except that you almost lost to them as well.
I never said Fisher was a "very good team"...those are your words. "Elite team" those were tecmobowler's words....why do these words keep getting imputed to Fisher posters
In YOUR bolded part, you seem to be saying that tecmo shouldn't only ascribe the win to Ithaca playing poorly, because it was a blowout. You're saying that Fisher must have played very well in order for it to be a blowout.
I'M saying that that is not necessarily true; Fisher could still be a bad team and blowout an even "badder" team. (IC)
And no, you never said Fisher was a very good team. You are, however, a Fisher fan that started all this by saying that Alfred would lose 3 out of 5 games to five top eastern teams including Fisher. That to me seems to mean that you think Fisher is a top 5 team in the east, at least.
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 02:58:34 PM
Dude can you really not see connections? Stop blowing up about the plight of "Fisher fans", the only one anyone in here has a gripe with is YOU.
Look:Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:52:12 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 01:47:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 01:45:27 PM
did a Fisher fan say or imply they were elite this year?
"horrendous Ithaca effort"...so that's why the final was 40-17. Did the second half count?
Are you saying that only very good teams can win blowouts? Have you seen Utica's results this year?
What??? No, I am not saying anything except responding to the prior post. How the hell do you go from beating the #20 team in the Country at their Homecoming by 23 points (shoulda been 40pts) to a comparison to Utica's results. Except that you almost lost to them as well.
I never said Fisher was a "very good team"...those are your words. "Elite team" those were tecmobowler's words....why do these words keep getting imputed to Fisher posters
I'M saying that that is not necessarily true; Fisher could still be a bad team and blowout an even "badder" team. (IC)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher.
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 03:58:24 PM
I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.
I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.
I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.
Then, I pointed out that while you never said Fisher was a very good team, you implied it while talking about ANOTHER SCHOOL'S RANKING:Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher.
Now you've called Fisher a "quality team." Maybe, to end all this, you should describe the difference between "quality", "very good", and "would beat the consensus #1 East team 3 out of 5 times".
You don't have to, though...
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 03:58:24 PM
Now you've called Fisher a "quality team." Maybe, to end all this, you should describe the difference between "quality", "very good", and "would beat the consensus #1 East team 3 out of 5 times".
You don't have to, though...
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 04:11:52 PM
maxpower: first East Region poster to have an entire board dedicated to him?
Quote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 03:58:24 PM
I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.
I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.
I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 12, 2009, 04:29:35 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 03:58:24 PM
I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.
I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.
I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.
Unrelated to this ongoing Creed - Balboa prizefight/Wrestlemania Steel Cage Death Match, I'm really struck by this comment, since it parallels a lot of my thinking/impressions.
I had no clue about any team's quality before Week 1. However, those in the know said Ithaca was better than all but nine teams nationally. Those same knowers said that Union sucked enough to receive zero Top 25 votes. St. John Fisher received enough votes for low spots to "rank" no. 32, two spots behind 2008's Ithaca killer, Curry.
After the first week, Ithaca was voted better than all but seven teams nationally, and SJF's pounding by MUC pushed them down to "no. 41." Union continued to poll as suck.
Then, in Union's first game, they took it to Ithaca. (RS81's head begins to expand from a buildup of pressure)
Union follows that up with a loss to Muhlenberg, who has since looked barely better than mediocre, if that good. (Pressure continues to build)
Ithaca strings together a few unimpressive wins, while SJFisher travels the country getting its @$$ handed to it. SJF returns to NY, squeaks past Rochacha, and lays a monkeystomp on Ithaca.
My head is reaching the bursting point. Is Union any good? They beat Hobart, who's having a disappointing season. How'd Union, 3-0 in the LL, lose to Muhlenberg, and beat Ithaca? How'd SJFisher lose to Salisbury, and mash Ithaca into the turf?
I'm so confused.
Quote from: pg04 on October 12, 2009, 04:19:24 PM
How about this? Compared to the powers in D3 football, you ALL suck!
Quote from: dlippiel on October 12, 2009, 04:46:16 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on October 12, 2009, 04:29:35 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 03:58:24 PM
I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.
I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.
I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.
Unrelated to this ongoing Creed - Balboa prizefight/Wrestlemania Steel Cage Death Match, I'm really struck by this comment, since it parallels a lot of my thinking/impressions.
I had no clue about any team's quality before Week 1. However, those in the know said Ithaca was better than all but nine teams nationally. Those same knowers said that Union sucked enough to receive zero Top 25 votes. St. John Fisher received enough votes for low spots to "rank" no. 32, two spots behind 2008's Ithaca killer, Curry.
After the first week, Ithaca was voted better than all but seven teams nationally, and SJF's pounding by MUC pushed them down to "no. 41." Union continued to poll as suck.
Then, in Union's first game, they took it to Ithaca. (RS81's head begins to expand from a buildup of pressure)
Union follows that up with a loss to Muhlenberg, who has since looked barely better than mediocre, if that good. (Pressure continues to build)
Ithaca strings together a few unimpressive wins, while SJFisher travels the country getting its @$$ handed to it. SJF returns to NY, squeaks past Rochacha, and lays a monkeystomp on Ithaca.
My head is reaching the bursting point. Is Union any good? They beat Hobart, who's having a disappointing season. How'd Union, 3-0 in the LL, lose to Muhlenberg, and beat Ithaca? How'd SJFisher lose to Salisbury, and mash Ithaca into the turf?
I'm so confused.
Very good questions here RS. dlip can give you an answer...WHO THE **** KNOWS! dlip follows Union with his heart and soul and still cannot figure this team out as well as many others in our beautiful region here in the ****in East. dlip came away from Saturday feeling Union may actually be weaker than he thought unimpressed with many aspects of the Dutch game. Yet then he says, well they outplayed a supposedly solid Ithaca team, yet that solid Ithaca team got ****in vibrated by SJF who in turn got homoginized by Salisbury. Right now dlip looks at it this way, he is figuring in two weeks when Union goes down to Salisibury we will learn a lot about the East as a result of the outcome of that game.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
As another point of comparison, the ECAC runs the Lambert Poll which ranks the top 10 teams in the ECAC's coverage area. That coverage area is more expansive than the fan poll's since it includes the ACFC, PAC and Centennial but you might find it interesting.
The first Lambert poll for the year was published today (http://www.ecacsports.com/lambert/2009-10_releases/lambert_poll_101209).
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
As another point of comparison, the ECAC runs the Lambert Poll which ranks the top 10 teams in the ECAC's coverage area. That coverage area is more expansive than the fan poll's since it includes the ACFC, PAC and Centennial but you might find it interesting.
The first Lambert poll for the year was published today (http://www.ecacsports.com/lambert/2009-10_releases/lambert_poll_101209).
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 12, 2009, 05:06:48 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
As another point of comparison, the ECAC runs the Lambert Poll which ranks the top 10 teams in the ECAC's coverage area. That coverage area is more expansive than the fan poll's since it includes the ACFC, PAC and Centennial but you might find it interesting.
The first Lambert poll for the year was published today (http://www.ecacsports.com/lambert/2009-10_releases/lambert_poll_101209).
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
Here is the poll Gordon speaks of.
ECAC® Lambert Meadowlands Division III Football Poll
presented by FieldTurf Tarkett
1. Wesley
2. Washington & Jefferson
3. Alfred
4. Albright
5. Thomas More
6. Delaware Valley
7. Kean
8. Cortland State
9. Ithaca
10. Union
Quote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 12, 2009, 07:06:27 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
I'm glad you made that clear, for your sake, because that is one HORRENDOUS poll at the bottom. Wow.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 12, 2009, 07:45:32 PMQuote from: Doid23 on October 12, 2009, 07:06:27 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
I'm glad you made that clear, for your sake, because that is one HORRENDOUS poll at the bottom. Wow.
****ing horrendous for sure!
Quote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 10:27:04 PM
I have 8 of the 10 teams in the Lambert poll on my ballot but not in the order in which they appear. Instead of Cortland State and Ithaca, I have Rowan and Johns Hopkins.
Quote from: redswarm81 on October 12, 2009, 04:29:35 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 12, 2009, 03:58:24 PM
I don't have my panties in a bunch, they are resting comfortably. Victoria's Secret is quality.
I've never said Ithaca was a quality team, I've been saying they suck since week 1. I never said Fisher wasn't a quality team.
I pointed out that one statement you made implied that teams that score a lot of points must have played well.
Unrelated to this ongoing Creed - Balboa prizefight/Wrestlemania Steel Cage Death Match, I'm really struck by this comment, since it parallels a lot of my thinking/impressions.
I had no clue about any team's quality before Week 1. However, those in the know said Ithaca was better than all but nine teams nationally. Those same knowers said that Union sucked enough to receive zero Top 25 votes. St. John Fisher received enough votes for low spots to "rank" no. 32, two spots behind 2008's Ithaca killer, Curry.
After the first week, Ithaca was voted better than all but seven teams nationally, and SJF's pounding by MUC pushed them down to "no. 41." Union continued to poll as suck.
Then, in Union's first game, they took it to Ithaca. (RS81's head begins to expand from a buildup of pressure)
Union follows that up with a loss to Muhlenberg, who has since looked barely better than mediocre, if that good. (Pressure continues to build)
Ithaca strings together a few unimpressive wins, while SJFisher travels the country getting its @$$ handed to it. SJF returns to NY, squeaks past Rochacha, and lays a monkeystomp on Ithaca.
My head is reaching the bursting point. Is Union any good? They beat Hobart, who's having a disappointing season. How'd Union, 3-0 in the LL, lose to Muhlenberg, and beat Ithaca? How'd SJFisher lose to Salisbury, and mash Ithaca into the turf?
I'm so confused.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
As another point of comparison, the ECAC runs the Lambert Poll which ranks the top 10 teams in the ECAC's coverage area. That coverage area is more expansive than the fan poll's since it includes the ACFC, PAC and Centennial but you might find it interesting.
The first Lambert poll for the year was published today (http://www.ecacsports.com/lambert/2009-10_releases/lambert_poll_101209).
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 12:58:17 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
As another point of comparison, the ECAC runs the Lambert Poll which ranks the top 10 teams in the ECAC's coverage area. That coverage area is more expansive than the fan poll's since it includes the ACFC, PAC and Centennial but you might find it interesting.
The first Lambert poll for the year was published today (http://www.ecacsports.com/lambert/2009-10_releases/lambert_poll_101209).
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
ECAC® Lambert Meadowlands Division III Football Poll
presented by FieldTurf Tarkett
1. Wesley
2. Washington & Jefferson
3. Alfred
4. Albright
5. Thomas More
6. Delaware Valley
7. Kean
8. Cortland State
9. Ithaca
10. Union
This is funny...
(and I dont mean that Union is at 10. generally)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 12:58:17 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 12, 2009, 04:52:58 PM
As another point of comparison, the ECAC runs the Lambert Poll which ranks the top 10 teams in the ECAC's coverage area. That coverage area is more expansive than the fan poll's since it includes the ACFC, PAC and Centennial but you might find it interesting.
The first Lambert poll for the year was published today (http://www.ecacsports.com/lambert/2009-10_releases/lambert_poll_101209).
I vote in this poll, though my ballot is substantially different from this week's final result.
ECAC® Lambert Meadowlands Division III Football Poll
presented by FieldTurf Tarkett
1. Wesley
2. Washington & Jefferson
3. Alfred
4. Albright
5. Thomas More
6. Delaware Valley
7. Kean
8. Cortland State
9. Ithaca
10. Union
This is funny...
(and I dont mean that Union is at 10. generally)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 08:47:28 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 11, 2009, 06:57:32 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 05:15:48 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 11, 2009, 04:38:46 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 11, 2009, 03:49:53 PM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...Alfred is not the Number 1 team in the east. For poll purposes fine...they are undefeated and seem to be the 'easy' popular choice. Fact is...they have never lived up to their billing in the past, so why now as a No. 1 will they? So far they have taken care of their business but have not been really tested. I dont know much about Albright, but I say AU would lose 3 outta 5 to Kean, Del Val and Fisher. 4 outta 5 to Rowan. Union is the only team within striking distance in this poll they could probably handle regularly. I have always liked and respected AU...love going to Merrill.
When all is said and done in the East though, AU will be 5-7 in most polls.
Pep and Kaz00 can agree that it's too early to anoint the Saxons as King of the East Region. AU is taking care of business, but AU didn't open with Mount Union or travel to southern Maryland for Salisbury Steak...so Oct. 24 at Growney will be the Saxons' next test.
The only thing Pep would contend in your statement, '82, is that AU, if memory serves Pep correctly, never has had "a billing" to live up to. Pep doesn't recall the Saxons ever being favored to sweep through the E8. The Saxons just have a recent past of hanging around and making things interesting...and perhaps that will be the case again in 2009. Who knows? But win or lose, the ride on the bandwagon has been a blast! Stay tuned.....
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, by their "billing" I wasnt referring to having been favored in the E8, certainly that has never been the case. You would agree though that a few times in the past half-decade AU has been kinda the team that many have said "this is going to be the year they put it together" and then its always the IC-SJF-3RD TEAM (?) stretch that nips them.
I just dont see why everyone sees this year as any different. I guess maybe many power teams have slipped back to them in the East and SJF has been scheduling giants to start the season so their record doesnt looks all that good 5 games in.
We'll see of course...
82,
If anyone can understand how a team can turn around their fortunes it should be you. Back when you played for Fisher, the Cardinals couldn't do anything right....look how far they have come.
Cut Alfred some slack....they are a very well deserving #1....regardless of your barbs.
leave it to someone....especially you, to try and make something out of nothing. There was no barbs at AU....just my opinion that they are not the Beast of the East yet.
I know I'm late to the party, but it's Columbus Day and I was out working the clayish Alfred soil. Here are my thoughts:
Pep and I have both thought that Alfred is a top 40 team this year and they way they've played thus far has reinforced that opinion. Are they the best team in the East? Probably not, but they haven't done anything outside of sleepwalk through the third quarter in Madison and need to squeak by FDU to prove otherwise. Alfred could certainly lose 3 of their remaining games a la 2007, so the jury is still out of the 2009 Saxons.
I also think there are generalizations of fan bases on these boards due to past posts. It may not be fair, but they exist. For instance, Alfred posters seem to be viewed as relatively even-keeled and slowly (or perhaps quickly) going insane from our geographic isolation to civilization. Fisher posters are by-and-large seen as Johnny-come-lately, fair weather fans who are most concerned about their perceived place within the East Region. This is reiterated by things like the thread started by 82 about how good Fisher is because of Saterday's win at Ithaca and the reappearance of Superman57 after months away. And Soup may very well have been deployed and just gotten back stateside or gotten an internet connection in Kabul, but the timing is at the very least suspect.
Additionally, there are a number of posters here who root for the East Region even if their team is not the one taking on the Purple People Eaters in December. And if Fisher with their 2 bad out of region loses is the best team in the East, which is quite possible and is hard to dispute with their 3-0 in region record, then the East looks REALLY weak. If Fisher comes out on top of the mess which is the East, then that would be like being the top eunuch in a king's court. Sure it's great to be on top, but you've got no balls. And for that reason, many East Region fans are hoping that someone other than Fisher is the top dog so the East isn't the red-headed stepchild of D3 football.
Quote from: maxpower on October 13, 2009, 01:21:44 PM
82... are you beginning to think that maybe I'm just a figment of your imagination?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 01:29:04 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2009, 01:21:44 PM
82... are you beginning to think that maybe I'm just a figment of your imagination?
Maybe....I am actually starting wonder if I am crazy, because everytime I read a reply that is clearly non-responsive to my post, like "AU is not #1" and the reply is "Well Fisher is not an elite team like you say because IC wasnt really that good as the #20 team in the country" I feel like RedSwarm81 like my head is going to explode.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
Pep and I have both thought that Alfred is a top 40 team this year and they way they've played thus far has reinforced that opinion. Are they the best team in the East? Probably not, but they haven't done anything outside of sleepwalk through the third quarter in Madison and need to squeak by FDU to prove otherwise. Alfred could certainly lose 3 of their remaining games a la 2007, so the jury is still out of the 2009 Saxons.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
And if Fisher with their 2 bad out of region loses is the best team in the East, which is quite possible and is hard to dispute with their 3-0 in region record, then the East looks REALLY weak.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 07:14:21 AM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2009, 03:17:56 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 01:29:04 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2009, 01:21:44 PM
82... are you beginning to think that maybe I'm just a figment of your imagination?
Maybe....I am actually starting wonder if I am crazy, because everytime I read a reply that is clearly non-responsive to my post, like "AU is not #1" and the reply is "Well Fisher is not an elite team like you say because IC wasnt really that good as the #20 team in the country" I feel like RedSwarm81 like my head is going to explode.
82,
If you're going to take the time to go through my post and bold phrases, how about these two which address your post thesis:Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
Pep and I have both thought that Alfred is a top 40 team this year and they way they've played thus far has reinforced that opinion. Are they the best team in the East? Probably not, but they haven't done anything outside of sleepwalk through the third quarter in Madison and need to squeak by FDU to prove otherwise. Alfred could certainly lose 3 of their remaining games a la 2007, so the jury is still out of the 2009 Saxons.
AndQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
And if Fisher with their 2 bad out of region loses is the best team in the East, which is quite possible and is hard to dispute with their 3-0 in region record, then the East looks REALLY weak.
Nowhere in there did I say that Fisher couldn't or shouldn't be the best team in the East, but rather that a large portion of the East Region fans hope they aren't for the ramifications that would ensue (ie further proof of East Region irrelevance nationally).
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 03:40:00 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2009, 03:17:56 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 01:29:04 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2009, 01:21:44 PM
82... are you beginning to think that maybe I'm just a figment of your imagination?
Maybe....I am actually starting wonder if I am crazy, because everytime I read a reply that is clearly non-responsive to my post, like "AU is not #1" and the reply is "Well Fisher is not an elite team like you say because IC wasnt really that good as the #20 team in the country" I feel like RedSwarm81 like my head is going to explode.
82,
If you're going to take the time to go through my post and bold phrases, how about these two which address your post thesis:Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
Pep and I have both thought that Alfred is a top 40 team this year and they way they've played thus far has reinforced that opinion. Are they the best team in the East? Probably not, but they haven't done anything outside of sleepwalk through the third quarter in Madison and need to squeak by FDU to prove otherwise. Alfred could certainly lose 3 of their remaining games a la 2007, so the jury is still out of the 2009 Saxons.
AndQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
And if Fisher with their 2 bad out of region loses is the best team in the East, which is quite possible and is hard to dispute with their 3-0 in region record, then the East looks REALLY weak.
Nowhere in there did I say that Fisher couldn't or shouldn't be the best team in the East, but rather that a large portion of the East Region fans hope they aren't for the ramifications that would ensue (ie further proof of East Region irrelevance nationally).
Really...the only team in the East that has had success on a national stage in the past 4 years would be the ONE team from the East that would prove its irrelevance.....Really???? Maybe AU as our number 1 shows how weak the East has become....dont you think that is more accurate?
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 13, 2009, 03:58:33 PM
2004 Rowan loses in National Semifinals to eventual champ Linfield. SJF lost to 26-20 to Del Val in second round
2005 Rowan loses in National Semifinals to eventual champ MUC, NO SJF in playoffs.
2006 SJF loses in National semifinals to eventual champ MUC.
2007 SJF losed in regional finals to MUC.
2008 Cortland loses to MUC in the regional finals, NO SJF in playoffs.
I don't think only one East team has had success on the national stage the last 5 years. How can one team have success on the national stage for the last four years when they have only made the playoffs two of those years?
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 13, 2009, 03:58:33 PMHow can one team have success on the national stage for the last four years when they have only made the playoffs two of those years?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 03:40:00 PM
Really...the only team in the East that has had success on a national stage in the past 4 years would be the ONE team from the East that would prove its irrelevance.....Really???? Maybe AU as our number 1 shows how weak the East has become....dont you think that is more accurate?
Quote from: Doid23 on October 13, 2009, 03:24:58 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2009, 07:14:21 AM
I know nobody is saying it cuz they dont want to be 'that' guy, but I have always been that guy so here goes...
After reading your recent posts, I realize that you are in fact "that" guy, only it's not the guy you think.....
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2009, 04:03:37 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 03:40:00 PM
Really...the only team in the East that has had success on a national stage in the past 4 years would be the ONE team from the East that would prove its irrelevance.....Really???? Maybe AU as our number 1 shows how weak the East has become....dont you think that is more accurate?
I would argue that no East Region team has had success on the national stage, but I believe the national stage to be the national semis and finals and by that logic no East team has been successful at that level this decade. Plus, how does the 2006 Fisher team carry any relevance to 2009?
Alfred hasn't lost two out of region games this year, so the direct comparison to the North and the South aren't as easy with them. Is Alfred an elite team, probably not, but time will tell. However, if a team which has lost to teams from the North and South finishs top of the region, that certainly bodes poorly for the region as opposed to another team finishing atop by beating the first one and providing a certain degree of counterbalance for the region. In this thread, most readers are rooting for the latter regardless of who that team is. I hope that Alfred can develop into and perform like that second team, but I'm going to enjoy the remaining games regardless of the end result (more so if the Saxons win, obviously).
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 13, 2009, 04:16:36 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2009, 04:03:37 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 03:40:00 PM
Really...the only team in the East that has had success on a national stage in the past 4 years would be the ONE team from the East that would prove its irrelevance.....Really???? Maybe AU as our number 1 shows how weak the East has become....dont you think that is more accurate?
I would argue that no East Region team has had success on the national stage, but I believe the national stage to be the national semis and finals and by that logic no East team has been successful at that level this decade. Plus, how does the 2006 Fisher team carry any relevance to 2009?
Alfred hasn't lost two out of region games this year, so the direct comparison to the North and the South aren't as easy with them. Is Alfred an elite team, probably not, but time will tell. However, if a team which has lost to teams from the North and South finishs top of the region, that certainly bodes poorly for the region as opposed to another team finishing atop by beating the first one and providing a certain degree of counterbalance for the region. In this thread, most readers are rooting for the latter regardless of who that team is. I hope that Alfred can develop into and perform like that second team, but I'm going to enjoy the remaining games regardless of the end result (more so if the Saxons win, obviously).
I was basically going with the teams getting as far as SJF which Rowan has done 3 times this decade and RPI has done once. Of course we will never really know how successful Rowan would have been in 01 if not for a clock operator.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 13, 2009, 03:58:33 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 03:40:00 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2009, 03:17:56 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 01:29:04 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2009, 01:21:44 PM
82... are you beginning to think that maybe I'm just a figment of your imagination?
Maybe....I am actually starting wonder if I am crazy, because everytime I read a reply that is clearly non-responsive to my post, like "AU is not #1" and the reply is "Well Fisher is not an elite team like you say because IC wasnt really that good as the #20 team in the country" I feel like RedSwarm81 like my head is going to explode.
82,
If you're going to take the time to go through my post and bold phrases, how about these two which address your post thesis:Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
Pep and I have both thought that Alfred is a top 40 team this year and they way they've played thus far has reinforced that opinion. Are they the best team in the East? Probably not, but they haven't done anything outside of sleepwalk through the third quarter in Madison and need to squeak by FDU to prove otherwise. Alfred could certainly lose 3 of their remaining games a la 2007, so the jury is still out of the 2009 Saxons.
AndQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 12, 2009, 05:13:15 PM
And if Fisher with their 2 bad out of region loses is the best team in the East, which is quite possible and is hard to dispute with their 3-0 in region record, then the East looks REALLY weak.
Nowhere in there did I say that Fisher couldn't or shouldn't be the best team in the East, but rather that a large portion of the East Region fans hope they aren't for the ramifications that would ensue (ie further proof of East Region irrelevance nationally).
Really...the only team in the East that has had success on a national stage in the past 4 years would be the ONE team from the East that would prove its irrelevance.....Really???? Maybe AU as our number 1 shows how weak the East has become....dont you think that is more accurate?
I don't think only one East team has had success on the national stage the last 5 years. How can one team have success on the national stage for the last four years when they have only made the playoffs two of those years?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2009, 04:03:37 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 03:40:00 PM
Really...the only team in the East that has had success on a national stage in the past 4 years would be the ONE team from the East that would prove its irrelevance.....Really???? Maybe AU as our number 1 shows how weak the East has become....dont you think that is more accurate?
I would argue that no East Region team has had success on the national stage, but I believe the national stage to be the national semis and finals and by that logic no East team has been successful at that level this decade. Plus, how does the 2006 Fisher team carry any relevance to 2009?
Alfred hasn't lost two out of region games this year, so the direct comparison to the North and the South aren't as easy with them. Is Alfred an elite team, probably not, but time will tell. However, if a team which has lost to teams from the North and South finishs top of the region, that certainly bodes poorly for the region as opposed to another team finishing atop by beating the first one and providing a certain degree of counterbalance for the region. In this thread, most readers are rooting for the latter regardless of who that team is. I hope that Alfred can develop into and perform like that second team, but I'm going to enjoy the remaining games regardless of the end result (more so if the Saxons win, obviously).
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 13, 2009, 04:02:56 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 13, 2009, 03:58:33 PMHow can one team have success on the national stage for the last four years when they have only made the playoffs two of those years?
Depends on how you define "success."
If you go solely by the opinion of guys that played on a club team that had all their wins stripped, then Fisher is the only team with national success...ever.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 13, 2009, 05:02:15 PMyour petty
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 13, 2009, 05:36:30 PM
82 has been regulated to guest?
wha happen 82?
Quote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 05:50:00 PMI think he quit because people were unanimously disagreeing with everything he said.
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 13, 2009, 05:53:53 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 05:50:00 PMI think he quit because people were unanimously disagreeing with everything he said.
That can't be it. After all, you're still here!
I kid, I kid.
Quote from: JoseQViper on October 13, 2009, 05:53:53 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 05:50:00 PMI think he quit because people were unanimously disagreeing with everything he said.
That can't be it. After all, you're still here!
I kid, I kid.
Quote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 06:00:03 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on October 13, 2009, 05:53:53 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 05:50:00 PMI think he quit because people were unanimously disagreeing with everything he said.
That can't be it. After all, you're still here!
I kid, I kid.
Or he could be waiting to appear under some other name and build up Fisher... Of course then he'd probably be caught by Pat.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2009, 06:13:19 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 06:00:03 PMQuote from: JoseQViper on October 13, 2009, 05:53:53 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 05:50:00 PMI think he quit because people were unanimously disagreeing with everything he said.
That can't be it. After all, you're still here!
I kid, I kid.
Or he could be waiting to appear under some other name and build up Fisher... Of course then he'd probably be caught by Pat.
Any progress on that poll, pg? Pep's got a press deadline looming tomorrow.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 13, 2009, 07:01:09 PM
Seeing how a previous post of mine has been removed (understandably so), dlip will remake his point in an appropriate way. The East has not had a serious national contender in a long time. What is the reason for this? Are we that far away or closer than we think? Looking at the polls (just as a piece of the puzzle) Ithaca and Cortland were in the top 10 nationally and now they are not even or should not even be in the top ten regionally. To dlip it's obvious they were WAY overated to begin with and did not belong with the company they were being put with. Seriously looking at this dlip wonders why is the East not able to field that team/teams that can compete for the National Championship? Obviously you have Mount and UWW as the exceptions way on top but with parity seemingly growing here in the east why is it not growing nationally? Just some thoughts and questions. Questions that we should maybe ask ourselves and look into. dlip really never looks to far out of the East region knowing that East Region teams aren't very relevant when it comes to the big picture. *Pat dlip will keep the obscene references out in the future :D.
Quote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 11:50:18 PM
Week 6 Fan Poll (Not as nicely formatted as usual, but hey it's late and gets the point across):
Team Record Last Rating.... Next Week 1 Alfred ( 8 ) 5-0 1 Open Date 2 Albright ( 2 ) 5-0 3 at Lycoming 3 Delaware Valley 4-1 2 vs. Wilkes 4 Kean 4-1 5 at Brockport State 5 Rowan 4-1 7 at Morrisville State 6 St. John Fisher 3-2 NR vs. Utica 7 Union 4-1 8 at St. Lawrence 8 Lebanon Valley 4-1 NR at FDU-Florham 9 Springfield 4-1 NR at Mount Ida 10 TCNJ 4-1 NR at William Paterson
Dropped Out:
#4 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State
#9 Wilkes
#10 RPI
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,3,1,2,1,1,)
Albright (2,5,2,2,3,1,2,1,3,4,)
Delaware Valley (5,2,3,4,4,2,3,4,2,5,)
Kean (4,4,4,6,5,4,4,3,4,2,)
Rowan (3,3,10,3,2,5,5,NR,6,3,)
St. John Fisher (6,8,5,7,6,8,8,6,8,7,)
Union (7,6,6,5,10,9,6,5,5,NR,)
Lebanon Valley (8,7,NR,8,9,10,7,8,7,9,)
Springfield (9,NR,7,10,8,6,10,NR,NR,NR,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,7,NR,9,NR,8,)
Montclair State (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,9,7,9,NR,)
RPI (NR,10,9,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,)
Ithaca (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,10,)
Cortland State (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Plymouth State (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,)
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 14, 2009, 12:00:00 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 13, 2009, 11:50:18 PM
Week 6 Fan Poll (Not as nicely formatted as usual, but hey it's late and gets the point across):
Team Record Points Last Rating.... Next Week 1 Alfred ( 8 ) 5-0 97 1 Open Date 2 Albright ( 2 ) 5-0 85 3 at Lycoming 3 Delaware Valley 4-1 76 2 vs. Wilkes 4 Kean 4-1 70 5 at Brockport State 5 Rowan 4-1 59 7 at Morrisville State 6 St. John Fisher 3-2 41 NR vs. Utica 7 Union 4-1 8 40 at St. Lawrence 8 Lebanon Valley 4-1 26 NR at FDU-Florham 9 Springfield 4-1 16 NR at Mount Ida 10 TCNJ 4-1 13 NR at William Paterson
Dropped Out:
#4 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State
#9 Wilkes
#10 RPI
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,3,1,2,1,1,)
Albright (2,5,2,2,3,1,2,1,3,4,)
Delaware Valley (5,2,3,4,4,2,3,4,2,5,)
Kean (4,4,4,6,5,4,4,3,4,2,)
Rowan (3,3,10,3,2,5,5,NR,6,3,)
St. John Fisher (6,8,5,7,6,8,8,6,8,7,)
Union (7,6,6,5,10,9,6,5,5,NR,)
Lebanon Valley (8,7,NR,8,9,10,7,8,7,9,)
Springfield (9,NR,7,10,8,6,10,NR,NR,NR,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,7,7,NR,9,NR,8,)
Montclair State (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,9,7,9,NR,)
RPI (NR,10,9,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,)
Ithaca (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,10,)
Cortland State (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Plymouth State (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,)
Okay, what did you change? ??? :-\
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating.... | Next Week |
1 Alfred ( 8 ) | 5-0 | 97 | 1 | Open Date |
2 Albright ( 2 ) | 5-0 | 85 | 3 | at Lycoming |
3 Delaware Valley | 4-1 | 76 | 2 | vs. Wilkes |
4 Kean | 4-1 | 70 | 5 | at Brockport State |
5 Rowan | 4-1 | 59 | 7 | at Morrisville State |
6 St. John Fisher | 3-2 | 41 | NR | vs. Utica |
7 Union | 4-1 | 40 | 8 | at St. Lawrence |
8 Lebanon Valley | 4-1 | 26 | NR | at FDU-Florham |
9 Springfield | 4-1 | 16 | NR | at Mount Ida |
10 TCNJ | 4-1 | 13 | NR | at William Paterson |
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 14, 2009, 12:15:48 AM
Thanks!
I appreciate the poll. It is my source for following the East Region in conjunction with the Top 25!
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 14, 2009, 12:48:33 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 14, 2009, 12:15:48 AM
Thanks!
I appreciate the poll. It is my source for following the East Region in conjunction with the Top 25!
Pep appreciates the poll, too. It appears each week in the Pigskin Picks Contest spread in the Alfred Sun and serves as a crutch to those entering the contest, which features East Region D3 teams as well as nationally ranked D1 contests.
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: Union89 on October 13, 2009, 07:36:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 13, 2009, 07:01:09 PM
Seeing how a previous post of mine has been removed (understandably so), dlip will remake his point in an appropriate way. The East has not had a serious national contender in a long time. What is the reason for this? Are we that far away or closer than we think? Looking at the polls (just as a piece of the puzzle) Ithaca and Cortland were in the top 10 nationally and now they are not even or should not even be in the top ten regionally. To dlip it's obvious they were WAY overated to begin with and did not belong with the company they were being put with. Seriously looking at this dlip wonders why is the East not able to field that team/teams that can compete for the National Championship? Obviously you have Mount and UWW as the exceptions way on top but with parity seemingly growing here in the east why is it not growing nationally? Just some thoughts and questions. Questions that we should maybe ask ourselves and look into. dlip really never looks to far out of the East region knowing that East Region teams aren't very relevant when it comes to the big picture. *Pat dlip will keep the obscene references out in the future :D.
Ha, your quote being embedded in mine caused mine to be removed as well.
Damn you Dlip!!! :D
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 14, 2009, 08:54:09 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 13, 2009, 07:36:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 13, 2009, 07:01:09 PM
Seeing how a previous post of mine has been removed (understandably so), dlip will remake his point in an appropriate way. The East has not had a serious national contender in a long time. What is the reason for this? Are we that far away or closer than we think? Looking at the polls (just as a piece of the puzzle) Ithaca and Cortland were in the top 10 nationally and now they are not even or should not even be in the top ten regionally. To dlip it's obvious they were WAY overated to begin with and did not belong with the company they were being put with. Seriously looking at this dlip wonders why is the East not able to field that team/teams that can compete for the National Championship? Obviously you have Mount and UWW as the exceptions way on top but with parity seemingly growing here in the east why is it not growing nationally? Just some thoughts and questions. Questions that we should maybe ask ourselves and look into. dlip really never looks to far out of the East region knowing that East Region teams aren't very relevant when it comes to the big picture. *Pat dlip will keep the obscene references out in the future :D.
Ha, your quote being embedded in mine caused mine to be removed as well.
Damn you Dlip!!! :D
if you use *'s... how can you get a post removed, dlip? Refresh my memory on what it was you said.
Quote from: pg04 on October 14, 2009, 09:32:20 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 14, 2009, 08:54:09 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 13, 2009, 07:36:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 13, 2009, 07:01:09 PM
Seeing how a previous post of mine has been removed (understandably so), dlip will remake his point in an appropriate way. The East has not had a serious national contender in a long time. What is the reason for this? Are we that far away or closer than we think? Looking at the polls (just as a piece of the puzzle) Ithaca and Cortland were in the top 10 nationally and now they are not even or should not even be in the top ten regionally. To dlip it's obvious they were WAY overated to begin with and did not belong with the company they were being put with. Seriously looking at this dlip wonders why is the East not able to field that team/teams that can compete for the National Championship? Obviously you have Mount and UWW as the exceptions way on top but with parity seemingly growing here in the east why is it not growing nationally? Just some thoughts and questions. Questions that we should maybe ask ourselves and look into. dlip really never looks to far out of the East region knowing that East Region teams aren't very relevant when it comes to the big picture. *Pat dlip will keep the obscene references out in the future :D.
Ha, your quote being embedded in mine caused mine to be removed as well.
Damn you Dlip!!! :D
if you use *'s... how can you get a post removed, dlip? Refresh my memory on what it was you said.
There was an inappropriate word that wasn't starred out. Even so, when the stars become half of the post what use is it anymore anyway?
Quote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 09:53:10 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 14, 2009, 09:32:20 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 14, 2009, 08:54:09 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 13, 2009, 07:36:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 13, 2009, 07:01:09 PM
Seeing how a previous post of mine has been removed (understandably so), dlip will remake his point in an appropriate way. The East has not had a serious national contender in a long time. What is the reason for this? Are we that far away or closer than we think? Looking at the polls (just as a piece of the puzzle) Ithaca and Cortland were in the top 10 nationally and now they are not even or should not even be in the top ten regionally. To dlip it's obvious they were WAY overated to begin with and did not belong with the company they were being put with. Seriously looking at this dlip wonders why is the East not able to field that team/teams that can compete for the National Championship? Obviously you have Mount and UWW as the exceptions way on top but with parity seemingly growing here in the east why is it not growing nationally? Just some thoughts and questions. Questions that we should maybe ask ourselves and look into. dlip really never looks to far out of the East region knowing that East Region teams aren't very relevant when it comes to the big picture. *Pat dlip will keep the obscene references out in the future :D.
Ha, your quote being embedded in mine caused mine to be removed as well.
Damn you Dlip!!! :D
if you use *'s... how can you get a post removed, dlip? Refresh my memory on what it was you said.
There was an inappropriate word that wasn't starred out. Even so, when the stars become half of the post what use is it anymore anyway?
What the **** are you talking about?
Quote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 09:22:17 AM
I like the voting distribution for Rowan...
3,3,10,3,2,5,5,NR,6,3...
All over the place...
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 14, 2009, 10:52:25 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 09:22:17 AM
I like the voting distribution for Rowan...
3,3,10,3,2,5,5,NR,6,3...
All over the place...
Shouldn't Rowan be out of the poll, after all they lost to Cortland and head to head should count more than anything else. ;D
Quote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 10:54:35 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 14, 2009, 10:52:25 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 09:22:17 AM
I like the voting distribution for Rowan...
3,3,10,3,2,5,5,NR,6,3...
All over the place...
Shouldn't Rowan be out of the poll, after all they lost to Cortland and head to head should count more than anything else. ;D
Thanks KS, I totally forgot...
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 14, 2009, 08:54:09 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 13, 2009, 07:36:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 13, 2009, 07:01:09 PM
Seeing how a previous post of mine has been removed (understandably so), dlip will remake his point in an appropriate way. The East has not had a serious national contender in a long time. What is the reason for this? Are we that far away or closer than we think? Looking at the polls (just as a piece of the puzzle) Ithaca and Cortland were in the top 10 nationally and now they are not even or should not even be in the top ten regionally. To dlip it's obvious they were WAY overated to begin with and did not belong with the company they were being put with. Seriously looking at this dlip wonders why is the East not able to field that team/teams that can compete for the National Championship? Obviously you have Mount and UWW as the exceptions way on top but with parity seemingly growing here in the east why is it not growing nationally? Just some thoughts and questions. Questions that we should maybe ask ourselves and look into. dlip really never looks to far out of the East region knowing that East Region teams aren't very relevant when it comes to the big picture. *Pat dlip will keep the obscene references out in the future :D.
Ha, your quote being embedded in mine caused mine to be removed as well.
Damn you Dlip!!! :D
if you use *'s... how can you get a post removed, dlip? Refresh my memory on what it was you said.
Quote from: pg04 on October 14, 2009, 09:32:20 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 14, 2009, 08:54:09 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 13, 2009, 07:36:41 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 13, 2009, 07:01:09 PM
Seeing how a previous post of mine has been removed (understandably so), dlip will remake his point in an appropriate way. The East has not had a serious national contender in a long time. What is the reason for this? Are we that far away or closer than we think? Looking at the polls (just as a piece of the puzzle) Ithaca and Cortland were in the top 10 nationally and now they are not even or should not even be in the top ten regionally. To dlip it's obvious they were WAY overated to begin with and did not belong with the company they were being put with. Seriously looking at this dlip wonders why is the East not able to field that team/teams that can compete for the National Championship? Obviously you have Mount and UWW as the exceptions way on top but with parity seemingly growing here in the east why is it not growing nationally? Just some thoughts and questions. Questions that we should maybe ask ourselves and look into. dlip really never looks to far out of the East region knowing that East Region teams aren't very relevant when it comes to the big picture. *Pat dlip will keep the obscene references out in the future :D.
Ha, your quote being embedded in mine caused mine to be removed as well.
Damn you Dlip!!! :D
if you use *'s... how can you get a post removed, dlip? Refresh my memory on what it was you said.
There was an inappropriate word that wasn't starred out. Even so, when the stars become half of the post what use is it anymore anyway?
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 14, 2009, 10:52:25 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 09:22:17 AM
I like the voting distribution for Rowan...
3,3,10,3,2,5,5,NR,6,3...
All over the place...
Shouldn't Rowan be out of the poll, after all they lost to Cortland and head to head should count more than anything else. ;D
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 05:03:30 PM
I put a new poll up....the last one was getting a bit stale. As we have all said, Mount or Wesley will probably be moved in.
Which conference will the #2 seed represent? Interesting question IMO, when you look at remaining schedules.
Quote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 05:24:44 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 05:03:30 PM
I put a new poll up....the last one was getting a bit stale. As we have all said, Mount or Wesley will probably be moved in.
Which conference will the #2 seed represent? Interesting question IMO, when you look at remaining schedules.
I went with the MAC...
The winner of the DVC vs Albright game will likely get the #2 seed...
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 05:38:14 PM
My thought process is that the MAC & NJAC both seem to have at least 3 real good teams which will be slugging it out with one another down the stretch.
I have been impressed with Alfred, and if they win out, will obviously maybe even get the #1 overall in the East....tough order.
Throwing in my homer Garnet colors, I'm wondering if Union wins out....is there a chance they can sneak in.....could be interesting.
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 05:38:14 PM
My thought process is that the MAC & NJAC both seem to have at least 3 real good teams which will be slugging it out with one another down the stretch.
I have been impressed with Alfred, and if they win out, will obviously maybe even get the #1 overall in the East....tough order.
Throwing in my homer Garnet colors, I'm wondering if Union wins out....is there a chance they can sneak in.....could be interesting.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2009, 06:29:58 PM
Here's a question for everyone, especially those more incline than myself:
What's the best road win amongst east region teams? In region and/or out of region? From the bit I've followed, I haven't seen any impressive road wins (and I don't consider a road win over IC this year as phenomenal and worthy of thinking a team is top 15 because of such a win).
Also, if AU and/or Albright wins out, a #1 should not be imported (if DelVal is the east's best, how do you argue since they did lose to Wesley, who may or may not otherwise get a #1 seed).
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2009, 06:39:56 PM
So a win at Kean is the best road win in the east? While I agree about regional pods conceptually, how do you argue against moving someone in based on this information?
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2009, 06:49:46 PM
A team earning a home field advantage throughout an entire pod should be able to prove that they can win a significant road game first. Unless you believe there's no advantage to being at home (such as in the new RPI field), in which case, why do we care about an imported #1 seed? Because they're a tougher out prior to the nat'l semifinals? I hate that MUC's put in "our" bracket because they are so dominant, but I also recognize that you have to beat at least two top 5 teams to win a championship, so going out one round sooner doesn't really make a difference at the end of the day. How would one differentiate Cortland and Hobart's season's last year? Is Cortland better because they made it one round further before getting violated by MUC?
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2009, 06:29:58 PM
Here's a question for everyone, especially those more incline than myself:
What's the best road win amongst east region teams? In region and/or out of region? From the bit I've followed, I haven't seen any impressive road wins (and I don't consider a road win over IC this year as phenomenal and worthy of thinking a team is top 15 because of such a win).
Also, if AU and/or Albright wins out, a #1 should not be imported (if DelVal is the east's best, how do you argue since they did lose to Wesley, who may or may not otherwise get a #1 seed).
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 08:10:57 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2009, 06:29:58 PM
Here's a question for everyone, especially those more incline than myself:
What's the best road win amongst east region teams? In region and/or out of region? From the bit I've followed, I haven't seen any impressive road wins (and I don't consider a road win over IC this year as phenomenal and worthy of thinking a team is top 15 because of such a win).
Also, if AU and/or Albright wins out, a #1 should not be imported (if DelVal is the east's best, how do you argue since they did lose to Wesley, who may or may not otherwise get a #1 seed).
Although not a 'road' win, DelVal's season opening thumping of Johns Hopkins is pretty impressive to me. The CC is a pretty good conference and that remain's Hopkins' only loss.
Quote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 07:27:15 PM
PA you make extremely solid points...
I don't have issues with MUC (or any other team that may be moved in), I also don't have a problem with the idea of taking the top 4 teams and then making the brackets work. However I do have a problem with the NCAA preaching about the importance of Regional wins, then scrapping that belief and making "pods" vs regional brackets...
If they pick one and run with it that's fine but don't waver back and forth based on the results of one particular region...
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 08:10:57 PM
Although not a 'road' win, DelVal's season opening thumping of Johns Hopkins is pretty impressive to me. The CC is a pretty good conference and that remain's Hopkins' only loss.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2009, 10:02:59 PM
I agree with you. Why not count out of region games, which would, to a certain degree encourage more interesting out of conference matchups, or only counting regional games and keeping the brackets regionally structured. It doesn't make sense to have the current structure.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2009, 10:02:59 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 14, 2009, 07:27:15 PM
PA you make extremely solid points...
I don't have issues with MUC (or any other team that may be moved in), I also don't have a problem with the idea of taking the top 4 teams and then making the brackets work. However I do have a problem with the NCAA preaching about the importance of Regional wins, then scrapping that belief and making "pods" vs regional brackets...
If they pick one and run with it that's fine but don't waver back and forth based on the results of one particular region...
I agree with you. Why not count out of region games, which would, to a certain degree encourage more interesting out of conference matchups, or only counting regional games and keeping the brackets regionally structured. It doesn't make sense to have the current structure.
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 08:10:57 PM
Although not a 'road' win, DelVal's season opening thumping of Johns Hopkins is pretty impressive to me. The CC is a pretty good conference and that remain's Hopkins' only loss.
Good point. DelVal's body of work sets them up as the best #2 so far (JHU and Road vs. Kean), but again, if they're the East's best you kind of have to move Wesley over. If Albright can beat DelVal or AU runs the table, absent any evidence that these other out of region teams are better one of those should be #1. How is the roster an issue at Wesley when MUC carries like 200+? I get depth, but really, the top 50-55 are the guys that matter (coming from someone who didn't start travelling until midway through SO year).
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 14, 2009, 10:38:50 PM
I agree the top 50-55 players are what typically defines a team on game day but the other 50 or so play a pretty important role on the team in helping to prepare the travel squad. Those players above 50 on the depth chart can become critical when you lose multiple players at one position....like say QB!
I would submit that a coaching staff that is capable of keeping "the other 50" on the scout team engaged, will fair better during the season and build a solid foundation for the future.
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 14, 2009, 10:16:41 PM
pumpkinattack
I think rams1102 is talking about the NJAC having a 100 roster limit which some people believe has kept Wesley from joining the conference if in fact they have ever been invited. Which would place them in the east region
Quote from: maxpower on October 14, 2009, 11:40:48 PM
Good to see the NJAC/MAC guys over here.... how come ya don't give your two cents on the poll discussion more often? You should, maybe then half of us would know what we were talking about...
Quote from: maxpower on October 14, 2009, 11:40:48 PM
Good to see the NJAC/MAC guys over here.... how come ya don't give your two cents on the poll discussion more often? You should, maybe then half of us would know what we were talking about...
Quote from: rams1102 on October 15, 2009, 06:50:26 AMQuote from: maxpower on October 14, 2009, 11:40:48 PM
Good to see the NJAC/MAC guys over here.... how come ya don't give your two cents on the poll discussion more often? You should, maybe then half of us would know what we were talking about...
The NJAC has a great representative (Stalker) voting in the poll, but this board is basically quiet and I'm the only one with a big mouth. ;D
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 10:34:15 PM
I think Alfred is the only Eastern team with a shot at the #1 seed at this point.
Quote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 09:35:54 AMQuote from: rams1102 on October 15, 2009, 06:50:26 AMQuote from: maxpower on October 14, 2009, 11:40:48 PM
Good to see the NJAC/MAC guys over here.... how come ya don't give your two cents on the poll discussion more often? You should, maybe then half of us would know what we were talking about...
The NJAC has a great representative (Stalker) voting in the poll, but this board is basically quiet and I'm the only one with a big mouth. ;D
What about meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee? haha.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 14, 2009, 11:18:57 PMQuote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 14, 2009, 10:16:41 PM
pumpkinattack
I think rams1102 is talking about the NJAC having a 100 roster limit which some people believe has kept Wesley from joining the conference if in fact they have ever been invited. Which would place them in the east region
Have some brass balls and invite Wesley to the NJAC, let's see what happens. ;)
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 15, 2009, 09:44:18 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 09:35:54 AMQuote from: rams1102 on October 15, 2009, 06:50:26 AMQuote from: maxpower on October 14, 2009, 11:40:48 PM
Good to see the NJAC/MAC guys over here.... how come ya don't give your two cents on the poll discussion more often? You should, maybe then half of us would know what we were talking about...
The NJAC has a great representative (Stalker) voting in the poll, but this board is basically quiet and I'm the only one with a big mouth. ;D
What about meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee? haha.
'Port Grad....of course you are a NJAC rep. Funny, Pep is slow to associate Brockport State with the NJAC...
Pep was thinking about the silent foe in the E8...we are hearing NOTHING out of the Massachusetts member of the E8.
Hey, Pride!
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 15, 2009, 10:51:11 AMQuote from: rams1102 on October 14, 2009, 11:18:57 PMQuote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 14, 2009, 10:16:41 PM
pumpkinattack
I think rams1102 is talking about the NJAC having a 100 roster limit which some people believe has kept Wesley from joining the conference if in fact they have ever been invited. Which would place them in the east region
Have some brass balls and invite Wesley to the NJAC, let's see what happens. ;)
I would actually like to see Wesley go to the MAC, Salisbury and Frostburg St to the NJAC and Buff St and Morrisville to the E8 and lets just dump West Conn on the NEFC or something and keep Cortland in the NJAC.
Quote from: Upstate on October 15, 2009, 11:27:00 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 15, 2009, 10:51:11 AMQuote from: rams1102 on October 14, 2009, 11:18:57 PMQuote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 14, 2009, 10:16:41 PM
pumpkinattack
I think rams1102 is talking about the NJAC having a 100 roster limit which some people believe has kept Wesley from joining the conference if in fact they have ever been invited. Which would place them in the east region
Have some brass balls and invite Wesley to the NJAC, let's see what happens. ;)
I would actually like to see Wesley go to the MAC, Salisbury and Frostburg St to the NJAC and Buff St and Morrisville to the E8 and lets just dump West Conn on the NEFC or something and keep Cortland in the NJAC.
In addition to those moves...
How about a trade between Cortland and Morrisville?
Also I'd like to pick up Brockport as a FA to add to the E8 roster and dump Springfield to the ECFC or some other New England conference...
Giving the E8:
IC, AU, UC, Port, Cortland, SJF, Hartwick and Buff State!
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 15, 2009, 11:24:14 AM
I know most people including myself have Alfred as #1 in the ERP, but I think in the end Delaware Valley should take over the top spot by season's end. Even if both teams run the table, I would be more impressed with Delaware Valley's body of work over Alfred's just based on the competition they have played. Our best chance at a number 1 seed in the East depends on DVU or Alfred running the table. Even if both do this, I still like DVU as a number 1 seed bc of thier win over John Hopkins. John Hopkins has a great chance at finishing 9-1 with their only blemish being DVU. If DVU only loss ends up being Wesley, I could live with the fact that they beat more quality opponents then Alfred has over the season.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 15, 2009, 09:39:39 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 10:34:15 PM
I think Alfred is the only Eastern team with a shot at the #1 seed at this point.
I'm gonna take this to mean that you don't think Albright has a chance to beat Del Valley. Because if Albright runs the table I don't see how they wouldn't be just as deserving (perhaps more so) than if Alfred was undefeated.
Quote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 11:55:09 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 15, 2009, 09:39:39 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 10:34:15 PM
I think Alfred is the only Eastern team with a shot at the #1 seed at this point.
I'm gonna take this to mean that you don't think Albright has a chance to beat Del Valley. Because if Albright runs the table I don't see how they wouldn't be just as deserving (perhaps more so) than if Alfred was undefeated.
My bad, I should have referenced that I don't see Albright running the table....even tough undefeated, their body of work does not impress me.
I could easily see Albight losing 2 of 3 to Widener, Del Val & Leb Val.
Quote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 11:58:02 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 11:55:09 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 15, 2009, 09:39:39 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 10:34:15 PM
I think Alfred is the only Eastern team with a shot at the #1 seed at this point.
I'm gonna take this to mean that you don't think Albright has a chance to beat Del Valley. Because if Albright runs the table I don't see how they wouldn't be just as deserving (perhaps more so) than if Alfred was undefeated.
My bad, I should have referenced that I don't see Albright running the table....even tough undefeated, their body of work does not impress me.
I could easily see Albight losing 2 of 3 to Widener, Del Val & Leb Val.
Of course their body of work isn't too much better than the rest of the teams. I think it's possible they lose 2, but more likely they'll probably end up 9-1 in my mind. if the loss is to Del Val, then Del Val should be the highest seed in the east, IMO.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 15, 2009, 11:24:14 AM
I know most people including myself have Alfred as #1 in the ERP, but I think in the end Delaware Valley should take over the top spot by season's end. Even if both teams run the table, I would be more impressed with Delaware Valley's body of work over Alfred's just based on the competition they have played. Our best chance at a number 1 seed in the East depends on DVU or Alfred running the table. Even if both do this, I still like DVU as a number 1 seed bc of thier win over John Hopkins. John Hopkins has a great chance at finishing 9-1 with their only blemish being DVU. If DVU only loss ends up being Wesley, I could live with the fact that they beat more quality opponents then Alfred has over the season.
Quote from: Upstate on October 15, 2009, 12:00:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 11:58:02 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 11:55:09 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 15, 2009, 09:39:39 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2009, 10:34:15 PM
I think Alfred is the only Eastern team with a shot at the #1 seed at this point.
I'm gonna take this to mean that you don't think Albright has a chance to beat Del Valley. Because if Albright runs the table I don't see how they wouldn't be just as deserving (perhaps more so) than if Alfred was undefeated.
My bad, I should have referenced that I don't see Albright running the table....even tough undefeated, their body of work does not impress me.
I could easily see Albight losing 2 of 3 to Widener, Del Val & Leb Val.
Of course their body of work isn't too much better than the rest of the teams. I think it's possible they lose 2, but more likely they'll probably end up 9-1 in my mind. if the loss is to Del Val, then Del Val should be the highest seed in the east, IMO.
You really mean to say highest east region team seeded in the MUC Bracket!
Quote from: Upstate on October 15, 2009, 12:06:14 PM
PG, just a scenario, if Albright and AU finish 10-0 with Rowan finishing 9-1 can you still say the same thing?
Quote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 12:26:13 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 15, 2009, 12:06:14 PM
PG, just a scenario, if Albright and AU finish 10-0 with Rowan finishing 9-1 can you still say the same thing?
Yes.
Quote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 12:26:13 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 15, 2009, 12:06:14 PM
PG, just a scenario, if Albright and AU finish 10-0 with Rowan finishing 9-1 can you still say the same thing?
Yes.
Quote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 12:43:33 PM
I can't see how an undefeated Alfred would not get the #1 overall seed in the East. Baring Alfred (or Albright for that matter) winning out, a Wesley or MUC will be moved in....that seems fair to me as well.
Quote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 01:49:11 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 12:43:33 PM
I can't see how an undefeated Alfred would not get the #1 overall seed in the East. Baring Alfred (or Albright for that matter) winning out, a Wesley or MUC will be moved in....that seems fair to me as well.
The top 4 teams in the nation are all better than Alfred. I think that would in fact be more fair than giving it to Alfred just because of regional tie ins.
Quote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 02:14:44 PM
If you have won all your games (ie., done everything you can possibly do), in a quality conference like the E8, you should be rewarded. If say a Curry goes undefeated in the NEFC, I think you have a different situation.
Is it cast in stone that the NCAA seeds the top 4 teams then puts them at the regional #1's? I have heard this, but don't know that it is a steadfast rule.
Quote from: Upstate on October 15, 2009, 02:22:45 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 02:14:44 PM
If you have won all your games (ie., done everything you can possibly do), in a quality conference like the E8, you should be rewarded. If say a Curry goes undefeated in the NEFC, I think you have a different situation.
Is it cast in stone that the NCAA seeds the top 4 teams then puts them at the regional #1's? I have heard this, but don't know that it is a steadfast rule.
That has been the trend the past 2 years with the East down as a whole...
Until someone in the East steps up and starts kicking ass on a consistent basis it's probably going to continue...
Quote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 02:14:44 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 15, 2009, 01:49:11 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 12:43:33 PM
I can't see how an undefeated Alfred would not get the #1 overall seed in the East. Baring Alfred (or Albright for that matter) winning out, a Wesley or MUC will be moved in....that seems fair to me as well.
The top 4 teams in the nation are all better than Alfred. I think that would in fact be more fair than giving it to Alfred just because of regional tie ins.
If you have won all your games (ie., done everything you can possibly do), in a quality conference like the E8, you should be rewarded. If say a Curry goes undefeated in the NEFC, I think you have a different situation.
Is it cast in stone that the NCAA seeds the top 4 teams then puts them at the regional #1's? I have heard this, but don't know that it is a steadfast rule.
QuoteUntil someone in the East steps up and starts kicking ass on a consistent basis it's probably going to continue...
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 15, 2009, 07:42:59 PM
@U89 regarding seeds: the team being imported has to be 500 miles, that's the distance allowed by the NCAA. Not sure exactly how they do it, but I guess that's why MUC can slide so easily into the east.
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 15, 2009, 07:42:59 PM
@U89 regarding seeds: the team being imported has to be 500 miles, that's the distance allowed by the NCAA. Not sure exactly how they do it, but I guess that's why MUC can slide so easily into the east.
Quote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 06:59:29 PM
PG,
Good looking out helping that woman on the ECFC board. I'm just surprised you didn't set up a time to personally explain all the nuances of the Pool B & C's to her.....you get a gold star for your forehead.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 15, 2009, 09:35:29 PM
Here's my problem with the whole importing Mt. Union thing. The numbers don't support that the East is so lacking vs. the North. The real beneficiary of this model are the elite North (Midwest) teams, but I'm not sure why they deserve the pass. This is going to seem strange, sometimes comparing blowout losses, but basically, the results over the last 4 years vs. the North and East are very similar for Mt. U's opponents:
2005 d. MSJ 49-6, Augustana 44-7, Capital 34-31, Rowan 19-7
2006 d. Hope 49-6, Wheaton 44-7, Capital 17-14, Fisher 26-14
2007 d. Ithaca 42-18,New Jersey 59-7, Fisher 52-10, Bethel 62-14
2008 d. RMacon 56-0, Hobart 42-7, Cortland 41-14, d. Wheaton 45-24
They blow out everyone in the first rounds, no matter where they're from. But, the scores show that over the years, the best North Rep excluding Mt. U (Capital, Capital, Bethel, Wheaton) had similar results vs Mt. U and the East (Rowan, Fisher, Fisher, Cortland. So, ex Mt. U, why exactly is the North considered superior to the East? Take away Mt. Union (the fact that they carry a 200 man roster would suggest to me that they're really not a true DIII team, but that's a discussion for another day), and I'd stack the East vs. the North any day.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 16, 2009, 12:18:54 AM
So would John Carroll.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 15, 2009, 09:35:29 PM
Here's my problem with the whole importing Mt. Union thing. The numbers don't support that the East is so lacking vs. the North. The real beneficiary of this model are the elite North (Midwest) teams, but I'm not sure why they deserve the pass. This is going to seem strange, sometimes comparing blowout losses, but basically, the results over the last 4 years vs. the North and East are very similar for Mt. U's opponents:
2005 d. MSJ 49-6, Augustana 44-7, Capital 34-31, Rowan 19-7
2006 d. Hope 49-6, Wheaton 44-7, Capital 17-14, Fisher 26-14
2007 d. Ithaca 42-18,New Jersey 59-7, Fisher 52-10, Bethel 62-14
2008 d. RMacon 56-0, Hobart 42-7, Cortland 41-14, d. Wheaton 45-24
They blow out everyone in the first rounds, no matter where they're from. But, the scores show that over the years, the best North Rep excluding Mt. U (Capital, Capital, Bethel, Wheaton) had similar results vs Mt. U and the East (Rowan, Fisher, Fisher, Cortland. So, ex Mt. U, why exactly is the North considered superior to the East? Take away Mt. Union (the fact that they carry a 200 man roster would suggest to me that they're really not a true DIII team, but that's a discussion for another day), and I'd stack the East vs. the North any day.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 16, 2009, 12:47:27 AMQuote from: Doid23 on October 15, 2009, 09:35:29 PM
Here's my problem with the whole importing Mt. Union thing. The numbers don't support that the East is so lacking vs. the North. The real beneficiary of this model are the elite North (Midwest) teams, but I'm not sure why they deserve the pass. This is going to seem strange, sometimes comparing blowout losses, but basically, the results over the last 4 years vs. the North and East are very similar for Mt. U's opponents:
2005 d. MSJ 49-6, Augustana 44-7, Capital 34-31, Rowan 19-7
2006 d. Hope 49-6, Wheaton 44-7, Capital 17-14, Fisher 26-14
2007 d. Ithaca 42-18,New Jersey 59-7, Fisher 52-10, Bethel 62-14
2008 d. RMacon 56-0, Hobart 42-7, Cortland 41-14, d. Wheaton 45-24
They blow out everyone in the first rounds, no matter where they're from. But, the scores show that over the years, the best North Rep excluding Mt. U (Capital, Capital, Bethel, Wheaton) had similar results vs Mt. U and the East (Rowan, Fisher, Fisher, Cortland. So, ex Mt. U, why exactly is the North considered superior to the East? Take away Mt. Union (the fact that they carry a 200 man roster would suggest to me that they're really not a true DIII team, but that's a discussion for another day), and I'd stack the East vs. the North any day.
I salute your loyalty, but that puts you in a tiny minority.
Leaving aside MUC, would you want to put money on the East's best against Wheaton, Capital, Wabash, NCC, Case Western, Otterbein, etc.?
Quote from: dlippiel on October 16, 2009, 08:08:47 AMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 16, 2009, 12:47:27 AMQuote from: Doid23 on October 15, 2009, 09:35:29 PM
Here's my problem with the whole importing Mt. Union thing. The numbers don't support that the East is so lacking vs. the North. The real beneficiary of this model are the elite North (Midwest) teams, but I'm not sure why they deserve the pass. This is going to seem strange, sometimes comparing blowout losses, but basically, the results over the last 4 years vs. the North and East are very similar for Mt. U's opponents:
2005 d. MSJ 49-6, Augustana 44-7, Capital 34-31, Rowan 19-7
2006 d. Hope 49-6, Wheaton 44-7, Capital 17-14, Fisher 26-14
2007 d. Ithaca 42-18,New Jersey 59-7, Fisher 52-10, Bethel 62-14
2008 d. RMacon 56-0, Hobart 42-7, Cortland 41-14, d. Wheaton 45-24
They blow out everyone in the first rounds, no matter where they're from. But, the scores show that over the years, the best North Rep excluding Mt. U (Capital, Capital, Bethel, Wheaton) had similar results vs Mt. U and the East (Rowan, Fisher, Fisher, Cortland. So, ex Mt. U, why exactly is the North considered superior to the East? Take away Mt. Union (the fact that they carry a 200 man roster would suggest to me that they're really not a true DIII team, but that's a discussion for another day), and I'd stack the East vs. the North any day.
I salute your loyalty, but that puts you in a tiny minority.
Leaving aside MUC, would you want to put money on the East's best against Wheaton, Capital, Wabash, NCC, Case Western, Otterbein, etc.?
Might be more competitive than one thinks. dlip is always the first to hammer the east in comparison but looking at the picture now, he thinks there is more to it. Obvioulsy you have 4-5 teams that are almost untouchable, but after that the drop off is somewhat significant and may favor the East being much more competitive across the board than dlip has given them credit for. This year has seemed to cross dlip up a bit as a result of 1.) No clear cut East team taking the reigns and running away 2.) The East just beating the **** out of itself and parity seeming to grow across the region and conferences. Who knows but these are some good thoughts.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 16, 2009, 12:47:27 AM
I salute your loyalty, but that puts you in a tiny minority.
Leaving aside MUC, would you want to put money on the East's best against Wheaton, Capital, Wabash, NCC, Case Western, Otterbein, etc.?
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2009, 12:37:34 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 06:59:29 PM
PG,
Good looking out helping that woman on the ECFC board. I'm just surprised you didn't set up a time to personally explain all the nuances of the Pool B & C's to her.....you get a gold star for your forehead.
I'm not sure what the point of this statement was. I gave her a link, but that was still more than anyone else did...
Quote from: Doid23 on October 16, 2009, 09:26:03 AMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 16, 2009, 12:47:27 AM
I salute your loyalty, but that puts you in a tiny minority.
Leaving aside MUC, would you want to put money on the East's best against Wheaton, Capital, Wabash, NCC, Case Western, Otterbein, etc.?
Would I put my money on it? No. But then, I wouldn't put my money on the North either.
This isn't a loyalty issue. I've been on the same boat as everyone else, the East is inferior, etc. But then when I remove the Mt. U factor, and looked at the numbers, a different story emerges.
I guess I'll flip it on you...what leads you to the conclusion that Wheaton, Capital, Wabash, NCC, Case Western, Otterbein, etc. are better than Ithaca, Rowan, Fisher, Union, RPI, Cortland, etc.? Certainly, their results against their only common opponent (Mt. U) say that their pretty equal. Equally bad, maybe, but equal.
Quote from: Union89 on October 16, 2009, 09:50:56 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2009, 12:37:34 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 06:59:29 PM
PG,
Good looking out helping that woman on the ECFC board. I'm just surprised you didn't set up a time to personally explain all the nuances of the Pool B & C's to her.....you get a gold star for your forehead.
I'm not sure what the point of this statement was. I gave her a link, but that was still more than anyone else did...
Not even busting chops....I thought it was nice of you...hoenestly, good job....easy boy....
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 16, 2009, 07:21:15 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 16, 2009, 12:18:54 AM
So would John Carroll.
Pat is going to continue to reference that John Carroll run 40 years from now God bless him...
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 16, 2009, 09:38:01 AM
How come Union and RPI gets mentioned but not Bart? (just kidding....sort of)
I agree with the point though. Even the John Carroll example, which can easily be considered an outlier (at least its seeding of #7 in the east, but that's on the NCAA and their cheapness) since their biggest win against Hobart was 27-7 (where Hobart was up 7-0, fumbled on the JCU 3 which was taken back 97 yards, boy that sounds familiar right now, and Bart lost their will against the 11th ranked team in the country - total yards were about the same and our future Galiardi finalist QB threw 2 picks vs. their, I believe Gagliardi finalist Arth who didn't), they beat 4 seeded Muhlenburg 21-10 and then won 16-10 in OT against Brockport (who knocked out #1 seeded Rowan by 3 the week before). Basically JCU was about the same as the top 2-3 teams in the East that year then they got stuck by MUC. So how is that different than having an MUC that's out of this world and everyone else?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 16, 2009, 12:44:59 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 16, 2009, 09:38:01 AM
How come Union and RPI gets mentioned but not Bart? (just kidding....sort of)
I agree with the point though. Even the John Carroll example, which can easily be considered an outlier (at least its seeding of #7 in the east, but that's on the NCAA and their cheapness) since their biggest win against Hobart was 27-7 (where Hobart was up 7-0, fumbled on the JCU 3 which was taken back 97 yards, boy that sounds familiar right now, and Bart lost their will against the 11th ranked team in the country - total yards were about the same and our future Galiardi finalist QB threw 2 picks vs. their, I believe Gagliardi finalist Arth who didn't), they beat 4 seeded Muhlenburg 21-10 and then won 16-10 in OT against Brockport (who knocked out #1 seeded Rowan by 3 the week before). Basically JCU was about the same as the top 2-3 teams in the East that year then they got stuck by MUC. So how is that different than having an MUC that's out of this world and everyone else?
Two key things get lost in the spin here:
1) John Carroll was playing every game after, what, 8-hour bus rides? (Except Brockport)
2) Tom Arth was hurt and not at all at 100 percent.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 16, 2009, 12:44:59 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 16, 2009, 09:38:01 AM
How come Union and RPI gets mentioned but not Bart? (just kidding....sort of)
I agree with the point though. Even the John Carroll example, which can easily be considered an outlier (at least its seeding of #7 in the east, but that's on the NCAA and their cheapness) since their biggest win against Hobart was 27-7 (where Hobart was up 7-0, fumbled on the JCU 3 which was taken back 97 yards, boy that sounds familiar right now, and Bart lost their will against the 11th ranked team in the country - total yards were about the same and our future Galiardi finalist QB threw 2 picks vs. their, I believe Gagliardi finalist Arth who didn't), they beat 4 seeded Muhlenburg 21-10 and then won 16-10 in OT against Brockport (who knocked out #1 seeded Rowan by 3 the week before). Basically JCU was about the same as the top 2-3 teams in the East that year then they got stuck by MUC. So how is that different than having an MUC that's out of this world and everyone else?
Two key things get lost in the spin here:
1) John Carroll was playing every game after, what, 8-hour bus rides? (Except Brockport)
2) Tom Arth was hurt and not at all at 100 percent.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 16, 2009, 12:44:59 PM
Two key things get lost in the spin here:
1) John Carroll was playing every game after, what, 8-hour bus rides? (Except Brockport)
2) Tom Arth was hurt and not at all at 100 percent.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 16, 2009, 02:39:43 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 16, 2009, 12:44:59 PM
Two key things get lost in the spin here:
1) John Carroll was playing every game after, what, 8-hour bus rides? (Except Brockport)
2) Tom Arth was hurt and not at all at 100 percent.
Spin? How so? Just presented facts.
Quote from: pg04 on October 16, 2009, 11:55:19 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 16, 2009, 09:50:56 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 16, 2009, 12:37:34 AMQuote from: Union89 on October 15, 2009, 06:59:29 PM
PG,
Good looking out helping that woman on the ECFC board. I'm just surprised you didn't set up a time to personally explain all the nuances of the Pool B & C's to her.....you get a gold star for your forehead.
I'm not sure what the point of this statement was. I gave her a link, but that was still more than anyone else did...
Not even busting chops....I thought it was nice of you...hoenestly, good job....easy boy....
Sorry, sometimes I have trouble reading the tone of responses :P . Unfortunately no one's returned to that board since I posted there!
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 16, 2009, 12:44:59 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 16, 2009, 09:38:01 AM
How come Union and RPI gets mentioned but not Bart? (just kidding....sort of)
I agree with the point though. Even the John Carroll example, which can easily be considered an outlier (at least its seeding of #7 in the east, but that's on the NCAA and their cheapness) since their biggest win against Hobart was 27-7 (where Hobart was up 7-0, fumbled on the JCU 3 which was taken back 97 yards, boy that sounds familiar right now, and Bart lost their will against the 11th ranked team in the country - total yards were about the same and our future Galiardi finalist QB threw 2 picks vs. their, I believe Gagliardi finalist Arth who didn't), they beat 4 seeded Muhlenburg 21-10 and then won 16-10 in OT against Brockport (who knocked out #1 seeded Rowan by 3 the week before). Basically JCU was about the same as the top 2-3 teams in the East that year then they got stuck by MUC. So how is that different than having an MUC that's out of this world and everyone else?
Two key things get lost in the spin here:
1) John Carroll was playing every game after, what, 8-hour bus rides? (Except Brockport)
2) Tom Arth was hurt and not at all at 100 percent.
Quote from: NYGiants02 on October 19, 2009, 09:19:19 PM
Normally I just read thoughts on here, but I am compelled to bring this up, just out of curiosity to see how some of pollsters think on here.
Kean is ahead of Rowan on the East Region Fan Poll, both have 1 loss... Kean to Del Val at home and Rowan on the road to Cortland minus their starting QB and Cortland still with Pitcher playing. Comparable losses, but my thinking is that Rowan is a proven program and has been to the dance before, although never winning it. Kean does not have the same record of playoff runs as Rowan, so a 1 loss Rowan team would get the nod in my mind before a 1 loss Kean team. I know, every year is different... Teams differ from year to year, just my thought process and was curious to see if anyone agrees.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 20, 2009, 12:35:06 AM
Been extremely busy this weekend, thought I would get the poll in tonight, just got home and will get it in tomorrow.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:55:44 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 20, 2009, 12:35:06 AM
Been extremely busy this weekend, thought I would get the poll in tonight, just got home and will get it in tomorrow.
Hey KS...How did it go? I few glasses of wine and maybe you got your poll in? Just the tip?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 10:10:03 AM
I agree. The chance to have one team that might compete deep into the playoffs vs. a team with two OOR losses is they key.
In a down year for my Hobart I'd be fine with Fisher being a dominant team as long as we didn't have to hear about it all the time. I'm just waiting for Hobart's year to take off. NCAA's 7 times in 9 years but never that phenomenal team that could make it late. Some of those years they've faced the best in earlier rounds, but people tend to only give credit for how deep you got and not who you went through to get there (caveat, Bart's best wins in the playoffs are both at home vs. Cortland and Lycoming, then a couple of NEFC blowouts and a last second loss to a decent Rowan team on their turf and a close 2nd rd loss to DelVal on their mud).
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AM
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 11:55:20 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AM
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
I'm not so sure. How good is Salisbury? They've lost to NC Wesleyan who lost to Emory and Henry who isn't exactly the cream of the ODAC (who sent their winner to the East as the 8 seed last year) and to Christopher Newport who lost to Wilkes who most of us think is down quite a bit this year. Now with an offense like theirs it may lead to more divergent results than a more traditional offense, but I still think there are more than 3 or 4 east teams that could be 5-1 with Fisher's schedule.
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:59:17 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 11:55:20 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AM
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
I'm not so sure. How good is Salisbury? They've lost to NC Wesleyan who lost to Emory and Henry who isn't exactly the cream of the ODAC (who sent their winner to the East as the 8 seed last year) and to Christopher Newport who lost to Wilkes who most of us think is down quite a bit this year. Now with an offense like theirs it may lead to more divergent results than a more traditional offense, but I still think there are more than 3 or 4 east teams that could be 5-1 with Fisher's schedule.
AU, Rowan, Del Valley and Albright are those 4 teams I was referring to...
Other than those I don't see too many teams going into Salisbury and fairing any better...
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:52:48 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 10:10:03 AM
I agree. The chance to have one team that might compete deep into the playoffs vs. a team with two OOR losses is they key.
In a down year for my Hobart I'd be fine with Fisher being a dominant team as long as we didn't have to hear about it all the time. I'm just waiting for Hobart's year to take off. NCAA's 7 times in 9 years but never that phenomenal team that could make it late. Some of those years they've faced the best in earlier rounds, but people tend to only give credit for how deep you got and not who you went through to get there (caveat, Bart's best wins in the playoffs are both at home vs. Cortland and Lycoming, then a couple of NEFC blowouts and a last second loss to a decent Rowan team on their turf and a close 2nd rd loss to DelVal on their mud).
There's only a few boisterous SJF alum that perhaps toot their own horn a bit too much, in fact I don't think our loudest fan is on here anymore (82). We're still a young program, we've only been around for 21 years. We don't have a lot to draw on in terms of history like Ithaca, Hobart, Union, RPI and heck even Rochester has been playing football forever...
All in all I don't think there's a huge difference between the Hobarts, Unions and IC's followers on here compared to the SJF ones...
Hobart has been on a heck of a run recently this past decade, you can go off right now if you wanted about how you're a regional power you guys have earned it...
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:59:17 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 11:55:20 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AM
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
I'm not so sure. How good is Salisbury? They've lost to NC Wesleyan who lost to Emory and Henry who isn't exactly the cream of the ODAC (who sent their winner to the East as the 8 seed last year) and to Christopher Newport who lost to Wilkes who most of us think is down quite a bit this year. Now with an offense like theirs it may lead to more divergent results than a more traditional offense, but I still think there are more than 3 or 4 east teams that could be 5-1 with Fisher's schedule.
AU, Rowan, Del Valley and Albright are those 4 teams I was referring to...
Other than those I don't see too many teams going into Salisbury and fairing any better...
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 12:18:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
What the **** is wrong with you Fisher guys? I'm not saying ANYTHING bad about them or their schedule. I'm saying that they have had a crack out of region and if they are the East's best, then the East royally sucks. I hope Alfred can provide some hope to giving the East a shot at being competitive. Jesus H.!!!
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 12:07:44 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:52:48 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 10:10:03 AM
I agree. The chance to have one team that might compete deep into the playoffs vs. a team with two OOR losses is they key.
In a down year for my Hobart I'd be fine with Fisher being a dominant team as long as we didn't have to hear about it all the time. I'm just waiting for Hobart's year to take off. NCAA's 7 times in 9 years but never that phenomenal team that could make it late. Some of those years they've faced the best in earlier rounds, but people tend to only give credit for how deep you got and not who you went through to get there (caveat, Bart's best wins in the playoffs are both at home vs. Cortland and Lycoming, then a couple of NEFC blowouts and a last second loss to a decent Rowan team on their turf and a close 2nd rd loss to DelVal on their mud).
There's only a few boisterous SJF alum that perhaps toot their own horn a bit too much, in fact I don't think our loudest fan is on here anymore (82). We're still a young program, we've only been around for 21 years. We don't have a lot to draw on in terms of history like Ithaca, Hobart, Union, RPI and heck even Rochester has been playing football forever...
All in all I don't think there's a huge difference between the Hobarts, Unions and IC's followers on here compared to the SJF ones...
Hobart has been on a heck of a run recently this past decade, you can go off right now if you wanted about how you're a regional power you guys have earned it...
You may be right about the fans now that 82's presence has disappeared.
I just don't know how good Hobart has been. They've rarely had middle of the road, competitive playoff games. It's usually agianst the weaker teams or the nat'l semifinal rep, which means they could've been anywhere between #7 and #2 in the East in most of those years.
This year, we're working on the master plan to take down MUC next year (and SJF, who I believe we start playing in 2010 at least a home and home)
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:12:16 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:16:01 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:12:16 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
DUDE, this STILL isn't the point! You seriously must be retarded. If Fisher makes the playoffs OF COURSE they deserve it!!! Nevermind...back to your coloring book.
91 - You're cool...Not directed at you.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:16:01 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:12:16 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
DUDE, this STILL isn't the point! You seriously must be retarded. If Fisher makes the playoffs OF COURSE they deserve it!!! Nevermind...back to your coloring book.
91 - You're cool...Not directed at you.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:16:01 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:12:16 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
DUDE, this STILL isn't the point! You seriously must be retarded. If Fisher makes the playoffs OF COURSE they deserve it!!! Nevermind...back to your coloring book.
91 - You're cool...Not directed at you.
A wise man once said when someone's POINT is always that "that isnt the point", they are indeed pointless.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 01:23:03 PM
How about if we turned the argument around on itself. If Fisher were 5-0 and Alfred were 4-2 with those losses being out of region, which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:23:26 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:16:01 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:12:16 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
DUDE, this STILL isn't the point! You seriously must be retarded. If Fisher makes the playoffs OF COURSE they deserve it!!! Nevermind...back to your coloring book.
91 - You're cool...Not directed at you.
A wise man once said when someone's POINT is always that "that isnt the point", they are indeed pointless.
A wiser man once said "Me Hulk no read so good"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kitchenrat.com%2FHulk200by2002.jpg&hash=c6e2f4336222582fed2df5c2dec066eb5086b8b8)
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 12:18:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
What the **** is wrong with you Fisher guys? I'm not saying ANYTHING bad about them or their schedule. I'm saying that they have had a crack out of region and if they are the East's best, then the East royally sucks. I hope Alfred can provide some hope to giving the East a shot at being competitive. Jesus H.!!!
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 01:43:30 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 12:18:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
What the **** is wrong with you Fisher guys? I'm not saying ANYTHING bad about them or their schedule. I'm saying that they have had a crack out of region and if they are the East's best, then the East royally sucks. I hope Alfred can provide some hope to giving the East a shot at being competitive. Jesus H.!!!
Gro I got what you were saying, you and everyone else want to see how the rest of the east stacked up. No need to go ballistic when I say that there are less than a hand full of teams that would have done any better...
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 20, 2009, 01:54:24 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 01:43:30 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 12:18:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
What the **** is wrong with you Fisher guys? I'm not saying ANYTHING bad about them or their schedule. I'm saying that they have had a crack out of region and if they are the East's best, then the East royally sucks. I hope Alfred can provide some hope to giving the East a shot at being competitive. Jesus H.!!!
Gro I got what you were saying, you and everyone else want to see how the rest of the east stacked up. No need to go ballistic when I say that there are less than a hand full of teams that would have done any better...
gro? where did he come from? thought is was LD in here...
Quote from: Doid23 on October 20, 2009, 01:51:02 PM
LD, I'm just going to assume that the Fisher fans are just egging you on to see how crazy it makes you. At least, that's what I'm hoping, for their sake. See, if you would just stop hating Fisher, they would leave you alone.
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 01:55:59 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 20, 2009, 01:54:24 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 01:43:30 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 12:18:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
What the **** is wrong with you Fisher guys? I'm not saying ANYTHING bad about them or their schedule. I'm saying that they have had a crack out of region and if they are the East's best, then the East royally sucks. I hope Alfred can provide some hope to giving the East a shot at being competitive. Jesus H.!!!
Gro I got what you were saying, you and everyone else want to see how the rest of the east stacked up. No need to go ballistic when I say that there are less than a hand full of teams that would have done any better...
gro? where did he come from? thought is was LD in here...
Thanks for the correction, I get them confused...
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:56:22 PMQuote from: Doid23 on October 20, 2009, 01:51:02 PM
LD, I'm just going to assume that the Fisher fans are just egging you on to see how crazy it makes you. At least, that's what I'm hoping, for their sake. See, if you would just stop hating Fisher, they would leave you alone.
Giving them a lot of credit there dude.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 20, 2009, 01:56:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 01:55:59 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 20, 2009, 01:54:24 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 01:43:30 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 12:18:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 11:42:37 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 10:03:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 09:46:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.the700level.com%2Fimages%2F2008%2F08%2F06%2F0412agent.jpg&hash=339d1f9820e76893d0e453a341306888008ed437)
"Next question..."
From a perspective that doesn't involve Cardinal colored glasses I do see your point in wanting some fresh blood to represent the East as their top dog.
From a Cardinal and E8 fan I'd like to see SJF win the AQ and AU win out so both teams get in. But that's just me...
Doesn't have to do with 'fresh blood'...More like Fisher has already played some teams outside of the East and couldn't match up...So i'm hoping maybe Alfred will show that they can.
There are very few teams in the east (3-4) that would have a better record than SJF if they had SJF's schedule...
What the **** is wrong with you Fisher guys? I'm not saying ANYTHING bad about them or their schedule. I'm saying that they have had a crack out of region and if they are the East's best, then the East royally sucks. I hope Alfred can provide some hope to giving the East a shot at being competitive. Jesus H.!!!
Gro I got what you were saying, you and everyone else want to see how the rest of the east stacked up. No need to go ballistic when I say that there are less than a hand full of teams that would have done any better...
gro? where did he come from? thought is was LD in here...
Thanks for the correction, I get them confused...
yes they do look a lot alike...
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:23:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 01:23:03 PM
How about if we turned the argument around on itself. If Fisher were 5-0 and Alfred were 4-2 with those losses being out of region, which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time?
BINGO!!!
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 02:00:41 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:23:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 01:23:03 PM
How about if we turned the argument around on itself. If Fisher were 5-0 and Alfred were 4-2 with those losses being out of region, which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time?
BINGO!!!
Lew we get your point but honestly it's all pointless. Your main gripe here is about perception..."Which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time"....So if Fisher wins out it shows the East in weak since they lost their out of region games we get it. But who the hell cares about perception? Change their minds by winning in the playoffs. Like I said before if Alfred goes 8-1 they would still make it as an At-Large and in all likelyhood Mount Union would again be shipped East and then we'd all have our cracks to prove the East isn't that weak as opposed to a lame perception by one team winning out against regional opponents but losing out of region. Unless you guys are afraid to play them and would rather show how "strong" the East is against the less powerful playoff teams.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 02:00:41 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:23:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 01:23:03 PM
How about if we turned the argument around on itself. If Fisher were 5-0 and Alfred were 4-2 with those losses being out of region, which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time?
BINGO!!!
Lew we get your point but honestly it's all pointless. Your main gripe here is about perception..."Which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time"....So if Fisher wins out it shows the East in weak since they lost their out of region games we get it. But who the hell cares about perception? Change their minds by winning in the playoffs. Like I said before if Alfred goes 8-1 they would still make it as an At-Large and in all likelyhood Mount Union would again be shipped East and then we'd all have our cracks to prove the East isn't that weak as opposed to a lame perception by one team winning out against regional opponents but losing out of region. Unless you guys are afraid to play them and would rather show how "strong" the East is against the less powerful playoff teams.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:08:51 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 02:00:41 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:23:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 01:23:03 PM
How about if we turned the argument around on itself. If Fisher were 5-0 and Alfred were 4-2 with those losses being out of region, which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time?
BINGO!!!
Lew we get your point but honestly it's all pointless. Your main gripe here is about perception..."Which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time"....So if Fisher wins out it shows the East in weak since they lost their out of region games we get it. But who the hell cares about perception? Change their minds by winning in the playoffs. Like I said before if Alfred goes 8-1 they would still make it as an At-Large and in all likelyhood Mount Union would again be shipped East and then we'd all have our cracks to prove the East isn't that weak as opposed to a lame perception by one team winning out against regional opponents but losing out of region. Unless you guys are afraid to play them and would rather show how "strong" the East is against the less powerful playoff teams.
Nah man, I don't care about perception. Look, maybe Fisher laid an egg against Salisbury, and has improved a great deal since Mt. Union, and I really do hope so, especially if they are in the tournament. But right now, that's all we have to go on UNTIL the playoffs. So we have a few scenarios:
1. Fisher is MUCH improved, beats up Alfred, makes the playoffs, and does well.
2. Alfred isn't that good, loses to Fisher, and the East looks dookie again(except for maybe an NJAC/MAC rescue)
3. Fisher is MUCH improved, loses to a better Alfred team, who does well in the playoffs, or,
4. Alfred slides by a mediocre Fisher, and does nothing in the playoffs.
No perceptions here. Just wishful thinking on the big picture, not just through a tiny little microscope in Rochester.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 02:14:12 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:08:51 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 02:00:41 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:23:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 01:23:03 PM
How about if we turned the argument around on itself. If Fisher were 5-0 and Alfred were 4-2 with those losses being out of region, which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time?
BINGO!!!
Lew we get your point but honestly it's all pointless. Your main gripe here is about perception..."Which team winning out would you think would show that the East isn't a complete push-over come playoff time"....So if Fisher wins out it shows the East in weak since they lost their out of region games we get it. But who the hell cares about perception? Change their minds by winning in the playoffs. Like I said before if Alfred goes 8-1 they would still make it as an At-Large and in all likelyhood Mount Union would again be shipped East and then we'd all have our cracks to prove the East isn't that weak as opposed to a lame perception by one team winning out against regional opponents but losing out of region. Unless you guys are afraid to play them and would rather show how "strong" the East is against the less powerful playoff teams.
Nah man, I don't care about perception. Look, maybe Fisher laid an egg against Salisbury, and has improved a great deal since Mt. Union, and I really do hope so, especially if they are in the tournament. But right now, that's all we have to go on UNTIL the playoffs. So we have a few scenarios:
1. Fisher is MUCH improved, beats up Alfred, makes the playoffs, and does well.
2. Alfred isn't that good, loses to Fisher, and the East looks dookie again(except for maybe an NJAC/MAC rescue)
3. Fisher is MUCH improved, loses to a better Alfred team, who does well in the playoffs, or,
4. Alfred slides by a mediocre Fisher, and does nothing in the playoffs.
No perceptions here. Just wishful thinking on the big picture, not just through a tiny little microscope in Rochester.
Ha, no I am not looking at things through my tiny microscope in Rochester...I obviously would like for my school to be as high as seed as possible so I mean you won't see me actively rooting for them to be destroyed by Alfred...But I have said ime and again I root for the East pretty hard come playoff time, and I would love to see an Eastern team go deep. I just don't particularly agree that Alfred winning out is the best scenario for that to play out. Do you know what I mean? Because now even I am starting to sound vague and nondescript to myself....
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:08:51 PM
Nah man, I don't care about perception. Look, maybe Fisher laid an egg against Salisbury, and has improved a great deal since Mt. Union, and I really do hope so, especially if they are in the tournament. But right now, that's all we have to go on UNTIL the playoffs. So we have a few scenarios:
1. Fisher is MUCH improved, beats up Alfred, makes the playoffs, and does well.
2. Alfred isn't that good, loses to Fisher, and the East looks dookie again(except for maybe an NJAC/MAC rescue)
3. Fisher is MUCH improved, loses to a better Alfred team, who does well in the playoffs, or,
4. Alfred slides by a mediocre Fisher, and does nothing in the playoffs.
No perceptions here. Just wishful thinking on the big picture, not just through a tiny little microscope in Rochester.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:22:42 PM
Alfred would smoke Mt. Union for sure.
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 02:20:34 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:08:51 PM
Nah man, I don't care about perception. Look, maybe Fisher laid an egg against Salisbury, and has improved a great deal since Mt. Union, and I really do hope so, especially if they are in the tournament. But right now, that's all we have to go on UNTIL the playoffs. So we have a few scenarios:
1. Fisher is MUCH improved, beats up Alfred, makes the playoffs, and does well.
2. Alfred isn't that good, loses to Fisher, and the East looks dookie again(except for maybe an NJAC/MAC rescue)
3. Fisher is MUCH improved, loses to a better Alfred team, who does well in the playoffs, or,
4. Alfred slides by a mediocre Fisher, and does nothing in the playoffs.
No perceptions here. Just wishful thinking on the big picture, not just through a tiny little microscope in Rochester.
With teams like Wesley, Wheaton, Linfield, St. Johns and UW-W all going strong again there is a 100% chance MUC gets moved to the East. So regardless of how Rowan, Del Valley, Alfred, Albright and St. John Fisher finish up we're all going to have to be fed to the purple people eaters again. So to be arguing on who would look better representing the east is a moot point...
Quote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 02:29:25 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:22:42 PM
Alfred would smoke Mt. Union for sure.
One thing for sure it would be every AU fans dream, there would be purple all over the place...
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 20, 2009, 02:29:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 02:20:34 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:08:51 PM
Nah man, I don't care about perception. Look, maybe Fisher laid an egg against Salisbury, and has improved a great deal since Mt. Union, and I really do hope so, especially if they are in the tournament. But right now, that's all we have to go on UNTIL the playoffs. So we have a few scenarios:
1. Fisher is MUCH improved, beats up Alfred, makes the playoffs, and does well.
2. Alfred isn't that good, loses to Fisher, and the East looks dookie again(except for maybe an NJAC/MAC rescue)
3. Fisher is MUCH improved, loses to a better Alfred team, who does well in the playoffs, or,
4. Alfred slides by a mediocre Fisher, and does nothing in the playoffs.
No perceptions here. Just wishful thinking on the big picture, not just through a tiny little microscope in Rochester.
With teams like Wesley, Wheaton, Linfield, St. Johns and UW-W all going strong again there is a 100% chance MUC gets moved to the East. So regardless of how Rowan, Del Valley, Alfred, Albright and St. John Fisher finish up we're all going to have to be fed to the purple people eaters again. So to be arguing on who would look better representing the east is a moot point...
I have this strange feeling that somthing funky and different is going to happen with the east this year. Like Wesley at the #1 and Otterbein or W@J as the #2 seeds.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 02:34:46 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 02:29:25 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:22:42 PM
Alfred would smoke Mt. Union for sure.
One thing for sure it would be every AU fans dream, there would be purple all over the place...
The Saxons are doing what they can to bring about a family reunion of sorts. The band's sousaphone player has a twin sister in the MUC marching band and the football team needs to make sure she has bragging rights over Christmas dinner!
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 02:40:59 PM
Not to be contrarian but can I ask a basic question underlying this entire debate: why does everyone care how the East Region is perceived or how it performs? I don't wish ill on Alfred, Fisher, RPI, or anyone else in the East once IC's season is over but I also don't really care if they succeed. When I was still playing I never understood why opponents would say "now you have to go win the whole thing" after my team beat them in a tournament or in the playoffs. Why do opponents become allies so quickly?
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:42:32 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 02:40:59 PM
Not to be contrarian but can I ask a basic question underlying this entire debate: why does everyone care how the East Region is perceived or how it performs? I don't wish ill on Alfred, Fisher, RPI, or anyone else in the East once IC's season is over but I also don't really care if they succeed. When I was still playing I never understood why opponents would say "now you have to go win the whole thing" after my team beat them in a tournament or in the playoffs. Why do opponents become allies so quickly?
Because i'm sick of Mt. ****ing Union.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 20, 2009, 02:29:51 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 20, 2009, 02:20:34 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 02:08:51 PM
Nah man, I don't care about perception. Look, maybe Fisher laid an egg against Salisbury, and has improved a great deal since Mt. Union, and I really do hope so, especially if they are in the tournament. But right now, that's all we have to go on UNTIL the playoffs. So we have a few scenarios:
1. Fisher is MUCH improved, beats up Alfred, makes the playoffs, and does well.
2. Alfred isn't that good, loses to Fisher, and the East looks dookie again(except for maybe an NJAC/MAC rescue)
3. Fisher is MUCH improved, loses to a better Alfred team, who does well in the playoffs, or,
4. Alfred slides by a mediocre Fisher, and does nothing in the playoffs.
No perceptions here. Just wishful thinking on the big picture, not just through a tiny little microscope in Rochester.
With teams like Wesley, Wheaton, Linfield, St. Johns and UW-W all going strong again there is a 100% chance MUC gets moved to the East. So regardless of how Rowan, Del Valley, Alfred, Albright and St. John Fisher finish up we're all going to have to be fed to the purple people eaters again. So to be arguing on who would look better representing the east is a moot point...
I have this strange feeling that somthing funky and different is going to happen with the east this year. Like Wesley at the #1 and Otterbein or W@J as the #2 seeds.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 03:27:17 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
You admit your involvement in 82's disappearance....I shall turn this over to the appropriate authorities
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 02:40:59 PM
Not to be contrarian but can I ask a basic question underlying this entire debate: why does everyone care how the East Region is perceived or how it performs? I don't wish ill on Alfred, Fisher, RPI, or anyone else in the East once IC's season is over but I also don't really care if they succeed. When I was still playing I never understood why opponents would say "now you have to go win the whole thing" after my team beat them in a tournament or in the playoffs. Why do opponents become allies so quickly?
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 04:03:20 PM
And thus far comprehends on about the same level.
I'm trying to avoid getting sucked into all this, but the one comment that jumps out is the prediction that if Albright and AU finish undefeateed they'll still ship MUC or another team in as a #1. I personally think the East is weak this year and it won't matter come nat'l semifinals or sooner, this would be f****d up. I'm too lazy to do all the math and compare 300 teams, but if the criteria is based on in region schedule to a large degree and this region has two undefeated teams, there should be a #1 seed from this region. There isn't enough data to have an objective standard and still do this, in which case, just scrap the whole AQ system and have a committee do the selections and full 32 team seeding.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:12:16 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 04:21:32 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:12:16 PMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 01:05:36 PM
I'm starting to think you guys aren't crazy. You're just ****-ing STUPID!!! I don't care who is better. I really don't!!! What don't you get? It's not you against the world!!! I hope whoever represents the East at this point does well, but...Fisher has already turned their cards over(no pun intended). We know where they stand for the most part, out of region. We don't know with Alfred. I don't care if both make the playoffs. That is not the point.
Seriously guys? Is Fisher an accredited college because you all are not very convincing as having functioning ****ing brains. You're starting to make Cortland look like Harvard.
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
You lost me after this one.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 04:30:33 PM
Or it means I was open minded until you continued to attempt to drive your point through of how wonderful SJF would be as an eastern representative irrespective of the conversation going on around you. The other conversation was about how we know the ending to SJF, whereas we have an idea how AU's season would end, but we don't know until it happens which at least offers some modicum on intrigue for those of us who aren't directly involved at that point (or in my case after Bart lost the Susquehanna game).
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 04:42:12 PM
If AU beats them on Sat, end of discussion. If SJF wins and wins handily, then what....? Then the East's darling AU got beat by a ****ty SJF squad and the East truly does suck.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 04:57:11 PM
Hey, hey, hey...."Make Cortland look like Harvard"....ouch...you don't see Cortland alumni denigrating AU or SJF alumni like that....and for those of you who graduated from AU or SJF, denigrating means to make fun of or put down but I digress...
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 04:57:11 PM
Hey, hey, hey...."Make Cortland look like Harvard"....ouch....you don't see Cortland alumni denigrating AU or SJF alumni like that....and for those of you who graduated from AU or SJF, denigrating means to make fun of or put down but I digress....
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 05:12:37 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 04:57:11 PM
Hey, hey, hey...."Make Cortland look like Harvard"....ouch....you don't see Cortland alumni denigrating AU or SJF alumni like that....and for those of you who graduated from AU or SJF, denigrating means to make fun of or put down but I digress....
I love it! Look at the vocab! Denigrating. Digress. Alumni. If it weren't for the extra period in your ellipses I'd have thought you were just posing as a Cortland alum to...well...I can't think of a reason to pretend you went to Cortland. But, alas, you gave use the punctuation error and revealed your true identity: A Cortland alum that got word-a-day toilet paper as a graduation gift.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 04:42:12 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 04:30:33 PM
Or it means I was open minded until you continued to attempt to drive your point through of how wonderful SJF would be as an eastern representative irrespective of the conversation going on around you. The other conversation was about how we know the ending to SJF, whereas we have an idea how AU's season would end, but we don't know until it happens which at least offers some modicum on intrigue for those of us who aren't directly involved at that point (or in my case after Bart lost the Susquehanna game).
Believe me....I understand the argument going on. I just disagree with the position being taken. Would you at least agree that with respect to MUC (because that is one of SJF's losses that was being referred to by the poster that started this thread) we know how everyone's season ends? So if you agree with that, then isnt it a bit unfair to use that against SJF?
As far as using the Salisbury loss as an indicator of how SJF would fair against 00C teams in the playoffs...It is my opinion that "it is what it is". Many teams have a 'bad' loss during an otherwise good season. They just have easily could have lost to IC in conference. It seems the Salisbury loss is being cherry picked to support the idea that SJF cannot compete OOC.
If AU beats them on Sat, end of discussion. If SJF wins and wins handily, then what....? Then the East's darling AU got beat by a ****ty SJF squad and the East truly does suck.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 06:22:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 04:42:12 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 04:30:33 PM
Or it means I was open minded until you continued to attempt to drive your point through of how wonderful SJF would be as an eastern representative irrespective of the conversation going on around you. The other conversation was about how we know the ending to SJF, whereas we have an idea how AU's season would end, but we don't know until it happens which at least offers some modicum on intrigue for those of us who aren't directly involved at that point (or in my case after Bart lost the Susquehanna game).
Believe me....I understand the argument going on. I just disagree with the position being taken. Would you at least agree that with respect to MUC (because that is one of SJF's losses that was being referred to by the poster that started this thread) we know how everyone's season ends? So if you agree with that, then isnt it a bit unfair to use that against SJF?
As far as using the Salisbury loss as an indicator of how SJF would fair against 00C teams in the playoffs...It is my opinion that "it is what it is". Many teams have a 'bad' loss during an otherwise good season. They just have easily could have lost to IC in conference. It seems the Salisbury loss is being cherry picked to support the idea that SJF cannot compete OOC.
If AU beats them on Sat, end of discussion. If SJF wins and wins handily, then what....? Then the East's darling AU got beat by a ****ty SJF squad and the East truly does suck.
As Pat discussed on In The HuddLLe (which even you E8ers should listen to), Salisbury is probably a 4-55 win team this year. It is his opinion that Union is the favorite going in. No team in in the top 10 or top 15 should lose to Salisbury so yes, if the best team in the East loses to Salisbury, no matter how many backstories, excuses etc., then the region sucks. Period, end of story. It's not like losing to another top 25 team.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 06:28:45 PM
My humblest apologies for the extra period in my ellipses. Didn't realize anyone would be paying attention to that level of detail on this board. Seems borderline anal to me but I won't continue down that path. Just responding to a completely unprovoked pot shot at Cortland which I am pretty confident all would have done the same. So I leave you now until my next visit to the crapper when I will find some more words to astound you all with from my grad gift!(Fingers crossed that abbreviations are acceptable)
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 03:27:17 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
You admit your involvement in 82's disappearance....I shall turn this over to the appropriate authorities
Come to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 20, 2009, 06:28:58 PM
look at the top 25, Del Val wins and drops a spot and they are our ONLY representation as of right now in the damn poll.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2009, 08:31:36 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 03:27:17 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
You admit your involvement in 82's disappearance....I shall turn this over to the appropriate authorities
Come to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Glad someone else figured it out.
Quote from: pg04 on October 20, 2009, 08:41:45 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2009, 08:31:36 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 03:27:17 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
You admit your involvement in 82's disappearance....I shall turn this over to the appropriate authorities
Come to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Glad someone else figured it out.
I.E. Ty = SJF... Shame on the east region posters for being slow on the draw!
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:47:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 20, 2009, 08:41:45 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2009, 08:31:36 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 03:27:17 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
You admit your involvement in 82's disappearance....I shall turn this over to the appropriate authorities
Come to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Glad someone else figured it out.
I.E. Ty = SJF... Shame on the east region posters for being slow on the draw!
Well that is good news for Fisher fans I suppose. I was amazed that they could possibly have 2 followers so equally dimwitted.
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:47:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 20, 2009, 08:41:45 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2009, 08:31:36 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 03:27:17 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
You admit your involvement in 82's disappearance....I shall turn this over to the appropriate authorities
Come to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Glad someone else figured it out.
I.E. Ty = SJF... Shame on the east region posters for being slow on the draw!
Well that is good news for Fisher fans I suppose. I was amazed that they could possibly have 2 followers so equally dimwitted.
Quote from: maxpower on October 20, 2009, 08:55:14 PM
No biggie, I've thought KS and LD were the same person for years...
Quote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:47:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 20, 2009, 08:41:45 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2009, 08:31:36 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 03:27:17 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2009, 09:38:32 AMQuote from: Dr. Lew Von Doggenstein on October 20, 2009, 08:58:33 AM
Is anyone else, outside of the Fisher bubble secretly hoping Alfred blows Fisher out, not for revenge or anything, but because of Fisher's performance against Mt. Union and Salisbury?...So that we have a hope and savior in the East???
This was at the nexus of the post I made which eventually led to 82's disappearance.
You admit your involvement in 82's disappearance....I shall turn this over to the appropriate authorities
Come to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Glad someone else figured it out.
I.E. Ty = SJF... Shame on the east region posters for being slow on the draw!
Well that is good news for Fisher fans I suppose. I was amazed that they could possibly have 2 followers so equally dimwitted.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 06:28:45 PM
My humblest apologies for the extra period in my ellipses. Didn't realize anyone would be paying attention to that level of detail on this board. Seems borderline anal to me but I won't continue down that path. Just responding to a completely unprovoked pot shot at Cortland which I am pretty confident all would have done the same. So I leave you now until my next visit to the crapper when I will find some more words to astound you all with from my grad gift!(Fingers crossed that abbreviations are acceptable)
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 06:22:35 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 04:42:12 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2009, 04:30:33 PM
Or it means I was open minded until you continued to attempt to drive your point through of how wonderful SJF would be as an eastern representative irrespective of the conversation going on around you. The other conversation was about how we know the ending to SJF, whereas we have an idea how AU's season would end, but we don't know until it happens which at least offers some modicum on intrigue for those of us who aren't directly involved at that point (or in my case after Bart lost the Susquehanna game).
Believe me....I understand the argument going on. I just disagree with the position being taken. Would you at least agree that with respect to MUC (because that is one of SJF's losses that was being referred to by the poster that started this thread) we know how everyone's season ends? So if you agree with that, then isnt it a bit unfair to use that against SJF?
As far as using the Salisbury loss as an indicator of how SJF would fair against 00C teams in the playoffs...It is my opinion that "it is what it is". Many teams have a 'bad' loss during an otherwise good season. They just have easily could have lost to IC in conference. It seems the Salisbury loss is being cherry picked to support the idea that SJF cannot compete OOC.
If AU beats them on Sat, end of discussion. If SJF wins and wins handily, then what....? Then the East's darling AU got beat by a ****ty SJF squad and the East truly does suck.
As Pat discussed on In The HuddLLe (which even you E8ers should listen to), Salisbury is probably a 4-5 win team this year. It is his opinion that Union is the favorite going in. No team in in the top 10 or top 15 should lose to Salisbury so yes, if the best team in the East loses to Salisbury, no matter how many backstories, excuses etc., then the region sucks. Period, end of story. It's not like losing to another top 25 team.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2009, 08:31:36 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMCome to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Glad someone else figured it out.
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:13:46 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2009, 08:31:36 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2009, 03:42:35 PMCome to think of it.....Ty did show up shortly after 82 left.
Glad someone else figured it out.
Wait ... wait ... wait. Finkle is Einhorn? Einhorn is Finkle? Einhorn is a man?
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvdactive.com%2Fimages%2Freviews%2Fscreenshot%2F2001%2F11%2Face_ventura_pet_detective_r4_002.jpg&hash=e2d55242389493a1266385a1b3491768aef2da95)
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred ( 7 ) | 5-0 | 96 | 1 | at #6 Fisher |
2 Albright ( 1 ) | 6-0 | 84 | 2 | vs. Widener |
3 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 5-1 | 80 | 3 | at Lycoming |
4 Rowan | 5-1 | 66 | 5 | vs. Buffalo State |
5 Kean | 5-1 | 68 | 4 | vs. Morrisville State |
6 St. John Fisher | 4-2 | 47 | 6 | vs. #1 Alfred |
7 Union | 5-1 | 35 | 7 | at Salisbury |
8 Lebanon Valley | 5-1 | 27 | 8 | vs King's |
9 Springfield | 5-1 | 21 | 9 | at Hartwick |
10 Montclair State | 5-1 | 16 | NR | at TCNJ |
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 09:17:52 PM...and Q is the consumate 'frontrunner'...good thing you figured this out all on your own...Pet Detective. Smell that dog ****....its Ithaca's legacy in Fisher's rearview mirror.
Quote from: pg04 on October 20, 2009, 09:24:51 PM
Week 7 Fan Poll -- Not much movement
1 Point is missing here because one of the polls was missing a 10th team. I will adjust if receive the 10th team tonight.
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred ( 7 ) 5-0 96 1 at #6 Fisher 2 Albright ( 1 ) 6-0 84 2 vs. Widener 3 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 5-1 80 3 at Lycoming 4 Rowan 5-1 66 5 vs. Buffalo State 5 Kean 5-1 68 4 vs. Morrisville State 6 St. John Fisher 4-2 47 6 vs. #1 Alfred 7 Union 5-1 35 7 at Salisbury 8 Lebanon Valley 5-1 27 8 vs King's 9 Springfield 5-1 21 9 at Hartwick 10 Montclair State 5-1 16 NR at TCNJ
Dropped Out:
#10 TCNJ
Also Receiving votes:
Ithaca 4
Susquehanna 2
TCNJ 1
Cortland State 1
Plymouth State 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,3,1,2,2,1,)
Albright (2,5,2,2,3,2,2,1,3,4,)
Delaware Valley (4,2,3,4,4,1,3,3,1,5,)
Rowan (3,3,5,3,2,4,5,9,5,3,)
Kean (6,4,4,6,5,5,4,4,4,2,)
St. John Fisher (5,6,6,7,6,7,8,6,6,6,)
Union (9,7,8,5,9,8,6,5,7,NR,)
Lebanon Valley (7,8,9,8,8,NR,7,8,9,8,)
Springfield (10,NR,7,9,7,6,10,NR,NR,7,)
Montclair State (8,NR,NR,10,10,9,9,7,8,NR,)
Ithaca (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Susquehanna (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,)
Cortland State (NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Plymouth State (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,)
Key Matchups:
#1 Alfred @ #6 St. John Fisher
#7 Union @ Salisbury
#9 Springfield @ Hartwick
Quote from: pg04 on October 20, 2009, 09:24:51 PM
Week 7 Fan Poll -- Not much movement
1 Point is missing here because one of the polls was missing a 10th team. I will adjust if receive the 10th team tonight.
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred ( 7 ) 5-0 96 1 at #6 Fisher 2 Albright ( 1 ) 6-0 84 2 vs. Widener 3 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 5-1 80 3 at Lycoming 4 Rowan 5-1 66 5 vs. Buffalo State 5 Kean 5-1 68 4 vs. Morrisville State 6 St. John Fisher 4-2 47 6 vs. #1 Alfred 7 Union 5-1 35 7 at Salisbury 8 Lebanon Valley 5-1 27 8 vs King's 9 Springfield 5-1 21 9 at Hartwick 10 Montclair State 5-1 16 NR at TCNJ
Dropped Out:
#10 TCNJ
Also Receiving votes:
Ithaca 4
Susquehanna 2
TCNJ 1
Cortland State 1
Plymouth State 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (1,1,1,1,1,3,1,2,2,1,)
Albright (2,5,2,2,3,2,2,1,3,4,)
Delaware Valley (4,2,3,4,4,1,3,3,1,5,)
Rowan (3,3,5,3,2,4,5,9,5,3,)
Kean (6,4,4,6,5,5,4,4,4,2,)
St. John Fisher (5,6,6,7,6,7,8,6,6,6,)
Union (9,7,8,5,9,8,6,5,7,NR,)
Lebanon Valley (7,8,9,8,8,NR,7,8,9,8,)
Springfield (10,NR,7,9,7,6,10,NR,NR,7,)
Montclair State (8,NR,NR,10,10,9,9,7,8,NR,)
Ithaca (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,)
Susquehanna (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,)
Cortland State (NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Plymouth State (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,)
Key Matchups:
#1 Alfred @ #6 St. John Fisher
#7 Union @ Salisbury
#9 Springfield @ Hartwick
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 07:12:18 AM
Just a random thought here:
The NJAC is like the 2009 NFL with absolutly no parity. 4 Good teams, 3 ok teams, and 3 really bad teams. And these 3 really bad teams have no chance at beating anyone. The E8, LL and MAC dont have any "really bad teams". I think that makes it a lot easier for the NJAC in some regards. Not in terms of the conference being worse or better than the other conferences, but there are 3 automatic wins for everyone there. Its not like that in the other leagues where teams dont have any cupcakes in conference.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMPlease, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 21, 2009, 08:00:15 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 07:12:18 AM
Just a random thought here:
The NJAC is like the 2009 NFL with absolutly no parity. 4 Good teams, 3 ok teams, and 3 really bad teams. And these 3 really bad teams have no chance at beating anyone. The E8, LL and MAC dont have any "really bad teams". I think that makes it a lot easier for the NJAC in some regards. Not in terms of the conference being worse or better than the other conferences, but there are 3 automatic wins for everyone there. Its not like that in the other leagues where teams dont have any cupcakes in conference.
Good point. Pep will also make note of Norwich's sudden success (4-0 with tilts remaining against SUNY-Maritime, and "JV programs" Castleton State and Anna Maria) in its new Eastern Collegiate Football Conference after being the cupcake in the E8 for a few years. Reminds Pep of Coast Guard's struggles in the LL followed by instant success after its bolt for the NEFC.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 21, 2009, 08:37:49 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 21, 2009, 08:00:15 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 07:12:18 AM
Just a random thought here:
The NJAC is like the 2009 NFL with absolutly no parity. 4 Good teams, 3 ok teams, and 3 really bad teams. And these 3 really bad teams have no chance at beating anyone. The E8, LL and MAC dont have any "really bad teams". I think that makes it a lot easier for the NJAC in some regards. Not in terms of the conference being worse or better than the other conferences, but there are 3 automatic wins for everyone there. Its not like that in the other leagues where teams dont have any cupcakes in conference.
Good point. Pep will also make note of Norwich's sudden success (4-0 with tilts remaining against SUNY-Maritime, and "JV programs" Castleton State and Anna Maria) in its new Eastern Collegiate Football Conference after being the cupcake in the E8 for a few years. Reminds Pep of Coast Guard's struggles in the LL followed by instant success after its bolt for the NEFC.
Is having 3 conference cupcakes any different than scheduling ooc cupcakes ala RPI? The NJAC team have to play those three games against the conf cupcakes and still risk losing a key player to injury or unprecedented upset. Ask the 98 Rowan team what a conf cupcake can rise up to do. Sorry JT, KS has to take that shot any time he can.
KS is working hard to clear up his day for Halloween, the Kean Rowan game should be a good one and it should show us a lot about both teams.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 21, 2009, 08:37:49 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 21, 2009, 08:00:15 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 07:12:18 AM
Just a random thought here:
The NJAC is like the 2009 NFL with absolutly no parity. 4 Good teams, 3 ok teams, and 3 really bad teams. And these 3 really bad teams have no chance at beating anyone. The E8, LL and MAC dont have any "really bad teams". I think that makes it a lot easier for the NJAC in some regards. Not in terms of the conference being worse or better than the other conferences, but there are 3 automatic wins for everyone there. Its not like that in the other leagues where teams dont have any cupcakes in conference.
Good point. Pep will also make note of Norwich's sudden success (4-0 with tilts remaining against SUNY-Maritime, and "JV programs" Castleton State and Anna Maria) in its new Eastern Collegiate Football Conference after being the cupcake in the E8 for a few years. Reminds Pep of Coast Guard's struggles in the LL followed by instant success after its bolt for the NEFC.
Is having 3 conference cupcakes any different than scheduling ooc cupcakes ala RPI? The NJAC team have to play those three games against the conf cupcakes and still risk losing a key player to injury or unprecedented upset. Ask the 98 Rowan team what a conf cupcake can rise up to do. Sorry JT, KS has to take that shot any time he can.
KS is working hard to clear up his day for Halloween, the Kean Rowan game should be a good one and it should show us a lot about both teams.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 08:48:53 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 21, 2009, 08:37:49 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 21, 2009, 08:00:15 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 07:12:18 AM
Just a random thought here:
The NJAC is like the 2009 NFL with absolutly no parity. 4 Good teams, 3 ok teams, and 3 really bad teams. And these 3 really bad teams have no chance at beating anyone. The E8, LL and MAC dont have any "really bad teams". I think that makes it a lot easier for the NJAC in some regards. Not in terms of the conference being worse or better than the other conferences, but there are 3 automatic wins for everyone there. Its not like that in the other leagues where teams dont have any cupcakes in conference.
Good point. Pep will also make note of Norwich's sudden success (4-0 with tilts remaining against SUNY-Maritime, and "JV programs" Castleton State and Anna Maria) in its new Eastern Collegiate Football Conference after being the cupcake in the E8 for a few years. Reminds Pep of Coast Guard's struggles in the LL followed by instant success after its bolt for the NEFC.
Is having 3 conference cupcakes any different than scheduling ooc cupcakes ala RPI? The NJAC team have to play those three games against the conf cupcakes and still risk losing a key player to injury or unprecedented upset. Ask the 98 Rowan team what a conf cupcake can rise up to do. Sorry JT, KS has to take that shot any time he can.
KS is working hard to clear up his day for Halloween, the Kean Rowan game should be a good one and it should show us a lot about both teams.
Well besides RPIs nonleague schedule, most east teams play average or above non-league competition. And there is really no chance of an upset and you should only risk injury for a quarter or two against those teams.
Again, my point wasn't that the NJAC does this on purpose, its just the way the league happend to end up this year.
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 21, 2009, 08:33:44 AM
Not sure of the connection but, +k.
Either way, I'll have figured out this interweb thing on November 14, 2009. That's when IC will string together its third straight Jug win.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 21, 2009, 08:59:39 AMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 21, 2009, 08:33:44 AM
Not sure of the connection but, +k.
Either way, I'll have figured out this interweb thing on November 14, 2009. That's when IC will string together its third straight Jug win.
Nice, all that money spent on an IC diploma and still can't make the connections. I'll bring it down a couple of notches for you going forward so you don't miss anything. If anyone else posts something out here that you are unsure of, feel free to ask for help. Looking forward to 11/14 too. CStates season is over but we always have that to look forward to.
Knightstalker is correct that the NJAC seems to always have 2-3 really weak teams, but in the end, when you look at most teams schedules, some can argue that there are a couple on everyones schedule.
Quote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
What the hell is the SID going to do?? Put out a release about the call?
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
What the hell is the SID going to do?? Put out a release about the call?
dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.
Quote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 21, 2009, 11:38:53 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
What the hell is the SID going to do?? Put out a release about the call?
dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.
All i can say to this is....Be careful to speak too soon, because so far, Union couldn't match up against a 2-4 out of Region team. Hopefully they can bring it to Salisbury, but be careful until then.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
What the hell is the SID going to do?? Put out a release about the call?
dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 11:57:24 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
What the hell is the SID going to do?? Put out a release about the call?
dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.
not so sure that dvc had their azzes handed to them by wesley....dvc had 5 turnovers that day w/ 2 of them well into wesley territory as dvc was driving on them....if they were to play again dont think you would see that many errors/mistakes again and a much closer game if not a dvc win. easy on the how bad a stomping wesley put on dvc...
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:03:21 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 11:57:24 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
What the hell is the SID going to do?? Put out a release about the call?
dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.
not so sure that dvc had their azzes handed to them by wesley....dvc had 5 turnovers that day w/ 2 of them well into wesley territory as dvc was driving on them....if they were to play again dont think you would see that many errors/mistakes again and a much closer game if not a dvc win. easy on the how bad a stomping wesley put on dvc...
dlip hears pbr, but dude, when a team turns the ball over 5 ****in times in a game that is part of their performance as well as a prat of the other teams defensive performance. **** the U threw INT's against SLU like it was there job and got lucky to win the game. Yes U made mistakes but SLU deserves credit for causing those turnovers as well. No way would dlip come out and say, "well it shouldn't have been close because of our 5 turnovers... **** why didn't Wesley have 5 turnovers? Del val got beat and in dlip's mind did not seem to be very competitive with Wesley. If they were the score would have been closer.
Quotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PMQuotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:30:10 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 09:17:52 PM...and Q is the consumate 'frontrunner'...good thing you figured this out all on your own...Pet Detective. Smell that dog ****....its Ithaca's legacy in Fisher's rearview mirror.
Which thing makes you think I am a frontrunner again?
-Is it waiting to care about my alma mater's football team until some kids turn my former club team around and make it into a winner 20 years after I slip off campus into anonymity?
-Or was it when I waited for the outcome of a game to taunt an opponent?
-Maybe it was the time everyone called me out so I took my ball, went home, and came back under an assumed identity in the hopes that I could play well with others?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 11:56:54 AM
Dont forget Salisbury is a triple option team if Im not mistaken. That can be good or bad for some defenses. Union had some small but tough d-backs from what I remember. That may give them an edge on defense.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PMQuotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.
exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it? ;D
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PMQuotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.
exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it? ;D
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 11:56:54 AM
Dont forget Salisbury is a triple option team if Im not mistaken. That can be good or bad for some defenses. Union had some small but tough d-backs from what I remember. That may give them an edge on defense.
Quote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:00:05 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PMQuotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.
exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it? ;D
The loss in and of itself doesn't sting. What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...
That's what stings...
Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 01:05:04 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:00:05 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PMQuotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.
exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it? ;D
The loss in and of itself doesn't sting. What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...
That's what stings...
Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...
LOL...based on your response pbr just rubbed salt and alcohol in that open wound...ouch must be tough to go through life that bitter still...
Quote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 11:22:03 AMQuote from: SaintsFAN on October 21, 2009, 09:03:51 AMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
Everyone's cards are turned over when it comes to losing to MUC by 50 in the play-offs, reg. season or in Donkey Kong.
Did they turn their cards over against salisbury? If you say so. Just call the Fisher SID and let him know Fisher shouldnt bother playing the rest of their games cuz they lost in week 4 on the road in a OOC game that wont affect them as long as they win out going undefeated against all other East competition.
What the hell is the SID going to do?? Put out a release about the call?
dlip will be honest here. He has always liked SJF and rooted for them most weeks in region and all the time out of region. Yet he finds himself getting ****ing annoyed with all the SJF bull**** going on. With an Alfred W and them possibly continuing to run the table the East may just get that #1 seed in the Saxons, so dlip may just be pulling for them against SJF. SJF wins and wins out you can definitely open the door for and out of region team (****in MUC). We know SJF can't handle MUC (nor can anyone else) and we know SJF can't handle an off year Salisbury team. Hence, we already know **** about them OOC wise that they are not very good against mediocore to Great out of region competition. With Alfred and even Rowan or Alrbight there is the element of the unknown and possibly a false sense of hope come tournament time for the East. We even know about Del Val having had their ass handed to them by now #4 Wesley. So regarding hope and excitement it may just be better to have a Saxon W over the Cardinals. In reality dlip does not give a **** who represents our region because they will eventually get Monkey stomped (hoping dlip is wrong here) in the Quater or Semi-finals. dlip's measure of success here in the East; 1st and 2nd round NCAA victories, **** even making the tourney.
Quote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:13:00 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 01:05:04 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:00:05 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PMQuotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.
exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it? ;D
The loss in and of itself doesn't sting. What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...
That's what stings...
Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...
LOL...based on your response pbr just rubbed salt and alcohol in that open wound...ouch must be tough to go through life that bitter still...
I will say that it had nothing to do with anything DVC did that day...
Quote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 21, 2009, 01:14:14 PM
Ty, are you that dip**** that played the Mt Union drum?
Quote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 21, 2009, 01:14:14 PM
Ty, are you that dip**** that played the Mt Union drum?
Quote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 21, 2009, 01:14:14 PMTy, are you that dip**** that played the Mt Union drum?
Quote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 21, 2009, 01:21:56 PMQuote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 21, 2009, 01:14:14 PMTy, are you that dip**** that played the Mt Union drum?
You know that's impossible LD. That guy was athletic enough to get himself into the end zone before playing the drum...
Quote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:13:00 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 01:05:04 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 21, 2009, 01:00:05 PMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on October 21, 2009, 12:46:34 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 21, 2009, 12:26:55 PMQuotedid the better team win that day? absolutely...proved it on the field. but the teams are much closer than that score showed.... did dvc outgain wesley yards wise? yes and if wesley is so good why did isgro go 22/34 for 282 yards w/ a td? so in short wesley won and the better team won that day but to say they had their azzes handed to them that day from someone who didnt see the game one questions the method of their judgement...in otherwords you just look at a final score and determine if it was a close game? so if florida/lsu are tied 7-7 for 3.5 qtrs and florida score 3 tds in the final 5 minutes it was a monkey stomp?
Well said pbr, but dlip still firmly believes that 5 out of 6 times when the score is quite lop-sided in a game it is lop-sided for a ****in reason. The reason is the winning team is that much better. If a team gives up 3 tds in five minutes to another team they deserve to recieve the label of getting monkey stomped don't you think? Many times lessor opponents will give everything they have against much more talented teams and keep it close until the end. The end where straight up talent, coaching, and team skill takes over. So dlip agrees that maybe his use of "asses handed to them," may have been a bit harsh and not as accurate, but, they sure as hell lost the ****in game and it was proven that Del Val is not on Wesley's level, from looking at that one game. Plus how many other eastern teams have played the top5 or 6 teams in the country? Not many, SJF played MUC and got ****in worked. So in the two games we have, two of the teams that are held in quite hign regard in the east lost two two top teams by lopsided scores. Don't have muchmore to go on.
exactly if they play 10 times wesley most likely wins the majority imho....but my point was the teams are closer than that final score indicated, thats all....now lets get back to bashing the overrated sjf cards....the loss the encountered when playing dvc in the playoffs still stings dont it? ;D
The loss in and of itself doesn't sting. What really stings is throwing an out route vs press coverage to the wide side of the field while being tied with under a minute to go. Doing so despite having a QB that was 5/18 passing at the time with a RB that had 250yds rushing on the game and 2200 yds on the year...
That's what stings...
Hey but at least we didn't go down by 50 the following week...
LOL...based on your response pbr just rubbed salt and alcohol in that open wound...ouch must be tough to go through life that bitter still...
I will say that it had nothing to do with anything DVC did that day...
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 21, 2009, 12:50:58 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:30:10 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 09:17:52 PM...and Q is the consumate 'frontrunner'...good thing you figured this out all on your own...Pet Detective. Smell that dog ****....its Ithaca's legacy in Fisher's rearview mirror.
Which thing makes you think I am a frontrunner again?
-Is it waiting to care about my alma mater's football team until some kids turn my former club team around and make it into a winner 20 years after I slip off campus into anonymity?
-Or was it when I waited for the outcome of a game to taunt an opponent?
-Maybe it was the time everyone called me out so I took my ball, went home, and came back under an assumed identity in the hopes that I could play well with others?
once again Q, dont let the facts get in the way of a good post. I fall into this trap every time, but why again do you think I played club ball? And if I did, what does that have to do with you being a coward about how you go about your disdain for Fisher in your posts.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 21, 2009, 06:02:33 PMDid you really change identities on an anonymous message board (for really any reason, doesn't matter) and then call someone else a coward?
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 21, 2009, 08:37:49 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 21, 2009, 08:00:15 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 21, 2009, 07:12:18 AM
Just a random thought here:
The NJAC is like the 2009 NFL with absolutly no parity. 4 Good teams, 3 ok teams, and 3 really bad teams. And these 3 really bad teams have no chance at beating anyone. The E8, LL and MAC dont have any "really bad teams". I think that makes it a lot easier for the NJAC in some regards. Not in terms of the conference being worse or better than the other conferences, but there are 3 automatic wins for everyone there. Its not like that in the other leagues where teams dont have any cupcakes in conference.
Good point. Pep will also make note of Norwich's sudden success (4-0 with tilts remaining against SUNY-Maritime, and "JV programs" Castleton State and Anna Maria) in its new Eastern Collegiate Football Conference after being the cupcake in the E8 for a few years. Reminds Pep of Coast Guard's struggles in the LL followed by instant success after its bolt for the NEFC.
Is having 3 conference cupcakes any different than scheduling ooc cupcakes ala RPI? The NJAC team have to play those three games against the conf cupcakes and still risk losing a key player to injury or unprecedented upset. Ask the 98 Rowan team what a conf cupcake can rise up to do. Sorry JT, KS has to take that shot any time he can.
KS is working hard to clear up his day for Halloween, the Kean Rowan game should be a good one and it should show us a lot about both teams.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 21, 2009, 06:02:33 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 21, 2009, 12:50:58 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:30:10 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 20, 2009, 09:17:52 PM...and Q is the consumate 'frontrunner'...good thing you figured this out all on your own...Pet Detective. Smell that dog ****....its Ithaca's legacy in Fisher's rearview mirror.
Which thing makes you think I am a frontrunner again?
-Is it waiting to care about my alma mater's football team until some kids turn my former club team around and make it into a winner 20 years after I slip off campus into anonymity?
-Or was it when I waited for the outcome of a game to taunt an opponent?
-Maybe it was the time everyone called me out so I took my ball, went home, and came back under an assumed identity in the hopes that I could play well with others?
once again Q, dont let the facts get in the way of a good post. I fall into this trap every time, but why again do you think I played club ball? And if I did, what does that have to do with you being a coward about how you go about your disdain for Fisher in your posts.
Alright, I know I'm going to regret this, but it's been a fun afternoon, so I'll bite.
Did you really change identities on an anonymous message board (for really any reason, doesn't matter) and then call someone else a coward?
Quote from: maxpower on October 21, 2009, 11:41:36 PM
82, do you even know what rhetorical means?
"Do I know what rhetorical means?!"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fz.about.com%2Fd%2Ftvcomedies%2F1%2F7%2Fn%2F5%2F-%2F-%2Fhomer_simpson.jpg&hash=ad94e87a9b0c31b989a619368f63a6cca159b138)
Quote from: maxpower on October 22, 2009, 12:05:20 AM
And yet only managed an impressive loss?
EDIT: Don't give me any crap about "they just need experience closing them out".
Quote from: maxpower on October 22, 2009, 12:05:20 AM
And yet only managed an impressive loss?
EDIT: Don't give me any crap about "they just need experience closing them out".
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 22, 2009, 02:01:49 AMQuote from: maxpower on October 22, 2009, 12:05:20 AM
And yet only managed an impressive loss?
EDIT: Don't give me any crap about "they just need experience closing them out".
They do need experience to close it out... but you knew I'd say that. :D ::)
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 22, 2009, 11:28:34 AM
ty-
i forgot that you were there a year after i graduated.
was patims still open then?
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 22, 2009, 12:15:22 PM
did the red light still come on when the place got raided?
that place was great---tho hindsight being 20-20 what a dump
i still have/use a pitcher that i "borrowed" from there 20 some years ago
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 22, 2009, 12:27:57 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on October 22, 2009, 12:15:22 PM
did the red light still come on when the place got raided?
that place was great---tho hindsight being 20-20 what a dump
i still have/use a pitcher that i "borrowed" from there 20 some years ago
only heard stories of that, but I remember the barber chair all too well, and my hair getting shredded in some sick style. They left a strip a hair down the side....looked like Flea from Red Hot Chili Peppers
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 22, 2009, 01:28:35 PM
waterworld- a true classic
Quote from: Dr. LVD, OBGYN on October 22, 2009, 01:27:10 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 22, 2009, 12:27:57 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on October 22, 2009, 12:15:22 PM
did the red light still come on when the place got raided?
that place was great---tho hindsight being 20-20 what a dump
i still have/use a pitcher that i "borrowed" from there 20 some years ago
only heard stories of that, but I remember the barber chair all too well, and my hair getting shredded in some sick style. They left a strip a hair down the side....looked like Flea from Red Hot Chili Peppers
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages1.wikia.nocookie.net%2Fbttf%2Fimages%2Fthumb%2F3%2F35%2FNeedles.JPG%2F250px-Needles.JPG&hash=fea683d763e4549f900ebabba3b84adbfb89183e)
NOBODY CALLS ME CHICKEN, NEEDLES! NOBODY!!!
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 26, 2009, 08:39:00 PM
Thoughts on who will be in the first Regional Rankings? Albright, Alfred, Del Valley and Union are all undefeated in region, so they should be in there. Fisher, Kean and Springfield all have only one loss to a regionally undefeated team, so I bet they are included. Not sure who I think the last team will be, but I'm betting it's Rowan.
Quote from: TGP on October 27, 2009, 11:23:57 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 26, 2009, 08:39:00 PM
Thoughts on who will be in the first Regional Rankings? Albright, Alfred, Del Valley and Union are all undefeated in region, so they should be in there. Fisher, Kean and Springfield all have only one loss to a regionally undefeated team, so I bet they are included. Not sure who I think the last team will be, but I'm betting it's Rowan.
You can expect to see the Purple Drank (aka Curry) in there as well. They have 1 loss in region and look to be in control of the NEFC after beating down the PSU Sex Panthers last weekend.
Quote from: TGP on October 27, 2009, 11:23:57 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 26, 2009, 08:39:00 PM
Thoughts on who will be in the first Regional Rankings? Albright, Alfred, Del Valley and Union are all undefeated in region, so they should be in there. Fisher, Kean and Springfield all have only one loss to a regionally undefeated team, so I bet they are included. Not sure who I think the last team will be, but I'm betting it's Rowan.
You can expect to see the Purple Drank (aka Curry) in there as well. They have 1 loss in region and look to be in control of the NEFC after beating down the PSU Sex Panthers last weekend.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2009, 09:42:01 AM
my fault on one of those. computer is down at home and Ive been away from work.....
Quote from: Union89 on October 28, 2009, 11:55:42 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2009, 09:42:01 AM
my fault on one of those. computer is down at home and Ive been away from work.....
Jump on that train that runs through your backyard and rent some time at Kinko's.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2009, 09:41:00 AM
Are we gonna get something before press time this week? The Alfred Sun will look naked without the ERFP in there!
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2009, 03:32:26 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2009, 09:41:00 AM
Are we gonna get something before press time this week? The Alfred Sun will look naked without the ERFP in there!
I doubt it. I don't get home until like 7pm and I am still missing one. So much for my idea to have it done on Sunday evenings! :-\
Quote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Quote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2009, 07:48:11 PM
As for the last poll, it's still not in. I would like to make it a general policy that if you are going to be late with your poll, please let me know, as I feel kind of bad when we can't get this out in a timely manner. I'm debating on continuing the poll with just 9 ...
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2009, 07:28:31 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
I heard Penn St. might get the #1 seed in the east this year.....
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2009, 07:44:55 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
I think this has been said before, but the 4 brackets aren't OFFICIALLY named by geographic region. Yes, it saves on money by having each bracket one segment of the geography, but in general they are trying to pick the 4 best teams as number 1 seeds (ie, the best way they can arrange 4 of the best teams geographically ).
Honestly, if we want it to stop happening, an east team is going to have to do something...ie beat mount union.
Quote from: TGP on October 28, 2009, 03:33:20 PM
pg04 has my last ballot so he would need to confirm, but i noted that the ncaa rankings were very similar to my (maybe not the exact order, but i am pretty sure all the teams listed were on my last) ballot:
East Region
1. Albright 6-0 7-0
2. Alfred 6-0 6-0
3. Delaware Valley 5-0 6-1
4. Kean 6-1 6-1
5. Rowan 6-1 6-1
6. Montclair State 6-1 6-1
7. Springfield 6-1 6-1
8. Lebanon Valley 6-1 6-1
9. Union 5-1 5-2
10. Curry 6-1 6-2
i am pretty sure my 1-5 is the same. i had union up higher (i think 5 or 6) and i know i def had curry at 10.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2009, 08:45:06 PM
Cortland, I think played Mount Union very well last year compared to Mounts other opponents.
Quote from: TGP on October 28, 2009, 09:47:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2009, 08:45:06 PM
Cortland, I think played Mount Union very well last year compared to Mounts other opponents.
Compared to who? MUC beat Hobart, Cortland and Wheaton by pretty similiar (north of 20pt) margins. And Cortland was the only team to have 0 rushing yards against the Raiders (Hobart had 104 and Wheaton 90).
Quote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2009, 10:44:15 PMQuote from: TGP on October 28, 2009, 09:47:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2009, 08:45:06 PM
Cortland, I think played Mount Union very well last year compared to Mounts other opponents.
Compared to who? MUC beat Hobart, Cortland and Wheaton by pretty similiar (north of 20pt) margins. And Cortland was the only team to have 0 rushing yards against the Raiders (Hobart had 104 and Wheaton 90).
Cortland lost by 27, and Hobart lost by 35. I was refering to East Teams.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Quote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2009, 08:45:06 PM
Gotta agree with Dip. I think as of today the Top 5 teams in the East would fare well in the NCAA'S first couple rounds.
Quote from: TGP on October 28, 2009, 09:40:19 PMQuote from: TGP on October 28, 2009, 03:33:20 PM
pg04 has my last ballot so he would need to confirm, but i noted that the ncaa rankings were very similar to my (maybe not the exact order, but i am pretty sure all the teams listed were on my last) ballot:
East Region
1. Albright 6-0 7-0
2. Alfred 6-0 6-0
3. Delaware Valley 5-0 6-1
4. Kean 6-1 6-1
5. Rowan 6-1 6-1
6. Montclair State 6-1 6-1
7. Springfield 6-1 6-1
8. Lebanon Valley 6-1 6-1
9. Union 5-1 5-2
10. Curry 6-1 6-2
i am pretty sure my 1-5 is the same. i had union up higher (i think 5 or 6) and i know i def had curry at 10.
i checked and here was my latest ballot (kind of weird how close):
Albright - same
Alfred - same
DVC - same
Kean - same
Montclair - off by 1
Rowan - off by 1
LVC - off by 1
Sjfc - i still think the cards will beat SC in the e6 finale
Union - same
curry - same
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2009, 12:49:37 AM
Agreed, but I thought it might help if I said it anyway.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
Quote from: Upstate on October 29, 2009, 08:34:59 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
You do know that there are travel restrictions right?
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:44:00 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 29, 2009, 08:34:59 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
You do know that there are travel restrictions right?
Yes, but it's a fair question to ask? Especially with travel restricitons, the economy, etc this provides even more rationale to keep brackets regional? Let N,W,E,S battle it out and meet. Listen just dlip's opinion here but the more he argues and gets annoyed he starts to see the fact that; if an Eastern team did defeat an MUC who was imported dlip would be estactic and probably forget everything he has been saying. Who knows maybe it is even a bit of sour grapes as a result of the East inability to compete at the elite level, dlip can admit that. Still he would like to see N,W,E,S battle it out and the regional winners, who truly represent that region, meet in the semi's. dlip understands that many disagree and thats coo!
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 29, 2009, 11:07:00 AMDo posters really believe an NEFC team should be in the top ten?
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 29, 2009, 11:30:21 AM
Very good point. But I think your not giving Springfield and Alfred enough credit. This Curry team is not nearly as good as the last two versions. Come playoff time we will find out. I think the best team in the NEFC is actually Maine Maritime who are on a collision course with Curry for the NEFC championship and before Plymouth was the last team to beat Curry from the NEFC.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
Quote from: JQV on October 29, 2009, 11:26:00 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 29, 2009, 11:07:00 AMDo posters really believe an NEFC team should be in the top ten?
Curry has two playoff wins in seasons when the E8 wasn't as far "down" as it is this year. Of all years, this is the year they probably deserve some credit...
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:44:00 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 29, 2009, 08:34:59 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
You do know that there are travel restrictions right?
Yes, but it's a fair question to ask? Especially with travel restricitons, the economy, etc this provides even more rationale to keep brackets regional? Let N,W,E,S battle it out and meet. Listen just dlip's opinion here but the more he argues and gets annoyed he starts to see the fact that; if an Eastern team did defeat an MUC who was imported dlip would be estactic and probably forget everything he has been saying. Who knows maybe it is even a bit of sour grapes as a result of the East inability to compete at the elite level, dlip can admit that. Still he would like to see N,W,E,S battle it out and the regional winners, who truly represent that region, meet in the semi's. dlip understands that many disagree and thats coo!
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 29, 2009, 12:06:09 PM
"travel restictions" only explains why the play-offs are not seeded on a national basis. Travel restrictions do not prevent a purely regional play-off system. It is the exact opposite, it forces the Regional system. The powers to be wanting to seed the perceived Top 4 as #1's is the ONLY reason for the present system.
It just happens to work out for the powers that be, that MUC happens to be within the mileage requirements of the East.
What would happen if MUC was 1 mile outside the limits, and no other Top 4 was within the radius.
Hmmmm.....gerrymandering.
Quote from: maxpower on October 29, 2009, 11:59:40 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:44:00 AMQuote from: Upstate on October 29, 2009, 08:34:59 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
You do know that there are travel restrictions right?
Yes, but it's a fair question to ask? Especially with travel restricitons, the economy, etc this provides even more rationale to keep brackets regional? Let N,W,E,S battle it out and meet. Listen just dlip's opinion here but the more he argues and gets annoyed he starts to see the fact that; if an Eastern team did defeat an MUC who was imported dlip would be estactic and probably forget everything he has been saying. Who knows maybe it is even a bit of sour grapes as a result of the East inability to compete at the elite level, dlip can admit that. Still he would like to see N,W,E,S battle it out and the regional winners, who truly represent that region, meet in the semi's. dlip understands that many disagree and thats coo!
I don't really see the difference. We're talking about losing to MUC one round later if it's a purely regional bracket. After a couple years of that, our expectations will have shifted from "the honor of losing to MUC" to "the honor of winning the East Region and then losing to MUC" and we'll find something else to bitch about.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 29, 2009, 12:09:29 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 29, 2009, 12:06:09 PM
"travel restictions" only explains why the play-offs are not seeded on a national basis. Travel restrictions do not prevent a purely regional play-off system. It is the exact opposite, it forces the Regional system. The powers to be wanting to seed the perceived Top 4 as #1's is the ONLY reason for the present system.
It just happens to work out for the powers that be, that MUC happens to be within the mileage requirements of the East.
What would happen if MUC was 1 mile outside the limits, and no other Top 4 was within the radius.
Hmmmm.....gerrymandering.
:)
We all know about "gerrymandering". After all, it was first done in Massachusetts. :D
Quote from: TGP on October 28, 2009, 10:49:13 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2009, 10:44:15 PMQuote from: TGP on October 28, 2009, 09:47:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2009, 08:45:06 PM
Cortland, I think played Mount Union very well last year compared to Mounts other opponents.
Compared to who? MUC beat Hobart, Cortland and Wheaton by pretty similiar (north of 20pt) margins. And Cortland was the only team to have 0 rushing yards against the Raiders (Hobart had 104 and Wheaton 90).
Cortland lost by 27, and Hobart lost by 35. I was refering to East Teams.
Gotcha - I still argue despite the 8 pt scoring differential Hobart hung in there equally as well as the Dragons, but the fact is you guys did score 14 pts and we only scored 7.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 29, 2009, 11:49:01 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
No, Dlip, dont waver, you are correct in that there is an inconsistency. I went through this a few months ago on the boards. Either make the tourney regional, or seed all 32 independently and have at it. Make the East teams 25-32 if need be. The rankings are regional and do not give the East teams the benefit of playing non-regional teams in the Reg. Season, so why make them play the out of region teams come play-off time? And I know the 'answer' is travel restrictions, at least that is what was brought up last time...however, I have said this...the NCAA has plenty of $ to overcome this if they want their logo on the field and half the gate money come play-off time.
Not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with the present system....just pointing out the glaring inconsistencies with reg season and post-season.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 29, 2009, 01:19:16 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 29, 2009, 11:49:01 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
No, Dlip, dont waver, you are correct in that there is an inconsistency. I went through this a few months ago on the boards. Either make the tourney regional, or seed all 32 independently and have at it. Make the East teams 25-32 if need be. The rankings are regional and do not give the East teams the benefit of playing non-regional teams in the Reg. Season, so why make them play the out of region teams come play-off time? And I know the 'answer' is travel restrictions, at least that is what was brought up last time...however, I have said this...the NCAA has plenty of $ to overcome this if they want their logo on the field and half the gate money come play-off time.
Not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with the present system....just pointing out the glaring inconsistencies with reg season and post-season.
yea but what happens in 100 years when Mt. Union isn't good anymore and a 9-1 SJF team doesnt make a playoff spot because the "north" region has an independent or conference champ that SJF beat 77-0 in week 7?
What goes around comes around. Someday the east might have the top 10 teams in the country and the other regions will be whining because Mt. Ida keeps getting the #1 seed in the South! Until a team gets shafted from a playoff spot (which is very rare in d3 football playoff selections), let someone beat MUC and then things will change.
Lets face it, midwest football is currently better than east football and they deserve more playoff spots. "regions" "areas" whatever, thats simply semantics. Hell, they even use vague language in the NCAA championship literature when describing the whole process.
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 11:34:32 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 29, 2009, 11:30:21 AM
Very good point. But I think your not giving Springfield and Alfred enough credit. This Curry team is not nearly as good as the last two versions. Come playoff time we will find out. I think the best team in the NEFC is actually Maine Maritime who are on a collision course with Curry for the NEFC championship and before Plymouth was the last team to beat Curry from the NEFC.
dlip concurs regarding the lack of love that the Pride has recieved this year. They must earn it though and during the next two weeks they will have to. We will no as of Saturday night if they are going to challenge for a pool C.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred ( 6 ) | 6-0 | 86 | 1 | vs. Rochester |
2 Albright ( 1 ) | 7-0 | 75 | 2 | vs. FDU-Florham |
Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 6-1 | 75 | 3 | at King's |
4 Rowan | 6-1 | 63 | 4 | at #5 Kean |
5 Kean | 6-1 | 60 | 5 | vs. #4 Rowan |
6 Lebanon Valley | 6-1 | 34 | 8 | vs King's |
Springfield | 6-1 | 34 | 9 | vs. Ithaca |
8 Montclair State | 6-1 | 26 | NR | vs. Western Connecticut |
9 Union | 5-2 | 16 | 7 | vs. RPI |
10 St. John Fisher | 4-3 | 15 | 6 | OPEN DATE |
Quote from: Veda Sultenfuss on October 29, 2009, 01:27:35 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 29, 2009, 01:19:16 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 29, 2009, 11:49:01 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
No, Dlip, dont waver, you are correct in that there is an inconsistency. I went through this a few months ago on the boards. Either make the tourney regional, or seed all 32 independently and have at it. Make the East teams 25-32 if need be. The rankings are regional and do not give the East teams the benefit of playing non-regional teams in the Reg. Season, so why make them play the out of region teams come play-off time? And I know the 'answer' is travel restrictions, at least that is what was brought up last time...however, I have said this...the NCAA has plenty of $ to overcome this if they want their logo on the field and half the gate money come play-off time.
Not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with the present system....just pointing out the glaring inconsistencies with reg season and post-season.
yea but what happens in 100 years when Mt. Union isn't good anymore and a 9-1 SJF team doesnt make a playoff spot because the "north" region has an independent or conference champ that SJF beat 77-0 in week 7?
What goes around comes around. Someday the east might have the top 10 teams in the country and the other regions will be whining because Mt. Ida keeps getting the #1 seed in the South! Until a team gets shafted from a playoff spot (which is very rare in d3 football playoff selections), let someone beat MUC and then things will change.
Lets face it, midwest football is currently better than east football and they deserve more playoff spots. "regions" "areas" whatever, thats simply semantics. Hell, they even use vague language in the NCAA championship literature when describing the whole process.
Dude, in 100 years it will be RPI vs. MIT every year since robots will be playing each other.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefukerton.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F01%2Freview_foxrobot_1.jpg&hash=7fdc51166c9f6a453878be8137f83205f83d2614)
Quote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 11:34:32 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 29, 2009, 11:30:21 AMQuote from: JQV on October 29, 2009, 11:26:00 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 29, 2009, 11:07:00 AMDo posters really believe an NEFC team should be in the top ten?
Curry has two playoff wins in seasons when the E8 wasn't as far "down" as it is this year. Of all years, this is the year they probably deserve some credit...
Very good point. But I think your not giving Springfield and Alfred enough credit. This Curry team is not nearly as good as the last two versions. Come playoff time we will find out. I think the best team in the NEFC is actually Maine Maritime who are on a collision course with Curry for the NEFC championship and before Plymouth was the last team to beat Curry from the NEFC.
dlip concurs regarding the lack of love that the Pride has recieved this year. They must earn it though and during the next two weeks they will have to. We will no as of Saturday night if they are going to challenge for a pool C.
Quote from: maxpower on October 30, 2009, 12:03:29 PM
+k on 5000 posts PG.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 30, 2009, 12:06:14 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 30, 2009, 12:03:29 PM
+k on 5000 posts PG.
No +k for my 1358th post max??
Quote from: maxpower on October 30, 2009, 12:07:06 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 30, 2009, 12:06:14 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 30, 2009, 12:03:29 PM
+k on 5000 posts PG.
No +k for my 1358th post max??
Sigh. Fisher posters. Always crowing about respect.
+k.
Quote from: maxpower on October 30, 2009, 12:03:29 PM
+k on 5000 posts PG.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 29, 2009, 01:19:16 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 29, 2009, 11:49:01 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
No, Dlip, dont waver, you are correct in that there is an inconsistency. I went through this a few months ago on the boards. Either make the tourney regional, or seed all 32 independently and have at it. Make the East teams 25-32 if need be. The rankings are regional and do not give the East teams the benefit of playing non-regional teams in the Reg. Season, so why make them play the out of region teams come play-off time? And I know the 'answer' is travel restrictions, at least that is what was brought up last time...however, I have said this...the NCAA has plenty of $ to overcome this if they want their logo on the field and half the gate money come play-off time.
Not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with the present system....just pointing out the glaring inconsistencies with reg season and post-season.
yea but what happens in 100 years when Mt. Union isn't good anymore and a 9-1 SJF team doesnt make a playoff spot because the "north" region has an independent or conference champ that SJF beat 77-0 in week 7?
What goes around comes around. Someday the east might have the top 10 teams in the country and the other regions will be whining because Mt. Ida keeps getting the #1 seed in the South! Until a team gets shafted from a playoff spot (which is very rare in d3 football playoff selections), let someone beat MUC and then things will change.
Lets face it, midwest football is currently better than east football and they deserve more playoff spots. "regions" "areas" whatever, thats simply semantics. Hell, they even use vague language in the NCAA championship literature when describing the whole process.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 30, 2009, 01:55:48 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 29, 2009, 01:19:16 PMQuote from: Ty1983 on October 29, 2009, 11:49:01 AMQuote from: dlippiel on October 29, 2009, 08:21:08 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Understood Guru and you are right on with the fact that the East Region teams need to get better and make some noise. The only respect a team should really get is the respect they earn and we know it has been awhile since an Eastern team has really earned that respect in comparison to the top 4-6 teams in the nation. Yet dlip still believes the Brackets should be regional and feels it is annoying that there is always going to be a team "brought into" the East bracket for the tourney. Yet I guess you are right if you are saying there is no East bracket that is fully representative of the East as a whole. If not though then why is that brakcet made up of all eastern teams with the exception of one? Either mix it up or keep the brackets by region! Yet again, dlip will concurr, if an East region team and/or teams really started making noise on a consistent basis in the tourney and OOR games during the season then this would not even be an issue.
No, Dlip, dont waver, you are correct in that there is an inconsistency. I went through this a few months ago on the boards. Either make the tourney regional, or seed all 32 independently and have at it. Make the East teams 25-32 if need be. The rankings are regional and do not give the East teams the benefit of playing non-regional teams in the Reg. Season, so why make them play the out of region teams come play-off time? And I know the 'answer' is travel restrictions, at least that is what was brought up last time...however, I have said this...the NCAA has plenty of $ to overcome this if they want their logo on the field and half the gate money come play-off time.
Not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with the present system....just pointing out the glaring inconsistencies with reg season and post-season.
yea but what happens in 100 years when Mt. Union isn't good anymore and a 9-1 SJF team doesnt make a playoff spot because the "north" region has an independent or conference champ that SJF beat 77-0 in week 7?
What goes around comes around. Someday the east might have the top 10 teams in the country and the other regions will be whining because Mt. Ida keeps getting the #1 seed in the South! Until a team gets shafted from a playoff spot (which is very rare in d3 football playoff selections), let someone beat MUC and then things will change.
Lets face it, midwest football is currently better than east football and they deserve more playoff spots. "regions" "areas" whatever, thats simply semantics. Hell, they even use vague language in the NCAA championship literature when describing the whole process.
JU...I have no problem with the selection process as far as what teams get in. Likewise, I dont think that has been anyone's issue. My problem is the seeding. Under the scenario I have a problem with, the same 32 teams get in. Its not that MUC is taking away an East team. I agree that only 9 east teams should get in...maybe even less. I just dont think the East should be 'shorted' the luxury of a #1...despite the relative strength of that #1 compared to the nation's top 4.
There is no harm in a particular region having 2 #1 quality teams in its bracket come play-offs...indeed, the region should be proud of such a feat.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 30, 2009, 02:42:56 PM
We all know how good MUC is. If they get put here, so be it. They or UWW are the end of the road for everyone else this year anyway. I'm not sure anyone is too frustrated about that specific concept.
The issue would seem to be if the East had a team that let's say the D3 poll and general consensus was that is maybe 10th best or 8th best, and #1 regionally ranked. The system isn't set up to really compare across regions, so what is the objective standard that allows this to be done? At that point, it's not that a great MUC squad is being put in this bracket, but rather there's some conclusion that the #1 regionally ranked, undefeated Eastern team isn't deserving to have a top seed compared with the other three number one seeds. In other words, what makes one undefeated team with a regional ranking of #1 better than another? If there were a good answer to that other than we just know than the system functions properly.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 30, 2009, 02:42:56 PM
I'm not sure anyone is too frustrated about that specific concept.
Quote from: Ty1983 on October 30, 2009, 02:50:42 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 30, 2009, 02:42:56 PM
I'm not sure anyone is too frustrated about that specific concept.
What the DLIP are you DLIPPIN talkin about... dlippiel has been DLIP DLIPPIN about how MUC should stay the DLIP out of the DLIPPIN East for 3 DLIPPIN weeks now....I think he has a DLIPPIN big problem with this DLIP.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 30, 2009, 04:36:14 PM
But hasn't his complaint been mainly that if there's a legitimate undefeated team in region (e.g. as opposed to last year where all the top teams had a loss) they shouldn't shift MUC over? Then you get into, is AU or Albright legitimate and that's where you get into the debate. What's legitimate is both the debate and problem with the system. We all pretty much believe that AU and Albright aren't a top 5-6 team in the country, but we've accepted this system that's been in place and now it feels like the subjectivity has crept back in to the detriment of us in the East.
Dlip,
Would you have a problem if MUC was moved in if Curry was the only undefeated team in the East. Assume the loss wasn't like a road loss in OT to MUC or Wesley or something like that. Assume it's a loss to like a 7 win, decent but not great in region team.
QuoteDlip,
Would you have a problem if MUC was moved in if Curry was the only undefeated team in the East. Assume the loss wasn't like a road loss in OT to MUC or Wesley or something like that. Assume it's a loss to like a 7 win, decent but not great in region team.
Quote from: dlippiel on November 02, 2009, 06:59:56 PM
dlip will say he thinks Alfred at #25 seems a bit low. Preseason poll had preseason E8 favorite in the top ten and now, the E8 leader, whom played their back-up QB, just ****in destroyed an O.K. U of R team like Milk through a processor. To dlip, the D3 powers that be, may realize how they were off with their initial rankings of Cortland and Ithaca, and are going to make the Eastern teams earn their way back into any type of national favor. dlip thinks that in the past the undefeated E* leader by week #9 would be in the top 20. Pat made a good point last week, very simply he said, "get better."
Quote from: maxpower on November 02, 2009, 09:41:56 PM
Pep, +k for your continued use of Saterday, even when it's at an AU player's expense.
Although now that I think about it, I made fun of dumbass IC ballplayers when I was at school (Jose), why would I stop now?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 28, 2009, 11:59:18 PMQuote from: dlippiel on October 28, 2009, 07:16:32 PM
Regional rankings came out... ???Why even give any East region team a #1 ranking if they are going to ****ing bring someone East for the ****ing tourney. It is really ****ing stupid and ridiculous that even if an East region team runs the table and goes undefeated they will not get a #1 seed in a tourney that should be set by ****ing regions. This is really starting to piss dlip off if you guys couldn't tell. Well come on over MUC; Alfred, Albright, Del Val, Rowan, and everyone else are playing for # 2 in the East because the #1 seed in the East will not be from the east. WHAT THE ****!!!!!!!
Nobody said it was the East Region bracket any longer, dlippiel. If the top four teams don't include an East team, then so be it. Get better.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 30, 2009, 04:36:14 PM
But hasn't his complaint been mainly that if there's a legitimate undefeated team in region (e.g. as opposed to last year where all the top teams had a loss) they shouldn't shift MUC over? Then you get into, is AU or Albright legitimate and that's where you get into the debate. What's legitimate is both the debate and problem with the system. We all pretty much believe that AU and Albright aren't a top 5-6 team in the country, but we've accepted this system that's been in place and now it feels like the subjectivity has crept back in to the detriment of us in the East.
Dlip,
Would you have a problem if MUC was moved in if Curry was the only undefeated team in the East. Assume the loss wasn't like a road loss in OT to MUC or Wesley or something like that. Assume it's a loss to like a 7 win, decent but not great in region team.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 03, 2009, 01:28:24 PM
Might have to run last week's this week. Either that or you could put the NCAA Regional Rankings in there. How's the full-length feature on the fire coming?
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 03, 2009, 03:29:59 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 03, 2009, 01:28:24 PM
Might have to run last week's this week. Either that or you could put the NCAA Regional Rankings in there. How's the full-length feature on the fire coming?
Pep assigned that to his student intern....could do a lot with the fire but by now, it's old news. Election results will be a bit more timely.
Quote from: pg04 on November 03, 2009, 04:21:45 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on November 03, 2009, 03:29:59 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 03, 2009, 01:28:24 PM
Might have to run last week's this week. Either that or you could put the NCAA Regional Rankings in there. How's the full-length feature on the fire coming?
Pep assigned that to his student intern....could do a lot with the fire but by now, it's old news. Election results will be a bit more timely.
I hope to tonight, but there is one missing again, a different one this week than last so it would be unfair to not give due time again.
Correction: Just got it. Will be up around 8pm tonight.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred (7 ) | 7-0 | 97 | 1 | at Ithaca |
2 Albright ( 1 ) | 8-0 | 85 | T2 | at #2 Delaware Valley |
Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 7-1 | 85 | T2 | vs. #2 Albright |
4 Kean | 7-1 | 73 | 5 | at William Paterson |
5 Springfield | 7-1 | 47 | T6 | vs. #10 St. John Fisher |
6 Rowan | 6-2 | 46 | 4 | vs #8 Montclair State |
7 Lebanon Valley | 7-1 | 45 | T6 | vs. Lycoming |
8 Montclair State | 7-1 | 27 | 8 | at Rowan |
9 Union | 6-2 | 21 | 9 | at Merchant Marine |
10 St. John Fisher | 4-3 | 14 | 10 | at #5 Springfield |
Quote from: dlippiel on November 03, 2009, 07:37:02 PM
+k pg.04 you do a great job with the poll.
Quote from: Union89 on November 03, 2009, 07:49:02 PM
Great poll question this week.
Quote from: TGP on November 03, 2009, 08:21:38 PM
I for one can't wait to see how the Albright-DVC game pans out. I will either be vindicated (or humiliated) for ranking Albright higher than DVC.
That said I see Alfred beating IC, SJFC beating SC and Rowan beating Montclair.
Time will tell. Great slate of games.
Quote from: maxpower on November 03, 2009, 10:09:25 PMDepends on the nature of the loss. IE, was it a stomp, was it a last minute fg that won the game, was it played in a nor easter. I already have Del Val ranked ahead of Albright. I feel Del Val has played a tougher schedule so far and has a couple of better wins. Albright gets to prove who they are the next two weeks.
What do the pollsters see happening to the following teams' rankings, should they lose:
-Albright
-Del Val
-Fisher
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[
Quote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[Quote
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.
How would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 09:03:54 AM
I have Del Val over Albright in the poll. If Albright wins they move to # 2 and lose they will probaly fall to the number 4 seed right behind Kean. Same for Del Val. I think both teams are better then the #2 in the NJAC. If Fisher loses I have them out of the top ten and if they win I have them in the top 5 becuase I believe Springfield is a top 3 team in the east if they get by SJF.
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 09:04:31 AMQuote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[Quote
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.
How would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
So do you want a Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, NY, Mid West, Pacific Northwest, Southwest, and South bracket? Hell, let's just have 50 brackets, 1 for each state, and everyone can keep playing until March.
Quote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.
QuoteHow would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on November 04, 2009, 09:29:02 AMQuote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.QuoteHow would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
d3football.com on left hand side 1st link you will see E/W/N/S now its not science but that is east/west/north/south and each region where a school falls into...dont think its that difficult is it?
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 09:04:31 AMQuote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[Quote
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.
How would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
So do you want a Mid-Atlantic, Northeast, NY, Mid West, Pacific Northwest, Southwest, and South bracket? Hell, let's just have 50 brackets, 1 for each state, and everyone can keep playing until March.
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 10:09:10 AMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on November 04, 2009, 09:29:02 AMQuote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.QuoteHow would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
d3football.com on left hand side 1st link you will see E/W/N/S now its not science but that is east/west/north/south and each region where a school falls into...dont think its that difficult is it?
PBR,
Doid is joking/busting chops.
Quote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 10:13:12 AMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 10:09:10 AMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on November 04, 2009, 09:29:02 AMQuote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.QuoteHow would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
d3football.com on left hand side 1st link you will see E/W/N/S now its not science but that is east/west/north/south and each region where a school falls into...dont think its that difficult is it?
PBR,
Doid is joking/busting chops.
What, you mean I don't get my own Doid region? And I was about to rank SJF #1 in the Doid Region, scheduled for a February playoff game with Mississippi. Oh well.
Quote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 09:07:03 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 09:03:54 AM
I have Del Val over Albright in the poll. If Albright wins they move to # 2 and lose they will probaly fall to the number 4 seed right behind Kean. Same for Del Val. I think both teams are better then the #2 in the NJAC. If Fisher loses I have them out of the top ten and if they win I have them in the top 5 becuase I believe Springfield is a top 3 team in the east if they get by SJF.
You would put a 6-3 St. John Fisher in the top 5?
Quote from: uPBRmeASAP on November 04, 2009, 12:27:58 PMQuote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 10:13:12 AMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 10:09:10 AMQuote from: uPBRmeASAP on November 04, 2009, 09:29:02 AMQuote from: Doid23 on November 04, 2009, 09:01:20 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 03, 2009, 11:46:08 PM
[
Oh wait, Albright and Del Val aren't in the Doid region so they don't count anymore.QuoteHow would you know? I haven't announced the Doid region yet. But I can tell you, I am considering some 4-4 and 5-3 teams that, while not strong, are geographically near Mt. Union geographically, or have played a team in the top 25, or just seem like good guys. I certainly will not consider anyone from the east, they just don't "play better" or have enough games. Who knows, I may even throw some baseball teams in, just for Gro.
For clarification, my comment was made about the disrespect that the East was getting, not getting technical about NCAA regions and brackets, I'll leave that to much smarter people than me. Of course, where I come from, PA/ Del/ MD/ Va are part of the Mid Atlantic Region, and I know that's crazy, oh, wait, that's how the "Around the Region" columns are set up too.
d3football.com on left hand side 1st link you will see E/W/N/S now its not science but that is east/west/north/south and each region where a school falls into...dont think its that difficult is it?
PBR,
Doid is joking/busting chops.
What, you mean I don't get my own Doid region? And I was about to rank SJF #1 in the Doid Region, scheduled for a February playoff game with Mississippi. Oh well.
well now u ticked off u89 w/ that statement and not having da U #1 in the doid region
Quote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 12:42:29 PMQuote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 09:07:03 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 09:03:54 AM
I have Del Val over Albright in the poll. If Albright wins they move to # 2 and lose they will probaly fall to the number 4 seed right behind Kean. Same for Del Val. I think both teams are better then the #2 in the NJAC. If Fisher loses I have them out of the top ten and if they win I have them in the top 5 becuase I believe Springfield is a top 3 team in the east if they get by SJF.
You would put a 6-3 St. John Fisher in the top 5?
I would because their only loss in region would be by 3 points to Alfred who most likely is going to be the undefeated E8 champs. If Springfield beats SJF they have a very good chance at a Pool C bid, and as of right now are a top 5 team in the East. SJF two out of region losses are to Mt Union and Salisbury. Even though Salisbury is not as strong as in years past they have already beat Union as well, who some consider a top 7 Team in the East as well who has not played the competition of SJF IMO. Therefore I would give a 6-3 SJF team the number 5 ranking in the east with a win.
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 12:44:56 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 12:42:29 PMQuote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 09:07:03 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 09:03:54 AM
I have Del Val over Albright in the poll. If Albright wins they move to # 2 and lose they will probaly fall to the number 4 seed right behind Kean. Same for Del Val. I think both teams are better then the #2 in the NJAC. If Fisher loses I have them out of the top ten and if they win I have them in the top 5 becuase I believe Springfield is a top 3 team in the east if they get by SJF.
You would put a 6-3 St. John Fisher in the top 5?
I would because their only loss in region would be by 3 points to Alfred who most likely is going to be the undefeated E8 champs. If Springfield beats SJF they have a very good chance at a Pool C bid, and as of right now are a top 5 team in the East. SJF two out of region losses are to Mt Union and Salisbury. Even though Salisbury is not as strong as in years past they have already beat Union as well, who some consider a top 7 Team in the East as well who has not played the competition of SJF IMO. Therefore I would give a 6-3 SJF team the number 5 ranking in the east with a win.
You are crazy...Especially with the company of Alfred, Albright, Delaware Valley, Kean, Lebanon Valley, Montclair, and even Rowan.
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 01:57:21 PM
Boxer,
What has Fisher done YTD to warrant the type of respect you are giving them? The Cardinals have 3 losses....which of their 4 wins jump out at you to even have them ranked in the Top 10?
I am not paralleling Fisher to Union....I'm not sure Union belongs in the Top 10 either.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 04, 2009, 02:25:17 PM
I also don't see what the coaches poll sees in Albright that makes them so much better than Delaware Valley.
The coaches poll has traditionally been very, very high on win-loss record and less so on strength of schedule. Del Val has lost to someone, yes, but it's a team that's better than anyone on Albright's schedule.
Here's Albright:
No. 29 Albright (8-0):
Sep 05 AWAY Ursinus (4-4) W 3-28
Sep 12 HOME Western Connecticut (1-7) W 48-7
Sep 26 AWAY Pace () W 20-26
Oct 03 HOME Wilkes (5-3) W 43-21
Oct 10 AWAY Lycoming (3-5) W 7-26
Oct 17 AWAY King's (2-6) W 16-34
Oct 24 HOME Widener (3-5) W 31-17
Oct 31 HOME FDU-Florham (1-7) W 49-28
And Delaware Valley:
No. 20 Delaware Valley (7-1):
Sep 05 HOME Johns Hopkins (6-2) W 23-7
Sep 12 AWAY Kean (7-1) W 17-30
Sep 19 HOME 5 Wesley (8-0) L 13-31
Oct 03 AWAY Lebanon Valley (7-1) W 7-28
Oct 10 HOME FDU-Florham (1-7) W 41-17
Oct 17 HOME Wilkes (5-3) W 23-0
Oct 24 AWAY Lycoming (3-5) W 7-21
Oct 31 AWAY King's (2-6) W 21-47
Quote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 02:31:29 PM
Utah somes up for me. There is not a lot of evidence, but outside of the top 4 in the East, you can make a compelling argument for the 5th spot with about 5-7 other teams how you feel each conference measure up with the other one.
If Fisher beats Springfield, which we all have as a top 5 team in the East, then we are measuring them up against Union, Montclair vs Rowan winner, Lebanon Valley, Suqueshanna and maybe if things shake out Cortland, RPI. Out of those teams, honestly speaking, I think SJF would be the best out of all them. The only team that can make an argument would be Lebanon Valley, but that would mean they would have beaten Del Val or Albright.
I know some of you think I'm crazy, who knows maybe I am. If Fisher does beat Springfield then I believe they do warrant the 5th spot IMO. With Springfield you have the W that warrant respect. If Ithaca beats Cortland then that makes the argument stronger only because Cortland could be in the top 3 of the NJAC race and Ithaca would be in the bottom fourth.
Remember I'm only saying this if Fisher beats Springfield, as of this moment I don't have Fisher at 5
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 12:44:56 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 12:42:29 PMQuote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 09:07:03 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 09:03:54 AM
I have Del Val over Albright in the poll. If Albright wins they move to # 2 and lose they will probaly fall to the number 4 seed right behind Kean. Same for Del Val. I think both teams are better then the #2 in the NJAC. If Fisher loses I have them out of the top ten and if they win I have them in the top 5 becuase I believe Springfield is a top 3 team in the east if they get by SJF.
You would put a 6-3 St. John Fisher in the top 5?
I would because their only loss in region would be by 3 points to Alfred who most likely is going to be the undefeated E8 champs. If Springfield beats SJF they have a very good chance at a Pool C bid, and as of right now are a top 5 team in the East. SJF two out of region losses are to Mt Union and Salisbury. Even though Salisbury is not as strong as in years past they have already beat Union as well, who some consider a top 7 Team in the East as well who has not played the competition of SJF IMO. Therefore I would give a 6-3 SJF team the number 5 ranking in the east with a win.
You are crazy...Especially with the company of Alfred, Albright, Delaware Valley, Kean, Lebanon Valley, Montclair, and even Rowan.
Quote from: Upstate on November 04, 2009, 02:36:55 PMQuote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 12:44:56 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 12:42:29 PMQuote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 09:07:03 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 04, 2009, 09:03:54 AM
I have Del Val over Albright in the poll. If Albright wins they move to # 2 and lose they will probaly fall to the number 4 seed right behind Kean. Same for Del Val. I think both teams are better then the #2 in the NJAC. If Fisher loses I have them out of the top ten and if they win I have them in the top 5 becuase I believe Springfield is a top 3 team in the east if they get by SJF.
You would put a 6-3 St. John Fisher in the top 5?
I would because their only loss in region would be by 3 points to Alfred who most likely is going to be the undefeated E8 champs. If Springfield beats SJF they have a very good chance at a Pool C bid, and as of right now are a top 5 team in the East. SJF two out of region losses are to Mt Union and Salisbury. Even though Salisbury is not as strong as in years past they have already beat Union as well, who some consider a top 7 Team in the East as well who has not played the competition of SJF IMO. Therefore I would give a 6-3 SJF team the number 5 ranking in the east with a win.
You are crazy...Especially with the company of Alfred, Albright, Delaware Valley, Kean, Lebanon Valley, Montclair, and even Rowan.
Gotta agree with Terd here...
I'm a SJF alum and I've got them at #10 behind those he listed along with Union and Springfield. If SJF beats SC the highest I'll move them up (with out taking the possibilities of complete chaos of this weekends games into account) is to the 8th spot...
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:18:07 PM(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi25.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fc60%2FDon_Jorge%2Fcrazy_eyes.jpg&hash=93ff12409bac38001bba5f1d16e09739e40bab96)
Made for interesting conversation.....plus it's always fun when LD calls someone crazy.
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2009, 03:46:33 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
I had Cortland at 10 but then looked at Union and thought they were slightly better at this point. I also wonder why I am the only one voting for Sasquatch. I have them at 7 right now.
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2009, 03:46:33 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
I had Cortland at 10 but then looked at Union and thought they were slightly better at this point. I also wonder why I am the only one voting for Sasquatch. I have them at 7 right now.
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:52:23 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2009, 03:46:33 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
I had Cortland at 10 but then looked at Union and thought they were slightly better at this point. I also wonder why I am the only one voting for Sasquatch. I have them at 7 right now.
KS, I'm with you on both fronts.
Also, why does Rowan deserve to be the ERFP's #6 team? Rowan stomps terrible teams, yet hasn't beaten a team with a winning record.....Rowan the bully of the East, has yet to prove against a decent team. How #6 or even Top 10 for that matter?
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 03:54:58 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:52:23 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2009, 03:46:33 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
I had Cortland at 10 but then looked at Union and thought they were slightly better at this point. I also wonder why I am the only one voting for Sasquatch. I have them at 7 right now.
KS, I'm with you on both fronts.
Also, why does Rowan deserve to be the ERFP's #6 team? Rowan stomps terrible teams, yet hasn't beaten a team with a winning record.....Rowan the bully of the East, has yet to prove against a decent team. How #6 or even Top 10 for that matter?
I have Rowan at 8 for lack of finding a fitting team. a 2 OT loss to my #4 Kean I think justifies it.
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 03:54:58 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:52:23 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2009, 03:46:33 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
I had Cortland at 10 but then looked at Union and thought they were slightly better at this point. I also wonder why I am the only one voting for Sasquatch. I have them at 7 right now.
KS, I'm with you on both fronts.
Also, why does Rowan deserve to be the ERFP's #6 team? Rowan stomps terrible teams, yet hasn't beaten a team with a winning record.....Rowan the bully of the East, has yet to prove against a decent team. How #6 or even Top 10 for that matter?
I have Rowan at 8 for lack of finding a fitting team. a 2 OT loss to my #4 Kean I think justifies it.
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:58:33 PMQuote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 03:54:58 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:52:23 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2009, 03:46:33 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
I had Cortland at 10 but then looked at Union and thought they were slightly better at this point. I also wonder why I am the only one voting for Sasquatch. I have them at 7 right now.
KS, I'm with you on both fronts.
Also, why does Rowan deserve to be the ERFP's #6 team? Rowan stomps terrible teams, yet hasn't beaten a team with a winning record.....Rowan the bully of the East, has yet to prove against a decent team. How #6 or even Top 10 for that matter?
I have Rowan at 8 for lack of finding a fitting team. a 2 OT loss to my #4 Kean I think justifies it.
Maybe, but they have yet to even beat an average team......look at their victories, brutal squads.
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 04:00:14 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:58:33 PMQuote from: Terd Fergusen on November 04, 2009, 03:54:58 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:52:23 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2009, 03:46:33 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 03:39:00 PM
Why has everyone fallen out of love with Cortland?
Cortland beat everyones darling, Rowan.....then lost close games to undefeated Kean & a 1 loss Montclair. Cortland looks like a good, quality team to me, yet they can't get a single vote in the ERFP?
I had Cortland at 10 but then looked at Union and thought they were slightly better at this point. I also wonder why I am the only one voting for Sasquatch. I have them at 7 right now.
KS, I'm with you on both fronts.
Also, why does Rowan deserve to be the ERFP's #6 team? Rowan stomps terrible teams, yet hasn't beaten a team with a winning record.....Rowan the bully of the East, has yet to prove against a decent team. How #6 or even Top 10 for that matter?
I have Rowan at 8 for lack of finding a fitting team. a 2 OT loss to my #4 Kean I think justifies it.
Maybe, but they have yet to even beat an average team......look at their victories, brutal squads.
I know, but atleast they lost to good teams.
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 04:16:02 PM
The Rowan conversation started because if I were still voting, I would have Cortland ahead of Rowan. What makes Rowan worthy of 46 votes & Cortland zero?
Quote from: dlippiel on November 04, 2009, 05:55:34 PM
Great conversation here. dlip was one of those big on the profs earlier in the year and still feels they are a solid team. Granted they have not beaten anyone of merit but they lost to Kean in OT where, please correct me if I am wrong, the Profs had the lead going into the fourth. We feel Kean is at least well above avg in the east and with Rowan giving them a good game, to dlip that still gives the profs enough street cred to warrent a top ten position. dlip also feels...feels...feels...if Rowan played Cortland again they would come out victorious. Obviously there is a very good point/question regarding the ranking of Rowan over Cortland because of the H to H win earlier in the year, though not to start a crazy ****in powder keg again but dlip still takes into account Frank W being out during that game. Cortland is still a good team and Cortaca will tell dlip some more about the Red Dragons. dlip really hopes the Pride takes out SJF on Saturday to solidify their position as a team that warrents a possible pool C bid. dlip believes SJF is still a very good eastern team, putting them at #10, so he feels a Pride victory would rpovide more rationale behind the Pride being considered for real.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 04, 2009, 06:37:52 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 04:16:02 PM
The Rowan conversation started because if I were still voting, I would have Cortland ahead of Rowan. What makes Rowan worthy of 46 votes & Cortland zero?
I think Cortland has lost some key players and might not be as good now as Rowan.
I guess it depends on the criteria you want to rank teams on. I (and probably most of us) have only seen a few d3 teams live this year, and probably less cross conference games. All we are going on is records and common opponents.
Quote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 06:43:02 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 04, 2009, 06:37:52 PMQuote from: Union89 on November 04, 2009, 04:16:02 PM
The Rowan conversation started because if I were still voting, I would have Cortland ahead of Rowan. What makes Rowan worthy of 46 votes & Cortland zero?
I think Cortland has lost some key players and might not be as good now as Rowan.
I guess it depends on the criteria you want to rank teams on. I (and probably most of us) have only seen a few d3 teams live this year, and probably less cross conference games. All we are going on is records and common opponents.
Common opponents and H to H?? To quote Glenn Ordway, "Your makinnnng my point!!!!"
Quote from: TGP on November 07, 2009, 02:52:31 PM
My ballots may need to be revoked. Albright getting CRUSHED by DVC 31-0 late in the 3rd qtr. DVC is clearly the #1 team in the region.
Quote from: pg04 on November 07, 2009, 03:25:52 PM
The Eastern region shows its true colors again... If anyone was disputing MUC before, well the reality is here. Del Val is our best team and they got Trounced by Wesley.
Quote from: pg04 on November 07, 2009, 03:29:46 PM
After this display I still think anyone could win the E8...Alfred shows that they could lose to Utica. Ok maybe that's to far... or is it?? ???
Quote from: maxpower on November 07, 2009, 03:43:23 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 07, 2009, 03:29:46 PM
After this display I still think anyone could win the E8...Alfred shows that they could lose to Utica. Ok maybe that's to far... or is it?? ???
I didn't see/hear the AU game today, but it sure likes like IC had more trouble with Utica...
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2009, 07:42:30 PM
Norwich isn't in the NEFC.
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 07, 2009, 08:06:40 PM
Yeah you're right, I made a mistake. How 'bout this: Curry lost to 3-5 Widener AT HOME! (who lost to 3-6 Lycoming at Home)
Some premise with the "Dood, Stop!"
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 07, 2009, 08:06:40 PM
Yeah you're right, I made a mistake. How 'bout this: Curry lost to 3-5 Widener AT HOME! (who lost to 3-6 Lycoming at Home)
Some premise with the "Dood, Stop!"
Quote from: pg04 on November 07, 2009, 03:25:52 PM
The Eastern region shows its true colors again... If anyone was disputing MUC before, well the reality is here. Del Val is our best team and they got Trounced by Wesley.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on November 08, 2009, 12:38:05 PM
I'm not sure the purple drank will even make the playoffs this year. For the first time in quite some while their are posters who believe Maine Maritime can beat Curry. Maine is 8-1 with their only loss to Bridgewater St, which now looking back came out of no where. Maine has been crushing their opponents of late and are completely healthy. Their could be an upset.
Quote from: TGP on November 09, 2009, 04:39:17 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 08, 2009, 12:38:05 PM
I'm not sure the purple drank will even make the playoffs this year. For the first time in quite some while their are posters who believe Maine Maritime can beat Curry. Maine is 8-1 with their only loss to Bridgewater St, which now looking back came out of no where. Maine has been crushing their opponents of late and are completely healthy. Their could be an upset.
I disagree. I see the Colonels beating the Mainers this weekend, but I have certainly been wrong before.
Quote from: pg04 on November 10, 2009, 08:02:30 PM
Still missing two... Sigh...
Quote from: Union89 on November 11, 2009, 12:55:21 AMQuote from: pg04 on November 10, 2009, 08:02:30 PM
Still missing two... Sigh...
PG, you should call out the stragglers on a weekly basis....they volunteered.
Sunday PM can be tough if you are away for the weekend, but Wednesday is rediculouas.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 9 ) | 8-1 | 90 | 3 | at Widener |
2 Kean | 8-1 | 81 | 4 | at #3 Montclair State |
3 Montclair State | 8-1 | 57 | 8 | vs. #2 Kean |
4 Alfred | 7-1 | 55 | 1 | vs. Utica |
5 Lebanon Valley | 8-1 | 48 | 7 | at #6 Albright |
6 Albright | 8-1 | 45 | 2 | vs #5 Lebanon Valley |
7 St. John Fisher | 5-3 | 35 | 10 | at Hartwick |
8 Union | 7-2 | 33 | 9 | vs. #9 Susquehanna |
9 Susquehanna | 7-2 | 23 | NR | at #8 Union |
10 Rowan | 6-3 | 10 | 6 | vs. TCNJ |
Quote from: pg04 on November 11, 2009, 09:22:01 PM
Week 10 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 9 ) 8-1 90 3 at Widener 2 Kean 8-1 81 4 at #3 Montclair State 3 Montclair State 8-1 57 8 vs. #2 Kean 4 Alfred 7-1 55 1 vs. Utica 5 Lebanon Valley 8-1 48 7 at #6 Albright 6 Albright 8-1 45 2 vs #5 Lebanon Valley 7 St. John Fisher 5-3 35 10 at Hartwick 8 Union 7-2 33 9 vs. #9 Susquehanna 9 Susquehanna 7-2 23 NR at #8 Union 10 Rowan 6-3 10 6 vs. TCNJ
Dropped Out:
#5 Springfield
Also Receiving votes:
Springfield 7
Cortland State 7
Curry 3
TCNJ 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,NR,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,)
Kean (2,2,NR,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,)
Montclair State (4,6,NR,3,4,6,3,3,6,7,)
Alfred (8,4,NR,5,3,3,5,8,3,5,)
Lebanon Valley (7,3,NR,10,5,4,4,5,5,8,)
Albright (6,7,NR,8,6,5,6,9,4,3,)
St. John Fisher (5,10,NR,6,7,9,10,4,7,6,)
Union (3,8,NR,4,8,NR,9,6,8,9,)
Susquehanna (9,5,NR,7,10,10,7,7,10,NR,)
Rowan (NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,4,)
Springfield (10,NR,NR,NR,NR,7,NR,NR,9,NR,)
Cortland State (NR,9,NR,NR,9,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,)
TCNJ (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,)
Key Matchups:
#2 Kean at #3 Montclair State -- NJAC Championship
#5 Lebanon Valley at #6 Albright -- Pool C bid??
#8 Union vs. #9 Susquehanna -- LL Championship
#4 Alfred vs. Utica -- Alfred Clinches E8 title
Quote from: Boxer7806 on November 14, 2009, 05:20:29 PM
Maine beat Curry to win the NEFC championship today. But I was one of the few posters or only one not a fan of Maine that picked this game correctly. I'm telling you Maine is a dangerous team come NCAA playoff time. They are very explosive.
Quote from: Upstate on November 14, 2009, 08:54:12 PM
Doing another one?
Quote from: Upstate on November 14, 2009, 05:23:04 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 14, 2009, 05:20:29 PM
Maine beat Curry to win the NEFC championship today. But I was one of the few posters or only one not a fan of Maine that picked this game correctly. I'm telling you Maine is a dangerous team come NCAA playoff time. They are very explosive.
Depends on where they are seeded...
If they're a 7/8 seed forget about it...
Quote from: Upstate on November 15, 2009, 12:16:05 PM
My preseason ballot:
1) Hobart - 6-3
2) Cortland - 7-2
3) Alfred 8-1
4) Ithaca 7-3
5) DVC 9-1
6) Rowan 7-3
7) RPI 5-4
8.) Montclair 9-1?
9) Curry 9-1?
10) SJF 6-3
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Quote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
Quote from: Upstate on November 16, 2009, 11:01:25 AMQuote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
You can't pull this out and try to zing him after a month...
This would have been funnier on Saterday afternoon not Monday morning....
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 16, 2009, 06:35:14 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 16, 2009, 11:01:25 AMQuote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
You can't pull this out and try to zing him after a month...
This would have been funnier on Saterday afternoon not Monday morning....
Don't worry Upstate. Now I understand the signs we saw as wedroverode on the short bus through Ithaca's campus:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.collegeflavor.com%2FProductImages%2FSlow-Children-At-Play-Forest-Big.jpg&hash=1cd9f4a4ebe8861c220ff1393cdfe0b77857320e)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2009, 03:24:17 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 16, 2009, 06:35:14 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 16, 2009, 11:01:25 AMQuote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
You can't pull this out and try to zing him after a month...
This would have been funnier on Saterday afternoon not Monday morning....
Don't worry Upstate. Now I understand the signs we saw as wedroverode on the short bus through Ithaca's campus:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.collegeflavor.com%2FProductImages%2FSlow-Children-At-Play-Forest-Big.jpg&hash=1cd9f4a4ebe8861c220ff1393cdfe0b77857320e)
Fixed it for you
Quote from: pg04 on November 17, 2009, 06:33:21 PM
Just a reminder that I wanted to release one of these this week, and there are still some out there... Please send it to me if you can. Thanks.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 17, 2009, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2009, 03:24:17 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 16, 2009, 06:35:14 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 16, 2009, 11:01:25 AMQuote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
You can't pull this out and try to zing him after a month...
This would have been funnier on Saterday afternoon not Monday morning....
Don't worry Upstate. Now I understand the signs we saw as wedroverode on the short bus through Ithaca's campus:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.collegeflavor.com%2FProductImages%2FSlow-Children-At-Play-Forest-Big.jpg&hash=1cd9f4a4ebe8861c220ff1393cdfe0b77857320e)
Fixed it for you
+k Bombers...getting called dumb by a Cortland grad is like being called a poo-poo head by my best friends 3-year old. It's funny...and all you can really do is laugh.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 08:33:04 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 17, 2009, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2009, 03:24:17 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 16, 2009, 06:35:14 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 16, 2009, 11:01:25 AMQuote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
You can't pull this out and try to zing him after a month...
This would have been funnier on Saterday afternoon not Monday morning....
Don't worry Upstate. Now I understand the signs we saw as wedroverode on the short bus through Ithaca's campus:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.collegeflavor.com%2FProductImages%2FSlow-Children-At-Play-Forest-Big.jpg&hash=1cd9f4a4ebe8861c220ff1393cdfe0b77857320e)
Fixed it for you
+k Bombers...getting called dumb by a Cortland grad is like being called a poo-poo head by my best friends 3-year old. It's funny...and all you can really do is laugh.
Poo Poo head the best you could come up with Yanks? Very dissappointing, but wait, check that...now that I think about your past posts, I guess it's really not. Bravo.
I leave you with I'd much rather ride a short bus than have to out run my roommate every night. Lights out must really suck at Ithaca.
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
No pun intended.
See you next year girls.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 18, 2009, 08:36:32 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 08:33:04 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 17, 2009, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2009, 03:24:17 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 16, 2009, 06:35:14 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 16, 2009, 11:01:25 AMQuote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
You can't pull this out and try to zing him after a month...
This would have been funnier on Saterday afternoon not Monday morning....
Don't worry Upstate. Now I understand the signs we saw as wedroverode on the short bus through Ithaca's campus:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.collegeflavor.com%2FProductImages%2FSlow-Children-At-Play-Forest-Big.jpg&hash=1cd9f4a4ebe8861c220ff1393cdfe0b77857320e)
Fixed it for you
+k Bombers...getting called dumb by a Cortland grad is like being called a poo-poo head by my best friends 3-year old. It's funny...and all you can really do is laugh.
Poo Poo head the best you could come up with Yanks? Very dissappointing, but wait, check that...now that I think about your past posts, I guess it's really not. Bravo.
I leave you with I'd much rather ride a short bus than have to out run my roommate every night. Lights out must really suck at Ithaca.
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
No pun intended.
See you next year girls.
It's cool...it will give you a whole year to come up with different ways of telling the same gay jokes as in 2009. And why do you think I went to Ithaca???
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 18, 2009, 11:15:09 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 18, 2009, 08:36:32 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 08:33:04 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 17, 2009, 03:51:13 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2009, 03:24:17 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 16, 2009, 06:35:14 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 16, 2009, 11:01:25 AMQuote from: bomber3 on November 16, 2009, 09:07:35 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 20, 2009, 10:22:23 PMQuote from: Yankee_Dragon (f/k/a JQV before USF got ripped by Cincy) on October 20, 2009, 09:09:38 PM
I am sad to admit that it was all I had. I do not have any experience sparring with a literate graduate of C-State. But, I can always fall back on the immortal words of great thinkers from generation to generation: Cortland Sucks.
Please, no need to be sad. As a relatively new poster to these boards I was unaware of your affiliation. Even more of a surprise is your ability to access the internet to post here given how difficult it is for Ithaca to string together three W's.
Hey Dragon Fan here are three w's in a row for ya!
2007 - Ithaca 40 Cortland 17
2008 - Ithaca 35 Cortland 13
2009 - Ithaca 23 Cortland 20
You can't pull this out and try to zing him after a month...
This would have been funnier on Saterday afternoon not Monday morning....
Don't worry Upstate. Now I understand the signs we saw as wedroverode on the short bus through Ithaca's campus:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.collegeflavor.com%2FProductImages%2FSlow-Children-At-Play-Forest-Big.jpg&hash=1cd9f4a4ebe8861c220ff1393cdfe0b77857320e)
Fixed it for you
+k Bombers...getting called dumb by a Cortland grad is like being called a poo-poo head by my best friends 3-year old. It's funny...and all you can really do is laugh.
Poo Poo head the best you could come up with Yanks? Very dissappointing, but wait, check that...now that I think about your past posts, I guess it's really not. Bravo.
I leave you with I'd much rather ride a short bus than have to out run my roommate every night. Lights out must really suck at Ithaca.
Wait for it...
Wait for it...
No pun intended.
See you next year girls.
It's cool...it will give you a whole year to come up with different ways of telling the same gay jokes as in 2009. And why do you think I went to Ithaca???
Man you should never leave a hanging curve like that on these boards.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 01:27:14 PM(thought you were Ithaca alumni based on your pompous, holier than thou, anti Cortland posts...and because your gay)
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 01:27:14 PM
And your gym teacher or short bus jokes are new?
(thought you were Ithaca alumni based on your pompous, holier than thou, anti Cortland posts...and because your gay)
Quote from: maxpower on November 18, 2009, 01:50:07 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 01:27:14 PM
And your gym teacher or short bus jokes are new?
(thought you were Ithaca alumni based on your pompous, holier than thou, anti Cortland posts...and because your gay)
THAT never gets old either.
There's a fine line between innuendo and full-blown homophobia, way to cross it. And I wouldn't worry about him.... you're the one whose job it likely is to supervise a locker room of high school boys....
BTW let's not forget why we're all here.... Cortland Sucked!
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 18, 2009, 01:57:30 PMQuote from: maxpower on November 18, 2009, 01:50:07 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 01:27:14 PM
And your gym teacher or short bus jokes are new?
(thought you were Ithaca alumni based on your pompous, holier than thou, anti Cortland posts...and because your gay)
THAT never gets old either.
There's a fine line between innuendo and full-blown homophobia, way to cross it. And I wouldn't worry about him.... you're the one whose job it likely is to supervise a locker room of high school boys....
BTW let's not forget why we're all here.... Cortland Sucked!
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftengossip.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F01%2Fjensengym_a.jpg&hash=70c140f6d3d58e7bbb915e3ee5cc8223ef6bad39)
Allright boys.....theres a hernia in this room somewhere....and I'm gonna find it... (RedDragonFan to his 11th grade gym class)
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 02:28:43 PM(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fginnypub.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F02%2Fgay-pride-parade.jpg&hash=ff2ddb8335a84bcee6966a62851dab1717ecf889)
Ithaca Alumni rooting on the Bombers.
Quote from: JQV on November 18, 2009, 02:37:24 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 18, 2009, 02:28:43 PM(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fginnypub.files.wordpress.com%2F2009%2F02%2Fgay-pride-parade.jpg&hash=ff2ddb8335a84bcee6966a62851dab1717ecf889)
Ithaca Alumni rooting on the Bombers.
...while standing on the 10 Jugs IC won since he left IC:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_dAd_RHGzUx0%2FSRz7AGIf0XI%2FAAAAAAAAAwQ%2FxchHu-pmjmM%2Fs320%2FCortaca%2BJugs.jpg&hash=0b6174d530fb63ab7551363df60d8a575851fde2)(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_dAd_RHGzUx0%2FSRz7AGIf0XI%2FAAAAAAAAAwQ%2FxchHu-pmjmM%2Fs320%2FCortaca%2BJugs.jpg&hash=0b6174d530fb63ab7551363df60d8a575851fde2)(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_dAd_RHGzUx0%2FSRz7AGIf0XI%2FAAAAAAAAAwQ%2FxchHu-pmjmM%2Fs320%2FCortaca%2BJugs.jpg&hash=0b6174d530fb63ab7551363df60d8a575851fde2)(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_dAd_RHGzUx0%2FSRz7AGIf0XI%2FAAAAAAAAAwQ%2FxchHu-pmjmM%2Fs320%2FCortaca%2BJugs.jpg&hash=0b6174d530fb63ab7551363df60d8a575851fde2)(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F_dAd_RHGzUx0%2FSRz7AGIf0XI%2FAAAAAAAAAwQ%2FxchHu-pmjmM%2Fs320%2FCortaca%2BJugs.jpg&hash=0b6174d530fb63ab7551363df60d8a575851fde2)
Quote from: TGP on November 18, 2009, 07:32:26 PM
Thx for running this during the season. I assume the "NR" for Del Val and others is the AWOL 10th poster?
Quote from: Doid23 on November 18, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Well done, PG and pollsters, the last poll is always anticlimactic, but I appreciate the effort all season, started a lot of good debates. Now, when does the 2010 preseason poll come out?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 19, 2009, 07:10:36 AM? ? ?Quote from: Doid23 on November 18, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Well done, PG and pollsters, the last poll is always anticlimactic, but I appreciate the effort all season, started a lot of good debates. Now, when does the 2010 preseason poll come out?
Right now.
1) Ithaca
2) Winner of the Del Val/Alfred game
3) Loser of the Del Val/Alfred game
4) Montclair
5) Albright
6) Susquhana (if Sasquach is not in the east anymore then Maine Maritime)
7) SJF
8) Union
9) Framingham State
10) Kean
Joking of course, but I saw Framingham States football field for the first time the other day. I have to say it is the worst d3 football facility I have ever seen. It does have the older new turf, but this place was horrible.
Quote from: Terd Fergusen on November 19, 2009, 09:08:54 AM\Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 19, 2009, 07:10:36 AM? ? ?Quote from: Doid23 on November 18, 2009, 10:15:02 PM
Well done, PG and pollsters, the last poll is always anticlimactic, but I appreciate the effort all season, started a lot of good debates. Now, when does the 2010 preseason poll come out?
Right now.
1) Ithaca
2) Winner of the Del Val/Alfred game
3) Loser of the Del Val/Alfred game
4) Montclair
5) Albright
6) Susquhana (if Sasquach is not in the east anymore then Maine Maritime)
7) SJF
8) Union
9) Framingham State
10) Kean
Joking of course, but I saw Framingham States football field for the first time the other day. I have to say it is the worst d3 football facility I have ever seen. It does have the older new turf, but this place was horrible.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.travelpod.com%2Fusers%2Fmikerickson%2F1.1217618580.an-old-turf-fishing-hutx.jpg&hash=c10fc834e6e543c40aa236d2d1d503c2036fe162)
Quote from: maxpower on November 18, 2009, 09:19:21 PM
Who's #10?
1. DVC
2. Kean
3. Albright
4. Rowan (??)
Quote from: pg04 on November 19, 2009, 11:18:33 AMQuote from: maxpower on November 18, 2009, 09:19:21 PM
Who's #10?
1. DVC
2. Kean
3. Albright
4. Rowan (??)
Yeah I know, that poster has created a lot of controversy this year. But unless he comes forward defending it I guess I shouldn't say who it is.
Quote from: pg04 on November 19, 2009, 11:18:33 AMQuote from: maxpower on November 18, 2009, 09:19:21 PM
Who's #10?
1. DVC
2. Kean
3. Albright
4. Rowan (??)
Yeah I know, that poster has created a lot of controversy this year. But unless he comes forward defending it I guess I shouldn't say who it is.
Quote from: Upstate on November 19, 2009, 02:48:14 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 19, 2009, 11:18:33 AMQuote from: maxpower on November 18, 2009, 09:19:21 PM
Who's #10?
1. DVC
2. Kean
3. Albright
4. Rowan (??)
Yeah I know, that poster has created a lot of controversy this year. But unless he comes forward defending it I guess I shouldn't say who it is.
I give it 2:1 odds that it's the AU contingent. They are always looking to stir up a controversy...
Quote from: pg04 on December 06, 2009, 09:56:53 PM
The East Region's Season is over, so pollsters please , if you would, send me your final end of year polls. There is no rush, but I'm sure what people will want to know what we think after this weak showing in the playoffs.
Quote from: pg04 on June 04, 2010, 09:11:52 PM
Greetings East Regioners!
For the previous 3 years I have been putting this Poll together (basically accumulating the votes and posting them). I think I am going to step aside this year and ask If anyone else would like to be the leader of this? I have a lot of changes coming up in my life and I will be pretty busy in the Fall. I guess if the regulars can come to a consensus then someone can take over..
It's been Fun...and I'll still be around, just I won't really be able to follow D3 as much as I'd like to to keep this going!
Quote from: pg04 on June 04, 2010, 09:11:52 PM
Greetings East Regioners!
For the previous 3 years I have been putting this Poll together (basically accumulating the votes and posting them). I think I am going to step aside this year and ask If anyone else would like to be the leader of this? I have a lot of changes coming up in my life and I will be pretty busy in the Fall. I guess if the regulars can come to a consensus then someone can take over..
It's been Fun...and I'll still be around, just I won't really be able to follow D3 as much as I'd like to to keep this going!
Quote from: Yanks 99 on June 09, 2010, 08:09:33 AM
How does one get into voting in the weekly rankings?
Quote from: dlip on August 18, 2010, 03:03:48 PM
Do we know who is taking pg.04's place yet? Is AUKazoo going to do it? dlip is really looking forward taking part again.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 22, 2010, 03:42:36 PM
I indeed will continue the tradition of the ERFP now that pg04 has stepped down. Basically, Pep needed something to include in the Alfred Sun each week, so he twisted my arm. As such, I'll post the poll each Monday afternoon with or without all submissions so Pep can have it before deadline. So, polls will be due in to me by noon on Monday.
We'll start with the final pollsters from last year who can work within that timeline and since there seem to be other posters who would like to have a spot in the poll, I'll institute a 3 strikes policy. I'll try to fill any vacancy with a poster from an under-represented conference. I'll try to fill any openings with a willing and active poster with preference to someone from the least represented conference in our poll, if possible.
Let me know if these guidelines seem out of place, since this exercise should be fun and informative for us all, but it's frustrating when a poll has to come out short of votes.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 23, 2010, 03:53:27 PM
Okay, I've gotten responses from 6 returning pollsters so far (all E6 and LL) and I'll keep the spots open to incumbents if they let me know. PG seems to be bowing out, so we will have one opening and I want to fill it with a poster from the MAC, NJAC, NEFC or the ECFC. There may be another opening or two, so send me a PM if you're interested and fit that criteria.
I'd like to get our first poll out this Monday, 8/30 so we can have preseason rankings and get it into next week's Sun.
Quote from: TGP on August 23, 2010, 04:05:58 PM
As an aside, do we need 6 E8 and LL guys? Could be get by with 1 or 2 from each league?
Quote from: Upstate on August 23, 2010, 04:07:32 PM
When do you want the Preseason ballot by?
Quote from: TGP on August 23, 2010, 04:05:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on August 23, 2010, 03:53:27 PM
Okay, I've gotten responses from 6 returning pollsters so far (all E6 and LL) and I'll keep the spots open to incumbents if they let me know. PG seems to be bowing out, so we will have one opening and I want to fill it with a poster from the MAC, NJAC, NEFC or the ECFC. There may be another opening or two, so send me a PM if you're interested and fit that criteria.
I'd like to get our first poll out this Monday, 8/30 so we can have preseason rankings and get it into next week's Sun.
I am pretty sure either JT or rams/xreddragon represented the NJAC in the past, PBR covererd the MAC and noolinenoglory was our NEFC rep.
As an aside, do we need 6 E8 and LL guys? Could be get by with 1 or 2 from each league?
Quote from: pg04 on August 26, 2010, 03:44:49 PMQuote from: TGP on August 23, 2010, 04:05:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on August 23, 2010, 03:53:27 PM
Okay, I've gotten responses from 6 returning pollsters so far (all E6 and LL) and I'll keep the spots open to incumbents if they let me know. PG seems to be bowing out, so we will have one opening and I want to fill it with a poster from the MAC, NJAC, NEFC or the ECFC. There may be another opening or two, so send me a PM if you're interested and fit that criteria.
I'd like to get our first poll out this Monday, 8/30 so we can have preseason rankings and get it into next week's Sun.
I am pretty sure either JT or rams/xreddragon represented the NJAC in the past, PBR covererd the MAC and noolinenoglory was our NEFC rep.
As an aside, do we need 6 E8 and LL guys? Could be get by with 1 or 2 from each league?
This is something I tried to do for 3 years. It's not an easy task. Outside of the E8 and LL there is little participation on these boards as a whole. And those in the NJAC and MAC have always either not answered my pleas or said no.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 26, 2010, 08:51:21 PMQuote from: pg04 on August 26, 2010, 03:44:49 PMQuote from: TGP on August 23, 2010, 04:05:58 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on August 23, 2010, 03:53:27 PM
Okay, I've gotten responses from 6 returning pollsters so far (all E6 and LL) and I'll keep the spots open to incumbents if they let me know. PG seems to be bowing out, so we will have one opening and I want to fill it with a poster from the MAC, NJAC, NEFC or the ECFC. There may be another opening or two, so send me a PM if you're interested and fit that criteria.
I'd like to get our first poll out this Monday, 8/30 so we can have preseason rankings and get it into next week's Sun.
I am pretty sure either JT or rams/xreddragon represented the NJAC in the past, PBR covererd the MAC and noolinenoglory was our NEFC rep.
As an aside, do we need 6 E8 and LL guys? Could be get by with 1 or 2 from each league?
This is something I tried to do for 3 years. It's not an easy task. Outside of the E8 and LL there is little participation on these boards as a whole. And those in the NJAC and MAC have always either not answered my pleas or said no.
I'm in. ;) Are you going to participate in the NJAC Pick-E'M contest this year?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) | 0-0 | 75 | NR | at Muhlenberg |
2 St. John Fisher( 1 ) | 0-0 | 68 | NR | vs. Brockport State |
3 Montclair State | 0-0 | 64 | NR | Open Date |
4 Union( 1 ) | 0-0 | 39 | NR | Open Date |
5 Alfred | 0-0 | 36 | NR | vs. Widener |
6t Cortland State | 0-0 | 33 | NR | Open Date |
6t Lebanon Valley | 0-0 | 33 | NR | vs. Gettysburg |
8t Ithaca | 0-0 | 18 | NR | vs. St. Lawrence |
8t Hobart | 0-0 | 18 | NR | Open Date |
8t Rowan | 0-0 | 18 | NR | vs. Lycoming |
Quote from: Union89 on August 30, 2010, 02:28:52 PM
Interesting.
FYI, Ithaca opens against St. Lawrence.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 30, 2010, 02:59:31 PMQuote from: Union89 on August 30, 2010, 02:28:52 PM
Interesting.
FYI, Ithaca opens against St. Lawrence.
I knew I'd screw something up, besides it's my first day on the job! Stupid bye weeks.
Quote from: JT on August 26, 2010, 09:29:44 PM
As a top 25 voter, I have abstained from the East region poll. Although I do read the posts and take the all region polls and posts into account when I vote.
Quote from: Union89 on August 30, 2010, 05:36:24 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on August 30, 2010, 02:59:31 PMQuote from: Union89 on August 30, 2010, 02:28:52 PM
Interesting.
FYI, Ithaca opens against St. Lawrence.
I knew I'd screw something up, besides it's my first day on the job! Stupid bye weeks.
The layout looks fantastic! Good job.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 30, 2010, 01:59:11 PM
While not perfect due to the hurried nature of forming the team of pollsters, here is the 2010 East Region Preseason Fan Poll in time for this week's edition of the Alfred Sun:
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 0-0 75 NR at Muhlenberg 2 St. John Fisher( 1 ) 0-0 68 NR vs. Brockport State 3 Montclair State 0-0 64 NR Open Date 4 Union( 1 ) 0-0 39 NR Open Date 5 Alfred 0-0 36 NR vs. Widener 6t Cortland State 0-0 33 NR Open Date 6t Lebanon Valley 0-0 33 NR vs. Gettysburg 8t Ithaca 0-0 18 NR vs. St. Lawrence 8t Hobart 0-0 18 NR Open Date 8t Rowan 0-0 18 NR vs. Lycoming
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 12
Springfield 10
Kean 9
RPI 6
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,NR)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,3,NR,3,NR)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,2,NR,2,NR)
Union (3,NR,8,1,4,NR,6,NR,5,NR)
Alfred (5,6,7,4,NR,9,4,NR,6,NR)
Cortland (8,5,3,8,3,6,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lebanon Valley (6,4,5,NR,7,3,NR,NR,8,NR)
Ithaca (NR,8,6,7,10,10,7,NR,NR,NR)
Hobart (9,7,9,NR,6,7,NR,NR,10,NR)
Rowan (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,5,5,NR,7,NR)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,9,9,NR,10,NR,4,NR)
Springfield(7,NR,NR,10,8,NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
Kean (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,8,8,NR,9,NR)
RPI (NR,10,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 30, 2010, 01:59:11 PM
While not perfect due to the hurried nature of forming the team of pollsters, here is the 2010 East Region Preseason Fan Poll in time for this week's edition of the Alfred Sun:
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 0-0 75 NR at Muhlenberg 2 St. John Fisher( 1 ) 0-0 68 NR vs. Brockport State 3 Montclair State 0-0 64 NR Open Date 4 Union( 1 ) 0-0 39 NR Open Date 5 Alfred 0-0 36 NR vs. Widener 6t Cortland State 0-0 33 NR Open Date 6t Lebanon Valley 0-0 33 NR vs. Gettysburg 8t Ithaca 0-0 18 NR vs. St. Lawrence 8t Hobart 0-0 18 NR Open Date 8t Rowan 0-0 18 NR vs. Lycoming
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 12
Springfield 10
Kean 9
RPI 6
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,NR)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,3,NR,3,NR)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,2,NR,2,NR)
Union (3,NR,8,1,4,NR,6,NR,5,NR)
Alfred (5,6,7,4,NR,9,4,NR,6,NR)
Cortland (8,5,3,8,3,6,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lebanon Valley (6,4,5,NR,7,3,NR,NR,8,NR)
Ithaca (NR,8,6,7,10,10,7,NR,NR,NR)
Hobart (9,7,9,NR,6,7,NR,NR,10,NR)
Rowan (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,5,5,NR,7,NR)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,9,9,NR,10,NR,4,NR)
Springfield(7,NR,NR,10,8,NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
Kean (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,8,8,NR,9,NR)
RPI (NR,10,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 02, 2010, 12:23:55 AM
Alfred is being dogged because the Saxons graduated a kid that accounted for nearly 2000 all-purpose yards in ONE SEASON and another kid that ran for nearly 1300+ yards in 2009.
Heck, the one kid not only led the E6 in receptions (65) but he also caught 5 of the bad guys' passes, also leading the E6 in interceptions!
Arguably Manzer's injury early in the Albright game hurt the Saxon defense perhaps more than it hurt their offense and was a key factor in AU's 35-25 loss.
That's why, understandably, Alfred isn't getting pre-season high marks. And Pep is okay with that.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 02, 2010, 12:23:55 AM
Alfred is being dogged because the Saxons graduated a kid that accounted for nearly 2000 all-purpose yards in ONE SEASON and another kid that ran for nearly 1300+ yards in 2009.
Heck, the one kid not only led the E6 in receptions (65) but he also caught 5 of the bad guys' passes, also leading the E6 in interceptions!
Arguably Manzer's injury early in the Albright game hurt the Saxon defense perhaps more than it hurt their offense and was a key factor in AU's 35-25 loss.
That's why, understandably, Alfred isn't getting pre-season high marks. And Pep is okay with that.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 01, 2010, 10:28:13 PM
So, I have a question for the voters, as I reassess my original Top 25 ballot this weekend:
The order of my teams in the East Region go more along the lines of Del Val, SJF, Alfred, LebVal and Montclair. My question is: why is Alfred being dogged relatively in the East Region Poll when they seem to be bringing back a fair amount of experience -- and why last year's overall results would allow placing Montclair so high (was the Maine Maritime win that impressive in voters' minds)? The margin is pretty steep, and I'm shocked that Union, who needs to prove itself I think for one or two games at the least, came in slightly ahead of Alfred. Any thoughts?
Quote from: rams1102 on September 02, 2010, 01:25:18 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 01, 2010, 10:28:13 PM
So, I have a question for the voters, as I reassess my original Top 25 ballot this weekend:
The order of my teams in the East Region go more along the lines of Del Val, SJF, Alfred, LebVal and Montclair. My question is: why is Alfred being dogged relatively in the East Region Poll when they seem to be bringing back a fair amount of experience -- and why last year's overall results would allow placing Montclair so high (was the Maine Maritime win that impressive in voters' minds)? The margin is pretty steep, and I'm shocked that Union, who needs to prove itself I think for one or two games at the least, came in slightly ahead of Alfred. Any thoughts?
Keep in mind that as a voter I am a Montclair fan. My top (5) in order was Del-Val, Fisher, Cortland, Montclair and Leb Val. I had Ithaca 6th and Alfred 7th and that could easially be reversed. As far as Montclair they made it out of the 1st round and scored more points on MU besides Whitewater and we did give up a ton of points. Alfred did not make it out of the 1st round and as Pep said they lost some big guns on "O". Alfred is a good team and time will tell. This is a lot of fun expressing our opinions and let's see what the next (2) weeks bring. I will be surprised if there will be any movement in the poll from the pre-season, but one never knows. ;)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 06, 2010, 10:02:46 AM
Due to the holiday weekend I'll put the week 1 poll out tomorrow afternoon. Hopefully Pep can still sneak it into the Sun this week, but I suspect many of our pollsters have been predisposed and it will be better to put out a poll with more than half the voters represented.
Quote from: Upstate on September 06, 2010, 10:31:30 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 06, 2010, 10:02:46 AM
Due to the holiday weekend I'll put the week 1 poll out tomorrow afternoon. Hopefully Pep can still sneak it into the Sun this week, but I suspect many of our pollsters have been predisposed and it will be better to put out a poll with more than half the voters represented.
Slackers....
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) | 1-0 | 84 | 1 | vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* |
2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) | 1-0 | 80 | 2 | at Buffalo State |
3 Montclair State | 0-0 | 70 | 3 | vs. Westfield State |
4 Alfred | 1-0 | 47 | 5 | Open Date |
5 Union( 1 ) | 0-0 | 45 | 4 | at #9 Ithaca |
6 Cortland State | 0-0 | 43 | 6t | at Kean |
7 Hobart | 0-0 | 29 | 8t | vs. Dickinson |
8 Rowan | 1-0 | 27 | 8t | Open Date |
9 Ithaca | 1-0 | 26 | 8t | vs. #5 Union |
10 Springfield | 1-0 | 14 | NR | at Husson |
Quote from: maxpower on September 07, 2010, 02:07:53 PM
I hope that ninth pollster had Curry as 10, not 1.... ;)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
Quote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
Quote from: dlip on September 07, 2010, 04:05:33 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
As one who bleeds Garnet dlip really cannot imagine any explanation that would convince him Union belongs at #1 right now, sorry.
Quote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 04:10:03 PMQuote from: dlip on September 07, 2010, 04:05:33 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
As one who bleeds Garnet dlip really cannot imagine any explanation that would convince him Union belongs at #1 right now, sorry.
The poll is supposed to be objective, not who do you like the most.
Quote from: Union89 on September 07, 2010, 05:57:47 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 04:10:03 PMQuote from: dlip on September 07, 2010, 04:05:33 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
As one who bleeds Garnet dlip really cannot imagine any explanation that would convince him Union belongs at #1 right now, sorry.
The poll is supposed to be objective, not who do you like the most.
Knucklehead,
It's obviously not a Union supporter who put them at #1.
Quote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 06:11:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 07, 2010, 05:57:47 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 04:10:03 PMQuote from: dlip on September 07, 2010, 04:05:33 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
As one who bleeds Garnet dlip really cannot imagine any explanation that would convince him Union belongs at #1 right now, sorry.
The poll is supposed to be objective, not who do you like the most.
Knucklehead,
It's obviously not a Union supporter who put them at #1.
First off, i'm not a knucklehead, doe doe brain. I did however, read dlip's post wrong. I read it that he couldn't think of a reason why Union wouldn't be # 1 and was owning up to the poll. But I was way off. My apologies dlip. U89 on the other hand, taste it.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2010, 10:48:26 AM
I think part of the beauty of the poll is that any outliers typically get averaged out by the other voters. It's hard to get worked up over the combined rankings after week 1, so I say we give this particular poster a couple weeks to be proven right or wrong by results. He did have Union as #1 last week so it's hard to fault him for keeping them there since they didn't play.
Quote from: Union89 on September 07, 2010, 05:57:47 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 04:10:03 PMQuote from: dlip on September 07, 2010, 04:05:33 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
As one who bleeds Garnet dlip really cannot imagine any explanation that would convince him Union belongs at #1 right now, sorry.
The poll is supposed to be objective, not who do you like the most.
Knucklehead,
It's obviously not a Union supporter who put them at #1.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 08, 2010, 12:24:22 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 07, 2010, 05:57:47 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 04:10:03 PMQuote from: dlip on September 07, 2010, 04:05:33 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
As one who bleeds Garnet dlip really cannot imagine any explanation that would convince him Union belongs at #1 right now, sorry.
The poll is supposed to be objective, not who do you like the most.
Knucklehead,
It's obviously not a Union supporter who put them at #1.
...alright, I am thoroughly confused...why is it obvious that it is not a Union supporter...or are u being sarcastic?
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
Quote from: Union89 on September 08, 2010, 01:02:12 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 08, 2010, 12:24:22 PMQuote from: Union89 on September 07, 2010, 05:57:47 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 04:10:03 PMQuote from: dlip on September 07, 2010, 04:05:33 PMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
As one who bleeds Garnet dlip really cannot imagine any explanation that would convince him Union belongs at #1 right now, sorry.
The poll is supposed to be objective, not who do you like the most.
Knucklehead,
It's obviously not a Union supporter who put them at #1.
...alright, I am thoroughly confused...why is it obvious that it is not a Union supporter...or are u being sarcastic?
dlip is the Union representative in the polling process.
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 08, 2010, 01:12:28 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
didnt have a problem really w/ union #1 in their poll what pbr was questioning was having dvc at #5. No problem imho if dvc is 1-3 in the poll but to this person there is no way logically to put them #5 unless you have a huge ax to grind or your just a homer and put your favorite team #1 and just kinda fill out the ballot w/o any real thought or reason
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 01:32:04 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 08, 2010, 01:12:28 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
didnt have a problem really w/ union #1 in their poll what pbr was questioning was having dvc at #5. No problem imho if dvc is 1-3 in the poll but to this person there is no way logically to put them #5 unless you have a huge ax to grind or your just a homer and put your favorite team #1 and just kinda fill out the ballot w/o any real thought or reason
Yea you are right, you would really have to explain not having DVC in the top 3.
But we can all agree that RPI and Utica are going to have better years this year. After all, they are RPI and Utica.
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 08, 2010, 01:12:28 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
didnt have a problem really w/ union #1 in their poll what pbr was questioning was having dvc at #5. No problem imho if dvc is 1-3 in the poll but to this person there is no way logically to put them #5 unless you have a huge ax to grind or your just a homer and put your favorite team #1 and just kinda fill out the ballot w/o any real thought or reason
Quote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 01:32:04 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 08, 2010, 01:12:28 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
didnt have a problem really w/ union #1 in their poll what pbr was questioning was having dvc at #5. No problem imho if dvc is 1-3 in the poll but to this person there is no way logically to put them #5 unless you have a huge ax to grind or your just a homer and put your favorite team #1 and just kinda fill out the ballot w/o any real thought or reason
Yea you are right, you would really have to explain not having DVC in the top 3.
But we can all agree that RPI and Utica are going to have better years this year. After all, they are RPI and Utica.
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 08, 2010, 03:01:52 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 01:32:04 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 08, 2010, 01:12:28 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
didnt have a problem really w/ union #1 in their poll what pbr was questioning was having dvc at #5. No problem imho if dvc is 1-3 in the poll but to this person there is no way logically to put them #5 unless you have a huge ax to grind or your just a homer and put your favorite team #1 and just kinda fill out the ballot w/o any real thought or reason
Yea you are right, you would really have to explain not having DVC in the top 3.
But we can all agree that RPI and Utica are going to have better years this year. After all, they are RPI and Utica.
LOL...+k
Quote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 08, 2010, 12:49:24 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on September 08, 2010, 12:32:37 PM
And why is it so horrible that Union is ranked #1? Maybe someone saw both them and Del Val last year and was more impressed with Union and what they are coming back with? I mean if someone had RPI or Utica at #1 we would have a problem.
It should be noted that in my opinion Union had an above average season last year in terms of wins, quality wins, and impressive wins. By St. Lawrence standards that would be a great season, but by Union standards (or Ithacas) I would call it above average. Just my opinion.
They may end up the # 1 team, but as of right now, they do not deserve to be there.
And please don't put RPI and Utica in the same sentence ever again.
Quote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 11:44:16 AMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
I am the voter that has Union #1 overall, and DV #5. Not sure what the big issue is. It's only Week #1 for god's sake. Like Kaz said, I have/will stay consistent with who wins/loses, and who plays who each week. Honestly...can you really tell me why after week #1 where half the teams didn't even play that Union shouldn't be the number one team in the East...and why Del Valley isn't where they belong at #5? Is it because Del Valley is ranked #10 overall in the D3 poll? I have gone on record before to say I don't take the national polls into account, as hardly any teams from seperate regions even play each other. Hell...teams from the same region but different leagues hardly ever play each other until the playoffs.
I have no skin in the game on this one...you don't see Hartwick on there...and clearly I am not a Union fan. Tell you what Lew Dogg...send me a PM next week on your top 10 picks so I can mirror them for week #2. Feel better???
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 12:17:53 PM
I'll share...that is not an issue. At this point in the season, it is pretty subjective. I think all of this plays out over th course of the next few weeks/season, but my top 5 to start the season in order are 1) Union, 2) SJF, 3) Montclair, 4) Alfred, and 5) Del Valley.
Like most, I tried to represent what I consider the 4 best conferences of the east...E8, LL, NJAC, and MAC. Out of those, I thought Union, if they could get by Ithaca and Salisbury, would have the best chance to run the table and win out. They tied for the league title last year (losing out on the tie breaker with Sus), bring I believe 6 starters back on offense and 5 back on defense. Then I took a look at the second place teams from each and thought that Alfred also belonged in the top 5. I know they lost a lot, but they have been pretty consistent the last few years and do bring back the best QB in the league (though Bailey from SJF is right behind him).
It's nothing personal against Del Valley. I just have a feeling that the rest of the leagues may have been down last year just a tad, as opposed to the MAC being strong. I have seen them play once over the past 2 years...and they were strong...no question...which is why they are in my top 5. If they start blowing people up...I will definitely consider moving them up.
It's week #1...I will adjust as teams adjust. I mean....raise your hand if you had Susquahanna in your top 10 to start last season...
It's cool dlip...I know what you mean. I apologize (for real) if it came across, or comes across, as defensive. I'm on vacation right now...baby is finally sleeping...and I have about 10 minutes to get this down before I have to run. Sometimes when writing these things fast it comes across defensive. Don't mean it to be...just typing fast.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 12:17:53 PM
I'll share...that is not an issue. At this point in the season, it is pretty subjective. I think all of this plays out over th course of the next few weeks/season, but my top 5 to start the season in order are 1) Union, 2) SJF, 3) Montclair, 4) Alfred, and 5) Del Valley.
Like most, I tried to represent what I consider the 4 best conferences of the east...E8, LL, NJAC, and MAC. Out of those, I thought Union, if they could get by Ithaca and Salisbury, would have the best chance to run the table and win out. They tied for the league title last year (losing out on the tie breaker with Sus), bring I believe 6 starters back on offense and 5 back on defense. Then I took a look at the second place teams from each and thought that Alfred also belonged in the top 5. I know they lost a lot, but they have been pretty consistent the last few years and do bring back the best QB in the league (though Bailey from SJF is right behind him).
It's nothing personal against Del Valley. I just have a feeling that the rest of the leagues may have been down last year just a tad, as opposed to the MAC being strong. I have seen them play once over the past 2 years...and they were strong...no question...which is why they are in my top 5. If they start blowing people up...I will definitely consider moving them up.
It's week #1...I will adjust as teams adjust. I mean....raise your hand if you had Susquahanna in your top 10 to start last season...
It's cool dlip...I know what you mean. I apologize (for real) if it came across, or comes across, as defensive. I'm on vacation right now...baby is finally sleeping...and I have about 10 minutes to get this down before I have to run. Sometimes when writing these things fast it comes across defensive. Don't mean it to be...just typing fast.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 09, 2010, 11:58:19 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 11:44:16 AMQuote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 07, 2010, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 07, 2010, 01:57:54 PM
Had two missed submissions again. I used the preseason rankings for one of the missed pollsters. Here are the results:
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 1-0 84 1 vs. #7 Washington & Jefferson* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 1-0 80 2 at Buffalo State 3 Montclair State 0-0 70 3 vs. Westfield State 4 Alfred 1-0 47 5 Open Date 5 Union( 1 ) 0-0 45 4 at #9 Ithaca 6 Cortland State 0-0 43 6t at Kean 7 Hobart 0-0 29 8t vs. Dickinson 8 Rowan 1-0 27 8t Open Date 9 Ithaca 1-0 26 8t vs. #5 Union 10 Springfield 1-0 14 NR at Husson
Dropped Out:
#6t Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Kean 11
Lebanon Valley 11
RPI 7
Curry 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,5,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,2,1,4,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,3,5,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,6,4,NR,9,4,NR,4,4)
Union (3,NR,7,1,4,NR,6,NR,9,6)
Cortland (7,4,3,8,3,6,10,NR,9,6)
Hobart (8,6,8,NR,6,7,9,NR,8,7)
Rowan (10,8,10,10,9,5,5,NR,5,10)
Ithaca (9,7,5,7,8,10,7,NR,NR,9)
Springfield(6,NR,NR,9,7,NR,8,NR,7,NR)
Kean (NR,10,9,NR,10,8,NR,NR,7,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,8)
RPI (NR,9,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Washington & Jefferson* at #1 Delaware Valley
#5 Union at #9 Ithaca
#6 Cortland State at Kean
*Wash & Jeff ranking from South Region Preseason Fan Poll
Huh? can see not having dvc #1 but 5th? ??? ??? ???
come on now...
It's the same jerk that has Union 1. Dude is all over the place.
I am the voter that has Union #1 overall, and DV #5. Not sure what the big issue is. It's only Week #1 for god's sake. Like Kaz said, I have/will stay consistent with who wins/loses, and who plays who each week. Honestly...can you really tell me why after week #1 where half the teams didn't even play that Union shouldn't be the number one team in the East...and why Del Valley isn't where they belong at #5? Is it because Del Valley is ranked #10 overall in the D3 poll? I have gone on record before to say I don't take the national polls into account, as hardly any teams from seperate regions even play each other. Hell...teams from the same region but different leagues hardly ever play each other until the playoffs.
I have no skin in the game on this one...you don't see Hartwick on there...and clearly I am not a Union fan. Tell you what Lew Dogg...send me a PM next week on your top 10 picks so I can mirror them for week #2. Feel better???
Well, you've given us a reason why Del Valley isn't number #1 (You don't take polls into account)
You've asked why people think Delaware Valley doesn't deserve to be at #5...
But you haven't actually said why you put them behind an Alfred team that went one and done in the playoffs and graduated pretty much everyone of significance except Secky, or a Union and Fisher team who missed the playoffs last season. I'm sure you have your reasons. Care to share?
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 09, 2010, 12:34:21 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 12:17:53 PM
I'll share...that is not an issue. At this point in the season, it is pretty subjective. I think all of this plays out over th course of the next few weeks/season, but my top 5 to start the season in order are 1) Union, 2) SJF, 3) Montclair, 4) Alfred, and 5) Del Valley.
Like most, I tried to represent what I consider the 4 best conferences of the east...E8, LL, NJAC, and MAC. Out of those, I thought Union, if they could get by Ithaca and Salisbury, would have the best chance to run the table and win out. They tied for the league title last year (losing out on the tie breaker with Sus), bring I believe 6 starters back on offense and 5 back on defense. Then I took a look at the second place teams from each and thought that Alfred also belonged in the top 5. I know they lost a lot, but they have been pretty consistent the last few years and do bring back the best QB in the league (though Bailey from SJF is right behind him).
It's nothing personal against Del Valley. I just have a feeling that the rest of the leagues may have been down last year just a tad, as opposed to the MAC being strong. I have seen them play once over the past 2 years...and they were strong...no question...which is why they are in my top 5. If they start blowing people up...I will definitely consider moving them up.
It's week #1...I will adjust as teams adjust. I mean....raise your hand if you had Susquahanna in your top 10 to start last season...
It's cool dlip...I know what you mean. I apologize (for real) if it came across, or comes across, as defensive. I'm on vacation right now...baby is finally sleeping...and I have about 10 minutes to get this down before I have to run. Sometimes when writing these things fast it comes across defensive. Don't mean it to be...just typing fast.
interesting take yanks who knows u may be right....pbr doesnt think union will come out on top but who knows its why they play the games. To pbr on paper dvc looked to be the strongest in the east and wanted to see reasoning why somone had dvc ranked 5th w/ 18 returning starters from a team that made the playoffs last year. Personally taking off the dvc sunglasses for a second pbr thinks dvc would manhandle most of the LL teams this year w/ sjf really the only 1 giving them a game from the teams up north... ;D (love stirring the pot) dvc certainly aint backing down from anyone w/ muhlenberg/ #20 wash&jeff/#3 wesley....will certainly be tested the next several weeks.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 09, 2010, 02:34:09 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 09, 2010, 12:34:21 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 12:17:53 PM
I'll share...that is not an issue. At this point in the season, it is pretty subjective. I think all of this plays out over th course of the next few weeks/season, but my top 5 to start the season in order are 1) Union, 2) SJF, 3) Montclair, 4) Alfred, and 5) Del Valley.
Like most, I tried to represent what I consider the 4 best conferences of the east...E8, LL, NJAC, and MAC. Out of those, I thought Union, if they could get by Ithaca and Salisbury, would have the best chance to run the table and win out. They tied for the league title last year (losing out on the tie breaker with Sus), bring I believe 6 starters back on offense and 5 back on defense. Then I took a look at the second place teams from each and thought that Alfred also belonged in the top 5. I know they lost a lot, but they have been pretty consistent the last few years and do bring back the best QB in the league (though Bailey from SJF is right behind him).
It's nothing personal against Del Valley. I just have a feeling that the rest of the leagues may have been down last year just a tad, as opposed to the MAC being strong. I have seen them play once over the past 2 years...and they were strong...no question...which is why they are in my top 5. If they start blowing people up...I will definitely consider moving them up.
It's week #1...I will adjust as teams adjust. I mean....raise your hand if you had Susquahanna in your top 10 to start last season...
It's cool dlip...I know what you mean. I apologize (for real) if it came across, or comes across, as defensive. I'm on vacation right now...baby is finally sleeping...and I have about 10 minutes to get this down before I have to run. Sometimes when writing these things fast it comes across defensive. Don't mean it to be...just typing fast.
interesting take yanks who knows u may be right....pbr doesnt think union will come out on top but who knows its why they play the games. To pbr on paper dvc looked to be the strongest in the east and wanted to see reasoning why somone had dvc ranked 5th w/ 18 returning starters from a team that made the playoffs last year. Personally taking off the dvc sunglasses for a second pbr thinks dvc would manhandle most of the LL teams this year w/ sjf really the only 1 giving them a game from the teams up north... ;D (love stirring the pot) dvc certainly aint backing down from anyone w/ muhlenberg/ #20 wash&jeff/#3 wesley....will certainly be tested the next several weeks.
I am still in denial of how their playoff matchup ended nearly 6 years ago. I would love love love to see a rematch.
Quote from: Upstate on September 09, 2010, 02:49:00 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 09, 2010, 02:34:09 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 09, 2010, 12:34:21 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 12:17:53 PM
I'll share...that is not an issue. At this point in the season, it is pretty subjective. I think all of this plays out over th course of the next few weeks/season, but my top 5 to start the season in order are 1) Union, 2) SJF, 3) Montclair, 4) Alfred, and 5) Del Valley.
Like most, I tried to represent what I consider the 4 best conferences of the east...E8, LL, NJAC, and MAC. Out of those, I thought Union, if they could get by Ithaca and Salisbury, would have the best chance to run the table and win out. They tied for the league title last year (losing out on the tie breaker with Sus), bring I believe 6 starters back on offense and 5 back on defense. Then I took a look at the second place teams from each and thought that Alfred also belonged in the top 5. I know they lost a lot, but they have been pretty consistent the last few years and do bring back the best QB in the league (though Bailey from SJF is right behind him).
It's nothing personal against Del Valley. I just have a feeling that the rest of the leagues may have been down last year just a tad, as opposed to the MAC being strong. I have seen them play once over the past 2 years...and they were strong...no question...which is why they are in my top 5. If they start blowing people up...I will definitely consider moving them up.
It's week #1...I will adjust as teams adjust. I mean....raise your hand if you had Susquahanna in your top 10 to start last season...
It's cool dlip...I know what you mean. I apologize (for real) if it came across, or comes across, as defensive. I'm on vacation right now...baby is finally sleeping...and I have about 10 minutes to get this down before I have to run. Sometimes when writing these things fast it comes across defensive. Don't mean it to be...just typing fast.
interesting take yanks who knows u may be right....pbr doesnt think union will come out on top but who knows its why they play the games. To pbr on paper dvc looked to be the strongest in the east and wanted to see reasoning why somone had dvc ranked 5th w/ 18 returning starters from a team that made the playoffs last year. Personally taking off the dvc sunglasses for a second pbr thinks dvc would manhandle most of the LL teams this year w/ sjf really the only 1 giving them a game from the teams up north... ;D (love stirring the pot) dvc certainly aint backing down from anyone w/ muhlenberg/ #20 wash&jeff/#3 wesley....will certainly be tested the next several weeks.
I am still in denial of how their playoff matchup ended nearly 6 years ago. I would love love love to see a rematch.
That game should have went into overtime...
:'(
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 09, 2010, 02:34:09 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 09, 2010, 12:34:21 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 09, 2010, 12:17:53 PM
I'll share...that is not an issue. At this point in the season, it is pretty subjective. I think all of this plays out over th course of the next few weeks/season, but my top 5 to start the season in order are 1) Union, 2) SJF, 3) Montclair, 4) Alfred, and 5) Del Valley.
Like most, I tried to represent what I consider the 4 best conferences of the east...E8, LL, NJAC, and MAC. Out of those, I thought Union, if they could get by Ithaca and Salisbury, would have the best chance to run the table and win out. They tied for the league title last year (losing out on the tie breaker with Sus), bring I believe 6 starters back on offense and 5 back on defense. Then I took a look at the second place teams from each and thought that Alfred also belonged in the top 5. I know they lost a lot, but they have been pretty consistent the last few years and do bring back the best QB in the league (though Bailey from SJF is right behind him).
It's nothing personal against Del Valley. I just have a feeling that the rest of the leagues may have been down last year just a tad, as opposed to the MAC being strong. I have seen them play once over the past 2 years...and they were strong...no question...which is why they are in my top 5. If they start blowing people up...I will definitely consider moving them up.
It's week #1...I will adjust as teams adjust. I mean....raise your hand if you had Susquahanna in your top 10 to start last season...
It's cool dlip...I know what you mean. I apologize (for real) if it came across, or comes across, as defensive. I'm on vacation right now...baby is finally sleeping...and I have about 10 minutes to get this down before I have to run. Sometimes when writing these things fast it comes across defensive. Don't mean it to be...just typing fast.
interesting take yanks who knows u may be right....pbr doesnt think union will come out on top but who knows its why they play the games. To pbr on paper dvc looked to be the strongest in the east and wanted to see reasoning why somone had dvc ranked 5th w/ 18 returning starters from a team that made the playoffs last year. Personally taking off the dvc sunglasses for a second pbr thinks dvc would manhandle most of the LL teams this year w/ sjf really the only 1 giving them a game from the teams up north... ;D (love stirring the pot) dvc certainly aint backing down from anyone w/ muhlenberg/ #20 wash&jeff/#3 wesley....will certainly be tested the next several weeks.
I am still in denial of how their playoff matchup ended nearly 6 years ago. I would love love love to see a rematch.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) | 2-0 | 78 | 1 | at #1 Wesley* |
2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) | 2-0 | 72 | 2 | at Rochester |
3 Montclair State | 1-0 | 63 | 3 | vs. #8 Rowan |
4 Alfred | 1-0 | 46 | 4 | at St. Lawrence |
5 Cortland State | 1-0 | 42 | 6 | vs. Buffalo State |
6 Hobart | 1-0 | 39 | 7 | at Carnegie Mellon |
7 Ithaca | 2-0 | 34 | 9 | at Widener |
8 Rowan | 1-0 | 32 | 8 | at #3 Montclair State |
9 Springfield | 2-0 | 24 | 10 | at Wilkes |
10 Union | 0-1 | 3 | 5 | Open Date |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Week 2 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 2-0 78 1 at #1 Wesley* 2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) 2-0 72 2 at Rochester 3 Montclair State 1-0 63 3 vs. #8 Rowan 4 Alfred 1-0 46 4 at St. Lawrence 5 Cortland State 1-0 42 6 vs. Buffalo State 6 Hobart 1-0 39 7 at Carnegie Mellon 7 Ithaca 2-0 34 9 at Widener 8 Rowan 1-0 32 8 at #3 Montclair State 9 Springfield 2-0 24 10 at Wilkes 10 Union 0-1 3 5 Open Date
Also Receiving votes:
Curry 2
Kean 2
Lycoming 1
RPI 1
Utica 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,NR,2,1,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,NR,1,3,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (4,2,4,NR,4,2,3,NR,3,3)
Alfred (3,5,6,NR,9,7,4,NR,4,4)
Cortland (7,4,3,NR,3,5,9,NR,8,7)
Hobart (5,6,7,NR,6,6,7,NR,6,6)
Ithaca (8,7,5,NR,5,8,6,NR,7,8)
Rowan (9,8,8,NR,8,4,5,NR,5,9)
Springfield(6,9,9,NR,7,9,8,NR,NR,5)
Union (10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
Kean (NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Lycoming (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#1 Delaware Valley at #1 Wesley*
#8 Rowan at #3 Montclair State
*Wesley ranking from South Region Week 1 Fan Poll
Quote from: rams1102 on September 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 13, 2010, 09:13:51 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.
Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.
Quote from: Upstate on September 13, 2010, 09:29:03 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 13, 2010, 09:13:51 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.
Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.
I always get my poll in on time...
I've got 4 kids as evidence...
Quote from: Upstate on September 13, 2010, 09:29:03 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 13, 2010, 09:13:51 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.
Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.
I always get my poll in on time...
I've got 4 kids as evidence...
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 14, 2010, 08:20:06 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 13, 2010, 09:29:03 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 13, 2010, 09:13:51 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.
Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.
I always get my poll in on time...
I've got 4 kids as evidence...
In on time or just don't get out in time?
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 14, 2010, 08:20:06 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 13, 2010, 09:29:03 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 13, 2010, 09:13:51 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.
Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.
I always get my poll in on time...
I've got 4 kids as evidence...
In on time or just don't get out in time?
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 14, 2010, 08:20:06 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 13, 2010, 09:29:03 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 13, 2010, 09:13:51 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 13, 2010, 08:57:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 13, 2010, 12:39:40 PM
I decided not to include previous rankings for pollsters who missed the noon cut-off even though I did last week. I'm not sure what the correct decision is, so feel free to comment on that along with this week's rankings.
Thanks for all of your hard work. +K I'm a little confused with the "NR". The Top (8) each had (2) NR'S. Were there (2) people who did not vote or there were (2) voters who did not vote for anyone in the Top (8). Thanks.
Given that there are ten (10) pollsters, it appears that Pollsters #4 and #8 did NOT get their poles (oops, was this a set up job?)....in by the deadline, resulting in the "Not Ranked" designation for ALL vote-getters.
I always get my poll in on time...
I've got 4 kids as evidence...
In on time or just don't get out in time?
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 14, 2010, 05:55:34 PM
I missed it this week...went right from vacation to a road trip for work to Texas. This should be my last one for the rest of the year. Didn't mean to screw up the curve on this...but here is how I would have voted for the week (and feel free to rip it apart after my Union pick blew up right in my face!!!):
1) SJF
2) Montclair State
3) Deleware Valley
4) Alfred
5) Ithaca
6) Cortland
7) Springfield
8) Rowan
9) Hobart
10) Union
I clearly had RPI way too high at #6...and dropped them out after their 6-3 win...I mean debacle. Watched the Hobart game...and they looked tough, so they moved into the top 10. I had a hard time dropping Union all the way out of the poll after one loss...so I kept them in at #10. Del Valley made a big jump to #3.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2010, 07:36:07 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 14, 2010, 05:55:34 PM
I missed it this week...went right from vacation to a road trip for work to Texas. This should be my last one for the rest of the year. Didn't mean to screw up the curve on this...but here is how I would have voted for the week (and feel free to rip it apart after my Union pick blew up right in my face!!!):
1) SJF
2) Montclair State
3) Deleware Valley
4) Alfred
5) Ithaca
6) Cortland
7) Springfield
8) Rowan
9) Hobart
10) Union
I clearly had RPI way too high at #6...and dropped them out after their 6-3 win...I mean debacle. Watched the Hobart game...and they looked tough, so they moved into the top 10. I had a hard time dropping Union all the way out of the poll after one loss...so I kept them in at #10. Del Valley made a big jump to #3.
I don't see how you don't have Del Val #1 after they beat a Top 25 tean (W&J). Cortland played a tough team in Kean, won on their turf and should get more love. Fisher and Montclair (I'm a Montclair homer) have not played a tough team and should be below Del Val. We are all entitled to our opinions and that's why this is fun. ;D
Quote from: Upstate on September 14, 2010, 07:58:30 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 14, 2010, 07:36:07 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 14, 2010, 05:55:34 PM
I missed it this week...went right from vacation to a road trip for work to Texas. This should be my last one for the rest of the year. Didn't mean to screw up the curve on this...but here is how I would have voted for the week (and feel free to rip it apart after my Union pick blew up right in my face!!!):
1) SJF
2) Montclair State
3) Deleware Valley
4) Alfred
5) Ithaca
6) Cortland
7) Springfield
8) Rowan
9) Hobart
10) Union
I clearly had RPI way too high at #6...and dropped them out after their 6-3 win...I mean debacle. Watched the Hobart game...and they looked tough, so they moved into the top 10. I had a hard time dropping Union all the way out of the poll after one loss...so I kept them in at #10. Del Valley made a big jump to #3.
I don't see how you don't have Del Val #1 after they beat a Top 25 tean (W&J). Cortland played a tough team in Kean, won on their turf and should get more love. Fisher and Montclair (I'm a Montclair homer) have not played a tough team and should be below Del Val. We are all entitled to our opinions and that's why this is fun. ;D
Agree...
DVC deserves to be #1 until they lose a game...
Quote from: Garnet on September 15, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. :P
Quote from: Garnet on September 15, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. :P
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 15, 2010, 01:29:53 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 15, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. :P
That's a fair point. But it's not like people are jumping on the Del. Valley bandwagon for no reason. They had a better season last year than SJF, and have had a better season so far this year. Sure, we don't know that they're better than SJF or Montclair. But we don't know that they're better than Ithaca either. Yes, we all interpret information differently, but there would appear to be more evidence supporting DVC than SJF
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 15, 2010, 01:40:14 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 15, 2010, 01:29:53 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 15, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. :P
That's a fair point. But it's not like people are jumping on the Del. Valley bandwagon for no reason. They had a better season last year than SJF, and have had a better season so far this year. Sure, we don't know that they're better than SJF or Montclair. But we don't know that they're better than Ithaca either. Yes, we all interpret information differently, but there would appear to be more evidence supporting DVC than SJF
exactly and this weekends game for them is going to answer any remaining questions...they hammered the #20 ranked team last weekend and playing the #3 team on the road this weekend. They are ducking no one and deserve a lot of credit for scheduling a tough ooc series of games. Not scheduling a team bunch of teams like coast guard...
Quote from: Upstate on September 15, 2010, 01:50:14 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 15, 2010, 01:40:14 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 15, 2010, 01:29:53 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 15, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. :P
That's a fair point. But it's not like people are jumping on the Del. Valley bandwagon for no reason. They had a better season last year than SJF, and have had a better season so far this year. Sure, we don't know that they're better than SJF or Montclair. But we don't know that they're better than Ithaca either. Yes, we all interpret information differently, but there would appear to be more evidence supporting DVC than SJF
exactly and this weekends game for them is going to answer any remaining questions...they hammered the #20 ranked team last weekend and playing the #3 team on the road this weekend. They are ducking no one and deserve a lot of credit for scheduling a tough ooc series of games. Not scheduling a team bunch of teams like coast guard...
Schedule Mount Union for a home and home and then talk!!!
I kid, Wesley and W&J are no jokes of an OOC opponents. After facing MUC and Salisbury the past two years and the subsequent beat downs by MUC, I'm more than happy to see Brockport and Frostburgh on the schedule this year.
Quote from: TGP on September 15, 2010, 01:44:01 PM
"Coast Guard?!?!?!?!" - Groseph Gro Grobertson
Quote from: LewDoth Stonehammer on September 15, 2010, 02:04:31 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 15, 2010, 01:50:14 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 15, 2010, 01:40:14 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 15, 2010, 01:29:53 PMQuote from: Garnet on September 15, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. :P
That's a fair point. But it's not like people are jumping on the Del. Valley bandwagon for no reason. They had a better season last year than SJF, and have had a better season so far this year. Sure, we don't know that they're better than SJF or Montclair. But we don't know that they're better than Ithaca either. Yes, we all interpret information differently, but there would appear to be more evidence supporting DVC than SJF
exactly and this weekends game for them is going to answer any remaining questions...they hammered the #20 ranked team last weekend and playing the #3 team on the road this weekend. They are ducking no one and deserve a lot of credit for scheduling a tough ooc series of games. Not scheduling a team bunch of teams like coast guard...
Schedule Mount Union for a home and home and then talk!!!
I kid, Wesley and W&J are no jokes of an OOC opponents. After facing MUC and Salisbury the past two years and the subsequent beat downs by MUC, I'm more than happy to see Brockport and Frostburgh on the schedule this year.
What sucks about scheduling MUC is you still don't know how good you are when all is said and done because they always win, and mostly win big. Atleast with W&J, there was a decent gauge. Wesley is a weird one though. I feel like every year Wesley puts up a really surprising win, then they have a mind boggling loss. A W over them would be very impressive though.
Quote from: Garnet on September 15, 2010, 11:48:00 AM
Why bother with the poll if he is supposed fal lin line with the rest of you. :P
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 15, 2010, 04:00:58 PM
Pep says, "Respect the Poll!"
Quote from: Knightstalker on September 15, 2010, 04:06:04 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 15, 2010, 04:00:58 PM
Pep says, "Respect the Poll!"
So do all the Pep GF's.
Quote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Quote from: gordonmann on September 18, 2010, 08:37:26 PM
You really could interpret the Del Val-Wesley game almost anyway you want.
If Wesley doesn't turn the ball over six times - a bunch of them leading to red zone opportunities that the Aggies couldn't convert - the game isn't a nail biter. That said Del Val created some of those turnovers with great plays. There were two interceptions by defensive ends on screen passes and one fumble created by Del Val sacking the quarterback. Two of the interceptions were bad throws and one fumble was on a punt return by a freshman who probably should've called fair catch.
Del Val's defense played really well in the second half. The Wolverines scored 21 points but one of those appeared to be sprung by an illegal block. Del Val also appeared to cause a seventh turnover on a third down play late in the game protecting a three point lead. Five people told me they thought the play was a fumble - a couple of them from Wesley - and Del Val reportedly reviewed the tape and didn't think it was close. If that call goes the other way, maybe Del Val beats the No. 3 team on their own turf. So that's the pro-Aggies view.
The anti-Aggies view says Del Val had five red zone chances and came away with one touchdown. Their offense had six turnovers to work with - four of them giving Del Val the ball in Wesley territory - a bunch of penalties to help drives or stall Wesley and Del Val still couldn't win. You couldn't say Del Val is better than Wesley from watching that game.
My three takeaways with which I feel pretty comfortable:
- Wesley is better than Del Val. The Wolverines defense is outstanding with great talent, size and speed. They will be tough to score on, particularly if a team relies on the run. Obviously it won't help if they are constantly defending a short field. And if Wesley doesn't avoid the mistakes they made today, they won't challenge Mount Union or Whitewater. But it won't be because their defense is weak.
- Del Val's defense is really good, too. Not at Wesley's level, but they play very hard and are getting great contributions off the defensive line. If the Aggies get the illegal block call on the play, Del Val gives up 14 points to Wesley. Pretty impressive.
- Del Val is in the conversation for the top team in the East. I think SJF is underrated right now. I was the first Top 25 voter to put Cortland State on his ballot. And Montclair State's win was nice today. If you've seen any of those teams and have been really impressed by them, I don't think voting them No. 1 is unreasonable. If you haven't and you're reading box scores, then it's tough to pick against Del Val given what they've returned, whom they've played (relative to the other top East teams) and how they've played those opponents so far.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 19, 2010, 08:53:20 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Have no idea how you can make that statement w/o seeing the game. Really? It couldn't be that DVC has a darn good defense and made excellent plays to force the turnovers? Or Wesley took penalties to save their players from getting mashed? i.e. a def. end beats the tackle clean around the end and to keep your qb from getting decapitated you hold hold/tackle the defensive end? IMHO you can call it sloppiness but remember they were playing the #8 ranked team, and maybe DVC deserves just a crumb of credit for forcing some of those turnovers and penalties....just a thought
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 19, 2010, 08:53:20 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Have no idea how you can make that statement w/o seeing the game. Really? It couldn't be that DVC has a darn good defense and made excellent plays to force the turnovers? Or Wesley took penalties to save their players from getting mashed? i.e. a def. end beats the tackle clean around the end and to keep your qb from getting decapitated you hold hold/tackle the defensive end? IMHO you can call it sloppiness but remember they were playing the #8 ranked team, and maybe DVC deserves just a crumb of credit for forcing some of those turnovers and penalties....just a thought
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 19, 2010, 08:53:20 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Have no idea how you can make that statement w/o seeing the game. Really? It couldn't be that DVC has a darn good defense and made excellent plays to force the turnovers? Or Wesley took penalties to save their players from getting mashed? i.e. a def. end beats the tackle clean around the end and to keep your qb from getting decapitated you hold hold/tackle the defensive end? IMHO you can call it sloppiness but remember they were playing the #8 ranked team, and maybe DVC deserves just a crumb of credit for forcing some of those turnovers and penalties....just a thought
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 19, 2010, 09:54:31 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 19, 2010, 08:53:20 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Have no idea how you can make that statement w/o seeing the game. Really? It couldn't be that DVC has a darn good defense and made excellent plays to force the turnovers? Or Wesley took penalties to save their players from getting mashed? i.e. a def. end beats the tackle clean around the end and to keep your qb from getting decapitated you hold hold/tackle the defensive end? IMHO you can call it sloppiness but remember they were playing the #8 ranked team, and maybe DVC deserves just a crumb of credit for forcing some of those turnovers and penalties....just a thought
How do you know I didn't listen to the game since I was the guy updating "GameDay Live" in the blog Saturday? Just a thought. And I did defer to Gordon, who pretty much echoed some of my thoughts.
[Edit: What bothers me with your post is that I didn't discredit DVC entirely. My point is more that Wesley's sloppy play in the second half kept DVC in the game... But even if it was DVC's defense that made the game winnable, as you say, DVC still lost with a +5 turnover ratio (and a penalty ratio from hell, too). I dropped BOTH teams in my Top 25, but DVC dropped just 4 spots -- a very small drop for a team with an early-season loss historically. And that drop matched the general drop in the Poll. I dropped Wesley, on the other hand, two spots (from #2 to #4) because that sloppy play is something that some people were hoping was gone from this team. Obviously, it's not quite yet.]
Quote from: rams1102 on September 19, 2010, 09:36:04 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 19, 2010, 08:53:20 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Have no idea how you can make that statement w/o seeing the game. Really? It couldn't be that DVC has a darn good defense and made excellent plays to force the turnovers? Or Wesley took penalties to save their players from getting mashed? i.e. a def. end beats the tackle clean around the end and to keep your qb from getting decapitated you hold hold/tackle the defensive end? IMHO you can call it sloppiness but remember they were playing the #8 ranked team, and maybe DVC deserves just a crumb of credit for forcing some of those turnovers and penalties....just a thought
If you want Wesleydad to respond, cut and paste to the South Region, Atlantic Central. We beat them at home (3) years ago and heard some of the same stuff. Wesley is a real good team, but they have to beat the MUU / UWW to solidify themselves. The East is usually very inconsistant with the exception of Rowan some time ago. You guys are the best of the East, coming from a Montclair fan, but remember what happened with Albright last year. :o
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 7 ) | 2-1 | 87 | 1 | Open Date |
2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) | 3-0 | 81 | 2 | at #6 Hobart |
3 Montclair State | 2-0 | 73 | 3 | at Morrisville State |
4 Cortland State | 2-0 | 50 | 5 | at Western Connecticut |
5 Ithaca | 3-0 | 49 | 7 | at Lycoming |
6 Hobart | 2-0 | 47 | 6 | vs. #2 St. John Fisher |
7 Alfred | 2-0 | 43 | 4 | at #8 Springfield |
8 Springfield | 3-0 | 34 | 9 | vs. #7 Alfred |
9 Rowan | 1-1 | 8 | 8 | vs. William Paterson |
10 Curry | 2-1 | 6 | NR | vs. MIT |
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 07:50:49 AM
Sure they appreciate that crumb of credit you give them....and they appreciate you not discrediting them entirely....
Quote from: TGP on September 20, 2010, 02:02:26 PM
I thought Rowan played Montclair last weekend? I think you meant to show them playing William P...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2010, 03:42:11 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 07:50:49 AM
Sure they appreciate that crumb of credit you give them....and they appreciate you not discrediting them entirely....
Trust me, that's a lot more than a crumb -- other teams in the first couple weeks that lost dropped on average 8-10 spots (like an established St. John's team). Was I supposed to move them up on a national basis after the loss? The first three weeks for me showed a weaker offense than last year, and Wesley helped prove that. The defense is a surprise to me -- but it takes both sides of the ball to make a team a national powerhouse.
#13 is a powerful ranking in a 200+ team division. DelVal can easily jump back into the Top 10 with some strong MAC performances this season, but currently, I think SJF is a slightly stronger team that would be able to win in a shootout against Wesley. So, SJF is one spot higher in my ballot right now than DelVal.
So, if you're going to stand there throwing stones that people like me didn't respect your team enough, at least defend the offense's performance compared to last year for people that don't get DVC on their radar every week.
Quote from: Upstate on September 20, 2010, 03:53:50 PM
You're still doing a great job Kaz00, don't let those pumpkin heads talk down to you!!!
Quote from: TGP on September 20, 2010, 04:14:45 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 20, 2010, 03:53:50 PM
You're still doing a great job Kaz00, don't let those pumpkin heads talk down to you!!!
I wasn't talking down - AUKaz is doing a great job - just pointing out a typo...no big deal.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 20, 2010, 04:21:06 PMQuote from: TGP on September 20, 2010, 04:14:45 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 20, 2010, 03:53:50 PM
You're still doing a great job Kaz00, don't let those pumpkin heads talk down to you!!!
I wasn't talking down - AUKaz is doing a great job - just pointing out a typo...no big deal.
Seems like the Pumpkinheads and the Fishermen are a bit testy with one another. Perhaps y'all should take this down to the new Boswell Saterday night and let your boys settle it on the field?
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: TGP on September 20, 2010, 04:14:45 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 20, 2010, 03:53:50 PM
You're still doing a great job Kaz00, don't let those pumpkin heads talk down to you!!!
I wasn't talking down - AUKaz is doing a great job - just pointing out a typo...no big deal.
Quote from: Upstate on September 20, 2010, 04:34:05 PMQuote from: TGP on September 20, 2010, 04:14:45 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 20, 2010, 03:53:50 PM
You're still doing a great job Kaz00, don't let those pumpkin heads talk down to you!!!
I wasn't talking down - AUKaz is doing a great job - just pointing out a typo...no big deal.
Ha, my bad TGP I forgot to put /sarcasm...
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 04:08:36 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2010, 03:42:11 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 07:50:49 AM
Sure they appreciate that crumb of credit you give them....and they appreciate you not discrediting them entirely....
Trust me, that's a lot more than a crumb -- other teams in the first couple weeks that lost dropped on average 8-10 spots (like an established St. John's team). Was I supposed to move them up on a national basis after the loss? The first three weeks for me showed a weaker offense than last year, and Wesley helped prove that. The defense is a surprise to me -- but it takes both sides of the ball to make a team a national powerhouse.
#13 is a powerful ranking in a 200+ team division. DelVal can easily jump back into the Top 10 with some strong MAC performances this season, but currently, I think SJF is a slightly stronger team that would be able to win in a shootout against Wesley. So, SJF is one spot higher in my ballot right now than DelVal.
So, if you're going to stand there throwing stones that people like me didn't respect your team enough, at least defend the offense's performance compared to last year for people that don't get DVC on their radar every week.
no frank my problem is that you totally blew them off and made it sound like they don't deserve to be on the same field as wesley, that it was total luck the dvc was in the position they were....i don't expect them to move up in the polls at all my beef was when you totally discredit the team and their performance. personally could care less what team you like (even w/ your bias towards union and the LL) , and whatever team your discounting.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2010, 05:06:28 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 04:08:36 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2010, 03:42:11 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 07:50:49 AM
Sure they appreciate that crumb of credit you give them....and they appreciate you not discrediting them entirely....
Trust me, that's a lot more than a crumb -- other teams in the first couple weeks that lost dropped on average 8-10 spots (like an established St. John's team). Was I supposed to move them up on a national basis after the loss? The first three weeks for me showed a weaker offense than last year, and Wesley helped prove that. The defense is a surprise to me -- but it takes both sides of the ball to make a team a national powerhouse.
#13 is a powerful ranking in a 200+ team division. DelVal can easily jump back into the Top 10 with some strong MAC performances this season, but currently, I think SJF is a slightly stronger team that would be able to win in a shootout against Wesley. So, SJF is one spot higher in my ballot right now than DelVal.
So, if you're going to stand there throwing stones that people like me didn't respect your team enough, at least defend the offense's performance compared to last year for people that don't get DVC on their radar every week.
no frank my problem is that you totally blew them off and made it sound like they don't deserve to be on the same field as wesley, that it was total luck the dvc was in the position they were....i don't expect them to move up in the polls at all my beef was when you totally discredit the team and their performance. personally could care less what team you like (even w/ your bias towards union and the LL) , and whatever team your discounting.
OK, now those be some fighting words at the end of that passage. Hobart was the first Liberty League team to see the light of day on my ballot this season this week at #25. Above any Liberty League team, I have SJF, DVC, Montclair, Alfred and Ithaca. As I've covered the playoffs and the Stagg Bowl over the last few years, I've broadened my view of the quality conferences in the East and the entire nation. When Ithaca beat Union, I reassessed Union as being the favorite in the LL and stated I thought Hobart was then the favorite. And I picked SJF to beat Hobart by 10 last night on the show. You can stick your bias schtick... You know the rest.
You're the one that was complaining in the LLPP that we shouldn't focus on just the LL on "In the HuddLLe" and focus on the MAC above all other conferences -- and if you notice, we've attempted to get two out-of-conference coaches RELEVANT to the LL, with one accepting (and let me state for those who didn't listen to last night's show that Coach Vosburgh was a tremendous guest and a class act). We will likely try to get Salisbury's coach on before Salisbury plays against Union and/or SJF. If there were more cross-scheduling between the LL and the MAC, we'd do the same in that instance.
Now, let's remember my words from Saturday evening -- paraphrasing myself, I said that solely basing that game and DVC's standing on a regional/national scale on the final score would not tell the full story of that game because of the turnover and penalty ratios. I deferred to Gordon. Gordon took the view that Wesley is definitely the better of the two teams, but he pointed out the bright spots for DVC -- and I respect Gordon's views on such things, having worked with him over the past five years. My statement was in response to the notion that DVC was undoubtedly the best team in the East following that game. Yet, you continue to ignore the ultimate question I've been asking you all day and that led to my initial statement on Saturday: "What is up with DVC's offense this season? They had five more opportunities with the ball than Wesley did ultimately, if you assume a turnover nullifies a possession. And this has been a little consistent with the results this season." Sure, Wesley's defense is great -- but DVC should've been able to surge in the second half the way things turned out. It was a muted surge that gave the team the lead, but Wesley responded because it wasn't put out of reach.
DVC is an EXCELLENT team. However, it's a team that lacks a little balance right now, I believe. Yet, that doesn't take away from my notion that DVC is the #13 team in the nation. If you want to talk about respect/disrespect, then talk to SJF fans that have seen SJF unable to even crack the Top 25 after the team's finish last year and start this year with much of the same personnel. And I think DVC needs to remember what happened last year after a bit too much self-back-patting in the rout vs. Susquehanna in the First Round of the playoffs. I sense that there's a little bit of that going on even after the Wesley loss, and that's a huge mistake if it's happening. There's still A LOT of football to be played before mid-November.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 20, 2010, 06:23:24 PM
PBR -- even if Frank were favoring the LL and Union, which I think he's made it clear he's not, you have to remember that we have 25 voters for a reason. Each voter comes in with a different view on things, so we make sure we represent as many Top 25-worthy conferences as possible on the panel every year.
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 06:46:06 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 20, 2010, 06:23:24 PM
PBR -- even if Frank were favoring the LL and Union, which I think he's made it clear he's not, you have to remember that we have 25 voters for a reason. Each voter comes in with a different view on things, so we make sure we represent as many Top 25-worthy conferences as possible on the panel every year.
Pat..totally understand what you are saying and I have no problem w/ where frank or any other pollster has voted dvc. My point is saying they were lucky to be in the game and the field w/ wesley was totally in appropriate. What should dvc do forgive the turnovers and say no thanks we would rather try and march 80 yards each drive? To give no credit to dvc and their defense is a total slap in the face to the players and coaching staff for their effort and preparation. It has nothing to do w/ where the voters have placed dvc in the polls.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2010, 07:28:46 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Since you're severely misquoting me, PBR, maybe you should take a look at the original thread that led to this. No place did I say DVC was "lucky" or "didn't belong on the same field as Wesley." I said in a game in which Wesley outgained DVC by 180 yards but gave DVC 150 of those back on penalty differential and had a -5 turnover margin, the final score did not tell the whole story. And I gave my take as to what kept that game as close as it was late. If that justifies persecution and calls of bias by you, then so be it -- I know how I feel about DVC's performance this season so far, it matches other pollsters' feelings and as a general fan of the East Region, I hope DVC or some other team can get some momentum to bring the Region back into the national discussion. Yet, I vote with my head, not with my heart.
Quote from: Upstate on September 20, 2010, 06:54:34 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 06:46:06 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on September 20, 2010, 06:23:24 PM
PBR -- even if Frank were favoring the LL and Union, which I think he's made it clear he's not, you have to remember that we have 25 voters for a reason. Each voter comes in with a different view on things, so we make sure we represent as many Top 25-worthy conferences as possible on the panel every year.
Pat..totally understand what you are saying and I have no problem w/ where frank or any other pollster has voted dvc. My point is saying they were lucky to be in the game and the field w/ wesley was totally in appropriate. What should dvc do forgive the turnovers and say no thanks we would rather try and march 80 yards each drive? To give no credit to dvc and their defense is a total slap in the face to the players and coaching staff for their effort and preparation. It has nothing to do w/ where the voters have placed dvc in the polls.
DVC should have just punted after each turnover to make it fair...
;D
Quote from: wesleydad on September 20, 2010, 11:09:43 PM
somehow i got thrown into this dispute. think it was by rams. what i can tell you is that i am likely the only one before this week that saw both teams play, saw wesley against cnu and del val against wash and jeff. from those games and if gordan wants to vouch i told him that i thought delval would have trouble scoring against wesley, which they obviously did, getting only 17 with all those gift to's and penalty yards. i am not sure what the beef is, other than some thin skin when frank mentions those facts and believes that the game would not be close if wesley plays a clean game. it would not have been, simple as that. now, if you want to credit delval with playing tough, sounds like the did. they are good and may be the best in the east, i have not seen stjf so i dont know what they look like. wesley is ranked 3rd for a reason and if you went to the game, which i did not this week, then you know why. if not, your opinion is just that an opinion based on just boxscores. have fun travel to other games and get a read on other teams, you may be surprised by what you find out. frank is inciteful, nuff said!!!
Quote from: maxpower on September 20, 2010, 11:27:23 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 20, 2010, 11:09:43 PM
somehow i got thrown into this dispute. think it was by rams. what i can tell you is that i am likely the only one before this week that saw both teams play, saw wesley against cnu and del val against wash and jeff. from those games and if gordan wants to vouch i told him that i thought delval would have trouble scoring against wesley, which they obviously did, getting only 17 with all those gift to's and penalty yards. i am not sure what the beef is, other than some thin skin when frank mentions those facts and believes that the game would not be close if wesley plays a clean game. it would not have been, simple as that. now, if you want to credit delval with playing tough, sounds like the did. they are good and may be the best in the east, i have not seen stjf so i dont know what they look like. wesley is ranked 3rd for a reason and if you went to the game, which i did not this week, then you know why. if not, your opinion is just that an opinion based on just boxscores. have fun travel to other games and get a read on other teams, you may be surprised by what you find out. frank is inciteful, nuff said!!!
that's for sure...
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 20, 2010, 10:04:18 PM
your right should of called it what it was ....a cheap shot. As many people have emailed me and asked what your beef was w/ either dvc or the mac. People do question you and your words frank and since your a pollster want to know if there is a bias towards union and the LL, thus the validity of this site and its polls. That has always been my point. Has nothing to do w/ where you or any pollster ranks dvc. You may have not meant it that way, but there are people out there who are thinking it.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on September 21, 2010, 07:28:59 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2010, 05:04:48 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 18, 2010, 04:58:29 PM
No doubt that DVC belongs #1 in the ERFP now...
On the road, vs the #3 team in the country and Wesley had to come from behind to beat them...
It was more a case of Wesley beating themselves, though. Here's my problem with annointing DVC based solely on the score:
Wesley had six turnovers, five in the second half alone. Wesley also committed 13 penalties for about 200 yards. Yet, DVC still only put up 17. Gordon will have a better perspective of this game having announced it. However, Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score.
Just wanted to throw in my two cents:
I agree with almost everything Frank has said regarding how he ranks teams and where he ranks them. I also don't think Frank is pro-Union or pro-LL in where it would effect how he ranks teams. I think he explains himself very well in terms of why he would rank these teams, and his point about Del Val's offense is a great one, and actually made me change my own mind as to why they may not be a top 5 or 10 team.
That being said, I can see PBR's point about how Frank was somewhat dismissive in his first post above. I also didn't see or hear the game, but from the recaps on this board, many of Wesley's turnovers were due to plays that DelVall may have made. 2 Interceptions and a QB fumble after a sack tells me that DelVall's defense should probably get more credit than Frank gave them in his first post here. Frank said it was more of a case of Wesley beating themselves and that their sloppiness was to blame. Actually Frank said Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score. This to me means that DelVall had little to do with forcing turnovers when possibly the opposite is true.
I mean, what if DelVall just scored on one of those times in the redzone? What would we all be talking about? Probably about how great DelValls defense was causing all those turnovers and how it could have been 41-21 if DelVall wasn't so sloppy in the redzone.
Either way the argument got kind of off track. The focus should have been on Frank's first statement here, and not about how he ranks teams. Then again, maybe I'm biased because I agree with Frank about how where he ranks teams.
Ah well, great Monday night game last night. One of the best I've seen in a while.
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 21, 2010, 07:53:21 AMQuote from: Jonny Podunk on September 21, 2010, 07:28:59 AM
Just wanted to throw in my two cents:
I agree with almost everything Frank has said regarding how he ranks teams and where he ranks them. I also don't think Frank is pro-Union or pro-LL in where it would effect how he ranks teams. I think he explains himself very well in terms of why he would rank these teams, and his point about Del Val's offense is a great one, and actually made me change my own mind as to why they may not be a top 5 or 10 team.
That being said, I can see PBR's point about how Frank was somewhat dismissive in his first post above. I also didn't see or hear the game, but from the recaps on this board, many of Wesley's turnovers were due to plays that DelVall may have made. 2 Interceptions and a QB fumble after a sack tells me that DelVall's defense should probably get more credit than Frank gave them in his first post here. Frank said it was more of a case of Wesley beating themselves and that their sloppiness was to blame. Actually Frank said Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score. This to me means that DelVall had little to do with forcing turnovers when possibly the opposite is true.
I mean, what if DelVall just scored on one of those times in the redzone? What would we all be talking about? Probably about how great DelValls defense was causing all those turnovers and how it could have been 41-21 if DelVall wasn't so sloppy in the redzone.
Either way the argument got kind of off track. The focus should have been on Frank's first statement here, and not about how he ranks teams. Then again, maybe I'm biased because I agree with Frank about how where he ranks teams.
Ah well, great Monday night game last night. One of the best I've seen in a while.
exactly...well stated as i said all along it had nothing to do w/ the rankings.
QuoteI think SJF is a slightly stronger team that would be able to win in a shootout against Wesley. So, SJF is one spot higher in my ballot right now than DelVal.
Quote from: dlip on September 21, 2010, 12:17:16 PM
This is dlip's feeling as well, he is currently high on both SJF and Del Val giving SJF a slight nod. He is however rooting against the Cardinals this weekend so he is actually rooting for his position to be disproven...WTF ???
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 21, 2010, 12:16:26 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 21, 2010, 07:53:21 AMQuote from: Jonny Podunk on September 21, 2010, 07:28:59 AM
Just wanted to throw in my two cents:
I agree with almost everything Frank has said regarding how he ranks teams and where he ranks them. I also don't think Frank is pro-Union or pro-LL in where it would effect how he ranks teams. I think he explains himself very well in terms of why he would rank these teams, and his point about Del Val's offense is a great one, and actually made me change my own mind as to why they may not be a top 5 or 10 team.
That being said, I can see PBR's point about how Frank was somewhat dismissive in his first post above. I also didn't see or hear the game, but from the recaps on this board, many of Wesley's turnovers were due to plays that DelVall may have made. 2 Interceptions and a QB fumble after a sack tells me that DelVall's defense should probably get more credit than Frank gave them in his first post here. Frank said it was more of a case of Wesley beating themselves and that their sloppiness was to blame. Actually Frank said Wesley's sloppiness was a lot more to blame for the nature of the score. This to me means that DelVall had little to do with forcing turnovers when possibly the opposite is true.
I mean, what if DelVall just scored on one of those times in the redzone? What would we all be talking about? Probably about how great DelValls defense was causing all those turnovers and how it could have been 41-21 if DelVall wasn't so sloppy in the redzone.
Either way the argument got kind of off track. The focus should have been on Frank's first statement here, and not about how he ranks teams. Then again, maybe I'm biased because I agree with Frank about how where he ranks teams.
Ah well, great Monday night game last night. One of the best I've seen in a while.
exactly...well stated as i said all along it had nothing to do w/ the rankings.
First off, thanks to Jonny and wesleydad for their comments. +k to both
Second, with respect to discussing rankings, I think I was the one to bring them up to show that I didn't disrespect DVC's overall effort in the game. I was simply stating that the drop by DVC following a loss was only a net-2-spot loss compared to my treatment of Wesley in the same ballot-to-ballot comparison, meaning I obviously had a great deal of respect for DVC before and after the game. So, if I spun the issue off course, I apologize.
A lot of times, we throw around statements on these boards as if they are the definitive word of God or something, and I'm guilty of it from time to time (I know, maxpower and Upstate, hard to believe ;)). So, if I came across too harsh or as overstating my point Saturday, then I do apologize. My main idea remains, though, that Wesley played very poorly on offense compared to expectations and other games this year. DVC likely played very well on defense compared to what I would have expected. So I have great confidence in one half of DVC's team right now, and the jury is out for me on the other half. I've got a very open mind still about DVC's offense, but I want to see some of the same spark we saw last year when it comes to the MAC scheduling coming up. THEN I might agree that DVC is the absolute cream of the East with no doubts.
Like I said last night, the death of the Thiel player put a lot in perspective for me last night, so I don't want this to continue being a petty argument about biases and the like. I apologize as much as anyone for that. Thanks. +k PBR
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 5 ) | 3-1 | 85 | 1 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) | 4-0 | 84 | 2 | at #9 Utica |
3 Montclair State | 3-0 | 72 | 3 | at Kean |
4 Cortland State | 3-0 | 60 | 4 | at New Jersey |
5 Alfred | 3-0 | 58 | 7 | vs. Frostburg State |
6 Springfield | 3-1 | 25 | 8 | vs. Merchant Marine |
7 Ithaca | 3-1 | 20 | 5 | vs. Hartwick |
8 Hobart | 2-1 | 19 | 6 | at St. Lawrence |
9 Utica | 4-0 | 18 | NR | vs. #2 St. John Fisher |
10 Rowan | 2-1 | 17 | 9 | at Buffalo State |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 27, 2010, 01:56:28 PM
Still looking for a 10th poster. If anyone's interested, send me a PM.
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 5 ) 3-1 85 1 vs. Lebanon Valley 2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) 4-0 84 2 at #9 Utica 3 Montclair State 3-0 72 3 at Kean 4 Cortland State 3-0 60 4 at New Jersey 5 Alfred 3-0 58 7 vs. Frostburg State 6 Springfield 3-1 25 8 vs. Merchant Marine 7 Ithaca 3-1 20 5 vs. Hartwick 8 Hobart 2-1 19 6 at St. Lawrence 9 Utica 4-0 18 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 10 Rowan 2-1 17 9 at Buffalo State
Dropped Out:
#10 Curry
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 13
Kean 10
Curry 9
Albright 2
Union 2
SUNY-Maritime 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,3,2,2,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,1,1,1,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (3,2,4,2,4,3,3,NR,3,3)
Cortland (4,4,3,5,3,4,5,NR,5,6)
Alfred (5,5,5,4,5,5,4,NR,4,4)
Springfield(8,6,6,10,6,8,10,NR,NR,9)
Ithaca (7,NR,9,8,9,6,8,NR,NR,10)
Hobart (6,NR,NR,NR,7,7,7,NR,9,NR)
Utica (NR,8,10,NR,NR,10,6,NR,7,7)
Rowan (NR,9,7,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,5)
Lycoming (NR,10,NR,7,10,9,9,NR,NR,8)
Kean (NR,9,10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,NR,10,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY-Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #9 Utica
#3 Montclair State at Kean
Quote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2010, 02:10:01 PM
Why would Lycoming be behind Ithaca despite beating them this weekend, and their sole loss being to #10 Rowan?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 27, 2010, 02:15:17 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2010, 02:10:01 PM
Why would Lycoming be behind Ithaca despite beating them this weekend, and their sole loss being to #10 Rowan?
Well, it is a poll and not just a listing of teams by record. Ithaca had a few key injuries and lost by 2 on the road. We've argued over the value of home field advantage before on this space, but the combination of those two could leave voters to consider Ithaca a top 10 team that happened to lose to an inferior opponent.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 27, 2010, 01:56:28 PM
Still looking for a 10th poster. If anyone's interested, send me a PM.
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 5 ) 3-1 85 1 vs. Lebanon Valley 2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) 4-0 84 2 at #9 Utica 3 Montclair State 3-0 72 3 at Kean 4 Cortland State 3-0 60 4 at New Jersey 5 Alfred 3-0 58 7 vs. Frostburg State 6 Springfield 3-1 25 8 vs. Merchant Marine 7 Ithaca 3-1 20 5 vs. Hartwick 8 Hobart 2-1 19 6 at St. Lawrence 9 Utica 4-0 18 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 10 Rowan 2-1 17 9 at Buffalo State
Dropped Out:
#10 Curry
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 13
Kean 10
Curry 9
Albright 2
Union 2
SUNY-Maritime 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,3,2,2,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,1,1,1,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (3,2,4,2,4,3,3,NR,3,3)
Cortland (4,4,3,5,3,4,5,NR,5,6)
Alfred (5,5,5,4,5,5,4,NR,4,4)
Springfield(8,6,6,10,6,8,10,NR,NR,9)
Ithaca (7,NR,9,8,9,6,8,NR,NR,10)
Hobart (6,NR,NR,NR,7,7,7,NR,9,NR)
Utica (NR,8,10,NR,NR,10,6,NR,7,7)
Rowan (NR,9,7,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,5)
Lycoming (NR,10,NR,7,10,9,9,NR,NR,8)
Kean (NR,9,10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,NR,10,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY-Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #9 Utica
#3 Montclair State at Kean
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) | 2-1 | 95 | 1 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) | 4-0 | 93 | 2 | at #9 Utica |
3 Montclair State | 3-0 | 79 | 3 | at Kean |
T4 Alfred | 3-0 | 66 | 7 | vs. Frostburg State |
T4 Cortland State | 3-0 | 66 | 4 | at New Jersey |
6 Springfield | 3-1 | 29 | 8 | vs. Merchant Marine |
7 Utica | 4-0 | 23 | NR | vs. #2 St. John Fisher |
8 Ithaca | 3-1 | 21 | 5 | vs. Hartwick |
9 Rowan | 2-1 | 20 | 9 | at Buffalo State |
10 Hobart | 2-1 | 19 | 6 | at St. Lawrence |
Quote from: rams1102 on September 27, 2010, 02:25:44 PM
I'm surprised that Curry (and I'm no Curry fan) dropped out, I guess more love was given to Utica. As Yanks said, the next few weeks should shake everything out.
Quote from: TGP on September 27, 2010, 02:32:57 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 27, 2010, 02:25:44 PM
I'm surprised that Curry (and I'm no Curry fan) dropped out, I guess more love was given to Utica. As Yanks said, the next few weeks should shake everything out.
I included dem spicy boyz in my vote this week. Also had SUNY M at #10 since it seems like they could run the table in the ECFC and go into the playoffs 10-0 if/when they dispatch Norwich.
Quote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:35:59 PM
For Full Disclosure, I'm the 10th voter... and I guess I Pushed Utica up 2 spots from the one with 9 posters lol. I have them in 6th. As people have said prior, there could be a lot of switching around to be done in the next few weeks.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:38:50 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:35:59 PM
For Full Disclosure, I'm the 10th voter... and I guess I Pushed Utica up 2 spots from the one with 9 posters lol. I have them in 6th. As people have said prior, there could be a lot of switching around to be done in the next few weeks.
I think Utica is too high (I do not have them ranked). Time will tell though...hey, look how having Union #1 to start the year turned out. If they beat Fisher this weekend...which in my opinion would be a miracle of EPIC proportions...you can bank on them being ranked #5 next week in my EFRP.
Quote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:43:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:38:50 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:35:59 PM
For Full Disclosure, I'm the 10th voter... and I guess I Pushed Utica up 2 spots from the one with 9 posters lol. I have them in 6th. As people have said prior, there could be a lot of switching around to be done in the next few weeks.
I think Utica is too high (I do not have them ranked). Time will tell though...hey, look how having Union #1 to start the year turned out. If they beat Fisher this weekend...which in my opinion would be a miracle of EPIC proportions...you can bank on them being ranked #5 next week in my EFRP.
They could definitely be too high, and it was hard for me to figure where to place them, but I do definitely think they have a chance to win this weekend.
Quote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 02:47:04 PM
I have them in 6th also, they've been impressive early and I have to give them respect for that...
Things change throughout the year though...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:52:39 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:43:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:38:50 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:35:59 PM
For Full Disclosure, I'm the 10th voter... and I guess I Pushed Utica up 2 spots from the one with 9 posters lol. I have them in 6th. As people have said prior, there could be a lot of switching around to be done in the next few weeks.
I think Utica is too high (I do not have them ranked). Time will tell though...hey, look how having Union #1 to start the year turned out. If they beat Fisher this weekend...which in my opinion would be a miracle of EPIC proportions...you can bank on them being ranked #5 next week in my EFRP.
They could definitely be too high, and it was hard for me to figure where to place them, but I do definitely think they have a chance to win this weekend.
It's all good...this was a tough week...lot of one loss teams who have happened to lost to each other. I tried to keep some parity with the mix. Top 5 was pretty easy, and is pretty much universal. I have the following ranked from 6 - 10:
- #6 Rowan (only loss to my #3 Delaware Valley, and a 7 point win over my #7 Lycoming)
- #7 Lycoming (with a win over my #8 Ithaca)
- #8 Ithaca (with a win over my #9 Union)
- #9 Union (only loss to my #8 Ithaca)
- #10 Springfield (only loss to my #4 Alfred)
I just cannot get on the Utica bangwagon...yet. I watched the whole Wilkes game...and I wasn't impressed at all. I don't think they would beat a single team in my Top 10 right now, not playing the way they did against Wilkes. Their signature win is over an RPI team who will probably finish 3-6. I would be floored if they stay with Fisher (my #1 team). Fisher just looks ridiculously strong this year, and I just get the feeling they are going to throttle teams until they get deep in the playoffs. Now...if Utica pulls of a stunning upset...then things get interesting...
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on September 27, 2010, 03:09:40 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:52:39 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:43:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:38:50 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:35:59 PM
For Full Disclosure, I'm the 10th voter... and I guess I Pushed Utica up 2 spots from the one with 9 posters lol. I have them in 6th. As people have said prior, there could be a lot of switching around to be done in the next few weeks.
I think Utica is too high (I do not have them ranked). Time will tell though...hey, look how having Union #1 to start the year turned out. If they beat Fisher this weekend...which in my opinion would be a miracle of EPIC proportions...you can bank on them being ranked #5 next week in my EFRP.
They could definitely be too high, and it was hard for me to figure where to place them, but I do definitely think they have a chance to win this weekend.
It's all good...this was a tough week...lot of one loss teams who have happened to lost to each other. I tried to keep some parity with the mix. Top 5 was pretty easy, and is pretty much universal. I have the following ranked from 6 - 10:
- #6 Rowan (only loss to my #3 Delaware Valley, and a 7 point win over my #7 Lycoming)
- #7 Lycoming (with a win over my #8 Ithaca)
- #8 Ithaca (with a win over my #9 Union)
- #9 Union (only loss to my #8 Ithaca)
- #10 Springfield (only loss to my #4 Alfred)
I just cannot get on the Utica bangwagon...yet. I watched the whole Wilkes game...and I wasn't impressed at all. I don't think they would beat a single team in my Top 10 right now, not playing the way they did against Wilkes. Their signature win is over an RPI team who will probably finish 3-6. I would be floored if they stay with Fisher (my #1 team). Fisher just looks ridiculously strong this year, and I just get the feeling they are going to throttle teams until they get deep in the playoffs. Now...if Utica pulls of a stunning upset...then things get interesting...
fyi...rowan didn't lose to dvc...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 27, 2010, 01:56:28 PM
Still looking for a 10th poster. If anyone's interested, send me a PM.
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 5 ) 3-1 85 1 vs. Lebanon Valley 2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) 4-0 84 2 at #9 Utica 3 Montclair State 3-0 72 3 at Kean 4 Cortland State 3-0 60 4 at New Jersey 5 Alfred 3-0 58 7 vs. Frostburg State 6 Springfield 3-1 25 8 vs. Merchant Marine 7 Ithaca 3-1 20 5 vs. Hartwick 8 Hobart 2-1 19 6 at St. Lawrence 9 Utica 4-0 18 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 10 Rowan 2-1 17 9 at Buffalo State
Dropped Out:
#10 Curry
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 13
Kean 10
Curry 9
Albright 2
Union 2
SUNY-Maritime 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,3,2,2,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,1,1,1,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (3,2,4,2,4,3,3,NR,3,3)
Cortland (4,4,3,5,3,4,5,NR,5,6)
Alfred (5,5,5,4,5,5,4,NR,4,4)
Springfield(8,6,6,10,6,8,10,NR,NR,9)
Ithaca (7,NR,9,8,9,6,8,NR,NR,10)
Hobart (6,NR,NR,NR,7,7,7,NR,9,NR)
Utica (NR,8,10,NR,NR,10,6,NR,7,7)
Rowan (NR,9,7,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,5)
Lycoming (NR,10,NR,7,10,9,9,NR,NR,8)
Kean (NR,9,10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,NR,10,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY-Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #9 Utica
#3 Montclair State at Kean
Quote from: Union89 on September 27, 2010, 03:22:05 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 27, 2010, 01:56:28 PM
Still looking for a 10th poster. If anyone's interested, send me a PM.
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 5 ) 3-1 85 1 vs. Lebanon Valley 2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) 4-0 84 2 at #9 Utica 3 Montclair State 3-0 72 3 at Kean 4 Cortland State 3-0 60 4 at New Jersey 5 Alfred 3-0 58 7 vs. Frostburg State 6 Springfield 3-1 25 8 vs. Merchant Marine 7 Ithaca 3-1 20 5 vs. Hartwick 8 Hobart 2-1 19 6 at St. Lawrence 9 Utica 4-0 18 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 10 Rowan 2-1 17 9 at Buffalo State
Dropped Out:
#10 Curry
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 13
Kean 10
Curry 9
Albright 2
Union 2
SUNY-Maritime 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,3,2,2,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,1,1,1,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (3,2,4,2,4,3,3,NR,3,3)
Cortland (4,4,3,5,3,4,5,NR,5,6)
Alfred (5,5,5,4,5,5,4,NR,4,4)
Springfield(8,6,6,10,6,8,10,NR,NR,9)
Ithaca (7,NR,9,8,9,6,8,NR,NR,10)
Hobart (6,NR,NR,NR,7,7,7,NR,9,NR)
Utica (NR,8,10,NR,NR,10,6,NR,7,7)
Rowan (NR,9,7,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,5)
Lycoming (NR,10,NR,7,10,9,9,NR,NR,8)
Kean (NR,9,10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,NR,10,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY-Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #9 Utica
#3 Montclair State at Kean
After a loss at home to Alfred, Springfield moves up 2 spots? Having trouble getting my mind around how 10 individual pollsters can, as a collective group, shake out that way.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 03:00:30 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 02:47:04 PM
I have them in 6th also, they've been impressive early and I have to give them respect for that...
Things change throughout the year though...
Just for the arguements sake, who has Utica looked impressive over? 1-3 Becker, 1-2 Castleton State, 1-2 RPI, or 1-2 Wilkes???
Quote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 03:29:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 03:00:30 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 02:47:04 PM
I have them in 6th also, they've been impressive early and I have to give them respect for that...
Things change throughout the year though...
Just for the arguements sake, who has Utica looked impressive over? 1-3 Becker, 1-2 Castleton State, 1-2 RPI, or 1-2 Wilkes???
I know they haven't played the best competition but they've been blowing people out and that's what good teams do. Does that change? Probably.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 03:32:06 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 03:29:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 03:00:30 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 02:47:04 PM
I have them in 6th also, they've been impressive early and I have to give them respect for that...
Things change throughout the year though...
Just for the arguements sake, who has Utica looked impressive over? 1-3 Becker, 1-2 Castleton State, 1-2 RPI, or 1-2 Wilkes???
I know they haven't played the best competition but they've been blowing people out and that's what good teams do. Does that change? Probably.
I got a feeling that Utica may be on the "other end" of a 78-19 score this week...
Quote from: Union89 on September 27, 2010, 03:22:05 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 27, 2010, 01:56:28 PM
Still looking for a 10th poster. If anyone's interested, send me a PM.
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 5 ) 3-1 85 1 vs. Lebanon Valley 2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) 4-0 84 2 at #9 Utica 3 Montclair State 3-0 72 3 at Kean 4 Cortland State 3-0 60 4 at New Jersey 5 Alfred 3-0 58 7 vs. Frostburg State 6 Springfield 3-1 25 8 vs. Merchant Marine 7 Ithaca 3-1 20 5 vs. Hartwick 8 Hobart 2-1 19 6 at St. Lawrence 9 Utica 4-0 18 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 10 Rowan 2-1 17 9 at Buffalo State
Dropped Out:
#10 Curry
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 13
Kean 10
Curry 9
Albright 2
Union 2
SUNY-Maritime 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,3,2,2,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,1,1,1,2,NR,2,1)
Montclair State (3,2,4,2,4,3,3,NR,3,3)
Cortland (4,4,3,5,3,4,5,NR,5,6)
Alfred (5,5,5,4,5,5,4,NR,4,4)
Springfield(8,6,6,10,6,8,10,NR,NR,9)
Ithaca (7,NR,9,8,9,6,8,NR,NR,10)
Hobart (6,NR,NR,NR,7,7,7,NR,9,NR)
Utica (NR,8,10,NR,NR,10,6,NR,7,7)
Rowan (NR,9,7,6,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,5)
Lycoming (NR,10,NR,7,10,9,9,NR,NR,8)
Kean (NR,9,10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,NR,10,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY-Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #9 Utica
#3 Montclair State at Kean
After a loss at home to Alfred, Springfield moves up 2 spots? Having trouble getting my mind around how 10 individual pollsters can, as a collective group, shake out that way.
Quote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 03:39:01 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 03:32:06 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 03:29:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 03:00:30 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 02:47:04 PM
I have them in 6th also, they've been impressive early and I have to give them respect for that...
Things change throughout the year though...
Just for the arguements sake, who has Utica looked impressive over? 1-3 Becker, 1-2 Castleton State, 1-2 RPI, or 1-2 Wilkes???
I know they haven't played the best competition but they've been blowing people out and that's what good teams do. Does that change? Probably.
I got a feeling that Utica may be on the "other end" of a 78-19 score this week...
I predicted a 41-24 score...
They have a legit QB and WR so anything can happen but they don't have the horses on D to stop Fisher enough. I can see them upsetting some other top E8 schools this year though...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 27, 2010, 02:32:08 PM
We now have 10 voters, so here is the updated poll (with DelVal's record corrected in time for the "Battle of the Valleys"):
UPDATED Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 6 ) 2-1 95 1 vs. Lebanon Valley 2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) 4-0 93 2 at #9 Utica 3 Montclair State 3-0 79 3 at Kean T4 Alfred 3-0 66 7 vs. Frostburg State T4 Cortland State 3-0 66 4 at New Jersey 6 Springfield 3-1 29 8 vs. Merchant Marine 7 Utica 4-0 23 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 8 Ithaca 3-1 21 5 vs. Hartwick 9 Rowan 2-1 20 9 at Buffalo State 10 Hobart 2-1 19 6 at St. Lawrence
Dropped Out:
#10 Curry
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 15
Kean 10
Curry 9
Albright 2
Union 2
SUNY-Maritime 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,1,3,2,2,1,1,1,2)
St. John Fisher (2,3,2,1,1,1,2,2,2,1)
Montclair State (3,2,4,2,4,3,3,4,3,3)
Alfred (5,5,5,4,5,5,4,3,4,4)
Cortland (4,4,3,5,3,4,5,5,5,6)
Springfield(8,6,6,10,6,8,10,7,NR,9)
Utica (NR,8,10,NR,NR,10,6,6,7,7)
Ithaca (7,NR,9,8,9,6,8,10,NR,10)
Rowan (NR,9,7,6,NR,NR,NR,8,NR,5)
Hobart (6,NR,NR,NR,7,7,7,NR,9,NR)
Lycoming (NR,10,NR,7,10,9,9,9,NR,8)
Kean (NR,9,10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Curry (10,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,6,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,NR,10,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY-Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #7 Utica
#3 Montclair State at Kean
Quote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
QuoteFor me, Springfield's loss to Alfred was much more impressive than Ithaca's loss to Lyco or Hobart getting killed by SJF. It was more or less that Springfield is better than both in my mind, even with a loss.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 28, 2010, 11:28:46 AM
Jeez 82 I only live in Utica. My heart bleeds cardinal!
Ill be at the UC game- hope you have time to cime down!
Ill save a cold UC for ya!
Quote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 11:35:19 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Respectfully, how much of Fisher's success can be attributed to the Bills' moving their and improving the facilities? Obviously Vos is a great coach and has outcoached Welch the last four years, and that helps. But Fisher has better athletes than Ithaca, and it's probably not a coincidence that that started happening once those early recruits from 2000, 2001, 2002 started maturing and becoming juniors and seniors.
Heck. Cortland got a brand spanking new facility in 2002 and they started getting better right at that time.
Fisher deserves all their success, but they had a recruiting draw that Utica does not. I don't think Utica will pass Ithaca in the near future, but if they do, I think it will be similar to how Buffalo State did it in the mid 90's. I was (obviously) not a recruited athlete, so I don't know what attracts a D-III athlete--outside of the academics--but I would suspect facilities help a lot.
Quote from: Upstate on September 28, 2010, 11:56:55 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 11:35:19 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Respectfully, how much of Fisher's success can be attributed to the Bills' moving their and improving the facilities? Obviously Vos is a great coach and has outcoached Welch the last four years, and that helps. But Fisher has better athletes than Ithaca, and it's probably not a coincidence that that started happening once those early recruits from 2000, 2001, 2002 started maturing and becoming juniors and seniors.
Heck. Cortland got a brand spanking new facility in 2002 and they started getting better right at that time.
Fisher deserves all their success, but they had a recruiting draw that Utica does not. I don't think Utica will pass Ithaca in the near future, but if they do, I think it will be similar to how Buffalo State did it in the mid 90's. I was (obviously) not a recruited athlete, so I don't know what attracts a D-III athlete--outside of the academics--but I would suspect facilities help a lot.
Me and Yanks had this conversation on the E8 board (i believe, it might have been on here) last week. I totally agree with the premise that the facilities and Bills have propelled the program to where they are now. It started to bring in good players, which lead to more wins, which lead to more good players, which lead to even more wins, which lead to even more good players...
The Bills and the SJF administration started the process and the coaches/recruiters took it from there...
I agree that Utica needs something to draw the kids in, however they're doing a very good job of it now w/o that "bright and shiny" object that is needed for consistent success...
If they do a major upgrade to their facilities like a new fieldhouse or an upgrade to their stadium they could have their own "bright and shiny" object...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 11:35:19 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Respectfully, how much of Fisher's success can be attributed to the Bills' moving their and improving the facilities? Obviously Vos is a great coach and has outcoached Welch the last four years, and that helps. But Fisher has better athletes than Ithaca, and it's probably not a coincidence that that started happening once those early recruits from 2000, 2001, 2002 started maturing and becoming juniors and seniors.
Heck. Cortland got a brand spanking new facility in 2002 and they started getting better right at that time.
Fisher deserves all their success, but they had a recruiting draw that Utica does not. I don't think Utica will pass Ithaca in the near future, but if they do, I think it will be similar to how Buffalo State did it in the mid 90's. I was (obviously) not a recruited athlete, so I don't know what attracts a D-III athlete--outside of the academics--but I would suspect facilities help a lot.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 11:35:19 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Respectfully, how much of Fisher's success can be attributed to the Bills' moving their and improving the facilities? Obviously Vos is a great coach and has outcoached Welch the last four years, and that helps. But Fisher has better athletes than Ithaca, and it's probably not a coincidence that that started happening once those early recruits from 2000, 2001, 2002 started maturing and becoming juniors and seniors.
Heck. Cortland got a brand spanking new facility in 2002 and they started getting better right at that time.
Fisher deserves all their success, but they had a recruiting draw that Utica does not. I don't think Utica will pass Ithaca in the near future, but if they do, I think it will be similar to how Buffalo State did it in the mid 90's. I was (obviously) not a recruited athlete, so I don't know what attracts a D-III athlete--outside of the academics--but I would suspect facilities help a lot.
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on September 28, 2010, 01:33:31 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 11:35:19 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Respectfully, how much of Fisher's success can be attributed to the Bills' moving their and improving the facilities? Obviously Vos is a great coach and has outcoached Welch the last four years, and that helps. But Fisher has better athletes than Ithaca, and it's probably not a coincidence that that started happening once those early recruits from 2000, 2001, 2002 started maturing and becoming juniors and seniors.
Heck. Cortland got a brand spanking new facility in 2002 and they started getting better right at that time.
Fisher deserves all their success, but they had a recruiting draw that Utica does not. I don't think Utica will pass Ithaca in the near future, but if they do, I think it will be similar to how Buffalo State did it in the mid 90's. I was (obviously) not a recruited athlete, so I don't know what attracts a D-III athlete--outside of the academics--but I would suspect facilities help a lot.
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
They were pretty horrible for a while after that though. And RPI was a powerhouse in 1995? Even Buff State had peaked by then.
Quote from: Upstate on September 28, 2010, 01:37:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
Vos is a great coach, but you can't win a horse race with out a horse...
The coaches were given everything they needed to build a better program and they ran with it...
I came there in 97 on a visit and despite the great staff there I wanted nothing to do with the program because of their facilities. A couple years later it was a completely different mentality and atmosphere surrounding the program...
Even the AD says the Bills and the facilities are a huge reason for the improvement...
I don't see why some can't agree with that...
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:37:27 PMQuote from: Jonny Podunk on September 28, 2010, 01:33:31 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 11:35:19 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Respectfully, how much of Fisher's success can be attributed to the Bills' moving their and improving the facilities? Obviously Vos is a great coach and has outcoached Welch the last four years, and that helps. But Fisher has better athletes than Ithaca, and it's probably not a coincidence that that started happening once those early recruits from 2000, 2001, 2002 started maturing and becoming juniors and seniors.
Heck. Cortland got a brand spanking new facility in 2002 and they started getting better right at that time.
Fisher deserves all their success, but they had a recruiting draw that Utica does not. I don't think Utica will pass Ithaca in the near future, but if they do, I think it will be similar to how Buffalo State did it in the mid 90's. I was (obviously) not a recruited athlete, so I don't know what attracts a D-III athlete--outside of the academics--but I would suspect facilities help a lot.
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
They were pretty horrible for a while after that though. And RPI was a powerhouse in 1995? Even Buff State had peaked by then.
yeh....i said that....that is what "doormat" means
as far as RPI and powerhouse....if I recall correctly they were 2 years removed from back to back 9-1 seasons and they finished 8-2 that season. Maybe powerhouse is a stretch but not many teams in the East were better than them in those days.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:39:31 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 28, 2010, 01:37:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
Vos is a great coach, but you can't win a horse race with out a horse...
The coaches were given everything they needed to build a better program and they ran with it...
I came there in 97 on a visit and despite the great staff there I wanted nothing to do with the program because of their facilities. A couple years later it was a completely different mentality and atmosphere surrounding the program...
Even the AD says the Bills and the facilities are a huge reason for the improvement...
I don't see why some can't agree with that...
re-read my post..."of course facilities matter"
Quote from: clandfan on September 28, 2010, 03:43:50 PM
The Jets camp at Cortland is certainly a big help. I believe Cortland's President contacted SJF President when looking at the advantages and disadvantages of hosting an NFL camp.
I do know that improvements to certain facilities were required by the Jets, the biggest being the installation of two grass fields up to NFL specs. They were maintained by Jets personnel and they remained fenced in with no access by the college teams to my knowledge. So, while they are nice, we are not benefitting from them from a football standpoint. In fact, the stadium field turf is in rough shape and needs to be replaced. I don't think there is any help coming from the Jets or the state for that capital improvement. I believe the Jets leave equipment and donate cleats and things that the football program. There were upgrades to dormitories and such but not a direct benefit to the football program. Certainly coaches have access to the camp and I am sure pick up ideas that ultimately benefit the program. And then, of course, it has widened our athlete pool and has been a recruiting benefit. Some of our players have had Jets internships as a result of the camp...I think there are many plusses. Not sure it translates yet into success on the field but given a long term relationship with the Jets, I have no doubt that iit will.
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on September 28, 2010, 01:47:49 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:37:27 PMQuote from: Jonny Podunk on September 28, 2010, 01:33:31 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 11:35:19 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Respectfully, how much of Fisher's success can be attributed to the Bills' moving their and improving the facilities? Obviously Vos is a great coach and has outcoached Welch the last four years, and that helps. But Fisher has better athletes than Ithaca, and it's probably not a coincidence that that started happening once those early recruits from 2000, 2001, 2002 started maturing and becoming juniors and seniors.
Heck. Cortland got a brand spanking new facility in 2002 and they started getting better right at that time.
Fisher deserves all their success, but they had a recruiting draw that Utica does not. I don't think Utica will pass Ithaca in the near future, but if they do, I think it will be similar to how Buffalo State did it in the mid 90's. I was (obviously) not a recruited athlete, so I don't know what attracts a D-III athlete--outside of the academics--but I would suspect facilities help a lot.
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
They were pretty horrible for a while after that though. And RPI was a powerhouse in 1995? Even Buff State had peaked by then.
yeh....i said that....that is what "doormat" means
as far as RPI and powerhouse....if I recall correctly they were 2 years removed from back to back 9-1 seasons and they finished 8-2 that season. Maybe powerhouse is a stretch but not many teams in the East were better than them in those days.
I was just referencing SJF poor record in terms that Vosbergh may not be such a great coach. I should say I know nothing about the man, and he could be one of the best coaches in the country. It's just tough to say someone is great when you have so many horrible seasons in a row.
Buff State had some solid teams during the 1990s, although I do think they started to go downhill after 1994, and RPI played a lot of cupcakes back then and really hurt themselves. I really believe if they had beaten 1 or 2 better quality teams back then they may have made the playoffs.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 01:57:54 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:39:31 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 28, 2010, 01:37:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
Vos is a great coach, but you can't win a horse race with out a horse...
The coaches were given everything they needed to build a better program and they ran with it...
I came there in 97 on a visit and despite the great staff there I wanted nothing to do with the program because of their facilities. A couple years later it was a completely different mentality and atmosphere surrounding the program...
Even the AD says the Bills and the facilities are a huge reason for the improvement...
I don't see why some can't agree with that...
re-read my post..."of course facilities matter"
As far as your glaciers point, if the college had a national title in the ice age, you could argue that.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 05:30:10 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2010, 01:57:54 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:39:31 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 28, 2010, 01:37:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
Vos is a great coach, but you can't win a horse race with out a horse...
The coaches were given everything they needed to build a better program and they ran with it...
I came there in 97 on a visit and despite the great staff there I wanted nothing to do with the program because of their facilities. A couple years later it was a completely different mentality and atmosphere surrounding the program...
Even the AD says the Bills and the facilities are a huge reason for the improvement...
I don't see why some can't agree with that...
re-read my post..."of course facilities matter"
As far as your glaciers point, if the college had a national title in the ice age, you could argue that.
sure seems it was that long ago... ;)
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:52:39 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:43:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2010, 02:38:50 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 27, 2010, 02:35:59 PM
For Full Disclosure, I'm the 10th voter... and I guess I Pushed Utica up 2 spots from the one with 9 posters lol. I have them in 6th. As people have said prior, there could be a lot of switching around to be done in the next few weeks.
I think Utica is too high (I do not have them ranked). Time will tell though...hey, look how having Union #1 to start the year turned out. If they beat Fisher this weekend...which in my opinion would be a miracle of EPIC proportions...you can bank on them being ranked #5 next week in my EFRP.
They could definitely be too high, and it was hard for me to figure where to place them, but I do definitely think they have a chance to win this weekend.
It's all good...this was a tough week...lot of one loss teams who have happened to lost to each other. I tried to keep some parity with the mix. Top 5 was pretty easy, and is pretty much universal. I have the following ranked from 6 - 10:
- #6 Rowan (only loss to my #2 Montclair State, and a 7 point win over my #7 Lycoming)
- #7 Lycoming (with a win over my #8 Ithaca)
- #8 Ithaca (with a win over my #9 Union)
- #9 Union (only loss to my #8 Ithaca)
- #10 Springfield (only loss to my #4 Alfred)
I just cannot get on the Utica bangwagon...yet. I watched the whole Wilkes game...and I wasn't impressed at all. I don't think they would beat a single team in my Top 10 right now, not playing the way they did against Wilkes. Their signature win is over an RPI team who will probably finish 3-6. I would be floored if they stay with Fisher (my #1 team). Fisher just looks ridiculously strong this year, and I just get the feeling they are going to throttle teams until they get deep in the playoffs. Now...if Utica pulls of a stunning upset...then things get interesting...
Quote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 29, 2010, 02:40:28 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
just the one we beat AU 52-35... ;)
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 02:04:53 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
absolutely. I just think that they will catch up to Fisher sooner rather than later.
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on September 30, 2010, 06:33:12 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 02:04:53 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
absolutely. I just think that they will catch up to Fisher sooner rather than later.
Why do you say that Dewcrew though. Are they getting a better recruiting classes now? Giving more financial aid? You just think Coach Fagg is going to do it? The school has better facilities?
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 02:04:53 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
absolutely. I just think that they will catch up to Fisher sooner rather than later.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2010, 08:19:45 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 02:04:53 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
absolutely. I just think that they will catch up to Fisher sooner rather than later.
Define "catch up"
Beat? Have a better record than? Higher ranking? And are we talking about how the Wick "caught" everyone in 2007 by putting together one good season? How Springfield alternates good with bad? Or how Fisher caught--and passed--IC?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 30, 2010, 08:41:26 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2010, 08:19:45 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 02:04:53 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
absolutely. I just think that they will catch up to Fisher sooner rather than later.
Define "catch up"
Beat? Have a better record than? Higher ranking? And are we talking about how the Wick "caught" everyone in 2007 by putting together one good season? How Springfield alternates good with bad? Or how Fisher caught--and passed--IC?
I think he means running down Fisher players after long plays and tackling them inside the 5 rather than letting them into the end zone untouched.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 30, 2010, 08:53:30 AM
Let's face it...someday, Utica is going to in fact beat Fisher, Ithaca, and Alfred. I mean...if they play every year for 50 years they would almost have to statisctically speaking.
Quote from: maxpower on September 30, 2010, 09:21:55 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 30, 2010, 08:53:30 AM
Let's face it...someday, Utica is going to in fact beat Fisher, Ithaca, and Alfred. I mean...if they play every year for 50 years they would almost have to statisctically speaking.
Tell that to the Washington Generals....
Quote from: Upstate on September 30, 2010, 08:26:43 AM
My "catch" was referring to UC beating SJF, I don't know if they can get the continued success w/o some sort of eye candy on campus (like SJF's facilities/Bills). However with the familiarity between coaching staffs and Faggiano's ability to recruit I think they'll beat SJF within a couple years.
I don't think it happens this SatErday because SJF is too strong this year, but next year could be open for debate considering all of the losses in personnel SJF will have.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2010, 09:35:17 AMQuote from: Upstate on September 30, 2010, 08:26:43 AM
My "catch" was referring to UC beating SJF, I don't know if they can get the continued success w/o some sort of eye candy on campus (like SJF's facilities/Bills). However with the familiarity between coaching staffs and Faggiano's ability to recruit I think they'll beat SJF within a couple years.
I don't think it happens this SatErday because SJF is too strong this year, but next year could be open for debate considering all of the losses in personnel SJF will have.
Anything Norwich can do, Utica should be able to ;)
But you're right. Eventually, things with break right for one team and they will do it. They've come close to beating Ithaca twice. You're probably correct that continued success is a long shot though, at least for now.
Is Fisher senior-heavy? I feel like Bailey has been there forever
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2010, 08:19:45 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 02:04:53 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
absolutely. I just think that they will catch up to Fisher sooner rather than later.
Define "catch up"
Beat? Have a better record than? Higher ranking? And are we talking about how the Wick "caught" everyone in 2007 by putting together one good season? How Springfield alternates good with bad? Or how Fisher caught--and passed--IC?
Quote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 11:33:49 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2010, 08:19:45 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 30, 2010, 02:04:53 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 29, 2010, 09:03:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on September 28, 2010, 11:48:38 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:55:04 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 27, 2010, 04:49:37 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 27, 2010, 04:44:42 PM
82, if Ithaca doesn't get their run game on track they're going to drop a couple more. I wouldn't be surprised if UC took out IC this year. It's going to happen eventually and with the injuries and inconsistencies on the IC squad this may be the year.
I gotcha....I have posted this year that Utica looks strong, so they are on 'my' radar....I just cant imagine that a school in Utica, NY, virtually unheard of (sorry FA91) may apparently be out-recruiting Ithaca and all its tradition (i mean that seriously and as a compliment to Ithaca).
If it is true as you predict....and we chalk it up to Faggiano's coaching and recruiting skills....then it is only logical that they will also catch Fisher in the near future. Utica will be to Fisher what Fisher was to Ithaca, when out of know where Fisher 'Caught' them.
It's just a matter of time before UC catches SJF.
Not many truer words have been spoken on these boards.
Great ATE piece...though I think Utica has light years to go before they are in SJF category. Not when your conference record over the past 8 years is 8-35...with 4 of those wins over Norwich, and never having beat Ithaca, Fisher, or Alfred. I mean...you have to get at least ONE win against one of those 3 teams before there is talk about "turning the corner"...
absolutely. I just think that they will catch up to Fisher sooner rather than later.
Define "catch up"
Beat? Have a better record than? Higher ranking? And are we talking about how the Wick "caught" everyone in 2007 by putting together one good season? How Springfield alternates good with bad? Or how Fisher caught--and passed--IC?
Could be any of the above. Although it will take sustained success to really be a part of that top echelon. I just think it happens sooner, within the next few years, as opposed to decades.
I think that way as an alum but also as a D3 observer. I think they can catch up to Ithaca soon too. In the first four years of the program, Utica was shut out. Last year, they only fell by a field goal. Being competitive is a start.
Quote from: maxpower on September 30, 2010, 09:21:55 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 30, 2010, 08:53:30 AM
Let's face it...someday, Utica is going to in fact beat Fisher, Ithaca, and Alfred. I mean...if they play every year for 50 years they would almost have to statisctically speaking.
Tell that to the Washington Generals....
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 29, 2010, 02:51:37 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
What, to me, distinguishes Vosburgh and the SJF program as being a good/great program, has little to do with the mid-'90s. What I look at is the 2000-2010 goings on. This is a team that has never been really afraid to face tougher opponents in its non-conference schedule, even when Pool A/C issues may have changed many schools' approaches to such scheduling. I really think the belief is (as Coach Vos said on "In the HuddLLe" a couple weekends back) you have to play the tough teams to become better.
The facilities have helped the program, sure. However, it is still necessary to recruit the top-level players, get those players to play up to their potential and create an impetus for the local and alumni crowd to support the team. I've seen no other program in the East nearly perfect those three things as well as SJF has in the past decade -- and this is coming from what you guys tend to refer as "a Liberty League guy."
Sure, every team has the capability to shock the conference in any given year. On the other end, any good team has the capability to be upset in a couple games and, thus, not finish with a 9-1/8-1 record every year. Yet, it's consistency that matters -- and in the 2000s, SJF consistently got better and has maintained that better level of play since the semifinals appearance. I don't see how anyone can try to tear apart the job Vosburgh has done turning his team into a national-caliber contender on an annual basis.
When we interviewed Union tailback Chris Coney last weekend, he brought up how Coach John Audino convinced him to pick Union based on Audino's dedication to "the win." That still trumps facilities in a lot of players' minds as they get recruited. The facilities are indeed prime at SJF, but I think it's a chicken-and-egg question about whether the dedication to bring the program to the consistency led to the facilities or vice-versa. I think the dedication on the part of Vos, his staff and, in turn, his school's administration has led to the program's success before the facilities.
I've watched Fisher for a while, and I've never NOT been impressed with the entire program.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 09:18:07 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 29, 2010, 02:40:28 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
just the one we beat AU 52-35... ;)
Pep was there...and even the visitor bleachers at Growney were a step up from that field...
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2010, 09:56:40 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 09:18:07 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 29, 2010, 02:40:28 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
just the one we beat AU 52-35... ;)
Pep was there...and even the visitor bleachers at Growney were a step up from that field...
Ha! Believe it or not, same bleachers Pep....the present visitor bleachers are the SAME exact ones my Mom and Dad sat in on the home side of our field from 92-95.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 01, 2010, 01:55:12 AM
Small, wooden open-air press box. I was there in the pre-laptop era, so I don't remember if they had electricity. Guess they had to to run the scoreboard, though. :)
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2010, 09:53:50 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 29, 2010, 02:51:37 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
What, to me, distinguishes Vosburgh and the SJF program as being a good/great program, has little to do with the mid-'90s. What I look at is the 2000-2010 goings on. This is a team that has never been really afraid to face tougher opponents in its non-conference schedule, even when Pool A/C issues may have changed many schools' approaches to such scheduling. I really think the belief is (as Coach Vos said on "In the HuddLLe" a couple weekends back) you have to play the tough teams to become better.
The facilities have helped the program, sure. However, it is still necessary to recruit the top-level players, get those players to play up to their potential and create an impetus for the local and alumni crowd to support the team. I've seen no other program in the East nearly perfect those three things as well as SJF has in the past decade -- and this is coming from what you guys tend to refer as "a Liberty League guy."
Sure, every team has the capability to shock the conference in any given year. On the other end, any good team has the capability to be upset in a couple games and, thus, not finish with a 9-1/8-1 record every year. Yet, it's consistency that matters -- and in the 2000s, SJF consistently got better and has maintained that better level of play since the semifinals appearance. I don't see how anyone can try to tear apart the job Vosburgh has done turning his team into a national-caliber contender on an annual basis.
When we interviewed Union tailback Chris Coney last weekend, he brought up how Coach John Audino convinced him to pick Union based on Audino's dedication to "the win." That still trumps facilities in a lot of players' minds as they get recruited. The facilities are indeed prime at SJF, but I think it's a chicken-and-egg question about whether the dedication to bring the program to the consistency led to the facilities or vice-versa. I think the dedication on the part of Vos, his staff and, in turn, his school's administration has led to the program's success before the facilities.
I've watched Fisher for a while, and I've never NOT been impressed with the entire program.
as a Fisher homer...82 of course agrees with this post...but seriously...I had the same thought about the 'chicken-egg' theory, just that I didnt want to overkill the subject....
...nice to hear that perception from an outsider with no SJF bias Frank.
Recruiting with class still does mean something....it may be premature, but Faggiano at Utica is proof of this. He was the recruiter that brought much of Fisher's talent to the 04, 05 and 06 squads. Now he's at Utica...that's right...in Utica, NY, the armpit of NY, with a 10 year old program and seating for 1200, and he's already winning.
Coincidence? What NFL team plays at Utica?
and of course I am not comparing a 4-0 start (Utica's) to SJF's runs in the play-offs, just comparing pre Faggiano Utica to present Utica.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 01, 2010, 10:56:42 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2010, 09:53:50 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 29, 2010, 02:51:37 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
What, to me, distinguishes Vosburgh and the SJF program as being a good/great program, has little to do with the mid-'90s. What I look at is the 2000-2010 goings on. This is a team that has never been really afraid to face tougher opponents in its non-conference schedule, even when Pool A/C issues may have changed many schools' approaches to such scheduling. I really think the belief is (as Coach Vos said on "In the HuddLLe" a couple weekends back) you have to play the tough teams to become better.
The facilities have helped the program, sure. However, it is still necessary to recruit the top-level players, get those players to play up to their potential and create an impetus for the local and alumni crowd to support the team. I've seen no other program in the East nearly perfect those three things as well as SJF has in the past decade -- and this is coming from what you guys tend to refer as "a Liberty League guy."
Sure, every team has the capability to shock the conference in any given year. On the other end, any good team has the capability to be upset in a couple games and, thus, not finish with a 9-1/8-1 record every year. Yet, it's consistency that matters -- and in the 2000s, SJF consistently got better and has maintained that better level of play since the semifinals appearance. I don't see how anyone can try to tear apart the job Vosburgh has done turning his team into a national-caliber contender on an annual basis.
When we interviewed Union tailback Chris Coney last weekend, he brought up how Coach John Audino convinced him to pick Union based on Audino's dedication to "the win." That still trumps facilities in a lot of players' minds as they get recruited. The facilities are indeed prime at SJF, but I think it's a chicken-and-egg question about whether the dedication to bring the program to the consistency led to the facilities or vice-versa. I think the dedication on the part of Vos, his staff and, in turn, his school's administration has led to the program's success before the facilities.
I've watched Fisher for a while, and I've never NOT been impressed with the entire program.
as a Fisher homer...82 of course agrees with this post...but seriously...I had the same thought about the 'chicken-egg' theory, just that I didnt want to overkill the subject....
...nice to hear that perception from an outsider with no SJF bias Frank.
Recruiting with class still does mean something....it may be premature, but Faggiano at Utica is proof of this. He was the recruiter that brought much of Fisher's talent to the 04, 05 and 06 squads. Now he's at Utica...that's right...in Utica, NY, the armpit of NY, with a 10 year old program and seating for 1200, and he's already winning.
Coincidence? What NFL team plays at Utica?
and of course I am not comparing a 4-0 start (Utica's) to SJF's runs in the play-offs, just comparing pre Faggiano Utica to present Utica.
I think, much like our debate to the status of the East Region, there are a multitude of reasons. Certainly, I don't think Fisher's success has been just a product of the facilities, and I don't think anyone who's brought up facilities has implied that. You don't obliterate your main conference rival five years in a row because you have nicer bleachers.
But it seems silly we can't admit that it plays a role. Just like coaching, tuition, financial aid, location, tradition, hotness of the student bodies, panoramic views, etc. all play roles. Takes different strokes to move the world
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 01, 2010, 11:48:18 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 01, 2010, 10:56:42 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2010, 09:53:50 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 29, 2010, 02:51:37 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
What, to me, distinguishes Vosburgh and the SJF program as being a good/great program, has little to do with the mid-'90s. What I look at is the 2000-2010 goings on. This is a team that has never been really afraid to face tougher opponents in its non-conference schedule, even when Pool A/C issues may have changed many schools' approaches to such scheduling. I really think the belief is (as Coach Vos said on "In the HuddLLe" a couple weekends back) you have to play the tough teams to become better.
The facilities have helped the program, sure. However, it is still necessary to recruit the top-level players, get those players to play up to their potential and create an impetus for the local and alumni crowd to support the team. I've seen no other program in the East nearly perfect those three things as well as SJF has in the past decade -- and this is coming from what you guys tend to refer as "a Liberty League guy."
Sure, every team has the capability to shock the conference in any given year. On the other end, any good team has the capability to be upset in a couple games and, thus, not finish with a 9-1/8-1 record every year. Yet, it's consistency that matters -- and in the 2000s, SJF consistently got better and has maintained that better level of play since the semifinals appearance. I don't see how anyone can try to tear apart the job Vosburgh has done turning his team into a national-caliber contender on an annual basis.
When we interviewed Union tailback Chris Coney last weekend, he brought up how Coach John Audino convinced him to pick Union based on Audino's dedication to "the win." That still trumps facilities in a lot of players' minds as they get recruited. The facilities are indeed prime at SJF, but I think it's a chicken-and-egg question about whether the dedication to bring the program to the consistency led to the facilities or vice-versa. I think the dedication on the part of Vos, his staff and, in turn, his school's administration has led to the program's success before the facilities.
I've watched Fisher for a while, and I've never NOT been impressed with the entire program.
as a Fisher homer...82 of course agrees with this post...but seriously...I had the same thought about the 'chicken-egg' theory, just that I didnt want to overkill the subject....
...nice to hear that perception from an outsider with no SJF bias Frank.
Recruiting with class still does mean something....it may be premature, but Faggiano at Utica is proof of this. He was the recruiter that brought much of Fisher's talent to the 04, 05 and 06 squads. Now he's at Utica...that's right...in Utica, NY, the armpit of NY, with a 10 year old program and seating for 1200, and he's already winning.
Coincidence? What NFL team plays at Utica?
and of course I am not comparing a 4-0 start (Utica's) to SJF's runs in the play-offs, just comparing pre Faggiano Utica to present Utica.
I think, much like our debate to the status of the East Region, there are a multitude of reasons. Certainly, I don't think Fisher's success has been just a product of the facilities, and I don't think anyone who's brought up facilities has implied that. You don't obliterate your main conference rival five years in a row because you have nicer bleachers.
But it seems silly we can't admit that it plays a role. Just like coaching, tuition, financial aid, location, tradition, hotness of the student bodies, panoramic views, etc. all play roles. Takes different strokes to move the world
...OK....but who's not admitting it?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 01, 2010, 11:51:19 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 01, 2010, 11:48:18 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 01, 2010, 10:56:42 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 30, 2010, 09:53:50 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 29, 2010, 02:51:37 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 29, 2010, 10:34:29 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 28, 2010, 01:27:09 PM
and I actually thought that we would stop hearing this someday...I mean, respectfully, can we chalk IC's success in 798891 to the glaciers that formed the beautiful panoramic views in Ithaca....of course the facilities matter....but what is your point?
I know nobody wants to hear this from me, but Fisher was a decent program at one time before they were a doormat in the late '90's and early '00's. In 1995, with a **** hole field, barely stands and barely a scoreboard (not to mention the so-called training facilities), we started the season 6-0 and were ranked 4th in the East region and in line for a play-off bid...back when a coaches poll determined the top 4 from each region and 16 total went to the NCAA. We finished 7-3, losing to then powerhouses RPI and Buff State in very competitive games. In fact we were just slightly better than .500 in my four years from 92-95.
Vosburgh was the coach and was building the groundwork for what we have today.
So its not just the Bills....Vosburgh kinda knows what he's doing.
How many of those 1995 wins had to be forfeited because of an ineligible player?
What, to me, distinguishes Vosburgh and the SJF program as being a good/great program, has little to do with the mid-'90s. What I look at is the 2000-2010 goings on. This is a team that has never been really afraid to face tougher opponents in its non-conference schedule, even when Pool A/C issues may have changed many schools' approaches to such scheduling. I really think the belief is (as Coach Vos said on "In the HuddLLe" a couple weekends back) you have to play the tough teams to become better.
The facilities have helped the program, sure. However, it is still necessary to recruit the top-level players, get those players to play up to their potential and create an impetus for the local and alumni crowd to support the team. I've seen no other program in the East nearly perfect those three things as well as SJF has in the past decade -- and this is coming from what you guys tend to refer as "a Liberty League guy."
Sure, every team has the capability to shock the conference in any given year. On the other end, any good team has the capability to be upset in a couple games and, thus, not finish with a 9-1/8-1 record every year. Yet, it's consistency that matters -- and in the 2000s, SJF consistently got better and has maintained that better level of play since the semifinals appearance. I don't see how anyone can try to tear apart the job Vosburgh has done turning his team into a national-caliber contender on an annual basis.
When we interviewed Union tailback Chris Coney last weekend, he brought up how Coach John Audino convinced him to pick Union based on Audino's dedication to "the win." That still trumps facilities in a lot of players' minds as they get recruited. The facilities are indeed prime at SJF, but I think it's a chicken-and-egg question about whether the dedication to bring the program to the consistency led to the facilities or vice-versa. I think the dedication on the part of Vos, his staff and, in turn, his school's administration has led to the program's success before the facilities.
I've watched Fisher for a while, and I've never NOT been impressed with the entire program.
as a Fisher homer...82 of course agrees with this post...but seriously...I had the same thought about the 'chicken-egg' theory, just that I didnt want to overkill the subject....
...nice to hear that perception from an outsider with no SJF bias Frank.
Recruiting with class still does mean something....it may be premature, but Faggiano at Utica is proof of this. He was the recruiter that brought much of Fisher's talent to the 04, 05 and 06 squads. Now he's at Utica...that's right...in Utica, NY, the armpit of NY, with a 10 year old program and seating for 1200, and he's already winning.
Coincidence? What NFL team plays at Utica?
and of course I am not comparing a 4-0 start (Utica's) to SJF's runs in the play-offs, just comparing pre Faggiano Utica to present Utica.
I think, much like our debate to the status of the East Region, there are a multitude of reasons. Certainly, I don't think Fisher's success has been just a product of the facilities, and I don't think anyone who's brought up facilities has implied that. You don't obliterate your main conference rival five years in a row because you have nicer bleachers.
But it seems silly we can't admit that it plays a role. Just like coaching, tuition, financial aid, location, tradition, hotness of the student bodies, panoramic views, etc. all play roles. Takes different strokes to move the world
...OK....but who's not admitting it?
Fair point. A better way to say it may just be, it seems odd how defensive people get when the topic is mentioned
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 7 ) | 3-1 | 87 | 1 | at FDU-Florham |
2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) | 5-0 | 81 | 2 | vs. #9 Ithaca |
3 Montclair State | 4-0 | 72 | 3 | vs. New Jersey |
4 Cortland State | 4-0 | 61 | T4 | vs. Brockport State |
5 Alfred | 4-0 | 59 | T4 | at Hartwick |
6 Springfield | 4-1 | 31 | 6 | Open Date |
7 Rowan | 3-1 | 30 | 9 | vs. Kean |
8 Lycoming | 3-1 | 23 | NR | at Albright |
9 Ithaca | 4-1 | 20 | 8 | at #2 St. John Fisher |
10 Utica | 4-1 | 18 | 7 | vs. St. Lawrence |
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 02:25:39 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I'm surprised i'm the only one with a Willy P vote. Might need to start getting them on the radar.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
Quote from: pg04 on October 04, 2010, 02:39:44 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I dropped them from 6 to 10, below those teams. But All of them could almost be interchangeable at this point as it's very hard to compare them. A few more E8 games should help stratify this out.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:48:02 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 04, 2010, 02:39:44 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I dropped them from 6 to 10, below those teams. But All of them could almost be interchangeable at this point as it's very hard to compare them. A few more E8 games should help stratify this out.
You are dead on. At this point, all of this is for fun. Chip Kelly, the head coach at Oregon, had a great point on rankings during an interview before the Stanford game this weekend when he asked "name the #4 team in the country during the last week of September last year"? No one could answer...because no one cares.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 04, 2010, 03:40:09 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:48:02 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 04, 2010, 02:39:44 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I dropped them from 6 to 10, below those teams. But All of them could almost be interchangeable at this point as it's very hard to compare them. A few more E8 games should help stratify this out.
You are dead on. At this point, all of this is for fun. Chip Kelly, the head coach at Oregon, had a great point on rankings during an interview before the Stanford game this weekend when he asked "name the #4 team in the country during the last week of September last year"? No one could answer...because no one cares.
1. At the D-I level, polls are used for a little more than "fun"
2. The very presence of these polls would seem to indicate that people do in fact care
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 03:42:09 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 04, 2010, 03:40:09 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:48:02 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 04, 2010, 02:39:44 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I dropped them from 6 to 10, below those teams. But All of them could almost be interchangeable at this point as it's very hard to compare them. A few more E8 games should help stratify this out.
You are dead on. At this point, all of this is for fun. Chip Kelly, the head coach at Oregon, had a great point on rankings during an interview before the Stanford game this weekend when he asked "name the #4 team in the country during the last week of September last year"? No one could answer...because no one cares.
1. At the D-I level, polls are used for a little more than "fun"
2. The very presence of these polls would seem to indicate that people do in fact care
It's not that they don't care...it's that at this point in the season, it doesn't truly mean anything. I said it before...raise your hand in you had Susquehana in your Top 10 at the beginning of the year last season? These polls will mean more towards the end of the year simply because you get to judge the body of work of the season...
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 04, 2010, 04:09:07 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 03:42:09 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 04, 2010, 03:40:09 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:48:02 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 04, 2010, 02:39:44 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I dropped them from 6 to 10, below those teams. But All of them could almost be interchangeable at this point as it's very hard to compare them. A few more E8 games should help stratify this out.
You are dead on. At this point, all of this is for fun. Chip Kelly, the head coach at Oregon, had a great point on rankings during an interview before the Stanford game this weekend when he asked "name the #4 team in the country during the last week of September last year"? No one could answer...because no one cares.
1. At the D-I level, polls are used for a little more than "fun"
2. The very presence of these polls would seem to indicate that people do in fact care
It's not that they don't care...it's that at this point in the season, it doesn't truly mean anything. I said it before...raise your hand in you had Susquehana in your Top 10 at the beginning of the year last season? These polls will mean more towards the end of the year simply because you get to judge the body of work of the season...
agreed, but the flip side of that is that at the end of the season when the games have all been played and the results all setlled on the field, what is the utility and/or expertise of the poll at that point?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 02:25:39 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I'm surprised i'm the only one with a Willy P vote. Might need to start getting them on the radar.
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on October 04, 2010, 04:56:20 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 02:25:39 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I'm surprised i'm the only one with a Willy P vote. Might need to start getting them on the radar.
I thought about Willy P. But I'm still not so sure about the NJAC. The only game that I can judge them by is the Rowan over Lycoming win (24-17).
I'm suprised it took a week to rank Lycoming over Ithaca though. I had Lycoming last week.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 04, 2010, 05:14:01 PMQuote from: Jonny Podunk on October 04, 2010, 04:56:20 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 02:25:39 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I'm surprised i'm the only one with a Willy P vote. Might need to start getting them on the radar.
I thought about Willy P. But I'm still not so sure about the NJAC. The only game that I can judge them by is the Rowan over Lycoming win (24-17).
I'm suprised it took a week to rank Lycoming over Ithaca though. I had Lycoming last week.
I've had Lyco for a couple of weeks now. I always keep an eye on them, they are usually strong and sneak up as the season goes on.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 05:38:13 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 04, 2010, 05:14:01 PMQuote from: Jonny Podunk on October 04, 2010, 04:56:20 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 02:25:39 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I'm surprised i'm the only one with a Willy P vote. Might need to start getting them on the radar.
I thought about Willy P. But I'm still not so sure about the NJAC. The only game that I can judge them by is the Rowan over Lycoming win (24-17).
I'm suprised it took a week to rank Lycoming over Ithaca though. I had Lycoming last week.
I've had Lyco for a couple of weeks now. I always keep an eye on them, they are usually strong and sneak up as the season goes on.
Yeah I had Lyco at 10 last week and 9 this week. I have Ithaca at 11 right now. It looks like most people with Ithaca have them ahead of Lyco which I don't get.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 05:38:13 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 04, 2010, 05:14:01 PMQuote from: Jonny Podunk on October 04, 2010, 04:56:20 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 04, 2010, 02:25:39 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 04, 2010, 02:19:13 PM
Wow...surprised a few voters have Utica ahead of Springfield, Rowan, and Ithaca. Other then that, everything seems about right.
I'm surprised i'm the only one with a Willy P vote. Might need to start getting them on the radar.
I thought about Willy P. But I'm still not so sure about the NJAC. The only game that I can judge them by is the Rowan over Lycoming win (24-17).
I'm suprised it took a week to rank Lycoming over Ithaca though. I had Lycoming last week.
I've had Lyco for a couple of weeks now. I always keep an eye on them, they are usually strong and sneak up as the season goes on.
Yeah I had Lyco at 10 last week and 9 this week. I have Ithaca at 11 right now. It looks like most people with Ithaca have them ahead of Lyco which I don't get.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 05, 2010, 08:52:28 AM
I'll defend an Ithaca over Lycoming vote (which I have). Ithaca lost on a last second field goal at Lycoming with a few key injuries. I try to set my rankings based on which team I think would win a game on a neutral field not just on results or records. Yes that's extremely subjective but with 10 pollsters I think it works it self out rather well.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 05, 2010, 09:17:05 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 05, 2010, 08:52:28 AM
I'll defend an Ithaca over Lycoming vote (which I have). Ithaca lost on a last second field goal at Lycoming with a few key injuries. I try to set my rankings based on which team I think would win a game on a neutral field not just on results or records. Yes that's extremely subjective but with 10 pollsters I think it works it self out rather well.
In principle, I agree with this (Though if I had a vote, Ithaca would be behind Lycoming) I mean, the FG changes who won the game, but it didn't really change what happened between the two squads. If Lycoming had botched the snap, does that make Ithaca a better football team than them? Or does it just change who one the H2H?
I always have trouble boiling down a larger "Which team is better?" concept into "Well, it all depends if this kicker hits a short FG on this play."
Quote from: Doid23 on October 05, 2010, 11:27:13 AMand field goal kickers, are part of the team,
Quote from: Doid23 on October 05, 2010, 11:27:13 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 05, 2010, 09:17:05 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 05, 2010, 08:52:28 AM
I'll defend an Ithaca over Lycoming vote (which I have). Ithaca lost on a last second field goal at Lycoming with a few key injuries. I try to set my rankings based on which team I think would win a game on a neutral field not just on results or records. Yes that's extremely subjective but with 10 pollsters I think it works it self out rather well.
In principle, I agree with this (Though if I had a vote, Ithaca would be behind Lycoming) I mean, the FG changes who won the game, but it didn't really change what happened between the two squads. If Lycoming had botched the snap, does that make Ithaca a better football team than them? Or does it just change who one the H2H?
I always have trouble boiling down a larger "Which team is better?" concept into "Well, it all depends if this kicker hits a short FG on this play."
I have no problem with someone ranking Ithaca slightly ahead of Lycoming, since the body of work is important as well, and another posters neutral field test is valid. But you can't just discount what happened in the game, the field goal was part of the game, and the team (Lycoming) got itself in a position to kick the field goal. They had a player on their team execute the field goal. Special teams, and field goal kickers, are part of the team, and therefore can't be discounted.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 05, 2010, 11:56:38 AMQuote from: Doid23 on October 05, 2010, 11:27:13 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 05, 2010, 09:17:05 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 05, 2010, 08:52:28 AM
I'll defend an Ithaca over Lycoming vote (which I have). Ithaca lost on a last second field goal at Lycoming with a few key injuries. I try to set my rankings based on which team I think would win a game on a neutral field not just on results or records. Yes that's extremely subjective but with 10 pollsters I think it works it self out rather well.
In principle, I agree with this (Though if I had a vote, Ithaca would be behind Lycoming) I mean, the FG changes who won the game, but it didn't really change what happened between the two squads. If Lycoming had botched the snap, does that make Ithaca a better football team than them? Or does it just change who one the H2H?
I always have trouble boiling down a larger "Which team is better?" concept into "Well, it all depends if this kicker hits a short FG on this play."
I have no problem with someone ranking Ithaca slightly ahead of Lycoming, since the body of work is important as well, and another posters neutral field test is valid. But you can't just discount what happened in the game, the field goal was part of the game, and the team (Lycoming) got itself in a position to kick the field goal. They had a player on their team execute the field goal. Special teams, and field goal kickers, are part of the team, and therefore can't be discounted.
My point wasn't that you discount the game. My point was in fact, that you take the whole game. If you want to make an argument that Lycoming is better than Ithaca (or vice versea) you shouldn't need that one kick to be made or missed to be the proof. There was ample proof to suggest Lycoming was better
The question is: If Lycoming misses the kick, does that one play drastically change how we view those two teams' seasons thus far? I just don't believe so
Quote from: Upstate on October 05, 2010, 11:31:24 AMQuote from: Doid23 on October 05, 2010, 11:27:13 AMand field goal kickers, are part of the team,
That's debatable...
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 7 ) | 3-1 | 96 | 1 | at FDU-Florham |
2 St. John Fisher( 3 ) | 5-0 | 91 | 2 | vs. #9 Ithaca |
3 Montclair State | 4-0 | 80 | 3 | vs. New Jersey |
4 Cortland State | 4-0 | 68 | T4 | vs. Brockport State |
5 Alfred | 4-0 | 65 | T4 | at Hartwick |
6 Springfield | 4-1 | 35 | 6 | Open Date |
7 Rowan | 3-1 | 30 | 9 | vs. Kean |
8 Lycoming | 3-1 | 26 | NR | at Albright |
9 Ithaca | 4-1 | 25 | 8 | at #2 St. John Fisher |
10 Utica | 4-1 | 20 | 7 | vs. St. Lawrence |
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2010, 07:51:19 AM
Guess head to head match ups don't mean as much as they used to. Everyone talks about the FG that Lycoming kicked which "won" the game like it was an accident. Are we forgetting that Lycoming stopped Ithaca on 3 consecutive plays when IC had a chance to put the game away? It's not like IC took a knee. Are we forgetting that Lycoming marched right down the field for the winning kick? IC didn't fumble or give the ball away while in the Victory formation. Has anyone dug out any information showing maybe Lycoming had a few players out...or banged up?
While I do believe IC would beat Lycoming at least 6 out of 10 times they play, probably 7 out of 10 actually, they won the one game that matters. Period. When both teams have the same record, I cannot think of a single circumstance where I would rank the team that lost to the other head to head in front of the team that won.
Quote from: Upstate on October 05, 2010, 09:36:24 AM
After the top 5 (DVC, SJF, MSU, AU, Cort), the other teams are pretty interchangeable...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2010, 07:51:19 AM
Guess head to head match ups don't mean as much as they used to. Everyone talks about the FG that Lycoming kicked which "won" the game like it was an accident. Are we forgetting that Lycoming stopped Ithaca on 3 consecutive plays when IC had a chance to put the game away? It's not like IC took a knee. Are we forgetting that Lycoming marched right down the field for the winning kick? IC didn't fumble or give the ball away while in the Victory formation. Has anyone dug out any information showing maybe Lycoming had a few players out...or banged up?
While I do believe IC would beat Lycoming at least 6 out of 10 times they play, probably 7 out of 10 actually, they won the one game that matters. Period. When both teams have the same record, I cannot think of a single circumstance where I would rank the team that lost to the other head to head in front of the team that won.
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 10:53:42 AM
Yanks --
"Not one time would you rank the team the won behind the other"
--that is just absurd in my opinion. Rankings are for the best team not the best individual matchups. There are a hundred factors that come into play other than just that one single matchup - and within that single matchup there are a lot of other factors to consider. The whole body of work needs to be taken into consideration and other external circumstances that need to be considered.
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 11:34:55 AM
Well I am both :) --in all seriousness excluding playing each other here are their opponents' records(excluding games against IC/Lyco):
Ithaca opponents - 8-4
Lycoming's opponents 4-8
That is a factor also. But I'm not just saying IC/Lyco I'm saying as a whole you can't just factor in the head to head matchup.
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 11:34:55 AM
Well I am both :) --in all seriousness excluding playing each other here are their opponents' records(excluding games against IC/Lyco):
Ithaca opponents - 8-4
Lycoming's opponents 4-8
That is a factor also. But I'm not just saying IC/Lyco I'm saying as a whole you can't just factor in the head to head matchup.
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 12:59:56 PM
Yanks/PBR (we really should be able to quote comments from a BB) -
Should Utica be ranked ahead of Fisher? No, absolutely not. Why? Because they haven't beaten anyone with a decent record, weren't missing SEVERAL players with injuries, lost @ home to Fisher, and lost by 10+ points. IC has beaten teams with good/decent records, were missing a number of their best players, were playing on the road, and lost on a last second field goal. All those factors add up to my belief that you can (and should IMO) rank IC ahead of Lyco but you can't Utica ahead of Fisher.
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 12:59:56 PM
Yanks/PBR (we really should be able to quote comments from a BB) -
Should Utica be ranked ahead of Fisher? No, absolutely not. Why? Because they haven't beaten anyone with a decent record, weren't missing SEVERAL players with injuries, lost @ home to Fisher, and lost by 10+ points. IC has beaten teams with good/decent records, were missing a number of their best players, were playing on the road, and lost on a last second field goal. All those factors add up to my belief that you can (and should IMO) rank IC ahead of Lyco but you can't Utica ahead of Fisher.
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on October 06, 2010, 01:22:52 PMQuote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 12:59:56 PM
Yanks/PBR (we really should be able to quote comments from a BB) -
Should Utica be ranked ahead of Fisher? No, absolutely not. Why? Because they haven't beaten anyone with a decent record, weren't missing SEVERAL players with injuries, lost @ home to Fisher, and lost by 10+ points. IC has beaten teams with good/decent records, were missing a number of their best players, were playing on the road, and lost on a last second field goal. All those factors add up to my belief that you can (and should IMO) rank IC ahead of Lyco but you can't Utica ahead of Fisher.
everyone has injuries and people banged up. imho u give that very little creedence....yes they lost on a last second field goal, they are 2 very closely matched teams but the overriding weight that tips the scale in lyco's favor to pbr is they one the head to head matchup. yes you weight in opponents/records/win margins etc...but to this fan head to head gets the most weight. As bill parcells says...your are what your record says you are...and lyco's record shows they beat IC head to head hence at this point in the season they get the nod over IC which could obviously change and probably will...it is interesting to hear everyones views on how they rank teams and where they give heavier weightings. sure the d3 top25 pollsters go thru the same problems everyweek
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2010, 02:15:42 PM
I still have Ithaca ranked ahead of Lyco, mostly because I had Ithaca with a fairly high ranking to start and Lyco was off the rankings. I can't justify jumping Lyco over Springfield and can't really justify moving Springfield past Ithaca yet. Here is my top ten this week.
1 SJF
2 Del Val
3 Montclair
4 Cortland
5 Alfred
6 Ithaca
7 Springfield
8 Lyco
9 Utica
10 WPU
Quote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 01:56:05 PM
Unless your starting QB is out, injuries/missing players mean squat at this level...
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2010, 02:15:42 PM
mostly because I had Ithaca with a fairly high ranking to start and Lyco was off the rankings.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 06, 2010, 02:22:23 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 01:56:05 PM
Unless your starting QB is out, injuries/missing players mean squat at this level...
Wow -- I really don't think this is true.
What I do think is true is that people can't assess the impact of an injury aside from a stud quarterback or running back unless they have very closely observed the program in question. So people like us won't be able to tell per se what the impact is of a missing left tackle or an outside linebacker, but there is definitely an impact.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 06, 2010, 02:26:19 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 06, 2010, 02:15:42 PM
mostly because I had Ithaca with a fairly high ranking to start and Lyco was off the rankings.
Arrrgggghhh! Not that. Anything but that, please. I personally believe that 4 games into the season a head to head win trumps all, but I can get my head around the neutral field debate, or the injury debate, or the body of work debate, but certainly NOT the "I had them high in my preseason/ early season ranking" answer.
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 02:30:34 PM
I am not saying injuries are the only factor. I stated they are one of many factors that go into consideration. I am not using it as an excuse; this whole conversation was started because you said the only consideration that matters for two teams with the same record that play each other is the head to head matchup. If IC destroys Fisher and Lycoming wins they would still have the same record and Lycoming would still own the head to head so according to your initial philosophy they cannot jump them. You are contradicting yourself because you said the head to head win is the only factor that matters!
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 02:52:10 PM
You just said 10 mins ago that you would jump them, and I quote, "if IC does something completely unexpected...like destroy Fisher.". That is a direct quote! Now you're contradicting your contradiction! Bottom line I have absolutely no problem with you or anyone having Lycoming ahead of IC but I will debate your rationale that the only factor is the head to head W/L. That's my only beef with this whole debate! :)
Quote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 02:33:31 PM
Don't get me wrong Pat, in the grand scheme of things they do matter and do have some impact on the games. Just not as big of an impact as a QB and therefore shouldn't be taken into consideration. At this level if you lose your QB during the season you're toast, if any other player goes down you can get by.
Quote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 03:25:36 PM
Yanks -
You didn't directly say it but you said they would be behind them unless IC destroys Fisher. Deductive reasoning says that means you are saying you would jump them if that happens. Maybe you didn't mean it but you said it. And if they both went 9-1 that meant IC went undefeated in the 5th toughest conference in the nation (according to ATN). But I don't have the time or patience to explain that situation...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 06, 2010, 03:13:27 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 02:33:31 PM
Don't get me wrong Pat, in the grand scheme of things they do matter and do have some impact on the games. Just not as big of an impact as a QB and therefore shouldn't be taken into consideration. At this level if you lose your QB during the season you're toast, if any other player goes down you can get by.
The 1988 National Champion Ithaca Bombers would disagree with you there... ;D
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2010, 03:35:46 PMQuote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 03:25:36 PM
Yanks -
You didn't directly say it but you said they would be behind them unless IC destroys Fisher. Deductive reasoning says that means you are saying you would jump them if that happens. Maybe you didn't mean it but you said it. And if they both went 9-1 that meant IC went undefeated in the 5th toughest conference in the nation (according to ATN). But I don't have the time or patience to explain that situation...
You win man...Ithaca #1 FOREVER!!!
Quote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 03:45:03 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 06, 2010, 03:13:27 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 02:33:31 PM
Don't get me wrong Pat, in the grand scheme of things they do matter and do have some impact on the games. Just not as big of an impact as a QB and therefore shouldn't be taken into consideration. At this level if you lose your QB during the season you're toast, if any other player goes down you can get by.
The 1988 National Champion Ithaca Bombers would disagree with you there... ;D
Good point, I see what you're saying. However, the Bills were somewhat good and I was 10 at that time just to point out it's relevance now. Also, there weren't nearly as many quality D-3 programs around to steal talent away from the Bombers back then.
Quote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 03:45:58 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2010, 03:35:46 PMQuote from: bomber3 on October 06, 2010, 03:25:36 PM
Yanks -
You didn't directly say it but you said they would be behind them unless IC destroys Fisher. Deductive reasoning says that means you are saying you would jump them if that happens. Maybe you didn't mean it but you said it. And if they both went 9-1 that meant IC went undefeated in the 5th toughest conference in the nation (according to ATN). But I don't have the time or patience to explain that situation...
You win man...Ithaca #1 FOREVER!!!
It's about time you caught on, other than Fisher week I just play along with the Ithaca guys to fluff up their collective egos...
Quote from: Upstate on September 19, 2010, 07:56:43 PM
Games week of 9/25
- 13 Ithaca (3-0) @ Lycoming (1-1)
Alfred (2-0) @ -7 Springfield (3-0)
Wilkes (1-1) @ -13 Utica (3-0)
-10 St. John Fisher (3-0) @ Hobart (2-0)
Quote from: maxpower on October 06, 2010, 03:43:05 PM
LOL and +k on 1000 posts Yanks. Go Yanks.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 06, 2010, 07:48:41 PM
Pep is a bit disappointed he will miss Alfred's game at Hartwick this Saterday. Pep Jr. is coming home for this weekend for a birthday celebration, driving in Friday night from D.C. and returning on Sunday evening. He, understandably, doesn't wish to be on the road for six hours on Saturday.
So, Pep was elated to receive word today that the Alfred-Hartwick game will be webcast. Upon further investigation, Pep is excited by Saterday's schedule of Upstate NY D3 football webcasts. Look at this lineup:
12 noon--Union at Hobart
2 p.m.--Alfred at Hartwick
4 p.m. Ithaca at St. John Fisher
family
Now Pep is delighted to stay at home and chill with thelaptopand celebrate a birthday.
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 06, 2010, 07:48:41 PM
Pep is a bit disappointed he will miss Alfred's game at Hartwick this Saterday. Pep Jr. is coming home for this weekend for a birthday celebration, driving in Friday night from D.C. and returning on Sunday evening. He, understandably, doesn't wish to be on the road for six hours on Saturday.
So, Pep was elated to receive word today that the Alfred-Hartwick game will be webcast. Upon further investigation, Pep is excited by Saterday's schedule of Upstate NY D3 football webcasts. Look at this lineup:
12 noon--Union at Hobart
2 p.m.--Alfred at Hartwick
4 p.m. Ithaca at St. John Fisher
family
Now Pep is delighted to stay at home and chill with thelaptopand celebrate a birthday.
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 01:56:05 PM
Unless your starting QB is out, injuries/missing players mean squat at this level...
Quote from: Union89 on October 07, 2010, 01:54:12 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 01:56:05 PM
Unless your starting QB is out, injuries/missing players mean squat at this level...
Not directing this at you Upstate, but didn't we beat this topic to death a year or 2 ago....I was of the mindset that injuries are an excuse at this level.....if I remember correctly, PBR (or maybe PG) was pounding the drum that we should take injuries into consideration when ranking teams
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 07, 2010, 02:02:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2010, 01:54:12 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 01:56:05 PM
Unless your starting QB is out, injuries/missing players mean squat at this level...
Not directing this at you Upstate, but didn't we beat this topic to death a year or 2 ago....I was of the mindset that injuries are an excuse at this level.....if I remember correctly, PBR (or maybe PG) was pounding the drum that we should take injuries into consideration when ranking teams
I think it depends. Are we talking any one injury, or injuries period? I would agree that, QB's aside, there seem to be very few individual players who can have that kind of impact by themselves. But if you're missing 3-4 starters in one game, I think you'd see a drop off.
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on October 07, 2010, 02:13:48 PM
Yea if Mt. Union had 6 offensive starters suspended for one game and lost to a 5-5 OAC team, do you drop MUC out of the top 10 or 20? Would you do the same (or rank them the same I should say) if they lost to that 5-5 team and the players weren't suspended? Those are the questions you need to ask yourself.
Quote from: Union89 on October 07, 2010, 01:54:12 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 01:56:05 PM
Unless your starting QB is out, injuries/missing players mean squat at this level...
Not directing this at you Upstate, but didn't we beat this topic to death a year or 2 ago....I was of the mindset that injuries are an excuse at this level.....if I remember correctly, PBR (or maybe PG) was pounding the drum that we should take injuries into consideration when ranking teams
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on October 07, 2010, 02:13:48 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 07, 2010, 02:02:23 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 07, 2010, 01:54:12 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2010, 01:56:05 PM
Unless your starting QB is out, injuries/missing players mean squat at this level...
Not directing this at you Upstate, but didn't we beat this topic to death a year or 2 ago....I was of the mindset that injuries are an excuse at this level.....if I remember correctly, PBR (or maybe PG) was pounding the drum that we should take injuries into consideration when ranking teams
I think it depends. Are we talking any one injury, or injuries period? I would agree that, QB's aside, there seem to be very few individual players who can have that kind of impact by themselves. But if you're missing 3-4 starters in one game, I think you'd see a drop off.
Yea if Mt. Union had 6 offensive starters suspended for one game and lost to a 5-5 OAC team, do you drop MUC out of the top 10 or 20? Would you do the same (or rank them the same I should say) if they lost to that 5-5 team and the players weren't suspended? Those are the questions you need to ask yourself.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 08, 2010, 10:13:34 AM
Injuries, no doubt, at the D3 level, can become a major factor in a team's success. When Yunevich started at Alfred, it was before the "platoon" system so his players usually played 60 minutes. You see a lot of this even today in the smaller high schools that continue to play 11-man football with a mere 18 to 25 players.
Until Coach Murray's appearance at Alfred, injuries to starters was most difficult for the Saxons. Today, Alfred has more depth than ever in the history of the program. While not close to Alliance, OH, Pep would contend that the University of Mount Union (or whatever they're calling that purple monster out there today) can attribute much of its success to the fact that the second and maybe even third strings are not far from the starters in terms of talent and effort.
That is not to say that AU has backups at every skill postion that can match what the starters bring to the turf. They are different and bring different strengths to the position--and likely some different weaknesses. Pep can think of no greater example than the 2009 AU-Fisher game at Growney when Secky went down in the second quarter. Kilcarr is not Secky. But Secky is not Kilcarr, either. When Kilcarr scrambled and went for a 17-yard run late in the game, Pep was thinking that's not how Secky would have gotten the Saxons in field goal range. But Kilcarr got the job done and did it using his strengths.
D3 football is not the same these days. Anyone who looked at that 1968 Union-Alfred game that Pep posted can see a major difference. Nevertheless, like days gone by, football is the quintessence of the spirit of an institution of higher learning.
On Saxon Warriors!!
Quote from: clandfan on October 08, 2010, 11:08:39 AM
As for the rankings, we keep W/L records for a reason. Teams don't go to the playoffs based on their yds per carry or their passing efficiency. The bottom line is that there will be a winner and a loser. On a given weekend in a head to head game, I score more points, I win, you lose. I am better. The season record will reflect the "body of work". If I lose to a lower ranked team or an unranked team, my rank should drop, regardless of injury or last second field goal. If it's early in the season I will drop further, later in the season there will be greater weight placed on the body of work. With that being said then...I don't really understand why St. Johns is still in the top 25 with a 3-2 record. Obviously, I don't have a clue.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 08, 2010, 02:08:50 PMQuote from: clandfan on October 08, 2010, 11:08:39 AM
As for the rankings, we keep W/L records for a reason. Teams don't go to the playoffs based on their yds per carry or their passing efficiency. The bottom line is that there will be a winner and a loser. On a given weekend in a head to head game, I score more points, I win, you lose. I am better. The season record will reflect the "body of work". If I lose to a lower ranked team or an unranked team, my rank should drop, regardless of injury or last second field goal. If it's early in the season I will drop further, later in the season there will be greater weight placed on the body of work. With that being said then...I don't really understand why St. Johns is still in the top 25 with a 3-2 record. Obviously, I don't have a clue.
Well, they lost to the #4 and #17 ranked teams by a total of four points.
To me, I try to say, ok St. John's is #23 and Cortland is #25. If those two teams played today, who would win? To me, St. John's wins that game. So I am ok with that difference. Another way I sometimes think "Would Cortland be better than 3-2 if they played St. John's schedule?" Probably. And St. John's would absolutely be 4-0 if they played Cortland's schedule.
Yes, it stands to reason with similar/identical records and a H2H win, that we could tell. But until the NCAA admits they screwed IC in 1998, I guess we have to make do with what we got
Quote from: clandfan on October 09, 2010, 09:06:06 PM
St. Johns plays in a tougher conference; no argument. Your formula though is chock full of hypotheticals that we can never answer with over 200 DIII teams and however many conferences. Heck DI BCS has tried weighting conrference strength, like opponents, like opponents opponents, ranking and we all know how everyone likes that....sometimes they get it right, more often not. You gotta go with watchya got. St. Johns now, by the way, is 3-3. I don't think we can now rank them ahead of a 5-0 team that has held their opponents to 13 straight scoreless quarters and has given up 19 points all season.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 10, 2010, 08:50:44 AM
Funny that no one in my top ten lost yesterday, but my 11, 12, and 13 all lost. Not much work for my poll this week.
Quote from: clandfan on October 09, 2010, 09:06:06 PM
St. Johns plays in a tougher conference; no argument. Your formula though is chock full of hypotheticals that we can never answer with over 200 DIII teams and however many conferences. Heck DI BCS has tried weighting conrference strength, like opponents, like opponents opponents, ranking and we all know how everyone likes that....sometimes they get it right, more often not. You gotta go with watchya got. St. Johns now, by the way, is 3-3. I don't think we can now rank them ahead of a 5-0 team that has held their opponents to 13 straight scoreless quarters and has given up 19 points all season.
Quote from: Upstate on October 11, 2010, 12:40:43 PM
Good point Bombers...
Cortland is beating the teams they should beat, and they deserve credit for that...
They've yet to be tested so we'll see what happens when they are...
Quote from: clandfan on October 11, 2010, 02:34:48 PM
All fair comments. Rowan this week.
It would also be fair to say that the bombers have not exactly been world beaters with wins over St. Larry, Union, Widener and Hartwick and losses to your only two real quality opponents.
Agreed....E8 is a stronger conference top to bottom but you are talking hypotheticals again. You have shown some deficiencies in your OL and run game and I am not sure that the Keans and TCNJs of the world couldn't contain your so-called air-Zappia. We'll never know and Cortaca will be our best judge but that will be a crapshoot as always given the nature of the beast.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 11, 2010, 05:08:31 PMQuote from: clandfan on October 11, 2010, 02:34:48 PM
All fair comments. Rowan this week.
It would also be fair to say that the bombers have not exactly been world beaters with wins over St. Larry, Union, Widener and Hartwick and losses to your only two real quality opponents.
Agreed....E8 is a stronger conference top to bottom but you are talking hypotheticals again. You have shown some deficiencies in your OL and run game and I am not sure that the Keans and TCNJs of the world couldn't contain your so-called air-Zappia. We'll never know and Cortaca will be our best judge but that will be a crapshoot as always given the nature of the beast.
Of course the Bombers aren't world beaters. Who said they were? I do think they would be 5-0 against Cortland's schedule thus far, but that's more an indictment of the schedule than an endorsement of the Bombers. Western Connecticut, Buff State and Brockport are all terrible. As for TCNJ, I think a team averaging less than 200 yards offensively is not going to be put in my good category
So that leaves Kean. And again, they're probably going to be, at best, 6-4 and maybe 5-5. No-one's saying Cortland's not good--in fact, I believe I got flak on the E8 board for saying that Cortland would probably beat IC. Stomp Rowan and Montclair and I'll look pretty smart
Anyone can contain Zappia. He's above average, but not the kind of guy who can win playing behind, against a good defense, when you can't run the ball. It's not so much that he's good, as much as it is he's better than the alternative (running the ball for 2 yards). He ain't Team Boltus, that's for sure. He's not even Brian Grastorf.
The whole thing with polls is hypothetical. We don't know anything about the relative strength of most of these teams. Is Cortland better than Alfred? Is Fisher better than Montclair? How good is Del Valley? It's all educated guesswork, my friend
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 7 ) | 4-1 | 96 | 1 | at Wilkes |
2 St. John Fisher( 3 ) | 6-0 | 91 | 2 | vs. Hartwick |
3 Montclair State | 5-0 | 78 | 3 | vs. Buffalo State |
4 Cortland State | 5-0 | 70 | 4 | at #7 Rowan |
5 Alfred | 5-0 | 64 | 5 | at RPI |
6 Springfield | 4-1 | 42 | 6 | vs. #9 Utica |
7 Rowan | 4-1 | 34 | 7 | vs. #4 Cortland State |
8 Lycoming | 4-1 | 33 | 8 | vs. Widener |
9 Utica | 5-1 | 28 | 10 | at #6 Springfield |
10 Ithaca | 4-2 | 6 | 9 | Open Date |
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2010, 12:43:57 PM
just 'thinkin' out loud here...and wondering how strong this Fisher team is compared to the 2006 squad that hung within 5 pts until 4 minutes to go against MUC.
I saw several games live that year and 2 so far this year. In my mind, this present team is at least a 7pt underdog to the 2006 team. How that equates to the relative strength of the East this year and the rest of the country remains to be seen.
The 2 major differences are the RB and the defense as a whole. I have seen Borum carry the ball 40 or so times this year, and I cannot recall seeing him break many tackles nor do I recall seeing him getting to the second level on too many runs. Robinson did that on almost every carry in 2006. I dont see Borum busting through MUC's defensive line on 4th and goal from the 1 in December like Robby did in '06. You need that to go deep in December.
Yes their passing game is the 'greatest show on turf' since the Rams of Warner, Faulk, et al, but passing games can become erratic, and good defenses will make you pay for being 1 dimensional.
Their current defense is a far cry from the ball-hawking defense that led them in 06. Stepnick and Lang were animals. This defense is very adequate, and even showed some spark against IC this week, but very adequate means you only give up 49 to MUC in December instead of 49 by half time. And dont tell me about bend dont break defense, because the 06 defense never bent OR broke..well, except the Chris Sharpe debacle, but they were down Stepnick and others that game.
So...being the glass is laying broken on the floor instead of half-full guy that I am....I am going out on a limb and stating that should we make the NCAA's this year, anything less than a 4th quarter show-down with MUC along the way will prove the correctness of the foregoing non-sense.
I kinda see us going down in a shootout with DVC ala 2004...before MUC gets their teeth in us.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 12, 2010, 09:07:25 PM
While 82 seems intent on drawing comparisons of the 2010 Cardinals to the 2006 Cardinals, Pep wonders whether 82 had taken note of the fact that SJF defeated Ithaca 34-10 in 2006, identical score to the 2010. Seems rather coincidental, no?
Quote from: rams1102 on October 12, 2010, 09:57:18 PM
Had a thought about the East and the East Poll.
Let's throw Wesley into the mix and see how things shake out. I firmly believe that Wesley should be an East team, but the roster limit is a problem. Anyway I came up with (9) teams from the East.
Wesley, Del-Val,Fisher, Cortland, Montclair, Alferd, Hobart, Lycoming, & Suny Mar. The winner should be a formidable final four candidate. This will make a nice (8). There are other possibilities, but as of now this may work.
I feel that Wesley would be #1 and the travel to Wesley would be under the 400-500 mile NCAA, you take a bus.
Any Thoughts and possibilities?
Quote from: Upstate on October 12, 2010, 10:03:17 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 12, 2010, 09:57:18 PM
Had a thought about the East and the East Poll.
Let's throw Wesley into the mix and see how things shake out. I firmly believe that Wesley should be an East team, but the roster limit is a problem. Anyway I came up with (9) teams from the East.
Wesley, Del-Val,Fisher, Cortland, Montclair, Alferd, Hobart, Lycoming, & Suny Mar. The winner should be a formidable final four candidate. This will make a nice (8). There are other possibilities, but as of now this may work.
I feel that Wesley would be #1 and the travel to Wesley would be under the 400-500 mile NCAA, you take a bus.
Any Thoughts and possibilities?
What about the NEFC rep?
[/quote/]
OK, let's throw in Endicott, Plymouth or Mass Mar. Pick one.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 12, 2010, 09:07:25 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 12, 2010, 12:43:57 PM
just 'thinkin' out loud here...and wondering how strong this Fisher team is compared to the 2006 squad that hung within 5 pts until 4 minutes to go against MUC.
I saw several games live that year and 2 so far this year. In my mind, this present team is at least a 7pt underdog to the 2006 team. How that equates to the relative strength of the East this year and the rest of the country remains to be seen.
The 2 major differences are the RB and the defense as a whole. I have seen Borum carry the ball 40 or so times this year, and I cannot recall seeing him break many tackles nor do I recall seeing him getting to the second level on too many runs. Robinson did that on almost every carry in 2006. I dont see Borum busting through MUC's defensive line on 4th and goal from the 1 in December like Robby did in '06. You need that to go deep in December.
Yes their passing game is the 'greatest show on turf' since the Rams of Warner, Faulk, et al, but passing games can become erratic, and good defenses will make you pay for being 1 dimensional.
Their current defense is a far cry from the ball-hawking defense that led them in 06. Stepnick and Lang were animals. This defense is very adequate, and even showed some spark against IC this week, but very adequate means you only give up 49 to MUC in December instead of 49 by half time. And dont tell me about bend dont break defense, because the 06 defense never bent OR broke..well, except the Chris Sharpe debacle, but they were down Stepnick and others that game.
So...being the glass is laying broken on the floor instead of half-full guy that I am....I am going out on a limb and stating that should we make the NCAA's this year, anything less than a 4th quarter show-down with MUC along the way will prove the correctness of the foregoing non-sense.
I kinda see us going down in a shootout with DVC ala 2004...before MUC gets their teeth in us.
While 82 seems intent on drawing comparisons of the 2010 Cardinals to the 2006 Cardinals, Pep wonders whether 82 had taken note of the fact that SJF defeated Ithaca 34-10 in 2006, identical score to the 2010. Seems rather coincidental, no?
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: footballfan75 on October 13, 2010, 10:07:29 AM
Well you cant throw in Mass Maritime as a rep for the NEFC. ha The top four teams are Endicott, Plymouth State, Maine Maritime, and Framingham. RIght now i would throw in Endicott.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2010, 10:10:33 AMQuote from: footballfan75 on October 13, 2010, 10:07:29 AM
Well you cant throw in Mass Maritime as a rep for the NEFC. ha The top four teams are Endicott, Plymouth State, Maine Maritime, and Framingham. RIght now i would throw in Endicott.
I wish we could throw out all of the NEFC reps...nothing personal...
Quote from: Upstate on October 13, 2010, 10:24:19 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2010, 10:10:33 AMQuote from: footballfan75 on October 13, 2010, 10:07:29 AM
Well you cant throw in Mass Maritime as a rep for the NEFC. ha The top four teams are Endicott, Plymouth State, Maine Maritime, and Framingham. RIght now i would throw in Endicott.
I wish we could throw out all of the NEFC reps...nothing personal...
Still hurting from that 07 loss to Curry are we?
Quote from: Upstate on October 13, 2010, 10:24:19 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2010, 10:10:33 AMQuote from: footballfan75 on October 13, 2010, 10:07:29 AM
Well you cant throw in Mass Maritime as a rep for the NEFC. ha The top four teams are Endicott, Plymouth State, Maine Maritime, and Framingham. RIght now i would throw in Endicott.
I wish we could throw out all of the NEFC reps...nothing personal...
Still hurting from that 07 loss to Curry are we?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2010, 12:54:51 PM
Quick correction, TGP:
There are 23 Pool A Conferences.
There are 3 Pool B bids.
That leaves 6 Pool C bids.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 13, 2010, 02:33:28 PM
Actually, I don't want the Top 25 voters to pay any credence to the f'ed up way Division III chooses its at-large teams. :)
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 13, 2010, 05:15:32 PM
Not being sarcastic -- I am saying I don't want somebody to look at the at-large selections and say, well, Washington and Jefferson made it but North Central didn't, therefore I should vote for W&J before I vote for North Central.
Just to use a historical reference.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 13, 2010, 05:15:32 PM
Not being sarcastic -- I am saying I don't want somebody to look at the at-large selections and say, well, Washington and Jefferson made it but North Central didn't, therefore I should vote for W&J before I vote for North Central.
Just to use a historical reference.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2010, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 13, 2010, 05:15:32 PM
Not being sarcastic -- I am saying I don't want somebody to look at the at-large selections and say, well, Washington and Jefferson made it but North Central didn't, therefore I should vote for W&J before I vote for North Central.
Just to use a historical reference.
Here's a thought though: If they don't pay attention to the at-large selections, should they pay attention to the results come playoff time?
For example, I remember in 2001, when you guys projected Menlo to get in the playoffs over IC. It seems like you're saying (and if I'm wrong, feel free to correct me) that you wouldn't want voters to say "Ithaca made it but Menlo didn't, so I should vote for IC over Menlo." But IC then won two playoff games, so how do those count? Would it be a "Fruit of the poisonous tree" kind of situation?
Since the selection process is, as you say, "f'ed up," what does that do to the results obtained from said process? Not being sarcastic, genuinely curious
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2010, 10:33:28 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2010, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 13, 2010, 05:15:32 PM
Not being sarcastic -- I am saying I don't want somebody to look at the at-large selections and say, well, Washington and Jefferson made it but North Central didn't, therefore I should vote for W&J before I vote for North Central.
Just to use a historical reference.
Here's a thought though: If they don't pay attention to the at-large selections, should they pay attention to the results come playoff time?
For example, I remember in 2001, when you guys projected Menlo to get in the playoffs over IC. It seems like you're saying (and if I'm wrong, feel free to correct me) that you wouldn't want voters to say "Ithaca made it but Menlo didn't, so I should vote for IC over Menlo." But IC then won two playoff games, so how do those count? Would it be a "Fruit of the poisonous tree" kind of situation?
Since the selection process is, as you say, "f'ed up," what does that do to the results obtained from said process? Not being sarcastic, genuinely curious
When we're about to put together our first ballot in the preseason, Pat sends us a spreadsheet with most teams that had received votes at the end of the prior year and any teams which he felt through Kickoff should be on our radars. The spreadsheet includes the prior year's record, the number of returning starters on each side of the ball and the teams to which the team lost the prior year. It's as good a reference as anything to help move teams around. My guess is that carryover voters will use their final ballot from prior years as starter ballots before using the spreadsheet and their own knowledge to move teams up/down/in/out of the poll for the preseason ballot.
As far as playoff wins go, the final ballot each year comes out after the Stagg Bowl, and you'll see teams that outperformed their ranking, if any, jump in that final ballot. Just making the tourney doesn't have much effect on anything -- wins are necessary historically. This is how SJF became a regular in the poll for a couple years after their Final 4 visit. It's also how Hobart started in the poll at 15th last year. So, while playoff wins don't dictate the preseason poll per se, they ARE influential since the final poll each year is probably most voters' starting point the next year.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2010, 10:46:16 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2010, 10:33:28 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2010, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 13, 2010, 05:15:32 PM
Not being sarcastic -- I am saying I don't want somebody to look at the at-large selections and say, well, Washington and Jefferson made it but North Central didn't, therefore I should vote for W&J before I vote for North Central.
Just to use a historical reference.
Here's a thought though: If they don't pay attention to the at-large selections, should they pay attention to the results come playoff time?
For example, I remember in 2001, when you guys projected Menlo to get in the playoffs over IC. It seems like you're saying (and if I'm wrong, feel free to correct me) that you wouldn't want voters to say "Ithaca made it but Menlo didn't, so I should vote for IC over Menlo." But IC then won two playoff games, so how do those count? Would it be a "Fruit of the poisonous tree" kind of situation?
Since the selection process is, as you say, "f'ed up," what does that do to the results obtained from said process? Not being sarcastic, genuinely curious
When we're about to put together our first ballot in the preseason, Pat sends us a spreadsheet with most teams that had received votes at the end of the prior year and any teams which he felt through Kickoff should be on our radars. The spreadsheet includes the prior year's record, the number of returning starters on each side of the ball and the teams to which the team lost the prior year. It's as good a reference as anything to help move teams around. My guess is that carryover voters will use their final ballot from prior years as starter ballots before using the spreadsheet and their own knowledge to move teams up/down/in/out of the poll for the preseason ballot.
As far as playoff wins go, the final ballot each year comes out after the Stagg Bowl, and you'll see teams that outperformed their ranking, if any, jump in that final ballot. Just making the tourney doesn't have much effect on anything -- wins are necessary historically. This is how SJF became a regular in the poll for a couple years after their Final 4 visit. It's also how Hobart started in the poll at 15th last year. So, while playoff wins don't dictate the preseason poll per se, they ARE influential since the final poll each year is probably most voters' starting point the next year.
Makes sense...thanks for the response
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2010, 11:56:42 AM
By the way, U89, what "interest in the poll" does Pat have by running the site? That makes no sense -- there will always be 25 teams and 25 voters in the poll. He has no dog in the seasonal fight. Care to explain that odd point?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2010, 06:18:55 PM
Here's a thought though: If they don't pay attention to the at-large selections, should they pay attention to the results come playoff time?
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
Quote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 12:04:33 PM
Why so defensive?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:10:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
This model worked wonders when I was at Baseball Weekly and we ran the Division I baseball coaches' poll. I'm not concerned. Leaving 25 voters to do their own research would lead to a pretty piss-poor preseason poll because who has the time to do all that work? All I do is provide the baseline so that voters are educated about what is outside their area. They still are free to use their brains.
I think perhaps you don't know how difficult it is to rank 25 teams of 238. It's not like a regional poll. I can't ask them to spend as much time on it as you seem to expect. They all have teams to coach, games to cover, stories to write, news releases to send out, etc.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:10:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
This model worked wonders when I was at Baseball Weekly and we ran the Division I baseball coaches' poll. I'm not concerned. Leaving 25 voters to do their own research would lead to a pretty piss-poor preseason poll because who has the time to do all that work? All I do is provide the baseline so that voters are educated about what is outside their area. They still are free to use their brains.
I think perhaps you don't know how difficult it is to rank 25 teams of 238. It's not like a regional poll. I can't ask them to spend as much time on it as you seem to expect. They all have teams to coach, games to cover, stories to write, news releases to send out, etc.
Quote from: Jonny Podunk on October 14, 2010, 12:42:38 PMD3football.com press release to the NCAA playoff committee....
Dear Voters,
Here are the teams you should consider for an at large bid.
Thank you, Pat Coleman.
Aflred
St. Johns
North Central
Ithaca
Rowan
Montclair
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:05:27 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2010, 06:18:55 PM
Here's a thought though: If they don't pay attention to the at-large selections, should they pay attention to the results come playoff time?
Yes, because those games are actually played. But I wouldn't knock a team in the national poll for not making the national playoffs just because regional criteria suggest that perhaps they should.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:32:56 PM
Right. And I list the teams alphabetically. :)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2010, 02:23:28 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:32:56 PM
Right. And I list the teams alphabetically. :)
I remember reading how certain new authors will pick pen names which start with the same letter as famous authors so their books will be placed next to them in bookstores. Shifty stuff
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2010, 12:59:12 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:05:27 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2010, 06:18:55 PM
Here's a thought though: If they don't pay attention to the at-large selections, should they pay attention to the results come playoff time?
Yes, because those games are actually played. But I wouldn't knock a team in the national poll for not making the national playoffs just because regional criteria suggest that perhaps they should.
That's what I figured. Does playoff performance, in your mind, validate what might have been an odd decision? Again, using the IC-Menlo one, does Ithaca winning those games make you think, "Maybe they weren't a bad pick after all?"
Quote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on October 14, 2010, 12:24:57 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:10:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
This model worked wonders when I was at Baseball Weekly and we ran the Division I baseball coaches' poll. I'm not concerned. Leaving 25 voters to do their own research would lead to a pretty piss-poor preseason poll because who has the time to do all that work? All I do is provide the baseline so that voters are educated about what is outside their area. They still are free to use their brains.
I think perhaps you don't know how difficult it is to rank 25 teams of 238. It's not like a regional poll. I can't ask them to spend as much time on it as you seem to expect. They all have teams to coach, games to cover, stories to write, news releases to send out, etc.
seems like a good starting point...its not like the games are on espn/cbs/nbc every week. So if pbr was a pollster living here in eastern pa. any info/baseline someone could give me on linfield, etc with not getting a chance to see them would be appreciated. Would still do a bunch of research on my own to figure out where each team would be slotted but w/o influencing anyone and giving good background information is a good way to start.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 4 ) | 5-1 | 75 | 1 | vs. #6 Lycoming |
2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) | 7-0 | 74 | 2 | at #8 Alfred |
3 Montclair State | 6-0 | 67 | 3 | at Western Connecticut |
4 Rowan | 5-1 | 53 | 7 | at Brockport State |
5 Springfield | 5-1 | 45 | 6 | at #10 Ithaca |
6 Lycoming | 5-1 | 38 | 8 | at #1 Delaware Valley |
7 Cortland State | 5-1 | 36 | 4 | at Morrisville State |
8 Alfred | 5-1 | 25 | 5 | vs. #2 St. John Fisher |
9 Utica | 5-2 | 11 | 9 | Open Date |
10 Ithaca | 4-2 | 9 | 10 | vs. #5 Springfield |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 18, 2010, 02:29:50 PM
Two pollsters short, but I'm off the next two days so I'm posting it as is:
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley( 4 ) 5-1 75 1 vs. #6 Lycoming 2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) 7-0 74 2 at #8 Alfred 3 Montclair State 6-0 67 3 at Western Connecticut 4 Rowan 5-1 53 7 at Brockport State 5 Springfield 5-1 45 6 at #10 Ithaca 6 Lycoming 5-1 38 8 at #1 Delaware Valley 7 Cortland State 5-1 36 4 at Morrisville State 8 Alfred 5-1 25 5 vs. #2 St. John Fisher 9 Utica 5-2 11 9 Open Date 10 Ithaca 4-2 9 10 vs. #5 Springfield
Also Receiving votes:
SUNY-Maritime 4
Hobart 1
RPI 1
St. Lawrence 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (2,1,1,3,1,NR,1,NR,1,2)
St. John Fisher (1,3,2,1,1,1,NR,2,NR,1)
Montclair State (3,2,3,2,3,NR,3,NR,2,3)
Rowan (4,4,5,4,5,NR,5,NR,4,4)
Springfield (7,5,4,8,4,NR,4,NR,5,6)
Lycoming (8,7,6,5,7,NR,6,NR,6,5)
Cortland (5,6,7,6,6,NR,8,NR,7,7)
Alfred (6,8,8,7,NR,NR,7,NR,8,8)
Utica (9,9,9,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Ithaca (10,10,NR,9,9,NR,9,NR,NR,10)
SUNY-Maritime (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,9,NR)
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
St. Lawrence (NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Lycoming at #1 Delaware Valley
#2 St. John Fisher at #8 Alfred
#10 Ithaca at #5 Springfield
Quote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 5 ) | 5-1 | 85 | 1 | vs. #6 Lycoming |
2 St. John Fisher( 4 ) | 7-0 | 83 | 2 | at #8 Alfred |
3 Montclair State | 6-0 | 75 | 3 | at Western Connecticut |
4 Rowan | 5-1 | 59 | 7 | at Brockport State |
5 Springfield | 5-1 | 52 | 6 | at #10 Ithaca |
6 Lycoming | 5-1 | 43 | 8 | at #1 Delaware Valley |
7 Cortland State | 5-1 | 40 | 4 | at Morrisville State |
8 Alfred | 5-1 | 27 | 5 | vs. #2 St. John Fisher |
9 Utica | 5-2 | 11 | 9 | Open Date |
10 Ithaca | 4-2 | 9 | 10 | vs. #5 Springfield |
Quote from: maxpower on October 18, 2010, 07:23:08 PM
Ithaca has a bye but drops a spot.... if I were a Fisher poster I'd be sh*tting bricks right now.
Quote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2010, 03:40:44 PMQuote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
I think they're a bit over rated on the national poll. They're a definite top 25 team, just not top 15...
Their defense is great but against the higher scoring teams their offense isn't going to win them games...
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2010, 08:13:22 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 18, 2010, 07:23:08 PM
Ithaca has a bye but drops a spot.... if I were a Fisher poster I'd be sh*tting bricks right now.
Ha, classic...
Oh wait, you were talking about me...
+K anyways...
Quote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
Quote from: JT on October 18, 2010, 08:29:05 PMQuote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
After watching both, Cortland is better. Will they play that way is the question. And for that matter can Rowan TCB.
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2010, 08:38:24 PMQuote from: JT on October 18, 2010, 08:29:05 PMQuote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
After watching both, Cortland is better. Will they play that way is the question. And for that matter can Rowan TCB.
I would like to point out that with Rowan's remaining schedule I think they're a lock for a post season bid (either an A or C bid)...
Brockport, Mo'Ville, West Conn and New Jersey have 5 wins combined. They are 4 of the bottom 5 teams in the NJAC and just happen to be the last 4 teams on Rowan's schedule...
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2010, 08:38:24 PMQuote from: JT on October 18, 2010, 08:29:05 PMQuote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
After watching both, Cortland is better. Will they play that way is the question. And for that matter can Rowan TCB.
I would like to point out that with Rowan's remaining schedule I think they're a lock for a post season bid (either an A or C bid)...
Brockport, Mo'Ville, West Conn and New Jersey have 5 wins combined. They are 4 of the bottom 5 teams in the NJAC and just happen to be the last 4 teams on Rowan's schedule...
Quote from: JT on October 16, 2010, 06:21:31 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on October 14, 2010, 12:24:57 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:10:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
This model worked wonders when I was at Baseball Weekly and we ran the Division I baseball coaches' poll. I'm not concerned. Leaving 25 voters to do their own research would lead to a pretty piss-poor preseason poll because who has the time to do all that work? All I do is provide the baseline so that voters are educated about what is outside their area. They still are free to use their brains.
I think perhaps you don't know how difficult it is to rank 25 teams of 238. It's not like a regional poll. I can't ask them to spend as much time on it as you seem to expect. They all have teams to coach, games to cover, stories to write, news releases to send out, etc.
seems like a good starting point...its not like the games are on espn/cbs/nbc every week. So if pbr was a pollster living here in eastern pa. any info/baseline someone could give me on linfield, etc with not getting a chance to see them would be appreciated. Would still do a bunch of research on my own to figure out where each team would be slotted but w/o influencing anyone and giving good background information is a good way to start.
Technology helps a lot. A gmail account. Set it up to look for certain news, and one can be pretty informed spending 10-15 minutes a day. Plus, there are certain posters around the country that draw a lot of respect. And don't forget the regional fan polls. I've used all these sources. I'd take this as the definitive poll top 25 for D3.
I don't know all the voters, but the ones I know, are top notch. I would imagine the rest are too.
Quote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 18, 2010, 11:37:59 PMQuote from: JT on October 16, 2010, 06:21:31 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on October 14, 2010, 12:24:57 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:10:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
This model worked wonders when I was at Baseball Weekly and we ran the Division I baseball coaches' poll. I'm not concerned. Leaving 25 voters to do their own research would lead to a pretty piss-poor preseason poll because who has the time to do all that work? All I do is provide the baseline so that voters are educated about what is outside their area. They still are free to use their brains.
I think perhaps you don't know how difficult it is to rank 25 teams of 238. It's not like a regional poll. I can't ask them to spend as much time on it as you seem to expect. They all have teams to coach, games to cover, stories to write, news releases to send out, etc.
seems like a good starting point...its not like the games are on espn/cbs/nbc every week. So if pbr was a pollster living here in eastern pa. any info/baseline someone could give me on linfield, etc with not getting a chance to see them would be appreciated. Would still do a bunch of research on my own to figure out where each team would be slotted but w/o influencing anyone and giving good background information is a good way to start.
Technology helps a lot. A gmail account. Set it up to look for certain news, and one can be pretty informed spending 10-15 minutes a day. Plus, there are certain posters around the country that draw a lot of respect. And don't forget the regional fan polls. I've used all these sources. I'd take this as the definitive poll top 25 for D3.
I don't know all the voters, but the ones I know, are top notch. I would imagine the rest are too.
These don't help much in July, though -- are you saying you were doing all that research and had all those sources available for the preseason poll?
Quote from: dlip on October 19, 2010, 09:07:54 AMQuote from: TGP on October 18, 2010, 03:34:10 PM
Not many points separating the top 3 teams....
MSU up to #14 in the Top 25...not sure even if they go 10-0 if the 'Hawks would surpass DVC (currently #9) in the national poll.
Overall: 6-0 - Conference: 5-0
9/11 vs. Westfield State • W, 34-0 BX
9/18 vs. Rowan * • W, 26-7 RC
9/25 at Morrisville State * • W, 42-6 BX RC
10/1 at Kean * • W, 21-7 BX RC
10/9 vs. New Jersey * • W, 30-14 BX RC
10/16 vs. Buffalo State * • W, 35-20 BX
10/23 at Western Connecticut * • 12:00 PM LS
10/30 at Cortland State * • 1:00 PM LS A
11/6 vs. Brockport State * • 1:00 PM LS A
11/13 at William Paterson * • 1:00 PM
dlip is very happy for MSU's early season success and feels they are DEFINITELY a top 20 team. To dlip #14 may not be all that far off honestly. Yet dlip has a buring feeling that Cortland may just derail MSU's good fortune. We shall see.
Quote from: JT on October 19, 2010, 10:02:38 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 18, 2010, 11:37:59 PMQuote from: JT on October 16, 2010, 06:21:31 PMQuote from: a fine mug of pbr'th... on October 14, 2010, 12:24:57 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 14, 2010, 12:10:20 PMQuote from: Union89 on October 14, 2010, 11:30:20 AM
Should Pat be sending out that info?? I think not. Pat runs D3.com and therefor has an obvious interest in the poll. Pollsters should go about finding their own information and gauge the criteria they use individually. If everyone is given the same 'packet', this will undoubtedly direct voters down a certain path. If Pat has faith in each pollster to ask them to be involved, he should have the same faith that they should do their own research and present an unbiased poll. By sending the exact same info to everyone, don't you run the danger of a biased product?
This model worked wonders when I was at Baseball Weekly and we ran the Division I baseball coaches' poll. I'm not concerned. Leaving 25 voters to do their own research would lead to a pretty piss-poor preseason poll because who has the time to do all that work? All I do is provide the baseline so that voters are educated about what is outside their area. They still are free to use their brains.
I think perhaps you don't know how difficult it is to rank 25 teams of 238. It's not like a regional poll. I can't ask them to spend as much time on it as you seem to expect. They all have teams to coach, games to cover, stories to write, news releases to send out, etc.
seems like a good starting point...its not like the games are on espn/cbs/nbc every week. So if pbr was a pollster living here in eastern pa. any info/baseline someone could give me on linfield, etc with not getting a chance to see them would be appreciated. Would still do a bunch of research on my own to figure out where each team would be slotted but w/o influencing anyone and giving good background information is a good way to start.
Technology helps a lot. A gmail account. Set it up to look for certain news, and one can be pretty informed spending 10-15 minutes a day. Plus, there are certain posters around the country that draw a lot of respect. And don't forget the regional fan polls. I've used all these sources. I'd take this as the definitive poll top 25 for D3.
I don't know all the voters, but the ones I know, are top notch. I would imagine the rest are too.
These don't help much in July, though -- are you saying you were doing all that research and had all those sources available for the preseason poll?
Nope. During the season I'd spend a a few minutes a day checking emailed articles, and surfing post patterns. Preseason is really up to how thorough school submissions are to your inquiries.
Quote from: maxpower on October 24, 2010, 11:45:42 PM
I'm not a pollster, but just for fun, here's how I'd lay it out:
1. DVC
2. MSU
3. Alfred
4. SJF
5. Rowan
6. Cortland
7. Lycoming
8. Ithaca
9. SLU
10. Utica
Quote from: maxpower on October 25, 2010, 09:00:12 AM
and that's why i'm not a pollster.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 25, 2010, 09:34:13 AMQuote from: maxpower on October 25, 2010, 09:00:12 AM
and that's why i'm not a pollster.
But isn't it a relief that posters aren't always criticizing you for your imperfect poll?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 7 ) | 6-1 | 88 | 1 | vs. King's |
2 Montclair State( 2 ) | 7-0 | 83 | 3 | at #6 Cortland State |
T3 Alfred | 6-1 | 63 | 8 | vs. Rochester |
T3 Rowan | 6-1 | 63 | 4 | vs. Morrisville State |
5 St. John Fisher | 7-1 | 59 | 2 | vs. Frostburg State |
6 Cortland State | 6-1 | 49 | 7 | vs. #2 Montclair |
7 Ithaca | 5-2 | 27 | 10 | vs. #10 Utica |
8 Springfield | 5-2 | 19 | 5 | vs. Hartwick |
9 Lycoming | 5-2 | 18 | 6 | at Wilkes |
10 Utica | 5-2 | 9 | 9 | at #7 Ithaca |
Quote from: dlip on October 25, 2010, 07:45:55 PM
****ing frustrating the first place LL team doesn't even make the poll. Frustrating but warranted if dlip is being honest. ****ing LL...well at least it is entertaining to watch the teams in the conference battle it out. ???
Quote from: dlip on October 25, 2010, 07:45:55 PM
****ing frustrating the first place LL team doesn't even make the poll. Frustrating but warranted if dlip is being honest. ****ing LL...well at least it is entertaining to watch the teams in the conference battle it out. ???
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 25, 2010, 07:52:21 PMQuote from: dlip on October 25, 2010, 07:45:55 PM
****ing frustrating the first place LL team doesn't even make the poll. Frustrating but warranted if dlip is being honest. ****ing LL...well at least it is entertaining to watch the teams in the conference battle it out. ???
Yeah, what happened to the LL? I mean, I love me some Raymond, but when the team that runs the table in the conference loses to everyone OOC, man that's saying something. Maybe we revoke the LL's auto bid this year and give it to someone else? ;)
Quote from: TGP on October 25, 2010, 07:53:14 PMQuote from: dlip on October 25, 2010, 07:45:55 PM
****ing frustrating the first place LL team doesn't even make the poll. Frustrating but warranted if dlip is being honest. ****ing LL...well at least it is entertaining to watch the teams in the conference battle it out. ???
Playing devil's advocate, is SLU simply just lucky? They get 5 turnovers from Hobart - most, if not all weren't forced (i.e., they were bad throws by Vella), they get Union w/o their starting QB and the team is emotional reeling, they beat MMA on a 75 yard hail mary, etc.
Regardless, the games have been entertaining. Hopefully the Larries will acquit themselves much better than Susquehanna did last season.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 10 ) | 7-1 | 100 | 1 | at Albright |
2 St. John Fisher | 8-1 | 85 | 5 | vs. #8 Springfield |
3 Rowan | 7-1 | 80 | T3 | vs. Western Connecticut |
4 Cortland State | 7-1 | 71 | 6 | vs. William Paterson |
5 Montclair State | 7-1 | 63 | 2 | vs. Brockport State |
6 Ithaca | 6-2 | 47 | 7 | at #7 Alfred |
7 Alfred | 6-2 | 33 | T3 | vs. #6 Ithaca |
8 Springfield | 6-2 | 24 | 8 | at #2 St. John Fisher |
9 SUNY-Maritime | 9-0 | 17 | NR | at Gallaudet |
10 Hobart | 5-2 | 15 | NR | at RPI |
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 08, 2010, 12:00:47 PM
Guess interest has waned in the fan poll? No chatter here since this was posted last week!
Quote from: rams1102 on November 08, 2010, 01:04:42 PM
I'll be interested to see how the Poll comes out today and compare it to the NCAA Final East Regional Rankings. This was my order :
Del Val, Cortland, Montclair, Rowan, Alfred, Springfield, Fisher, Ithaca,SUNY Maritime and Maine Maritime.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley( 7 ) | 8-1 | 70 | 1 | vs. Widener |
2 Rowan | 8-1 | 59 | 3 | at New Jersey |
3 Cortland State | 8-1 | 56 | 4 | vs. #9 Ithaca |
4 Montclair State | 8-1 | 53 | 5 | at William Paterson |
5 Alfred | 7-2 | 40 | 7 | at Utica |
6 Springfield | 7-2 | 33 | 8 | vs. Union |
7 St. John Fisher | 8-2 | 25 | 2 | Open Date |
8 SUNY-Maritime | 10-0 | 20 | 9 | Open Date |
9 Ithaca | 6-3 | 15 | 6 | at #4 Cortland State |
10 Maine Maritime | 8-1 | 8 | NR | vs. Endicott |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2010, 01:33:45 PM
Only two received so far. If we don't, I'll try to pull something together after the East has played their final game.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 15, 2010, 01:39:19 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2010, 01:33:45 PM
Only two received so far. If we don't, I'll try to pull something together after the East has played their final game.
Give me until the end of the day to put mine together Kaz. I just assumed that we were done as of last week.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Cortland State( 3 ) | 9-1 | 63 | 3 | vs. #T9 Endicott |
2 Rowan( 2 ) | 9-1 | 62 | 2 | End of Season |
3 Montclair State( 1 ) | 9-1 | 59 | 4 | at #9 Hampden-Sydney* |
4 Delaware Valley( 1 ) | 8-2 | 50 | 1 | vs. #8 Salisbury* |
5 Alfred | 8-2 | 42 | 5 | vs. #7 SUNY-Maritime |
6 Springfield | 8-2 | 33 | 6 | vs. Mount Ida |
7 SUNY-Maritime | 10-0 | 25 | 8 | at #5 Alfred |
8 St. John Fisher | 8-2 | 22 | 7 | vs. RPI |
T9 Endicott | 9-2 | 5 | NR | at #1 Cortland State |
T9 Ithaca | 6-4 | 5 | 9 | End of Season |
T9 Williams | 8-0 | 5 | NR | End of Season |
Quote from: TGP on November 17, 2010, 04:09:35 PM
Nice to see Williams on there. Certainly deserved but I'll admit I didn't vote for any NESCACs all season b/c of the "non-playoff" deal. Probably will re-think that going forward.
k+ to AUKaz for picking up the ball from pg04 and running point on this all season.
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 17, 2010, 04:18:22 PMQuote from: TGP on November 17, 2010, 04:09:35 PM
Nice to see Williams on there. Certainly deserved but I'll admit I didn't vote for any NESCACs all season b/c of the "non-playoff" deal. Probably will re-think that going forward.
k+ to AUKaz for picking up the ball from pg04 and running point on this all season.
I don't vote for the NESCAC teams because of the no OOC games deal. They cannot be measured against the rest of the region as they only play with themselves.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on December 13, 2010, 09:21:25 AM
I was hoping to post a final fan poll today since the East region season is in the books, but I only have 2 polls so far. And it seems that one of our pollsters is no longer a member of the PP community. Hopefully we can pull together something this week.
-Management
Quote from: AUKaz00 on December 13, 2010, 09:21:25 AM
I was hoping to post a final fan poll today since the East region season is in the books, but I only have 2 polls so far. And it seems that one of our pollsters is no longer a member of the PP community. Hopefully we can pull together something this week.
-Management
Quote from: pg04 on December 13, 2010, 02:18:53 PM
Did they just disappear or did they go crazy before they left?
Quote from: pg04 on December 13, 2010, 02:25:49 PM
Doesn't really speak well for each of their respective university's English department. :D
Upstate's disappearance and complete removal from the board is quite perplexing.
Quote from: pg04 on December 13, 2010, 02:25:49 PM
Doesn't really speak well for each of their respective university's English department. :D
Upstate's disappearance and complete removal from the board is quite perplexing.
Quote from: theoriginalupstate on November 07, 2010, 09:06:21 PM
Looking towards next year, some good talent comes back...
Schmidt, Francis, Kramer, Borum, Zemaitis, Leavall, Moore, Sawyer, Balcerzak, Vosburgh...
Big issues are Bailey's replacement, his backup this year was a SR so looking at their roster the guy that intrigues me the most is Connor King a 6'4", 240lb freshman...
Also the O-line graduates 9 out of 10 guys on the two deep...
Fisher desperately needs to figure out Secky and the option on defense though...
Secky is 3-0 vs SJF in his career as a starter and the only success SJF had vs him was when Secky was taken out of the game in 2009...
Salisubury and Springfield in the conference next year doesn't bode well for a team that has only played it well vs the two teams once since 2008...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 13, 2010, 02:21:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on December 13, 2010, 02:18:53 PM
Did they just disappear or did they go crazy before they left?
For PBR, here was his last exchange with dlip after dlip picked Salisbury to beat DelVal earlier in the playoffs (11/23 was the date):
dlip:
O.K. pbr, U89 and dlip know nothing about football and our football picks/opinions are ish and garbage because our picks are different from yours or because they went against your team? wa wa wa cry dlip a ****ing river dick. Next time Del Val does not want to be questioned tell them not to lose to a ****ing **** team in Widener the week berfore the playoffs...injuries or not. If a team loses to Widener and then faces a team that played Wesley as good, if not better than Del Val, dlip wouldn't say it's garbage to pick them to to lose. dlip is hoping the Aggies can give Mount all they can handle...but he shouldn't even express an opinion or thought though dickhead unless it corresponds with yours
PBR:
what a f'n tool....what are u next gonna tell us how much u bench press and run a blazin' 40? don't choke on it while your smokin' your bone...could f'n care less who you pick but when u can't see the forest through the trees well that shows your intelligence...go stick jug a nice jug of merlot down your throat and play jenga w/ the rest of those tools and fools from da U and tell anyone who listens and cares anymore about how union was relevant back in the 70s and ruled eastern football....
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 13, 2010, 02:21:12 PMQuote from: pg04 on December 13, 2010, 02:18:53 PM
Did they just disappear or did they go crazy before they left?
For PBR, here was his last exchange with dlip after dlip picked Salisbury to beat DelVal earlier in the playoffs (11/23 was the date):
dlip:
O.K. pbr, U89 and dlip know nothing about football and our football picks/opinions are ish and garbage because our picks are different from yours or because they went against your team? wa wa wa cry dlip a ****ing river dick. Next time Del Val does not want to be questioned tell them not to lose to a ****ing **** team in Widener the week berfore the playoffs...injuries or not. If a team loses to Widener and then faces a team that played Wesley as good, if not better than Del Val, dlip wouldn't say it's garbage to pick them to to lose. dlip is hoping the Aggies can give Mount all they can handle...but he shouldn't even express an opinion or thought though dickhead unless it corresponds with yours
PBR:
what a f'n tool....what are u next gonna tell us how much u bench press and run a blazin' 40? don't choke on it while your smokin' your bone...could f'n care less who you pick but when u can't see the forest through the trees well that shows your intelligence...go stick jug a nice jug of merlot down your throat and play jenga w/ the rest of those tools and fools from da U and tell anyone who listens and cares anymore about how union was relevant back in the 70s and ruled eastern football....
Quote from: AUPepBand on December 13, 2010, 09:56:08 PM
PG04 will never leave. He's here through thick and thin.
+K for the 'port grad!
Quote from: Knightstalker on December 13, 2010, 10:44:24 PM
KS will not be able to do a final poll. KS mom passed away on Saturday morning after being sick and going downhill for a long time. KS has been waiting for this to happen for a while and is actually relieved that mom is no longer in pain and not suffering anymore. Just wanted to let the boards know where KS has disappeared to lately.
Quote from: Knightstalker on December 13, 2010, 10:44:24 PM
KS will not be able to do a final poll. KS mom passed away on Saturday morning after being sick and going downhill for a long time. KS has been waiting for this to happen for a while and is actually relieved that mom is no longer in pain and not suffering anymore. Just wanted to let the boards know where KS has disappeared to lately.
Quote from: Knightstalker on December 13, 2010, 10:44:24 PM
KS will not be able to do a final poll. KS mom passed away on Saturday morning after being sick and going downhill for a long time. KS has been waiting for this to happen for a while and is actually relieved that mom is no longer in pain and not suffering anymore. Just wanted to let the boards know where KS has disappeared to lately.
Quote from: Knightstalker on December 13, 2010, 10:44:24 PM
KS will not be able to do a final poll. KS mom passed away on Saturday morning after being sick and going downhill for a long time. KS has been waiting for this to happen for a while and is actually relieved that mom is no longer in pain and not suffering anymore. Just wanted to let the boards know where KS has disappeared to lately.
Quote from: Knightstalker on December 13, 2010, 10:44:24 PM
KS will not be able to do a final poll. KS mom passed away on Saturday morning after being sick and going downhill for a long time. KS has been waiting for this to happen for a while and is actually relieved that mom is no longer in pain and not suffering anymore. Just wanted to let the boards know where KS has disappeared to lately.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred( 3 ) | 10-3 | 47 | 5 | End of Season |
2 Delaware Valley( 1 ) | 9-3 | 43 | 4 | End of Season |
T3 Cortland State | 10-2 | 37 | 1 | End of Season |
T3 Montclair State | 10-2 | 37 | 3 | End of Season |
5 Rowan( 1 ) | 9-1 | 33 | 2 | End of Season |
T6 St. John Fisher | 9-2 | 24 | 8 | End of Season |
T6 Springfield | 9-2 | 24 | 6 | End of Season |
7 Ithaca | 6-4 | 7 | T9 | End of Season |
T9 Endicott | 9-3 | 6 | T9 | End of Season |
T9 St. Lawrence | 5-6 | 6 | NR | End of Season |
T9 Williams | 8-0 | 6 | T9 | End of Season |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on December 17, 2010, 11:22:44 AM
2010 Final Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred( 3 ) 10-3 47 5 End of Season 2 Delaware Valley( 1 ) 9-3 43 4 End of Season T3 Cortland State 10-2 37 1 End of Season T3 Montclair State 10-2 37 3 End of Season 5 Rowan( 1 ) 9-1 33 2 End of Season T6 St. John Fisher 9-2 24 8 End of Season T6 Springfield 9-2 24 6 End of Season 7 Ithaca 6-4 7 T9 End of Season T9 Endicott 9-3 6 T9 End of Season T9 St. Lawrence 5-6 6 NR End of Season T9 Williams 8-0 6 T9 End of Season
Dropped Out:
#7 SUNY-Maritime
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 3
Rochester 1
RPI 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (3,2,NR,1,NR,NR,NR,1,1,NR)
Delaware Valley (2,1,NR,2,NR,NR,NR,4,3,NR)
Cortland (7,3,NR,3,NR,NR,NR,3,2,NR)
Montclair State (4,4,NR,4,NR,NR,NR,2,4,NR)
Rowan (1,5,NR,5,NR,NR,NR,5,6,NR)
St. John Fisher (5,6,NR,7,NR,NR,NR,6,7,NR)
Springfield (6,7,NR,6,NR,NR,NR,7,5,NR)
Ithaca (9,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,8,NR,NR)
Endicott (NR,9,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,9,10,NR)
St. Lawrence (NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,9,NR)
Williams (8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,8,NR)
Lycoming (NR,NR,NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
Rochester (10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Quote from: rams1102 on August 12, 2011, 08:52:33 PM
If they are in the E8 they should be in the East, IMHO. I will have them in my Top 10 Poll.
Quote from: pg04 on August 12, 2011, 08:57:17 PMQuote from: rams1102 on August 12, 2011, 08:52:33 PM
If they are in the E8 they should be in the East, IMHO. I will have them in my Top 10 Poll.
I guess we should wait for "official" word, since some of us can't ignore them while others put them on. I would go the other way on this.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 15, 2011, 12:00:01 PM
I think they should be considered as well, just as Sasquatch was when they were in the LL.
Also, we're still short 2 to 4 voters since I haven't heard from everyone and lost a couple to PP attrition. Send me a PM if you're interested and I'll start seeking out active posters from underrepresented leagues.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 17, 2011, 10:45:12 AM
We're all set with 10 pollsters. Thanks to everyone for returning and welcome to the two new pollsters. We have a little better distribution this year with 3 reps from the E8, LL and NJAC (sorta) and one from the NEFC. Look for the first ERFP on the 29th.
And Utah, I still can't PM you though I did get your message.
Quote from: AZDutchman on August 17, 2011, 02:45:12 PM
Questions??
A little more detail on Salisbury and Frostburg. I don't see them in the Eastern Conferences?
Sasquatch was or still are in LL? I didn't see them either?
NEFC Bogan and Boyd? Just a matter of two different conferences?
Quote from: softballrz on August 17, 2011, 03:33:47 PM
The NEFC sucks! Really. Those are the words of someone who is responible to rate the east objectively. This person should be removed.
Please note, last fall Endicott scored more points on SUNY Courtland then any other school has in years!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 17, 2011, 03:04:36 PMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 17, 2011, 02:45:12 PM
Questions??
A little more detail on Salisbury and Frostburg. I don't see them in the Eastern Conferences?
Sasquatch was or still are in LL? I didn't see them either?
NEFC Bogan and Boyd? Just a matter of two different conferences?
Salisbury and Frostburg are new to the E8. Technically they are South teams, but we are including them in this poll.
Susquehanna is gone. Ignore them.
NEFC is 1 big conference with 2 Divisions. Both suck. Will be lucky to have 1 team in the poll all year.
Quote from: softballrz on August 17, 2011, 03:33:47 PM
The NEFC sucks! Really. Those are the words of someone who is responible to rate the east objectively. This person should be removed.
Please note, last fall Endicott scored more points on SUNY Courtland then any other school has in years!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 17, 2011, 11:21:06 PMQuote from: softballrz on August 17, 2011, 03:33:47 PM
The NEFC sucks! Really. Those are the words of someone who is responible to rate the east objectively. This person should be removed.
Please note, last fall Endicott scored more points on SUNY Courtland then any other school has in years!
Dude, my history on these polls over the years is nothing short of spot on, so don't fool yourself into thinking I shouldn't be a part of it. Not to mention i've been a part of these boards since their inception and have actually been following the D3 East Region prior to halftime of last year's Endicott/Cortland game.
If you want to play the stupid 'Who cares about the actual result?' game, Endicott scored 3 points against a mediocre RPI team who let up 42 points to Utica and 56 points to St. John Fisher, but RPI beat Alfred who was only down to Mount Union 10-7 with 8:54 left in the first quarter. So that makes everything much more clear, yes?
Anyway, to piggy back on what Frank says, i'll ease up on my statement. The ECFC sucks. The NEFC isn't good. If they prove otherwise, they will make the poll a la Curry 2008. Otherwise, i'll stick to dropping knowledge.
PS - My favorite part of your post is 'The NEFC sucks!' Not a question, a flat out statement!!!
Quote from: AUPepBand on August 18, 2011, 08:49:42 AM
Just aside, LD, the Saxons got their TD in the second quarter against the Mount, to pull to within 10-7 before it got ugly.
Quote from: AUPepBand on August 18, 2011, 08:49:42 AM
One pollster gets out of line and starts acting like a homie, the others call him out.
Quote from: softballrz on August 18, 2011, 12:52:18 PM
I was angry to read the word "suck" being used to identify a group of D3 football players. However, the banter back and forth has been entertaning to read.
Also, the reach that "pg04" has made that I am related to a Endicott lineman, wow. This will be my second post since I joined last november. The kid is a senior, one of many at Endicott. I used Endicott vs Cortland (no U) because they represented the NEFC last fall. Yes, I am related to a NEFC (hope to play soon) player.
Iasmuch, as I would like to continue to write I must get back to work and look foward to a good D3 season.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on August 18, 2011, 12:05:00 PM
C'mon Alfred guys. You always have to curb expectations when you're faced with the following matchup:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecker.typepad.com%2Fphotos%2Funcategorized%2Fgorilla.jpg&hash=1cc56b52851bd52ac9c7003f6aa4c22bef8ff15e)
Mount Union
vs.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Felderly.com%2Fimages%2Faccessories%2FMISC%2FKZ1.jpg&hash=5b1cb101d987d32036ad3df6b7fa908e63997576)
Alfred
Quote from: Frank Rossi on August 18, 2011, 12:52:34 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 18, 2011, 08:49:42 AM
homer
One pollster gets out of line and starts acting like ahomie, the others call him out.
Oh my. More comparison time since Mayberry may have filtered out street slang from the campus.
"Homie" vs. "Homer"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Flegitimatenews.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F11%2Fwhat_up_homie.jpg&hash=d677b06084480f80e2ae3131369e27111c37ac7d)
"Homie"
vs.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theoffside.com%2Ffiles%2F2010%2F12%2Frip.jpg&hash=143bec991d61b1fd7aab6378c28b6e4a438e8339)
"Homer"
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 18, 2011, 01:23:42 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on August 18, 2011, 12:05:00 PM
C'mon Alfred guys. You always have to curb expectations when you're faced with the following matchup:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdecker.typepad.com%2Fphotos%2Funcategorized%2Fgorilla.jpg&hash=1cc56b52851bd52ac9c7003f6aa4c22bef8ff15e)
Mount Union
vs.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Felderly.com%2Fimages%2Faccessories%2FMISC%2FKZ1.jpg&hash=5b1cb101d987d32036ad3df6b7fa908e63997576)
Alfred
That is actually the EXACT style of kazoo which the band uses, FWIW.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 18, 2011, 04:03:27 PM
You Alfred guys are a strange bunch.
Quote from: AUPepBand on August 19, 2011, 08:24:54 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 18, 2011, 04:03:27 PM
You Alfred guys are a strange bunch.
Pep prefers "peculiar people."
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 19, 2011, 10:46:56 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 19, 2011, 08:24:54 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 18, 2011, 04:03:27 PM
You Alfred guys are a strange bunch.
Pep prefers "peculiar people."
Pep also prefers to talk up consession workers at Yankee Stadium about Alfred and print it in the weekly newspaper. Just sayin.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on August 19, 2011, 01:40:59 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on August 19, 2011, 10:46:56 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 19, 2011, 08:24:54 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 18, 2011, 04:03:27 PM
You Alfred guys are a strange bunch.
Pep prefers "peculiar people."
Pep also prefers to talk up consession workers at Yankee Stadium about Alfred and print it in the weekly newspaper. Just sayin.
Here's the oddity... Everytime I walk past this one place on 22nd & 8th in NYC, I think of you guys and kazoos. Apparently, Alfred rented out a gallery space at street level for some Alfred art expo, and the signage is still there. It's official, Pep and Kazoo really put Alfred on the map after Stan Ren started the surge.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on August 19, 2011, 01:40:59 PMPep's sis, a staff member of the AU Career Development Center which coordinates the Big Apple art exhibit, attended the 2011 opening and stayed at The Gem.Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 19, 2011, 10:46:56 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on August 19, 2011, 08:24:54 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 18, 2011, 04:03:27 PM
You Alfred guys are a strange bunch.
Pep prefers "peculiar people."
Pep also prefers to talk up consession workers at Yankee Stadium about Alfred and print it in the weekly newspaper. Just sayin.
Here's the oddity... Everytime I walk past this one place on 22nd & 8th in NYC, I think of you guys and kazoos. Apparently, Alfred rented out a gallery space at street level for some Alfred art expo, and the signage is still there. It's official, Pep and Kazoo really put Alfred on the map after Stan Ren started the surge.
Quote from: softballrz on August 17, 2011, 03:33:47 PM
The NEFC sucks! Really. Those are the words of someone who is responible to rate the east objectively. This person should be removed.
Please note, last fall Endicott scored more points on SUNY Courtland then any other school has in years!
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred( 2 ) | 0-0 | 62 | NR | Open Date |
2 Cortland State( 3 ) | 0-0 | 57 | NR | vs. Buffalo State |
3 Montclair State( 1 ) | 0-0 | 51 | NR | Open Date |
4 Rowan( 1 ) | 0-0 | 50 | NR | at Lycoming |
5 Delaware Valley | 0-0 | 39 | NR | vs. Muhlenberg |
6 Salisbury | 0-0 | 37 | NR | vs. Newport News |
7 Springfield | 0-0 | 30 | NR | Open Date |
8 St. John Fisher | 0-0 | 29 | NR | Open Date |
9 Hobart | 0-0 | 8 | NR | at Dickinson |
10 Williams | 0-0 | 5 | NR | Open Date |
Quote from: rams1102 on August 29, 2011, 04:59:41 PM
I am a little surprised to see that Ithaca was not in tne Top 10. I had them at #9. To be honest, I overlooked Williams. No knock on Hobart, but surprised with them at #9. I had Montclair at #1 and like I told Kaz when I sent my ballet, you can justify any order for the Top (3). By the end of Sept we should have a much better look.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 29, 2011, 05:18:42 PMQuote from: rams1102 on August 29, 2011, 04:59:41 PM
I am a little surprised to see that Ithaca was not in tne Top 10. I had them at #9. To be honest, I overlooked Williams. No knock on Hobart, but surprised with them at #9. I had Montclair at #1 and like I told Kaz when I sent my ballet, you can justify any order for the Top (3). By the end of Sept we should have a much better look.
My take on Williams, or anyone in the NESCAC, is unless someone is really sticking out by season's end, it's just a waste of a spot in the top 10 to put them on there.
Quote from: dlip on August 29, 2011, 06:33:22 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 29, 2011, 05:18:42 PMQuote from: rams1102 on August 29, 2011, 04:59:41 PM
I am a little surprised to see that Ithaca was not in tne Top 10. I had them at #9. To be honest, I overlooked Williams. No knock on Hobart, but surprised with them at #9. I had Montclair at #1 and like I told Kaz when I sent my ballet, you can justify any order for the Top (3). By the end of Sept we should have a much better look.
My take on Williams, or anyone in the NESCAC, is unless someone is really sticking out by season's end, it's just a waste of a spot in the top 10 to put them on there.
dlip concurrs, any NESCAC team is a waste of a spot in this poll IDHO. dlip is really not trying to be spiteful or anything like that but if they don't play any OOC games and on top of that choose to not participate in the NCAA tournement, you deserve ZERO coverage from any national or regional poll. If one wants to play by themselves then they can have their own poll. dlip wouldn't want to waste the spot that could be filled by a fully participating member of D3 football.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 29, 2011, 02:55:46 PM
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred( 2 ) 0-0 62 NR Open Date 2 Cortland State( 3 ) 0-0 57 NR vs. Buffalo State 3 Montclair State( 1 ) 0-0 51 NR Open Date 4 Rowan( 1 ) 0-0 50 NR at Lycoming 5 Delaware Valley 0-0 39 NR vs. Muhlenberg 6 Salisbury 0-0 37 NR vs. Newport News 7 Springfield 0-0 30 NR Open Date 8 St. John Fisher 0-0 29 NR Open Date 9 Hobart 0-0 8 NR at Dickinson 10 Williams 0-0 5 NR Open Date
Also Receiving votes:
Ithaca 4
Endicott 3
Lebanon Valley 3
Lycoming 2
RPI 2
SUNY Maritime 2
Rochester 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (2,2,3,2,4,NR,1,NR,1,NR)
Cortland State (1,1,2,1,5,NR,2,NR,8,NR)
Montclair State (4,6,1,3,3,NR,3,NR,6,NR)
Rowan (3,3,4,7,1,NR,7,NR,2,NR)
Delaware Valley (8,7,5,4,7,NR,4,NR,3,NR)
Salisbury (6,5,6,6,2,NR,NR,NR,4,NR)
Springfield (9,4,7,5,6,NR,5,NR,NR,NR)
St. John Fisher (5,8,8,8,8,NR,6,NR,5,NR)
Hobart (10,10,NR,10,10,NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Williams (7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,10,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lycoming (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
RPI (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
Rochester (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 29, 2011, 10:37:16 PM
Yanks, didn't even notice that, but agree wholefartedly. ECFC will not see a vote from me, OR the NEFC until atleast Week 8. And probably not then either, unless St. Lawrence is winning the LL with a 4-5 record again.
QuoteEven if SLU does the "impossible" again (.500 record but league champs), I am sure I can find 10 teams better then anyone the NEFC or the ECFC have to offer.
Quote from: dlip on August 30, 2011, 06:11:40 AMQuoteEven if SLU does the "impossible" again (.500 record but league champs), I am sure I can find 10 teams better then anyone the NEFC or the ECFC have to offer.
dlip was very happy for SLU's success last year. With that said dlip really does not want the LL champ to have a 0-5 OOC record again though. If SLU can win it's OOC games and/or at least some of them, dlip will have no problem with them repeating. If not dlip, would prefer an undefeated or at least a team with a winning record to win the conferene title.
Quote from: AZDutchman on August 29, 2011, 11:41:22 PM
*"There is D3...and DNESCAC... The poll is for D3."
So DNESCAC is not in the D3?
Quote...or for the 14 people who watch NESCAC games, on how you think they look or could match up.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 07:37:42 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 29, 2011, 11:41:22 PM
*"There is D3...and DNESCAC... The poll is for D3."
So DNESCAC is not in the D3?
For all rules, regulations, and requirements, yes, the NESCAC is D3. But they are an isolated conference in football and all we would be doing is placing some team from that conference into a ranking system solely based on record or what we have heard, or for the 14 people who watch NESCAC games, on how you think they look or could match up.
Hell, for all we know, the NESCAC might be leaps and bounds above the top teams of the East. For all we know, they would get smacked down by the ECFC. We have nothing to judge it on, we probably never will, so it is not worth a spot on this poll as far as i'm concerned.
Quote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 10:38:52 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 07:37:42 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 29, 2011, 11:41:22 PM
*"There is D3...and DNESCAC... The poll is for D3."
So DNESCAC is not in the D3?
For all rules, regulations, and requirements, yes, the NESCAC is D3. But they are an isolated conference in football and all we would be doing is placing some team from that conference into a ranking system solely based on record or what we have heard, or for the 14 people who watch NESCAC games, on how you think they look or could match up.
Hell, for all we know, the NESCAC might be leaps and bounds above the top teams of the East. For all we know, they would get smacked down by the ECFC. We have nothing to judge it on, we probably never will, so it is not worth a spot on this poll as far as i'm concerned.
I just checked all the NESCAC teams schedules. I have never seen a conference only play within their own conference before?
I'm not sure if I would exclude them or not? Doesn't the comment, "They haven't played any real teams yet", come up quite often through out the entire D3 league?
Quote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 10:41:03 AM
I'm still wondering why Williams was considered in the polls last year, but not wanting to include them this year??
Quote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 10:38:52 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 07:37:42 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 29, 2011, 11:41:22 PM
*"There is D3...and DNESCAC... The poll is for D3."
So DNESCAC is not in the D3?
For all rules, regulations, and requirements, yes, the NESCAC is D3. But they are an isolated conference in football and all we would be doing is placing some team from that conference into a ranking system solely based on record or what we have heard, or for the 14 people who watch NESCAC games, on how you think they look or could match up.
Hell, for all we know, the NESCAC might be leaps and bounds above the top teams of the East. For all we know, they would get smacked down by the ECFC. We have nothing to judge it on, we probably never will, so it is not worth a spot on this poll as far as i'm concerned.
I just checked all the NESCAC teams schedules. I have never seen a conference only play within their own conference before?
I'm not sure if I would exclude them or not? Doesn't the comment, "They haven't played any real teams yet", come up quite often through out the entire D3 league?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 10:43:17 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 10:38:52 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 07:37:42 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 29, 2011, 11:41:22 PM
*"There is D3...and DNESCAC... The poll is for D3."
So DNESCAC is not in the D3?
For all rules, regulations, and requirements, yes, the NESCAC is D3. But they are an isolated conference in football and all we would be doing is placing some team from that conference into a ranking system solely based on record or what we have heard, or for the 14 people who watch NESCAC games, on how you think they look or could match up.
Hell, for all we know, the NESCAC might be leaps and bounds above the top teams of the East. For all we know, they would get smacked down by the ECFC. We have nothing to judge it on, we probably never will, so it is not worth a spot on this poll as far as i'm concerned.
I just checked all the NESCAC teams schedules. I have never seen a conference only play within their own conference before?
I'm not sure if I would exclude them or not? Doesn't the comment, "They haven't played any real teams yet", come up quite often through out the entire D3 league?
Every other conference in the East sends a representative(or atleast intends to send one) to the playoffs where they can branch out of their incest-fest conference play and you can have an idea where they match up overall. NESCAC does not. Why am I defending this? I'm pretty sure my logic makes sense to everyone else here. You don't have to agree, but you should be able to understand my logic.
Quote from: dlip on August 30, 2011, 10:49:39 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 10:38:52 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 07:37:42 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 29, 2011, 11:41:22 PM
*"There is D3...and DNESCAC... The poll is for D3."
So DNESCAC is not in the D3?
For all rules, regulations, and requirements, yes, the NESCAC is D3. But they are an isolated conference in football and all we would be doing is placing some team from that conference into a ranking system solely based on record or what we have heard, or for the 14 people who watch NESCAC games, on how you think they look or could match up.
Hell, for all we know, the NESCAC might be leaps and bounds above the top teams of the East. For all we know, they would get smacked down by the ECFC. We have nothing to judge it on, we probably never will, so it is not worth a spot on this poll as far as i'm concerned.
I just checked all the NESCAC teams schedules. I have never seen a conference only play within their own conference before?
I'm not sure if I would exclude them or not? Doesn't the comment, "They haven't played any real teams yet", come up quite often through out the entire D3 league?
Yes AZ and this is a topic that has been debated many times over (not saying we shouldn't talk about it, dlip is only pointing this out as to prove the topic's validity). The NESCAC is one and alone in regards to it's football scheduling and league format at the D3 level. It used to annoy dlip quite a bit, but over time he just has accepted it (but will still take shots at those tea drinking ****ers for the fun of it). The schools within the NESCAC are very presitgious academic institutions yet, in dlip's opinion, no more prestgious than a Union, RPI, Hobart, etc. It just seems to dlip that their primary focus is academics above all else. Then of course he wonders why they particpate in the NCAA's in all other sports? In many sports they are very competetive and even dominent at times (ex. Middlebury ice hockey). Bottom line dlip repects their position as long as they keep their mouths shut about national polls and comparisons to other D3 teams. Honestly, for the most part, dlip has yet to meet a NESCAC fan or parent who doesn't so he is fine with it. To restate dlip's opinion; to even be considered for a poll one must play OOC games and/or participate in the NCAA tourney. If not, ****'um.
Quote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 11:04:34 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 10:43:17 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 10:38:52 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 07:37:42 AMQuote from: AZDutchman on August 29, 2011, 11:41:22 PM
*"There is D3...and DNESCAC... The poll is for D3."
So DNESCAC is not in the D3?
For all rules, regulations, and requirements, yes, the NESCAC is D3. But they are an isolated conference in football and all we would be doing is placing some team from that conference into a ranking system solely based on record or what we have heard, or for the 14 people who watch NESCAC games, on how you think they look or could match up.
Hell, for all we know, the NESCAC might be leaps and bounds above the top teams of the East. For all we know, they would get smacked down by the ECFC. We have nothing to judge it on, we probably never will, so it is not worth a spot on this poll as far as i'm concerned.
I just checked all the NESCAC teams schedules. I have never seen a conference only play within their own conference before?
I'm not sure if I would exclude them or not? Doesn't the comment, "They haven't played any real teams yet", come up quite often through out the entire D3 league?
Every other conference in the East sends a representative(or atleast intends to send one) to the playoffs where they can branch out of their incest-fest conference play and you can have an idea where they match up overall. NESCAC does not. Why am I defending this? I'm pretty sure my logic makes sense to everyone else here. You don't have to agree, but you should be able to understand my logic.
Another thing that I wasn't aware of. That's one of the reasons I wanted to review last years play off schedule.
I would like to present my Top 10 with some intelligence and logic.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 11:16:49 AM
I was reading your posts/questions as a means to cause argument. My apologies if I misread them and they were just honest questions.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on August 30, 2011, 11:38:11 AM
Hey, if you watch enough D-III football that you feel comfortable assessing how a NESCAC's team matches up talent-wise to an ECFC/LL/E8 team, I say go ahead. I think that it's just incredibly difficult for most people to do that. It's hard enough in D-III to make comparisons between teams that do play OOC games because of the highly regional nature of the regular season and the fact that, since this is D-III, there's not exactly an easy way to follow many of these teams. For many people, I suspect even attempting to rank at NESCAC team would be a shot in the dark.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 30, 2011, 01:06:30 PM
I think dlip and AZ have said it. Williams does not participate in the D3 Football Post Season but participates the D3 Basketball Post Season. Does anyone have the answer? It appears to be a bit elitest to me. ;D
Also why the lack of respect for Ithaca in the Top 10 Pre-Season? I'm no lover of Ithaca, but felt they S/B in the Top 10.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 30, 2011, 01:06:30 PM
I think dlip and AZ have said it. Williams does not participate in the D3 Football Post Season but participates the D3 Basketball Post Season. Does anyone have the answer? It appears to be a bit elitest to me. ;D
Also why the lack of respect for Ithaca in the Top 10 Pre-Season? I'm no lover of Ithaca, but felt they S/B in the Top 10.
Quote from: AZDutchman on August 30, 2011, 02:16:27 PMQuote from: rams1102 on August 30, 2011, 01:06:30 PM
I think dlip and AZ have said it. Williams does not participate in the D3 Football Post Season but participates the D3 Basketball Post Season. Does anyone have the answer? It appears to be a bit elitest to me. ;D
Also why the lack of respect for Ithaca in the Top 10 Pre-Season? I'm no lover of Ithaca, but felt they S/B in the Top 10.
I wouldn't put too much stock into the preseason poll.
A lot of upsets happen in the beginning of the year. Why?, because they're not really upsets.
For some very odd reason people think that the same exact team that played last year step out onto the field this year. This is a whole new season, with a whole new team.
Yes, there are teams that consistently put out great teams, but a very small percentage.
I would let the first two weeks play out and then ask the whats and the whys?
Just my opinion.....
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 02:35:47 PM
RE the Nescac.
I'll include the Nescac teams in the poll because I usually catch 1-2 nescac games a year and 1-2 NEFC/ECFC games a year. The Nescac top three teams would be 6-4 or 7-3 in the E8 or LL, while the bottom 5 teams would go 2-8 in those leagues (if they went in alone)
Quote from: Yanks 99 on August 30, 2011, 03:10:53 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 02:35:47 PM
RE the Nescac.
I'll include the Nescac teams in the poll because I usually catch 1-2 nescac games a year and 1-2 NEFC/ECFC games a year. The Nescac top three teams would be 6-4 or 7-3 in the E8 or LL, while the bottom 5 teams would go 2-8 in those leagues (if they went in alone)
I will have to take your word for it JU...7-3 seems high....and again, it is tough to judge.
As an example, based on watching Utica play IC and SJF the past two years, a lot of people argued that they would kill Hartwick (using Wick because it is easier for me to compare). It probably made sense if you had to judge how Wick played against IC and SJF leading up to the Utica game. Yet Wick won both.
Now we are supposed to compare a team (from the NESCAC) that doesn't even play against any commom opponents? To me...and me only...that makes it too tough to judge. As far as I am concerned, they (the NESCAC football teams) are a club sport...nothing more. And because of this, I will never cast a vote for them in my ERFP.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 03:15:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on August 30, 2011, 03:10:53 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 02:35:47 PM
RE the Nescac.
I'll include the Nescac teams in the poll because I usually catch 1-2 nescac games a year and 1-2 NEFC/ECFC games a year. The Nescac top three teams would be 6-4 or 7-3 in the E8 or LL, while the bottom 5 teams would go 2-8 in those leagues (if they went in alone)
I will have to take your word for it JU...7-3 seems high....and again, it is tough to judge.
As an example, based on watching Utica play IC and SJF the past two years, a lot of people argued that they would kill Hartwick (using Wick because it is easier for me to compare). It probably made sense if you had to judge how Wick played against IC and SJF leading up to the Utica game. Yet Wick won both.
Now we are supposed to compare a team (from the NESCAC) that doesn't even play against any commom opponents? To me...and me only...that makes it too tough to judge. As far as I am concerned, they (the NESCAC football teams) are a club sport...nothing more. And because of this, I will never cast a vote for them in my ERFP.
Ok, I think we can all agree that the E8 has been a bigger, more physical conference than the LL has been over the last two years. If St. Lawrence can win the LL, then Trinity, Williams and Amherst would be able to win it as well.
Some of my opinion is also based on the fact that I coach high school football in MA and I see a lot the league all stars and all-state players going to Nescac schools. Some of these players will even choose Williams over Harvard or Yale for football.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on August 30, 2011, 03:20:49 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 03:15:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on August 30, 2011, 03:10:53 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 02:35:47 PM
RE the Nescac.
I'll include the Nescac teams in the poll because I usually catch 1-2 nescac games a year and 1-2 NEFC/ECFC games a year. The Nescac top three teams would be 6-4 or 7-3 in the E8 or LL, while the bottom 5 teams would go 2-8 in those leagues (if they went in alone)
I will have to take your word for it JU...7-3 seems high....and again, it is tough to judge.
As an example, based on watching Utica play IC and SJF the past two years, a lot of people argued that they would kill Hartwick (using Wick because it is easier for me to compare). It probably made sense if you had to judge how Wick played against IC and SJF leading up to the Utica game. Yet Wick won both.
Now we are supposed to compare a team (from the NESCAC) that doesn't even play against any commom opponents? To me...and me only...that makes it too tough to judge. As far as I am concerned, they (the NESCAC football teams) are a club sport...nothing more. And because of this, I will never cast a vote for them in my ERFP.
Ok, I think we can all agree that the E8 has been a bigger, more physical conference than the LL has been over the last two years. If St. Lawrence can win the LL, then Trinity, Williams and Amherst would be able to win it as well.
Some of my opinion is also based on the fact that I coach high school football in MA and I see a lot the league all stars and all-state players going to Nescac schools. Some of these players will even choose Williams over Harvard or Yale for football.
You aren't wrong in your assessment...and being in the position you are in, you will certainly have more insight on the type of players that go to the NESCAC.
I still won't vote for them...ever...but that doesn't mean you are wrong in your assessment.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 30, 2011, 04:19:44 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on August 30, 2011, 03:20:49 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 03:15:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on August 30, 2011, 03:10:53 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 02:35:47 PM
RE the Nescac.
I'll include the Nescac teams in the poll because I usually catch 1-2 nescac games a year and 1-2 NEFC/ECFC games a year. The Nescac top three teams would be 6-4 or 7-3 in the E8 or LL, while the bottom 5 teams would go 2-8 in those leagues (if they went in alone)
I will have to take your word for it JU...7-3 seems high....and again, it is tough to judge.
As an example, based on watching Utica play IC and SJF the past two years, a lot of people argued that they would kill Hartwick (using Wick because it is easier for me to compare). It probably made sense if you had to judge how Wick played against IC and SJF leading up to the Utica game. Yet Wick won both.
Now we are supposed to compare a team (from the NESCAC) that doesn't even play against any commom opponents? To me...and me only...that makes it too tough to judge. As far as I am concerned, they (the NESCAC football teams) are a club sport...nothing more. And because of this, I will never cast a vote for them in my ERFP.
Ok, I think we can all agree that the E8 has been a bigger, more physical conference than the LL has been over the last two years. If St. Lawrence can win the LL, then Trinity, Williams and Amherst would be able to win it as well.
Some of my opinion is also based on the fact that I coach high school football in MA and I see a lot the league all stars and all-state players going to Nescac schools. Some of these players will even choose Williams over Harvard or Yale for football.
You aren't wrong in your assessment...and being in the position you are in, you will certainly have more insight on the type of players that go to the NESCAC.
I still won't vote for them...ever...but that doesn't mean you are wrong in your assessment.
I said it earlier (maybe yesterday?) that there is a definite possibility that the top NESCAC teams could mop the floor with the rest of the East. But there's also a chance that they can't. I could put Williams or Trinity at 1 in my poll every year and you can't really argue against me, cause maybe they are that good. But because we have no real idea, it's tough to put them in a poll. Just because good athletes go there doesn't mean they are just as good either. It's the whole Mt. Union vs. a DI squad argument...They LOOK like they could compete...chances are they can't compete...but we probably will never find out.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 04:54:35 PM
And although I only saw Mt. Union live once, they didn't look like a d1 or d1-aa team for that matter. They had the same size as an E8 or LL team. No 280 pound dlinemen. No Olinemen over 6'5. No 6'5 QB that could throw it 60 yards. They just had some tough, quick players that didn't get full rides somewhere else.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on August 30, 2011, 05:10:46 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on August 30, 2011, 04:54:35 PM
And although I only saw Mt. Union live once, they didn't look like a d1 or d1-aa team for that matter. They had the same size as an E8 or LL team. No 280 pound dlinemen. No Olinemen over 6'5. No 6'5 QB that could throw it 60 yards. They just had some tough, quick players that didn't get full rides somewhere else.
I remember asking Jamie Donovan what it was like going up against MUC, and he said the size/strength jumped out at him. But he spent all day running into their line, so that's probably to be expected
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 29, 2011, 02:55:46 PM
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred( 2 ) 0-0 62 NR Open Date 2 Cortland State( 3 ) 0-0 57 NR vs. Buffalo State 3 Montclair State( 1 ) 0-0 51 NR Open Date 4 Rowan( 1 ) 0-0 50 NR at Lycoming 5 Delaware Valley 0-0 39 NR vs. Muhlenberg 6 Salisbury 0-0 37 NR vs. Newport News 7 Springfield 0-0 30 NR Open Date 8 St. John Fisher 0-0 29 NR Open Date 9 Hobart 0-0 8 NR at Dickinson 10 Williams 0-0 5 NR Open Date
Also Receiving votes:
Ithaca 4
Endicott 3
Lebanon Valley 3
Lycoming 2
RPI 2
SUNY Maritime 2
Rochester 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (2,2,3,2,4,NR,1,NR,1,NR)
Cortland State (1,1,2,1,5,NR,2,NR,8,NR)
Montclair State (4,6,1,3,3,NR,3,NR,6,NR)
Rowan (3,3,4,7,1,NR,7,NR,2,NR)
Delaware Valley (8,7,5,4,7,NR,4,NR,3,NR)
Salisbury (6,5,6,6,2,NR,NR,NR,4,NR)
Springfield (9,4,7,5,6,NR,5,NR,NR,NR)
St. John Fisher (5,8,8,8,8,NR,6,NR,5,NR)
Hobart (10,10,NR,10,10,NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Williams (7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,10,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lycoming (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
RPI (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
Rochester (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 29, 2011, 02:55:46 PMHSCTiger74 alerted me to your including Salisbury in your East Region Fan Poll.
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred( 2 ) 0-0 62 NR Open Date 2 Cortland State( 3 ) 0-0 57 NR vs. Buffalo State 3 Montclair State( 1 ) 0-0 51 NR Open Date 4 Rowan( 1 ) 0-0 50 NR at Lycoming 5 Delaware Valley 0-0 39 NR vs. Muhlenberg 6 Salisbury 0-0 37 NR vs. Newport News 7 Springfield 0-0 30 NR Open Date 8 St. John Fisher 0-0 29 NR Open Date 9 Hobart 0-0 8 NR at Dickinson 10 Williams 0-0 5 NR Open Date
Also Receiving votes:
Ithaca 4
Endicott 3
Lebanon Valley 3
Lycoming 2
RPI 2
SUNY Maritime 2
Rochester 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (2,2,3,2,4,NR,1,NR,1,NR)
Cortland State (1,1,2,1,5,NR,2,NR,8,NR)
Montclair State (4,6,1,3,3,NR,3,NR,6,NR)
Rowan (3,3,4,7,1,NR,7,NR,2,NR)
Delaware Valley (8,7,5,4,7,NR,4,NR,3,NR)
Salisbury (6,5,6,6,2,NR,NR,NR,4,NR)
Springfield (9,4,7,5,6,NR,5,NR,NR,NR)
St. John Fisher (5,8,8,8,8,NR,6,NR,5,NR)
Hobart (10,10,NR,10,10,NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Williams (7,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,10,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lycoming (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
RPI (NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
SUNY Maritime (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
Rochester (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 05, 2011, 01:59:43 PM
I was hoping to have this out today, but with the holiday I only have 5 submissions so I'll hold off until tomorrow (and miss deadline for the Alfred Sun - sorry Pep!).
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 05, 2011, 01:59:43 PM
I was hoping to have this out today, but with the holiday I only have 5 submissions so I'll hold off until tomorrow (and miss deadline for the Alfred Sun - sorry Pep!).
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred( 2 ) | 0-0 | 72 | 1 | vs. RPI |
2 Cortland State( 4 ) | 1-0 | 71 | 2 | Open Date |
3 Montclair State( 1 ) | 0-0 | 63 | 3 | vs. Salve Regina |
4 Salisbury( 1 ) | 1-0 | 59 | 6 | vs. Ithaca |
5 St. John Fisher | 0-0 | 40 | 7 | vs. Buffalo State |
6 Springfield | 0-0 | 35 | 8 | vs. Frostburg State |
7 Delaware Valley | 1-0 | 33 | 5 | at #8 (South) Washington & Jefferson |
8 Hobart | 1-0 | 23 | 9 | Open Date |
9 Lycoming | 1-0 | 17 | NR | at Westminster (PA) |
10 Rowan | 0-1 | 11 | 4 | Open Date |
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred( 6 ) | 1-0 | 78 | 1 | vs. St. Lawrence |
2 Cortland State( 2 ) | 1-0 | 65 | 2 | vs. #5 Kean |
3 Salisbury | 2-0 | 60 | 4 | at Christopher Newport |
4 Montclair State | 1-0 | 54 | 3 | at Morrisville State |
5 Kean | 1-0 | 37 | NR | at #2 Cortland |
6 Delaware Valley | 2-0 | 36 | 7 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
7 Springfield | 1-0 | 33 | 6 | vs. Husson |
8 Lycoming | 2-0 | 26 | 9 | at Widener |
9t Hobart | 1-0 | 22 | 8 | Open Date |
9t St. John Fisher | 1-0 | 22 | 5 | vs. Rochester |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 19, 2011, 01:21:07 PM
Only have 5 submissions, so I'm going to hold off on posting. Also, we are still short 2 pollsters in case there is anyone interested in participating. Otherwise, we may just scale the poll down to fewer voters like the South Region.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred( 4 ) | 2-0 | 58 | 1 | vs. #6 Springfield |
2 Kean( 2 ) | 2-0 | 56 | 5 | at Western Connecticut |
3 Salisbury | 3-0 | 41 | 3 | Open Date |
4 Cortland State | 1-1 | 34 | 2 | at Rowan |
5 Montclair State | 2-0 | 31 | 4 | vs. Buffalo State |
6 Springfield | 2-0 | 29 | 7 | at #1 Alfred |
7 Delaware Valley | 3-0 | 28 | 6 | at FDU-Florham |
8 St. John Fisher | 2-0 | 27 | 9t | vs. #9 Hobart |
9 Hobart | 1-0 | 17 | 9t | at #8 St. John Fisher |
10 Widener | 3-0 | 5 | NR | at Wilkes |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 20, 2011, 09:47:10 AM
Food for thought while I put together the week 3 rankings: is Montclair better than Ithaca based on their results to date?
Montclair beat Salve Regina 18-7 who beat Union on a last second field goal. The same Union that Ithaca just homogenized (copyright dlip). And the Red Hawks squeaked out a win against Moo'ville that also lost to Hartwick who no one is picking to finish better than Ithaca in the E8.
Quote from: maxpower on September 20, 2011, 10:23:15 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 20, 2011, 09:47:10 AM
Food for thought while I put together the week 3 rankings: is Montclair better than Ithaca based on their results to date?
Montclair beat Salve Regina 18-7 who beat Union on a last second field goal. The same Union that Ithaca just homogenized (copyright dlip). And the Red Hawks squeaked out a win against Moo'ville that also lost to Hartwick who no one is picking to finish better than Ithaca in the E8.
+k for the love. good points, too... of course, i'm sure someone will trot out the "hartwick could have beaten oklahoma" train we see every year....
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 20, 2011, 10:06:07 AM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred( 4 ) 2-0 58 1 vs. #6 Springfield 2 Kean( 2 ) 2-0 56 5 at Western Connecticut 3 Salisbury 3-0 41 3 Open Date 4 Cortland State 1-1 34 2 at Rowan 5 Montclair State 2-0 31 4 vs. Buffalo State 6 Springfield 2-0 29 7 at #1 Alfred 7 Delaware Valley 3-0 28 6 at FDU-Florham 8 St. John Fisher 2-0 27 9t vs. #9 Hobart 9 Hobart 1-0 17 9t at #8 St. John Fisher 10 Widener 3-0 5 NR at Wilkes
Dropped Out:
#8 Lycoming
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 2
Endicott 1
Rowan 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (2,1,1,1,NR,NR,1,NR,2,NR)
Kean (1,2,2,2,NR,NR,2,NR,1,NR)
Salisbury (5,4,3,5,NR,NR,5,NR,3,NR)
Cortland State (3,6,4,7,NR,NR,4,NR,8,NR)
Montclair State (NR,7,7,3,NR,NR,3,NR,4,NR)
Springfield (7,3,5,6,NR,NR,6,NR,10,NR)
Delaware Valley (6,8,6,4,NR,NR,7,NR,7,NR)
St. John Fisher (4,5,9,8,NR,NR,8,NR,5,NR)
Hobart (8,9,8,9,NR,NR,9,NR,6,NR)
Widener (10,10,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Endicott (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Rowan (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Springfield at #1 Alfred
#9 Hobart at #8 St. John Fisher
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 20, 2011, 10:42:57 AM
Can you eliminate the NR's for voters who didn't vote?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred( 5 ) | 3-0 | 59 | 1 | at St. John Fisher |
2 Kean( 1 ) | 3-0 | 43 | 2 | vs. #10 New Jersey |
3 Salisbury | 3-0 | 42 | 3 | at Utica |
4t Cortland State | 2-1 | 38 | 4 | vs. Morrisville State |
4t Montclair State | 3-0 | 38 | 5 | at Brockport State |
6 Hobart | 2-0 | 35 | 9 | vs. St. Lawrence |
7 Delaware Valley | 4-0 | 31 | 7 | at FDU-Florham |
8 Springfield | 2-1 | 25 | 6 | at Merchant Marine |
9 Albright | 3-0 | 10 | NR | at Lycoming |
10 New Jersey | 3-0 | 4 | NR | at #2 Kean |
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 27, 2011, 10:06:00 AM
Interesting poll.
I'm the last set of votes (and the only oone who has Kean first, believe me, I'd rather have an E8 team there) for disclosure, but I'd be curious to hear about the #8 vote on Kean. Is it just that someone doesn't trust the NJAC with only one OOC game (a good one for them for sure), or something else. I have a hard time ignoring back to back wins over Wesley and Cortland though. AU's done everything they're supposed to up til now, but the body doesn't seem to have the same kind of win.
Haven't posted in a week, but the Hobart win was a very good one. They return a lot of guys including a very veteran OL that runs 9-10 deep. The questions were on the DL and at QB. QB looks pretty resolved, I think. We'll see about the DL, but I think the DE's are improved over last year and gives more heft to the DL. If they hold up, no matter how the rest of the LL looks, Hobart is a playoff team. Still (sadly) 3/4 of the season to go.
Quote from: dlip on September 27, 2011, 11:11:08 AM
It was dlip who had Kean at #8 by mistake. dlip has iti right on his home computer but must have ****ed up his message to AU, sorry fellas, dlip is batting 1,000 the past two weeks ???. Anyway here is how dlips poll should look :o ...he said poll should look... :o
Alfred
Cortland
Kean
Montclair
Salisbury
Del Val
Bart
Springfield
Rowan
Albright
Yes, looking at the Cortland game's box score and reading posts about the game from many who were there and Keans ****ing awful performance against one of the worst teams in the entire east, dlip feels it appropriate to believe, that this week, even with the head to head loss, Cortland is a better team than Kean. Definitely up for debate though and dlip can see both sides. dlip is sorry to get everyone in a stir with his mistake, sorry fellas.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2011, 11:33:50 AM
Also...it's only Tuesday, so what else are we supposed to talk about!!!
Quote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 12:48:56 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2011, 11:33:50 AM
Also...it's only Tuesday, so what else are we supposed to talk about!!!
Oh, I don't know, the Red Sox collapse?
Quote from: maxpower on September 27, 2011, 01:09:41 PM
Yeah it's a good time to be a sports fan for pretty much any New York team right now.... 'cept the Jets.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2011, 01:14:47 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 12:48:56 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2011, 11:33:50 AM
Also...it's only Tuesday, so what else are we supposed to talk about!!!
Oh, I don't know, the Red Sox collapse?
I was going to wait until they were officially through...but it is hard to ignore a collapse of such historic proportion...I mean, they had a 9 game lead for the wild card on the night of September 3rd...24 days later, they are all tied up.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 01:16:52 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2011, 01:14:47 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 12:48:56 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2011, 11:33:50 AM
Also...it's only Tuesday, so what else are we supposed to talk about!!!
Oh, I don't know, the Red Sox collapse?
I was going to wait until they were officially through...but it is hard to ignore a collapse of such historic proportion...I mean, they had a 9 game lead for the wild card on the night of September 3rd...24 days later, they are all tied up.
As an extreme old school Red Sox fan, I hope they don't make it, because this team is so hard to like, and I just would have a hard time cheering for them. They have no heart. But all the fans at the game get to sing Sweet Caroline win or lose, so that is all they care about. Ugh, makes me nauseous.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 27, 2011, 01:30:27 PM
The Red Sox are like the Keystone cops right now. Wild pitches. Passed balls. Catchers dropping the exchanges or throwing relays into left field. Even the Ellsbury play from last night, which was admittedly a tough play, I mean it just looked awkward the way he fell and bobbled it.
The injuries have been tough to overcome, but some of it makes you shake your head. The Red Sox trying to trade for a pitcher, at this stage, just to throw him in there? It's like a kid running to a bookstore a 9:57 because he's got a report due the next day but he left the book in his locker, and when he sees the book is sold out, says "Screw it" and buys the Cliffs notes. And this is a team with a payroll approaching $200 million? It's like in 2006 when the Yankees were down 2-1 in the ALDS and they threw Jared Wright on the mound. These things end badly in most cases
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 27, 2011, 01:40:20 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 27, 2011, 01:30:27 PM
The Red Sox are like the Keystone cops right now. Wild pitches. Passed balls. Catchers dropping the exchanges or throwing relays into left field. Even the Ellsbury play from last night, which was admittedly a tough play, I mean it just looked awkward the way he fell and bobbled it.
The injuries have been tough to overcome, but some of it makes you shake your head. The Red Sox trying to trade for a pitcher, at this stage, just to throw him in there? It's like a kid running to a bookstore a 9:57 because he's got a report due the next day but he left the book in his locker, and when he sees the book is sold out, says "Screw it" and buys the Cliffs notes. And this is a team with a payroll approaching $200 million? It's like in 2006 when the Yankees were down 2-1 in the ALDS and they threw Jared Wright on the mound. These things end badly in most cases
Lets face it. The Red Sox didn't buy the right players this year. Don't worry, they have the same 300 million to spend next year. Kind of like a craps game.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 01:51:14 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 27, 2011, 01:40:20 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 27, 2011, 01:30:27 PM
The Red Sox are like the Keystone cops right now. Wild pitches. Passed balls. Catchers dropping the exchanges or throwing relays into left field. Even the Ellsbury play from last night, which was admittedly a tough play, I mean it just looked awkward the way he fell and bobbled it.
The injuries have been tough to overcome, but some of it makes you shake your head. The Red Sox trying to trade for a pitcher, at this stage, just to throw him in there? It's like a kid running to a bookstore a 9:57 because he's got a report due the next day but he left the book in his locker, and when he sees the book is sold out, says "Screw it" and buys the Cliffs notes. And this is a team with a payroll approaching $200 million? It's like in 2006 when the Yankees were down 2-1 in the ALDS and they threw Jared Wright on the mound. These things end badly in most cases
Lets face it. The Red Sox didn't buy the right players this year. Don't worry, they have the same 300 million to spend next year. Kind of like a craps game.
And more particular, they bought 1 really wrong player...Carl Crawford. I think Crawford's attitude has spread the the entire team. And JD Drew is exactly what I hate about this team. I've never watched a guy strike out on 3 pitches more gracefully in my life.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 27, 2011, 02:17:03 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 01:51:14 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 27, 2011, 01:40:20 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 27, 2011, 01:30:27 PM
The Red Sox are like the Keystone cops right now. Wild pitches. Passed balls. Catchers dropping the exchanges or throwing relays into left field. Even the Ellsbury play from last night, which was admittedly a tough play, I mean it just looked awkward the way he fell and bobbled it.
The injuries have been tough to overcome, but some of it makes you shake your head. The Red Sox trying to trade for a pitcher, at this stage, just to throw him in there? It's like a kid running to a bookstore a 9:57 because he's got a report due the next day but he left the book in his locker, and when he sees the book is sold out, says "Screw it" and buys the Cliffs notes. And this is a team with a payroll approaching $200 million? It's like in 2006 when the Yankees were down 2-1 in the ALDS and they threw Jared Wright on the mound. These things end badly in most cases
Lets face it. The Red Sox didn't buy the right players this year. Don't worry, they have the same 300 million to spend next year. Kind of like a craps game.
And more particular, they bought 1 really wrong player...Carl Crawford. I think Crawford's attitude has spread the the entire team. And JD Drew is exactly what I hate about this team. I've never watched a guy strike out on 3 pitches more gracefully in my life.
baseball is funny though isn't it? I guess that is what big money teams get when they want to spend big dough on players that don't work out. You are almost better off saving that money for trades in the middle of the season. At least Bedard is doing what they expect him to do.
QuoteYeah it's a good time to be a sports fan for pretty much any New York team right now.... 'cept the Jets.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Quote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
Quote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 04:14:28 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
This is how I feel about baseball altogether. I actually like routing for Tampa and Florida(in past years) and other small market teams. They are hungry, they have that 'this year or bust' feel to them and they have a lot of passion.
At least the Patriots tend to sign some underdogs and try to groom players that fit their system. I still enjoy watching them more than ever. But baseball has really lost it's appeal to me, and that sucks because I am a huge baseball fan.
Quote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 27, 2011, 07:39:42 PM
OK, back to Football. I'm #3 in the voting. I had it Alfred, Cort, MSU Sals, Kean, Del, Hobt, Spring, Alb, End. You can make an excuse for any order in the top (5). The poll is just peoples opinion and nobody is wrong. I believe Alfred is #1 as of this week. It could change on Sat. The NJAC probably won't be decided until the last (2) weeks. TCNJ can be a real wild card. We will see how they play at Kean. Now down to Kean. A great start w/wins against Wesley and Cortland. As yanks said they did not win the game of stats but won the game. Cortland had a shot to win at the end. Kean then played like crap against W.Conn and thats why I moved them down. I love my Red Hawks, but what have they done. Not an impressive 3-0 but seemed to get a little better against Buff St. We will see on grass at B-Port. Cortland could easially be 3-0and Kean 2-1. This is what makes the East Fan Poll so good. Watch out for the MAC Del appears to be good and we will see what Albright does and the schedule gets tougher. This is just a whole lot of fun.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 27, 2011, 11:33:50 AMQuote from: dlip on September 27, 2011, 11:11:08 AM
It was dlip who had Kean at #8 by mistake. dlip has iti right on his home computer but must have ****ed up his message to AU, sorry fellas, dlip is batting 1,000 the past two weeks ???. Anyway here is how dlips poll should look :o ...he said poll should look... :o
Alfred
Cortland
Kean
Montclair
Salisbury
Del Val
Bart
Springfield
Rowan
Albright
Yes, looking at the Cortland game's box score and reading posts about the game from many who were there and Keans ****ing awful performance against one of the worst teams in the entire east, dlip feels it appropriate to believe, that this week, even with the head to head loss, Cortland is a better team than Kean. Definitely up for debate though and dlip can see both sides. dlip is sorry to get everyone in a stir with his mistake, sorry fellas.
It's all good dlip...while I disagree with your rankings, its your opinion and you are entitled to it. Also...it's only Tuesday, so what else are we supposed to talk about!!!
Quote from: softballrz on September 27, 2011, 05:54:41 PM
Life long sox fan and they are killing all of us here in New England. Also, looking for a bone or two for the Gulls!
2011 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION III FOOTBALL POLL
Week #2 - 9/26/11
Rank Team Record (First-Place Votes) Points Last Week's Rank
1 Endicott 4-0 (16) 210 2
2 Springfield 2-1 (1) 167 1
3 Williams 1-0 (4) 165 3
4 Maine Maritime 3-0 149 4
5 Trinity 1-0 (1) 133 T5
6 Worcester St. 4-0 127 T5
7 Amherst 1-0 94 7
8 Curry 3-1 73 10
9 Western New England 3-1 43 ARV
10 Wesleyan 1-0 13 -
Also Receiving Votes (to be listed a team must receive at least one percent of the available
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 27, 2011, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
No more awkward than, say, blowing a 3-0 lead in an ALCS...
Quote from: Doid23 on September 28, 2011, 09:43:52 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 27, 2011, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
No more awkward than, say, blowing a 3-0 lead in an ALCS...
But certainly less akward than, say, blowing the 1986 World Series with 1 out to go...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 28, 2011, 12:47:11 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 28, 2011, 09:43:52 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 27, 2011, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
No more awkward than, say, blowing a 3-0 lead in an ALCS...
But certainly less akward than, say, blowing the 1986 World Series with 1 out to go...
A little different since it's pegged on one player (Buckner). We're discussing team collapses here, I thought.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2011, 01:33:27 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 28, 2011, 12:47:11 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 28, 2011, 09:43:52 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 27, 2011, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
No more awkward than, say, blowing a 3-0 lead in an ALCS...
But certainly less akward than, say, blowing the 1986 World Series with 1 out to go...
A little different since it's pegged on one player (Buckner). We're discussing team collapses here, I thought.
Except that pegging it on one player is a gross misrepresentation of what actually happened.
I mean, ignore the fact that it was 5-3 Boston with two outs and no-one on base before Calvin Schiraldi--who had blown a 3-2 lead in the 8th inning--allowed three straight singles. Then ignore that Bob Stanley came in an uncorked a wild pitch that tied the game.
Then in Game 7, forget that the Red Sox had a 3-0 lead in the 6th inning when Bruce Hurst allowed three runs to tie the game. Or that trailing 6-5 in the 7th, the Red Sox had the tying run on 2nd with no-one out, but Rich Gedman, Dave Henderson, and Don Baylor failed to get the runner in.
Of course, this also ignores the fact that the Red Sox were only in Game 6 because they failed to capitalize on winning the first two games in Shea Stadium and were soundly beaten in Games 3 and 4 at home.
Yeah, it was all Buckner's fault. Everyone else did their jobs to a T.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 28, 2011, 01:52:21 PM
Thought I'd try to steer this discussion back toward the subject by pointing out that Williams received 3 votes in the D3 Top 25 poll.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 28, 2011, 01:43:20 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2011, 01:33:27 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 28, 2011, 12:47:11 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 28, 2011, 09:43:52 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 27, 2011, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
No more awkward than, say, blowing a 3-0 lead in an ALCS...
But certainly less akward than, say, blowing the 1986 World Series with 1 out to go...
A little different since it's pegged on one player (Buckner). We're discussing team collapses here, I thought.
Except that pegging it on one player is a gross misrepresentation of what actually happened.
I mean, ignore the fact that it was 5-3 Boston with two outs and no-one on base before Calvin Schiraldi--who had blown a 3-2 lead in the 8th inning--allowed three straight singles. Then ignore that Bob Stanley came in an uncorked a wild pitch that tied the game.
Then in Game 7, forget that the Red Sox had a 3-0 lead in the 6th inning when Bruce Hurst allowed three runs to tie the game. Or that trailing 6-5 in the 7th, the Red Sox had the tying run on 2nd with no-one out, but Rich Gedman, Dave Henderson, and Don Baylor failed to get the runner in.
Of course, this also ignores the fact that the Red Sox were only in Game 6 because they failed to capitalize on winning the first two games in Shea Stadium and were soundly beaten in Games 3 and 4 at home.
Yeah, it was all Buckner's fault. Everyone else did their jobs to a T.
You do have to admit that a grounder between the legs is a little different than all of the other things you mention. The wild pitch might fall into that category but come on. Most World Series are won or lost by players leaving batters on base, letting up a few hits in a row, not putting games away etc.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2011, 02:01:14 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 28, 2011, 01:43:20 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2011, 01:33:27 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 28, 2011, 12:47:11 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 28, 2011, 09:43:52 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 27, 2011, 06:18:55 PMQuote from: Doid23 on September 27, 2011, 04:09:17 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2011, 02:22:08 PM
Both of those guys were head scratchers from the get go. No way were you like "YES, WE GOT JD DREW!!!". Same way I felt about Crawford and with re-signing Beckett. You get to the point of spending money just cause you can. Kind of how I imagine Yankees fans felt about guys like Sheffield and AJ Burnett.
Exactly. And don't forget A-Rod. I'm actually to the point that the Yankees spending is starting to make this all feel empty, where if they win they were supposed to, and anything less than winning the WS is a failure. As opposed to the Yankees run in the late 90's, which was accomplished with home grown players and smart, value trades. THAT was a team that I loved rooting for, especially after the doldrums of the early 90's.
I'm a die hard Yankee fan, but this Red Sox thing is more akward than enjoyable. But yet, I still fear them more than the Rays if they were to meet in the ALCS.
No more awkward than, say, blowing a 3-0 lead in an ALCS...
But certainly less akward than, say, blowing the 1986 World Series with 1 out to go...
A little different since it's pegged on one player (Buckner). We're discussing team collapses here, I thought.
Except that pegging it on one player is a gross misrepresentation of what actually happened.
I mean, ignore the fact that it was 5-3 Boston with two outs and no-one on base before Calvin Schiraldi--who had blown a 3-2 lead in the 8th inning--allowed three straight singles. Then ignore that Bob Stanley came in an uncorked a wild pitch that tied the game.
Then in Game 7, forget that the Red Sox had a 3-0 lead in the 6th inning when Bruce Hurst allowed three runs to tie the game. Or that trailing 6-5 in the 7th, the Red Sox had the tying run on 2nd with no-one out, but Rich Gedman, Dave Henderson, and Don Baylor failed to get the runner in.
Of course, this also ignores the fact that the Red Sox were only in Game 6 because they failed to capitalize on winning the first two games in Shea Stadium and were soundly beaten in Games 3 and 4 at home.
Yeah, it was all Buckner's fault. Everyone else did their jobs to a T.
You do have to admit that a grounder between the legs is a little different than all of the other things you mention. The wild pitch might fall into that category but come on. Most World Series are won or lost by players leaving batters on base, letting up a few hits in a row, not putting games away etc.
If it were game 7 and the Red Sox were winning 5-4 at the time, yes. But even if Buckner makes the play, all it means is that the game goes to the 11th. The Red Sox don't win the World Series if Buckner fields it cleanly. And how can the error lose the series when there was still another game to play? Were the Red Sox incapable of winning Game 7? The jumped out to an early lead, so it appears not
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 28, 2011, 02:08:34 PM
I'm not saying the Red Sox would have won that game or that Buckner lost the series for them, but if Buckner makes that play it means they don't lose that game at that point. Making an error like that to lose a game is different than striking out to lose the game. That is what makes the series remarkable.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2011, 02:45:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 28, 2011, 02:08:34 PM
I'm not saying the Red Sox would have won that game or that Buckner lost the series for them, but if Buckner makes that play it means they don't lose that game at that point. Making an error like that to lose a game is different than striking out to lose the game. That is what makes the series remarkable.
I know you're not. Frank's response was that the Red Sox losing the 1986 World Series , is, however blamed almost solely on Buckner, and in fact, that's how many people remember it.
And even though you're right that the error was the most memorable moment from that series, and it's what most people associate with the loss, Buckner's error was simply one step in an process that had a lot of culprits.
It's like the ESPN piece on Bartman's life after that foul ball in the 2003 NLCS. It's criminal that he's become the symbol of that collapse, when really, the Cubs just stunk the joint up. But it's easier in some ways for fans to scapegoat one guy than it is to admit your team as a whole played terribly.
I, for example, blame Max for Ithaca not being able to beat Fisher all these years. Him and his glasses
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2011, 02:45:30 PM
I, for example, blame Max for Ithaca not being able to beat Fisher all these years. Him and his glasses
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2011, 12:15:03 AM
If you can't beat 'em... That was the GREATEST night of baseball I have ever watched. With mlb.tv open and flipping between all three games, I was able to catch all the action. This was the baseball equivalent of March Madness and I will tell my grandchildren about this night!
Quote from: Doid23 on September 29, 2011, 09:29:54 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2011, 12:15:03 AM
If you can't beat 'em... That was the GREATEST night of baseball I have ever watched. With mlb.tv open and flipping between all three games, I was able to catch all the action. This was the baseball equivalent of March Madness and I will tell my grandchildren about this night!
You have made PG sad, but I agree, that was insane last night. Not just what happened, but how it unfolded.
Quote from: maxpower on September 29, 2011, 10:02:56 PM
No IC-'Wick pick?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Kean( 5 ) | 4-0 | 64 | 2 | vs. Buffalo State |
2 Salisbury | 4-0 | 53 | 3 | vs. #9 Springfield |
3 Delaware Valley | 4-0 | 50 | 7 | at Wilkes |
4 Montclair State | 4-0 | 47 | 4t | vs. #5t Cortland State |
5t Cortland State( 2 ) | 3-1 | 46 | 4t | at #4 Montclair State |
5t Hobart | 3-0 | 46 | 6 | at Union |
7 Alfred | 3-1 | 32 | 1 | vs. Hartwick |
8 St. John Fisher | 3-1 | 19 | NR | at Ithaca |
9 Springfield | 3-1 | 12 | 8 | at #2 Salisbury |
10t Endicott | 5-0 | 5 | NR | at Nichols |
10t New Jersey | 3-1 | 5 | 10 | vs. Brockport |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 03, 2011, 03:30:28 PM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Kean( 5 ) 4-0 64 2 vs. Buffalo State 2 Salisbury 4-0 53 3 vs. #9 Springfield 3 Delaware Valley 4-0 50 7 at Wilkes 4 Montclair State 4-0 47 4t vs. #5t Cortland State 5t Cortland State( 2 ) 3-1 46 4t at #4 Montclair State 5t Hobart 3-0 46 6 at Union 7 Alfred 3-1 32 1 vs. Hartwick 8 St. John Fisher 3-1 19 NR at Ithaca 9 Springfield 3-1 12 8 at #2 Salisbury 10 New Jersey 3-1 6 10 vs. Brockport
Dropped Out:
#9 Albright
Also Receiving votes:
Endicott 4
Lycoming 3
Albright 1
Lebanon Valley 1
Rowan 1
Voting Distribution:
Kean (5,1,3,1,1,1,1)
Salisbury (3,3,4,4,3,3,4)
Delaware Valley (4,5,7,3,2,4,2)
Montclair State (8,4,2,2,5,2,7)
Cortland State (1,8,1,6,4,5,6)
Hobart (2,2,6,5,7,6,3)
Alfred (6,6,5,8,6,9,5)
St. John Fisher (7,NR,9,7,9,7,8)
Springfield (NR,7,8,9,8,NR,NR)
New Jersey (9,9,NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Endicott (NR,10,NR,NR,NR,8,NR)
Lycoming (10,NR,10,10,NR,NR,NR)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Rowan (NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#9 Springfield at #2 Salisbury
#5t Cortland State at #4 Montclair State
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 03, 2011, 03:40:48 PM
Kaz, you messed up mine. I have Endicott at 9 don't I?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 03, 2011, 04:19:39 PM
Interesting to see the wide spread voting disparities
A couple that jump out....Kean having so many 1's but also being as low as 5....dont recall seeing that in other years.
also, one voter has Hobart 2 (presumably on the strength of the blow-out of Fisher), yet that same voter has Fisher "NR" ;
...also Cortland with two "1" votes but also a "8" vote.
...and where is IC (arent they 3-1 right now?) Some teams getting vote(s) have similar records of 3-1 or 4-1 but their schedules are high schoolish so far. Leb Valley's wins are against a combined 4-10 record (and one of those wins was against 1-4 Stevenson that is a 3pt win away from being 0-10 this year (assuming they lose the rest) Lycoming and Albright have similar resumes in that their opponent's records are weak on their face and even weaker when you examine their opponent's victories.
Of course knowing how astute you all are, I just examined IC's resume in this same way and they are worse on paper.... :-[ I guess I was just ready to give IC the benefit of the doubt and partly because they are in a much stronger conference (albeit they havent beaten anyone in their conference worthy of note yet)
From the philosophy of ranking teams based not on their week to week performance but on how you feel they are as a whole, I would think IC is stronger than many teams ahead of them right now.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 03, 2011, 05:15:22 PM
The other voter you reference is me. I've got Fisher at 7 and think they could end up around 4-5 depending on how the season shakes out. Not sure I agree that it would take beating a top 5 team to be #2 (I have Bart #3). Who else in the east has done that other than Kean? That one road win looks better than mosts datapoints for all eastern teams right now, especially in light of them turning around and beating Alfred in what looks like a pretty sound way.
As far as I'm concerned, Kean is the only NJAC team that's really impressed with OOC schedule, so I've had them a little lower in general (Cort & MSU) than many.
Know nothing about the MAC, but giving DelVal more credit after dropping them pretty low based on the early results.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 03, 2011, 04:35:22 PM
And I just don't understand how ANYONE can have Cortland ranked 1 ahead of Kean. They played head to head and lost. Cortland's only loss. Kean is undefeated. Until Kean loses, I just don't know how that can be justified.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2011, 01:07:11 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 03, 2011, 04:35:22 PM
And I just don't understand how ANYONE can have Cortland ranked 1 ahead of Kean. They played head to head and lost. Cortland's only loss. Kean is undefeated. Until Kean loses, I just don't know how that can be justified.
I'm one of those that voted Cortland #1. I'm voter #3. As a Montclair fan you know there is no love lost w/Cortland. I don't like them, but respect them. I try not to be a homer in the poll. Give Kean credit, they are undefeated but :
1. They got lucky against a Wesley team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Cortland blew it at the end and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Wesley.
4. Did not play well against a weak W.Conn team.
5. Should have lost to TCNJ. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they are 4-0, beat Wesley / Cortland. IMHO, can't make them #1. Maybe as the season progresses. My Red Hawks are 4-0, but who have they beat and survived with their lives against M-Ville. The winner of the Montclair / Cortland in my opinion should be #1 in the East Fan Poll.[/list]
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2011, 02:10:11 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2011, 01:07:11 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 03, 2011, 04:35:22 PM
And I just don't understand how ANYONE can have Cortland ranked 1 ahead of Kean. They played head to head and lost. Cortland's only loss. Kean is undefeated. Until Kean loses, I just don't know how that can be justified.
I'm one of those that voted Cortland #1. I'm voter #3. As a Montclair fan you know there is no love lost w/Cortland. I don't like them, but respect them. I try not to be a homer in the poll. Give Kean credit, they are undefeated but :
1. They got lucky against a Wesley team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Cortland blew it at the end and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Wesley.
4. Did not play well against a weak W.Conn team.
5. Should have lost to TCNJ. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they are 4-0, beat Wesley / Cortland. IMHO, can't make them #1. Maybe as the season progresses. My Red Hawks are 4-0, but who have they beat and survived with their lives against M-Ville. The winner of the Montclair / Cortland in my opinion should be #1 in the East Fan Poll.[/list]
I am with LD on this one...there is no way that I can justify putting Cortland ahead of Kean. They get one shot at each other all year...and Cortland didn't get it done. If we don't take head to head match ups into account, just go with your favorite team as #1, head-to-head match-ups be damned (although I know Rams is a Montclair fan, and not a Cortland fan). Besides...like I said in an earlier post, Cortland hasn't been that impressive at all this year either, and is probably lucky to be 3-1 (I am Voter #4...and I had Cortland ranked #1 to start the year).
Try this out:
"Give Cortland credit, they have one-loss but:
1. They got lucky against a Rowan team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Buff State blew it at the end against Cortland and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Buff State, and was down at half time to Rowan and to Buff State late in the 3rd.
4. Did not play well against a weak Buff State team (at home).
5. Should have lost to Rowan. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they (Cortland) are 3-1, beating nobody to date with an above .500 record, with a combined record of 4-9. IMHO, can't make them #1."
Somehow...it just doesn't sound right...or make any sense...
Also...there would be no way that I would move Montclair to #1 next week...even if they blow out Cortland, and assuming that Kean beats Buff State. I have Montclair at #2 in the poll right now...but mostly by virtue of where they were ranked to start the year, and with other teams losing. That being said, they have also not been very "impressive" this year if we are going to start looking at other things besides head-to-head wins. I mean...a nine point win at home against a 2-3 Salve Regina team? A one point win over a 0-4 Morrisville State team that just missed winning the game on the 2-point conversion attempt with 20 seconds left in the game? A seven point win over an 0-4 Brockport team?
You had mentioned Kean losing in the stat department before as one of the main reasons to rank Cortland ahead of them...but did you know that Montclair had been beat in the stat department by Morrisville, Brockport, and Buff State? A blowout win over Cortland would be their greatest win by far this year, but at the end of the day, it would be simply beating up on a 3-2 team that would probably not be ranked in the top 10 in next week's poll.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2011, 02:10:11 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2011, 01:07:11 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 03, 2011, 04:35:22 PM
And I just don't understand how ANYONE can have Cortland ranked 1 ahead of Kean. They played head to head and lost. Cortland's only loss. Kean is undefeated. Until Kean loses, I just don't know how that can be justified.
I'm one of those that voted Cortland #1. I'm voter #3. As a Montclair fan you know there is no love lost w/Cortland. I don't like them, but respect them. I try not to be a homer in the poll. Give Kean credit, they are undefeated but :
1. They got lucky against a Wesley team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Cortland blew it at the end and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Wesley.
4. Did not play well against a weak W.Conn team.
5. Should have lost to TCNJ. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they are 4-0, beat Wesley / Cortland. IMHO, can't make them #1. Maybe as the season progresses. My Red Hawks are 4-0, but who have they beat and survived with their lives against M-Ville. The winner of the Montclair / Cortland in my opinion should be #1 in the East Fan Poll.[/list]
I am with LD on this one...there is no way that I can justify putting Cortland ahead of Kean. They get one shot at each other all year...and Cortland didn't get it done. If we don't take head to head match ups into account, just go with your favorite team as #1, head-to-head match-ups be damned (although I know Rams is a Montclair fan, and not a Cortland fan). Besides...like I said in an earlier post, Cortland hasn't been that impressive at all this year either, and is probably lucky to be 3-1 (I am Voter #4...and I had Cortland ranked #1 to start the year).
Try this out:
"Give Cortland credit, they have one-loss but:
1. They got lucky against a Rowan team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Buff State blew it at the end against Cortland and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Buff State, and was down at half time to Rowan and to Buff State late in the 3rd.
4. Did not play well against a weak Buff State team (at home).
5. Should have lost to Rowan. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they (Cortland) are 3-1, beating nobody to date with an above .500 record, with a combined record of 4-9. IMHO, can't make them #1."
Somehow...it just doesn't sound right...or make any sense...
Also...there would be no way that I would move Montclair to #1 next week...even if they blow out Cortland, and assuming that Kean beats Buff State. I have Montclair at #2 in the poll right now...but mostly by virtue of where they were ranked to start the year, and with other teams losing. That being said, they have also not been very "impressive" this year if we are going to start looking at other things besides head-to-head wins. I mean...a nine point win at home against a 2-3 Salve Regina team? A one point win over a 0-4 Morrisville State team that just missed winning the game on the 2-point conversion attempt with 20 seconds left in the game? A seven point win over an 0-4 Brockport team?
You had mentioned Kean losing in the stat department before as one of the main reasons to rank Cortland ahead of them...but did you know that Montclair had been beat in the stat department by Morrisville, Brockport, and Buff State? A blowout win over Cortland would be their greatest win by far this year, but at the end of the day, it would be simply beating up on a 3-2 team that would probably not be ranked in the top 10 in next week's poll.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 06, 2011, 04:53:54 PM
Part of the reason Kean loses the stats battle so often is that they dominate special teams. Kickoff returns for TD's. Blocked punts returned for TD's—every time we turn around, Kean's blocked another kick. These things have a way of skewing traditional stats, but they still matter.
As far as Kean not playing great against W. Conn, you can't really argue it, but let's not kid ourselves. Rowan and Buffalo State aren't exactly worldbeaters right now and Cortland didn't really light them up. So shouldn't that be similarly held against the Red Dragons?
The thing that does it for me is this: Between the two teams, Kean has the THREE best wins. That's sort of astounding only four weeks into a season, isn't it? Yes, they weren't always dominating, but beating Cortland, Wesley and TCNJ is a heck of a lot more impressive than beating Buff State, Rowan and Morrisville
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 06, 2011, 03:53:51 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 06, 2011, 02:10:11 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2011, 01:07:11 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 03, 2011, 04:35:22 PM
And I just don't understand how ANYONE can have Cortland ranked 1 ahead of Kean. They played head to head and lost. Cortland's only loss. Kean is undefeated. Until Kean loses, I just don't know how that can be justified.
I'm one of those that voted Cortland #1. I'm voter #3. As a Montclair fan you know there is no love lost w/Cortland. I don't like them, but respect them. I try not to be a homer in the poll. Give Kean credit, they are undefeated but :
1. They got lucky against a Wesley team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Cortland blew it at the end and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Wesley.
4. Did not play well against a weak W.Conn team.
5. Should have lost to TCNJ. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they are 4-0, beat Wesley / Cortland. IMHO, can't make them #1. Maybe as the season progresses. My Red Hawks are 4-0, but who have they beat and survived with their lives against M-Ville. The winner of the Montclair / Cortland in my opinion should be #1 in the East Fan Poll.[/list]
I am with LD on this one...there is no way that I can justify putting Cortland ahead of Kean. They get one shot at each other all year...and Cortland didn't get it done. If we don't take head to head match ups into account, just go with your favorite team as #1, head-to-head match-ups be damned (although I know Rams is a Montclair fan, and not a Cortland fan). Besides...like I said in an earlier post, Cortland hasn't been that impressive at all this year either, and is probably lucky to be 3-1 (I am Voter #4...and I had Cortland ranked #1 to start the year).
Try this out:
"Give Cortland credit, they have one-loss but:
1. They got lucky against a Rowan team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Buff State blew it at the end against Cortland and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Buff State, and was down at half time to Rowan and to Buff State late in the 3rd.
4. Did not play well against a weak Buff State team (at home).
5. Should have lost to Rowan. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they (Cortland) are 3-1, beating nobody to date with an above .500 record, with a combined record of 4-9. IMHO, can't make them #1."
Somehow...it just doesn't sound right...or make any sense...
Also...there would be no way that I would move Montclair to #1 next week...even if they blow out Cortland, and assuming that Kean beats Buff State. I have Montclair at #2 in the poll right now...but mostly by virtue of where they were ranked to start the year, and with other teams losing. That being said, they have also not been very "impressive" this year if we are going to start looking at other things besides head-to-head wins. I mean...a nine point win at home against a 2-3 Salve Regina team? A one point win over a 0-4 Morrisville State team that just missed winning the game on the 2-point conversion attempt with 20 seconds left in the game? A seven point win over an 0-4 Brockport team?
You had mentioned Kean losing in the stat department before as one of the main reasons to rank Cortland ahead of them...but did you know that Montclair had been beat in the stat department by Morrisville, Brockport, and Buff State? A blowout win over Cortland would be their greatest win by far this year, but at the end of the day, it would be simply beating up on a 3-2 team that would probably not be ranked in the top 10 in next week's poll.
well then SJF should be ranked ahead of AU and Appalachain State ahead of Michigan (2007) despite the fact they are in different divisions altogether. Head to Head is huge when comparing teams of apparent equal strengh, however, if you can reasonably justify as rams1102 has, then I can acccept it.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2011, 01:07:11 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 03, 2011, 04:35:22 PM
And I just don't understand how ANYONE can have Cortland ranked 1 ahead of Kean. They played head to head and lost. Cortland's only loss. Kean is undefeated. Until Kean loses, I just don't know how that can be justified.
I'm one of those that voted Cortland #1. I'm voter #3. As a Montclair fan you know there is no love lost w/Cortland. I don't like them, but respect them. I try not to be a homer in the poll. Give Kean credit, they are undefeated but :
1. They got lucky against a Wesley team that did not play well, but a W is a W.
2. Cortland blew it at the end and beat them in the stat dept.
3. Also lost in the stat dept to Wesley.
4. Did not play well against a weak W.Conn team.
5. Should have lost to TCNJ. Did you watch the live video?
After all is said and done, they are 4-0, beat Wesley / Cortland. IMHO, can't make them #1. Maybe as the season progresses. My Red Hawks are 4-0, but who have they beat and survived with their lives against M-Ville. The winner of the Montclair / Cortland in my opinion should be #1 in the East Fan Poll.[/list]
Quote from: pg04 on October 07, 2011, 11:37:55 AM'
Unfortunately, If Salisbury ran the table they'd likely be put as the #1 seed in the bracket housing the southern teams, so it probably wouldn't help the east in the slightest. I still also have my objection of placing Salisbury in this poll to begin with.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2011, 07:37:36 PMWesleydad...you are far too wise to jump into this fray. Let's see where this stands at the end of the season.
only hypothetical point i will argue in this discussion is that in no way should cortland have lost to rowan. i didnt need to see the live video, i saw the game live and cortland took over in the second half and dominated. the score is only close due to the late rowan td. head to head matters, but if you look at the national pool, wesley has jumped back over kean. is wesley better, from what i saw live there is no doubt, but the scoreboard says otherwise. is cortland likely better than kean, from what i saw live i believe so, but the scoreboard says otherwise. is delval better than kean, from what i saw live i also believe so. in the end this is all opinion which makes it fun. as you can tell i have no dog in this east argument, but if kean is the top team in the east at they end they will have run the table against some pretty good teams and will have earned it , opinions be damned.
Quote from: clandfan on October 10, 2011, 04:12:39 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2011, 07:37:36 PMWesleydad...you are far too wise to jump into this fray. Let's see where this stands at the end of the season.
only hypothetical point i will argue in this discussion is that in no way should cortland have lost to rowan. i didnt need to see the live video, i saw the game live and cortland took over in the second half and dominated. the score is only close due to the late rowan td. head to head matters, but if you look at the national pool, wesley has jumped back over kean. is wesley better, from what i saw live there is no doubt, but the scoreboard says otherwise. is cortland likely better than kean, from what i saw live i believe so, but the scoreboard says otherwise. is delval better than kean, from what i saw live i also believe so. in the end this is all opinion which makes it fun. as you can tell i have no dog in this east argument, but if kean is the top team in the east at they end they will have run the table against some pretty good teams and will have earned it , opinions be damned.
I have seen Buff St., Kean, Rowan and Montclair this season...most of these pontificators probably havent seen 1/2 of them or perhaps seen any of them. Scoreboard wise...Kean is at the top with Montclair. Montclair is a better team, assuming Fischer is healthy...I haven't heard what his injury was. I can tell you that if not for two plays....two plays, Cortland would be undefeated. But polls are based on records so Cortland drops, it is what it is but I will put my dog in battle (oops, Sorry Michael Vick) over any of these other mentioned teams any time. I give Kean credit for digging deep and finding ways to win but talent-wise, they may be 4th best. They are overrated with a W/L record that doesn't tell the whole story. Can't prove it...just my opinion having actually seen all play. The truth will be told by season's end. Back to my depression over the late loss to montclair...see ya.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 10, 2011, 07:17:21 PM
clandfan, havent been accused of being too wise in some time. i have to jump into some fray since there is little to talk about over on the wesley board. I am glad to hear that someone else is also basing their opinion on what they saw. i do agree with you on kean, gritty team winning games anyway they can, but they are not a top 10 team. in the end i am glad that it will get played out and not based on some computer numbers. since i live in southern pa, it is easy for me to get to plenty of east games and i like the njac, they will at least play wesley. the njac will be very interesting the rest of the way. if it plays out, i will certainly be heading to montclaire for the game against kean the last week of the season. some nice games at the end for me, wesley-salisbury, st john fisher - salisbury, and then kean-montclaire
Quote from: clandfan on October 10, 2011, 07:42:43 PMAgree that the defense gave up big plays particularly the last pass to get MSU into fieldgoal range but the offense also had issues. We took the lead on the safety with under 5 minutes to go and of course we get the ball back. The offense has to be able to move the ball and kill the clock in that situation and just didn't get it done. The final offensive play for Cortland was a 3rd and maybe 12 thanks to an penalty and MSU stuffing the run on the first 2 downs. Pitcher throws to Green 2 yards down field. Might as well have handed it off to him. The play had no chance of getting the needed yardage. Then on top of the offense not getting it done, we get like a 25 or 30 yard punt that goes out of bounds around the 25. In addition, MSU fumbled 5-6 times and Cortland only came up with the ball once maybe.
Rams, would rather have lost 31-14 than to comeback and lose like that. I'm happy with our offense. Our depth at RB has been great. That kid sat is our 3rd back, now #2 with Autera out for season. Pitcher is playing well and has some weapons at WR. Just ashame for us that first we drop the INT and then we let that kid get behind us in that situation. Defensive lapses for sure. Any word on Fischer?
Quote from: clandfan on October 10, 2011, 07:42:43 PM
Rams, would rather have lost 31-14 than to comeback and lose like that. I'm happy with our offense. Our depth at RB has been great. That kid sat is our 3rd back, now #2 with Autera out for season. Pitcher is playing well and has some weapons at WR. Just ashame for us that first we drop the INT and then we let that kid get behind us in that situation. Defensive lapses for sure. Any word on Fischer?
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 10, 2011, 08:39:10 PMQuote from: clandfan on October 10, 2011, 07:42:43 PMAgree that the defense gave up big plays particularly the last pass to get MSU into fieldgoal range but the offense also had issues. We took the lead on the safety with under 5 minutes to go and of course we get the ball back. The offense has to be able to move the ball and kill the clock in that situation and just didn't get it done. The final offensive play for Cortland was a 3rd and maybe 12 thanks to an penalty and MSU stuffing the run on the first 2 downs. Pitcher throws to Green 2 yards down field. Might as well have handed it off to him. The play had no chance of getting the needed yardage. Then on top of the offense not getting it done, we get like a 25 or 30 yard punt that goes out of bounds around the 25. In addition, MSU fumbled 5-6 times and Cortland only came up with the ball once maybe.
Rams, would rather have lost 31-14 than to comeback and lose like that. I'm happy with our offense. Our depth at RB has been great. That kid sat is our 3rd back, now #2 with Autera out for season. Pitcher is playing well and has some weapons at WR. Just ashame for us that first we drop the INT and then we let that kid get behind us in that situation. Defensive lapses for sure. Any word on Fischer?
I too believe Cortland is a better team than their record indicates but it is what it is at this point.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 11, 2011, 01:05:40 PM
Kaz, Any idea when the New Poll will come out? Thanks.
Quote from: clandfan on October 11, 2011, 05:23:35 PMMy bad. I meant the last play of the series right after the safety.Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 10, 2011, 08:39:10 PMQuote from: clandfan on October 10, 2011, 07:42:43 PMAgree that the defense gave up big plays particularly the last pass to get MSU into fieldgoal range but the offense also had issues. We took the lead on the safety with under 5 minutes to go and of course we get the ball back. The offense has to be able to move the ball and kill the clock in that situation and just didn't get it done. The final offensive play for Cortland was a 3rd and maybe 12 thanks to an penalty and MSU stuffing the run on the first 2 downs. Pitcher throws to Green 2 yards down field. Might as well have handed it off to him. The play had no chance of getting the needed yardage. Then on top of the offense not getting it done, we get like a 25 or 30 yard punt that goes out of bounds around the 25. In addition, MSU fumbled 5-6 times and Cortland only came up with the ball once maybe.
Rams, would rather have lost 31-14 than to comeback and lose like that. I'm happy with our offense. Our depth at RB has been great. That kid sat is our 3rd back, now #2 with Autera out for season. Pitcher is playing well and has some weapons at WR. Just ashame for us that first we drop the INT and then we let that kid get behind us in that situation. Defensive lapses for sure. Any word on Fischer?
I too believe Cortland is a better team than their record indicates but it is what it is at this point.
Actually the final play was the ball meant for Babin in desperation that got batted down with QB running for his life trying to keep the play alive. The pass to Green...defense was in prevent, allowing nothing down field...only place to go with the ball and hope the kid can make a play, get first down and stop the clock. I have no problem with the desperation 50 sec. series.
Botched snap on the FG attempt though certainly was a factor. What did you think of the decision to kick. I understand why you kick there but 4th and 1 from the 2...I was thinking go for it...if you don't get it, they are pinned on the 1-2 yd. line...it was a momentum opportunity and it went completely the other way with the botch and then the long TD run.
We can second guess all day long...won't change a thing. Look out W. Conn.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Kean( 5 ) | 5-0 | 55 | 1 | at Brockport State |
2 Salisbury( 1 ) | 5-0 | 50 | 2 | at #6 Alfred |
3 Montclair State | 5-0 | 48 | 4 | vs. William Paterson |
4 Delaware Valley | 5-0 | 45 | 3 | at Albright |
5 Hobart | 4-0 | 40 | 5t | Open Date |
6 Alfred | 4-1 | 25 | 7 | vs. #2 Salisbury |
7 St. John Fisher | 4-1 | 24 | 8 | vs. Frostburg State |
8 Cortland State | 3-2 | 18 | 5t | at Western Connecticut |
9 Endicott | 6-0 | 8 | 10t | vs. Plymouth State |
10 New Jersey | 4-1 | 7 | 10t | at Buffalo State |
Quote from: maxpower on October 13, 2011, 12:01:28 PM
Wow, someone's down on Kean.
Quote from: maxpower on October 13, 2011, 12:01:28 PM
Wow, someone's down on Kean.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 13, 2011, 12:23:34 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2011, 12:01:28 PM
Wow, someone's down on Kean.
It's someone being stubborn saying 'I saw Kean and they aren't that good.' It's ridiculous. Bottom line is this...They have BEATEN Wesley(7), Cortland and TCNJ. Not to mention they are ranked 10th in the country right now. 10th in the country, but 6th in an East Region poll? Stop being so stubborn. Whether you like it or not, they have beaten good teams, and they are undefeated, and they deserve respect for that. If they lose to Rowan and Montclair, they STILL should probably be in the top 10 in this poll.
Pacific Lutheran didn't look like much in 1999, but they won the National Championship. Ask Rowan what they thought of them before the game.
GET OVER YOURSELF!!!
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 12:27:04 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 13, 2011, 12:23:34 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2011, 12:01:28 PM
Wow, someone's down on Kean.
It's someone being stubborn saying 'I saw Kean and they aren't that good.' It's ridiculous. Bottom line is this...They have BEATEN Wesley(7), Cortland and TCNJ. Not to mention they are ranked 10th in the country right now. 10th in the country, but 6th in an East Region poll? Stop being so stubborn. Whether you like it or not, they have beaten good teams, and they are undefeated, and they deserve respect for that. If they lose to Rowan and Montclair, they STILL should probably be in the top 10 in this poll.
Pacific Lutheran didn't look like much in 1999, but they won the National Championship. Ask Rowan what they thought of them before the game.
GET OVER YOURSELF!!!
I couldn't agree more LD...you could possibly make the arguement about where the remaining undefeated teams fall...but there is no way that a two-loss Cortland team who lost to both Kean (5-0) and Montclair State (5-0) within the last 4 weeks should be ranked ahead of these guys...there is just no logical explanation for that...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 01:19:19 PM
Interesting discussion about where teams are slotted. Here are the Massey Ratings for D3 for the teams we're considering here:
Hobart (16)
Salisbury (22)
Kean (25)
Del Valley (27)
Fisher (28)
Montclair (29)
Lycoming (33)
Cortland (34)
Rowan (45)
TCNJ (49)
A lot of compression between the 3rd and 8th ranked teams and something completely different than any of our ballots.
Quote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMQuote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMQuote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
Alfred isn't in the Massey ratings?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:58:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMQuote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
Alfred isn't in the Massey ratings?
60th in D3, after Ithaca (53). Though, the NESCAC has 5 teams in the top 20 so take all of this with a grain of salt.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:02:37 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:58:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMAlfred isn't in the Massey ratings?Quote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
60th in D3, after Ithaca (53). Though, the NESCAC has 5 teams in the top 20 so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I immediately disqualified the Massey rankings when I saw Endicott ranked ahead of Alfred and Ithaca...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:02:37 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:58:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMQuote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
Alfred isn't in the Massey ratings?
60th in D3, after Ithaca (53). Though, the NESCAC has 5 teams in the top 20 so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I immediately disqualified the Massey rankings when I saw Endicott ranked ahead of Alfred and Ithaca...
Quote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 03:18:56 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:02:37 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:58:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMAlfred isn't in the Massey ratings?Quote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
60th in D3, after Ithaca (53). Though, the NESCAC has 5 teams in the top 20 so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I immediately disqualified the Massey rankings when I saw Endicott ranked ahead of Alfred and Ithaca...
because Ithaca beat Union and Union barely was able to beat Salve Regina? Was that your logic??
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2011, 03:45:24 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:02:37 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:58:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMQuote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
Alfred isn't in the Massey ratings?
60th in D3, after Ithaca (53). Though, the NESCAC has 5 teams in the top 20 so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I immediately disqualified the Massey rankings when I saw Endicott ranked ahead of Alfred and Ithaca...
Well gosh, Yanks, Endicott beat Curry 55-7 and who can forget what Dem Spicy Boys did at Ithaca not so long ago?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 11:55:05 AM
Sorry for the late post, but I was away at a conference for work and this is the first I've had to compile the poll. There was one entry that listed Cortland twice and being so late already I didn't want to try and follow up on a correction. So, without further ado:
Week 6 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Kean( 5 ) 5-0 55 1 at Brockport State 2 Salisbury( 1 ) 5-0 50 2 at #6 Alfred 3 Montclair State 5-0 48 4 vs. William Paterson 4 Delaware Valley 5-0 45 3 at Albright 5 Hobart 4-0 40 5t Open Date 6 Alfred 4-1 25 7 vs. #2 Salisbury 7 St. John Fisher 4-1 24 8 vs. Frostburg State 8 Cortland State 3-2 18 5t at Western Connecticut 9 Endicott 6-0 8 10t vs. Plymouth State 10 New Jersey 4-1 7 10t at Buffalo State
Dropped Out:
#9 Springfield
Also Receiving votes:
Lycoming 6
Lebanon Valley 4
Voting Distribution:
Kean (6,1,1,1,1,1)
Salisbury (1,2,3,4,3,3)
Montclair State (5,3,2,2,4,2)
Delaware Valley (3,5,4,3,2,4)
Hobart (2,4,5,5,5,5)
Alfred (7,7,6,7,7,7)
St. John Fisher (8,6,7,6,6,9)
Cortland State (4,10,10,10,8,6)
Endicott (NR,8,9,NR,NR,8)
New Jersey (9,9,8,NR,NR,NR)
Lycoming (10,NR,NR,8,9,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,NR,NR,9,10,10)
Key Matchups:
#2 Salisbury at #6 Alfred
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:52:32 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2011, 03:45:24 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:02:37 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:58:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMQuote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
Alfred isn't in the Massey ratings?
60th in D3, after Ithaca (53). Though, the NESCAC has 5 teams in the top 20 so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I immediately disqualified the Massey rankings when I saw Endicott ranked ahead of Alfred and Ithaca...
Well gosh, Yanks, Endicott beat Curry 55-7 and who can forget what Dem Spicy Boys did at Ithaca not so long ago?
Hahaha...you got it Pep. Though...and this is weird...2008 seems like a long time ago now...
Quote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 04:05:05 PM
but didn't Curry go into Ithaca and stomp them at their place in 2008? How soon one forgets.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2011, 06:02:31 PM
This Cortland/Kean thing is bordering on absurd.
Quote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 04:05:05 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:52:32 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2011, 03:45:24 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 03:02:37 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:58:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 02:41:41 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2011, 02:40:13 PMQuote from: Charles on October 13, 2011, 02:35:56 PM
Endicott (52) Massey rating...
Yes, and Leb Valley at 51, but I decided to just list a top 10.
Alfred isn't in the Massey ratings?
60th in D3, after Ithaca (53). Though, the NESCAC has 5 teams in the top 20 so take all of this with a grain of salt.
I immediately disqualified the Massey rankings when I saw Endicott ranked ahead of Alfred and Ithaca...
Well gosh, Yanks, Endicott beat Curry 55-7 and who can forget what Dem Spicy Boys did at Ithaca not so long ago?
Hahaha...you got it Pep. Though...and this is weird...2008 seems like a long time ago now...
but didn't Curry go into Ithaca and stomp them at their place in 2008? How soon one forgets.
Quote from: softballrz on October 13, 2011, 10:44:50 PM
why all the dick measuring from years gone by? these polls are nothing more then a snap shot in time? yes, the nefc is historical weak, however this year, endicott and wnec are two competitive teams and should be part of any top 10 discussion until proved otherwise.
Quote from: softballrz on October 13, 2011, 10:44:50 PM
why all the dick measuring from years gone by? these polls are nothing more then a snap shot in time? yes, the nefc is historical weak, however this year, endicott and wnec are two competitive teams and should be part of any top 10 discussion until proved otherwise.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2011, 07:42:23 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2011, 06:02:31 PM
This Cortland/Kean thing is bordering on absurd.
Nationally, the Hobart/Cortland issue is just as perplexing. Just sayin'...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 10:30:22 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2011, 07:42:23 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2011, 06:02:31 PM
This Cortland/Kean thing is bordering on absurd.
Nationally, the Hobart/Cortland issue is just as perplexing. Just sayin'...
Maybe. I can at least see the "Conference/schedule strength" argument you could make for Cortland over Hobart. I don't necessarily agree that it trumps the differences in results right now, but there's a chance that Hobart only plays one team that finishes the season with a winning record. I know they stomped said team, but again, I can at least sort of get where it comes from.
I just can't wrap my head around the Kean/Cortland argument. The only argument for putting Cortland ahead of Kean is what? That they killed Morrisville? I mean, if we're saying that Kean hasn't looked impressive in their five wins, then don't we have to do the same for Cortland? They trailed Buffalo State in the second half too. And they had to come back against Rowan too.
The only thing I can see that Cortland's done that Kean hasn't is stomp someone. It just makes no sense.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2011, 11:04:48 AM
When you reach a two-loss differential this early in the season, I think you're playing with fire, especially when the two-loss team's only real resume booster is a narrow win vs. Rowan this year. Hobart thrashed SJF, which seems to be rebounding since that game. It's not like they are restricted to all NEFC/ECFC games -- Hobart whacked Dickinson, whacked SJF, defensively beat down SLU and won at an arch-rival in Union in a game that went pretty much as expected. I'd have trouble keeping Mount Union at 4-2 in my Top 25 ballot, let alone Cortland. I'm not saying to place Hobart over Kean, Montclair or Salisbury. I'm saying to look in the loss column and then consider if anything in the win column provides forgiveness for the differential. I don't see it here.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 11:18:39 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2011, 11:04:48 AM
When you reach a two-loss differential this early in the season, I think you're playing with fire, especially when the two-loss team's only real resume booster is a narrow win vs. Rowan this year. Hobart thrashed SJF, which seems to be rebounding since that game. It's not like they are restricted to all NEFC/ECFC games -- Hobart whacked Dickinson, whacked SJF, defensively beat down SLU and won at an arch-rival in Union in a game that went pretty much as expected. I'd have trouble keeping Mount Union at 4-2 in my Top 25 ballot, let alone Cortland. I'm not saying to place Hobart over Kean, Montclair or Salisbury. I'm saying to look in the loss column and then consider if anything in the win column provides forgiveness for the differential. I don't see it here.
That all makes sense. As I said, I'm not personally of the opinion that Cortland's better than Hobart. I do think Cortland would be 4-0 against Hobart's schedule, but I think Hobart might be better than 3-2 had they played Cortland's.
I do wish however, that we could see--without names--who voted who where. I understand this would be a lot of work, but I'd like to know, for example, where the pt. differential comes from. Two/three voters with Cortland ranked a lot higher? A bunch of voters who ranked Cortland one or two slots ahead of Hobart?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:20:48 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 11:18:39 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2011, 11:04:48 AM
When you reach a two-loss differential this early in the season, I think you're playing with fire, especially when the two-loss team's only real resume booster is a narrow win vs. Rowan this year. Hobart thrashed SJF, which seems to be rebounding since that game. It's not like they are restricted to all NEFC/ECFC games -- Hobart whacked Dickinson, whacked SJF, defensively beat down SLU and won at an arch-rival in Union in a game that went pretty much as expected. I'd have trouble keeping Mount Union at 4-2 in my Top 25 ballot, let alone Cortland. I'm not saying to place Hobart over Kean, Montclair or Salisbury. I'm saying to look in the loss column and then consider if anything in the win column provides forgiveness for the differential. I don't see it here.
That all makes sense. As I said, I'm not personally of the opinion that Cortland's better than Hobart. I do think Cortland would be 4-0 against Hobart's schedule, but I think Hobart might be better than 3-2 had they played Cortland's.
I do wish however, that we could see--without names--who voted who where. I understand this would be a lot of work, but I'd like to know, for example, where the pt. differential comes from. Two/three voters with Cortland ranked a lot higher? A bunch of voters who ranked Cortland one or two slots ahead of Hobart?
A lot of people have said which voter they are. I'm 2 and I believe a Hobart guy and a Fisher guy are 3 and 4. No idea on 1 though.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:08:20 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 10:30:22 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2011, 07:42:23 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2011, 06:02:31 PM
This Cortland/Kean thing is bordering on absurd.
Nationally, the Hobart/Cortland issue is just as perplexing. Just sayin'...
Maybe. I can at least see the "Conference/schedule strength" argument you could make for Cortland over Hobart. I don't necessarily agree that it trumps the differences in results right now, but there's a chance that Hobart only plays one team that finishes the season with a winning record. I know they stomped said team, but again, I can at least sort of get where it comes from.
I just can't wrap my head around the Kean/Cortland argument. The only argument for putting Cortland ahead of Kean is what? That they killed Morrisville? I mean, if we're saying that Kean hasn't looked impressive in their five wins, then don't we have to do the same for Cortland? They trailed Buffalo State in the second half too. And they had to come back against Rowan too.
The only thing I can see that Cortland's done that Kean hasn't is stomp someone. It just makes no sense.
This is just so aggravating to me. Like why is this person even part of the polling process? It's like ranking the Eagles at 1 in the NFL rankings because they are SUPPOSED to be good, but just haven't caught any breaks this year. And at the same time, the Packers only beat Carolina by 7, so they get knocked down a few spots. Just out of control.
I hate to harp on it, but for some reason it just aggravates the piss out of me.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 14, 2011, 11:32:13 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:08:20 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 10:30:22 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 13, 2011, 07:42:23 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2011, 06:02:31 PM
This Cortland/Kean thing is bordering on absurd.
Nationally, the Hobart/Cortland issue is just as perplexing. Just sayin'...
Maybe. I can at least see the "Conference/schedule strength" argument you could make for Cortland over Hobart. I don't necessarily agree that it trumps the differences in results right now, but there's a chance that Hobart only plays one team that finishes the season with a winning record. I know they stomped said team, but again, I can at least sort of get where it comes from.
I just can't wrap my head around the Kean/Cortland argument. The only argument for putting Cortland ahead of Kean is what? That they killed Morrisville? I mean, if we're saying that Kean hasn't looked impressive in their five wins, then don't we have to do the same for Cortland? They trailed Buffalo State in the second half too. And they had to come back against Rowan too.
The only thing I can see that Cortland's done that Kean hasn't is stomp someone. It just makes no sense.
This is just so aggravating to me. Like why is this person even part of the polling process? It's like ranking the Eagles at 1 in the NFL rankings because they are SUPPOSED to be good, but just haven't caught any breaks this year. And at the same time, the Packers only beat Carolina by 7, so they get knocked down a few spots. Just out of control.
I hate to harp on it, but for some reason it just aggravates the piss out of me.
Well its kind of like the NFL power rankings. Most have the Patriots ranked over the Bills, even though the Bills beat the Patriots. If there was a "poll" would it be justified to rank the Pats over the Bills?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:20:48 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 11:18:39 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2011, 11:04:48 AM
When you reach a two-loss differential this early in the season, I think you're playing with fire, especially when the two-loss team's only real resume booster is a narrow win vs. Rowan this year. Hobart thrashed SJF, which seems to be rebounding since that game. It's not like they are restricted to all NEFC/ECFC games -- Hobart whacked Dickinson, whacked SJF, defensively beat down SLU and won at an arch-rival in Union in a game that went pretty much as expected. I'd have trouble keeping Mount Union at 4-2 in my Top 25 ballot, let alone Cortland. I'm not saying to place Hobart over Kean, Montclair or Salisbury. I'm saying to look in the loss column and then consider if anything in the win column provides forgiveness for the differential. I don't see it here.
That all makes sense. As I said, I'm not personally of the opinion that Cortland's better than Hobart. I do think Cortland would be 4-0 against Hobart's schedule, but I think Hobart might be better than 3-2 had they played Cortland's.
I do wish however, that we could see--without names--who voted who where. I understand this would be a lot of work, but I'd like to know, for example, where the pt. differential comes from. Two/three voters with Cortland ranked a lot higher? A bunch of voters who ranked Cortland one or two slots ahead of Hobart?
A lot of people have said which voter they are. I'm 2 and I believe a Hobart guy and a Fisher guy are 3 and 4. No idea on 1 though.
Quote from: dlip on October 14, 2011, 11:28:42 AM
dlip just looked at this quickly, (he is at work and has his poll at home)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:42:01 AM
I have no problem with people ranking 0 loss or even 1 loss teams in the top 5. But to have a 2 loss team at 1 is ludicrous. Most teams play 9 or 10 games. Currently, Cortland has lost 40% of their games and at best will have lost 20% of their games. NOT the best team in the East.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 11:49:45 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:42:01 AM
I have no problem with people ranking 0 loss or even 1 loss teams in the top 5. But to have a 2 loss team at 1 is ludicrous. Most teams play 9 or 10 games. Currently, Cortland has lost 40% of their games and at best will have lost 20% of their games. NOT the best team in the East.
Okay, breathe easy. The voter with Cortland ahead of Kean has the Red Dragons at four, not one. They've got undefeated Salisbury at #1
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2011, 11:49:21 AMQuote from: dlip on October 14, 2011, 11:28:42 AM
dlip just looked at this quickly, (he is at work and has his poll at home)
Wow, Mrs. Dlip has some power. Dlip has to leave his poll at home these days...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 10:05:17 AM
I might check out the Endicott/Plymouth St. game this weekend. After seeing them, I may have them in the top 3 next week. Probably not.
Quote from: dlip on October 14, 2011, 12:01:04 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 14, 2011, 11:49:21 AMQuote from: dlip on October 14, 2011, 11:28:42 AM
dlip just looked at this quickly, (he is at work and has his poll at home)
Wow, Mrs. Dlip has some power. Dlip has to leave his poll at home these days...
The way dlip used to act, it is much better left there ;)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:47:13 AM
I'd like to say the Patriots were the best team in 2007-2008 going 18-1. But they lost the Super Bowl to the Giants so unfortunately...
The Red Sox SHOULD have been better than every team in MLB this year. But can you rank them higher than the 8 playoff teams?
2011 NCAA Basketball National Champion UConn. I hate them. I don't THINK they were the best team. But can you NOT rank them 1 at the end?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 14, 2011, 11:49:45 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:42:01 AM
I have no problem with people ranking 0 loss or even 1 loss teams in the top 5. But to have a 2 loss team at 1 is ludicrous. Most teams play 9 or 10 games. Currently, Cortland has lost 40% of their games and at best will have lost 20% of their games. NOT the best team in the East.
Okay, breathe easy. The voter with Cortland ahead of Kean has the Red Dragons at four, not one. They've got undefeated Salisbury at #1
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 14, 2011, 03:36:12 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:47:13 AM
I'd like to say the Patriots were the best team in 2007-2008 going 18-1. But they lost the Super Bowl to the Giants so unfortunately...
The Red Sox SHOULD have been better than every team in MLB this year. But can you rank them higher than the 8 playoff teams?
2011 NCAA Basketball National Champion UConn. I hate them. I don't THINK they were the best team. But can you NOT rank them 1 at the end?
yes...although it depends on what the criteria of the rankings are? Are you looking for perception or reality? Lets say a 34-2 Duke squad somehow got upset on a half-court buzzer beater in the Sweet Sixteen by a very good, upstart mid-major. But prior, and without any doubt they were the hands-down best team in the land. Now the field is wide-open and a 26-8 UCONN cuts down the nets, but more than likely, but for the upset by lets say, Gonzaga, circa 1999, Duke goes 38-2, then who is the true best team at the end? 34-3 Duke (who lost to UNC and MD, conference rivals on the road plus Gonzaga as explained) or 26-8 UCONN which coulda been any other 26-8 team like Mich St or Fla or UCLA?
If the so called "BEST" team has to be the end champion, or the team with the best record, then what is the purpose of the poll? Just leave the 'POLL' in your pocket and wait to whip it out after the champion is crowned. :o The in-season poll has to be based on perception, which is any given voters opinion of the games' outcomes. Certainly it does not appear to make sense that a 3-2 Cortland is ahead of a 5-0 Kean, that beat Cortland, but is it not possible, that Cortland, in the end, goes farther than Kean, such that the voter turns out to be correct using your theory of the last 'man' standing is the better team? Perhaps the voter is convinced that Cortland is the better overall team, and is confident that his pole...poll will be vindicated at the end of the season
Now I get your point about the Eagles (i think it was your point) at 1-4, but 1-4 is much different than 3-2. And 1 of those losses is to the 5-0 Kean team that is otherwise the top team. So isnt it possible that Cortland is #1?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 14, 2011, 03:36:12 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 14, 2011, 11:47:13 AM
I'd like to say the Patriots were the best team in 2007-2008 going 18-1. But they lost the Super Bowl to the Giants so unfortunately...
The Red Sox SHOULD have been better than every team in MLB this year. But can you rank them higher than the 8 playoff teams?
2011 NCAA Basketball National Champion UConn. I hate them. I don't THINK they were the best team. But can you NOT rank them 1 at the end?
yes...although it depends on what the criteria of the rankings are? Are you looking for perception or reality? Lets say a 34-2 Duke squad somehow got upset on a half-court buzzer beater in the Sweet Sixteen by a very good, upstart mid-major. But prior, and without any doubt they were the hands-down best team in the land. Now the field is wide-open and a 26-8 UCONN cuts down the nets, but more than likely, but for the upset by lets say, Gonzaga, circa 1999, Duke goes 38-2, then who is the true best team at the end? 34-3 Duke (who lost to UNC and MD, conference rivals on the road plus Gonzaga as explained) or 26-8 UCONN which coulda been any other 26-8 team like Mich St or Fla or UCLA?
If the so called "BEST" team has to be the end champion, or the team with the best record, then what is the purpose of the poll? Just leave the 'POLL' in your pocket and wait to whip it out after the champion is crowned. :o The in-season poll has to be based on perception, which is any given voters opinion of the games' outcomes. Certainly it does not appear to make sense that a 3-2 Cortland is ahead of a 5-0 Kean, that beat Cortland, but is it not possible, that Cortland, in the end, goes farther than Kean, such that the voter turns out to be correct using your theory of the last 'man' standing is the better team? Perhaps the voter is convinced that Cortland is the better overall team, and is confident that his pole...poll will be vindicated at the end of the season
Now I get your point about the Eagles (i think it was your point) at 1-4, but 1-4 is much different than 3-2. And 1 of those losses is to the 5-0 Kean team that is otherwise the top team. So isnt it possible that Cortland is #1?
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 14, 2011, 10:22:29 PM
JT (and Frank?), I wasn't talking about the next preseason poll. I was talking about the final poll of any current season. Perhaps I have misremembered what Pat has said, but I thought he had made it clear he expected final polls to always be unanimous for the title winner.
As I said, I can't offhand recall any d3 football or basketball title winners where I would likely have dissented, but I certainly can recall d1 basketball examples, and gave the example of my own team in d3 baseball.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 15, 2011, 12:27:38 AM
Thanks, Frank. I had added you only with a question mark because I was fairly sure you understood I was talking about the final poll. JT's post clearly showed he thought I meant the next preseason poll; I'm well aware the preseason polls are rarely (never?) unanimous.
My d3 baseball and d1 basketball examples were meant to indicate that in those sports a (clearly not THE best) team can get hot at the right time and win it all, despite a lengthy tournament trail. Football tends to be a more predictable sport; upsets happen, but 4 or 5 consecutive upsets seems highly unlikely! But hypothetically, if a team DID somehow manage to win the Stagg with 4 or 5 losses, while there were 3-4 teams with only one loss (and 8-10 with just two losses), would you still vote them #1? (They still get the trophy, regardless, but should they win the poll?)
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 12:18:08 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2011, 12:01:28 PM
Wow, someone's down on Kean.
Agreed...Voter #1 has some explaining to do...not only with an undefeated Kean team being #6 and an undefeated Montclair State team being #5, but with a two-loss Cortland team being #4, with both of their losses to Kean and Montclair.
Quote from: DanPadavona on October 15, 2011, 08:00:09 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 13, 2011, 12:18:08 PMQuote from: maxpower on October 13, 2011, 12:01:28 PM
Wow, someone's down on Kean.
Agreed...Voter #1 has some explaining to do...not only with an undefeated Kean team being #6 and an undefeated Montclair State team being #5, but with a two-loss Cortland team being #4, with both of their losses to Kean and Montclair.
In retrospect, Voter #1 nailed it last week. Salisbury is the best team in this field, and Kean is more or less an enigma. No sour grapes from this Cortland fan. I was at the game, and neither Cortland nor Kean particularly impressed me. And I watched the Kean-Wesley game on video feed the week before, and I still don't know how Wesley didn't win that game by 2 touchdowns. They dominated scrimmage but seemed to self destruct.
Whether you rank Cortland ahead of Kean or the other way around is rather meaningless. Neither team is close to being top 3 in region (as we define "region" in this poll) imo.
And for the people claiming Endicott should be ranked higher, I have one simple question for you. If Endicott played Brockport next week on a neutral field, and you had to bet a lot of money on the winner, would you really take Endicott?
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 08:39:35 PM
Would that bet include the Cortland State gym teachers watching from the stands? Since the closest the will come to the NCAAs will be watching with you in your basement. Endicott would destroy The Cortland State gym teachers this year. Last year was a gift.
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 08:39:35 PM
Would that bet include the Cortland State gym teachers watching from the stands? Since the closest the will come to the NCAAs will be watching with you in your basement. Endicott would destroy The Cortland State gym teachers this year. Last year was a gift.
Quote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:13:15 PMEndicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 08:39:35 PM
Would that bet include the Cortland State gym teachers watching from the stands? Since the closest the will come to the NCAAs will be watching with you in your basement. Endicott would destroy The Cortland State gym teachers this year. Last year was a gift.
Last year was a gift? Do you even remember last years game?
That game was no where near as close as the score indicated. It was 42-14 w/ 10 minutes left.
Endicott get's blasted if they go to the NCAAs.
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PM
Endicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...
Quote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:27:25 PMQuote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PM
Endicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...
Endicott would get blown out by the 3rd best E8/NJAC/MAC teams...
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:33:03 PMQuote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:27:25 PMQuote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PM
Endicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...
Endicott would get blown out by the 3rd best E8/NJAC/MAC teams...
I've seen Springfield, Ithaca and Utica all play this year play. Endicott would beat them all this year.
Quote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:13:15 PM
That game was no where near as close as the score indicated. It was 42-14 w/ 10 minutes left.
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:33:03 PMQuote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:27:25 PMQuote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PM
Endicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...
Endicott would get blown out by the 3rd best E8/NJAC/MAC teams...
I've seen Springfield, Ithaca and Utica all play this year play. Endicott would beat them all this year.
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:33:03 PM
I've seen Springfield, Ithaca and Utica all play this year play. Endicott would beat them all this year.
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:33:03 PMQuote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:27:25 PMQuote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PM
Endicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...
Endicott would get blown out by the 3rd best E8/NJAC/MAC teams...
I've seen Springfield, Ithaca and Utica all play this year play. Endicott would beat them all this year.
Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PMYou consider "settling down" well into the 4th quarter impressive? The toughest thing Cstate had to do as a result of playing Endicott at home last year was to replace the field turf. It was much easier to replace it than try to clean all the Gull crap off the field. Enjoy your run this season as the team is certainly doing well in conference. Time will tell if they even make it to the playoffs much less bring home a win.Quote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:13:15 PMEndicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 08:39:35 PM
Would that bet include the Cortland State gym teachers watching from the stands? Since the closest the will come to the NCAAs will be watching with you in your basement. Endicott would destroy The Cortland State gym teachers this year. Last year was a gift.
Last year was a gift? Do you even remember last years game?
That game was no where near as close as the score indicated. It was 42-14 w/ 10 minutes left.
Endicott get's blasted if they go to the NCAAs.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 16, 2011, 10:18:19 AMQuote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PMYou consider "settling down" well into the 4th quarter impressive? The toughest thing Cstate had to do as a result of playing Endicott at home last year was to replace the field turf. It was much easier to replace it than try to clean all the Gull crap off the field. Enjoy your run this season as the team is certainly doing well in conference. Time will tell if they even make it to the playoffs much less bring home a win.Quote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:13:15 PMEndicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 08:39:35 PM
Would that bet include the Cortland State gym teachers watching from the stands? Since the closest the will come to the NCAAs will be watching with you in your basement. Endicott would destroy The Cortland State gym teachers this year. Last year was a gift.
Last year was a gift? Do you even remember last years game?
That game was no where near as close as the score indicated. It was 42-14 w/ 10 minutes left.
Endicott get's blasted if they go to the NCAAs.
Quote from: Charles on October 16, 2011, 10:26:55 AM
I just looked up the history of NCAA D3 and went back to 1973, I never saw Cortland State (University) with a championship. Infact since 1991 I didn't see an E8 teams in the championship game. I'm willing to bet that the NEFC has a team in Salem before any E8 team returns.
Quote from: Charles on October 16, 2011, 10:26:55 AMQuote from: RedDragonFan on October 16, 2011, 10:18:19 AMQuote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PMYou consider "settling down" well into the 4th quarter impressive? The toughest thing Cstate had to do as a result of playing Endicott at home last year was to replace the field turf. It was much easier to replace it than try to clean all the Gull crap off the field. Enjoy your run this season as the team is certainly doing well in conference. Time will tell if they even make it to the playoffs much less bring home a win.Quote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:13:15 PMEndicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 08:39:35 PM
Would that bet include the Cortland State gym teachers watching from the stands? Since the closest the will come to the NCAAs will be watching with you in your basement. Endicott would destroy The Cortland State gym teachers this year. Last year was a gift.
Last year was a gift? Do you even remember last years game?
That game was no where near as close as the score indicated. It was 42-14 w/ 10 minutes left.
Endicott get's blasted if they go to the NCAAs.
I just looked up the history of NCAA D3 and went back to 1973, I never saw Cortland State (University) with a championship. Infact since 1991 I didn't see an E8 teams in the championship game. I'm willing to bet that the NEFC has a team in Salem before any E8 team returns.
Quote from: Charles on October 16, 2011, 10:26:55 AMThanks for the half azzed research Sir Charles of Massatwo****z. In recent years, CState has had maybe 7-8 playoff appearances including the first round win last year that got us new turf (thanks again) which I think was Endicott's first ever playoff game so not sure why you would go there. And that's just Cortland. Bring in the other teams from the NJAC and Empire 8 and it get's considerably worse. Safe to say you aren't pre-law.Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 16, 2011, 10:18:19 AMQuote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 09:17:03 PMYou consider "settling down" well into the 4th quarter impressive? The toughest thing Cstate had to do as a result of playing Endicott at home last year was to replace the field turf. It was much easier to replace it than try to clean all the Gull crap off the field. Enjoy your run this season as the team is certainly doing well in conference. Time will tell if they even make it to the playoffs much less bring home a win.Quote from: Timeforachange on October 15, 2011, 09:13:15 PMEndicott's first trip to the NCAAs they were excited. They were down 21 before they settled down. However Cortland's season is over already so they won't be playing them at least. The Gulls are a very dangerous team. Would not be suprised by a run in the NCAAs...Quote from: Charles on October 15, 2011, 08:39:35 PM
Would that bet include the Cortland State gym teachers watching from the stands? Since the closest the will come to the NCAAs will be watching with you in your basement. Endicott would destroy The Cortland State gym teachers this year. Last year was a gift.
Last year was a gift? Do you even remember last years game?
That game was no where near as close as the score indicated. It was 42-14 w/ 10 minutes left.
Endicott get's blasted if they go to the NCAAs.
I just looked up the history of NCAA D3 and went back to 1973, I never saw Cortland State (University) with a championship. Infact since 1991 I didn't see an E8 teams in the championship game. I'm willing to bet that the NEFC has a team in Salem before any E8 team returns.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2011, 08:05:12 PM
There should be a little movement in the Poll this week. I just submitted my poll. My top (5) were Montclair, Salisbury, Del Val, Fisher and Hobart. Moved Kean to 6th.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 16, 2011, 09:06:40 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2011, 08:05:12 PM
There should be a little movement in the Poll this week. I just submitted my poll. My top (5) were Montclair, Salisbury, Del Val, Fisher and Hobart. Moved Kean to 6th.
Dlip's wife is a little concerned since she says that Dlip's poll always moves around. His teams' placements might not, but definitely his poll...
OK, this really doesn't get old for some reason...
Quote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2011, 09:11:41 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 16, 2011, 09:06:40 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2011, 08:05:12 PM
There should be a little movement in the Poll this week. I just submitted my poll. My top (5) were Montclair, Salisbury, Del Val, Fisher and Hobart. Moved Kean to 6th.
Dlip's wife is a little concerned since she says that Dlip's poll always moves around. His teams' placements might not, but definitely his poll...
OK, this really doesn't get old for some reason...
I was waiting for this post and was not disappointed. ;) +K
Quote from: kubiack78 on October 17, 2011, 06:40:08 AM
Ok,
Being a Midwest guy and too lazy to google it... where is Endicott? Just curious in case UWW gets seeded #2 in the weakest bracket like last year and has to travel to Endicott for the play-offs (hotels, airport, ect...) Thanks.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2011, 08:08:53 AMQuote from: kubiack78 on October 17, 2011, 06:40:08 AM
Ok,
Being a Midwest guy and too lazy to google it... where is Endicott? Just curious in case UWW gets seeded #2 in the weakest bracket like last year and has to travel to Endicott for the play-offs (hotels, airport, ect...) Thanks.
This might be post of the year
Quote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 08:45:37 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2011, 08:08:53 AMQuote from: kubiack78 on October 17, 2011, 06:40:08 AM
Ok,
Being a Midwest guy and too lazy to google it... where is Endicott? Just curious in case UWW gets seeded #2 in the weakest bracket like last year and has to travel to Endicott for the play-offs (hotels, airport, ect...) Thanks.
This might be post of the year
anyone know what happened to Ithaca the last time they played against an NEFC team?
Quote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 09:33:39 AM
you guys are so funny, such passion, I love it....
Quote from: dlip on October 17, 2011, 10:33:18 AM
dlip thinks it may be time to just ignore Charles until he starts posting with some sort of passion and knowledge instead of just trying to get a rise out of everyone. See what Charles does not understand, like dlip did not first understand when he arrived on the D3 boards, is how passionate, knowledgeable, and serious (within the game of football, not life) we are about our D3 football. dlip came on the LL board insulting and taking pot shots at SRT and anything to do with RPI and anything that was not completely in favor of Union. It was then, after a few days of being a complete asshole, dlip realized that these boards are very meaningful and sacred to many of us. So let's maybe cut Charles a break and ignore him until he stops being a ****ing asshole and realizes that he is meaningless on here unless he brings some meaningful, legitimate talk to the boards. If he does that, than we welcome him and would be glad to look at what Endicott has accomplished thus far and what is possibly to come from them. ;)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 10:40:02 AM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.cox.net%2Fawmorris%2Fwooderson%2Fthewooderson13.jpg&hash=3e3a5ed5b018a4769007ea2ebfe71e51e73b8fd2)
'That's what I love about these NEFC teams. I get older, they're still the same sucky league.'
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 10:40:02 AM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.cox.net%2Fawmorris%2Fwooderson%2Fthewooderson13.jpg&hash=3e3a5ed5b018a4769007ea2ebfe71e51e73b8fd2)
'That's what I love about these NEFC teams. I get older, they're still the same sucky league.'
Quote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 10:58:16 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 10:40:02 AM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.cox.net%2Fawmorris%2Fwooderson%2Fthewooderson13.jpg&hash=3e3a5ed5b018a4769007ea2ebfe71e51e73b8fd2)
'That's what I love about these NEFC teams. I get older, they're still the same sucky league.'
saying kids suck is wrong, please refrain from calling our student athletes, perhaps on this board you may think that you're something special but to call out student athletes is rude and wrong.
Quote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 10:58:16 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 10:40:02 AM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.cox.net%2Fawmorris%2Fwooderson%2Fthewooderson13.jpg&hash=3e3a5ed5b018a4769007ea2ebfe71e51e73b8fd2)
'That's what I love about these NEFC teams. I get older, they're still the same sucky league.'
saying kids suck is wrong, please refrain from calling our student athletes, perhaps on this board you may think that you're something special but to call out student athletes is rude and wrong.
Quote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 10:58:16 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 10:40:02 AM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.cox.net%2Fawmorris%2Fwooderson%2Fthewooderson13.jpg&hash=3e3a5ed5b018a4769007ea2ebfe71e51e73b8fd2)
'That's what I love about these NEFC teams. I get older, they're still the same sucky league.'
saying kids suck is wrong, please refrain from calling our student athletes, perhaps on this board you may think that you're something special but to call out student athletes is rude and wrong.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 16, 2011, 09:06:40 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2011, 08:05:12 PM
There should be a little movement in the Poll this week. I just submitted my poll. My top (5) were Montclair, Salisbury, Del Val, Fisher and Hobart. Moved Kean to 6th.
Dlip's wife is a little concerned since she says that Dlip's poll always moves around. His teams' placements might not, but definitely his poll...
OK, this really doesn't get old for some reason...
Quote from: dlip on October 17, 2011, 11:56:56 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 16, 2011, 09:06:40 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2011, 08:05:12 PM
There should be a little movement in the Poll this week. I just submitted my poll. My top (5) were Montclair, Salisbury, Del Val, Fisher and Hobart. Moved Kean to 6th.
Dlip's wife is a little concerned since she says that Dlip's poll always moves around. His teams' placements might not, but definitely his poll...
OK, this really doesn't get old for some reason...
+k to the counselor for this post. ****, since dlip has gotton married no one has talked about his poll very much at all, ERFP or otherwise. Dlip feels like he is in college again, and even then his poll never made it onto a website. Well technically...alright dlip is done ;)
Quote from: pg04 on October 17, 2011, 12:03:20 PM
OK, we've passed the line... :P
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 17, 2011, 12:04:59 PM
I understand that and that's why I think the system is flawed when the NJAC and MAC only play one OOC conference. There's got to be a better way to evaluate pool C candidates than the current system. I'm still skeptical about the NJAC and think they're living off last year a little bit given that three teams were in the top 15 a week or two ago.
More importantly, at the halfway point or so, if one's formulating an opinion to date, you have to take into consideration the SOS to date. E.g. who they played. Perhaps I feel it more acutely because the LL has been down two years running and Hobart's getting effectively zero credit for their season to date and somehow being cast as the team who went, unfortunately, 11-7 the last two years (which would've been good when I played in the late 90's) and look at commentary and voting from everyone that's completely discounted a 36 point road evisceration of SJF (who beat us similarly last year on our home field) as well as no close wins to date. Hobart's SOS is going down from here, so it seems like they should've gotten more credit in the front half of the seson (Dick-Road, SJF-Road, SLU-Home, Union-Road) than in the back half (MM-Home, WPI-Road, RPI-Home, UofR-Home), yet you know that they'll drift up the rankings in D3 and east poll and probably in seeding consideration if they win the last 4 which should be easier than the front 4. It just doesn't follow and yet, it's predictable that will happen if Hobart can pull off an undefeated season.
I bet Widener is just as unhappy about swapping Hobart out with Thiel as Hobart is with losing that game altogether now. A win over this Hobart team might give them a shot at pool C is they won out with only a close loss to an undefeated DelVal. All things considered, that move is going to hurt them more than us this year and we're back to 10 games next year (I think, Springfield and we pick up Utica along with Dickinson and somebody else, maybe Geneva).
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 17, 2011, 12:09:36 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 17, 2011, 12:04:59 PM
I understand that and that's why I think the system is flawed when the NJAC and MAC only play one OOC conference. There's got to be a better way to evaluate pool C candidates than the current system. I'm still skeptical about the NJAC and think they're living off last year a little bit given that three teams were in the top 15 a week or two ago.
More importantly, at the halfway point or so, if one's formulating an opinion to date, you have to take into consideration the SOS to date. E.g. who they played. Perhaps I feel it more acutely because the LL has been down two years running and Hobart's getting effectively zero credit for their season to date and somehow being cast as the team who went, unfortunately, 11-7 the last two years (which would've been good when I played in the late 90's) and look at commentary and voting from everyone that's completely discounted a 36 point road evisceration of SJF (who beat us similarly last year on our home field) as well as no close wins to date. Hobart's SOS is going down from here, so it seems like they should've gotten more credit in the front half of the seson (Dick-Road, SJF-Road, SLU-Home, Union-Road) than in the back half (MM-Home, WPI-Road, RPI-Home, UofR-Home), yet you know that they'll drift up the rankings in D3 and east poll and probably in seeding consideration if they win the last 4 which should be easier than the front 4. It just doesn't follow and yet, it's predictable that will happen if Hobart can pull off an undefeated season.
I bet Widener is just as unhappy about swapping Hobart out with Thiel as Hobart is with losing that game altogether now. A win over this Hobart team might give them a shot at pool C is they won out with only a close loss to an undefeated DelVal. All things considered, that move is going to hurt them more than us this year and we're back to 10 games next year (I think, Springfield and we pick up Utica along with Dickinson and somebody else, maybe Geneva).
You know my preachings about SoS. If we don't get a subjective component sooner rather than later (not a fully subjective strength index, but a component that includes perhaps the Top 25 polls in D3), then the only teams that will win Pool C bids are teams with only 6, 7 or 8 conference teams. Teams in conferences with 9 or 10 are at a distinct disadvantage since their SoS will trend at .500 without much deviation. That proves nothing about strength of schedule -- it proves that you lack deviation in larger conferences. The numbers are pretty much a joke.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 11:49:17 AMQuote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 10:58:16 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 10:40:02 AM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.cox.net%2Fawmorris%2Fwooderson%2Fthewooderson13.jpg&hash=3e3a5ed5b018a4769007ea2ebfe71e51e73b8fd2)
'That's what I love about these NEFC teams. I get older, they're still the same sucky league.'
saying kids suck is wrong, please refrain from calling our student athletes, perhaps on this board you may think that you're something special but to call out student athletes is rude and wrong.
Dude, you are out of your mind. I'm actually pulling for the NEFC to improve. I DO have indirect ties to Endicott and I root for them each week.. But when some clown like you comes on here saying that they should be respected nationally and will be in Salem before we know it...well, I have to draw a line somewhere.
I don't call out specific players and wouldn't do that. And i'm not biased either. I'm realistic. And i'm more than willing to say that other than Hobart, the LL is a sucky league right now too.
However, I AM something special.
Quote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 12:56:52 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 11:49:17 AMQuote from: Charles on October 17, 2011, 10:58:16 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 10:40:02 AM
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmembers.cox.net%2Fawmorris%2Fwooderson%2Fthewooderson13.jpg&hash=3e3a5ed5b018a4769007ea2ebfe71e51e73b8fd2)
'That's what I love about these NEFC teams. I get older, they're still the same sucky league.'
saying kids suck is wrong, please refrain from calling our student athletes, perhaps on this board you may think that you're something special but to call out student athletes is rude and wrong.
Dude, you are out of your mind. I'm actually pulling for the NEFC to improve. I DO have indirect ties to Endicott and I root for them each week.. But when some clown like you comes on here saying that they should be respected nationally and will be in Salem before we know it...well, I have to draw a line somewhere.
I don't call out specific players and wouldn't do that. And i'm not biased either. I'm realistic. And i'm more than willing to say that other than Hobart, the LL is a sucky league right now too.
However, I AM something special.
first of all "lewdogg" I wrote "I'm willing to bet that the NEFC has a team in Salem before any E8 team returns".
and second, dude, you're way out of line dissing student athletes, that's just wrong and not very nice. They all work extremely hard from the 0-7 teams to the 7-0 teams.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 17, 2011, 01:31:07 PM
he who smites should also reply....
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 4 ) | 6-0 | 67 | 2 | at Hartwick |
2 Montclair State( 3 ) | 6-0 | 60 | 3 | at New Jersey |
3 Delaware Valley | 5-0 | 58 | 4 | vs. King's |
4 Hobart | 4-0 | 50 | 5 | vs. Merchant Marine |
5 St. John Fisher | 5-1 | 39 | 7 | at Springfield |
6 Kean | 5-1 | 33 | 1 | vs. Morrisville State |
7 Cortland State | 4-2 | 26 | 8 | vs. William Paterson |
8 Widener | 6-1 | 16 | NR | vs. #10 Lebanon Valley |
9 Lycoming | 5-1 | 15 | NR | at Stevenson |
10 Lebanon Valley | 5-1 | 11 | NR | at #8 Widener |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 02:12:26 PM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 4 ) 6-0 67 2 at Hartwick 2 Montclair State( 3 ) 6-0 60 3 at New Jersey 3 Delaware Valley 5-0 58 4 vs. King's 4 Hobart 4-0 50 5 vs. Merchant Marine 5 St. John Fisher 5-1 39 7 at Springfield 6 Kean 5-1 33 1 vs. Morrisville State 7 Cortland State 4-2 26 8 vs. William Paterson 8 Widener 6-1 16 NR vs. #10 Lebanon Valley 9 Lycoming 5-1 15 NR at Stevenson 10 Lebanon Valley 5-1 11 NR at #8 Widener
Dropped Out:
#6 Alfred
#9 Endicott
#10 New Jersey
Also Receiving votes:
Endicott 8
Rowan 1
Springfield 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,2,2,1,2,1)
Montclair State (5,2,1,1,3,1,4)
Delaware Valley (2,4,3,3,2,3,2)
Hobart (3,3,5,4,4,5,3)
St. John Fisher (6,6,4,5,6,6,5)
Kean (8,5,6,6,5,7,7)
Cortland State (4,10,7,10,7,4,9)
Widener (7,8,NR,8,10,NR,6)
Lycoming (9,9,8,9,8,NR,8)
Lebanon Valley (10,NR,9,7,9,9,NR)
Endicott (NR,7,10,NR,NR,8,NR)
Rowan (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#10 Lebanon Valley at #8 Widener
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 02:09:51 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 17, 2011, 01:31:07 PM
he who smites should also reply....
I'll come right out and admit. I smited you, not because you think Endicott can compete, but because you just aren't getting it. I don't think there are too many people on this board that do not think that Endicott can win at least 1 game in the playoffs. They are a decent team and the NEFC is improving a little at a time. They are getting recognized on all of the polls and people are paying attention to them.
The issue here is the manner of which Sir Charles is trying to tout Endicott and the NEFC. He's over the top and he's made some ridiculous comments and then he even tries to defend himself by twisting other people's posts. Dude can be proud of his team for finally winning consistently, but being obnoxious isn't going to make a lot of fans. Even if they do better than everyone thinks, in the end, he's still a blue duck.(*and in this case, it's code for a-hole)
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 17, 2011, 12:36:58 PM
Two problems, though, Bombers. Look at the Liberty League -- there's a good chance that any league will begin to bulk up in the middle anyway, with 7 teams or 10 teams. Even the E8 is beginning to do that this year. Also, the current SoS index does nothing to reflect what you just stated (the 7-1/1-7 opponents instead of 5-4/4-5 opponents). At the end of the season, with the exception of the game played against that team, both pairs of games register as basically .500 in the OWP (with maybe only slight variations in OOWP).
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 17, 2011, 02:24:43 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 02:09:51 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 17, 2011, 01:31:07 PM
he who smites should also reply....
I'll come right out and admit. I smited you, not because you think Endicott can compete, but because you just aren't getting it. I don't think there are too many people on this board that do not think that Endicott can win at least 1 game in the playoffs. They are a decent team and the NEFC is improving a little at a time. They are getting recognized on all of the polls and people are paying attention to them.
The issue here is the manner of which Sir Charles is trying to tout Endicott and the NEFC. He's over the top and he's made some ridiculous comments and then he even tries to defend himself by twisting other people's posts. Dude can be proud of his team for finally winning consistently, but being obnoxious isn't going to make a lot of fans. Even if they do better than everyone thinks, in the end, he's still a blue duck.(*and in this case, it's code for a-hole)
i did not get that out of the replies. I do agree that most of the backlash at Charles was due to his 'attitude' as opposed to who he was touting.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 02:12:26 PM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 4 ) 6-0 67 2 at Hartwick 2 Montclair State( 3 ) 6-0 60 3 at New Jersey 3 Delaware Valley 5-0 58 4 vs. King's 4 Hobart 4-0 50 5 vs. Merchant Marine 5 St. John Fisher 5-1 39 7 at Springfield 6 Kean 5-1 33 1 vs. Morrisville State 7 Cortland State 4-2 26 8 vs. William Paterson 8 Widener 6-1 16 NR vs. #10 Lebanon Valley 9 Lycoming 5-1 15 NR at Stevenson 10 Lebanon Valley 5-1 11 NR at #8 Widener
Dropped Out:
#6 Alfred
#9 Endicott
#10 New Jersey
Also Receiving votes:
Endicott 8
Rowan 1
Springfield 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,2,2,1,2,1)
Montclair State (5,2,1,1,3,1,4)
Delaware Valley (2,4,3,3,2,3,2)
Hobart (3,3,5,4,4,5,3)
St. John Fisher (6,6,4,5,6,6,5)
Kean (8,5,6,6,5,7,7)
Cortland State (4,10,7,10,7,4,9)
Widener (7,8,NR,8,10,NR,6)
Lycoming (9,9,8,9,8,NR,8)
Lebanon Valley (10,NR,9,7,9,9,NR)
Endicott (NR,7,10,NR,NR,8,NR)
Rowan (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#10 Lebanon Valley at #8 Widener
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2011, 02:37:34 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 02:12:26 PM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 4 ) 6-0 67 2 at Hartwick 2 Montclair State( 3 ) 6-0 60 3 at New Jersey 3 Delaware Valley 5-0 58 4 vs. King's 4 Hobart 4-0 50 5 vs. Merchant Marine 5 St. John Fisher 5-1 39 7 at Springfield 6 Kean 5-1 33 1 vs. Morrisville State 7 Cortland State 4-2 26 8 vs. William Paterson 8 Widener 6-1 16 NR vs. #10 Lebanon Valley 9 Lycoming 5-1 15 NR at Stevenson 10 Lebanon Valley 5-1 11 NR at #8 Widener
Dropped Out:
#6 Alfred
#9 Endicott
#10 New Jersey
Also Receiving votes:
Endicott 8
Rowan 1
Springfield 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,2,2,1,2,1)
Montclair State (5,2,1,1,3,1,4)
Delaware Valley (2,4,3,3,2,3,2)
Hobart (3,3,5,4,4,5,3)
St. John Fisher (6,6,4,5,6,6,5)
Kean (8,5,6,6,5,7,7)
Cortland State (4,10,7,10,7,4,9)
Widener (7,8,NR,8,10,NR,6)
Lycoming (9,9,8,9,8,NR,8)
Lebanon Valley (10,NR,9,7,9,9,NR)
Endicott (NR,7,10,NR,NR,8,NR)
Rowan (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#10 Lebanon Valley at #8 Widener
So, um, voter #3. Fisher over Hobart huh? Gotta say I'm not a fan. Alfred getting reduced to a smoldering crater and Ithaca losing makes those wins carry a little less weight, even if Rochester and Buffalo State picked up wins. And unlike the whole Kean/Cortland drama, this wasn't a situation where the Cardinals got stopped on the goal line as time ran out and might have played better. Hobart just whipped them. I also give credit to the Statesman playing 3 of 4 on the road, while Fisher's had a lot of home cooking.
Hopefully this doesn't start a firestorm, and I'm not trying to diss Fisher here. But it's how I see it
Quote from: rams1102 on October 17, 2011, 03:27:09 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2011, 02:37:34 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 02:12:26 PM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 4 ) 6-0 67 2 at Hartwick 2 Montclair State( 3 ) 6-0 60 3 at New Jersey 3 Delaware Valley 5-0 58 4 vs. King's 4 Hobart 4-0 50 5 vs. Merchant Marine 5 St. John Fisher 5-1 39 7 at Springfield 6 Kean 5-1 33 1 vs. Morrisville State 7 Cortland State 4-2 26 8 vs. William Paterson 8 Widener 6-1 16 NR vs. #10 Lebanon Valley 9 Lycoming 5-1 15 NR at Stevenson 10 Lebanon Valley 5-1 11 NR at #8 Widener
Dropped Out:
#6 Alfred
#9 Endicott
#10 New Jersey
Also Receiving votes:
Endicott 8
Rowan 1
Springfield 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,2,2,1,2,1)
Montclair State (5,2,1,1,3,1,4)
Delaware Valley (2,4,3,3,2,3,2)
Hobart (3,3,5,4,4,5,3)
St. John Fisher (6,6,4,5,6,6,5)
Kean (8,5,6,6,5,7,7)
Cortland State (4,10,7,10,7,4,9)
Widener (7,8,NR,8,10,NR,6)
Lycoming (9,9,8,9,8,NR,8)
Lebanon Valley (10,NR,9,7,9,9,NR)
Endicott (NR,7,10,NR,NR,8,NR)
Rowan (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#10 Lebanon Valley at #8 Widener
So, um, voter #3. Fisher over Hobart huh? Gotta say I'm not a fan. Alfred getting reduced to a smoldering crater and Ithaca losing makes those wins carry a little less weight, even if Rochester and Buffalo State picked up wins. And unlike the whole Kean/Cortland drama, this wasn't a situation where the Cardinals got stopped on the goal line as time ran out and might have played better. Hobart just whipped them. I also give credit to the Statesman playing 3 of 4 on the road, while Fisher's had a lot of home cooking.
Hopefully this doesn't start a firestorm, and I'm not trying to diss Fisher here. But it's how I see it
I'm voter #3. I realize that Hobart beat Fisher pretty good. Fisher plays a (10) game schedule and their conference is very good. I am not a fan of either team. I am not sure we will know more about Hobart other then they will win the LL and go to the dance. The next 2-3 weeks will tell when it comes to Fisher and Salisbury, but as of now I lead twords Fisher. Looks like voter #1 & #7 have no love for Montclair. ::) Pretty surprised to see Endicott getting bumped. I guess all the chatter about the NEFC killed them.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 02:21:40 PM
Very surprised to see Endicott drop out with a 49-0 W over Plymouth((4-3) with 4 JV wins) and replaced by Lebanon Valley with a 51-7 W over FDU-Florham((0-6) all blowout losses). Neither win is overly 'impressive', but expected. Usually don't see a swing like that when a team wins 49-0. Interesting.
I see voter 1 is still being stubborn as all hell. Now it's with Cortland/Montclair. It's gotta be a Cortland guy right?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 02:26:16 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 17, 2011, 02:24:43 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 02:09:51 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 17, 2011, 01:31:07 PM
he who smites should also reply....
I'll come right out and admit. I smited you, not because you think Endicott can compete, but because you just aren't getting it. I don't think there are too many people on this board that do not think that Endicott can win at least 1 game in the playoffs. They are a decent team and the NEFC is improving a little at a time. They are getting recognized on all of the polls and people are paying attention to them.
The issue here is the manner of which Sir Charles is trying to tout Endicott and the NEFC. He's over the top and he's made some ridiculous comments and then he even tries to defend himself by twisting other people's posts. Dude can be proud of his team for finally winning consistently, but being obnoxious isn't going to make a lot of fans. Even if they do better than everyone thinks, in the end, he's still a blue duck.(*and in this case, it's code for a-hole)
i did not get that out of the replies. I do agree that most of the backlash at Charles was due to his 'attitude' as opposed to who he was touting.
I'll give your +K back then :-)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 03:57:18 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 02:21:40 PM
Very surprised to see Endicott drop out with a 49-0 W over Plymouth((4-3) with 4 JV wins) and replaced by Lebanon Valley with a 51-7 W over FDU-Florham((0-6) all blowout losses). Neither win is overly 'impressive', but expected. Usually don't see a swing like that when a team wins 49-0. Interesting.
I see voter 1 is still being stubborn as all hell. Now it's with Cortland/Montclair. It's gotta be a Cortland guy right?
Well, Endicott did make 9th in last week's poll with 8 points, the same number they garnered this week. Endicott will likely grab some more votes next week barring a close finish between Widener and Leb Valley.
And, FWIW, voter #1 left Cortland and Montclair in the same spot as last week when the focus was clearly on the positioning of Kean.
Quote from: pg04 on October 17, 2011, 04:19:14 PM
Are you voter #1? Everyone has pretty much fessed up but voter 1
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 04:25:01 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 17, 2011, 04:19:14 PM
Are you voter #1? Everyone has pretty much fessed up but voter 1
If everyone is so interested, yes, I am the stubborn as hell voter #1. I like to try and stay out of the "parsing every ballot" discussions since I don't want to keep anyone from joining in the future for fear they'll have to spend hours discussing why they placed each team where they did. We've had a hard enough time getting 7 voters this year!
But feel free to say Kaz is a d-bag rather than voter #1 from now on.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 04:25:01 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 17, 2011, 04:19:14 PM
Are you voter #1? Everyone has pretty much fessed up but voter 1
If everyone is so interested, yes, I am the stubborn as hell voter #1. I like to try and stay out of the "parsing every ballot" discussions since I don't want to keep anyone from joining in the future for fear they'll have to spend hours discussing why they placed each team where they did. We've had a hard enough time getting 7 voters this year!
But feel free to say Kaz is a d-bag rather than voter #1 from now on.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 17, 2011, 09:22:08 PM
Here's another point of reference, the Lambert poll administered by the ECAC. The Lambert poll encompasses the East region plus the teams from the Centennial Conference, Wesley, Presidents Athletic Conference and a few spare teams in Pennsylvania, Virginia and DC. The pollsters are mostly media, I believe, including a handful of people from D3football.com.
The poll is posted here. Let's see who can spot the strangest vote first. :)
http://www.ecacsports.com/lambert/2011-12_Releases/Lambert_Release_Week_2_Poll.pdf
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 17, 2011, 04:45:55 PM
OK, let's get to the heart of the matter. Kaz, enlighten me on this -- what are you seeing that I'm not? Cortland loses to Montclair head-to-head and has a two-loss differential. Cortland has no major victory aside from a moderate one against Rowan. Their loss to Kean looks even worse now, since Kean just lost to a former oh-fer team (sorry pg). How is that positioning tenable?
Listen, you and I both saw the Alfred/Cortland game last year in the Second Round of the NCAA Playoffs. We were both impressed by both teams. That said, neither team is at their 2010 level. Cortland started in my rankings as the highest East Region team and now doesn't even appear in my Lambert Poll ballot (meaning, not in the Top 10 of the ECAC teams eligible in that system). Until they do something noteworthy (like win a few games in a row or beat Ithaca or something of the like), I can't put that team over Montclair.
Trust me, I face this issue in the national poll. I still have Trine over Adrian despite Adrian's head-to-head win over Trine. I'm giving Trine a little benefit of the doubt because of the team's normal dominance in their conference and their history in playoff games giving the team an overall advantage down the stretch. That said, Trine is #23 and Adrian would be #26 if I had to vote it out further than 25 -- and that margin continues to shrink. If Adrian keeps winning and Trine doesn't impress me one week, those two will invert. I had Trine further up than most, so #23 was a crash for Trine on my ballot. Adrian wasn't even a consideration, so #26 is an overall leap. But all that said, if the loss differential between the teams were two losses, Trine wouldn't be in the same echelon as Adrian on my ballot at that point. Every benefit of the doubt would be gone, and I'd have room for Adrian in the actual ballot.
So, I'm not a stranger to these decisions. I just want to see your own insight on this one.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 17, 2011, 04:45:55 PM
OK, let's get to the heart of the matter. Kaz, enlighten me on this -- what are you seeing that I'm not?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 18, 2011, 09:33:52 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 17, 2011, 04:45:55 PM
OK, let's get to the heart of the matter. Kaz, enlighten me on this -- what are you seeing that I'm not?
Well, to be fair, it's a lot of little things which I'm valuing more than the H2H. I feel like Cortland, Montclair and Rowan are all about equal with Kean a little lower. Kean's big wins seem more like they were fortunate on a few plays to change the result; good enough to be in the game and lucky enough to win it. But Kean does have those wins over Wesley and Cortland, so they count for something which is why I have them in and not Rowan.
As for why Cortland over Montclair, a one point win at home doesn't seem like enough evidence to declare Montclair better than Cortland. Home field should count for something (which is why Alfred held Salisbury to 69 on saterday!). On the season Cortland has gained more yards per game on offense and allowed fewer on defense than Montclair. And the same occurred in their H2H - 406 to 280. In a one point road loss where the losing team outgained the winner by 45%, I'll naturally think the losing team was a better team that got beat.
Plus, I won't hide the fact that I do love reading posts from LD11 and Yanks going off the handle, so my stubbornness may also stem from my desire to see some animated posts. The poll itself works out the individual voter quirks, so taking a few small liberties in our rankings I think is a good thing overall.
Quote from: pg04 on October 17, 2011, 09:30:26 PM
I'm assuming it's Brockport somehow receiving a vote at 1-5.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 18, 2011, 11:19:39 AMQuote from: pg04 on October 17, 2011, 09:30:26 PM
I'm assuming it's Brockport somehow receiving a vote at 1-5.
Not just a vote but apparently multiple mentions to be essentially No. 12.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 18, 2011, 09:33:52 AM
In a one point road loss where the losing team outgained the winner by 45%, I'll naturally think the losing team was a better team that got beat.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 18, 2011, 12:00:13 PMAs much as my heart wants to agree with Clandfan, I do agree with Yanks. While two plays going different would have changed the outcome to wins for Cortland, they didn't and Cortland had not just those two but multiple, good, solid opportunities to win the games. Cortland is no doubt a strong team and can compete at high levels but they needed to finish those two games. Yanks is right, the Montclair game they needed to run out the clock and didn't and Kean, at home no less, they didn't get it done 4 plays from the 5. They had the opportunites and needed to find a way and didn't.
I agree with LD on this one, and removing Kean from the equation now, that the fact that Cortland now has two losses in the league and that Montclair has zero, I just have no idea how Cortland can be ranked ahead of Montclair, especially with Montclair winning the H2H match-up.
What makes football great compared to other sports, in my opinion, is the fact that the head to head match ups are so important. Every game single matters. I mean, if MUC had two similar losses to Cortland this season in their league where there was a perceived (although probably real) domination of their opponents in every aspect of the game except the scoreboard...they would still be on the outside looking in come playoff time. You only get one shot at a team...nothing else really, truly matters...which is why H2H match-ups is the first tie-breaker, and always will be.
And clandfan, Cortland may be better than they were in 2010...but unlike 2010, they didn't get it done when they had to, and their "poor" season doesn't simply break down to 2 plays.
- Let's take a look at the Kean game first, where you mentioned a failed 4th and goal at the Kean 2 yard line. What about the previous 3 plays? Cortland has a 1st and Goal at the 5 yard line, and then proceeded to run the ball for no gain on 1st down. Then Cortland ran it again for 3 yards on 2nd down. On third down it said Pitcher had a run/gain for no yards...so either it was a draw or he scrambled after dropping back. Next was the incomplete pass on 4th and 2. Good or great teams find a way to score...at home...with a first and goal at the 5 yard line...not complain that a failed 4th and 2 cost them the game. Honestly...in that situation, I give all the credit in the world to the Kean defense.
- Now for Montclair...yes...there appears to have been "blown" coverage on Montclair's final drive to the tune of a 41 yards that set up the final FG that ultimately won the game for Montclair. Or...it could have just been a great play/call going deep on 3rd and 4 at their own 42...it all depends on which sideline you are rooting for. But the question that should be asked is why didn't Cortland respond after the FG? You are acting like that FG was the final play of the game...but in reality, there was 1:16 remaining on the clock. After the KO, Cortland had the ball at their own 37 yard line and 1:11 left to play, down by 1 point. Going a little over 40 yards to get a shot at a 35 yard FG in just over one minute is not unheard of. But how did Cortland respond? A scramble by Pitcher, followed by 3 straight incomplete passes. Also...I would challenge you that Cortland was lucky to get back in the game after being down 31-14 late in the 3rd. What about getting a safety late in the game to put you up 33-31, and then getting the ball back on the KO at about the 50 with just under 5 minutes to go and a chance to run out the clock? Again...good or great teams find a way to get that done...and Cortland didn't.
I am actually not ripping Cortland here...they were my preseason #1, and are still ranked in my top 10 despite two early losses where they had a chance to win both games on multiple occasions and failed to do so. But let's not pretend that their "poor" season breaks down to 2 plays. Teams that are "better" than they were the year before (when they made the 2nd round of the NCAA tournament) find ways to win both of those games when presented with multiple opportunities. Personally though...I hope Montclair runs the table now so that we have a chance to keep MUC out of the East.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 17, 2011, 04:41:50 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 17, 2011, 04:25:01 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 17, 2011, 04:19:14 PM
Are you voter #1? Everyone has pretty much fessed up but voter 1
If everyone is so interested, yes, I am the stubborn as hell voter #1. I like to try and stay out of the "parsing every ballot" discussions since I don't want to keep anyone from joining in the future for fear they'll have to spend hours discussing why they placed each team where they did. We've had a hard enough time getting 7 voters this year!
But feel free to say Kaz is a d-bag rather than voter #1 from now on.
No one is calling anyone a d-bag, minus maybe Charles...
It's just interesting how you had 2 teams behind Cortland that both beat them. It's not wrong, it just didn't make a heck of a lot of sense to a few people. Especially since both(Kean/Montclair) were undefeated at the time. Now that Kean has lost to a previous 0 win Brockport(although they've played pretty much every team close), I can understand it. I like to rank the teams on a week by week basis rather than trying to stay static and guess what the end of the year will look like. In that case, we could just keep our pre-season polls and talk about it at the end of the year.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 18, 2011, 12:36:18 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 18, 2011, 09:33:52 AM
In a one point road loss where the losing team outgained the winner by 45%, I'll naturally think the losing team was a better team that got beat.
I'm looking at the Cortland-Montclair boxscore and I don't see what you see.
http://d3football.com/seasons/2011/boxscores/20111008_hrvs.xml
Cortland: 294 passing yards + 136 rushing yards = 430 total yards
Montclair: 259 passing yards + 151 rushing yards = 410 total yards
If my math is right, this is about a 5% difference, not 45%
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 18, 2011, 02:49:46 PM
Let me be more blunt about the Cortland effect:
2010:
9/11 at Kean * • W, 24-12 BX RC
9/18 vs. Buffalo State * • W, 35-7 BX RC
9/25 at Western Connecticut * • W, 45-0 BX RC
10/2 at New Jersey * • W, 37-0 BX RC
10/9 vs. Brockport State * • W, 35-0 BX RC
10/16 at Rowan * • L, 20-17
10/23 at Morrisville State * • W, 42-6 BX
10/30 vs. Montclair State * • W, 10-9 BX RC
11/6 vs. William Paterson * • W, 38-7 BX RC
11/13 vs. Ithaca • W, 20-17 BX RC
11/20 vs. Endicott W, 49-35 BX RC
11/27 vs. Alfred L, 34-20 BX RC RC
2011:
9/3 vs. Buffalo State * • W, 28-12 BX RC
9/17 vs. Kean * • L, 21-16 BX RC RC
9/24 at Rowan * • W, 31-28 BX RC
10/1 vs. Morrisville State * • W, 55-14 BX RC
10/8 at Montclair State * • L, 34-33 BX RC
10/15 at Western Connecticut * • W, 56-10 BX
We're not just talking about 2 plays, and even if Cortland were undefeated, I would not be feeling comfortable about making a statement that the team is better than or as good as they were in 2010. The team has taken a step back this year, and the scores alone are pointing to that, let alone the W/L record. I am not impressed by the body of work so far, even if we were talking about a 5-1 team right now. Montclair has not won impressively for the most part, but their play has been a helluva lot more consistent than this list of games shows.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 18, 2011, 04:21:35 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 18, 2011, 02:49:46 PM
Let me be more blunt about the Cortland effect:
2010:
9/11 at Kean * • W, 24-12 BX RC
9/18 vs. Buffalo State * • W, 35-7 BX RC
9/25 at Western Connecticut * • W, 45-0 BX RC
10/2 at New Jersey * • W, 37-0 BX RC
10/9 vs. Brockport State * • W, 35-0 BX RC
10/16 at Rowan * • L, 20-17
10/23 at Morrisville State * • W, 42-6 BX
10/30 vs. Montclair State * • W, 10-9 BX RC
11/6 vs. William Paterson * • W, 38-7 BX RC
11/13 vs. Ithaca • W, 20-17 BX RC
11/20 vs. Endicott W, 49-35 BX RC
11/27 vs. Alfred L, 34-20 BX RC RC
2011:
9/3 vs. Buffalo State * • W, 28-12 BX RC
9/17 vs. Kean * • L, 21-16 BX RC RC
9/24 at Rowan * • W, 31-28 BX RC
10/1 vs. Morrisville State * • W, 55-14 BX RC
10/8 at Montclair State * • L, 34-33 BX RC
10/15 at Western Connecticut * • W, 56-10 BX
We're not just talking about 2 plays, and even if Cortland were undefeated, I would not be feeling comfortable about making a statement that the team is better than or as good as they were in 2010. The team has taken a step back this year, and the scores alone are pointing to that, let alone the W/L record. I am not impressed by the body of work so far, even if we were talking about a 5-1 team right now. Montclair has not won impressively for the most part, but their play has been a helluva lot more consistent than this list of games shows.
Turnovers. It's all about the turnovers. Nothing else explains it.
The rush defense is better--opponents are averaging 2.3 yards per carry, as opposed to the 2.7 last season. The pass defense is better--opponents have a 52.7% completion percentage, 9.2 yards per catch and a 95.4 rating, as opposed to the 55.7%, 11.6 YPC and 115.5 rating, they had last season. Cortland's sack totals are up as well, with 18 through six games, as opposed to the 31 in 12 games last year. The red zone defense is allowing TD's at the same rate (50%) than last year
Cortland's running backs are down a bit--averaging 4.1 yards a carry as opposed to 4.6 last season. But, the passing game is much better, completing 60.8% of its' passes, at 14.9 yards a catch for a 161.4 rating, as opposed to last season's 55.1%, 11.4 YPC and 120.4 rating. The sacks are down, as Cortland's only allowed four in six games, after allowing 18 last season. The offense has been much better in the red zone
Cortland's offense is actually scoring 5.5 more points a game this season. The defense is allowing 7.6 more, but almost all of their statistics are as good or better. Except for turnovers.
Last season, Cortland forced 34 in 12 games, nearly three a game. This year? Six in six. That's a huge difference, and it's really the only major difference. (Cortland's special teams are a little weaker, and it cost them the Kean game, but still) Last year, Cortland picked off 21 passes. This year? Three.
That's a lot of interceptions turning into incompletions, keeping drives alive, and allowing a team more opportunities to score.
This is exactly what happened with Ithaca. First five weeks, they force 18 turnovers, and the defense looks otherwordly. Last week? One, and they get shredded.
I know you're an evidence guy Frank, so I know you'll appreciate it
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 18, 2011, 05:27:25 PM
But it goes back to an argument we had a year ago concerning the DelVal/Wesley barnburner. It's the sword and shield issue of turnovers. We questioned whether or not DelVal was strong because they forced either 5 or 6 turnovers but still lost by just 3 points, if memory serves.
The point is that the forcing of turnovers DOES define the strength of a team and its defense. Usually, it points to effectiveness in reach a QB since most turnovers initiate with either poor passes under duress or sack/fumbles.
And as for other teams getting better -- if every team is getting better, according to you, then it's just as bad a situation for Cortland since, as you said, the relative comparison basis is only the NJAC teams for the most part. Honestly, I don't fully see this. I think the truth lays in the middle. Kean could still prove to be a two-game wonder. Morrisville plays well for a half and then fades. I'm not ready to crown these teams as world beaters yet, since Rowan has shown a dropoff, too, including in the OOC game. Remember, I was very up on the NJAC after Kickoff showed the conference rankings, and so far, it's been a pretty shaky experience.
Again, Cortland has to prove something still this season for me (and I think many others) to shake off the losses and fair play thus far. Else, we're watching a carbon copy of Union 2005 vs. Union 2006 (lots of players back after a great season, big letdown).
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 19, 2011, 11:42:25 AMGotta love a well posted photo.Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.allsandiegocomputerrepair.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F08%2Fcrying_baby.jpg&hash=999c44f372ba090bd9e249bd39fbcb297cde18ef)
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 19, 2011, 12:23:46 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
Congrats Endicott...you are 7-0, and yet as far as I can tell since 2003 (in what I believe was your first year of Varsity football as a Division 3 school) you have never beaten...ever...any school outside of the NEFC or ECFC. I will say it again...ever.
0-12 all time against schools not in the NEFC or ECFC . 0-9 against the LL, 0-2 against the E-8, and 0-1 against the NJAC. Anyone that is a D3 football fan knows that the NEFC and the ECFC are generally considered two of the probably four or five weakest D3 football leagues in all of Division 3. But it's ok...keep complaining about not being ranked in some D3 Boards fan poll and demanding some respect...good move...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 19, 2011, 12:25:43 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 19, 2011, 12:23:46 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
Congrats Endicott...you are 7-0, and yet as far as I can tell since 2003 (in what I believe was your first year of Varsity football as a Division 3 school) you have never beaten...ever...any school outside of the NEFC or ECFC. I will say it again...ever.
0-12 all time against schools not in the NEFC or ECFC . 0-9 against the LL, 0-2 against the E-8, and 0-1 against the NJAC. Anyone that is a D3 football fan knows that the NEFC and the ECFC are generally considered two of the probably four or five weakest D3 football leagues in all of Division 3. But it's ok...keep complaining about not being ranked in some D3 Boards fan poll and demanding some respect...good move...
But they scored 28 in the second half against Cortland last year.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 19, 2011, 12:28:57 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 19, 2011, 12:25:43 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 19, 2011, 12:23:46 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
Congrats Endicott...you are 7-0, and yet as far as I can tell since 2003 (in what I believe was your first year of Varsity football as a Division 3 school) you have never beaten...ever...any school outside of the NEFC or ECFC. I will say it again...ever.
0-12 all time against schools not in the NEFC or ECFC . 0-9 against the LL, 0-2 against the E-8, and 0-1 against the NJAC. Anyone that is a D3 football fan knows that the NEFC and the ECFC are generally considered two of the probably four or five weakest D3 football leagues in all of Division 3. But it's ok...keep complaining about not being ranked in some D3 Boards fan poll and demanding some respect...good move...
But they scored 28 in the second half against Cortland last year.
And don't forget LD that they "were excited" and down by 21 "before they settled down". Imagine if they weren't excited? Cortland dodged a bullet there...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 18, 2011, 02:49:46 PM
Let me be more blunt about the Cortland effect:
2010:
9/11 at Kean * • W, 24-12 BX RC
9/18 vs. Buffalo State * • W, 35-7 BX RC
9/25 at Western Connecticut * • W, 45-0 BX RC
10/2 at New Jersey * • W, 37-0 BX RC
10/9 vs. Brockport State * • W, 35-0 BX RC
10/16 at Rowan * • L, 20-17
10/23 at Morrisville State * • W, 42-6 BX
10/30 vs. Montclair State * • W, 10-9 BX RC
11/6 vs. William Paterson * • W, 38-7 BX RC
11/13 vs. Ithaca • W, 20-17 BX RC
11/20 vs. Endicott W, 49-35 BX RC
11/27 vs. Alfred L, 34-20 BX RC RC
2011:
9/3 vs. Buffalo State * • W, 28-12 BX RC
9/17 vs. Kean * • L, 21-16 BX RC RC
9/24 at Rowan * • W, 31-28 BX RC
10/1 vs. Morrisville State * • W, 55-14 BX RC
10/8 at Montclair State * • L, 34-33 BX RC
10/15 at Western Connecticut * • W, 56-10 BX
We're not just talking about 2 plays, and even if Cortland were undefeated, I would not be feeling comfortable about making a statement that the team is better than or as good as they were in 2010. The team has taken a step back this year, and the scores alone are pointing to that, let alone the W/L record. I am not impressed by the body of work so far, even if we were talking about a 5-1 team right now. Montclair has not won impressively for the most part, but their play has been a helluva lot more consistent than this list of games shows.
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 12:52:07 PM
How does 6 words create so much anger toward one school that has only fielded a football team for eight years?
Are you all "fans of Obama" where one persons opinon is welcomed only if it agrees with yours and all others are nonsence.
A side note about last falls Endicott/Cortland game. The Gulls scored 35 points! One more then Alfred did last fall and Montclair State this fall against the Cortland "mighty D". Means nothing, just like three year old stats.
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 12:52:07 PM
How does 6 words create so much anger toward one school that has only fielded a football team for eight years?
Are you all "fans of Obama" where one persons opinon is welcomed only if it agrees with yours and all others are nonsence.
A side note about last falls Endicott/Cortland game. The Gulls scored 35 points! One more then Alfred did last fall and Montclair State this fall against the Cortland "mighty D". Means nothing, just like three year old stats.
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 12:52:07 PM
How does 6 words create so much anger toward one school that has only fielded a football team for eight years?
Are you all "fans of Obama" where one persons opinon is welcomed only if it agrees with yours and all others are nonsence.
A side note about last falls Endicott/Cortland game. The Gulls scored 35 points! One more then Alfred did last fall and Montclair State this fall against the Cortland "mighty D". Means nothing, just like three year old stats.
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 12:52:07 PM
How does 6 words create so much anger toward one school that has only fielded a football team for eight years?
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 12:52:07 PMAre you all "fans of Obama" where one persons opinon is welcomed only if it agrees with yours and all others are nonsence.
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 12:52:07 PMA side note about last falls Endicott/Cortland game. The Gulls scored 35 points! One more then Alfred did last fall and Montclair State this fall against the Cortland "mighty D". Means nothing, just like three year old stats.
Quote from: Timeforachange on October 19, 2011, 01:10:34 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 12:52:07 PM
How does 6 words create so much anger toward one school that has only fielded a football team for eight years?
Because you're a douchebag...
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 19, 2011, 01:24:50 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 11:19:43 AM
Everywhere, but the d3 fan poll.
I gotta admit, Endicott is not the best team in the east, but softballrz post kind of made a funny point.
Lighten up pollsters.
Quote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 02:39:47 PM
Not that it matters, I will add my thoughts and poll if I were still participating:
1. Salisbury
2. Delaware Valley
3. Hobart
4. Montclair State
5. Kean
6. Cortland State
7. Widener
8. St. John Fisher
9. Endicott
10. Lebanon Valley
Salisbury is way out in front. I think Del Val, Hobart, and Montclair State are the second class, and to me are interchangeable (at this point!). I have trouble moving Kean way down because they still have those big wins, and although the loss to an 0-5 team is bad, I don't think Brockport is nearly as bad as that record. Cortland could now be put in front of Kean, but right now they are just edged out. Widener has been good this year and I have trouble with Fisher's blowout loss. Endicott does get in, it's hard to ignore their wins.
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 03:02:05 PM
Neither Charles our I have said anything about where in the top ten Endicott should be listed. Just to be in the top 10 discussion is a win for the program. Also, WENC needs to be in the discussion.
Quote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 02:30:36 PM
A relevant and interesting question to both Softballrz and Charles would be, where do they think Endicott should be rated in the poll (seriously, not fishing for non-genuine answers)?
Quote from: softballrz on October 19, 2011, 03:02:05 PM
Neither Charles our I have said anything about where in the top ten Endicott should be listed. Just to be in the top 10 discussion is a win for the program. Also, WENC needs to be in the discussion.
Quote from: Charles on October 19, 2011, 04:14:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 02:30:36 PM
A relevant and interesting question to both Softballrz and Charles would be, where do they think Endicott should be rated in the poll (seriously, not fishing for non-genuine answers)?
I think in the second 5 is fair. All they can do is what they are doing, win the games on the field. If they make the NCAAs then they will have another game against a common opponent perhaps and then a more fair judgement could be made.
Quote from: Charles on October 19, 2011, 04:14:42 PM
[All they can do is what they are doing, win the games on the field. If they make the NCAAs then they will have another game against a common opponent perhaps and then a more fair judgement could be made.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 19, 2011, 05:38:22 PMQuote from: Charles on October 19, 2011, 04:14:42 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 02:30:36 PM
A relevant and interesting question to both Softballrz and Charles would be, where do they think Endicott should be rated in the poll (seriously, not fishing for non-genuine answers)?
I think in the second 5 is fair. All they can do is what they are doing, win the games on the field. If they make the NCAAs then they will have another game against a common opponent perhaps and then a more fair judgement could be made.
Well, that brings up an interesting point. Including Salisbury in the count, I have exactly 5 East teams in my Top 25, with Hobart being the last of the 5 near the very bottom of the ballot. If you're upset that Endicott is missing national respect here, and still admitting that the regional poll should have them as sixth or seventh, then nationally, Endicott is getting exactly the amount of respect you yourself think they should be getting.
Nothing against the Fan Poll, but it's a group of seven individuals just stating their feelings and is cited by only one publication. It's a fun thing -- not a national barometer. I no longer see your complaints as valid, whether or not you stated them cogently from the start.
Quote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 07:54:39 PM
I guess I should be clear: I'm not saying that the AFCA poll is unreliable or anything. That's for others to determine. However, it's always easiest to pick the poll that makes your team look best.
Quote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 08:08:41 PM
Ugh.
Quote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 07:54:39 PM
I guess I should be clear: I'm not saying that the AFCA poll is unreliable or anything. That's for others to determine. However, it's always easiest to pick the poll that makes your team look best.
Quote from: dlip on October 19, 2011, 08:36:52 PM
Honestly dlip does not put a whole lot of stock in the AFCA poll. pg.04 is correct IDHO regarding the fact that most coaches at the d3 level dont spend time studying teams they dont play. Many of us on the other hand kind of obsess over this stuff. Dlip is a box score and recap hound. Does he know other teams better than some coaches? Who knows, all he knows is he spends a **** load of time reading about and studying d3 football, which is at least more than any casual d3 fan does. He assumes many others on here are as ****ed up as he is, love the game, the level, the athletes, and the teams that play it. Dlip doesn't necessarily put tons of stock in his erfp, but from his time on these boards respects the **** out of thd fan pollsters and the conclusions they come to whether it favors dlios team or not.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 19, 2011, 08:16:30 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 07:54:39 PM
I guess I should be clear: I'm not saying that the AFCA poll is unreliable or anything. That's for others to determine. However, it's always easiest to pick the poll that makes your team look best.
Both National Polls have Montclair ahead of Salisbury and the D3 Fan Poll has it the same way. What does that mean? It actually means that you play the games and when the regular season is over we will see. Nuff said.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 19, 2011, 10:01:48 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 19, 2011, 08:16:30 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 07:54:39 PM
I guess I should be clear: I'm not saying that the AFCA poll is unreliable or anything. That's for others to determine. However, it's always easiest to pick the poll that makes your team look best.
Both National Polls have Montclair ahead of Salisbury and the D3 Fan Poll has it the same way. What does that mean? It actually means that you play the games and when the regular season is over we will see. Nuff said.
Clearly, we should shut down the boards till November then. After all, what's the point in talking until we have played all the games?
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 19, 2011, 10:07:03 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 19, 2011, 10:01:48 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 19, 2011, 08:16:30 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 19, 2011, 07:54:39 PM
I guess I should be clear: I'm not saying that the AFCA poll is unreliable or anything. That's for others to determine. However, it's always easiest to pick the poll that makes your team look best.
Both National Polls have Montclair ahead of Salisbury and the D3 Fan Poll has it the same way. What does that mean? It actually means that you play the games and when the regular season is over we will see. Nuff said.
Clearly, we should shut down the boards till November then. After all, what's the point in talking until we have played all the games?
Bombers, you're right. Nothing to talk about until December at the earliest. Pep hereby disconnects his keyboard........On Saxon Warriors!
QuoteI think if you look at the ranked teams that get upset each week, invariably they were ranked higher in the coaches' poll than they were in our poll.
Good example from this past week: Our poll had Wartburg at No. 22 going into last week's game, and Dubuque unranked, with the game at Dubuque. The AFCA had Dubuque ranked No. 20 and Wartburg ranked No. 21. The AFCA poll said Dubuque should win that game, the higher ranked team playing at home. Wartburg won, however.
The AFCA poll loves unbeaten teams more than teams with losses. Here's another example, and you tell me which poll was more accurate:
No. 7 Montclair State 34, No. 24 Cortland State 33 (game at Montclair)
No. 11 Montclair State 34, No. 15 Cortland State 33
The second one is our poll.
Wittenberg, which lost at Huntingdon this past week, was ranked 11th in their poll, 14th in ours. Two weeks ago Trine lost, ranked No. 12 in their poll, No. 17 in ours.
Earlier in the season:
Cal Lutheran 28, No. 18 Redlands 24 (at Cal Lutheran)
No. 20 Cal Lutheran 28, No. 13 Redlands 24
Ours is the second one. Obviously we didn't nail this result but we were a lot closer than they were.
Just some food for thought. Neither poll is perfect but we have a very good track record.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 19, 2011, 08:54:24 PMQuote from: dlip on October 19, 2011, 08:36:52 PM
Honestly dlip does not put a whole lot of stock in the AFCA poll. pg.04 is correct IDHO regarding the fact that most coaches at the d3 level dont spend time studying teams they dont play. Many of us on the other hand kind of obsess over this stuff. Dlip is a box score and recap hound. Does he know other teams better than some coaches? Who knows, all he knows is he spends a **** load of time reading about and studying d3 football, which is at least more than any casual d3 fan does. He assumes many others on here are as ****ed up as he is, love the game, the level, the athletes, and the teams that play it. Dlip doesn't necessarily put tons of stock in his erfp, but from his time on these boards respects the **** out of thd fan pollsters and the conclusions they come to whether it favors dlios team or.
Just back from standing in my back yard with my dog in the rain. ::) In any event I agree with you. You are a D3 Wacko and I'm not far behind, but you played and I did not. As a Montclair fan, most posters don't give them enough respect. Sometimes we earn it. ;) I did not have Montclair #1 all year with the exception of last week. After Kean stubbed their toe last week against B-Port, which they should have won, sorry PG but a nice win, it was time to put Montclair #1 in the East for my Poll. You can also argue that Salisbury should be #1 and nobody could argue except every other national Poll. To be honest I felt sorry for the Endicott supporters and decided to chime in at the expense of my Red Hawls. We fight for our lives at work every day and I enjoy the fun of D3 Football. Thanks.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 19, 2011, 10:07:03 PM
Bombers, you're right. Nothing to talk about until December at the earliest. Pep hereby disconnects his keyboard........On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 19, 2011, 11:47:45 PM
On the AFCA/D3football.com Top 25 question, I posted this last week on the CCIW board:QuoteI think if you look at the ranked teams that get upset each week, invariably they were ranked higher in the coaches' poll than they were in our poll.
Good example from this past week: Our poll had Wartburg at No. 22 going into last week's game, and Dubuque unranked, with the game at Dubuque. The AFCA had Dubuque ranked No. 20 and Wartburg ranked No. 21. The AFCA poll said Dubuque should win that game, the higher ranked team playing at home. Wartburg won, however.
The AFCA poll loves unbeaten teams more than teams with losses. Here's another example, and you tell me which poll was more accurate:
No. 7 Montclair State 34, No. 24 Cortland State 33 (game at Montclair)
No. 11 Montclair State 34, No. 15 Cortland State 33
The second one is our poll.
Wittenberg, which lost at Huntingdon this past week, was ranked 11th in their poll, 14th in ours. Two weeks ago Trine lost, ranked No. 12 in their poll, No. 17 in ours.
Earlier in the season:
Cal Lutheran 28, No. 18 Redlands 24 (at Cal Lutheran)
No. 20 Cal Lutheran 28, No. 13 Redlands 24
Ours is the second one. Obviously we didn't nail this result but we were a lot closer than they were.
Just some food for thought. Neither poll is perfect but we have a very good track record.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 20, 2011, 12:43:12 PM
The question was which poll is better, not which poll is perfect. No poll is perfect.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 19, 2011, 11:47:45 PM
On the AFCA/D3football.com Top 25 question, I posted this last week on the CCIW board:QuoteI think if you look at the ranked teams that get upset each week, invariably they were ranked higher in the coaches' poll than they were in our poll.
Good example from this past week: Our poll had Wartburg at No. 22 going into last week's game, and Dubuque unranked, with the game at Dubuque. The AFCA had Dubuque ranked No. 20 and Wartburg ranked No. 21. The AFCA poll said Dubuque should win that game, the higher ranked team playing at home. Wartburg won, however.
The AFCA poll loves unbeaten teams more than teams with losses. Here's another example, and you tell me which poll was more accurate:
No. 7 Montclair State 34, No. 24 Cortland State 33 (game at Montclair)
No. 11 Montclair State 34, No. 15 Cortland State 33
The second one is our poll.
Wittenberg, which lost at Huntingdon this past week, was ranked 11th in their poll, 14th in ours. Two weeks ago Trine lost, ranked No. 12 in their poll, No. 17 in ours.
Earlier in the season:
Cal Lutheran 28, No. 18 Redlands 24 (at Cal Lutheran)
No. 20 Cal Lutheran 28, No. 13 Redlands 24
Ours is the second one. Obviously we didn't nail this result but we were a lot closer than they were.
Just some food for thought. Neither poll is perfect but we have a very good track record.
Quote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 12:55:02 PM
I guess the "squeky wheel gets the grease". Good read in today's Boston Globe about the Endicott Gulls. Sorry can't link it the globe is a "pay to read page". Yesterday a few of you were asking for stats, here you are. Like all other stats they mean little. Each team needs to win the game on the field.
The Team is:
1) Ranked 5thth in the "NATION" in Total Defense
2) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Total Offense
3) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Turnover margin (+12)
4) Ranked 2nd in the "NATION" in Scoring Offense (Total Pts)
5) Ranked 4th in "NATION" in Rushing Defense
6) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in total First downs (Offense)
7) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in 3rd down Def
8) Ranked 5th in "NATION" in First Downs allowed
9) Ranked 13th in "NATION" in sacks allowed Individuals:
10) Endicott Has 5th ranked QB (QB rating) in "NATION"
11) Endicott Has 2nd ranked RB (Total Yds) in "NATION"
12) Endicott DB is leading "NATION" in total INT's
13) Endicott Has 2nd ranked K (Total FG's) in the "NATION"
NCAA link (see National Rankings) http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2011
Quote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 12:55:02 PM
I guess the "squeky wheel gets the grease". Good read in today's Boston Globe about the Endicott Gulls. Sorry can't link it the globe is a "pay to read page". Yesterday a few of you were asking for stats, here you are. Like all other stats they mean little. Each team needs to win the game on the field.
The Team is:
1) Ranked 5thth in the "NATION" in Total Defense
2) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Total Offense
3) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Turnover margin (+12)
4) Ranked 2nd in the "NATION" in Scoring Offense (Total Pts)
5) Ranked 4th in "NATION" in Rushing Defense
6) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in total First downs (Offense)
7) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in 3rd down Def
8) Ranked 5th in "NATION" in First Downs allowed
9) Ranked 13th in "NATION" in sacks allowed Individuals:
10) Endicott Has 5th ranked QB (QB rating) in "NATION"
11) Endicott Has 2nd ranked RB (Total Yds) in "NATION"
12) Endicott DB is leading "NATION" in total INT's
13) Endicott Has 2nd ranked K (Total FG's) in the "NATION"
NCAA link (see National Rankings) http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2011
Quote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 12:55:02 PM
I guess the "squeky wheel gets the grease". Good read in today's Boston Globe about the Endicott Gulls. Sorry can't link it the globe is a "pay to read page". Yesterday a few of you were asking for stats, here you are. Like all other stats they mean little. Each team needs to win the game on the field.
The Team is:
1) Ranked 5thth in the "NATION" in Total Defense
2) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Total Offense
3) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Turnover margin (+12)
4) Ranked 2nd in the "NATION" in Scoring Offense (Total Pts)
5) Ranked 4th in "NATION" in Rushing Defense
6) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in total First downs (Offense)
7) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in 3rd down Def
8) Ranked 5th in "NATION" in First Downs allowed
9) Ranked 13th in "NATION" in sacks allowed Individuals:
10) Endicott Has 5th ranked QB (QB rating) in "NATION"
11) Endicott Has 2nd ranked RB (Total Yds) in "NATION"
12) Endicott DB is leading "NATION" in total INT's
13) Endicott Has 2nd ranked K (Total FG's) in the "NATION"
NCAA link (see National Rankings) http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2011
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 20, 2011, 01:05:25 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 12:55:02 PM
I guess the "squeky wheel gets the grease". Good read in today's Boston Globe about the Endicott Gulls. Sorry can't link it the globe is a "pay to read page". Yesterday a few of you were asking for stats, here you are. Like all other stats they mean little. Each team needs to win the game on the field.
The Team is:
1) Ranked 5thth in the "NATION" in Total Defense
2) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Total Offense
3) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Turnover margin (+12)
4) Ranked 2nd in the "NATION" in Scoring Offense (Total Pts)
5) Ranked 4th in "NATION" in Rushing Defense
6) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in total First downs (Offense)
7) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in 3rd down Def
8) Ranked 5th in "NATION" in First Downs allowed
9) Ranked 13th in "NATION" in sacks allowed Individuals:
10) Endicott Has 5th ranked QB (QB rating) in "NATION"
11) Endicott Has 2nd ranked RB (Total Yds) in "NATION"
12) Endicott DB is leading "NATION" in total INT's
13) Endicott Has 2nd ranked K (Total FG's) in the "NATION"
NCAA link (see National Rankings) http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2011
A few years ago TCNJ was the top ranked defense in the NATION, you can look up what happened when they got to Mt Union. National rankings need to be taken with a grain of salt. Endicott is ranked high based on a great record in weak conference, stopping the running game of WNEC is different than stopping Mt Union or UWW' running attack.
Quote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 01:11:07 PM
You are correct. All just stats. However, a team can only play the schedule and should never have to justify or be ridiculed for it.
Quote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 01:11:07 PM
You are correct. All just stats. However, a team can only play the schedule and should never have to justify or be ridiculed for it.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 20, 2011, 01:21:49 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 20, 2011, 01:05:25 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 12:55:02 PM
I guess the "squeky wheel gets the grease". Good read in today's Boston Globe about the Endicott Gulls. Sorry can't link it the globe is a "pay to read page". Yesterday a few of you were asking for stats, here you are. Like all other stats they mean little. Each team needs to win the game on the field.
The Team is:
1) Ranked 5thth in the "NATION" in Total Defense
2) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Total Offense
3) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Turnover margin (+12)
4) Ranked 2nd in the "NATION" in Scoring Offense (Total Pts)
5) Ranked 4th in "NATION" in Rushing Defense
6) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in total First downs (Offense)
7) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in 3rd down Def
8) Ranked 5th in "NATION" in First Downs allowed
9) Ranked 13th in "NATION" in sacks allowed Individuals:
10) Endicott Has 5th ranked QB (QB rating) in "NATION"
11) Endicott Has 2nd ranked RB (Total Yds) in "NATION"
12) Endicott DB is leading "NATION" in total INT's
13) Endicott Has 2nd ranked K (Total FG's) in the "NATION"
NCAA link (see National Rankings) http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2011
A few years ago TCNJ was the top ranked defense in the NATION, you can look up what happened when they got to Mt Union. National rankings need to be taken with a grain of salt. Endicott is ranked high based on a great record in weak conference, stopping the running game of WNEC is different than stopping Mt Union or UWW' running attack.
first of all "Knightstalker", I'm willing to bet that the NEFC has a team in Salem before any NJAC team returns.
and second, dude, you're way out of line dissing student athletes, that's just wrong and not very nice. They all work extremely hard from the 0-7 teams to the 7-0 teams.
saying kids suck is wrong, please refrain from calling our student athletes, perhaps on this board you may think that you're something special but to call out student athletes is rude and wrong.
Quote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 12:55:02 PM
I guess the "squeky wheel gets the grease". Good read in today's Boston Globe about the Endicott Gulls. Sorry can't link it the globe is a "pay to read page". Yesterday a few of you were asking for stats, here you are. Like all other stats they mean little. Each team needs to win the game on the field.
The Team is:
1) Ranked 5thth in the “NATION” in Total Defense
2) Ranked 10th in the “NATION” in Total Offense
3) Ranked 10th in the “NATION” in Turnover margin (+12)
4) Ranked 2nd in the “NATION” in Scoring Offense (Total Pts)
5) Ranked 4th in “NATION” in Rushing Defense
6) Ranked 6th in “NATION” in total First downs (Offense)
7) Ranked 6th in “NATION” in 3rd down Def
8) Ranked 5th in “NATION” in First Downs allowed
9) Ranked 13th in “NATION” in sacks allowed Individuals:
10) Endicott Has 5th ranked QB (QB rating) in “NATION”
11) Endicott Has 2nd ranked RB (Total Yds) in “NATION”
12) Endicott DB is leading “NATION” in total INT’s
13) Endicott Has 2nd ranked K (Total FG’s) in the “NATION”
NCAA link (see National Rankings) http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2011
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 20, 2011, 02:18:48 PM
You want respect as a team, and even bigger as a league... Stop scheduling ECFC teams for your non-league games.
Quote from: Charles on October 20, 2011, 03:07:16 PM
Just for Endicott to be in the NCAA conversation is nice. The stats pasted previously is against NEFC competition only, so there foresince there is obviously such a gap in programs nationally, the stats are really useless, nice, but useless. I agree with the previous poster that until any NEFC team starts scheduling outside New England that they won't have the credibility. However, Endicott for example is a 10 year old program. I am sure they still have alot of the original pads. Ten years from now if they continue to win consistantly then we will have to see. That being said, the curren team is mostly seniors and most are 4 year starters. They have 3 legitimate All Americans who along with probably 80% of their starters will graduate. What Endicott does the next few years will tell if they are a legitamate program or another Curry, Plymouth State, etc.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 20, 2011, 01:21:49 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on October 20, 2011, 01:05:25 PMQuote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 12:55:02 PM
I guess the "squeky wheel gets the grease". Good read in today's Boston Globe about the Endicott Gulls. Sorry can't link it the globe is a "pay to read page". Yesterday a few of you were asking for stats, here you are. Like all other stats they mean little. Each team needs to win the game on the field.
The Team is:
1) Ranked 5thth in the "NATION" in Total Defense
2) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Total Offense
3) Ranked 10th in the "NATION" in Turnover margin (+12)
4) Ranked 2nd in the "NATION" in Scoring Offense (Total Pts)
5) Ranked 4th in "NATION" in Rushing Defense
6) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in total First downs (Offense)
7) Ranked 6th in "NATION" in 3rd down Def
8) Ranked 5th in "NATION" in First Downs allowed
9) Ranked 13th in "NATION" in sacks allowed Individuals:
10) Endicott Has 5th ranked QB (QB rating) in "NATION"
11) Endicott Has 2nd ranked RB (Total Yds) in "NATION"
12) Endicott DB is leading "NATION" in total INT's
13) Endicott Has 2nd ranked K (Total FG's) in the "NATION"
NCAA link (see National Rankings) http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2011
A few years ago TCNJ was the top ranked defense in the NATION, you can look up what happened when they got to Mt Union. National rankings need to be taken with a grain of salt. Endicott is ranked high based on a great record in weak conference, stopping the running game of WNEC is different than stopping Mt Union or UWW' running attack.
first of all "Knightstalker", I'm willing to bet that the NEFC has a team in Salem before any NJAC team returns.
and second, dude, you're way out of line dissing student athletes, that's just wrong and not very nice. They all work extremely hard from the 0-7 teams to the 7-0 teams.
saying kids suck is wrong, please refrain from calling our student athletes, perhaps on this board you may think that you're something special but to call out student athletes is rude and wrong.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2011, 04:08:21 PM
I actually 'like' the stats of 'Dem New Spicy Girlz'
... they are 7-0, score alot, play defense and have many seniors as I pointed out in a prior post. I was thinking about whether they had any players with nationally ranked statistics, and apparently they do. Of course they are playing weaker opponents....but if they were 6-1 winning games 20-17, instead of being undefeated by an avg of 48-12, we would be yelling "start crushing your cream-puff opponents and then talk"....well they are. Top flight players at key positions, that have experience, and have had a taste of success, and are hungry, are dangerous.
Hey...Aaron Rogers played JUCO cuz nobody recognized his talent....and those were expert recruiters...we are d3 bloggers that have never seen this team play....
Remember what Apollo Creed thought of Rocky..... :P
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 20, 2011, 08:15:11 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2011, 04:08:21 PM
Remember what Apollo Creed thought of Rocky..... :P
Don't you mean what Mohammed Ali thought of Chuck Wepner?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 21, 2011, 02:41:35 PM
Who am I going to see at the Montclair/TCNJ game tomorrow?
[/quote
I'll be there at the top of the 50 of the visitors section. MSU hooded grey sweatshirt with a red Montclair Cap. Grey hair and 58. Remenber respect your elders young man. ;D
Quote from: rams1102 on October 21, 2011, 05:16:26 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 21, 2011, 02:41:35 PM
Who am I going to see at the Montclair/TCNJ game tomorrow?
I'll be there at the top of the 50 of the visitors section. MSU hooded grey sweatshirt with a red Montclair Cap. Grey hair and 58. Remenber respect your elders young man. ;D
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 20, 2011, 12:23:59 PM
If the poll is a prediction of who is going to win a given match-up, then how does the poll account for the classic scenario where A beats B, B beats C, but then C beats A?
Quote from: softballrz on October 20, 2011, 07:44:38 PM
drop the may. they will need to win out to get the NCAA bid.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 23, 2011, 09:23:51 AM
after yesterday, looks like the only discussion about the top team comes down to salisbury and del val for now. after this weekend, salisbury at wesley, i will be able to give some insight into that discussion. even if salisbury losses i will compare them to what i saw from del val. the njac must be a very balanced conference with no standout team since no one is able to run the table. great for the fans, not so much for the playoff chances after the aq. looks like the qb injury may have hurt montclaire. still have the kean - montclaire game on the travel list for the last week, especially if it is for the njac title.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2011, 11:38:08 AMEndicott did well to win a serious trap game. Senior day ceremonies seemed to make the team a little flat just before kickoff and UMass Dartmouth came to play. I also thought they were looking ahead to the game next week. However they took care of business and should be up for what is looking like a big game at WNEC.
Endicott is dropping a spot in my poll this week because Widener's win was way more impressive in my mind. A solid win vs. WNEC would do them good though. Salisbury is flat out scary. Looking forward to see what happens vs. Wesley. Fisher is clearly a team on the rise. And Utica at 5-2 is starting to raise some eyebrows. Hobart has the schedule lined up to win out.
What the hell happened to Alfred and Springfield though?
Quote from: Charles on October 23, 2011, 12:22:53 PM
However they took care of business and should be up for what is looking like a big game at WNEC.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2011, 11:33:27 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 23, 2011, 09:23:51 AM
after yesterday, looks like the only discussion about the top team comes down to salisbury and del val for now. after this weekend, salisbury at wesley, i will be able to give some insight into that discussion. even if salisbury losses i will compare them to what i saw from del val. the njac must be a very balanced conference with no standout team since no one is able to run the table. great for the fans, not so much for the playoff chances after the aq. looks like the qb injury may have hurt montclaire. still have the kean - montclaire game on the travel list for the last week, especially if it is for the njac title.
I wouldn't forget about Hobart. Fisher appears to be stronger than I thought and Hobart throttled them.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 23, 2011, 05:33:25 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2011, 11:33:27 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 23, 2011, 09:23:51 AM
after yesterday, looks like the only discussion about the top team comes down to salisbury and del val for now. after this weekend, salisbury at wesley, i will be able to give some insight into that discussion. even if salisbury losses i will compare them to what i saw from del val. the njac must be a very balanced conference with no standout team since no one is able to run the table. great for the fans, not so much for the playoff chances after the aq. looks like the qb injury may have hurt montclaire. still have the kean - montclaire game on the travel list for the last week, especially if it is for the njac title.
I wouldn't forget about Hobart. Fisher appears to be stronger than I thought and Hobart throttled them.
Hobart gave Fisher a giant punch right to the kisser when they played, but I think if they were to play a rematch next week the results would be dramatically different. Offensively I'd still expect Fisher to struggle but I don't understand what happened to Fisher's defense that day. I've seen five of their games this year and the D was inexplicably non existent against Hobart. I still think Hobart is the best team Fisher has faced this year however.
As well as Fisher's defense has performed, I can still see them getting lit up by Salisbury in a couple of weeks. What they are doing is just nasty.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 7 ) | 7-0 | 70 | 1 | at #2 (South) Wesley |
2 Delaware Valley | 8-0 | 62 | 3 | Open Date |
3 Hobart | 5-0 | 57 | 4 | at WPI |
4 St. John Fisher | 6-1 | 44 | 5 | vs. Utica |
5 Kean | 6-1 | 38 | 6 | vs. Rowan |
6 Montclair State | 6-1 | 31 | 2 | vs. Western Connecticut |
7 Cortland State | 5-2 | 28 | 7 | vs. New Jersey |
8 Widener | 7-1 | 24 | 8 | at Albright |
9 Lycoming | 6-1 | 19 | 9 | at Lebanon Valley |
10 Endicott | 8-0 | 8 | NR | at Western New England |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 24, 2011, 12:07:37 PM
Pretty even distribution across the board this week. Probably as close as we'll get this year. It's always tough to rank the teams who were in the top 4 but recently lost(Montclair/Kean) and those appear to be the biggest where the biggest discrepanices are.
Quote from: dlip on October 24, 2011, 12:14:36 PM
Question: Is Montclair without their starting QB? (Did he play this weekend? If he is injured, for how long?)
Quote from: dlip on October 24, 2011, 12:14:36 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 24, 2011, 12:07:37 PM
Pretty even distribution across the board this week. Probably as close as we'll get this year. It's always tough to rank the teams who were in the top 4 but recently lost(Montclair/Kean) and those appear to be the biggest where the biggest discrepanices are.
Lew this is true. Both teams have yet to play the Profs and dlip thinks Kean's game against Rowan this week will tell us a lot about the Hot Old Lady Bangers. Honestly, dlip thinks Kean drops this game to Rowan. Yet, obviously when Kean and Montcalir go head to head will we know who the better team is overall. Who knows, Rowan might beat both Montclair and Kean and overcome their loss to Cortland(however unlikely it may seem). Question: Is Montclair without their starting QB? (Did he play this weekend? If he is injured, for how long?)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 24, 2011, 03:24:17 PMI think that UMHB will be the South Region #1. An undefeated Thomas More might also tie up the other side of the South Bracket.
so come play-off time, does Salisbury take their impending E8 title and go home (South) thereby effectively swiping a slot from the East. Assuming they win the e8 title and if they beat Wesley and win out, will they be the number 1 in the South region.....?
Frank.....anyone?
Quote from: pg04 on October 24, 2011, 08:50:28 PM
Plus I think a 2-loss (losses to UMU and UWW) team UWO could end up with a Pool C bid over some 1-loss teams.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 24, 2011, 03:24:17 PM
so come play-off time, does Salisbury take their impending E8 title and go home (South) thereby effectively swiping a slot from the East. Assuming they win the e8 title and if they beat Wesley and win out, will they be the number 1 in the South region.....?
Frank.....anyone?
Quote from: sjfcards on October 25, 2011, 12:10:06 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 24, 2011, 03:24:17 PM
so come play-off time, does Salisbury take their impending E8 title and go home (South) thereby effectively swiping a slot from the East. Assuming they win the e8 title and if they beat Wesley and win out, will they be the number 1 in the South region.....?
Frank.....anyone?
I hope Salisbury stays in the East, and keeps MUC out. Well, I would rather see Fisher beat Salisbury, but if that isn't going to happen, then that is what I would like to see.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 01:20:05 AM
special thanks to the E8 in that desperation move to ensure an auto-bid for creating this conundrum for the rest of the East Region. We're all paying the price unless someone steps up and beats Salisbury.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 10:28:25 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 01:20:05 AM
special thanks to the E8 in that desperation move to ensure an auto-bid for creating this conundrum for the rest of the East Region. We're all paying the price unless someone steps up and beats Salisbury.
Really it's the northern members of the E8 that suffer from Salisbury running the table unless the insinuation is that the remaining East teams will now get worse seedings. But Salisbury would be just as good whether they were playing in the E8 or not. And what was the E8 supposed to do? Not fill out their conference and play for the shrinking Pool B bid(s)? Fisher would be the only team left in contention for that and another loss would leave us right where we would be with Salisbury winning the AQ.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 10:28:25 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 01:20:05 AM
special thanks to the E8 in that desperation move to ensure an auto-bid for creating this conundrum for the rest of the East Region. We're all paying the price unless someone steps up and beats Salisbury.
Really it's the northern members of the E8 that suffer from Salisbury running the table unless the insinuation is that the remaining East teams will now get worse seedings. But Salisbury would be just as good whether they were playing in the E8 or not. And what was the E8 supposed to do? Not fill out their conference and play for the shrinking Pool B bid(s)? Fisher would be the only team left in contention for that and another loss would leave us right where we would be with Salisbury winning the AQ.
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 12:53:40 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 10:28:25 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 01:20:05 AM
special thanks to the E8 in that desperation move to ensure an auto-bid for creating this conundrum for the rest of the East Region. We're all paying the price unless someone steps up and beats Salisbury.
Really it's the northern members of the E8 that suffer from Salisbury running the table unless the insinuation is that the remaining East teams will now get worse seedings. But Salisbury would be just as good whether they were playing in the E8 or not. And what was the E8 supposed to do? Not fill out their conference and play for the shrinking Pool B bid(s)? Fisher would be the only team left in contention for that and another loss would leave us right where we would be with Salisbury winning the AQ.
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
Does it really matter all that much? Salisbury is a part of the E8. What is the big deal if they win the E8 and are in the South Region? Montclair made the playoffs last year and was put in the South. If Cortland wins the NJAC, it takes 1 NJ team out of contention. Same thing really. If you don't deserve to be in the playoffs, then you don't deserve to be in the playoffs. Case closed.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 25, 2011, 12:58:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 12:53:40 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 10:28:25 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 01:20:05 AM
special thanks to the E8 in that desperation move to ensure an auto-bid for creating this conundrum for the rest of the East Region. We're all paying the price unless someone steps up and beats Salisbury.
Really it's the northern members of the E8 that suffer from Salisbury running the table unless the insinuation is that the remaining East teams will now get worse seedings. But Salisbury would be just as good whether they were playing in the E8 or not. And what was the E8 supposed to do? Not fill out their conference and play for the shrinking Pool B bid(s)? Fisher would be the only team left in contention for that and another loss would leave us right where we would be with Salisbury winning the AQ.
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
Does it really matter all that much? Salisbury is a part of the E8. What is the big deal if they win the E8 and are in the South Region? Montclair made the playoffs last year and was put in the South. If Cortland wins the NJAC, it takes 1 NJ team out of contention. Same thing really. If you don't deserve to be in the playoffs, then you don't deserve to be in the playoffs. Case closed.
...well yeah, that is kinda the point. I started with the idea that because the E8 took on a South import, and now that South import stands to win the e8, then effectively, the East has one less team going to the dance ie: SC, SJF...etc.
and its not as easy as "if you dont deserve it then you dont go" last check the NEFC and ECFC are getting auto-bids in.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 01:01:54 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 25, 2011, 12:58:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 12:53:40 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 10:28:25 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 01:20:05 AM
special thanks to the E8 in that desperation move to ensure an auto-bid for creating this conundrum for the rest of the East Region. We're all paying the price unless someone steps up and beats Salisbury.
Really it's the northern members of the E8 that suffer from Salisbury running the table unless the insinuation is that the remaining East teams will now get worse seedings. But Salisbury would be just as good whether they were playing in the E8 or not. And what was the E8 supposed to do? Not fill out their conference and play for the shrinking Pool B bid(s)? Fisher would be the only team left in contention for that and another loss would leave us right where we would be with Salisbury winning the AQ.
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
Does it really matter all that much? Salisbury is a part of the E8. What is the big deal if they win the E8 and are in the South Region? Montclair made the playoffs last year and was put in the South. If Cortland wins the NJAC, it takes 1 NJ team out of contention. Same thing really. If you don't deserve to be in the playoffs, then you don't deserve to be in the playoffs. Case closed.
...well yeah, that is kinda the point. I started with the idea that because the E8 took on a South import, and now that South import stands to win the e8, then effectively, the East has one less team going to the dance ie: SC, SJF...etc.
and its not as easy as "if you dont deserve it then you dont go" last check the NEFC and ECFC are getting auto-bids in.
Right, but you don't see many 2nd and 3rd place NEFC teams complaining if they don't get in. Same with the LL at this point. Salisbury is part of the E8 and should be embraced by the E8 regardless of geography because their success makes the league stronger.
If they win the league and jet next year ala Susquehanna in the LL a few years ago, then being upset is understandable.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2011, 02:36:40 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 01:01:54 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 25, 2011, 12:58:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 12:53:40 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 10:28:25 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 01:20:05 AM
special thanks to the E8 in that desperation move to ensure an auto-bid for creating this conundrum for the rest of the East Region. We're all paying the price unless someone steps up and beats Salisbury.
Really it's the northern members of the E8 that suffer from Salisbury running the table unless the insinuation is that the remaining East teams will now get worse seedings. But Salisbury would be just as good whether they were playing in the E8 or not. And what was the E8 supposed to do? Not fill out their conference and play for the shrinking Pool B bid(s)? Fisher would be the only team left in contention for that and another loss would leave us right where we would be with Salisbury winning the AQ.
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
Does it really matter all that much? Salisbury is a part of the E8. What is the big deal if they win the E8 and are in the South Region? Montclair made the playoffs last year and was put in the South. If Cortland wins the NJAC, it takes 1 NJ team out of contention. Same thing really. If you don't deserve to be in the playoffs, then you don't deserve to be in the playoffs. Case closed.
...well yeah, that is kinda the point. I started with the idea that because the E8 took on a South import, and now that South import stands to win the e8, then effectively, the East has one less team going to the dance ie: SC, SJF...etc.
and its not as easy as "if you dont deserve it then you dont go" last check the NEFC and ECFC are getting auto-bids in.
Right, but you don't see many 2nd and 3rd place NEFC teams complaining if they don't get in. Same with the LL at this point. Salisbury is part of the E8 and should be embraced by the E8 regardless of geography because their success makes the league stronger.
If they win the league and jet next year ala Susquehanna in the LL a few years ago, then being upset is understandable.
I kind of agree with LD on this one. I have absolutely no problem with Salisbury in the E8. I think it makes the league much stronger then it was before, and I think that is saying a lot. Even Frostburg, who now has wins over Alfred and Utica, is a huge improvement from say Norwich a few years ago. What would you have the E8 do? Implode like the LL, or get that much stronger like they have?
And let's face it...Salisbury seems to be on one of those special runs, with a special group. They are playing at a level that I haven't seen out of the NYS teams since Fisher in 06.
QuoteDoes it really matter all that much? Salisbury is a part of the E8. What is the big deal if they win the E8 and are in the South Region? Montclair made the playoffs last year and was put in the South. If Cortland wins the NJAC, it takes 1 NJ team out of contention. Same thing really. If you don't deserve to be in the playoffs, then you don't deserve to be in the playoffs. Case closed.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 25, 2011, 05:00:14 PM
I agree with Frank here. How do you determine if one 10-0 or 9-0 team is better than another if they don't really play across regions? It could mean the difference between a home and away game. That hasn't mattered much for eastern teams the last few years due to the lack of a credible representative, but in a close game, that home field can be a major advantage. Even if you're just talking about the top 4 teams, how do we know that an undefeated DelVal isn't as good as St Thomas, Linfield, MTU, UWW this season?
At the end of the day, let's wait and see an eastern team go 9-0 or 10-0 with regionally ranked wins of significance and see if someone gets shipped to this region of the country. That'll be a fairly apparent way of the committtee saying that eastern teams at 9-0 or 10-0 aren't good enough until they go on the road and beat somebody from outside the region.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 06:40:13 PM
Gordon, the other part of the argument is playoff access, including access to a number of games to help allow teams to improve over time.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:41:47 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 06:40:13 PM
Gordon, the other part of the argument is playoff access, including access to a number of games to help allow teams to improve over time.
Guaranteed access is only guaranteed to one game in a single-elimination tournament. There is no entitlement to a specific number of games. Your "number" in football is one. That's it.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 05:58:42 PM
So what should happen, LD, if DelVal, Hobart and Endicott run the table, LD?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:49:17 PM
That may be part of the argument but it doesn't make it valid. You earn your way into the next round. Mount Union can only knock out one team per week.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:57:25 PM
No worse than the North had for a decade before that. There is no reason to protect the East if they are within 500 miles.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:57:25 PM
No worse than the North had for a decade before that. There is no reason to protect the East if they are within 500 miles.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 06:58:37 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:57:25 PM
No worse than the North had for a decade before that. There is no reason to protect the East if they are within 500 miles.
But protect the South or West because they're not? Smells like a regional argument in a national context.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 06:59:53 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:57:25 PM
No worse than the North had for a decade before that. There is no reason to protect the East if they are within 500 miles.
Beat me to it. How many OAC teams have gotten screwed because of Mount Union in the last 10-12 years?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 07:03:26 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 06:58:37 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:57:25 PM
No worse than the North had for a decade before that. There is no reason to protect the East if they are within 500 miles.
But protect the South or West because they're not? Smells like a regional argument in a national context.
Irrelevant with the 500-mile radius on the books.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 07:03:49 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 06:59:53 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:57:25 PM
No worse than the North had for a decade before that. There is no reason to protect the East if they are within 500 miles.
Beat me to it. How many OAC teams have gotten screwed because of Mount Union in the last 10-12 years?
If an OAC team won every game aside from UMU, they would win a Pool C bid almost without exception. That's also those teams' choice to have UMU in their conference. Ask Wesley what similar but not quite the same success has done to their attempts to join a Pool A conference over time.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 07:12:58 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 07:03:49 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2011, 06:59:53 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2011, 06:57:25 PM
No worse than the North had for a decade before that. There is no reason to protect the East if they are within 500 miles.
Beat me to it. How many OAC teams have gotten screwed because of Mount Union in the last 10-12 years?
If an OAC team won every game aside from UMU, they would win a Pool C bid almost without exception. That's also those teams' choice to have UMU in their conference. Ask Wesley what similar but not quite the same success has done to their attempts to join a Pool A conference over time.
Yeah but each OAC team basically starts the year with 1 loss. So if they lose to a similar team, they are done. Ultimately similar to going undefeated in the East. Except they are hoping for just a bid rather than hopes of a 1 seed.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PM
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 09:12:04 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PM
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
I presumed there would be an additional Pool B, but wasn't certain. As it stands now, if the E8 were Pool B eligible, the winner of Fisher/Utica would be competing with Salisbury, Wesley and Case for the two Pool B spots. If they didn't get one of those bids then they'd be in the Pool C line with every other 1-loss team. So, no guarantees that we'd get an extra East team in. So, we wouldn't have an autobid, but at what cost?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 10:13:17 PMI read the post with interest.Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 25, 2011, 09:12:04 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 12:46:07 PM
Pool B would re-enlarge with six E8 teams to an additional bid. Kaz, do the math. There are six autobid conferences in the East Region. If the entire Region could account for just one or two Pool C bids, then there wouldn't be a need for a double-shift. Now, with Salisbury dominating, it's as if the East only has five Pool A bids -- plus Salisbury. The inclusion of Salisbury has rocked the entire bracketology of the East in a way that gives the East one less team, most likely, in the mix. As Coach Greene said on ITH a few weeks back, watch what you wish for sometimes. Yes, you have an autobid -- at what price?
I presumed there would be an additional Pool B, but wasn't certain. As it stands now, if the E8 were Pool B eligible, the winner of Fisher/Utica would be competing with Salisbury, Wesley and Case for the two Pool B spots. If they didn't get one of those bids then they'd be in the Pool C line with every other 1-loss team. So, no guarantees that we'd get an extra East team in. So, we wouldn't have an autobid, but at what cost?
Two problems. First, Salisbury wasn't required for the autobid. You were just one team short. You're likely losing Springfield because of the geography of this, so there's already a cost in the offing. Second, if the E8 fielded 6, SJF and Utica would be undefeated currently, would they not? Of course, that assumes they would've won the OOC game in place of those two teams, but at undefeated or one loss, the E8 would've received a bid (Case and Wesley both are at one loss and Case isn't a tremendous power right now). This move may have caused irreparable damage to the football E8 component in the longrun and damage to the whole East Region in the quasi-longrun. You were the one that laughed at the Boise State inclusion into the Big East a couple weeks ago. Remember the 5-time-zone WAC? And those were Div. 1 conferences. The effects of these things magnify in D3. Ask Brockport how that whole ACFC experiment went for them...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2011, 10:13:17 PM
if the E8 fielded 6, SJF and Utica would be undefeated currently, would they not? Of course, that assumes they would've won the OOC game in place of those two teams, but at undefeated or one loss, the E8 would've received a bid (Case and Wesley both are at one loss and Case isn't a tremendous power right now).
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 26, 2011, 07:37:59 AM
Yeah Kaz, in some ways it seems like the E8 has a little bit of an existential crisis going on and crisis management would dictate that you do whatever is necessary to show your core membership that you can retain access to the playoffs. They guaranteed it here. The conference may still have an issue in two years, but you deal with that then. Springfield and Norwich didn't seem like natural fits in what is effectively a western NY conference, same way Susquehanna and Coast Guard weren't for the LL (still not sure about Merchant Marine other than that they have no other natural home and having a presence on LI is welcomed by most college presidents). We were just geographically diverse enough in our core to cover western NY and NE NY including RPI's relationship with WPI, so having a New England component is justifiable for the LL even though it's a pretty long haul between there and UofR/Hobart. Springfield will help bridge that on the map.
On the playoff discussion, Gordon is right that it doesn't really matter when you play the best (other than in the rare situation where it's a 1-3 or 4pt game where home field might matter. And Lew I agree that all systems have problems, but I don't recall anyone outside of the greater Seattle area having anything positive to say about the Seahawks-Saints situation last year, so it's not like that outcome was easily accepted nationally. I guess the point is that if you raise the concerns or structural problems in a system there's at least a chance to improve the system. If it goes on with everyone simply acquiescing to the situation and it's imperfections, there's no chance for any improvement.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 26, 2011, 07:37:59 AM
Springfield and Norwich didn't seem like natural fits in what is effectively a western NY conference, same way Susquehanna and Coast Guard weren't for the LL
Quote from: gordonmann on October 25, 2011, 04:12:48 PMQuoteDoes it really matter all that much? Salisbury is a part of the E8. What is the big deal if they win the E8 and are in the South Region? Montclair made the playoffs last year and was put in the South. If Cortland wins the NJAC, it takes 1 NJ team out of contention. Same thing really. If you don't deserve to be in the playoffs, then you don't deserve to be in the playoffs. Case closed.
I'm with LD. As he points out, teams can and will be moved around across geographic regions.
To throw an even bigger damper on the conversation, I don't understand the preoccupation with whether Mount Union is in the "East" bracket . And we, at D3football.com, have the same preoccupation with bracketing so I'm not exempting us.
The geographic lables are just short hand. The committee could decide that Mount Union, UW-Whitewater and two non-East teams are the best four teams and build brackets around them. It's hard for me to argue with that approach. Or they could ignore the regional labels and throw Salisbury (or Johns Hopkins, Thomas More or Mount Union) in the "East" bracket because that's what makes sense based on the eventual participants and their geographic proximity. Irrespective of regional lables, geography will always impact the brackets.
Whether you play Mount Union in the national quarterfinals or the national semifinals, it's a difference of one week. Whenever I ask coaches or players about this issue, that's basically their response. The proverbial shrug. To win the title, you still likely have to beat Mount Union and UW-Whitewater (or a surprise team that proves to be their equal).
Maybe there's some recruiting advantage to saying, "We were one of the last four teams in the country" and there's an extra week of practice on the line. But I don't think those benefits are a big deal. Especially when you can still say, "We were the last team standing in this section of the country." That's what Alfred can say, regardless of when they played Mount Union.
In my view, it's better to enjoy the weeks and games as they come and don't worry about when you're going to play Mount Union or UW-Whitewater, especially not when there's this much uncertainty. As Keith has written in ATN, the journey is more important than the highly predictable destination of another Mount-Whitewater title game.
Oh, and get off my lawn. :)
Quote from: gordonmann on October 25, 2011, 06:15:07 PM
Frank and Pumpkinattack:
I know you've thought a lot about this matter. A lot more than I have, to be honest. In retrospect, there's not much value in me weighing in to say, "I don't care that much." I should've just kept that to myself and not diverted the conversation.
But, for some reason, it just doesn't matter that much to me whether an East region team gets to be the top seed in one of the brackets. Maybe there have been years where an East team was tops in its bracket and it wasn't one of the best four teams in the country. That's frequently the argument at basketball time when an East/Mid-Atlantic/Northeast team gets to host throughout a bracket. And I don't care that much when fans of Central, Midwest or Great Lakes teams raise the same complaint. Maybe it's some kind of inherent fairness fault in me.
Eventually you have to beat really good teams at some place other than your own stadium to win a championship (unless we're talking women's hoops where Final Four level teams can host). The teams that have easier roads to the national semifinals almost always get squashed once they get that far. I can't think of an undeserving Division III football champion who only won a national championshiop because they got the perfect seeding.
I guess my indifference comes down to two things:
* Mount Union and UW-Whitewater squash teams no matter where they play them, home or away. I know it bothered the UWW fans when they had to play NCC or Wesley on the road. I didn't think it would prevent UWW from winning those two games. Wesley wasn't competitive against UWW on the road and it wasn't much better hosting UWW. If the game was played at a neutral site, I'd expect the same result. Mount and UW-Whitewater are currently that much better than everyone else. Some day that won't be the case and maybe I'll care more then.
* The playoff is designed to determine who is the best team in the country, not who are the best four teams in the country. As long as there's a championship game on a neutral field and teams don't have an obviously non-representative path to the title game (like playing the champions of the NEFC, EFC, NATHC and UMAC in successive rounds), I'm not that worried about who gets a harder road to the national championship based on subjective criteria.
If Del Val runs the table and ends up playing Mount Union in the national quarterfinals, I won't worry that much about it. Because they'd probably end up playing them the next week any way. And the tournament is about figuring out who the best team is. If Del Val can't beat them, they aren't the best team.
I will now get out of the way and let those who do care discuss the subject at hand. :)
Quote from: clandfan on October 26, 2011, 10:59:04 PM
For those of you who say it doesn't matter when you play MUC or WW, thats BS. It does matter. It matters to every kid on the field who has a dream of winning a national championship. Yes, to be the best you have to beat the best but there isn't a player out there that wouldnt want that opportunity to be in the final or at the very least, the semis. With rare exception, that last game a senior plays at the DIII level is the end. These young men break down and cry when it is over. For you it doesn't matter but don't be so naive to think that it doesn't matter to the players on the field. They are the only ones that count.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
I think clands point is (or should be) that you want your last game to be in the national championship game and not the first round. I would agree with that.
But LDs point is also valid. You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team. I'm just thinking back when Ithaca loses to Mt. union in the first round in a game that was close until the 3rd quarter. Then TCNJ uspets RPI and gets crushed by Mt .Union in the second round. I'd rather be Ithaca that season than TCNJ.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2011, 01:33:39 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
I think clands point is (or should be) that you want your last game to be in the national championship game and not the first round. I would agree with that.
But LDs point is also valid. You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team. I'm just thinking back when Ithaca loses to Mt. union in the first round in a game that was close until the 3rd quarter. Then TCNJ uspets RPI and gets crushed by Mt .Union in the second round. I'd rather be Ithaca that season than TCNJ.
man, this just makes no sense to me, am I misunderstanding you....and perhaps LD? Your post effectively states that you would rather lose to MUC in the first round, than in the second round? I dont get it....or I just completely misunderstand your post.
It seems to me that the whole issue has been contorted now. Thye earlier posts were discussing whether it mattered whether MUC was in your bracket in the scenario where you were going to either lose to them in the Regional finals, or the National semis and beyond. It cannot be about whether the score was close in the 3rd quarter and then it was a blowout and then someone else upset someone and then got crushed, because that is all after the fact. Before the games are played, would you rather have an impending showdown with MUC in the Regional finals or beyond.
It was gordonmann's point that it didnt matter because if you die, you die....and the play-offs are about a champion not who shats themself when the Purple people eaters take the field. Mine, and others have claimed that one more game does matter, especially when it puts you one game closer to the prize.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2011, 01:33:39 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
I think clands point is (or should be) that you want your last game to be in the national championship game and not the first round. I would agree with that.
But LDs point is also valid. You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team. I'm just thinking back when Ithaca loses to Mt. union in the first round in a game that was close until the 3rd quarter. Then TCNJ uspets RPI and gets crushed by Mt .Union in the second round. I'd rather be Ithaca that season than TCNJ.
man, this just makes no sense to me, am I misunderstanding you....and perhaps LD? Your post effectively states that you would rather lose to MUC in the first round, than in the second round? I dont get it....or I just completely misunderstand your post.
It seems to me that the whole issue has been contorted now. Thye earlier posts were discussing whether it mattered whether MUC was in your bracket in the scenario where you were going to either lose to them in the Regional finals, or the National semis and beyond. It cannot be about whether the score was close in the 3rd quarter and then it was a blowout and then someone else upset someone and then got crushed, because that is all after the fact. Before the games are played, would you rather have an impending showdown with MUC in the Regional finals or beyond.
It was gordonmann's point that it didnt matter because if you die, you die....and the play-offs are about a champion not who shats themself when the Purple people eaters take the field. Mine, and others have claimed that one more game does matter, especially when it puts you one game closer to the prize.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 27, 2011, 01:41:57 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2011, 01:33:39 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
I think clands point is (or should be) that you want your last game to be in the national championship game and not the first round. I would agree with that.
But LDs point is also valid. You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team. I'm just thinking back when Ithaca loses to Mt. union in the first round in a game that was close until the 3rd quarter. Then TCNJ uspets RPI and gets crushed by Mt .Union in the second round. I'd rather be Ithaca that season than TCNJ.
man, this just makes no sense to me, am I misunderstanding you....and perhaps LD? Your post effectively states that you would rather lose to MUC in the first round, than in the second round? I dont get it....or I just completely misunderstand your post.
It seems to me that the whole issue has been contorted now. Thye earlier posts were discussing whether it mattered whether MUC was in your bracket in the scenario where you were going to either lose to them in the Regional finals, or the National semis and beyond. It cannot be about whether the score was close in the 3rd quarter and then it was a blowout and then someone else upset someone and then got crushed, because that is all after the fact. Before the games are played, would you rather have an impending showdown with MUC in the Regional finals or beyond.
It was gordonmann's point that it didnt matter because if you die, you die....and the play-offs are about a champion not who shats themself when the Purple people eaters take the field. Mine, and others have claimed that one more game does matter, especially when it puts you one game closer to the prize.
Yeah, you definitely shat yourself when reading these. My bottom line is this....
Yes, EVERY team wants to get as far as humanly possible. That's a no-brainer.
If you're playing Mount Union in the first round, chances are you don't have much of a shot to win against anyone because you're an 8 seed.
If you're playing Mount Union in the second round, same deal, you probably didn't have much of a chance to beat the 1 seed no matter who it is. But if you did make it that far, would you rather lose to Alfred or Mount Union?
If you make it to the 3rd round and beyond, the games just don't get any easier. You're gonna play Wesley, UWW, Mount Union, MHB, St. Johns, Linfield etc etc who are perennial powerhouses. Someone has to lose. Let's stop crying like f'ing babies. Mount Union is a d3 football team. They should be treated like one.
UWW had to go on the road last year. You know how they whined? They beat everyone.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2011, 02:06:38 PM
....so LD, you agree that it does matter whether you lose to MUC in the Regional finals versus 1 rd later? That was the discussion earlier. I mean, when you change the issue and then answer your own questions as if someone had a different point of view, it gets confusing.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 02:10:28 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2011, 02:06:38 PM
....so LD, you agree that it does matter whether you lose to MUC in the Regional finals versus 1 rd later? That was the discussion earlier. I mean, when you change the issue and then answer your own questions as if someone had a different point of view, it gets confusing.
I think it still depends. Would you rather lose 60-0 in the semifinals or lose 21-17 in the first round (to the same team)? I might agree that losing by any amount in the national championship would be worth it, but I'd rather be close in the first round than blown out in the semifinals.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2011, 02:06:38 PM
....so LD, you agree that it does matter whether you lose to MUC in the Regional finals versus 1 rd later? That was the discussion earlier. I mean, when you change the issue and then answer your own questions as if someone had a different point of view, it gets confusing.
Quote from: clandfan on October 26, 2011, 10:59:04 PM
For those of you who say it doesn't matter when you play MUC or WW, thats BS. It does matter. It matters to every kid on the field who has a dream of winning a national championship. Yes, to be the best you have to beat the best but there isn't a player out there that wouldnt want that opportunity to be in the final or at the very least, the semis. With rare exception, that last game a senior plays at the DIII level is the end. These young men break down and cry when it is over. For you it doesn't matter but don't be so naive to think that it doesn't matter to the players on the field. They are the only ones that count.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 27, 2011, 03:26:54 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team.
So you would rather be Franklin, which lost to Whitewater in Round 1, than the team that lost to Mount in the National Semis?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 27, 2011, 03:49:45 PM
From LD's posts, I think what he's saying is he'd rather his team lost a close game to one of the purple powers in the first round than get homogenized in anything short of the Final Four. And he'd rather lose to them at any point along the way than lose to someone else.
Quote from: pg04 on October 27, 2011, 04:51:21 PM
Boy I have a headache after reading all of this. What the f*ck is anyone even saying anymore?? ???
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 25, 2011, 10:55:17 PM
I read the post with interest.
What are the damages that you have considered that arise from the invitation to Frostburg State and Salisbury?
Thanks.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 27, 2011, 04:44:44 PM
Suggestion to insure fairness for the East in the event that MUC gets shipped here this year....Assemble an ALL-EAST Region squad (cue debate about who's considered an East team, the 500 mile rule and whether Endicott should be considered in the discussion) to compete against MUC in a best 2/3 series. After they win both games 59-3, then they get a week-off before they beat Wesley in the National semis 59-4......ok?
Quote from: Charles on October 27, 2011, 08:02:57 PM
why would you diss Endicott?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 27, 2011, 08:06:51 PMughQuote from: Charles on October 27, 2011, 08:02:57 PM
why would you diss Endicott?
Probably precisely to elicit that response from you.
Quote from: softballrz on October 27, 2011, 09:00:57 PMyou mean the Fighting Gulls are ranked higher than of Kean, Widener, Lycoming and Cortland State? No way!
charles, you need to read the new d3 rankings! your gulls are 6th in the east and 24 in the nation
Quote from: softballrz on October 27, 2011, 09:00:57 PM
charles, you need to read the new d3 rankings! your gulls are 6th in the east and 24 in the nation
Quote from: pg04 on October 27, 2011, 11:14:25 PM
Between the statements on various boards, I believe that Wesleydad thinks every team sucks except Wesley. Even the team that beat Wesley :P
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 27, 2011, 03:26:54 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team.
So you would rather be Franklin, which lost to Whitewater in Round 1, than the team that lost to Mount in the National Semis?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 27, 2011, 03:35:26 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 27, 2011, 03:26:54 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 27, 2011, 01:00:25 PM
You want to lose to the best team in the country rather than a team that loses to that best team.
So you would rather be Franklin, which lost to Whitewater in Round 1, than the team that lost to Mount in the National Semis?
Seriously, you guys are nuts. If you are an 8 seed, you are playing a team that is better than you in Round 1. Case f'ing closed!
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 28, 2011, 07:42:08 AM
Well Franklin got smoked so they showed that they had no business in the playoffs anyway so I would have rather be the team in the semifinals since they couldn't have lost worse than Franklin anyway.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 28, 2011, 11:20:00 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 28, 2011, 07:42:08 AM
Well Franklin got smoked so they showed that they had no business in the playoffs anyway so I would have rather be the team in the semifinals since they couldn't have lost worse than Franklin anyway.
I find it difficult to use this logic (the fact that Franklin got smoked by UWW) to illustrate that any team had no business in the playoffs.
By this logic, almost no team besides Mount Union and UWW has had any business in the playoffs for nearly a decade, even multiple-time semifinalist Wesley (since they've been repeatedly blown out by UWW and UMU). You gotta be kidding me.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 27, 2011, 06:05:48 PM
Here's the issue. In 2012, the E8 will still have 8 (Buffalo State in, Springfield out). In 2013, the E8 will have 6 (Frostburg and Salisbury out). There are rumors (confirmed by people in the know a step or two removed, but what I would consider safe sources) that the LL is happy at 8 teams. That said, if RPI goes to D1, leaving the LL at 7, one E8 school has shown repeated interest to jump to the LL. The instability of the E8 is playing some role in that decision. So what happens if that does happen? The E8 moves down to 5. They end up, at best, in Pool B, because, let's be realistic: they couldn't find one school in two years to join until Buffalo State finally threw in the NJAC towel and decided to join. Cortland and Brockport apparently did not jump still after repeated overtures. How are they going to find TWO more schools to join unless they begin to redefine their own search parameters for permanent members? Essentially, Ralph, the short-term "fix" they employed might actually lead to a deeper, longer-term disaster. Sure, this could change, but I don't know how under the current climate -- and I really do see some odd but fitting comparisons being made between the Big East and E8 (a conference that had seemingly become stronger of late somehow still losing membership because of the instability members were witnessing and the potential for more stability and, at least in the Big East's case, revenues/less costs elsewhere). So, in the end, this two-year agreement is potentially a problem REGARDLESS OF Salisbury's strength these two years.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 28, 2011, 12:12:55 PM
I'm surprised anyone even read Frank's novel. Too long winded for my tiny brain.
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2011, 12:43:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 28, 2011, 12:12:55 PM
I'm surprised anyone even read Frank's novel. Too long winded for my tiny brain.
You may or may not be joking, but I know I didn't read it. Whenever something reaches 10 lines of continuous chatter on this board I completely tune out. I know I'm exposing myself to looking stupid (again). But I need the info quick and move on to the next thing I'm doing. Some people (ahem) have a tendency to make long winded posts.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 28, 2011, 01:13:49 PM
I got about halfway through it and then heard blah blah blah........
Sorry Frank...I have the Attention span of a flea....
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2011, 11:50:11 AM
I do agree that getting a more geographical proximate team to fill the void left by Norwich (who knew Norwich football could leave a void?!?) would have been preferrable. And I can't believe the E8 didn't try every avenue before moving on to the Maryland fix. However, after the two year agreement, won't the E8 be back to a two year grace period to get back to 7 members? So, we're looking at 3+ years to find another dance partner. With Buff State leaving the NJAC next year, Brockport and, to a lesser extent, Cortland will feel the same pinch that Springfield felt when Norwich left. Port now becomes the NJAC team furthest west and the one with the most to gain budget-wise by making a switch. And in the next 3 years that may intensify. Maybe this is just Pollyannaish on my part, but I think by 2015 the Empire 8 football consortium will be all teams in the Empire State, if not 8 members.
Quote from: pg04 on October 28, 2011, 01:14:30 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on October 28, 2011, 01:13:49 PM
I got about halfway through it and then heard blah blah blah........
Sorry Frank...I have the Attention span of a flea....
That means I'm even worse than a flea!
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 28, 2011, 02:59:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 28, 2011, 01:14:30 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on October 28, 2011, 01:13:49 PM
I got about halfway through it and then heard blah blah blah........
Sorry Frank...I have the Attention span of a flea....
That means I'm even worse than a flea!
It's ok, since your name isn't Ralph... ;)
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 28, 2011, 02:57:39 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2011, 11:50:11 AM
I do agree that getting a more geographical proximate team to fill the void left by Norwich (who knew Norwich football could leave a void?!?) would have been preferrable. And I can't believe the E8 didn't try every avenue before moving on to the Maryland fix. However, after the two year agreement, won't the E8 be back to a two year grace period to get back to 7 members? So, we're looking at 3+ years to find another dance partner. With Buff State leaving the NJAC next year, Brockport and, to a lesser extent, Cortland will feel the same pinch that Springfield felt when Norwich left. Port now becomes the NJAC team furthest west and the one with the most to gain budget-wise by making a switch. And in the next 3 years that may intensify. Maybe this is just Pollyannaish on my part, but I think by 2015 the Empire 8 football consortium will be all teams in the Empire State, if not 8 members.
No, the exemption must be granted on a case-by-case basis. It's plausible they could get an exemption, but how bad is it if a conference went back to the NCAA two years after a two-year exemption period to ask for yet another? I'm not sure they'd grant another one to the E8. So, it's a real roll of the dice.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2011, 04:00:39 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 28, 2011, 02:57:39 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2011, 11:50:11 AM
I do agree that getting a more geographical proximate team to fill the void left by Norwich (who knew Norwich football could leave a void?!?) would have been preferrable. And I can't believe the E8 didn't try every avenue before moving on to the Maryland fix. However, after the two year agreement, won't the E8 be back to a two year grace period to get back to 7 members? So, we're looking at 3+ years to find another dance partner. With Buff State leaving the NJAC next year, Brockport and, to a lesser extent, Cortland will feel the same pinch that Springfield felt when Norwich left. Port now becomes the NJAC team furthest west and the one with the most to gain budget-wise by making a switch. And in the next 3 years that may intensify. Maybe this is just Pollyannaish on my part, but I think by 2015 the Empire 8 football consortium will be all teams in the Empire State, if not 8 members.
No, the exemption must be granted on a case-by-case basis. It's plausible they could get an exemption, but how bad is it if a conference went back to the NCAA two years after a two-year exemption period to ask for yet another? I'm not sure they'd grant another one to the E8. So, it's a real roll of the dice.
Fair enough, but I still don't understand how the conference is worse off with this temporary bridge. They have already lined up Buff State and have 18 months to find one more partner. My presumption is that whether they went Pool B, were able to land a WNY SUNY school, or brought in the Maryland contingent that Springfield would make the move to the LL anyway, so this move really gave them additional time to negotiate.
Considering the exemption, even if there is only a small chance for another exemption, that chance is larger than going back and asking for more time prior to this season. And I find it hard to believe that Buff State would burn their bridges with the NJAC to move to a league that will lose it's AQ a year later. Maybe we can get Alfred State to make the leap from NJCAA and get a rivalry game here in Mayberry out of the deal!
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 28, 2011, 02:57:39 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2011, 11:50:11 AM
I do agree that getting a more geographical proximate team to fill the void left by Norwich (who knew Norwich football could leave a void?!?) would have been preferrable. And I can't believe the E8 didn't try every avenue before moving on to the Maryland fix. However, after the two year agreement, won't the E8 be back to a two year grace period to get back to 7 members? So, we're looking at 3+ years to find another dance partner. With Buff State leaving the NJAC next year, Brockport and, to a lesser extent, Cortland will feel the same pinch that Springfield felt when Norwich left. Port now becomes the NJAC team furthest west and the one with the most to gain budget-wise by making a switch. And in the next 3 years that may intensify. Maybe this is just Pollyannaish on my part, but I think by 2015 the Empire 8 football consortium will be all teams in the Empire State, if not 8 members.
No, the exemption must be granted on a case-by-case basis. It's plausible they could get an exemption, but how bad is it if a conference went back to the NCAA two years after a two-year exemption period to ask for yet another? I'm not sure they'd grant another one to the E8. So, it's a real roll of the dice.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2011, 02:07:01 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 28, 2011, 02:57:39 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2011, 11:50:11 AM
I do agree that getting a more geographical proximate team to fill the void left by Norwich (who knew Norwich football could leave a void?!?) would have been preferrable. And I can't believe the E8 didn't try every avenue before moving on to the Maryland fix. However, after the two year agreement, won't the E8 be back to a two year grace period to get back to 7 members? So, we're looking at 3+ years to find another dance partner. With Buff State leaving the NJAC next year, Brockport and, to a lesser extent, Cortland will feel the same pinch that Springfield felt when Norwich left. Port now becomes the NJAC team furthest west and the one with the most to gain budget-wise by making a switch. And in the next 3 years that may intensify. Maybe this is just Pollyannaish on my part, but I think by 2015 the Empire 8 football consortium will be all teams in the Empire State, if not 8 members.
No, the exemption must be granted on a case-by-case basis. It's plausible they could get an exemption, but how bad is it if a conference went back to the NCAA two years after a two-year exemption period to ask for yet another? I'm not sure they'd grant another one to the E8. So, it's a real roll of the dice.
There's no evidence to suggest this, by the way. This is pure, pure speculation to fit Frank's worldview that the Empire 8 is somehow any more in trouble than usual.
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 29, 2011, 02:31:40 AM
attention FR y PC:
Don't hijack this thread like my FB status :P
kthxbye
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 02:34:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 29, 2011, 02:31:40 AM
attention FR y PC:
Don't hijack this thread like my FB status :P
kthxbye
What, where Pat didn't think that the year Joe Buck's dad died allowed for Joe to use his dad's line... and the year that the Cardinals pulled out a Game 6 miracle nine years later would allow for his first use of said line? Yeah, you're right, DC. No need to hijack. soknightynight
Quote from: dewcrew88 on October 29, 2011, 02:37:08 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 02:34:40 AMQuote from: dewcrew88 on October 29, 2011, 02:31:40 AM
attention FR y PC:
Don't hijack this thread like my FB status :P
kthxbye
What, where Pat didn't think that the year Joe Buck's dad died allowed for Joe to use his dad's line... and the year that the Cardinals pulled out a Game 6 miracle nine years later would allow for his first use of said line? Yeah, you're right, DC. No need to hijack. soknightynight
I was kidding, mang. Good luck to your Dutchmen tomorrow.
Quote from: pg04 on October 29, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
Endicott lost to WNEC 40-37. Say goodbye to the gulls' playoff chances. I guess we won't be seeing Endicott in Salem this year.
The other gulls, Salisbury also lost (to Wesley).
Quote from: pg04 on October 29, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
Endicott lost to WNEC 40-37. Say goodbye to the gulls' playoff chances. I guess we won't be seeing Endicott in Salem this year.
The other gulls, Salisbury also lost (to Wesley).
Quote from: dlip on October 29, 2011, 06:36:58 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 29, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
Endicott lost to WNEC 40-37. Say goodbye to the gulls' playoff chances. I guess we won't be seeing Endicott in Salem this year.
The other gulls, Salisbury also lost (to Wesley).
Dlip is ****ing annoyed by the Salisbury loss.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 06:54:30 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 29, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
Endicott lost to WNEC 40-37. Say goodbye to the gulls' playoff chances. I guess we won't be seeing Endicott in Salem this year.
The other gulls, Salisbury also lost (to Wesley).
Not so fast, pg. If WNEC and Endicott run the table, Endicott will be in serious Pool C consideration. One-loss runners up are hard to come by, and we saw this happen in 2008 (Curry).
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 06:54:30 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 29, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
Endicott lost to WNEC 40-37. Say goodbye to the gulls' playoff chances. I guess we won't be seeing Endicott in Salem this year.
The other gulls, Salisbury also lost (to Wesley).
Not so fast, pg. If WNEC and Endicott run the table, Endicott will be in serious Pool C consideration. One-loss runners up are hard to come by, and we saw this happen in 2008 (Curry).
Quote from: Charles on October 29, 2011, 07:17:33 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 06:54:30 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 29, 2011, 04:26:22 PM
Endicott lost to WNEC 40-37. Say goodbye to the gulls' playoff chances. I guess we won't be seeing Endicott in Salem this year.
The other gulls, Salisbury also lost (to Wesley).
Not so fast, pg. If WNEC and Endicott run the table, Endicott will be in serious Pool C consideration. One-loss runners up are hard to come by, and we saw this happen in 2008 (Curry).
Endicott had 505 yards of offense to 255 for WNEC. At times you couldn't see across the field, the field had 4 inches of snow on it. Too bad they had to play in that weatehr. Oh well, both teams had to play in it. I'm thinking that the guys will be in Salem tonight for Halloween.
Quote from: Cardinal Pride on October 29, 2011, 11:03:55 PM
Damn weather, who would have thought they would play football in bad weather. I have 2 questions... 505 yards of O in bad weather, how many yards would they have under normal conditions? How does a team score 40 points on 255 yards of offense? Weather???
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 11:12:45 PMQuote from: Cardinal Pride on October 29, 2011, 11:03:55 PM
Damn weather, who would have thought they would play football in bad weather. I have 2 questions... 505 yards of O in bad weather, how many yards would they have under normal conditions? How does a team score 40 points on 255 yards of offense? Weather???
Well, here's one way:
2nd 00:34 WNE - Mike Graham 85 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
...
3rd 00:00 WNE - Mike Graham 83 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
Plus, WNEC turned the ball over 3 times, while Endicott did 4 times -- location of turnovers mattered a lot.
Quote from: Cardinal Pride on October 29, 2011, 11:16:23 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 11:12:45 PMQuote from: Cardinal Pride on October 29, 2011, 11:03:55 PM
Damn weather, who would have thought they would play football in bad weather. I have 2 questions... 505 yards of O in bad weather, how many yards would they have under normal conditions? How does a team score 40 points on 255 yards of offense? Weather???
Well, here's one way:
2nd 00:34 WNE - Mike Graham 85 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
...
3rd 00:00 WNE - Mike Graham 83 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
Plus, WNEC turned the ball over 3 times, while Endicott did 4 times -- location of turnovers mattered a lot.
What a day for Mike Graham. Doesn't sound weather related though.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 11:12:45 PMQuote from: Cardinal Pride on October 29, 2011, 11:03:55 PM
Damn weather, who would have thought they would play football in bad weather. I have 2 questions... 505 yards of O in bad weather, how many yards would they have under normal conditions? How does a team score 40 points on 255 yards of offense? Weather???
Well, here's one way:
2nd 00:34 WNE - Mike Graham 85 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
...
3rd 00:00 WNE - Mike Graham 83 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
Plus, WNEC turned the ball over 3 times, while Endicott did 4 times -- location of turnovers mattered a lot.
Quote from: DanPadavona on October 29, 2011, 11:59:34 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 11:12:45 PMQuote from: Cardinal Pride on October 29, 2011, 11:03:55 PM
Damn weather, who would have thought they would play football in bad weather. I have 2 questions... 505 yards of O in bad weather, how many yards would they have under normal conditions? How does a team score 40 points on 255 yards of offense? Weather???
Well, here's one way:
2nd 00:34 WNE - Mike Graham 85 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
...
3rd 00:00 WNE - Mike Graham 83 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
Plus, WNEC turned the ball over 3 times, while Endicott did 4 times -- location of turnovers mattered a lot.
Whenever someone who loses points to their higher offensive yardage stats from scrimmage, you know they are conveniently leaving out special teams yardage, and the estimated yardage value of turnovers. I believe the value of a lost fumble is -40 yards or so. I assume an interception carries a similar value.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2011, 11:12:45 PMQuote from: Cardinal Pride on October 29, 2011, 11:03:55 PM
Damn weather, who would have thought they would play football in bad weather. I have 2 questions... 505 yards of O in bad weather, how many yards would they have under normal conditions? How does a team score 40 points on 255 yards of offense? Weather???
Well, here's one way:
2nd 00:34 WNE - Mike Graham 85 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
...
3rd 00:00 WNE - Mike Graham 83 yd kickoff return (Nick Fox-Edele kick)
Plus, WNEC turned the ball over 3 times, while Endicott did 4 times -- location of turnovers mattered a lot.
Quote from: SUADC on October 30, 2011, 06:05:11 PM
This is what I have as the East bracket, as of today. Feel free to comment and make your suggestions.
#1 Mount Union (Subject to St. Thomas going undefeated)
vs.
#8 SUNY Maritime/Norwich
#4 Winner of E8 (Salisbury or St. John Fisher)
vs.
#5 Endicott
#2 Hobart/Delaware Valley (Depending on committee and Del Val winning out)
vs.
#7 2nd Place E8 (Salisbury or St. John Fisher or 2nd Place MAC (Del Val, Widener, Lycoming)
#3 Del Val/Hobart, or Widener (If Widener beats Del Val or Del Val Winning out, up to Committee)
vs.
#6 NJAC Winner (Kean, Montclair St., Rowan)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 30, 2011, 06:18:42 PMQuote from: SUADC on October 30, 2011, 06:05:11 PM
This is what I have as the East bracket, as of today. Feel free to comment and make your suggestions.
#1 Mount Union (Subject to St. Thomas going undefeated)
vs.
#8 SUNY Maritime/Norwich
#4 Winner of E8 (Salisbury or St. John Fisher)
vs.
#5 Endicott
#2 Hobart/Delaware Valley (Depending on committee and Del Val winning out)
vs.
#7 2nd Place E8 (Salisbury or St. John Fisher or 2nd Place MAC (Del Val, Widener, Lycoming)
#3 Del Val/Hobart, or Widener (If Widener beats Del Val or Del Val Winning out, up to Committee)
vs.
#6 NJAC Winner (Kean, Montclair St., Rowan)
NEFC is now WNEC or Framingham St. They will most likely get a 6 or 7 seed. Endicott COULD see a Pool C bid at 9-1. Normally I would say it's unlikely, but there's going to be a lot of 2 loss teams and very few one loss teams left in the East.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 30, 2011, 06:47:36 PM
I think that it is highly doubtful that the E8 will get 2 bids....
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 10:44:59 AM
If MTUnion comes East, so be it. I'm not delusional, but excited to have another chance at them (this team doesn't have the same core on Defense with Hager, Sanders, Aruck, but a infinitely better offense). That being said, with DelVal having Widener and Lyco to finish their season, their metrics may be good enough to warrant a #1 seed. 10-0, wins over 1 or more RRO, etc. I don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Who knows. You could also be right. I just want Hobart to crush the next two R's, RPI & UofR, the next two weeks and remain healthy. Very worried about RPI next week and thinking of 2001 and 2003 when RPI was undefeated. In 01' Bart couldn't pull it out, but in 2003 they did and those were the only two non-playoff Bart teams until 2009.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 10:44:59 AM
If MTUnion comes East, so be it. I'm not delusional, but excited to have another chance at them (this team doesn't have the same core on Defense with Hager, Sanders, Aruck, but a infinitely better offense). That being said, with DelVal having Widener and Lyco to finish their season, their metrics may be good enough to warrant a #1 seed. 10-0, wins over 1 or more RRO, etc. I don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Who knows. You could also be right. I just want Hobart to crush the next two R's, RPI & UofR, the next two weeks and remain healthy. Very worried about RPI next week and thinking of 2001 and 2003 when RPI was undefeated. In 01' Bart couldn't pull it out, but in 2003 they did and those were the only two non-playoff Bart teams until 2009.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 11:23:29 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 10:44:59 AM
If MTUnion comes East, so be it. I'm not delusional, but excited to have another chance at them (this team doesn't have the same core on Defense with Hager, Sanders, Aruck, but a infinitely better offense). That being said, with DelVal having Widener and Lyco to finish their season, their metrics may be good enough to warrant a #1 seed. 10-0, wins over 1 or more RRO, etc. I don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Who knows. You could also be right. I just want Hobart to crush the next two R's, RPI & UofR, the next two weeks and remain healthy. Very worried about RPI next week and thinking of 2001 and 2003 when RPI was undefeated. In 01' Bart couldn't pull it out, but in 2003 they did and those were the only two non-playoff Bart teams until 2009.
A 10-0 DVC team should be #1....period. I know they may not be, but they should. And that is regardless of how the rest of the East shakes out. It makes no sense to me the argument about the "Top 4" in the Country. That is a false premise to move MUC East every year. There is no Top 4, there is MUC and UWW, and then everyone else.
As I do every year at this time, I ask why have Regional Rankings if a DVCesque 10-0 team doesnt get the benefit of running the table in its region. Why does the East get punished just because the West has so many potential #1's. When is the last time (and I know somebody will find out ;)) a North team faired much better against MUC in the National Semis than the EAST team did in the East Regional Finals against them?
The proponents of the so called Top 4 have claimed that what is the difference between losing to MUC in the final 8 or final 4; and that the tournament is about finding a champion, not to worry about how far any other team advances. Ok, then why do we care if a 10-0 West team is a two seed in the West? Whoever that team is, they aren't beating MUC any sooner than Hobart is!!!
Quick quiz.....name me the team that is winning the title this year....times up....its either MUC or UWW. So screw the WEST teams that 'deserve' a number 1....no they dont, unless they are better than the team ahead of them that gets the #1.
QuoteI don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 31, 2011, 11:28:28 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 11:23:29 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 10:44:59 AM
If MTUnion comes East, so be it. I'm not delusional, but excited to have another chance at them (this team doesn't have the same core on Defense with Hager, Sanders, Aruck, but a infinitely better offense). That being said, with DelVal having Widener and Lyco to finish their season, their metrics may be good enough to warrant a #1 seed. 10-0, wins over 1 or more RRO, etc. I don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Who knows. You could also be right. I just want Hobart to crush the next two R's, RPI & UofR, the next two weeks and remain healthy. Very worried about RPI next week and thinking of 2001 and 2003 when RPI was undefeated. In 01' Bart couldn't pull it out, but in 2003 they did and those were the only two non-playoff Bart teams until 2009.
A 10-0 DVC team should be #1....period. I know they may not be, but they should. And that is regardless of how the rest of the East shakes out. It makes no sense to me the argument about the "Top 4" in the Country. That is a false premise to move MUC East every year. There is no Top 4, there is MUC and UWW, and then everyone else.
As I do every year at this time, I ask why have Regional Rankings if a DVCesque 10-0 team doesnt get the benefit of running the table in its region. Why does the East get punished just because the West has so many potential #1's. When is the last time (and I know somebody will find out ;)) a North team faired much better against MUC in the National Semis than the EAST team did in the East Regional Finals against them?
The proponents of the so called Top 4 have claimed that what is the difference between losing to MUC in the final 8 or final 4; and that the tournament is about finding a champion, not to worry about how far any other team advances. Ok, then why do we care if a 10-0 West team is a two seed in the West? Whoever that team is, they aren't beating MUC any sooner than Hobart is!!!
Quick quiz.....name me the team that is winning the title this year....times up....its either MUC or UWW. So screw the WEST teams that 'deserve' a number 1....no they dont, unless they are better than the team ahead of them that gets the #1.
Ok, so they put DVC at 1 and keep Mt. Union out. They are still going to have to ship in 2-3 teams to fill out this bracket. If they move in Wesley with a 4-5 seed, they probably take the bracket. Same end result.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 12:28:40 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 31, 2011, 11:28:28 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 11:23:29 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 10:44:59 AM
If MTUnion comes East, so be it. I'm not delusional, but excited to have another chance at them (this team doesn't have the same core on Defense with Hager, Sanders, Aruck, but a infinitely better offense). That being said, with DelVal having Widener and Lyco to finish their season, their metrics may be good enough to warrant a #1 seed. 10-0, wins over 1 or more RRO, etc. I don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Who knows. You could also be right. I just want Hobart to crush the next two R's, RPI & UofR, the next two weeks and remain healthy. Very worried about RPI next week and thinking of 2001 and 2003 when RPI was undefeated. In 01' Bart couldn't pull it out, but in 2003 they did and those were the only two non-playoff Bart teams until 2009.
A 10-0 DVC team should be #1....period. I know they may not be, but they should. And that is regardless of how the rest of the East shakes out. It makes no sense to me the argument about the "Top 4" in the Country. That is a false premise to move MUC East every year. There is no Top 4, there is MUC and UWW, and then everyone else.
As I do every year at this time, I ask why have Regional Rankings if a DVCesque 10-0 team doesnt get the benefit of running the table in its region. Why does the East get punished just because the West has so many potential #1's. When is the last time (and I know somebody will find out ;)) a North team faired much better against MUC in the National Semis than the EAST team did in the East Regional Finals against them?
The proponents of the so called Top 4 have claimed that what is the difference between losing to MUC in the final 8 or final 4; and that the tournament is about finding a champion, not to worry about how far any other team advances. Ok, then why do we care if a 10-0 West team is a two seed in the West? Whoever that team is, they aren't beating MUC any sooner than Hobart is!!!
Quick quiz.....name me the team that is winning the title this year....times up....its either MUC or UWW. So screw the WEST teams that 'deserve' a number 1....no they dont, unless they are better than the team ahead of them that gets the #1.
Ok, so they put DVC at 1 and keep Mt. Union out. They are still going to have to ship in 2-3 teams to fill out this bracket. If they move in Wesley with a 4-5 seed, they probably take the bracket. Same end result.
Wesley v. Hobart/Del Val/SJF/Sals score Wesley 28-opponent 21
MUC v. anyone not named UWW.....55-5
I'll take my chances against Wesley...and if the end result is the same, so be it, but that doesnt mean a 10-0 true East Region team shouldnt be #1
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 11:23:29 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 10:44:59 AM
If MTUnion comes East, so be it. I'm not delusional, but excited to have another chance at them (this team doesn't have the same core on Defense with Hager, Sanders, Aruck, but a infinitely better offense). That being said, with DelVal having Widener and Lyco to finish their season, their metrics may be good enough to warrant a #1 seed. 10-0, wins over 1 or more RRO, etc. I don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Who knows. You could also be right. I just want Hobart to crush the next two R's, RPI & UofR, the next two weeks and remain healthy. Very worried about RPI next week and thinking of 2001 and 2003 when RPI was undefeated. In 01' Bart couldn't pull it out, but in 2003 they did and those were the only two non-playoff Bart teams until 2009.
A 10-0 DVC team should be #1....period. I know they may not be, but they should. And that is regardless of how the rest of the East shakes out. It makes no sense to me the argument about the "Top 4" in the Country. That is a false premise to move MUC East every year. There is no Top 4, there is MUC and UWW, and then everyone else.
As I do every year at this time, I ask why have Regional Rankings if a DVCesque 10-0 team doesnt get the benefit of running the table in its region. Why does the East get punished just because the West has so many potential #1's. When is the last time (and I know somebody will find out ;)) a North team faired much better against MUC in the National Semis than the EAST team did in the East Regional Finals against them?
The proponents of the so called Top 4 have claimed that what is the difference between losing to MUC in the final 8 or final 4; and that the tournament is about finding a champion, not to worry about how far any other team advances. Ok, then why do we care if a 10-0 West team is a two seed in the West? Whoever that team is, they aren't beating MUC any sooner than Hobart is!!!
Quick quiz.....name me the team that is winning the title this year....times up....its either MUC or UWW. So screw the WEST teams that 'deserve' a number 1....no they dont, unless they are better than the team ahead of them that gets the #1.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 31, 2011, 10:27:44 AM
Ok, well I was rethinking the playoff scenarios, and I now think that there is a good chance that we see Mount Union AND Salisbury(if they beat Fisher) in the 'East' bracket. We're running low on numbers it seems. I could even see a 3rd import out of necessity. Here is how I see it at this point:
If Delaware Valley wins out
1. Mount Union
2. Delaware Valley
3. Hobart
4. Johns Hopkins
5. Salisbury/St. John Fisher
6. Kean/Montclair St.
7. WNEC/Framingham St.
8. SUNY Maritime
If Delaware Valley loses 1:
1. Mount Union
2. Hobart
3. Salisbury/St. John Fisher
4. Kean/Montclair St.
5. Widener/Lycoming
6. Delaware Valley
7. WNEC/Framingham St.
8. SUNY-Maritime
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 31, 2011, 12:32:54 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 12:28:40 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 31, 2011, 11:28:28 AMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 11:23:29 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 10:44:59 AM
If MTUnion comes East, so be it. I'm not delusional, but excited to have another chance at them (this team doesn't have the same core on Defense with Hager, Sanders, Aruck, but a infinitely better offense). That being said, with DelVal having Widener and Lyco to finish their season, their metrics may be good enough to warrant a #1 seed. 10-0, wins over 1 or more RRO, etc. I don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
Who knows. You could also be right. I just want Hobart to crush the next two R's, RPI & UofR, the next two weeks and remain healthy. Very worried about RPI next week and thinking of 2001 and 2003 when RPI was undefeated. In 01' Bart couldn't pull it out, but in 2003 they did and those were the only two non-playoff Bart teams until 2009.
A 10-0 DVC team should be #1....period. I know they may not be, but they should. And that is regardless of how the rest of the East shakes out. It makes no sense to me the argument about the "Top 4" in the Country. That is a false premise to move MUC East every year. There is no Top 4, there is MUC and UWW, and then everyone else.
As I do every year at this time, I ask why have Regional Rankings if a DVCesque 10-0 team doesnt get the benefit of running the table in its region. Why does the East get punished just because the West has so many potential #1's. When is the last time (and I know somebody will find out ;)) a North team faired much better against MUC in the National Semis than the EAST team did in the East Regional Finals against them?
The proponents of the so called Top 4 have claimed that what is the difference between losing to MUC in the final 8 or final 4; and that the tournament is about finding a champion, not to worry about how far any other team advances. Ok, then why do we care if a 10-0 West team is a two seed in the West? Whoever that team is, they aren't beating MUC any sooner than Hobart is!!!
Quick quiz.....name me the team that is winning the title this year....times up....its either MUC or UWW. So screw the WEST teams that 'deserve' a number 1....no they dont, unless they are better than the team ahead of them that gets the #1.
Ok, so they put DVC at 1 and keep Mt. Union out. They are still going to have to ship in 2-3 teams to fill out this bracket. If they move in Wesley with a 4-5 seed, they probably take the bracket. Same end result.
Wesley v. Hobart/Del Val/SJF/Sals score Wesley 28-opponent 21
MUC v. anyone not named UWW.....55-5
I'll take my chances against Wesley...and if the end result is the same, so be it, but that doesnt mean a 10-0 true East Region team shouldnt be #1
If they aren't Regional brackets it does. There will probably be like 15 undefeated teams. Not all of them can be 1 seeds.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 12:04:24 PMQuoteI don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
I've seen every game Del Val has played for the last 8 years. I don't have them ranked in the Top 5 on my ballot. The defense is very good. The offense is very young. I think last year's Aggie team (offense + defense) is better than this year's overall.
That said, I don't have a problem with them being No. 1 in the bracket if they win out. Or being No. 2 if they win out. But they have to win out first, which will be very, very difficult.
Incidentally doesn't the highest ranked East team usually lose in the NCAA playoffs before playing Mount Union anyway?
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 12:41:30 PM
....but why do we get bombarded with Regional rankings...and why does that matter for selection criteria....if an East team plays Wesley or MUC in the Reg season, they gain no benefit or detriment, win or lose, in the objective numbers crunching, yet come seeding time, we are supposed to accept that there are no regions
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 12:56:21 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 12:41:30 PM
....but why do we get bombarded with Regional rankings...and why does that matter for selection criteria....if an East team plays Wesley or MUC in the Reg season, they gain no benefit or detriment, win or lose, in the objective numbers crunching, yet come seeding time, we are supposed to accept that there are no regions
This is what has always bugged me about it. When it comes to selecting the teams for the playoffs, it's all about regional performance, but yet, come playoff time, the idea of regions disappears. The selection (and seeding) criteria for the at-large teams:
• Win-loss percentage against regional opponents.
• Strength-of-schedule (only contests versus regional competition).
- Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OWP).
- Opponents' Opponents' Average Winning Percentage (OOWP).
• In-region head-to-head competition.
• In-region results versus common regional opponents.
• In-region results versus regionally ranked teams.
Every single primary criteria makes direct note that regions are what matters. The sport itself is regional. But come playoff time, that whole concept just shifts to something completely different. Why are regions so incredibly important right until we want to completely forget about them?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 12:45:59 PMGreat year. An Ithaca win over Curry would have set up Cortaca Part Deux! Cortland did make it to the Quarterfinals but lost to Mt Union 41-14. Cortland went up early 7-0 which was the only game that year that Mt Union was down. CState hung around till the third quarter going into the half down just 20-14. It was all down hill from there with the game ending 41 -14. Still a good run for Cortland and the East. As was stated in earlier posts, while winning it all is the dream, that team can enjoy making it that far and losing to the ultimate National Champ. Did making the quarterfinals in 2008 do the East any good or do we need to get a team deep into the playoffs consistently? (oh and by the way, not lose 41 - 14 when you do make it that far!)Quote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 12:04:24 PMQuoteI don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
I've seen every game Del Val has played for the last 8 years. I don't have them ranked in the Top 5 on my ballot. The defense is very good. The offense is very young. I think last year's Aggie team (offense + defense) is better than this year's overall.
That said, I don't have a problem with them being No. 1 in the bracket if they win out. Or being No. 2 if they win out. But they have to win out first, which will be very, very difficult.
Incidentally doesn't the highest ranked East team usually lose in the NCAA playoffs before playing Mount Union anyway?
I'm with SJF82. It's one thing if we're talking about a 9-1 Cortland State or IC a la 2008, or if some random ECFC team like Norwich goes 10-0, or even Hobart running it but only winning eight games.
But if you've got a traditionally strong program going 10-0 in the East in a decent conference, and they don't get a #1 seed, I mean, what's the point? It sort of becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy at that point. No East team makes a deep run to have the preseason equity built up enough to get a #1 seed even if they do go 10-0, especially if their conference is weak, so they keep getting Mount shipped East.
Hypothetically speaking, do you think the selection committee would have made IC or Cortland a #1 seed had they gone 10-0 in 2008? Cortland was ranked #7 before losing to Ithaca in Week 10, and Ithaca wound up at #12 following the regular season, despite being unranked as late as week 5. I know the Top 25 isn't a determining factor, but still, it's clear those were considered two of the best teams in the country.
I ask because this seemed to me to be the season where we had a legit chance to have a true #1, and Ithaca made a mess of the whole thing, losing to Fisher, beating Cortland and then blowing the Curry game in the NCAA's. I feel like had either the Bombers or Red Dragons not lost, they could have really changed the perception of the East
Quote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 01:22:42 PM
Hmmm... I'm trying to think of a way to state my view on this argument without having my Karma dinged excessively :P
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 31, 2011, 01:21:24 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 12:45:59 PMGreat year. An Ithaca win over Curry would have set up Cortaca Part Deux! Cortland did make it to the Quarterfinals but lost to Mt Union 41-14. Cortland went up early 7-0 which was the only game that year that Mt Union was down. CState hung around till the third quarter going into the half down just 20-14. It was all down hill from there with the game ending 41 -14. Still a good run for Cortland and the East. As was stated in earlier posts, while winning it all is the dream, that team can enjoy making it that far and losing to the ultimate National Champ. Did making the quarterfinals in 2008 do the East any good or do we need to get a team deep into the playoffs consistently? (oh and by the way, not lose 41 - 14 when you do make it that far!)Quote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 12:04:24 PMQuoteI don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
I've seen every game Del Val has played for the last 8 years. I don't have them ranked in the Top 5 on my ballot. The defense is very good. The offense is very young. I think last year's Aggie team (offense + defense) is better than this year's overall.
That said, I don't have a problem with them being No. 1 in the bracket if they win out. Or being No. 2 if they win out. But they have to win out first, which will be very, very difficult.
Incidentally doesn't the highest ranked East team usually lose in the NCAA playoffs before playing Mount Union anyway?
I'm with SJF82. It's one thing if we're talking about a 9-1 Cortland State or IC a la 2008, or if some random ECFC team like Norwich goes 10-0, or even Hobart running it but only winning eight games.
But if you've got a traditionally strong program going 10-0 in the East in a decent conference, and they don't get a #1 seed, I mean, what's the point? It sort of becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy at that point. No East team makes a deep run to have the preseason equity built up enough to get a #1 seed even if they do go 10-0, especially if their conference is weak, so they keep getting Mount shipped East.
Hypothetically speaking, do you think the selection committee would have made IC or Cortland a #1 seed had they gone 10-0 in 2008? Cortland was ranked #7 before losing to Ithaca in Week 10, and Ithaca wound up at #12 following the regular season, despite being unranked as late as week 5. I know the Top 25 isn't a determining factor, but still, it's clear those were considered two of the best teams in the country.
I ask because this seemed to me to be the season where we had a legit chance to have a true #1, and Ithaca made a mess of the whole thing, losing to Fisher, beating Cortland and then blowing the Curry game in the NCAA's. I feel like had either the Bombers or Red Dragons not lost, they could have really changed the perception of the East
Quote from: RedDragonFan on October 31, 2011, 01:21:24 PM
Great year. An Ithaca win over Curry would have set up Cortaca Part Deux! Cortland did make it to the Quarterfinals but lost to Mt Union 41-14. Cortland went up early 7-0 which was the only game that year that Mt Union was down. CState hung around till the third quarter going into the half down just 20-14. It was all down hill from there with the game ending 41 -14. Still a good run for Cortland and the East. As was stated in earlier posts, while winning it all is the dream, that team can enjoy making it that far and losing to the ultimate National Champ. Did making the quarterfinals in 2008 do the East any good or do we need to get a team deep into the playoffs consistently? (oh and by the way, not lose 41 - 14 when you do make it that far!)
Quote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 01:40:54 PM
Edit (Addendum): Also, wouldn't the NCAA want to attempt to line up the 4 teams they determine are the best to meet in the National Semifinals? I don't think this is a horrible thing to do...
Quote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 12:04:24 PMQuoteI don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
I've seen every game Del Val has played for the last 8 years. I don't have them ranked in the Top 5 on my ballot. The defense is very good. The offense is very young. I think last year's Aggie team (offense + defense) is better than this year's overall.
That said, I don't have a problem with them being No. 1 in the bracket if they win out. Or being No. 2 if they win out. But they have to win out first, which will be very, very difficult.
Incidentally doesn't the highest ranked East team usually lose in the NCAA playoffs before playing Mount Union anyway?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 02:24:56 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 12:04:24 PMQuoteI don't know if they're on the level of the top 4 teams in the nation and really neither does anyone else (perhaps someone from D3 has seen them, but seeing one game can be deceiving in both directions), but given that inability to compare, it would seem reasonable for them to be a #1. If you want to go by D3football ranings, they'll probably be top 10 if they win out, which gives them enough credibility.
I've seen every game Del Val has played for the last 8 years. I don't have them ranked in the Top 5 on my ballot. The defense is very good. The offense is very young. I think last year's Aggie team (offense + defense) is better than this year's overall.
That said, I don't have a problem with them being No. 1 in the bracket if they win out. Or being No. 2 if they win out. But they have to win out first, which will be very, very difficult.
Incidentally doesn't the highest ranked East team usually lose in the NCAA playoffs before playing Mount Union anyway?
Gordon -- guess your 80-plus games of Delaware Valley experience didn't impress 82. He wasn't interested in the contrary opinion, only assuming that we didn't know what we were talking about.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 02:56:17 PM
Gordon, thanks for the feedback. Have you seen enough of Linfield & St Thomas (since it appears this debate, this year, assuming UMHB is locked into #1 in the south) to be comfortable with their strengths and weaknesses vis-a-vis Del Val.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 02:24:56 PM
Gordon -- guess your 80-plus games of Delaware Valley experience didn't impress 82. He wasn't interested in the contrary opinion, only assuming that we didn't know what we were talking about.
Quote from: dlip on October 31, 2011, 02:36:09 PMI agree that regional brackets should only contain teams from that region. Trying to have what they think the top 4 teams are make the semis might even be shortsighted. Gonna ask questions that are probably naive but here it goes. (save the Cortland cracks for next week!)
dlip just thinks the touney should be set up BY regions (yes meaning each region's bracket only contains teams from that region). Right or wrong, weak or strong, this is just dlip's opinion. It's region this, and region that, all year until it's time to place teams into the brackets (specifically the top four seeds). dlip doesn't think it's a bad idea to place the best 4 teams as #1 seeds, he just likes the purely regional set-up better. He thinks it provides each geographic region the opportunity to continue the battle, within itself, to make the final four. Then you truly have the best teams from each region facing off.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 03:22:57 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 02:56:17 PM
Gordon, thanks for the feedback. Have you seen enough of Linfield & St Thomas (since it appears this debate, this year, assuming UMHB is locked into #1 in the south) to be comfortable with their strengths and weaknesses vis-a-vis Del Val.Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 02:24:56 PM
Gordon -- guess your 80-plus games of Delaware Valley experience didn't impress 82. He wasn't interested in the contrary opinion, only assuming that we didn't know what we were talking about.
Pat: How is seeing Delaware Valley play so many games over the years relevant to whether or not this year's team is better than say, St. Thomas this year? Many of the 80+ games you speak of are largely irrelevant to a discussion of the 2011 teams relative power.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 01:28:16 PM
+k....there, I gave you a credit, so take a position now....
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 12:56:21 PM
Every single primary criteria makes direct note that regions are what matters. The sport itself is regional. But come playoff time, that whole concept just shifts to something completely different. Why are regions so incredibly important right until we want to completely forget about them?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 02:24:56 PM
Gordon -- guess your 80-plus games of Delaware Valley experience didn't impress 82. He wasn't interested in the contrary opinion, only assuming that we didn't know what we were talking about.
QuoteGordon, thanks for the feedback. Have you seen enough of Linfield & St Thomas (since it appears this debate, this year, assuming UMHB is locked into #1 in the south) to be comfortable with their strengths and weaknesses vis-a-vis Del Val. Or is it just you know DelVal really well and don't believe they can be one of the top 5 teams this year? Is it possible that you may be overly critical of DelVal vs a team like one of the aforementioned that you may have only seen once this year?
QuoteDoes this mean you guys should be listening to me about Ithaca? After all, if 82 is supposed to be impressed by 80+ games over seven years, then what's 200+ over the last 24? Shouldn't Pep be anointed the all-knowing sage of Alfred?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley ( 5 ) | 8-0 | 67 | 2 | at #9 Lycoming |
2 Salisbury( 2 ) | 7-1 | 63 | 1 | vs. #4 St. John Fisher |
3 Hobart | 6-0 | 55 | 3 | vs. RPI |
4 St. John Fisher | 7-1 | 46 | 4 | at #2 Salisbury |
5 Kean | 7-1 | 44 | 5 | at William Paterson |
6 Montclair State | 7-1 | 34 | 6 | at Rowan |
7 Widener | 8-1 | 26 | 8 | Open Date |
8 Cortland State | 6-2 | 24 | 7 | at Brockport State |
9 Lycoming | 7-1 | 19 | 9 | vs. #1 Delaware Valley |
10t Lebanon Valley | 5-3 | 2 | NR | at Wilkes |
10t Western New England | 8-1 | 2 | NR | at Mass-Dartmouth |
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 03:59:24 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 03:22:57 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 02:56:17 PM
Gordon, thanks for the feedback. Have you seen enough of Linfield & St Thomas (since it appears this debate, this year, assuming UMHB is locked into #1 in the south) to be comfortable with their strengths and weaknesses vis-a-vis Del Val.Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 02:24:56 PM
Gordon -- guess your 80-plus games of Delaware Valley experience didn't impress 82. He wasn't interested in the contrary opinion, only assuming that we didn't know what we were talking about.
Pat: How is seeing Delaware Valley play so many games over the years relevant to whether or not this year's team is better than say, St. Thomas this year? Many of the 80+ games you speak of are largely irrelevant to a discussion of the 2011 teams relative power.
Not saying it is, but 82 asked for something specific, got it, then ignored it.
I understand that the East Region fans would love to have eight guaranteed spots for East Region teams but that isn't how it works. Each region gets what it earns.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 04:14:22 PM
Shouldn't Pep be anointed the all-knowing sage of Alfred?
QuoteI've always found it interesting that many of the best games Mount seems to get pre-Whitewater come from these supposedly weaker East teams. In 2006, Fisher gave them all they could handle, losing by 12. In 2007, Ithaca gave them a better game than anyone in the OAC did in the regular season, to mention nothing of the 48 point win Mount had in the semi-finals over Bethel. In 2008, Cortland hung with them a lot longer in the regional finals than Wheaton did in the National semis. Last year, Del Valley did no worse than Bethel in the national semis. Sure, lots of times, East teams get boat-raced by Mount. So what? Like that's some new thing exclusive to the East?
Quote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 04:17:06 PMQuoteGordon, thanks for the feedback. Have you seen enough of Linfield & St Thomas (since it appears this debate, this year, assuming UMHB is locked into #1 in the south) to be comfortable with their strengths and weaknesses vis-a-vis Del Val. Or is it just you know DelVal really well and don't believe they can be one of the top 5 teams this year? Is it possible that you may be overly critical of DelVal vs a team like one of the aforementioned that you may have only seen once this year?
Fair questions and I don't mind trying to answer them.
No, I haven't seen Linfield or St. Thomas enough to guage them against Del Val. I think they are both better than Del Val, but it's not based on anything objectively anchored in this year. I've seen a lot of highly ranked teams over the years -- and not just UWW and Mount Union -- so I have an internal guage of whether a team is at that level. But it is internal and subjective.
To the extent it's helpful, I can compare this year's Del Val team to last year's and I don't think it's as good. Nor is it as good as the 2006 team, at least not so far. Neither of those past Del Val teams finished in the Top 4 in the country. In fact, neither of those teams was even the last East region team standing. So I feel comfortable in my personal assessment that this isn't one of the fourth best teams in the country.
If the Aggies beat Lycoming and Widener, I'll reconsider that opinion. And if others feel differently for whatever reason -- wanting to maintain the regional structure, wanting an East region team to be rewarded for finishing 10-0, not believing St. Thomas or Linfield is better than Del Val -- s'alright with me.
There's room for disagreement and logical conclusions either way.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 02:05:57 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 01:40:54 PM
Edit (Addendum): Also, wouldn't the NCAA want to attempt to line up the 4 teams they determine are the best to meet in the National Semifinals? I don't think this is a horrible thing to do...
...except it often doesnt materialize....last year the Tommies HAD to get a #1 because we had to have the 4 best be #1....well funny thing happened on the way to Salem....they didnt even make it out of the North bracket that muc was shipped out of to make way for them
...and then, Bethel, who beat them 12-7, got MUCinized the next week....same 'ol story.....
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 02:05:57 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 01:40:54 PM
Edit (Addendum): Also, wouldn't the NCAA want to attempt to line up the 4 teams they determine are the best to meet in the National Semifinals? I don't think this is a horrible thing to do...
...except it often doesnt materialize....last year the Tommies HAD to get a #1 because we had to have the 4 best be #1....well funny thing happened on the way to Salem....they didnt even make it out of the North bracket that muc was shipped out of to make way for them
...and then, Bethel, who beat them 12-7, got MUCinized the next week....same 'ol story.....
Quote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 04:22:08 PMQuoteI've always found it interesting that many of the best games Mount seems to get pre-Whitewater come from these supposedly weaker East teams. In 2006, Fisher gave them all they could handle, losing by 12. In 2007, Ithaca gave them a better game than anyone in the OAC did in the regular season, to mention nothing of the 48 point win Mount had in the semi-finals over Bethel. In 2008, Cortland hung with them a lot longer in the regional finals than Wheaton did in the National semis. Last year, Del Valley did no worse than Bethel in the national semis. Sure, lots of times, East teams get boat-raced by Mount. So what? Like that's some new thing exclusive to the East?
This is a really good counter argument to mine and a very defensible position. +K to you.
Quote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 05:58:03 PM
Of course, I am fighting a losing battle here, since no one else seems to agree with me. Oh well, :P
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 31, 2011, 07:02:46 PM
SOMEBODY HAS TO LOSE THESE REGULAR SEASON IN-REGION GAMES BETWEEN STRONG EAST TEAMS.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 31, 2011, 07:51:55 PM
pg04, eventhough you took a shot at me the other day i gave you a plus 1 for your point.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 08:42:36 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 31, 2011, 07:02:46 PM
SOMEBODY HAS TO LOSE THESE REGULAR SEASON IN-REGION GAMES BETWEEN STRONG EAST TEAMS.
Where I will slightly disagree with Frank here is to say, that often what keeps East teams from going 10-0 is their own ability to beat teams they are better than
Quote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 05:48:15 PM
I almost Wonder, if it were Wesley who had been moved in 4 years in a row, would we be having this discussion? It is my opinion that we probably wouldn't be.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 08:59:07 PM
I agree. The North Region's Keans don't seem to lose to Brockport State.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 09:42:42 PM
No. I think the difference between those two teams we were talking about then is not the same as the distance between Kean and Brockport -- and that is the relevant comparison here, not what you're trying to say.
Quote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 05:48:15 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 02:05:57 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 01:40:54 PM
Edit (Addendum): Also, wouldn't the NCAA want to attempt to line up the 4 teams they determine are the best to meet in the National Semifinals? I don't think this is a horrible thing to do...
...except it often doesnt materialize....last year the Tommies HAD to get a #1 because we had to have the 4 best be #1....well funny thing happened on the way to Salem....they didnt even make it out of the North bracket that muc was shipped out of to make way for them
...and then, Bethel, who beat them 12-7, got MUCinized the next week....same 'ol story.....
So they were wrong, now they aren't allowed to be wrong when picking the "top 4 teams"? I know that the NCAA Basketball tournament always matches the top 4 teams in the National Semifinals...
I almost Wonder, if it were Wesley who had been moved in 4 years in a row, would we be having this discussion? It is my opinion that we probably wouldn't be.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 04:19:17 PMQuoteDoes this mean you guys should be listening to me about Ithaca? After all, if 82 is supposed to be impressed by 80+ games over seven years, then what's 200+ over the last 24? Shouldn't Pep be anointed the all-knowing sage of Alfred?
Go back and look at what SJF82 initially asked. He was looking for input from someone who has seen Del Val more than once this year. I have so I offered input. He's not obliged to take it. I wasn't offended that he didn't.
And actually I do personally put more weight in your view of Ithaca than other posters who aren't as familiar with the school. :)
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PM
Why is it called the East Region in the play-offs?
Quote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 10:22:40 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PM
Why is it called the East Region in the play-offs?
Just to Clarify, the NCAA uses no such designation to the playoff brackets any longer.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:35:18 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 10:22:40 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PM
Why is it called the East Region in the play-offs?
Just to Clarify, the NCAA uses no such designation to the playoff brackets any longer.
oh...ok...is this thread still called the East Region Fan Poll??? :-[
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 04:19:17 PMQuoteDoes this mean you guys should be listening to me about Ithaca? After all, if 82 is supposed to be impressed by 80+ games over seven years, then what's 200+ over the last 24? Shouldn't Pep be anointed the all-knowing sage of Alfred?
Go back and look at what SJF82 initially asked. He was looking for input from someone who has seen Del Val more than once this year. I have so I offered input. He's not obliged to take it. I wasn't offended that he didn't.
And actually I do personally put more weight in your view of Ithaca than other posters who aren't as familiar with the school. :)
while I certainly appreciate your opinion on Del Val, and when its top observer claims they aint one of the Top 5 I have no basis to debate, I did not ask how good they were nor did I claim they were Top 5, or one of the "Top 4" in the land.
That was Pat's implication of my posts because he refuses to address the point that I did make (and several other posters have as well)
I believe you that DVC aint one of the 4 best in the land....
The point I clearly made was that a 10-0 DVC team (regardless of their perceived National Ranking) has earned and deserves the #1 EAST REGION ranking?
That is the question PC, that you cant answer, so dont claim someone else answered it and that I ignored it. Gordanmann was not even responding to my post....go back and look at the thread. He responded to Pumpkin attack's post.
Why is it called the East Region in the play-offs?
Bombers does make some good pts about The East teams shooting themselves in the foot, but what we have been discussing of late is the perception that a 10-0 East team may still play second fiddle to MUC.
Show me the team from the North that has recently played MUC closer or further into a Region final or National semi than SJF, IC, or Cortland.
I have shown you how the North pushed its best team out the door last year for the Tommies who couldnt score 2 TDs against Bethel in the Region finals. Without looking, I believe a similar scenario has played itself out in the North a few times since MUC has been coming East.
The fact is, that whatever team replaces MUC in the NORTH, usually doesnt even win the Region, and even if they do, they get smoked by MUC anyway.
If that so called #1 cant win the North Region, then what evidence is there that they are a Top 4 team??? Because PC sarcastically says so???
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 03:59:24 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2011, 03:22:57 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 31, 2011, 02:56:17 PM
Gordon, thanks for the feedback. Have you seen enough of Linfield & St Thomas (since it appears this debate, this year, assuming UMHB is locked into #1 in the south) to be comfortable with their strengths and weaknesses vis-a-vis Del Val.Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 02:24:56 PM
Gordon -- guess your 80-plus games of Delaware Valley experience didn't impress 82. He wasn't interested in the contrary opinion, only assuming that we didn't know what we were talking about.
Pat: How is seeing Delaware Valley play so many games over the years relevant to whether or not this year's team is better than say, St. Thomas this year? Many of the 80+ games you speak of are largely irrelevant to a discussion of the 2011 teams relative power.
Not saying it is, but 82 asked for something specific, got it, then ignored it.
I understand that the East Region fans would love to have eight guaranteed spots for East Region teams but that isn't how it works. Each region gets what it earns. And since each region can have a different number of automatic bids, it doesn't make sense for it easier to get an at-large bid on one region than another.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PM
Show me the team from the North that has recently played MUC closer or further into a Region final or National semi than SJF, IC, or Cortland.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:45:49 PM
PC...you would love to find an East Region fan who actually 'said' that or even implied that....
have you read this thread...at all? Nobody is asking for 8 spots....the discussion has been strictly about 1 spot....the #1 spot.....focus
Quote from: dlip on October 31, 2011, 02:36:09 PM
dlip just thinks the touney should be set up BY regions (yes meaning each region's bracket only contains teams from that region). Right or wrong, weak or strong, this is just dlip's opinion. It's region this, and region that, all year until it's time to place teams into the brackets (specifically the top four seeds). dlip doesn't think it's a bad idea to place the best 4 teams as #1 seeds, he just likes the purely regional set-up better. He thinks it provides each geographic region the opportunity to continue the battle, within itself, to make the final four. Then you truly have the best teams from each region facing off.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 04:19:17 PMQuoteDoes this mean you guys should be listening to me about Ithaca? After all, if 82 is supposed to be impressed by 80+ games over seven years, then what's 200+ over the last 24? Shouldn't Pep be anointed the all-knowing sage of Alfred?
Go back and look at what SJF82 initially asked. He was looking for input from someone who has seen Del Val more than once this year. I have so I offered input. He's not obliged to take it. I wasn't offended that he didn't.
And actually I do personally put more weight in your view of Ithaca than other posters who aren't as familiar with the school. :)
while I certainly appreciate your opinion on Del Val, and when its top observer claims they aint one of the Top 5 I have no basis to debate, I did not ask how good they were nor did I claim they were Top 5, or one of the "Top 4" in the land.
That was Pat's implication of my posts because he refuses to address the point that I did make (and several other posters have as well)
I believe you that DVC aint one of the 4 best in the land....
The point I clearly made was that a 10-0 DVC team (regardless of their perceived National Ranking) has earned and deserves the #1 EAST REGION ranking?
That is the question PC, that you cant answer, so dont claim someone else answered it and that I ignored it. Gordanmann was not even responding to my post....go back and look at the thread. He responded to Pumpkin attack's post.
Why is it called the East Region in the play-offs?
Bombers does make some good pts about The East teams shooting themselves in the foot, but what we have been discussing of late is the perception that a 10-0 East team may still play second fiddle to MUC.
Show me the team from the North that has recently played MUC closer or further into a Region final or National semi than SJF, IC, or Cortland.
I have shown you how the North pushed its best team out the door last year for the Tommies who couldnt score 2 TDs against Bethel in the Region finals. Without looking, I believe a similar scenario has played itself out in the North a few times since MUC has been coming East.
The fact is, that whatever team replaces MUC in the NORTH, usually doesnt even win the Region, and even if they do, they get smoked by MUC anyway.
If that so called #1 cant win the North Region, then what evidence is there that they are a Top 4 team??? Because PC sarcastically says so???
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 31, 2011, 09:01:58 PM
I think a lot of these lesser-team losses come down to pure fatigue in many cases. I think DelVal was experiencing that in Game 10 last year in the Widener shocker (I know they had the Wesley loss, but just as an example). If you look past the MIAC, WIAC, CCIW and ASC, I don't see this level of competition whereby teams are just toast by Game 9 or 10 and drop an unexpected matchup to the degree we see in the East.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 10:48:50 PM
I understand that the East Region fans would love to have eight guaranteed spots for East Region teams but that isn't how it works.Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:45:49 PM
PC...you would love to find an East Region fan who actually 'said' that or even implied that....
have you read this thread...at all? Nobody is asking for 8 spots....the discussion has been strictly about 1 spot....the #1 spot.....focus
It happened right here, 82:Quote from: dlip on October 31, 2011, 02:36:09 PM
dlip just thinks the touney should be set up BY regions (yes meaning each region's bracket only contains teams from that region). Right or wrong, weak or strong, this is just dlip's opinion. It's region this, and region that, all year until it's time to place teams into the brackets (specifically the top four seeds). dlip doesn't think it's a bad idea to place the best 4 teams as #1 seeds, he just likes the purely regional set-up better. He thinks it provides each geographic region the opportunity to continue the battle, within itself, to make the final four. Then you truly have the best teams from each region facing off.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 31, 2011, 10:53:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 04:19:17 PMQuoteDoes this mean you guys should be listening to me about Ithaca? After all, if 82 is supposed to be impressed by 80+ games over seven years, then what's 200+ over the last 24? Shouldn't Pep be anointed the all-knowing sage of Alfred?
Go back and look at what SJF82 initially asked. He was looking for input from someone who has seen Del Val more than once this year. I have so I offered input. He's not obliged to take it. I wasn't offended that he didn't.
And actually I do personally put more weight in your view of Ithaca than other posters who aren't as familiar with the school. :)
while I certainly appreciate your opinion on Del Val, and when its top observer claims they aint one of the Top 5 I have no basis to debate, I did not ask how good they were nor did I claim they were Top 5, or one of the "Top 4" in the land.
That was Pat's implication of my posts because he refuses to address the point that I did make (and several other posters have as well)
I believe you that DVC aint one of the 4 best in the land....
The point I clearly made was that a 10-0 DVC team (regardless of their perceived National Ranking) has earned and deserves the #1 EAST REGION ranking?
That is the question PC, that you cant answer, so dont claim someone else answered it and that I ignored it. Gordanmann was not even responding to my post....go back and look at the thread. He responded to Pumpkin attack's post.
Why is it called the East Region in the play-offs?
Bombers does make some good pts about The East teams shooting themselves in the foot, but what we have been discussing of late is the perception that a 10-0 East team may still play second fiddle to MUC.
Show me the team from the North that has recently played MUC closer or further into a Region final or National semi than SJF, IC, or Cortland.
I have shown you how the North pushed its best team out the door last year for the Tommies who couldnt score 2 TDs against Bethel in the Region finals. Without looking, I believe a similar scenario has played itself out in the North a few times since MUC has been coming East.
The fact is, that whatever team replaces MUC in the NORTH, usually doesnt even win the Region, and even if they do, they get smoked by MUC anyway.
If that so called #1 cant win the North Region, then what evidence is there that they are a Top 4 team??? Because PC sarcastically says so???
In addition to the fact that playoffs regions have been not named East, North, etc., for several years now, you are mistaken even about the traditional designations. St. Thomas was #1 in the WEST. What used to be the North put up with UMU for years before they were inflicted on you; all but one year since then, we have received UWW as a replacement (gosh, thanks committee! :P).
Sorry, but you are not going to receive much sympathy from what used to be called the North region! ;)
Quote from: pg04 on October 31, 2011, 10:58:52 PM
It certainly becomes confusing when even we say that the brackets don't get named by region anymore but then we start labeling the regions that way anyway... I've started to say "The region that houses most of the Eastern Teams"
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 31, 2011, 10:53:17 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:21:08 PMQuote from: gordonmann on October 31, 2011, 04:19:17 PMQuoteDoes this mean you guys should be listening to me about Ithaca? After all, if 82 is supposed to be impressed by 80+ games over seven years, then what's 200+ over the last 24? Shouldn't Pep be anointed the all-knowing sage of Alfred?
Go back and look at what SJF82 initially asked. He was looking for input from someone who has seen Del Val more than once this year. I have so I offered input. He's not obliged to take it. I wasn't offended that he didn't.
And actually I do personally put more weight in your view of Ithaca than other posters who aren't as familiar with the school. :)
while I certainly appreciate your opinion on Del Val, and when its top observer claims they aint one of the Top 5 I have no basis to debate, I did not ask how good they were nor did I claim they were Top 5, or one of the "Top 4" in the land.
That was Pat's implication of my posts because he refuses to address the point that I did make (and several other posters have as well)
I believe you that DVC aint one of the 4 best in the land....
The point I clearly made was that a 10-0 DVC team (regardless of their perceived National Ranking) has earned and deserves the #1 EAST REGION ranking?
That is the question PC, that you cant answer, so dont claim someone else answered it and that I ignored it. Gordanmann was not even responding to my post....go back and look at the thread. He responded to Pumpkin attack's post.
Why is it called the East Region in the play-offs?
Bombers does make some good pts about The East teams shooting themselves in the foot, but what we have been discussing of late is the perception that a 10-0 East team may still play second fiddle to MUC.
Show me the team from the North that has recently played MUC closer or further into a Region final or National semi than SJF, IC, or Cortland.
I have shown you how the North pushed its best team out the door last year for the Tommies who couldnt score 2 TDs against Bethel in the Region finals. Without looking, I believe a similar scenario has played itself out in the North a few times since MUC has been coming East.
The fact is, that whatever team replaces MUC in the NORTH, usually doesnt even win the Region, and even if they do, they get smoked by MUC anyway.
If that so called #1 cant win the North Region, then what evidence is there that they are a Top 4 team??? Because PC sarcastically says so???
St. Thomas was #1 in the WEST.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 31, 2011, 11:10:30 PM
And before UMU, there was Capital (http://www.d3football.com/playoffs/2005)...
:)
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 31, 2011, 11:28:19 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on October 31, 2011, 11:10:30 PM
And before UMU, there was Capital (http://www.d3football.com/playoffs/2005)...
:)
And note that Capital lost by only 3 to UMU (then MUC). And since Capital only beat NCC by 2 in the first round, then Wabash by 3 in the second, it is certainly plausible that either of those teams could ALSO have given the Mount a run for their money (or conceivably even won).
I'm finding this board fascinating, but quit your whining! Alliance is closer to many of you than it is to the CCIW, and we had to put up with them for their first 7 national titles! ;D (PLUS, in exchange for UMU, we got UWW for all three of their titles! :P)
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 12:11:19 AM
Hard to prove either of our subjectivities are wrong.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2011, 10:48:50 PM
I understand that the East Region fans would love to have eight guaranteed spots for East Region teams but that isn't how it works.Quote from: SJFF82 on October 31, 2011, 10:45:49 PM
PC...you would love to find an East Region fan who actually 'said' that or even implied that....
have you read this thread...at all? Nobody is asking for 8 spots....the discussion has been strictly about 1 spot....the #1 spot.....focus
It happened right here, 82:Quote from: dlip on October 31, 2011, 02:36:09 PM
dlip just thinks the touney should be set up BY regions (yes meaning each region's bracket only contains teams from that region). Right or wrong, weak or strong, this is just dlip's opinion. It's region this, and region that, all year until it's time to place teams into the brackets (specifically the top four seeds). dlip doesn't think it's a bad idea to place the best 4 teams as #1 seeds, he just likes the purely regional set-up better. He thinks it provides each geographic region the opportunity to continue the battle, within itself, to make the final four. Then you truly have the best teams from each region facing off.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 10:25:04 AM
Very subjective based on virtually no regional crossover all year. Remember, the D1 basketball comparisons are faulty because the teams travel all over the country -- our teams don't. Without the ability to make objective comparisons in virtually any meaningful way, this "Top 4 Teams" idea is a fool's game, especially when Wesley has a loss this season.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 10:25:04 AM
Very subjective based on virtually no regional crossover all year. Remember, the D1 basketball comparisons are faulty because the teams travel all over the country -- our teams don't. Without the ability to make objective comparisons in virtually any meaningful way, this "Top 4 Teams" idea is a fool's game, especially when Wesley has a loss this season.
Let me say this to the other regions: the East has faced this before and we never complained about it. We had Rowan. Rowan was the 800lb. Gorilla in the East and meaningfully in the country for years in the 1990s. The NCAA never shifted Rowan around. We accepted it because they belonged here geographically in a regional system -- it was, and here's the word, JUSTIFIABLE that they were placed in the East, even though other teams in the tournament may have played them in the regular season (less likely back when there were 16 teams, 4 to a region, but possible). We suffered through the regional nature of the system, too, and now we're suffering through the nationalized system? Why? To justify a national fiction that even the Committee admits they can't use strength of schedule numbers to verify? Again, either subsidize cross-regional games every year to allow for some level of objective placement and seeding, or stick to the regional system, shifting only lower seeded teams when shifting is an absolute necessity. Top teams with 0 or 1 loss deserve to be at the top of their regional bracket. The lower teams can lay no such claim. That's the only way the present system collectively makes any sense.
QuoteAnd even if you can't see them in person, in D-I, you can actually watch many of these teams play on TV, thanks to DVRs and the 75 ESPNs, and at least then you're seeing the team and can get a decent feel for them. In D-III, you're reading boxscores and going off second/third hand accounts all the time. There's so much bias built into that equation its kind of hard to gain an accurate view
Quote from: dlip on November 01, 2011, 11:03:27 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 10:25:04 AM
Very subjective based on virtually no regional crossover all year. Remember, the D1 basketball comparisons are faulty because the teams travel all over the country -- our teams don't. Without the ability to make objective comparisons in virtually any meaningful way, this "Top 4 Teams" idea is a fool's game, especially when Wesley has a loss this season.
Let me say this to the other regions: the East has faced this before and we never complained about it. We had Rowan. Rowan was the 800lb. Gorilla in the East and meaningfully in the country for years in the 1990s. The NCAA never shifted Rowan around. We accepted it because they belonged here geographically in a regional system -- it was, and here's the word, JUSTIFIABLE that they were placed in the East, even though other teams in the tournament may have played them in the regular season (less likely back when there were 16 teams, 4 to a region, but possible). We suffered through the regional nature of the system, too, and now we're suffering through the nationalized system? Why? To justify a national fiction that even the Committee admits they can't use strength of schedule numbers to verify? Again, either subsidize cross-regional games every year to allow for some level of objective placement and seeding, or stick to the regional system, shifting only lower seeded teams when shifting is an absolute necessity. Top teams with 0 or 1 loss deserve to be at the top of their regional bracket. The lower teams can lay no such claim. That's the only way the present system collectively makes any sense.
Great point referencing Rowan and the East's experience with the Profs during their time in the national spotlight. This is a fair comparison to what we have today, in dlip's opinion. dlip just thinks having a purely regional set-up would make sense and be exciting for each region's teams/fans as teams continue to battle, in region, to make the final four. As this debate goes on, aside from Pat being very annoying and taking his typical pot shots from the podium, dlip does get a sense just how difficult it is to work this out with the amount of teams D3 has.QuoteAnd even if you can't see them in person, in D-I, you can actually watch many of these teams play on TV, thanks to DVRs and the 75 ESPNs, and at least then you're seeing the team and can get a decent feel for them. In D-III, you're reading boxscores and going off second/third hand accounts all the time. There's so much bias built into that equation its kind of hard to gain an accurate view
dlip likes this post as well from Bombers. As fans, pollsters, coaches, etc, we are unable to get around and see as many teams play. As a result of this, subjectiviety sits and creates this debate. We should ask ourselves, what would be best for the student athletes regarding this playoff bracket system? What woudl be affordable for parents to travel and see their sons play in an NCAA game? If the answer does not fit dlip's preference than so be it. Anything subjective will always be questioned, as it should. If one can't handle that then get out of the business. Gordon seemed to handle it fine and not take it personally. Anyway dlip has had enough of this debate. It is what it is and that's it. Question it like 82 did and your just ignoring the most knowledgeable, smartest football analysts in the world, right? :P
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 10:25:04 AM
Again, either subsidize cross-regional games every year to allow for some level of objective placement and seeding, or stick to the regional system, shifting only lower seeded teams when shifting is an absolute necessity.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 11:28:01 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 10:25:04 AM
Again, either subsidize cross-regional games every year to allow for some level of objective placement and seeding, or stick to the regional system, shifting only lower seeded teams when shifting is an absolute necessity.
I hate to give Frank any +K's, since we're supposed to disagree on everything, but I like this too much not to. Your sport is either regional or it's not. The realities of conferences having 10 teams and the shrinking budgets for travel would, to me, seem to paint a pretty clear picture of a regional sport.
Hey, I thought it was cool when Huntington played at IC. I loved watching Fisher play Mount Union live. I'd love it if more games like that got played. But it's simply not realistic right now.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 01, 2011, 11:32:17 AM
Doesn't it always come down to the final question though:
Is there a team which should have made the playoffs but didn't because Mt. Union got shipped to the east?
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 01, 2011, 11:32:17 AM
Is there a team which should have made the playoffs but didn't because Mt. Union got shipped to the east?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 12:12:28 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 01, 2011, 11:32:17 AM
Is there a team which should have made the playoffs but didn't because Mt. Union got shipped to the east?
No, what it is is that a 4-5 team that should have gotten a more reasonable second-round game instead gets to travel to Mount Union, and a 2-3 team that could have played a toss-up game in the regional finals gets to travel to Mount Union. I know I'll probably upset an Ithaca person or two but I don't think the bottom seed has a real gripe. If they're an at-large, they have to be happy they're in the playoffs and it shouldn't matter where you go.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 11:55:49 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 01, 2011, 11:32:17 AM
Doesn't it always come down to the final question though:
Is there a team which should have made the playoffs but didn't because Mt. Union got shipped to the east?
No, that's not how it works. Selection is done first. Seeding is done second. There could be 10 North teams, 6 East teams, 9 South teams and 7 West teams selected. It's the seeding and placement that matter at that point. My statement is to rank the regional selections and, when there are more than 8 teams in that region selected, shift the bottom teams over to a more empty region. If the 500-mile rule is a problem, keep moving upward until it isn't. Teams 7, 8, 9 and 10 in a region have very little claim to anything most years, so make them truly earn their next game(s).
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 12:12:28 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 01, 2011, 11:32:17 AM
Is there a team which should have made the playoffs but didn't because Mt. Union got shipped to the east?
No, what it is is that a 4-5 team that should have gotten a more reasonable second-round game instead gets to travel to Mount Union, and a 2-3 team that could have played a toss-up game in the regional finals gets to travel to Mount Union. I know I'll probably upset an Ithaca person or two but I don't think the bottom seed has a real gripe. If they're an at-large, they have to be happy they're in the playoffs and it shouldn't matter where you go.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 01:00:30 PM
Good. Glad you're not upset by it, then. I thought there was a chance.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 01:03:24 PM
Are you now the only one? :)
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 01, 2011, 11:32:17 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 11:28:01 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 10:25:04 AM
Again, either subsidize cross-regional games every year to allow for some level of objective placement and seeding, or stick to the regional system, shifting only lower seeded teams when shifting is an absolute necessity.
I hate to give Frank any +K's, since we're supposed to disagree on everything, but I like this too much not to. Your sport is either regional or it's not. The realities of conferences having 10 teams and the shrinking budgets for travel would, to me, seem to paint a pretty clear picture of a regional sport.
Hey, I thought it was cool when Huntington played at IC. I loved watching Fisher play Mount Union live. I'd love it if more games like that got played. But it's simply not realistic right now.
Doesn't it always come down to the final question though:
Is there a team which should have made the playoffs but didn't because Mt. Union got shipped to the east?
Quote from: Timeforachange on November 01, 2011, 07:21:39 AM
Look, I don't want to try and sound reasonable because that's just not my style...BUT
Isn't this whole conversation moot since the East Region hasn't had a legitimate #1 seed in what seems like forever?
It's the "East's" fault for not having a team worthy of the #1 seed. Don't give me the attrition or fatigue junk either there were like 11 teams that were 10-0 or 9-0 last year, why couldn't have AU/Cort/DVC be one of them? No offense here but they were not that strong of teams to begin with if they were they would have ran the table.
Is it "fatigue" or "attrition" that Kean lost to a piss poor Brockport team (no offense PG) that just lost to Buff St by 21? Or that Widener lost to a sub par Wilkes team? Their two lowest scoring outputs were 27 & 31, they could probably be the best team in the "East" right now but they screwed the pooch versus a mediocre team.
Is it anyone but Hobart's fault they're only playing 8 games this year when they honestly could have had a legit shot at a #1 this year? I mean they killed themselves with the back to back BYE weeks in weeks 2 & 3 they've got no momentum at all because of their truncated schedule.
If DVC runs the table maybe the "East" has a legitimate #1 seed seeing as they face their two toughest opponents on their schedule including one of the "East's" best teams in Widener.
Until the "East" has a team strong enough to be a #1 seed and it then gets passed over for UMU then this discussion that just lasted the past 10 pages is just a bunch of dizzying jargon that made me go cross eyed.
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 01, 2011, 02:54:07 PMQuote from: Timeforachange on November 01, 2011, 07:21:39 AM
Look, I don't want to try and sound reasonable because that's just not my style...BUT
Isn't this whole conversation moot since the East Region hasn't had a legitimate #1 seed in what seems like forever?
It's the "East's" fault for not having a team worthy of the #1 seed. Don't give me the attrition or fatigue junk either there were like 11 teams that were 10-0 or 9-0 last year, why couldn't have AU/Cort/DVC be one of them? No offense here but they were not that strong of teams to begin with if they were they would have ran the table.
Is it "fatigue" or "attrition" that Kean lost to a piss poor Brockport team (no offense PG) that just lost to Buff St by 21? Or that Widener lost to a sub par Wilkes team? Their two lowest scoring outputs were 27 & 31, they could probably be the best team in the "East" right now but they screwed the pooch versus a mediocre team.
Is it anyone but Hobart's fault they're only playing 8 games this year when they honestly could have had a legit shot at a #1 this year? I mean they killed themselves with the back to back BYE weeks in weeks 2 & 3 they've got no momentum at all because of their truncated schedule.
If DVC runs the table maybe the "East" has a legitimate #1 seed seeing as they face their two toughest opponents on their schedule including one of the "East's" best teams in Widener.
Until the "East" has a team strong enough to be a #1 seed and it then gets passed over for UMU then this discussion that just lasted the past 10 pages is just a bunch of dizzying jargon that made me go cross eyed.
...well, except, the discussion started in response to a few predictions that a 10-0 DVC doesnt get #1 in the East this year. I think we all kinda understood that we were debating the prospective issue. But Frank also raises the claim that a 9-1 East team should get a number 1, despite them clearly not being a Top 4....I cannot say I disagree with that. if you are 10-0 and your fate is to lose to MUC 42-10 in the National Semis, are you a better team than a 9-1 IC squad that may have lost by 25 to SJF in the reg season?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 04:10:08 PM
St. Thomas remains a West Region team. The comparison is likely between St. Thomas and UW-Whitewater in the West, but only UWW can be in a bracket with mostly North teams because of where UWW is. That kicks UWW into a bracket where Mount Union would normally be.
For those new to this discussion, the MO has been for years now to draw a bracket around the eight easternmost teams. What changed a few years ago was the committee no longer felt it necessary to protect the top team in the East Region and give them the top seed if Mount Union was better.
We were advocating this as early as 1999, when it first became possible under the rules. It took the committee a while to pull the trigger.
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 01, 2011, 02:44:44 PM
No Jonny, that is not the question we have been discussing...the problem I raised and we have been discussing is the TOP of the East bracket, #1, and not the bottom. I dont think anyone is arguing that some East team deserves to be in the play-offs, that didnt get in (that argument starts in a few weeks when the third world AQ's get handed out in New England ;D)
The premise behind my stance is that no other team (save MUC/UWW of course) in the Country has shown on the field that they deserve a #1 anymore than a 9-1 or 10-0 East team. The 10-0 West teams that replace UWW as the West #1, so that UWW can move North to replace a 10-0 MUC, either lose before they even get out of their play-off bracket or end up getting creamed by MUC just like the East teams do. In some years I believe it has been a North 10-0 team that 'needed' a #1, so that MUC gets shipped over.
And as I also presented, and my co-counsel Rossi and Dlip backed, which way does the NCAA want it Regional or Non-Regional?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 04:10:08 PM
What changed a few years ago was the committee no longer felt it necessary to protect the top team in the East Region and give them the top seed if Mount Union was better.
Quote from: SUADC on November 01, 2011, 04:22:46 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 04:10:08 PM
St. Thomas remains a West Region team. The comparison is likely between St. Thomas and UW-Whitewater in the West, but only UWW can be in a bracket with mostly North teams because of where UWW is. That kicks UWW into a bracket where Mount Union would normally be.
For those new to this discussion, the MO has been for years now to draw a bracket around the eight easternmost teams. What changed a few years ago was the committee no longer felt it necessary to protect the top team in the East Region and give them the top seed if Mount Union was better.
We were advocating this as early as 1999, when it first became possible under the rules. It took the committee a while to pull the trigger.
Pat,
You hit it on spot. So are we protecting Mount Union and Wisconsin-Whitewater from playing each other before the championship?
Quote from: SUADC on November 01, 2011, 04:06:20 PM
I feel that St. Thomas is overrated in regards to points. St. Thomas hasn't had a great history of doing damage in the playoffs and proved itself as a force, so why do they deserve a #1 seed over an undefeated Del Val team.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 04:35:58 PM
But from a philosophical standpoint, we "protect" teams the top teams in crappy conferences and "give" them playoff berths, even though other teams are clearly better.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 01, 2011, 06:39:38 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 01, 2011, 04:06:20 PM
I feel that St. Thomas is overrated in regards to points. St. Thomas hasn't had a great history of doing damage in the playoffs and proved itself as a force, so why do they deserve a #1 seed over an undefeated Del Val team.
????
St. Thomas has won four playoff games in the last two years. Delaware Valley has won one in that time frame (and don't give me the excuse about losing to Mount Union - Del Val was eliminated by Albright in 2009).
Meanwhile, in 2011, St. Thomas is clearly the best team in the MIAC, which has a history of playoff success. The MIAC has produced at least one team that went deep into the playoffs in four of the past five years: 2006 St. John's (quarterfinalist), 2007 Bethel (semifinalist), 2009 St. Thomas (quarterfinalist - and they weren't even the MIAC champ that year, St. John's was), 2010 St. Thomas (quarterfinalist - eliminated by...), 2010 Bethel (semifinalist).
In 2011, St. Thomas has steamrolled through the MIAC (including a 49-14 win over a very tough St. Olaf team). You're seriously suggesting that the clear-cut conference champ from a conference that's produced five quarterfinalists and two semifinalists in the last five seasons isn't deserving of a #1 seed, but Delaware Valley is?
Del Val has a one-point win over 5-3 Muhlenberg, a one-point win over 4-4 Washington & Jefferson (who just lost to winless Grove City), and a 20-10 win over Albright (a team that gave up 60 points to Widener), and somehow I'm supposed to take that as a team that's more deserving of a #1 seed than St. Thomas, who hasn't played a game closer than 13 points all season in one of the toughest conferences in Division III?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 05:06:31 PMFrank,thanks for the comment. You will recall most of these points.
I can accept the balance of automatic bids, but I believe we oversaturated the country with them with an access ration of 6.5/1 (meaning seven-team conferences get autobids). The number should be at 8 or 9. Listen, if you don't think your teams are good enough in your confernce to merit a Pool B or C bid, then band together with 7 or 8 other similar teams and we'll give you a bid. I'd lean more toward 9 total, to be honest.
That right there should only account for, at most, 20 bids (probably less). That means the remainder would be granted in a Pool B/Pool C structure that would ensure a lot more depth in the playoffs. Sure, we will still be subject to subjectivity, but our margin for error will be a lot more forgiving since we are going to be more comprehensive in selecting those 13th-20th ranked teams. Strong two-loss teams would finally have a chance to get into the playoffs if they played a strong schedule. Weak undefeated teams would still get in, but at least they'd have to consider their own strength of schedule going forward enough to avoid question marks in future years. This achieves the balance that was intended by the NCAA but has been eliminated by too many automatic bids in a sport that has a 32-team limitation. For those that want to say "football should be treated like any other sport, even in access ratio," I'd tell you that you don't have any clue about what's going on here and shouldn't even be in the discussion.
Now, as for regions, etc. REDRAW THE LINES if we're not going to break out of the regional structure in the regular season. That's the first thing I would do. I would return to mainly regional brackets, but with regions that make more geographic sense so that the whole 500-mile fiction wouldn't need to keep playing a role in things. Why isn't Salisbury in the East in the first place? Why isn't Whitewater in the North? There can definitely be better deliniations here. If Mount Union were redrawn into the East with the OAC, then so be it. THAT would justify the next step, just like I suggested about Rowan.
For brackets, as I said, go region-centric, with the top teams in each region placed in their slots, and the lower ranked teams being the ones with mobility, as discussed earlier. There would be less of these teams. We guaranteed and granted them access. That's all we need to offer them at that point. Why should the #1 team in a region be forced, because of the rotation of TOP teams in brackets, to travel at all before the semifinals? There are times in history when 9-1 teams were actually better than 10-0 teams in the Division. If the #1 seed at 9-1 gets through to the Semis, then they will get to test that theory. Yet, they did what they were asked to do -- perform the best in their REGION. Rotation of top teams based on the Top 4 Fiction doesn't impress me, and actually has helped maintain the dual-dynasty lock we're in. It doesn't take a genius to understand how.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 06:48:16 PMI am all for the "crappy" conferences sending their champion to the playoffs. It is about access. Those student-athletes have the same clear goal ahead of them in August just as they do in Alliance Ohio, Belton TX or Whitewater WI.Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 04:35:58 PM
But from a philosophical standpoint, we "protect" teams the top teams in crappy conferences and "give" them playoff berths, even though other teams are clearly better.
Well, this is a different argument, now. This conversation is already pretty chaotic as it is but remember, this is the Division III philosophy, and the "strong conferences" had to agree to allow the "crappy conferences" to have this access. They had to vote for it in order for it to pass back in the late '90s.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 07:01:02 PM
Bethel. 2010. It's science.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 01, 2011, 07:35:12 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 07:01:02 PM
Bethel. 2010. It's science.
OK, I'll play...so Bethel defeated St. Thomas in the quarterfinals of the 2010 playoffs, after St. Thomas defeated them in the regular season. I think that further supports my point - considering that the MIAC's top two teams last year both advanced to the quarterfinals, with signature wins over current top-20 teams Linfield and Wheaton, it seems pretty logical that an undefeated MIAC champ is more than deserving of a top seed.
I see your point that there's no direct comparison of St. Thomas and/or other MIAC teams to the Eastern teams, but I still think it's pretty disingenuous to argue that an undefeated (in impressive fashion) MIAC champion is less worthy of a top seed than an undefeated MAC champion when the MIAC has more recent playoff success than any conference save the WIAC/OAC, whose numbers are inflated by the Purple Powers.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 01, 2011, 07:10:23 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 06:48:16 PMI am all for the "crappy" conferences sending their champion to the playoffs. It is about access. Those student-athletes have the same clear goal ahead of them in August just as they do in Alliance Ohio, Belton TX or Whitewater WI.Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 04:35:58 PM
But from a philosophical standpoint, we "protect" teams the top teams in crappy conferences and "give" them playoff berths, even though other teams are clearly better.
Well, this is a different argument, now. This conversation is already pretty chaotic as it is but remember, this is the Division III philosophy, and the "strong conferences" had to agree to allow the "crappy conferences" to have this access. They had to vote for it in order for it to pass back in the late '90s.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 01, 2011, 07:18:49 PM
I'll also say that it's a little disingenuous to say the strong conferences voted for crappy conferences to get bids, so deal with it... What the schools voted on was the idea of broader overall access. 16 teams was woefully insufficient with D3 football's growth since the early 70s -- I still wonder what having 8 teams was like in the 80s. I highly doubt that many schools focused on how the mechanism of Pool A would play out the way it has. Unintended consequences, like the growth in number of crappy conferences, 4- and 5-loss teams entering the tournament and a shrinkage of Pool C bids since we grew to 32 were not necessarily foreseeable. All many schools saw was 12 extra slots.
QuoteDelaware Valley has won one in that time frame (and don't give me the excuse about losing to Mount Union - Del Val was eliminated by Albright in 2009).
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 11:35:22 PM
I am sure everyone on this board knows Rowan has never won the Stagg ... doesn't need to be repeated, I suspect.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 08:34:01 PMThe move to autobids across all of the D-III sports has prompted schools to add new sports on campus.Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 01, 2011, 07:10:23 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 06:48:16 PMI am all for the "crappy" conferences sending their champion to the playoffs. It is about access. Those student-athletes have the same clear goal ahead of them in August just as they do in Alliance Ohio, Belton TX or Whitewater WI.Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 04:35:58 PM
But from a philosophical standpoint, we "protect" teams the top teams in crappy conferences and "give" them playoff berths, even though other teams are clearly better.
Well, this is a different argument, now. This conversation is already pretty chaotic as it is but remember, this is the Division III philosophy, and the "strong conferences" had to agree to allow the "crappy conferences" to have this access. They had to vote for it in order for it to pass back in the late '90s.
But why wouldn't this apply without autobids?
Quote from: Ralph Turner on October 31, 2011, 11:10:30 PMActually, I was thinking about #7 seed John Carroll (http://www.d3football.com/teams/John_Carroll/2002/index) which beat Hobart, (South Region) Muhlenberg and Brockport State to get to the semis against MUC. :)
And before UMU, there was Capital (http://www.d3football.com/playoffs/2005)...
:)
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:47:33 AM
In our part of the country, in 1998, Hardin-Simmons (9-1) lost to D-2 Midwestern State and it kept the school out of the 16 team format when four schools were selected from each region. That was a great miscarriage of justice. The next season, HSU beat (highly regarded) Wash U 28-21, W&J ( a perennial favorite with a great reputation) 51-3 and finally lost to Trinity 40-33. Not getting a bid in 1998 under the non-AQ format was not fun!
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:47:33 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 08:34:01 PMThe move to autobids across all of the D-III sports has prompted schools to add new sports on campus.Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 01, 2011, 07:10:23 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2011, 06:48:16 PMI am all for the "crappy" conferences sending their champion to the playoffs. It is about access. Those student-athletes have the same clear goal ahead of them in August just as they do in Alliance Ohio, Belton TX or Whitewater WI.Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 01, 2011, 04:35:58 PM
But from a philosophical standpoint, we "protect" teams the top teams in crappy conferences and "give" them playoff berths, even though other teams are clearly better.
Well, this is a different argument, now. This conversation is already pretty chaotic as it is but remember, this is the Division III philosophy, and the "strong conferences" had to agree to allow the "crappy conferences" to have this access. They had to vote for it in order for it to pass back in the late '90s.
But why wouldn't this apply without autobids?
We have not seen it as much growth in M/W Hoops, M/W Soccer, M/W XC, baseball and volleyball, but once you have your core 5 sports over 3 seasons according to D-III rules, schools are adding golf, lacrosse, tennis and even football at remarkable rates. Those team sports have AQ's for the conferences. It is all about the AQ!
In our part of the country, in 1998, Hardin-Simmons (9-1) lost to D-2 Midwestern State and it kept the school out of the 16 team format when four schools were selected from each region. That was a great miscarriage of justice. The next season, HSU beat (highly regarded) Wash U 28-21, W&J ( a perennial favorite with a great reputation) 51-3 and finally lost to Trinity 40-33. Not getting a bid in 1998 under the non-AQ format was not fun!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 08:41:13 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:47:33 AM
In our part of the country, in 1998, Hardin-Simmons (9-1) lost to D-2 Midwestern State and it kept the school out of the 16 team format when four schools were selected from each region. That was a great miscarriage of justice. The next season, HSU beat (highly regarded) Wash U 28-21, W&J ( a perennial favorite with a great reputation) 51-3 and finally lost to Trinity 40-33. Not getting a bid in 1998 under the non-AQ format was not fun!
So what about Rowan last year? They went 9-1 and missed out on the playoffs because a 5-5 St. Lawrence had to go. Seems to me we've got great miscarriages of justice in this format too.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 02, 2011, 09:49:00 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 08:41:13 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:47:33 AM
In our part of the country, in 1998, Hardin-Simmons (9-1) lost to D-2 Midwestern State and it kept the school out of the 16 team format when four schools were selected from each region. That was a great miscarriage of justice. The next season, HSU beat (highly regarded) Wash U 28-21, W&J ( a perennial favorite with a great reputation) 51-3 and finally lost to Trinity 40-33. Not getting a bid in 1998 under the non-AQ format was not fun!
So what about Rowan last year? They went 9-1 and missed out on the playoffs because a 5-5 St. Lawrence had to go. Seems to me we've got great miscarriages of justice in this format too.
Except that in this format Rowan had a way to guarantee its playoff spot: Win the automatic bid. In the old system, someone could go 10-0 and stay home. And several teams did.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 02, 2011, 09:49:00 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 08:41:13 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:47:33 AM
In our part of the country, in 1998, Hardin-Simmons (9-1) lost to D-2 Midwestern State and it kept the school out of the 16 team format when four schools were selected from each region. That was a great miscarriage of justice. The next season, HSU beat (highly regarded) Wash U 28-21, W&J ( a perennial favorite with a great reputation) 51-3 and finally lost to Trinity 40-33. Not getting a bid in 1998 under the non-AQ format was not fun!
So what about Rowan last year? They went 9-1 and missed out on the playoffs because a 5-5 St. Lawrence had to go. Seems to me we've got great miscarriages of justice in this format too.
Except that in this format Rowan had a way to guarantee its playoff spot: Win the automatic bid. In the old system, someone could go 10-0 and stay home. And several teams did.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 10:27:07 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 02, 2011, 09:49:00 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 08:41:13 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:47:33 AM
In our part of the country, in 1998, Hardin-Simmons (9-1) lost to D-2 Midwestern State and it kept the school out of the 16 team format when four schools were selected from each region. That was a great miscarriage of justice. The next season, HSU beat (highly regarded) Wash U 28-21, W&J ( a perennial favorite with a great reputation) 51-3 and finally lost to Trinity 40-33. Not getting a bid in 1998 under the non-AQ format was not fun!
So what about Rowan last year? They went 9-1 and missed out on the playoffs because a 5-5 St. Lawrence had to go. Seems to me we've got great miscarriages of justice in this format too.
Except that in this format Rowan had a way to guarantee its playoff spot: Win the automatic bid. In the old system, someone could go 10-0 and stay home. And several teams did.
But would that happen today with the 32-team format? By my count, there are 13 unbeaten, non-NESCAC teams teams in D-III right now--one being Hobart, who will go at best 8-0. This will likely get reduced even more as the season progresses. Last year (I think) there were eleven. In 2009, there were 11 again. I could see how in the 16-team format, that may cause problems, but with 32 spots, would we have unbeaten teams left out?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 10:18:29 AMThe use of regional committees is a logical way to get the opinion of 40 people across the country to determine the best 7 (the Pool B/C) teams to get the at-large bids. The opinions of those 40-odd go to the national committee where another 8-10 get to consider the information that they have for the final bracket.Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 02, 2011, 09:49:00 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 08:41:13 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:47:33 AM
In our part of the country, in 1998, Hardin-Simmons (9-1) lost to D-2 Midwestern State and it kept the school out of the 16 team format when four schools were selected from each region. That was a great miscarriage of justice. The next season, HSU beat (highly regarded) Wash U 28-21, W&J ( a perennial favorite with a great reputation) 51-3 and finally lost to Trinity 40-33. Not getting a bid in 1998 under the non-AQ format was not fun!
So what about Rowan last year? They went 9-1 and missed out on the playoffs because a 5-5 St. Lawrence had to go. Seems to me we've got great miscarriages of justice in this format too.
Except that in this format Rowan had a way to guarantee its playoff spot: Win the automatic bid. In the old system, someone could go 10-0 and stay home. And several teams did.
Not even sure how this is relevant. Nobody is suggesting going back to 16 teams. Nobody is suggesting completely removing AQs. We're suggesting revising the system based on the unintended consequences we've seen, stopping the sword and shield use of "regions" the NCAA has been doing of late and explaining why the "Top 4" concept is bogus under current circumstances. If you were around since 1995, you would probably understand our institutional knowledge of such issues...
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 02, 2011, 10:46:24 AM
Well the pool a thing has kind of forced d3 teams to join leagues which means there will be less undefeated teams. That needs to be factored in as well.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 11:01:03 AM
There were a lot of Pool B bids going to teams that could arrange an undefeated schedule.
The new Pool A leagues since 1999 include...the ECFC
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 11:27:11 AM
These 8 teams arranged a conference to take advantage of a Pool A bid. Maritime got it. And what happened when that Maritime team was in the playoffs? They played a home game and trailed 50-0 at halftime. They had four offensive yards in the first half and four turnovers! What great matchups has the ECFC given us?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 11:57:33 AM
Bombers, Maritime travelled last year to Alfred. Otherwise, you're spot on.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 02, 2011, 12:08:13 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 11:27:11 AM
These 8 teams arranged a conference to take advantage of a Pool A bid. Maritime got it. And what happened when that Maritime team was in the playoffs? They played a home game and trailed 50-0 at halftime. They had four offensive yards in the first half and four turnovers! What great matchups has the ECFC given us?Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 11:57:33 AM
Bombers, Maritime travelled last year to Alfred. Otherwise, you're spot on.
And they were a Pool B bid.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 11:53:38 AM
I guess what I'm wondering is why does every conference with a minimum of members have to automatically be given the Pool A bid? Can't we apply standards for earning it?
Picking on the ECFC in this one because frankly, it's an egregious offender, but why can't their be some sort of minimum requirement? Why not make all teams in the conference have a program for at least a certain number of years with one exception? That way, you don't have a conference made up of multiple teams who've just started programs simply to pad membership numbers. (Seriously, what's the combined number of years all those ECFC teams have had programs? It's gotta be insanely low.)
Or what about performance-based Pool A bids for a conference? Should a conference that has gone 3-13, 2-12, or 2-11 in the playoffs automatically have a Pool A bid? Why not try something like "A conference has to win at least one NCAA playoff game over a five year span" or it loses the auto-bid until it does? (the spot then becomes a Pool B/C bid)
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 11:57:33 AMYes. If the MASCAC wants to be the core conference and sponsor the sport for its teams and the affiliates (I believe it will need 1 or 2), then they can get a bid. The Bogan becomes the MASCAC. The other teams can then do what the ECFC did and form a new conference, if the CCC does not want to sponsor it is.
Bombers, Maritime travelled last year to Alfred. Otherwise, you're spot on.
That said, what's to stop the NEFC from splitting to ensure two bids under the current system? Again, this seven-team conference structure is not helping maintain at-large bids going forward. We keep adding more and more teams nationally, and it will begin to eat into Pool C over the next 5-10 years more than most people will be able to stomach.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:50:49 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 11:57:33 AM
Bombers, Maritime travelled last year to Alfred. Otherwise, you're spot on.
That said, what's to stop the NEFC from splitting to ensure two bids under the current system? Again, this seven-team conference structure is not helping maintain at-large bids going forward. We keep adding more and more teams nationally, and it will begin to eat into Pool C over the next 5-10 years more than most people will be able to stomach.
I don't have any trouble with this. In fact the dissolution of the NEFC is about the only conference that I can see that will affect the number of Pool A bids.
Does anyone hear any rumors that the Presidents of the NEFC institutions are dissatisfied with the arrangement and the legacy that the NEFC has. It has a conference playoff game, just like the Big Ten, the Pac -10, the SEC, the ACC, just like D1 FBS!
This is D3. This is about the experience of the student-athlete. What is happening in the ECFC or the NJAC or the NCAC or the WIAC is about the experiences that are afforded these student athletes. Yes, there are probably6 ASC teams that are better than the NEFC champion, but I like D3 for what it is provinding to the student-athlete.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:50:49 PM
This is D3. This is about the experience of the student-athlete. What is happening in the ECFC or the NJAC or the NCAC or the WIAC is about the experiences that are afforded these student athletes. Yes, there are probably 6 ASC teams that are better than the NEFC champion, but I like D3 for what it is provinding to the student-athlete.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:50:49 PM
This is D3. This is about the experience of the student-athlete.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 02, 2011, 01:28:44 PM
If you did not win your conference, you have not "earned" the right to compete for the national championship, no matter what your excuse is (our QB was hurt, we lost in overtime on the road, etcet). Yes, occasionally this will omit a VERY GOOD team from the playoffs, but how is that any better than arbitrarily deciding that a weak-conference champion isn't good enough just because we said so?
Quote from: Charles on November 02, 2011, 01:37:55 PM
Invite 56 teams and start 1 week earlier, eliminate the early games (scrimmages), play an unbalanced schedule if need be and maybe most schools would be happy. That may also help with the regionalization theory by giving byes to the top 2 seeds in each region.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 01:40:08 PM
We arbitrarily decide teams aren't good enough for the playoffs all the time—that's how at-large bids work. If it's good enough for Pool C teams, why can't it be good enough for possible Pool A teams? What's so sacred about winning the conference that puts it above a second look?
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 02, 2011, 01:47:33 PM
Fair point.
If you leave, say, the NEFC/ECFC conference champion out of the field just because they play in a weak conference, you've now essentially told them that (once the season started and the schedule was fixed*) there was NOTHING they could have done to earn a playoff berth. They had no access whatsoever. That's very different than the case of a Pool C team, which theoretically DID have access to a playoff berth.
*I'm discounting arguments like "they could have played a harder schedule!" or "they could have joined a harder conference!" because those would be off-season, long-term moves. I'm talking strictly about what happens from the first snap in September to the last snap in November.
To me, again, that's the great thing about the NCAA basketball tournament. When the conference tournaments tip off, EVERY TEAM has a path to get into the national title game. Just win the games in front of you. Taking away AQ's removes that, and puts us completely into the land of the hypothetical; there will be teams that no longer have guaranteed access.
Since football is a once-a-week game, a conference tournament is impractical; thus, the regular-season conference schedule acts as your "conference tournament." Win them all and you should be in.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 02:37:32 PM
Ralph, nothing you've said, or anyone else for that matter, has addressed the problem with raising the Pool A minimum to nine-team conferences. There are several conferences utilizing "football-only members" to achieve seven.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Raising the conference minimum would likely accomplish that, LD.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:33:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Raising the conference minimum would likely accomplish that, LD.
Raising the conference minimum sucks though because it cuts out OOC games and creates NEFC type of 'inbred' issues. I'd rather see a 6-7 game in conference schedule and 2-4 OOC matchups.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:36:04 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:33:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Raising the conference minimum would likely accomplish that, LD.
Raising the conference minimum sucks though because it cuts out OOC games and creates NEFC type of 'inbred' issues. I'd rather see a 6-7 game in conference schedule and 2-4 OOC matchups.
That's an equation for 4- and 5-loss teams winning AQs, though.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:38:26 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:36:04 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:33:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Raising the conference minimum would likely accomplish that, LD.
Raising the conference minimum sucks though because it cuts out OOC games and creates NEFC type of 'inbred' issues. I'd rather see a 6-7 game in conference schedule and 2-4 OOC matchups.
That's an equation for 4- and 5-loss teams winning AQs, though.
Yeah vs. the equation for SUNY-Maritime's of the world getting top seeds.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:43:35 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:38:26 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:36:04 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:33:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Raising the conference minimum would likely accomplish that, LD.
Raising the conference minimum sucks though because it cuts out OOC games and creates NEFC type of 'inbred' issues. I'd rather see a 6-7 game in conference schedule and 2-4 OOC matchups.
That's an equation for 4- and 5-loss teams winning AQs, though.
Yeah vs. the equation for SUNY-Maritime's of the world getting top seeds.
That's a whole separate question -- Committee inability to differentiate relative conference strength.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:38:26 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:36:04 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:33:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Raising the conference minimum would likely accomplish that, LD.
Raising the conference minimum sucks though because it cuts out OOC games and creates NEFC type of 'inbred' issues. I'd rather see a 6-7 game in conference schedule and 2-4 OOC matchups.
That's an equation for 4- and 5-loss teams winning AQs, though.
Yeah vs. the equation for SUNY-Maritime's of the world getting top seeds.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:50:12 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:43:35 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:38:26 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:36:04 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 03:33:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 03:29:07 PM
Raising the conference minimum would likely accomplish that, LD.
Raising the conference minimum sucks though because it cuts out OOC games and creates NEFC type of 'inbred' issues. I'd rather see a 6-7 game in conference schedule and 2-4 OOC matchups.
That's an equation for 4- and 5-loss teams winning AQs, though.
Yeah vs. the equation for SUNY-Maritime's of the world getting top seeds.
That's a whole separate question -- Committee inability to differentiate relative conference strength.
How can you when they only play each other?
Quote from: pg04 on November 02, 2011, 04:05:28 PM
IMO, I like it better when teams play 2 or 3 OOC. Therefore, I completely disagree with the super conference thing. The OOC games are the ONLY way we can compare conferences in the regular season at all. So now we eliminate that factor, yet you want more Pool C bids? Talk about MORE subjectivity.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 04:13:38 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 02, 2011, 04:05:28 PM
IMO, I like it better when teams play 2 or 3 OOC. Therefore, I completely disagree with the super conference thing. The OOC games are the ONLY way we can compare conferences in the regular season at all. So now we eliminate that factor, yet you want more Pool C bids? Talk about MORE subjectivity.
True, but even raising it to a 9-team conference would allow for two OOC games. So it wouldn't be eliminated, just reduced.
Quote from: pg04 on November 02, 2011, 04:05:28 PM
IMO, I like it better when teams play 2 or 3 OOC. Therefore, I completely disagree with the super conference thing. The OOC games are the ONLY way we can compare conferences in the regular season at all. So now we eliminate that factor, yet you want more Pool C bids? Talk about MORE subjectivity.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 04:17:01 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 04:13:38 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 02, 2011, 04:05:28 PM
IMO, I like it better when teams play 2 or 3 OOC. Therefore, I completely disagree with the super conference thing. The OOC games are the ONLY way we can compare conferences in the regular season at all. So now we eliminate that factor, yet you want more Pool C bids? Talk about MORE subjectivity.
True, but even raising it to a 9-team conference would allow for two OOC games. So it wouldn't be eliminated, just reduced.
Unless it's a 9 game schedule, which isn't uncommon, then you potentially have 1 OOC game against Castleton St. which does nothing. I'd just rather see 2-4 OOC games where teams can actually schedule a couple freebies and a couple tough ones.
Quote from: pg04 on November 02, 2011, 04:35:47 PM
But then, if it's a superconference, there will most likely be a conference championship game, which takes away one of the OOC games. This can go on and on. And, apparently it will, I'm not even sure what this argument is about anymore.
Quote from: jknezek on November 02, 2011, 04:39:11 PM
The NCAA's first regional rankings are up. Can be found here:
http://www.d3blogs.com/d3football/category/regional-rankings/
1 Delaware Valley 7-0 8-0
2 Hobart 6-0 6-0
3 Salisbury 6-1 7-1
4 St. John Fisher 7-1 7-1
5 Montclair State 7-1 7-1
6 Kean 7-1 7-1
7 Widener 7-1 8-1
8 Lycoming 6-1 7-1
8 Western New England 8-1 8-1
10 SUNY-Maritime 7-0 7-1
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 04:46:48 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 02, 2011, 04:39:11 PM
The NCAA's first regional rankings are up. Can be found here:
http://www.d3blogs.com/d3football/category/regional-rankings/
1 Delaware Valley 7-0 8-0
2 Hobart 6-0 6-0
3 Salisbury 6-1 7-1
4 St. John Fisher 7-1 7-1
5 Montclair State 7-1 7-1
6 Kean 7-1 7-1
7 Widener 7-1 8-1
8 Lycoming 6-1 7-1
8 Western New England 8-1 8-1
10 SUNY-Maritime 7-0 7-1
The proximity of SJF to Salisbury makes for bad news for teams like Endicott. The loser of that head-to-head matchup will likely not fall too far under the Widener/Lycoming bloc. That means that in Pool C rankings, Endicott may never see the board as one of the four regions' top teams not yet picked because SJF/Salisbury would block them until that team (if ever) gets picked.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 04:49:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 04:46:48 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 02, 2011, 04:39:11 PM
The NCAA's first regional rankings are up. Can be found here:
http://www.d3blogs.com/d3football/category/regional-rankings/
1 Delaware Valley 7-0 8-0
2 Hobart 6-0 6-0
3 Salisbury 6-1 7-1
4 St. John Fisher 7-1 7-1
5 Montclair State 7-1 7-1
6 Kean 7-1 7-1
7 Widener 7-1 8-1
8 Lycoming 6-1 7-1
8 Western New England 8-1 8-1
10 SUNY-Maritime 7-0 7-1
The proximity of SJF to Salisbury makes for bad news for teams like Endicott. The loser of that head-to-head matchup will likely not fall too far under the Widener/Lycoming bloc. That means that in Pool C rankings, Endicott may never see the board as one of the four regions' top teams not yet picked because SJF/Salisbury would block them until that team (if ever) gets picked.
Yeah but it's entirely likely that Fisher, Kean/Montclair, and Widener AND Lyco(or even DVC) could tumble way down in the next 2 weeks.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 04:53:53 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 04:49:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 04:46:48 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 02, 2011, 04:39:11 PM
The NCAA's first regional rankings are up. Can be found here:
http://www.d3blogs.com/d3football/category/regional-rankings/
1 Delaware Valley 7-0 8-0
2 Hobart 6-0 6-0
3 Salisbury 6-1 7-1
4 St. John Fisher 7-1 7-1
5 Montclair State 7-1 7-1
6 Kean 7-1 7-1
7 Widener 7-1 8-1
8 Lycoming 6-1 7-1
8 Western New England 8-1 8-1
10 SUNY-Maritime 7-0 7-1
The proximity of SJF to Salisbury makes for bad news for teams like Endicott. The loser of that head-to-head matchup will likely not fall too far under the Widener/Lycoming bloc. That means that in Pool C rankings, Endicott may never see the board as one of the four regions' top teams not yet picked because SJF/Salisbury would block them until that team (if ever) gets picked.
Yeah but it's entirely likely that Fisher, Kean/Montclair, and Widener AND Lyco(or even DVC) could tumble way down in the next 2 weeks.
I doubt the SJF/Salisbury falls below Endicott. That's asking for a lot.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 05:05:16 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 04:53:53 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 04:49:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 04:46:48 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 02, 2011, 04:39:11 PM
The NCAA's first regional rankings are up. Can be found here:
http://www.d3blogs.com/d3football/category/regional-rankings/
1 Delaware Valley 7-0 8-0
2 Hobart 6-0 6-0
3 Salisbury 6-1 7-1
4 St. John Fisher 7-1 7-1
5 Montclair State 7-1 7-1
6 Kean 7-1 7-1
7 Widener 7-1 8-1
8 Lycoming 6-1 7-1
8 Western New England 8-1 8-1
10 SUNY-Maritime 7-0 7-1
The proximity of SJF to Salisbury makes for bad news for teams like Endicott. The loser of that head-to-head matchup will likely not fall too far under the Widener/Lycoming bloc. That means that in Pool C rankings, Endicott may never see the board as one of the four regions' top teams not yet picked because SJF/Salisbury would block them until that team (if ever) gets picked.
Yeah but it's entirely likely that Fisher, Kean/Montclair, and Widener AND Lyco(or even DVC) could tumble way down in the next 2 weeks.
I doubt the SJF/Salisbury falls below Endicott. That's asking for a lot.
I doubt Salisbury would because I expect them to win, but what if Salisbury wins 42-3?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 05:14:56 PM
Frank,
If you were a cat, and I called you a cat, would you tell me that you are not a cat, but in fact you are a dog?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 05:15:40 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 05:14:56 PM
Frank,
If you were a cat, and I called you a cat, would you tell me that you are not a cat, but in fact you are a dog?
Depends on whether the NCAA Manual told me that I was a dog or a cat.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 05:18:24 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 05:15:40 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 05:14:56 PM
Frank,
If you were a cat, and I called you a cat, would you tell me that you are not a cat, but in fact you are a dog?
Depends on whether the NCAA Manual told me that I was a dog or a cat.
The NCAA manual says you are a nerd. :-)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 02, 2011, 02:57:15 PM
The NEFC has 16 teams fighting for a Playoff spot in which they get an automatic 1. I'm ok with this. BUT, why doesn't the NCAA take advantage of this model, and take some crappy conferences, or even struggling conferences, and pit them up against each other to put the winner of each conference in 'play-in' game. Like before the season, the NCAA picks the LL and the ECFC, who had poor playoff results last year, and say they need to play each other for the Pool A. This eliminates a few Pool A teams, and opens up a few spots for Pool B and C. And the format changes yearly of who plays who based on past season results.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2011, 01:34:08 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 02, 2011, 12:50:49 PM
This is D3. This is about the experience of the student-athlete.
I like this post too Ralph. But I am going to make a comparison that might upset people, but I'm not trying to make anyone angry. Maybe however, it will explain my position on this issue. I'm disabled, and I've never played organized disabled sport. (I was a skiier for a long time, but that's an individual thing) One of the reasons I didn't like disabled sport was so often it was about the "experience" and winning/losing or even keeping score wasn't emphasized.
(This is true even at the supposedly higher levels like the Paralympics. The national media always makes the fact that disabled athletes are so "heroic" and "Brave" more important than the results.)
I know we don't go anywhere near that level at the D-III, but sometimes I feel a similar mentality in D-III when we start talking about "experiences". The fact that Rowan was clearly better than St. Lawrence, or that all those ASC teams have easily proven more deserving of a playoff spot than Norwich/Maritime should matter more than making sure everyone's "experience" was as good as we could make it, at least in my view.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 07:19:51 PM
Well, I must be saying something right. My karma has dropped about 17 points during this discussion. I guess some people are worried that their regions and conferences would not enjoy the benefits that might not necessarily be deserved under the current system.
ON SAXON WARRIORS!
Oh... wait... I didn't go to Alfred...
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 02, 2011, 09:19:16 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 07:19:51 PM
Well, I must be saying something right. My karma has dropped about 17 points during this discussion. I guess some people are worried that their regions and conferences would not enjoy the benefits that might not necessarily be deserved under the current system.
ON SAXON WARRIORS!
Oh... wait... I didn't go to Alfred...
Pep will give you some +K!
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 11:54:06 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on November 02, 2011, 09:19:16 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 07:19:51 PM
Well, I must be saying something right. My karma has dropped about 17 points during this discussion. I guess some people are worried that their regions and conferences would not enjoy the benefits that might not necessarily be deserved under the current system.
ON SAXON WARRIORS!
Oh... wait... I didn't go to Alfred...
Pep will give you some +K!
On Saxon Warriors!
Thanks Pep. Tough, tight game against U of R this past weekend. The Rochester backup QB almost pulled a rabbit out of his hat. Was surprised, but it bodes well for the LL if he continues such play. Any insight into his play?
Quote from: pg04 on November 03, 2011, 12:07:59 AM
I won't give you +K but I will assure you that I don't recall smiting you even though I disagree with you. I have smited you in the past but I don't think it's been in the past week :P
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 03, 2011, 12:21:05 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 11:54:06 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on November 02, 2011, 09:19:16 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2011, 07:19:51 PM
Well, I must be saying something right. My karma has dropped about 17 points during this discussion. I guess some people are worried that their regions and conferences would not enjoy the benefits that might not necessarily be deserved under the current system.
ON SAXON WARRIORS!
Oh... wait... I didn't go to Alfred...
Pep will give you some +K!
On Saxon Warriors!
Thanks Pep. Tough, tight game against U of R this past weekend. The Rochester backup QB almost pulled a rabbit out of his hat. Was surprised, but it bodes well for the LL if he continues such play. Any insight into his play?
Kennedy posed a real threat running the ball...was leading rusher for UR with 47 yards on 6 carries, coming at critical times to keep the 'Jackets' drives alive. Has an uncanny ability to avoid sacks. On final drive, facing a 3rd and 26 on the AU 46-yard-line, he hits a 35-yard pass completion, which ran the clock down to :17. Seems like a decent QB....Subick was hurt while making the tackle after he was intercepted.
That's about all Pep can offer in his limited football knowledge. ;)
Quote from: wesleydad on November 03, 2011, 09:49:33 AM
ex tartan, i totally agree with you. i see no reason why any school that is in a conference with an AQ doesnt play tough ooc games. it can only help your team get ready for the conference games and if you happen to beat a team that maybe you should not have then it looks good on the resume come seeding time. take away the AQ and why would anyone play a team like wesley knowing that if they lose to them that 1 lose could keep them out of the playoffs. that is why i cant figure out why more teams in AQ conferences dont take on wesley in non conference games. wesley has to fill their schedule with non d3 games when there have been several d3 schools contacted about playing and they have turned it down.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 03, 2011, 09:49:33 AMJust wondering, but when Wesley played Husson, did they fly the 600 miles or were the kids on a bus for 10 hours? Maybe they left on Friday and drove all day and stayed in hotels? Who pays for the trip of that length and how do the kids miss a day of classes? Not all schools can afford the travel and some of the schools prefer to have their student athletes in class on Fridays.
ex tartan, i totally agree with you. i see no reason why any school that is in a conference with an AQ doesnt play tough ooc games. it can only help your team get ready for the conference games and if you happen to beat a team that maybe you should not have then it looks good on the resume come seeding time. take away the AQ and why would anyone play a team like wesley knowing that if they lose to them that 1 lose could keep them out of the playoffs. that is why i cant figure out why more teams in AQ conferences dont take on wesley in non conference games. wesley has to fill their schedule with non d3 games when there have been several d3 schools contacted about playing and they have turned it down.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 03, 2011, 08:26:55 AM
I know we've just about moved past the AQ discussion, but a few more comments:
(Disclaimer before this starts: yes, I'm aware that this still does not address the issue of raising the minimum number of teams to 8/9, or forcing "weaker" conferences to stage a "play-in" game just to allow more Pool C's)
Two things from this week's Around the Region columns caught my eye:
http://www.d3football.com/columns/around-the-region/greatlakes/2011/albions-scheduling-pays-off
Albion voluntarily chose to play a VERY tough nonconference schedule. They were able to do so, in part, because they knew that even if they should stumble against that brutal slate, they would still be able to play their way into the playoffs by winning their conference games. Remove the AQ bids, and that's no longer the case. Given the committee's preference for undefeated and one-loss teams, I would argue that most teams from iffy conferences would choose to schedule DOWN in order to preserve their undefeated record.
You guys have argued, correctly, that we should be rewarding teams that play tougher schedules and penalizing teams that play weaker schedules. I postulate that taking away AQ's will have the opposite effect; teams that play tough nonconference schedules will now lack the "protection" of being able to win their conference's AQ bid.
http://www.d3football.com/columns/around-the-region/west/2011/constructing-success-at-css
The UMAC is a fairly new (and, by most standards, a fairly "weak" Division III conference; several teams in the upper-echelon of the UMAC played middling CCIW/MIAC teams in a nonconference game and were blown off the field). However, by the tone of this column, the St. Scholastica coach used the possibility of winning the conference AQ bid as a rallying cry all season.
As I said above: I know that this doesn't directly address the minimum-teams question, or the requirement that weaker conferences stage a "play-in" game. But after sleeping on it, these arguments came to mind as reasons why keeping the AQ bid is very important, IMHO.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 11:23:05 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 03, 2011, 08:26:55 AM
I know we've just about moved past the AQ discussion, but a few more comments:
(Disclaimer before this starts: yes, I'm aware that this still does not address the issue of raising the minimum number of teams to 8/9, or forcing "weaker" conferences to stage a "play-in" game just to allow more Pool C's)
Two things from this week's Around the Region columns caught my eye:
http://www.d3football.com/columns/around-the-region/greatlakes/2011/albions-scheduling-pays-off
Albion voluntarily chose to play a VERY tough nonconference schedule. They were able to do so, in part, because they knew that even if they should stumble against that brutal slate, they would still be able to play their way into the playoffs by winning their conference games. Remove the AQ bids, and that's no longer the case. Given the committee's preference for undefeated and one-loss teams, I would argue that most teams from iffy conferences would choose to schedule DOWN in order to preserve their undefeated record.
You guys have argued, correctly, that we should be rewarding teams that play tougher schedules and penalizing teams that play weaker schedules. I postulate that taking away AQ's will have the opposite effect; teams that play tough nonconference schedules will now lack the "protection" of being able to win their conference's AQ bid.
http://www.d3football.com/columns/around-the-region/west/2011/constructing-success-at-css
The UMAC is a fairly new (and, by most standards, a fairly "weak" Division III conference; several teams in the upper-echelon of the UMAC played middling CCIW/MIAC teams in a nonconference game and were blown off the field). However, by the tone of this column, the St. Scholastica coach used the possibility of winning the conference AQ bid as a rallying cry all season.
As I said above: I know that this doesn't directly address the minimum-teams question, or the requirement that weaker conferences stage a "play-in" game. But after sleeping on it, these arguments came to mind as reasons why keeping the AQ bid is very important, IMHO.
Liked this, wanted to address something.
1) AQ's don't uniformly protect against weak scheduling. Why? Because not all teams aren't Pool A or bust, like Albion was. I mean, let's say you're in the MIAC with St. Thomas. You have to acknowledge the strong possibility you'll lose that game, but you know you're screwed for Pool C if you pick up a second loss. So are you going to schedule two hard OOC games, and make it even more difficult? Or two easier ones to help your Pool C bid?
Let's look at what other schools in the MIAC played OOC
St. Olaf: 2-6 Luther, 4-4 Simpson
Bethel: 4-4 Simpson, 3-5 Concordia
Concordia Morehead: 3-6 Dickinson State, 1-7 Buena Vista
Augsburg: 3-5 Concordia, 0-8 Hamline
St. John's: 6-3 Northwestern, 4-4 Eau Claire
Carelton: 5-3 Carthage, 3-5 Macalester
Gustavus Adolphus: 6-2 Wartburg, St. Mary's
(Hamline's been terrible forever, so I doubt they had Pool C aspirations. I'm just guessing, considering that they've been shut out six times this year)
For the most part, pretty unassuming. Now yes, some of these may be long standing things (I confess to not knowing anything about the MIAC) but it's odd, given the "protection" the supposedly AQ provides, that these teams chose to play a relatively unimpressive slate. Could it be possible that schools are saying, "Hey, we might very well lose to St. Thomas, so we need to be careful who we schedule OOC if we want to make the playoffs?"
I mean, coaches want to win and you'll never get one to say "Yeah, we don't think we can win against this team" on record. But they're also realists. Lots of coaches may very well understand that a Pool A bid is slim, and that Pool C is their only way to go.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 03, 2011, 01:32:26 PM
The teams that really SHOULD be trying to schedule up are teams that will NOT be tested in conference, and THEY are protected by AQ access.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 01:24:59 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Right, but my point is, it's a risky call to make when there are only six slots available. I think a number of schools would play it safe
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:55:51 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 01:24:59 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Right, but my point is, it's a risky call to make when there are only six slots available. I think a number of schools would play it safe
Right, but those NEFC and ECFC schools don't benefit by playing it safe do they? Now if Salve Regina beat Hobart instead of Union and only had one loss, they might have a pool C chance. Then again, we would all be thinking twice about Hobart as well.
But it kind of shows us that it all works out in the end. Salve didn't play Hobart, and if they did, would have lost by 28 points.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 01:54:20 PM
Remember, though, that nobody is really advocating the complete removal of Pool A bids. Some people are suggesting mandating a certain W/L percentage for it. Some are advocating increasing the Pool A conference minimum to artificially create a more legitimate batch of Pool A teams (based on what mathematically becomes a higher winning percentage for larger conferences). Ultimately, the problem we have to remember is this:
Soon there will be about 245 D3 teams -- about 235 when you remove the NESCAC. Divide 235 by 7 (the Pool A minimum) and get 33.6. That means that if every team belonged to a 7-member conference, Pool A would require 33 bids. As we know, that's impossible. So, Pool A at 7 teams may not be sustainable. It wouldn't require that extreme case -- if we were to drop below 4 Pool C bids (an average of 1 per region), I think the demand would be to change something. For everyone that wants to say the current system is sustainable, the numbers don't lie. As D3 continues to grow, the numbers get more gruesome. And while Ralph suggested the NESCAC is happy being at its current structure, I'm sure there are some NESCAC ADs looking at the ECFC with an access ratio of 8:1 and thinking that teams that may be weaker than the NEFC teams actually have a better chance to make the NCAA Playoffs. Why WOULDN'T splitting the NEFC make sense in some ways to at least level out that access ratio under current circumstances, eating up another Pool C bid? If Endicott finishes 9-1 and doesn't get a bid, it's going to help raise questions internally, I would guarantee.
So, the fact is that something needs to be considered as we get closer to a saturation point in Division 3 football. I like the AQ structure. I just think we can refine it slightly to point it toward certain goals and elimination of some unintended consequences we've experienced over the last decade.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 02:00:31 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:55:51 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 01:24:59 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Right, but my point is, it's a risky call to make when there are only six slots available. I think a number of schools would play it safe
Right, but those NEFC and ECFC schools don't benefit by playing it safe do they? Now if Salve Regina beat Hobart instead of Union and only had one loss, they might have a pool C chance. Then again, we would all be thinking twice about Hobart as well.
But it kind of shows us that it all works out in the end. Salve didn't play Hobart, and if they did, would have lost by 28 points.
True, they don't. But your example was an school joining the MIAC. For those types of schools, playing it safe is the better option, in my view.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 02:02:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 01:54:20 PM
Remember, though, that nobody is really advocating the complete removal of Pool A bids. Some people are suggesting mandating a certain W/L percentage for it. Some are advocating increasing the Pool A conference minimum to artificially create a more legitimate batch of Pool A teams (based on what mathematically becomes a higher winning percentage for larger conferences). Ultimately, the problem we have to remember is this:
Soon there will be about 245 D3 teams -- about 235 when you remove the NESCAC. Divide 235 by 7 (the Pool A minimum) and get 33.6. That means that if every team belonged to a 7-member conference, Pool A would require 33 bids. As we know, that's impossible. So, Pool A at 7 teams may not be sustainable. It wouldn't require that extreme case -- if we were to drop below 4 Pool C bids (an average of 1 per region), I think the demand would be to change something. For everyone that wants to say the current system is sustainable, the numbers don't lie. As D3 continues to grow, the numbers get more gruesome. And while Ralph suggested the NESCAC is happy being at its current structure, I'm sure there are some NESCAC ADs looking at the ECFC with an access ratio of 8:1 and thinking that teams that may be weaker than the NEFC teams actually have a better chance to make the NCAA Playoffs. Why WOULDN'T splitting the NEFC make sense in some ways to at least level out that access ratio under current circumstances, eating up another Pool C bid? If Endicott finishes 9-1 and doesn't get a bid, it's going to help raise questions internally, I would guarantee.
So, the fact is that something needs to be considered as we get closer to a saturation point in Division 3 football. I like the AQ structure. I just think we can refine it slightly to point it toward certain goals and elimination of some unintended consequences we've experienced over the last decade.
Frank, I may be missing your big picture here. You want to raise the pool A conference minimums for what main reason? More Pool C bids? What if the LL accepts Ithaca, St. John Fisher and Cortland and all those 11 teams have to fight for one spot (with the NEFC spitting into 2)? Or you know that won't happen so you don't care or have to worry about that?
Quote from: Charles on November 03, 2011, 02:12:03 PM
But it kind of shows us that it all works out in the end. Salve didn't play Hobart, and if they did, would have lost by 28 points.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 02:13:52 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 02:02:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 01:54:20 PM
Remember, though, that nobody is really advocating the complete removal of Pool A bids. Some people are suggesting mandating a certain W/L percentage for it. Some are advocating increasing the Pool A conference minimum to artificially create a more legitimate batch of Pool A teams (based on what mathematically becomes a higher winning percentage for larger conferences). Ultimately, the problem we have to remember is this:
Soon there will be about 245 D3 teams -- about 235 when you remove the NESCAC. Divide 235 by 7 (the Pool A minimum) and get 33.6. That means that if every team belonged to a 7-member conference, Pool A would require 33 bids. As we know, that's impossible. So, Pool A at 7 teams may not be sustainable. It wouldn't require that extreme case -- if we were to drop below 4 Pool C bids (an average of 1 per region), I think the demand would be to change something. For everyone that wants to say the current system is sustainable, the numbers don't lie. As D3 continues to grow, the numbers get more gruesome. And while Ralph suggested the NESCAC is happy being at its current structure, I'm sure there are some NESCAC ADs looking at the ECFC with an access ratio of 8:1 and thinking that teams that may be weaker than the NEFC teams actually have a better chance to make the NCAA Playoffs. Why WOULDN'T splitting the NEFC make sense in some ways to at least level out that access ratio under current circumstances, eating up another Pool C bid? If Endicott finishes 9-1 and doesn't get a bid, it's going to help raise questions internally, I would guarantee.
So, the fact is that something needs to be considered as we get closer to a saturation point in Division 3 football. I like the AQ structure. I just think we can refine it slightly to point it toward certain goals and elimination of some unintended consequences we've experienced over the last decade.
Frank, I may be missing your big picture here. You want to raise the pool A conference minimums for what main reason? More Pool C bids? What if the LL accepts Ithaca, St. John Fisher and Cortland and all those 11 teams have to fight for one spot (with the NEFC spitting into 2)? Or you know that won't happen so you don't care or have to worry about that?
Three reasons:
1) Because we have to eventually since Pool A would be unsustainable at a 7 minimum when we reach around the 260 team mark, perhaps even sooner;
2) Because to ensure a certain number of Pool C bids even at 245 teams, we will need to do something soon; and
3) Mandating eight-team AQ conferences will prevent, or at least make extremely more rare, 5-5 teams from gaining entry, and makes 6-4 a rarity. Do the math: how often in eight-team conferences does the winner lose more than two games in conference? Very, very infrequently (and more often than not, there is a one-loss team). If the team were to lose all three OOC games, sure, they would finish 5-5, but that would become much more rare. Look, if Hobart loses two games, Union could make it in this year at 5-5 still. Again, it's not a pretty situation. What's worse, SLU almost made it in with a 4-6 record last year. That's the problem of seven-member conferences... they allow for too much danger in the team that comes out because of the margin of error allowed.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:55:51 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 01:24:59 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Right, but my point is, it's a risky call to make when there are only six slots available. I think a number of schools would play it safe
Right, but those NEFC and ECFC schools don't benefit by playing it safe do they? Now if Salve Regina beat Hobart instead of Union and only had one loss, they might have a pool C chance. Then again, we would all be thinking twice about Hobart as well.
But it kind of shows us that it all works out in the end. Salve didn't play Hobart, and if they did, would have lost by 28 points.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 01:54:20 PM
If Endicott finishes 9-1 and doesn't get a bid, it's going to help raise questions internally, I would guarantee.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2011, 02:42:26 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:55:51 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 01:24:59 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Right, but my point is, it's a risky call to make when there are only six slots available. I think a number of schools would play it safe
Right, but those NEFC and ECFC schools don't benefit by playing it safe do they? Now if Salve Regina beat Hobart instead of Union and only had one loss, they might have a pool C chance. Then again, we would all be thinking twice about Hobart as well.
But it kind of shows us that it all works out in the end. Salve didn't play Hobart, and if they did, would have lost by 28 points.
How about if Salve beat Montclair with the same schedule? Can't fault them for scheduling Union. Union has been historically good.
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 03, 2011, 04:50:18 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2011, 02:42:26 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:55:51 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 01:24:59 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Right, but my point is, it's a risky call to make when there are only six slots available. I think a number of schools would play it safe
Right, but those NEFC and ECFC schools don't benefit by playing it safe do they? Now if Salve Regina beat Hobart instead of Union and only had one loss, they might have a pool C chance. Then again, we would all be thinking twice about Hobart as well.
But it kind of shows us that it all works out in the end. Salve didn't play Hobart, and if they did, would have lost by 28 points.
How about if Salve beat Montclair with the same schedule? Can't fault them for scheduling Union. Union has been historically good.
Havent followed the thread thoroughly here, so forgive me if i am missing some point here...
...you cant fault them, but is that the real issue? Or is the real issue, did they play and beat teams good enough to be considered for pool C? I mean, the traditionally weaker conferences already get the benefit an AQ even if they go 7-3, so now we are supposed to also worry if a Salve Regina squad thought they were scheduling strong enough opponents, but it turns out a historically good team aint so good this year, so their record isnt as impressive as they hoped it would be before the season started?
You play who you play, you beat who you beat, and then AFTER the season a committee analyzes those wins/losses to determine the net outcome. Its subjective in many ways and should be? Who really thinks Salve should get consideration if they are not an AQ?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 03, 2011, 03:37:58 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 01:54:20 PM
If Endicott finishes 9-1 and doesn't get a bid, it's going to help raise questions internally, I would guarantee.
What it should do is raise questions about who they are scheduling out of conference and why, although I understand some administrators will look at it as "how can we game the system to get into the playoffs" rather than "how can we perform better to make a playoff bid more likely."
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 02:28:48 PM
Jonny... No offense, but all three points are based on simple math of the situations we are experiencing. It would be like me defending 2+2=4 right now.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2011, 02:42:26 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:55:51 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 01:24:59 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 01:05:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2011, 12:23:30 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 11:40:04 AM
I've argued this for years. The NCAA usually makes the right decision when it comes to these pool C bids, especially when it comes to teams that lose non conference games. If Albion joins the MIAC, then loses to St. Thomas in a close game, but blows out everyone else in the league and loses two more non conference games to the Northern Iowa and Grand Valley State (by close scores lets say), do we really think the NCAA is going to put a 9-1 NEFC in over them
? I say they wouldn't.
You may be right Jonny, but would you risk you and a 9-1 NEFC being the last two on the board?
Last year, in the regular season, you had Ohio Northern losing to #2 Mount, Wheaton losing to #5 North Central, Pacific Lutheran losing to #9 Linfield, W&J losing to #10 Thomas More, Coe losing to #11 Wartburg, and two 9-1 runners up in the NJAC. So right there, you've got five teams with their only loss being against a Top 11 team. Then you throw in the two 9-1 runner up NJAC schools and you're staring at seven pretty good one loss teams fighting for six spots.
There's no weak NEFC school you can easily make a strength of schedule argument over in this scenario. Best hope is jumping the pair of 9-1 NJAC schools
Again, it depends on who you lose to and by how much.
Right, but my point is, it's a risky call to make when there are only six slots available. I think a number of schools would play it safe
Right, but those NEFC and ECFC schools don't benefit by playing it safe do they? Now if Salve Regina beat Hobart instead of Union and only had one loss, they might have a pool C chance. Then again, we would all be thinking twice about Hobart as well.
But it kind of shows us that it all works out in the end. Salve didn't play Hobart, and if they did, would have lost by 28 points.
How about if Salve beat Montclair with the same schedule? Can't fault them for scheduling Union. Union has been historically good.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 03, 2011, 06:33:05 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 03, 2011, 02:28:48 PM
Jonny... No offense, but all three points are based on simple math of the situations we are experiencing. It would be like me defending 2+2=4 right now.
Ok so maybe I am still missing your big picture. You just said these are situations we are experiencing but in your points 1 and 2 you mention the phrases "we have to eventually", and "we will need to do something soon".
Thats why I said we can deal with that when the situation comes and we don't have to play by the same rules we are playing by now.
Unless we are just discussing for the sake of discussing which is fine.
Quote from: pg04 on November 05, 2011, 03:16:06 PM
Hobart has lost, and Del Val is tied at 14 with Lycoming in the 4th quarter. We're closer to being assured of the Purple power...We'll see what Del Val does...
Quote from: pg04 on November 05, 2011, 03:47:22 PM
Lycoming had tied it at 21, but with 13 seconds left, DV gets a touchdown to take the lead back 28-21. Also, Rowan has gotten their lead back but MSU is driving... Weird day here...
Quote from: pg04 on November 05, 2011, 03:50:17 PM
Del Val wins 28-21 and mSU leads 31-28 with 2 minutes left.
ALSO, Mount Union TRAILS Baldwin wallace at home with 5 minutes left in the game, 20-19!
Quote from: pg04 on November 05, 2011, 04:07:58 PM
Rowan got to the 1, kicked a field goal, they are in OT.
Baldwin-Wallace is going to fail to win due to a miracle catch by UMU. Why can't just once a miracle go against them? Honestly I'm so sick of them winning it literally makes me sick.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 06, 2011, 01:08:24 PM
We also have an interesting overall Pool C problem:
Conferences with potential for one-loss runners-up for Pool C (Updated 11/6/11) (Letters preceding estimate chances of potential, * - clinched runner-up status with one loss):
(*) MWC – Illinois College in clubhouse at 9-1
(*) NEFC – Endicott in clubhouse at 9-1
(A) CCIW – Illinois Wesleyan must beat Augustana
(A) SCAC – Centre must beat Rhodes
(B) IND/Pool B – Wesley must beat Huntingdon; Case must beat Carnegie Mellon (Note: Case has one loss out of its region)
(B) MAC – Widener must beat DelVal
(B) SCIAC – Redlands must beat Chapman
(D) NWC – Lewis & Clark must beat Linfield
-----------
(F) ASC – Impossible for runner-up 1-loss team (Note: 1 McMurry loss vs. Non-D3 opponent; faces MS College)
(F) ECFC – Impossible for runner-up to have 1 loss (Note that Maritime's OOC loss was out of division)
If Linfield and DelVal win next week, there are only six teams remaining at the Pool C, 1-loss list. Now, here's the kicker: McMurry's (ASC) first loss was to a team outside of its division. The second loss was to UMHB. Chances are, McMurry will be viewed as a one-loss team for the purposes of selection. Therefore, Endicott potentially gets trumped there. What happens if one other upset occurs in the top list? Does the Committee just blindly take Endicott as a Pool C team, or does the Committee enter into the sea of two-loss teams, like the NJAC runner up, Fisher and several other teams across the country?
Quote from: SUADC on November 06, 2011, 04:33:34 PM
Here is my East bracket predictions as of now:
1. Delaware Valley
2. Salisbury
3. Winner of NJAC (Montclair St. or Kean)
4. Wesley (Moving from South)
5. Hobart
6. Western New England/Worchester Winner
7. Norwich
8. (2nd Place NJAC or St. John Fisher) or Endicott
I do not think that Mount Union will be moved from the North, due to the North not having that many undefeated teams. I believe that if Delaware Valley wins out they should be able to prove that they are the true #1 East team. Also, I think they will move Wesley into the bracket to help out with traveling. I believe that at least one two lost team should should be able to be the eight seed (e.g. Montclair/Kean, St. John Fisher, Widener/Lycoming.)
Quote from: SUADC on November 06, 2011, 04:33:34 PM
I do not think that Mount Union will be moved from the North, due to the North not having that many undefeated teams.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 06, 2011, 08:51:54 PMI agree. You have a log jam of quality teams in the West...Linfield, Tommies, UWW, ,Quote from: SUADC on November 06, 2011, 04:33:34 PM
I do not think that Mount Union will be moved from the North, due to the North not having that many undefeated teams.
I'm not sure that's really a thing, and even so, they would move undefeated Whitewater into that bracket.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 06, 2011, 10:59:33 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 06, 2011, 08:51:54 PMI agree. You have a log jam of quality teams in the West...Linfield, Tommies, UWW, ,Quote from: SUADC on November 06, 2011, 04:33:34 PM
I do not think that Mount Union will be moved from the North, due to the North not having that many undefeated teams.
I'm not sure that's really a thing, and even so, they would move undefeated Whitewater into that bracket.
And the West has had more unique schools as national champions in the last 18 years of the Salem era...Pac LU, Linfield, St Johns, UWW UW-La Crosse.
It is the West Region that is causing trouble for the committee.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 07, 2011, 09:36:35 AM
Bracket 3: (Delaware Valley loses this week)
1. Mount Union
2. Widener
3. Kean/Montclair
4. Hobart
5. Delaware Valley
6. WNEC/Framingham
7. Norwich
8. Albion
*In this case, I think Salisbury gets a 3-5 seed in the South Region.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 07, 2011, 09:36:35 AM
Ok, dependent on what Delaware Valley does this week, I think the bracket's will shake out as such:
Bracket 1: (Delaware Valley wins this week)
1. Mount Union
2. Delaware Valley
3. Salisbury
4. Kean/Montclair
5. Hobart
6. WNEC/Framingham
7. Norwich
8. Albion
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 07, 2011, 07:34:06 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 06, 2011, 10:59:33 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 06, 2011, 08:51:54 PMI agree. You have a log jam of quality teams in the West...Linfield, Tommies, UWW, ,Quote from: SUADC on November 06, 2011, 04:33:34 PM
I do not think that Mount Union will be moved from the North, due to the North not having that many undefeated teams.
I'm not sure that's really a thing, and even so, they would move undefeated Whitewater into that bracket.
And the West has had more unique schools as national champions in the last 18 years of the Salem era...Pac LU, Linfield, St Johns, UWW UW-La Crosse.
It is the West Region that is causing trouble for the committee.
Well they should stop causing so much damn trouble.
Quote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 10:56:03 AM
I think that Wisconsin-Whitewater should be #1 in the West, the Tommies #2, and then Linfield #3.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 07, 2011, 10:53:57 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 07, 2011, 09:36:35 AM
Ok, dependent on what Delaware Valley does this week, I think the bracket's will shake out as such:
Bracket 1: (Delaware Valley wins this week)
1. Mount Union
2. Delaware Valley
3. Salisbury
4. Kean/Montclair
5. Hobart
6. WNEC/Framingham
7. Norwich
8. Albion
Wow... Identical to mine, Boss, from yesterday afternoon.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 07, 2011, 11:06:32 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 10:56:03 AM
I think that Wisconsin-Whitewater should be #1 in the West, the Tommies #2, and then Linfield #3.
I really want an East team to host a bracket, but you look at the above with 3 of the top 5 teams in the country in one bracket and you realize how selfish it seems.
Quote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 11:31:03 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 07, 2011, 11:06:32 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 10:56:03 AM
I think that Wisconsin-Whitewater should be #1 in the West, the Tommies #2, and then Linfield #3.
I really want an East team to host a bracket, but you look at the above with 3 of the top 5 teams in the country in one bracket and you realize how selfish it seems.
Your'e exactly right. Still, you can not fault Delaware Valley for being a solid 'East' regional team and going undefeated and prevent them from being #1. I think they should rotate counter-clockwise and send John Hopkins east or Wesley to help strengthen the "East." With that being said, how can you make majority of the South teams play Linfield, Whitewater, or the Tommies that would by far be a traveling concern, but it has been done before.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 07, 2011, 01:34:07 PM
OK, let me be clear about one aspect of this year's process that nobody seems to be discussing. Between last season and this season, the NCAA adopted a new wrinkle at the request of last year's Committee -- now, for the purpose of SEEDING, undefeated teams can be compared based on their recent playoff performance.
Why is this important? I truly believe that this has given the Committee a new out for the whole idea they stated in the past that "if an East Region team [presumably in a power conference] went undefeated, that team would be the #1 seed in the East." I honestly think that with the new wrinkle, it no longer applies. Now, no matter what bracket the Committee chooses to compare Mount Union and Whitewater to, their recent playoff histories will trump any East, North, South or West team. Essentially, Mount Union and Whitewater can be viewed as 10-0+, the "+" being a super-undefeated indicator that allows for a more fluid movement of the teams to the top of any bracket with better justification.
This is why I've been adamant on the idea that Mount Union WILL be included in the East under current circumstances; there's just no way I can see to presently avoid it if there is the need for a "Top 4" and the inclusion of the new wrinkle for playoff histories of undefeated teams.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley ( 5 ) | 9-0 | 68 | 1 | vs. #5 Widener |
2 Salisbury( 2 ) | 8-1 | 65 | 2 | vs. Frostburg State |
3 Kean | 8-1 | 51 | 5 | at #4 Montclair State |
4 Montclair State | 8-1 | 46 | 6 | vs. #3 Kean |
5 Widener | 8-1 | 39 | 7 | at #1 Delaware Valley |
6 Hobart | 6-1 | 34 | 3 | at Rochester |
7 Cortland State | 7-2 | 33 | 8 | at Ithaca |
8 St. John Fisher | 7-2 | 27 | 4 | at Hartwick |
9 Lycoming | 7-2 | 19 | 13 | vs. FDU-Florham |
10 Western New England | 9-1 | 5 | 10t | vs. Framingham State |
Quote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 07, 2011, 06:11:44 PM
I know it may not seem like a huge matchup, AUKaz, but I'd add the Rochester-Hobart game to your list of key matchups because it does hold playoff implications.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 08, 2011, 09:25:02 AM
Yeah, as does WNEC vs. Framingham along with a number of other "big" games that I didn't include throughout the year. I've been using that space to highlight any games between two fan regionally ranked teams. I could expand that if it was worthwhile content, but where do I stop?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2011, 08:36:15 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
St. Thomas beat Bethel this year. Bethel has beaten St. Thomas in the playoffs one time.
Quote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:07:11 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2011, 08:36:15 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
St. Thomas beat Bethel this year. Bethel has beaten St. Thomas in the playoffs one time.
I understand that, so what justifies them? They have a great rivalry with Bethel, going back the last 10 meetings between the two, they're tied at 5 each. However, St. Thomas has never played against the purple powers to show that they deserve to be #1. Yet, Bethel has played Mount Union twice since 2007, having a good game last year, but getting destroyed in 2007. I just don't think the 'West' should be represented by a team that has not proven themselves historically in the playoffs by not playing either Mount Union or Wisconsin-Whitewater. I would still consider Linfield more of a #1 seed than St. Thomas, because they have went toe to toe with "west" regional powerhouse Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Quote from: kubiack78 on November 08, 2011, 10:16:15 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:07:11 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2011, 08:36:15 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
St. Thomas beat Bethel this year. Bethel has beaten St. Thomas in the playoffs one time.
I understand that, so what justifies them? They have a great rivalry with Bethel, going back the last 10 meetings between the two, they're tied at 5 each. However, St. Thomas has never played against the purple powers to show that they deserve to be #1. Yet, Bethel has played Mount Union twice since 2007, having a good game last year, but getting destroyed in 2007. I just don't think the 'West' should be represented by a team that has not proven themselves historically in the playoffs by not playing either Mount Union or Wisconsin-Whitewater. I would still consider Linfield more of a #1 seed than St. Thomas, because they have went toe to toe with "west" regional powerhouse Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Historically UST is 1-0 against WW in the playoffs. Thye beat WW in the 1990 playoffs 24-23 ;) (don't go and lose you mind because I posted this... but you asked for history)
Quote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:19:31 AMQuote from: kubiack78 on November 08, 2011, 10:16:15 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:07:11 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2011, 08:36:15 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
St. Thomas beat Bethel this year. Bethel has beaten St. Thomas in the playoffs one time.
I understand that, so what justifies them? They have a great rivalry with Bethel, going back the last 10 meetings between the two, they're tied at 5 each. However, St. Thomas has never played against the purple powers to show that they deserve to be #1. Yet, Bethel has played Mount Union twice since 2007, having a good game last year, but getting destroyed in 2007. I just don't think the 'West' should be represented by a team that has not proven themselves historically in the playoffs by not playing either Mount Union or Wisconsin-Whitewater. I would still consider Linfield more of a #1 seed than St. Thomas, because they have went toe to toe with "west" regional powerhouse Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Historically UST is 1-0 against WW in the playoffs. Thye beat WW in the 1990 playoffs 24-23 ;) (don't go and lose you mind because I posted this... but you asked for history)
And that Whitewater team was in no comparison to the Whitewater teams of the last six years and Mount Union teams of the last 15 years and you only beat them by one point.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 08, 2011, 09:54:34 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 08, 2011, 09:25:02 AM
Yeah, as does WNEC vs. Framingham along with a number of other "big" games that I didn't include throughout the year. I've been using that space to highlight any games between two fan regionally ranked teams. I could expand that if it was worthwhile content, but where do I stop?
Fair point; I understand that you have to stop somewhere, and you're right that a number of games with playoff implciations are played in any given week.
IMHO, with the stakes a little higher in Week 10/11, expanding the "Key Matchups" to include any game featuring at least one ranked team with a playoff berth on the line would be a worthwhile addition.
The reason that this seemingly-benign Week 11 matchup holds some regional/national significance is the effect that the LL's Pool A bid going to 7-1 Hobart vs. 5-5 Union could have on playoff bracketology. Hobart would be a candidate for a decent seed, while Union is a guaranteed #8 seed. Teams like WNEC, the Kean/Montclair loser, and the Widener/DelVal loser oughta be pulling for Rochester to knock off Hobart this weekend, because that locks Union into a #8 slot and assures the above teams that they WON'T get stuck playing Mount Union.*
(*I think: is Union within 500 miles by the NCAA's official travel software? GoogleMaps puts the trip at 487 miles).
Quote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:19:31 AMQuote from: kubiack78 on November 08, 2011, 10:16:15 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:07:11 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2011, 08:36:15 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
St. Thomas beat Bethel this year. Bethel has beaten St. Thomas in the playoffs one time.
I understand that, so what justifies them? They have a great rivalry with Bethel, going back the last 10 meetings between the two, they're tied at 5 each. However, St. Thomas has never played against the purple powers to show that they deserve to be #1. Yet, Bethel has played Mount Union twice since 2007, having a good game last year, but getting destroyed in 2007. I just don't think the 'West' should be represented by a team that has not proven themselves historically in the playoffs by not playing either Mount Union or Wisconsin-Whitewater. I would still consider Linfield more of a #1 seed than St. Thomas, because they have went toe to toe with "west" regional powerhouse Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Historically UST is 1-0 against WW in the playoffs. Thye beat WW in the 1990 playoffs 24-23 ;) (don't go and lose you mind because I posted this... but you asked for history)
And that Whitewater team was in no comparison to the Whitewater teams of the last six years and Mount Union teams of the last 15 years and you only beat them by one point.
Quote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:19:31 AMQuote from: kubiack78 on November 08, 2011, 10:16:15 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:07:11 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2011, 08:36:15 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
St. Thomas beat Bethel this year. Bethel has beaten St. Thomas in the playoffs one time.
I understand that, so what justifies them? They have a great rivalry with Bethel, going back the last 10 meetings between the two, they're tied at 5 each. However, St. Thomas has never played against the purple powers to show that they deserve to be #1. Yet, Bethel has played Mount Union twice since 2007, having a good game last year, but getting destroyed in 2007. I just don't think the 'West' should be represented by a team that has not proven themselves historically in the playoffs by not playing either Mount Union or Wisconsin-Whitewater. I would still consider Linfield more of a #1 seed than St. Thomas, because they have went toe to toe with "west" regional powerhouse Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Historically UST is 1-0 against WW in the playoffs. Thye beat WW in the 1990 playoffs 24-23 ;) (don't go and lose you mind because I posted this... but you asked for history)
And that Whitewater team was in no comparison to the Whitewater teams of the last six years and Mount Union teams of the last 15 years and you only beat them by one point.
Quote from: kubiack78 on November 08, 2011, 12:26:58 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:19:31 AMQuote from: kubiack78 on November 08, 2011, 10:16:15 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 08, 2011, 10:07:11 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 07, 2011, 08:36:15 PMQuote from: SUADC on November 07, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
So what justifies St. Thomas for getting a number one seed. I think Bethel has more justification than they do. They beat Bethel every year and when playoffs come around Bethel takes care of business.
St. Thomas beat Bethel this year. Bethel has beaten St. Thomas in the playoffs one time.
I understand that, so what justifies them? They have a great rivalry with Bethel, going back the last 10 meetings between the two, they're tied at 5 each. However, St. Thomas has never played against the purple powers to show that they deserve to be #1. Yet, Bethel has played Mount Union twice since 2007, having a good game last year, but getting destroyed in 2007. I just don't think the 'West' should be represented by a team that has not proven themselves historically in the playoffs by not playing either Mount Union or Wisconsin-Whitewater. I would still consider Linfield more of a #1 seed than St. Thomas, because they have went toe to toe with "west" regional powerhouse Wisconsin-Whitewater.
Historically UST is 1-0 against WW in the playoffs. Thye beat WW in the 1990 playoffs 24-23 ;) (don't go and lose you mind because I posted this... but you asked for history)
And that Whitewater team was in no comparison to the Whitewater teams of the last six years and Mount Union teams of the last 15 years and you only beat them by one point.
Ok I'll play since you don't understand toung in cheek humor:
Your statement is not completely true, the 90 team was undefeated 10-0 going onto the playoffs even without their all american running back (lost to a knee injury). They had 2 all americans on the team and three players that went on to NFL camps after college. After looking at your profile you either lied about your age or you were 2 years old when the 1990 playoffs were played and really can't make any kind of judgement about any team BPP (Before Post Patterns).
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 09, 2011, 03:36:10 PM
Endicott jumps into the Regional Rankings above Fisher, so it seems like the committee is setting it up to get Endicott on the board before any two-loss teams in the East.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 09, 2011, 04:02:32 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 09, 2011, 03:36:10 PM
Endicott jumps into the Regional Rankings above Fisher, so it seems like the committee is setting it up to get Endicott on the board before any two-loss teams in the East.
Stupid...simply stupid. Is this the same regional rankings that last year had Mount Union ranked 3rd in the North going into the last week of the season? The same regional ranking last year with the #1 and #2 ranked team in the North region (I forget who they were off of the top of my head) playing against each other in the final week of the season, with the #1 team winning...yet somehow getting jumped by MUC in the final poll?
Now...to be clear...I am arguing against this particular NCAA regional ranking system on two fronts. #1...for them to have Mount Union only ranked as the third best team in the region at that point last year was ridiculous, and should immediately disqualify the poll as being serious, or useful. The second piece is let's say we stick to their rankings...and that MUC was the 3rd best team in the region going into the final week of the season. The two teams ranked ahead of MUC played against each other in the final week of the season, with the #1 team winning. Yet somehow, MUC jumped them in the final poll. Show me another example where the two top teams from the same region play each other and then the winner gets jumped by the #3 ranked team.
If it is in fact the same regional ranking poll, it is as useless today as it was a year ago. While I am not sure that Fisher will get in as a Pool C if they finish 8-2...I am more certain that Endicott and the terrible NEFC doesn't deserve a 2nd bid this year...not with their terrible schedule of NEFC and ECFC teams and losing the one tough game that they played all year long.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 09, 2011, 04:02:32 PM
If it is in fact the same regional ranking poll, it is as useless today as it was a year ago. While I am not sure that Fisher will get in as a Pool C if they finish 8-2...I am more certain that Endicott and the terrible NEFC doesn't deserve a 2nd bid this year...not with their terrible schedule of NEFC and ECFC teams and losing the one tough game that they played all year long.
Quote from: Timeforachange on November 09, 2011, 07:11:39 PM
I think it was Frank & LD who brought up the idea of Albion moving into the bracket.
If that were to happen I'd love to see:
1) MUC (Pool A)
2) Salisbury (Pool A)
3) Weidner (Pool A)
4) NJAC Winner (Pool A)
5) DVC (Pool C)
6) Hobart (Pool A)
7) NEFC Winner (Pool A)
8) Albion (Pool A)
[/quote
Where do you put Norwich ?
Quote from: rams1102 on November 09, 2011, 07:48:49 PMQuote from: Timeforachange on November 09, 2011, 07:11:39 PM
I think it was Frank & LD who brought up the idea of Albion moving into the bracket.
If that were to happen I'd love to see:
1) MUC (Pool A)
2) Salisbury (Pool A)
3) Weidner (Pool A)
4) NJAC Winner (Pool A)
5) DVC (Pool C)
6) Hobart (Pool A)
7) NEFC Winner (Pool A)
8) Albion (Pool A)
Where do you put Norwich ?
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:01:32 AM
Im glad someone else said something about Endicott jumping Fisher and not some Fisher homer like me.
Honest to god, what does it take for the committee to realize that this conference is just BAD?
Fisher doesnt deserve a spot but Endicott? Really?
Quote from: Timeforachange on November 10, 2011, 12:02:44 AMQuote from: rams1102 on November 09, 2011, 07:48:49 PMQuote from: Timeforachange on November 09, 2011, 07:11:39 PM
I think it was Frank & LD who brought up the idea of Albion moving into the bracket.
If that were to happen I'd love to see:
1) MUC (Pool A)
2) Salisbury (Pool A)
3) Weidner (Pool A)
4) NJAC Winner (Pool A)
5) DVC (Pool C)
6) Hobart (Pool A)
7) NEFC Winner (Pool A)
8) Albion (Pool A)
Where do you put Norwich ?
Ugh...
I'd take Salisbury out and put them in the south then...
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:01:32 AM
Im glad someone else said something about Endicott jumping Fisher and not some Fisher homer like me.
Honest to god, what does it take for the committee to realize that this conference is just BAD?
Fisher doesnt deserve a spot but Endicott? Really?
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:31:48 AM
Yanks,
No need to go full throttle, your 3rd string could score at will anyway.
Get the scrubs some PT!
Quote from: SUADC on November 10, 2011, 09:21:18 AM
It would something like this.
1) MUC (Pool A)
2) Johns Hopkins (Pool A)
3) Salisbury (Pool A)
4) Widener (Pool A)
5) NJAC Winner (Pool A)
6) Hobart (Pool A)
7) NEFC Winner (Pool A)
8) Norwich (Pool A)
Quote from: Timeforachange on November 10, 2011, 09:51:57 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 10, 2011, 09:21:18 AM
It would something like this.
1) MUC (Pool A)
2) Johns Hopkins (Pool A)
3) Salisbury (Pool A)
4) Widener (Pool A)
5) NJAC Winner (Pool A)
6) Hobart (Pool A)
7) NEFC Winner (Pool A)
8) Norwich (Pool A)
It's been pointed out several times that neither the NEFC rep or Norwich will be going to MUC because of the 500 mile rule...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 10, 2011, 09:44:46 AMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:31:48 AM
Yanks,
No need to go full throttle, your 3rd string could score at will anyway.
Get the scrubs some PT!
Hey, now. You only have a 53 man roster and Alfred's backups were only able to put up 10 on SUNY-Maritime in the second half last year (with 6 of those coming on a pick-six).
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 09:08:31 AMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:01:32 AM
Im glad someone else said something about Endicott jumping Fisher and not some Fisher homer like me.
Honest to god, what does it take for the committee to realize that this conference is just BAD?
Fisher doesnt deserve a spot but Endicott? Really?
Neither of them deserve a spot, and unless some crazy ish happens this week, I'm pretty confident neither get a bid.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:48:04 AM
Cmon Kaz,
As much as you enjoyed that game.....Didnt you want a little better competition?
Quote from: SUADC on November 10, 2011, 09:57:18 AMQuote from: Timeforachange on November 10, 2011, 09:51:57 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 10, 2011, 09:21:18 AM
It would something like this.
1) MUC (Pool A)
2) Johns Hopkins (Pool A)
3) Salisbury (Pool A)
4) Widener (Pool A)
5) NJAC Winner (Pool A)
6) Hobart (Pool A)
7) NEFC Winner (Pool A)
8) Norwich (Pool A)
It's been pointed out several times that neither the NEFC rep or Norwich will be going to MUC because of the 500 mile rule...
Agree 100%, that is why MUC would most likely play the NJAC Winner because based on playoff seed usually the winner of #1 vs #8 team plays the winner of #4 vs. #5, so in all respect, they would allow MUC to play the #5 seed for the first round and assuming the #4 beats #8, the travel rule will still be in affect with MUC playing the #4 in the second round.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 10:25:25 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 10, 2011, 09:57:18 AMQuote from: Timeforachange on November 10, 2011, 09:51:57 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 10, 2011, 09:21:18 AM
It would something like this.
1) MUC (Pool A)
2) Johns Hopkins (Pool A)
3) Salisbury (Pool A)
4) Widener (Pool A)
5) NJAC Winner (Pool A)
6) Hobart (Pool A)
7) NEFC Winner (Pool A)
8) Norwich (Pool A)
It's been pointed out several times that neither the NEFC rep or Norwich will be going to MUC because of the 500 mile rule...
Agree 100%, that is why MUC would most likely play the NJAC Winner because based on playoff seed usually the winner of #1 vs #8 team plays the winner of #4 vs. #5, so in all respect, they would allow MUC to play the #5 seed for the first round and assuming the #4 beats #8, the travel rule will still be in affect with MUC playing the #4 in the second round.
That's not how it works. Hobart would be the team that travels under your bracket.
That said, if there is no East Pool C team and Union does not make the playoffs, the NCAA will likely be forced to move Mount Union in with another team from another bracket that can travel to Mount Union. It's problematic if by moving Mount Union into the East allows for a First Round 1/6 matchup because of the 500-mile rule -- the decision begins lacking any kind of equity at that point. That's why LD and I both spotted Albion -- they are 250 miles away from Mount Union and a legitimate 8-seed. It would cleanly fill the East bracket in a less controversial way.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 09:27:54 AMLike I said it was border line pathetic. You're funny.Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:01:32 AM
Im glad someone else said something about Endicott jumping Fisher and not some Fisher homer like me.
Honest to god, what does it take for the committee to realize that this conference is just BAD?
Fisher doesnt deserve a spot but Endicott? Really?
91...it was me. Like I said before, it is borderline pathetic. Endicott played one "tough" team this year, and lost (to WNEC). WNEC...the same team that needed to score with under two minutes to go to beat the ECFC champion, Norwich. Honestly...even at 9-1...what team did Endicott beat that is even remotely "impressive", considering they only beat two teams with an above .500 record (Framingham State and Salve)? When you are hanging your hat, and body of work, on a 7 point win over Salve (who isn't a bad team, just not an overly impressive one)...your body of work is pretty terrible. Especially when you look at these "Regional Rankings"...where it is pretty obvious that whoever is voting on this poll is looking at nothing more that overall wins and loses...and doing zero homework on who is playing who.
These conferences (NEFC and ECFC), with their utterly weak overall play and performance, are killing the East Region. An additional problem that we are seeing right now is because of their (the NEFC and ECFC leagues) geographical location, they pretty much have to remain in the East Region (with the current 500 mile rule). So now...unlike almost every NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep who could be shipped to the South Region (or even the North Region in some instances)...the East Region is stuck with these two stellar Pool A reps, and also get to avoid a #1 seed like MUC in the first round.
Honestly...I think running up scores on teams in almost every case is in ridiculously poor taste...but if I were an NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep, I would be hard pressed to take my foot off the gas against any NEFC/ECFC team in the first round match-up in attempt to send a message to the NCAA that they need to do a better job of managing the tournament.
Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 11:12:10 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 09:27:54 AMLike I said it was border line pathetic. You're funny.Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:01:32 AM
Im glad someone else said something about Endicott jumping Fisher and not some Fisher homer like me.
Honest to god, what does it take for the committee to realize that this conference is just BAD?
Fisher doesnt deserve a spot but Endicott? Really?
91...it was me. Like I said before, it is borderline pathetic. Endicott played one "tough" team this year, and lost (to WNEC). WNEC...the same team that needed to score with under two minutes to go to beat the ECFC champion, Norwich. Honestly...even at 9-1...what team did Endicott beat that is even remotely "impressive", considering they only beat two teams with an above .500 record (Framingham State and Salve)? When you are hanging your hat, and body of work, on a 7 point win over Salve (who isn't a bad team, just not an overly impressive one)...your body of work is pretty terrible. Especially when you look at these "Regional Rankings"...where it is pretty obvious that whoever is voting on this poll is looking at nothing more that overall wins and loses...and doing zero homework on who is playing who.
These conferences (NEFC and ECFC), with their utterly weak overall play and performance, are killing the East Region. An additional problem that we are seeing right now is because of their (the NEFC and ECFC leagues) geographical location, they pretty much have to remain in the East Region (with the current 500 mile rule). So now...unlike almost every NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep who could be shipped to the South Region (or even the North Region in some instances)...the East Region is stuck with these two stellar Pool A reps, and also get to avoid a #1 seed like MUC in the first round.
Honestly...I think running up scores on teams in almost every case is in ridiculously poor taste...but if I were an NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep, I would be hard pressed to take my foot off the gas against any NEFC/ECFC team in the first round match-up in attempt to send a message to the NCAA that they need to do a better job of managing the tournament.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:24:42 AMListen Matt, you should stop bashing Endicott and the NEFC. It is offensive to people.Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 11:12:10 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 09:27:54 AMLike I said it was border line pathetic. You're funny.Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:01:32 AM
Im glad someone else said something about Endicott jumping Fisher and not some Fisher homer like me.
Honest to god, what does it take for the committee to realize that this conference is just BAD?
Fisher doesnt deserve a spot but Endicott? Really?
91...it was me. Like I said before, it is borderline pathetic. Endicott played one "tough" team this year, and lost (to WNEC). WNEC...the same team that needed to score with under two minutes to go to beat the ECFC champion, Norwich. Honestly...even at 9-1...what team did Endicott beat that is even remotely "impressive", considering they only beat two teams with an above .500 record (Framingham State and Salve)? When you are hanging your hat, and body of work, on a 7 point win over Salve (who isn't a bad team, just not an overly impressive one)...your body of work is pretty terrible. Especially when you look at these "Regional Rankings"...where it is pretty obvious that whoever is voting on this poll is looking at nothing more that overall wins and loses...and doing zero homework on who is playing who.
These conferences (NEFC and ECFC), with their utterly weak overall play and performance, are killing the East Region. An additional problem that we are seeing right now is because of their (the NEFC and ECFC leagues) geographical location, they pretty much have to remain in the East Region (with the current 500 mile rule). So now...unlike almost every NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep who could be shipped to the South Region (or even the North Region in some instances)...the East Region is stuck with these two stellar Pool A reps, and also get to avoid a #1 seed like MUC in the first round.
Honestly...I think running up scores on teams in almost every case is in ridiculously poor taste...but if I were an NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep, I would be hard pressed to take my foot off the gas against any NEFC/ECFC team in the first round match-up in attempt to send a message to the NCAA that they need to do a better job of managing the tournament.
Not sure what you are getting at here...I never said that you said it was pathetic. I am saying that the regional poll that has Endicott above Fisher is pathetic. And it is.
And you can ask anyone...I am the furthest thing from a St. John Fisher fan...
Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 11:33:00 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:24:42 AMListen Matt, you should stop bashing Endicott and the NEFC. It is offensive to people.Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 11:12:10 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 09:27:54 AMLike I said it was border line pathetic. You're funny.Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 10, 2011, 09:01:32 AM
Im glad someone else said something about Endicott jumping Fisher and not some Fisher homer like me.
Honest to god, what does it take for the committee to realize that this conference is just BAD?
Fisher doesnt deserve a spot but Endicott? Really?
91...it was me. Like I said before, it is borderline pathetic. Endicott played one "tough" team this year, and lost (to WNEC). WNEC...the same team that needed to score with under two minutes to go to beat the ECFC champion, Norwich. Honestly...even at 9-1...what team did Endicott beat that is even remotely "impressive", considering they only beat two teams with an above .500 record (Framingham State and Salve)? When you are hanging your hat, and body of work, on a 7 point win over Salve (who isn't a bad team, just not an overly impressive one)...your body of work is pretty terrible. Especially when you look at these "Regional Rankings"...where it is pretty obvious that whoever is voting on this poll is looking at nothing more that overall wins and loses...and doing zero homework on who is playing who.
These conferences (NEFC and ECFC), with their utterly weak overall play and performance, are killing the East Region. An additional problem that we are seeing right now is because of their (the NEFC and ECFC leagues) geographical location, they pretty much have to remain in the East Region (with the current 500 mile rule). So now...unlike almost every NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep who could be shipped to the South Region (or even the North Region in some instances)...the East Region is stuck with these two stellar Pool A reps, and also get to avoid a #1 seed like MUC in the first round.
Honestly...I think running up scores on teams in almost every case is in ridiculously poor taste...but if I were an NJAC, MAC, E8, or LL rep, I would be hard pressed to take my foot off the gas against any NEFC/ECFC team in the first round match-up in attempt to send a message to the NCAA that they need to do a better job of managing the tournament.
Not sure what you are getting at here...I never said that you said it was pathetic. I am saying that the regional poll that has Endicott above Fisher is pathetic. And it is.
And you can ask anyone...I am the furthest thing from a St. John Fisher fan...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 11:38:04 AM
My hopes and dreams would be answered if Endicott plays Fisher in an ECAC game.
My guess is that it would go something like:
St. John Fisher - 63
Endicott - 21
But Endicott would score all 21 with 3 minutes remaining and then next year say 'We scored 21 on big bad St. John Fisher!'
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:54:04 AMMatt, you make me laugh.
Kind of like LD...I am an E8 fan...but you can check on the E8 board and see that very recently I went into detail on why this hasn't been a good year for the E8. By Charles' logic, I should take offense to my own remarks about "bashing" the E8. Looks like I owe myself an apology...
Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 11:55:57 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:54:04 AMMatt, you make me laugh.
Kind of like LD...I am an E8 fan...but you can check on the E8 board and see that very recently I went into detail on why this hasn't been a good year for the E8. By Charles' logic, I should take offense to my own remarks about "bashing" the E8. Looks like I owe myself an apology...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 11:45:25 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Actually, what's offensive is the overall scheduling practices of these conferences. If they don't change their ways, they should just adopt the NESCAC standard of inter-scheduling and no playoff bids. The Committee needs to begin to understand that rewarding fake SOS numbers (since inter-scheduling automatically helps to inflate SOS standings for many of these "strong" teams) is having a backward affect on teams' desires to schedule stronger teams in OOC scenarios. There is no real reward to strong OOC scheduling under current scenarios if your conference schedule already contains 6 or 7 other strong teams.
[EDIT: I want to parse out Salve Regina from this discussion. That team took some nice risks and performed reasonably in doing so. However, the NEFC should not be able to just sit there and ride the coattails of one team that made the right decisions. If Salve was in the clubhouse at 9-1, I'd be the first person out front to say they deserve a Pool C bid, if nothing else, to reward that scheduling.]
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 12:09:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 11:45:25 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Actually, what's offensive is the overall scheduling practices of these conferences. If they don't change their ways, they should just adopt the NESCAC standard of inter-scheduling and no playoff bids. The Committee needs to begin to understand that rewarding fake SOS numbers (since inter-scheduling automatically helps to inflate SOS standings for many of these "strong" teams) is having a backward affect on teams' desires to schedule stronger teams in OOC scenarios. There is no real reward to strong OOC scheduling under current scenarios if your conference schedule already contains 6 or 7 other strong teams.
[EDIT: I want to parse out Salve Regina from this discussion. That team took some nice risks and performed reasonably in doing so. However, the NEFC should not be able to just sit there and ride the coattails of one team that made the right decisions. If Salve was in the clubhouse at 9-1, I'd be the first person out front to say they deserve a Pool C bid, if nothing else, to reward that scheduling.]
Frank...we often don't see eye to eye...but like you, I also give Salve some credit. If they finished 9-1 or 10-1 this year and won the NEFC with their only loss being to Montclair...I think they would be a good candidate, and would not receive much grief about getting a bid.
For the NEFC's sake, it was probably unfortunate that they lost to WNEC and Endicott this year.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 12:27:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 12:09:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 11:45:25 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Actually, what's offensive is the overall scheduling practices of these conferences. If they don't change their ways, they should just adopt the NESCAC standard of inter-scheduling and no playoff bids. The Committee needs to begin to understand that rewarding fake SOS numbers (since inter-scheduling automatically helps to inflate SOS standings for many of these "strong" teams) is having a backward affect on teams' desires to schedule stronger teams in OOC scenarios. There is no real reward to strong OOC scheduling under current scenarios if your conference schedule already contains 6 or 7 other strong teams.
[EDIT: I want to parse out Salve Regina from this discussion. That team took some nice risks and performed reasonably in doing so. However, the NEFC should not be able to just sit there and ride the coattails of one team that made the right decisions. If Salve was in the clubhouse at 9-1, I'd be the first person out front to say they deserve a Pool C bid, if nothing else, to reward that scheduling.]
Frank...we often don't see eye to eye...but like you, I also give Salve some credit. If they finished 9-1 or 10-1 this year and won the NEFC with their only loss being to Montclair...I think they would be a good candidate, and would not receive much grief about getting a bid.
For the NEFC's sake, it was probably unfortunate that they lost to WNEC and Endicott this year.
If they won the NEFC they would have gotten the AQ. DOH!
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 12:39:19 PMDid you walk over to see them Staurday?Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 12:27:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 12:09:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 11:45:25 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Actually, what's offensive is the overall scheduling practices of these conferences. If they don't change their ways, they should just adopt the NESCAC standard of inter-scheduling and no playoff bids. The Committee needs to begin to understand that rewarding fake SOS numbers (since inter-scheduling automatically helps to inflate SOS standings for many of these "strong" teams) is having a backward affect on teams' desires to schedule stronger teams in OOC scenarios. There is no real reward to strong OOC scheduling under current scenarios if your conference schedule already contains 6 or 7 other strong teams.
[EDIT: I want to parse out Salve Regina from this discussion. That team took some nice risks and performed reasonably in doing so. However, the NEFC should not be able to just sit there and ride the coattails of one team that made the right decisions. If Salve was in the clubhouse at 9-1, I'd be the first person out front to say they deserve a Pool C bid, if nothing else, to reward that scheduling.]
Frank...we often don't see eye to eye...but like you, I also give Salve some credit. If they finished 9-1 or 10-1 this year and won the NEFC with their only loss being to Montclair...I think they would be a good candidate, and would not receive much grief about getting a bid.
For the NEFC's sake, it was probably unfortunate that they lost to WNEC and Endicott this year.
If they won the NEFC they would have gotten the AQ. DOH!
Right, I meant that if Salve sat in Endicott's shoes, there'd be no argument here from me about their placement.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 12:39:19 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 12:27:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 12:09:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 11:45:25 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Actually, what's offensive is the overall scheduling practices of these conferences. If they don't change their ways, they should just adopt the NESCAC standard of inter-scheduling and no playoff bids. The Committee needs to begin to understand that rewarding fake SOS numbers (since inter-scheduling automatically helps to inflate SOS standings for many of these "strong" teams) is having a backward affect on teams' desires to schedule stronger teams in OOC scenarios. There is no real reward to strong OOC scheduling under current scenarios if your conference schedule already contains 6 or 7 other strong teams.
[EDIT: I want to parse out Salve Regina from this discussion. That team took some nice risks and performed reasonably in doing so. However, the NEFC should not be able to just sit there and ride the coattails of one team that made the right decisions. If Salve was in the clubhouse at 9-1, I'd be the first person out front to say they deserve a Pool C bid, if nothing else, to reward that scheduling.]
Frank...we often don't see eye to eye...but like you, I also give Salve some credit. If they finished 9-1 or 10-1 this year and won the NEFC with their only loss being to Montclair...I think they would be a good candidate, and would not receive much grief about getting a bid.
For the NEFC's sake, it was probably unfortunate that they lost to WNEC and Endicott this year.
If they won the NEFC they would have gotten the AQ. DOH!
Right, I meant that if Salve sat in Endicott's shoes, there'd be no argument here from me about their placement.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 01:08:46 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 12:39:19 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 12:27:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 12:09:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 11:45:25 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Actually, what's offensive is the overall scheduling practices of these conferences. If they don't change their ways, they should just adopt the NESCAC standard of inter-scheduling and no playoff bids. The Committee needs to begin to understand that rewarding fake SOS numbers (since inter-scheduling automatically helps to inflate SOS standings for many of these "strong" teams) is having a backward affect on teams' desires to schedule stronger teams in OOC scenarios. There is no real reward to strong OOC scheduling under current scenarios if your conference schedule already contains 6 or 7 other strong teams.
[EDIT: I want to parse out Salve Regina from this discussion. That team took some nice risks and performed reasonably in doing so. However, the NEFC should not be able to just sit there and ride the coattails of one team that made the right decisions. If Salve was in the clubhouse at 9-1, I'd be the first person out front to say they deserve a Pool C bid, if nothing else, to reward that scheduling.]
Frank...we often don't see eye to eye...but like you, I also give Salve some credit. If they finished 9-1 or 10-1 this year and won the NEFC with their only loss being to Montclair...I think they would be a good candidate, and would not receive much grief about getting a bid.
For the NEFC's sake, it was probably unfortunate that they lost to WNEC and Endicott this year.
If they won the NEFC they would have gotten the AQ. DOH!
Right, I meant that if Salve sat in Endicott's shoes, there'd be no argument here from me about their placement.
This is completely hypothetical...but if Salve had finished 9-1, but had lost to WNEC like Endicott did and therefore didn't advance to the NEFC Championship game...but had beaten Union and Montclair in their non-league games...I would be OK with Salve getting serious Pool C consideration.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 01:13:05 PMUnion hasn't beaten anyone with a winning record yet, Endicott held SR to 8fd and Montclair held them to 7fd. I'm pretty sure nobody has seen Endicott play except for Frank.Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 01:08:46 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 12:39:19 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 12:27:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 12:09:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 11:45:25 AMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 10, 2011, 11:36:00 AM
You know what is offensive? The overall quality of the NEFC and the ECFC. Get better...quickly...please...for the entire Region's sake.
Actually, what's offensive is the overall scheduling practices of these conferences. If they don't change their ways, they should just adopt the NESCAC standard of inter-scheduling and no playoff bids. The Committee needs to begin to understand that rewarding fake SOS numbers (since inter-scheduling automatically helps to inflate SOS standings for many of these "strong" teams) is having a backward affect on teams' desires to schedule stronger teams in OOC scenarios. There is no real reward to strong OOC scheduling under current scenarios if your conference schedule already contains 6 or 7 other strong teams.
[EDIT: I want to parse out Salve Regina from this discussion. That team took some nice risks and performed reasonably in doing so. However, the NEFC should not be able to just sit there and ride the coattails of one team that made the right decisions. If Salve was in the clubhouse at 9-1, I'd be the first person out front to say they deserve a Pool C bid, if nothing else, to reward that scheduling.]
Frank...we often don't see eye to eye...but like you, I also give Salve some credit. If they finished 9-1 or 10-1 this year and won the NEFC with their only loss being to Montclair...I think they would be a good candidate, and would not receive much grief about getting a bid.
For the NEFC's sake, it was probably unfortunate that they lost to WNEC and Endicott this year.
If they won the NEFC they would have gotten the AQ. DOH!
Right, I meant that if Salve sat in Endicott's shoes, there'd be no argument here from me about their placement.
This is completely hypothetical...but if Salve had finished 9-1, but had lost to WNEC like Endicott did and therefore didn't advance to the NEFC Championship game...but had beaten Union and Montclair in their non-league games...I would be OK with Salve getting serious Pool C consideration.
I'd be ok with anyone at 9-1 getting in with wins over Union and Montclair.
Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 01:29:06 PM
Union hasn't beaten anyone with a winning record yet, Endicott held SR to 8fd and Montclair held them to 7fd. I'm pretty sure nobody has seen Endicott play except for Frank.
Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 01:29:06 PM
Union hasn't beaten anyone with a winning record yet, Endicott held SR to 8fd and Montclair held them to 7fd. I'm pretty sure nobody has seen Endicott play except for Frank.
Quote from: Timeforachange on November 10, 2011, 01:36:04 PMQuote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 01:29:06 PM
Union hasn't beaten anyone with a winning record yet, Endicott held SR to 8fd and Montclair held them to 7fd. I'm pretty sure nobody has seen Endicott play except for Frank.
Who cares, Endicott would still get blown out by any respectable team in the East...
Quote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 01:29:06 PM
Union hasn't beaten anyone with a winning record yet, Endicott held SR to 8fd and Montclair held them to 7fd. I'm pretty sure nobody has seen Endicott play except for Frank.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 02:26:07 PMQuote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 01:29:06 PM
Union hasn't beaten anyone with a winning record yet, Endicott held SR to 8fd and Montclair held them to 7fd. I'm pretty sure nobody has seen Endicott play except for Frank.
Who said I saw Endicott play? I saw a Play of the Week clip of a long field goal... Daz about it...
And, that's my point, charles. Whose fault is it that nobody has seen them play? Ours or Endicott's? SCHEDULE SOMEBODY, DAMMIT!
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 10, 2011, 03:35:34 PM
After reading this weeks "Around the East" column I have to ask a question. Andrew states, and I am paraphrasing, if Cortland wins Cortaca, they might get a pool C bid with serious help. Does anyone see a scenario other than Superman reversing the rotation of the earth to go back in time and erase one of the two losses Cortland had, where they might actually have a shot? If there is a scenario, I want go light a candle or do something to help the cause, but honestly I don't see it in the cards. Am I missing something?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 10, 2011, 03:41:43 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 10, 2011, 03:35:34 PM
After reading this weeks "Around the East" column I have to ask a question. Andrew states, and I am paraphrasing, if Cortland wins Cortaca, they might get a pool C bid with serious help. Does anyone see a scenario other than Superman reversing the rotation of the earth to go back in time and erase one of the two losses Cortland had, where they might actually have a shot? If there is a scenario, I want go light a candle or do something to help the cause, but honestly I don't see it in the cards. Am I missing something?
Well, there's always blackmail...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 03:43:38 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 10, 2011, 03:41:43 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 10, 2011, 03:35:34 PM
After reading this weeks "Around the East" column I have to ask a question. Andrew states, and I am paraphrasing, if Cortland wins Cortaca, they might get a pool C bid with serious help. Does anyone see a scenario other than Superman reversing the rotation of the earth to go back in time and erase one of the two losses Cortland had, where they might actually have a shot? If there is a scenario, I want go light a candle or do something to help the cause, but honestly I don't see it in the cards. Am I missing something?
Well, there's always blackmail...
I'm sure in that apocalypse of events, St. John Fisher would need to lose to Hartwick as well.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 04:41:12 PMGood news and bad news...the good news is that I wasn't missing something. The bad news is that I wasn't missing something.Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 10, 2011, 03:43:38 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 10, 2011, 03:41:43 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 10, 2011, 03:35:34 PM
After reading this weeks "Around the East" column I have to ask a question. Andrew states, and I am paraphrasing, if Cortland wins Cortaca, they might get a pool C bid with serious help. Does anyone see a scenario other than Superman reversing the rotation of the earth to go back in time and erase one of the two losses Cortland had, where they might actually have a shot? If there is a scenario, I want go light a candle or do something to help the cause, but honestly I don't see it in the cards. Am I missing something?
Well, there's always blackmail...
I'm sure in that apocalypse of events, St. John Fisher would need to lose to Hartwick as well.
The list of scenarios include Penn State forfeiting this weekend, the Pope converting to Judaism and 'Gro winning this weekend's "Play of the Week."
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 10, 2011, 01:12:28 PMQuote from: Charles on November 10, 2011, 12:52:54 PM
Did you walk over to see them Staurday?
HUH?!
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 13, 2011, 03:43:41 PM
so are the d3 projections a prediction of how the NCAA committee will see it or are they what d3.com thinks the field should be?
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 13, 2011, 03:43:41 PM
so are the d3 projections a prediction of how the NCAA committee will see it or are they what d3.com thinks the field should be?
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 13, 2011, 03:43:41 PM
so are the d3 projections a prediction of how the NCAA committee will see it or are they what d3.com thinks the field should be?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 03:45:53 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on November 13, 2011, 03:43:41 PM
so are the d3 projections a prediction of how the NCAA committee will see it or are they what d3.com thinks the field should be?
Prediction of the field. It's clear that we don't believe Endicott is stronger than some of the 2-loss teams -- however, we must use the anticipated final Regional Rankings (that we will never see) to simulate the process. Endicott would be the first Pool C nominee in the East -- and would not be chosen until the final Pool C choice, most likely. No other East team likely saw the light of day in Pool C either way (whether or not Endicott was chosen).
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 13, 2011, 03:48:27 PM
of course it would perhaps be tooting Fisher's horn (and I am far from convinced they deserve it) but then why not send a statement to the committee of how things should be. Who has more knowledge and insight than this staff? ....instead of validating the NCAA nonsense, like the example Yanks99 gave previously where the committee had MUC 3 in the North in week 9 last year...
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 13, 2011, 03:50:39 PM
Well, honestly, we've tried that tactic the past couple years, 82. It doesn't work.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 13, 2011, 03:54:44 PM
Right. That should be dealt with separately, and we have, with this front page piece:
http://www.d3football.com/playoffs/2011/two-loss-teams-need-not-apply
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 13, 2011, 05:05:08 PM"Results" is the wording used in the Handbook.
Almost feel bad asking but gonna anyway! Curious why Cortland wasn't mentioned as a two loss team in the article? This is going to sound weird but does the quality of a teams loss come into play? Based on what's being said the answer is no but Cortland's losses were very close losses to two ranked teams. Either game could of gone the other way but didn't I well know. They are a tough team that I am sorry let it get away.
Quote from: RedDragonFan on November 13, 2011, 05:05:08 PM
Almost feel bad asking but gonna anyway! Curious why Cortland wasn't mentioned as a two loss team in the article? This is going to sound weird but does the quality of a teams loss come into play? Based on what's being said the answer is no but Cortland's losses were very close losses to two ranked teams. Either game could of gone the other way but didn't I well know. They are a tough team that I am sorry let it get away.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 13, 2011, 05:32:18 PMQuote from: RedDragonFan on November 13, 2011, 05:05:08 PM
Almost feel bad asking but gonna anyway! Curious why Cortland wasn't mentioned as a two loss team in the article? This is going to sound weird but does the quality of a teams loss come into play? Based on what's being said the answer is no but Cortland's losses were very close losses to two ranked teams. Either game could of gone the other way but didn't I well know. They are a tough team that I am sorry let it get away.
I could list a lot of two-loss teams -- Cortland would be behind Montclair, of course, because of the loss, and their SOS was under .500, so I did not list them.
Quote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 06:26:50 PM
After all the kvetching, the East has teams in every bracket...except the one with Mount Union. :)
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 13, 2011, 06:34:29 PM
There's reverse psychology at play for you, 82. You like? :)
The bracket, for those who still haven't seen:
http://www.d3football.com/notables/2011/11/bracket-released
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 06:28:02 PMQuote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 06:26:50 PM
After all the kvetching, the East has teams in every bracket...except the one with Mount Union. :)
They must have been reading....
I would really like to see a SJF/DVC Rd 2 matchup!!!
Quote from: skratch29 on November 13, 2011, 06:37:24 PM
when do they pick the ecac games?
Quote from: RunningRobby25 on November 13, 2011, 06:39:28 PM
First person to find out what time Fisher plays at JH please let me know.
I have a 6pm flight to Miami on Saturday but would love to start the day by watching the alma mater!
Feels good to have them back in the postseason! Now what bracket are they in so I can follow the banter?
Quote from: RunningRobby25 on November 13, 2011, 06:39:28 PM
First person to find out what time Fisher plays at JH please let me know.
I have a 6pm flight to Miami on Saturday but would love to start the day by watching the alma mater!
Feels good to have them back in the postseason! Now what bracket are they in so I can follow the banter?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 06:39:46 PM
If you have questions for us to ask the Committee Chair tonight on "In the HuddLLe" -- please place them in this board preceded by ****
Quote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 07:17:25 PM
Are you sure about that? We aren't sure who the top seeds are in some brackets. We're not sure if Del Val and Mount are top seeds or UST and Wabash.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 13, 2011, 07:14:27 PM
yes, except that it will be linfield or cal luth coming east, wesley is apparently the 2 seed in their bracket.
Quote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 07:17:25 PM
Are you sure about that? We aren't sure who the top seeds are in some brackets. We're not sure if Del Val and Mount are top seeds or UST and Wabash.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 13, 2011, 07:33:14 PM
82 -- in 2009 they refused to give us any seedings at all, even claiming, somehow, that seedings had NEVER EXISTED.
Ever since then, I won't be surprised at seedings. I did request them.
BTW, I think LD11 is correct that the top seeds tend to be the host teams in the corners.
Quote from: rams1102 on November 13, 2011, 07:33:44 PM
None of this makes sense. The only thing that doed is that the brackets have UWW and MU in the finals. To me the brackets are pure BS and POLITICS. >:(
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 07:38:52 PM
Quick question the St. John Fisher guys...
Is the picture that I keep having to view on the front page a recent pic, or one from 1984?
Quote from: Timeforachange on November 13, 2011, 07:41:15 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 07:38:52 PM
Quick question the St. John Fisher guys...
Is the picture that I keep having to view on the front page a recent pic, or one from 1984?
Recent, they changed their helmets back to the white ones...
But this is the kid on the front page in case you were wondering about the mullet coming out of the back of the helmet...
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fathletics.sjfc.edu%2Fimages%2F2011%2F9%2F1%2FTroy%2520Sant.jpg&hash=92833012ab7c28c8834296f593a4a4937c5d7fb2)
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2011, 07:53:54 PM
LD is right. The NCAA has finally shown some balls.
Although I can't say I'm not suprised, but I'm not shocked that SJF is in. I've always had this feeling in my gut that the NCAA uses common sense when making selections like this. The E8 helps out two teams looking for a league (Salisbury and Frostburg) and one of its original members (SJF) gets left out because of the move. To me, this is the NCAA telling leagues that add good teams that they might get thrown a bone come playoff time.
Is the NCAA telling Hobart to shape up and add some teams to their schedule?
Quote from: rams1102 on November 13, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
The end result is MTU plays UWW. What else is new?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:05:38 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2011, 07:53:54 PM
LD is right. The NCAA has finally shown some balls.
Although I can't say I'm not suprised, but I'm not shocked that SJF is in. I've always had this feeling in my gut that the NCAA uses common sense when making selections like this. The E8 helps out two teams looking for a league (Salisbury and Frostburg) and one of its original members (SJF) gets left out because of the move. To me, this is the NCAA telling leagues that add good teams that they might get thrown a bone come playoff time.
Is the NCAA telling Hobart to shape up and add some teams to their schedule?
I actually just said that in a conversation with PBR on Facebook. I think Hobart probably got the worst seeding in the entire bracket and I think it says something.
Quote from: rams1102 on November 13, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
The end result is MTU plays UWW. What else is new?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:14:55 PMQuote from: rams1102 on November 13, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
The end result is MTU plays UWW. What else is new?
What's your issue dude? This is the best bracket we've seen in many years.
Quote from: dlip on November 13, 2011, 08:20:31 PM
dlip likes the brackets and is really looking forward to the outcome of many of the match-ups. Bart at Wesley will be interesting. dlip will tell you one thing, if Strang and co play like they have as of late, the only interesting thing about it will be watching pumkins go through the homogonization process like milk. As far as the NEFC is concerned, welcome WNEC to the big time. If you can take out Salisbury, or for that matter keep it close, dlip will gain some serious respect for ya. He may even go as far as to say you are the best team in the greater Springfield Mass area.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2011, 08:24:09 PMQuote from: dlip on November 13, 2011, 08:20:31 PM
dlip likes the brackets and is really looking forward to the outcome of many of the match-ups. Bart at Wesley will be interesting. dlip will tell you one thing, if Strang and co play like they have as of late, the only interesting thing about it will be watching pumkins go through the homogonization process like milk. As far as the NEFC is concerned, welcome WNEC to the big time. If you can take out Salisbury, or for that matter keep it close, dlip will gain some serious respect for ya. He may even go as far as to say you are the best team in the greater Springfield Mass area.
Until about 2 or 3 years ago, the WNEC coaching staff were all part time. Don't be suprised if they show up in the NCAAs in the future.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:26:26 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2011, 08:24:09 PMQuote from: dlip on November 13, 2011, 08:20:31 PM
dlip likes the brackets and is really looking forward to the outcome of many of the match-ups. Bart at Wesley will be interesting. dlip will tell you one thing, if Strang and co play like they have as of late, the only interesting thing about it will be watching pumkins go through the homogonization process like milk. As far as the NEFC is concerned, welcome WNEC to the big time. If you can take out Salisbury, or for that matter keep it close, dlip will gain some serious respect for ya. He may even go as far as to say you are the best team in the greater Springfield Mass area.
Until about 2 or 3 years ago, the WNEC coaching staff were all part time. Don't be suprised if they show up in the NCAAs in the future.
Also, don't be surprised by a 50 pt loss.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:14:55 PMQuote from: rams1102 on November 13, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
The end result is MTU plays UWW. What else is new?
What's your issue dude? This is the best bracket we've seen in many years.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:05:38 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2011, 07:53:54 PM
LD is right. The NCAA has finally shown some balls.
Although I can't say I'm not suprised, but I'm not shocked that SJF is in. I've always had this feeling in my gut that the NCAA uses common sense when making selections like this. The E8 helps out two teams looking for a league (Salisbury and Frostburg) and one of its original members (SJF) gets left out because of the move. To me, this is the NCAA telling leagues that add good teams that they might get thrown a bone come playoff time.
Is the NCAA telling Hobart to shape up and add some teams to their schedule?
I actually just said that in a conversation with PBR on Facebook. I think Hobart probably got the worst seeding in the entire bracket and I think it says something.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 13, 2011, 08:52:16 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:05:38 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2011, 07:53:54 PM
LD is right. The NCAA has finally shown some balls.
Although I can't say I'm not suprised, but I'm not shocked that SJF is in. I've always had this feeling in my gut that the NCAA uses common sense when making selections like this. The E8 helps out two teams looking for a league (Salisbury and Frostburg) and one of its original members (SJF) gets left out because of the move. To me, this is the NCAA telling leagues that add good teams that they might get thrown a bone come playoff time.
Is the NCAA telling Hobart to shape up and add some teams to their schedule?
I actually just said that in a conversation with PBR on Facebook. I think Hobart probably got the worst seeding in the entire bracket and I think it says something.
I have said this elsewhere, and with other sports, but the NCAA committees love irony. There was certainly someone in the room that knew that Hobart had the opportunity to schedule Wesley this year but declined.
Quote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 09:17:43 PM
People from the OAC are complaining that Whitewater has no challenge before Salem. However, I see them as having Kean, Del Val, St. Thomas or Salisbury as a challenge before then. Am I wrong to think those teams could provide a challenge?
Quote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 09:22:08 PM
I'm sure that will inflame things (If they actually come over here to read anythng :P).
Quote from: wesleydad on November 13, 2011, 09:24:34 PM
pg04, having seen all but st thomas, all 3 of the other teams would have to really up their overall game to challenge uww unless uww plays a bad game. out of the 3 slaisbury may be the toughest since they run the triple option. i dont think kean would have any chance as their offense is limited which is not a good thing against uww. del val would be interesting since they are young. i dont know about st thomas, didnt see them this year, too far of a drive to catch one of their games.
Quote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 09:17:43 PMTommies and Salisbury, definitely, IMHO.
People from the OAC are complaining that Whitewater has no challenge before Salem. However, I see them as having Kean, Del Val, St. Thomas or Salisbury as a challenge before then. Am I wrong to think those teams could provide a challenge?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 09:27:20 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 13, 2011, 09:24:34 PM
pg04, having seen all but st thomas, all 3 of the other teams would have to really up their overall game to challenge uww unless uww plays a bad game. out of the 3 slaisbury may be the toughest since they run the triple option. i dont think kean would have any chance as their offense is limited which is not a good thing against uww. del val would be interesting since they are young. i dont know about st thomas, didnt see them this year, too far of a drive to catch one of their games.
Yeah but the real point here is that 30 of 32 teams need to 'really up their overall game to challenge UWW'. I think DVC, Kean, Salisbury etc have as good a chance as any.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 13, 2011, 09:32:50 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 09:27:20 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 13, 2011, 09:24:34 PM
pg04, having seen all but st thomas, all 3 of the other teams would have to really up their overall game to challenge uww unless uww plays a bad game. out of the 3 slaisbury may be the toughest since they run the triple option. i dont think kean would have any chance as their offense is limited which is not a good thing against uww. del val would be interesting since they are young. i dont know about st thomas, didnt see them this year, too far of a drive to catch one of their games.
Yeah but the real point here is that3029 of 32 teams need to 'really up their overall game to challenge UWW'. I think DVC, Kean, Salisbury etc have as good a chance as any.
I can readily think of at least one exception to your claim - in the quarters last year, NCC LED UWW in the 4th quarter. UWW posters say they felt PLENTY challenged.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 13, 2011, 09:44:07 PMThat is when the match up should appear... when there will be only 8 teams left.
Just looked at the brackets, and am way behind everyone else on this...but...wow. Regions be damned I guess. Personally...I love it. This has to be better then letting in two NEFC teams into the tournament, having an ECFC rep, sending Mt. Union over...and then calling it the East Region.
SJFC...good luck against Hopkins. Fisher vs. Del Valley would be a great second round match up (obviously using some presumption here that both would win). Also...cannot believe it could be Salisbury vs. Kean winner against UWW in the quarters...this is the craziest bracket I have ever seen...
Quote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 08:58:25 PMIf you remember , Wesley actually got seeded 1st above UWW last year. So the committee has a little history and seeing Del Val as a #1 is good
Just for all's information, just read on the d3 twitter that UMU, UWW, Mary-Hardin Baylor and Del Val are the 4 #1 seeds, so Del Val did get a #1 seed after all the trepidation, just not with the brackets we'd ever assume would have taken shape! I think it's going to be a very interesting playoff!
Remember, UMU and UWW have had significant scares in the regular season, This year may be the year that one of them doesn't make it to the end..
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 13, 2011, 09:47:41 PM
Whatever else one may say about it, this is certainly the most intriguing bracket I can ever recall. All sorts of matchups (and potential matchups) that have probably never occurred before. Potentially, at least, the airlines are in for a windfall!
It is also the chance for the East Region to 'put up or shut up'. Rather than all together to 'eat' each other, then by 'eaten' by the guys in Alliance, the East Region teams are all over the bracket. Time to show the 'haters' what you have (or haven't) got.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 13, 2011, 09:46:49 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 13, 2011, 09:44:07 PMThat is when the match up should appear... when there will be only 8 teams left.
Just looked at the brackets, and am way behind everyone else on this...but...wow. Regions be damned I guess. Personally...I love it. This has to be better then letting in two NEFC teams into the tournament, having an ECFC rep, sending Mt. Union over...and then calling it the East Region.
SJFC...good luck against Hopkins. Fisher vs. Del Valley would be a great second round match up (obviously using some presumption here that both would win). Also...cannot believe it could be Salisbury vs. Kean winner against UWW in the quarters...this is the craziest bracket I have ever seen...
Quote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 10:06:22 PM
If Delaware Valley is the top seed in its bracket, that'll be news to Del Val. I spoke with the administrators tonight and they were told there are no seeds and no decision has been made on who will host beyond the upcoming game. So it's not clear whether Del Val is even the two seed (i.e. hosting Johns Hopkins).
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 13, 2011, 09:49:56 PMThanks, I am sorry that I misunderstood.Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 13, 2011, 09:46:49 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 13, 2011, 09:44:07 PMThat is when the match up should appear... when there will be only 8 teams left.
Just looked at the brackets, and am way behind everyone else on this...but...wow. Regions be damned I guess. Personally...I love it. This has to be better then letting in two NEFC teams into the tournament, having an ECFC rep, sending Mt. Union over...and then calling it the East Region.
SJFC...good luck against Hopkins. Fisher vs. Del Valley would be a great second round match up (obviously using some presumption here that both would win). Also...cannot believe it could be Salisbury vs. Kean winner against UWW in the quarters...this is the craziest bracket I have ever seen...
That is what I thought I said...Kean (assuming they beat CN in the first round) would play Salisbury (assuming they beat WNEC in the first round) in the second round...with the winner playing against UWW in the quarterfinals (again...presuming, almost withouth question that UWW gets that far).
Quote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:08:06 PMQuote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 10:06:22 PM
If Delaware Valley is the top seed in its bracket, that'll be news to Del Val. I spoke with the administrators tonight and they were told there are no seeds and no decision has been made on who will host beyond the upcoming game. So it's not clear whether Del Val is even the two seed (i.e. hosting Johns Hopkins).
According to Pat Coleman and the D3Twitter they are, in the discussion with the committee this evening.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 10:09:28 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:08:06 PMQuote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 10:06:22 PM
If Delaware Valley is the top seed in its bracket, that'll be news to Del Val. I spoke with the administrators tonight and they were told there are no seeds and no decision has been made on who will host beyond the upcoming game. So it's not clear whether Del Val is even the two seed (i.e. hosting Johns Hopkins).
According to Pat Coleman and the D3Twitter they are, in the discussion with the committee this evening.
It was according to our show -- the Committee Chair told them to us. I'll post a YouTube of the interview later tonight.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 13, 2011, 10:09:04 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 13, 2011, 09:49:56 PMThanks, I am sorry that I misunderstood.Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 13, 2011, 09:46:49 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 13, 2011, 09:44:07 PMThat is when the match up should appear... when there will be only 8 teams left.
Just looked at the brackets, and am way behind everyone else on this...but...wow. Regions be damned I guess. Personally...I love it. This has to be better then letting in two NEFC teams into the tournament, having an ECFC rep, sending Mt. Union over...and then calling it the East Region.
SJFC...good luck against Hopkins. Fisher vs. Del Valley would be a great second round match up (obviously using some presumption here that both would win). Also...cannot believe it could be Salisbury vs. Kean winner against UWW in the quarters...this is the craziest bracket I have ever seen...
That is what I thought I said...Kean (assuming they beat CN in the first round) would play Salisbury (assuming they beat WNEC in the first round) in the second round...with the winner playing against UWW in the quarterfinals (again...presuming, almost withouth question that UWW gets that far).
Quote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:10:21 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 10:09:28 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:08:06 PMQuote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 10:06:22 PM
If Delaware Valley is the top seed in its bracket, that'll be news to Del Val. I spoke with the administrators tonight and they were told there are no seeds and no decision has been made on who will host beyond the upcoming game. So it's not clear whether Del Val is even the two seed (i.e. hosting Johns Hopkins).
According to Pat Coleman and the D3Twitter they are, in the discussion with the committee this evening.
It was according to our show -- the Committee Chair told them to us. I'll post a YouTube of the interview later tonight.
Well I was getting it from the twitter post. Sorry I didn't listen to your "show"
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 10:14:24 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:10:21 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 10:09:28 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:08:06 PMQuote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 10:06:22 PM
If Delaware Valley is the top seed in its bracket, that'll be news to Del Val. I spoke with the administrators tonight and they were told there are no seeds and no decision has been made on who will host beyond the upcoming game. So it's not clear whether Del Val is even the two seed (i.e. hosting Johns Hopkins).
According to Pat Coleman and the D3Twitter they are, in the discussion with the committee this evening.
It was according to our show -- the Committee Chair told them to us. I'll post a YouTube of the interview later tonight.
Well I was getting it from the twitter post. Sorry I didn't listen to your "show"
Feel free to start one for your conference if you think you can do it better. Competition is a nice thing.
Anyway, subjectivity is now possible based on her discussion concerning the Fisher vs. Endicott scenario... it was an enlightening interview and worth the listen.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 10:14:24 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:10:21 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 10:09:28 PMQuote from: pg04 on November 13, 2011, 10:08:06 PMQuote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 10:06:22 PM
If Delaware Valley is the top seed in its bracket, that'll be news to Del Val. I spoke with the administrators tonight and they were told there are no seeds and no decision has been made on who will host beyond the upcoming game. So it's not clear whether Del Val is even the two seed (i.e. hosting Johns Hopkins).
According to Pat Coleman and the D3Twitter they are, in the discussion with the committee this evening.
It was according to our show -- the Committee Chair told them to us. I'll post a YouTube of the interview later tonight.
Well I was getting it from the twitter post. Sorry I didn't listen to your "show"
Feel free to start one for your conference if you think you can do it better. Competition is a nice thing.
Anyway, subjectivity is now possible based on her discussion concerning the Fisher vs. Endicott scenario... it was an enlightening interview and worth the listen.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:14:55 PMQuote from: rams1102 on November 13, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
The end result is MTU plays UWW. What else is new?
What's your issue dude? This is the best bracket we've seen in many years.
Quote from: HSCTiger74 on November 13, 2011, 11:10:46 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2011, 08:14:55 PMQuote from: rams1102 on November 13, 2011, 08:13:37 PM
The end result is MTU plays UWW. What else is new?
What's your issue dude? This is the best bracket we've seen in many years.
I suspect that he's po'd because two 2-loss NJAC teams, including the one he supports, were left out of the brackets and SJF got in.
QuoteI suspect that he's po'd because two 2-loss NJAC teams, including the one he supports, were left out of the brackets and SJF got in.
Quote from: gordonmann on November 13, 2011, 11:31:28 PMQuoteI suspect that he's po'd because two 2-loss NJAC teams, including the one he supports, were left out of the brackets and SJF got in.
PG is a Brockport alum so that wasn't an issue.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 13, 2011, 09:47:41 PM
Whatever else one may say about it, this is certainly the most intriguing bracket I can ever recall. All sorts of matchups (and potential matchups) that have probably never occurred before. Potentially, at least, the airlines are in for a windfall!
It is also the chance for the East Region to 'put up or shut up'. Rather than all together to 'eat' each other, then by 'eaten' by the guys in Alliance, the East Region teams are all over the bracket. Time to show the 'haters' what you have (or haven't) got.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2011, 10:14:24 PM
Anyway, subjectivity is now possible based on her discussion concerning the Fisher vs. Endicott scenario... it was an enlightening interview and worth the listen.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2011, 03:50:45 PM
AUKaz, i also found the piece of information about Hobart turning down the game with Wesley and then getting them in the playoffs interesting. Waiting to hear about Hobart from anyone who saw them play this year.
Quote from: bleedpurple on November 14, 2011, 09:13:08 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2011, 03:50:45 PM
AUKaz, i also found the piece of information about Hobart turning down the game with Wesley and then getting them in the playoffs interesting. Waiting to hear about Hobart from anyone who saw them play this year.
Nothing against any of the Hobart fans, but I will be rooting for Wesley in this one. One thing UW-W and Wesley have in common is the unwillingness of schools to play them. I know a school has a right to say yes and no to games, but I also have a right to express an opinion about it. I always find it puzzling at best when a school has a chance to play a higher level of competition and turns it down. I think it's great the NCAA National Selection Committee brought Hobart to Wesley. If Hobart turned down the Wesley game to have a better chance to make the playoffs, I guess they got their reward. We'll see how competitive they are now that they are there.
I was bummed when Albion beat Adrian because I was hoping Adrian would be coming to UW-W in the first round. They scheduled a home and home against UW-W for 2010 and 2011, but backed out of the second year.
Quote from: bleedpurple on November 14, 2011, 09:13:08 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2011, 03:50:45 PM
AUKaz, i also found the piece of information about Hobart turning down the game with Wesley and then getting them in the playoffs interesting. Waiting to hear about Hobart from anyone who saw them play this year.
Nothing against any of the Hobart fans, but I will be rooting for Wesley in this one. One thing UW-W and Wesley have in common is the unwillingness of schools to play them. I know a school has a right to say yes and no to games, but I also have a right to express an opinion about it. I always find it puzzling at best when a school has a chance to play a higher level of competition and turns it down. I think it's great the NCAA National Selection Committee brought Hobart to Wesley. If Hobart turned down the Wesley game to have a better chance to make the playoffs, I guess they got their reward. We'll see how competitive they are now that they are there.
I was bummed when Albion beat Adrian because I was hoping Adrian would be coming to UW-W in the first round. They scheduled a home and home against UW-W for 2010 and 2011, but backed out of the second year.
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on November 14, 2011, 09:40:40 PM
Frank
I have to disagree about the money issue. Wesley would play at Hobart in a heart beat and pay their own way. I would even risk saying that Wesley would agree to a one year agreement. I don't think you can fully understand what wesley goes through year after year trying to schedule games!!! I fully believe that Hobart would weigh a loss against Wesley as harmful .But as we have seen the last few years teams are getting rewarded more for playing tougher competition and losing rather than playing less games. I have reread my emails on this subject and I stand by my remarks on the subject..
But that all doesn't matter now.. The game Saturday does. It will be nice football day in Dover as projected highs in the mid 50s .. absolutely no promises on a slight breeze to gale!!! ;D
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 14, 2011, 09:20:20 PMQuote from: bleedpurple on November 14, 2011, 09:13:08 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2011, 03:50:45 PM
AUKaz, i also found the piece of information about Hobart turning down the game with Wesley and then getting them in the playoffs interesting. Waiting to hear about Hobart from anyone who saw them play this year.
Nothing against any of the Hobart fans, but I will be rooting for Wesley in this one. One thing UW-W and Wesley have in common is the unwillingness of schools to play them. I know a school has a right to say yes and no to games, but I also have a right to express an opinion about it. I always find it puzzling at best when a school has a chance to play a higher level of competition and turns it down. I think it's great the NCAA National Selection Committee brought Hobart to Wesley. If Hobart turned down the Wesley game to have a better chance to make the playoffs, I guess they got their reward. We'll see how competitive they are now that they are there.
I was bummed when Albion beat Adrian because I was hoping Adrian would be coming to UW-W in the first round. They scheduled a home and home against UW-W for 2010 and 2011, but backed out of the second year.
A couple insights, as I reviewed the situation today after last night's discussion with Pat. First, remember, Wesley was an out-of-region opponent if Hobart played them. It would have been a quasi-nullity for playoff purposes. Also, Hobart's mantra all season was "Pool A or Bust." They knew that 7-1 with an OOC loss was a huge risk.
Hobart did have other irons in the fire. There was a Norwich game that ended up having Norwich back out, according to my sources. It may have been because Norwich thought another game was falling through that didn't actually happen. They also looked at teams like Catholic and Galludet, but the preference was for an East Region team overall. It wasn't a flat-out Wesley rejection as much as it was a notion of finding a team that made it worth the money and risk combined. Hobart already has a ten-game schedule next year, so there would've been no reciprocal -- that makes it tougher for securing a team.
Wesley was not Hobart's only pursuit/option. They did pass up the opportunity, but it was not strictly to duck a better team -- it was a cost/benefit analysis from what I've been told -- one that led to the decision against the game.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 15, 2011, 06:45:33 AM
Frank you have to know now that this line of reasoning can never be used again. I stopped using it 10 years ago when it appeared that every year the NCAA didn't follow their own "rules" regarding playoff selection. We knew 10 years ago that they use "guidelines" and not rules. The only thing set in stone with the NCAA d3 playoffs is that pool A teams are going to get spots. Nothing else has ever been guarenteed.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 07:40:58 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 15, 2011, 06:45:33 AM
Frank you have to know now that this line of reasoning can never be used again. I stopped using it 10 years ago when it appeared that every year the NCAA didn't follow their own "rules" regarding playoff selection. We knew 10 years ago that they use "guidelines" and not rules. The only thing set in stone with the NCAA d3 playoffs is that pool A teams are going to get spots. Nothing else has ever been guarenteed.
2 things:
1) Don't shoot the messenger for conveying others' reasons; and
2) Hence why I used the word "quasi" -- which was as much of a commentary by me as you'll find in that explanation.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 14, 2011, 09:39:31 PM
Although you took it easy on Adrian (only 35-0), recognize that there is a difference between 'playing up' and 'suicide'. I have no first-hand (or even second-hand) knowledge, but suspect that the Bulldogs realized you were SO far out of their league that they really had nothing to learn. Most of the time teams need to grow by steps; games against, say, Wabash or IWU might be beneficial - games against UWW or UMU might just be 'soul-crushing'.
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 07:06:35 AM
As far as the ducking commentary, I guess they don't teach logic in college anymore. Because someone said no doesn't tell anyone what yhe reason for that decision was. Really all these people are doing is impugning the integrity of these kids, Coach Cragg and he institution.
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 08:26:52 AM
How are these Fisher people the biggest babies I've ever met? First UofR "is like that" and now there crying and making excuses for a 5+ td win on their own field. And we know you logic is flawed at best given the posts on the Pool C board ("Are you calling Pat a liar?" No the reality is there is a different between correlation and causation, how hard is that to understand for a college educated person?). Oh wait, that was another SJF poster named "time for a change". That's someone else right?
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 08:30:32 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 07:06:35 AM
As far as the ducking commentary, I guess they don't teach logic in college anymore. Because someone said no doesn't tell anyone what yhe reason for that decision was. Really all these people are doing is impugning the integrity of these kids, Coach Cragg and he institution.
One point to emphasize here is the separation between the adminstration's actions and the kids' wishes. People talking about how Hobart (or anyone, for that matter) is "ducking" a tough game often make it sound like a collective effort when, in reality, the players have ZERO control over the situation.
(Kinda like how some people have argued that Penn State should forfeit the rest of this football season - as though the current players are somehow at fault for this whole mess?)
QuoteAlthough you took it easy on Adrian (only 35-0), recognize that there is a difference between 'playing up' and 'suicide'. I have no first-hand (or even second-hand) knowledge, but suspect that the Bulldogs realized you were SO far out of their league that they really had nothing to learn. Most of the time teams need to grow by steps; games against, say, Wabash or IWU might be beneficial - games against UWW or UMU might just be 'soul-crushing'.
Quote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 09:00:20 AM
I just went through Hobarts schedule the past decade...Seriously, Carnegie Mellon, Dickinson, Franklin & Marshall?
You're biggest OOC win since 2002 was just this past year when you took Fisher to the woodshed, which coincidentally was the first time Bart has beaten Fisher since 2001...
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 07:06:35 AM
Thanks for the info on Wesley. I know it will be a challenge healthy, and our qb and top 3 wr's are injured (at least two will play though one will be playing with a torn pcl). It would take a tight complete game. On the other hand with your two layer comp- Sals to Fisher, please note that we went to Fisher (only about 40 min down he thruway) amd laid a 36 pt loss on them which every bit he game he score indicates (we may have had aome revenge in mind from the prior year), so that's something if you believe in the transitive.
I didn't look at Philly or Wilmington, but truthfully I've got it in my head to drive. I've got buttloads of airmiles I could use too and it looks like I roped a client meeting in Raleigh for Friday morning, which gets me a chunk of the way on the company dime.
As far as the ducking commentary, I guess they don't teach logic in college anymore. Because someone said no doesn't tell anyone what yhe reason for that decision was. Really all these people are doing is impugning the integrity of these kids, Coach Cragg and he institution. I have major, major issues with the AD, but hese kids fight hard and duck no one. Coach Cragg has proven his willingness to take risks over his 15 year career that no who's ever paid attention can deny (fake punts in league champ games or contested playoff games from inside their own 20, regularly going for two and the win in 1st overyime, etc). None of these folks know anything about Hobart, but we compete in DI lacrosse with the biggest schools im the country without scholarships (have petitioned the ncaa since we had no choice but to move up in orde to maintain contiguous rivalries with Syracuae and Cornell that are older than more than 50% of the schools participating in D3 football) and have played all sorts of bcs schools with far greater resources for years. We were in the Patriot League and won 3 of 5 titles and now are in a wayward league that involves travel to denver, colorado springs, columbus oh, ann arbor (now), baltimore, louisville, etc. We didn't file for an ECAC game in 09 because they felt they had to spread the money around the non lax sports.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 14, 2011, 09:39:31 PMQuote from: bleedpurple on November 14, 2011, 09:13:08 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2011, 03:50:45 PM
AUKaz, i also found the piece of information about Hobart turning down the game with Wesley and then getting them in the playoffs interesting. Waiting to hear about Hobart from anyone who saw them play this year.
Nothing against any of the Hobart fans, but I will be rooting for Wesley in this one. One thing UW-W and Wesley have in common is the unwillingness of schools to play them. I know a school has a right to say yes and no to games, but I also have a right to express an opinion about it. I always find it puzzling at best when a school has a chance to play a higher level of competition and turns it down. I think it's great the NCAA National Selection Committee brought Hobart to Wesley. If Hobart turned down the Wesley game to have a better chance to make the playoffs, I guess they got their reward. We'll see how competitive they are now that they are there.
I was bummed when Albion beat Adrian because I was hoping Adrian would be coming to UW-W in the first round. They scheduled a home and home against UW-W for 2010 and 2011, but backed out of the second year.
Although you took it easy on Adrian (only 35-0), recognize that there is a difference between 'playing up' and 'suicide'. :P I have no first-hand (or even second-hand) knowledge, but suspect that the Bulldogs realized you were SO far out of their league that they really had nothing to learn. Most of the time teams need to grow by steps; games against, say, Wabash or IWU might be beneficial - games against UWW or UMU might just be 'soul-crushing'.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 10:02:40 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 09:00:20 AM
I just went through Hobarts schedule the past decade...Seriously, Carnegie Mellon, Dickinson, Franklin & Marshall?
You're biggest OOC win since 2002 was just this past year when you took Fisher to the woodshed, which coincidentally was the first time Bart has beaten Fisher since 2001...
Your gripe doesn't make all that much sense here.
Hobart played Carnegie Mellon from 2007-10, meaning that the series was likely "planned" somewhere in the 2006-07 timeframe. CMU was coming off a playoff appearance in 2006, blew out fellow Liberty League member Rochester in the season opener in 2007, and went on to win an ECAC bowl game that season. When the series was initiated, the CMU program was at a high-water mark, and even with a slight decline afterwards CMU was .500 or better in every season that Hobart played them except 2010 (when they finished 4-6). That seems like a pretty respectable nonconference opponent to schedule.
Dickinson has been a long-time opponent for Hobart in the season opener (going back to at least 1999). During that time, Dickinson has rarely been truly GOOD but never have they been really BAD either (they've hovered around .500 for most of that stretch, with really good seasons in 2006, 2007, and 2009; one playoff appearance in 2006).
Franklin and Marshall fits a pretty similar description to Dickinson - they have rarely been really GOOD but they are never really BAD either. Again, it seems like a perfectly reasonable nonconference game for Hobart.
Your gripe doesn't really make that much sense here. It's not like they schedule first-year programs or NEFC teams. Sure, they aren't playing Mount Union in nonconference games, but they aren't scheduling cupcakes either.
As for the other teams that you would have them play: NJAC teams only play one nonconference game, and they often schedule MAC schools. Similarly, the MAC only has two openings for nonconference games (though I think that's about to drop to one with Stevenson starting a program), and since they often schedule NJAC schools, those are again tough to come by. The only realistic option is scheduling an Empire 8 opponent...which they have done by scheduling St. John Fisher.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 15, 2011, 09:28:48 AM
-They would have lost some money on an extra football game.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 10:02:40 AM
Your gripe doesn't make all that much sense here.
Hobart played Carnegie Mellon from 2007-10, meaning that the series was likely "planned" somewhere in the 2006-07 timeframe. CMU was coming off a playoff appearance in 2006, blew out fellow Liberty League member Rochester in the season opener in 2007, and went on to win an ECAC bowl game that season. When the series was initiated, the CMU program was at a high-water mark, and even with a slight decline afterwards CMU was .500 or better in every season that Hobart played them except 2010 (when they finished 4-6). That seems like a pretty respectable nonconference opponent to schedule.
Dickinson has been a long-time opponent for Hobart in the season opener (going back to at least 1999). During that time, Dickinson has rarely been truly GOOD but never have they been really BAD either (they've hovered around .500 for most of that stretch, with really good seasons in 2006, 2007, and 2009; one playoff appearance in 2006).
Franklin and Marshall fits a pretty similar description to Dickinson - they have rarely been really GOOD but they are never really BAD either. Again, it seems like a perfectly reasonable nonconference game for Hobart.
Your gripe doesn't really make that much sense here. It's not like they schedule first-year programs or NEFC teams. Sure, they aren't playing Mount Union in nonconference games, but they aren't scheduling cupcakes either.
As for the other teams that you would have them play: NJAC teams only play one nonconference game, and they often schedule MAC schools. Similarly, the MAC only has two openings for nonconference games (though I think that's about to drop to one with Stevenson starting a program), and since they often schedule NJAC schools, those are again tough to come by. The only realistic option is scheduling an Empire 8 opponent...which they have done by scheduling St. John Fisher.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 15, 2011, 10:50:24 AM
Hobart and Ithaca should renew their series.
I think you're right that Hobart is scheduling middle of the road OOC teams, but for a team that churns out eight and nine win seasons and qualifies for the NCAA's on a pretty regular basis, I am surprised they haven't scheduled more ambitiously. Bart's right on that cusp (in my mind) between very good and a power in the region. Playing up might be a ticket to that. Is Wesley "suicide"? Probably for that one game--and that season's Pool C bid.
But, you have to ask, what's the message you send to your team by scheduling that game? What does it say to the administration about your goals for the program? In the long run, that might help more than a loss hurts. Again, this isn't true for everyone. The Wick had a chance to play Wesley, but they don't have as strong a program as Hobart.
The Statesmen's OOC scheduling makes them seem, in my view, content. Content to be in contention in the LL each year, cranking out those 8-9 win seasons, maybe winning a game in the NCAAs. There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but I could see them aiming for more.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 15, 2011, 10:50:24 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 10:02:40 AM
Your gripe doesn't make all that much sense here.
Hobart played Carnegie Mellon from 2007-10, meaning that the series was likely "planned" somewhere in the 2006-07 timeframe. CMU was coming off a playoff appearance in 2006, blew out fellow Liberty League member Rochester in the season opener in 2007, and went on to win an ECAC bowl game that season. When the series was initiated, the CMU program was at a high-water mark, and even with a slight decline afterwards CMU was .500 or better in every season that Hobart played them except 2010 (when they finished 4-6). That seems like a pretty respectable nonconference opponent to schedule.
Dickinson has been a long-time opponent for Hobart in the season opener (going back to at least 1999). During that time, Dickinson has rarely been truly GOOD but never have they been really BAD either (they've hovered around .500 for most of that stretch, with really good seasons in 2006, 2007, and 2009; one playoff appearance in 2006).
Franklin and Marshall fits a pretty similar description to Dickinson - they have rarely been really GOOD but they are never really BAD either. Again, it seems like a perfectly reasonable nonconference game for Hobart.
Your gripe doesn't really make that much sense here. It's not like they schedule first-year programs or NEFC teams. Sure, they aren't playing Mount Union in nonconference games, but they aren't scheduling cupcakes either.
As for the other teams that you would have them play: NJAC teams only play one nonconference game, and they often schedule MAC schools. Similarly, the MAC only has two openings for nonconference games (though I think that's about to drop to one with Stevenson starting a program), and since they often schedule NJAC schools, those are again tough to come by. The only realistic option is scheduling an Empire 8 opponent...which they have done by scheduling St. John Fisher.
Hobart and Ithaca should renew their series.
I think you're right that Hobart is scheduling middle of the road OOC teams, but for a team that churns out eight and nine win seasons and qualifies for the NCAA's on a pretty regular basis, I am surprised they haven't scheduled more ambitiously. Bart's right on that cusp (in my mind) between very good and a power in the region. Playing up might be a ticket to that. Is Wesley "suicide"? Probably for that one game--and that season's Pool C bid.
But, you have to ask, what's the message you send to your team by scheduling that game? What does it say to the administration about your goals for the program? In the long run, that might help more than a loss hurts. Again, this isn't true for everyone. The Wick had a chance to play Wesley, but they don't have as strong a program as Hobart.
The Statesmen's OOC scheduling makes them seem, in my view, content. Content to be in contention in the LL each year, cranking out those 8-9 win seasons, maybe winning a game in the NCAAs. There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but I could see them aiming for more.
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 11:10:48 AM
The two ironies of Upstate's bitterness is that if they are really seeded higher, than means they didn't really value the blowout of SJF very much and that he's complaining about scheduling when we just completed a home and home with them.
Quote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 10:37:14 AM
Dickinson- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
F&M- 2 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
CMU- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
Those are some really impressive teams...
Quote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 11:32:56 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 11:10:48 AM
The two ironies of Upstate's bitterness is that if they are really seeded higher, than means they didn't really value the blowout of SJF very much and that he's complaining about scheduling when we just completed a home and home with them.
Fisher, even when they sucked, always scheduled up. They weren't content with being content...
They played the top LL schools, the top NJAC schools and SUNY schools which were always bigger & stronger than SJF, those SUNY schools are the schools that the LL seems to avoid like the plague...
Not to mention being the only one in the east that had the balls to schedule MUC, which I guarantee wouldn't even be in the thoughts of anyone from the LL, sure they got their heads kicked in but it does a lot more for a program to test yourself instead of scheduling teams that aren't a real threat...
Congrats to Bart for beating SJF, I mean it was only the first time in 4 tries since 2002 and it only took them having 21 days to prepare & the SJF coaches trying to make Kramer play like Bailey to do so...
But hey, have fun playing Utica the next two years...
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 11:38:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 10:37:14 AM
Dickinson- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
F&M- 2 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
CMU- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
Those are some really impressive teams...
I took the liberty of looking up a few SJF nonconference opponents.
2011
Buff State - 1 season with 6+ wins since 2000 (and that was all the way back IN 2000)
Rochester - 3 seasons with 6+ wins since 2000 (2000, 2006, 2007)
Hobart (covered here)
2010
Brockport State - 6 seasons with 6+ wins, but NONE since going 7-4 in 2008
Buff State (covered above)
Rochester (covered above)
Hobart (covered above)
Frostburg State - 2 seasons with 6+ wins, none since going 6-5 in 2005
If you go back to 2007, we can include King's, a doormat from the MAC.
SJF deserves a lot of credit for having the balls to schedule Mount Union in 2008-09. Other than that, their nonconference scheduling has been pretty similar to Hobart's over the past five years. Playing Buff State, Rochester, Frostburg State is certainly no more impressive than Dickinson, F & M, Carnegie Mellon and arguably less so.
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 11:10:48 AM
Jonny, on Lax. It's what the school's known for and about. Those rivalries might be the most important and best driver of applicants to the school when competing with LL, IC/AU, CC and some of the NESCAC schools for students. It gives Hobart a national brand. People I've met in Atlanta the past few years have surprisingly known about Hobart (they always ask "did you play lacrosse there" as if it's the only reason the school exists). Being in the LL and playing all D3 would make them generic and lose a serious competitive advantage. Look at the listed recruits that are known for next year (and whatever you think about the rules, these kids end up getting pretty good packages, but they bring non athlete, full paying buddies with them often):
131 1 Miller, Luke Vienna VA Gonzaga DC Defense E Hobart
769 1 Llewellyn, Gavin Towson MD St. Paul's School MD Attack/Midfield R Hobart
83 1 Graham, Bud Orangeville ON Culver Academy IN Attack E Hobart
76 1 Opsahl, Matt Potomac MD Bullis School MD Attack E Hobart
286 1 Sipe, Charles Charlottesville VA St. Anne's-Belfield VA Midfield/FO E Hobart
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 15, 2011, 11:57:34 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 11:38:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 10:37:14 AM
Dickinson- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
F&M- 2 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
CMU- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
Those are some really impressive teams...
I took the liberty of looking up a few SJF nonconference opponents.
2011
Buff State - 1 season with 6+ wins since 2000 (and that was all the way back IN 2000)
Rochester - 3 seasons with 6+ wins since 2000 (2000, 2006, 2007)
Hobart (covered here)
2010
Brockport State - 6 seasons with 6+ wins, but NONE since going 7-4 in 2008
Buff State (covered above)
Rochester (covered above)
Hobart (covered above)
Frostburg State - 2 seasons with 6+ wins, none since going 6-5 in 2005
If you go back to 2007, we can include King's, a doormat from the MAC.
SJF deserves a lot of credit for having the balls to schedule Mount Union in 2008-09. Other than that, their nonconference scheduling has been pretty similar to Hobart's over the past five years. Playing Buff State, Rochester, Frostburg State is certainly no more impressive than Dickinson, F & M, Carnegie Mellon and arguably less so.
I think part of it though is that SJF will play teams close just to get games. Why wouldn't they play Brockport, Rochester and Buff State? Those are the closes d3 schools to them. Hobart seems to play or not play schools based on other things. SJF doesn't care about who they play, as long as they have 10 games. It now seems like the NCAA approves of that mentality.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 15, 2011, 12:16:53 PM
I think we can all agree here that St. John's Fishers sucks.
Right?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 12:55:22 PM
OK, there are some very off-base comments flying here. Let me state for now the umpteenth time that Hobart was ranked above Fisher in the final rankings. I went back and listened to the Selection Chair interview -- she specifically stated that Fisher "lost to two teams that were above them" when they looked at the positioning for Fisher. It does not follow that somehow Fisher jumped Hobart at any point. My view continues to be that Hobart is a 5/6, and Fisher is a 6/7. The best that we can consider for Fisher is that they ended up with equal seedings.
Also, she specifically said that the Hobart eight-game schedule DID NOT play a role in the views of Hobart from the best of her recollection. Hobart was viewed as a one-loss team -- they did not read into it further. Remember that some teams actually play less in-region games than Hobart, so it didn't necessitate a special treatment in the end.
Finally, this Dickinson issue completely misses the reasons for the game. A good amount of the desire to keep that series is the Pennsylvania exposure the team and school want. Look at Hobart's location on a map, and you'll understand why they like to keep a Pennsylvania school. Dickinson plays in a very good conference, and navigates the middle of it most of the last five years. I have no problem with that game, especially from the recruiting and exposure benefits the school receives from retaining it.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 15, 2011, 12:59:11 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 12:55:22 PM
OK, there are some very off-base comments flying here. Let me state for now the umpteenth time that Hobart was ranked above Fisher in the final rankings. I went back and listened to the Selection Chair interview -- she specifically stated that Fisher "lost to two teams that were above them" when they looked at the positioning for Fisher. It does not follow that somehow Fisher jumped Hobart at any point. My view continues to be that Hobart is a 5/6, and Fisher is a 6/7. The best that we can consider for Fisher is that they ended up with equal seedings.
Also, she specifically said that the Hobart eight-game schedule DID NOT play a role in the views of Hobart from the best of her recollection. Hobart was viewed as a one-loss team -- they did not read into it further. Remember that some teams actually play less in-region games than Hobart, so it didn't necessitate a special treatment in the end.
Finally, this Dickinson issue completely misses the reasons for the game. A good amount of the desire to keep that series is the Pennsylvania exposure the team and school want. Look at Hobart's location on a map, and you'll understand why they like to keep a Pennsylvania school. Dickinson plays in a very good conference, and navigates the middle of it most of the last five years. I have no problem with that game, especially from the recruiting and exposure benefits the school receives from retaining it.
I'm pretty sure a lot of this is stemming from Wesley's reputation vs. Johnnie Hopkins' reputation.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 15, 2011, 12:59:11 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 12:55:22 PM
OK, there are some very off-base comments flying here. Let me state for now the umpteenth time that Hobart was ranked above Fisher in the final rankings. I went back and listened to the Selection Chair interview -- she specifically stated that Fisher "lost to two teams that were above them" when they looked at the positioning for Fisher. It does not follow that somehow Fisher jumped Hobart at any point. My view continues to be that Hobart is a 5/6, and Fisher is a 6/7. The best that we can consider for Fisher is that they ended up with equal seedings.
Also, she specifically said that the Hobart eight-game schedule DID NOT play a role in the views of Hobart from the best of her recollection. Hobart was viewed as a one-loss team -- they did not read into it further. Remember that some teams actually play less in-region games than Hobart, so it didn't necessitate a special treatment in the end.
Finally, this Dickinson issue completely misses the reasons for the game. A good amount of the desire to keep that series is the Pennsylvania exposure the team and school want. Look at Hobart's location on a map, and you'll understand why they like to keep a Pennsylvania school. Dickinson plays in a very good conference, and navigates the middle of it most of the last five years. I have no problem with that game, especially from the recruiting and exposure benefits the school receives from retaining it.
I'm pretty sure a lot of this is stemming from Wesley's reputation vs. Johnnie Hopkins' reputation.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 15, 2011, 01:09:42 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 15, 2011, 12:59:11 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 12:55:22 PM
OK, there are some very off-base comments flying here. Let me state for now the umpteenth time that Hobart was ranked above Fisher in the final rankings. I went back and listened to the Selection Chair interview -- she specifically stated that Fisher "lost to two teams that were above them" when they looked at the positioning for Fisher. It does not follow that somehow Fisher jumped Hobart at any point. My view continues to be that Hobart is a 5/6, and Fisher is a 6/7. The best that we can consider for Fisher is that they ended up with equal seedings.
Also, she specifically said that the Hobart eight-game schedule DID NOT play a role in the views of Hobart from the best of her recollection. Hobart was viewed as a one-loss team -- they did not read into it further. Remember that some teams actually play less in-region games than Hobart, so it didn't necessitate a special treatment in the end.
Finally, this Dickinson issue completely misses the reasons for the game. A good amount of the desire to keep that series is the Pennsylvania exposure the team and school want. Look at Hobart's location on a map, and you'll understand why they like to keep a Pennsylvania school. Dickinson plays in a very good conference, and navigates the middle of it most of the last five years. I have no problem with that game, especially from the recruiting and exposure benefits the school receives from retaining it.
I'm pretty sure a lot of this is stemming from Wesley's reputation vs. Johnnie Hopkins' reputation.
I smoked pot with Johnny Hopkins...it was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazing that $hit up everyday...
Quote from: MasterJedi on November 15, 2011, 01:15:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 15, 2011, 01:09:42 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 15, 2011, 12:59:11 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 12:55:22 PM
OK, there are some very off-base comments flying here. Let me state for now the umpteenth time that Hobart was ranked above Fisher in the final rankings. I went back and listened to the Selection Chair interview -- she specifically stated that Fisher "lost to two teams that were above them" when they looked at the positioning for Fisher. It does not follow that somehow Fisher jumped Hobart at any point. My view continues to be that Hobart is a 5/6, and Fisher is a 6/7. The best that we can consider for Fisher is that they ended up with equal seedings.
Also, she specifically said that the Hobart eight-game schedule DID NOT play a role in the views of Hobart from the best of her recollection. Hobart was viewed as a one-loss team -- they did not read into it further. Remember that some teams actually play less in-region games than Hobart, so it didn't necessitate a special treatment in the end.
Finally, this Dickinson issue completely misses the reasons for the game. A good amount of the desire to keep that series is the Pennsylvania exposure the team and school want. Look at Hobart's location on a map, and you'll understand why they like to keep a Pennsylvania school. Dickinson plays in a very good conference, and navigates the middle of it most of the last five years. I have no problem with that game, especially from the recruiting and exposure benefits the school receives from retaining it.
I'm pretty sure a lot of this is stemming from Wesley's reputation vs. Johnnie Hopkins' reputation.
I smoked pot with Johnny Hopkins...it was Johnny Hopkins, and Sloan Kettering, and they were blazing that $hit up everyday...
+K for the Step Brothers reference!
Quote from: pumkinattack on November 15, 2011, 01:10:13 PM
JU, I know many of those guys from the 80's that think they should go back to DIII and run the table (if the landscape is the same, all the DIII guys insist they'd be mediocre if they went back down, but I'm not interested in the "what if" there), but many of them don't understand how the landscape has changed and you can't play mixed schedules anymore. It wasn't just Cuse and Cornell, they were playing UNC, PSU, etc, etc.
And either way, the fact that it gives it national exposure (and I went to the Bellarmine game and Louisville's a cool town, even hooked up w/Ol' Saints Fan while in the area) which helps when you're charging $50k+ for what's comparable to 30 other schools in the Northeast. And having lived in DC and Atlanta (with a stop in NY in between), the school's name is there if not 100%, at least 98% because of lacrosse. There's a lot of value in that. If you have a competitive advantage in that (current program in shambles thanks to Hanna, but I mean the reputation/history), you invest in it nuture and milk it for what it's worth. Look at that list of recruits again. None of them are at Hobart because it's a cool place to be (perhaps that is the case, but only in the context of the other lacrosse schools that recruit them).
I'm not looking at this from a sports/competitive situation, I care much more about the institution and am looking at it like a banker with an MBA and how you maximiaze value. And for all those 70's and 80's guys that pine for winning D3 championships, we had a full referendum in 2008 and the clear winner was to stay in DI, so that debate is over and done with no matter how much pride those alums are assigning to winning all the time vs. competing at the highest level. I went from 96-01 and all the guys I know from those years and more recent love that they get to go to a small school, not have scholarships to give out and compete with the best.
If people want to live in a bubble and only think of these things about what does on in the D3 football world, but Hobart's working to build a national presence. Get some of that Cheddar that RPI has (we're at around $200MM, RPI has ONE BILLION DOLLARS in respective endowments, Union's like $400-$500MM, I think).
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 01:02:19 PM
Upstate isn't beating a dead horse here. He's beating a dead unicorn since the rationale just doesn't exist.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 01:35:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 15, 2011, 01:02:19 PM
Upstate isn't beating a dead horse here. He's beating a dead unicorn since the rationale just doesn't exist.
Upstate, I'm well aware that there are REASONS why SJF scheduled Buff State, Frostburgh, et cet. However, you keep perpetuating this idea that Hobart is running from competition while SJF gallantly takes on the world. It's just not true - with the exception of the Mount Union game in 2008-09, the quality of Hobart's nonconference opponents is essentially on par with SJF's over the last decade.
SJF plays a terrible King's team for several years running? No problem, Upstate points out that King's was really good when that series was started. However, if I point out that Hobart started the series with CMU the year after CMU won a playoff game, somehow this logic isn't allowed to extend to them.
I understand SJF's long-running series with UR is for other reasons - I'm more familiar with UR than you might think (UR was the other in my "final two" before I announced a national press conference to say that I was taking my talents to Forbes Avenue). However, as Frank eloquently points out, Hobart has maintained a long-running series with Dickinson for "other reasons" as well - it's good recruiting exposure for them to keep a series with a school in Pennsylvania, and Dickinson is a fairly similar institution from a fairly similar conference of schools. Again, Upstate, you slam Hobart here while giving SJF a free pass.
I guess my point, Upstate, is that you can't have it both ways. If SJF gets to keep a series with mediocre Rochester for "other reasons" then you have to give that same leeway to Hobart for keeping the series with Dickinson (a program that's roughly equivalent to Rochester over the past decade). If SJF gets credit for playing King's when they "used to" be good, then you have to give that same credit to Hobart for scheduling CMU coming off a playoff appearance (who is not nearly the chopped liver that you're making them out to be; CMU went 63-39 in the 2000's, while King's went 53-53).
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 15, 2011, 02:03:33 PM
Fisher also scheduled a home and home with Salisbury the past couple of years...also not a bad team.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2011, 04:16:48 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 15, 2011, 02:03:33 PM
Fisher also scheduled a home and home with Salisbury the past couple of years...also not a bad team.
Salisbury sucks. If they were in the E8 they'd be lucky to finish 4th!
Ah, crap.
Quote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 12:15:05 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 15, 2011, 11:57:34 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 15, 2011, 11:38:45 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 15, 2011, 10:37:14 AM
Dickinson- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
F&M- 2 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
CMU- 3 seasons with more than 6 wins since 2000
Those are some really impressive teams...
I took the liberty of looking up a few SJF nonconference opponents.
2011
Buff State - 1 season with 6+ wins since 2000 (and that was all the way back IN 2000)
Rochester - 3 seasons with 6+ wins since 2000 (2000, 2006, 2007)
Hobart (covered here)
2010
Brockport State - 6 seasons with 6+ wins, but NONE since going 7-4 in 2008
Buff State (covered above)
Rochester (covered above)
Hobart (covered above)
Frostburg State - 2 seasons with 6+ wins, none since going 6-5 in 2005
If you go back to 2007, we can include King's, a doormat from the MAC.
SJF deserves a lot of credit for having the balls to schedule Mount Union in 2008-09. Other than that, their nonconference scheduling has been pretty similar to Hobart's over the past five years. Playing Buff State, Rochester, Frostburg State is certainly no more impressive than Dickinson, F & M, Carnegie Mellon and arguably less so.
I think part of it though is that SJF will play teams close just to get games. Why wouldn't they play Brockport, Rochester and Buff State? Those are the closes d3 schools to them. Hobart seems to play or not play schools based on other things. SJF doesn't care about who they play, as long as they have 10 games. It now seems like the NCAA approves of that mentality.
Would like to point out that Buff State is joining the E8 and Frostburg joined the E8 this year as well so it's not like there wasn't a reason for playing them..
It's been covered 100x over in the east but the UR game isn't about football at least for Fisher it wasn't...it was about Camp Good Days. Apparently UR has had enough of getting their heads kicked in though, and yes their pompous asses are "like that" especially when their HC (before Greene) said he'd rather lose his first born than lose to SJF...
Regards to Kings they were coming off 4 straight 7+ win seasons and 3 straight post season appearances when SJF scheduled them...
Brockport kicked the hell out of SJF like 13 years in a row but they still kept Brockport on the schedule, Fisher was Ports cupcake back then. When they moved to the NJAC they had to cancel the long standing series between state school & a private school...
SJF was always playing the top area schools that would kick the hell out of them. Regardless of conference and school. Why? Because they wanted 10 games and didn't care who they played, SJF didn't hide behind it's private school status. In fact IC & SJF are the only two private institutions that played state schools year in and year out...
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 15, 2011, 05:34:53 PM
He asked -- it's not quite the same because his old posts aren't on it but you can change your name whenever you like and I gave him his old post total.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley ( 4 ) | 10-0 | 49 | 1 | vs. Norwich |
2 Salisbury( 1 ) | 9-1 | 46 | 2 | vs. #10 Western New England |
3 Kean | 9-1 | 39 | 3 | vs. Christopher Newport |
4 Hobart | 7-1 | 32 | 6 | at #2 (South) Wesley |
5 St. John Fisher | 8-2 | 28 | 8 | at #3 (South) Johns Hopkins |
6 Cortland State | 8-2 | 27 | 7 | vs. Albright |
7t Lycoming | 8-2 | 17 | 9 | End of Season |
7t Montclair State | 8-2 | 17 | 4 | End of Season |
9 Widener | 8-2 | 10 | 5 | vs. Waynesburg |
10 Western New England | 10-1 | 5 | 10 | at #2 Salisbury |
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 16, 2011, 02:46:30 PM
I read through the Around the Region for the Northeast (which covers the NESCAC, NEFC, and ECFC). I was a good write up...and when reading through the write up, especially about Western New England and Norwich getting into the NCAA tournament for the first time, it reminded me of St. Lawrence's run last year when they made the tournament for the first time in forever. It's good to see that stuff from time to time and reminds you why D3 football is one of the very best sports around...
I will say this though...I was caught off guard a bit by the WNE's Head Coach (Keith Emery). He said that "I was just disappointed personally because I thought we would be a higher seed." There were only 7 teams in the entire 32 team field that had more than one-loss, and ten teams that are undefeated. Honestly...what seed did he think he was going to get? Did he think he was going to get a home game? A rematch with Norwich in the first round while a couple of unbeatens battle it out in Round #1? I mean, the guy has been at the helm for 7 seasons in the NEFC...he has to have some sort of clue about the reality of where the NEFC stands...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 16, 2011, 03:22:49 PM
The Committee in the mid-2000s didn't do well to set expectations, with Curry getting a very hide seed at least twice. I think the NEFC just got a rude awakening this year -- it's a good message, and I'd encourage the schools not to ignore it. Subjectivity is finally part of the process in some small way (but large enough to matter).
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 16, 2011, 04:42:56 PM
Here's the bad news for the NEFC and the ECFC... and this is where it gets complicated...
Let's look at the number of OOC games available in the NEFC and ECFC... and then the number in the E8, LL, NJAC and MAC.
NEFC:
16 teams (each division with 8 teams). Assume 9-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 2
2 x 16 teams = 32 OOC games
ECFC:
8 teams. Assume 9-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 2
2 x 8 teams = 16 OOC games
LL:
8 teams (as of next year). Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 3
3 x 8 teams = 24 OOC games
E8:
8 teams. Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 3
3 x 8 teams = 24 OOC games
NJAC:
9 teams (as of next year). One mandated NJAC/MAC game. Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team (excluding NJAC/MAC Challenge) = 1
1 x 9 teams = 9 OOC games
MAC:
9 teams. One mandated NJAC/MAC game. Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team (excluding NJAC/MAC Challenge) = 1
1 x 9 teams = 9 OOC games
Let's tally them up:
NEFC + ECFC = 32 + 16 = 48 (assuming 9-game schedules)
LL + E8 + NJAC + MAC = 24 + 24 + 9 + 9 = 66 (assuming 10-game schedules and NJAC/MAC Challenge)
Every game that the LL and E8 schedule against each other accounts for 2 OOCs less. So, if every Liberty League team scheduled one E8 game, we would be down to 50. A game like Cortaca similarly reduces it by 2 (48). The point here is that the complacency that the NEFC has shown in intra-scheduling has really cost the NEFC a chance to make inroads to create any OOC strength. There are too many rivalries and too many traditional games being played now for the NEFC and ECFC to really allow for much headway in future scheduling in such games. Look, Salve/Union occurred because WPI's coach didn't want to coach against his former team (making it a nullity in the numbers I showed above). The best chance NEFC and ECFC teams have of turning the tide is by inquiring NOW about what happens to the E8 when Frostburg and Salisbury likely leave the E8 in 2013. There's time right now to take the lesson and make something happen. Will they? I don't know, but maybe Charles and softbalz need to get on the phone with their NEFC schools and suggest it pronto. Scheduling happens a couple to a few years in advance, so this is the time to act.
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 16, 2011, 04:51:16 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 16, 2011, 04:42:56 PM
Here's the bad news for the NEFC and the ECFC... and this is where it gets complicated...
Let's look at the number of OOC games available in the NEFC and ECFC... and then the number in the E8, LL, NJAC and MAC.
NEFC:
16 teams (each division with 8 teams). Assume 9-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 2
2 x 16 teams = 32 OOC games
ECFC:
8 teams. Assume 9-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 2
2 x 8 teams = 16 OOC games
LL:
8 teams (as of next year). Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 3
3 x 8 teams = 24 OOC games
E8:
8 teams. Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team = 3
3 x 8 teams = 24 OOC games
NJAC:
9 teams (as of next year). One mandated NJAC/MAC game. Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team (excluding NJAC/MAC Challenge) = 1
1 x 9 teams = 9 OOC games
MAC:
9 teams. One mandated NJAC/MAC game. Assume 10-game schedules.
OOCs per Team (excluding NJAC/MAC Challenge) = 1
1 x 9 teams = 9 OOC games
Let's tally them up:
NEFC + ECFC = 32 + 16 = 48 (assuming 9-game schedules)
LL + E8 + NJAC + MAC = 24 + 24 + 9 + 9 = 66 (assuming 10-game schedules and NJAC/MAC Challenge)
Every game that the LL and E8 schedule against each other accounts for 2 OOCs less. So, if every Liberty League team scheduled one E8 game, we would be down to 50. A game like Cortaca similarly reduces it by 2 (48). The point here is that the complacency that the NEFC has shown in intra-scheduling has really cost the NEFC a chance to make inroads to create any OOC strength. There are too many rivalries and too many traditional games being played now for the NEFC and ECFC to really allow for much headway in future scheduling in such games. Look, Salve/Union occurred because WPI's coach didn't want to coach against his former team (making it a nullity in the numbers I showed above). The best chance NEFC and ECFC teams have of turning the tide is by inquiring NOW about what happens to the E8 when Frostburg and Salisbury likely leave the E8 in 2013. There's time right now to take the lesson and make something happen. Will they? I don't know, but maybe Charles and softbalz need to get on the phone with their NEFC schools and suggest it pronto. Scheduling happens a couple to a few years in advance, so this is the time to act.
Wow Frank....is that a post or an Algebra question on the SAT? If I was an AD and tried to figure that out, I would say screw it, lets just go 8-2 and play in the ECAC
Quote from: SJFF82 on November 16, 2011, 08:30:07 PM
....wait, is that Charles calculating his team's SoS? I think they're in on a re-vote...
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 12:01:41 AM
Brilliant post, Frank.
The challenge that faces the E8 in finding games in October and November after the departure of Salisbury and Frostburg State needs to be addressed now.
The NEFC and the ECFC are the conferences that are most likely to fill the void.
I wonder if the UAA and the old SCAC (with Trinity, Austin and Southwestern) will move to an affiliation agreement to solve their scheduling problems. Pool b will be interesting in those years, even if there is only one Pool B berth in the tourney.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2011, 10:37:00 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 12:01:41 AM
Brilliant post, Frank.
The challenge that faces the E8 in finding games in October and November after the departure of Salisbury and Frostburg State needs to be addressed now.
The NEFC and the ECFC are the conferences that are most likely to fill the void.
I wonder if the UAA and the old SCAC (with Trinity, Austin and Southwestern) will move to an affiliation agreement to solve their scheduling problems. Pool b will be interesting in those years, even if there is only one Pool B berth in the tourney.
Buffalo State joining will alleviate some of the issues as well.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 17, 2011, 10:52:07 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2011, 10:37:00 AMQuote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 12:01:41 AM
Brilliant post, Frank.
The challenge that faces the E8 in finding games in October and November after the departure of Salisbury and Frostburg State needs to be addressed now.
The NEFC and the ECFC are the conferences that are most likely to fill the void.
I wonder if the UAA and the old SCAC (with Trinity, Austin and Southwestern) will move to an affiliation agreement to solve their scheduling problems. Pool b will be interesting in those years, even if there is only one Pool B berth in the tourney.
Buffalo State joining will alleviate some of the issues as well.
Buffalo State is nullified by the loss of Springfield. It's accounted for in those numbers.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 17, 2011, 12:41:13 PM
I'm assuming it won't be forever, but do we know for a fact that Salisbury and Frostburg St are leaving the conference after next year?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 17, 2011, 12:54:04 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 17, 2011, 12:41:13 PM
I'm assuming it won't be forever, but do we know for a fact that Salisbury and Frostburg St are leaving the conference after next year?
It was a two-year agreement. Prevailing thought is that Wesley, Salisbury and Frostburg will form a new conference with some of the more nearby stragglers after everything shakes out in some of the more recent conference realignments. There's no real desire that I've heard for the agreement to be continued -- although, weirder things have happened.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 12:01:41 AM
Brilliant post, Frank.
The challenge that faces the E8 in finding games in October and November after the departure of Salisbury and Frostburg State needs to be addressed now.
The NEFC and the ECFC are the conferences that are most likely to fill the void.
I wonder if the UAA and the old SCAC (with Trinity, Austin and Southwestern) will move to an affiliation agreement to solve their scheduling problems. Pool b will be interesting in those years, even if there is only one Pool B berth in the tourney.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 17, 2011, 02:08:24 PMThe OAC plays a full 9-game conference schedule in the last 9 weeks of the season. Can you find a pair of OAC teams that want to move their late October match to week #1 or #2 to accommodate a pair of E8's?Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 12:01:41 AM
Brilliant post, Frank.
The challenge that faces the E8 in finding games in October and November after the departure of Salisbury and Frostburg State needs to be addressed now.
The NEFC and the ECFC are the conferences that are most likely to fill the void.
I wonder if the UAA and the old SCAC (with Trinity, Austin and Southwestern) will move to an affiliation agreement to solve their scheduling problems. Pool b will be interesting in those years, even if there is only one Pool B berth in the tourney.
Schools like Ithaca, Alfred, Buff St. and SJF are as close to PA and maybe Ohio to many ECFC and NEFC schools. They don't need to fill their schedules with those teams necessarily.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 04:54:35 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 17, 2011, 02:08:24 PMThe OAC plays a full 9-game conference schedule in the last 9 weeks of the season. Can you find a pair of OAC teams that want to move their late October match to week #1 or #2 to accommodate a pair of E8's?Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 12:01:41 AM
Brilliant post, Frank.
The challenge that faces the E8 in finding games in October and November after the departure of Salisbury and Frostburg State needs to be addressed now.
The NEFC and the ECFC are the conferences that are most likely to fill the void.
I wonder if the UAA and the old SCAC (with Trinity, Austin and Southwestern) will move to an affiliation agreement to solve their scheduling problems. Pool b will be interesting in those years, even if there is only one Pool B berth in the tourney.
Schools like Ithaca, Alfred, Buff St. and SJF are as close to PA and maybe Ohio to many ECFC and NEFC schools. They don't need to fill their schedules with those teams necessarily.
The Pres AC has an 8-game schedule so there are 9 late-season open dates (minus Thomas More's Bridge Bowl with MSJ) correction, 8 late-season open dates after the opening weekends. How does that work to fill the 12 new open dates that you have with the FSU SSU departure?
Gordon Mann covered the MAC is up to 10 teams and plays the NJAC for one of its games.
The possible candidates for a Capital AC football bid (for Wesley, Frostburg and Salisbury) have dissipated with the departure of Stevenson to the MAC. A remore possiblility, Shenandoah has evened the ODAC at 8 football playing teams. Getting CNU to move from the USA South to the Capital AC without the risk of the Football AQ is now gone.
The dilemma for the E8 is that they can contend for a guaranteed Pool A bid with the help of Salisbury and Frostburg, or they can fight for that same bid in Pool B, which only gets one bid for the first 16 Pool B teams.
I tend to agree with Pat. That two year E8 contract with FSU and Salisbury can just as easily renewed with a self-renewing 2-year clause.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 17, 2011, 06:50:19 PMThanks for the reply, Jonny.Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 04:54:35 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 17, 2011, 02:08:24 PMThe OAC plays a full 9-game conference schedule in the last 9 weeks of the season. Can you find a pair of OAC teams that want to move their late October match to week #1 or #2 to accommodate a pair of E8's?Quote from: Ralph Turner on November 17, 2011, 12:01:41 AM
Brilliant post, Frank.
The challenge that faces the E8 in finding games in October and November after the departure of Salisbury and Frostburg State needs to be addressed now.
The NEFC and the ECFC are the conferences that are most likely to fill the void.
I wonder if the UAA and the old SCAC (with Trinity, Austin and Southwestern) will move to an affiliation agreement to solve their scheduling problems. Pool b will be interesting in those years, even if there is only one Pool B berth in the tourney.
Schools like Ithaca, Alfred, Buff St. and SJF are as close to PA and maybe Ohio to many ECFC and NEFC schools. They don't need to fill their schedules with those teams necessarily.
The Pres AC has an 8-game schedule so there are 9 late-season open dates (minus Thomas More's Bridge Bowl with MSJ) correction, 8 late-season open dates after the opening weekends. How does that work to fill the 12 new open dates that you have with the FSU SSU departure?
Gordon Mann covered the MAC is up to 10 teams and plays the NJAC for one of its games.
The possible candidates for a Capital AC football bid (for Wesley, Frostburg and Salisbury) have dissipated with the departure of Stevenson to the MAC. A remore possiblility, Shenandoah has evened the ODAC at 8 football playing teams. Getting CNU to move from the USA South to the Capital AC without the risk of the Football AQ is now gone.
The dilemma for the E8 is that they can contend for a guaranteed Pool A bid with the help of Salisbury and Frostburg, or they can fight for that same bid in Pool B, which only gets one bid for the first 16 Pool B teams.
I tend to agree with Pat. That two year E8 contract with FSU and Salisbury can just as easily renewed with a self-renewing 2-year clause.
Ralph, I'm just saying those places are as far away as the NEFC teams would be. You still have the NJ and NY teams that would need games. There are also many d2 schools around. Plus Ithaca never seemed to have a problem filling their schedules. You just can't be too picky.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 17, 2011, 07:38:51 PM
The Liberty League will be booked solid in October and November with the addition of Springfield. You might MAYBE get a couple of sparse OOC games in there, but that's it.
Quote from: Upstate on November 17, 2011, 07:46:06 PM
If SU & Frostburg don't get re-upped, the E8 needs to get Cortland and/or Brockport on board...
Imagine Cortaca for the AQ (if Ithaca decides to get good again)...
There's also some rumblings of Brockport being added for the Courage Bowl after UR is done tucking it's tail between it's legs next year...
Both teams make a huge ton of sense geographically, either one of them plus Buff St keeps their AQ...
Quote from: SUADC on November 18, 2011, 10:21:10 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 17, 2011, 07:46:06 PM
If SU & Frostburg don't get re-upped, the E8 needs to get Cortland and/or Brockport on board...
Imagine Cortaca for the AQ (if Ithaca decides to get good again)...
There's also some rumblings of Brockport being added for the Courage Bowl after UR is done tucking it's tail between it's legs next year...
Both teams make a huge ton of sense geographically, either one of them plus Buff St keeps their AQ...
If that is the case, I can see Wesley, Salisbury, and Frostburg State going to the NJAC.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 18, 2011, 10:36:08 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 18, 2011, 10:21:10 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 17, 2011, 07:46:06 PM
If SU & Frostburg don't get re-upped, the E8 needs to get Cortland and/or Brockport on board...
Imagine Cortaca for the AQ (if Ithaca decides to get good again)...
There's also some rumblings of Brockport being added for the Courage Bowl after UR is done tucking it's tail between it's legs next year...
Both teams make a huge ton of sense geographically, either one of them plus Buff St keeps their AQ...
If that is the case, I can see Wesley, Salisbury, and Frostburg State going to the NJAC.
From what I remember, it seemed that the NJAC didn't want those teams in the first place.
It also seems that Cortland did not have any intrest in joining the E8, and I did not hear any news of Brockport wanting to join either when the E8 was looking for members.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 18, 2011, 10:36:08 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 18, 2011, 10:21:10 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 17, 2011, 07:46:06 PM
If SU & Frostburg don't get re-upped, the E8 needs to get Cortland and/or Brockport on board...
Imagine Cortaca for the AQ (if Ithaca decides to get good again)...
There's also some rumblings of Brockport being added for the Courage Bowl after UR is done tucking it's tail between it's legs next year...
Both teams make a huge ton of sense geographically, either one of them plus Buff St keeps their AQ...
If that is the case, I can see Wesley, Salisbury, and Frostburg State going to the NJAC.
From what I remember, it seemed that the NJAC didn't want those teams in the first place.
It also seems that Cortland did not have any intrest in joining the E8, and I did not hear any news of Brockport wanting to join either when the E8 was looking for members.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 18, 2011, 10:39:43 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 18, 2011, 10:36:08 AMQuote from: SUADC on November 18, 2011, 10:21:10 AMQuote from: Upstate on November 17, 2011, 07:46:06 PM
If SU & Frostburg don't get re-upped, the E8 needs to get Cortland and/or Brockport on board...
Imagine Cortaca for the AQ (if Ithaca decides to get good again)...
There's also some rumblings of Brockport being added for the Courage Bowl after UR is done tucking it's tail between it's legs next year...
Both teams make a huge ton of sense geographically, either one of them plus Buff St keeps their AQ...
If that is the case, I can see Wesley, Salisbury, and Frostburg State going to the NJAC.
From what I remember, it seemed that the NJAC didn't want those teams in the first place.
It also seems that Cortland did not have any intrest in joining the E8, and I did not hear any news of Brockport wanting to join either when the E8 was looking for members.
Frank beat me to the 100 player roster limit.
As for Brockport, I'm hopeful that with Buff State having made the switch that they will reconsider. Either that or we'll have to press Alfred State to make the move to D3 and start the Traffic Light Trophy game here in Mayberry!
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 18, 2011, 10:41:22 AM
Whats the limit in the NJAC?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 18, 2011, 11:08:18 AM
A small part of this feature story, but part of it nonetheless, is Mike Cragg talking about the schedule timing and whether they had a chance to play Wesley this regular season or not:
http://www.d3football.com/playoffs/2011/upstate-underdogs-hit-the-road
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 18, 2011, 11:19:51 AM
Of all of the intriguing games that I would LIKE to attend tomorrow, I will be going to Endicott vs. Mt. Ida. Should be HIGHLY competitive. But it looks to be a nice day anyhow.
Their website says it's at 1. Can anyone confirm?
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 18, 2011, 10:42:22 AM
Traffic Light Trophy? I thought it was a four way stop sign?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 18, 2011, 11:35:42 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 18, 2011, 10:42:22 AM
Traffic Light Trophy? I thought it was a four way stop sign?
Oh, no. It's most definitely a traffic light (http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/finalword/2004-04-21-final-word_x.htm).
Quote from: pg04 on November 18, 2011, 12:43:34 PM
My Stab at predicting the NCAA playoff games involving those teams in "Eastern" conferences.
Western New England 17
Salisbury 52
With the offense of Salisbury I don't see this being close.
Norwich 3
Delaware Valley 49
I just don't think Norwich has a chance in hell in this one...
St. John Fisher 24
Johns Hopkins 28
I wanted to give Fisher the win here, but think Hopkins will pull it out in the end.
And my Upset Special :
Christopher Newport 35
Kean 31
I still have trouble being convinced of Kean now that they've lost to Brockport
And my REAL upset Special:
Wesley 21
Hobart 24
I know I'm going out on a limb here, but I think they'll be fired up for this game. Hobart blasted Fisher during the season, and I think that team could show up again. Wesley is kind of an enigma to me. I'm not sure if they are actually the team they have been in the past. They beat Salisbury, but lost to Kean. I think either way this could come down to the end... ( I hope so!)
Anyway, good luck to all teams this weekend!
Quote from: pg04 on November 18, 2011, 12:43:34 PMThe Wesley that lost to Kean and the Wesley that rolled at the end of the season are completely different teams. They have come together since then and are really playing the best ball i have seen them play all season. Wesley will be plenty fired up for this game as well. They have been since the Walsh game. They want to keep winning for Ben Knapp. Pumped up for Saturday though. Best of luck.
Wesley 21
Hobart 24
I know I'm going out on a limb here, but I think they'll be fired up for this game. Hobart blasted Fisher during the season, and I think that team could show up again. Wesley is kind of an enigma to me. I'm not sure if they are actually the team they have been in the past. They beat Salisbury, but lost to Kean. I think either way this could come down to the end... ( I hope so!)
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 18, 2011, 03:09:34 PM
I am not usually this optimistic about Fisher this year, but I have a good feeling about this game.
Their size and physicality should be a key factor in winning this game.
Quote from: SU Backer on November 18, 2011, 03:47:02 PM
Ok-been lurking the E8 boards all year, 1st post this season. I have been following Salisbury football for almost all of Coach Wood's tenure (the last 9 years or so at least, my son played for them '04-'07, was a 4 year starter as a D-lineman), so I know them very well. I saw every home and away game in that time and many games before and since, both home and away. First, SU- I beleive this is the best team since the '04 team that went 10-0 in the regular season (including the last time they beat Wesley). However, I hope that this team isn't reading what you all are posting, or starting to believe their own press. In '04 they did just that, and lost in the 1st round to a lesser (IMHO) opponent in Christopher Newport. I have seen SU in person 3 times this year and have watched tape on WNEC and I don't think SU is 70 points better than they are. Yes, they are better and they should win convincingly, but they must stay focused and avoid turnovers-always their undoing in the playoffs. I think SU wins 42-17 and hope that you all are right in predicting a larger margin of victory. I will be there with my son cheering them on for sure!
Lastly do NOT underestimate Wesley-I've seen them and they are the real deal and (IMHO) will whip Hobart handily. Go GULLS!
Quote from: SU Backer on November 18, 2011, 03:47:02 PM
Ok-been lurking the E8 boards all year, 1st post this season. I have been following Salisbury football for almost all of Coach Wood's tenure (the last 9 years or so at least, my son played for them '04-'07, was a 4 year starter as a D-lineman), so I know them very well. I saw every home and away game in that time and many games before and since, both home and away. First, SU- I beleive this is the best team since the '04 team that went 10-0 in the regular season (including the last time they beat Wesley). However, I hope that this team isn't reading what you all are posting, or starting to believe their own press. In '04 they did just that, and lost in the 1st round to a lesser (IMHO) opponent in Christopher Newport. I have seen SU in person 3 times this year and have watched tape on WNEC and I don't think SU is 70 points better than they are. Yes, they are better and they should win convincingly, but they must stay focused and avoid turnovers-always their undoing in the playoffs. I think SU wins 42-17 and hope that you all are right in predicting a larger margin of victory. I will be there with my son cheering them on for sure!
Lastly do NOT underestimate Wesley-I've seen them and they are the real deal and (IMHO) will whip Hobart handily. Go GULLS!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 18, 2011, 01:54:14 PM
Salisbury 70
WNEC 10
WNEC is VERY pumped up in the first half and falls to a large 49-0 halftime deficit. Once calm, they put up 10 points in the 4th.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 18, 2011, 11:15:15 PM
sorry for my arrogance, as i have been accused of it before. hobart has no chance. they have not played a team close to as good as wesley is, dont give me fisher, i have seen both play this year live, most of you have not, and they are not close. wesley wins by 30 unless they turn the ball over, then the game may be close. i think fisher has a good chance of winning and so does cnu.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 18, 2011, 11:25:14 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 18, 2011, 11:15:15 PM
sorry for my arrogance, as i have been accused of it before. hobart has no chance. they have not played a team close to as good as wesley is, dont give me fisher, i have seen both play this year live, most of you have not, and they are not close. wesley wins by 30 unless they turn the ball over, then the game may be close. i think fisher has a good chance of winning and so does cnu.
I don't think you're arrogant Wesleydad, you've been ok in my book. We differ only in the sense that you seem to view Wesley as a team that nobody has ever seen before, and a team that will lose to nobody outside of UWW or UMU. Wesley is good but they aren't Mount Union good. They can be beaten by a team outside of the top 5 in the country. Heck it has even been proven this year. I know Wesley supporters like to pretend the Kean game didn't happen, much like the Fisher people wish Hobart never happened to them. But if Hobart plays the way they did against Fisher...it won't be a blowout. Of course Hobart it would seem hasn't played at the level they played the day I saw them since the Fisher game. So in the end you may be correct.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 19, 2011, 09:03:53 AMHear you'll be in Beverly today. Please where a big red hat so that we can find you!
wesleydad, I'm having a hard time figuring out if you've seen a live game this year.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 18, 2011, 03:09:34 PM
I am not usually this optimistic about Fisher this year, but I have a good feeling about this game.
Their size and physicality should be a key factor in winning this game.
Quote from: Charles on November 19, 2011, 09:23:44 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 19, 2011, 09:03:53 AMHear you'll be in Beverly today. Please where a big red hat so that we can find you!
wesleydad, I'm having a hard time figuring out if you've seen a live game this year.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 18, 2011, 11:15:15 PM
sorry for my arrogance, as i have been accused of it before. hobart has no chance. they have not played a team close to as good as wesley is, dont give me fisher, i have seen both play this year live, most of you have not, and they are not close. wesley wins by 30 unless they turn the ball over, then the game may be close. i think fisher has a good chance of winning and so does cnu.
Quote from: DanPadavona on November 19, 2011, 07:23:22 PM
The East has been waiting for a chance to prove itself against someone in the country not named Mount Union. I think it is time people wake up and realize that teams like CNU and JHU play in much weaker conferences, and that their gaudy regular season records would not hold up in the NJAC, MAC, and the E8.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 02, 2011, 04:19:05 PM(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.pelicanparts.com%2Fuploads17%2Fbeatdeadhorse51277151977.gif&hash=73159adb55a1bd83d9036b754c774850fa880471)
Not to revive a dead horse...
Quote from: Ralph Turner on December 03, 2011, 05:05:32 PM
Nice run in the playoffs for SJF.
The committee was right to give the Cards a Pool C bid!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 02:31:48 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on December 03, 2011, 05:05:32 PM
Nice run in the playoffs for SJF.
The committee was right to give the Cards a Pool C bid!
I agree, but let's be careful using playoff results as an after the fact argument for selection. The decision is either right or wrong at the time. Just because something worked out doesn't mean it was the right call to begin with. How do we know the team Fisher got picked over couldn't have done the same thing? Or even upset St. Thomas?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 05, 2011, 02:50:41 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 02:31:48 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on December 03, 2011, 05:05:32 PM
Nice run in the playoffs for SJF.
The committee was right to give the Cards a Pool C bid!
I agree, but let's be careful using playoff results as an after the fact argument for selection. The decision is either right or wrong at the time. Just because something worked out doesn't mean it was the right call to begin with. How do we know the team Fisher got picked over couldn't have done the same thing? Or even upset St. Thomas?
Because Endicott barely beat Mt. Ida?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 04:37:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 05, 2011, 02:50:41 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 02:31:48 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on December 03, 2011, 05:05:32 PM
Nice run in the playoffs for SJF.
The committee was right to give the Cards a Pool C bid!
I agree, but let's be careful using playoff results as an after the fact argument for selection. The decision is either right or wrong at the time. Just because something worked out doesn't mean it was the right call to begin with. How do we know the team Fisher got picked over couldn't Hhave done the same thing? Or even upset St. Thomas?
Because Endicott barely beat Mt. Ida?
Fine, replace Endicott with one of the NJAC teams left out of the equation...
You're selected for the postseason based on you did in the regular season. The selection is either right or wrong at that point.
I agree that Fisher deserved it,
Quote from: clandfan on December 05, 2011, 05:03:39 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 04:37:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 05, 2011, 02:50:41 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 02:31:48 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on December 03, 2011, 05:05:32 PM
Nice run in the playoffs for SJF.
The committee was right to give the Cards a Pool C bid!
I agree, but let's be careful using playoff results as an after the fact argument for selection. The decision is either right or wrong at the time. Just because something worked out doesn't mean it was the right call to begin with. How do we know the team Fisher got picked over couldn't Hhave done the same thing? Or even upset St. Thomas?
Because Endicott barely beat Mt. Ida?
Fine, replace Endicott with one of the NJAC teams left out of the equation...
You're selected for the postseason based on you did in the regular season. The selection is either right or wrong at that point.
I agree that Fisher deserved it,
Congrats to SJF, they should be proud but I'm not all that sure they deserved it. I understand that the committee had to view Cortland as the third best NJAC team but if you put them side by side SJF, we didn't have 30 point losses to ranked teams and we fared better against like opponents (Ithaca and buff st.).
Easy Regional Team is out. I don't understand POY but I'm probably in the minority for both my comments in this post.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on December 05, 2011, 05:42:02 PMQuote from: clandfan on December 05, 2011, 05:03:39 PM
Congrats to SJF, they should be proud but I'm not all that sure they deserved it. I understand that the committee had to view Cortland as the third best NJAC team but if you put them side by side SJF, we didn't have 30 point losses to ranked teams and we fared better against like opponents (Ithaca and buff st.).
Easy Regional Team is out. I don't understand POY but I'm probably in the minority for both my comments in this post.
With all the static the East Region has gotten for being allegedly the weakest (pretty nice rebuttal this playoff season ;)), was this a Freudian slip?! 8-)
Quote from: Upstate on December 05, 2011, 05:56:34 PMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on December 05, 2011, 05:42:02 PMQuote from: clandfan on December 05, 2011, 05:03:39 PM
Congrats to SJF, they should be proud but I'm not all that sure they deserved it. I understand that the committee had to view Cortland as the third best NJAC team but if you put them side by side SJF, we didn't have 30 point losses to ranked teams and we fared better against like opponents (Ithaca and buff st.).
Easy Regional Team is out. I don't understand POY but I'm probably in the minority for both my comments in this post.
With all the static the East Region has gotten for being allegedly the weakest (pretty nice rebuttal this playoff season ;)), was this a Freudian slip?! 8-)
Nope, he is just the product of the SUNY educational system...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 04:37:10 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 05, 2011, 02:50:41 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 05, 2011, 02:31:48 PMQuote from: Ralph Turner on December 03, 2011, 05:05:32 PM
Nice run in the playoffs for SJF.
The committee was right to give the Cards a Pool C bid!
I agree, but let's be careful using playoff results as an after the fact argument for selection. The decision is either right or wrong at the time. Just because something worked out doesn't mean it was the right call to begin with. How do we know the team Fisher got picked over couldn't have done the same thing? Or even upset St. Thomas?
Because Endicott barely beat Mt. Ida?
Fine, replace Endicott with one of the NJAC teams left out of the equation...
You're selected for the postseason based on you did in the regular season. The selection is either right or wrong at that point.
I agree that Fisher deserved it,
Quote from: clandfan on December 05, 2011, 07:10:29 PM
It's a TYPO! Fat fingers on an iPhone. I thought the East was represented well by SJF but in support of East strength, I don't think that SJF is the only East team that could have made it to the quarter finals and only to be whooped up on by St Thomas.
My question about the EAST Regional team is related to how D3football.com selects an East Region Offensive Player of the Year who wasn't even deemed the best offensive player in his own conference? If they wanted to buck the trend and show some love to a WR then Babin had equal to better numbers from a stronger league. Congrats to the Union WR, just seemed like a curious pick. I never saw him play so I guess I shouldn't comment. I had never even heard of him and I follow the boards fairly regularly.
Quote from: clandfan on December 05, 2011, 07:10:29 PM
It's a TYPO! Fat fingers on an iPhone. I thought the East was represented well by SJF but in support of East strength, I don't think that SJF is the only East team that could have made it to the quarter finals and only to be whooped up on by St Thomas.
My question about the EAST Regional team is related to how D3football.com selects an East Region Offensive Player of the Year who wasn't even deemed the best offensive player in his own conference? If they wanted to buck the trend and show some love to a WR then Babin had equal to better numbers from a stronger league. Congrats to the Union WR, just seemed like a curious pick. I never saw him play so I guess I shouldn't comment. I had never even heard of him and I follow the boards fairly regularly.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on December 05, 2011, 08:22:50 PM
Sometimes the MVP of a conference isn't the best player, but the best player on the championship team.
Quote from: jknezek on December 06, 2011, 10:23:04 AM
OK. This is kind of tongue in cheek and I can't imagine how much I'm going to get dinged for it, but while SJF had a nice playoff run and everyone wants to point to Salisbury and SJF in the last eight as proof the East is better than everyone thinks... I can't help but point out that the ONLY region NOT represented in the Final Four, even in a year of multiple cross region games is... The East.
Wesley knocked off a strong West team in Linfield, UWW knocked off a strong East team in Salisbury, UST knocked off a strong East team in SJF, and UMU knocked off a strong North team in Wabash. So the only team not to have to really prove itself across region was UMU (I know Centre was South, but we're not talking a traditional power program). The South and West both proved they can win top quality cross region games (Wesley, St. Thomas and UWW), and the North (UMU) will get a shot this week, though UMU has plenty of history to be given the benefit of the doubt.
SJF did knock off a very well respected South team in JHU, again not really a power program, but that certainly deserves props. Salisbury's run involved CNU and Kean, so basically a lower South team and an East team. Looking at it this way, the East feasted on itself, SJF knocking off Del Val and Salisbury knocking off Kean, but once again fell at the higher cross-region hurdle.
As I said, this post is a bit tongue-in-cheek since some of who you play in Elite Eight is luck, but the fact remains that when people look at the Final Four year after year, the East has been under-represented for a while. And this year it can't be blamed on moving UMU to the region. So next year, I fully expect the same arguments about the East to come up again, although if the committee continues to seed like they did this year, it certainly becomes less important.
Quote from: jknezek on December 06, 2011, 10:23:04 AM
OK. This is kind of tongue in cheek and I can't imagine how much I'm going to get dinged for it, but while SJF had a nice playoff run and everyone wants to point to Salisbury and SJF in the last eight as proof the East is better than everyone thinks... I can't help but point out that the ONLY region NOT represented in the Final Four, even in a year of multiple cross region games is... The East.
Wesley knocked off a strong West team in Linfield, UWW knocked off a strong East team in Salisbury, UST knocked off a strong East team in SJF, and UMU knocked off a strong North team in Wabash. So the only team not to have to really prove itself across region was UMU (I know Centre was South, but we're not talking a traditional power program). The South and West both proved they can win top quality cross region games (Wesley, St. Thomas and UWW), and the North (UMU) will get a shot this week, though UMU has plenty of history to be given the benefit of the doubt.
SJF did knock off a very well respected South team in JHU, again not really a power program, but that certainly deserves props. Salisbury's run involved CNU and Kean, so basically a lower South team and an East team. Looking at it this way, the East feasted on itself, SJF knocking off Del Val and Salisbury knocking off Kean, but once again fell at the higher cross-region hurdle.
As I said, this post is a bit tongue-in-cheek since some of who you play in Elite Eight is luck, but the fact remains that when people look at the Final Four year after year, the East has been under-represented for a while. And this year it can't be blamed on moving UMU to the region. So next year, I fully expect the same arguments about the East to come up again, although if the committee continues to seed like they did this year, it certainly becomes less important.
Quote from: SUADC on December 06, 2011, 11:19:34 AM
Your post is very interesting. I agree that both of the two east teams that went to the elite 8 got knock off in the cross region games and that there is no East team represented in the Final Four. However, I don't think it is luck at all when it comes to getting to the Elite 8, you never know on any given weekend, what a team might do, that is why you play the game (Did you think Wabash was going to beat North Central or predict 100% of the many upsets throughout the year). It is just matchups and execution, some teams (Mount Union & Wisconisin-Whitewater) matchup and execute their game plans very well against certain teams (Every Division III team other than UWW & MU). Hypothetically speaking, do you believe that either Wisconsin-Whitewater or Mount Union regardless of what bracket they are put in are going to make it to the Stagg Bowl (Yes). So how do you make a claim that the historically the East is weaker, every other team that plays Whitewater & Mount Union are weaker.
Now, with the cross regional games in the third round, Yes, St. Thomas beat St. John Fisher whom beat Johns Hopkins and Delaware Valley (both undeafeated teams). But you overlook the other teams that beat St. John Fisher as well. Both Salisbury & Hobart beat beat St. John Fisher convincingly and both of these teams were playoff teams that loss to great teams, Hobart to Wesley in a close one and Salisbury to Whitewater (who hasn't loss to Whitewater). When you match up any team from any region against Whitewater and Mount Union, what is the expected result (A loss). It is not who makes it to the Final Four, Elite Eight, or Stagg Bowl, but who wins it all and proves it own the field (Not by votes and computer systems like the BCS) at the end of the day. Like Pat said in the podcast, it would have been Whitewater vs. St. Thomas traditionally in the third round and if done correctly St. John Fisher vs. Salisbury in the Third Round. Then as you exclaim about making it to the Final Four, either St. John Fisher or Salisbury would be in the Final Four. Again, we do not have a team in the Final Four, but put Mount Union in the West bracket next year, Whitewater in the South Bracket, Wesley in the East Bracke, and whomever in the East in the North Bracket, looking back, who do you find in the Stagg bowl, Whitewater and Mount Union. Nevertheless, I want to see a different matchup in the Stagg Bowl, but until any team from any region beat Whitewater and Mount Union, I believe that saying the East is Weak because there best team looses to the Purple Powers is Ludicrous.
I still give you a +K, because you explained yourself well and proper, without being an "A hole."
Quote from: jknezek on December 06, 2011, 11:43:16 AMQuote from: SUADC on December 06, 2011, 11:19:34 AM
Your post is very interesting. I agree that both of the two east teams that went to the elite 8 got knock off in the cross region games and that there is no East team represented in the Final Four. However, I don't think it is luck at all when it comes to getting to the Elite 8, you never know on any given weekend, what a team might do, that is why you play the game (Did you think Wabash was going to beat North Central or predict 100% of the many upsets throughout the year). It is just matchups and execution, some teams (Mount Union & Wisconisin-Whitewater) matchup and execute their game plans very well against certain teams (Every Division III team other than UWW & MU). Hypothetically speaking, do you believe that either Wisconsin-Whitewater or Mount Union regardless of what bracket they are put in are going to make it to the Stagg Bowl (Yes). So how do you make a claim that the historically the East is weaker, every other team that plays Whitewater & Mount Union are weaker.
Now, with the cross regional games in the third round, Yes, St. Thomas beat St. John Fisher whom beat Johns Hopkins and Delaware Valley (both undeafeated teams). But you overlook the other teams that beat St. John Fisher as well. Both Salisbury & Hobart beat beat St. John Fisher convincingly and both of these teams were playoff teams that loss to great teams, Hobart to Wesley in a close one and Salisbury to Whitewater (who hasn't loss to Whitewater). When you match up any team from any region against Whitewater and Mount Union, what is the expected result (A loss). It is not who makes it to the Final Four, Elite Eight, or Stagg Bowl, but who wins it all and proves it own the field (Not by votes and computer systems like the BCS) at the end of the day. Like Pat said in the podcast, it would have been Whitewater vs. St. Thomas traditionally in the third round and if done correctly St. John Fisher vs. Salisbury in the Third Round. Then as you exclaim about making it to the Final Four, either St. John Fisher or Salisbury would be in the Final Four. Again, we do not have a team in the Final Four, but put Mount Union in the West bracket next year, Whitewater in the South Bracket, Wesley in the East Bracke, and whomever in the East in the North Bracket, looking back, who do you find in the Stagg bowl, Whitewater and Mount Union. Nevertheless, I want to see a different matchup in the Stagg Bowl, but until any team from any region beat Whitewater and Mount Union, I believe that saying the East is Weak because there best team looses to the Purple Powers is Ludicrous.
I still give you a +K, because you explained yourself well and proper, without being an "A hole."
I like this post. Well put. The first bolded part is what I meant by luck. Any upset in one of the two prior rounds can get you an easier or harder opponent or a home or away game. The fact that both East teams had to travel was a bit unlucky, the fact that Salisbury got UWW is a bit unlucky, though more or less scripted from the bracket, but the way the bracket was set up by pods means Salisbury got unlucky playing UWW after winning their pod as opposed to say Wesley or UMHB who are great teams, but not UWW or UMU obviously.
The second bolded part is kind of interesting, but a non-sequitor from my argument. I made the point that the East appears weak year after year because they don't progress as deep into the Tournament as teams from other regions on a consistent basis. Your point that UMU and UWW make the West and North appear strong is a good one, but this year that argument is blunted by SJF. The 1 and 2 East lost to the 1 and 2 in the West this year, and neither game was all that close, although I'd say they were a long way from truly bad losses. In other words, part of your argument stands, but part of it is no good. At some point, your 1 needs to beat someone else's 1, or your 2 needs to beat someone else's 2. With 1 vs 1 in recent years (UMU versus the last East team standing) hasn't worked out well, or been expected to work out well, 2 vs 2 this year wasn't so good either.
I'm not sure how the third bolded part helps your argument. Wesley beat Hobart. A close loss or a bad loss, the East Region again fell at a cross-region hurdle. The fact that Hobart beat SJF means they were quality teams, but still not up to the snuff of the best teams other regions can produce. That doesn't seem to help the East's case unless you are arguing depth versus top line strength. I always struggle with depth because there aren't enough cross-region games, though SJF beating up on JHU is certainly a good argument that there is more depth in the East than the South, a point I might concede though I don't think JHU would have held up well against Trinity, McM, La. College, UMHB, Wesley or maybe even Centre. They did, however, go undefeated and need to be respected.
Finally, I completely agree with the last bolded point, but that is the problem you and I are getting at. In years past, the East could point to that and say... "you try and do better against a Purple Power". This year with SJF and Hobart, that argument is muted. Both were very good teams in the East, top tier, and both lost against top tier teams from other regions that WEREN'T a Purple Power. Salisbury, however, is admittedly a different case.
Great discussion and I'm going to +K you back because while we may not agree, we can have fun talking about it without slinging mud!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 06, 2011, 11:40:39 AM
Granted, the gap is closing, and Mount isn't rolling teams 66-0 in the semifinals like they were, but Division III football is one of the most top heavy sports there is. Mount's been nearly unbeatable for 15 years, and we're staring at seven straight Stagg Bowls featuring the same two opponents. Good for them, of course, but it's sort of sad we're reduced to Final 4 appearances, #1 seeds, and having to remove two teams from almost any discussion of other team's relative strength...
Quote from: Upstate on December 06, 2011, 12:09:47 PM
Great discussion and great points on both sides +K all around!
What really bums me out is that for the first time since 2006 the East got a #1 seed and they didn't do anything with it. Don't get me wrong I'm glad that the Cardinals were able to knock off the Aggies but it didn't do the region any favors when the last team in, a 2 loss team with their 3rd string QB, was able to go on the road and beat them...
I don't think the East will be seeing a #1 seed again anytime soon...
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 06, 2011, 11:59:02 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 06, 2011, 11:40:39 AM
Granted, the gap is closing, and Mount isn't rolling teams 66-0 in the semifinals like they were, but Division III football is one of the most top heavy sports there is. Mount's been nearly unbeatable for 15 years, and we're staring at seven straight Stagg Bowls featuring the same two opponents. Good for them, of course, but it's sort of sad we're reduced to Final 4 appearances, #1 seeds, and having to remove two teams from almost any discussion of other team's relative strength...
I agree, Bombers, and for that reason I am REALLY hoping that Wesley or St. Thomas knocks off one of the purple powers this year. I have nothing against UMU or UWW; I just want to see some new blood. I was thrilled a while back when St. John's toppled Mount in the early 00's, because I thought that might end the complete Purple Reign, but instead Mount came back stronger than ever, and then an even bigger "bully" (UWW) emerged.
You make the point that at least Mount isn't winning semifinal games by 60 anymore, but that hasn't happened for a while. There have only been a few really bad blowouts in the semifinals in the last 7-8 years (and while Wesley got demolished by UWW a couple times in 2005-06, they did play Mount very tough in 2009).
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 06, 2011, 12:23:54 PM
The East will get a 1 seed. It will just go to a more deserving conference like the LL or E8. Not some chumpy PA conference.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 06, 2011, 12:23:54 PM
The East will get a 1 seed. It will just go to a more deserving conference like the LL or E8. Not some chumpy PA conference.
Quote from: jknezek on December 06, 2011, 06:24:01 PM
Nice dig. But with the youth Del Val has at their impact player positions, I think you'll be seeing them get stronger over the next 2 years. Or some injuries and a few key graduations could do them in. That's the great thing about having to play the games. Although I am thinking one of these years Salisbury will get over the Wesley hurdle again and run the table. If they stay in the E8 it could get harder as the teams get more used to seeing their offense, but they've excelled at it for years and even teams that see it year in and out struggle to contain it except at the very highest levels.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 06, 2011, 12:23:54 PM
The East will get a 1 seed. It will just go to a more deserving conference like the LL or E8. Not some chumpy PA conference.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 06, 2011, 07:10:11 PM
Overall: it's hard to show that the MAC is notably weaker than the NJAC and E8, in my opinion, based on the last few years. I suppose the biggest argument against the MAC is the fact that an undefeated MAC champ lost to the E8 runner-up in the playoffs at home this year. That's it? You're basing your opinion on that one game?
What about 2009, when Albright (MAC runner-up) beat E8 champion Alfred in the playoffs at home? Whoops!
Quote from: pg04 on December 06, 2011, 08:26:33 PMHere you go. :)
I need that beating of a dead horse picture again.
Quote from: Ralph Turner on December 06, 2011, 08:44:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on December 06, 2011, 08:26:33 PMHere you go. :)
I need that beating of a dead horse picture again.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.pelicanparts.com%2Fuploads17%2Fbeatdeadhorse51277151977.gif&hash=73159adb55a1bd83d9036b754c774850fa880471)
Quote from: Ralph Turner on December 06, 2011, 08:44:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on December 06, 2011, 08:26:33 PMHere you go. :)
I need that beating of a dead horse picture again.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.pelicanparts.com%2Fuploads17%2Fbeatdeadhorse51277151977.gif&hash=73159adb55a1bd83d9036b754c774850fa880471)
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on December 06, 2011, 08:39:36 PM
Besides beating a dead horse, ya s'pose Upstate is aware that Mount Union WON with their third string qb?
Quote from: Upstate on December 06, 2011, 08:10:37 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 06, 2011, 07:10:11 PMDid Albright do it with their 3rd string QB?
What about 2009, when Albright (MAC runner-up) beat E8 champion Alfred in the playoffs at home?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 07, 2011, 09:56:30 AM
For anyone who has ever read one of my posts, i'm sure you understood that my comment about the MAC was completely joking. I think the MAC, NJAC, E8, and LL's top teams can all beat each other in any given year. I truly only rip on the ECFC, NEFC, and NESCAC.
Glad I could stir up the pot a bit though....
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Floveourcanucks.com%2Ffin%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F01%2Fstir-the-pot.jpg&hash=21f823f571791bb68972eb565ee16a8cc875c275)
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 02:28:32 PM
Ralph, c'mon. Enough about the need for the NEFC to stick together...
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff159%2FRaulMonkey%2FAnimated%2Fbeating-a-dead-horse.gif&hash=7a20331cd31442ee21711f807d84547f33b9dbe3)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 07, 2011, 02:42:24 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 02:28:32 PM
Ralph, c'mon. Enough about the need for the NEFC to stick together...
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff159%2FRaulMonkey%2FAnimated%2Fbeating-a-dead-horse.gif&hash=7a20331cd31442ee21711f807d84547f33b9dbe3)
That looks like a Llama...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 07, 2011, 02:42:24 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 02:28:32 PM
Ralph, c'mon. Enough about the need for the NEFC to stick together...
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff159%2FRaulMonkey%2FAnimated%2Fbeating-a-dead-horse.gif&hash=7a20331cd31442ee21711f807d84547f33b9dbe3)
That looks like a Llama...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 04:14:14 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 07, 2011, 02:42:24 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 02:28:32 PM
Ralph, c'mon. Enough about the need for the NEFC to stick together...
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff159%2FRaulMonkey%2FAnimated%2Fbeating-a-dead-horse.gif&hash=7a20331cd31442ee21711f807d84547f33b9dbe3)
That looks like a Llama...
You must be using your Press Box's Internet connection again.
HEY NOW!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 07, 2011, 04:17:11 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 04:14:14 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 07, 2011, 02:42:24 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 02:28:32 PM
Ralph, c'mon. Enough about the need for the NEFC to stick together...
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff159%2FRaulMonkey%2FAnimated%2Fbeating-a-dead-horse.gif&hash=7a20331cd31442ee21711f807d84547f33b9dbe3)
That looks like a Llama...
You must be using your Press Box's Internet connection again.
HEY NOW!
Ha! Joke's on you! Ithaca's press box is not handicap accessible, so I wouldn't even be IN the press box! BAM! :o
Maybe it's rain in my eyes, preventing me from looking up and seeing clearly? ;)
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 04:21:37 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 07, 2011, 04:17:11 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 04:14:14 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 07, 2011, 02:42:24 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on December 07, 2011, 02:28:32 PM
Ralph, c'mon. Enough about the need for the NEFC to stick together...
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff159%2FRaulMonkey%2FAnimated%2Fbeating-a-dead-horse.gif&hash=7a20331cd31442ee21711f807d84547f33b9dbe3)
That looks like a Llama...
You must be using your Press Box's Internet connection again.
HEY NOW!
Ha! Joke's on you! Ithaca's press box is not handicap accessible, so I wouldn't even be IN the press box! BAM! :o
Maybe it's rain in my eyes, preventing me from looking up and seeing clearly? ;)
But Ithaca players, coaches and students can walk on water, no? Just transcend the raindrops.
Boo-Yah!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 06, 2011, 10:56:31 AM
I agree with the Cortland fan...(ugh)
Even taking into account Pat's point, Gallo's numbers were virtually identical to Babin's.
D'Andrea, in my view, also had a better season, averaging 158 yards per game on the ground in a much better conference.
Pitcher as well...31 TD's to 5 INT's is astounding. Here's the thing about those numbers too...the NJAC had three teams who finished the year with 20 interceptions, which was tied for eighth in the country. Some of that may be due to bad quarterback play, but Pitcher still only threw two INT's in those three games against obviously good secondaries. He also chipped in with 318 rushing yards (sack yardage not included) and three TD's, which is enough in my view that it provides a slight boost
Gallo had a great year but to me it was:
1. Pitcher
2. D'Andrea
T-3 Gallo, Babin
Quote from: SJFF82 on December 19, 2011, 01:27:13 PM
In the past I have 'critiqued' the Weekly poll system because, at this level, other than MUC/UWW, we really dont know how good the teams are as they relate to eachother. Consequently, the weekly poll from 3-25 is really just an attempt to rank teams based on the game just played with no real insight as to how that team could fare OOC against a team with a similar record.
...all that mumbling for this.....How the hell does Hobart end up ranked so low in the final poll, other than pure apathy on part of the voters because the season is over. Did they miss the part of the play-offs where Hobart went to Wesley and only lost by a TD, and then Wesley went all the way to the Final 4 and played MUC to the end, and then MUC almost pulled it off against UWW?
Then the obvious....they beat Fisher by 75 points at Fisher and ends up over 15 spots ahead of them in the poll...
I know that beating someone who beat someone who beat someone else doesnt always lead to the right conclusion, but in this case the are some real hard and fast numbers that just dont add up? I would like to ask the pollsters whether they think Fisher woulda fared better in RD 1 ag. WESLEY. Likewise, do they think Hobart would not have beaten Johns Hopkins and DVC and then have been homogenized by the Tommies like FISHER.
IMHO, I think had Hobart and SJF been reversed in the play-off seedings (and certainly you coulda have argued they shoulda) Hobart makes the run SJF did, SJF loses to Wesley and Hobart is 11 and SJF is not even an afterthought.....yet they are the same team nonetheless regardless of the poll
Bottom line I guess....its awesome when your team finishes 11, but it sucks when you are 27 and but for the draw of the seeds, you know you are better than the 11 team.
Oh wait....I wear Burgundy not Orange....scratch all that ;)
[/quo
SJFF82, well put couldnt agree more
Quote from: pumkinattack on December 19, 2011, 03:16:50 PM
82, I've found myself on the other side of you on a few topics, but thanks for pointing this out. I was bummed, but not surprised, and think I noted that right after the Wesley game, that Bart would be long forgotten. Too bad, but congrats to you guys - definitely don't begrudge SJF that. More games, more experience against good (JHU/DelVal) to great competition (St Tom), more accolades like AA's. I'd gladly take the other side of the situation (Fisher's) and hope to get that one day. Interestingly, in all the playoff appearances over the past dozen years, Bart's almost always gotten suspect competion, or top 6 teams early. Arguably the only matchups that were sort of middle of the road competition were 2004 (Cortland), 2006 (Rowan) and 2008 (Lyco, although even though Bart was predicted to be the underdog, I think that had more to do with the continous underappreciation of what Coach Cragg has built at Hobart).
It's not only SJF vis a vis Hobart, but the entire East that are ranked.
Salisbury 8
Kean 9
SJF 11
DelVal 13
Even JHU (CC schools are East in my book, even though for NCAA purposes they're south) only dropping to 18. I would glady put Hobart, Union, RPI up against the top 3 in the CC any day.
Hobart ORV
I only hope that our boys come back with a massive chip on their shoulders and rip a new one into the entire schedule next year. Some talent graduates for Bart, but if they can fix the secondary, they should be right there with the top's in the East, and hopefully competitive with the top 6-8 nationally, next year.
Quote from: SUADC on December 19, 2011, 03:28:31 PM
The Top 5 North: #1 MUC, #2 Wabash, #3 Franklin, #4 Illinois Wesleyan, #T5 Baldwin-Wallace & Wheaton (Ill.)
Quote from: Pat Coleman on December 19, 2011, 06:03:08 PM
This is worth an entire blog post unto itself and I might or might not get a chance to write it in the near future, but here's my take. It's really hard to equate a September game to a November or December finish. Now, Hobart didn't get much of an opportunity to prove itself in November and passed up opportunities to do so in September, but it seems reasonable to believe that St. John Fisher changed over the course of the season.
And a word about comparative scores. (Yes, I know that's not what this is necessarily about.) What do the comparative scores mean for the Puple Powers against UW-Oshkosh? Nothing. Part of the finesse of voting in a Top 25 is knowing which results to give greater weight to. The fact that UWO almost beat UWW weeks after getting blown out by Mount Union turned out to predict absolutely nothing.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 20, 2011, 01:54:03 PM
I have no problem with Hobart there. I know seedings and they can play a role in a playoff run, but part of the reason Hobart got that seeding was because of an unimpressive regular-season slate. I mean, heading into the playoffs, you had a 7-1 Hobart who had a Fisher win and...what exactly? Hobart had two wins all season against teams with winning records, and at the risk of getting Frank's ire up, Union wasn't that great of a win.
Sure, they played Wesley tough. But considering where they were when the regular season ended, it's tough to move Hobart up that much based on a loss.
At the end of the day Hobart had seven wins. I'm looking at prior polls, and the last 7-win team to finish ranked was Union in 2006. But that Union team had a better body of work (IMO) and even then, they were 25th, receiving fewer votes than Hobart did. So Hobart got the same treatment that Union team did
The last team with 7 wins to finish highly ranked? La-Crosse who was 13th and 7-4. Again, a better body of work. (Tougher conference, Playoff win, games against upper-division schools OOC.)
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 02:35:17 PM
Yea but if Mount Union played Hobarts schedule they would have only had 8 wins. Unless you are saying pollsters are punishing the team because of the schedule they had to play?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on December 20, 2011, 02:47:14 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 02:35:17 PM
Yea but if Mount Union played Hobarts schedule they would have only had 8 wins. Unless you are saying pollsters are punishing the team because of the schedule they had to play?
One team's punishing is another team's rewarding. It's rewarding another team that played a more complete schedule.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 20, 2011, 02:44:06 PM
It's not a question of getting my ire up here... It's just a little unfortunate that you tend to cherry pick in that analysis. Hobart had 8 sacks vs. a Union team that had a Second Team All-East OL (Smith) and was obviously turning the corner at that point in the season into a much-improved team. I've heard more than one coach say that Union was actually the best team in the LL by the end of the season once the defense shored up and got comfortable. In retrospect now, the Union win and SJF win by Hobart are actually a lot more impressive when you look at how both teams proved themselves to be better than what we considered at the time of the matchups.
More importantly, though, name another team that, in the First Round, played a better game while losing. Ironically, I placed Hobart 17th (I looked at the 16 Second Round teams and basically considered level of strength before placing all 16 Second Round teams ahead of Hobart -- yet, the 8 quarterfinalists were not my top 8, in case you're wondering if I just used the playoffs as a proxy). The thing that irks me a bit is that 9 of Hobart's points came from me. The average position for all other pollsters was 24th for Hobart. That provided for both some unfortunate math here (since average position of 24th leading to a 26th place ranking is a little sad) and some questioning as to how bad the perception is regarding the region. Looking at the sum total of Hobart, they have to be the LL favorite next year, without a doubt in my mind, especially with their returning starters on defense. If our job is to rank the teams as they stand as of Friday night, then Hobart is, indeed, a Top 20 team. Their resume, although limited, supports that assessment, and the team itself is still very much intact looking forward.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 02:50:53 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on December 20, 2011, 02:47:14 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 02:35:17 PM
Yea but if Mount Union played Hobarts schedule they would have only had 8 wins. Unless you are saying pollsters are punishing the team because of the schedule they had to play?
One team's punishing is another team's rewarding. It's rewarding another team that played a more complete schedule.
Ok then, what if Hobart scheduled Colgate and Cornell and beat those teams instead of playing SJF and Bruce Dickinson? Would they still have been punished by playing the best schedule in the country? Or what if they replaced SJF and Bruce with MIT and Anna Maria, Caselton and Husson? That would be a 10 game schedule that is worse than their 8 game schedule, and much worse if they had played Colgate and Cornell.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 20, 2011, 03:41:06 PM
I guess here's how I view Hobart: They're a team that won a mediocre conference, and lost in the first round of the playoffs. To some degree, that's out of their control. They had some scheduling issues, and the LL being down isn't their fault. But that's still their season. I think you're right that sometimes teams are playing better than their seeding/record might indicate, but I don't think 26th is an insult to the team.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 20, 2011, 04:15:32 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 02:50:53 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on December 20, 2011, 02:47:14 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 02:35:17 PM
Yea but if Mount Union played Hobarts schedule they would have only had 8 wins. Unless you are saying pollsters are punishing the team because of the schedule they had to play?
One team's punishing is another team's rewarding. It's rewarding another team that played a more complete schedule.
Ok then, what if Hobart scheduled Colgate and Cornell and beat those teams instead of playing SJF and Bruce Dickinson? Would they still have been punished by playing the best schedule in the country? Or what if they replaced SJF and Bruce with MIT and Anna Maria, Caselton and Husson? That would be a 10 game schedule that is worse than their 8 game schedule, and much worse if they had played Colgate and Cornell.
Here's the thing: We've seen teams play weak schedules. We've seen teams play shortened schedules. But Hobart did both. Eight games, and an SOS good for 128th in the country. That strikes me as unique, (although maybe Frank or Pat know of some other instances where something similar occurred?)
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 04:33:08 PM
Hobart lost to one of the top 4 teams in the country by 7 points in the playoffs and lost to another top 10 team (or close to it) by a monkeystomp. Hobart should have been ranked around 15 in my opinion.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 20, 2011, 04:41:22 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 04:33:08 PM
Hobart lost to one of the top 4 teams in the country by 7 points in the playoffs and lost to another top 10 team (or close to it) by a monkeystomp. Hobart should have been ranked around 15 in my opinion.
Jonny,
I would have agreed with this until I looked at the resumes of teams in the lower tier of the top 25 and noticed that many of them could claim something similar. Hobart lost to one of the top 4 teams in the country by 7? Bethel lost to one of the top 4 teams in the country by 10. Baldwin-Wallace lost to one of the top 2 teams in the country by 5 (and actually LED in the fourth quarter). Both of Wheaton's losses came against playoff teams. None of the aforementioned teams lost to a team as "bad" as RPI.
As a factual correction: you reference Hobart losing a monkey-stomp to another top 10 team, but I think you got temporarily mixed up. Hobart actually WON a monkey-stomp against a borderline top 10 team (SJF), but they LOST to a very mediocre 4-5 RPI team (and they did this late in the season, when the "Oh, it was Week 1" or "Well, they improved over the season" arguments probably don't hold up any more).
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 04:51:34 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 20, 2011, 04:41:22 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 04:33:08 PM
Hobart lost to one of the top 4 teams in the country by 7 points in the playoffs and lost to another top 10 team (or close to it) by a monkeystomp. Hobart should have been ranked around 15 in my opinion.
Jonny,
I would have agreed with this until I looked at the resumes of teams in the lower tier of the top 25 and noticed that many of them could claim something similar. Hobart lost to one of the top 4 teams in the country by 7? Bethel lost to one of the top 4 teams in the country by 10. Baldwin-Wallace lost to one of the top 2 teams in the country by 5 (and actually LED in the fourth quarter). Both of Wheaton's losses came against playoff teams. None of the aforementioned teams lost to a team as "bad" as RPI.
As a factual correction: you reference Hobart losing a monkey-stomp to another top 10 team, but I think you got temporarily mixed up. Hobart actually WON a monkey-stomp against a borderline top 10 team (SJF), but they LOST to a very mediocre 4-5 RPI team (and they did this late in the season, when the "Oh, it was Week 1" or "Well, they improved over the season" arguments probably don't hold up any more).
Yea I know these things can go either way, but Hobart knew what it needed to do to get in the playoffs and they did it and then lost on the road in a close game (I think) in the playoffs. That is the only reason why I give them the edge over those other teams.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on December 20, 2011, 04:57:12 PM
I guess the question is why those teams can prosper from their affiliations with Wesley in the playoffs, but Hobart seemed somewhat ignored in the same assessment.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on December 21, 2011, 12:00:35 PM
It is who you beat, but remember that Hobart has the extra loss that Johns Hopkins doesn't have. The understanding behind the "It's not who you lost to, it's who you beat," mantra is that the "who you lost to" is a ranked team or a high-quality opponent.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on December 21, 2011, 12:00:35 PM
It is who you beat, but remember that Hobart has the extra loss that Johns Hopkins doesn't have. The understanding behind the "It's not who you lost to, it's who you beat," mantra is that the "who you lost to" is a ranked team or a high-quality opponent.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 04:33:08 PM
The LL was not a great conference this past year but I think they were a little underated. As bad as some of their records were, they showed that many of their teams could play with the best. Maybe the most inconsistent conference thats for sure.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 01:17:19 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 20, 2011, 04:33:08 PM
The LL was not a great conference this past year but I think they were a little underated. As bad as some of their records were, they showed that many of their teams could play with the best. Maybe the most inconsistent conference thats for sure.
Other than Hobart, who showed anything close to that in the LL? The rest of the conference was 6-14 in OOC play this season
Here were the OOC wins by the LL teams other than Hobart
Springfield (6-4, 4th place in the E8)
Case Western (9-1, 1st place in UAA)
Castleton State (4-6, 5th place in the ECFC)
Norwich (7-4, 1st in ECFC)
Coast Guard (2-7, 7th in NEFC)
Becker (1-9, 7th in ECFC)
Four absolutely awful teams, one decent, tough to play team (Springfield) and one team that got an also receiving votes (Case).
And the losses were similarly uninspiring. Salve, Utica, and Ithaca by Union is not exactly a murderer's row. Rochester hung with Alfred but got embarrassed by Fisher. RPI lost to Utica and got waxed by Alfred. So did St. Lawrence. Merchant got waxed by Hopkins and lost to Maritime. WPI got lit up by Merrimack, and lost to Worchester State.
I'm not trying to pile on, but come on. Other than Hobart, what's standing out here?
Quote from: pumkinattack on December 21, 2011, 02:00:15 PM
Ok, so we all think then that Kean, DelVal and SJF are far superior to Hobart then? Before it was that all those teams are much closer (like a page or two ago). I'm really not interested in responding to Pat here simply because I've never witnessed him accept anyone else's opinion when it differs from him on anything (when we're discussing subjective matters that require critical thought - his defense will be something about how many teams he's seen play this year, but listening others, currently involved in the game is somehow not germane).
How about this, Thomas More (Sorry SF, just trying to make a point). Is a home loss to Waynesburg any different? 34 pts is a decent difference, especially when it's clear that Bart's pt total is inflated by LL homer FR.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 21, 2011, 02:04:00 PM
Jonny, I really mean this as a good-natured debate, but when you say this:
"I think many of the LL teams (Union, Rochester, RPI) could have given any E8 team a good game at the end of the season."
I'm basically going to repeat what Bombers said back to you: what makes you believe that's true?
Union beat the E8's fourth-place team, Springfield, by one touchdown at home. Springfield got hammered by Salisbury and SJF and also lost to Alfred. Perhaps I'm just arguing semantics, but I don't see how that means that Union could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
Rochester went 0-2 against the E8, getting destroyed by SJF early and losing to Alfred later (an Alfred team that had just lost two straight E8 games, giving up 69 and 54 points, and one of THOSE came against a mediocre Frostburg State team who wasn't in the top half of the E8).
RPI got steamrolled by Alfred to open the season and lost to LL bottom-feeder Merchant Marine to end it. The only thing that suggests that they could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season is their upset win over Hobart, but considering that was sandwiched between two losses and came a few weeks after a home loss to E8 bottom-feeder Utica, I'm still not sure that I'm buying RPI giving "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 21, 2011, 02:04:00 PM
Jonny, I really mean this as a good-natured debate, but when you say this:
"I think many of the LL teams (Union, Rochester, RPI) could have given any E8 team a good game at the end of the season."
I'm basically going to repeat what Bombers said back to you: what makes you believe that's true?
Union beat the E8's fourth-place team, Springfield, by one touchdown at home. Springfield got hammered by Salisbury and SJF and also lost to Alfred. Perhaps I'm just arguing semantics, but I don't see how that means that Union could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
Rochester went 0-2 against the E8, getting destroyed by SJF early and losing to Alfred later (an Alfred team that had just lost two straight E8 games, giving up 69 and 54 points, and one of THOSE came against a mediocre Frostburg State team who wasn't in the top half of the E8).
RPI got steamrolled by Alfred to open the season and lost to LL bottom-feeder Merchant Marine to end it. The only thing that suggests that they could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season is their upset win over Hobart, but considering that was sandwiched between two losses and came a few weeks after a home loss to E8 bottom-feeder Utica, I'm still not sure that I'm buying RPI giving "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 02:14:30 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 21, 2011, 02:04:00 PM
Jonny, I really mean this as a good-natured debate, but when you say this:
"I think many of the LL teams (Union, Rochester, RPI) could have given any E8 team a good game at the end of the season."
I'm basically going to repeat what Bombers said back to you: what makes you believe that's true?
Union beat the E8's fourth-place team, Springfield, by one touchdown at home. Springfield got hammered by Salisbury and SJF and also lost to Alfred. Perhaps I'm just arguing semantics, but I don't see how that means that Union could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
Rochester went 0-2 against the E8, getting destroyed by SJF early and losing to Alfred later (an Alfred team that had just lost two straight E8 games, giving up 69 and 54 points, and one of THOSE came against a mediocre Frostburg State team who wasn't in the top half of the E8).
RPI got steamrolled by Alfred to open the season and lost to LL bottom-feeder Merchant Marine to end it. The only thing that suggests that they could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season is their upset win over Hobart, but considering that was sandwiched between two losses and came a few weeks after a home loss to E8 bottom-feeder Utica, I'm still not sure that I'm buying RPI giving "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
If RPI can give Hobart the same game Wesley can, what makes you think RPI can't play a good game at the end of the year?
If Union can then beat RPI, wouldn't you put them in the same boat?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 02:52:27 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 02:14:30 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 21, 2011, 02:04:00 PM
Jonny, I really mean this as a good-natured debate, but when you say this:
"I think many of the LL teams (Union, Rochester, RPI) could have given any E8 team a good game at the end of the season."
I'm basically going to repeat what Bombers said back to you: what makes you believe that's true?
Union beat the E8's fourth-place team, Springfield, by one touchdown at home. Springfield got hammered by Salisbury and SJF and also lost to Alfred. Perhaps I'm just arguing semantics, but I don't see how that means that Union could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
Rochester went 0-2 against the E8, getting destroyed by SJF early and losing to Alfred later (an Alfred team that had just lost two straight E8 games, giving up 69 and 54 points, and one of THOSE came against a mediocre Frostburg State team who wasn't in the top half of the E8).
RPI got steamrolled by Alfred to open the season and lost to LL bottom-feeder Merchant Marine to end it. The only thing that suggests that they could have given "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season is their upset win over Hobart, but considering that was sandwiched between two losses and came a few weeks after a home loss to E8 bottom-feeder Utica, I'm still not sure that I'm buying RPI giving "any" E8 team a good game by the end of the season.
If RPI can give Hobart the same game Wesley can, what makes you think RPI can't play a good game at the end of the year?
If Union can then beat RPI, wouldn't you put them in the same boat?
Other than the fact that RPI's final game of the year saw them lose at home to the 6th place team in the LL and they needed a 4th-and-15 conversion to avoid being Monkey-Stomped?
Look at RPI's body of work for the season. Other than Hobart, zero quality wins. Several bad losses.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 02:36:20 PM
All told, I think Union would go 6-2 against the E8 today. 5-3 at the worst.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 21, 2011, 02:58:03 PM
You E8 guys are funny about Salisbury. Salisbury blew out every team in the E8 too, so don't go thinking that there is a huge difference between all E8 teams vs. LL teams. Your second best(Fisher) went up against the LL best(Hobart) and didn't fare well.
Salisbury was obviously in a class by themselves.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 03:35:05 PM
Yea but my whole point is that if they beat Hobart, they could probably beat other teams don't you think? Salsibury and Hobart basically do the same thing against Wesley, and no one in the E8 even came close to Salisbury this year. As Luvd3 kind of points out below, maybe some of this familiarity comes into play with some league games, but I still say that you can argue Hobart is the best team in the east this year, and that other LL teams proved they could hang with the best team in the east.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 03:50:19 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 03:35:05 PM
Yea but my whole point is that if they beat Hobart, they could probably beat other teams don't you think? Salsibury and Hobart basically do the same thing against Wesley, and no one in the E8 even came close to Salisbury this year. As Luvd3 kind of points out below, maybe some of this familiarity comes into play with some league games, but I still say that you can argue Hobart is the best team in the east this year, and that other LL teams proved they could hang with the best team in the east.
No. I think they beat Hobart because the Statesman had an epic special teams meltdown that cost them 13 points.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 21, 2011, 02:58:03 PM
Salisbury blew out every team in the E8 too, so don't go thinking that there is a huge difference between all E8 teams vs. LL teams. Your second best(Fisher) went up against the LL best(Hobart) and didn't fare well.
Salisbury was obviously in a class by themselves.
Quote from: Luv D3 on December 21, 2011, 03:15:16 PM
I have read through some of these posts A lot of us are forgetting to mention how much familiarity of opponent is really worth. Within your league regardless if its E8 or LL, the fact of the matter is you know those teams you are playing inside and out. You can throw the records out when certain programs play one another.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 03:57:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 03:50:19 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 03:35:05 PM
Yea but my whole point is that if they beat Hobart, they could probably beat other teams don't you think? Salsibury and Hobart basically do the same thing against Wesley, and no one in the E8 even came close to Salisbury this year. As Luvd3 kind of points out below, maybe some of this familiarity comes into play with some league games, but I still say that you can argue Hobart is the best team in the east this year, and that other LL teams proved they could hang with the best team in the east.
No. I think they beat Hobart because the Statesman had an epic special teams meltdown that cost them 13 points.
So other teams wouldn't be possible of having meltdowns on special teams, offense or defense?
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 04:28:28 PM
I said the end of the season when I was making my point. RPIs first 8 games or Ithaca's first 4 don't mean anything in regards to my point.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 04:51:46 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 04:28:28 PM
I said the end of the season when I was making my point. RPIs first 8 games or Ithaca's first 4 don't mean anything in regards to my point.
The end of the season, where RPI lost to the 6th place team in the LL? That was RPI's end of the season. Not the Hobart game.
But you're ignoring that too. You're basically saying "Look at how they played Hobart." Well, yeah Johnny. Every halfway decent team could hang with the top teams if they could replicate how they played at their best. Everyone could hang with great teams if the only thing we decided to look at was how they looked in their best week.
If Jason Hendel had completed 65% of his passes, and had 3 total TD's and zero turnovers like he did against Union, Ithaca might have been beaten Salisbury, and Fisher, and Alfred, and Utica. The point is, he never played like that again. Which is, in large part, why Ithaca lost all those games.
The point I'm making is yes, RPI beat Hobart. And they never played that well any other week of the season. When you're discussing a hypothetical game, body of work always matters.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:21:20 PM
I don't think Hendel could complete 65% of his passes, because he has not shown me anything that would indicate that he could do that. RPI did show me that they could in fact beat a good team.
Factoring in RPIs last game only shows that they can still lose to crappy teams, but has no bearing on their ability to win big games, since they beat Hobart the week before in the second to last game of the season. Hendel never threw 65% (I am assuming we are making up these numbers for Hendel), so I would have no basis to speculate whether or not Hendel could ever throw 65%.
Quote from: WashedUp on December 21, 2011, 05:30:10 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:21:20 PM
I don't think Hendel could complete 65% of his passes, because he has not shown me anything that would indicate that he could do that. RPI did show me that they could in fact beat a good team.
Factoring in RPIs last game only shows that they can still lose to crappy teams, but has no bearing on their ability to win big games, since they beat Hobart the week before in the second to last game of the season. Hendel never threw 65% (I am assuming we are making up these numbers for Hendel), so I would have no basis to speculate whether or not Hendel could ever throw 65%.
You missed the part where Hendel had these numbers against Union.
18/26 = 69.23%
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 03:44:37 PM
Yeah, if they played today, Union would beat Utica and Ithaca and Salve. Well, then don't wait until Week 4 to kick it into gear next time and you won't have that problem
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:21:20 PM
The facts are that RPI did in fact beat Hobart at the end of the season. In my opinion, I think RPI might be able to do that to another team. Ithaca, Springfield, Hartwick, Frostburg or Utica sure didn't prove to me that they could beat a top E8 team or Hobart late in the season.
And in theory, yes, every halfway decent team could hang with the top teams if they could replicate how they played their best, but you know what? The E8 teams did not do that and RPI did do that.
I am working right now and have to type fast, but am I really off the wall on my opinions here?
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on December 21, 2011, 07:11:36 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:21:20 PM
The facts are that RPI did in fact beat Hobart at the end of the season. In my opinion, I think RPI might be able to do that to another team. Ithaca, Springfield, Hartwick, Frostburg or Utica sure didn't prove to me that they could beat a top E8 team or Hobart late in the season.
And in theory, yes, every halfway decent team could hang with the top teams if they could replicate how they played their best, but you know what? The E8 teams did not do that and RPI did do that.
I am working right now and have to type fast, but am I really off the wall on my opinions here?
Sorry, Jonny...but yes, I do think you're off the wall on your opinion. You've now moved to the point where you're arguing that RPI is more dangerous tio a "Top" team than all of the aforementioned E8 teams - despite a laundry list of results demonstrating that the vast majority of the E8 is superior to the vast majority of the LL, in which RPI finished tied for third/fourth - because of a single upset win against Hobart.
As Bombers has been telling you - the fact that RPI did manage to upset Hobart merely illustrates that they were capable, on their very best day and Hobart's very worst day, of beating ONE top team. You continue to cling to the fact that the bottom two-thirds of the E8 was not capable of that since they didn't do it, again, ignoring ALL of the results that would suggest that most of those E8 teams are better than RPI (in some cases, probably a LOT better). Again, to wit - the Empire 8 annihilated the LL, up and down the ranks, and that was with ZERO results from Salisbury (who we can essentially exclude from the discussion). Bart (LL #1) beat SJF (E8 #2) and Union (LL#2) beat Springfield (E8 #4). Offsetting that, Union (LL #2) lost to E8 #6 and E8 #7, Rochy (LL #3A) lost to SJF (E8 #2) and Alfred (E8 #3A), RPI (LL#3B) lost to Alfred (E8 #3A) and Utica (E8 #6), SLU (LL #5) also lost to Alfred and Utica, and Merchant Marine lost to Springfield.
That is a LONG list of results (between teams that finished in relatively comparable spots in the two conferences) demonstrating that the vast majority of the E8 teams were far superior to the LL counterparts in the same place. If you REALLY, truly think that RPI is better (or, more dangerous, or whatever) than all of those E8 teams because they managed to upset Hobart...I mean, REALLY? You don't think that the two Empire 8 teams that BEAT RPI might have been capable of a similar effort? Alfred beat RPI by 30 points!!!
Quote from: pumkinattack on December 21, 2011, 02:00:15 PM
Ok, so we all think then that Kean, DelVal and SJF are far superior to Hobart then? Before it was that all those teams are much closer (like a page or two ago). I'm really not interested in responding to Pat here simply because I've never witnessed him accept anyone else's opinion when it differs from him on anything (when we're discussing subjective matters that require critical thought - his defense will be something about how many teams he's seen play this year, but listening others, currently involved in the game is somehow not germane).
How about this, Thomas More (Sorry SF, just trying to make a point). Is a home loss to Waynesburg any different? 34 pts is a decent difference, especially when it's clear that Bart's pt total is inflated by LL homer FR.
I think the real answer is that Hobart started off completely off the map after two mediocre years and becasue they didn't get that natural inflation over the course of the season that others did, they didn't make the grade. That's fine, but it seems to me it would be honest to accept that many voters start with a preseason projection and drift teams up and if you don't start high you damn well run the table in the regular season.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:35:03 PMQuote from: WashedUp on December 21, 2011, 05:30:10 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:21:20 PM
I don't think Hendel could complete 65% of his passes, because he has not shown me anything that would indicate that he could do that. RPI did show me that they could in fact beat a good team.
Factoring in RPIs last game only shows that they can still lose to crappy teams, but has no bearing on their ability to win big games, since they beat Hobart the week before in the second to last game of the season. Hendel never threw 65% (I am assuming we are making up these numbers for Hendel), so I would have no basis to speculate whether or not Hendel could ever throw 65%.
You missed the part where Hendel had these numbers against Union.
18/26 = 69.23%
No I didn't even look. I thought bombers was throwing out a number that Hendel did not have. We can use 75% for this argument then. Or if you want to use 65% that's fine too. But you wouldn't find me saying that he couldn't do it against other teams then.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 21, 2011, 03:50:19 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 03:35:05 PM
Yea but my whole point is that if they beat Hobart, they could probably beat other teams don't you think? Salsibury and Hobart basically do the same thing against Wesley, and no one in the E8 even came close to Salisbury this year. As Luvd3 kind of points out below, maybe some of this familiarity comes into play with some league games, but I still say that you can argue Hobart is the best team in the east this year, and that other LL teams proved they could hang with the best team in the east.
No. I think they beat Hobart because the Statesman had an epic special teams meltdown that cost them 13 points.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 07:45:42 PM
Why don't you tell me why Hobart can hang with SJF and Wesley, but struggle in their conference?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 22, 2011, 10:41:24 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:35:03 PMQuote from: WashedUp on December 21, 2011, 05:30:10 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 05:21:20 PM
I don't think Hendel could complete 65% of his passes, because he has not shown me anything that would indicate that he could do that. RPI did show me that they could in fact beat a good team.
Factoring in RPIs last game only shows that they can still lose to crappy teams, but has no bearing on their ability to win big games, since they beat Hobart the week before in the second to last game of the season. Hendel never threw 65% (I am assuming we are making up these numbers for Hendel), so I would have no basis to speculate whether or not Hendel could ever throw 65%.
You missed the part where Hendel had these numbers against Union.
18/26 = 69.23%
No I didn't even look. I thought bombers was throwing out a number that Hendel did not have. We can use 75% for this argument then. Or if you want to use 65% that's fine too. But you wouldn't find me saying that he couldn't do it against other teams then.
So you would feel comfortable with me saying, "If Jason Hendel were Ithaca's starting QB next year, he would complete 70% of his passes" on the basis of that one game?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 22, 2011, 10:59:05 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 07:45:42 PM
Why don't you tell me why Hobart can hang with SJF and Wesley, but struggle in their conference?
For the same reason Ithaca can hang with Fisher and struggle, Jonny. (Although Hobart hardly struggled in Conference)
When you only look at one or two games, you can pretty much come to any conclusion you want. There's almost always going to be something that supports any conclusion you want to draw. That's why you have to, as best you can, look at the body of work for a team, or conference.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 22, 2011, 11:12:01 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 22, 2011, 10:59:05 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 07:45:42 PM
Why don't you tell me why Hobart can hang with SJF and Wesley, but struggle in their conference?
For the same reason Ithaca can hang with Fisher and struggle, Jonny. (Although Hobart hardly struggled in Conference)
When you only look at one or two games, you can pretty much come to any conclusion you want. There's almost always going to be something that supports any conclusion you want to draw. That's why you have to, as best you can, look at the body of work for a team, or conference.
That is why I said gut feeling. It is the same gut feeling that you and I get when Ithaca plays SJF every year. Or the same gut feeling I had in 2009 when I thought Ithaca was going to beat Alfred. I had no numbers to back up my prediction that year, but I had a gut feeling Ithaca would win. The greatest thing about football is the emotion and inner passion and strength and faith that people have before football games. It is the story of the underdog.
So no, If you forced me to bet on d3 college games, I would make some bets that might not make sense to the numbers people, and I'm sure I would lose some money. But in the end I think I would do alright.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 22, 2011, 11:49:27 AM
Let's just get this out of the way....
Hobart should have been ranked in the Top 25, probably around 18-22. This was computed by a scientific algorithm that is much too complicated for the tiny brains perusing this site, but have no fear, it is science.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 22, 2011, 11:49:27 AM
Let's just get this out of the way....
Hobart should have been ranked in the Top 25, probably around 18-22. This was computed by a scientific algorithm that is much too complicated for the tiny brains perusing this site, but have no fear, it is science.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 22, 2011, 11:12:01 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on December 22, 2011, 10:59:05 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on December 21, 2011, 07:45:42 PM
Why don't you tell me why Hobart can hang with SJF and Wesley, but struggle in their conference?
For the same reason Ithaca can hang with Fisher and struggle, Jonny. (Although Hobart hardly struggled in Conference)
When you only look at one or two games, you can pretty much come to any conclusion you want. There's almost always going to be something that supports any conclusion you want to draw. That's why you have to, as best you can, look at the body of work for a team, or conference.
That is why I said gut feeling. It is the same gut feeling that you and I get when Ithaca plays SJF every year. Or the same gut feeling I had in 2009 when I thought Ithaca was going to beat Alfred. I had no numbers to back up my prediction that year, but I had a gut feeling Ithaca would win. The greatest thing about football is the emotion and inner passion and strength and faith that people have before football games. It is the story of the underdog.
So no, If you forced me to bet on d3 college games, I would make some bets that might not make sense to the numbers people, and I'm sure I would lose some money. But in the end I think I would do alright.
Quote from: SJFF82 on December 22, 2011, 02:03:20 PM
wow...when is the last time we had a 6 page 'off-season' discussion? Good thing Hobart gotstiffedaccurately rated
Quote from: Cardinal Pride on December 22, 2011, 06:53:32 PM
Merry Christmas!!
I have learned alot about D3 football this season from some very intelligent people with a distinct passion for the game.
Best Wishes to All !
Quote from: LewDogg11 on December 22, 2011, 11:49:27 AM
Let's just get this out of the way....
Hobart should have been ranked in the Top 25, probably around 18-22. This was computed by a scientific algorithm that is much too complicated for the tiny brains perusing this site, but have no fear, it is science.
Quote from: fulbakdad on December 24, 2011, 05:27:48 AM
Don't forget Union lost to Salve.....
Quote from: SUADC on February 10, 2012, 01:40:43 PM
Now if the NCAA requires you to have at least 8 teams for a conference bid, then as far as Division 3 is concerned each conference should be restricted to only 8 teams and should play a 9 game season with 8 conference games and one regional OOC game
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 15, 2012, 09:08:52 AM
Thanks for kicking this to the fore, Dlip. Give me a holler if you want to be a pollster this year; I'll give preference to those who did it last year and to anyone from an underrepresented conference (which is basically anything other than E8 and LL). Let's push for the preseason poll to come out on 8/27.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 5 ) | 0-0 | 50 | NR | at Christopher Newport |
2t Delaware Valley | 0-0 | 41 | NR | at Rowan |
2t St. John Fisher | 0-0 | 41 | NR | vs. Thomas More |
4 Cortland State | 0-0 | 27 | NR | at Buffalo State |
5t Hobart | 0-0 | 25 | NR | vs. Dickenson |
5t Kean | 0-0 | 25 | NR | vs. Albright |
7 Widener | 0-0 | 23 | NR | vs. Western Connecticut |
8 Montclair State | 0-0 | 12 | NR | vs. Lebanon Valley |
9 Lycoming | 0-0 | 9 | NR | vs. Brockport State |
10 Springfield | 0-0 | 8 | NR | vs. Bridgewater State |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 27, 2012, 01:50:54 PM
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 5 ) 0-0 50 NR at Christopher Newport 2t Delaware Valley 0-0 41 NR at Rowan 2t St. John Fisher 0-0 41 NR vs. Thomas More 4 Cortland State 0-0 27 NR at Buffalo State 5t Hobart 0-0 25 NR vs. Dickenson 5t Kean 0-0 25 NR vs. Albright 7 Widener 0-0 23 NR vs. Western Connecticut 8 Montclair State 0-0 12 NR vs. Lebanon Valley 9 Lycoming 0-0 9 NR vs. Brockport State 10 Springfield 0-0 8 NR vs. Bridgewater State
Also Receiving votes:
Alfred 4
Rowan 4
Buffalo State 3
Lebanon Valley 2
RPI 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,1,1)
Delaware Valley (2,4,3,3,2)
St. John Fisher (4,3,2,2,3)
Cortland State (3,8,5,4,8)
Hobart (6,2,NR,7,4)
Kean (10,6,4,5,5)
Widener (5,5,7,9,6)
Montclair State (NR,10,9,6,7)
Lycoming (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Springfield (9,NR,6,10,NR)
Alfred (NR,NR,8,NR,10)
Rowan (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (8,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on August 27, 2012, 04:00:11 PM
I think Cortland is being undersold by some.
I know they lose some defensive players, but they bring back (I think) six starters and two backups that should be fine in the starter role. That's eight solid, starting-caliber returning defensive players by my count.
Offensively, they lose Pitcher, but they return their top 3 pass catchers. Ithaca had a similar situation in 2010. Rob Zappia was pretty mediocre in camp from what I heard (and had a horrid running game behind him), but with Ruffrage, Higgins, and Vossler, he put up a 57%, 2507, 19-8 line. I think Cortland could be in line for the same. Having multiple receiving options is a matchup nightmare for all but the best teams, and John Babin is really, really, good. (BTW, any one know what Justin Autera's status is for 2012?)
I see Cortland going 7-3 at worst next year. TCNJ, Montclair, Kean, and Rowan will be tough, but I think Cortland splits those four at least. And unless Buff State trips them up, I don't see any upsets from the lower ranked NJAC schools or Ithaca.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 27, 2012, 01:50:54 PM
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 5 ) 0-0 50 NR at Christopher Newport 2t Delaware Valley 0-0 41 NR at Rowan 2t St. John Fisher 0-0 41 NR vs. Thomas More 4 Cortland State 0-0 27 NR at Buffalo State 5t Hobart 0-0 25 NR vs. Dickenson 5t Kean 0-0 25 NR vs. Albright 7 Widener 0-0 23 NR vs. Western Connecticut 8 Montclair State 0-0 12 NR vs. Lebanon Valley 9 Lycoming 0-0 9 NR vs. Brockport State 10 Springfield 0-0 8 NR vs. Bridgewater State
Also Receiving votes:
Alfred 4
Rowan 4
Buffalo State 3
Lebanon Valley 2
RPI 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,1,1)
Delaware Valley (2,4,3,3,2)
St. John Fisher (4,3,2,2,3)
Cortland State (3,8,5,4,8)
Hobart (6,2,NR,7,4)
Kean (10,6,4,5,5)
Widener (5,5,7,9,6)
Montclair State (NR,10,9,6,7)
Lycoming (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Springfield (9,NR,6,10,NR)
Alfred (NR,NR,8,NR,10)
Rowan (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (8,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Lebanon Valley (NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Quote from: pg04 on August 27, 2012, 02:18:34 PM
The top 3 pretty much was standard ( a couple 4's in there as well even) but after that the distribution was really interesting for teams like Hobart and Cortland.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on August 27, 2012, 04:00:11 PM
I think Cortland is being undersold by some.
I know they lose some defensive players, but they bring back (I think) six starters and two backups that should be fine in the starter role. That's eight solid, starting-caliber returning defensive players by my count.
Offensively, they lose Pitcher, but they return their top 3 pass catchers. Ithaca had a similar situation in 2010. Rob Zappia was pretty mediocre in camp from what I heard (and had a horrid running game behind him), but with Ruffrage, Higgins, and Vossler, he put up a 57%, 2507, 19-8 line. I think Cortland could be in line for the same. Having multiple receiving options is a matchup nightmare for all but the best teams, and John Babin is really, really, good. (BTW, any one know what Justin Autera's status is for 2012?)
I see Cortland going 7-3 at worst next year. TCNJ, Montclair, Kean, and Rowan will be tough, but I think Cortland splits those four at least. And unless Buff State trips them up, I don't see any upsets from the lower ranked NJAC schools or Ithaca.
Quote from: clandfan on August 27, 2012, 10:39:05 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on August 27, 2012, 04:00:11 PM
I think Cortland is being undersold by some.
I know they lose some defensive players, but they bring back (I think) six starters and two backups that should be fine in the starter role. That's eight solid, starting-caliber returning defensive players by my count.
Offensively, they lose Pitcher, but they return their top 3 pass catchers. Ithaca had a similar situation in 2010. Rob Zappia was pretty mediocre in camp from what I heard (and had a horrid running game behind him), but with Ruffrage, Higgins, and Vossler, he put up a 57%, 2507, 19-8 line. I think Cortland could be in line for the same. Having multiple receiving options is a matchup nightmare for all but the best teams, and John Babin is really, really, good. (BTW, any one know what Justin Autera's status is for 2012?)
I see Cortland going 7-3 at worst next year. TCNJ, Montclair, Kean, and Rowan will be tough, but I think Cortland splits those four at least. And unless Buff State trips them up, I don't see any upsets from the lower ranked NJAC schools or Ithaca.
FYI: Babin is out with a broken collarbone suffered Sat. could possibly return week 9 or later but my guess would be medical red shirt. That being said, still pretty deep at receiver and RB is filthy deep. QB play should be adequate or better. Defense will be pretty solid but thin in the secondary. I think the big question will be OL. Rose inexperienced, not as mobile as Pitcher, and lost his number one receiver. He really needs to OL to step up and there is inexperience there and they aren't very deep. Time will tell.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 27, 2012, 04:43:35 PM
Your voting distribution appears to be off. Just an FYI.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 5 ) | 0-0 | 50 | NR | at Christopher Newport |
2t Delaware Valley | 0-0 | 41 | NR | at Rowan |
2t St. John Fisher | 0-0 | 41 | NR | vs. Thomas More |
4 Hobart | 0-0 | 29 | NR | vs. Dickenson |
5 Cortland State | 0-0 | 27 | NR | at Buffalo State |
6 Kean | 0-0 | 25 | NR | vs. Albright |
7 Widener | 0-0 | 19 | NR | vs. Western Connecticut |
8 Montclair State | 0-0 | 12 | NR | vs. Lebanon Valley |
9 Lycoming | 0-0 | 9 | NR | vs. Brockport State |
10 Springfield | 0-0 | 8 | NR | vs. Bridgewater State |
Quote from: dlip on September 04, 2012, 08:54:39 AM
Looks like Buffalo State may be Lew. Dlip thinks there may be a couple trip ups for the Bengals but this team is on the rise. dlip is going to touch on it on his blog but at least record wise and opponent wise, not a great showing for the LL. Dlip was quite pleased with WPI's win over Curry. The LL needed that.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 5 ) | 1-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. #1 (South) Wesley |
2 St. John Fisher | 1-0 | 43 | 2t | at Washington and Jefferson |
3 Hobart | 1-0 | 36 | 4 | vs. Geneva |
4 Widener | 1-0 | 33 | 7 | at King's |
5t Buffalo State | 1-0 | 30 | NR | at Brockport State |
5t Rowan | 1-0 | 30 | NR | at Merrimack |
7 Delaware Valley | 0-1 | 15 | 2t | vs. Lycoming |
8 Lebanon Valley | 1-0 | 10 | NR | vs. Misericordia |
9 Alfred | 0-0 | 8 | NR | at RPI |
10 Kean | 0-1 | 7 | 6 | at #2 (South) Mary Hardin-Baylor |
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 04, 2012, 11:52:42 AM
Kaz- you may want to update the records too
Quote from: rams1102 on September 04, 2012, 12:37:10 PM
I am corious how Alfred got ranked #9. They were not in the Top 10 in the preseason poll, and did not play last week. I really don not understand this distribution stuff. I thought Cortland should have been #10 even after their visit to Buff St and this is coming from a Montclair homer who has no love for Cortland but does respect them. No disrespect to Alfred on my post. Await responses.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 04, 2012, 12:37:10 PM
I am corious how Alfred got ranked #9. They were not in the Top 10 in the preseason poll, and did not play last week. I really don not understand this distribution stuff. I thought Cortland should have been #10 even after their visit to Buff St and this is coming from a Montclair homer who has no love for Cortland but does respect them. No disrespect to Alfred on my post. Await responses.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 04, 2012, 03:05:32 PM
You're clearly all biased against Ithaca. Clay Ardoin ran for 55 yards in the time it took me to write this. Le'Veon Bell called him from East Lansing and was like, "What's your secret?" They've been playing since Saturday, and Moravian still hasn't scored. And yet, no love for the Bombers. Unreal. Nearly 350 rushing yards? This team would be a three-touchdown favorite over the '88 Bombers and they don't even get an honorable mention? You're all a bunch of haters.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 04, 2012, 03:35:15 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 04, 2012, 03:05:32 PM
You're clearly all biased against Ithaca. Clay Ardoin ran for 55 yards in the time it took me to write this. Le'Veon Bell called him from East Lansing and was like, "What's your secret?" They've been playing since Saturday, and Moravian still hasn't scored. And yet, no love for the Bombers. Unreal. Nearly 350 rushing yards? This team would be a three-touchdown favorite over the '88 Bombers and they don't even get an honorable mention? You're all a bunch of haters.
Even from you Bombers, I am trying to decipher the sarcastic/cynicism from the genuine claim that Ithaca should be in the poll....please elaborate...although I think the clincher on the side of sarcasm certainly appears to be the mention of the '88 squad...no? ;D
Quote from: rams1102 on September 04, 2012, 12:37:10 PM
I am corious how Alfred got ranked #9. They were not in the Top 10 in the preseason poll, and did not play last week. I really don not understand this distribution stuff. I thought Cortland should have been #10 even after their visit to Buff St and this is coming from a Montclair homer who has no love for Cortland but does respect them. No disrespect to Alfred on my post. Await responses.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 04, 2012, 10:41:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 04, 2012, 12:37:10 PM
I am corious how Alfred got ranked #9. They were not in the Top 10 in the preseason poll, and did not play last week. I really don not understand this distribution stuff. I thought Cortland should have been #10 even after their visit to Buff St and this is coming from a Montclair homer who has no love for Cortland but does respect them. No disrespect to Alfred on my post. Await responses.
UNDEFEATED, BABY!! Saxons practiced all week. They are much better this week than they were a week ago. Amazing what a week of practice will do. ;)
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 04, 2012, 08:08:47 AM
I just had a chance to look at all fo the scores and submitted my poll. WTF happened this week? What a crazy first week. 2 NEFC teams beat LL teams and WPI beats Curry? And Cortland, Montclair, Kean, all lose? Delaware Valley isn't a huge surprise because Rowan knows how to play football. Wow. Will be an interesting season. Is Buff St. back????
Quote from: Bengalsrule on September 05, 2012, 10:57:55 PM
One 1 word........YES! The BENGALS are back!
Quote from: Upstate on September 05, 2012, 11:19:53 PMQuote from: Bengalsrule on September 05, 2012, 10:57:55 PM
One 1 word........YES! The BENGALS are back!
You do know that you have 3 top 10 teams left on the schedule right?
Not to mention Alfred and Ithaca.
Quote from: Bengalsrule on September 05, 2012, 11:33:02 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 05, 2012, 11:19:53 PMQuote from: Bengalsrule on September 05, 2012, 10:57:55 PM
One 1 word........YES! The BENGALS are back!
You do know that you have 3 top 10 teams left on the schedule right?
Not to mention Alfred and Ithaca.
Thats why Head Coach/A. D. Boyes left NJAC to join the E8. Better comp affords 1 the opportunity for a stronger Strength of schedule and, if you win, a better seat win the dance selections gurus come calling!.
#1 D3 Champ Wisconsin- Whitewater, #5 Salisbury and #10 Fisher (fan poll) certainly help create a schedule that will scare some. I believe that Boyes knew what he was doing, when he put this schedule together. Time will tell. Hopefully I'll see you at Brockport this weekend!!!
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 06, 2012, 09:37:48 AM
Pat took the words out of my mouth!
Thx Pat!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 06, 2012, 10:33:01 AMQuote from: fisheralum91 on September 06, 2012, 09:37:48 AM
Pat took the words out of my mouth!
Thx Pat!
So he took the real poll out of your mouth?
Quote from: Upstate on September 05, 2012, 11:36:02 PMQuote from: Bengalsrule on September 05, 2012, 11:33:02 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 05, 2012, 11:19:53 PMQuote from: Bengalsrule on September 05, 2012, 10:57:55 PM
One 1 word........YES! The BENGALS are back!
You do know that you have 3 top 10 teams left on the schedule right?
Not to mention Alfred and Ithaca.
Thats why Head Coach/A. D. Boyes left NJAC to join the E8. Better comp affords 1 the opportunity for a stronger Strength of schedule and, if you win, a better seat win the dance selections gurus come calling!.
#1 D3 Champ Wisconsin- Whitewater, #5 Salisbury and #10 Fisher (fan poll) certainly help create a schedule that will scare some. I believe that Boyes knew what he was doing, when he put this schedule together. Time will tell. Hopefully I'll see you at Brockport this weekend!!!
Agree with that mindset 100%, however get through those 5 games and then you can say that the Bengals are back...
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 05, 2012, 11:36:15 PM
Hi -- St. John Fisher is No. 9 in the real poll.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 06, 2012, 10:28:33 AM
Let's remember that we don't know how good wins really are until a season progresses.
Don't take this personal Dlip, but I remember when Ithaca beat Union in the opening week of 2010. The Dutchman were coming off an 8-3 season, and the win looked nice after three weeks with Union winning their next two. Well, the boys from Union wound up 2-7 that year. Not exactly a win to beef up the ole resume. Sometimes teams just have bad years. Let's allow for the season to play out a bit before we start rolling out the red carpet for the Bengals.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 06, 2012, 10:28:33 AM
Let's remember that we don't know how good wins really are until a season progresses.
Don't take this personal Dlip, but I remember when Ithaca beat Union in the opening week of 2010. The Dutchman were coming off an 8-3 season, and the win looked nice after three weeks with Union winning their next two. Well, the boys from Union wound up 2-7 that year. Not exactly a win to beef up the ole resume. Sometimes teams just have bad years. Let's allow for the season to play out a bit before we start rolling out the red carpet for the Bengals.
Quote from: dlip on September 06, 2012, 11:41:35 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 06, 2012, 10:28:33 AM
Let's remember that we don't know how good wins really are until a season progresses.
Don't take this personal Dlip, but I remember when Ithaca beat Union in the opening week of 2010. The Dutchman were coming off an 8-3 season, and the win looked nice after three weeks with Union winning their next two. Well, the boys from Union wound up 2-7 that year. Not exactly a win to beef up the ole resume. Sometimes teams just have bad years. Let's allow for the season to play out a bit before we start rolling out the red carpet for the Bengals.
A good post here Bombers! dlip thinks you are right on. It is very difficult to predict an entire season based upon week 1 results. The win over Cortland is impressive and one dlip was happy to see. Still a ton of ball left Bengals...however if they beat Dub Dub Dub Dub... ::)
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 04, 2012, 10:41:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 04, 2012, 12:37:10 PM
I am corious how Alfred got ranked #9. They were not in the Top 10 in the preseason poll, and did not play last week. I really don not understand this distribution stuff. I thought Cortland should have been #10 even after their visit to Buff St and this is coming from a Montclair homer who has no love for Cortland but does respect them. No disrespect to Alfred on my post. Await responses.
UNDEFEATED, BABY!! Saxons practiced all week. They are much better this week than they were a week ago. Amazing what a week of practice will do. ;)
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 06, 2012, 01:50:57 PMQuote from: dlip on September 06, 2012, 11:41:35 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 06, 2012, 10:28:33 AM
Let's remember that we don't know how good wins really are until a season progresses.
Don't take this personal Dlip, but I remember when Ithaca beat Union in the opening week of 2010. The Dutchman were coming off an 8-3 season, and the win looked nice after three weeks with Union winning their next two. Well, the boys from Union wound up 2-7 that year. Not exactly a win to beef up the ole resume. Sometimes teams just have bad years. Let's allow for the season to play out a bit before we start rolling out the red carpet for the Bengals.
A good post here Bombers! dlip thinks you are right on. It is very difficult to predict an entire season based upon week 1 results. The win over Cortland is impressive and one dlip was happy to see. Still a ton of ball left Bengals...however if they beat Dub Dub Dub Dub... ::)
In 1996 Mansfield (PA d2) beat Cortland in week 1 of the season 18-0. I played for the Ithaca team who then beat Mansfield in week two 59-20. Mansfield was one of the most inept teams I have ever seen on a football field. I had no clue how Cortland could have lost to them 18-0, and how they couldn't even score a point.
Needless to say we lost to Cortland at the end of the year 41-13 (in a game which got a little out of hand but thats another story).
I always think back to that season when looking at first games or games early in the season. Sometimes you have guys starting in week 1 who you realize probably aren't starters. You also find out which schemes work or don't work. You find your weaknesses and can fix them, and you find your strengths and build on them.
So the lesson is that early season games don't mean much in division 3.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 06, 2012, 02:24:27 PM
Utes,
I would go so far as to say that the first 2 maybe even 3 games dont show the whole picture of a team.
Hell - just look at Fisher last year.
What was supposed to be a great homecoming turned into an all out route by Hobart.
Yes Hobart was good, but Fisher proved that they certainly werent that bad!!
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 06, 2012, 02:28:07 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on September 06, 2012, 02:24:27 PM
Utes,
I would go so far as to say that the first 2 maybe even 3 games dont show the whole picture of a team.
Hell - just look at Fisher last year.
What was supposed to be a great homecoming turned into an all out route by Hobart.
Yes Hobart was good, but Fisher proved that they certainly werent that bad!!
We've all been to a game where our team completely folded. Well, except me - I've never seen Alfred lose 69-0 or anything close to that...
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 05, 2012, 11:36:15 PM
Hi -- St. John Fisher is No. 9 in the real poll.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 07, 2012, 11:07:42 AM
LD going to the Rowan game?
JU has a few choices this weekend for college/HS football:
Indiana @ Umass (Foxboro Stadium, 20 mins from JU)
Maine @ Boston College (20 mins from JU)
Rowan @ Merrimack (40 mins from JU)
UMass Dartmouth @ Bridgewater State (25 mins from JU)
Coast Guard @ MIT (25 mins from JU)
Framingham HS @ Wellesley HS (15 mins from JU)
Walpole HS @ Braintree HS (20 mins from JU)
Leaning towards CGA/MIT but I'm interested in this new Umass program playing all their homegames at Foxboro as well.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 07, 2012, 11:12:28 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 07, 2012, 11:07:42 AM
LD going to the Rowan game?
JU has a few choices this weekend for college/HS football:
Indiana @ Umass (Foxboro Stadium, 20 mins from JU)
Maine @ Boston College (20 mins from JU)
Rowan @ Merrimack (40 mins from JU)
UMass Dartmouth @ Bridgewater State (25 mins from JU)
Coast Guard @ MIT (25 mins from JU)
Framingham HS @ Wellesley HS (15 mins from JU)
Walpole HS @ Braintree HS (20 mins from JU)
Leaning towards CGA/MIT but I'm interested in this new Umass program playing all their homegames at Foxboro as well.
Utah, what's the scoop on BC tickets? How much? You have a hookup? I could be down with a BC game.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 07, 2012, 11:32:22 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 07, 2012, 11:12:28 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 07, 2012, 11:07:42 AM
LD going to the Rowan game?
JU has a few choices this weekend for college/HS football:
Indiana @ Umass (Foxboro Stadium, 20 mins from JU)
Maine @ Boston College (20 mins from JU)
Rowan @ Merrimack (40 mins from JU)
UMass Dartmouth @ Bridgewater State (25 mins from JU)
Coast Guard @ MIT (25 mins from JU)
Framingham HS @ Wellesley HS (15 mins from JU)
Walpole HS @ Braintree HS (20 mins from JU)
Leaning towards CGA/MIT but I'm interested in this new Umass program playing all their homegames at Foxboro as well.
Utah, what's the scoop on BC tickets? How much? You have a hookup? I could be down with a BC game.
BC is basically selling season tickets for as low as $150 per seat for the entire season (including some good teams like Notre Dame, Clemson, Va Tech) This Maine game isn't going to be sold out and there are probably $10-$30 seats available at the gate. You can get $30 ones online now but I bet if you call or go down there they will give you a deal.
Parking is horrible there though and I have a wedding later in the day so I'm not sure If I will have time to make it in and out of there but Ill give you a shout out if I do.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 07, 2012, 10:48:26 AM
Because of last week, these predictions probably mean nothing, but let's give this a shot: (for the games I kinda give a shish about anyway)
Buff St - 56
Brockport St. - 31
Both teams could be back! I'm going to take a leap of faith on which one is the real deal. Buff St.
Disclaimer - While the majority of my posts are usually backed by Science, this post, in no way, shape or form, has any Scientific, Mathematic, or Algorithmic theory associated with it. It is purely for entertainment purposes.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 07, 2012, 10:48:26 AM
Because of last week, these predictions probably mean nothing, but let's give this a shot: (for the games I kinda give a shish about anyway)
Wesley - 31
Salisbury - 28
Can you say 'Game of the Week'? I'm sure this would be a good one to see live. It's a toss up really.
Mary Hardin-Baylor - 35
Kean - 24
I'm going to say this will be closer than expected but MHB will score late to make it look worse than it was. I like the scheduling though!
St. John Fisher - 20
Washington and Jefferson - 6
These games are tough so far. Lots of unknowns. I think Fisher will handle it.
Hobart - 49
Geneva - 21
Don't know much about Geneva. They DID score 53 last week so i'll hand them some points. Hobart in a blowout.
Merrimack - 31
Rowan - 28
I think Merrimack sucks but they had a couple studs there last year and the whole D2 thing. I don't know, I hope Rowan blows them out. I think D2 sucks around here on the whole. I might actually go to this game. Maybe this or Endicott/Castleton St. We'll see.
Delaware St. - 35
Lycoming - 10
I think Delaware St. is gonna have a dissapointing year. But Lyco scored 2 on Brockport so I don't think this one looks good for them.
Endicott - 42
Castleton St - 28
I list this one because 1. I may go to it and hang with charles and 2. RPI plays Castleton St. next week. Now they blew out Plymouth St last week. Is there any team more confusing than Plymouth St.? I think Endicott is decent this year though and will battle Salve for the NEFC.
Salve Regina - 10
Montclair St. - 6
This game might tell a lot for both teams. Interested to find out the result of this one.
RPI - 49
Alfred - 35
First game for both teams. 2 Wild Cards. Alfred has been consistent the last few years. RPI has some veteran studs but 14 coaches in 74 days. I'm going to be a homer and say RPI clicks on all cylinders for the first time in a while and throws the ball all over Alfred. Fun game to watch, lots of long plays, and a hot thunderstorm at halftime. Boom.
Buff St - 56
Brockport St. - 31
Both teams could be back! I'm going to take a leap of faith on which one is the real deal. Buff St.
Springfield - 55
Husson - 2
I'm serious about the score too. Husson? Potentially the worst program in the country in the worst conference in the country. Troy High could beat Husson. A team of mini-Ditka's could beat Husson. The Prescott Wildcats(before coach McGrath) could beat Husson. But what happened to Springfield last week? Normally i'd say Springfield in the 70's or 80's here, but not at this point.
Union - 24
Utica - 21
Another, 'I have no idea what these teams are about this year' game. LL homer. Hopefully Audino took a coaching class this week. LL > E8.
That's all I got.
Disclaimer - While the majority of my posts are usually backed by Science, this post, in no way, shape or form, has any Scientific, Mathematic, or Algorithmic theory associated with it. It is purely for entertainment purposes.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 07, 2012, 10:48:26 AM
Because of last week, these predictions probably mean nothing, but let's give this a shot: (for the games I kinda give a shish about anyway)
Wesley - 31
Salisbury - 28
Can you say 'Game of the Week'? I'm sure this would be a good one to see live. It's a toss up really.
Mary Hardin-Baylor - 35
Kean - 24
I'm going to say this will be closer than expected but MHB will score late to make it look worse than it was. I like the scheduling though!
St. John Fisher - 20
Washington and Jefferson - 6
These games are tough so far. Lots of unknowns. I think Fisher will handle it.
Hobart - 49
Geneva - 21
Don't know much about Geneva. They DID score 53 last week so i'll hand them some points. Hobart in a blowout.
Merrimack - 31
Rowan - 28
I think Merrimack sucks but they had a couple studs there last year and the whole D2 thing. I don't know, I hope Rowan blows them out. I think D2 sucks around here on the whole. I might actually go to this game. Maybe this or Endicott/Castleton St. We'll see.
Delaware St. - 35
Lycoming - 10
I think Delaware St. is gonna have a dissapointing year. But Lyco scored 2 on Brockport so I don't think this one looks good for them.
Endicott - 42
Castleton St - 28
I list this one because 1. I may go to it and hang with charles and 2. RPI plays Castleton St. next week. Now they blew out Plymouth St last week. Is there any team more confusing than Plymouth St.? I think Endicott is decent this year though and will battle Salve for the NEFC.
Salve Regina - 10
Montclair St. - 6
This game might tell a lot for both teams. Interested to find out the result of this one.
RPI - 49
Alfred - 35
First game for both teams. 2 Wild Cards. Alfred has been consistent the last few years. RPI has some veteran studs but 14 coaches in 74 days. I'm going to be a homer and say RPI clicks on all cylinders for the first time in a while and throws the ball all over Alfred. Fun game to watch, lots of long plays, and a hot thunderstorm at halftime. Boom.
Buff St - 56
Brockport St. - 31
Both teams could be back! I'm going to take a leap of faith on which one is the real deal. Buff St.
Springfield - 55
Husson - 2
I'm serious about the score too. Husson? Potentially the worst program in the country in the worst conference in the country. Troy High could beat Husson. A team of mini-Ditka's could beat Husson. The Prescott Wildcats(before coach McGrath) could beat Husson. But what happened to Springfield last week? Normally i'd say Springfield in the 70's or 80's here, but not at this point.
Union - 24
Utica - 21
Another, 'I have no idea what these teams are about this year' game. LL homer. Hopefully Audino took a coaching class this week. LL > E8.
That's all I got.
Disclaimer - While the majority of my posts are usually backed by Science, this post, in no way, shape or form, has any Scientific, Mathematic, or Algorithmic theory associated with it. It is purely for entertainment purposes.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 3 ) | 1-1 | 48 | 1 | vs. North Carolina Wesleyan |
2 St. John Fisher( 2 ) | 2-0 | 45 | 2 | vs. Rochester |
3 Hobart | 2-0 | 39 | 3 | at Utica |
4 Widener | 2-0 | 37 | 4 | at Misericordia |
5 Brockport State | 2-0 | 30 | NR | vs. New Jersey |
6 Lebanon Valley | 2-0 | 23 | 8 | at Lycoming |
7 Rowan | 1-1 | 18 | 6 | at William Paterson |
8 RPI | 1-0 | 12 | NR | at Castleton State |
9 Albright | 2-0 | 8 | NR | at Wilkes |
10 Buffalo State | 1-1 | 6 | 5 | at #1 (West) Wisconsin-Whitewater |
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 10:42:08 AM
Bombers still getting no love. Haters. All of you.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 10:42:08 AM
Bombers still getting no love. Haters. All of you.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 11, 2012, 11:07:42 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 10:42:08 AM
Bombers still getting no love. Haters. All of you.
They are on my radar in the 11-13 range right now. Been an odd first 2 weeks though, and they haven't played anyone 'familiar' yet. If/how they beat Union will make things a little clearer.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 11, 2012, 11:22:10 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 10:42:08 AM
Bombers still getting no love. Haters. All of you.
They have great burritos. I give them love whenever I'm in Shocktown and Smallbany.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 12:52:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 11, 2012, 11:22:10 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 10:42:08 AM
Bombers still getting no love. Haters. All of you.
They have great burritos. I give them love whenever I'm in Shocktown and Smallbany.
Where do you go for your Ithaca burritos? Viva? That place is awesome
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 11, 2012, 01:00:00 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 12:52:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 11, 2012, 11:22:10 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 10:42:08 AM
Bombers still getting no love. Haters. All of you.
They have great burritos. I give them love whenever I'm in Shocktown and Smallbany.
Where do you go for your Ithaca burritos? Viva? That place is awesome
I don't eat burritos in Ithaca. I'm only there to call games, and I don't want to create gastrointestinal problems while I'm in their press box since things are a bit tight. I'll begin my colon cleanse tonight as a courtesy.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 01:11:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 11, 2012, 01:00:00 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 12:52:56 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 11, 2012, 11:22:10 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 10:42:08 AM
Bombers still getting no love. Haters. All of you.
They have great burritos. I give them love whenever I'm in Shocktown and Smallbany.
Where do you go for your Ithaca burritos? Viva? That place is awesome
I don't eat burritos in Ithaca. I'm only there to call games, and I don't want to create gastrointestinal problems while I'm in their press box since things are a bit tight. I'll begin my colon cleanse tonight as a courtesy.
Well, we all appreciate that. Best of luck on Saturday!
Quote from: Upstate on September 11, 2012, 02:58:40 PM
Don't agree with Fisher getting first place votes over SU.
Until someone not named Wesley or UWW beats SU, they are the #1 team in the east.
Quote from: Upstate on September 11, 2012, 02:58:40 PM
Don't agree with Fisher getting first place votes over SU.
Until someone not named Wesley or UWW beats SU, they are the #1 team in the east.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 11, 2012, 03:04:19 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 11, 2012, 02:58:40 PM
Don't agree with Fisher getting first place votes over SU.
Until someone not named Wesley or UWW beats SU, they are the #1 team in the east.
I 100% agree here. It's tough for some pollsters to put a #1 team with a 1-1 record though is likely the case. I know it had me think twice, then I smacked myself in the face.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:19:04 PM
Salisbury has dominated SJF for 2 years now, or maybe even 3? That has to be reflected until either SJF beats them H2H or Salisbury has a loss to mediocre or less team. But how is Widener 2 in a poll?
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:27:54 PM
clearly Frank you are just playing devil's advocate b/c I dont perceive you have Widener ranked ahead of Fisher in your National Poll?
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 11, 2012, 04:23:39 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:19:04 PM
Salisbury has dominated SJF for 2 years now, or maybe even 3? That has to be reflected until either SJF beats them H2H or Salisbury has a loss to mediocre or less team. But how is Widener 2 in a poll?
Last I checked, these polls were based on 2012 opinions, not so much on 2010 and 2011 performance.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:27:54 PM
clearly Frank you are just playing devil's advocate b/c I dont perceive you have Widener ranked ahead of Fisher in your National Poll?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 04:48:03 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:27:54 PM
clearly Frank you are just playing devil's advocate b/c I dont perceive you have Widener ranked ahead of Fisher in your National Poll?
No way. Frank and I disagree on a ton of stuff, but I've rarely, if ever, seen him play the Devil's advocate card. His opinions are always backed up by his beliefs.
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 05:05:38 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 04:48:03 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:27:54 PM
clearly Frank you are just playing devil's advocate b/c I dont perceive you have Widener ranked ahead of Fisher in your National Poll?
No way. Frank and I disagree on a ton of stuff, but I've rarely, if ever, seen him play the Devil's advocate card. His opinions are always backed up by his beliefs.
well, yeah, his beliefs are that apparently Widener's 2-0 start should not be discounted by the fact that they beat 2 teams that just do not win football games over a full 2 year period. And I questioned the poll (not even sure who's it is) that has Widener ahead of Fisher in this regard and he defended it??? Anyone else think Widener is better than SJF?
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 05:05:38 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 04:48:03 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:27:54 PM
clearly Frank you are just playing devil's advocate b/c I dont perceive you have Widener ranked ahead of Fisher in your National Poll?
No way. Frank and I disagree on a ton of stuff, but I've rarely, if ever, seen him play the Devil's advocate card. His opinions are always backed up by his beliefs.
well, yeah, his beliefs are that apparently Widener's 2-0 start should not be discounted by the fact that they beat 2 teams that just do not win football games over a full 2 year period. And I questioned the poll (not even sure who's it is) that has Widener ahead of Fisher in this regard and he defended it??? Anyone else think Widener is better than SJF?
Quote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 05:05:38 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2012, 04:48:03 PMQuote from: SJFF82 on September 11, 2012, 04:27:54 PM
clearly Frank you are just playing devil's advocate b/c I dont perceive you have Widener ranked ahead of Fisher in your National Poll?
No way. Frank and I disagree on a ton of stuff, but I've rarely, if ever, seen him play the Devil's advocate card. His opinions are always backed up by his beliefs.
well, yeah, his beliefs are that apparently Widener's 2-0 start should not be discounted by the fact that they beat 2 teams that just do not win football games over a full 2 year period. And I questioned the poll (not even sure who's it is) that has Widener ahead of Fisher in this regard and he defended it??? Anyone else think Widener is better than SJF?
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 17, 2012, 09:04:06 AM
This is easily the most difficult week that I can remember in putting together the ERFP. Honestly, I could reasonably accept almost any argument that any team listed in my top 4 could/should be #1 overall...and I wouldn't have a single problem with it.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 5 ) | 2-1 | 50 | 1 | Open |
2 Hobart | 3-0 | 40 | 3 | vs. Merchant Marine |
3 St. John Fisher | 3-0 | 37 | 2 | vs. Hartwick |
4 Brockport State | 3-0 | 35 | 5 | at Kean |
5 Buffalo State | 2-1 | 33 | 10 | vs. Alfred |
6 Widener | 3-0 | 28 | 4 | vs. Wilkes |
7 Rowan | 2-1 | 21 | 7 | at Western Connecticut |
8 RPI | 2-0 | 9 | 8 | vs. WPI |
9 Albright | 3-0 | 8 | 9 | vs. #10t Lycoming |
10t Cortland State | 1-1 | 6 | NR | at Morrisville State |
10t Lycoming | 2-1 | 6 | NR | at #9 Albright |
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 17, 2012, 05:10:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Yeah, play that Rodney Dangerfield card, Bombers....apparently AU dropped that card some time ago and IC picked it up.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 06:25:56 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 17, 2012, 05:10:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Yeah, play that Rodney Dangerfield card, Bombers....apparently AU dropped that card some time ago and IC picked it up.
Turn up your sarcasm receiver there, Pep. As I think my previous posts indicate, I'm making a joke on things I hear from people.
True story: On the ICTV broadcast this week, it was declared that Neumann had "arrived" and that all the "haters" who criticized him last year needed to take note.
I love the great, great work that the ICTV/Radio kids do, and I know they're just college kids, and going live on the air is hard (I did it for 4 years myself, so I know) but that statement kind of irked me. I'm not sure a good 5 minutes + OT makes up for 55 minutes of zero points for the offense, especially when two of the touchdown drives totaled a combined 29 yards. But I'm also not sure that people who pointed out that Neumann struggled last season are "haters". Accurately pointing out a truth, regardless of if that truth is unpleasant, is not "hating". I'm the first to admit, I am crazy cynical, but last I checked, Moravian and Union weren't exactly having banner years, and some IC people are eye-rollingly praising this team. So I'm just picking up the theme here. My comments on the E8 board are more accurate indicators of my feelings. It's still a deeply flawed team. 4-6 seems about right
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 06:25:56 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 17, 2012, 05:10:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Yeah, play that Rodney Dangerfield card, Bombers....apparently AU dropped that card some time ago and IC picked it up.
Turn up your sarcasm receiver there, Pep. As I think my previous posts indicate, I'm making a joke on things I hear from people.
True story: On the ICTV broadcast this week, it was declared that Neumann had "arrived" and that all the "haters" who criticized him last year needed to take note.
I love the great, great work that the ICTV/Radio kids do, and I know they're just college kids, and going live on the air is hard (I did it for 4 years myself, so I know) but that statement kind of irked me. I'm not sure a good 5 minutes + OT makes up for 55 minutes of zero points for the offense, especially when two of the touchdown drives totaled a combined 29 yards. But I'm also not sure that people who pointed out that Neumann struggled last season are "haters". Accurately pointing out a truth, regardless of if that truth is unpleasant, is not "hating". I'm the first to admit, I am crazy cynical, but last I checked, Moravian and Union weren't exactly having banner years, and some IC people are eye-rollingly praising this team. So I'm just picking up the theme here. My comments on the E8 board are more accurate indicators of my feelings. It's still a deeply flawed team. 4-6 seems about right
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 17, 2012, 09:58:13 AM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 5 ) 2-1 50 1 Open 2 Hobart 3-0 40 3 vs. Merchant Marine 3 St. John Fisher 3-0 37 2 vs. Hartwick 4 Brockport State 3-0 35 5 at Kean 5 Buffalo State 2-1 33 10 vs. Alfred 6 Widener 3-0 28 4 vs. Wilkes 7 Rowan 2-1 21 7 at Western Connecticut 8 RPI 2-0 9 8 vs. WPI 9 Albright 3-0 8 9 vs. #10t Lycoming 10t Cortland State 1-1 6 NR at Morrisville State 10t Lycoming 2-1 6 NR at #9 Albright
Also Receiving votes:
Salve Regina 2
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,1,1)
Hobart (5,3,3,2,2)
St. John Fisher (2,2,4,5,5)
Brockport State (3,4,7,3,3)
Buffalo State (4,5,5,4,4)
Widener (6,7,2,6,6)
Rowan (8,6,6,7,7)
RPI (NR,8,NR,8,8)
Albright (7,9,10,NR,10)
Cortland State (10,NR,8,9,NR)
Lycoming(9,10,9,10,NR)
Salve Regina (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Key Matchups:
#10t Lycoming at #9 Albright
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 06:25:56 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 17, 2012, 05:10:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Yeah, play that Rodney Dangerfield card, Bombers....apparently AU dropped that card some time ago and IC picked it up.
Turn up your sarcasm receiver there, Pep. As I think my previous posts indicate, I'm making a joke on things I hear from people.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 17, 2012, 06:47:47 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 06:25:56 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 17, 2012, 05:10:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Yeah, play that Rodney Dangerfield card, Bombers....apparently AU dropped that card some time ago and IC picked it up.
Turn up your sarcasm receiver there, Pep. As I think my previous posts indicate, I'm making a joke on things I hear from people.
True story: On the ICTV broadcast this week, it was declared that Neumann had "arrived" and that all the "haters" who criticized him last year needed to take note.
I love the great, great work that the ICTV/Radio kids do, and I know they're just college kids, and going live on the air is hard (I did it for 4 years myself, so I know) but that statement kind of irked me. I'm not sure a good 5 minutes + OT makes up for 55 minutes of zero points for the offense, especially when two of the touchdown drives totaled a combined 29 yards. But I'm also not sure that people who pointed out that Neumann struggled last season are "haters". Accurately pointing out a truth, regardless of if that truth is unpleasant, is not "hating". I'm the first to admit, I am crazy cynical, but last I checked, Moravian and Union weren't exactly having banner years, and some IC people are eye-rollingly praising this team. So I'm just picking up the theme here. My comments on the E8 board are more accurate indicators of my feelings. It's still a deeply flawed team. 4-6 seems about right
Bombers... I'd suggest listening to my commentary concerning the game that followed "Around the League" on ITH Sunday (http://InTheHuddLLe.com -- select the 9/16/12 show). I saw your question in the E8PP and I gave a decently long soapbox discussion about Union and Ithaca during that (around the 0:25 mark). It sounds like you and I have the same overall assessment right now.
Quote from: Upstate on September 17, 2012, 01:15:19 PM
I don't see why anyone can really put up much of a gripe with knocking SJF down in the polls. They haven't been impressive at all, they've made plays to win the game when it counts but good teams don't put themselves in that position three weeks in a row.
Yes I know all 3 teams are undefeated outside of the SJF game but SJF did NOT look good in any of the games to date.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 10:04:16 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 17, 2012, 06:47:47 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 06:25:56 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 17, 2012, 05:10:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Yeah, play that Rodney Dangerfield card, Bombers....apparently AU dropped that card some time ago and IC picked it up.
Turn up your sarcasm receiver there, Pep. As I think my previous posts indicate, I'm making a joke on things I hear from people.
True story: On the ICTV broadcast this week, it was declared that Neumann had "arrived" and that all the "haters" who criticized him last year needed to take note.
I love the great, great work that the ICTV/Radio kids do, and I know they're just college kids, and going live on the air is hard (I did it for 4 years myself, so I know) but that statement kind of irked me. I'm not sure a good 5 minutes + OT makes up for 55 minutes of zero points for the offense, especially when two of the touchdown drives totaled a combined 29 yards. But I'm also not sure that people who pointed out that Neumann struggled last season are "haters". Accurately pointing out a truth, regardless of if that truth is unpleasant, is not "hating". I'm the first to admit, I am crazy cynical, but last I checked, Moravian and Union weren't exactly having banner years, and some IC people are eye-rollingly praising this team. So I'm just picking up the theme here. My comments on the E8 board are more accurate indicators of my feelings. It's still a deeply flawed team. 4-6 seems about right
Bombers... I'd suggest listening to my commentary concerning the game that followed "Around the League" on ITH Sunday (http://InTheHuddLLe.com -- select the 9/16/12 show). I saw your question in the E8PP and I gave a decently long soapbox discussion about Union and Ithaca during that (around the 0:25 mark). It sounds like you and I have the same overall assessment right now.
We're agreeing on stuff? So, where are you riding out the apocalypse?
Quote from: middlerelief on September 17, 2012, 10:15:22 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 17, 2012, 01:15:19 PM
I don't see why anyone can really put up much of a gripe with knocking SJF down in the polls. They haven't been impressive at all, they've made plays to win the game when it counts but good teams don't put themselves in that position three weeks in a row.
Yes I know all 3 teams are undefeated outside of the SJF game but SJF did NOT look good in any of the games to date.
There aren't that many teams that are going to "look good" when they play Thomas More and W&J - those are rock solid programs.
Typically if you're going to have something special happen you have to be able to show you can win late and win ugly. SJF certainly filled their quota for 2012. Obviously all griping will be put to rest now that the E8 season has begun -- this week, they play yet another undefeated team in 'Wick, then the week after is Salisbury. Obviously, if Salisbury runs them into the ground like last year - we'll know the ranking was generous. If however, if Buff State or SJF end up beating Salisbury, by landslide or by the slimmest of margins -- I think the gripes will be justified for the higher rankings.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2012, 09:23:24 AMQuote from: middlerelief on September 17, 2012, 10:15:22 PMQuote from: Upstate on September 17, 2012, 01:15:19 PM
I don't see why anyone can really put up much of a gripe with knocking SJF down in the polls. They haven't been impressive at all, they've made plays to win the game when it counts but good teams don't put themselves in that position three weeks in a row.
Yes I know all 3 teams are undefeated outside of the SJF game but SJF did NOT look good in any of the games to date.
There aren't that many teams that are going to "look good" when they play Thomas More and W&J - those are rock solid programs.
Typically if you're going to have something special happen you have to be able to show you can win late and win ugly. SJF certainly filled their quota for 2012. Obviously all griping will be put to rest now that the E8 season has begun -- this week, they play yet another undefeated team in 'Wick, then the week after is Salisbury. Obviously, if Salisbury runs them into the ground like last year - we'll know the ranking was generous. If however, if Buff State or SJF end up beating Salisbury, by landslide or by the slimmest of margins -- I think the gripes will be justified for the higher rankings.
And we all look forward to Fisher bumbling their way to 4-0 against a mediocre Wick team...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 18, 2012, 01:17:11 PM
A few interesting matchups this week:
UW-Stevens Point @ UWW - Call me crazy but I wouldn't be at all surprised to see UWW lost again. Their confidence is rattled and they play a decent team. I just have a weird feeling...
Hartwick @ Fisher - Is Fisher for real? Is Hartwick better than we think? This week might clear some things up here. I like Fisher in fashion.
Brockport @ Kean - Kean has me confused. They lost to a potentially really good Albright and lost to a National title candidate. This could be a tough game. I don't know, I think maybe Brockport is as real as we think though.
Alfred @ Buff St. - All things point to a blowout here. But that whole, 'we just beat the #1 team in the country so this game should be a cake walk' letdown could be in effect. Never know. I doubt it though.
Endicott @ Salve - I was excited for this one before Endicott pooped themselves last week. I'd like to see Salve take it to them and not stop until charles cries.
WPI @ RPI - This should be a blowout on paper. RPI's performance last week scares me a bit though. Hopefully they shake it off and still score 56, but give up single digits.
Lycoming @ Albright - This is a big game for my East Rankings because most MAC games have to be based on final results since I don't have much experience with those programs. I'll take Albright in a close one.
Rochester @ Springfield - I likes Springfield's chances to win the LL preseason, but I think i was way wrong. Rochester played Fisher pretty tough. Maybe Rochester will be in the mix?
Union @ St. Lawrence - I'm only listing this here because Union losing this game would be a blackeye to a proud program and to me, would signal the need for change. I think Union wins by a lot, but if not, trouble could be brewing...
Some of the other games weren't worth mentioning because they should be decided handily.
Oh yeah, and the NESCAC starts their post-scrimage scrimages this week. Yawwwwwnnnnn.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 18, 2012, 11:21:48 AM
And you know Hartwick is mediocre this year how? Because they got steamrolled by RPI? No...no that was Alfred. I would say the jury is still out on this year's version of Hartwick since they have yet to play a traditionally tough opponent but it's clear they know how to take out the lower tier teams pretty handily. You have no idea how they will perform against the rest of the E8.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 18, 2012, 02:42:07 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 18, 2012, 11:21:48 AM
And you know Hartwick is mediocre this year how? Because they got steamrolled by RPI? No...no that was Alfred. I would say the jury is still out on this year's version of Hartwick since they have yet to play a traditionally tough opponent but it's clear they know how to take out the lower tier teams pretty handily. You have no idea how they will perform against the rest of the E8.
I would hardly call a 12-point win at home against Becker while allowing 430 yards and turning the ball over six times an example of winning "handily"
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 18, 2012, 03:15:57 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 18, 2012, 02:42:07 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 18, 2012, 11:21:48 AM
And you know Hartwick is mediocre this year how? Because they got steamrolled by RPI? No...no that was Alfred. I would say the jury is still out on this year's version of Hartwick since they have yet to play a traditionally tough opponent but it's clear they know how to take out the lower tier teams pretty handily. You have no idea how they will perform against the rest of the E8.
I would hardly call a 12-point win at home against Becker while allowing 430 yards and turning the ball over six times an example of winning "handily"
Conveniently you have ignored their other 2 games this season where they won by an average margin of 35 points. Also I'd say if you can turn the ball over 6 times and still put up 53 points you are doing something well. Ultimately you have digressed from the point of my post - please indicate to me how anyone can tell Hartwick is mediocre this year thus far. They lost to Western New England by 27 points and beat Husson by only 8 points the year they won the E8. I'd say their accomplishments this year through 3 games are markedly better than the first 3 during their successful run in 2007.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 18, 2012, 01:17:11 PM
Union @ St. Lawrence - I'm only listing this here because Union losing this game would be a blackeye to a proud program and to me, would signal the need for change. I think Union wins by a lot, but if not, trouble could be brewing...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2012, 08:41:49 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 18, 2012, 01:17:11 PM
Union @ St. Lawrence - I'm only listing this here because Union losing this game would be a blackeye to a proud program and to me, would signal the need for change. I think Union wins by a lot, but if not, trouble could be brewing...
A change of your underwear, maybe. Union is not RPI. We didn't spend $1 billion on a new stadium yet.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 18, 2012, 10:34:30 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2012, 08:41:49 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 18, 2012, 01:17:11 PM
Union @ St. Lawrence - I'm only listing this here because Union losing this game would be a blackeye to a proud program and to me, would signal the need for change. I think Union wins by a lot, but if not, trouble could be brewing...
A change of your underwear, maybe. Union is not RPI. We didn't spend $1 billion on a new stadium yet.
Pep enjoyed his Sept. 8 visit to Acronym Stadium. Didn't care for the on-the-field results, but DID enjoy getting acquainted with RPI's good-sized Pep Band. Pep was one of seven from Alfred who made the trip. Five of us drove to Albany Friday evening and stayed with an AU alum who was a four-year veteran of the pep band. Unfortunately, he had to attend a wedding in Syracuse so he was unable to join us at the game. Nevertheless, it was good seeing him again and hope to attend his wedding in October. Two more drove up from Alfred Saterday morning, while two alums (top notch trumpet from Class of 2011 and a stellar trombone from the Class of 2005) drove in from Massachusetts. Everyone was at the impressive stadium (Is it paid for?) about an hour before kickoff.
Pep wandered over to the RPI side, looking around and occasioned to run into the student conductor of RPI's band. We reviewed our game-time schemes and came to an amiable agreement for playing times, etc. The conductor was slightly amused that the AU band had its roots with the kazoo and still carried a kazoo along. Meanwhile, he informed Pep that they had a great turnout among freshmen and boasted having 18 trumpets!!! After the exchange, Pep headed back to the visitors' stands. As Pep came up the steps to where the band was seated, he passed a member of the RPI pep band. Band members then told Pep how the trumpet player (obviously a freshman), donning an RPI pep band shirt, came up and sat with the AU band and started asking questions about what music he'd be playing. Members of the AU band, puzzled by the trumpet player's peculiar query, realized he thought the AU Pep Band was the RPI Pep Band and broke it to him gently that his band was actually seated on the other side of the stadium. (Did he not notice all were wearing white shirts with purple and gold while his shirt was black?)
Both bands got reacquainted after the game as a gatekeeper, obviously eager to "punch out," prematurely locked up the gate that both bands had entered and, coincidentally, both bands waited to exit through. Ten to fifteen minutes later, after watching the RPI band members hand instruments over the fence to be loaded up in their van, someone arrived to unlock the gate and let us go.
It was a quick enough ride home in spite of hitting a severe storm as we got on I-88, with heavy winds followed by a torrential downpour slowing us considerably. The rest of the trip was uneventful, but it's always good to be back in Mayberry.
On Saxon (Road) Warriors!
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 18, 2012, 08:41:49 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 18, 2012, 01:17:11 PM
Union @ St. Lawrence - I'm only listing this here because Union losing this game would be a blackeye to a proud program and to me, would signal the need for change. I think Union wins by a lot, but if not, trouble could be brewing...
A change of your underwear, maybe. Union is not RPI. We didn't spend $1 billion on a new stadium yet.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 19, 2012, 10:01:13 AM
Speaking of Union, a friend of the show recently pointed out that the last 10 seasons have been subpar (6 years of either losing, .500 or just 1 win over .500 seasons) by "Union standards". The obvious exceptions being '09 and '05 (you could probably lump '06 in there too as most programs would happily take a 7 win season).
What we observed was that it was the OOC scheduling is what's dinged Union the most (winning % of .357 and if you take out 2005 the WP drops to .297). What Audino and others could point to however is that the Dutchmen have performed fairly well (2010 being the main exception) against their LL slate winning at a .737 rate which may not be like the "old days", but in a league and region with greater parity, .737 is more than good enough (obviously this year's LL slate is still TBD but wanted to include the 2012 OOC for emphasis):
2012 (0-3, 0-3 OOC, 0-0 LL)
2011 (6-4, 1-3 OCC, 5-1 LL)
2010 (2-7, 0-3 OCC, 2-4 LL)
2009 (8-3, 2-2 OOC, 6-1 LL)
2008 (5-4, 1-1 OOC, 4-3 LL)
2007 (5-5, 0-3 OOC, 5-2 LL)
2006 (7-3, 2-2 OOC, 5-1 LL)
2005 (11-1, 4-1 OOC, 7-0 LL)
2004 (6-3, 0-2 OOC, 6-1 LL)
2003 (5-5, 3-3 OOC, 2-2 LL)
2002 (5-5, 2-4 OOC, 3-1 LL)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 10:41:11 AM
And it's not like Union has a Buff St. or SJF OOC schedule recently. Salve, Ithaca, and Utica are all teams that aren't world beaters, and Union is 0-6 against them the past 2 years.
I give them credit for a decent OOC schedule, but there are teams here they should beat. As I mentioned, I like seeing Union lose, but for the pride of the LL, it's tough losing to an NEFC team, a sub-par Ithaca team, and a Utica team that has won 10 conference games since 2001.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 12:35:23 PM
And to build off of my point in the first place...
If Union loses this week to St. Lawrence, and you come in on Sunday or Monday to say why they lost, and that they showed improvement somewhere, and it's not the St. Lawrence of old, yadda yadda yadda, then i'll print out and mail you one of those participation ribbons and you can glue it on the entrance gate at the Frank Bailey.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 19, 2012, 12:45:44 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 12:35:23 PM
And to build off of my point in the first place...
If Union loses this week to St. Lawrence, and you come in on Sunday or Monday to say why they lost, and that they showed improvement somewhere, and it's not the St. Lawrence of old, yadda yadda yadda, then i'll print out and mail you one of those participation ribbons and you can glue it on the entrance gate at the Frank Bailey.
And if they win, I'll mail you this to eat for dinner next week:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.allaboutbirds.org%2Fguide%2FPHOTO%2FLARGE%2Famerican_crow_glamor.jpg&hash=c3fb67a9569d297a81f8683d872be51707e7f458)
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 19, 2012, 01:25:13 PM
I don't really know that any D3 coach should be pushed out if their in good standing and the students are graduating and becoming quality citizens, but I've had the same questions about Audino's performance lately. So in this case, I would side w/Lew on this and am not buying the long winded justification. The reality is that the program isn't the same as it was 10-15 years ago when I played against them
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 03:06:11 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 19, 2012, 01:25:13 PM
I don't really know that any D3 coach should be pushed out if their in good standing and the students are graduating and becoming quality citizens, but I've had the same questions about Audino's performance lately. So in this case, I would side w/Lew on this and am not buying the long winded justification. The reality is that the program isn't the same as it was 10-15 years ago when I played against them
You know, people say this about Ithaca (myself included), but things are just different in the region compared to when Union and IC were powers (I know you're speaking more recently pumkin, but I think this holds true.) The cost of attendance difference compared to certain schools is even more drastic than it was then. You didn't have a team in Hartwick or Utica. Fisher was emerging from club team status and wasn't consistently good until 2002. Buff State didn't have a varsity team until 1981. Hobart was mediocre at best, horrible at worst in the 80's. Cortland was really only good from maybe 1987-1992. You think to all the kids going to those schools now, who would have been looking at IC/Union in the 80's and early 90's. Where's Mark Robinson go? Boltus? Pitcher? Jeff Baker? You think IC would be the first choice for a great running back from Rochester leaving U of R today like it was for Mike Scott in 1988?
Yes, there are things both schools can do better—though I can only speak to Ithaca there—but to quote 'The Wire' "Game's the same. Just got more fierce." Do Union and IC need to respond? Sure. But I also think people who hark back to the glory days need to realize that the landscape is just different. The Unions and Ithacas of the world don't just get the pick of the litter anymore.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 03:17:25 PM
What is it exactly that people are attracted to go to Hobart for?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 03:17:25 PM
Maybe it's just the coaching(or recruiting)? Hmmmmmmmmm
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 03:06:11 PM
You think IC would be the first choice for a great running back from Rochester leaving U of R today like it was for Mike Scott in 1988?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 03:17:25 PM
Maybe they don't get 'the pick of the litter', but you can't tell me that they(Ithaca and Union) don't both get enough high quality athlete's to put out teams that should fare better than they are currently. Ithaca has been down but has represented the league pretty well in OOC competition the past few years. Their issues are more in conference in a conference only getting stronger.
What is it exactly that people are attracted to go to Hobart for? Is it the girls? Is it the location? Is it the Engineering school? Is it the Orange Helmets? I don't know what it is, but Hobart doesn't have any unfair advantage yet they continue to get better...Utica is in the same boat. Why would ANYONE go to Utica? The brewery? Maybe it is the orange helmets. I don't know. But the product on the field continues to improve.
Maybe it's just the coaching(or recruiting)? Hmmmmmmmmm
Quote from: Yanks 99 on September 19, 2012, 03:58:28 PM
there better be a tremendous interest in Ithaca's communication school or PT school
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 04:24:42 PM
Other than maybe the 2006 Fisher team, has any NY team ever been a serious title contender since IC?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 04:24:42 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 03:17:25 PM
Maybe they don't get 'the pick of the litter', but you can't tell me that they(Ithaca and Union) don't both get enough high quality athlete's to put out teams that should fare better than they are currently. Ithaca has been down but has represented the league pretty well in OOC competition the past few years. Their issues are more in conference in a conference only getting stronger.
What is it exactly that people are attracted to go to Hobart for? Is it the girls? Is it the location? Is it the Engineering school? Is it the Orange Helmets? I don't know what it is, but Hobart doesn't have any unfair advantage yet they continue to get better...Utica is in the same boat. Why would ANYONE go to Utica? The brewery? Maybe it is the orange helmets. I don't know. But the product on the field continues to improve.
Maybe it's just the coaching(or recruiting)? Hmmmmmmmmm
Why couldn't things like degree programs, difficulty of admission, cost of attendance all matter? Why couldn't it be based on girls, wanting to stay closer to home, color of the uniforms? 17-year old kids aren't always rational actors. Just because we're talking about football players doesn't mean that the fundamental question is "What football team do I want to play for?" and not "What do I want to do with the next four years of my life?"
As far as coaches, remember, they work within a system. From speaking with people I know at IC, I don't think Mike Welch received the administrative support that Jim Butterfield did, because I don't think the administration was as focused on athletics (and football) compared to when Jim was there. From an institutional standpoint, that's not necessarily a bad thing, and maybe it's a good thing. After all, we're institutions of higher learning that happen to have a football team. But I do think the focus is different, and that's affected the football team too. Is it possible that Union just doesn't prioritize football success the way they did back in the day?
And, let's remember something: New programs don't just mean the player pool is thinner. It means the coaches pool is too. A guy like Blaise probably stays at Ithaca if this is the 1980's.
Also, consider something about the self-cannibalization in the NY area. Other than maybe the 2006 Fisher team, has any NY team ever been a serious title contender since IC? Sure, Hobart's been good, but they're still topping out at 9 wins a season. How many NCAA playoff wins do they have? Utica's "improvement" has resulted in a whole bunch of 5-5 to this point. Color me unimpressed.
It's not like Hobart or Utica have risen to the level of a Union or an IC back in the day. Only Fisher has even come close. The bar for everyone in this area has been lowered across the board. Yes, Ithaca and Union are below where they could be, but the reality is that this sea change affects peaks and valleys. Whereas 12-1 and a national title turns into 10-3 and a trip to the NCAA quarters, 7-3 turns into 5-5. Both teams are in a frustrating down cycle now, yes. But regardless of where on the wheel, that wheel itself is lower.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 05:12:55 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 04:24:42 PM
Other than maybe the 2006 Fisher team, has any NY team ever been a serious title contender since IC?
RPI lost to the eventual National Champ in the final 4 of 2003.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 08:12:47 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 05:12:55 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 04:24:42 PM
Other than maybe the 2006 Fisher team, has any NY team ever been a serious title contender since IC?
RPI lost to the eventual National Champ in the final 4 of 2003.
How close was that game? I remember IC nearly winning the RPI game, but couldn't remember if they would have had a shot the next week
Quote from: pg04 on September 19, 2012, 09:11:13 PM
I think that RPI team was relatively even with Fisher in terms of their "strength" or "ability to win it all"
When I compiled "The top 10 Eastern Teams in the D3football.com era" 5 years ago, RPI 2003 finished #4 and Fisher 2006 finished #3 (Rowan's teams were #1 and #2, but they aren't NY as discussed here). I don't think any team since then has come close, so these are really the 2 teams that come to closes to what Bombers was looking for.
(link to the post describing 2003 RPI: http://www.d3boards.com/index.php?topic=5303.msg727504#msg727504 )
Quote from: Garnet on September 20, 2012, 10:39:46 AM
I stopped reading Frank's post after the second paragraph and then just skimmed the third one. After that, I moved to the next post.
Al Davis-"just win baby!"
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2012, 11:11:31 AMQuote from: Garnet on September 20, 2012, 10:39:46 AM
I stopped reading Frank's post after the second paragraph and then just skimmed the third one. After that, I moved to the next post.
Al Davis-"just win baby!"
Feel free to forward those comments to Union's Admissions and Financial Aid Departments.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2012, 11:19:51 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2012, 11:11:31 AMQuote from: Garnet on September 20, 2012, 10:39:46 AM
I stopped reading Frank's post after the second paragraph and then just skimmed the third one. After that, I moved to the next post.
Al Davis-"just win baby!"
Feel free to forward those comments to Union's Admissions and Financial Aid Departments.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft3.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcTLZ40E9cRW2FzHRBE6UqoM-x_M34XlbZEKFDMDZGFNZQQYE99KUHs_Ia62&hash=09bcca74c0e8bcc4b72fb27ea8a75c58addbbe3d)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2012, 11:19:51 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on September 20, 2012, 11:11:31 AMQuote from: Garnet on September 20, 2012, 10:39:46 AM
I stopped reading Frank's post after the second paragraph and then just skimmed the third one. After that, I moved to the next post.
Al Davis-"just win baby!"
Feel free to forward those comments to Union's Admissions and Financial Aid Departments.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft3.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcTLZ40E9cRW2FzHRBE6UqoM-x_M34XlbZEKFDMDZGFNZQQYE99KUHs_Ia62&hash=09bcca74c0e8bcc4b72fb27ea8a75c58addbbe3d)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 04:24:42 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 03:17:25 PM
What is it exactly that people are attracted to go to Hobart for? Is it the girls? Is it the location? Is it the Engineering school? Is it the Orange Helmets? I don't know what it is, but Hobart doesn't have any unfair advantage yet they continue to get better...Utica is in the same boat. Why would ANYONE go to Utica? The brewery? Maybe it is the orange helmets. I don't know. But the product on the field continues to improve.
Why couldn't things like degree programs, difficulty of admission, cost of attendance all matter? Why couldn't it be based on girls, wanting to stay closer to home, color of the uniforms? 17-year old kids aren't always rational actors. Just because we're talking about football players doesn't mean that the fundamental question is "What football team do I want to play for?" and not "What do I want to do with the next four years of my life?"
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 19, 2012, 03:17:25 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 19, 2012, 03:06:11 PMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 19, 2012, 01:25:13 PM
I don't really know that any D3 coach should be pushed out if their in good standing and the students are graduating and becoming quality citizens, but I've had the same questions about Audino's performance lately. So in this case, I would side w/Lew on this and am not buying the long winded justification. The reality is that the program isn't the same as it was 10-15 years ago when I played against them
You know, people say this about Ithaca (myself included), but things are just different in the region compared to when Union and IC were powers (I know you're speaking more recently pumkin, but I think this holds true.) The cost of attendance difference compared to certain schools is even more drastic than it was then. You didn't have a team in Hartwick or Utica. Fisher was emerging from club team status and wasn't consistently good until 2002. Buff State didn't have a varsity team until 1981. Hobart was mediocre at best, horrible at worst in the 80's. Cortland was really only good from maybe 1987-1992. You think to all the kids going to those schools now, who would have been looking at IC/Union in the 80's and early 90's. Where's Mark Robinson go? Boltus? Pitcher? Jeff Baker? You think IC would be the first choice for a great running back from Rochester leaving U of R today like it was for Mike Scott in 1988?
Yes, there are things both schools can do better—though I can only speak to Ithaca there—but to quote 'The Wire' "Game's the same. Just got more fierce." Do Union and IC need to respond? Sure. But I also think people who hark back to the glory days need to realize that the landscape is just different. The Unions and Ithacas of the world don't just get the pick of the litter anymore.
Maybe they don't get 'the pick of the litter', but you can't tell me that they(Ithaca and Union) don't both get enough high quality athlete's to put out teams that should fare better than they are currently. Ithaca has been down but has represented the league pretty well in OOC competition the past few years. Their issues are more in conference in a conference only getting stronger.
What is it exactly that people are attracted to go to Hobart for? Is it the girls? Is it the location? Is it the Engineering school? Is it the Orange Helmets? I don't know what it is, but Hobart doesn't have any unfair advantage yet they continue to get better...Utica is in the same boat. Why would ANYONE go to Utica? The brewery? Maybe it is the orange helmets. I don't know. But the product on the field continues to improve.
Maybe it's just the coaching(or recruiting)? Hmmmmmmmmm
Quote from: ITH radio on September 20, 2012, 01:27:49 PM
Either that or it could be the camo jerseys http://gohobart.blogspot.com
QuoteI also recall visiting Rochester as a recruit and having a less-than-enjoyable visit because my hosts went to a kegger and left me alone for the night. For some kids that would have worked, for me it didn't. High school seniors are a funny bunch - what works for some of us won't work for others, and football is far from the only factor for a player choosing a Division III school.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
Quote from: pg04 on September 22, 2012, 05:58:00 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
I'm not sure they can be ignored any longer. And Salve needs to be in too, I think.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 22, 2012, 06:15:51 PMQuote from: pg04 on September 22, 2012, 05:58:00 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2012, 02:43:52 PM
The Bomber juggernaut continues to roll by, disrespected.
I'm not sure they can be ignored any longer. And Salve needs to be in too, I think.
Two of their wins were over teams they beat last season, and Moravian...eh...
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 23, 2012, 12:03:52 AM
Dear LD,
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ft0.gstatic.com%2Fimages%3Fq%3Dtbn%3AANd9GcRT0a8FNigKSOKhl0a3wcMLTOHwzdMuoKYQSV0J7VxdF0XCc6Ft-6-yOw32Vw&hash=af5e34ad90b5d67c31794083e76a8637a5b68524)
Sincerely,
Frank
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 23, 2012, 09:13:22 AM
I think there's some fair answers here. I don't mind paying and have paid for most road games as well, but I have a massive problem with the quality of the video, having spent easily more than 500 bucks over the years on FB and Lax games while missing full quarters and halves due to technical issues. This is an even bigger deal in lax competing with Cuse, ACC schools, etc. to offer so little value and put out a garbage produce (the video not the teams).
I do agree that the OOC isn't great. Dickinson will always be there. Like complaining if IC or Cortland sucked for years, they'd still play. CMU being replaced with Geneva is weird, since they're both in the Pittsburg area and clearly the SJF was a one and one, then picked up another upstate program (though I'd rather they bring Alfred back).
I guess my gripe, so to speak, is that they've consistently put a good product out there (playoffs every year since 2000 except 01, 03, 09 & 2010 - all above .500) and when they played top teams last year, they won big over SJF (don't want to rehash why or how, it wasn't fluky just like SJF pounded us out the prior year on our homecoming - the night I flew home from a trip to Ireland all excited to listen in somewhere in the 2nd quarter only to be disappointed by my boys) and a result against a final four team that no other playoff team replicated against another final four team except each other without multiple key starters playing. I realize history doesn't matter, but it's clear that on the overall D3 site and regionally, seasons from 3-8 years ago clearly influence thinking (see Wash & Jeff or Trinity, TX consistently overrated). Beyond that, last year should influence and they're bringing back two guys who should be 1st all americans on D (Coleman & Worthington), almost all of the rest of the D, a good chunk of the O incl QB, RB's, most of the WR's, etc. Other than the stupid RPI game, they won the rest of their games by double digits, are winning by 20pts a game to start the season this year and it seems like they still get dismissed.
And to finish the rant. I think Hobart's played like crap to date. The O has been bad in 3 of 4 games (except UC, but even there they fumbled the ball 3x in a quarter, twice on the end of first down gaining plays where you fumble while being tackled from behind by the ankles). If they continue this way, and have (unfortunately) little motivation on their schedule other than winning the league and returning the favor to RPI, I think they'll trip up to some team that will be around .500 or worse (that would include Union - who's already locked in no better than 7-3 and I suspect they won't win out).
Rant over.
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 23, 2012, 09:13:22 AM
I think there's some fair answers here. I don't mind paying and have paid for most road games as well, but I have a massive problem with the quality of the video, having spent easily more than 500 bucks over the years on FB and Lax games while missing full quarters and halves due to technical issues. This is an even bigger deal in lax competing with Cuse, ACC schools, etc. to offer so little value and put out a garbage produce (the video not the teams).
I do agree that the OOC isn't great. Dickinson will always be there. Like complaining if IC or Cortland sucked for years, they'd still play. CMU being replaced with Geneva is weird, since they're both in the Pittsburg area and clearly the SJF was a one and one, then picked up another upstate program (though I'd rather they bring Alfred back).
I guess my gripe, so to speak, is that they've consistently put a good product out there (playoffs every year since 2000 except 01, 03, 09 & 2010 - all above .500) and when they played top teams last year, they won big over SJF (don't want to rehash why or how, it wasn't fluky just like SJF pounded us out the prior year on our homecoming - the night I flew home from a trip to Ireland all excited to listen in somewhere in the 2nd quarter only to be disappointed by my boys) and a result against a final four team that no other playoff team replicated against another final four team except each other without multiple key starters playing. I realize history doesn't matter, but it's clear that on the overall D3 site and regionally, seasons from 3-8 years ago clearly influence thinking (see Wash & Jeff or Trinity, TX consistently overrated). Beyond that, last year should influence and they're bringing back two guys who should be 1st all americans on D (Coleman & Worthington), almost all of the rest of the D, a good chunk of the O incl QB, RB's, most of the WR's, etc. Other than the stupid RPI game, they won the rest of their games by double digits, are winning by 20pts a game to start the season this year and it seems like they still get dismissed.
And to finish the rant. I think Hobart's played like crap to date. The O has been bad in 3 of 4 games (except UC, but even there they fumbled the ball 3x in a quarter, twice on the end of first down gaining plays where you fumble while being tackled from behind by the ankles). If they continue this way, and have (unfortunately) little motivation on their schedule other than winning the league and returning the favor to RPI, I think they'll trip up to some team that will be around .500 or worse (that would include Union - who's already locked in no better than 7-3 and I suspect they won't win out).
Rant over.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on September 23, 2012, 01:27:36 PM
For what it's worth, I believe Hobart's current D3football.com Top 25 ranking is the highest it has ever been. And I agree with the previous sentiment that Hobart isn't getting a whole lot of buzz because it hasn't played its most interesting opponents yet.
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 24, 2012, 08:01:14 AM
so Frank, you're completely misinteroreting pretty explicit things in my posts.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 24, 2012, 09:26:50 AM
Anyone getting the feeling that Widener is trying to get noticed???
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 24, 2012, 09:38:57 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 24, 2012, 08:01:14 AM
so Frank, you're completely misinteroreting pretty explicit things in my posts.
Ummm... REALLY? I think I discussed the dis-attachment that's being witnessed concerning Hobart and the rest of the LL, addressing the point you made concerning the lack of LL success the past five years. The other part concerning mid-level matchups essentially is addressed in the remainder -- there is sufficient national respect to ensure Hobart gets a better draw this year, especially assuming they go undefeated. Even if the First Round is an easy game, the Second Round would represent a more mid-level opponent. The point we're all making is that you're getting your wishes, so the complaints seem unfounded going forward as long as they continue winning. Mount Union didn't wake up one day and become the 800-pound gorilla they are, and neither did Whitewater. It takes time and proof of consistent strength before you just get the matchups you think you deserve in the playoffs, especially if your league is a little bit off. The dis-attachment we're witnessing is a big signal that can't be ignored.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 24, 2012, 11:43:34 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 24, 2012, 09:26:50 AM
Anyone getting the feeling that Widener is trying to get noticed???
Iffy. Beating W. Conn by 46 points isn't exactly a new trick (ask Cortland). King's has gone 1-9 each of the last two years (and really, a 35-point win is pretty common at the D-III level) And Misericordia might be the worst team in D-III (Consider that 1-3 Kings beat them 55-17). If you're a good team, and Widener probably is, a 46-, 35-, and even 67-point win isn't out of the question if the opponents are bad enough. The 2001 Bombers won four games by 49, 49, 52, and 66 points respectively.
The Wilkes score stunned me, and I already mentioned that I thought they left their staring QB in too long, but I will say this: I've seen games with similar/worse yardage discrepencies than 681-276 end much closer than that.
I think it's a perfect storm of a very good team playing horrible opponents back-to-back-to-back-to-back, leaving guys in a bit too long, and having one game where it was a perfect storm. Three of the games were conference games too, so a lot of that is out of their control. If these games were scattered throughout the year, I think we'd only notice the Wilkes game.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 24, 2012, 11:59:54 AM
Scoring 28 points in the 4th quarter of a 62-0 game tells me they are trying to get noticed.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 24, 2012, 11:59:54 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 24, 2012, 11:43:34 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 24, 2012, 09:26:50 AM
Anyone getting the feeling that Widener is trying to get noticed???
Iffy. Beating W. Conn by 46 points isn't exactly a new trick (ask Cortland). King's has gone 1-9 each of the last two years (and really, a 35-point win is pretty common at the D-III level) And Misericordia might be the worst team in D-III (Consider that 1-3 Kings beat them 55-17). If you're a good team, and Widener probably is, a 46-, 35-, and even 67-point win isn't out of the question if the opponents are bad enough. The 2001 Bombers won four games by 49, 49, 52, and 66 points respectively.
The Wilkes score stunned me, and I already mentioned that I thought they left their staring QB in too long, but I will say this: I've seen games with similar/worse yardage discrepencies than 681-276 end much closer than that.
I think it's a perfect storm of a very good team playing horrible opponents back-to-back-to-back-to-back, leaving guys in a bit too long, and having one game where it was a perfect storm. Three of the games were conference games too, so a lot of that is out of their control. If these games were scattered throughout the year, I think we'd only notice the Wilkes game.
I don't know. I think if they beat Wilkes 56-0 we'd all feel similarly about them. Scoring 28 points in the 4th quarter of a 62-0 game tells me they are trying to get noticed. The MAC looks like it's got some decent mid-level teams this year and no stud teams, so maybe Widener is trying to make a case that they are better than they are getting credit for, and the only way for people to take notice is to hang 90 on someone. Wilkes does not appear to be a bad team.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 5 ) | 2-1 | 50 | 1 | at Buffalo State |
2 St. John Fisher | 4-0 | 42 | 3 | Open |
3 Hobart | 4-0 | 41 | 2 | at WPI |
4 Widener | 4-0 | 37 | 6 | at Lebanon Valley |
5 RPI | 3-0 | 24 | 8 | at Merchant Marine |
6 Brockport State | 3-1 | 20 | 4 | at #7 Rowan |
7 Rowan | 3-1 | 17 | 7 | vs. #6 Brockport State |
8 Lycoming | 3-1 | 15 | 10t | vs. King's |
9 Cortland State | 2-1 | 9 | 10t | vs. Montclair State |
10t Ithaca | 3-0 | 6 | NR | vs. Utica |
10t Salve Regina | 4-0 | 6 | NR | at Western New England |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 24, 2012, 01:29:21 PM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 5 ) 2-1 50 1 at Buffalo State 2 St. John Fisher 4-0 42 3 Open 3 Hobart 4-0 41 2 at WPI 4 Widener 4-0 37 6 at Lebanon Valley 5 RPI 3-0 24 8 at Merchant Marine 6 Brockport State 3-1 20 4 at #7 Rowan 7 Rowan 3-1 17 7 vs. #6 Brockport State 8 Lycoming 3-1 15 10t vs. King's 9 Cortland State 2-1 9 10t vs. Montclair State 10t Ithaca 3-0 6 NR vs. Utica 10t Salve Regina 4-0 6 NR at Western New England
Also Receiving votes:
Buff State 4
Albright 2
Alfred 1
Delaware Valley 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,3,3,3,2)
Hobart (3,4,2,2,3)
Widener (4,2,4,4,4)
RPI (6,9,6,5,5)
Brockport State (9,7,5,7,7)
Rowan (5,6,10,6,NR)
Lycoming(7,8,8,9,8)
Cortland State (10,5,9,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,NR,10,6)
Salve Regina (8,NR,NR,8,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Alfred (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Delaware Valley (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Brockport State at #7 Rowan
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 24, 2012, 01:34:39 PM
Wow, someone ranked IC sixth? I know we've had some carnage out here, but that's awfully high for a team with three wins over some bland opponents.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 24, 2012, 12:46:18 PM
ExTartan beat me to it. +K for being quick on the draw, didn't mean to trample on your post
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 24, 2012, 01:59:25 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 24, 2012, 12:46:18 PM
ExTartan beat me to it. +K for being quick on the draw, didn't mean to trample on your post
I've been sensitive to this issue since ESPN's Gregg Easterbrook wrote a column criticizing Mount Union for running up the score when, in reality, nothing could have been further from the truth (i.e. they'd be running simple offensive plays with backups, kicking FG's on first down, etc). Since then, I've always done the same as you - I check the boxscore to see HOW a team scored that many points.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 24, 2012, 01:39:08 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 24, 2012, 01:34:39 PM
Wow, someone ranked IC sixth? I know we've had some carnage out here, but that's awfully high for a team with three wins over some bland opponents.
Friggin' South Hill bias...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 24, 2012, 01:39:08 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 24, 2012, 01:34:39 PM
Wow, someone ranked IC sixth? I know we've had some carnage out here, but that's awfully high for a team with three wins over some bland opponents.
Friggin' South Hill bias...
Quote from: dlip on September 24, 2012, 06:12:07 PM
Is it bizarre that Salve is ranked ahead of Buffalo State, a team that beat UWW in Cheese land? Don't get dlip wrong, he is a fan of Salve but something about that just seems a little off to him.
Quote from: dlip on September 24, 2012, 07:21:19 PM
Yes a few more games consisting of a win, a big win dlip might add over Cortland and a loss at #6 Brockport. The loss to Alfred is disturbing to dlip but not disturbing enough to knock them out of the poll after defeating the #1 team in the nation on the road ya know bombers? Just some thoughts after Back to School Night.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 24, 2012, 07:39:05 PMoQuote from: dlip on September 24, 2012, 07:21:19 PM
Yes a few more games consisting of a win, a big win dlip might add over Cortland and a loss at #6 Brockport. The loss to Alfred is disturbing to dlip but not disturbing enough to knock them out of the poll after defeating the #1 team in the nation on the road ya know bombers? Just some thoughts after Back to School Night.
Buff St got smoked by Alfred who got smoked by RPI. Buff St might have some serious talent but at 2-2 and losing like that, they don't deserve to be ranked at this point. If they continue to win, I'll think differently, but they are just far too inconsistent.
Quote from: dlip on September 24, 2012, 07:54:33 PM
Dlip feels spots 4-10 are not an easy call.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 25, 2012, 03:22:27 PM
Utica @ Ithaca
Ithaca gets a chance here to prove their own fan base wrong. Utica wins by 35.
Quote from: gordonmann on September 25, 2012, 04:22:20 PM
These posts are rapidly becoming a highlight of my week. :)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 24, 2012, 01:29:21 PM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury( 5 ) 2-1 50 1 at Buffalo State 2 St. John Fisher 4-0 42 3 Open 3 Hobart 4-0 41 2 at WPI 4 Widener 4-0 37 6 at Lebanon Valley 5 RPI 3-0 24 8 at Merchant Marine 6 Brockport State 3-1 20 4 at #7 Rowan 7 Rowan 3-1 17 7 vs. #6 Brockport State 8 Lycoming 3-1 15 10t vs. King's 9 Cortland State 2-1 9 10t vs. Montclair State 10t Ithaca 3-0 6 NR vs. Utica 10t Salve Regina 4-0 6 NR at Western New England
Also Receiving votes:
Buff State 4
Albright 2
Alfred 1
Delaware Valley 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,3,3,3,2)
Hobart (3,4,2,2,3)
Widener (4,2,4,4,4)
RPI (6,9,6,5,5)
Brockport State (9,7,5,7,7)
Rowan (5,6,10,6,NR)
Lycoming(7,8,8,9,8)
Cortland State (10,5,9,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,NR,10,6)
Salve Regina (8,NR,NR,8,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Albright (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Alfred (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Delaware Valley (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Brockport State at #7 Rowan
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 25, 2012, 03:22:27 PM
Got an uncommon few minutes here on a Tuesday to give some insight/predictions of some interesting games this week:
Salisbury @ Buff St.
I don't think anyone can look forward to playing Buff St. right now. They are obviously a Jeckyll and Hyde team but they are obviously very talented. I expect last week's loss to be emotionally crushing. I see Salisbury disposing of them without a ton of trouble, but I still wouldn't be surprised if that isn't the case. Very interesting matchup.
Hobart @ WPI
Hobart continues to roll. Although i thought WPI would have a half-decent season, they just can't get it together. Hobart by more than a little.
Brockport @ Rowan
I'm starting to get this feeling that Rowan is dope. I expect to see Rowan put a stamp on their season this week and let all the pee pee and poop haters know that they are for real.
Widener @ Leb Valley
Can Widener go for 90 again? Doubt it against this team. But I think Widener might be the beast in the MAC.
St. Lawrence @ Rochester
Just kidding... Who cares about this one.
Utica @ Ithaca
Ithaca gets a chance here to prove their own fan base wrong. Utica wins by 35.
Montclair @ Cortland
I think a lot of people thought more of both of these teams to start the year. I'm not counting Cortland out yet, but Montclair is toast. Cortland starts their run at it. CState in a Monkey Stomp.
RPI @ MMA
Only here because of my allegiances...RPI should win big. SHOULD is the key word. They will win, but hopefully they have some swag doing it.
Springfield @ Union
Springfield hangs 40+. Union drops a terd. Frank writes 4 page analysis. Participation trophy given to Union after the game.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 24, 2012, 07:39:05 PMQuote from: dlip on September 24, 2012, 07:21:19 PM
Yes a few more games consisting of a win, a big win dlip might add over Cortland and a loss at #6 Brockport. The loss to Alfred is disturbing to dlip but not disturbing enough to knock them out of the poll after defeating the #1 team in the nation on the road ya know bombers? Just some thoughts after Back to School Night.
Buff St got smoked by Alfred who got smoked by RPI. Buff St might have some serious talent but at 2-2 and losing like that, they don't deserve to be ranked at this point. If they continue to win, I'll think differently, but they are just far too inconsistent.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 25, 2012, 03:22:27 PM
Got an uncommon few minutes here on a Tuesday to give some insight/predictions of some interesting games this week:
Salisbury @ Buff St.
I don't think anyone can look forward to playing Buff St. right now. They are obviously a Jeckyll and Hyde team but they are obviously very talented. I expect last week's loss to be emotionally crushing. I see Salisbury disposing of them without a ton of trouble, but I still wouldn't be surprised if that isn't the case. Very interesting matchup.
Hobart @ WPI
Hobart continues to roll. Although i thought WPI would have a half-decent season, they just can't get it together. Hobart by more than a little.
Brockport @ Rowan
I'm starting to get this feeling that Rowan is dope. I expect to see Rowan put a stamp on their season this week and let all the pee pee and poop haters know that they are for real.
Widener @ Leb Valley
Can Widener go for 90 again? Doubt it against this team. But I think Widener might be the beast in the MAC.
St. Lawrence @ Rochester
Just kidding... Who cares about this one.
Utica @ Ithaca
Ithaca gets a chance here to prove their own fan base wrong. Utica wins by 35.
Montclair @ Cortland
I think a lot of people thought more of both of these teams to start the year. I'm not counting Cortland out yet, but Montclair is toast. Cortland starts their run at it. CState in a Monkey Stomp.
RPI @ MMA
Only here because of my allegiances...RPI should win big. SHOULD is the key word. They will win, but hopefully they have some swag doing it.
Springfield @ Union
Springfield hangs 40+. Union drops a terd. Frank writes 4 page analysis. Participation trophy given to Union after the game.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 26, 2012, 07:59:39 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 25, 2012, 03:22:27 PM
Got an uncommon few minutes here on a Tuesday to give some insight/predictions of some interesting games this week:
Salisbury @ Buff St.
I don't think anyone can look forward to playing Buff St. right now. They are obviously a Jeckyll and Hyde team but they are obviously very talented. I expect last week's loss to be emotionally crushing. I see Salisbury disposing of them without a ton of trouble, but I still wouldn't be surprised if that isn't the case. Very interesting matchup.
Hobart @ WPI
Hobart continues to roll. Although i thought WPI would have a half-decent season, they just can't get it together. Hobart by more than a little.
Brockport @ Rowan
I'm starting to get this feeling that Rowan is dope. I expect to see Rowan put a stamp on their season this week and let all the pee pee and poop haters know that they are for real.
Widener @ Leb Valley
Can Widener go for 90 again? Doubt it against this team. But I think Widener might be the beast in the MAC.
St. Lawrence @ Rochester
Just kidding... Who cares about this one.
Utica @ Ithaca
Ithaca gets a chance here to prove their own fan base wrong. Utica wins by 35.
Montclair @ Cortland
I think a lot of people thought more of both of these teams to start the year. I'm not counting Cortland out yet, but Montclair is toast. Cortland starts their run at it. CState in a Monkey Stomp.
RPI @ MMA
Only here because of my allegiances...RPI should win big. SHOULD is the key word. They will win, but hopefully they have some swag doing it.
Springfield @ Union
Springfield hangs 40+. Union drops a terd. Frank writes 4 page analysis. Participation trophy given to Union after the game.
Any take on the Fisher @ Bye Week?
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 26, 2012, 08:02:41 AMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 26, 2012, 07:59:39 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 25, 2012, 03:22:27 PM
Got an uncommon few minutes here on a Tuesday to give some insight/predictions of some interesting games this week:
Salisbury @ Buff St.
I don't think anyone can look forward to playing Buff St. right now. They are obviously a Jeckyll and Hyde team but they are obviously very talented. I expect last week's loss to be emotionally crushing. I see Salisbury disposing of them without a ton of trouble, but I still wouldn't be surprised if that isn't the case. Very interesting matchup.
Hobart @ WPI
Hobart continues to roll. Although i thought WPI would have a half-decent season, they just can't get it together. Hobart by more than a little.
Brockport @ Rowan
I'm starting to get this feeling that Rowan is dope. I expect to see Rowan put a stamp on their season this week and let all the pee pee and poop haters know that they are for real.
Widener @ Leb Valley
Can Widener go for 90 again? Doubt it against this team. But I think Widener might be the beast in the MAC.
St. Lawrence @ Rochester
Just kidding... Who cares about this one.
Utica @ Ithaca
Ithaca gets a chance here to prove their own fan base wrong. Utica wins by 35.
Montclair @ Cortland
I think a lot of people thought more of both of these teams to start the year. I'm not counting Cortland out yet, but Montclair is toast. Cortland starts their run at it. CState in a Monkey Stomp.
RPI @ MMA
Only here because of my allegiances...RPI should win big. SHOULD is the key word. They will win, but hopefully they have some swag doing it.
Springfield @ Union
Springfield hangs 40+. Union drops a terd. Frank writes 4 page analysis. Participation trophy given to Union after the game.
Any take on the Fisher @ Bye Week?
Fisher does not lose on their bye week. Still drops in the National Rankings.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 26, 2012, 08:34:50 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
I guess it really depends how much value you place on any one apparent "outlier" as part of a team's body of work. For example, UWW is still ranked 4th nationally (!) even with the loss to Buff State. Personally, I think Rowan is still getting credit for the season opening win over Del Val. I'm willing to excuse the occasional closer-than-it-should-have-been victory if there's at least one real quality WIN on the schedule. Leaving the East Region for a moment, last year Wabash barely survived a depleted Oberlin team with only 30-some players dressed for the game, then made a run to the quarterfinals.
In any case, this will all sort itself out in the end.
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2012, 11:41:27 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 26, 2012, 08:34:50 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
I guess it really depends how much value you place on any one apparent "outlier" as part of a team's body of work. For example, UWW is still ranked 4th nationally (!) even with the loss to Buff State. Personally, I think Rowan is still getting credit for the season opening win over Del Val. I'm willing to excuse the occasional closer-than-it-should-have-been victory if there's at least one real quality WIN on the schedule. Leaving the East Region for a moment, last year Wabash barely survived a depleted Oberlin team with only 30-some players dressed for the game, then made a run to the quarterfinals.
In any case, this will all sort itself out in the end.
Agreed. All would be included in my long and hard thinking, were I voting. In poll voting, one difficulty I would have is how to reconcile single data points--the "outliers" as you describe them. Polling is a way inexact science. There are multiple (but limited) data points to consider, each of which is nearly useless by itself, such as margin of victory and record v. common opponents.
That said, I think WCSU in an in-conference game is a more weighty outlier than Buff State in an out-of-conference game.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 26, 2012, 11:44:49 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2012, 11:41:27 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 26, 2012, 08:34:50 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
I guess it really depends how much value you place on any one apparent "outlier" as part of a team's body of work. For example, UWW is still ranked 4th nationally (!) even with the loss to Buff State. Personally, I think Rowan is still getting credit for the season opening win over Del Val. I'm willing to excuse the occasional closer-than-it-should-have-been victory if there's at least one real quality WIN on the schedule. Leaving the East Region for a moment, last year Wabash barely survived a depleted Oberlin team with only 30-some players dressed for the game, then made a run to the quarterfinals.
In any case, this will all sort itself out in the end.
Agreed. All would be included in my long and hard thinking, were I voting. In poll voting, one difficulty I would have is how to reconcile single data points--the "outliers" as you describe them. Polling is a way inexact science. There are multiple (but limited) data points to consider, each of which is nearly useless by itself, such as margin of victory and record v. common opponents.
That said, I think WCSU in an in-conference game is a more weighty outlier than Buff State in an out-of-conference game.
Hey, we could always just have some nerd put together a BCS type algorithm that tells us who the best teams are. But as we all know, this isn't an exact science either. Either way, there will always be question marks. Fortunately, of the 32 teams that make the playoffs, most times the best 5-6 teams in the country are in that mix.
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2012, 11:41:27 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 26, 2012, 08:34:50 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
I guess it really depends how much value you place on any one apparent "outlier" as part of a team's body of work. For example, UWW is still ranked 4th nationally (!) even with the loss to Buff State. Personally, I think Rowan is still getting credit for the season opening win over Del Val. I'm willing to excuse the occasional closer-than-it-should-have-been victory if there's at least one real quality WIN on the schedule. Leaving the East Region for a moment, last year Wabash barely survived a depleted Oberlin team with only 30-some players dressed for the game, then made a run to the quarterfinals.
In any case, this will all sort itself out in the end.
Agreed. All would be included in my long and hard thinking, were I voting. In poll voting, one difficulty I would have is how to reconcile single data points--the "outliers" as you describe them. Polling is a way inexact science. There are multiple (but limited) data points to consider, each of which is nearly useless by itself, such as margin of victory and record v. common opponents.
That said, I think WCSU in an in-conference game is a more weighty outlier than Buff State in an out-of-conference game.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2012, 12:28:46 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2012, 11:41:27 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 26, 2012, 08:34:50 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
I guess it really depends how much value you place on any one apparent "outlier" as part of a team's body of work. For example, UWW is still ranked 4th nationally (!) even with the loss to Buff State. Personally, I think Rowan is still getting credit for the season opening win over Del Val. I'm willing to excuse the occasional closer-than-it-should-have-been victory if there's at least one real quality WIN on the schedule. Leaving the East Region for a moment, last year Wabash barely survived a depleted Oberlin team with only 30-some players dressed for the game, then made a run to the quarterfinals.
In any case, this will all sort itself out in the end.
Agreed. All would be included in my long and hard thinking, were I voting. In poll voting, one difficulty I would have is how to reconcile single data points--the "outliers" as you describe them. Polling is a way inexact science. There are multiple (but limited) data points to consider, each of which is nearly useless by itself, such as margin of victory and record v. common opponents.
That said, I think WCSU in an in-conference game is a more weighty outlier than Buff State in an out-of-conference game.
The problem with all polls (especially early season ones) is there isn't a lot of data to determine if things are outliers or not. Cortland's 2-1, but since they've played the two worst teams in the NJAC, what do we really know? Buffalo State's win over Whitewater's going to look a lot different if the Bengals fall to 2-3 this weekend.
But this can go on all year. Heck, how many weeks did we debate Fisher in (I think) 2008? Brutal OOC, monkeystomp over a great IC team, lackluster wins over dreck like Rochester and Utica. Did we ever decide how good that team really was? I mean, I still maintain that the 2004 Bombers were the best team Mike Welch ever had, and they didn't even make the playoffs. But I firmly believe that squad would have taken the 2003 Ithaca team that nearly won the East region to the cleaners.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 26, 2012, 06:49:02 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2012, 12:28:46 PMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 26, 2012, 11:41:27 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 26, 2012, 08:34:50 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 25, 2012, 11:46:54 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 24, 2012, 06:55:41 PM
what caught my eye was that someone did not rank Rowan. not sure how that could be. guess they get a chance to change someones perspective this weekend.
Were I voting, I'd think long and hard about voting for a Rowan team that had to come back in the 2d half to beat Western CT by 6. WestConn has lost 24 straight:
2010 average margin of loss = 31 points;
2011 average margin of loss = 36 points;
2012 1st 2 games, average margin of loss = 52 points.
I guess it really depends how much value you place on any one apparent "outlier" as part of a team's body of work. For example, UWW is still ranked 4th nationally (!) even with the loss to Buff State. Personally, I think Rowan is still getting credit for the season opening win over Del Val. I'm willing to excuse the occasional closer-than-it-should-have-been victory if there's at least one real quality WIN on the schedule. Leaving the East Region for a moment, last year Wabash barely survived a depleted Oberlin team with only 30-some players dressed for the game, then made a run to the quarterfinals.
In any case, this will all sort itself out in the end.
Agreed. All would be included in my long and hard thinking, were I voting. In poll voting, one difficulty I would have is how to reconcile single data points--the "outliers" as you describe them. Polling is a way inexact science. There are multiple (but limited) data points to consider, each of which is nearly useless by itself, such as margin of victory and record v. common opponents.
That said, I think WCSU in an in-conference game is a more weighty outlier than Buff State in an out-of-conference game.
The problem with all polls (especially early season ones) is there isn't a lot of data to determine if things are outliers or not. Cortland's 2-1, but since they've played the two worst teams in the NJAC, what do we really know? Buffalo State's win over Whitewater's going to look a lot different if the Bengals fall to 2-3 this weekend.
But this can go on all year. Heck, how many weeks did we debate Fisher in (I think) 2008? Brutal OOC, monkeystomp over a great IC team, lackluster wins over dreck like Rochester and Utica. Did we ever decide how good that team really was? I mean, I still maintain that the 2004 Bombers were the best team Mike Welch ever had, and they didn't even make the playoffs. But I firmly believe that squad would have taken the 2003 Ithaca team that nearly won the East region to the cleaners.
redswarm, i get your point, but the win [Rowan] had over del val far outweighs the close win against w conn. [Rowan] still won [v. WestConn] and as usual most teams end up playing a closer game than was expected. to keep them out of the top 10 for that reason just doesnt make sense to me. out of the 7 teams i have seen play this year, rowan is the 4th best i have seen. the 3 better than them are UMHB, Wesley, and Salisbury.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 26, 2012, 10:31:16 PM
redswarm, where does it say the w conn cant play a close game against someone? werent they due to play one sooner or later?
Quote from: redswarm81 on September 27, 2012, 12:15:29 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 26, 2012, 10:31:16 PM
redswarm, where does it say the w conn cant play a close game against someone? werent they due to play one sooner or later?
Where does it say? I would start by looking at the 2010 and 2011 season records. In those two seasons, WestConn won no games, and lost by an average of 31 and 38 points, respectively. Their first two games this season were even worse. The trend for over two seasons has been getting worse. Sure, theoretically there's always the possibility of a breakout, but there's no evidence in the record that said or even hinted that it was going to occur last weekend against Rowan, or anytime this season against any good team.
Like I said, I don't know exactly what it means. But I do know that "usual" and "ordinary" are adjectives that simply don't apply to the Western Connecticut Colonials right now. With their 24 game losing streak and the huge scoring margins in those losses, WestConn has a good case to make that it's the weakest team in Division III right now, especially if you exclude Misericordia from the comparison.
I don't dispute your methodology, but I don't think it can be credibly applied to WestConn right now.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 27, 2012, 07:34:39 AMQuote from: redswarm81 on September 27, 2012, 12:15:29 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 26, 2012, 10:31:16 PM
redswarm, where does it say the w conn cant play a close game against someone? werent they due to play one sooner or later?
Where does it say? I would start by looking at the 2010 and 2011 season records. In those two seasons, WestConn won no games, and lost by an average of 31 and 38 points, respectively. Their first two games this season were even worse. The trend for over two seasons has been getting worse. Sure, theoretically there's always the possibility of a breakout, but there's no evidence in the record that said or even hinted that it was going to occur last weekend against Rowan, or anytime this season against any good team.
Like I said, I don't know exactly what it means. But I do know that "usual" and "ordinary" are adjectives that simply don't apply to the Western Connecticut Colonials right now. With their 24 game losing streak and the huge scoring margins in those losses, WestConn has a good case to make that it's the weakest team in Division III right now, especially if you exclude Misericordia from the comparison.
I don't dispute your methodology, but I don't think it can be credibly applied to WestConn right now.
I'd take Wesconn over Anna Maria or Husson. Osborne St. Pub represent!!!
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F1.bp.blogspot.com%2F-LfeX2iAXk0w%2FT3NnPLPH3JI%2FAAAAAAAADds%2F5E8ay7CkSEE%2Fs1600%2FDENNIS-RODMAN-DRUGS.jpg&hash=49be76ea33ba2bd61ffb9ab62c8871723d6ca179)
"Whatchu talkin bout LewDogg?"
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 28, 2012, 09:54:20 AM
Since we talked about this earlier, I thought it would be relevant to post:
http://articles.philly.com/2012-09-27/sports/34128305_1_widener-chris-haupt-issue
Widener's coach discusses the issue of the 90-0 game, and frankly, comes across really classy. He seems to clearly regret that the game went the way that it did, and says he'd do certain things differently. Good for him.
I'm surprised however, that while the writer seems to say that the game reached "embarrassing" levels, he had no problem with Haupt's 6th TD pass that made it 62-0. It seems to me, that if you truly want games to not be embarrassing, you'd want starters to be pulled sooner, rather than later.
Regardless, good to see that this was something Widener's coach has given some thought to.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 28, 2012, 10:32:42 AM
Why do I really want to go to the NESCAC boards and give my weekly predictions with all games ending in a gentleman's tie????
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 28, 2012, 10:32:42 AM
Why do I really want to go to the NESCAC boards and give my weekly predictions with all games ending in a gentleman's tie????
Quote from: Frank Rossi on September 30, 2012, 12:00:13 PM
Dear LD,
Have a double dose:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.juliezickefoose.com%2Fblog%2Fuploaded_images%2Fjekyll-771161.jpg&hash=2737915a1a1444cb477302373816667a7a6ee5f6)
However, since you're such a cool dood, here's a little gift for playing:
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-ODGd1CssBec%2FTZ7SNUavPpI%2FAAAAAAAAAjw%2FpygFRZArkLM%2Fs1600%2FAward%2BRibbon.jpg&hash=8e52c7984e4496e9fffc911b6baecbe5c871be80)
Sincerely,
Frank
Quote from: Rt Rev J.H. Hobart on October 01, 2012, 11:06:08 AM
I realize that I am commenting about the national top 25, not regional, but please allow The Rev to calmly and rationally say that he is neither surprised nor upset by Hobart remaining #12. It makes sense. Yes, it was a stellar win, but it was against a bottom-feeder.
With that said, The Rev anxiously awaits tougher opponents and wonders how Hobart will fare if it goes undefeated. Honestly, I can't see the rank going much higher due to the LL's position as a conference.
Quote from: Rt Rev J.H. Hobart on October 01, 2012, 11:06:08 AM
I realize that I am commenting about the national top 25, not regional, but please allow The Rev to calmly and rationally say that he is neither surprised nor upset by Hobart remaining #12. It makes sense. Yes, it was a stellar win, but it was against a bottom-feeder.
With that said, The Rev anxiously awaits tougher opponents and wonders how Hobart will fare if it goes undefeated. Honestly, I can't see the rank going much higher due to the LL's position as a conference.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 01, 2012, 11:47:01 AMQuote from: Rt Rev J.H. Hobart on October 01, 2012, 11:06:08 AM
I realize that I am commenting about the national top 25, not regional, but please allow The Rev to calmly and rationally say that he is neither surprised nor upset by Hobart remaining #12. It makes sense. Yes, it was a stellar win, but it was against a bottom-feeder.
With that said, The Rev anxiously awaits tougher opponents and wonders how Hobart will fare if it goes undefeated. Honestly, I can't see the rank going much higher due to the LL's position as a conference.
If Hobart runs the table, they will have a chance to climb. Bethel's still got St. Thomas, and Salisbury has to play Fisher. I could see Hobart passing Bethel and the loser of the SJF/Salisbury game. But they've risen 10 spots in the poll despite lacking a marquee win. Not too bad
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 01, 2012, 01:15:30 PM
Hobart's already drifted up more than they probably should given the SOS/opponents they've played. My comments earlier were more internal to the East region discussion. I felt like everyone talked about Sals/SJF/MAC/NJAC, etc. and Bart was sort of getting ignored. I would even note that TMC just lost to Geneva College.
At this point Hobart hasn't earned anything this season other than a 5-0 record. I think they're really good and should be able to go a few rounds into the playoffs, but if they don't take care of business the rest of the way they'll get what they deserve. They learned that the hard way last year.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 01, 2012, 08:10:29 AM
On to more important things with smaller egos...
I thought I had this ERFP figured out last week and once again we get toppled over. Here is what I submitted. I had a hard time dropping Buff St. with a 2-3 record since they beat UWW but it had to be done(sorry dlip, just messing). Widener showed they are solid. Cortland is making their way back up on my radar. And it's now impossible to ignore Ithaca. After the top 5, you could insert about 8-10 teams. One of these weeks the planets will align and the East Region and all things will go as expected.
1 Salisbury (3-1)
2 Hobart (5-0)
3 St. John Fisher (4-0)
4 Widener (5-0)
5 Rowan (4-1)
6 Lycoming (4-1)
7 Cortland (4-1)
8 Salve Regina (5-0)
9 Ithaca (4-0)
10 Lebanon Valley (3-2)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 01, 2012, 08:06:36 AM
Why do you keep coming at me? I didn't say a word to you this past week.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 25, 2012, 03:22:27 PM
Springfield @ Union
Springfield hangs 40+. Union drops a terd. Frank writes 4 page analysis. Participation trophy given to Union after the game.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 3 ) | 3-1 | 39 | 1 | at #3 St. John Fisher |
2 Hobart( 1 ) | 5-0 | 34 | 3 | vs. Springfield |
3 St. John Fisher | 4-0 | 33 | 2 | vs. #1 Salisbury |
4 Widener | 5-0 | 29 | 4 | vs. Stevenson |
5 Rowan | 4-1 | 24 | 7 | at Montclair State |
6 Cortland State | 3-1 | 20 | 9 | at New Jersey |
7 Lycoming | 4-1 | 17 | 8 | at FDU-Florham |
8 Salve Regina | 5-0 | 8 | 10t | at Mass-Dartmouth |
9t Delaware Valley | 3-2 | 6 | NR | Open |
9t Ithaca | 4-0 | 6 | 10t | at Alfred |
Quote from: dlip on October 06, 2012, 08:34:06 PM
Upstate what did you think of Fenti?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 4 ) | 4-1 | 49 | 1 | VS. Hartwick |
2 Hobart( 1 ) | 6-0 | 45 | 2 | Open |
3 Widener | 6-0 | 38 | 4 | Open |
4 St. John Fisher | 4-1 | 36 | 3 | at #10 Alfred |
5 Rowan | 5-1 | 32 | 5 | Open |
6 Cortland State | 4-1 | 24 | 6 | vs. Brockport State |
7 Lycoming | 5-1 | 21 | 7 | Open |
8 Salve Regina | 6-0 | 8 | 8 | vs. Curry |
9 Delaware Valley | 4-2 | 7 | 9t | at King's |
10 Alfred | 3-1 | 6 | NR | vs. #4 St. John Fisher |
Quote from: pg04 on October 09, 2012, 09:47:36 AM
I think it's interesting that the Salisbury win didn't switch the lone voter from Hobart to Salisbury. I may have switched in that case, but then again, how can you penalize a team that didn't lose (Hobart). I guess that's why these things are so great!
Even though they have two losses, I think one of the best under the radar teams is Kean. I think there is a good chance they run the table and win the NJAC. I think their only challenge comes to Rowan, and boy that should be a great game!
I'm also interested to see the Cortland vs. Brockport game. Can the golden eagles play spoiler? Their road schedule has seemed to be incredibly difficult with Lycoming, Kean, Rowan and now Cortland, so I hope they can get to 2-2 on that schedule.
Finally, we will see where Alfred's season really will end up this week at home vs. Fisher.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 09, 2012, 10:37:36 AM
With all due respect, I think that might be a little too much love for Kean. Dropped the opener at home to an Albright team that is at best 3rd in the MAC, possibly 4th or 5th. I'll give them a pass for UMHB, but even then the close win over Brockport is the only real high-quality game on the schedule - blowout wins against the two worst teams in the NJAC don't really stamp someone a contender IMO.
I wouldn't rule it out that Kean could make a splash, but do you really trust them to beat Cortland and Rowan in back-to-back weeks at the end of the season?
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2012, 01:29:39 PM
In the context of a collective voting, Fisher should fall off, so Hobart should probably pick up some "east" votes from them. What I mean is that voters likely look at the regions and sort the 5-10 best teams before stacking them up nationally and for many outside the east, I'd expect some (many?) still had Fisher ahead of Hobart going into this week.
By Pat's theory, you shouldn't move down much for losing to a team above you, but I have to think Bethel would slide a bit in the context of a narrow, last second/ditch win over an unranked team where they probably should've lost and then a 37-0 blowout loss to, an excellent, St Thomas team. Perhaps St Thomas should beat #10 team by that margin, but it's also probably fair to punish them a little for the score. UW Platteville lost and Illinois Wesleyan didn't do anything to get rewarded meaningfully. Hard to see anyone else jumping them, so seems like unless Bethel remains at #10 or slips to #11 instead of falling further.
The real question is should a team drift up on a bye week, or just in general when beating average competition? I feel like most of Hobart's move up this season hasn't been an analysis of what they've done so much as attrition above them. They haven't beaten any great teams, but in post patterns it seems that some still want to give credit for a win over Buff St, in which case, the Utica road win looks a little better at 4-2 despite their bad loss to IC. Beyond that, they just gone out and won by 3-5 tds every week, which is good, but let's see how they do against 5-1 RPI - a team that beat now interesting Alfred by 18pts.
At the end of the day, with RPI and Union still remaining, it's all just increasing ammo for the opponents on the schedule. I'm more focused on the fact that RPI's beaten Hobart two years in a row, including ruining last year's regular season for us. Should be a noteworthy game within the east region this upcoming week.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 14, 2012, 06:07:42 PM
So you've got Widener inside of the top 10?
I actually don't want Hobart to be this high at this point. I had a beef basically in the first couple of weeks, not really nationally, but that they were seen as like 5-7 in the East from what I could tell, but otherwise, I'd much rather they sit in the 15-25 area in the national poll. It's neat to get to #10, especially from us barely cracking .500 in my days in the late 90s and that was big improvement over Hobart in the early 90's and prior sans the one good year (93). They've come a long way, but until the go past the second round of the playoffs, it's nice to say "hey we've made the playoffs 8 out of 12 years" or whatever, but consistent first and second round exits and a good regular season ranking aren't as special as they would've seemed to me in 2002 or even 2005. And for all the success they've had in the Cragg years, there's never been a perfect regular season - even in 2004 with a perfect league record they dropped a dumb one out of conference, so I'm terrified of this team being ranked really highly nationally and still having to go to RPI and play Union. They're good, but they have to bring their A game every week until the season's over and I just hope Cragg, DeWall and Yoder (and Backhaus who's been there a long time also and was a really underrated and damn good Mike LB in my days) have them ready to rock each and every week.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 15, 2012, 09:15:26 AM
how in my right mind can I think Salve could beat St. John Fisher or Kean just because they have 2 losses? I think they would get buried.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 15, 2012, 10:32:41 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 15, 2012, 09:15:26 AM
how in my right mind can I think Salve could beat St. John Fisher or Kean just because they have 2 losses? I think they would get buried.
That's been my thought process as well these past few weeks. I'd add both the Valleys to that list of teams that would bury Salve and there are probably another half dozen teams in the middle of the power East conferences that would be favored.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 15, 2012, 10:39:17 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 15, 2012, 10:32:41 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 15, 2012, 09:15:26 AM
how in my right mind can I think Salve could beat St. John Fisher or Kean just because they have 2 losses? I think they would get buried.
That's been my thought process as well these past few weeks. I'd add both the Valleys to that list of teams that would bury Salve and there are probably another half dozen teams in the middle of the power East conferences that would be favored.
Yeah agreed. But before this past week, i seemed to have 'more room' for Salve in the poll. But now that the parity is apparent, I just don't have room anymore. fullbakdad is gonna be pissed.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 4 ) | 5-1 | 49 | 1 | VS. #6 Alfred |
2 Hobart( 1 ) | 6-0 | 45 | 2 | at #9 RPI |
3 Widener | 6-0 | 39 | 3 | at #7 Lycoming |
4 Rowan | 5-1 | 36 | 5 | at #5 Cortland |
5 Cortland State | 5-1 | 27 | 6 | vs. #4 Rowan |
6 Alfred | 4-1 | 23 | 10 | at #1 Salisbury |
7 Lycoming | 5-1 | 21 | 7 | vs. #3 Widener |
8 St. John Fisher | 4-2 | 12 | 4 | vs. Ithaca |
9 RPI | 5-1 | 10 | NR | vs. #2 Hobart |
10 Delaware Valley | 5-2 | 7 | 9 | vs. Misericordia |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 15, 2012, 10:39:17 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 15, 2012, 10:32:41 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 15, 2012, 09:15:26 AM
how in my right mind can I think Salve could beat St. John Fisher or Kean just because they have 2 losses? I think they would get buried.
That's been my thought process as well these past few weeks. I'd add both the Valleys to that list of teams that would bury Salve and there are probably another half dozen teams in the middle of the power East conferences that would be favored.
Yeah agreed. But before this past week, i seemed to have 'more room' for Salve in the poll. But now that the parity is apparent, I just don't have room anymore. fullbakdad is gonna be pissed.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 15, 2012, 01:46:42 PM
How can Widener beat Wilkes by 90 and Lebanon Valley only beat them by 8? Did they kneel on the ball every down after the 1st quarter as a show of good sportsmanship?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury( 3 ) | 6-1 | 48 | 1 | at Ithaca |
2 Hobart( 2 ) | 7-0 | 47 | 2 | vs. Union |
3 Widener | 7-0 | 40 | 3 | vs. Albright |
4 Cortland State | 6-1 | 34 | 5 | at #10 Kean |
5 Rowan | 5-2 | 29 | 4 | vs. Morrisville State |
6 Alfred | 4-2 | 25 | 6 | at Utica |
7 Lycoming | 5-2 | 18 | 7 | at Wilkes |
8 St. John Fisher | 5-2 | 12 | 8 | at Frostburg State |
9 Delaware Valley | 6-2 | 8 | 10 | at Lebanon Valley |
10 Kean | 5-2 | 6 | NR | vs. #4 Cortland State |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 22, 2012, 11:48:25 AM
Who in the hell still has RPI at 6???
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 22, 2012, 11:58:59 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 22, 2012, 11:48:25 AM
Who in the hell still has RPI at 6???
It's me...I struggled with that one...but looking at my ERFP from last week...and with a lot of similar teams losing to the higher ranking teams in the East...I had a tough time NOT listing them there. RPI (my #6) has the same record as Alfred (my #7) and beat them H2H...so I had a hard time ranking them ahead of Alfred. Alfred (my #7) has the same record as Fisher (my #8) and beat them head to head. Then it was a toss up between Lycoming, Kean, and Del Valley for the final two spots. I left Del Valley out because their 5 wins are against the bottom feeders (with the exception of Albright) with a combined record of 8-27.
My top five is the same as everyone else. Besides...if RPI wins out...and it should...they will be a very respectable 8-2, with a quality win over a good Alfred team, and losses against Hobart (no shame in losing to the #11 team in the country) and MMA (who if they beat Union and SLU would finish the year 6-4).
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 22, 2012, 11:58:59 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 22, 2012, 11:48:25 AM
Who in the hell still has RPI at 6???
It's me...I struggled with that one...but looking at my ERFP from last week...and with a lot of similar teams losing to the higher ranking teams in the East...I had a tough time NOT listing them there. RPI (my #6) has the same record as Alfred (my #7) and beat them H2H...so I had a hard time ranking them behind Alfred. Alfred (my #7) has the same record as Fisher (my #8) and beat them head to head. Then it was a toss up between Lycoming, Kean, and Del Valley for the final two spots. I left Del Valley out because their 5 wins are against the bottom feeders (with the exception of Albright) with a combined record of 8-27.
My top five is the same as everyone else. Besides...if RPI wins out...and it should...they will be a very respectable 8-2, with a quality win over a good Alfred team, and losses against Hobart (no shame in losing to the #11 team in the country) and MMA (who if they beat Union and SLU would finish the year 6-4).
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 22, 2012, 12:26:48 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 22, 2012, 11:58:59 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 22, 2012, 11:48:25 AM
Who in the hell still has RPI at 6???
It's me...I struggled with that one...but looking at my ERFP from last week...and with a lot of similar teams losing to the higher ranking teams in the East...I had a tough time NOT listing them there. RPI (my #6) has the same record as Alfred (my #7) and beat them H2H...so I had a hard time ranking them behind Alfred. Alfred (my #7) has the same record as Fisher (my #8) and beat them head to head. Then it was a toss up between Lycoming, Kean, and Del Valley for the final two spots. I left Del Valley out because their 5 wins are against the bottom feeders (with the exception of Albright) with a combined record of 8-27.
My top five is the same as everyone else. Besides...if RPI wins out...and it should...they will be a very respectable 8-2, with a quality win over a good Alfred team, and losses against Hobart (no shame in losing to the #11 team in the country) and MMA (who if they beat Union and SLU would finish the year 6-4).
I just think at this point, you're probably putting WAY too much weight on the RPI/Alfred game. It was the first game of the year and I think that has to play into this at some point too. If RPI just lost to Hobart like they did this week, i'd feel differently, but the loss to MMA shows me that they are not quite top 10 calibur. I'd probably be ok with a 9 or 10, but 6 just seems way too high for me.
Quote from: dlip on October 22, 2012, 02:47:47 PM
You know Yanks you make some great points. Dlip really dismissed RPI after their loss this weekend. They got ****ing smoked but smoked by my #1 in Hobart. Plus dlip had basically forgotton about their big win over Alfred. Having seen the game though the Saxons looked ****ing awful (Definitely could have been because of the Engineers play) and dlip thought they would only win 4 or 5 games this season. The shock of their turn around combined with RPI getting dominated in everyway by Bart put the Engineers on my back burner. After reading your post though dlip thinks he should have given more thought to RPI and their win over a team dlip ranked well ahead of them.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 23, 2012, 09:16:25 AM
RPI can't go 8-2 in the regular season b/c they only have 9 games scheduled. RPI also has to face Springfield and Union which will be tough outs to say the least.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2012, 11:47:06 AM
I tell ya what. When i refresh my message boards page and the NESCAC board is the only one that keeps lighting up with NEW posts. I always wonder what has to be so exciting over there to cause all the chatter. And every time I am sorely disappointed at how meaningless that chatter is. I'd seriously rather talk to someone about my cat's litter box. Brutal.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2012, 11:47:06 AM
I tell ya what. When i refresh my message boards page and the NESCAC board is the only one that keeps lighting up with NEW posts. I always wonder what has to be so exciting over there to cause all the chatter. And every time I am sorely disappointed at how meaningless that chatter is. I'd seriously rather talk to someone about my cat's litter box. Brutal.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2012, 02:52:35 PM
I have 2 cats. They take HUGE dumps. I work from home so the litter box is actually in my office and it can get brutally disgusting in here when it happens. One of the cats actually likes to play mind games with me and knows whenever I am on a long and/or important call, he takes a dump the size of Gro (and worse smelling), kicks around the litter and goes back to nap time with a smirk on his evil face.
Because of the proximity of my desk to the litter box, we use high quality high end litter which helps mask the smell a little and makes cleanup much less terrible, but it's pretty terrible overall. I am mostly in charge of scooping the box, otherwise, everything I own would smell of cat doo doo.
Oh, and Tufts vs. Amherst looks to be a wild one this weekend.
Quote from: pg04 on October 23, 2012, 03:47:13 PM
And it seems none of them ever look at any of the topics so we can pretty much bash them without response :P
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2012, 02:52:35 PM
I have 2 cats. They take HUGE dumps. I work from home so the litter box is actually in my office and it can get brutally disgusting in here when it happens. One of the cats actually likes to play mind games with me and knows whenever I am on a long and/or important call, he takes a dump the size of Gro (and worse smelling), kicks around the litter and goes back to nap time with a smirk on his evil face.
Because of the proximity of my desk to the litter box, we use high quality high end litter which helps mask the smell a little and makes cleanup much less terrible, but it's pretty terrible overall. I am mostly in charge of scooping the box, otherwise, everything I own would smell of cat doo doo.
Oh, and Tufts vs. Amherst looks to be a wild one this weekend.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 23, 2012, 02:52:35 PM
I have 2 cats. They take HUGE dumps. I work from home so the litter box is actually in my office and it can get brutally disgusting in here when it happens. One of the cats actually likes to play mind games with me and knows whenever I am on a long and/or important call, he takes a dump the size of Gro (and worse smelling), kicks around the litter and goes back to nap time with a smirk on his evil face.
Because of the proximity of my desk to the litter box, we use high quality high end litter which helps mask the smell a little and makes cleanup much less terrible, but it's pretty terrible overall. I am mostly in charge of scooping the box, otherwise, everything I own would smell of cat doo doo.
Oh, and Tufts vs. Amherst looks to be a wild one this weekend.
Quote from: Garnet on October 24, 2012, 10:18:06 AM
Lew Dogg has cats so he can collect their turds to make the Frozen Cat Turd trophy.
bman, No Garnet on the list. Where is the love?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 01:16:55 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Salve being #6 on this list is ridiculous...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Quote from: pg04 on October 25, 2012, 01:40:00 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 01:16:55 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Salve being #6 on this list is ridiculous...
It's calculation based, so the fact that they only have one loss weighs HEAVILY on the ranking (Note that there are no 2 loss teams above them, and consequently the only one loss teams below them are Framingham State and Mount Ida, who I would assume have SOS much lower due to the selection of OOC games). That and the fact that their SOS is "better" than the average put them where they are.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 02:24:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 25, 2012, 01:40:00 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 01:16:55 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Salve being #6 on this list is ridiculous...
It's calculation based, so the fact that they only have one loss weighs HEAVILY on the ranking (Note that there are no 2 loss teams above them, and consequently the only one loss teams below them are Framingham State and Mount Ida, who I would assume have SOS much lower due to the selection of OOC games). That and the fact that their SOS is "better" than the average put them where they are.
I hear you...but I just look at Salve sitting at #6 on this list and all I can think of is that "you got beat by a team that needed a last second TD to beat Becker???".
With geographical regions out window for the tournament...if the committee holds to the same form as last year...I hope they finally ship the NEFC champ out to MUC, UWW, or Wesley for a first round match up...listen to the coach from the NEFC complain about not getting a higher seed after navigating their way through the perilous Bogan or Boyd Division (like the WNEC coach did last year)...and then watch them get their doors blown off. I know there are usually some geographical and mileage issues here most of the time...but just once, I would like to see this happen.
The only good news for the NEFC is that next year the Massachusetts State Collegiate Athletic Conference (MASCAC) comes on board and automatically becomes the worst league in the nation that gets an automatic bid.
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 02:24:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 25, 2012, 01:40:00 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 01:16:55 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Salve being #6 on this list is ridiculous...
It's calculation based, so the fact that they only have one loss weighs HEAVILY on the ranking (Note that there are no 2 loss teams above them, and consequently the only one loss teams below them are Framingham State and Mount Ida, who I would assume have SOS much lower due to the selection of OOC games). That and the fact that their SOS is "better" than the average put them where they are.
I hear you...but I just look at Salve sitting at #6 on this list and all I can think of is that "you got beat by a team that needed a last second TD to beat Becker???".
With geographical regions out window for the tournament...if the committee holds to the same form as last year...I hope they finally ship the NEFC champ out to MUC, UWW, or Wesley for a first round match up...listen to the coach from the NEFC complain about not getting a higher seed after navigating their way through the perilous Bogan or Boyd Division (like the WNEC coach did last year)...and then watch them get their doors blown off. I know there are usually some geographical and mileage issues here most of the time...but just once, I would like to see this happen.
The only good news for the NEFC is that next year the Massachusetts State Collegiate Athletic Conference (MASCAC) comes on board and automatically becomes the worst league in the nation that gets an automatic bid.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 02:39:47 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 02:24:11 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 25, 2012, 01:40:00 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 25, 2012, 01:16:55 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 25, 2012, 12:40:51 PM
East
http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index (http://d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/index)
1. Hobart, 7-0, .559 (47th), defeated RPI.
2. Salisbury, 6-1, .600 (25th), defeated Alfred, St. John Fisher, lost to Wesley (No. 2 South).
3. Widener, 7-0, .423 (206th), defeated Lycoming.
4. Cortland State, 6-1, .472 (149th), defeated Rowan.
5. Rowan, 5-1, .568 (60th), lost to Rowan.
6. Salve Regina, 7-1, .530 (76th), no results vs. RRO.
7. RPI, 5-2, .532 (74th), defeated Alfred, lost to Hobart.
8. Alfred, 4-2, .580 (38th), defeated St. John Fisher, lost to RPI, Salisbury.
9. St. John Fisher, 4-2, .603 (21st), lost to Alfred, Salisbury.
10. Lycoming, 5-2, .574 (40th), lost to Widener.
The bubble: Kean, Delaware Valley.
Beyond the bubble: Framingham State, Mount Ida
Kind of an interesting Regional ranking, specifically Salve and RPI's rankings. Salve lost to a mediocre MIT and RPI lost to a mediocre MMA. RPI's Alfred victory obviously is holding a lot of weight. To me, Alfred's wins should put them above RPI. If RPI wins out, I guess they'd be a bubble tournament team. Could be interesting...
Salve being #6 on this list is ridiculous...
It's calculation based, so the fact that they only have one loss weighs HEAVILY on the ranking (Note that there are no 2 loss teams above them, and consequently the only one loss teams below them are Framingham State and Mount Ida, who I would assume have SOS much lower due to the selection of OOC games). That and the fact that their SOS is "better" than the average put them where they are.
I hear you...but I just look at Salve sitting at #6 on this list and all I can think of is that "you got beat by a team that needed a last second TD to beat Becker???".
With geographical regions out window for the tournament...if the committee holds to the same form as last year...I hope they finally ship the NEFC champ out to MUC, UWW, or Wesley for a first round match up...listen to the coach from the NEFC complain about not getting a higher seed after navigating their way through the perilous Bogan or Boyd Division (like the WNEC coach did last year)...and then watch them get their doors blown off. I know there are usually some geographical and mileage issues here most of the time...but just once, I would like to see this happen.
The only good news for the NEFC is that next year the Massachusetts State Collegiate Athletic Conference (MASCAC) comes on board and automatically becomes the worst league in the nation that gets an automatic bid.
After all is said and done, sending the NEFC out to Mount Union is kind of pointless. WNEC went to Salisbury last year and lost 62-24. Norwich went to Delaware Valley and lost 62-10. I don't think it really matters much where these teams get sent.
With a loss, they aren't likely to get a great seed and Mount probably wouldn't run the score any higher than any of these other teams. Mount Union tends to have a point ceiling that they stay within. It just sucks that 2 spots get taken by the NEFC and ECFC and another will be taken soon when the NEFC splits. It really kills the East's strength.
Last year, the East showed it can compete across the country. What might have happened if 2 more teams got the nod over WNEC and Norwich? Other than likely playing another east team, they might have gotten a different draw and the East could have saturated the brackets.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2012, 03:18:59 PM
WNEC is more than 500 miles from Mount Union, as are most, if not all other NEFC teams. SUNY-Maritime I believe is in the 500 range and is one of the very few (if not only) schools from the New England conferences that could drive to Mount Union. Otherwise, a flight would be involved.
Quote from: pg04 on October 25, 2012, 05:15:44 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2012, 03:18:59 PM
WNEC is more than 500 miles from Mount Union, as are most, if not all other NEFC teams. SUNY-Maritime I believe is in the 500 range and is one of the very few (if not only) schools from the New England conferences that could drive to Mount Union. Otherwise, a flight would be involved.
Although this was slightly less relevant last year wasn't it? They seem to switch things up and seemed more willing to pitch for SOME flights.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2012, 05:37:34 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 25, 2012, 05:15:44 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 25, 2012, 03:18:59 PM
WNEC is more than 500 miles from Mount Union, as are most, if not all other NEFC teams. SUNY-Maritime I believe is in the 500 range and is one of the very few (if not only) schools from the New England conferences that could drive to Mount Union. Otherwise, a flight would be involved.
Although this was slightly less relevant last year wasn't it? They seem to switch things up and seemed more willing to pitch for SOME flights.
They'll only get a maximum of two flights in the first round. The third round had a guarantee of three flights, and that's where the NCAA didn't force them to avoid that scenario. That said, I wonder if there wasn't a little concern after the fact once the NCAA paid for so many flights. There tends to be an on-year/off-year push and pull with Committees as we've seen in basketball at this Division. My feeling is that what we saw last year will not repeat this year -- yet, I could be wrong. Again, though, the first round is pretty much set in stone that it's either one or two flights, maximum.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 8-0 | 50 | 2 | at St. Lawrence |
2 Widener | 8-0 | 44 | 3 | at FDU-Florham |
3 Cortland State | 7-1 | 40 | 4 | at William Paterson |
4 Salisbury | 6-2 | 35 | 1 | vs. #9 Utica |
5 Rowan | 6-2 | 31 | 5 | vs. Kean |
6 Lycoming | 6-2 | 23 | 7 | vs. Stevenson |
7 Delaware Valley | 6-2 | 16 | 9 | vs. Delaware Valley |
8 St. John Fisher | 6-2 | 13.5 | 8 | vs. Buffalo State |
9 Utica | 6-2 | 10 | NR | at #4 Salisbury |
10 RPI | 5-2 | 5 | NR | at Springfield |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2012, 09:25:21 AM
Here is what I submitted this week:
Week 9 Poll
1 Hobart (8-0)
2 Widener (8-0)
3 Cortland St. (8-1)
4 Salisbury (6-2)
5 Rowan (6-2)
6 Lycoming (6-2)
7 Delaware Valley (6-2)
8 St. John Fisher (6-2)
9 Utica (6-2)
10 RPI (5-2)
I'm so confused as to how in the he!! Salve is getting more votes in the Top 25 than Delaware Valley and Utica. They are getting almost as many votes as UWW. Imagine how that game would go?
I like to think in terms of head to head competitions and how do you think Salve would fare against Delaware Valley and Utica? My guess is it wouldn't be within 4-5 TDs.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2012, 09:25:21 AM
Here is what I submitted this week:
Week 9 Poll
1 Hobart (8-0)
2 Widener (8-0)
3 Cortland St. (8-1)
4 Salisbury (6-2)
5 Rowan (6-2)
6 Lycoming (6-2)
7 Delaware Valley (6-2)
8 St. John Fisher (6-2)
9 Utica (6-2)
10 RPI (5-2)
I'm so confused as to how in the he!! Salve is getting more votes in the Top 25 than Delaware Valley and Utica. They are getting almost as many votes as UWW. Imagine how that game would go?
I like to think in terms of head to head competitions and how do you think Salve would fare against Delaware Valley and Utica? My guess is it wouldn't be within 4-5 TDs.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2012, 11:26:23 AMI'm not saying Salve could beat them, but let's just consider that Bridgewater State will receive consideration before UWW does for Pool C -- and Bridgewater State may not make it to the NEFC Championship Game. There is a LOT more parity across the Division right now than what you're assuming -- past the Top 10 is a complete jumble.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2012, 11:32:37 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2012, 11:26:23 AMI'm not saying Salve could beat them, but let's just consider that Bridgewater State will receive consideration before UWW does for Pool C -- and Bridgewater State may not make it to the NEFC Championship Game. There is a LOT more parity across the Division right now than what you're assuming -- past the Top 10 is a complete jumble.
How the NCAA chooses to make its at-large decisions is not at all relevant to the Top 25.
Agreed there is parity beyond the Top 10, which is exactly how a three-loss Whitewater merits Top 25 votes. :)
Quote from: pg04 on October 29, 2012, 02:17:02 PM
I agree with those that do not believe UWW should be a top 25 team on anyone's ballot at this point. Prestige is doing a LOT with this. It is similar to an argument I see on another board of Wheaton being ranked ahead of a team they beat and have one more loss than. Wheaton's name recognition in large part has garnered them being ahead of the other school.
While it's a good top 25 poll, there are definitely some big curiosities.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 29, 2012, 02:10:53 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2012, 11:32:37 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2012, 11:26:23 AMI'm not saying Salve could beat them, but let's just consider that Bridgewater State will receive consideration before UWW does for Pool C -- and Bridgewater State may not make it to the NEFC Championship Game. There is a LOT more parity across the Division right now than what you're assuming -- past the Top 10 is a complete jumble.
How the NCAA chooses to make its at-large decisions is not at all relevant to the Top 25.
Agreed there is parity beyond the Top 10, which is exactly how a three-loss Whitewater merits Top 25 votes. :)
Hey, in 2006, you had 6-3 and 7-3 teams in the Top 25. It's not unheard of. But, and I'm speaking based on a very cursory glance of some of these ranked three-loss teams, aren't most of these cases where a three-loss team is ranked/receiving votes a result of a team that:
A. Makes a playoff run and/or wins 9+ games (Numerous teams) or
B. Loses to three pretty good teams (Linfield and Union in '06 and Ithaca in '05/'07 come to mind)
Whitewater's going to finish with seven wins, and of its three loses, Buff State is mediocre, (and considering it was a home game, AND Whitewater had two weeks to prepare, that is probably much closer to a bad loss) and Stevens Point just looks bad. Of course, Whitewater's not in the top 25, but they might be by season's end if they win these last two.
So it seems like a team with Whitewater's record/resume getting votes this late in the year in a unique development, which certainly drives home Frank's point that there's just a ton of parity outside the top 10
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2012, 03:13:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 29, 2012, 02:17:02 PM
I agree with those that do not believe UWW should be a top 25 team on anyone's ballot at this point. Prestige is doing a LOT with this. It is similar to an argument I see on another board of Wheaton being ranked ahead of a team they beat and have one more loss than. Wheaton's name recognition in large part has garnered them being ahead of the other school.
While it's a good top 25 poll, there are definitely some big curiosities.
Similar with Alfred being ranked behind St. John Fisher last week.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 29, 2012, 10:41:30 AM
lew, i would agree with all your points. your poll looks good to me. i am going to the rowan/kean game this weekend and then to the del val/widener game next weekend. want to see how rowan looks since i saw them in week 1 and then want to see if del val is playing as good as i thought they would at the beginning of the season. if del val has straightened the offense out i think they will beat widener who relied on miracle comebacks against the other top teams in the mac, leb val and lycoming. i know that lyco beat del val, but that was back in week 2 and i think that del val has changed their o up a little. the win against leb val looks good to me for del val. the east is imploding like the south is. both seem to be eliminating each other so that very few will get a chance to be pool c's. if utica beats salisbury, the gulls are out. if kean beats rowan they are both likely out. i think hobart is reall good, after that i think the east is suspect, but we shall see as it plays out the next 2 weeks.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2012, 03:13:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 29, 2012, 02:17:02 PM
I agree with those that do not believe UWW should be a top 25 team on anyone's ballot at this point. Prestige is doing a LOT with this. It is similar to an argument I see on another board of Wheaton being ranked ahead of a team they beat and have one more loss than. Wheaton's name recognition in large part has garnered them being ahead of the other school.
While it's a good top 25 poll, there are definitely some big curiosities.
Similar with Alfred being ranked behind St. John Fisher last week.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 29, 2012, 04:33:05 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 29, 2012, 10:41:30 AM
lew, i would agree with all your points. your poll looks good to me. i am going to the rowan/kean game this weekend and then to the del val/widener game next weekend. want to see how rowan looks since i saw them in week 1 and then want to see if del val is playing as good as i thought they would at the beginning of the season. if del val has straightened the offense out i think they will beat widener who relied on miracle comebacks against the other top teams in the mac, leb val and lycoming. i know that lyco beat del val, but that was back in week 2 and i think that del val has changed their o up a little. the win against leb val looks good to me for del val. the east is imploding like the south is. both seem to be eliminating each other so that very few will get a chance to be pool c's. if utica beats salisbury, the gulls are out. if kean beats rowan they are both likely out. i think hobart is reall good, after that i think the east is suspect, but we shall see as it plays out the next 2 weeks.
man, you guys are taking this poll **** way too seriously to miss this one...no matter how many times its played itself out......
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2012, 11:32:37 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2012, 11:26:23 AMI'm not saying Salve could beat them, but let's just consider that Bridgewater State will receive consideration before UWW does for Pool C -- and Bridgewater State may not make it to the NEFC Championship Game. There is a LOT more parity across the Division right now than what you're assuming -- past the Top 10 is a complete jumble.
How the NCAA chooses to make its at-large decisions is not at all relevant to the Top 25.
Agreed there is parity beyond the Top 10, which is exactly how a three-loss Whitewater merits Top 25 votes. :)
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2012, 06:48:09 PM
However, if the season ended today, Whitewater's relative strength wouldn't even be looked at by the Selection Committee at a 5-3 record for good reasons. Namely, it SHOULDN'T be considered -- if we're going to sit here and parse whether or not a three-loss team is better than an undefeated or reasonably strong one-loss team to that degree, then what we're really doing is assessing history in both polling and prior seasons' victories more than we're assessing the current state of affairs, in my honest opinion.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2012, 06:48:09 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2012, 11:32:37 AMQuote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2012, 11:26:23 AMI'm not saying Salve could beat them, but let's just consider that Bridgewater State will receive consideration before UWW does for Pool C -- and Bridgewater State may not make it to the NEFC Championship Game. There is a LOT more parity across the Division right now than what you're assuming -- past the Top 10 is a complete jumble.
How the NCAA chooses to make its at-large decisions is not at all relevant to the Top 25.
Agreed there is parity beyond the Top 10, which is exactly how a three-loss Whitewater merits Top 25 votes. :)
Yes and no, Guru. Pool C and Pool B (to the degree it exists) collectively are an effort to pick out "the best of the rest" in the Division. It was pretty much the grand compromise to allow the AQ system to work across most sports in the Division. What you're disagreeing with here is whether or not the MODEL used by the NCAA is an accurate assessment of relative strength.
Quote from: SJFF82 on October 29, 2012, 04:35:19 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 29, 2012, 03:13:55 PMQuote from: pg04 on October 29, 2012, 02:17:02 PM
I agree with those that do not believe UWW should be a top 25 team on anyone's ballot at this point. Prestige is doing a LOT with this. It is similar to an argument I see on another board of Wheaton being ranked ahead of a team they beat and have one more loss than. Wheaton's name recognition in large part has garnered them being ahead of the other school.
While it's a good top 25 poll, there are definitely some big curiosities.
Similar with Alfred being ranked behind St. John Fisher last week.
but doesnt AU's loss this week 'vindicate' those that apparently saw past the H2H game and ranked SJF ahead of them? Or is the poll just a week to week guessing game based on that Saterday's results?
Quote from: SUADC on November 01, 2012, 09:34:38 AM
With the cancellations and re-scheduling of games around the east. Do you think the games that got re-scheduled and the games that was cancelled completely was dictated by each teams playoff chances? It appears that the Widener game was cancelled because win or lose in week 11, they still are a playoff team and Cortland has already clinched, so those games is not worth the hassel of re-scheduling. However, the Rowan vs. Kean game definitely has playoff implications on the line.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 9-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. Rochester |
2 Widener | 8-0 | 42 | 2 | vs. #7 Delaware Valley |
3 Salisbury | 7-2 | 39 | 4 | at Frostburg State |
4 Cortland State | 7-1 | 38 | 3 | vs. #T9 Ithaca |
5 Rowan | 6-2 | 31 | 5 | at TCNJ |
6 Lycoming | 7-2 | 25 | 6 | at Misericordia |
7 Delaware Valley | 7-2 | 20 | 7 | at #2 Widener |
T9 Alfred | 5-3 | 6 | NR | at Hartwick |
T9 Ithaca | 6-3 | 6 | NR | at #4 Cortland State |
T9 Lebanon Valley | 6-3 | 6 | NR | vs. Albright |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 05, 2012, 10:01:08 AM
Week 10 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 9-0 50 1 vs. Rochester 2 Widener 8-0 42 2 vs. #7 Delaware Valley 3 Salisbury 7-2 39 4 at Frostburg State 4 Cortland State 7-1 38 3 vs. #T9 Ithaca 5 Rowan 6-2 31 5 at TCNJ 6 Lycoming 7-2 25 6 at Misericordia 7 Delaware Valley 7-2 20 7 at #2 Widener T9 Alfred 5-3 6 NR at Hartwick T9 Ithaca 6-3 6 NR at #4 Cortland State T9 Lebanon Valley 6-3 6 NR vs. Albright
Dropped Out:
RPI
St. John Fisher
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Salve Regina 5
St. John Fisher 2
Utica 2
Kean 1
Trinity 1
Union 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
Widener (3,4,2,2,2)
Salisbury (2,3,3,5,3)
Cortland State (4,2,4,3,4)
Rowan (5,5,5,4,5)
Lycoming(6,6,6,6,6)
Delaware Valley (7,7,7,7,7)
Alfred (9,NR,NR,8,10)
Ithaca (NR,9,NR,10,8)
Lebanon Valley (8,8,NR,NR,NR)
Salve Regina (NR,NR,8,NR,9)
St. John Fisher (NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Kean (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Trinity (10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#7 Delaware Valley at #2 Widener
#T9 Ithaca at #4 Cortland State
Quote from: dlip on November 05, 2012, 04:23:29 PM
Looking at everything and trying to be as objective as possible, Bridgewater has no buisness getting in. The win over Springfield early, although impressive in regards to history, really isn't impressive considering the Pride didn't find any identity until recently. Jason Marrero has grown ten fold. Kid can throw and is shifty as ****. Defense is still not good but if those two teams play again Springfield runs all over them big time. On top of this dlip does not feel they could do anything against Rowan or any other 2 loss team from another conference (aside from any in the ECFC).
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 07, 2012, 04:09:22 PM
OK...f'ing seriously...
East
1 Hobart 9-0 9-0
2 Widener 8-0 8-0
3 Cortland State 7-1 7-1
4 Salisbury 6-2 7-2
5 Rowan 6-1 6-2
6 Salve Regina 9-1 9-1
7 Lycoming 7-2 7-2
8 Framingham St. 9-1 9-1
9 Bridgewater St. 9-1 9-1
10 Endicott 8-2 8-2
Four teams from the NEFC ranked in the East Region Top 10 in the latest NCCA Regional rankings? This is flat out embarrassing...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 07, 2012, 04:09:22 PM
OK...f'ing seriously...
East
1 Hobart 9-0 9-0
2 Widener 8-0 8-0
3 Cortland State 7-1 7-1
4 Salisbury 6-2 7-2
5 Rowan 6-1 6-2
6 Salve Regina 9-1 9-1
7 Lycoming 7-2 7-2
8 Framingham St. 9-1 9-1
9 Bridgewater St. 9-1 9-1
10 Endicott 8-2 8-2
Four teams from the NEFC ranked in the East Region Top 10 in the latest NCCA Regional rankings? This is flat out embarrassing...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 07, 2012, 04:09:22 PM
OK...f'ing seriously...
East
1 Hobart 9-0 9-0
2 Widener 8-0 8-0
3 Cortland State 7-1 7-1
4 Salisbury 6-2 7-2
5 Rowan 6-1 6-2
6 Salve Regina 9-1 9-1
7 Lycoming 7-2 7-2
8 Framingham St. 9-1 9-1
9 Bridgewater St. 9-1 9-1
10 Endicott 8-2 8-2
Four teams from the NEFC ranked in the East Region Top 10 in the latest NCCA Regional rankings? This is flat out embarrassing...
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 07, 2012, 04:09:22 PM
OK...f'ing seriously...
East
1 Hobart 9-0 9-0
2 Widener 8-0 8-0
3 Cortland State 7-1 7-1
4 Salisbury 6-2 7-2
5 Rowan 6-1 6-2
6 Salve Regina 9-1 9-1
7 Lycoming 7-2 7-2
8 Framingham St. 9-1 9-1
9 Bridgewater St. 9-1 9-1
10 Endicott 8-2 8-2
Four teams from the NEFC ranked in the East Region Top 10 in the latest NCCA Regional rankings? This is flat out embarrassing...
Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2012, 05:08:43 PM
Del Val is the only team I can think of that is being omitted, other than that I can't really make a case for any other team. The E8 and LL are a complete mess outside of Bart and SU. Other than Cortland and Rowan the rest of the NJAC is also a mess.
It's just a really, really bad year for the east. Injuries and poor play are killing the teams that are normally strong and inexperience is killing teams that are looking to take the next step for their programs.
Quote from: dlip on November 07, 2012, 06:47:03 PM
Honestly dlip knows that looking at the numbers involved, records, etc Del Val is seemingly the only one here getting shafted to an extent and this makes some semblance of sense BUT dlip just looks at regional rankings as if they should represent the BEST teams in the region. This list, at least #'s 6,8,9,10 do not represent the best teams in the east region, at least in dlip's opinion.
Quote from: dlip on November 05, 2012, 04:23:29 PM
Looking at everything and trying to be as objective as possible, Bridgewater has no buisness getting in. The win over Springfield early, although impressive in regards to history, really isn't impressive considering the Pride didn't find any identity until recently. Jason Marrero has grown ten fold. Kid can throw and is shifty as ****. Defense is still not good but if those two teams play again Springfield runs all over them big time. On top of this dlip does not feel they could do anything against Rowan or any other 2 loss team from another conference (aside from any in the ECFC).
Quote from: rams1102 on November 07, 2012, 08:23:00 PMQuote from: dlip on November 05, 2012, 04:23:29 PM
Looking at everything and trying to be as objective as possible, Bridgewater has no buisness getting in. The win over Springfield early, although impressive in regards to history, really isn't impressive considering the Pride didn't find any identity until recently. Jason Marrero has grown ten fold. Kid can throw and is shifty as ****. Defense is still not good but if those two teams play again Springfield runs all over them big time. On top of this dlip does not feel they could do anything against Rowan or any other 2 loss team from another conference (aside from any in the ECFC).
I agree with you. What about Salve and Framingham? Have you noticed the feelings of the NCAA Regional Rankings. Looks like the NJAC may only get one bid. Thoughts?
Quote from: dlip on November 05, 2012, 04:23:29 PM
Looking at everything and trying to be as objective as possible, Bridgewater has no buisness getting in. The win over Springfield early, although impressive in regards to history, really isn't impressive considering the Pride didn't find any identity until recently. Jason Marrero has grown ten fold. Kid can throw and is shifty as ****. Defense is still not good but if those two teams play again Springfield runs all over them big time. On top of this dlip does not feel they could do anything against Rowan or any other 2 loss team from another conference (aside from any in the ECFC).
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 10-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. #9 (South) Washington and Lee |
2 Widener | 9-0 | 43 | 2 | vs. Bridgewater State |
3 Cortland State | 8-1 | 39 | 4 | vs. Framingham State |
4 Salisbury | 8-2 | 37 | 3 | vs. #5 Rowan |
5 Rowan | 7-2 | 31 | 5 | at #4 Salisbury |
6 Lycoming | 8-2 | 25 | 6 | End of Season |
7 Alfred | 6-3 | 17 | T9 | at Springfield |
8 St. John Fisher | 7-3 | 12 | NR | vs. Castleton State |
9 Delaware Valley | 7-3 | 8 | 7 | at #8 (South) Muhlenberg |
10 Ithaca | 6-4 | 5 | T9 | End of Season |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 14, 2012, 10:36:14 AM
Sorry for the late post; I got back from Viper country yesterday and couldn't pull myself away from seeing a tailless dolphin to post this as normal.
10 Ithaca 7-3 5 T9 End of Season
Quote from: D3MAFAN on June 11, 2013, 12:29:50 PM
East Region Teams with Lindy's Top 25:
13.Hobart
16.Widener
19.Cortland State
22.Salisbury
Average Ranking of 17.5, I guess the east in only worthy enough of a 1st round team. Can not wait until the Division III rankings come out with much more information supporting their rankings.
Any fan predictions on how the east may shape out overall?
Quote from: AUPepBand on June 12, 2013, 12:29:22 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on June 11, 2013, 12:29:50 PM
East Region Teams with Lindy's Top 25:
13.Hobart
16.Widener
19.Cortland State
22.Salisbury
Average Ranking of 17.5, I guess the east in only worthy enough of a 1st round team. Can not wait until the Division III rankings come out with much more information supporting their rankings.
Any fan predictions on how the east may shape out overall?
Pep sees Hobart as the team to beat in the East....or whoever wins the dogfight that Pep anticipates in the Empire 8. All will try to stop Salisbury, which is 2-for-2 in E8 titles, with only Ithaca stopping the Seagulls in two years of E8 play. Pep is thinking one of the teams in the E8 logjam will emerge to edge Salisbury for the '13 title...either Fisher, Buff State, AU, Utica or Ithaca, perhaps in that order.
But Pep will guarantee that the E8 team that wins the most conference games will emerge as the Empire 8 champion. Take that to the bank. ;)
Get the fight song ready....
Quote from: D3MAFAN on June 12, 2013, 12:15:11 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on June 12, 2013, 12:29:22 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on June 11, 2013, 12:29:50 PM
East Region Teams with Lindy's Top 25:
13.Hobart
16.Widener
19.Cortland State
22.Salisbury
Average Ranking of 17.5, I guess the east in only worthy enough of a 1st round team. Can not wait until the Division III rankings come out with much more information supporting their rankings.
Any fan predictions on how the east may shape out overall?
Pep sees Hobart as the team to beat in the East....or whoever wins the dogfight that Pep anticipates in the Empire 8. All will try to stop Salisbury, which is 2-for-2 in E8 titles, with only Ithaca stopping the Seagulls in two years of E8 play. Pep is thinking one of the teams in the E8 logjam will emerge to edge Salisbury for the '13 title...either Fisher, Buff State, AU, Utica or Ithaca, perhaps in that order.
But Pep will guarantee that the E8 team that wins the most conference games will emerge as the Empire 8 champion. Take that to the bank. ;)
Get the fight song ready....
Hobart is definitely the team the beat in its conference and the East. However, over the years the represenative of the East has change so many times. Also, other than last year and going back as far as 2004 season, Hobart has lost a conference game, I wouldn't be surprise to see Union step back up this year. Now it appears that teams in the E8 are adjusting to Salisbury speed, maybe Salisbury had a down year, nevertheless, I think that whichever team beats Salisbury wins the E8 conference, as of now I think either Alfred or Ithaca has the best chance, if they get out early on Salisbury they have a good chance. Regarding both the NJAC & MAC, I think that the NJAC and MAC conference are up for grabs, just like any other year, if I had to choose today for the two conferences, it would be Cortland State and Delaware Valley respectively. As for the remaining East conferences, their represenative have to prove they can win against other East teams.
It looks to be very competitive in the East. Hopefully the East can get a represenative that can get some solid wins agains top teams from other regions.
Quote from: D3viewer on June 12, 2013, 08:28:07 PM
I think SJF was ranked in the Sporting News D3 rankings as well.
Quote from: PBR... on June 12, 2013, 12:21:01 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on June 12, 2013, 12:15:11 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on June 12, 2013, 12:29:22 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on June 11, 2013, 12:29:50 PM
East Region Teams with Lindy's Top 25:
13.Hobart
16.Widener
19.Cortland State
22.Salisbury
Average Ranking of 17.5, I guess the east in only worthy enough of a 1st round team. Can not wait until the Division III rankings come out with much more information supporting their rankings.
Any fan predictions on how the east may shape out overall?
Pep sees Hobart as the team to beat in the East....or whoever wins the dogfight that Pep anticipates in the Empire 8. All will try to stop Salisbury, which is 2-for-2 in E8 titles, with only Ithaca stopping the Seagulls in two years of E8 play. Pep is thinking one of the teams in the E8 logjam will emerge to edge Salisbury for the '13 title...either Fisher, Buff State, AU, Utica or Ithaca, perhaps in that order.
But Pep will guarantee that the E8 team that wins the most conference games will emerge as the Empire 8 champion. Take that to the bank. ;)
Get the fight song ready....
Hobart is definitely the team the beat in its conference and the East. However, over the years the represenative of the East has change so many times. Also, other than last year and going back as far as 2004 season, Hobart has lost a conference game, I wouldn't be surprise to see Union step back up this year. Now it appears that teams in the E8 are adjusting to Salisbury speed, maybe Salisbury had a down year, nevertheless, I think that whichever team beats Salisbury wins the E8 conference, as of now I think either Alfred or Ithaca has the best chance, if they get out early on Salisbury they have a good chance. Regarding both the NJAC & MAC, I think that the NJAC and MAC conference are up for grabs, just like any other year, if I had to choose today for the two conferences, it would be Cortland State and Delaware Valley respectively. As for the remaining East conferences, their represenative have to prove they can win against other East teams.
It looks to be very competitive in the East. Hopefully the East can get a represenative that can get some solid wins agains top teams from other regions.
Some good points but for me until someone beats wesley I consider them the top team in the east.
Quote from: rams1102 on June 18, 2013, 07:46:32 PM
Any thoughts for the Pre-Season Top10 ? Should open up some discussion.
Quote from: fulbakdad on June 19, 2013, 05:58:28 AM
Nope, Salve shouldn't be ranked this year.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on June 20, 2013, 02:09:25 PM
d3mafan,
Fisher isn't even in your top ten and you have a team Framington? at ten.
Any thoughts?
Quote from: D3MAFAN on June 19, 2013, 12:13:49 PM
1) Hobart
2) Widener
3) Salisbury
4) Delaware Valley
5) Cortland State
6) Ithaca
7) Rowan
8) Lebanon Valley, Lycoming, Albright
9) Alfred
10) Framington State
Quote from: Bombers798891 on June 20, 2013, 04:28:17 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on June 19, 2013, 12:13:49 PMand I hear they're improved on the lines
1) Hobart
2) Widener
3) Salisbury
4) Delaware Valley
5) Cortland State
6) Ithaca
7) Rowan
8) Lebanon Valley, Lycoming, Albright
9) Alfred
10) Framington State
Quote from: D3MAFAN on June 20, 2013, 04:00:32 PMI know that Fisher has a couple of holes to fill, but are strong in the key positions. The age old debate on how Kramer should be used is still there, but remember, he was granted the additional year and is back for his final year of eligibility! Secondary will need to step up, but as a whole I expect big things from this Fisher team!Quote from: fisheralum91 on June 20, 2013, 02:09:25 PM
d3mafan,
Fisher isn't even in your top ten and you have a team Framington? at ten.
Any thoughts?
Well, the east is very competitive and I think that from what I have as my top 10, it is obviously going to change after week two. However, in my opinion SJF has a lot of question marks that I just can't just solve just yet, maybe its the coaching changes and quarterback questions. I know they have been a dominate force since the early '00s, so not putting them in my top 10 seems a bit unrealistic. However, I like how Framington State has improved over the last couple years and if they can find a way to beat Endicott, there would be no question they should be top 10.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on June 21, 2013, 10:11:43 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on June 20, 2013, 04:00:32 PMI know that Fisher has a couple of holes to fill, but are strong in the key positions. The age old debate on how Kramer should be used is still there, but remember, he was granted the additional year and is back for his final year of eligibility! Secondary will need to step up, but as a whole I expect big things from this Fisher team!Quote from: fisheralum91 on June 20, 2013, 02:09:25 PM
d3mafan,
Fisher isn't even in your top ten and you have a team Framington? at ten.
Any thoughts?
Well, the east is very competitive and I think that from what I have as my top 10, it is obviously going to change after week two. However, in my opinion SJF has a lot of question marks that I just can't just solve just yet, maybe its the coaching changes and quarterback questions. I know they have been a dominate force since the early '00s, so not putting them in my top 10 seems a bit unrealistic. However, I like how Framington State has improved over the last couple years and if they can find a way to beat Endicott, there would be no question they should be top 10.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on June 21, 2013, 11:40:52 AM
My personal opinion is unless someone transfers in or comes in as a freshman withBoltusFelicetti like skills, Kramer gets the ball.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on June 21, 2013, 12:03:33 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on June 21, 2013, 11:40:52 AM
My personal opinion is unless someone transfers in or comes in as a freshman withBoltusFelicettiKeeley like skills, Kramer gets the ball.
Fixed that for you ;)
Quote from: D3MAFAN on July 16, 2013, 07:08:15 AM
What are the potential conferences that Alfred State has requested to join or are more than likely to join?
Quote from: Knightstalker on July 16, 2013, 08:27:32 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on July 16, 2013, 07:08:15 AM
What are the potential conferences that Alfred State has requested to join or are more than likely to join?
The Mount Pilot Athletic Association.
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 16, 2013, 08:35:01 AMQuote from: Knightstalker on July 16, 2013, 08:27:32 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on July 16, 2013, 07:08:15 AM
What are the potential conferences that Alfred State has requested to join or are more than likely to join?
The Mount Pilot Athletic Association.
Pep is thinking the MPAA would likely be most cost-efficient for the Pioneers, travel-wise, but ASC will more likely land in the ECFC for football, for starters. ASC will play Husson this season.
+K to the Knightstalker who's always stalking the boards...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 06, 2013, 10:49:07 AM
I'm hoping to have an ERFP out by 8/26. I have two submissions so far and I'm waiting to hear back from the other pollsters from last year. If we need someone new, I'll post that request here.
Quote from: AUPepBand on August 08, 2013, 10:40:48 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on August 06, 2013, 10:49:07 AM
I'm hoping to have an ERFP out by 8/26. I have two submissions so far and I'm waiting to hear back from the other pollsters from last year. If we need someone new, I'll post that request here.
Pep is hoping that ERFP is available on 8/26 as it could then appear in the 8/29 Alfred Sun along with the season's first Pigskin Picks Football Contest!
Stay tuned!
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 0-0 | 50 | NR | at Dickinson |
2 Salisbury | 0-0 | 43 | NR | vs. Christopher Newport |
3 Cortland | 0-0 | 36 | NR | vs. Buffalo State |
4 Rowan | 0-0 | 30 | NR | at #7 Delaware Valley |
5 Widener | 0-0 | 29 | NR | at Wesley |
6 St. John Fisher | 0-0 | 27 | NR | at Otterbein |
7 Delaware Valley | 0-0 | 24 | NR | vs. #4 Rowan |
8 Lycoming | 0-0 | 13 | NR | at Brockport State |
9 Springfield | 0-0 | 9 | NR | at Western New England |
10t Alfred | 0-0 | 3 | NR | Open |
10t Union | 0-0 | 3 | NR | Open |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 12, 2013, 11:45:52 AM
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 0-0 50 NR at Dickinson 2 Salisbury 0-0 43 NR vs. Christopher Newport 3 Cortland 0-0 36 NR vs. Buffalo State 4 Rowan 0-0 30 NR at #7 Delaware Valley 5 Widener 0-0 29 NR at Wesley 6 St. John Fisher 0-0 27 NR at Otterbein 7 Delaware Valley 0-0 24 NR vs. #4 Rowan 8 Lycoming 0-0 13 NR at Brockport State 9 Springfield 0-0 9 NR at Western New England 10t Alfred 0-0 3 NR Open 10t Union 0-0 3 NR Open
Also Receiving votes:
Buffalo State 2
Framingham State 2
Ithaca 2
Utica 2
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
Salisbury (2,2,3,3,2)
Cortland State (5,3,4,4,3)
Rowan (3,4,7,7,4)
Widener (7,7,5,2,5)
St. John Fisher (10,5,2,5,6)
Delaware Valley (4,6,6,8,7)
Lycoming (9,NR,8,6,8)
Springfield (6,10,NR,9,10)
Alfred (8,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Union (NR,8,NR,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,10,10,NR)
Framingham (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Ithaca (NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#4 Rowan at # 7 Delaware Valley
#5 Widener at Wesley (presumably #1 South)
Quote from: dlip on August 12, 2013, 08:08:32 PM
Their 9/14 game vs Rowan will give us all some perspective on whether or not Framingham belongs. Dlip thinks they will be the NEFC team on our radar this season. Like dlip said, 9/14 against Rowan is a Billy Fuccillo "HUGE" game for Framingham and really the NEFC as a whole. Props to them for scheduling the profs. That alone puts a soft spot in dlip's football soul for them :).
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 13, 2013, 10:13:24 AMQuote from: dlip on August 12, 2013, 08:08:32 PM
Their 9/14 game vs Rowan will give us all some perspective on whether or not Framingham belongs. Dlip thinks they will be the NEFC team on our radar this season. Like dlip said, 9/14 against Rowan is a Billy Fuccillo "HUGE" game for Framingham and really the NEFC as a whole. Props to them for scheduling the profs. That alone puts a soft spot in dlip's football soul for them :).
dlip hit it right on the head. I absolutely refuse to give an NEFC team any credit typically until later in the year because of their horrendous schedules. This year i'm slightly impressed with Framingham's scheduling. But I would not give them any type of ranking on here until we see what happens vs. Endicott and Rowan. Maybe they'll earn a spot, maybe they won't.
I am surprised that SJF wasn't ranked higher. Otherwise, hard to nitpick a preseason poll. Makes sense to me.
Quote from: dlip on August 12, 2013, 08:08:32 PM
Their 9/14 game vs Rowan will give us all some perspective on whether or not Framingham belongs. Dlip thinks they will be the NEFC team on our radar this season. Like dlip said, 9/14 against Rowan is a Billy Fuccillo "HUGE" game for Framingham and really the NEFC as a whole. Props to them for scheduling the profs. That alone puts a soft spot in dlip's football soul for them :).
Quote from: dlip on August 14, 2013, 07:52:25 PM
Fisher is a tough call for dlip. Dlip feels they will be good. However with some key losses on D and an offense that was quite inconsistent last season they may struggle to get over the hump against some good teams. However if Kramer and the O can find more of a rhythm and score consistently this year to help the D you may see the Cardinals do quite well.
Quote from: dlip on August 15, 2013, 11:02:50 AM
If you get a kid behind center who can throw and limit mistakes, which in turn would free up Kramer for multiple offensive purposes this may be a great season for fisher and Kramer. You take the weight off that kid's shoulders and watch out.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on August 15, 2013, 11:21:50 AM
I'm pretty sure, if given the opportunity, dlip would have man on man relations with Kramer.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 15, 2013, 01:44:18 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 15, 2013, 11:21:50 AM
I'm pretty sure, if given the opportunity, dlip would have man on man relations with Kramer.
Here's looking at you, dlip!
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi220.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fdd257%2Fpriv8pete%2FKramer2006.jpg&hash=bf8e5fb4f9cb7f741aeab43f03563cbe6a72ce74)
Quote from: fisheralum91 on August 15, 2013, 03:39:45 PM
for those that don't know---that's Ryan's older Brother Rob in his infamous pic from a few years ago........... ::)
Quote from: dlip on August 15, 2013, 08:26:51 PM
C'mon guys you should all know me better by now. Dlip has one man crush only and that is only Chris Sharpe. You must be at least an All American and preferably a Melberger and/or Gagliardi winner to fall under consideration.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 15, 2013, 01:44:18 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on August 15, 2013, 11:21:50 AMSeperated at birth?
I'm pretty sure, if given the opportunity, dlip would have man on man relations with Kramer.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi220.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fdd257%2Fpriv8pete%2FKramer2006.jpg&hash=bf8e5fb4f9cb7f741aeab43f03563cbe6a72ce74)(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.luminomagazine.com%2F2004.10%2Fspotlight%2Fnerds%2Fimages%2Fbooger%2Fbooger5.jpg&hash=456dcf67ba68803b9109f348625d96beb21a9931)
Quote from: Upstate on August 16, 2013, 10:00:02 AM
Chris Sharpe can only be used for away games vs SJF (0-3 at home, 1-0 at Fisher)...
Quote from: fisheralum91 on August 16, 2013, 12:58:06 PM
That indeed is Rob's older brother at UC!
The whole Kramer Clan is working in sports one way or another!
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 10, 2013, 08:44:15 AM
Do we have an East Region poll underway for this week?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 1-0 | 50 | 1 | Open |
2 St. John Fisher | 1-0 | 43 | 6 | vs. South #7 Washington & Jefferson |
3 Delaware Valley | 1-0 | 35 | 7 | at Misericordia |
4t Buffalo State | 1-0 | 32 | NR | vs. #7 Brockport State |
4t Widener | 0-1 | 32 | 5 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
6 Salisbury | 0-1 | 21 | 2 | at South #2 Wesley |
7 Brockport State | 1-0 | 18 | NR | at #4t Buffalo State |
8 Rowan | 0-1 | 14 | 4 | vs. #10t Framingham State |
9 Cortland | 0-1 | 10 | 3 | Open |
10t Alfred | 0-0 | 4 | 10t | vs. RPI |
10t Framingham State | 1-0 | 4 | NR | at #8 Rowan |
10t Utica | 1-0 | 4 | NR | vs. Union |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 10, 2013, 09:42:12 AM
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 1-0 50 1 Open 2 St. John Fisher 1-0 43 6 vs. South #7 Washington & Jefferson 3 Delaware Valley 1-0 35 7 at Misericordia 4t Buffalo State 1-0 32 NR vs. #7 Brockport State 4t Widener 0-1 32 5 vs. Lebanon Valley 6 Salisbury 0-1 21 2 at South #2 Wesley 7 Brockport State 1-0 18 NR at #4t Buffalo State 8 Rowan 0-1 14 4 vs. #10t Framingham State 9 Cortland 0-1 10 3 Open 10t Alfred 0-0 4 10t vs. RPI 10t Framingham State 1-0 4 NR at #8 Rowan 10t Utica 1-0 4 NR vs. Union
Dropped Out:
Lycoming
Springfield
Union
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 3
Springfield 3
Ithaca 2
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,4,2,2,2)
Delaware Valley (3,2,7,3,5)
Buffalo State (5,8,3,4,3)
Widener (4,6,4,5,4)
Salisbury (NR,5,5,6,7)
Brockport State (6,NR,6,8,6)
Rowan (8,3,NR,10,9)
Cortland State (10,10,8,9,8)
Alfred (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,9,10,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Salisbury at #2 (South) Wesley
#7 (South) Washington & Jefferson at #2 St. John Fisher
#7 Brockport State at #4t Buffalo State
#10t Framingham State at #8 Rowan
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 10, 2013, 10:22:03 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 10, 2013, 09:42:12 AM
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 1-0 50 1 Open 2 St. John Fisher 1-0 43 6 vs. South #7 Washington & Jefferson 3 Delaware Valley 1-0 35 7 at Misericordia 4t Buffalo State 1-0 32 NR vs. #7 Brockport State 4t Widener 0-1 32 5 vs. Lebanon Valley 6 Salisbury 0-1 21 2 at South #2 Wesley 7 Brockport State 1-0 18 NR at #4t Buffalo State 8 Rowan 0-1 14 4 vs. #10t Framingham State 9 Cortland 0-1 10 3 Open 10t Alfred 0-0 4 10t vs. RPI 10t Framingham State 1-0 4 NR at #8 Rowan 10t Utica 1-0 4 NR vs. Union
Dropped Out:
Lycoming
Springfield
Union
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 3
Springfield 3
Ithaca 2
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,4,2,2,2)
Delaware Valley (3,2,7,3,5)
Buffalo State (5,8,3,4,3)
Widener (4,6,4,5,4)
Salisbury (NR,5,5,6,7)
Brockport State (6,NR,6,8,6)
Rowan (8,3,NR,10,9)
Cortland State (10,10,8,9,8)
Alfred (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,9,10,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Salisbury at #2 (South) Wesley
#7 (South) Washington & Jefferson at #2 St. John Fisher
#7 Brockport State at #4t Buffalo State
#10t Framingham State at #8 Rowan
Pep is wondering who the heck is giving Alfred respect after a dismal finish to 2012 and nary a game under its belt? Could it be that homer, Kaz00?
Quote from: rams1102 on September 11, 2013, 01:22:33 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 10, 2013, 10:22:03 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 10, 2013, 09:42:12 AM
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 1-0 50 1 Open 2 St. John Fisher 1-0 43 6 vs. South #7 Washington & Jefferson 3 Delaware Valley 1-0 35 7 at Misericordia 4t Buffalo State 1-0 32 NR vs. #7 Brockport State 4t Widener 0-1 32 5 vs. Lebanon Valley 6 Salisbury 0-1 21 2 at South #2 Wesley 7 Brockport State 1-0 18 NR at #4t Buffalo State 8 Rowan 0-1 14 4 vs. #10t Framingham State 9 Cortland 0-1 10 3 Open 10t Alfred 0-0 4 10t vs. RPI 10t Framingham State 1-0 4 NR at #8 Rowan 10t Utica 1-0 4 NR vs. Union
Dropped Out:
Lycoming
Springfield
Union
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 3
Springfield 3
Ithaca 2
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,4,2,2,2)
Delaware Valley (3,2,7,3,5)
Buffalo State (5,8,3,4,3)
Widener (4,6,4,5,4)
Salisbury (NR,5,5,6,7)
Brockport State (6,NR,6,8,6)
Rowan (8,3,NR,10,9)
Cortland State (10,10,8,9,8)
Alfred (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,9,10,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Salisbury at #2 (South) Wesley
#7 (South) Washington & Jefferson at #2 St. John Fisher
#7 Brockport State at #4t Buffalo State
#10t Framingham State at #8 Rowan
Pep is wondering who the heck is giving Alfred respect after a dismal finish to 2012 and nary a game under its belt? Could it be that homer, Kaz00?
I'm also surprised that Albright did not get in. Still way too early for everything to shake out.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 10, 2013, 09:42:12 AM
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 1-0 50 1 Open 2 St. John Fisher 1-0 43 6 vs. South #7 Washington & Jefferson 3 Delaware Valley 1-0 35 7 at Misericordia 4t Buffalo State 1-0 32 NR vs. #7 Brockport State 4t Widener 0-1 32 5 vs. Lebanon Valley 6 Salisbury 0-1 21 2 at South #2 Wesley 7 Brockport State 1-0 18 NR at #4t Buffalo State 8 Rowan 0-1 14 4 vs. #10t Framingham State 9 Cortland 0-1 10 3 Open 10t Alfred 0-0 4 10t vs. RPI 10t Framingham State 1-0 4 NR at #8 Rowan 10t Utica 1-0 4 NR vs. Union
Dropped Out:
Lycoming
Springfield
Union
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 3
Springfield 3
Ithaca 2
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,4,2,2,2)
Delaware Valley (3,2,7,3,5)
Buffalo State (5,8,3,4,3)
Widener (4,6,4,5,4)
Salisbury (NR,5,5,6,7)
Brockport State (6,NR,6,8,6)
Rowan (8,3,NR,10,9)
Cortland State (10,10,8,9,8)
Alfred (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,9,10,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Salisbury at #2 (South) Wesley
#7 (South) Washington & Jefferson at #2 St. John Fisher
#7 Brockport State at #4t Buffalo State
#10t Framingham State at #8 Rowan
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 09:23:58 AM
Buffalo State at #4? I agree that the program seems to be trending the right direction (4-6, 5-5, 6-4 with a few nice wins) but already at #4 after a 6-4 season in 2012 plus a season-opening win over Cortland? Yes, that is a solid opening win, but they beat Cortland in Week 1 last year too...I know they're facing a quality opponent in Brockport this weekend but still that seems high, no? Do they really deserve some rankings above Widener, a team that made the quarterfinals last season and opened with a competitive loss to Wesley, one of the nation's best teams?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 13, 2013, 09:46:50 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 09:23:58 AM
Buffalo State at #4? I agree that the program seems to be trending the right direction (4-6, 5-5, 6-4 with a few nice wins) but already at #4 after a 6-4 season in 2012 plus a season-opening win over Cortland? Yes, that is a solid opening win, but they beat Cortland in Week 1 last year too...I know they're facing a quality opponent in Brockport this weekend but still that seems high, no? Do they really deserve some rankings above Widener, a team that made the quarterfinals last season and opened with a competitive loss to Wesley, one of the nation's best teams?
I completely agree. I've said I think BSU could be dangerous, but in all honesty, I feel that Buffalo State plays to the level of their opponent too much. When a team wins the two toughest games on the schedule, but still finishes 6-4 and needs a last-minute comeback to beat Hartwick, there are legitimate consistency questions, IMO
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 13, 2013, 09:58:51 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 13, 2013, 09:46:50 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 09:23:58 AM
Buffalo State at #4? I agree that the program seems to be trending the right direction (4-6, 5-5, 6-4 with a few nice wins) but already at #4 after a 6-4 season in 2012 plus a season-opening win over Cortland? Yes, that is a solid opening win, but they beat Cortland in Week 1 last year too...I know they're facing a quality opponent in Brockport this weekend but still that seems high, no? Do they really deserve some rankings above Widener, a team that made the quarterfinals last season and opened with a competitive loss to Wesley, one of the nation's best teams?
I completely agree. I've said I think BSU could be dangerous, but in all honesty, I feel that Buffalo State plays to the level of their opponent too much. When a team wins the two toughest games on the schedule, but still finishes 6-4 and needs a last-minute comeback to beat Hartwick, there are legitimate consistency questions, IMO
Let's all just relax. It's only been one week. Many of us had Cortland ranked high and Buff St. beat them up. So after 1 week of evidence, that's what we have to go on. Buff St. has a very tough schedule so they could screw themselves there, but if they are able to win their tough games, look out! They are 1 for 1 so far.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 10:02:28 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 13, 2013, 09:58:51 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 13, 2013, 09:46:50 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 09:23:58 AM
Buffalo State at #4? I agree that the program seems to be trending the right direction (4-6, 5-5, 6-4 with a few nice wins) but already at #4 after a 6-4 season in 2012 plus a season-opening win over Cortland? Yes, that is a solid opening win, but they beat Cortland in Week 1 last year too...I know they're facing a quality opponent in Brockport this weekend but still that seems high, no? Do they really deserve some rankings above Widener, a team that made the quarterfinals last season and opened with a competitive loss to Wesley, one of the nation's best teams?
I completely agree. I've said I think BSU could be dangerous, but in all honesty, I feel that Buffalo State plays to the level of their opponent too much. When a team wins the two toughest games on the schedule, but still finishes 6-4 and needs a last-minute comeback to beat Hartwick, there are legitimate consistency questions, IMO
Let's all just relax. It's only been one week. Many of us had Cortland ranked high and Buff St. beat them up. So after 1 week of evidence, that's what we have to go on. Buff St. has a very tough schedule so they could screw themselves there, but if they are able to win their tough games, look out! They are 1 for 1 so far.
Oh, I know, it's all in the name of good discussion. I'm not bent out of shape about it - I'm just genuinely surprised that Buff State is ranked that high (maybe more surprised that anyone would rank them above Widener right now without more evidence that Buff State belongs up there).
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 13, 2013, 10:25:13 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 10:02:28 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 13, 2013, 09:58:51 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 13, 2013, 09:46:50 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 09:23:58 AM
Buffalo State at #4? I agree that the program seems to be trending the right direction (4-6, 5-5, 6-4 with a few nice wins) but already at #4 after a 6-4 season in 2012 plus a season-opening win over Cortland? Yes, that is a solid opening win, but they beat Cortland in Week 1 last year too...I know they're facing a quality opponent in Brockport this weekend but still that seems high, no? Do they really deserve some rankings above Widener, a team that made the quarterfinals last season and opened with a competitive loss to Wesley, one of the nation's best teams?
I completely agree. I've said I think BSU could be dangerous, but in all honesty, I feel that Buffalo State plays to the level of their opponent too much. When a team wins the two toughest games on the schedule, but still finishes 6-4 and needs a last-minute comeback to beat Hartwick, there are legitimate consistency questions, IMO
Let's all just relax. It's only been one week. Many of us had Cortland ranked high and Buff St. beat them up. So after 1 week of evidence, that's what we have to go on. Buff St. has a very tough schedule so they could screw themselves there, but if they are able to win their tough games, look out! They are 1 for 1 so far.
Oh, I know, it's all in the name of good discussion. I'm not bent out of shape about it - I'm just genuinely surprised that Buff State is ranked that high (maybe more surprised that anyone would rank them above Widener right now without more evidence that Buff State belongs up there).
Well, technically they are tied in the cumulative ranks. It's tough putting an 0-1 team ahead of a 1-0 team with a quality win like Buff St had, even if it was a decent loss to Wesley. Widener is a bit of a question mark. They lost some good players, but they should be pretty tough regardless. Just tough to know exactly where to put any of them right now.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 10, 2013, 10:22:03 PM
Pep is wondering who the heck is giving Alfred respect after a dismal finish to 2012 and nary a game under its belt? Could it be that homer, Kaz00?
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 13, 2013, 09:23:58 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 10, 2013, 09:42:12 AM
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 1-0 50 1 Open 2 St. John Fisher 1-0 43 6 vs. South #7 Washington & Jefferson 3 Delaware Valley 1-0 35 7 at Misericordia 4t Buffalo State 1-0 32 NR vs. #7 Brockport State 4t Widener 0-1 32 5 vs. Lebanon Valley 6 Salisbury 0-1 21 2 at South #2 Wesley 7 Brockport State 1-0 18 NR at #4t Buffalo State 8 Rowan 0-1 14 4 vs. #10t Framingham State 9 Cortland 0-1 10 3 Open 10t Alfred 0-0 4 10t vs. RPI 10t Framingham State 1-0 4 NR at #8 Rowan 10t Utica 1-0 4 NR vs. Union
Dropped Out:
Lycoming
Springfield
Union
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 3
Springfield 3
Ithaca 2
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,4,2,2,2)
Delaware Valley (3,2,7,3,5)
Buffalo State (5,8,3,4,3)
Widener (4,6,4,5,4)
Salisbury (NR,5,5,6,7)
Brockport State (6,NR,6,8,6)
Rowan (8,3,NR,10,9)
Cortland State (10,10,8,9,8)
Alfred (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Albright (9,NR,NR,10,NR)
Springfield (NR,9,10,NR,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#6 Salisbury at #2 (South) Wesley
#7 (South) Washington & Jefferson at #2 St. John Fisher
#7 Brockport State at #4t Buffalo State
#10t Framingham State at #8 Rowan
Buffalo State at #4? I agree that the program seems to be trending the right direction (4-6, 5-5, 6-4 with a few nice wins) but already at #4 after a 6-4 season in 2012 plus a season-opening win over Cortland? Yes, that is a solid opening win, but they beat Cortland in Week 1 last year too...I know they're facing a quality opponent in Brockport this weekend but still that seems high, no? Do they really deserve some rankings above Widener, a team that made the quarterfinals last season and opened with a competitive loss to Wesley, one of the nation's best teams?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 4 ) | 1-0 | 49 | 1 | vs. #10 Utica |
2 St. John Fisher( 1 ) | 2-0 | 45 | 2 | Open |
3 Delaware Valley | 2-0 | 37 | 3 | at Albright |
4 Buffalo State | 2-0 | 33 | 4t | vs. Wisconsin Whitewater |
5 Widener | 1-1 | 28 | 4t | at Wilkes |
6 Salisbury | 0-2 | 26 | 6 | at N.C. Wesleyan |
7t Brockport State | 1-1 | 16 | 7 | Open |
7t Rowan | 1-1 | 16 | 8 | Open |
9 Cortland | 0-1 | 10 | 9 | vs. William Paterson |
10 Utica | 2-0 | 8 | 10t | at #1 Hobart |
Quote from: Bengalsrule on September 16, 2013, 12:27:35 PM
MY beloved BENGALS are now 2-0 and solidly in 4th place in the East region Poll. Not too much to complain about. Especially after the mistake filled game they played vs. Brockport. I counted 6 penalties in less than 1 quarter. If we can't fix that before this coming Saturday, vs. Wisconsin-Whitewater, then you can chalk up our first loss. We must play "nearly" error free football. If so, then the future looks bright.
Sidenote...Brockports Stoldt will be the best Q.B. Buff State faces this year! A few drops kept him from 1 HELL of a game!!
Quote from: Bengalsrule on September 16, 2013, 03:46:11 PM
Well lets try this. Stoldt will be the best NON- E8 QB we will see this year. I must defer to our conference when it comes to kudos. Nov 9th is a day when I'm hoping Fenti is not as hot as he was yesterday vs. W&J!! ;)
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 2-0 | 50 | 1 | at Merchant Marine |
2 St. John Fisher | 2-0 | 45 | 2 | vs. #10t Cortland |
3 Delaware Valley | 3-0 | 38 | 3 | vs. Stevenson |
4 Widener | 2-1 | 33 | 5 | vs. Lycoming |
5 Salisbury | 1-2 | 30 | 6 | Open |
6 Buffalo State | 2-1 | 16 | 4 | vs. #9 Ithaca |
7 Brockport State | 1-1 | 14 | 7t | vs. Alfred |
8 Rowan | 1-1 | 13 | 7t | vs. Montclair State |
9 Ithaca | 2-0 | 8 | NR | at #6 Buffalo State |
10t Cortland State | 1-1 | 7 | 9 | at #2 St. John Fisher |
10t Springfield | 3-0 | 7 | NR | at Rochester |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 30, 2013, 09:16:59 AM
Just filled out my rankings for this week's poll. It's hard to make sense of anything below the top couple teams. I think, as usual, there are 10 or 12 teams that could beat each other, so we end up with a glut of teams to squeeze into spots 6 through 10.
What to make of Lycoming (who lost to Brockport) beating Widener (who played Wesley tight)? And Port losing by 2 at Buff State and in OT at home to Alfred? And Buff State, who beat Cortland worse on the road than Fisher did at home, or Alfred who beat Montclair worse than Rowan - who played Del Val tight? Speaking of close Del Val results, what to make of Stevenson and Albright? And Utica? Leb Val? Framingham?
Looking forward to see how it all shakes out in the poll later today.
Quote from: dlip on September 30, 2013, 10:34:38 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 30, 2013, 09:16:59 AM
Just filled out my rankings for this week's poll. It's hard to make sense of anything below the top couple teams. I think, as usual, there are 10 or 12 teams that could beat each other, so we end up with a glut of teams to squeeze into spots 6 through 10.
What to make of Lycoming (who lost to Brockport) beating Widener (who played Wesley tight)? And Port losing by 2 at Buff State and in OT at home to Alfred? And Buff State, who beat Cortland worse on the road than Fisher did at home, or Alfred who beat Montclair worse than Rowan - who played Del Val tight? Speaking of close Del Val results, what to make of Stevenson and Albright? And Utica? Leb Val? Framingham?
Looking forward to see how it all shakes out in the poll later today.
dlip just sent his in. He feels worse about this poll than any he has put out before. Honestly after #3 it was quite challenging for him. Stevenson is inching up on dlip's radar though. It's a complete clutser%$# right now.
Quote from: dlip on September 30, 2013, 11:39:49 AM
Thanks Kaz, dlip was typing so fast he messed it up. Also he had to get his crumpled paper out of the garbage with his rankings on it. Usually he has them down in his head almost immediately...not this $#@!&* week! ;D
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 4 ) | 3-0 | 49 | 1 | vs. WPI |
2 St. John Fisher( 1 ) | 3-0 | 46 | 2 | vs. Frostburg State |
3 Delaware Valley | 4-0 | 38 | 3 | at #7 Lycoming |
4 Ithaca | 3-0 | 33 | 9 | at Hartwick |
5 Salisbury | 1-2 | 30 | 5 | at #10 Utica |
6 Rowan | 2-1 | 17 | 8 | at Brockport State |
7 Lycoming | 3-1 | 14 | NR | vs. #3 Delaware Valley |
8 Widener | 2-2 | 9 | 4 | at Stevenson |
9 Alfred | 2-1 | 7 | NR | vs. Buffalo State |
10 Utica | 2-1 | 6 | NR | vs. #5 Salisbury |
Team | "Record" | Common "Results" |
Hobart | 3-0 | Utica (34-24) |
St. John Fisher | 3-0 | Cortland (33-28) |
Delaware Valley | 4-0 | Rowan (35-30), Albright (23-17), Stevenson (41-26) |
Ithaca | 3-0 | Union (20-3), Buff State (27-20) |
Salisbury | 1-1-1 | Wesley (30-30), N.C. Wesleyan (31-10) |
Rowan | 2-1 | Del Val (30-35), Framingham (29-22), Montclair (7-3) |
Lycoming | 3-1 | Brockport (5-30), Widener (19-14) |
Widener | 2-2 | Wesley (24-33), Leb Val (35-31), Lycoming (14-19) |
Alfred | 2-1 | Montclair (33-13), Brockport (37-28) |
Utica | 2-1 | Union (25-19), Hobart (24-34) |
Stevenson | 3-1 | N.C. Wesleyan (19-12), Albright (24-21), Del Val (26-41) |
Albright | 2-2 | Stevenson (21-24), Del Val (17-23) |
Cortland | 1-2 | Buff State (28-44), Fisher (28-33) |
Lebanon Valley | 2-2 | Montclair (15-17), Widener (31-35) |
Brockport | 2-1 | Lycoming (30-5), Buff State (43-42), Alfred (28-37) |
Springfield | 4-0 | Rochester (38-36) |
Buff State | 1-3 | Cortland (44-28), Brockport (42-43), Ithaca (20-27) |
Framingham | 3-1 | Rowan (22-29) |
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 4-0 | 50 | 1 | at Springfield |
2 St. John Fisher | 4-0 | 45 | 2 | at #9 Hartwick |
3 Salisbury | 2-2 | 40 | 5 | vs. Buffalo State |
4 Lycoming | 4-1 | 33 | 7 | at Lebanon Valley |
5 Rowan | 3-1 | 28 | 6 | at Morrisville State |
6 Delaware Valley | 4-1 | 24 | 3 | Open |
7 Alfred | 3-1 | 14 | 9 | at #10 Ithaca |
8 Widener | 3-2 | 12 | 8 | Open |
9 Hartwick | 4-0 | 9 | NR | vs. #2 St. John Fisher |
10 Ithaca | 3-1 | 6 | 4 | vs. #7 Alfred |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 07, 2013, 01:23:32 PM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 4-0 50 1 at Springfield 2 St. John Fisher 4-0 45 2 at #9 Hartwick 3 Salisbury 2-2 40 5 vs. Buffalo State 4 Lycoming 4-1 33 7 at Lebanon Valley 5 Rowan 3-1 28 6 at Morrisville State 6 Delaware Valley 4-1 24 3 Open 7 Alfred 3-1 14 9 at #10 Ithaca 8 Widener 3-2 12 8 Open 9 Hartwick 4-0 9 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 10 Ithaca 3-1 6 4 vs. #7 Alfred
Dropped Out:
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Lebanon Valley 4
Buffalo State 3
Brockport State 2
Framingham State 2
Cortland State 1
St. Lawrence 1
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,2,2,2,2)
Salisbury (3,3,3,3,3)
Lycoming (4,5,4,4,5)
Rowan (6,4,7,6,4)
Delaware Valley (6,4,7,6,4)
Alfred (7,6,NR,NR,6)
Widener (10,NR,6,9,7)
Hartwick (NR,9,8,7,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,NR,8,8)
Lebanon Valley (NR,8,NR,10,NR)
Buffalo State (8,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Brockport State (9,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
St. Lawrence (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #9 Hartwick
#7 Alfred at #10 Ithaca
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 07, 2013, 07:33:12 PM
Kaz00, it looks like there may be something up with Rowan and Del Valley. They look to have the same votes on your breakdown. Not sure if this came into play with the vote tally or not.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 07, 2013, 05:06:42 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 07, 2013, 01:23:32 PM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 4-0 50 1 at Springfield 2 St. John Fisher 4-0 45 2 at #9 Hartwick 3 Salisbury 2-2 40 5 vs. Buffalo State 4 Lycoming 4-1 33 7 at Lebanon Valley 5 Rowan 3-1 28 6 at Morrisville State 6 Delaware Valley 4-1 24 3 Open 7 Alfred 3-1 14 9 at #10 Ithaca 8 Widener 3-2 12 8 Open 9 Hartwick 4-0 9 NR vs. #2 St. John Fisher 10 Ithaca 3-1 6 4 vs. #7 Alfred
Dropped Out:
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Lebanon Valley 4
Buffalo State 3
Brockport State 2
Framingham State 2
Cortland State 1
St. Lawrence 1
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,2,2,2,2)
Salisbury (3,3,3,3,3)
Lycoming (4,5,4,4,5)
Rowan (6,4,7,6,4)
Delaware Valley (6,4,7,6,4)
Alfred (7,6,NR,NR,6)
Widener (10,NR,6,9,7)
Hartwick (NR,9,8,7,NR)
Ithaca (NR,NR,NR,8,8)
Lebanon Valley (NR,8,NR,10,NR)
Buffalo State (8,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Brockport State (9,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
St. Lawrence (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 St. John Fisher at #9 Hartwick
#7 Alfred at #10 Ithaca
It's kind of weird that Rowan would be higher than Delaware Valley, I see that Rowan got two 4 place votes, but I didn't see two 3rd place votes for Delaware Valley. I would think that you would compare head-to-head as consideration, unless there was some type of anomaly during the two teams head-to-head matchup.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 07, 2013, 07:33:12 PM
Kaz00, it looks like there may be something up with Rowan and Del Valley. They look to have the same votes on your breakdown. Not sure if this came into play with the vote tally or not.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 07, 2013, 08:02:46 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 07, 2013, 07:33:12 PM
Kaz00, it looks like there may be something up with Rowan and Del Valley. They look to have the same votes on your breakdown. Not sure if this came into play with the vote tally or not.
Pep is thinking he copied it incorrectly because their point totals are different and there are a few "5"s missing. Probably doesn't affect outcome in any way, IMHO.
Quote from: bman on October 09, 2013, 11:48:16 AM
I think it's just me, but I am not buying into the whole Rowan thing here... I still don't see a quality win, (Brockport win over Lyco comparitive somwhat dismissed in my mind as their record offsets that)...
I guess the real Rowan will be uncovered(or displayed) against Wesley in a couple weeks...until then, my thought is they are vastly overranked here...
Quote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2013, 02:03:03 PM
having seen the rowan and del val game, i would say that they are about the same. rowan should not have lost the game, but did not show much during it to make them stand out. the east is imploding with only hobart and fisher looking like they are worthy of their placing. most of the other teams have a bad loss on their record.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 09, 2013, 10:36:55 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 07, 2013, 08:02:46 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 07, 2013, 07:33:12 PM
Kaz00, it looks like there may be something up with Rowan and Del Valley. They look to have the same votes on your breakdown. Not sure if this came into play with the vote tally or not.
Pep is thinking he copied it incorrectly because their point totals are different and there are a few "5"s missing. Probably doesn't affect outcome in any way, IMHO.
Pep's right; I'm an idiot. Del Val's line should read 5,7,5,5,9. I'll adjust that now.
Quote from: bman on October 09, 2013, 11:48:16 AM
I think it's just me, but I am not buying into the whole Rowan thing here... I still don't see a quality win, (Brockport win over Lyco comparitive somwhat dismissed in my mind as their record offsets that)...
I guess the real Rowan will be uncovered(or displayed) against Wesley in a couple weeks...until then, my thought is they are vastly overranked here...
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 10, 2013, 08:56:36 AM
Big problem for Hobart is schedule...
No one really knows if Hobart is the 5th best team in the country or the 16th best team, but they're really good.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 10, 2013, 08:56:36 AM
I keep seeing a skepticism about Hobart this year and I sort of understand (have shared many frustrations/thoughts w/ITH privately). However, I think this is being oversold. Consider that Hobart has effectively shut out three of its first four (admittedly not as strong) opponents. Dickinson, MMA & WPI all scored in the 4th quarter not against the 2nd string D, but the "let the hard working kids at the end of the bench and walk ons get some run" portion of the roster. The "top" league rushers were completely shut down and the yardage they did get came largely against this group late (I think Grasis had like 35 yards through three quarters and same for the QB at MMA). The D looks every bit as good as last year. Utica game we had four turnovers and had some big play scores, so they held the ball for like 40 minutes, which skews all the stats, but that game was no closer than last years and we know what Hobart did last year with 75% of the same folks including the most key defensive players and awesome RB.
Now, we're breaking in a new QB who played a little last year and lost Jr Woodard, but we do have a deep, talented and experienced OL a good Senior in Yosh K at WR who's been slient. Also a RB who's perhaps the most underrated offensive player in the country in Steve Webb. The guy had 1k yards last year splitting time with another 1k rusher and has been doing big things for 3+ years now. I watch these guys every week and Conlon is more talented than Strang (who won a ton, but from a pure talent perspective is on par with Rich Doyle and behind Swanson, Mizro and Strom IMO) and comes from great family football pedigree. It appears as though he's still learning the position (called a couple of unnecessary TO's when he looked confused and a few throws where the WR was running a different route), but I think as the season progresses he'll do some thing to make people do a double take (the big run against MMA was spectacular and could open up opposing D's if he has a couple of 15+ gains in the next few weeks).
Big problem for Hobart is schedule. I thought this iteration of Utica was better than last year's overall despite Benkwitt leaving. They obviously got smoked last week and who knows, they probably aren't better than 6-4 probably at this point. Dickinson is in a secular downturn, but is a historical opponent/season opener for 20yrs now and isn't going anywhere. The 10th game is a frustration, but it's not as simple as people who aren't involved with the school think. Springfield is not looking as advertised going into the year (and I'm sure losing that stud DE is killing them) and Union being one league loss away from their season totally being over (forget mathematical possibilities, no one's winning the league with 2 conference losses this year).
No one really knows if Hobart is the 5th best team in the country or the 16th best team, but they're really good. The fact that they don't have a MIAC/WIAC type of schedule may help the offense get up to speed, but I will go on record now as saying they won't lose a regular season game this year if they win the +/-.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 10, 2013, 01:11:13 PM
I like these replies, and I probably posted because of my own confusion about the team this year. I think they should be in the 10-15 range right now and 7 is too high personally, but I'll take it as it's good marketing for the school/program.
I had a much, much bigger beef with 2011 where I thought we got treated like a second class citizen in the national discussion and on seeding due to a bizarre loss to RPI that I still can't explain. Last year's team wasn't really any better and the team that played Wesley had backups at QB, ILB and WR. SJF finished in the top ten for beating DelVal and JHU that year, but I still maintain we would've had the same results in 2011 and a different discussion if we had gotten a different draw than a road trip to the #3 or #4 team in the country on the road.
My biggest concern, however, is the loss of assistant coach Scott Yoder to Shenendoah. Kevin DeWall is a great guy, coach and recruiter, but Yoder was every bit as important w/15yrs in Geneva as a student/athlete and coach. I was there with both and you can see what Yoder's already done with Shenendoah and I think he's going to turn them into a conference power in the ODAC within 5yrs.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 10, 2013, 01:48:27 PM
That would be a tough one. I heard they are HUGE.
Quote from: bman on October 09, 2013, 11:48:16 AM
I think it's just me, but I am not buying into the whole Rowan thing here... I still don't see a quality win, (Brockport win over Lyco comparitive somwhat dismissed in my mind as their record offsets that)...
I guess the real Rowan will be uncovered(or displayed) against Wesley in a couple weeks...until then, my thought is they are vastly overranked here...
Quote from: dlip on October 13, 2013, 01:37:29 PM
No we don't, you had that one right bman.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 5-0 | 50 | 1 | Open |
2 St. John Fisher | 5-0 | 45 | 2 | at #3 Salisbury |
3 Salisbury | 3-2 | 40 | 3 | vs. #2 St. John Fisher |
4 Delaware Valley | 4-1 | 32 | 6 | at FDU-Florham |
5 Lebanon Valley | 5-1 | 28 | NR | Open |
6 Widener | 3-2 | 20 | 8 | vs. Misericordia |
7t Ithaca | 4-1 | 15 | 10 | at Utica |
7t Lycoming | 4-2 | 15 | 4 | Open |
9 Hartwick | 4-1 | 9 | 9 | at Alfred |
10 St. Lawrence | 5-1 | 8 | NR | Open |
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 19, 2013, 07:13:39 PM
1. Hobart
And that's this week's East Region Fan Poll
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 19, 2013, 07:13:39 PM
1. Hobart
And that's this week's East Region Fan Poll
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 19, 2013, 07:37:34 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 19, 2013, 07:13:39 PM
1. Hobart
And that's this week's East Region Fan Poll
Honestly, you are somewhat right, I don't know what to say. But in this comment I'm going to be an optimist and say the East is really competitive this year and have a lot a solid teams.
Quote from: dlip on October 20, 2013, 12:04:46 PM
It will be interesting for sure. The one thing Dlip feels will hurt us voters is the fact that many of us have not been able to see some of these teams play in person. Not that that would make all the difference but when the faced with the current cluster**** we have this season it would sure help. Dlip wishes he had about 15 HD screens going yesterday afternoon so he could have seen some of the action. Well at least he could agree with others in welcoming Rowan back in.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on October 20, 2013, 08:01:36 AM
I think for the past couple of weeks the top 3 has been
Hobart
Fisher
Salisbury
It would seem likely to me there will be a flip flop between two and three now
Hobart
Salisbury
Fisher
The rest of it? Well that's a horse of a different color.
Quote from: pumkinattack on October 20, 2013, 07:06:02 PM
I've been bored and could care less about the Mac the past 4-5 years, but I think it's shaping up to be the most interesting eastern conference to me this year.
How in the world did Lyco get smoked by Brockport? Bizarre.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 20, 2013, 12:51:55 PMQuote from: dlip on October 20, 2013, 12:04:46 PM
It will be interesting for sure. The one thing Dlip feels will hurt us voters is the fact that many of us have not been able to see some of these teams play in person. Not that that would make all the difference but when the faced with the current cluster**** we have this season it would sure help. Dlip wishes he had about 15 HD screens going yesterday afternoon so he could have seen some of the action. Well at least he could agree with others in welcoming Rowan back in.
I had six games all on at once...3 on my desktop (which is kind of huge) and 3 on my laptop (which is a good size). However, it was hard to watch all, I only watched competitive games and watch some of the top teams for the first half. I also listened to some radio broadcast as well.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 23, 2013, 07:14:22 AM
Sorry everyone, my wife's Mom passed away early Monday morning. I will get my poll in later this afternoon.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 23, 2013, 07:14:22 AM
Sorry everyone, my wife's Mom passed away early Monday morning. I will get my poll in later this afternoon.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 23, 2013, 07:14:22 AM
Sorry everyone, my wife's Mom passed away early Monday morning. I will get my poll in later this afternoon.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 5-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. RPI |
2 Salisbury | 4-2 | 44 | 3 | at Hartwick |
3 St. John Fisher | 5-1 | 41 | 2 | at #6 Ithaca |
4 Delaware Valley | 5-1 | 32 | 4 | vs. King's |
5 Lebanon Valley | 5-1 | 26 | 5 | at Misericordia |
6 Ithaca | 5-1 | 23 | 7t | vs. #3 St. John Fisher |
7 Widener | 4-2 | 18 | 6 | vs. FDU-Florham |
8 Rowan | 4-2 | 15 | NR | at William Paterson |
9 Lycoming | 4-2 | 12 | 7t | vs. Albright |
10 St. Lawrence | 5-1 | 10 | 10 | at Springfield |
Quote from: dlip on October 24, 2013, 12:53:19 PM
Dlip thinks the Pride/Saints match-up is a big one. Obviously the Pride is a mess this year but if SLU can't handle them then Dlip thinks theyay not be as decent as he thinks they are now. A good team should take down SC in Dlip's eyes.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2013, 01:51:25 PM
Still waiting on one more ballot, but at this point all 4 voters have ranked the same 10 teams. I don't think we've ever had that happen before, so we'll see if our final voter presents a desenting opinion!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 28, 2013, 02:23:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2013, 01:51:25 PM
Still waiting on one more ballot, but at this point all 4 voters have ranked the same 10 teams. I don't think we've ever had that happen before, so we'll see if our final voter presents a desenting opinion!
There's just not a lot on the outside looking in. Gallaudet would get killed by every team in the top 10. I'm guessing Framingham would get handled pretty easily as well. Salve, Endicott, Western CT, St. Lawrence, Bridgewater are all in the same boat too, where they just aren't nearly as good as their records. Albright, Cortland, and TCNJ could all probably compete but are 4-3 with some ugly losses. Just not a lot to go on here.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 02:35:53 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 28, 2013, 02:23:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2013, 01:51:25 PM
Still waiting on one more ballot, but at this point all 4 voters have ranked the same 10 teams. I don't think we've ever had that happen before, so we'll see if our final voter presents a desenting opinion!
There's just not a lot on the outside looking in. Gallaudet would get killed by every team in the top 10. I'm guessing Framingham would get handled pretty easily as well. Salve, Endicott, Western CT, St. Lawrence, Bridgewater are all in the same boat too, where they just aren't nearly as good as their records. Albright, Cortland, and TCNJ could all probably compete but are 4-3 with some ugly losses. Just not a lot to go on here.
I would have to disagree with your assessment on that one, I think Framingham State would hold their own against half of the teams. I am not saying that they would win them all, but to say get handled pretty easily is kind of harsh.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 02:35:53 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 28, 2013, 02:23:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 28, 2013, 01:51:25 PM
Still waiting on one more ballot, but at this point all 4 voters have ranked the same 10 teams. I don't think we've ever had that happen before, so we'll see if our final voter presents a desenting opinion!
There's just not a lot on the outside looking in. Gallaudet would get killed by every team in the top 10. I'm guessing Framingham would get handled pretty easily as well. Salve, Endicott, Western CT, St. Lawrence, Bridgewater are all in the same boat too, where they just aren't nearly as good as their records. Albright, Cortland, and TCNJ could all probably compete but are 4-3 with some ugly losses. Just not a lot to go on here.
I would have to disagree with your assessment on that one, I think Framingham State would hold their own against half of the teams. I am not saying that they would win them all, but to say get handled pretty easily is kind of harsh.
Quote from: @d3jason on October 28, 2013, 03:19:11 PM
Framingham gave Cortland a pretty good run in last year's playoffs if I remember it right.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 03:39:46 PMQuote from: @d3jason on October 28, 2013, 03:19:11 PM
Framingham gave Cortland a pretty good run in last year's playoffs if I remember it right.
See the bold for why that statement is irrelevant on October 28, 2013:
Framingham Starters against Cortland in 2012 Framingham Starters last week
QB Matthew Silva QB William Luks
WR Philip Clain WR Jared Gauthier
WR Alexander Avery WR Travis Hayes
WR Tyrone Figueroa WR Tevin Jones
RB Melikke Van Alstyne RB Melikke Van Alstyne
C Nicholas Stanfield C N. Stanfield
LG Aaron Ferreira RG Aaron Ferreira
RG Bryan DaSilva LG Bryan Dasilva
RT Joseph Masucci RT Patrick McDonald
LT James Krebs LT James Krebs
FB Randall Kelleher FB Aaron Owens
S Chris Blydell S Matthew Mangano
DE Chevere Archer DE Chevere Archer
LB Michael Altavesta LB Michael Altavesta
CB Tyrone Notice CB Lewis Bailey
CB Ony Ramos CB Ony Ramos
LB Samuel Hill LB Samuel Hill
LB Patrick McGrath LB Patrick McGrath
S Kevin Donahue S Kevin Donahue
DT James Muirhead DT O. Dickerson
DT Alexander Torti DT Alexander Torti
DE Jeffrey Touron DE Jeffrey Touron
Quote from: Yanks 99 on October 28, 2013, 03:42:03 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 03:39:46 PMQuote from: @d3jason on October 28, 2013, 03:19:11 PM
Framingham gave Cortland a pretty good run in last year's playoffs if I remember it right.
See the bold for why that statement is irrelevant on October 28, 2013:
Framingham Starters against Cortland in 2012 Framingham Starters last week
QB Matthew Silva QB William Luks
WR Philip Clain WR Jared Gauthier
WR Alexander Avery WR Travis Hayes
WR Tyrone Figueroa WR Tevin Jones
RB Melikke Van Alstyne RB Melikke Van Alstyne
C Nicholas Stanfield C N. Stanfield
LG Aaron Ferreira RG Aaron Ferreira
RG Bryan DaSilva LG Bryan Dasilva
RT Joseph Masucci RT Patrick McDonald
LT James Krebs LT James Krebs
FB Randall Kelleher FB Aaron Owens
S Chris Blydell S Matthew Mangano
DE Chevere Archer DE Chevere Archer
LB Michael Altavesta LB Michael Altavesta
CB Tyrone Notice CB Lewis Bailey
CB Ony Ramos CB Ony Ramos
LB Samuel Hill LB Samuel Hill
LB Patrick McGrath LB Patrick McGrath
S Kevin Donahue S Kevin Donahue
DT James Muirhead DT O. Dickerson
DT Alexander Torti DT Alexander Torti
DE Jeffrey Touron DE Jeffrey Touron
I was waiting for someone to break out the fact that Curry beat Hartwick and Ithaca back in 2007 and 2008 as reasons that Framingham should be ranked...but this covers it better...
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 04:08:59 PM
They have a good portion of both their defense back and a good portion of the O-line and an All-American RB. I think with 8 guys on defense with playoff experience, I would consider that good enough.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 04:34:48 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 04:08:59 PM
They have a good portion of both their defense back and a good portion of the O-line and an All-American RB. I think with 8 guys on defense with playoff experience, I would consider that good enough.
You'd be wrong. The teams are different because the players are different. Not just on Framingham, but every team in the country. And what about new coaches? And different schedules? And returning players not being as good one year as they are the year before? And returning players being a lot better than the year before? You can't just change all these things and then say "But let's pretend it's last year"
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 04:48:07 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 04:34:48 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 04:08:59 PM
They have a good portion of both their defense back and a good portion of the O-line and an All-American RB. I think with 8 guys on defense with playoff experience, I would consider that good enough.
You'd be wrong. The teams are different because the players are different. Not just on Framingham, but every team in the country. And what about new coaches? And different schedules? And returning players not being as good one year as they are the year before? And returning players being a lot better than the year before? You can't just change all these things and then say "But let's pretend it's last year"
No need to pretend, I understand each and everyone point why they feel Framingham State is not in the Top 10. I just think that the way the east has being playing out, its hard to say "Who's, Who." If you feel that somone should be higher than another team you have to support it and as many of you already said, Framingham State loss its game to Rowan, which was a competitive game and Rowan is at the bottom of the East regional fan poll, so they essentially would have to be less than that. My point, which I started tis conversation was that Framingham State would get beat easily by most teams in the Top 10 east fan poll, which I said was kind of harsh. They don't have to be a Top 10 team in the east fan poll, but saying they would just sit down and lose easily "bad" is kind of just saying they aren't competive at all.
Quote from: @d3jason on October 28, 2013, 03:19:11 PM
Framingham gave Cortland a pretty good run in last year's playoffs if I remember it right.
Quote from: dlip on October 28, 2013, 06:59:20 PM
Dlip is with Lew here. We have this discussion every year regarding one of the upstart teams in the NEFC/MASCAC. Dlip can appreciate the perspective by some regarding the said team's ability to compete with other top level ER teams however IDHO Framingham is still not there yet. Again, Dlip has said this many times over that the gap is getting smaller and these conversations are warrented as a result. All Dlip knows is that he feels the east region as a whole is getting A Fletch level proctologist exam regarding the D3 poll. The bias is getting a bit annoying to Dlip.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 04:57:40 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 04:48:07 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 04:34:48 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 04:08:59 PM
They have a good portion of both their defense back and a good portion of the O-line and an All-American RB. I think with 8 guys on defense with playoff experience, I would consider that good enough.
You'd be wrong. The teams are different because the players are different. Not just on Framingham, but every team in the country. And what about new coaches? And different schedules? And returning players not being as good one year as they are the year before? And returning players being a lot better than the year before? You can't just change all these things and then say "But let's pretend it's last year"
No need to pretend, I understand each and everyone point why they feel Framingham State is not in the Top 10. I just think that the way the east has being playing out, its hard to say "Who's, Who." If you feel that somone should be higher than another team you have to support it and as many of you already said, Framingham State loss its game to Rowan, which was a competitive game and Rowan is at the bottom of the East regional fan poll, so they essentially would have to be less than that. My point, which I started tis conversation was that Framingham State would get beat easily by most teams in the Top 10 east fan poll, which I said was kind of harsh. They don't have to be a Top 10 team in the east fan poll, but saying they would just sit down and lose easily "bad" is kind of just saying they aren't competive at all.
I think we can quibble with whether or not the statement about Framingham is correct or not. But I don't think introducing data from 2012 is the best way to do it.
Quote from: Knightstalker on October 28, 2013, 08:36:05 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 04:57:40 PMIf you are going to quibble, you should wear a bib.
I think we can quibble with whether or not the statement about Framingham is correct or not. But I don't think introducing data from 2012 is the best way to do it.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 07:37:59 PMQuote from: dlip on October 28, 2013, 06:59:20 PM
Dlip is with Lew here. We have this discussion every year regarding one of the upstart teams in the NEFC/MASCAC. Dlip can appreciate the perspective by some regarding the said team's ability to compete with other top level ER teams however IDHO Framingham is still not there yet. Again, Dlip has said this many times over that the gap is getting smaller and these conversations are warrented as a result. All Dlip knows is that he feels the east region as a whole is getting A Fletch level proctologist exam regarding the D3 poll. The bias is getting a bit annoying to Dlip.
The bias starts at home with our own perception. I am sure many individuals have never watch more than one NEFC/MASCAC game. Also, it is getting annoying.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 03:39:46 PMQuote from: @d3jason on October 28, 2013, 03:19:11 PM
Framingham gave Cortland a pretty good run in last year's playoffs if I remember it right.
See the bold for why that statement is irrelevant on October 28, 2013:
Framingham Starters against Cortland in 2012 Framingham Starters last week
QB Matthew Silva QB William Luks
WR Philip Clain WR Jared Gauthier
WR Alexander Avery WR Travis Hayes
WR Tyrone Figueroa WR Tevin Jones
RB Melikke Van Alstyne RB Melikke Van Alstyne
C Nicholas Stanfield C N. Stanfield
LG Aaron Ferreira RG Aaron Ferreira
RG Bryan DaSilva LG Bryan Dasilva
RT Joseph Masucci RT Patrick McDonald
LT James Krebs LT James Krebs
FB Randall Kelleher FB Aaron Owens
S Chris Blydell S Matthew Mangano
DE Chevere Archer DE Chevere Archer
LB Michael Altavesta LB Michael Altavesta
CB Tyrone Notice CB Lewis Bailey
CB Ony Ramos CB Ony Ramos
LB Samuel Hill LB Samuel Hill
LB Patrick McGrath LB Patrick McGrath
S Kevin Donahue S Kevin Donahue
DT James Muirhead DT O. Dickerson
DT Alexander Torti DT Alexander Torti
DE Jeffrey Touron DE Jeffrey Touron
Quote from: ECoastFootball on October 29, 2013, 08:44:58 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 03:39:46 PMQuote from: @d3jason on October 28, 2013, 03:19:11 PM
Framingham gave Cortland a pretty good run in last year's playoffs if I remember it right.
See the bold for why that statement is irrelevant on October 28, 2013:
Framingham Starters against Cortland in 2012 Framingham Starters last week
QB Matthew Silva QB William Luks
WR Philip Clain WR Jared Gauthier
WR Alexander Avery WR Travis Hayes
WR Tyrone Figueroa WR Tevin Jones
RB Melikke Van Alstyne RB Melikke Van Alstyne
C Nicholas Stanfield C N. Stanfield
LG Aaron Ferreira RG Aaron Ferreira
RG Bryan DaSilva LG Bryan Dasilva
RT Joseph Masucci RT Patrick McDonald
LT James Krebs LT James Krebs
FB Randall Kelleher FB Aaron Owens
S Chris Blydell S Matthew Mangano
DE Chevere Archer DE Chevere Archer
LB Michael Altavesta LB Michael Altavesta
CB Tyrone Notice CB Lewis Bailey
CB Ony Ramos CB Ony Ramos
LB Samuel Hill LB Samuel Hill
LB Patrick McGrath LB Patrick McGrath
S Kevin Donahue S Kevin Donahue
DT James Muirhead DT O. Dickerson
DT Alexander Torti DT Alexander Torti
DE Jeffrey Touron DE Jeffrey Touron
While this is important, it is also important to know that the changes aren't necessarily because of graduation. Luks is starting for Silva because he was hurt this week. Jared Gauthier is a new starter at WR because he is a 1-AA transfer from the University of New Hampshire. Tevin Jones is starting over last years guy Clain because he is better, Clain just got beat out. That being said, I do not think they are as good as last year and if Silva doesn't come back they are in trouble in he first round if they are blessed with a bid.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 6-0 | 50 | 1 | at Union |
2 Salisbury | 5-2 | 45 | 2 | at #9 Alfred |
3 Ithaca | 6-1 | 37 | 6 | vs. Frostburg State |
4 St. John Fisher | 5-2 | 31 | 3 | vs. Utica |
5 Lebanon Valley | 6-1 | 29 | 5 | at #10 Delaware Valley |
6 Widener | 5-2 | 23 | 7 | at Albright |
7t Lycoming | 5-2 | 20 | 9 | at King's |
7t Rowan | 5-2 | 20 | 8 | vs. Cortland State |
9 Alfred | 5-2 | 11 | NR | vs. #2 Salisbury |
10 Delaware Valley | 5-2 | 9 | 4 | vs. #5 Lebanon Valley |
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 28, 2013, 04:08:59 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on October 28, 2013, 03:42:03 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 28, 2013, 03:39:46 PMQuote from: @d3jason on October 28, 2013, 03:19:11 PM
Framingham gave Cortland a pretty good run in last year's playoffs if I remember it right.
See the bold for why that statement is irrelevant on October 28, 2013:
Framingham Starters against Cortland in 2012 Framingham Starters last week
QB Matthew Silva QB William Luks
WR Philip Clain WR Jared Gauthier
WR Alexander Avery WR Travis Hayes
WR Tyrone Figueroa WR Tevin Jones
RB Melikke Van Alstyne RB Melikke Van Alstyne
C Nicholas Stanfield C N. Stanfield
LG Aaron Ferreira RG Aaron Ferreira
RG Bryan DaSilva LG Bryan Dasilva
RT Joseph Masucci RT Patrick McDonald
LT James Krebs LT James Krebs
FB Randall Kelleher FB Aaron Owens
S Chris Blydell S Matthew Mangano
DE Chevere Archer DE Chevere Archer
LB Michael Altavesta LB Michael Altavesta
CB Tyrone Notice CB Lewis Bailey
CB Ony Ramos CB Ony Ramos
LB Samuel Hill LB Samuel Hill
LB Patrick McGrath LB Patrick McGrath
S Kevin Donahue S Kevin Donahue
DT James Muirhead DT O. Dickerson
DT Alexander Torti DT Alexander Torti
DE Jeffrey Touron DE Jeffrey Touron
I was waiting for someone to break out the fact that Curry beat Hartwick and Ithaca back in 2007 and 2008 as reasons that Framingham should be ranked...but this covers it better...
They have a good portion of both their defense back and a good portion of the O-line and an All-American RB. I think with 8 guys on defense with playoff experience, I would consider that good enough.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 09:56:52 AM
To be honest, i'm kind of sick of all of the comments that the NEFC, MASCAC, ECFC, teams have 'closed the gap'. Where is the evidence? Playing a close game against Cortland last year? If anything, some of the traditional powers from the LL, E8 and NJAC have gotten worse(RPI, Union, Springfield, Montclair, TCNJ, Hartwick), but in no way do I feel an NEFC, ECFC, or MASCAC team has a better chance now of winning a playoff game than they did 10 years ago. All they've done is swap who the good team is from Curry to Framingham St. Bridgewater, Endicott, and Salve are all decent teams, but there were decent teams back in Curry's hayday. I still wouldn't expect them to win.
Can one of these teams win in a playoff game? Yes. They always have had the opportunity, and they've had some close games, and even a couple of wins, but I wouldn't say their chances are any better now than they ever were. Fact.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 12:47:21 PM
First off, WPI sucks. Worcester State used to be nasty back in the 90's. You really can't take those games into consideration at all. They are a toss up every year. It's a small rivalry and both teams are mediocre at their best in any given year recently. We've definitely seen plenty of times where Worcester St. has a decent year overall and loses to WPI, but WPI losing to Worcester St. has no meaning to me. WPI is no measuring stick for the LL. I think the bottom of the LL is as bad as the bottom of any conference. And I don't think bad upon Salve(you say a 'not good' Salve team) and Bridgewater, and Endicott etc. I think they are half decent, even pretty good. But they can't compete with the top 10 of the East this year. Framingham appears to be the cream of the crop in 2013 for this group, and I think they will lose in the first round IF they make the playoffs. Endicott or Salve will lose in Rd 1, depending on who wins the conference(unless they play another layup). Those teams are all leaps and bounds ahead of the ECFC, but not at the level of the rest of the East's best. I have Delaware Valley at 10. Who would you pick in a Delaware Valley vs. Framingham game??? Who would you pick if I set the spread at +14? I know who i'd take in both cases.
RPI and Union suck so bad this year I might be headed to the Endicott/Salve season finale instead of making the trip to Schenectady.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 12:53:00 PM
It's extremely likely that Gallaudet goes undefeated, and it's a shame but likely that they will steal a playoff spot. Hopefully the NCAA does right and let's Hobart have their crack at them instead of facing them off vs. a South Region team based on location. Hobart has had some tough seedings in the past. I would love to see them get a better bracket this year with their high national rank.
Quote from: ECoastFootball on October 30, 2013, 09:31:46 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 12:53:00 PM
It's extremely likely that Gallaudet goes undefeated, and it's a shame but likely that they will steal a playoff spot. Hopefully the NCAA does right and let's Hobart have their crack at them instead of facing them off vs. a South Region team based on location. Hobart has had some tough seedings in the past. I would love to see them get a better bracket this year with their high national rank.
Steal a spot? They'll be the auto-bid, so that's a spot you were already assuming was going to be gone. Also, if an ECFC team has to make it, Ill take one that has beaten Shenandoah (who beat Hampden-Sydney) and Rochester (by 24) over the ECFC teams of the past.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 30, 2013, 09:36:23 AMQuote from: ECoastFootball on October 30, 2013, 09:31:46 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 12:53:00 PM
It's extremely likely that Gallaudet goes undefeated, and it's a shame but likely that they willstealearn a playoff spot. Hopefully the NCAA does right and let's Hobart have their crack at them instead of facing them off vs. a South Region team based on location. Hobart has had some tough seedings in the past. I would love to see them get a better bracket this year with their high national rank.
Steal a spot? They'll be the auto-bid, so that's a spot you were already assuming was going to be gone. Also, if an ECFC team has to make it, Ill take one that has beaten Shenandoah (who beat Hampden-Sydney) and Rochester (by 24) over the ECFC teams of the past.
I think that "stealing" a spot means when a team outside of the top 8 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team only because they won their conference.
Felony Larceny is when a team outside of the top 20 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 10:17:20 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 30, 2013, 09:36:23 AMQuote from: ECoastFootball on October 30, 2013, 09:31:46 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 12:53:00 PM
It's extremely likely that Gallaudet goes undefeated, and it's a shame but likely that they willstealearn a playoff spot. Hopefully the NCAA does right and let's Hobart have their crack at them instead of facing them off vs. a South Region team based on location. Hobart has had some tough seedings in the past. I would love to see them get a better bracket this year with their high national rank.
Steal a spot? They'll be the auto-bid, so that's a spot you were already assuming was going to be gone. Also, if an ECFC team has to make it, Ill take one that has beaten Shenandoah (who beat Hampden-Sydney) and Rochester (by 24) over the ECFC teams of the past.
I think that "stealing" a spot means when a team outside of the top 8 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team only because they won their conference.
Felony Larceny is when a team outside of the top 20 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team.
I understand your point, but stealing is such a harsh word, but do I believe there are stronger teams, yes. But they have beaten everyone on their schedule and have beaten the #2 team in the LL and #4 team in the ODAC. Yes, they are not blowing the breaks off of the teams in their conference, but they are still undefeated, which you can't ask anymore of them. I know many of you do not like looking into the past, but they have been very competitive in their OOC games the last couple years. Maybe next year they can get apprentice off the schedule and schedule a team from the big conferences.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 10:17:20 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 30, 2013, 09:36:23 AMQuote from: ECoastFootball on October 30, 2013, 09:31:46 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 12:53:00 PM
It's extremely likely that Gallaudet goes undefeated, and it's a shame but likely that they willstealearn a playoff spot. Hopefully the NCAA does right and let's Hobart have their crack at them instead of facing them off vs. a South Region team based on location. Hobart has had some tough seedings in the past. I would love to see them get a better bracket this year with their high national rank.
Steal a spot? They'll be the auto-bid, so that's a spot you were already assuming was going to be gone. Also, if an ECFC team has to make it, Ill take one that has beaten Shenandoah (who beat Hampden-Sydney) and Rochester (by 24) over the ECFC teams of the past.
I think that "stealing" a spot means when a team outside of the top 8 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team only because they won their conference.
Felony Larceny is when a team outside of the top 20 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team.
I understand your point, but stealing is such a harsh word, but do I believe there are stronger teams, yes. But they have beaten everyone on their schedule and have beaten the #2 team in the LL and #4 team in the ODAC.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2013, 10:42:46 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 10:17:20 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 30, 2013, 09:36:23 AMQuote from: ECoastFootball on October 30, 2013, 09:31:46 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 29, 2013, 12:53:00 PM
It's extremely likely that Gallaudet goes undefeated, and it's a shame but likely that they willstealearn a playoff spot. Hopefully the NCAA does right and let's Hobart have their crack at them instead of facing them off vs. a South Region team based on location. Hobart has had some tough seedings in the past. I would love to see them get a better bracket this year with their high national rank.
Steal a spot? They'll be the auto-bid, so that's a spot you were already assuming was going to be gone. Also, if an ECFC team has to make it, Ill take one that has beaten Shenandoah (who beat Hampden-Sydney) and Rochester (by 24) over the ECFC teams of the past.
I think that "stealing" a spot means when a team outside of the top 8 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team only because they won their conference.
Felony Larceny is when a team outside of the top 20 in the east gets a bid over a top 8 team.
I understand your point, but stealing is such a harsh word, but do I believe there are stronger teams, yes. But they have beaten everyone on their schedule and have beaten the #2 team in the LL and #4 team in the ODAC.
Let's put this in context.
Rochester hasn't had a winning season since 2007. Yes, UR will have a winning season this year, in large part because they got to switch MMA for Alfred State. They're a mediocre program in a mediocre conference.
Shenandoah is 3-4 and still has to go on the road to play 5-2 Randolph-Macon, and has a couple other games against teams with similar W/L records. I don't know much about the ODAC, but this looks like a team that's staring at 5-5, at best.
At the end of the day, there's a chance everyone in the ECFC except Gallaudet finishes with four losses. Running through that schedule unbeaten is not impressive.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on October 29, 2013, 11:47:44 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on October 29, 2013, 11:11:44 AM
On playoff seeding, see 2011. No meaningful strength in or OOC and 9 game schedule and they were sent to Wesley in the first round. Perhaps the team was less of a known quantity to the committe than compared with now, but that team was pretty close to this one and just blew a 3td lead in bizarre fashion to RPI. Maybe they still get a decent seed, but insure wouldn't leave it up to the committee and want to test that theory.
In 2011, these existed:
Kean 9-1
WNE 10-1
Salisbury 9-1
DelVal 10-0
Hobart 7-1
With three weeks to go in 2013, these exist:
Gallaudet 7-0
Hobart 6-0
Framingham State 6-1
Lebanon Valley 6-1
Ithaca 6-1
Merchant Marine 4-1
Odds are low that the other five teams will all get by unscathed, and Hobart's playoff results in 2012 can be used to determine close issues in seeding. In addition, they beat MMA and the last ECFC team that went undefeated was abused by Alfred and almost didn't even get in through Pool B. One loss would not considerably devastate seeding this season for Hobart.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 07:49:36 PM
Quick Question:
What should/could the NEFC, ECFC, and MASCAC do to strengthen their perspective conferences? Do you think it is monetary, admissions, etc...
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 30, 2013, 09:43:03 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 07:49:36 PM
Quick Question:
What should/could the NEFC, ECFC, and MASCAC do to strengthen their perspective conferences? Do you think it is monetary, admissions, etc...
Pep is thinking there's a glut of college football programs in New England/Northeast much because the country was settled from east to west.
Pep says, "Go West, young man!"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk85%2FAUPepBand%2FGoWestYoungMan_.jpg&hash=b2370cda058e7e6a3df0fa3b6e1967661322f0bd) (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/AUPepBand/media/GoWestYoungMan_.jpg.html)
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 31, 2013, 09:14:06 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 30, 2013, 09:43:03 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 07:49:36 PM
Quick Question:
What should/could the NEFC, ECFC, and MASCAC do to strengthen their perspective conferences? Do you think it is monetary, admissions, etc...
Pep is thinking there's a glut of college football programs in New England/Northeast much because the country was settled from east to west.
Pep says, "Go West, young man!"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk85%2FAUPepBand%2FGoWestYoungMan_.jpg&hash=b2370cda058e7e6a3df0fa3b6e1967661322f0bd) (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/AUPepBand/media/GoWestYoungMan_.jpg.html)
I always enjoy watching two top teams from top conferences face off against each other in the season, either it be East region vs. East region or East region vs. "X" region. However, speaking from an East region perspective, do you think teams that schedule tough opponents are at risk of not making the playoffs, especially if you lose that OOC game and don't win your conference. I was poking around other regions and they felt that their top teams should not play each other, because of that risk, so you rarely see a UW-Whitewater play a St. Thomas or a Linfield vs. St. John's. Does it behoove the East region top teams to schedule against each other, especially looking at how this year has gone. I know it is not the case in everyteam, since some top teams have lost conference games that they should not have.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 31, 2013, 09:14:06 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 30, 2013, 09:43:03 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 07:49:36 PM
Quick Question:
What should/could the NEFC, ECFC, and MASCAC do to strengthen their perspective conferences? Do you think it is monetary, admissions, etc...
Pep is thinking there's a glut of college football programs in New England/Northeast much because the country was settled from east to west.
Pep says, "Go West, young man!"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk85%2FAUPepBand%2FGoWestYoungMan_.jpg&hash=b2370cda058e7e6a3df0fa3b6e1967661322f0bd) (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/AUPepBand/media/GoWestYoungMan_.jpg.html)
I always enjoy watching two top teams from top conferences face off against each other in the season, either it be East region vs. East region or East region vs. "X" region. However, speaking from an East region perspective, do you think teams that schedule tough opponents are at risk of not making the playoffs, especially if you lose that OOC game and don't win your conference. I was poking around other regions and they felt that their top teams should not play each other, because of that risk, so you rarely see a UW-Whitewater play a St. Thomas or a Linfield vs. St. John's. Does it behoove the East region top teams to schedule against each other, especially looking at how this year has gone. I know it is not the case in everyteam, since some top teams have lost conference games that they should not have.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 31, 2013, 09:14:06 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 30, 2013, 09:43:03 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 30, 2013, 07:49:36 PM
Quick Question:
What should/could the NEFC, ECFC, and MASCAC do to strengthen their perspective conferences? Do you think it is monetary, admissions, etc...
Pep is thinking there's a glut of college football programs in New England/Northeast much because the country was settled from east to west.
Pep says, "Go West, young man!"
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi86.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fk85%2FAUPepBand%2FGoWestYoungMan_.jpg&hash=b2370cda058e7e6a3df0fa3b6e1967661322f0bd) (http://s86.photobucket.com/user/AUPepBand/media/GoWestYoungMan_.jpg.html)
I always enjoy watching two top teams from top conferences face off against each other in the season, either it be East region vs. East region or East region vs. "X" region. However, speaking from an East region perspective, do you think teams that schedule tough opponents are at risk of not making the playoffs, especially if you lose that OOC game and don't win your conference. I was poking around other regions and they felt that their top teams should not play each other, because of that risk, so you rarely see a UW-Whitewater play a St. Thomas or a Linfield vs. St. John's. Does it behoove the East region top teams to schedule against each other, especially looking at how this year has gone. I know it is not the case in everyteam, since some top teams have lost conference games that they should not have.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 31, 2013, 12:15:00 PM
I'm pretty firmly of the mind that teams who don't win conferences not named the OAC or WIAC squabbling about whether they deserve a Pool C bid are missing the bigger point - if you're a national contender, just win the damn conference. Henceforth, top teams should feel free to schedule some tough OOC games, because if you have designs on advancing in the playoffs, you'd better also be planning to win your conference.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2013, 12:52:39 PM
"Just win the damn conference" is an interesting take for those conferences. Those are places where you could be a national quarterfinal team and not be the best team in the conference. Surely we want to get national quarterfinalists in the field.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2013, 12:52:39 PM
"Just win the damn conference" is an interesting take for those conferences. Those are places where you could be a national quarterfinal team and not be the best team in the conference. Surely we want to get national quarterfinalists in the field.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 31, 2013, 01:32:07 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2013, 12:52:39 PMWho is "we" Pat? It should be clear that the NCAA does not care about getting the best teams into tournaments in many sports.
"Just win the damn conference" is an interesting take for those conferences. Those are places where you could be a national quarterfinal team and not be the best team in the conference. Surely we want to get national quarterfinalists in the field.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2013, 02:04:51 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 31, 2013, 01:32:07 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2013, 12:52:39 PMWho is "we" Pat? It should be clear that the NCAA does not care about getting the best teams into tournaments in many sports.
"Just win the damn conference" is an interesting take for those conferences. Those are places where you could be a national quarterfinal team and not be the best team in the conference. Surely we want to get national quarterfinalists in the field.
I agree, but when it comes to national quarterfinal teams, we should at least make sure all of those teams actually get in.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2013, 02:17:51 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2013, 02:04:51 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 31, 2013, 01:32:07 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2013, 12:52:39 PMWho is "we" Pat? It should be clear that the NCAA does not care about getting the best teams into tournaments in many sports.
"Just win the damn conference" is an interesting take for those conferences. Those are places where you could be a national quarterfinal team and not be the best team in the conference. Surely we want to get national quarterfinalists in the field.
I agree, but when it comes to national quarterfinal teams, we should at least make sure all of those teams actually get in.
Curiously, when's the last time an at-large made that kind of noise? Or, perhaps, who's the best team to be left out of the playoffs in recent years? I mean, I'm not a fan of the disappearing Pool C bids either, but are teams this good really being left out?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:57:31 AM
Sooooo, Gallaudet beat perennial powerhouse Becker on a blocked FG return for TD. Anyone still think they won't be 'stealing' a playoff spot?
Quote from: D3MAFAN on November 03, 2013, 05:41:22 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:57:31 AM
Sooooo, Gallaudet beat perennial powerhouse Becker on a blocked FG return for TD. Anyone still think they won't be 'stealing' a playoff spot?
They won the game and are undefeated, they are in a conference that followed all procedures and rules to qualify for a playoff seed. Until the rules change, just constructively discuss football. There are many other conferences that have a represenative that's going to get an invitation to the playoff that may not be a Top 32 team and the East as a whole may not have a Top 32 team (I do think so). So instead of moping about things you can not control, do as Pat's quote say's "Let's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect."
Quote from: D3MAFAN on November 03, 2013, 05:41:22 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:57:31 AM
Sooooo, Gallaudet beat perennial powerhouse Becker on a blocked FG return for TD. Anyone still think they won't be 'stealing' a playoff spot?
They won the game and are undefeated, they are in a conference that followed all procedures and rules to qualify for a playoff seed. Until the rules change, just constructively discuss football. There are many other conferences that have a represenative that's going to get an invitation to the playoff that may not be a Top 32 team and the East as a whole may not have a Top 32 team (I do think so). So instead of moping about things you can not control, do as Pat's quote say's "Let's discuss (sports) in a positive way, sometimes kidding each other with no disrespect."
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:57:31 AM
Sooooo, Gallaudet beat perennial powerhouse Becker on a blocked FG return for TD. Anyone still think they won't be 'stealing' a playoff spot?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:44:47 PM
Dude!!!! Becker has won 11 games in 9 years against the worst competition in the country!!!! Comparing them to Union as an opponent is like comparing a turtle with an egg roll.
And did you really want to pump up a win vs. Rochester? The LL is awful this year. I wouldn't be all that excited about that one.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 03, 2013, 11:10:57 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:44:47 PM
Dude!!!! Becker has won 11 games in 9 years against the worst competition in the country!!!! Comparing them to Union as an opponent is like comparing a turtle with an egg roll.
And did you really want to pump up a win vs. Rochester? The LL is awful this year. I wouldn't be all that excited about that one.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!
No, I'm not saying Becker is as good as Union. But I am saying that you guys ALWAYS look for the worst possible framing of teams from the crummy conferences to distort them and make them look as bad as you can. I don't have some agenda - I'm not a Gallaudet fan. I'm a completely unbiased observer when it comes to the East. It's silly that you act like the NEFC and ECFC are the only conferences "stealing" playoff spots - as I noted, there are several conferences in each region clearly a step below their regional competition. You're the only one who acts like it's a grave injustice that they get a playoff bid.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2013, 08:15:57 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 03, 2013, 11:10:57 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:44:47 PM
Dude!!!! Becker has won 11 games in 9 years against the worst competition in the country!!!! Comparing them to Union as an opponent is like comparing a turtle with an egg roll.
And did you really want to pump up a win vs. Rochester? The LL is awful this year. I wouldn't be all that excited about that one.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!
No, I'm not saying Becker is as good as Union. But I am saying that you guys ALWAYS look for the worst possible framing of teams from the crummy conferences to distort them and make them look as bad as you can. I don't have some agenda - I'm not a Gallaudet fan. I'm a completely unbiased observer when it comes to the East. It's silly that you act like the NEFC and ECFC are the only conferences "stealing" playoff spots - as I noted, there are several conferences in each region clearly a step below their regional competition. You're the only one who acts like it's a grave injustice that they get a playoff bid.
ETP, let's examine this 3rd place Rochester. Here are their five wins:
Alfred State
A one-point win over a 2-6 Thiel
A one-point win over a 4-3 Springfield
A six-point win over a 4-4 RPI
A 14-point win over a 2-6 Union
This is a pretty mediocre resume. Figure they beat WPI, (currently 2-6) and lose to Hobart. What's a 5-3* record against that schedule? And this is the BEST win Gallaudet's going to get?
* I know losing out on the MMA game wasn't their fault, and it was hard to find a last-minute replacement. But I'm not giving them credit for beating an Alfred State team that followed up the Rochester game by struggling to beat Erie Community College. That's not a D-III caliber opponent. It might as well have been an exhibition game
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 03, 2013, 11:10:57 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:44:47 PM
Dude!!!! Becker has won 11 games in 9 years against the worst competition in the country!!!! Comparing them to Union as an opponent is like comparing a turtle with an egg roll.
And did you really want to pump up a win vs. Rochester? The LL is awful this year. I wouldn't be all that excited about that one.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!
No, I'm not saying Becker is as good as Union. But I am saying that you guys ALWAYS look for the worst possible framing of teams from the crummy conferences to distort them and make them look as bad as you can. I don't have some agenda - I'm not a Gallaudet fan. I'm a completely unbiased observer when it comes to the East. It's silly that you act like the NEFC and ECFC are the only conferences "stealing" playoff spots - as I noted, there are several conferences in each region clearly a step below their regional competition. You're the only one who acts like it's a grave injustice that they get a playoff bid.
Quote from: dlip on November 04, 2013, 10:32:50 AM
The main beef dlip thinks is that when teams from these two (next year three) conferences get the auto bid in their respective leagues that auto bid prevents a team that plays tougher competition all year from getting in. Many would like to see the "best teams" awarded entry to the tourney year in and year out. dlip supports that thinking however in order to do that the auto bid system would have to be completely wiped out.
Quote from: jknezek on October 31, 2013, 12:59:18 PM
I don't think it becomes a problem until you are under 4 Pool C bids. As for options, I don't want to see the AQ limit upped as that will lead to more conference musical chairs. And I don't think the NCAA is going to be real interested in growing the tournament size again, especially if they start losing revenue from some of the lawsuits going around.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 04, 2013, 10:46:53 AMQuote from: dlip on November 04, 2013, 10:32:50 AM
The main beef dlip thinks is that when teams from these two (next year three) conferences get the auto bid in their respective leagues that auto bid prevents a team that plays tougher competition all year from getting in. Many would like to see the "best teams" awarded entry to the tourney year in and year out. dlip supports that thinking however in order to do that the auto bid system would have to be completely wiped out.
Frank has touched on this in the past, but some progress could be made toward getting more of the "best teams" in while maintaining the AQ system just by increasing the conference minimum from 7 to 8 or 9 teams. That would probably net a couple more at-large bids, whether they be pool B or C though costing additional OOC games. Technically, there are enough teams in D3 to fill 34 conferences that would qualify for AQ status, so things could be worse for second place teams.
Quote from: jknezek on November 04, 2013, 10:58:00 AM
CCIW, E8, ECFC, IIAC, NEFC, NJAC, SCIAC, WIAC, ODAC, and LL. Anyone want to join the WIAC? Do you really think, for the sake of allowing extra "second chance" teams into the field, the NCAA is going to set off this type of chaos? It would make 0 sense to the majority of the membership to accommodate another 4 or 5 teams total.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 04, 2013, 11:20:12 AMQuote from: jknezek on November 04, 2013, 10:58:00 AM
CCIW, E8, ECFC, IIAC, NEFC, NJAC, SCIAC, WIAC, ODAC, and LL. Anyone want to join the WIAC? Do you really think, for the sake of allowing extra "second chance" teams into the field, the NCAA is going to set off this type of chaos? It would make 0 sense to the majority of the membership to accommodate another 4 or 5 teams total.
I think you just named 10 conferences plus the 3 or 4 seven-team conferences we're facing. So it's more like 13-14 until realignment, if any, occurs. And, actually, yes I do think the NCAA would set this off since, 14 years ago, they touched off this exact line of "chaos" (as you call it) by setting up the rules in this way. The NCAA's biggest issues is balancing access (Pool A/B) with rewarding strength (Pool C). This isn't unique to football. However, in football, you can't accomplish both if you have no at-large bids to give out in a sport that can't have its playoff field expand further. This is where the NCAA needs to rethink forcing football to utilize the same setup as baseball or soccer since you can't simply play an extra game or extra day in football like you can in other sports.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 04, 2013, 10:19:41 AM
Y'all act like the NEFC and ECFC are stealing playoff bids that should go to some other East teams
Quote from: dlip on November 04, 2013, 11:56:46 AM
With that said dlip's earlier point was in regards to the constant whining and beating down of these conferences day in and day out (which again dlip has been guilty of) when in fact this scenario, in some form, is happening in all four regions every year.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 04, 2013, 12:05:51 PM
The difference I keep trying to define is that in the East, the NEFC and ECFC are vilified for "stealing" an AQ bid...the East is the only region where this complaint is so persistently and whin-ily raised.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2013, 01:22:51 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 04, 2013, 12:05:51 PM
The difference I keep trying to define is that in the East, the NEFC and ECFC are vilified for "stealing" an AQ bid...the East is the only region where this complaint is so persistently and whin-ily raised.
And I hate seeing good teams, 8-2/9-1 type teams that are playoff caliber and capable of, if not winning, giving teams half a game, staying home because the system has decided it's easier to have Norwich and Maritime get dominated from the opening kickoff. Exchanging good Pool C teams with mediocre-to-bad Pool A teams doesn't change the national picture. But I think it affects the quality of the playoffs as a whole, in this region more than others. I think it's good if teams lower in the bracket are capable of winning/playing tough games.
To me, this is what we're missing out on. Compelling early-round games featuring good teams. That's unfortunate, IMO
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 04, 2013, 01:28:33 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 04, 2013, 01:22:51 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 04, 2013, 12:05:51 PM
The difference I keep trying to define is that in the East, the NEFC and ECFC are vilified for "stealing" an AQ bid...the East is the only region where this complaint is so persistently and whin-ily raised.
And I hate seeing good teams, 8-2/9-1 type teams that are playoff caliber and capable of, if not winning, giving teams half a game, staying home because the system has decided it's easier to have Norwich and Maritime get dominated from the opening kickoff. Exchanging good Pool C teams with mediocre-to-bad Pool A teams doesn't change the national picture. But I think it affects the quality of the playoffs as a whole, in this region more than others. I think it's good if teams lower in the bracket are capable of winning/playing tough games.
To me, this is what we're missing out on. Compelling early-round games featuring good teams. That's unfortunate, IMO
Well said. Already +K'd you earlier but would do so again for this post. Thanks for fleshing this out a little more. I still am a big fan of AQ's for every qualified conference, but I see/understand your point much better now.
Quote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2013, 01:07:40 PM
All this whining and bitching about crappy teams in the East just means that we are happier than everybody in the other regions. We had a saying in the Navy, the only happy sailor is a bitching sailor. I am revising it to the only happy posters are bitching posters. Crappy teams make the playoffs by winning their conference or division every year in all sports on all levels. KS old HS made the NJ state playoffs last year and got to the sectional finals last year with a losing regular season record. This year the NFC East my very well be won by a team with an 8-8 record or even possibly a 7-9 record. Guess what, they make the playoffs and host a wild card game.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 04, 2013, 02:08:32 PMQuote from: Knightstalker on November 04, 2013, 01:07:40 PM
All this whining and bitching about crappy teams in the East just means that we are happier than everybody in the other regions. We had a saying in the Navy, the only happy sailor is a bitching sailor. I am revising it to the only happy posters are bitching posters. Crappy teams make the playoffs by winning their conference or division every year in all sports on all levels. KS old HS made the NJ state playoffs last year and got to the sectional finals last year with a losing regular season record. This year the NFC East my very well be won by a team with an 8-8 record or even possibly a 7-9 record. Guess what, they make the playoffs and host a wild card game.
KS - the eternal voice of sanity! :D
My personal favorite is the 2010 d3 World Series. With 2 weeks left in the regular season, IWU was 14-17. They then proceeded to go 17-4 the rest of the season (barely edging into the #4 slot of the 4-team conference tourney) and won the national title!
Once the playoffs begin, ya just never know what might happen. Who'd a thunk George Mason could make the Final Four, but it sure was fun to see! ;)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 04, 2013, 01:53:53 PM
And then there's that other fear like last year, that because the conferences are so bad, a second team gets into the playoffs in a Pool C. There was no need for BOTH Framingham and Bridgewater last year. Like what if Husson scheduled Maine Maritime and Nichols this year and beat them both instead of losing their OOC's and finished 9-1 with their 1 loss to Gallaudet. The thought of anyone getting in that way is flat out terrifying. Salve and Endicott are 1 OOC victory away from causing that again this year.
Quote from: ECoastFootball on November 04, 2013, 02:14:39 PM
Every NCAA tournament there is works the same way. All those 16-15 seeds that make the NCAA men's hoop tourney would finish dead last in the ACC, but they don't just let the ACC get 12 bids. That's not how the NCAA works.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 7-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. St. Lawrence |
2 Ithaca | 7-1 | 45 | 3 | at #5 Salisbury |
3 Lebanon Valley | 7-1 | 36 | 5 | vs. Stevenson |
4 Alfred | 6-2 | 32 | 9 | vs. Utica |
5 Salisbury | 5-3 | 28 | 2 | vs. #2 Ithaca |
6 St. John Fisher | 6-2 | 27 | 4 | at Buffalo State |
7 Rowan | 6-2 | 26 | 7t | at Kean |
8t Delaware Valley | 6-2 | 8 | 10 | at Wilkes |
8t Lycoming | 5-3 | 8 | 7t | vs. FDU-Florham |
10 Widener | 5-3 | 6 | 6 | vs. King's |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 04, 2013, 01:53:53 PM[/b]
I do think AQ's are good. It's really a way to tell if a team actually is competitive on a regional/national scene that you may not find out otherwise. It just sucks that there are so many of them. I know there's nothing that can be done at this point, and it's not the teams' faults or the players faults, but it's how the NCAA made the structure. This year there will be less to bitch about I think because we probably won't have that 9-1/8-2 runner up in the E8 or NJAC or MAC on the outside looking in that could probably win 2-3 games in the playoffs. I guess your options then are expansion of the playoffs which probably won't happen, or a re-structuring of the AQ process, or we can just b!tch on message boards each year. We'll probably b!tch either way.
If Gallaudet wins a game in the playoffs against a half decent team, I think everyone on here will congratulate them. So thinking otherwise is a misconception. It's just that fear of them getting absolutely manhandled that is so aggravating each year.
And then there's that other fear like last year, that because the conferences are so bad, a second team gets into the playoffs in a Pool C. There was no need for BOTH Framingham and Bridgewater last year. Like what if Husson scheduled Maine Maritime and Nichols this year and beat them both instead of losing their OOC's and finished 9-1 with their 1 loss to Gallaudet. The thought of anyone getting in that way is flat out terrifying. Salve and Endicott are 1 OOC victory away from causing that again this year.
I cringed in a similar fashion when St. Lawrence won the LL a few years ago and finished with a 5-6 record on the year. I'm not strictly bashing the NEFC/ECFC/MASCAC. If a relatively crappy team makes the playoffs, they are all up for criticism.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:44:47 PM
Dude!!!! Becker has won 11 games in 9 years against the worst competition in the country!!!! Comparing them to Union as an opponent is like comparing a turtle with an egg roll.
And did you really want to pump up a win vs. Rochester? The LL is awful this year. I wouldn't be all that excited about that one.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!
Quote from: Rt Rev J.H. Hobart on November 04, 2013, 08:08:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:44:47 PM
Dude!!!! Becker has won 11 games in 9 years against the worst competition in the country!!!! Comparing them to Union as an opponent is like comparing a turtle with an egg roll.
And did you really want to pump up a win vs. Rochester? The LL is awful this year. I wouldn't be all that excited about that one.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!
I'd like the lizard fried rice and two turtle egg rolls to go, please.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 04, 2013, 08:55:01 PMQuote from: Rt Rev J.H. Hobart on November 04, 2013, 08:08:14 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 03, 2013, 10:44:47 PM
Dude!!!! Becker has won 11 games in 9 years against the worst competition in the country!!!! Comparing them to Union as an opponent is like comparing a turtle with an egg roll.
And did you really want to pump up a win vs. Rochester? The LL is awful this year. I wouldn't be all that excited about that one.
I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!!!!
I'd like the lizard fried rice and two turtle egg rolls to go, please.
And dennnnnnnnnn?
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 01:50:32 PM
First RR's. I have a feeling this won't be very popular in these parts.
EAST
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 06, 2013, 01:55:08 PM
What in the name of all that is holy..................
Dear lord.... Not popular?
Actually it was a fantastic laugh!
Ive lost faith in polls
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 06, 2013, 02:04:29 PM
Im not going to bash conferences as that has been done enough on other threads, but I will say.....really?
Framingham? Gallaudet?
Wow....
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 06, 2013, 02:04:29 PM
Im not going to bash conferences as that has been done enough on other threads, but I will say.....really?
Framingham? Gallaudet?
Wow....
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 01:50:32 PM
First RR's. I have a feeling this won't be very popular in these parts.
EAST
1 Hobart 7-0 7-0
2 Ithaca 7-1 7-1
3 Gallaudet 8-0 8-0
4 Rowan 6-2 6-2
5 Lebanon Valley 7-1 7-1
6 Framingham State 7-1 7-1
7 Alfred 6-2 6-2
8 St. John Fisher 6-2 6-2
9 Salve Regina 6-2 6-2
10 St. Lawrence 6-2 6-2
Quote from: Yanks 99 on November 06, 2013, 02:53:07 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 01:50:32 PM
First RR's. I have a feeling this won't be very popular in these parts.
EAST
1 Hobart 7-0 7-0
2 Ithaca 7-1 7-1
3 Gallaudet 8-0 8-0
4 Rowan 6-2 6-2
5 Lebanon Valley 7-1 7-1
6 Framingham State 7-1 7-1
7 Alfred 6-2 6-2
8 St. John Fisher 6-2 6-2
9 Salve Regina 6-2 6-2
10 St. Lawrence 6-2 6-2
This is an absolute embarrassing RR poll...and shows that whoever is on this so called committee is doing nothing more than looking at the records. Hey...where can I sign up...I can see that 8 wins is greater than 7 wins!!!
These guys should be fired. Seriously...Gallaudet #3? Framingham #6?
Additionally, I have never took stock in these polls (though I guess we have to, if this is how the NCAA ties Pool B and C bids). These are the same knuckleheads a few years back who had an undefeated Mount Union team ranked 3rd in the North Region heading into the last week of the regular season. Ironically, and I will admit that I forget who the teams were exactly, but the #1 and #2 ranked teams of the North Region were playing each other in the final week of the season. It what can only be some sort of realization about how stupid their ranking system was...MUC jumped the #1 team the following week in the final regular season poll, even though the #1 team had just beaten the region's #2 team. I am not arguing that MUC should not have been #1 to begin with...they absolutely should have...but this type of nonsense shows you how piss poor these RR's are.
Hopefully Pat Coleman can straighten these idiots out at some point...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 06, 2013, 03:00:23 PMQuote from: Yanks 99 on November 06, 2013, 02:53:07 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 01:50:32 PM
First RR's. I have a feeling this won't be very popular in these parts.
EAST
1 Hobart 7-0 7-0
2 Ithaca 7-1 7-1
3 Gallaudet 8-0 8-0
4 Rowan 6-2 6-2
5 Lebanon Valley 7-1 7-1
6 Framingham State 7-1 7-1
7 Alfred 6-2 6-2
8 St. John Fisher 6-2 6-2
9 Salve Regina 6-2 6-2
10 St. Lawrence 6-2 6-2
This is an absolute embarrassing RR poll...and shows that whoever is on this so called committee is doing nothing more than looking at the records. Hey...where can I sign up...I can see that 8 wins is greater than 7 wins!!!
These guys should be fired. Seriously...Gallaudet #3? Framingham #6?
Additionally, I have never took stock in these polls (though I guess we have to, if this is how the NCAA ties Pool B and C bids). These are the same knuckleheads a few years back who had an undefeated Mount Union team ranked 3rd in the North Region heading into the last week of the regular season. Ironically, and I will admit that I forget who the teams were exactly, but the #1 and #2 ranked teams of the North Region were playing each other in the final week of the season. It what can only be some sort of realization about how stupid their ranking system was...MUC jumped the #1 team the following week in the final regular season poll, even though the #1 team had just beaten the region's #2 team. I am not arguing that MUC should not have been #1 to begin with...they absolutely should have...but this type of nonsense shows you how piss poor these RR's are.
Hopefully Pat Coleman can straighten these idiots out at some point...
I believe something like that happened to defending champ and undefeated UWW a year or 2 ago and they had to go on the road in the playoffs....
But if we're looking solely at records, why is Rowan where they are? Why? Because they recognize their name of course!!!
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 03:17:52 PM
But I think Fisher got really screwed here, given that their two losses are much better than Rowan's two losses (three-point loss to regional #2 and one-touchdown loss to Salisbury, who may be 5-3 but is indisputably a better loss than a 20-point loss to Morrisville State) and they also have a 21-point win over South-regionally-ranked W & J to match with Rowan's win over Wesley.
Quote from: sjfcards on November 06, 2013, 04:00:23 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 03:17:52 PM
But I think Fisher got really screwed here, given that their two losses are much better than Rowan's two losses (three-point loss to regional #2 and one-touchdown loss to Salisbury, who may be 5-3 but is indisputably a better loss than a 20-point loss to Morrisville State) and they also have a 21-point win over South-regionally-ranked W & J to match with Rowan's win over Wesley.
This is the issue with using any type of ranking to select playoff teams. It just does not work. I totally agree that Fisher is a much more impressive 6-2 than Rowan, but Rowan has a name and a quality win. These are the types of debates that a group has to discuss in detail before putting someon in the playoffs. Fisher probably doesn't deserve to get in with 2 losses, but if any 2 loss team in the East had an argument to make I think they are it, but, my bias is as bad a someone not really looking at the teams involved so it is all murky...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 06, 2013, 04:03:20 PMQuote from: sjfcards on November 06, 2013, 04:00:23 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 03:17:52 PM
But I think Fisher got really screwed here, given that their two losses are much better than Rowan's two losses (three-point loss to regional #2 and one-touchdown loss to Salisbury, who may be 5-3 but is indisputably a better loss than a 20-point loss to Morrisville State) and they also have a 21-point win over South-regionally-ranked W & J to match with Rowan's win over Wesley.
This is the issue with using any type of ranking to select playoff teams. It just does not work. I totally agree that Fisher is a much more impressive 6-2 than Rowan, but Rowan has a name and a quality win. These are the types of debates that a group has to discuss in detail before putting someon in the playoffs. Fisher probably doesn't deserve to get in with 2 losses, but if any 2 loss team in the East had an argument to make I think they are it, but, my bias is as bad a someone not really looking at the teams involved so it is all murky...
Fisher's schedule with 2 losses looks a he!! of a lot more impressive than Framingham's 1 loss record.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 06, 2013, 04:03:20 PMQuote from: sjfcards on November 06, 2013, 04:00:23 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 03:17:52 PM
But I think Fisher got really screwed here, given that their two losses are much better than Rowan's two losses (three-point loss to regional #2 and one-touchdown loss to Salisbury, who may be 5-3 but is indisputably a better loss than a 20-point loss to Morrisville State) and they also have a 21-point win over South-regionally-ranked W & J to match with Rowan's win over Wesley.
This is the issue with using any type of ranking to select playoff teams. It just does not work. I totally agree that Fisher is a much more impressive 6-2 than Rowan, but Rowan has a name and a quality win. These are the types of debates that a group has to discuss in detail before putting someon in the playoffs. Fisher probably doesn't deserve to get in with 2 losses, but if any 2 loss team in the East had an argument to make I think they are it, but, my bias is as bad a someone not really looking at the teams involved so it is all murky...
Fisher's schedule with 2 losses looks a he!! of a lot more impressive than Framingham's 1 loss record.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 04:13:06 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 06, 2013, 04:03:20 PMQuote from: sjfcards on November 06, 2013, 04:00:23 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 03:17:52 PM
But I think Fisher got really screwed here, given that their two losses are much better than Rowan's two losses (three-point loss to regional #2 and one-touchdown loss to Salisbury, who may be 5-3 but is indisputably a better loss than a 20-point loss to Morrisville State) and they also have a 21-point win over South-regionally-ranked W & J to match with Rowan's win over Wesley.
This is the issue with using any type of ranking to select playoff teams. It just does not work. I totally agree that Fisher is a much more impressive 6-2 than Rowan, but Rowan has a name and a quality win. These are the types of debates that a group has to discuss in detail before putting someon in the playoffs. Fisher probably doesn't deserve to get in with 2 losses, but if any 2 loss team in the East had an argument to make I think they are it, but, my bias is as bad a someone not really looking at the teams involved so it is all murky...
Fisher's schedule with 2 losses looks a he!! of a lot more impressive than Framingham's 1 loss record.
As I said, I think Framingham's ranking is partially tied to Rowan's abnormally high ranking. I know you're on the warpath about the lack of quality wins (you'll love this, if Endicott beats Salve to finish the season, they'll probably get into the last set of RR's and Framingham will end up with a win over a RR team), but I have no problem with a team that has close loss to a highly-ranked team and is otherwise undefeated being ranked in a vacuum. Framingham two spots behind Rowan is okay...you may disagree, but IMO the problem is that Rowan's #4 ranking is actually just as much of a joke as Framingham's #6 ranking. Rowan should be way lower than they are (as I said, the juxtaposition of Rowan/Fisher is pretty striking when you consider that both have one win over a South-RR and that Fisher's two losses are much better-looking than Rowan's two losses). If Rowan was at #8 like they should be, Framingham would be #9 or 10 and that would be much more reasonable.
Lebanon Valley behind Rowan is somewhat comical too. Leb Val has a better record, a favorable common opponent (they beat Delaware Valley, who gave Rowan one of their two losses) and their only loss came against 5-3 Widener (again, far better than a loss to Morrisville State).
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 04:13:06 PM
Lebanon Valley behind Rowan is somewhat comical too. Leb Val has a better record, a favorable common opponent (they beat Delaware Valley, who gave Rowan one of their two losses) and their only loss came against 5-3 Widener (again, far better than a loss to Morrisville State).
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 06, 2013, 04:56:42 PM
Wouldn't Ithaca be a possible Pool C over Fisher if they both go 8-2? The Bombers have a bad loss to the Wick, and certainly, W&J/Otterbein is much better than Union/Moravian. But does the H2H win overtake that?
In a related story, man the Bombers have to be kicking themselves for that Hartwick loss.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 06, 2013, 05:12:05 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 04:13:06 PM
Lebanon Valley behind Rowan is somewhat comical too. Leb Val has a better record, a favorable common opponent (they beat Delaware Valley, who gave Rowan one of their two losses) and their only loss came against 5-3 Widener (again, far better than a loss to Morrisville State).
This is my #1 problem with the rankings. You can point out the two wins vs. regionally-ranked opponents for Rowan, but that stat is pretty much manufactured by the rankings themselves because of the mediocrity this year in the East and the oddity of the placement of Wesley. The DelVal results should trump this criterion, but they obviously are not. I have trouble when we ignore on-the-field data points in place of something that was created by the regional committees themselves.
I will also say that the placement of 7-0 Millsaps behind 4-2 Wesley (for D3 purposes) is an absolute abomination. I understand the Committee is going to try to act in a manner that understands Wesley's scheduling issues overall as an independent team, but Millsaps is actually being punished for being in a conference in these rankings. Why? Because any team in a conference of seven teams or greater will not have the ability to post an SOS that is as high as Wesley's because the teams inside the conference will end up making the SOS numbers stick closer to 0.500 (in either direction). Teams with more OOC games (or an independent team here) have much greater SOS volatility. Thus, the Committee should not place that level of scrutiny on SOS when Wesley is involved and has two more losses than the team directly below them. I could understand if Millsaps were 6-1 slightly better, but the team is 7-0 and is vying for a Pool B slot against Wesley. Wesley has one remaining D3 game (to go to 5-2 in D3 games) against... Alfred State. Millsaps could finish 9-0 in D3 games and still get jumped by Wesley? That makes me very uncomfortable under these circumstances.
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 06, 2013, 09:54:26 PM
Regardless of the Win, Loss records at the end of the season, one might consider the "quality" of the TEAM after the last game of the regular season. For instance Alfred's current team would not have lost to RPI IMHO. This would potentially make them 9-1 with a loss to a very good team. However, if some team was 9-0 going into their last game and lost to a poor team they would be 9-1 also. So, if AU ends up 8-2 the TEAM is much better at the end of the season but doesn't have the 9 wins and 1 loss to get a bid.
Does anyone know if this type of scenario takes place. If it doesn't maybe it should ???
Quote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 06, 2013, 05:12:05 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 06, 2013, 04:13:06 PM
Lebanon Valley behind Rowan is somewhat comical too. Leb Val has a better record, a favorable common opponent (they beat Delaware Valley, who gave Rowan one of their two losses) and their only loss came against 5-3 Widener (again, far better than a loss to Morrisville State).
This is my #1 problem with the rankings. You can point out the two wins vs. regionally-ranked opponents for Rowan, but that stat is pretty much manufactured by the rankings themselves because of the mediocrity this year in the East and the oddity of the placement of Wesley. The DelVal results should trump this criterion, but they obviously are not. I have trouble when we ignore on-the-field data points in place of something that was created by the regional committees themselves.
I will also say that the placement of 7-0 Millsaps behind 4-2 Wesley (for D3 purposes) is an absolute abomination. I understand the Committee is going to try to act in a manner that understands Wesley's scheduling issues overall as an independent team, but Millsaps is actually being punished for being in a conference in these rankings. Why? Because any team in a conference of seven teams or greater will not have the ability to post an SOS that is as high as Wesley's because the teams inside the conference will end up making the SOS numbers stick closer to 0.500 (in either direction). Teams with more OOC games (or an independent team here) have much greater SOS volatility. Thus, the Committee should not place that level of scrutiny on SOS when Wesley is involved and has two more losses than the team directly below them. I could understand if Millsaps were 6-1 slightly better, but the team is 7-0 and is vying for a Pool B slot against Wesley. Wesley has one remaining D3 game (to go to 5-2 in D3 games) against... Alfred State. Millsaps could finish 9-0 in D3 games and still get jumped by Wesley? That makes me very uncomfortable under these circumstances.
Quote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 05:21:38 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
According to what? Who would get to decide how well a team has to be playing for the result to change?
Quote from: dlip on November 07, 2013, 04:59:16 PM
If home how many screens will you have going at one time?
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 05:33:53 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 05:21:38 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
According to what? Who would get to decide how well a team has to be playing for the result to change?
Good points. Not having thought through that far, I suppose there would have to be something significant to draw attention. The AU defeat of Sals could be an example. Then considering AU to be a 9-1 team the regular process would be used.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on November 07, 2013, 06:55:22 PMQuote from: dlip on November 07, 2013, 04:59:16 PM
If home how many screens will you have going at one time?
Depending on what video the school uses/offer, I can put upto six games on at once.
Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2013, 08:21:59 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 05:33:53 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 05:21:38 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
According to what? Who would get to decide how well a team has to be playing for the result to change?
Good points. Not having thought through that far, I suppose there would have to be something significant to draw attention. The AU defeat of Sals could be an example. Then considering AU to be a 9-1 team the regular process would be used.
You are what your record is...
The what if game isn't a legitimate stance to take when discussing playoff possibilities...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 09:33:02 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 07, 2013, 08:21:59 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 05:33:53 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 05:21:38 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
According to what? Who would get to decide how well a team has to be playing for the result to change?
Good points. Not having thought through that far, I suppose there would have to be something significant to draw attention. The AU defeat of Sals could be an example. Then considering AU to be a 9-1 team the regular process would be used.
You are what your record is...
The what if game isn't a legitimate stance to take when discussing playoff possibilities...
I agree. Almost everyone has a game they wish they could play over. You think the Bombers don't want the Wick right now, with Dempsey settled in, and the Wick in a tailspin?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 08, 2013, 12:14:15 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 09:33:02 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 07, 2013, 08:21:59 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 05:33:53 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 05:21:38 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
According to what? Who would get to decide how well a team has to be playing for the result to change?
Good points. Not having thought through that far, I suppose there would have to be something significant to draw attention. The AU defeat of Sals could be an example. Then considering AU to be a 9-1 team the regular process would be used.
You are what your record is...
The what if game isn't a legitimate stance to take when discussing playoff possibilities...
I agree. Almost everyone has a game they wish they could play over. You think the Bombers don't want the Wick right now, with Dempsey settled in, and the Wick in a tailspin?
Yeah, the thing that hurts Alfred's potential Pool C chances (as with most teams) is that game they wish they could have back. Now, I'd rank the Pool C chances of the 3 potential 8-2 E8 teams as Fisher, Ithaca, Alfred. Fisher would be 2-1 vs RRO, Ithaca likely 2-1 as well (gonna guess Salisbury moves into 10th with the win), while Salisbury wouldn't enter in to the RR is Alfred finishes as an 8-2 Pool C, so they'd be 1-1.
Plus, as Upstate pointed out, Alfred can't win the Courage Bowl...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 08, 2013, 12:34:44 PM
Let's all hope Bridgewater beats Framingham this weekend too so we can put that to bed....
Quote from: ECoastFootball on November 08, 2013, 12:54:10 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 08, 2013, 12:34:44 PM
Let's all hope Bridgewater beats Framingham this weekend too so we can put that to bed....
After 3 weeks of being out with injury, Framingham's QB came back and played last week. Threw for 300+ yards and really only played the first half. Healthy Framingham vs an overrated BWater team, I think Framingham may blow them out bad.
Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2013, 08:21:59 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 05:33:53 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 07, 2013, 05:21:38 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 07, 2013, 04:46:50 PMQuote from: Upstate on November 06, 2013, 11:33:06 PM
One, there's a shortage of Pool C bids as opposed to previous years. Two, there's just way too many quality one loss teams out there right not to consider a two loss team getting in. Three, just going to toss out a friendly notification that you're not winning the Courage Bowl!
I understand that what you are saying is the way it is done.
I was just thinking that the best teams at the END of the regular season should get in the playoffs. In my scenario for example, the AU team at the end of the season would not be a 8-2 "quality" team. They could be "considered" a 9-1 team as they would have beaten RPI.
Currently, "we've always done it this way." I just wanted to post an alternative thought.
According to what? Who would get to decide how well a team has to be playing for the result to change?
Good points. Not having thought through that far, I suppose there would have to be something significant to draw attention. The AU defeat of Sals could be an example. Then considering AU to be a 9-1 team the regular process would be used.
You are what your record is...
The what if game isn't a legitimate stance to take when discussing playoff possibilities...
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 08, 2013, 09:17:01 PM
Let us consider two teams X and Y. They have played the same opponents and X is 9-0 and Y is 7-2. They play each other in the last game of the regular season. Y beats X big time, 28-0. So X is 9-1 and Y is 8-2. So X with the better record gets the only bid available because they have a better record, but is the BEST team getting the bid? I guess that sums up what I was wondering.
As Gallagher(sp?) the missing comedian used to say " I gots my questions. ???
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 8-0 | 50 | 1 | at Rochester |
2 Ithaca | 8-1 | 45 | 2 | vs. Cortland State |
3 Lebanon Valley | 8-1 | 39 | 3 | at Albright |
4 Alfred | 7-2 | 34 | 4 | at # 5 St. John Fisher |
5 St. John Fisher | 7-2 | 31 | 6 | vs. #4 Alfred |
6 Rowan | 7-2 | 24 | 7 | vs. New Jersey |
7 Salisbury | 5-4 | 14 | 5 | vs. Frostburg State |
8 Widener | 6-3 | 13 | 10 | at #9t Delaware Valley |
9t Delaware Valley | 6-3 | 8 | 8t | vs. #8 Widener |
9t Lycoming | 6-3 | 8 | 8t | at Stevenson |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 11, 2013, 03:00:04 PM
Week 10 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 8-0 50 1 at Rochester 2 Ithaca 8-1 45 2 vs. Cortland State 3 Lebanon Valley 8-1 39 3 at Albright 4 Alfred 7-2 34 4 at # 5 St. John Fisher 5 St. John Fisher 7-2 31 6 vs. #4 Alfred 6 Rowan 7-2 24 7 vs. New Jersey 7 Salisbury 5-4 14 5 vs. Frostburg State 8 Widener 6-3 13 10 at #9t Delaware Valley 9t Delaware Valley 6-3 8 8t vs. #8 Widener 9t Lycoming 6-3 8 8t at Stevenson
Dropped Out:
Also Receiving votes:
Brockport State 6
St. Lawrence 2
Albright 1
Framingham 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
Ithaca (2,2,2,2,2)
Lebanon Valley (4,3,3,3,3)
Alfred (5,4,4,4,4)
St. John Fisher (3,5,6,5,5)
Rowan (7,7,5,6,6)
Salisbury (6,6,10,8,NR)
Widener (NR,9,8,7,7)
Delaware Valley (9,NR,7,NR,9)
Lycoming (8,NR,9,NR,8)
Brockport State (NR,8,NR,9,10)
St. Lawrence (NR,10,NR,10,NR)
Albright (10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#4 Alfred at #5 St. John Fisher
#9t Delaware Valley at #8 Widener
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 13, 2013, 12:14:54 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 11, 2013, 03:00:04 PM
Week 10 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 8-0 50 1 at Rochester 2 Ithaca 8-1 45 2 vs. Cortland State 3 Lebanon Valley 8-1 39 3 at Albright 4 Alfred 7-2 34 4 at # 5 St. John Fisher 5 St. John Fisher 7-2 31 6 vs. #4 Alfred 6 Rowan 7-2 24 7 vs. New Jersey 7 Salisbury 5-4 14 5 vs. Frostburg State 8 Widener 6-3 13 10 at #9t Delaware Valley 9t Delaware Valley 6-3 8 8t vs. #8 Widener 9t Lycoming 6-3 8 8t at Stevenson
Dropped Out:
Also Receiving votes:
Brockport State 6
St. Lawrence 2
Albright 1
Framingham 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
Ithaca (2,2,2,2,2)
Lebanon Valley (4,3,3,3,3)
Alfred (5,4,4,4,4)
St. John Fisher (3,5,6,5,5)
Rowan (7,7,5,6,6)
Salisbury (6,6,10,8,NR)
Widener (NR,9,8,7,7)
Delaware Valley (9,NR,7,NR,9)
Lycoming (8,NR,9,NR,8)
Brockport State (NR,8,NR,9,10)
St. Lawrence (NR,10,NR,10,NR)
Albright (10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#4 Alfred at #5 St. John Fisher
#9t Delaware Valley at #8 Widener
Pep finds it interesting that the East Region Fans have Alfred (7-2) ahead of both Fisher (7-2) (barely) and Rowan (7-2) while Framingham (8-1) had just one 10th place vote and Gallaudet (9-0) isn't even mentioned.
Whereas, in the D3Football.com Top 25 poll, while pollsters have the top three Eastern teams listed the same as here #7 Hobart (8-0), #20 Ithaca (8-1) and #22 Lebanon Valley (8-1); after that, the only other Eastern teams garnering votes are Framingham (17 points), Fisher (8 points), Rowan (6 points), Middlebury (1 point) and Gallaudet (9-0) (1 point).
What's it all about, Alfie? Pep is thinking there aren't likely any pollsters from out here near Klipnocky on the D3football.com team of 25 coaches, SIDs and media members. Heck, it's a rare occurrence to see an Alfred score in the Rochester paper. You can bet there's a pollster from a New England metropolis "ramming" Framingham into the points total. But no worries. Pep always says a team is only as good as its next game...and that certainly showed in that Franklin loss to Bluffton. What was that about?
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 13, 2013, 02:43:04 PM
LOL at the way the RR's get adjusted from week 1 to week 2. This week's iteration:
EAST
1 Hobart 8-0 8-0
2 Ithaca 8-1 8-1
3 Lebanon Valley 8-1 8-1
4 Rowan 7-2 7-2
5 Gallaudet 8-0 9-0
6 Framingham State 8-1 8-1
7 Alfred 7-2 7-2
7 St. John Fisher 7-2 7-2
9 Salve Regina 7-1 7-2
10 Brockport 6-3 6-3
Highlights:
1) Lebanon Valley gets moved ahead of Rowan...where they should have been all along, like I said last week.
2) Rowan is still too high. Alfred and SJF probably both deserve to be ahead of Rowan.
3) Gallaudet inexplicably drops two spots. Now, don't mistake my statement here as arguing that Gallaudet DESERVED that initial #3 ranking (or even the #5 ranking that they have now), but more of a "Wait, why rank them third last week and then fifth this week?" question. It's just funny to me that they were #3 last week and then dropped two spots this week without LVC or Rowan notching a season-changing kind of win that screams "MOVE US UP IN THE RANKINGS!" in the past week. If your argument is that Gallaudet's win this week was not impressive enough, that was even MORE true last week (when they needed the blocked FG to beat Becker) than this week. This is just kind of amusing to me.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
We all agreed that last weeks ranking were ridiculous, but to inexplicably drop a team 2 places for no apparent region just shows more of how clueless the people are who are putting these ranks together in the first place.
Quote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:18:03 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
We all agreed that last weeks ranking were ridiculous, but to inexplicably drop a team 2 places for no apparent region just shows more of how clueless the people are who are putting these ranks together in the first place.
Would you rather they not have corrected it and just kept on being mullishly wrong? Seems like you've made a darned if you do/darned if you don't objection here. Had they kept putting the Bison that high, you would have complained about it. But since they moved them down, more in line with your thinking, you killed them for doing that as well. Geez, at least they are trying...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:20:36 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:18:03 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
We all agreed that last weeks ranking were ridiculous, but to inexplicably drop a team 2 places for no apparent region just shows more of how clueless the people are who are putting these ranks together in the first place.
Would you rather they not have corrected it and just kept on being mullishly wrong? Seems like you've made a darned if you do/darned if you don't objection here. Had they kept putting the Bison that high, you would have complained about it. But since they moved them down, more in line with your thinking, you killed them for doing that as well. Geez, at least they are trying...
Let's get something straight, Gallaudet at 5 is NOT in line with my thinking.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 13, 2013, 02:43:04 PM
LOL at the way the RR's get adjusted from week 1 to week 2. This week's iteration:
EAST
1 Hobart 8-0 8-0
2 Ithaca 8-1 8-1
3 Lebanon Valley 8-1 8-1
4 Rowan 7-2 7-2
5 Gallaudet 8-0 9-0
6 Framingham State 8-1 8-1
7 Alfred 7-2 7-2
7 St. John Fisher 7-2 7-2
9 Salve Regina 7-1 7-2
10 Brockport 6-3 6-3
2) Rowan is still too high. Alfred and SJF probably both deserve to be ahead of Rowan.
Quote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:24:00 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:20:36 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:18:03 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
We all agreed that last weeks ranking were ridiculous, but to inexplicably drop a team 2 places for no apparent region just shows more of how clueless the people are who are putting these ranks together in the first place.
Would you rather they not have corrected it and just kept on being mullishly wrong? Seems like you've made a darned if you do/darned if you don't objection here. Had they kept putting the Bison that high, you would have complained about it. But since they moved them down, more in line with your thinking, you killed them for doing that as well. Geez, at least they are trying...
Let's get something straight, Gallaudet at 5 is NOT in line with my thinking.
I did say "more in line". The rankings only go to 10... But you have to admit, moving from 3 to 5 is "more in line" with having them unranked than they were last week.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 13, 2013, 02:43:04 PM
LOL at the way the RR's get adjusted from week 1 to week 2. This week's iteration:
EAST
1 Hobart 8-0 8-0
2 Ithaca 8-1 8-1
3 Lebanon Valley 8-1 8-1
4 Rowan 7-2 7-2
5 Gallaudet 8-0 9-0
6 Framingham State 8-1 8-1
7 Alfred 7-2 7-2
7 St. John Fisher 7-2 7-2
9 Salve Regina 7-1 7-2
10 Brockport 6-3 6-3
Highlights:
1) Lebanon Valley gets moved ahead of Rowan...where they should have been all along, like I said last week.
2) Rowan is still too high. Alfred and SJF probably both deserve to be ahead of Rowan.
3) Gallaudet inexplicably drops two spots. Now, don't mistake my statement here as arguing that Gallaudet DESERVED that initial #3 ranking (or even the #5 ranking that they have now), but more of a "Wait, why rank them third last week and then fifth this week?" question. It's just funny to me that they were #3 last week and then dropped two spots this week without LVC or Rowan notching a season-changing kind of win that screams "MOVE US UP IN THE RANKINGS!" in the past week. If your argument is that Gallaudet's win this week was not impressive enough, that was even MORE true last week (when they needed the blocked FG to beat Becker) than this week. This is just kind of amusing to me.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:27:30 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:24:00 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:20:36 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:18:03 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
We all agreed that last weeks ranking were ridiculous, but to inexplicably drop a team 2 places for no apparent region just shows more of how clueless the people are who are putting these ranks together in the first place.
Would you rather they not have corrected it and just kept on being mullishly wrong? Seems like you've made a darned if you do/darned if you don't objection here. Had they kept putting the Bison that high, you would have complained about it. But since they moved them down, more in line with your thinking, you killed them for doing that as well. Geez, at least they are trying...
Let's get something straight, Gallaudet at 5 is NOT in line with my thinking.
I did say "more in line". The rankings only go to 10... But you have to admit, moving from 3 to 5 is "more in line" with having them unranked than they were last week.
Gallaudet has to get into the playoffs, therefore, I suppose they HAVE to be on this list. They probably should be in the 8-10 range though. My complaint is that this ranking came out last week guns blazing, and for no reason they dropped 2 spots. Does this trend lend to the assumption that they'll be at 7-8 next week with another victory? If the committee wants to make a statement putting them at 3 a week ago, stick to your guns, if not, why did they do it in the first place? If Gallaudet hosts a playoff game, I think I may throw in the towel.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 13, 2013, 03:24:43 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 13, 2013, 02:43:04 PM
LOL at the way the RR's get adjusted from week 1 to week 2. This week's iteration:
EAST
1 Hobart 8-0 8-0
2 Ithaca 8-1 8-1
3 Lebanon Valley 8-1 8-1
4 Rowan 7-2 7-2
5 Gallaudet 8-0 9-0
6 Framingham State 8-1 8-1
7 Alfred 7-2 7-2
7 St. John Fisher 7-2 7-2
9 Salve Regina 7-1 7-2
10 Brockport 6-3 6-3
2) Rowan is still too high. Alfred and SJF probably both deserve to be ahead of Rowan.
I don't get this Alfred thing. Rowan has a 3-0 record against regionally-ranked opponents (Brockport, Wesley, and Framingham). Alfred is 1-1 (Win over Brockport, loss to Ithaca). So not only is Rowan better there, Alfred's best win is shared by Rowan. As usual, the Saxons played a weak OOC slate, and they couldn't run it. They've had six home games to three road games to this point. They lost to the best team they've played in their conference (Ithaca), and haven't played the next best yet.
I'm not impressed by a team going 7-2 against a home-heavy schedule filled with mostly lightweights, especially considering their toughest game was a double-digit loss. What, if anything, does Alfred have over Rowan? A more impressive win over 3-6 Montclair?
Quote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:33:39 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:27:30 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:24:00 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:20:36 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:18:03 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 03:02:43 PM
We all agreed that last weeks ranking were ridiculous, but to inexplicably drop a team 2 places for no apparent region just shows more of how clueless the people are who are putting these ranks together in the first place.
Would you rather they not have corrected it and just kept on being mullishly wrong? Seems like you've made a darned if you do/darned if you don't objection here. Had they kept putting the Bison that high, you would have complained about it. But since they moved them down, more in line with your thinking, you killed them for doing that as well. Geez, at least they are trying...
Let's get something straight, Gallaudet at 5 is NOT in line with my thinking.
I did say "more in line". The rankings only go to 10... But you have to admit, moving from 3 to 5 is "more in line" with having them unranked than they were last week.
Gallaudet has to get into the playoffs, therefore, I suppose they HAVE to be on this list. They probably should be in the 8-10 range though. My complaint is that this ranking came out last week guns blazing, and for no reason they dropped 2 spots. Does this trend lend to the assumption that they'll be at 7-8 next week with another victory? If the committee wants to make a statement putting them at 3 a week ago, stick to your guns, if not, why did they do it in the first place? If Gallaudet hosts a playoff game, I think I may throw in the towel.
If they drop to 7-8 next week would you complain again? I mean, at that point they are where they are supposed to be according to you. Isn't getting it "right" the important thing? The process, at least as far as most posters weight the strengths of the teams is working by moving them down, so it seems like the committee is doing what it should, even if you don't like how they started. I agree that they shouldn't have been 3, and I can't really believe they are the 5th best team in the East, but when you consider win % is a primary criteria, being undefeated is important to the committee.
All that being said, I'm just amazed at the complaints about something that is being corrected.
Quote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:57:20 PM
You have to start somewhere. Respecting an undefeated team isn't a bad place to start. Then as more pieces of the puzzle are brought to the table you might re-evaluate whether win percentage, as a primary criteria, is the most applicable. It seems like those on the call last week thought that win percentage was the most important but as they reflected this week, it changed a bit. That's not unusual in process based committees, as often members don't really do much homework before the first meeting. Once the pulse of the group is taken and the dynamics of the membership are better understood, then other arguments are better presented and understood.
You have to remember this is a committee of people, all who have other, more important, real jobs. This is just one relatively small component of those jobs. While it is darned important to those of us on this board, it is a lot less important in the grand scheme of even the committee members' daily jobs and other responsibilities. So getting to the "best answer" over time is important, not just where they started.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on November 13, 2013, 04:38:52 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 13, 2013, 03:57:20 PM
You have to start somewhere. Respecting an undefeated team isn't a bad place to start. Then as more pieces of the puzzle are brought to the table you might re-evaluate whether win percentage, as a primary criteria, is the most applicable. It seems like those on the call last week thought that win percentage was the most important but as they reflected this week, it changed a bit. That's not unusual in process based committees, as often members don't really do much homework before the first meeting. Once the pulse of the group is taken and the dynamics of the membership are better understood, then other arguments are better presented and understood.
You have to remember this is a committee of people, all who have other, more important, real jobs. This is just one relatively small component of those jobs. While it is darned important to those of us on this board, it is a lot less important in the grand scheme of even the committee members' daily jobs and other responsibilities. So getting to the "best answer" over time is important, not just where they started.
According to Keith's article earlier, one of the committee members is the coach of SUNY-Maritime, another ECFC team who we all remember didn't fare too well a few years back in postseason action. I'm guessing he may have withheld some important info, or it was just overlooked?
http://www.d3football.com/columns/around-the-nation/2013/regional-rankings-primer
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2013, 06:16:04 PM
Actually, the committee that determines the regional rankings is made up of the following folks:
EAST REGION
John Marzka, co-chair Albright Middle Atlantic
Clayton Kendrick-Holmes, co-chair SUNY Maritime ECFC
Mark Murnyack Norwich ECFC
John Audino Union (New York) Liberty league
Tom Kelley Framingham State Pool B (MASCAC)
Dan Garrett Kean NJAC
TBD Empire 8
Mark Ross Misericordia Middle Atlantic
Chad Martinovich MIT New England Football
So, in fact, there are two ECFC reps there.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2013, 06:40:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2013, 06:16:04 PM
Actually, the committee that determines the regional rankings is made up of the following folks:
EAST REGION
John Marzka, co-chair Albright Middle Atlantic
Clayton Kendrick-Holmes, co-chair SUNY Maritime ECFC
Mark Murnyack Norwich ECFC
John Audino Union (New York) Liberty league
Tom Kelley Framingham State Pool B (MASCAC)
Dan Garrett Kean NJAC
TBD Empire 8
Mark Ross Misericordia Middle Atlantic
Chad Martinovich MIT New England Football
So, in fact, there are two ECFC reps there.
Frank, is the E8 rep still TBD?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 14, 2013, 09:00:28 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 13, 2013, 06:40:19 PMQuote from: Frank Rossi on November 13, 2013, 06:16:04 PM
Actually, the committee that determines the regional rankings is made up of the following folks:
EAST REGION
John Marzka, co-chair Albright Middle Atlantic
Clayton Kendrick-Holmes, co-chair SUNY Maritime ECFC
Mark Murnyack Norwich ECFC
John Audino Union (New York) Liberty league
Tom Kelley Framingham State Pool B (MASCAC)
Dan Garrett Kean NJAC
TBD Empire 8
Mark Ross Misericordia Middle Atlantic
Chad Martinovich MIT New England Football
So, in fact, there are two ECFC reps there.
Frank, is the E8 rep still TBD?
The committee was just ashamed to say that the E8 rep is Pep.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 9-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. Gallaudet |
2 St. John Fisher | 8-2 | 44 | 5 | at #2 (North) John Carroll |
3 Ithaca | 8-2 | 38 | 2 | vs. Framingham State |
4 Rowan | 8-2 | 35 | 6 | vs. Endicott |
5 Lebanon Valley | 8-2 | 27 | 3 | at #4 (North) Wittenberg |
6 Salisbury | 6-4 | 19 | 7 | at Muhlenberg |
7 Alfred | 7-3 | 18 | 4 | vs. Cortland State |
8 Delaware Valley | 7-3 | 14 | 9t | vs. Franklin & Marshall |
9 Lycoming | 7-3 | 12 | 9t | End of Season |
10 Brockport State | 7-3 | 8 | NR | vs. Waynesburg |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 21, 2013, 10:27:55 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Ithaca (4, 3,4,4,2)
Salisbury (NR,6,3,9,7)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 21, 2013, 10:41:09 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 21, 2013, 10:27:55 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Ithaca (4, 3,4,4,2)
Salisbury (NR,6,3,9,7)
Ithaca behind Salisbury? What Salisbury alum made that vote? Ithaca won the E8 and beat Salisbury on the road while missing their best defensive player. The Gulls have two wins Ithaca doesn't: Over the Wick and a 2-8 NC Wesleyan, neither of which is as impressive as Ithaca's win over Alfred.
Quote from: dlip on November 21, 2013, 11:43:50 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 21, 2013, 10:41:09 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 21, 2013, 10:27:55 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Ithaca (4, 3,4,4,2)
Salisbury (NR,6,3,9,7)
Ithaca behind Salisbury? What Salisbury alum made that vote? Ithaca won the E8 and beat Salisbury on the road while missing their best defensive player. The Gulls have two wins Ithaca doesn't: Over the Wick and a 2-8 NC Wesleyan, neither of which is as impressive as Ithaca's win over Alfred.
Went with a feeling here. dlip origionally had them flipped for the aforementioned reasons. dlip is always a huge Bomber fan however he felt (could be wrong here and probably is) that IC deserved IDHO to be punished for the loss to Cortland. Rivalry game dlip knows and that is his point. Union losing to RPI in 2006 deflated the Dutchmen and proved to end their season even though they actually played one more game (and didn't show up to play SJF). dlip thinks this is a similar caase here and felt if IC deserved to be in the top 3 they needed to beat Cortland. dlip has NO issue with the questioning of this move. Very rarely does dlip go on a gut feeling. Here he did.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 21, 2013, 11:54:55 AM
Yeah, although Frank and I disagreed (shocker ;D ) he picked Fram State to beat IC this weekend in Rd 1. After all the distractions post-Cortaca, I am coming around to seeing that as a possibility. The Rams acquitted themselves in Rd 1 last season. They know what they need to do Saterday.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 21, 2013, 11:54:55 AM
Yeah, although Frank and I disagreed (shocker ;D ) he picked Fram State to beat IC this weekend in Rd 1. After all the distractions post-Cortaca, I am coming around to seeing that as a possibility. The Rams acquitted themselves in Rd 1 last season. They know what they need to do Saterday.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 21, 2013, 12:32:47 PMQuote from: ITH radio on November 21, 2013, 11:54:55 AM
Yeah, although Frank and I disagreed (shocker ;D ) he picked Fram State to beat IC this weekend in Rd 1. After all the distractions post-Cortaca, I am coming around to seeing that as a possibility. The Rams acquitted themselves in Rd 1 last season. They know what they need to do Saterday.
I think if anything the Cortland loss helps them for this game. Often times a loss makes you focus more on the next game.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 21, 2013, 01:36:56 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on November 21, 2013, 12:32:47 PMQuote from: ITH radio on November 21, 2013, 11:54:55 AM
Yeah, although Frank and I disagreed (shocker ;D ) he picked Fram State to beat IC this weekend in Rd 1. After all the distractions post-Cortaca, I am coming around to seeing that as a possibility. The Rams acquitted themselves in Rd 1 last season. They know what they need to do Saterday.
I think if anything the Cortland loss helps them for this game. Often times a loss makes you focus more on the next game.
One of IC's players said something similar to me the other day. Now, instead of going into the game with six straight wins and thinking you can't lose (especially dangerous for this IC team considering the closeness of many of the games), you come in a bit humbled.
I don't think the whole Cortaca thing will be a distraction though. For one, apparently, IC announced it's not considering a ban:
http://theithacan.org/35331
Two, almost all the drama was attached to Cortland, not Ithaca
Quote from: dlip on November 21, 2013, 11:43:50 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 21, 2013, 10:41:09 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 21, 2013, 10:27:55 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Ithaca (4, 3,4,4,2)
Salisbury (NR,6,3,9,7)
Ithaca behind Salisbury? What Salisbury alum made that vote? Ithaca won the E8 and beat Salisbury on the road while missing their best defensive player. The Gulls have two wins Ithaca doesn't: Over the Wick and a 2-8 NC Wesleyan, neither of which is as impressive as Ithaca's win over Alfred.
Went with a feeling here. dlip origionally had them flipped for the aforementioned reasons. dlip is always a huge Bomber fan however he felt (could be wrong here and probably is) that IC deserved IDHO to be punished for the loss to Cortland. Rivalry game dlip knows and that is his point. Union losing to RPI in 2006 deflated the Dutchmen and proved to end their season even though they actually played one more game (and didn't show up to play SJF). dlip thinks this is a similar caase here and felt if IC deserved to be in the top 3 they needed to beat Cortland. dlip has NO issue with the questioning of this move. Very rarely does dlip go on a gut feeling. Here he did.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 21, 2013, 12:11:42 PMQuote from: dlip on November 21, 2013, 11:43:50 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 21, 2013, 10:41:09 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 21, 2013, 10:27:55 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Ithaca (4, 3,4,4,2)
Salisbury (NR,6,3,9,7)
Ithaca behind Salisbury? What Salisbury alum made that vote? Ithaca won the E8 and beat Salisbury on the road while missing their best defensive player. The Gulls have two wins Ithaca doesn't: Over the Wick and a 2-8 NC Wesleyan, neither of which is as impressive as Ithaca's win over Alfred.
Went with a feeling here. dlip origionally had them flipped for the aforementioned reasons. dlip is always a huge Bomber fan however he felt (could be wrong here and probably is) that IC deserved IDHO to be punished for the loss to Cortland. Rivalry game dlip knows and that is his point. Union losing to RPI in 2006 deflated the Dutchmen and proved to end their season even though they actually played one more game (and didn't show up to play SJF). dlip thinks this is a similar caase here and felt if IC deserved to be in the top 3 they needed to beat Cortland. dlip has NO issue with the questioning of this move. Very rarely does dlip go on a gut feeling. Here he did.
I guess my issue was more with a 4-loss Salisbury team being ranked third as opposed to dinging Ithaca for a bad loss
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 27, 2014, 04:03:49 PM
I'm back! This summer has been a bit too busy, so I'm only getting around to much of what I normally do during the summer (including Post Patterns).
Anyway, I'm game for running this again and will reach out to the pollsters from the past few years to gauge interest. Post here if you're interested in taking over any spots that become available and let's aim for having the first set of regional rankings ready by September 5th.
Quote from: dlip on September 03, 2014, 11:50:00 AM
Yes, the pre-season poll should be out by Friday. dlip is doing his tonight.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 St. John Fisher( 3 ) | 0-0 | 39 | NR | vs. Otterbein |
2 Hobart( 1 ) | 0-0 | 34 | NR | vs. Dickinson |
3 Rowan | 0-0 | 28 | NR | vs. #9 Widener |
4 Salisbury | 0-0 | 25 | NR | at Christopher Newport |
5 Lycoming | 0-0 | 23 | NR | vs. Susquehanna |
6 Ithaca | 0-0 | 20 | NR | vs. Union |
7 Cortland State | 0-0 | 13 | NR | at Buffalo State |
8 Brockport State | 0-0 | 10 | NR | vs. Oberlin |
9 Widener | 0-0 | 9 | NR | at #3 Rowan |
10 Albright | 0-0 | 7 | NR | at Kean |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2014, 11:30:52 AM
Preseason Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 St. John Fisher( 3 ) 0-0 39 NR vs. Otterbein 2 Hobart( 1 ) 0-0 34 NR vs. Dickinson 3 Rowan 0-0 28 NR vs. #9 Widener 4 Salisbury 0-0 25 NR at Christopher Newport 5 Lycoming 0-0 23 NR vs. Susquehanna 6 Ithaca 0-0 20 NR vs. Union 7 Cortland State 0-0 13 NR at Buffalo State 8 Brockport State 0-0 10 NR vs. Oberlin 9 Widener 0-0 9 NR at #3 Rowan 10 Albright 0-0 7 NR at Kean
Also Receiving votes:
Alfred 6
Delaware Valley 4
RPI 2
Voting Distribution:
St. John Fisher (1,1,2,1)
Hobart (2,4,1,3)
Rowan (8,2,3,2)
Salisbury (3,6,4,6)
Lycoming (7,3,6,5)
Ithaca (8,7,5,4)
Cortland State (NA,5,7,8)
Brockport State (5,8,NR,10)
Widener (6,9,NR,9)
Albright (4,NR,NR,NR)
Alfred (NR,10,10,7)
Delaware Valley (10,NR,8,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,9,NR)
Key Matchups:
#9 Widener at #3 Rowan
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 St. John Fisher( 4 ) | 1-0 | 40 | 1 | Open |
2 Hobart | 1-0 | 35 | 2 | at Endicott |
3 Widener | 1-0 | 26 | 9 | at Lebanon Valley |
4 Salisbury | 1-0 | 25 | 4 | vs. #2 (South) Wesley |
5t Ithaca | 1-0 | 22 | 6 | Open |
5t Lycoming | 1-0 | 22 | 5 | at #8 Albright |
7 Brockport State | 1-0 | 13 | 8 | at Cortland State |
8 Albright | 1-0 | 10 | 10 | vs. #5t Lycoming |
9 Delaware Valley | 1-0 | 8 | NR | Open |
10 Rowan | 0-1 | 5 | 3 | at Framingham State |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 08, 2014, 03:33:16 PM
I venture to take a stab that voter 1 reps the MAC? :-)
Quote from: Saxon73 on September 11, 2014, 06:46:48 AM
Kaz, Ithaca v Hartwick this week.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 11, 2014, 08:35:47 AMQuote from: Saxon73 on September 11, 2014, 06:46:48 AM
Kaz, Ithaca v Hartwick this week.
Bombers have this Saterday off....Hartwick hosts Moo'ville (Pep's alma mater). Go Mustangs!
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 St. John Fisher( 5 ) | 1-0 | 50 | 1 | at #6 Brockport State |
2 Hobart | 2-0 | 42 | 2 | at Curry |
3 Lycoming | 2-0 | 39 | 5t | vs. King's |
4 Widener | 2-0 | 37 | 3 | vs. Albright |
5 Ithaca | 1-0 | 29 | 5t | vs. Hartwick |
6 Brockport State | 2-0 | 21 | 7 | vs. #1 St. John Fisher |
7 Salisbury | 1-1 | 16 | 4 | Open |
8t Delaware Valley | 1-0 | 12 | 9 | vs. Wilkes |
8t Rowan | 1-1 | 12 | 10 | at #2 (South) Wesley |
10 Alfred | 2-0 | 8 | NR | at Buffalo State |
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 15, 2014, 03:22:06 PM
To see Salisbury getting some 6th place votes after that no-show at home surprises me. Wesley's great, but Wesley's always great, and Salisbury gives them fits. This year, the Gulls just got hammered. Four first downs on offense?
I kind of feel like Salisbury's spent two years sliding back to the pack, and this year, with some of the departures, (especially in the secondary) I think they're going to struggle.
Quote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 03:42:07 PM
I would still give them a fighting shot at anyone in the top-ten. If you think about it, they were still a really good if unlucky team last year, beat SJF, lost to Wesley on a Hail Mary, lost Ithaca by a point.
That was one of the best games I've seen Wesley play overall in the past couple of seasons. They get a week off to get healthy too. (Salisbury that is.)
Quote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 03:42:07 PM
I would still give them a fighting shot at anyone in the top-ten. If you think about it, they were still a really good if unlucky team last year, beat SJF, lost to Wesley on a Hail Mary, lost Ithaca by a point.
That was one of the best games I've seen Wesley play overall in the past couple of seasons. They get a week off to get healthy too. (Salisbury that is.)
Quote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 03:42:07 PM
I would still give them a fighting shot at anyone in the top-ten If you think about it, they were still a really good if unlucky team last year, beat SJF, lost to Wesley on a Hail Mary, lost Ithaca by a point.
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 15, 2014, 04:11:56 PMQuote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 03:42:07 PM
I would still give them a fighting shot at anyone in the top-ten. If you think about it, they were still a really good if unlucky team last year, beat SJF, lost to Wesley on a Hail Mary, lost Ithaca by a point.
That was one of the best games I've seen Wesley play overall in the past couple of seasons. They get a week off to get healthy too. (Salisbury that is.)
...the Gulls lost to Alfred last year by 10 at Merrill Field where they had annihilated and humiliated the Saxons 69-0 two years earlier. Just sayin'.
Quote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 05:46:02 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 15, 2014, 04:11:56 PMQuote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 03:42:07 PM
I would still give them a fighting shot at anyone in the top-ten. If you think about it, they were still a really good if unlucky team last year, beat SJF, lost to Wesley on a Hail Mary, lost Ithaca by a point.
That was one of the best games I've seen Wesley play overall in the past couple of seasons. They get a week off to get healthy too. (Salisbury that is.)
...the Gulls lost to Alfred last year by 10 at Merrill Field where they had annihilated and humiliated the Saxons 69-0 two years earlier. Just sayin'.
Hi Pep. Was aware of that and sure you were going to chime in to remind me. Watched that feed, the Saxons were great that day. Meant top ten in east poll of course ....
Quote from: AUPepBand on September 15, 2014, 09:40:37 PMQuote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 05:46:02 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 15, 2014, 04:11:56 PMQuote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 03:42:07 PM
I would still give them a fighting shot at anyone in the top-ten. If you think about it, they were still a really good if unlucky team last year, beat SJF, lost to Wesley on a Hail Mary, lost Ithaca by a point.
That was one of the best games I've seen Wesley play overall in the past couple of seasons. They get a week off to get healthy too. (Salisbury that is.)
...the Gulls lost to Alfred last year by 10 at Merrill Field where they had annihilated and humiliated the Saxons 69-0 two years earlier. Just sayin'.
Hi Pep. Was aware of that and sure you were going to chime in to remind me. Watched that feed, the Saxons were great that day. Meant top ten in east poll of course ....
Gotcha....was thinking the nation's Top Ten. And Pep is in no way suggesting the Gulls will be easy prey for the Saxons this season, not with that long trip. And the Gulls will be ready for some retaliation, no doubt.
But right now the Saxons have their work cut out for them with a trip to Buffalo State's Coyer Field!
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 22, 2014, 10:29:07 AM
Just inserted my poll for this week(pun intended for you literal monkeys). Not a ton of movement for me in the top 5 but after that it's a crap shoot. Alfred is looking pretty tough after all so RPI's 3 point loss might have some merit. I watched RPI on the live feed this week. I was pretty impressed actually. They look like they have it together. Although Castleton isn't much to gauge against. Castleton has some pretty good skill guys, but those lineman......yikes. Looks like they just found some large guys walking around campus and threw them in pads. It wasn't pretty.
Not sure what to make of Utica or Delaware Valley. Both are loss-less without a real monument win. Utica's win over Union jumps out a little but not sure how much.
The Brockport St./Buff St. 2-headed enigma kept everyone as confused as every year. They win some big games but can't seem to win consistently year after year. They both had tough opponents this week and neither won so I still am confused about both of them. Are they top 10 or 10-15? Don't know.
And Salisbury is a huge question mark. Bye week this past week and beat a good Christopher Newport team and got killed by Wesley, so there's nothing to gauge them on either. I'm sure it'll all shake out in the coming weeks.
So, with just a small taste of my poll, I have no idea whether it's coming or going still.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 St. John Fisher( 5 ) | 2-0 | 50 | 1 | at Frostburg State |
2 Hobart | 3-0 | 42 | 2 | vs. Merchant Marine |
3 Lycoming | 3-0 | 37 | 3 | at Wilkes |
4 Widener | 3-0 | 36 | 4 | at FDU-Florham |
5 Ithaca | 2-0 | 34 | 5 | at #6 Alfred |
6 Alfred | 3-0 | 18 | 10 | vs. #5 Ithaca |
7t Brockport State | 2-1 | 13 | 6 | at Utica |
7t Delaware Valley | 2-0 | 13 | 8t | at Lebanon Valley |
9 Salisbury | 1-1 | 12 | 7 | at Buffalo State |
10 RPI | 2-1 | 7 | NR | vs. WPI |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 22, 2014, 10:29:07 AM
Just inserted my poll for this week(pun intended for you literal monkeys). Not a ton of movement for me in the top 5 but after that it's a crap shoot. Alfred is looking pretty tough after all so RPI's 3 point loss might have some merit. I watched RPI on the live feed this week. I was pretty impressed actually. They look like they have it together. Although Castleton isn't much to gauge against. Castleton has some pretty good skill guys, but those lineman......yikes. Looks like they just found some large guys walking around campus and threw them in pads. It wasn't pretty.
Not sure what to make of Utica or Delaware Valley. Both are loss-less without a real monument win. Utica's win over Union jumps out a little but not sure how much.
The Brockport St./Buff St. 2-headed enigma kept everyone as confused as every year. They win some big games but can't seem to win consistently year after year. They both had tough opponents this week and neither won so I still am confused about both of them. Are they top 10 or 10-15? Don't know.
And Salisbury is a huge question mark. Bye week this past week and beat a good Christopher Newport team and got killed by Wesley, so there's nothing to gauge them on either. I'm sure it'll all shake out in the coming weeks.
So, with just a small taste of my poll, I have no idea whether it's coming or going still.
Quote from: D3viewer on September 24, 2014, 10:39:49 AM
"have they ever met before /"
As far as I know Utica and Brockport have played only once before..in the early 2000's at Utica. Mike Kemp was the coach for Utica and Brockport won. There was no reciprocal visit to Brockport.
Quote from: Saxon73 on September 24, 2014, 12:02:27 PMQuote from: D3viewer on September 24, 2014, 10:39:49 AM
"have they ever met before /"
As far as I know Utica and Brockport have played only once before..in the early 2000's at Utica. Mike Kemp was the coach for Utica and Brockport won. There was no reciprocal visit to Brockport.
They met in 2002 and 2003.
2002 at Utica, B St 45 - UC 0
2003 at Brock, B St 49 - UC 0
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 St. John Fisher( 5 ) | 3-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. Salisbury |
2 Hobart | 4-0 | 44 | 2 | at WPI |
3 Ithaca | 3-0 | 39 | 5 | vs. #8 Utica |
4 Widener | 4-0 | 33 | 4 | at Misericordia |
5 Lycoming | 4-0 | 32 | 3 | vs. Stevenson |
6 Delaware Valley | 3-0 | 22 | 7t | vs. Albright |
7 Alfred | 3-1 | 17 | 6 | at Hartwick |
8 Utica | 4-0 | 12 | NR | at #3 Ithaca |
9 Buffalo State | 3-1 | 8 | NR | at Frostburg State |
10 Rowan | 1-2 | 7 | NR | at Cortland State |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2014, 02:43:20 PM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 St. John Fisher( 5 ) 3-0 50 1 vs. Salisbury 2 Hobart 4-0 44 2 at WPI 3 Ithaca 3-0 39 5 vs. #8 Utica 4 Widener 4-0 33 4 at Misericordia 5 Lycoming 4-0 32 3 vs. Stevenson 6 Delaware Valley 3-0 22 7t vs. Albright 7 Alfred 3-1 17 6 at Hartwick 8 Utica 4-0 12 NR at #3 Ithaca 9 Buffalo State 3-1 8 NR at Frostburg State 10 Rowan 1-2 7 NR at Cortland State
Dropped Out:
Brockport State
Salisbury
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
RPI 6
Brockport State 4
Framingham State 1
Voting Distribution:
St. John Fisher (1,1,1,1,1)
Hobart (2,2,2,2,3)
Ithaca (3,5,3,3,2)
Widener (4,4,5,5,4)
Lycoming (5,3,4,4,7)
Delaware Valley (6,7,6,8,6)
Alfred (8,9,7,9,5)
Utica (NR,8,9,7,8)
Buffalo State (9,NR,10,6,NR)
Rowan (NR,6,NR,NR,9)
RPI (10,10,8,10,NR)
Brockport State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#8 Utica at #3 Ithaca
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2014, 03:19:44 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2014, 02:43:20 PM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 St. John Fisher( 5 ) 3-0 50 1 vs. Salisbury 2 Hobart 4-0 44 2 at WPI 3 Ithaca 3-0 39 5 vs. #8 Utica 4 Widener 4-0 33 4 at Misericordia 5 Lycoming 4-0 32 3 vs. Stevenson 6 Delaware Valley 3-0 22 7t vs. Albright 7 Alfred 3-1 17 6 at Hartwick 8 Utica 4-0 12 NR at #3 Ithaca 9 Buffalo State 3-1 8 NR at Frostburg State 10 Rowan 1-2 7 NR at Cortland State
Dropped Out:
Brockport State
Salisbury
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
RPI 6
Brockport State 4
Framingham State 1
Voting Distribution:
St. John Fisher (1,1,1,1,1)
Hobart (2,2,2,2,3)
Ithaca (3,5,3,3,2)
Widener (4,4,5,5,4)
Lycoming (5,3,4,4,7)
Delaware Valley (6,7,6,8,6)
Alfred (8,9,7,9,5)
Utica (NR,8,9,7,8)
Buffalo State (9,NR,10,6,NR)
Rowan (NR,6,NR,NR,9)
RPI (10,10,8,10,NR)
Brockport State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#8 Utica at #3 Ithaca
So I take it some voters aren't really following the season much eh? You can make the case to me for someone ranking Rowan at 6 only because of the quality of their losses, but for a voter to have Brockport (2-2) at # 7 and Utica (4-0) not ranked after Utica just beat them by 14 just makes no sense whatsoever. Get your sh!t together.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 29, 2014, 03:44:39 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2014, 03:19:44 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2014, 02:43:20 PM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 St. John Fisher( 5 ) 3-0 50 1 vs. Salisbury 2 Hobart 4-0 44 2 at WPI 3 Ithaca 3-0 39 5 vs. #8 Utica 4 Widener 4-0 33 4 at Misericordia 5 Lycoming 4-0 32 3 vs. Stevenson 6 Delaware Valley 3-0 22 7t vs. Albright 7 Alfred 3-1 17 6 at Hartwick 8 Utica 4-0 12 NR at #3 Ithaca 9 Buffalo State 3-1 8 NR at Frostburg State 10 Rowan 1-2 7 NR at Cortland State
Dropped Out:
Brockport State
Salisbury
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
RPI 6
Brockport State 4
Framingham State 1
Voting Distribution:
St. John Fisher (1,1,1,1,1)
Hobart (2,2,2,2,3)
Ithaca (3,5,3,3,2)
Widener (4,4,5,5,4)
Lycoming (5,3,4,4,7)
Delaware Valley (6,7,6,8,6)
Alfred (8,9,7,9,5)
Utica (NR,8,9,7,8)
Buffalo State (9,NR,10,6,NR)
Rowan (NR,6,NR,NR,9)
RPI (10,10,8,10,NR)
Brockport State (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#8 Utica at #3 Ithaca
So I take it some voters aren't really following the season much eh? You can make the case to me for someone ranking Rowan at 6 only because of the quality of their losses, but for a voter to have Brockport (2-2) at # 7 and Utica (4-0) not ranked after Utica just beat them by 14 just makes no sense whatsoever. Get your sh!t together.
I'm voter #1. I made mistake with B-Port, PM'd Kaz and told him to move B-Port to #10 and move everyone else up. I guess he did not see the PM. On vacation for a week and home today with a bad virus I missed Utica. Don't see how Rowan made the Top 10. I represent the NJAC. Sorry for the F-Up.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2014, 04:01:45 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 29, 2014, 03:44:39 PM
I'm voter #1. I made mistake with B-Port, PM'd Kaz and told him to move B-Port to #10 and move everyone else up. I guess he did not see the PM. On vacation for a week and home today with a bad virus I missed Utica. Don't see how Rowan made the Top 10. I represent the NJAC. Sorry for the F-Up.
At least it was a mistake and you didn't come on here with some type of algorithm explaining it all. FYI - I agree about Rowan, but like I said, I understand it a little to this point. They are getting top 25 votes still too so someone still thinks they are decent.
Quote from: bports on September 15, 2014, 08:58:19 PM
Lycoming is overrated again. Brockport has absolutely pounded them the last 2 years .
Quote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 05:46:02 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on September 15, 2014, 04:11:56 PMQuote from: @d3jason on September 15, 2014, 03:42:07 PM
I would still give them a fighting shot at anyone in the top-ten. If you think about it, they were still a really good if unlucky team last year, beat SJF, lost to Wesley on a Hail Mary, lost Ithaca by a point.
That was one of the best games I've seen Wesley play overall in the past couple of seasons. They get a week off to get healthy too. (Salisbury that is.)
...the Gulls lost to Alfred last year by 10 at Merrill Field where they had annihilated and humiliated the Saxons 69-0 two years earlier. Just sayin'.
Hi Pep. Was aware of that and sure you were going to chime in to remind me. Watched that feed, the Saxons were great that day. Meant top ten in east poll of course ....
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 4 ) | 5-0 | 48 | 2 | vs. Springfield |
2 Ithaca | 4-0 | 42 | 3 | vs. #7 Buffalo State |
3 St. John Fisher( 1 ) | 3-1 | 40 | 1 | vs. Hartwick |
4 Widener | 5-0 | 36 | 4 | Open |
5 Lycoming | 5-0 | 34 | 5 | at #6 Delaware Valley |
6 Delaware Valley | 4-0 | 23 | 6 | vs. #5 Lycoming |
7 Buffalo State | 4-1 | 16 | 9 | at #2 Ithaca |
8 Rowan | 2-2 | 13 | 10 | vs. William Paterson |
9 Salisbury | 2-2 | 8 | NR | vs. Utica |
10 RPI | 4-1 | 7 | NR | vs. Saint Lawrence |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 06, 2014, 01:54:44 PM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 4 ) 5-0 48 2 vs. Springfield 2 Ithaca 4-0 42 3 vs. #7 Buffalo State 3 St. John Fisher( 1 ) 3-1 40 1 vs. Hartwick 4 Widener 5-0 36 4 Open 5 Lycoming 5-0 34 5 at #6 Delaware Valley 6 Delaware Valley 4-0 23 6 vs. #5 Lycoming 7 Buffalo State 4-1 16 9 at #2 Ithaca 8 Rowan 2-2 13 10 vs. William Paterson 9 Salisbury 2-2 8 NR vs. Utica 10 RPI 4-1 7 NR vs. Saint Lawrence
Dropped Out:
Alfred
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Utica 4
Framingham State 3
Alfred 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,3,1,1,1)
Ithaca (5,2,2,2,2)
St. John Fisher (2,1,3,5,4)
Widener (3,5,5,3,3)
Lycoming (4,4,4,4,5)
Delaware Valley (7,6,7,6,6)
Buffalo State (NR,7,6,7,8)
Rowan (6,NR,10,8,7)
Salisbury (NR,8,9,10,9)
RPI (9,9,8,NR,NR)
Utica (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,9,NR)
Alfred (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#7 Buffalo State at #2 Ithaca
#5 Lycoming at #6 Delaware Valley
Quote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2014, 02:14:54 PM
Have to ask, How can fisher still receive a first place vote? They lost to a sub 500 team at the time. I get the fact that you might THINK they are better than everyone else, but the results don't back up the thinking. I know it is just a poll, but shouldn't it at least reflect actual outcomes. I take part in the South Region Fan Poll, so I like to see what the other regions are voting like.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 06, 2014, 02:16:38 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2014, 02:14:54 PM
Have to ask, How can fisher still receive a first place vote? They lost to a sub 500 team at the time. I get the fact that you might THINK they are better than everyone else, but the results don't back up the thinking. I know it is just a poll, but shouldn't it at least reflect actual outcomes. I take part in the South Region Fan Poll, so I like to see what the other regions are voting like.
Check out the NRFP's recent discussion and also the Top 25 fan poll's discussion for some thoughts on this. I happen to agree with you, FTR.
Quote from: jknezek on October 06, 2014, 02:21:49 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 06, 2014, 02:16:38 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2014, 02:14:54 PM
Have to ask, How can fisher still receive a first place vote? They lost to a sub 500 team at the time. I get the fact that you might THINK they are better than everyone else, but the results don't back up the thinking. I know it is just a poll, but shouldn't it at least reflect actual outcomes. I take part in the South Region Fan Poll, so I like to see what the other regions are voting like.
Check out the NRFP's recent discussion and also the Top 25 fan poll's discussion for some thoughts on this. I happen to agree with you, FTR.
ExTP -- I don't usually disagree with you, but I do here. This is completely different than the NRFP situation because we aren't dealing with common opponents or even a H2H. I wonder if what we have here is a voter who sees SJF lost to Salisbury and simply doesn't care because SJF always loses to Salisbury. And, despite losing to Salisbury, a couple of years it still worked out pretty good for SJF. That's different than ignoring a H2H. Won't say if it is better or worse, just different than the NRFP discussion...
Quote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2014, 02:27:59 PM
JK, I just don't get how you can just toss a loss because they always lose to them. They lost and that has to mean something. I just think the vote losses some credibility. It looks homerish to me. I dropped Thomas More out of the top 10 in the South because they have 2 losses. Do I think they may be still in the top 10, yes, but with 2 losses and others undefeated I have to make a change in my opinion and in the end that is all these polls are. Does make for fun discussion though.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2014, 02:14:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 06, 2014, 01:54:44 PM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 4 ) 5-0 48 2 vs. Springfield 2 Ithaca 4-0 42 3 vs. #7 Buffalo State 3 St. John Fisher( 1 ) 3-1 40 1 vs. Hartwick 4 Widener 5-0 36 4 Open 5 Lycoming 5-0 34 5 at #6 Delaware Valley 6 Delaware Valley 4-0 23 6 vs. #5 Lycoming 7 Buffalo State 4-1 16 9 at #2 Ithaca 8 Rowan 2-2 13 10 vs. William Paterson 9 Salisbury 2-2 8 NR vs. Utica 10 RPI 4-1 7 NR vs. Saint Lawrence
Dropped Out:
Alfred
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Utica 4
Framingham State 3
Alfred 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,3,1,1,1)
Ithaca (5,2,2,2,2)
St. John Fisher (2,1,3,5,4)
Widener (3,5,5,3,3)
Lycoming (4,4,4,4,5)
Delaware Valley (7,6,7,6,6)
Buffalo State (NR,7,6,7,8)
Rowan (6,NR,10,8,7)
Salisbury (NR,8,9,10,9)
RPI (9,9,8,NR,NR)
Utica (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,9,NR)
Alfred (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#7 Buffalo State at #2 Ithaca
#5 Lycoming at #6 Delaware Valley
Have to ask, How can fisher still receive a first place vote? They lost to a sub 500 team at the time. I get the fact that you might THINK they are better than everyone else, but the results don't back up the thinking. I know it is just a poll, but shouldn't it at least reflect actual outcomes. I take part in the South Region Fan Poll, so I like to see what the other regions are voting like.
Quote from: dlip on October 06, 2014, 02:31:04 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 06, 2014, 02:14:54 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 06, 2014, 01:54:44 PM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 4 ) 5-0 48 2 vs. Springfield 2 Ithaca 4-0 42 3 vs. #7 Buffalo State 3 St. John Fisher( 1 ) 3-1 40 1 vs. Hartwick 4 Widener 5-0 36 4 Open 5 Lycoming 5-0 34 5 at #6 Delaware Valley 6 Delaware Valley 4-0 23 6 vs. #5 Lycoming 7 Buffalo State 4-1 16 9 at #2 Ithaca 8 Rowan 2-2 13 10 vs. William Paterson 9 Salisbury 2-2 8 NR vs. Utica 10 RPI 4-1 7 NR vs. Saint Lawrence
Dropped Out:
Alfred
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Utica 4
Framingham State 3
Alfred 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,3,1,1,1)
Ithaca (5,2,2,2,2)
St. John Fisher (2,1,3,5,4)
Widener (3,5,5,3,3)
Lycoming (4,4,4,4,5)
Delaware Valley (7,6,7,6,6)
Buffalo State (NR,7,6,7,8)
Rowan (6,NR,10,8,7)
Salisbury (NR,8,9,10,9)
RPI (9,9,8,NR,NR)
Utica (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,9,NR)
Alfred (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Key Matchups:
#7 Buffalo State at #2 Ithaca
#5 Lycoming at #6 Delaware Valley
Have to ask, How can fisher still receive a first place vote? They lost to a sub 500 team at the time. I get the fact that you might THINK they are better than everyone else, but the results don't back up the thinking. I know it is just a poll, but shouldn't it at least reflect actual outcomes. I take part in the South Region Fan Poll, so I like to see what the other regions are voting like.
Dlip still has SJF at number #1 because he believes they still are the BEST team in the region. Their 1 loss was to a triple option offense that always gives them fits in the likes of Salisbury. When it comes to most teams in the middle of the pack Dlip concurs that there needs to be "solid" evidence that backs up a feeling. Well Dlip can tell you this. SJF IS BETTER than Hobart who they embarrassed last year in the playoffs. There is NO question this Hobart team is NOT as good as last years team an many believe this Fisher team is BETTER than they were last season. So if you would like to sit back and say "well I know they are probably better but the W's vs L's say they are not that's cool. Dlip knows they are better and has the balls to keep them where Dlip really believes they should be. Who would else would defeat them? Dlip would bet his mortgage that they would defeat the aforementioned Hobart, Lycoming, Widener, and Ithaca. Who will be there at the end? They lose another game and we'll talk.
Quote from: dlip on October 06, 2014, 02:46:52 PM
Dlip gets what you guys are saying, really he does. He guesses he just looks at this loss to Salisbury as a ****-up and a ****-up that doesn't do enough to make me put them behind Hobart. Honestly though he does get everyone's point and will look to take this experience into consideration in the future. Dlip did reward the Gulls for the win by entering them into his poll but just firmly believes, even with the loss, SJF is the best team in the East Region right now. Definitely great comments fellas and wesleydad you know Dlip really respects your knowledge and what you bring to the table! +k as well :)
Quote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2014, 08:24:29 PM
OK Guys,
Let's take a realistic look at the East. If the season would end today ther is no team that could host a bracket. The (4) would be UWW, MTU, MHB and Wesley. This is coming from a Montclair homer. I firmly believe that there is no current team in the East that could beat those (4). This is not a knock on the East, but reality is what it is. I also question RPI at #10 and not Alfred. I think Alfred beat them and I was the only one who voted for Alfred?
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2014, 09:54:00 PMAlfred's 1st team QB, Johnson, was injured half way through the 3rd QTR and he didn't return. I don't know if that is general knowledge, or if it would have impacted the voting. Don't know what the problem is but, with a bye next week he will have some time to heal.Quote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2014, 08:24:29 PM
OK Guys,
Let's take a realistic look at the East. If the season would end today ther is no team that could host a bracket. The (4) would be UWW, MTU, MHB and Wesley. This is coming from a Montclair homer. I firmly believe that there is no current team in the East that could beat those (4). This is not a knock on the East, but reality is what it is. I also question RPI at #10 and not Alfred. I think Alfred beat them and I was the only one who voted for Alfred?
Your argument on Alfred held up until they lost to Hartwick. The Ithaca loss didn't hurt them but Hartwick loss is bad. The RPI game could have gone either way.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2014, 09:54:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2014, 08:24:29 PM
OK Guys,
Let's take a realistic look at the East. If the season would end today ther is no team that could host a bracket. The (4) would be UWW, MTU, MHB and Wesley. This is coming from a Montclair homer. I firmly believe that there is no current team in the East that could beat those (4). This is not a knock on the East, but reality is what it is. I also question RPI at #10 and not Alfred. I think Alfred beat them and I was the only one who voted for Alfred?
Your argument on Alfred held up until they lost to Hartwick. The Ithaca loss didn't hurt them but Hartwick loss is bad. The RPI game could have gone either way.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 07, 2014, 07:14:06 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2014, 09:54:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2014, 08:24:29 PM
OK Guys,
Let's take a realistic look at the East. If the season would end today ther is no team that could host a bracket. The (4) would be UWW, MTU, MHB and Wesley. This is coming from a Montclair homer. I firmly believe that there is no current team in the East that could beat those (4). This is not a knock on the East, but reality is what it is. I also question RPI at #10 and not Alfred. I think Alfred beat them and I was the only one who voted for Alfred?
Your argument on Alfred held up until they lost to Hartwick. The Ithaca loss didn't hurt them but Hartwick loss is bad. The RPI game could have gone either way.
How about Alfred beating Buff St. I realize you can only play the games on your schedule, but who has RPI beat to make them #10. Does that mean Montclair at 3-1 with a loss to Del-Val should get consideration. Only Kidding. :)
Quote from: rams1102 on October 07, 2014, 07:14:06 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2014, 09:54:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2014, 08:24:29 PM
OK Guys,
Let's take a realistic look at the East. If the season would end today ther is no team that could host a bracket. The (4) would be UWW, MTU, MHB and Wesley. This is coming from a Montclair homer. I firmly believe that there is no current team in the East that could beat those (4). This is not a knock on the East, but reality is what it is. I also question RPI at #10 and not Alfred. I think Alfred beat them and I was the only one who voted for Alfred?
Your argument on Alfred held up until they lost to Hartwick. The Ithaca loss didn't hurt them but Hartwick loss is bad. The RPI game could have gone either way.
How about Alfred beating Buff St. I realize you can only play the games on your schedule, but who has RPI beat to make them #10. Does that mean Montclair at 3-1 with a loss to Del-Val should get consideration. Only Kidding. :)
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 07, 2014, 09:44:12 AMQuote from: rams1102 on October 07, 2014, 07:14:06 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2014, 09:54:00 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2014, 08:24:29 PM
OK Guys,
Let's take a realistic look at the East. If the season would end today ther is no team that could host a bracket. The (4) would be UWW, MTU, MHB and Wesley. This is coming from a Montclair homer. I firmly believe that there is no current team in the East that could beat those (4). This is not a knock on the East, but reality is what it is. I also question RPI at #10 and not Alfred. I think Alfred beat them and I was the only one who voted for Alfred?
Your argument on Alfred held up until they lost to Hartwick. The Ithaca loss didn't hurt them but Hartwick loss is bad. The RPI game could have gone either way.
How about Alfred beating Buff St. I realize you can only play the games on your schedule, but who has RPI beat to make them #10. Does that mean Montclair at 3-1 with a loss to Del-Val should get consideration. Only Kidding. :)
I think the hartwick loss is what puts rpi over alfred. Although I have a feeling Hartwick may be better than what they did in the ithaca game. That could have been an aberration and just one of those games where you just play like shizz and it is what it is.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 6-0 | 50 | 1 | Open |
2 St. John Fisher | 4-1 | 41 | 3 | at Utica |
3 Widener | 5-0 | 38 | 4 | vs. Wilkes |
4 Delaware Valley | 5-0 | 37 | 6 | at Stevenson |
5 Buffalo State | 5-1 | 31 | 7 | Open |
6 Ithaca | 4-1 | 20 | 2 | at Frostburg State |
7 Salisbury | 3-2 | 19 | 9 | vs. Hartwick |
8 Rowan | 3-2 | 17 | 8 | vs. Morrisville State |
9 Lycoming | 5-1 | 14 | 5 | Open |
10 St. Lawrence | 5-1 | 5 | NR | Open |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 14, 2014, 10:06:19 AM
Week 6 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Hobart( 5 ) 6-0 50 1 Open 2 St. John Fisher 4-1 41 3 at Utica 3 Widener 5-0 38 4 vs. Wilkes 4 Delaware Valley 5-0 37 6 at Stevenson 5 Buffalo State 5-1 31 7 Open 6 Ithaca 4-1 20 2 at Frostburg State 7 Salisbury 3-2 19 9 vs. Hartwick 8 Rowan 3-2 17 8 vs. Morrisville State 9 Lycoming 5-1 14 5 Open 10 St. Lawrence 5-1 5 NR Open
Dropped Out:
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
Framingham State 2
Morrisville State 1
Voting Distribution:
Hobart (1,1,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,2,5,3,2)
Widener (6,4,2,2,3)
Delaware Valley (3,3,3,4,5)
Buffalo State (4,5,4,5,6)
Ithaca (8,7,7,6,7)
Salisbury (5,6,8,9,8)
Lycoming (7,8,6,8,9)
Rowan (NR,10,9,7,4)
St. Lawrence (9,9,NR,10,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,10,NR,10)
Morrisville State (10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 6-0 | 50 | 1 | at RPI |
2 St. John Fisher | 5-1 | 41 | 2 | at Alfred State |
3 Widener | 6-0 | 40 | 3 | at #6t Lycoming |
4 Delaware Valley | 6-0 | 37 | 4 | vs. Misericordia |
5 Buffalo State | 5-1 | 30 | 5 | vs. Utica |
6t Lycoming | 5-1 | 21 | 9 | vs. #3 Widener |
6t Rowan | 4-2 | 21 | 8 | at Montclair State |
8 Salisbury | 4-2 | 14 | 7 | at Ithaca |
9 St. Lawrence | 5-1 | 8 | 10 | vs. Springfield |
10 Framingham State | 5-1 | 5 | NR | at Plymouth State |
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 20, 2014, 04:37:59 PM
Really pretty minor stuff here, but...someone gave Springfield a #10 vote, but there's no vote for the 6-0 WNEC team that beat them (at Springfield) in week 1, and that confuses me a little bit. If the h2h (admittedly a close game) wasn't enough to convince you, there's also the fact that WNEC beat Union much more decisively than Springfield did, games played in consecutive weeks. I don't necessarily think WNEC is all that and a bag of chips (they've had a couple of close calls), I just don't see any rational argument for a vote to Springfield in that 10th spot unless you have WNEC in the top 9.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 21, 2014, 12:24:42 PM
DLIP... come on man. A win is a freaking win. Springfield should not be getting any votes ahead of WNEC. Do I think WNEC is a top ten team in the East? No, I do not. I feel 2 loss Endicott is better than they are after watching WNEC this weekend. If anything Union's close losses are looking worst now because the "good" teams they lost to don't look so "good" now. I see little to no rationale for the Springfield vote. But again, who cares, its the ten spot we are talking about here.
Quote from: ECoastFootball on October 21, 2014, 12:32:05 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 21, 2014, 12:24:42 PM
DLIP... come on man. A win is a freaking win. Springfield should not be getting any votes ahead of WNEC. Do I think WNEC is a top ten team in the East? No, I do not. I feel 2 loss Endicott is better than they are after watching WNEC this weekend. If anything Union's close losses are looking worst now because the "good" teams they lost to don't look so "good" now. I see little to no rationale for the Springfield vote. But again, who cares, its the ten spot we are talking about here.
Im not sure if Endicott or WNEC are better, but I'd say it's about a coinflip. Sitting at 4-2 with your losses being Framingham and Rowan is not terrible. They could end up 8-2 with their losses being to two conference champs. Had WNEC played the same schedule I think they would most likely have the same record. That will be a good game in a few weeks.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 21, 2014, 12:24:42 PM
DLIP... come on man. A win is a freaking win. Springfield should not be getting any votes ahead of WNEC. Do I think WNEC is a top ten team in the East? No, I do not. I feel 2 loss Endicott is better than they are after watching WNEC this weekend. If anything Union's close losses are looking worst now because the "good" teams they lost to don't look so "good" now. I see little to no rationale for the Springfield vote. But again, who cares, its the ten spot we are talking about here.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 21, 2014, 01:29:13 PM
I agree re WNE getting votes ahead of SC based on H2H. I do think SC would probably beat them if they played today, but end of day, the Bears have the H2H, so they'd be ranked above SC.
Curious as to SC-SLU pans out. Could see the Pride "upsetting" the Larries, but really hope SLU wins convincingly so that the potential for an interesting LL "title game" on 11/8 stays in play.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 27, 2014, 10:13:44 AM
Is this the week the first regional rankings come out? Think it's next week (11/3) but either way, with 3 wkds left we're getting close.
Hoping that some of the non-AQ teams apply for ECACs so we have some good potential matchups there too.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 27, 2014, 02:19:24 PM
I couldnt disagree more with the Del Val placement in that poll...
Body of work....
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 27, 2014, 02:32:40 PM
I wasnt making a case for Fisher.
I was stating that Del Vals body of work isnt worthy of a number 2.
My opinion.
I agree with your statement re Fisher....I just find it hard to believe that Del Val is a no2.
Yes things will work out down the road...
Understood.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 27, 2014, 02:32:40 PM
I wasnt making a case for Fisher.
I was stating that Del Vals body of work isnt worthy of a number 2.
I agree with your statement re Fisher....I just find it hard to believe that Del Val is a no2.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 27, 2014, 04:17:10 PM
If Mount Union is the #1 seed in the East, my buddy is offering me MU's first three playoff opponents +100 points combined vs. MU.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 27, 2014, 04:17:10 PM
If Mount Union is the #1 seed in the East, my buddy is offering me MU's first three playoff opponents +100 points combined vs. MU.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 27, 2014, 04:27:51 PM
ExTartanPlayer - Let me rephrase................would you take 100 points and the total scores of Mount Union's first three opponents against Mount Union? I'm leaning no:)
Quote from: wally_wabash on October 27, 2014, 04:26:09 PMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on October 27, 2014, 04:17:10 PM
If Mount Union is the #1 seed in the East, my buddy is offering me MU's first three playoff opponents +100 points combined vs. MU.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg2.wikia.nocookie.net%2F__cb20120416213717%2Fvictorious%2Fimages%2F7%2F73%2FHeaddesk.gif&hash=ce0865453ca6881efa1e754a48ca5d65e112e2df)
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 27, 2014, 04:17:10 PM
Come playoff seeding time, none of this is really going to matter. Win one game before you get whacked by Mount Union or Wesley...............or maybe win a second game, before travelling to Ohio or Delaware to get whacked. DelVal is not the second best team............but they will and should be #2 in the first rankings, should they beat Kings, next week.
Nobody in the "pure East" has a prayer if we are being honest here so this is all fun, but quite meaningless come time to take the trip to Alliance or Dover in a few weeks.
Somebody from MU made an interesting proposal for a bet and I am thinking about it, and will probably decline.
If Mount Union is the #1 seed in the East, my buddy is offering me MU's first three playoff opponents +100 points combined vs. MU.
If MU wins the first round by 40, second round by 30 and third round by 25...............I'm in the money.
Would anybody take the 100 points vs. MU?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Hobart( 5 ) | 7-0 | 50 | 1 | vs. Union |
2 St. John Fisher | 6-1 | 43 | 2 | vs. #10t Buffalo State |
3 Widener | 7-0 | 41 | 3 | vs. Stephenson |
4 Delaware Valley | 7-0 | 36 | 4 | at King's |
5 Montclair State | 6-1 | 26 | NR | at Cortland State |
6 St. Lawrence | 6-1 | 24 | 9 | at WPI |
7 Lycoming | 5-2 | 15 | 6t | at Misericordia |
8 Ithaca | 5-2 | 13 | NR | at Brockport State |
9 Framingham State | 6-1 | 10 | 10 | at Massachusetts Maritime |
10t Buffalo State | 5-2 | 5 | 5 | at #2 St. John Fisher |
10t Rowan | 4-3 | 5 | 6t | vs. Southern Virginia |
Quote from: Saxon73 on October 20, 2014, 05:14:25 PMThis week perhaps, the Bombers should beware of Brockport. ???
With all the strange outcomes this year, Buff St vs. Utica could be a key matchup. Bengals beware.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 27, 2014, 04:17:10 PMAgree the East has no real shot against MU, and looking at the "pure east " in the playoffs since 2007 against MU that bet of taking 100 pts. looks good for MU fans. The average margin of victory since 2007 is 40 points with a spread range from 24 to 55. Not since Fisher in 2006 did an East team finish with one score, 26-14. With those stats I would want a few more points..... or lots of snow ;)
Come playoff seeding time, none of this is really going to matter. Win one game before you get whacked by Mount Union or Wesley...............or maybe win a second game, before travelling to Ohio or Delaware to get whacked. DelVal is not the second best team............but they will and should be #2 in the first rankings, should they beat Kings, next week.
Nobody in the "pure East" has a prayer if we are being honest here so this is all fun, but quite meaningless come time to take the trip to Alliance or Dover in a few weeks.
Somebody from MU made an interesting proposal for a bet and I am thinking about it, and will probably decline.
If Mount Union is the #1 seed in the East, my buddy is offering me MU's first three playoff opponents +100 points combined vs. MU.
If MU wins the first round by 40, second round by 30 and third round by 25...............I'm in the money.
Would anybody take the 100 points vs. MU?
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 28, 2014, 03:23:01 PM
For other's, not even attached to either institution, another MU vs. UW-W meeting is somehow captivating :'(
Quote from: rams1102 on November 06, 2014, 08:16:10 PM
No poll this week ???
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 07, 2014, 04:58:53 AMQuote from: rams1102 on November 06, 2014, 08:16:10 PM
No poll this week ???
It is all Dlip's fault ;D, jk, I am sure he has other matters that are more important. AU, you can post then update afterwards. Also, since the RR came out, I don't think many people mind.
Quote from: thewaterboy on July 08, 2015, 01:53:03 AM
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Delaware Valley
--- or is Wesley still a member of the South Region?
Quote from: thewaterboy on July 08, 2015, 01:53:03 AM
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Delaware Valley
--- or is Wesley still a member of the South Region?
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on July 08, 2015, 10:25:42 PMAgree that that is where Delaware belonged. Salisbury is a good ways south of Wesley and has been considered a part of the east since at least joining the Empire 8.Quote from: thewaterboy on July 08, 2015, 01:53:03 AM
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Delaware Valley
--- or is Wesley still a member of the South Region?
Virtually all conferences are all members of the same region - I would assume that joining the NJAC has moved Wesley to the East (which is probably where Delaware belonged anyway).
Quote from: thewaterboy on July 09, 2015, 12:32:22 AMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on July 08, 2015, 10:25:42 PMAgree that that is where Delaware belonged. Salisbury is a good ways south of Wesley and has been considered a part of the east since at least joining the Empire 8.Quote from: thewaterboy on July 08, 2015, 01:53:03 AM
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Delaware Valley
--- or is Wesley still a member of the South Region?
Virtually all conferences are all members of the same region - I would assume that joining the NJAC has moved Wesley to the East (which is probably where Delaware belonged anyway).
Quote from: HSCTiger74 on July 09, 2015, 01:11:39 AMSalisbury has already joined the NJAC for 2015 along with Christopher Newport and Frostburg State.Quote from: thewaterboy on July 09, 2015, 12:32:22 AMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on July 08, 2015, 10:25:42 PMAgree that that is where Delaware belonged. Salisbury is a good ways south of Wesley and has been considered a part of the east since at least joining the Empire 8.Quote from: thewaterboy on July 08, 2015, 01:53:03 AM
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Delaware Valley
--- or is Wesley still a member of the South Region?
Virtually all conferences are all members of the same region - I would assume that joining the NJAC has moved Wesley to the East (which is probably where Delaware belonged anyway).
Until joining the E8 Salisbury was a South Region team; conference affiliation trumps geography. In fact, if I remember correctly, the year they joined the conference they were receiving votes in both regional fan polls. If the Gulls ever leave the E8 I suspect they'll return to the South (unless they are leaving to join the NJAC).
As far as the Wesley/Delaware question, I can only assume that they were in the South for the same reason that the Centennial is ... too many D3 teams already in the East and a need to balance the regions.
Quote from: thewaterboy on July 09, 2015, 11:13:48 AMQuote from: HSCTiger74 on July 09, 2015, 01:11:39 AMSalisbury has already joined the NJAC for 2015 along with Christopher Newport and Frostburg State.Quote from: thewaterboy on July 09, 2015, 12:32:22 AMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on July 08, 2015, 10:25:42 PMAgree that that is where Delaware belonged. Salisbury is a good ways south of Wesley and has been considered a part of the east since at least joining the Empire 8.Quote from: thewaterboy on July 08, 2015, 01:53:03 AM
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Delaware Valley
--- or is Wesley still a member of the South Region?
Virtually all conferences are all members of the same region - I would assume that joining the NJAC has moved Wesley to the East (which is probably where Delaware belonged anyway).
Until joining the E8 Salisbury was a South Region team; conference affiliation trumps geography. In fact, if I remember correctly, the year they joined the conference they were receiving votes in both regional fan polls. If the Gulls ever leave the E8 I suspect they'll return to the South (unless they are leaving to join the NJAC).
As far as the Wesley/Delaware question, I can only assume that they were in the South for the same reason that the Centennial is ... too many D3 teams already in the East and a need to balance the regions.
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on July 10, 2015, 12:05:44 AM
CNU
I wanna hear that Joyzy accent LOL
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on July 10, 2015, 12:21:35 AMQuote from: PA_wesleyfan on July 10, 2015, 12:05:44 AM
CNU
I wanna hear that Joyzy accent LOL
I GOTTA hear a Joyzy accent with a Southern drawl (How does 'y'all' translate to Joyzy?) :o ;D
QuoteUnless Del Val has reloaded to the point that JM Cozenlaw had alluded to late last year (doubtful) , I wouldn't put Del Val anywhere near the top 3. I'm sure Rowan or Montclair may have a say near the top as well
Quote from: rams1102 on July 10, 2015, 01:31:57 PM
Hard to find out much information, but here goes for a 1st time thought for the East Regional Fan Poll :
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Fisher
4. Lycoming
5. Widner
6. Del Val
7. Montclair
8. Salisbury
9. Rowan
10A. CNU
10B. MIT
Quote from: Bombers798891 on July 10, 2015, 01:45:26 PMQuote from: rams1102 on July 10, 2015, 01:31:57 PM
Hard to find out much information, but here goes for a 1st time thought for the East Regional Fan Poll :
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Fisher
4. Lycoming
5. Widner
6. Del Val
7. Montclair
8. Salisbury
9. Rowan
10A. CNU
10B. MIT
What's stunning about this list is that the two-time E8 champs aren't on it...and I don't even disagree with that (although I think they'd beat at least two teams on this list)
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on July 10, 2015, 12:05:44 AM
CNU
I wanna hear that Joyzy accent LOL
Quote from: dedragon on July 10, 2015, 10:43:55 AMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on July 10, 2015, 12:21:35 AMQuote from: PA_wesleyfan on July 10, 2015, 12:05:44 AM
CNU
I wanna hear that Joyzy accent LOL
I GOTTA hear a Joyzy accent with a Southern drawl (How does 'y'all' translate to Joyzy?) :o ;D
I gotta think 'yooz'all.
Quote from: rams1102 on July 10, 2015, 01:31:57 PM
Hard to find out much information, but here goes for a 1st time thought for the East Regional Fan Poll :
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Fisher
4. Lycoming
5. Widner
6. Del Val
7. Montclair
8. Salisbury
9. Rowan
10A. CNU
10B. MIT
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 10, 2015, 03:31:15 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on July 10, 2015, 01:45:26 PMQuote from: rams1102 on July 10, 2015, 01:31:57 PM
Hard to find out much information, but here goes for a 1st time thought for the East Regional Fan Poll :
1. Wesley
2. Hobart
3. Fisher
4. Lycoming
5. Widner
6. Del Val
7. Montclair
8. Salisbury
9. Rowan
10A. CNU
10B. MIT
What's stunning about this list is that the two-time E8 champs aren't on it...and I don't even disagree with that (although I think they'd beat at least two teams on this list)
No way is MIT on there ahead of Ithaca. And the Bombers manhandled Salisbury, 32-7 on the seven-inch length grass at Butterfield last year. Heck, even Alfred, which finished 3-5 in the Empire 8, defeated Salisbury last year IN MARYLAND. Not sure what the love affair is with the Seagulls. This poll seems a bit Joisey heavy, if you ask Pep.....but then no one asked Pep, did they?
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: rams1102 on July 10, 2015, 04:25:02 PM
Somebody needs to get the board hopping. ;D
Quote from: rams1102 on July 11, 2015, 06:51:37 PM
The East is pretty tough. Between the E8, MAC and NJAC only 1 conference usually gets 2 bids if deserving. Last year.
E8 - Ithaca in at 7-3/6-2 and Fisher out 8-2/6-2
MAC - DelVal in 9-1/8-1, Widner in 10-0/9-0 and Lycoming out 8-2/7-2
NJAC - Rowan 7-4/6-1 in, Montclair out 8-2/6-1 and M-Ville out 8-2/6-1
The NJAC gets much tougher, E-8 better and the MAC stays the same. Strap e'm up boys. You could sit home with 2 loses and especially in conference if you don't win outright. Don't see Wesley losing 2 in conference but one never knows. ;)
Quote from: @d3jason on July 13, 2015, 11:03:51 AMQuote from: rams1102 on July 11, 2015, 06:51:37 PM
The East is pretty tough. Between the E8, MAC and NJAC only 1 conference usually gets 2 bids if deserving. Last year.
E8 - Ithaca in at 7-3/6-2 and Fisher out 8-2/6-2
MAC - DelVal in 9-1/8-1, Widner in 10-0/9-0 and Lycoming out 8-2/7-2
NJAC - Rowan 7-4/6-1 in, Montclair out 8-2/6-1 and M-Ville out 8-2/6-1
The NJAC gets much tougher, E-8 better and the MAC stays the same. Strap e'm up boys. You could sit home with 2 loses and especially in conference if you don't win outright. Don't see Wesley losing 2 in conference but one never knows. ;)
Wesley will have to be ready every week. Montclair, Kean and Rowan have all beat them over the last ten years. MSU is the only team other than UWW or UMHB to beat them at home. Del Val and Brockport have handed them their other road losses since 2005 (aside from UMU, Charlotte, UWW and UMHB.)
Should be great races in all three of those conferences.
Quote from: @d3jason on July 13, 2015, 11:03:51 AM
Wesley will have to be ready every week. Montclair, Kean and Rowan have all beat them over the last ten years.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on July 14, 2015, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: @d3jason on July 13, 2015, 11:03:51 AM
Wesley will have to be ready every week. Montclair, Kean and Rowan have all beat them over the last ten years.
I'm not really sure what losing to Montclair in 2007, or to a Kean team that in 2011 was in the Top 10 and is now coming off consecutive 2-8 seasons is supposed to tell us about Wesley in the NJAC going forward. I doubt there's some NJAC related issue Wesley has. They've lost some close games to some good teams over the years. That seems to be more of a common thread than any sort of conference affiliation
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on July 14, 2015, 03:18:45 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on July 14, 2015, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: @d3jason on July 13, 2015, 11:03:51 AM
Wesley will have to be ready every week. Montclair, Kean and Rowan have all beat them over the last ten years.
I'm not really sure what losing to Montclair in 2007, or to a Kean team that in 2011 was in the Top 10 and is now coming off consecutive 2-8 seasons is supposed to tell us about Wesley in the NJAC going forward. I doubt there's some NJAC related issue Wesley has. They've lost some close games to some good teams over the years. That seems to be more of a common thread than any sort of conference affiliation
I believe outside of purple powers and co. (UMHB), Wesley has only lost to NJAC opponents, except a few outliers aforementioned. This may be due to only a few conferences or teams wanting to play Wesley. I am sure Wesley has reach out to many other teams outside the NJAC and MAC, but was unable to get it done for the obvious reasons. What it tells us, is that teams/coaches in the NJAC do not fear Wesley as many other teams/coaches do and that Wesley know that playing in the NJAC, they will not be looked at as a super team and know that the name on the jersey can only carry them.
Quote from: AUPepBand on July 14, 2015, 05:34:56 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on July 14, 2015, 03:18:45 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on July 14, 2015, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: @d3jason on July 13, 2015, 11:03:51 AM
Wesley will have to be ready every week. Montclair, Kean and Rowan have all beat them over the last ten years.
I'm not really sure what losing to Montclair in 2007, or to a Kean team that in 2011 was in the Top 10 and is now coming off consecutive 2-8 seasons is supposed to tell us about Wesley in the NJAC going forward. I doubt there's some NJAC related issue Wesley has. They've lost some close games to some good teams over the years. That seems to be more of a common thread than any sort of conference affiliation
I believe outside of purple powers and co. (UMHB), Wesley has only lost to NJAC opponents, except a few outliers aforementioned. This may be due to only a few conferences or teams wanting to play Wesley. I am sure Wesley has reach out to many other teams outside the NJAC and MAC, but was unable to get it done for the obvious reasons. What it tells us, is that teams/coaches in the NJAC do not fear Wesley as many other teams/coaches do and that Wesley know that playing in the NJAC, they will not be looked at as a super team and know that the name on the jersey can only carry them.
Wesley's success over the past decade is indisputable. Factors leading to the Wolverines' scheduling issues in the past are multitudinous. Pep finds it a wee bit excessive to conclude that fear is/was the lone factor. When Salisbury and Frostburg joined the Empire 8 for football only, Pep understood that Wesley wanted in as well. Empire 8 would take two of them, but not three. Taking all three would put a burden on the already stretched travel budgets of the Empire 8 members and also reduce the opportunities to maintain local rivals from other conferences like the NJAC and LL.
Pep believes Wesley will do well in the NJAC. But the Wolverines will forever have a target on their backs which will make them forever hunted by dem Joisey Boys and the Maryland sisters.
Glad to see the Wolverines find a home and a consistent schedule with the NJAC....fully expect them to dominate. As for the Empire 8, it's Fisher's to lose....and after that, it's a dog fight. Grrrrrrrr!
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: CNU85 on July 14, 2015, 09:05:53 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on July 14, 2015, 05:34:56 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on July 14, 2015, 03:18:45 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on July 14, 2015, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: @d3jason on July 13, 2015, 11:03:51 AM
Wesley will have to be ready every week. Montclair, Kean and Rowan have all beat them over the last ten years.
I'm not really sure what losing to Montclair in 2007, or to a Kean team that in 2011 was in the Top 10 and is now coming off consecutive 2-8 seasons is supposed to tell us about Wesley in the NJAC going forward. I doubt there's some NJAC related issue Wesley has. They've lost some close games to some good teams over the years. That seems to be more of a common thread than any sort of conference affiliation
I believe outside of purple powers and co. (UMHB), Wesley has only lost to NJAC opponents, except a few outliers aforementioned. This may be due to only a few conferences or teams wanting to play Wesley. I am sure Wesley has reach out to many other teams outside the NJAC and MAC, but was unable to get it done for the obvious reasons. What it tells us, is that teams/coaches in the NJAC do not fear Wesley as many other teams/coaches do and that Wesley know that playing in the NJAC, they will not be looked at as a super team and know that the name on the jersey can only carry them.
Wesley's success over the past decade is indisputable. Factors leading to the Wolverines' scheduling issues in the past are multitudinous. Pep finds it a wee bit excessive to conclude that fear is/was the lone factor. When Salisbury and Frostburg joined the Empire 8 for football only, Pep understood that Wesley wanted in as well. Empire 8 would take two of them, but not three. Taking all three would put a burden on the already stretched travel budgets of the Empire 8 members and also reduce the opportunities to maintain local rivals from other conferences like the NJAC and LL.
Pep believes Wesley will do well in the NJAC. But the Wolverines will forever have a target on their backs which will make them forever hunted by dem Joisey Boys and the Maryland sisters.
Glad to see the Wolverines find a home and a consistent schedule with the NJAC....fully expect them to dominate. As for the Empire 8, it's Fisher's to lose....and after that, it's a dog fight. Grrrrrrrr!
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, ya forgot to mention some Va boys, y'all.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on July 14, 2015, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: @d3jason on July 13, 2015, 11:03:51 AM
Wesley will have to be ready every week. Montclair, Kean and Rowan have all beat them over the last ten years.
I'm not really sure what losing to Montclair in 2007, or to a Kean team that in 2011 was in the Top 10 and is now coming off consecutive 2-8 seasons is supposed to tell us about Wesley in the NJAC going forward. I doubt there's some NJAC related issue Wesley has. They've lost some close games to some good teams over the years. That seems to be more of a common thread than any sort of conference affiliation
Quote from: @d3jason on July 15, 2015, 11:41:41 AM
I was wondering if anyone thinks the roster limit has hurt the NJAC as far as deep playoff runs. I seem to remember it coming in around 15 years ago for budgetary reasons. Does anyone think that played a role in Rowan's drop from elite to very good status or was it Keeler leaving and less reliance on elite transfers. Probably both.
Quote from: jknezek on July 15, 2015, 12:34:56 PMQuote from: @d3jason on July 15, 2015, 11:41:41 AM
I was wondering if anyone thinks the roster limit has hurt the NJAC as far as deep playoff runs. I seem to remember it coming in around 15 years ago for budgetary reasons. Does anyone think that played a role in Rowan's drop from elite to very good status or was it Keeler leaving and less reliance on elite transfers. Probably both.
I'm going with 40% Keeler leaving, 50% easing off the transfers (which was part of Keeler leaving, so you could just cram 90% in there), and 10% the roster limits.
Quote from: CNU85 on July 15, 2015, 08:24:50 AM
Pep - you're killing me!!!! Thanks for the morning guffaw!!!
Quote from: @d3jason on July 15, 2015, 11:41:41 AM
I was wondering if anyone thinks the roster limit has hurt the NJAC as far as deep playoff runs. I seem to remember it coming in around 15 years ago for budgetary reasons. Does anyone think that played a role in Rowan's drop from elite to very good status or was it Keeler leaving and less reliance on elite transfers. Probably both.
Quote from: wally_wabash on July 17, 2015, 12:26:33 PMQuote from: @d3jason on July 15, 2015, 11:41:41 AM
I was wondering if anyone thinks the roster limit has hurt the NJAC as far as deep playoff runs. I seem to remember it coming in around 15 years ago for budgetary reasons. Does anyone think that played a role in Rowan's drop from elite to very good status or was it Keeler leaving and less reliance on elite transfers. Probably both.
I would say not so much. I believe they have a 100-player limit in the WIAC and at least one team out there seems to handle it pretty well. A roster limit doesn't necessarily equate to a limited roster, and I think 100 players is more than enough to have national success.
Quote from: HSCTiger74 on July 17, 2015, 02:51:20 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on July 17, 2015, 12:26:33 PMQuote from: @d3jason on July 15, 2015, 11:41:41 AM
I was wondering if anyone thinks the roster limit has hurt the NJAC as far as deep playoff runs. I seem to remember it coming in around 15 years ago for budgetary reasons. Does anyone think that played a role in Rowan's drop from elite to very good status or was it Keeler leaving and less reliance on elite transfers. Probably both.
I would say not so much. I believe they have a 100-player limit in the WIAC and at least one team out there seems to handle it pretty well. A roster limit doesn't necessarily equate to a limited roster, and I think 100 players is more than enough to have national success.
While I understand that it can help with depth and in developing players' experience for following seasons, isn't it likely that anyone below #100 on the roster is probably not going to play very much (if at all) anyway? Assuming an even distribution through the positions, you're talking about fifth teamers by the time you get to that level.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 06, 2015, 01:34:54 PM
Is anything being done with the East Region Fan Poll this year? Just curious.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on August 10, 2015, 08:04:29 PMQuote from: rams1102 on August 06, 2015, 01:34:54 PM
Is anything being done with the East Region Fan Poll this year? Just curious.
I'm curious as well. If someone has some fancy spreadsheet that allows it, I would be willing to give it a try.
Quote from: AUPepBand on August 11, 2015, 11:15:47 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on August 10, 2015, 08:04:29 PMQuote from: rams1102 on August 06, 2015, 01:34:54 PM
Is anything being done with the East Region Fan Poll this year? Just curious.
I'm curious as well. If someone has some fancy spreadsheet that allows it, I would be willing to give it a try.
Just texted AUKaz00 this morning. He says he'd be happy to run the ERFP again this year...just has to find the time to get back to the boards. With 90 new recruits and who knows how many returning players arriving on the east side of Mayberry this week, perhaps Kaz will join us here very soon...if he's not too busy at work or on a Str8 Eight card game promotional tour or something. Pep sure is hoping Kaz00 comes back on board with a finely-tuned instrument....he was a little flat last season. ;)
Stay tuned!
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 27, 2015, 03:13:56 PM
Okay, I only have 3 pollsters for the ERFP this year. So, if you're interested in providing your top 10 each Monday, let me know. Currently we have an E8, LL and one of the New England conferences (can't remember which one at the moment) represented.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on August 27, 2015, 03:13:56 PM
Okay, I only have 3 pollsters for the ERFP this year. So, if you're interested in providing your top 10 each Monday, let me know. Currently we have an E8, LL and one of the New England conferences (can't remember which one at the moment) represented.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley( 7 ) | 0-0 | 70 | NR | Open Date |
2 St. John Fisher | 0-0 | 53 | NR | at #5 (South) Thomas More |
3t Hobart | 0-0 | 47 | NR | at Dickinson |
3t widener | 0-0 | 47 | NR | vs. #6t Rowan |
5 St. Lawrence | 0-0 | 29 | NR | at Morrisville State |
6t Ithaca | 0-0 | 24 | NR | at Union |
6t Rowan | 0-0 | 24 | NR | at #3t Widener |
8t Delaware Valley | 0-0 | 19 | NR | vs. #8t Montclair State |
8t Montclair State | 0-0 | 19 | NR | at #8t Delaware Valley |
10 Lycoming | 0-0 | 14 | NR | at Susquehanna |
Quote from: wesleydad on September 04, 2015, 02:58:16 PM
Looking at the poll and I see some weirdness to me. How can someone not have Hobart or Widener ranked? I get the mess at the bottom of the poll with many receiving votes, but find it hard to take serious someone voting and before the season starts not ranking Hobart or Widener. It will all play out in the end but sure makes for good talk.
Quote from: fulbakdad on September 05, 2015, 06:54:47 AM
Lew Dog,
I would like to inform you I DID NOT submit a vote for Salve.
:)
Quote from: wesleydad on September 06, 2015, 07:45:05 AM
East top 10 took a beating this week. plenty of movement in my poll. Some good loses, some really bad ones. Nice wins by Rowan, Ithaca, Buffalo St, Brockport St, and Cortland St. The east is going to change plenty this year.
[/quote
I might just put Albright, Del Val and maybe Stevenson in that nice win category :)
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on September 06, 2015, 08:55:59 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 06, 2015, 07:45:05 AMYea, forgot them. I am trying to get used to who is who in the east.
East top 10 took a beating this week. plenty of movement in my poll. Some good loses, some really bad ones. Nice wins by Rowan, Ithaca, Buffalo St, Brockport St, and Cortland St. The east is going to change plenty this year.
[/quote
I might just put Albright, Del Val and maybe Stevenson in that nice win category :)
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on September 06, 2015, 08:55:59 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 06, 2015, 07:45:05 AMI was at the the Cortland St game yesterday. I will post a more detailed report on the E8 board tomorrow when I get home. While a good win, the last 4 minutes were a coaching disaster on both sides. I'd say that Cortland had no business winning but for the equally atrocious game decisions at Heidleberg.
East top 10 took a beating this week. plenty of movement in my poll. Some good loses, some really bad ones. Nice wins by Rowan, Ithaca, Buffalo St, Brockport St, and Cortland St. The east is going to change plenty this year.
[/quote
I might just put Albright, Del Val and maybe Stevenson in that nice win category :)
I'm not sure Heidleberg will be the same team they were last year, but I do get the impression that Cortland will be a bit better than last year.
Either way, I'm not moving Cortland up my board that much from this game...
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 0-0 | 70 | 1 | at Frostburg State |
2 Hobart | 1-0 | 59 | 3t | vs. Endicott |
3 Rowan | 1-0 | 58 | 6t | Open Date |
4 Delaware Valley | 1-0 | 44 | 8t | at Wilkes |
5 Ithaca | 1-0 | 43 | 6t | Open Date |
6 Framingham State | 1-0 | 22 | NR | vs. Cortland State |
7 Widener | 0-1 | 19 | 3t | vs. King's |
8t Buffalo State | 1-0 | 14 | NR | Open Date |
8t Morrisville State | 1-0 | 14 | NR | Open Date |
10 Christopher Newport | 1-0 | 11 | NR | vs. #10 (South) Hampden-Sydney |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
Key Matchups:
#10 (South) Hampden-Sydney at #10 Christopher Newport
Quote from: wally_wabash on September 08, 2015, 04:27:11 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
Key Matchups:
#10 (South) Hampden-Sydney at #10 Christopher Newport
I think the #10 South team is probably Hardin-Simmons instead of Hampden-Sydney...but this is still a cool game this weekend. :)
Quote from: jknezek on September 08, 2015, 04:30:50 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on September 08, 2015, 04:27:11 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
Key Matchups:
#10 (South) Hampden-Sydney at #10 Christopher Newport
I think the #10 South team is probably Hardin-Simmons instead of Hampden-Sydney...but this is still a cool game this weekend. :)
You are correct.
Quote from: wally_wabash on September 08, 2015, 04:27:11 PMHardin-Simmons (HSU) has the university and co-eds.Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
Key Matchups:
#10 (South) Hampden-Sydney at #10 Christopher Newport
I think the #10 South team is probably Hardin-Simmons instead of Hampden-Sydney...but this is still a cool game this weekend. :)
Quote from: HSCTiger74 on September 09, 2015, 02:05:58 PMMaybe you didn't catch the box score of W&L/Averett last Friday :oQuote from: jknezek on September 08, 2015, 04:30:50 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on September 08, 2015, 04:27:11 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
Key Matchups:
#10 (South) Hampden-Sydney at #10 Christopher Newport
I think the #10 South team is probably Hardin-Simmons instead of Hampden-Sydney...but this is still a cool game this weekend. :)
You are correct.
Maybe he meant #10 in Virginia? ;)
Quote from: Scots13 on September 10, 2015, 01:32:31 PMQuote from: HSCTiger74 on September 09, 2015, 02:05:58 PMMaybe you didn't catch the box score of W&L/Averett last Friday :oQuote from: jknezek on September 08, 2015, 04:30:50 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on September 08, 2015, 04:27:11 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
Key Matchups:
#10 (South) Hampden-Sydney at #10 Christopher Newport
I think the #10 South team is probably Hardin-Simmons instead of Hampden-Sydney...but this is still a cool game this weekend. :)
You are correct.
Maybe he meant #10 in Virginia? ;)
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on September 10, 2015, 12:27:44 PM
I think another key matchup would be Cortland State vs. Framingham State.
Quote from: Scots13 on September 10, 2015, 01:32:31 PMQuote from: HSCTiger74 on September 09, 2015, 02:05:58 PMMaybe you didn't catch the box score of W&L/Averett last Friday :oQuote from: jknezek on September 08, 2015, 04:30:50 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on September 08, 2015, 04:27:11 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 08, 2015, 04:01:46 PM
Key Matchups:
#10 (South) Hampden-Sydney at #10 Christopher Newport
I think the #10 South team is probably Hardin-Simmons instead of Hampden-Sydney...but this is still a cool game this weekend. :)
You are correct.
Maybe he meant #10 in Virginia? ;)
Quote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2015, 10:25:34 PMThe Gap between Wesley and the rest of the teams in this poll is "Donald Trump Huge" at this point of the season.
East region top 10 takes a beating again. 3 teams go down. Just going to be crazy each week if the first 2 weeks are any indication.
Quote from: Bartman on September 13, 2015, 11:27:22 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2015, 10:25:34 PMThe Gap between Wesley and the rest of the teams in this poll is "Donald Trump Huge" at this point of the season.
East region top 10 takes a beating again. 3 teams go down. Just going to be crazy each week if the first 2 weeks are any indication.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 1-0 | 70 | 1 | vs. Christopher Newport |
2 Hobart | 2-0 | 60 | 2 | at #4 Ithaca |
3 Rowan | 1-0 | 58 | 3 | at William Paterson |
4 Ithaca | 1-0 | 47 | 5 | vs. #2 Hobart |
5t Cortland State | 2-0 | 30 | NR | at St. John Fisher |
5t Stevenson | 2-0 | 30 | NR | at Lebanon Valley |
7 Widener | 1-1 | 26 | 7 | at Albright |
8 Morrisville State | 1-0 | 18 | 8t | at Utica |
9 Buffalo State | 1-0 | 17 | 8t | at #10 Alfred |
10 Alfred | 2-0 | 7 | NR | vs. #9 Buffalo State |
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 15, 2015, 09:53:11 AM
How about Ithaca ahead of Cortland?
I mean, I know Ithaca was the E8 champ last season, but they were 7-4 and lost to Cortland. As for this year's results, since when does a non-LL team beating Union mean anything? Cortland's got a pair of wins that are both better than Ithaca's lone win.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 15, 2015, 11:12:09 AM
Let's all just relax about the Cortlands and Ithacas of the world. The real story here is Husson and WPI getting votes. Let's not let the records after 2 weeks make us turn stoopid now. Clean up your act Husson and WPI voters.
Quote from: NED3Guy on September 15, 2015, 03:30:47 PM
Husson is a solid football team. They were very much in the game against Alfred (who many pollsters have climbing the poll). I wish they weren't in Bangor Maine so they could put together a better non-league schedule, and we'd have a better body of evidence to work off of. As it looks right now, they have TWO open weeks in a row before entering into league play. Nothing they do in league will help them gain or keep poll votes. So I'd be hard pressed to see them remaining in the poll in the weeks to come.
That being said they'll likely end the season as an 8-1 team with an AQ, and because of the 500 mile rule they'll either host or get a favorable New England match up in the first round...and we'll still have nothing to go off of besides a solid performance against a good (maybe real good?) Alfred team.
Quote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:01:56 PM
This is humorous to me (although I don't really like the bashing of programs, since they didn't vote, the pollsers did...)
It may make me vote for a random program in the future, just to stir the pot...
If FDU wins it's next game. perhaps they should be #5? ::)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 15, 2015, 04:09:40 PMQuote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:01:56 PM
This is humorous to me (although I don't really like the bashing of programs, since they didn't vote, the pollsers did...)
It may make me vote for a random program in the future, just to stir the pot...
If FDU wins it's next game. perhaps they should be #5? ::)
Hey Curry and Framingham got 'bashed' for years but they earned their stripes so they get some credit(not Dem Spicy Boyz in the current day, but in the hayday)... I just don't see that happening with Husson anytime soon, especially in that god awful conference. I wouldn't bash the conference so bad if they didn't get an AQ, but all of New England worked the AQ system, perfectly legally, and now gets 3 AQ's which is tough to stomach.
Quote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:19:44 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 15, 2015, 04:09:40 PMQuote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:01:56 PM
This is humorous to me (although I don't really like the bashing of programs, since they didn't vote, the pollsers did...)
It may make me vote for a random program in the future, just to stir the pot...
If FDU wins it's next game. perhaps they should be #5? ::)
Hey Curry and Framingham got 'bashed' for years but they earned their stripes so they get some credit(not Dem Spicy Boyz in the current day, but in the hayday)... I just don't see that happening with Husson anytime soon, especially in that god awful conference. I wouldn't bash the conference so bad if they didn't get an AQ, but all of New England worked the AQ system, perfectly legally, and now gets 3 AQ's which is tough to stomach.
I hear you, and that comment wasn't really directed at you. I saw one of the teams called "stooges" in one of the threads, and it caused me to pause.
I think most of us have an issue with the powers that worked the system to create AQs for groups of teams that don't earn it in play or strength of schedule etc...especially when some more deserving teams get left out...but I direct my ire towards the NCAA (as I do with many other issues) and the manipulative conference leadership that created the system. The players are playing in the conferences that are dictated, and they don't have any control of that, so i'll not denigrate their teams for that...
Quote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:23:02 PMQuote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:19:44 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 15, 2015, 04:09:40 PMQuote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:01:56 PM
This is humorous to me (although I don't really like the bashing of programs, since they didn't vote, the pollsers did...)
It may make me vote for a random program in the future, just to stir the pot...
If FDU wins it's next game. perhaps they should be #5? ::)
Hey Curry and Framingham got 'bashed' for years but they earned their stripes so they get some credit(not Dem Spicy Boyz in the current day, but in the hayday)... I just don't see that happening with Husson anytime soon, especially in that god awful conference. I wouldn't bash the conference so bad if they didn't get an AQ, but all of New England worked the AQ system, perfectly legally, and now gets 3 AQ's which is tough to stomach.
I hear you, and that comment wasn't really directed at you. I saw one of the teams called "stooges" in one of the threads, and it caused me to pause.
I think most of us have an issue with the powers that worked the system to create AQs for groups of teams that don't earn it in play or strength of schedule etc...especially when some more deserving teams get left out...but I direct my ire towards the NCAA (as I do with many other issues) and the manipulative conference leadership that created the system. The players are playing in the conferences that are dictated, and they don't have any control of that, so i'll not denigrate their teams for that...
PS I was not the one that voted for Husson or WPI... ;)
Quote from: bman on September 15, 2015, 04:19:44 PM
I hear you, and that comment wasn't really directed at you. I saw one of the teams called "stooges" in one of the threads, and it caused me to pause.
I think most of us have an issue with the powers that worked the system to create AQs for groups of teams that don't earn it in play or strength of schedule etc...especially when some more deserving teams get left out...but I direct my ire towards the NCAA (as I do with many other issues) and the manipulative conference leadership that created the system. The players are playing in the conferences that are dictated, and they don't have any control of that, so i'll not denigrate their teams for that...
Quote from: NED3Guy on September 15, 2015, 03:30:47 PM
Husson is a solid football team. They were very much in the game against Alfred (who many pollsters have climbing the poll). I wish they weren't in Bangor Maine so they could put together a better non-league schedule, and we'd have a better body of evidence to work off of. As it looks right now, they have TWO open weeks in a row before entering into league play. Nothing they do in league will help them gain or keep poll votes. So I'd be hard pressed to see them remaining in the poll in the weeks to come.
That being said they'll likely end the season as an 8-1 team with an AQ, and because of the 500 mile rule they'll either host or get a favorable New England match up in the first round...and we'll still have nothing to go off of besides a solid performance against a good (maybe real good?) Alfred team.
Quote from: NED3Guy on September 15, 2015, 03:30:47 PM
That being said they'll likely end the season as an 8-1 team with an AQ, and because of the 500 mile rule they'll either host or get a favorable New England match up in the first round...and we'll still have nothing to go off of besides a solid performance against a good (maybe real good?) Alfred team.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 20, 2015, 09:43:05 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
Lew, it is crazy but fun. I saw Widener against Rowan and thought they would be limited offensively against a good defense. Albright's comeback against Salisbury looks even more impressive with how Salisbury crushed Montclair yesterday. The top is pretty solid with Wesley, Rowan, Ithaca, and Cortland, after that who knows. But I am having fun trying to figure it out.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on September 20, 2015, 09:23:18 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
"The MAC is a complete S-show". Oh, ye LewDogg knows so very, very little about the essence of competitive balance within a conference. Give me a conference where six or seven teams have a shot......where every game means something......vs. a conference where teams are always playing for second place behind Mount Youngstown State Union, University of Wisconsin ww, Johns Hopkins and this year, Wesley. I'll take close games in a conference where the differences between 1 and 5/6 are miniscule vs. #1 being light years ahead, and a couple of teams "battling" for runner up.
As you were :)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 21, 2015, 06:59:34 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 20, 2015, 09:23:18 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
"The MAC is a complete S-show". Oh, ye LewDogg knows so very, very little about the essence of competitive balance within a conference. Give me a conference where six or seven teams have a shot......where every game means something......vs. a conference where teams are always playing for second place behind Mount Youngstown State Union, University of Wisconsin ww, Johns Hopkins and this year, Wesley. I'll take close games in a conference where the differences between 1 and 5/6 are miniscule vs. #1 being light years ahead, and a couple of teams "battling" for runner up.
As you were :)
Woa woah woah, step back from the ledge. Take a few deep breaths. Nowhere did I say the MAC stinks. I said it's a sh##show. Which it is. Stevenson and Albright at the moment are undefeated both with 2 nice wins. And then your usual suspects, DelVal, Lyco, and Widener haven't started great and might not be up to par. I don't think many people on these boards(outside of the MAC) are familiar with Stevenson or Albright, so things are in disarray. It's great for the conference I guess. It doesn't mean the conference stinks. Let's now remove our small girl panties and step into our magic undies. It's all going to be ok.
As I was...
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 21, 2015, 08:09:29 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 21, 2015, 06:59:34 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 20, 2015, 09:23:18 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
"The MAC is a complete S-show". Oh, ye LewDogg knows so very, very little about the essence of competitive balance within a conference. Give me a conference where six or seven teams have a shot......where every game means something......vs. a conference where teams are always playing for second place behind Mount Youngstown State Union, University of Wisconsin ww, Johns Hopkins and this year, Wesley. I'll take close games in a conference where the differences between 1 and 5/6 are miniscule vs. #1 being light years ahead, and a couple of teams "battling" for runner up.
As you were :)
Woa woah woah, step back from the ledge. Take a few deep breaths. Nowhere did I say the MAC stinks. I said it's a sh##show. Which it is. Stevenson and Albright at the moment are undefeated both with 2 nice wins. And then your usual suspects, DelVal, Lyco, and Widener haven't started great and might not be up to par. I don't think many people on these boards(outside of the MAC) are familiar with Stevenson or Albright, so things are in disarray. It's great for the conference I guess. It doesn't mean the conference stinks. Let's now remove our small girl panties and step into our magic undies. It's all going to be ok.
As I was...
The SEC is a ****e show this year. As it is every year.
As you were.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 21, 2015, 06:59:34 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 20, 2015, 09:23:18 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
"The MAC is a complete S-show". Oh, ye LewDogg knows so very, very little about the essence of competitive balance within a conference. Give me a conference where six or seven teams have a shot......where every game means something......vs. a conference where teams are always playing for second place behind Mount Youngstown State Union, University of Wisconsin ww, Johns Hopkins and this year, Wesley. I'll take close games in a conference where the differences between 1 and 5/6 are miniscule vs. #1 being light years ahead, and a couple of teams "battling" for runner up.
As you were :)
Woa woah woah, step back from the ledge. Take a few deep breaths. Nowhere did I say the MAC stinks. I said it's a sh##show. Which it is. Stevenson and Albright at the moment are undefeated both with 2 nice wins. And then your usual suspects, DelVal, Lyco, and Widener haven't started great and might not be up to par. I don't think many people on these boards(outside of the MAC) are familiar with Stevenson or Albright, so things are in disarray. It's great for the conference I guess. It doesn't mean the conference stinks. Let's now remove our small girl panties and step into our magic undies. It's all going to be ok.
As I was...
Quote from: bman on September 21, 2015, 11:11:31 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 21, 2015, 06:59:34 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 20, 2015, 09:23:18 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
"The MAC is a complete S-show". Oh, ye LewDogg knows so very, very little about the essence of competitive balance within a conference. Give me a conference where six or seven teams have a shot......where every game means something......vs. a conference where teams are always playing for second place behind Mount Youngstown State Union, University of Wisconsin ww, Johns Hopkins and this year, Wesley. I'll take close games in a conference where the differences between 1 and 5/6 are miniscule vs. #1 being light years ahead, and a couple of teams "battling" for runner up.
As you were :)
Woa woah woah, step back from the ledge. Take a few deep breaths. Nowhere did I say the MAC stinks. I said it's a sh##show. Which it is. Stevenson and Albright at the moment are undefeated both with 2 nice wins. And then your usual suspects, DelVal, Lyco, and Widener haven't started great and might not be up to par. I don't think many people on these boards(outside of the MAC) are familiar with Stevenson or Albright, so things are in disarray. It's great for the conference I guess. It doesn't mean the conference stinks. Let's now remove our small girl panties and step into our magic undies. It's all going to be ok.
As I was...
Well I think the conference (MAC) kinda stinks right now... :-\
I'm not on a ledge, but when I look at the conference as a whole, there doesn't seem to be any team (including Albright and Stevenson) at this point that looks like it can go a round or two deep in the playoffs...and forget anything further. And yes, I realize the season is early....I'll revert to my previous point, that the frontrunners seemed to have regressed, rather than the mid pack teams moving forward. No disrespect toward any of the teams or the conference, but it's just the way I see it right now...
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 21, 2015, 08:09:29 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 21, 2015, 06:59:34 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 20, 2015, 09:23:18 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 20, 2015, 09:05:39 AM
I just put my pole in, and I have to tell ya, what a cluster #%*!. The MAC is a complete S-show. I'm putting teams in the top 10 from that conference that ive never voted for in all my years doing this. Ithaca impressed yesterday for sure, but what does that do to Hobart? Not much I don't think, but enough to make you wonder. Cortland...no idea with them. Do they even have a defense? Do they need a defense? I will say, Husson didn't crack my top 10 this week. WPI moved up to like 16 on my board. But we've seen this before from them so I'm not holding my breath. This season is wack so far. Interested to see the cumulative vote.
"The MAC is a complete S-show". Oh, ye LewDogg knows so very, very little about the essence of competitive balance within a conference. Give me a conference where six or seven teams have a shot......where every game means something......vs. a conference where teams are always playing for second place behind Mount Youngstown State Union, University of Wisconsin ww, Johns Hopkins and this year, Wesley. I'll take close games in a conference where the differences between 1 and 5/6 are miniscule vs. #1 being light years ahead, and a couple of teams "battling" for runner up.
As you were :)
Woa woah woah, step back from the ledge. Take a few deep breaths. Nowhere did I say the MAC stinks. I said it's a sh##show. Which it is. Stevenson and Albright at the moment are undefeated both with 2 nice wins. And then your usual suspects, DelVal, Lyco, and Widener haven't started great and might not be up to par. I don't think many people on these boards(outside of the MAC) are familiar with Stevenson or Albright, so things are in disarray. It's great for the conference I guess. It doesn't mean the conference stinks. Let's now remove our small girl panties and step into our magic undies. It's all going to be ok.
As I was...
The SEC is a ****e show this year. As it is every year.
As you were.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 2-0 | 70 | 1 | at #6 (North) North Central |
2 Ithaca | 2-0 | 61 | 4 | vs. #6 Alfred |
3 Rowan | 2-0 | 56 | 3 | vs. Montclair State |
4 Cortland State | 3-0 | 48 | 5t | vs. Utica |
5 Stevenson | 3-0 | 33 | 5t | vs. Misericordia |
6 Alfred | 3-0 | 17 | 32 | at #2 Ithaca |
7 Hobart | 2-1 | 27 | 2 | at Merchant Marine |
8 Albright | 2-0 | 21 | NR | at Lycoming |
9 Brockport State | 2-0 | 10 | NR | at St. John Fisher |
10 Salisbury | 1-1 | 7 | NR | vs. Southern Virginia |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 22, 2015, 09:26:13 AM
Kaz, you got a screwup there with the same voter have both Utica and Buff St at 9.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 23, 2015, 09:38:13 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 22, 2015, 09:26:13 AM
Kaz, you got a screwup there with the same voter have both Utica and Buff St at 9.
Fixed. Lousy fat fingers...
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 3-0 | 70 | 1 | vs. Southern Virginia |
2 Ithaca | 3-0 | 62 | 2 | at Utica |
3 Rowan | 3-0 | 53 | 3 | at Christopher Newport |
4 Cortland State | 4-0 | 50 | 4 | vs. Hartwick |
6t Albright | 3-0 | 34 | 8 | at Misericordia |
6t Hobart | 3-1 | 34 | 7 | vs. WPI |
6t Stevenson | 4-0 | 34 | 5 | vs. King's |
8 Salisbury | 2-1 | 18 | 10 | at TCNJ |
9 Alfred | 3-1 | 11 | 6 | vs. Morrisville |
10t Brockport State | 2-1 | 4 | 9 | vs. Alfred State |
10t Western New England | 4-0 | 4 | NR | vs. Nichols |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 29, 2015, 09:36:11 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Wesley ( 7 ) 3-0 70 1 vs. Southern Virginia 2 Ithaca 3-0 62 2 at Utica 3 Rowan 3-0 53 3 at Christopher Newport 4 Cortland State 4-0 50 4 vs. Hartwick 6t Albright 3-0 34 8 at Misericordia 6t Hobart 3-1 34 7 vs. WPI 6t Stevenson 4-0 34 5 vs. King's 8 Salisbury 2-1 18 10 at TCNJ 9 Alfred 3-1 11 6 vs. Morrisville 10t Brockport State 2-1 4 9 vs. Alfred State 10t Western New England 4-0 4 NR vs. Nichols
Also Receiving votes:
Framingham State 3
Christopher Newport 2
RPI 2
Delaware Valley 1
Rochester 1
St. Lawrence 1
Utica 1
Voting Distribution:
Wesley (1,1,1,1,1,1,1)
Ithaca (2,2,3,2,2,2,2)
Rowan (5,4,2,4,3,3,3)
Cortland State (3,3,4,3,5,4,5)
Albright (4,5,5,9,7,6,7)
Hobart (6,6,7,7,6,7,4)
Stevenson (10,7,6,5,4,5,6)
Salisbury (7,10,8,6,8,9,NR)
Alfred (NR,9,NR,8,NR,8,8)
Brockport State (NR,8,NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Western New England (9,NR,9,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Framingham State (8,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Christopher Newport (NR,NR,NR,NR,8,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Delaware Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Rochester (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:20:09 PM
I'll bite...WNEC and Framingham would likely both lose to Christopher Newport, RPI, Delaware Valley, and St. Lawrence. And probably Utica and Rochacha too. There. I said it.
Quote from: D3pc on September 29, 2015, 06:29:50 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:20:09 PM
I'll bite...WNEC and Framingham would likely both lose to Christopher Newport, RPI, Delaware Valley, and St. Lawrence. And probably Utica and Rochacha too. There. I said it.
yeeuup. Both solid teams though
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:53:50 PM
BTW, if anyone wants to barf a little, go scroll through a few NESCAC pages. Don't read them obviously, just scroll through. The most verbose ridiculous posting I can ever remember. Book after book after book, and the first line of many responses are like 'Great Post!' Oy Vay. Different crowd over there!
Quote from: bman on September 29, 2015, 08:50:39 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:53:50 PM
BTW, if anyone wants to barf a little, go scroll through a few NESCAC pages. Don't read them obviously, just scroll through. The most verbose ridiculous posting I can ever remember. Book after book after book, and the first line of many responses are like 'Great Post!' Oy Vay. Different crowd over there!
I have been tempted to post over there periodically, however I would be viewed as a cretin invading their board, so I hold my tongue...and god forbid a I might make a grammatical error.. ::)
Quote from: bman on September 29, 2015, 08:50:39 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:53:50 PM
BTW, if anyone wants to barf a little, go scroll through a few NESCAC pages. Don't read them obviously, just scroll through. The most verbose ridiculous posting I can ever remember. Book after book after book, and the first line of many responses are like 'Great Post!' Oy Vay. Different crowd over there!
I have been tempted to post over there periodically, however I would be viewed as a cretin invading their board, so I hold my tongue...and god forbid a I might make a grammatical error.. ::)
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 07:58:23 AM
I'm actually a little surprised Hobart is not getting more 4-5 rankings than they are. I know it's only a spot or 2, but they have 1 regular season loss in like 4 years, and if Wesley wasn't part of this poll this year, that loss would be to the #1 team. I have them at 4 because, let's be serious here, toss the records out the window and who do you like, Hobart vs. Cortland/Albright/The Steve? I'll give a little leeway on Cortland because Cortland is good every year and is a proven entity, by Albright and The Steve don't really tickle my undercarriage. Albright has certainly beaten some historically good teams, but those teams are so-so this year. the Steve really doesn't have a signature win. Hobart doesn't either, but Hobart shouldn't have to gain reputation points here. If the playoffs started tomorrow, i'd take Hobart over all 3.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 07:58:23 AM
Albright has certainly beaten some historically good teams, but those teams are so-so this year.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 09:51:46 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 07:58:23 AM
Albright has certainly beaten some historically good teams, but those teams are so-so this year.
Wait a second. This is a self-fulfilling thing. Isn't part of the reason you perceive those teams as "so-so this year" just because they lost to Albright?
Salisbury went out and outscored their next two opponents 137-21, including a 46-14 win against Montclair State (0-3 team on paper, but the other 2 losses sandwiched around that 46-14 loss to Salisbury are 27-24 to Delaware Valley and 13-7 to #3-in-this-poll Rowan). Remove the Albright loss and Salisbury looks like normal Salisbury.
Widener is 2-2. The losses are 24-10 against Rowan and 27-10 against Albright. Remove the Albright loss and 2-1 Widener with a loss to Rowan is just normal pretty-solid-in-the-MAC Widener. Again, the only reason you're looking at Widener and saying they're "so-so this year" is because they lost to Albright.
Lycoming doesn't look so hot this year, admittedly. I'm fine with calling that just a so-so win.
OK, now let's turn this on its head. What has Hobart done this year?
- won 29-7 against a Dickinson team that was 3-7 last year and is off to a 1-3 start with a pair of shootout losses to non-contenders
- won 28-17 against Endicott in a game where they gained 204 yards. The same Framingham State team that you're ****ting on beat Endicott 42-6 and gained 473 yards the week before. Football isn't linear and comparative scores are not the end-all-be-all, but I think it's ****ing hilarious that you'll take a **** on Framingham (who is just "receiving votes") and then argue Hobart should be higher in the poll with these two results on the board.
- lost 24-6 to what's probably a pretty good Ithaca team. That's cool and all, but it wasn't an overtime loss or a one-pointer-at-the-buzzer, it was a decisive defeat. North Central gets that benefit of the doubt for losing 50-49 to Wesley...but against Ithaca, Hobart scored 6 points and gained 159 yards! Union scored 23 on Ithaca the week before; Alfred scored 18 on them the week after. Again, comparative scores are imperfect, but this comparison still does not stack up nicely for Hobart's offense.
- won 30-15 against USMMA in a game where they gained 215 yards.
I know that ordinarily Hobart can play the card of backing off and pulling the first stringers instead of piling on, but that doesn't really fly here. That game against USMMA was close until the end (23-15 in the 4th until Hobart TD with 4 mins to play). The Endicott game, similar deal. Hobart was (edit: meant to say NOT in danger) of losing either game, but it's not like those offensive numbers are depressed because the JV's played the second half...they really are struggling badly on offense. The teams Hobart has beaten are a combined 3-8 and all have lost by larger margins to teams you think are of lesser quality than Hobart. For eff's sake, Endicott sandwiched 42-6 losses to Framingham State and 34-9 to St. Lawrence around that sorta-close game with Hobart! And Albright is the team who has only beaten "so-so this year" competition?
Any argument for Hobart at #4 is based entirely on reputation from years past, not at all what's qualitatively happening on the field this year.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:45:12 PMQuote from: D3pc on September 29, 2015, 06:29:50 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:20:09 PM
I'll bite...WNEC and Framingham would likely both lose to Christopher Newport, RPI, Delaware Valley, and St. Lawrence. And probably Utica and Rochacha too. There. I said it.
yeeuup. Both solid teams though
I agree. They are the top of the New England teams for sure(and probably not even close) and they can certainly compete. I just can't justify them in my top 10 until the beat someone. Unfortunately Union and Springfield don't count as they aren't cracking anyone's top 20's in the East.
Quote from: bman on September 30, 2015, 10:23:37 AM
Lots of numbers tossed and good points made.
I know my ranking of Hobart was based on the loss to Ithaca (who I had them rated higher until the loss), and a so-so performance against MMA...
I have followed the MAC for 30 years, and seen multiple games this year...and I still am not sure if Albright is for real...
but I am comfortable where they are placed, and will let the season dictate moves up or down...
I have a friend who's son plays in the MASCAC. He was not overly impressed having seen Framingham St play in person. I have tried not to let that affect my opinion, but I will watch video in the next few weeks....
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 30, 2015, 10:41:04 AMQuote from: bman on September 30, 2015, 10:23:37 AM
Lots of numbers tossed and good points made.
I know my ranking of Hobart was based on the loss to Ithaca (who I had them rated higher until the loss), and a so-so performance against MMA...
I have followed the MAC for 30 years, and seen multiple games this year...and I still am not sure if Albright is for real...
but I am comfortable where they are placed, and will let the season dictate moves up or down...
I have a friend who's son plays in the MASCAC. He was not overly impressed having seen Framingham St play in person. I have tried not to let that affect my opinion, but I will watch video in the next few weeks....
I've watched 2 Framingham games this year, Cortland and Endicott. The offense is for real. The special teams and defense is not.
I find it tough not to be impressed by a team that hasn't lost a MASAC game in 3 years now, even if the conference does suck.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 10:11:17 AM
Hobart hasn't had a bad year in a long time. I'm not saying Hobart is better, and they certainly haven't played a tough schedule so far, outside of Ithaca who they got smoked by, but I just can't yet put these other teams ahead of them this early on. I need to see more. If Hobart loses another and they all continue piling on impressive wins, then i'm on board. Just don't see it yet.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:20:09 PM
I'll bite...WNEC and Framingham would likely both lose to Christopher Newport, RPI, Delaware Valley, and St. Lawrence. And probably Utica and Rochacha too. There. I said it.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 29, 2015, 06:20:09 PM
I'll bite...WNEC and Framingham would likely both lose to Christopher Newport, RPI, Delaware Valley, and St. Lawrence. And probably Utica and Rochacha too. There. I said it.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 01:45:53 PM
I'm amazed at how the NEFC struggles from the early 2000's still color some of the perceptions here that the New England teams can't compete with...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2015, 02:37:42 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 01:45:53 PM
I'm amazed at how the NEFC struggles from the early 2000's still color some of the perceptions here that the New England teams can't compete with...
Because nothing says "respect our conference as a legitimate threat outside of New England" like your recent signature moments being three first-round losses in the NCAAs and a few wins in the regular season over mediocre teams?
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 30, 2015, 03:07:50 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 30, 2015, 02:37:42 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 01:45:53 PM
I'm amazed at how the NEFC struggles from the early 2000's still color some of the perceptions here that the New England teams can't compete with...
Because nothing says "respect our conference as a legitimate threat outside of New England" like your recent signature moments being three first-round losses in the NCAAs and a few wins in the regular season over mediocre teams?
I don't think he saying they are a "legitimate threat", just saying that they can compete at a much higher level then most give them credit for. I think Framingham does get due respect here
Quote from: Boxer7806 on September 30, 2015, 03:07:50 PM
I don't think he saying they are a "legitimate threat", just saying that they can compete at a much higher level then most give them credit for. I think Framingham does get due respect here because at least they have competed and SCHEDULED good competition, even if the wins were lacking. Both those Rowans games I think they were up in the fourth quarters before losing, as well as that Ithaca playoff game. I agree, you can't be legitimate as you say without wins in those games against quality competition.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 03:20:27 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on September 30, 2015, 03:07:50 PM
I don't think he saying they are a "legitimate threat", just saying that they can compete at a much higher level then most give them credit for. I think Framingham does get due respect here because at least they have competed and SCHEDULED good competition, even if the wins were lacking. Both those Rowans games I think they were up in the fourth quarters before losing, as well as that Ithaca playoff game. I agree, you can't be legitimate as you say without wins in those games against quality competition.
Probably said it better than I could, I had started trying to write a reply here and just figured I'd call it quits, but this is where I was trying to go. I don't think Framingham is a legitimate threat to win three playoff games, but is it really so ridiculous to give them a 10th place vote in the ERFP? Lew stated the opinion that the next five teams plus Utica and Rochester are all better than Framingham...even with Framingham having beaten one of those teams last year and just played Cortland (#4 in the poll) to a game that literally came down to the final play? They're not only not worthy of a 10th place vote, but they're not even in the top 15?
And Bombers, saw your post late but you are correct to point this out; I was not talking about Framingham representing the "New England" teams as a whole, but themselves alone. Basically, I think they are being punished for the NEFC's past sins with comments like Lew's.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 03:38:17 PM
I didn't say they were better you frickin banana head! I said I would pick them if they were going to play Head to Head.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 03:38:17 PM
Boxer, I also didn't say Hobart should be above 4 or 5. I was the only one with them above 6 and I said i was surprised, then banana-land boy came out and said I hate Albright worse than pants.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 03:20:27 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on September 30, 2015, 03:07:50 PM
I don't think he saying they are a "legitimate threat", just saying that they can compete at a much higher level then most give them credit for. I think Framingham does get due respect here because at least they have competed and SCHEDULED good competition, even if the wins were lacking. Both those Rowans games I think they were up in the fourth quarters before losing, as well as that Ithaca playoff game. I agree, you can't be legitimate as you say without wins in those games against quality competition.
Probably said it better than I could, I had started trying to write a reply here and just figured I'd call it quits, but this is where I was trying to go. I don't think Framingham is a legitimate threat to win three playoff games, but is it really so ridiculous to give them a 10th place vote in the ERFP? Lew stated the opinion that the next five teams plus Utica and Rochester are all better than Framingham...even with Framingham having beaten one of those teams last year and just played Cortland (#4 in the poll) to a game that literally came down to the final play? They're not only not worthy of a 10th place vote, but they're not even in the top 15?
And Bombers, saw your post late but you are correct to point this out; I was not talking about Framingham representing the "New England" teams as a whole, but themselves alone. Basically, I think they are being punished for the NEFC's past sins with comments like Lew's.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 04:10:45 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 03:38:17 PM
Boxer, I also didn't say Hobart should be above 4 or 5. I was the only one with them above 6 and I said i was surprised, then banana-land boy came out and said I hate Albright worse than pants.
See, here's how rational discussion works:
You were surprised that Hobart was not ranked higher by some voters. You state that you would pick Hobart today, head-to-head, against Albright. That's cool.
I disagreed with your initial assertion. I present the teams' respective game results from this year, which pretty relevant to a discussion of which team is better, no?
Hobart has three "blah" wins and a loss to a very good team. Albright has three wins of arguably (in fact, likely) superior quality. I felt that your dismissiveness of Albright's wins for this season was a little off-base. Other than losing to Albright, those teams haven't really done anything out of line with their norms, although Lyco is definitely not looking so hot.
You are welcome to interpret that data differently than I do, that's fine. But I think it was kinda reasonable to look at the teams' results from this year in a discussion of which team is better. I don't know why any of this makes me a banana-head. It's all relevant information.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 03:38:17 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 03:20:27 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on September 30, 2015, 03:07:50 PM
I don't think he saying they are a "legitimate threat", just saying that they can compete at a much higher level then most give them credit for. I think Framingham does get due respect here because at least they have competed and SCHEDULED good competition, even if the wins were lacking. Both those Rowans games I think they were up in the fourth quarters before losing, as well as that Ithaca playoff game. I agree, you can't be legitimate as you say without wins in those games against quality competition.
Probably said it better than I could, I had started trying to write a reply here and just figured I'd call it quits, but this is where I was trying to go. I don't think Framingham is a legitimate threat to win three playoff games, but is it really so ridiculous to give them a 10th place vote in the ERFP? Lew stated the opinion that the next five teams plus Utica and Rochester are all better than Framingham...even with Framingham having beaten one of those teams last year and just played Cortland (#4 in the poll) to a game that literally came down to the final play? They're not only not worthy of a 10th place vote, but they're not even in the top 15?
And Bombers, saw your post late but you are correct to point this out; I was not talking about Framingham representing the "New England" teams as a whole, but themselves alone. Basically, I think they are being punished for the NEFC's past sins with comments like Lew's.
I didn't say they were better you frickin banana head! I said I would pick them if they were going to play Head to Head. You had too much of that beetlejuice powder sprinkled on your head dude. I can't even deal with people like you. If I said the sky was blue, you'd tell everyone I said it was red.
Boxer, I also didn't say Hobart should be above 4 or 5. I was the only one with them above 6 and I said i was surprised, then banana-land boy came out and said I hate Albright worse than pants.
If anything, I am beginning to question some of the educations of the New England team people here.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 01, 2015, 03:05:32 PMQuote from: LewDogg11 on September 30, 2015, 03:38:17 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on September 30, 2015, 03:20:27 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on September 30, 2015, 03:07:50 PM
I don't think he saying they are a "legitimate threat", just saying that they can compete at a much higher level then most give them credit for. I think Framingham does get due respect here because at least they have competed and SCHEDULED good competition, even if the wins were lacking. Both those Rowans games I think they were up in the fourth quarters before losing, as well as that Ithaca playoff game. I agree, you can't be legitimate as you say without wins in those games against quality competition.
Probably said it better than I could, I had started trying to write a reply here and just figured I'd call it quits, but this is where I was trying to go. I don't think Framingham is a legitimate threat to win three playoff games, but is it really so ridiculous to give them a 10th place vote in the ERFP? Lew stated the opinion that the next five teams plus Utica and Rochester are all better than Framingham...even with Framingham having beaten one of those teams last year and just played Cortland (#4 in the poll) to a game that literally came down to the final play? They're not only not worthy of a 10th place vote, but they're not even in the top 15?
And Bombers, saw your post late but you are correct to point this out; I was not talking about Framingham representing the "New England" teams as a whole, but themselves alone. Basically, I think they are being punished for the NEFC's past sins with comments like Lew's.
I didn't say they were better you frickin banana head! I said I would pick them if they were going to play Head to Head. You had too much of that beetlejuice powder sprinkled on your head dude. I can't even deal with people like you. If I said the sky was blue, you'd tell everyone I said it was red.
Boxer, I also didn't say Hobart should be above 4 or 5. I was the only one with them above 6 and I said i was surprised, then banana-land boy came out and said I hate Albright worse than pants.
If anything, I am beginning to question some of the educations of the New England team people here.
I didn't say you did either. I was just referencing your point that you had them at 4 and I would not have them above that because of their poor offense to date. I personally think they should be at 5, mostly based on reputation of years past and because as Bombers said, the Ithaca game was closer than the score indicates and Ithaca seems to be a top 3 team in the east as of right now.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 03, 2015, 09:10:58 PMIf Wesley were not in the East, it would be a cluster@#$% for #1. Watched parts of Rowan game and although they had a nice comeback that was an underwhelming performance...Ithaca loses to a pumped up Utica team that frankly looked like the better team today, and Cortland needs to make sure they have the ball last with that defense. Albright has separated from Stevenson in my mind as the Steve squeaked by Kings today. So, don't know who is No.2, but happy that Hobart finally played Bartball today and think they will move up the ranks over the next few weeks as Oline is clicking and 2nd string QB finally played with confidence. As a plug for LL, both St.Lawrence and RPI looked very strong today.
The east is filled with good/ok teams that on any given Saturday almost anyone of them can beat another one and they keep doing so. There is a big gap between Wesley and the rest. I really have no idea who is 2. I have Rowan but they can't score enough. Albright looks good but the Mac just looks ok. Cortland escapes every week and gives up too many points. I moved Salisbury up, more on gut feeling than anything else. It is a crap shoot trying to figure out who to put at the bottom of the top 10. On the national stage I have a better feeling about Wesley after watching UWW struggle to beat Platteville. The win over NCC looks better to me since NCC lead Platteville 28 - 7 in the 4th. The defense has to improve for sure. Who knows, certainly not me!!!
Quote from: wesleydad on October 03, 2015, 09:10:58 PM
The east is filled with good/ok teams that on any given Saturday almost anyone of them can beat another one and they keep doing so. There is a big gap between Wesley and the rest. I really have no idea who is 2. I have Rowan but they can't score enough. Albright looks good but the Mac just looks ok. Cortland escapes every week and gives up too many points. I moved Salisbury up, more on gut feeling than anything else. It is a crap shoot trying to figure out who to put at the bottom of the top 10. On the national stage I have a better feeling about Wesley after watching UWW struggle to beat Platteville. The win over NCC looks better to me since NCC lead Platteville 28 - 7 in the 4th. The defense has to improve for sure. Who knows, certainly not me!!!
Quote from: NED3Guy on October 04, 2015, 11:59:09 AM
Quick look at records shows only Stevenson, Albright, Cortland, Wesley, Rowan and Western New England as the unbeaten teams left in the region (NESCAC excluded). Pretty easy to assume 5 of those 6 will make up top half of most pollsters lists. WNE did nothing to move up this week, and only has two teams who currently have winning records remaining on their schedule....even winning out may not impress pollsters enough. I guess if the E8 teams keep beating each other pollsters may have no choice but to include an undefeated new England team.....?
There are tons of good one loss teams who have appeared in the poll at various points in time this fall who could make up the bottom 5. I think the liberty league teams suffer the most this week due to the top three LL teams each having losses to E8 teams with losses.
Quote from: NED3Guy on October 04, 2015, 11:59:09 AM
Quick look at records shows only Stevenson, Albright, Cortland, Wesley, Rowan and Western New England as the unbeaten teams left in the region (NESCAC excluded). Pretty easy to assume 5 of those 6 will make up top half of most pollsters lists. WNE did nothing to move up this week, and only has two teams who currently have winning records remaining on their schedule....even winning out may not impress pollsters enough. I guess if the E8 teams keep beating each other pollsters may have no choice but to include an undefeated new England team.....?
There are tons of good one loss teams who have appeared in the poll at various points in time this fall who could make up the bottom 5. I think the liberty league teams suffer the most this week due to the top three LL teams each having losses to E8 teams with losses.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 04, 2015, 08:40:53 PMQuote from: NED3Guy on October 04, 2015, 11:59:09 AM
Quick look at records shows only Stevenson, Albright, Cortland, Wesley, Rowan and Western New England as the unbeaten teams left in the region (NESCAC excluded). Pretty easy to assume 5 of those 6 will make up top half of most pollsters lists. WNE did nothing to move up this week, and only has two teams who currently have winning records remaining on their schedule....even winning out may not impress pollsters enough. I guess if the E8 teams keep beating each other pollsters may have no choice but to include an undefeated new England team.....?
There are tons of good one loss teams who have appeared in the poll at various points in time this fall who could make up the bottom 5. I think the liberty league teams suffer the most this week due to the top three LL teams each having losses to E8 teams with losses.
I voted for Framingham and WNE because no one stands out as that good so why not. We can argue all we want about level of play and such, but no one else has stepped up and shown they are a lock for the top 10. In the end it is the 9 and 10 spots, why not someone other than the top conferences in the region. I don't think any conference should have 4 or 5 teams in the top 10.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 04, 2015, 08:47:20 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 04, 2015, 08:40:53 PMQuote from: NED3Guy on October 04, 2015, 11:59:09 AM
Quick look at records shows only Stevenson, Albright, Cortland, Wesley, Rowan and Western New England as the unbeaten teams left in the region (NESCAC excluded). Pretty easy to assume 5 of those 6 will make up top half of most pollsters lists. WNE did nothing to move up this week, and only has two teams who currently have winning records remaining on their schedule....even winning out may not impress pollsters enough. I guess if the E8 teams keep beating each other pollsters may have no choice but to include an undefeated new England team.....?
There are tons of good one loss teams who have appeared in the poll at various points in time this fall who could make up the bottom 5. I think the liberty league teams suffer the most this week due to the top three LL teams each having losses to E8 teams with losses.
I voted for Framingham and WNE because no one stands out as that good so why not. We can argue all we want about level of play and such, but no one else has stepped up and shown they are a lock for the top 10. In the end it is the 9 and 10 spots, why not someone other than the top conferences in the region. I don't think any conference should have 4 or 5 teams in the top 10.
The E8 is fun to follow, plain and simple. It truly is like the SEC of Division 3 football. Other conferences might have stronger teams at the top, but simply from top to bottom, it might be the best conference in Division 3. Granted I don't have the best national perspective here but the only other conference that I can see that is similar is the WIAC? But still they have Whitewater at the top. It would be nice though for the E8 to get a team to the National Semi's and even win one, so then the comparison can be complete.
I agree although I'm going to bet the E8 is simply better than any NE conference. Like we joked about on another thread, the E8 is really like the SEC, with Hartwick and maybe only Brockport being like Vanderbilt and Kentucky. Everyone else is solid and no joke. (and Kentucky and Vanderbilt are not jokes)
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 4-0 | 70 | 1 | at New Jersey |
2 Rowan | 4-0 | 57 | 3 | at #8 Salisbury |
3 Cortland State | 5-0 | 55 | 4 | at Buffalo State |
4 Albright | 4-0 | 39 | 6t | vs. Wilkes |
5 Ithaca | 3-1 | 35 | 2 | at Hartwick |
6 Hobart | 4-1 | 34 | 6t | at Springfield |
7 Stevenson | 5-0 | 29 | 6t | at Delaware Valley |
8 Salisbury | 2-1 | 27 | 8 | vs. #2 Rowan |
9 Alfred | 4-1 | 11 | 9 | Open Date |
10t Framingham State | 4-1 | 7 | NR | at Westfield State |
10t Utica | 3-2 | 7 | NR | at Brockport State |
Quote from: jknezek on October 06, 2015, 08:37:24 AM
Not often you see 17 teams in a 10 team poll...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 06, 2015, 08:45:15 AMQuote from: jknezek on October 06, 2015, 08:37:24 AM
Not often you see 17 teams in a 10 team poll...
??? When we started in the preseason, there were 20 teams that received votes so this is actually progress!
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2015, 10:22:17 AM
I think of all the teams that are getting votes, the one that confuses me the most is Cortland. My ranking(5) is not quite in line with what everyone else has. I just have a hard time being confident in a team that's given up 40+ in 3 of 5 games, despite their record. Looking at Cortland's schedule(I'm not saying this will happen), it's crazy to think that it's possible that they finish 5-5. They probably won't but it's certainly possible. (Buff St, Alfred, Brockport, MoVille, Ithaca) Tough schedule there. I think if they can maybe get the next 2 games in the W column, I would put them up to # 2. Which leads to Rowan....
The other one that is getting big votes is Rowan, that opposite Cortland, has won in a not exciting fashion. They've played some great defense so far, and haven't put a ton of points up. I think a great defense gives them more staying power, but i could see them possibly losing 3 games of what is left.
That's why it's tough to sit on the overall records at this point in the season. Some of these 'top' teams could get bounced from the rankings altogether in a matter of weeks.
On the other end, we have Salisbury. Salisbury is getting votes as high as 4 and to as low as no vote. A cancelled game doesn't help their cause at this point in time, but they are a complete anomaly right now. They lost to what looks like a good Albright team and then they've beaten 2 not so good teams.(Montclair is probably slightly above average) Like everyone else, Salisbury could excel, only losing to Wesley, or they could lose 3-4. We don't quite know. Even though I don't have them ranked yet, mostly because of a lack of data, Salisbury may be the team to end up ahead of one or both of the teams above.
Weird year. I like it.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2015, 10:22:17 AM
Weird year. I like it.
Quote from: bman on October 06, 2015, 10:28:00 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2015, 10:22:17 AM
I think of all the teams that are getting votes, the one that confuses me the most is Cortland. My ranking(5) is not quite in line with what everyone else has. I just have a hard time being confident in a team that's given up 40+ in 3 of 5 games, despite their record. Looking at Cortland's schedule(I'm not saying this will happen), it's crazy to think that it's possible that they finish 5-5. They probably won't but it's certainly possible. (Buff St, Alfred, Brockport, MoVille, Ithaca) Tough schedule there. I think if they can maybe get the next 2 games in the W column, I would put them up to # 2. Which leads to Rowan....
The other one that is getting big votes is Rowan, that opposite Cortland, has won in a not exciting fashion. They've played some great defense so far, and haven't put a ton of points up. I think a great defense gives them more staying power, but i could see them possibly losing 3 games of what is left.
That's why it's tough to sit on the overall records at this point in the season. Some of these 'top' teams could get bounced from the rankings altogether in a matter of weeks.
On the other end, we have Salisbury. Salisbury is getting votes as high as 4 and to as low as no vote. A cancelled game doesn't help their cause at this point in time, but they are a complete anomaly right now. They lost to what looks like a good Albright team and then they've beaten 2 not so good teams.(Montclair is probably slightly above average) Like everyone else, Salisbury could excel, only losing to Wesley, or they could lose 3-4. We don't quite know. Even though I don't have them ranked yet, mostly because of a lack of data, Salisbury may be the team to end up ahead of one or both of the teams above.
Weird year. I like it.
I know I mentioned that I saw (in person) Cortland play this year, and I wasn't overly impressed. The problem is...who do you place ahead of them?...Rowan? (nope...not impressed), Ithaca? I saw them (get dominated at times) on Saturday by Utica...
Albright?...no way So who? I'm befuddled enough, that although I adjusted my pool somewhat this week, not enough to let some of the fringe 11-13 teams in...
Quote from: dlip on October 06, 2015, 11:47:53 AMQuote from: bman on October 06, 2015, 10:28:00 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2015, 10:22:17 AM
I think of all the teams that are getting votes, the one that confuses me the most is Cortland. My ranking(5) is not quite in line with what everyone else has. I just have a hard time being confident in a team that's given up 40+ in 3 of 5 games, despite their record. Looking at Cortland's schedule(I'm not saying this will happen), it's crazy to think that it's possible that they finish 5-5. They probably won't but it's certainly possible. (Buff St, Alfred, Brockport, MoVille, Ithaca) Tough schedule there. I think if they can maybe get the next 2 games in the W column, I would put them up to # 2. Which leads to Rowan....
The other one that is getting big votes is Rowan, that opposite Cortland, has won in a not exciting fashion. They've played some great defense so far, and haven't put a ton of points up. I think a great defense gives them more staying power, but i could see them possibly losing 3 games of what is left.
That's why it's tough to sit on the overall records at this point in the season. Some of these 'top' teams could get bounced from the rankings altogether in a matter of weeks.
On the other end, we have Salisbury. Salisbury is getting votes as high as 4 and to as low as no vote. A cancelled game doesn't help their cause at this point in time, but they are a complete anomaly right now. They lost to what looks like a good Albright team and then they've beaten 2 not so good teams.(Montclair is probably slightly above average) Like everyone else, Salisbury could excel, only losing to Wesley, or they could lose 3-4. We don't quite know. Even though I don't have them ranked yet, mostly because of a lack of data, Salisbury may be the team to end up ahead of one or both of the teams above.
Weird year. I like it.
I know I mentioned that I saw (in person) Cortland play this year, and I wasn't overly impressed. The problem is...who do you place ahead of them?...Rowan? (nope...not impressed), Ithaca? I saw them (get dominated at times) on Saturday by Utica...
Albright?...no way So who? I'm befuddled enough, that although I adjusted my pool somewhat this week, not enough to let some of the fringe 11-13 teams in...
dlip agrees that it is really a mess so far. He is also not impressed with Cortland and with that defense he agrees with Lew that losing the next 5 games wouldn't be overly shocking and/or impossible. Aside from Wesley dlip does not think we really have any team that is close to being dominant in the East and making any real noise in the tourney. dlip believes that if Wesley was not here in the east this season the east may actually be perceived as being the weakest it has ever been in comparison to the rest of the country. Utica's loss to Ohio Northern looks better after this week and Cortland's win over Heidelberg still isn't doing a whole lot for dlip even though they have been competitive with some decent teams (Ohio Northern, John Carroll). dlip looks forward to seeing how the Gulls play Rowan this week. This may tell us a bit about both teams...however how teams handle triple option teams is not always indicative of how good their D really is. It will be quite interesting to see how the remainder of the season shakes out over here.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 06, 2015, 01:53:19 PM
I feel Ithaca should be #2, but that's my opinion. They will only get better.
Quote from: NED3Guy on October 06, 2015, 04:04:10 PM
Hobart won't get many chances to earn the right to move up in the poll.
They'll roll a down Springfield team this week, then have a weekend off before playing RPI (who it is quite possible could be a three loss team by then as they play SLU and Rochester leading up to Hobart).
If RPI beats SLU and Rochester, than the Hobart game should carry some poll weight. Otherwise, Hobart won't get the chance to impress any pollsters until they play SLU the first weekend of November.
Maybe they'll move up because they're Hobart and the poll looks strange without seeing them up high, but nothing on their 2015 resume warrants a move up anytime soon.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 09, 2015, 11:44:20 AM
The Hobart - IC game wasn't a good depiction of what the Statesmen can do. It's a completely different game if Sweeney was healthy. If Hobart can run the table, I wouldn't be surprised to see them in a bracket playing the E8 champ in the first round like last year.
Quote from: Swish3 on October 06, 2015, 03:16:43 PM
I look for Salisbury to walk the dog against Rowan on Saturday....
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 10, 2015, 03:15:09 PM
So, about Hobart running the table...
I'm probably asking for trouble just by pointing this out, but that Springfield team who just rolled off 35 points in the second half against the Statesmen lost to WNE by 20 points in week 1...does WNE get any transitive points here? Not saying they should suddenly go up to #4 or something ridiculous, but can we at least agree that this solidifies them as a ranking-worthy team? Or will we see someone manage to rank Springfield ahead of WNE this week?
Quote from: bman on October 12, 2015, 08:52:51 AM
I have to say that I am now officially almost clueless...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 06, 2015, 10:22:17 AM
Weird year. I like it.
Quote from: bman on October 12, 2015, 12:39:16 PM
I'm not so sure yet that the Stevenson loss was a quality loss. I didn't treat it that way. I guess we'll know in a couple of weeks...
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 12, 2015, 03:01:42 PMQuote from: bman on October 12, 2015, 12:39:16 PM
I'm not so sure yet that the Stevenson loss was a quality loss. I didn't treat it that way. I guess we'll know in a couple of weeks...
I can't say I completely disagree with you but last week I had The Steve ranked 7 and DVC 10 and DVC won 18-15. So what exactly do I do? DVC took 7 and The Steve dropped to 8 for me. The PA teams are really tough for me because i've never seen any of them play in person, I just know there has been SOME success there in the playoffs over the past 15 years. The LL/E8 teams tend to be tough as nails, can lose a crappy game to anyone in the regular season because the competition is pretty stiff, but tend to at least have some success each year in the playoffs. DVC and Widener are really the 2 most recent to do it. Albright possibly could be the real deal this year. The Steve is an unknown.
I made mention last week that I wouldn't be crazy to look at Cortland's schedule and think they could finish 5-5. Well, 1 game in, they proved me right so far. They could still finish anywhere from 9-1 to 5-5. Look out for Alfred and Utica to possibly throw a major wrinkle into the E8 this year!!! If they don't, the Cortaca game might be something for the ages.
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 12, 2015, 07:55:51 PM
I wonder what effect the stabbing of one player by another at
Albright will have on the team going forward.
http://6abc.com/news/police-albright-player-stabs-teammate-with-corkscrew/1028891/
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 13, 2015, 08:28:08 AMQuote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 12, 2015, 07:55:51 PM
I wonder what effect the stabbing of one player by another at
Albright will have on the team going forward.
http://6abc.com/news/police-albright-player-stabs-teammate-with-corkscrew/1028891/
I don't think this will really affect the team on the field since they were both freshman, but this is just a sad state of affairs. What the he!! is wrong with the world? This story is ridiculous. Hopefully the victim(whether innocent in this or not) will be ok. I'll just be here shaking my head for a few hours.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 07:40:33 AM
If there is one thing we learned from The Wire, not messing with the Stevedores is one of them. Never underestimate the Steves.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpreviously.tv%2Fm%2F2015-01-29-the-wire.jpg&hash=d6fc4afbd4c5905631f16c9f044306fabff7f519)
WNEC just hasn't played enough good/common opponents to put them in the top 10 I agree, although if you gave any other East team besides maybe Wesley the same schedule, the results would probably be the same, with maybe even a loss to SC.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 13, 2015, 08:28:08 AMQuote from: PA_wesleyfan on October 12, 2015, 07:55:51 PM
I wonder what effect the stabbing of one player by another at
Albright will have on the team going forward.
http://6abc.com/news/police-albright-player-stabs-teammate-with-corkscrew/1028891/
I don't think this will really affect the team on the field since they were both freshman, but this is just a sad state of affairs. What the he!! is wrong with the world? This story is ridiculous. Hopefully the victim(whether innocent in this or not) will be ok. I'll just be here shaking my head for a few hours.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2015, 09:35:52 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 07:40:33 AM
If there is one thing we learned from The Wire, not messing with the Stevedores is one of them. Never underestimate the Steves.
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fpreviously.tv%2Fm%2F2015-01-29-the-wire.jpg&hash=d6fc4afbd4c5905631f16c9f044306fabff7f519)
WNEC just hasn't played enough good/common opponents to put them in the top 10 I agree, although if you gave any other East team besides maybe Wesley the same schedule, the results would probably be the same, with maybe even a loss to SC.
Alfred hasn't had a "breather" on its regular season schedule, at least in Pep's mind, in at least ten years. The only time Pep went into a game thinking the Saxons would easily win was, ironically, AU's NCAA first round game against an undefeated SUNY-Maritime in 2010. Even a year ago, last place Hartwick beat Pep's Saxons, while 8th place Frostburg State handed the AQ Bombers one of their two conference losses.
And, likewise, Pep doesn't think the Saxons have been looked upon by other Empire 8 teams as an "easy win" for at least as long. Pep would argue that the Saxons would likely put up similar scores as WNEC were they playing in the NEFC. And Pep believes his Saxons are "middle of the pack" in the Empire 8....which means they could be anywhere from #1 to #9!!!
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 5-0 | 70 | 1 | vs. Kean |
2 Albright | 5-0 | 62 | 4 | at FDU-Florham |
3 Salisbury | 3-1 | 54 | 8 | vs. William Paterson |
4 Ithaca | 4-1 | 46 | 5 | vs. Brockport State |
5 Rowan | 4-1 | 44 | 2 | vs. Southern Virginia |
6 Cortland State | 5-1 | 29 | 3 | vs. #7 Alfred |
7 Alfred | 4-1 | 17 | 9 | at #6 Cortland State |
8 Delaware Valley | 5-1 | 14 | NR | Open Date |
9 Western New England | 5-0 | 11 | NR | at Maine Maritime |
10 St. Lawrence | 5-1 | 10 | NR | Open Date |
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2015, 09:35:52 AM
1. Alfred hasn't had a "breather" on its regular season schedule, at least in Pep's mind, in at least ten years.
And, likewise, Pep doesn't think the Saxons have been looked upon by other Empire 8 teams as an "easy win" for at least as long. Pep would argue that the Saxons would likely put up similar scores as WNEC were they playing in the NEFC. And Pep believes his Saxons are "middle of the pack" in the Empire 8....which means they could be anywhere from #1 to #9!!!
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2015, 10:34:35 AM
Week 6 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Wesley ( 7 ) 5-0 70 1 vs. Kean 2 Albright 5-0 62 4 at FDU-Florham 3 Salisbury 3-1 54 8 vs. William Paterson 4 Ithaca 4-1 46 5 vs. Brockport State 5 Rowan 4-1 44 2 vs. Southern Virginia 6 Cortland State 5-1 29 3 vs. #7 Alfred 7 Alfred 4-1 17 9 at #6 Cortland State 8 Delaware Valley 5-1 14 NR Open Date 9 Western New England 5-0 11 NR at Maine Maritime 10 St. Lawrence 5-1 10 NR Open Date
Dropping Out:
Hobart
Stevenson
Framingham State
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Framingham State 9
Stevenson 7
Buffalo State 6
Utica 6
Voting Distribution:
Wesley (1,1,1,1,1,1,1)
Albright (2,2,2,2,2,3,2)
Salisbury (3,3,3,4,3,4,3)
Ithaca (5,7,6,3,4,2,7)
Rowan (4,5,4,5,5,6,4)
Cortland State (6,9,7,6,7,7,6)
Alfred (9,6,NR,7,NR,5,NR)
Delaware Valley (8,7,NR,NR,6,NR,9)
Western New England (10,NR,5,10,9,10,NR)
St. Lawrence (7,10,9,9,10,NR,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,8,8,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,8,NR,NR,NR,8,10)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,NR,5)
Utica (NR,NR,10,NR,NR,9,8)
Key Matchups:
#7 Alfred at #6 Cortland State
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 13, 2015, 11:12:41 AM
Not that I can judge because everyone is busy and has real lives and families and jobs to worry about, but sometimes I feel like some voters put time into their picks and others just throw crap against a wall and mail it in.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 13, 2015, 11:48:08 AM
I was that voter that had WNE at #5. I think they are playing at a high level and are beating the teams in convincing fashion. They beat teams that other teams either struggled with or lost to (i.e. Springfield and Union). Also, I was shock to see Salisbury ranked behind Rowan on DIII, I believe I have Albright, Salisbury, and Rowan in that order. I got to watch a bit of the Rowan vs. Salisbury game. Was impressed with Rowan RB, he is really that good. I still have Cortland up there although they lost. I think Framingham State can play with anyone with their offense. Then Stevenson and Del Val, I think Stevenson wins that game 7 times out of 10 on a neutral field.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 13, 2015, 11:53:32 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 13, 2015, 11:48:08 AM
I was that voter that had WNE at #5. I think they are playing at a high level and are beating the teams in convincing fashion. They beat teams that other teams either struggled with or lost to (i.e. Springfield and Union). Also, I was shock to see Salisbury ranked behind Rowan on DIII, I believe I have Albright, Salisbury, and Rowan in that order. I got to watch a bit of the Rowan vs. Salisbury game. Was impressed with Rowan RB, he is really that good. I still have Cortland up there although they lost. I think Framingham State can play with anyone with their offense. Then Stevenson and Del Val, I think Stevenson wins that game 7 times out of 10 on a neutral field.
I don't agree with WNE at 5 personally, but I have no reason to disagree with you ranking them there because there's nothing to really knock them down over, other than their bottom dweller schedule. But they have won every single game in appropriate fashion so at the end of the season, you might be right. At the very least there's no evidence THIS YEAR that you can't rank them there right now. Buff St on the other hand....
(https://www.d3boards.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Forig07.deviantart.net%2F868b%2Ff%2F2012%2F214%2Fb%2Ff%2Fpumpkin_throwing_up_by_lazywolfy-d59j2ew.jpg&hash=e07b2a21648c53fc1871e30ccda27b04ff06d87c)
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 13, 2015, 12:02:28 PM
The Empire 8 teams are another tough nut to figure. There are a ton of Cortland-beats-Utica-beats-Ithaca-beats-Alfred-beats-Buffalo State-beats-Cortland chains here. I can understand that some of these are tough to disentangle...but there are some things that should make it obvious. Buffalo State, for example, has a win over Cortland, but then has two losses, including a loss to someone not even in this team photo (Morrisville State). That bad loss should be enough to knock them out of this conversation. If you just have one loss, against someone else who's "in the conversation" here, and can also claim at least one WIN over someone in the conversation, I think an argument can be made to rank those teams in pretty much any order. But that second loss, against a team that's not in the discussion at all, ought to knock you down a peg. Buff State > Cortland just by h2h result is a ranking that only works without mitigating evidence to the contrary.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2015, 10:36:12 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2015, 09:35:52 AM
1. Alfred hasn't had a "breather" on its regular season schedule, at least in Pep's mind, in at least ten years.
And, likewise, Pep doesn't think the Saxons have been looked upon by other Empire 8 teams as an "easy win" for at least as long. Pep would argue that the Saxons would likely put up similar scores as WNEC were they playing in the NEFC. And Pep believes his Saxons are "middle of the pack" in the Empire 8....which means they could be anywhere from #1 to #9!!!
1. That's only because you respect other teams too much to admit that they're lousy. If you didn't think Norwich (1-23 in the E8 its last four seasons) was a breather, you're either WAY too nice or not being honest. And the Saxons had their fair share of Husson/Mass-Dartmouth/FDU Florham games
2. Alfred's been a consistent good/very good team in the E8 for a very long time, though they regressed a bit last year.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 01:25:30 PM
WNEC last in the country in punt return defense (giving up 23.5 yards per return)
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 13, 2015, 01:36:38 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 01:25:30 PM
WNEC last in the country in punt return defense (giving up 23.5 yards per return)
I didn't look through all of them, but one fun thing to show how statistics can be deceiving, even halfway through a season:
Game 1: WNE punts twice for 103 yards, none returned
Game 2: WNE punts five times for 193 yards, one returned for 4 yards
Game 3: WNE punts six times for 226 yards, none returned
Game 4: WNE punts five times for 200 yards, one returned for 43 yards (whoops!)
Game 5: WNE punts four times for 117 yards, none returned
So that "23.5 yards per return" has come on two returned punts (out of 22 punted footballs). The "average per return" makes it appear as though WNE has a punt-coverage problem, but on the whole (whether this is because of the punter coffin-cornering, the coverage team forcing fair catches, or both) they actually don't give up much in the return game. Viewed another way, they have allowed 47 return yards on 22 punts (which is probably the team-level statistic that really matters; but since we report punt-return yards as average-per-return for individual players, we tend to do the same for teams).
Anyways, just thought this was funny. Sometimes we can try to get cute in finding a team's strengths and weaknesses, and a simple statistic can be deceiving. The most common version of this happens when someone compares two teams' FG kickers solely based on their made FG % for the season without looking at how long the attempts were.
If I feel like it, I'll look into a few others and see if there are any other goofy quirks.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 01:40:01 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 13, 2015, 01:36:38 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 01:25:30 PM
WNEC last in the country in punt return defense (giving up 23.5 yards per return)
I didn't look through all of them, but one fun thing to show how statistics can be deceiving, even halfway through a season:
Game 1: WNE punts twice for 103 yards, none returned
Game 2: WNE punts five times for 193 yards, one returned for 4 yards
Game 3: WNE punts six times for 226 yards, none returned
Game 4: WNE punts five times for 200 yards, one returned for 43 yards (whoops!)
Game 5: WNE punts four times for 117 yards, none returned
So that "23.5 yards per return" has come on two returned punts (out of 22 punted footballs). The "average per return" makes it appear as though WNE has a punt-coverage problem, but on the whole (whether this is because of the punter coffin-cornering, the coverage team forcing fair catches, or both) they actually don't give up much in the return game. Viewed another way, they have allowed 47 return yards on 22 punts (which is probably the team-level statistic that really matters; but since we report punt-return yards as average-per-return for individual players, we tend to do the same for teams).
Anyways, just thought this was funny. Sometimes we can try to get cute in finding a team's strengths and weaknesses, and a simple statistic can be deceiving. The most common version of this happens when someone compares two teams' FG kickers solely based on their made FG % for the season without looking at how long the attempts were.
If I feel like it, I'll look into a few others and see if there are any other goofy quirks.
Yea there were a bunch I left out for the same reason. Lots of Nescac stats don't count as much because they only played 3 games (and they only play each other).
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 01:00:44 PM
http://stats.ncaa.org/rankings?sport_code=MFB&division=3
Noticed that Ithaca was ranked #209 in division 3 in punting, but when I saw Mt. Union was #201, I felt that maybe it was a useless stat.
I also noticed that Ithaca was #3 in Redzone offense, and other good teams like Linfield, Mt. Union, Wisc-Whitewater and OshKoshbagosh, Johns Hopkins, Thomas Moore, Salisbury and Albright were all in the top 25. Made me think that that actually is an important stat, more than I would think (SJF is #198 in Redzone offense)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2015, 02:02:35 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 01:00:44 PM
http://stats.ncaa.org/rankings?sport_code=MFB&division=3
Noticed that Ithaca was ranked #209 in division 3 in punting, but when I saw Mt. Union was #201, I felt that maybe it was a useless stat.
I also noticed that Ithaca was #3 in Redzone offense, and other good teams like Linfield, Mt. Union, Wisc-Whitewater and OshKoshbagosh, Johns Hopkins, Thomas Moore, Salisbury and Albright were all in the top 25. Made me think that that actually is an important stat, more than I would think (SJF is #198 in Redzone offense)
Net punt yards are totally useless. The difference between Ithaca at 209 and Birmingham Southern at 25 is about 7 yards a punt. Ithaca's punted 21 times this season, so we're talking a total of about 150 yards over five weeks. I mean, yeah, I'd rather Ithaca be good at it than bad, but there's so little practical difference, it's not a big thing, IMO.
Red zone offense directly relates to scoring, so it's going to be very important. I think a better stat, however, would be points-per-red zone trip.
For an extreme example, Utica's percentage (86%) ranks 48th but nearly half of their red zone trips result in FGs. They've scored TDs on just 11-of-31 trips. Now, this can cut both ways: If Utica had a lousy kicker instead of an elite one, they might go for TDs more often and have a higher percentage.
Still though, Utica's come away from their 31 RZ trips with 122 points. Meanwhile, Manchester, in 207th place (61%), has 18 RZ trips and 77 points. So you could argue they are a better red zone team than Utica.*
*Obviously, there are other contextual things to take into account. If you have RZ trips where you need a TD, or you're playing for a FG, or where you don't really care either way (in a blowout) things can get skewed further.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 02:05:22 PM
Yea, I guess what I took out of that was that the best teams in the country were all top redzone scoring teams by percentage (not points). I wouldn't think it would be such a telling stat for some reason.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2015, 02:12:56 PMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 02:05:22 PM
Yea, I guess what I took out of that was that the best teams in the country were all top redzone scoring teams by percentage (not points). I wouldn't think it would be such a telling stat for some reason.
Well, good teams usually have good offenses, and good offenses tend to score in the red zone
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on October 13, 2015, 02:19:09 PM
Well Duh. Still kind of weird that Del Val is in the bottom 3, and there are some stinkers in the top 20 as well (Earlham, Muskingum, Susquehanna). I simply didn't think that stat would be as telling as a total offense stat would be. (Total offense looks more like the top 25 than the total defense stat would).
Although the records are all pretty good in both top offense and defense categories.
QuoteUnion has thrown 15 interceptions, most in the country
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2015, 02:54:25 PM
I'd suspect some of the Earlham stuff has to do with the team being so bad. Even if the game isn't out of reach when they get into the RZ, I wonder if teams just don't go as all out defensively—or if kids are just less focused because they know the team is going to win anyway. I don't mean to discredit the offense, it's just a guess
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 13, 2015, 05:01:47 PM
I took a look at this earlier because I was curious. I think it's partly what you said, and partly that Earlham's offense might be sort-of-OK (I expected that maybe it was all garbage-time points in the 4th quarter, but they've actually scored a decent handful in the first half, too). Sometimes we can forget, as fans, that just because a team is really bad and loses all of its games, that doesn't mean the whole team is bad. Earlham's defense is really dreadful* so they're going to lose a lot of games by big scores, and that can overshadow some modest competence on one side of the ball. Imagine if Earlham's offense could just magically play with Wabash's defense; they're still not great, but that fake team probably wins 7 games in the NCAC, right? Then, instead of thinking of that offense as another unit from a really bad team, they're the just-good-enough guys who can win games with a great defense.
*I mean, really dreadful. Look at this:
http://www.d3football.com/seasons/2015/boxscores/20151010_t2x6.xml
Franklin took the starters out at halftime (with the QB having a stat line of 16-16-327 and 6 touchdowns...I mean, that's hard to do if you're playing against no defense, but I'm not sure Earlham's defense offers much more resistance than an empty field), gave everyone but the waterboy a carry, and still scored 80 points. Franklin is a very good team, but that is really embarrassing.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2015, 05:37:47 PMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 13, 2015, 05:01:47 PM
I took a look at this earlier because I was curious. I think it's partly what you said, and partly that Earlham's offense might be sort-of-OK (I expected that maybe it was all garbage-time points in the 4th quarter, but they've actually scored a decent handful in the first half, too). Sometimes we can forget, as fans, that just because a team is really bad and loses all of its games, that doesn't mean the whole team is bad. Earlham's defense is really dreadful* so they're going to lose a lot of games by big scores, and that can overshadow some modest competence on one side of the ball. Imagine if Earlham's offense could just magically play with Wabash's defense; they're still not great, but that fake team probably wins 7 games in the NCAC, right? Then, instead of thinking of that offense as another unit from a really bad team, they're the just-good-enough guys who can win games with a great defense.
*I mean, really dreadful. Look at this:
http://www.d3football.com/seasons/2015/boxscores/20151010_t2x6.xml
Franklin took the starters out at halftime (with the QB having a stat line of 16-16-327 and 6 touchdowns...I mean, that's hard to do if you're playing against no defense, but I'm not sure Earlham's defense offers much more resistance than an empty field), gave everyone but the waterboy a carry, and still scored 80 points. Franklin is a very good team, but that is really embarrassing.
I want to say you're probably right that Earlham's offense is at least decent/average. 17 PPG isn't great, but it's not awful. It's what Ithaca averaged in 2011.
But while you're here:
So I have this theory, based in part on a Rutgers-Wisconsin game I went to last year. Is it possible, when playing an opponent you know you're going to beat, teams do things outside the ordinary in order to shore up other parts of their game?
For example, the RU-Wisky game, Wisconsin threw the ball a decent amount early, even though the running game was dominant (As an example, on a 2nd and goal from the five, they threw incomplete and took a sack). My father couldn't believe they were trying to pass—the weather was also lousy—and struggling. But I wondered if part of that was because hey, it was Rutgers. Sure, Wisconsin could have run even more than they did and probably scored more. But they also likely knew they couldn't go into tougher games without having their passing offense functional, so why not use the Rutgers game to try it out? If things get hairy, you can always go back to the run.
I wonder if any of that is going on with these Earlham games? Maybe the defense is calling plays they don't usually execute well, but will need to later in the season, knowing that the offense isn't going to be stopped. Just a thought.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2015, 05:37:47 PM
But while you're here:
So I have this theory, based in part on a Rutgers-Wisconsin game I went to last year. Is it possible, when playing an opponent you know you're going to beat, teams do things outside the ordinary in order to shore up other parts of their game?
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 13, 2015, 05:01:47 PM
Imagine if Earlham's offense could just magically play with Wabash's defense;
QuoteTo be sure, Del Val at the bottom with Earlham at the top is surreal. The Del Valley one is tricky to explain—some of it is fluky, like running into the red zone on the last play of the half, or losing a bunch of yards just inside the red zone vs. just outside to kill a drive. But overall, that's just strange
Quote from: gordonmann on October 13, 2015, 11:07:28 PMQuoteTo be sure, Del Val at the bottom with Earlham at the top is surreal. The Del Valley one is tricky to explain—some of it is fluky, like running into the red zone on the last play of the half, or losing a bunch of yards just inside the red zone vs. just outside to kill a drive. But overall, that's just strange
Del Val's season has so far been one big statistical anomaly.
In addition to being dreadful inside the red zone, they are allowing opponents to convert third downs 41% of the time and their passing offense is basically non-existent. Any guesses on how many passing touchdowns they have this year? I'll give you a hint -- whatever you think it is, it's lower. :)
With all that said, they are 5-1. They have six guys averaging over 6 yards per carry and they all touch the ball throughout the game. They've had eight rushing touchdowns over 40 yards.
Some of this is the byproduct of player turnover. Last year they had an All-Region Quarterback who was invited to CFL tryouts and an All-American receiver who led the Philadelphia Eagles in receiving yards during the preseason. This year they have 11 new starters on offense. That's not a misprint. Every starter from last year is gone.
Some is a byproduct of the coaching staff adapting to the talent on the roster. They haven't had good quarterback play. They have great depth at running back. So, while the Aggies traditionally love to run five-wide, empty backfield, they have to do something else to succeed.
But some of it is just weirdness. They are a really young team who will win some games they shouldn't and lose some games they shouldn't.
They should probably just change their mascot from a ram to "¯\_(ツ)_/¯"
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 14, 2015, 09:28:47 AM
In light of our recent discussion, here's another take on how weird statistical anomalies can emerge sometimes:
http://grantland.com/the-triangle/taking-the-nfls-statistical-temperature/
Quote from: wesleydad on October 18, 2015, 09:12:35 AM
This is a mess. Trying to find a second team from the E8 is hard to do. Round robin wins/losses make each of the 2 loss teams look average. Ended up with Brockport but did not put them in top 10. They get a chance to change that this week with Cortland. Wesley v Rowan and Del Val v Albright and Widener v Stevenson plus several others will likely make it even more messy next week. or it will solify the top of the list and leave the rest as an afterthought.
Quote from: dlip on October 13, 2015, 04:21:30 PMQuoteUnion has thrown 15 interceptions, most in the countrymother****er! :'(
Quote from: Bengalsrule on October 18, 2015, 03:37:00 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 18, 2015, 09:12:35 AM
This is a mess. Trying to find a second team from the E8 is hard to do. Round robin wins/losses make each of the 2 loss teams look average. Ended up with Brockport but did not put them in top 10. They get a chance to change that this week with Cortland. Wesley v Rowan and Del Val v Albright and Widener v Stevenson plus several others will likely make it even more messy next week. or it will solify the top of the list and leave the rest as an afterthought.
While they may look average vs each other, a 14-2 non conference record (and a #3 conference ranking) means that the E8's better than average teams are beating up on each other. The #3 D1 conference (according to Massey) is Big 12! I doubt anyone would call Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Baylor or TCU average and yet 2 of the 4 are bound to have at least 2/3 losses and the others at least 1. Good conferences help prepare their teams for the playoffs/bowls. E8 is better than good as far as D3 conferences go and their post bseason berths will hopefully indicate that (IMHO)
Alfred State (0-6) at Fisher (3-3)
This week 6 E8 teams, with 500% or better conference record, face each other.Alfred 2-2 vs Fisher 3-2, Brockport 2-2 vs Cortland 4-1 and Utica 3-2 host my beloved BENGALS 2-2. There undoubtly will be some good teams with 2 possibly 3 losses in conference. I'm hoping for 1 team in particular, but I do appreciate the level of competiton that the E8 affords all of its members. maybe 3 bids for the E8?? ;)
Go BENGALS
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 18, 2015, 05:18:56 PMQuote from: Bengalsrule on October 18, 2015, 03:37:00 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 18, 2015, 09:12:35 AM
This is a mess. Trying to find a second team from the E8 is hard to do. Round robin wins/losses make each of the 2 loss teams look average. Ended up with Brockport but did not put them in top 10. They get a chance to change that this week with Cortland. Wesley v Rowan and Del Val v Albright and Widener v Stevenson plus several others will likely make it even more messy next week. or it will solify the top of the list and leave the rest as an afterthought.
While they may look average vs each other, a 14-2 non conference record (and a #3 conference ranking) means that the E8's better than average teams are beating up on each other. The #3 D1 conference (according to Massey) is Big 12! I doubt anyone would call Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Baylor or TCU average and yet 2 of the 4 are bound to have at least 2/3 losses and the others at least 1. Good conferences help prepare their teams for the playoffs/bowls. E8 is better than good as far as D3 conferences go and their post bseason berths will hopefully indicate that (IMHO)
Alfred State (0-6) at Fisher (3-3)
This week 6 E8 teams, with 500% or better conference record, face each other.Alfred 2-2 vs Fisher 3-2, Brockport 2-2 vs Cortland 4-1 and Utica 3-2 host my beloved BENGALS 2-2. There undoubtly will be some good teams with 2 possibly 3 losses in conference. I'm hoping for 1 team in particular, but I do appreciate the level of competiton that the E8 affords all of its members. maybe 3 bids for the E8?? ;)
Go BENGALS
Alfred hosts Hartwick this week. That's Alfred State that's playing Fisher this week. Which brings me to a pet peeve. Attended the Alfred University football game at SUNY Cortland yesterday (Brrrrrrr!) where I met up with my son and his wife along with my daughter. And, took my grandson and a member of the pep band with me.
Bought my ticket ($6) and entered the gates. Looked at my ticket, stopped, and returned to the gate where I asked for my money back. The ticket read, "Red Dragons vs. Alfred State". Told them that I had traveled two hours to see Alfred University's football team play. The clever individual took my ticket and carefully ripped the "State" off the bottom of the ticket so that it read "Red Dragons vs. Alfred."
Told him, "Gee, thanks, that makes me feel a whole lot better."
But Bengalsrule? Surely you know better.
BTW, was amazed the Saxons turned it over six times at Cortland yesterday (to the Red Dragons one fumble) and were still in a position to win the game. A case of shoulda woulda coulda as one pass was dropped in the end zone in the last minute, while Saxons failed to score when given a 1st-and-goal inside the 5-yard-line with less than 6 minutes remaining. Was a good game, but Pep is thinking with the other results yesterday, the Saxons could have found themselves in first place in this Empire 8 mess!
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 18, 2015, 05:18:56 PM
Alfred hosts Hartwick this week. That's Alfred State that's playing Fisher this week. Which brings me to a pet peeve. Attended the Alfred University football game at SUNY Cortland yesterday (Brrrrrrr!) where I met up with my son and his wife along with my daughter. And, took my grandson and a member of the pep band with me.
Bought my ticket ($6) and entered the gates. Looked at my ticket, stopped, and returned to the gate where I asked for my money back. The ticket read, "Red Dragons vs. Alfred State". Told them that I had traveled two hours to see Alfred University's football team play. The clever individual took my ticket and carefully ripped the "State" off the bottom of the ticket so that it read "Red Dragons vs. Alfred."
Told him, "Gee, thanks, that makes me feel a whole lot better."
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 19, 2015, 07:30:57 AMI agree, I watch a bit of the game and felt that Maine Maritime played at a very high level against WNEC, however WNEC was able to win the game. I think this game will help refocus WNEC going forward. As far as the rest of the East Region, the E 8 is a mess, I can't grasp it, I only have two teams on my ballot, but as you aforementioned, one of those teams can have 2 or 3 more losses by the end of the year. I was impressed with Wesley overall, they continue to dominate. Salisbury continue to score points, however they have to get their defense together, if they want to take that next step, I think the Kean game is going to be interesting for them, potential "upset". Now to the MAC, this is going to be one heck of week with the matchups there.
WNEC finally cracked my top 10 this week. Oddly enough, before placing the ranking, their win this week was the least impressive of the season for me. Giving up 35 to Maine Maritime(Even if 21 was in the 4th quarter) is not overly impressive, but Ithaca gave me no choice but to drop them out completely. Now feeling down on Hobart, Ithaca's W's are getting less and less impressive. This definitely doesn't mean they will stay there, even with a win. Wins by RPI, Buff St., or even Ithaca next week could make me put them back into the top 10, but who knows what happens to the top 10 teams this week. I still think Cortland loses 2-3 more games.
That said, this is going to get really fun the next few weeks.
ove
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 19, 2015, 07:30:57 AM
WNEC finally cracked my top 10 this week. Oddly enough, before placing the ranking, their win this week was the least impressive of the season for me. Giving up 35 to Maine Maritime(Even if 21 was in the 4th quarter) is not overly impressive, but Ithaca gave me no choice but to drop them out completely. Now feeling down on Hobart, Ithaca's W's are getting less and less impressive. This definitely doesn't mean they will stay there, even with a win. Wins by RPI, Buff St., or even Ithaca next week could make me put them back into the top 10, but who knows what happens to the top 10 teams this week. I still think Cortland loses 2-3 more games.
That said, this is going to get really fun the next few weeks.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 6-0 | 70 | 1 | vs. #4 Rowan |
2 Albright | 6-0 | 63 | 2 | vs. #6 Delaware Valley |
3 Salisbury | 4-1 | 56 | 3 | at Kean |
4 Rowan | 5-1 | 47 | 5 | at #1 Wesley |
5 Cortland State | 6-1 | 42 | 6 | vs. Brockport State |
6 Delaware Valley | 6-1 | 31 | 8 | at #2 Albright |
7 Western New England | 6-0 | 19 | 9 | at MIT |
8 Stevenson | 5-1 | 17 | NR | vs. Widener |
9 St. Lawrence | 5-1 | 12 | 10 | at Springfield |
10 Framingham State | 5-1 | 11 | NR | vs. Plymouth State |
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 20, 2015, 08:21:10 AM
Yowza, after last week, the Buff St guy, still has Buff St at 5? <baffled> Sweet win over Finlandia.
Quote from: LewDogg11 on October 20, 2015, 08:21:10 AM
Yowza, after last week, the Buff St guy, still has Buff St at 5? <baffled> Sweet win over Finlandia.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2015, 09:47:21 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 20, 2015, 08:21:10 AM
Yowza, after last week, the Buff St guy, still has Buff St at 5? <baffled> Sweet win over Finlandia.
I know I've been absent from these boards, but not absent-minded. Was fun to see all the hysteria I generated with my support of the Bengals!
Here's my defense: We're all trying to make sense of the mess that spots 2-15 are in the East, so I rank kind of how Pep said it - who'd I least want to face currently. Buff State has two losses, but I think they are misleading. The Bengals had the Alfred game well in hand until Hoppy got hurt; they looked better against the Saxons in Mayberry than the Red Dragons did in Cortland, plus they beat Cortland H2H. Everyone is mildly high on Cortland, so while those losses occurred they don't speak to the quality of team currently.
And it's fun to troll.
While you're dissecting my top 10, take at look at my #9. Montclair has three tough losses, so get on the bus now!
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 20, 2015, 08:31:18 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 20, 2015, 08:21:10 AM
Yowza, after last week, the Buff St guy, still has Buff St at 5? <baffled> Sweet win over Finlandia.
Hey, come on, LD, Buffalo State beat Finlandia by 62, just a point less than UW-Whitewater did...and the Bengals held them scoreless! It was a sweet win, indeed!
Pep knows he wouldn't want his Saxons facing dem pesky Bengals right now. Look what they did to Cortland State! They got Ertel playing like Hoppy....but they'd best change their e-roster as the boxscore has Hoppy completing two passes against Finlandia and Pep understands that he's done for the year (redshirt?) and they've got another #3 out there now. Which is it, bengalsrule? Is Hoppy back?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 20, 2015, 09:47:21 AMQuote from: LewDogg11 on October 20, 2015, 08:21:10 AM
Yowza, after last week, the Buff St guy, still has Buff St at 5? <baffled> Sweet win over Finlandia.
I know I've been absent from these boards, but not absent-minded. Was fun to see all the hysteria I generated with my support of the Bengals!
Here's my defense: We're all trying to make sense of the mess that spots 2-15 are in the East, so I rank kind of how Pep said it - who'd I least want to face currently. Buff State has two losses, but I think they are misleading. The Bengals had the Alfred game well in hand until Hoppy got hurt; they looked better against the Saxons in Mayberry than the Red Dragons did in Cortland, plus they beat Cortland H2H. Everyone is mildly high on Cortland, so while those losses occurred they don't speak to the quality of team currently.
And it's fun to troll.
While you're dissecting my top 10, take at look at my #9. Montclair has three tough losses, so get on the bus now!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 22, 2015, 12:46:24 PM
I'd half agree with Kaz's post.
The Buff State defense certainly looks like it's playing better than it was earlier. They allowed 7 garbage-time points to Fisher (which is looking pretty good considering they've scored 30+ three times), held Cortland's offense to 14 points, and a shutout is still a shutout. If the offense is at least capable of putting up 24-31 points, I could see them being very tough from here on out.
Still, five seems a little high for a team that got waxed by a three-loss Morrisville. I kind of like Brockport. Pair of double-digit wins in conference and two OT losses.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2015, 06:34:08 PM
I had a chance to watch a few games around the east and I think the East continues to run through Wesley, although Rowan made them appear human, they found a way to win the game. I think Rowan missed many opportunities to get the big upset, Marcelin continues to impress me, although he had some key turnovers, remove those and interception in the redzone and it would be a different front page story. Nevertheless, Wesley made mistakes as well, so it somewhat evens out and I still will have them number one on my ballot, but I am curious how they will fair against better defenses (i.e. St. Thomas, Wheaton, and UW-Oshkosh). Now to the Salisbury vs. Kean game. I am somewhat shaky about this Salisbury team, they can put up some numbers when they are executing the triple option, but I am still a believer that to beat good defenses, you are going to have to prove that you can throw the ball (i.e. dropback) and not be one-dimensional, defensively they didn't really finish the game, they had a chance to really demoralize Kean, but allowed them to score three touchdowns in the fourth easily. Maybe it was the fact that it was Kean's homecoming. Looking ahead in a couple weeks, I don't see them beating Wesley, I think Wesley actually beats them by 17+ points and that's because its a rivalry game. Now to the game that had me on my seat, the Albright vs. Delaware Val, I am impress with Delaware Valley, they came out on fire against Albright, but Albright settled in and played like the second half against Salisbury. Then Del Val made some key stops and some big plays and kept add it and took the lead, this was the game of the day for me in East that I watch from start to finish. Lastly, I watch the Framingham State game, they played shaky for three quarters and then erupted in the fourth, it took them a while to impose themselves, but they proved that they are a good team and when playing great, can score with the best of them. Also, I like that the defense stood firm all game when pressured came through to give the offense the ball. As far as the rest of region, I tuned out and watch some of the West and North region games. I will look at the recaps and analysis of others to help with my vote this week.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2015, 06:34:08 PM
but I am curious how they will fair against better defenses (i.e. St. Thomas, Wheaton, and UW-Oshkosh).
Quote from: wally_wabash on October 26, 2015, 04:39:43 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2015, 06:34:08 PM
but I am curious how they will fair against better defenses (i.e. St. Thomas, Wheaton, and UW-Oshkosh).
*clears throat loudly*
Quote from: jknezek on October 26, 2015, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on October 26, 2015, 04:39:43 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2015, 06:34:08 PM
but I am curious how they will fair against better defenses (i.e. St. Thomas, Wheaton, and UW-Oshkosh).
*clears throat loudly*
Need a cough drop?
Quote from: wesleydad on October 26, 2015, 08:52:56 PMThis.Quote from: jknezek on October 26, 2015, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on October 26, 2015, 04:39:43 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2015, 06:34:08 PM
but I am curious how they will fair against better defenses (i.e. St. Thomas, Wheaton, and UW-Oshkosh).
*clears throat loudly*
Need a cough drop?
The way things are going, I expect they will get the chance to see how they do against a "good defense". Rowan supposedly has one and that didn't go well for them. The secondary was really good, yet struggled to cover everything Wesley has to throw at them. I am more concerned about how they do against a really good offense.
Quote from: @d3jason on October 27, 2015, 07:12:17 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 26, 2015, 08:52:56 PMThis.Quote from: jknezek on October 26, 2015, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on October 26, 2015, 04:39:43 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2015, 06:34:08 PM
but I am curious how they will fair against better defenses (i.e. St. Thomas, Wheaton, and UW-Oshkosh).
*clears throat loudly*
Need a cough drop?
The way things are going, I expect they will get the chance to see how they do against a "good defense". Rowan supposedly has one and that didn't go well for them. The secondary was really good, yet struggled to cover everything Wesley has to throw at them. I am more concerned about how they do against a really good offense.
I would say that Rowan is as athletic and physical as any of those defenses. Wesley didn't have to punt. They threw two interceptions and turned it over on downs a few times in Rowan territory.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 7-0 | 70 | 1 | at Montclair State |
2 Salisbury | 5-1 | 60 | 3 | vs. Christopher Newport |
3t Cortland State | 7-1 | 51 | 5 | at Morrisville State |
3t Delaware Valley | 6-1 | 51 | 6 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
5 Albright | 6-1 | 38 | 2 | at King's |
6 Rowan | 5-2 | 34 | 4 | vs. Frostburg State |
7 St. Lawrence | 6-1 | 24 | 9 | vs. WPI |
8 Western New England | 7-0 | 17 | 7 | at MIT |
9 Stevenson | 6-1 | 16 | 8 | vs. Endicott |
10t Alfred | 5-2 | 8 | NR | at Brockport State |
10t Buffalo State | 5-2 | 8 | NR | at Hartwick |
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 27, 2015, 08:09:26 AMQuote from: @d3jason on October 27, 2015, 07:12:17 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 26, 2015, 08:52:56 PMThis.Quote from: jknezek on October 26, 2015, 04:43:10 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on October 26, 2015, 04:39:43 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2015, 06:34:08 PM
but I am curious how they will fair against better defenses (i.e. St. Thomas, Wheaton, and UW-Oshkosh).
*clears throat loudly*
Need a cough drop?
The way things are going, I expect they will get the chance to see how they do against a "good defense". Rowan supposedly has one and that didn't go well for them. The secondary was really good, yet struggled to cover everything Wesley has to throw at them. I am more concerned about how they do against a really good offense.
I would say that Rowan is as athletic and physical as any of those defenses. Wesley didn't have to punt. They threw two interceptions and turned it over on downs a few times in Rowan territory.
Choosing not to punt or fg and turning the ball on downs is pretty much the same in my book.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 7 ) | 7-0 | 70 | 1 | at Montclair State |
2 Salisbury | 5-1 | 60 | 3 | vs. Christopher Newport |
3t Cortland State | 7-1 | 51 | 5 | at Morrisville State |
3t Delaware Valley | 6-1 | 51 | 6 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
5 Albright | 6-1 | 38 | 2 | at King's |
6 Rowan | 5-2 | 34 | 4 | vs. Frostburg State |
7 St. Lawrence | 6-1 | 24 | 9 | vs. WPI |
8 Western New England | 7-0 | 17 | 7 | at MIT |
9 Stevenson | 6-1 | 16 | 8 | at Wilkes |
10t Alfred | 5-2 | 8 | NR | at Brockport State |
10t Buffalo State | 5-2 | 8 | NR | at Hartwick |
Quote from: jknezek on October 27, 2015, 09:35:08 AM
I love that Salisbury has all 2s and a 5! You guys have a hard region. The North and South are only a mess after 5, you guys are duking it out at 2.
Quote from: jknezek on October 27, 2015, 09:35:08 AM
I love that Salisbury has all 2s and a 5! You guys have a hard region. The North and South are only a mess after 5, you guys are duking it out at 2.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 27, 2015, 10:23:17 AMQuote from: jknezek on October 27, 2015, 09:35:08 AM
I love that Salisbury has all 2s and a 5! You guys have a hard region. The North and South are only a mess after 5, you guys are duking it out at 2.
I think the tough thing about Salisbury is that they have a h2h loss to Albright. I totally understand folks thinking that Del Val beating Albright is enough to drop Albright a few slots, and move Salisbury up to #2, but I presume that the #5 vote for Salisbury is the person who has Albright at #4 because they don't want to violate the h2h result between teams with otherwise comparable resumes (and then Del Val presumably is ahead of Albright and Salisbury on this ballot). I think that's defensible. It's kind of like bman's post...there are so many 1-loss teams that have a loss to someone else in the lot that you really can put them all into a hat, pick any two, and who knows who will win.
I have to admit that I'm vaguely intrigued by the surprising Frostburg State, who took a pounding from Wesley and has quietly kept on trucking with just that 1 loss. They might end up losing to Salisbury by 40, or maybe they'll pull a stunner and put the East into even more chaos.
(Actually, if that happens, you could make a pretty strong case for taking Frostburg from currently being unranked all the way up to #2; they would have beaten one of the other highly regarded poll contenders for the #2 spot, and would only have a loss to #1).
Quote from: dlip on October 27, 2015, 10:50:16 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 27, 2015, 10:23:17 AMQuote from: jknezek on October 27, 2015, 09:35:08 AM
I love that Salisbury has all 2s and a 5! You guys have a hard region. The North and South are only a mess after 5, you guys are duking it out at 2.
I think the tough thing about Salisbury is that they have a h2h loss to Albright. I totally understand folks thinking that Del Val beating Albright is enough to drop Albright a few slots, and move Salisbury up to #2, but I presume that the #5 vote for Salisbury is the person who has Albright at #4 because they don't want to violate the h2h result between teams with otherwise comparable resumes (and then Del Val presumably is ahead of Albright and Salisbury on this ballot). I think that's defensible. It's kind of like bman's post...there are so many 1-loss teams that have a loss to someone else in the lot that you really can put them all into a hat, pick any two, and who knows who will win.
I have to admit that I'm vaguely intrigued by the surprising Frostburg State, who took a pounding from Wesley and has quietly kept on trucking with just that 1 loss. They might end up losing to Salisbury by 40, or maybe they'll pull a stunner and put the East into even more chaos.
(Actually, if that happens, you could make a pretty strong case for taking Frostburg from currently being unranked all the way up to #2; they would have beaten one of the other highly regarded poll contenders for the #2 spot, and would only have a loss to #1).
entertaining point tart!
Quote from: wesleydad on October 27, 2015, 11:55:22 AMQuote from: dlip on October 27, 2015, 10:50:16 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on October 27, 2015, 10:23:17 AMQuote from: jknezek on October 27, 2015, 09:35:08 AM
I love that Salisbury has all 2s and a 5! You guys have a hard region. The North and South are only a mess after 5, you guys are duking it out at 2.
I think the tough thing about Salisbury is that they have a h2h loss to Albright. I totally understand folks thinking that Del Val beating Albright is enough to drop Albright a few slots, and move Salisbury up to #2, but I presume that the #5 vote for Salisbury is the person who has Albright at #4 because they don't want to violate the h2h result between teams with otherwise comparable resumes (and then Del Val presumably is ahead of Albright and Salisbury on this ballot). I think that's defensible. It's kind of like bman's post...there are so many 1-loss teams that have a loss to someone else in the lot that you really can put them all into a hat, pick any two, and who knows who will win.
I have to admit that I'm vaguely intrigued by the surprising Frostburg State, who took a pounding from Wesley and has quietly kept on trucking with just that 1 loss. They might end up losing to Salisbury by 40, or maybe they'll pull a stunner and put the East into even more chaos.
(Actually, if that happens, you could make a pretty strong case for taking Frostburg from currently being unranked all the way up to #2; they would have beaten one of the other highly regarded poll contenders for the #2 spot, and would only have a loss to #1).
entertaining point tart!
I expect Frostburg to lose this weekend to Rowan. If they win that one, they will move onto my ballot. I can't put them on right now because they got trounced by Wesley. As far as Salisbury ahead of Albright despite the h2h. Salisbury and Albright are even in my mind, actually I think Salisbury is better since they led 23 - 3 in the 4th and blew the game. I am not sold on Del Val so I put Salisbury second. It is interesting how each week I almost have to do a new poll since so much changes from the week before.
Quote from: bman on October 27, 2015, 10:17:46 AMQuote from: jknezek on October 27, 2015, 09:35:08 AM
I love that Salisbury has all 2s and a 5! You guys have a hard region. The North and South are only a mess after 5, you guys are duking it out at 2.
Here's how I see it:
Team
1 Wesley
2t Salisbury
2t Cortland State
2t Delaware Valley
2t Albright
2t Rowan
2t St. Lawrence
2t Western New England
2t Stevenson
2t Alfred
2t Buffalo State
2t Framingham State
2t Frostburg St.
12t everyone else...
Quote from: wesleydad on November 01, 2015, 09:08:11 AM
another week of carnage. starting to turn into 52 pick up. put the names on paper except for wesley, shuffle them up and whoever is on top is #2. there is so little to separate them and they all have beaten someone else on the list and lost to someone not on the list. the regional ranking will be very interesting. looking ahead to the playoffs, if wesley wins out, are they the #3 top seed behind Mount and Linfield but ahead of hardin simmons who looks like they would be the top south team. i think linfield gets the west top over oshkosh. i also expect some shuffling of teams to strengthen up the weaker looking east bracket. st thomas looks like they could also be a top seed consideration. this could be an interesting next few weeks around the nation.
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 01, 2015, 09:23:16 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 01, 2015, 09:08:11 AM
another week of carnage. starting to turn into 52 pick up. put the names on paper except for wesley, shuffle them up and whoever is on top is #2. there is so little to separate them and they all have beaten someone else on the list and lost to someone not on the list. the regional ranking will be very interesting. looking ahead to the playoffs, if wesley wins out, are they the #3 top seed behind Mount and Linfield but ahead of hardin simmons who looks like they would be the top south team. i think linfield gets the west top over oshkosh. i also expect some shuffling of teams to strengthen up the weaker looking east bracket. st thomas looks like they could also be a top seed consideration. this could be an interesting next few weeks around the nation.
Masterful word picture of the East Region Fan Poll! +K
You know how regional rankings for basketball and soccer have a variety of number of teams ranked, from region to region?
Perhaps the NCAA Football Committee will offer up an East Regional Ranking of:
1) Wesley (8-0)
That's it. There are no more teams in the East deserving of a regional ranking.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 01, 2015, 10:17:26 AM
hopefully as east team or 2 will end up in another bracket and win a game or 2 to make the east look better than it currently does nationwide.
Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 10:55:20 AM
IMO St. Lawrence should be given stronger recognition in this poll. If St.Lawrence handles Hobart(a big IF since Hobart offense finally read the playbook and Sweeney is now healthy), I think they are #2 in the East , especially after their one loss to a Morrisville team that took care of Cortland this weekend. I know the counter will be the LL league lost the tough OOC games early in the season, but I have watched the improvement in the league( SLU, RPI, Rochester as examples) during conference play and the LL is stronger than many here may believe. Alfred also deserves strong recognition as they look like the most balanced team in the E8 , especially as defense becomes the differentiator into the deep fall. I am not convinced the best of the MAC , runner up to Wesley in the NJAC or Western New England has anything over SLU or Alfred at this point in the season. I have no Ballot, but interested in final outcome here and Regional rankings.
Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 10:55:20 AMI reshuffled the deck, but I have the Larries way up there as well...
IMO St. Lawrence should be given stronger recognition in this poll. If St.Lawrence handles Hobart(a big IF since Hobart offense finally read the playbook and Sweeney is now healthy), I think they are #2 in the East , especially after their one loss to a Morrisville team that took care of Cortland this weekend. I know the counter will be the LL league lost the tough OOC games early in the season, but I have watched the improvement in the league( SLU, RPI, Rochester as examples) during conference play and the LL is stronger than many here may believe. Alfred also deserves strong recognition as they look like the most balanced team in the E8 , especially as defense becomes the differentiator into the deep fall. I am not convinced the best of the MAC , runner up to Wesley in the NJAC or Western New England has anything over SLU or Alfred at this point in the season. I have no Ballot, but interested in final outcome here and Regional rankings.
Quote from: gordonmann on November 02, 2015, 11:22:14 AM
If Del Val is the third best team in this region, that says a lot. While they are getting better, they are not a Top 20 team as the national poll suggests. I don't think the coaching staff would disagree.
Del Val has had a good program for a while now, so it's tough to sell them as underdogs. But the Aggies have overachieved this year after replacing every starter from last season, most of the defense and both kickers. They've already lost their best offensive lineman and leading tackler to season-ending injuries and took a while to settle on a quarterback.
They are a young team that won some games they probably shouldn't have (Stevenson, Albright) and lost one they shouldn't have. Hard to imagine they are going to win the league with all that's happened, though the coaching staff deserves major credit for navigating all these changes.
For what it's worth, I think Albright is Top 25 worthy. They are well balanced, have a really nice corps of receivers and good run defense. Against Del Val their All-American kicker missed three kicks and they had two red zone chances turn into an interception and a fourth-and-half-a-yard stop. Del Val isn't going to apologize for winning the game, but I don't know if they beat Albright three games in a five-game series.
Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 10:55:20 AM
IMO St. Lawrence should be given stronger recognition in this poll. If St.Lawrence handles Hobart(a big IF since Hobart offense finally read the playbook and Sweeney is now healthy), I think they are #2 in the East , especially after their one loss to a Morrisville team that took care of Cortland this weekend. I know the counter will be the LL league lost the tough OOC games early in the season, but I have watched the improvement in the league( SLU, RPI, Rochester as examples) during conference play and the LL is stronger than many here may believe. Alfred also deserves strong recognition as they look like the most balanced team in the E8 , especially as defense becomes the differentiator into the deep fall. I am not convinced the best of the MAC , runner up to Wesley in the NJAC or Western New England has anything over SLU or Alfred at this point in the season. I have no Ballot, but interested in final outcome here and Regional rankings.
Quote from: bman on October 26, 2015, 01:31:18 PM
Did Lewdogg actually retire?... :'(
He's listed as guest now....
this is where we need 'gro to step in and discuss frozen cat turds etc...to reduce the tension...
LD11 and Frank should sit down over some Irish Car Bombs and discuss wooden shoes...it will all be alright....
Quote from: wesleydad on November 02, 2015, 11:01:53 AMWesleydad, always enjoy your perspective. How do feel about Wesley this year? Offensive looks typically awesome, however the defense does not look as intimidating as the team I saw Hobart struggle against in last year's playoffs.Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 10:55:20 AM
IMO St. Lawrence should be given stronger recognition in this poll. If St.Lawrence handles Hobart(a big IF since Hobart offense finally read the playbook and Sweeney is now healthy), I think they are #2 in the East , especially after their one loss to a Morrisville team that took care of Cortland this weekend. I know the counter will be the LL league lost the tough OOC games early in the season, but I have watched the improvement in the league( SLU, RPI, Rochester as examples) during conference play and the LL is stronger than many here may believe. Alfred also deserves strong recognition as they look like the most balanced team in the E8 , especially as defense becomes the differentiator into the deep fall. I am not convinced the best of the MAC , runner up to Wesley in the NJAC or Western New England has anything over SLU or Alfred at this point in the season. I have no Ballot, but interested in final outcome here and Regional rankings.
no issue here, I have St Lawrence 3, behind wesley and del val. I have alfred 7 behind cortland due to h2h result. after wesley you can argue for almost anyone at this point. I have del val at 2 purely on other teams losing. too many this team beat that team who beat the other team who beat another team who beat someone else. crazy.
Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 05:07:41 PMBartman, I'm not wesleydad, but I'm going to offer my perspective anyway ;D IMO, Wesley's O is perhaps better than last year. Their RB has been able to run between the tackles, so it is not all on Callahan to make stuff happen. It is a much more balanced attack and teams have to respect the run more than in the past IMO. It has shown in the stats as well as Baynard has ran for over 100 yards in every game except for So. Va. and Kean (averaging 125 a game still). The receiving corps has been able to absorb the loss of Koudossou.Quote from: wesleydad on November 02, 2015, 11:01:53 AMWesleydad, always enjoy your perspective. How do feel about Wesley this year? Offensive looks typically awesome, however the defense does not look as intimidating as the team I saw Hobart struggle against in last year's playoffs.Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 10:55:20 AM
IMO St. Lawrence should be given stronger recognition in this poll. If St.Lawrence handles Hobart(a big IF since Hobart offense finally read the playbook and Sweeney is now healthy), I think they are #2 in the East , especially after their one loss to a Morrisville team that took care of Cortland this weekend. I know the counter will be the LL league lost the tough OOC games early in the season, but I have watched the improvement in the league( SLU, RPI, Rochester as examples) during conference play and the LL is stronger than many here may believe. Alfred also deserves strong recognition as they look like the most balanced team in the E8 , especially as defense becomes the differentiator into the deep fall. I am not convinced the best of the MAC , runner up to Wesley in the NJAC or Western New England has anything over SLU or Alfred at this point in the season. I have no Ballot, but interested in final outcome here and Regional rankings.
no issue here, I have St Lawrence 3, behind wesley and del val. I have alfred 7 behind cortland due to h2h result. after wesley you can argue for almost anyone at this point. I have del val at 2 purely on other teams losing. too many this team beat that team who beat the other team who beat another team who beat someone else. crazy.
Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 05:07:41 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 02, 2015, 11:01:53 AMWesleydad, always enjoy your perspective. How do feel about Wesley this year? Offensive looks typically awesome, however the defense does not look as intimidating as the team I saw Hobart struggle against in last year's playoffs.Quote from: Bartman on November 02, 2015, 10:55:20 AM
IMO St. Lawrence should be given stronger recognition in this poll. If St.Lawrence handles Hobart(a big IF since Hobart offense finally read the playbook and Sweeney is now healthy), I think they are #2 in the East , especially after their one loss to a Morrisville team that took care of Cortland this weekend. I know the counter will be the LL league lost the tough OOC games early in the season, but I have watched the improvement in the league( SLU, RPI, Rochester as examples) during conference play and the LL is stronger than many here may believe. Alfred also deserves strong recognition as they look like the most balanced team in the E8 , especially as defense becomes the differentiator into the deep fall. I am not convinced the best of the MAC , runner up to Wesley in the NJAC or Western New England has anything over SLU or Alfred at this point in the season. I have no Ballot, but interested in final outcome here and Regional rankings.
no issue here, I have St Lawrence 3, behind wesley and del val. I have alfred 7 behind cortland due to h2h result. after wesley you can argue for almost anyone at this point. I have del val at 2 purely on other teams losing. too many this team beat that team who beat the other team who beat another team who beat someone else. crazy.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 6 ) | 8-0 | 60 | 1 | VS. #9 Salisbury |
2 Delaware Valley | 7-1 | 52 | 3t | at Lycoming |
3 Albright | 7-1 | 41 | 5 | at #6 Stevenson |
4 St. Lawrence | 7-1 | 39 | 7 | at Hobart |
5 Rowan | 6-2 | 29 | 6 | at Kean |
6 Stevenson | 7-1 | 28 | 9 | vs. #3 Albright |
7 Western New England | 8-0 | 19 | 8 | at Coast Guard |
8 Alfred | 6-2 | 16 | 10t | vs. Utica |
9 Salisbury | 5-2 | 14 | 2 | at #1 Wesley |
10 Cortland State | 7-2 | 11 | 3t | Open Date |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 03, 2015, 09:41:15 AM
Week 9 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Wesley ( 6 ) 8-0 60 1 VS. #9 Salisbury 2 Delaware Valley 7-1 52 3t at Lycoming 3 Albright 7-1 41 5 at #6 Stevenson 4 St. Lawrence 7-1 39 7 at Hobart 5 Rowan 6-2 29 6 at Kean 6 Stevenson 7-1 28 9 vs. #3 Albright 7 Western New England 8-0 19 8 at Coast Guard 8 Alfred 6-2 16 10t vs. Utica 9 Salisbury 5-2 14 2 at #1 Wesley 10 Cortland State 7-2 11 3t Open Date
Dropping Out:
Buffalo State
Also Receiving votes:
Morrisville State 8
Framingham State 6
Frostburg State 3
Widener 3
Husson 1
Voting Distribution:
Wesley (1,1,1,1,1,1)
Delaware Valley (2,2,2,2,4,2)
Albright (3,4,6,3,5,4)
St. Lawrence (7,6,3,6,2,3)
Rowan (5,3,4,NR,6,8)
Stevenson (4,5,5,4,NR,9)
Western New England (6,10,7,5,8,NR)
Alfred (8,NR,9,8,7,7)
Salisbury (9,7,NR,NR,9,5)
Cortland State (10,NR,8,9,NR,6)
Morrisville State (NR,NR,NR,NR,3,NR)
Framingham State (NR,NR,10,7,NR,10)
Frostburg State (NR,9,NR,NR,10,NR)
Widener (NR,8,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#9 Salisbury at #1 Wesley
#6 Stevenson at #3 Albright
Quote from: NED3Guy on November 04, 2015, 06:34:19 PM
Albright Stevenson game Saturday basically playing for an at large bid?
Is Husson (Or whoever wins the ECFC the only, likely AQ from the east not currently ranked in region?
Quote from: bman on November 04, 2015, 09:36:50 PM
The longer answer is that Albright (based on their H2H win against Salisbury) has a better possibility of getting a Pool C bid than Stevenson. I'm not sure Stevenson is in the mix at this point even if they do win...unless some major upsets occur in the next 2 weeks...
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 04, 2015, 10:14:13 PMUnless they pull off the miracle against Wesley....then I would think they would be RR :)Quote from: bman on November 04, 2015, 09:36:50 PM
The longer answer is that Albright (based on their H2H win against Salisbury) has a better possibility of getting a Pool C bid than Stevenson. I'm not sure Stevenson is in the mix at this point even if they do win...unless some major upsets occur in the next 2 weeks...
Albright would have been more secure as a Pool C candidate if Salisbury hadn't screwed the pooch and lost to CNU this week. 8-2 Salisbury with 1-point loss to Albright and a loss to Wesley would have been RR'd, giving Albright an all-important RR win. But now it's likely that the Gulls will not make the final RR's, leaving Albright (if they beat Stevenson) in the precarious territory of 9-1, 0-1 against RR's, middling SOS which is a profile that is not a lock. I do think the Albright/Stevenson winner has a good shot.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 04, 2015, 10:19:46 PMwesleydad, do you think there's any chance NCC can sneak in to the North to help Wesley's chances?
Based on the RR, Wesley better not lose this weekend. They would be in trouble for a C. No RR results unless Rowan sneaks in. I am surprised that Rowan is not ranked. Seems the committee likes the E8 everyone beats everyone scenario more than the few good teams NJAC. The MAC even fared better.
Quote from: thewaterboy on November 04, 2015, 11:24:35 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 04, 2015, 10:19:46 PMwesleydad, do you think there's any chance NCC can sneak in to the North to help Wesley's chances?
Based on the RR, Wesley better not lose this weekend. They would be in trouble for a C. No RR results unless Rowan sneaks in. I am surprised that Rowan is not ranked. Seems the committee likes the E8 everyone beats everyone scenario more than the few good teams NJAC. The MAC even fared better.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 04, 2015, 11:43:00 PMYa think the result of the IWU-Wheaton game will have any bearing on NCC's ranking as well?Quote from: thewaterboy on November 04, 2015, 11:24:35 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 04, 2015, 10:19:46 PMwesleydad, do you think there's any chance NCC can sneak in to the North to help Wesley's chances?
Based on the RR, Wesley better not lose this weekend. They would be in trouble for a C. No RR results unless Rowan sneaks in. I am surprised that Rowan is not ranked. Seems the committee likes the E8 everyone beats everyone scenario more than the few good teams NJAC. The MAC even fared better.
If NCC wins their last two (they should), they will probably get up to 9 or 10 in the rankings. (The North region committee would presumably be loath to put them above any viable at large candidates, as they would block access to the table.)
Quote from: thewaterboy on November 05, 2015, 01:11:42 AMQuote from: Mr. Ypsi on November 04, 2015, 11:43:00 PMYa think the result of the IWU-Wheaton game will have any bearing on NCC's ranking as well?Quote from: thewaterboy on November 04, 2015, 11:24:35 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 04, 2015, 10:19:46 PMwesleydad, do you think there's any chance NCC can sneak in to the North to help Wesley's chances?
Based on the RR, Wesley better not lose this weekend. They would be in trouble for a C. No RR results unless Rowan sneaks in. I am surprised that Rowan is not ranked. Seems the committee likes the E8 everyone beats everyone scenario more than the few good teams NJAC. The MAC even fared better.
If NCC wins their last two (they should), they will probably get up to 9 or 10 in the rankings. (The North region committee would presumably be loath to put them above any viable at large candidates, as they would block access to the table.)
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 05, 2015, 11:43:18 AM
I don't think Wheaton can be a #1 seed without serious calamity. I know it was mentioned briefly on the pod a couple of weeks ago, but it isn't happening (without a great deal of help).
If you're looking at the North region's rankings and wondering how North Central can get in, this is what you're after:
- You want John Carroll to lose by 100 to Mount Union (possible)
- You want DePauw to get squashed by Wabash (probable)
- I think you need IWU to lose as that now gives a committee to look closer at that h2h now that the win percentage difference between IWU and NCC isn't as massive
- It wouldn't hurt if Olivet lost another game also
But the main things here are John Carroll and DePauw. That's going to open up two spots in the North rankings. Teams hovering around to fill those spots: Ohio Northern, Wittenberg, Benedictine/Lakeland, and North Central. Does North Central profile better than two of those teams? I think they do, but it's not a slam dunk.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on November 03, 2015, 02:45:40 PM
Morrisville State - 5 NR's and a #3. Now that is a head scratcher!! ???
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 05, 2015, 12:13:55 PMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on November 03, 2015, 02:45:40 PM
Morrisville State - 5 NR's and a #3. Now that is a head scratcher!! ???
It's always fun to see how people sort through the E8 madness, but I don't get this. Alfred's got a better record, better conference record, and a H2H win.
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 05, 2015, 12:44:39 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 05, 2015, 12:13:55 PMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on November 03, 2015, 02:45:40 PM
Morrisville State - 5 NR's and a #3. Now that is a head scratcher!! ???
It's always fun to see how people sort through the E8 madness, but I don't get this. Alfred's got a better record, better conference record, and a H2H win.
Additionally, The same voter has St Lawrence at #2 and Morrisville beat St Lawrence Head to Head
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 05, 2015, 01:11:07 PMQuote from: Saxon73 on November 05, 2015, 12:44:39 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 05, 2015, 12:13:55 PMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on November 03, 2015, 02:45:40 PM
Morrisville State - 5 NR's and a #3. Now that is a head scratcher!! ???
It's always fun to see how people sort through the E8 madness, but I don't get this. Alfred's got a better record, better conference record, and a H2H win.
Additionally, The same voter has St Lawrence at #2 and Morrisville beat St Lawrence Head to Head
Well, H2H isn't everything. 7-1 generally trumps 5-3 in my book. But in the Alfred case, they don't even have that
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | This Week |
1 Wesley ( 6 ) | 8-1 | 60 | 1 | LOST VS. #9 Salisbury |
2 Delaware Valley | 7-2 | 52 | 3t | LOST at Lycoming |
3 Albright | 8-1 | 41 | 5 | WON at #6 Stevenson |
4 St. Lawrence | 7-2 | 39 | 7 | LOST at Hobart |
5 Rowan | 6-3 | 29 | 6 | LOST at Kean |
6 Stevenson | 7-2 | 28 | 9 | LOST vs. #3 Albright |
7 Western New England | 9-0 | 19 | 8 | WON at Coast Guard |
8 Alfred | 7-2 | 16 | 10t | WON vs. Utica (barely) |
9 Salisbury | 6-2 | 14 | 2 | WON at #1 Wesley |
10 Cortland State | 7-2 | 11 | 3t | Open Date |
Quote from: Bartman on November 07, 2015, 04:31:58 PM
Please don't tell me Albright is No.1? Saw the SLU team at Hobart today , they are legit and Hobart has found momentum too late in the season, but a greatD3 game without the many turnovers of last year( although Sweeney's late pick was almost a death sentence. Good luck to the pollsters this week.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 07, 2015, 08:42:12 PM
Okay, let's play a game. The first person to name their team, will be my number 1 team this week.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 04:48:32 PM
i am going to ignore all h2h stuff since there are so many games that contradict other games and go with records. I still think Wesley is the best team even after the mess I saw today. Since everyone has at least 1 loss it almost goes back to the beginning of the year. They were the best team then and I think still the best team now. I will talk about the game today on the NJAC board. The only other team in the discussion to me at this point for #1 is Salisbury. All this means is that Mount will be on top of a bracket that has a lot of east teams in it since there is so many good teams in the west. Looks like someone will have to go to Mount in the quarters.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Looking at the regional rankings there is as good a chance as any that Wesley stays at #1. Is there any chance a 2 loss Cortland or Framingham move up to #1. The only team that might jump to #1 is Albright and that means they would have to jump both Cortland and Framingham which is not likely. I have to figure that Salisbury moves into the top 10. The only 1 loss teams in the rankings are Wesley, Albright, and Framingham. I am thinking Wesley, Albright, Cortland, and Framingham in some order next and then who knows. Stevenson probably drops out and Salisbury moved in. With Del Val losing Wesley is likely the first team on the board for the east and if Salisbury moves into rankings and North Central moves into the North than a 1-1 RRO and decent SOS should get Wesley in. Then I would look for a potential rematch with Salisbury in round 2 with the winner going to alliance for the region final. This week was just crazy around the region. Insanity.
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 09, 2015, 10:59:35 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Looking at the regional rankings there is as good a chance as any that Wesley stays at #1. Is there any chance a 2 loss Cortland or Framingham move up to #1. The only team that might jump to #1 is Albright and that means they would have to jump both Cortland and Framingham which is not likely. I have to figure that Salisbury moves into the top 10. The only 1 loss teams in the rankings are Wesley, Albright, and Framingham. I am thinking Wesley, Albright, Cortland, and Framingham in some order next and then who knows. Stevenson probably drops out and Salisbury moved in. With Del Val losing Wesley is likely the first team on the board for the east and if Salisbury moves into rankings and North Central moves into the North than a 1-1 RRO and decent SOS should get Wesley in. Then I would look for a potential rematch with Salisbury in round 2 with the winner going to alliance for the region final. This week was just crazy around the region. Insanity.
I really don't see a logical reason for Wesley to be ranked ahead of Albright given the common opponent result. From a poll perspective, sure. People can and will pretty universally vote Wesley ahead of Albright. But for the regional rankings, I think you have to pretty blatantly ignore some things to wind up with Wesley in front of Albright.
Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 09, 2015, 11:04:54 AMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 09, 2015, 10:59:35 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Looking at the regional rankings there is as good a chance as any that Wesley stays at #1. Is there any chance a 2 loss Cortland or Framingham move up to #1. The only team that might jump to #1 is Albright and that means they would have to jump both Cortland and Framingham which is not likely. I have to figure that Salisbury moves into the top 10. The only 1 loss teams in the rankings are Wesley, Albright, and Framingham. I am thinking Wesley, Albright, Cortland, and Framingham in some order next and then who knows. Stevenson probably drops out and Salisbury moved in. With Del Val losing Wesley is likely the first team on the board for the east and if Salisbury moves into rankings and North Central moves into the North than a 1-1 RRO and decent SOS should get Wesley in. Then I would look for a potential rematch with Salisbury in round 2 with the winner going to alliance for the region final. This week was just crazy around the region. Insanity.
I really don't see a logical reason for Wesley to be ranked ahead of Albright given the common opponent result. From a poll perspective, sure. People can and will pretty universally vote Wesley ahead of Albright. But for the regional rankings, I think you have to pretty blatantly ignore some things to wind up with Wesley in front of Albright.
Agreed. I was wondering if a team had ever stayed ranked #1 in a week where they lost. But for the regional rankings, I think Albright has to go ahead of Wesley thanks to the favorable common-opponent result with Salisbury, and that probably means Albright #1, as incredible and strange as that looks.
Like wally said: for poll purposes, we have room for a little discretion to take into account things like "Albright needed a crazy fourth-quarter comeback to beat Salisbury" and "Wesley has been more dominant all season against better competition" and plausibly vote Wesley over Albright. But in the rankings, which are really supposed to more rigidly adhere to h2h and common-opponent stuff where possible, I think it will be Albright / Wesley / Cortland / Framingham. And I have no idea how they will order Del Val, St. Lawrence, Stevenson, and the rest. Alfred could move way up this week depending on how much they slam the teams who just lost.
Quote from: bman on November 09, 2015, 11:35:12 AMQuote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 09, 2015, 11:04:54 AMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 09, 2015, 10:59:35 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Looking at the regional rankings there is as good a chance as any that Wesley stays at #1. Is there any chance a 2 loss Cortland or Framingham move up to #1. The only team that might jump to #1 is Albright and that means they would have to jump both Cortland and Framingham which is not likely. I have to figure that Salisbury moves into the top 10. The only 1 loss teams in the rankings are Wesley, Albright, and Framingham. I am thinking Wesley, Albright, Cortland, and Framingham in some order next and then who knows. Stevenson probably drops out and Salisbury moved in. With Del Val losing Wesley is likely the first team on the board for the east and if Salisbury moves into rankings and North Central moves into the North than a 1-1 RRO and decent SOS should get Wesley in. Then I would look for a potential rematch with Salisbury in round 2 with the winner going to alliance for the region final. This week was just crazy around the region. Insanity.
I really don't see a logical reason for Wesley to be ranked ahead of Albright given the common opponent result. From a poll perspective, sure. People can and will pretty universally vote Wesley ahead of Albright. But for the regional rankings, I think you have to pretty blatantly ignore some things to wind up with Wesley in front of Albright.
Agreed. I was wondering if a team had ever stayed ranked #1 in a week where they lost. But for the regional rankings, I think Albright has to go ahead of Wesley thanks to the favorable common-opponent result with Salisbury, and that probably means Albright #1, as incredible and strange as that looks.
Like wally said: for poll purposes, we have room for a little discretion to take into account things like "Albright needed a crazy fourth-quarter comeback to beat Salisbury" and "Wesley has been more dominant all season against better competition" and plausibly vote Wesley over Albright. But in the rankings, which are really supposed to more rigidly adhere to h2h and common-opponent stuff where possible, I think it will be Albright / Wesley / Cortland / Framingham. And I have no idea how they will order Del Val, St. Lawrence, Stevenson, and the rest. Alfred could move way up this week depending on how much they slam the teams who just lost.
From a fan poll perspective, I just can't do that...
It doesn't pass the smell test.
Wesley would beat Albright by 4 TDs min right now....
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 09, 2015, 10:59:35 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Looking at the regional rankings there is as good a chance as any that Wesley stays at #1. Is there any chance a 2 loss Cortland or Framingham move up to #1. The only team that might jump to #1 is Albright and that means they would have to jump both Cortland and Framingham which is not likely. I have to figure that Salisbury moves into the top 10. The only 1 loss teams in the rankings are Wesley, Albright, and Framingham. I am thinking Wesley, Albright, Cortland, and Framingham in some order next and then who knows. Stevenson probably drops out and Salisbury moved in. With Del Val losing Wesley is likely the first team on the board for the east and if Salisbury moves into rankings and North Central moves into the North than a 1-1 RRO and decent SOS should get Wesley in. Then I would look for a potential rematch with Salisbury in round 2 with the winner going to alliance for the region final. This week was just crazy around the region. Insanity.
I really don't see a logical reason for Wesley to be ranked ahead of Albright given the common opponent result. From a poll perspective, sure. People can and will pretty universally vote Wesley ahead of Albright. But for the regional rankings, I think you have to pretty blatantly ignore some things to wind up with Wesley in front of Albright.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 09, 2015, 12:08:25 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 09, 2015, 10:59:35 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Looking at the regional rankings there is as good a chance as any that Wesley stays at #1. Is there any chance a 2 loss Cortland or Framingham move up to #1. The only team that might jump to #1 is Albright and that means they would have to jump both Cortland and Framingham which is not likely. I have to figure that Salisbury moves into the top 10. The only 1 loss teams in the rankings are Wesley, Albright, and Framingham. I am thinking Wesley, Albright, Cortland, and Framingham in some order next and then who knows. Stevenson probably drops out and Salisbury moved in. With Del Val losing Wesley is likely the first team on the board for the east and if Salisbury moves into rankings and North Central moves into the North than a 1-1 RRO and decent SOS should get Wesley in. Then I would look for a potential rematch with Salisbury in round 2 with the winner going to alliance for the region final. This week was just crazy around the region. Insanity.
I really don't see a logical reason for Wesley to be ranked ahead of Albright given the common opponent result. From a poll perspective, sure. People can and will pretty universally vote Wesley ahead of Albright. But for the regional rankings, I think you have to pretty blatantly ignore some things to wind up with Wesley in front of Albright.
I get that but Albright was 6 in the RR last week. I do not see them jumping up to 1 despite the common opponent result. They have a loss which has to come under consideration too. I just dont see a committee jumping a team over other teams that did not lose. They were behind Cortland who has 2 loses and Framingham who has 1. What would make them jump those teams this week if they committee did not think they were better than them last week. Does Cortland go to 1 and Framingham 2 then Albright 3 and Wesley 4? How would Cortland be a 1 with 2 loses? But they are ahead of Framingham based on h2h result. It will be interesting to see what they do. I still think Wesley could stay the 1 since prior to last week they looked to be well ahead of the rest of the region.
Quote from: bman on November 09, 2015, 11:35:12 AMMaybe. But Albright would score 40 points though. And isn't that really the issue?Quote from: ExTartanPlayer on November 09, 2015, 11:04:54 AMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 09, 2015, 10:59:35 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 PM
Looking at the regional rankings there is as good a chance as any that Wesley stays at #1. Is there any chance a 2 loss Cortland or Framingham move up to #1. The only team that might jump to #1 is Albright and that means they would have to jump both Cortland and Framingham which is not likely. I have to figure that Salisbury moves into the top 10. The only 1 loss teams in the rankings are Wesley, Albright, and Framingham. I am thinking Wesley, Albright, Cortland, and Framingham in some order next and then who knows. Stevenson probably drops out and Salisbury moved in. With Del Val losing Wesley is likely the first team on the board for the east and if Salisbury moves into rankings and North Central moves into the North than a 1-1 RRO and decent SOS should get Wesley in. Then I would look for a potential rematch with Salisbury in round 2 with the winner going to alliance for the region final. This week was just crazy around the region. Insanity.
I really don't see a logical reason for Wesley to be ranked ahead of Albright given the common opponent result. From a poll perspective, sure. People can and will pretty universally vote Wesley ahead of Albright. But for the regional rankings, I think you have to pretty blatantly ignore some things to wind up with Wesley in front of Albright.
Agreed. I was wondering if a team had ever stayed ranked #1 in a week where they lost. But for the regional rankings, I think Albright has to go ahead of Wesley thanks to the favorable common-opponent result with Salisbury, and that probably means Albright #1, as incredible and strange as that looks.
Like wally said: for poll purposes, we have room for a little discretion to take into account things like "Albright needed a crazy fourth-quarter comeback to beat Salisbury" and "Wesley has been more dominant all season against better competition" and plausibly vote Wesley over Albright. But in the rankings, which are really supposed to more rigidly adhere to h2h and common-opponent stuff where possible, I think it will be Albright / Wesley / Cortland / Framingham. And I have no idea how they will order Del Val, St. Lawrence, Stevenson, and the rest. Alfred could move way up this week depending on how much they slam the teams who just lost.
From a fan poll perspective, I just can't do that...
It doesn't pass the smell test.
Wesley would beat Albright by 4 TDs min right now....
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on November 09, 2015, 02:48:49 PM
Johns Hopkins fits into the southern half of the east. So maybe they bring them east. Doesn't make much logistical sense to move Wesley or Salisbury south though they
Quote from: PA_wesleyfan on November 09, 2015, 02:48:49 PM
Johns Hopkins fits into the southern half of the east. So maybe they bring them east. Doesn't make much logistical sense to move Wesley or Salisbury south though they
Quote from: @d3jason on November 10, 2015, 02:15:04 PM
How po'ed are you if you are Hopkins and you have to see Wesley in the first round again like 2013?
Quote from: jknezek on November 10, 2015, 02:16:21 PMQuote from: @d3jason on November 10, 2015, 02:15:04 PM
How po'ed are you if you are Hopkins and you have to see Wesley in the first round again like 2013?
More likely fall to someone like W&L this time around.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 10, 2015, 02:47:44 PMQuote from: jknezek on November 10, 2015, 02:16:21 PMQuote from: @d3jason on November 10, 2015, 02:15:04 PM
How po'ed are you if you are Hopkins and you have to see Wesley in the first round again like 2013?
More likely fall to someone like W&L this time around.
I would think Salisbury would go to Hopkins since both are in Maryland and Wesley to Albright, with the winner facing each other the following round.
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 10, 2015, 02:58:20 PM
Not to pick on Norwich, but it would be 493 miles to Hopkins ??? ???
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Wesley ( 4 ) | 8-1 | 56 | 1 | at William Paterson |
2 Albright ( 1 ) | 8-1 | 53 | 3 | vs. Lebanon Valley |
3 Salisbury | 6-2 | 50 | 9 | vs. Frostburg State |
4 Stevenson | 7-2 | 27 | 6 | at FDU-Florham |
5 Alfred | 7-2 | 26 | 8 | at St. John Fisher |
6 Western New England ( 1 ) | 9-0 | 24 | 7 | vs. Salve Regina |
7t Delaware Valley | 7-2 | 22 | 2 | vs. Widener |
7t St. Lawrence | 7-2 | 22 | 4 | vs. Merchant Marine |
9 Framingham State | 8-1 | 18 | NR | at Worcester State |
10 Cortland State | 7-2 | 16 | 10 | at Ithaca |
Quote from: pg04 on November 10, 2015, 04:14:58 PM
At this point I think WNEC is probably underrated by at least 4 of the voters based just on the ineptness of the region. There is something to be said of winning them all.
Quote from: pg04 on November 10, 2015, 04:41:40 PM
I would not have even ranked Del Val this week. Their two losses are AWFUL.
Quote from: jknezek on November 10, 2015, 04:09:54 PM
I love the "1" vote for WNEC...
QuoteI would not have even ranked Del Val this week. Their two losses are AWFUL.
Quote from: jknezek on November 10, 2015, 04:09:54 PM
I love the "1" vote for WNEC...
Quote from: Boxer7806 on November 10, 2015, 08:27:51 PM
One voter has Framingham at 4, and Cortland, who beat them head to head at 9. To be honest, I'm glad to see most of the voters keep Wesley at 1. I think this is about as accurate reflection on the East region as you can have. Whether that is a good or bad thing, well your going to have to form your own opinion on that.
Quote from: bman on November 10, 2015, 09:14:12 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on November 10, 2015, 08:27:51 PM
One voter has Framingham at 4, and Cortland, who beat them head to head at 9. To be honest, I'm glad to see most of the voters keep Wesley at 1. I think this is about as accurate reflection on the East region as you can have. Whether that is a good or bad thing, well your going to have to form your own opinion on that.
While that wasn't me, I can say that the ranking is probably based on body of work, rather than head to head.
Since everyone has pretty much beaten each other or a common opponent, I am more relying on who is playing better right now, and their overall season.
For example, I ignored the H2H Wesley loss to Salisbury, and ranked them higher. I just feel that Wesley is stronger and has a better body of work this season...
Quote from: Boxer7806 on November 10, 2015, 08:27:51 PM
One voter has Framingham at 4, and Cortland, who beat them head to head at 9. To be honest, I'm glad to see most of the voters keep Wesley at 1. I think this is about as accurate reflection on the East region as you can have. Whether that is a good or bad thing, well your going to have to form your own opinion on that.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 11, 2015, 02:04:19 PM
In all honesty, I think Albright should have been #1, they beat the same team that Wesley loss too, however I think with NCC getting into the North Region Rankings was most likely the deciding factor in placing Wesley above Albright.
Quote from: @d3jason on November 12, 2015, 10:03:09 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 11, 2015, 02:04:19 PM
In all honesty, I think Albright should have been #1, they beat the same team that Wesley loss too, however I think with NCC getting into the North Region Rankings was most likely the deciding factor in placing Wesley above Albright.
I believe that their are four subcommittees, one for each region. So my question, that I'm sure anyone can answer here is, how would the East panel know that NCC was regionally-ranked?
Quote from: @d3jason on November 12, 2015, 10:03:09 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 11, 2015, 02:04:19 PM
In all honesty, I think Albright should have been #1, they beat the same team that Wesley loss too, however I think with NCC getting into the North Region Rankings was most likely the deciding factor in placing Wesley above Albright.
I believe that their are four subcommittees, one for each region. So my question, that I'm sure anyone can answer here is, how would the East panel know that NCC was regionally-ranked?
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 12, 2015, 10:10:58 AMQuote from: @d3jason on November 12, 2015, 10:03:09 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 11, 2015, 02:04:19 PM
In all honesty, I think Albright should have been #1, they beat the same team that Wesley loss too, however I think with NCC getting into the North Region Rankings was most likely the deciding factor in placing Wesley above Albright.
I believe that their are four subcommittees, one for each region. So my question, that I'm sure anyone can answer here is, how would the East panel know that NCC was regionally-ranked?
This is actually a mystery. I tend to think that if North Central being ranked or not was a deciding factor for placing Wesley ahead of Albright, a simple text/call to a representative of the North committee would do the trick. I did notice that this week's data sheets did not include RRO results, so maybe they're flying blind. In the end here with this particular case, I don't think it's terribly important if the order is Albright/Wesley or Wesley/Albright. Either way, Albright is already in the field (presumably) and Wesley is at the front of the at-large line in this region.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 12, 2015, 10:20:21 AMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 12, 2015, 10:10:58 AMQuote from: @d3jason on November 12, 2015, 10:03:09 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 11, 2015, 02:04:19 PM
In all honesty, I think Albright should have been #1, they beat the same team that Wesley loss too, however I think with NCC getting into the North Region Rankings was most likely the deciding factor in placing Wesley above Albright.
I believe that their are four subcommittees, one for each region. So my question, that I'm sure anyone can answer here is, how would the East panel know that NCC was regionally-ranked?
This is actually a mystery. I tend to think that if North Central being ranked or not was a deciding factor for placing Wesley ahead of Albright, a simple text/call to a representative of the North committee would do the trick. I did notice that this week's data sheets did not include RRO results, so maybe they're flying blind. In the end here with this particular case, I don't think it's terribly important if the order is Albright/Wesley or Wesley/Albright. Either way, Albright is already in the field (presumably) and Wesley is at the front of the at-large line in this region.
I agree, if both handle themselves this weekend, they are both in the playoffs, however looking at D3 Football projected bracket, I would think Albright would get at least two home games and Wesley one and Wesley going to Albright, it just doesn't make since not using the common opponent as a major factor, however it appears the same in other regions. I honestly believe the committee uses the old "eye test", money saver, and some other random data we are not privy to when selecting teams, such as last year when Muhlenberg made the field (although they played Widener very very close).
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 12, 2015, 10:30:23 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 12, 2015, 10:20:21 AMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 12, 2015, 10:10:58 AMQuote from: @d3jason on November 12, 2015, 10:03:09 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 11, 2015, 02:04:19 PM
In all honesty, I think Albright should have been #1, they beat the same team that Wesley loss too, however I think with NCC getting into the North Region Rankings was most likely the deciding factor in placing Wesley above Albright.
I believe that their are four subcommittees, one for each region. So my question, that I'm sure anyone can answer here is, how would the East panel know that NCC was regionally-ranked?
This is actually a mystery. I tend to think that if North Central being ranked or not was a deciding factor for placing Wesley ahead of Albright, a simple text/call to a representative of the North committee would do the trick. I did notice that this week's data sheets did not include RRO results, so maybe they're flying blind. In the end here with this particular case, I don't think it's terribly important if the order is Albright/Wesley or Wesley/Albright. Either way, Albright is already in the field (presumably) and Wesley is at the front of the at-large line in this region.
I agree, if both handle themselves this weekend, they are both in the playoffs, however looking at D3 Football projected bracket, I would think Albright would get at least two home games and Wesley one and Wesley going to Albright, it just doesn't make since not using the common opponent as a major factor, however it appears the same in other regions. I honestly believe the committee uses the old "eye test", money saver, and some other random data we are not privy to when selecting teams, such as last year when Muhlenberg made the field (although they played Widener very very close).
I think the way that bracket is set up, Wesley is clearly in the position to host. D3football.com has Albright on the road in the first round even.
How does selecting Muhlenberg save money?
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 12, 2015, 11:10:58 AMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 12, 2015, 10:30:23 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 12, 2015, 10:20:21 AMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 12, 2015, 10:10:58 AMQuote from: @d3jason on November 12, 2015, 10:03:09 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on November 11, 2015, 02:04:19 PM
In all honesty, I think Albright should have been #1, they beat the same team that Wesley loss too, however I think with NCC getting into the North Region Rankings was most likely the deciding factor in placing Wesley above Albright.
I believe that their are four subcommittees, one for each region. So my question, that I'm sure anyone can answer here is, how would the East panel know that NCC was regionally-ranked?
This is actually a mystery. I tend to think that if North Central being ranked or not was a deciding factor for placing Wesley ahead of Albright, a simple text/call to a representative of the North committee would do the trick. I did notice that this week's data sheets did not include RRO results, so maybe they're flying blind. In the end here with this particular case, I don't think it's terribly important if the order is Albright/Wesley or Wesley/Albright. Either way, Albright is already in the field (presumably) and Wesley is at the front of the at-large line in this region.
I agree, if both handle themselves this weekend, they are both in the playoffs, however looking at D3 Football projected bracket, I would think Albright would get at least two home games and Wesley one and Wesley going to Albright, it just doesn't make since not using the common opponent as a major factor, however it appears the same in other regions. I honestly believe the committee uses the old "eye test", money saver, and some other random data we are not privy to when selecting teams, such as last year when Muhlenberg made the field (although they played Widener very very close).
I think the way that bracket is set up, Wesley is clearly in the position to host. D3football.com has Albright on the road in the first round even.
How does selecting Muhlenberg save money?
That it is in regards to the Far West and Texas quadrants, which can't be avoided. However, listening to your analysis prior year, how did Muhlenberg get in...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 01, 2016, 01:23:16 PM
Football is still a thing? Well, I'll be!
Anyway, I've been neglectful of ERFP duties so no Pre-Season poll (obviously). However, I'm willing to coordinate voting again if anyone is interested. I'll send messages to everyone who voted last year and then open it up to responders on this thread to fill out gaps.
Get the fight song ready!
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 01, 2016, 01:23:16 PMIf you have dropouts from last year, I am happy to contribute
Football is still a thing? Well, I'll be!
Anyway, I've been neglectful of ERFP duties so no Pre-Season poll (obviously). However, I'm willing to coordinate voting again if anyone is interested. I'll send messages to everyone who voted last year and then open it up to responders on this thread to fill out gaps.
Get the fight song ready!
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury ( 3 ) | 1-0 | 47 | NR | Open |
2 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) | 1-0 | 44 | NR | vs. Misericordia |
3 Cortland State ( 1 ) | 1-0 | 40 | NR | vs. Framingham State |
4 St. John Fisher | 1-0 | 34 | NR | at Springfield |
5 Wesley | 0-1 | 28 | NR | vs. Frostburg State |
6t Hobart | 1-0 | 15 | NR | at Endicott |
6t St. Lawrence | 1-0 | 15 | NR | vs. Norwich |
6t Stevenson | 1-0 | 15 | NR | at #10 Albright |
9 Rowan | 1-0 | 14 | NR | Open |
10 Albright | 0-1 | 8 | NR | vs. #6t Stevenson |
Quote from: rams1102 on September 08, 2016, 05:08:45 PMI want whatever that person is taking. ;D
I found it strange that someone had Wesley and Hobart out of the top 10 and Cortland #1.
Quote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 09, 2016, 08:07:01 AMI agree . Only the future schedule will reveal whether Hobart and Brockport are top teams or just well matched that day with weak defenses. I am betting they will both be solid , and Brockport rises in the standings. Frankly, I felt their run defense shut Hobart down, although that may have been because Hobart prepared for a 3 DL scheme instead of the 4 DL they came out with. I think Brockport will surprise the E8 and Andrews is a special player to watch.We will see.
I thought Brockport looked good, I wouldn't be suprised if they end up in the pool later in the season.
Quote from: Bartman on September 09, 2016, 10:15:16 AMQuote from: Jonny "Utes" Utah on September 09, 2016, 08:07:01 AMI agree . Only the future schedule will reveal whether Hobart and Brockport are top teams or just well matched that day with weak defenses. I am betting they will both be solid , and Brockport rises in the standings. Frankly, I felt their run defense shut Hobart down, although that may have been because Hobart prepared for a 3 DL scheme instead of the 4 DL they came out with. I think Brockport will surprise the E8 and Andrews is a special player to watch.We will see.
I thought Brockport looked good, I wouldn't be suprised if they end up in the pool later in the season.
Quote from: D3viewer on September 09, 2016, 05:45:15 PM
"I'm still waiting for the HWS SID to put out that old upstate poll/stats sheet they used to do."
Utes, I remember that as well and it was great. Used to have the Upstate standings..stats..schedule and I think..an All Upstate Team at the end of the year. All the fun of an "Upstate" Conf without any of the politics and drama.
Quote from: D3viewer on September 09, 2016, 05:45:15 PM
"I'm still waiting for the HWS SID to put out that old upstate poll/stats sheet they used to do."
Utes, I remember that as well and it was great. Used to have the Upstate standings..stats..schedule and I think..an All Upstate Team at the end of the year. All the fun of an "Upstate" Conf without any of the politics and drama.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1t Salisbury ( 3 ) | 1-0 | 46 | 1 | vs. Montclair State |
1t Delaware Valley ( 1 ) | 2-0 | 46 | 2 | at King's |
3 Cortland State ( 1 ) | 2-0 | 40 | 3 | vs. #5 St. John Fisher |
4 Wesley | 1-1 | 35 | 5 | at Christopher Newport |
5 St. John Fisher | 2-0 | 31 | 4 | at #3 Cortland State |
6 Hobart | 2-0 | 20 | 6t | vs. Ithaca |
7t St. Lawrence | 2-0 | 18 | 6t | at Endicott |
7t Stevenson | 2-0 | 18 | 6t | vs. Lebanon Valley |
9 Rowan | 1-0 | 11 | 9 | vs. William Paterson |
10 Alfred | 2-0 | 6 | NR | at Buffalo State |
Quote from: UfanBill on September 12, 2016, 12:03:56 PM
How does Utica not get a single vote? I would have them no less than 7th after their win over Ohio Northern. Come on guys!
Quote from: UfanBill on September 12, 2016, 12:03:56 PM
How does Utica not get a single vote? I would have them no less than 7th after their win over Ohio Northern. Come on guys!
Quote from: rams1102 on September 12, 2016, 12:51:19 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 12, 2016, 12:03:56 PM
How does Utica not get a single vote? I would have them no less than 7th after their win over Ohio Northern. Come on guys!
I did not have them in my Top 10. If There was honorable mention they would get my vote. Who would you knock out of the Top 10 to insert Utica? It's still early. ;D
Quote from: dlip on September 12, 2016, 01:03:10 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 12, 2016, 12:51:19 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 12, 2016, 12:03:56 PM
How does Utica not get a single vote? I would have them no less than 7th after their win over Ohio Northern. Come on guys!
I did not have them in my Top 10. If There was honorable mention they would get my vote. Who would you knock out of the Top 10 to insert Utica? It's still early. ;D
Alfred (who I like), Rowan, and Stevenson to start. IDHO a 2-0 team with a win over a top 20 team CANNOT not be in the ERFP in week #2.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 12, 2016, 12:51:19 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 12, 2016, 12:03:56 PM
How does Utica not get a single vote? I would have them no less than 7th after their win over Ohio Northern. Come on guys!
I did not have them in my Top 10. If There was honorable mention they would get my vote. Who would you knock out of the Top 10 to insert Utica? It's still early. ;D
Quote from: Upstate on September 12, 2016, 01:38:26 PM
No offense to AU and Husson but Utica's win over a top 20 OAC team is a hell of a lot more impressive than a 7 point win over an ECFC team...
Quote from: Upstate on September 12, 2016, 01:38:26 PM
No offense to AU and Husson but Utica's win over a top 20 OAC team is a hell of a lot more impressive than a 7 point win over an ECFC team...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 12, 2016, 02:57:59 PM
The signal-to-noise ratio in early season polls makes them challenging to discern. For all we know, ONU could go 0-10
But the Utica win has to be the most improbable ending we've seen in awhile. For ONU to have the ball at the Utica 15, up 17, with less than seven minutes to go...it's kind of crazy.
This game also underscores why, unless you somehow wind up with 8 men on the field on defense, I think teams should avoid using 2nd half timeouts until the end. It blows my mind when I see teams call timeout to avoid a delay of game penalty on 2nd-and-3 in the third quarter just to save five yards.
Utica having all three timeouts gave them a second life after the onside kick failed.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on September 12, 2016, 05:09:46 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 12, 2016, 02:57:59 PM
The signal-to-noise ratio in early season polls makes them challenging to discern. For all we know, ONU could go 0-10
But the Utica win has to be the most improbable ending we've seen in awhile. For ONU to have the ball at the Utica 15, up 17, with less than seven minutes to go...it's kind of crazy.
This game also underscores why, unless you somehow wind up with 8 men on the field on defense, I think teams should avoid using 2nd half timeouts until the end. It blows my mind when I see teams call timeout to avoid a delay of game penalty on 2nd-and-3 in the third quarter just to save five yards.
Utica having all three timeouts gave them a second life after the onside kick failed.
Agree with the timeouts, I have witness over the last two weeks, teams waste timeouts for punts and xp conversions.
Quote from: dlip on September 12, 2016, 01:03:10 PMQuote from: rams1102 on September 12, 2016, 12:51:19 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 12, 2016, 12:03:56 PM
How does Utica not get a single vote? I would have them no less than 7th after their win over Ohio Northern. Come on guys!
I did not have them in my Top 10. If There was honorable mention they would get my vote. Who would you knock out of the Top 10 to insert Utica? It's still early. ;D
Alfred (who I like), Rowan, and Stevenson to start. IDHO a 2-0 team with a win over a top 20 team CANNOT not be in the ERFP in week #2.
Quote from: UfanBill on September 12, 2016, 12:03:56 PM
How does Utica not get a single vote? I would have them no less than 7th after their win over Ohio Northern. Come on guys!
Quote from: Upstate on September 12, 2016, 07:23:34 PM
Utica- good enough to get votes for the D3FB top 25 but not good enough to get votes for the ERFP top 10...
Quote from: Bartman on September 13, 2016, 08:40:58 AM
The OAC is a mediocre league without Mount Union and Ohio Northern top 25 ranking was questionable...that said, I think it was a great message by an E8 member to show the strength of the league with an intense comeback.....as Pep said a convincing win over Mo St will get votes
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 3-0 | 47 | 1t | vs. Albright |
2 Salisbury ( 3 ) | 2-0 | 46 | 1t | at Southern Virginia |
3 St. John Fisher | 3-0 | 42 | 5 | at Brockport |
4 St. Lawrence | 3-0 | 27 | 7t | at RPI |
5 Stevenson | 3-0 | 25 | 7t | vs. FDU-Florham |
6t Christopher Newport | 3-0 | 24 | NR | at TCNJ |
6t Hobart | 3-0 | 24 | 6 | vs. Union |
8 Cortland State | 2-1 | 13 | 3 | at Utica |
9 Rowan | 2-0 | 10 | 9 | at Montclair State |
10 Alfred | 3-0 | 9 | 10 | vs. Ithaca |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 19, 2016, 10:43:41 AM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 3-0 47 1t vs. Albright 2 Salisbury ( 3 ) 2-0 46 1t at Southern Virginia 3 St. John Fisher 3-0 42 5 at Brockport 4 St. Lawrence 3-0 27 7t at RPI 5 Stevenson 3-0 25 7t vs. FDU-Florham 6t Christopher Newport 3-0 24 NR at TCNJ 6t Hobart 3-0 24 6 vs. Union 8 Cortland State 2-1 13 3 at Utica 9 Rowan 2-0 10 9 at Montclair State 10 Alfred 3-0 9 10 vs. Ithaca
Dropping Out:
Wesley
Also Receiving votes:
Western New England 4
Wesley 3
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,1,2,2,2)
Salisbury (3,3,1,1,1)
St. John Fisher (2,2,3,3,3)
St. Lawrence (4,5,5,6,8)
Stevenson (7,7,6,5,5)
Christopher Newport (9,4,10,4,4)
Hobart (5,6,4,10,6)
Cortland State (6,9,9,7,NR)
Rowan (NR,NR,7,8,8)
Alfred (8,10,8,NR,9)
Western New England (NR,8,NR,NR,10)
Wesley (10,NR,NR,9,NR)
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2016, 11:41:04 AM
I just can't ignore how badly Heidelberg smashed ONU. The same Heidelberg that Cortland beat.
Combine that with Utica barely escaping against M-State (who the jury is still out on) and I just have a sneaking suspicion that Cortland will win this one by about 17.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2016, 11:41:04 AM
I just can't ignore how badly Heidelberg smashed ONU. The same Heidelberg that Cortland beat.
Combine that with Utica barely escaping against M-State (who the jury is still out on) and I just have a sneaking suspicion that Cortland will win this one by about 17.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 21, 2016, 11:52:38 AMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2016, 11:41:04 AM
I just can't ignore how badly Heidelberg smashed ONU. The same Heidelberg that Cortland beat.
Combine that with Utica barely escaping against M-State (who the jury is still out on) and I just have a sneaking suspicion that Cortland will win this one by about 17.
Me too.
Quote from: sjfcards on September 21, 2016, 12:26:01 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2016, 11:41:04 AM
I just can't ignore how badly Heidelberg smashed ONU. The same Heidelberg that Cortland beat.
Combine that with Utica barely escaping against M-State (who the jury is still out on) and I just have a sneaking suspicion that Cortland will win this one by about 17.
The only thing that makes me question if Cortland can beat UC is the QB situation. As I understand it Ferreira is out for the year with a broken ankle (really is a shame as it came on a late hit). Cortland looked pretty good against Fisher with the backup, but the offense completely changed when he went down to almost a wildcat type deal. Fisher struggled, but also probably hadn't prepared for that type of attack. Now that the scheme has been put on film (albeit a limited amount) Utica may be able to prepare.
Quote from: sjfcards on September 21, 2016, 12:26:01 PMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2016, 11:41:04 AM
I just can't ignore how badly Heidelberg smashed ONU. The same Heidelberg that Cortland beat.
Combine that with Utica barely escaping against M-State (who the jury is still out on) and I just have a sneaking suspicion that Cortland will win this one by about 17.
The only thing that makes me question if Cortland can beat UC is the QB situation. As I understand it Ferreira is out for the year with a broken ankle (really is a shame as it came on a late hit). Cortland looked pretty good against Fisher with the backup, but the offense completely changed when he went down to almost a wildcat type deal. Fisher struggled, but also probably hadn't prepared for that type of attack. Now that the scheme has been put on film (albeit a limited amount) Utica may be able to prepare.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on September 21, 2016, 12:38:16 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 21, 2016, 11:52:38 AMQuote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2016, 11:41:04 AM
I just can't ignore how badly Heidelberg smashed ONU. The same Heidelberg that Cortland beat.
Combine that with Utica barely escaping against M-State (who the jury is still out on) and I just have a sneaking suspicion that Cortland will win this one by about 17.
Me too.
Me three. ;D
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 22, 2016, 10:47:40 AM
Schneider was Cortland's QB in the 61-49 shootout over Framingham last season, so I think Cortland's still going to be potent on offense. It's also interesting to note that freshman QB DeAngelo Walker attempted 4 passes and ran 15 times. Could be a wrinkle.
But this was one of the reasons I was slightly down on Cortland this year. Last year, they got absolutely superb play from Ferreira. Prior to Linfield, he had a 67% completion rate, and a 26 TD/2 INT ratio. You just can't bank on that kind of production unless you're a UMU/Wesley/UMHB-type factory.
Three games in, Cortland seems to have some defensive problems, and they haven't found an answer at running back (yet). Any dropoff in QB play is going to hurt them, as we saw against Fisher, where they threw two late picks.
So, I wanted to ask, totally neutral and passing zero judgement because I am reading a box score:
Ferreira got hurt on a play in which a Fisher player was flagged for a late hit, and the same player was flagged for unsportsmanlike conduct after the last interception. Did this game get chippy? What was Cortland's response to the player after the hit on Ferreira?
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 22, 2016, 12:29:39 PM
I agree with what you are saying going forward with the possibility of a drop in QB play being likely. But I was at the game on Saturday. They weren't as effective with Ferreira. Once he went out they commmpletely changed their play calling and style of play offensively. Fisher did not do an amazing job of adapting. More of a serviceable job really.
But now that the cat is out of the bag other teams will have time to prepare for the Walker factor. So that advantage in theory should quickly dissipate.
Quote from: Upstate on September 22, 2016, 11:44:09 AM
No it wasn't chippy.
The player in question was trying to turn the corner when trying to sack Ferreira he was late getting there unfortunately and hit him low.
After the last int he took his helmet off on the field while celebrating.
Quote from: shaggy on September 22, 2016, 04:12:43 PM
I was also at the Cort/Fisher game and really believe if Ferreira doesn't go out Cortland wins...he's a threat to run or pass where Schneider is strictly a passer Walker was very good when he was in but not a passer..tough to defend Ferreira
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 23, 2016, 08:33:47 AM
If Tom Brady goes down the Pats dont win a single..........whoops.
This is the most inane topic.
Fisher won....
Courage bowl skuttlebut?
Any word on Fusco?
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on September 21, 2016, 11:41:04 AM
I just can't ignore how badly Heidelberg smashed ONU. The same Heidelberg that Cortland beat.
Combine that with Utica barely escaping against M-State (who the jury is still out on) and I just have a sneaking suspicion that Cortland will win this one by about 17.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 24, 2016, 05:33:49 PM
DelVal losing to Albright was a surprise. Fisher is in big trouble too. Hobart doesn't really deserve to, but will probably crack the Top 20 after today.
Quote from: UfanBill on September 25, 2016, 12:37:46 PMThe Pioneers are on the radar screen now, for sure. Although I think losing Ferreria hurt Cortland, it still was a very strong win and puts Utica in the hunt to prove it on the field and not worry about any polls or perception that teams like Fisher are the favorites...heck ,Fisher barely made it out alive from the Brockport game(another strong E8 team despite 2 close loses.). A solid football and very entertaining conference....
Nice win by Utica over Cortland. No excuse for the Pioneers not to get votes in this weeks ERFP... On a side note: something you don't see often, 2 brothers, Utica's starting QB Teddy VanGalen and Cortland's backup QB Ryan VanGalen (Shenendehowa, Clifton Park, NY) both saw game action.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury ( 4 ) | 3-0 | 49 | 2 | vs. TCNJ |
2 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) | 4-0 | 44 | 3 | vs. Buffalo State |
3 Stevenson | 4-0 | 34 | 5 | at Miscercordia |
4 Christopher Newport | 4-0 | 31 | 6t | at Rowan |
5 St. Lawrence | 4-0 | 29 | 4 | vs. Springfield |
6 Hobart | 4-0 | 23 | 6t | vs. Merchant Marine |
7 Alfred | 4-0 | 22 | 10 | at Morrisville State |
8 Utica | 4-0 | 14 | NR | at Ithaca |
9 Delaware Valley | 3-1 | 11 | 1 | at Lebanon Valley |
10 Western New England | 4-0 | 8 | NR | at Nichols |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 26, 2016, 10:31:53 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury ( 4 ) 3-0 49 2 vs. TCNJ 2 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 vs. Buffalo State 3 Stevenson 4-0 34 5 at Miscercordia 4 Christopher Newport 4-0 31 6t at Rowan 5 St. Lawrence 4-0 29 4 vs. Springfield 6 Hobart 4-0 23 6t vs. Merchant Marine 7 Alfred 4-0 22 10 at Morrisville State 8 Utica 4-0 14 NR at Ithaca 9 Delaware Valley 3-1 11 1 at Lebanon Valley 10 Western New England 4-0 8 NR at Nichols
Dropping Out:
Cortland State
Rowan
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 6
Wesley 3
Cortland State 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,2,1)
St. John Fisher (4,2,2,1,2)
Stevenson (3,7,3,4,4)
Christopher Newport (2,8,4,7,3)
St. Lawrence (6,3,5,3,9)
Hobart (5,4,6,6,NR)
Alfred (7,5,8,8,5)
Utica (10,6,9,9,7)
Delaware Valley (NR,9<NR,5,8)
Western New England (8,NR,7,NR,10)
Albright (NR,NR,10,NR,6)
Wesley (9,10,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on September 26, 2016, 10:40:50 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 26, 2016, 10:31:53 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury ( 4 ) 3-0 49 2 vs. TCNJ 2 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 vs. Buffalo State 3 Stevenson 4-0 34 5 at Miscercordia 4 Christopher Newport 4-0 31 6t at Rowan 5 St. Lawrence 4-0 29 4 vs. Springfield 6 Hobart 4-0 23 6t vs. Merchant Marine 7 Alfred 4-0 22 10 at Morrisville State 8 Utica 4-0 14 NR at Ithaca 9 Delaware Valley 3-1 11 1 at Lebanon Valley 10 Western New England 4-0 8 NR at Nichols
Dropping Out:
Cortland State
Rowan
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 6
Wesley 3
Cortland State 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,2,1)
St. John Fisher (4,2,2,1,2)
Stevenson (3,7,3,4,4)
Christopher Newport (2,8,4,7,3)
St. Lawrence (6,3,5,3,9)
Hobart (5,4,6,6,NR)
Alfred (7,5,8,8,5)
Utica (10,6,9,9,7)
Delaware Valley (NR,9<NR,5,8)
Western New England (8,NR,7,NR,10)
Albright (NR,NR,10,NR,6)
Wesley (9,10,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
I am fine with this, except I believe someone still kept Albright below Delaware Valley, discounting Saturday's head-to-head result. Good to see WNEC get to the Top 10. I think as the season continue. I struggled this week filling out, because I went with on the field results vs. expectations. I do believe that both Delaware Valley and Wesley could beat any team on this list, but with two losses and loss to a two loss team at home, couldn't do it. I voted for Salisbury at #1, but that may change, they struggled early against Southern Virginia and had some turnovers, so that may change next week.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 26, 2016, 12:03:50 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on September 26, 2016, 10:40:50 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 26, 2016, 10:31:53 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury ( 4 ) 3-0 49 2 vs. TCNJ 2 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 vs. Buffalo State 3 Stevenson 4-0 34 5 at Miscercordia 4 Christopher Newport 4-0 31 6t at Rowan 5 St. Lawrence 4-0 29 4 vs. Springfield 6 Hobart 4-0 23 6t vs. Merchant Marine 7 Alfred 4-0 22 10 at Morrisville State 8 Utica 4-0 14 NR at Ithaca 9 Delaware Valley 3-1 11 1 at Lebanon Valley 10 Western New England 4-0 8 NR at Nichols
Dropping Out:
Cortland State
Rowan
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 6
Wesley 3
Cortland State 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,2,1)
St. John Fisher (4,2,2,1,2)
Stevenson (3,7,3,4,4)
Christopher Newport (2,8,4,7,3)
St. Lawrence (6,3,5,3,9)
Hobart (5,4,6,6,NR)
Alfred (7,5,8,8,5)
Utica (10,6,9,9,7)
Delaware Valley (NR,9<NR,5,8)
Western New England (8,NR,7,NR,10)
Albright (NR,NR,10,NR,6)
Wesley (9,10,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
I am fine with this, except I believe someone still kept Albright below Delaware Valley, discounting Saturday's head-to-head result. Good to see WNEC get to the Top 10. I think as the season continue. I struggled this week filling out, because I went with on the field results vs. expectations. I do believe that both Delaware Valley and Wesley could beat any team on this list, but with two losses and loss to a two loss team at home, couldn't do it. I voted for Salisbury at #1, but that may change, they struggled early against Southern Virginia and had some turnovers, so that may change next week.
From that point, and I agree, how is Del Val still at 5 on 1 ballot? Albright was outplayed by Salisbury in week 1 and although it was only a scrimmage, by Wesley in camp. I am going with results on the field mostly, but expectations/beliefs do get in the way. It seems like we are all over the place with many of the teams. It will all sort out in the weeks to come since they all play each other.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 26, 2016, 12:45:41 PM
This is why I like being involved in the process.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 26, 2016, 02:29:14 PMI think the rankings end up being pretty balanced, but then who knows after 4 games? I know I probably wouldn't want to play a Wesley team that has a lot to prove the rest of the season...but we will seeQuote from: rams1102 on September 26, 2016, 12:45:41 PM
This is why I like being involved in the process.
Yeah, I like the distribution of opinions from our group. It's hard to quibble with the aggregate rankings since they really are subjective regardless. I think Wesley is actually the one "good" team that is hurt the most in all the convulsions of the East (and it didn't take long for our stink to get on them, huh?). But I had to leave them off my ballot at the moment because of the current direct lines of Salisbury>Albright>Del Val>Wesley, The Steve>Albright>Del Val>Wesley, and Chris Newport>Wesley. That's a lot of extra teams to sneak into the Top 10, though Wesley is probably just as good if not better than each of them.
Then, what to make of the E8 and LL teams? Brockport has played Hobart and Fisher tight, The Larries dropped a stomp-out on Morrisville who played Utica tight, Cortland played Fisher well after losing Ferreira but struggled against the Moose, and Alfred played Ithaca and RPI about as well as Hobart and St. Lawrence did, respectively. Throw in that WNE didn't play demonstrably worse than Fisher against Springfield and I just don't know where everyone "should" be. The lower portion of my top 15 seems stronger than usual.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 26, 2016, 10:31:53 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury ( 4 ) 3-0 49 2 vs. TCNJ 2 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 vs. Buffalo State 3 Stevenson 4-0 34 5 at Miscercordia 4 Christopher Newport 4-0 31 6t at Rowan 5 St. Lawrence 4-0 29 4 vs. Springfield 6 Hobart 4-0 23 6t vs. Merchant Marine 7 Alfred 4-0 22 10 at Morrisville State 8 Utica 4-0 14 NR at Ithaca 9 Delaware Valley 3-1 11 1 at Lebanon Valley 10 Western New England 4-0 8 NR at Nichols
Dropping Out:
Cortland State
Rowan
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 6
Wesley 3
Cortland State 1
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,2,1)
St. John Fisher (4,2,2,1,2)
Stevenson (3,7,3,4,4)
Christopher Newport (2,8,4,7,3)
St. Lawrence (6,3,5,3,9)
Hobart (5,4,6,6,NR)
Alfred (7,5,8,8,5)
Utica (10,6,9,9,7)
Delaware Valley (NR,9<NR,5,8)
Western New England (8,NR,7,NR,10)
Albright (NR,NR,10,NR,6)
Wesley (9,10,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
QuoteWe'll see how CNU does at Rowan on Saturday...as wesleydad said, they'll be pissed and at home, so I'm expecting a tough game.
Quote
The win by Rowan certainly creates the foundation for the NJAC circus tent!
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Salisbury ( 4 ) | 4-0 | 49 | 1 | at #10 Rowan |
2 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) | 5-0 | 43 | 2 | vs. Morrisville State |
3 Stevenson | 5-0 | 39 | 3 | Open |
4 St. Lawrence | 5-0 | 34 | 5 | at Rochester |
5 Alfred | 5-0 | 29 | 7 | Open |
6 Hobart | 5-0 | 18 | 6 | at RPI |
7 Delaware Valley | 4-1 | 15 | 9 | Open |
8 Christopher Newport | 4-1 | 14 | 4 | Open |
9 Western New England | 5-0 | 9 | 10 | Open |
10 Rowan | 3-1 | 8 | NR | vs. #1 Salisbury |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 04, 2016, 08:38:21 AM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Salisbury ( 4 ) 4-0 49 1 at #10 Rowan 2 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) 5-0 43 2 vs. Morrisville State 3 Stevenson 5-0 39 3 Open 4 St. Lawrence 5-0 34 5 at Rochester 5 Alfred 5-0 29 7 Open 6 Hobart 5-0 18 6 at RPI 7 Delaware Valley 4-1 15 9 Open 8 Christopher Newport 4-1 14 4 Open 9 Western New England 5-0 9 10 Open 10 Rowan 3-1 8 NR vs. #1 Salisbury
Dropping Out:
Utica
Also Receiving votes:
Albright 7
Wesley 7
Utica 3
Voting Distribution:
Salisbury (1,1,1,1,2)
St. John Fisher (3,3,3,2,1)
Stevenson (2,2,5,3,4)
St. Lawrence (8,4,2,4,3)
Alfred (6,5,4,6,5)
Hobart (NR,6,6,5,9)
Delaware Valley (7,9,7,NR,6)
Christopher Newport (5,NR,9,9,7)
Western New England (10,8,10,7,NR)
Rowan (NR,10,8,8,10)
Albright (4,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Wesley (9,7,NR,10,NR)
Utica (NR,NR,NR,NR,8)
Key Matchups:
#1 Salisbury at #10 Rowan
Quote from: ITH radio on October 04, 2016, 09:54:10 AM
hobart and sjfc seem to be very similar to me in that they've won several close calls and perhaps are underperforming compared to their true potential.
Agree on Sals vs Rowan - really only exciting matchup of the wkd at a national level. RPI could turn heads as Hobart isn't invulnerable and did lose to them last year to boot.
Quote from: Swish3 on October 04, 2016, 09:28:54 AM
Salisbury @ Rowan could be interesting...I can see the Profs slowing down the triple option, but can they score enough to win?
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 04, 2016, 11:02:21 AMQuote from: Swish3 on October 04, 2016, 09:28:54 AM
Salisbury @ Rowan could be interesting...I can see the Profs slowing down the triple option, but can they score enough to win?
I believe Rowan have some good skill guys on Defense, but unless there is an overcast for the weather, I don't thinks it's happening. However, it is Rowan's Homecoming, so the players may be up for the challenge.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 04, 2016, 12:57:00 PM
I have no real problem with the poll. I had Utica at #8 and WNE out but a very close to #10. My choice for Utica was they beat 2 ranked teams (ohio northern & Cortland). WNE had no big wins and yes I realize they can only play the teams on their schedule.
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 04, 2016, 06:12:27 PMFor whatever the AFCA Coaches poll is worth(not sure the coaches have much time to follow this during their season??) WNE is ranked 37th(8th in the East) and neither Rowan nor Utica received any votes. Perhaps this reflects a regional bias for NE coaches to vote for WNE, but it also shows no love for Utica or Rowan from any coach .I think WNE had solid "not in doubt" performances against Union and Springfield( mid level LL teams) and a 55-7 against Westfield St. as their OOC wins. Hard to really assess outcomes against the top teams from this sample, but I am sure they would be very competitive.Quote from: rams1102 on October 04, 2016, 12:57:00 PM
I have no real problem with the poll. I had Utica at #8 and WNE out but a very close to #10. My choice for Utica was they beat 2 ranked teams (ohio northern & Cortland). WNE had no big wins and yes I realize they can only play the teams on their schedule.
Yes, but they have beat those teams decisively and was never really in a battle with its opponents. Do I think WNE can beat Utica, Ohio Northern, and the current Cortland, Yes! Again, they have played very well.
Quote from: Bartman on October 05, 2016, 10:50:02 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 04, 2016, 06:12:27 PMFor whatever the AFCA Coaches poll is worth(not sure the coaches have much time to follow this during their season??) WNE is ranked 37th(8th in the East) and neither Rowan nor Utica received any votes. Perhaps this reflects a regional bias for NE coaches to vote for WNE, but it also shows no love for Utica or Rowan from any coach .I think WNE had solid "not in doubt" performances against Union and Springfield( mid level LL teams) and a 55-7 against Westfield St. as their OOC wins. Hard to really assess outcomes against the top teams from this sample, but I am sure they would be very competitive.Quote from: rams1102 on October 04, 2016, 12:57:00 PM
I have no real problem with the poll. I had Utica at #8 and WNE out but a very close to #10. My choice for Utica was they beat 2 ranked teams (ohio northern & Cortland). WNE had no big wins and yes I realize they can only play the teams on their schedule.
Yes, but they have beat those teams decisively and was never really in a battle with its opponents. Do I think WNE can beat Utica, Ohio Northern, and the current Cortland, Yes! Again, they have played very well.
On a more selfish matter of interest, the Coaches poll also shows that Hobart is ranked 16th (3rd in the East)...while I am happy to see this as a Statesman homer, I think this is a function of their brand on a National basis and being 5-0 as opposed to following the actual performance week to week........c'mon Defense pick it up >:( against RPI ...otherwise we look like Hartwick :'(
Quote from: Upstate on October 06, 2016, 01:04:31 PM+k for the comforting comment......I did some research and although I am disappointed on a relative basis, Hobart D is currently ranked 63rd nationally giving up 325 yards per game...Hartwick is 241st and giving up 534 ypg......wowQuote from: Bartman on October 05, 2016, 10:50:02 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 04, 2016, 06:12:27 PMFor whatever the AFCA Coaches poll is worth(not sure the coaches have much time to follow this during their season??) WNE is ranked 37th(8th in the East) and neither Rowan nor Utica received any votes. Perhaps this reflects a regional bias for NE coaches to vote for WNE, but it also shows no love for Utica or Rowan from any coach .I think WNE had solid "not in doubt" performances against Union and Springfield( mid level LL teams) and a 55-7 against Westfield St. as their OOC wins. Hard to really assess outcomes against the top teams from this sample, but I am sure they would be very competitive.Quote from: rams1102 on October 04, 2016, 12:57:00 PM
I have no real problem with the poll. I had Utica at #8 and WNE out but a very close to #10. My choice for Utica was they beat 2 ranked teams (ohio northern & Cortland). WNE had no big wins and yes I realize they can only play the teams on their schedule.
Yes, but they have beat those teams decisively and was never really in a battle with its opponents. Do I think WNE can beat Utica, Ohio Northern, and the current Cortland, Yes! Again, they have played very well.
On a more selfish matter of interest, the Coaches poll also shows that Hobart is ranked 16th (3rd in the East)...while I am happy to see this as a Statesman homer, I think this is a function of their brand on a National basis and being 5-0 as opposed to following the actual performance week to week........c'mon Defense pick it up >:( against RPI ...otherwise we look like Hartwick :'(
Don't beat yourself up for a very uncharacteristic Hobart defense...
Hobart could put 9 guys out there on Defense and still be better than Hartwick...
Quote from: Upstate on October 04, 2016, 10:16:54 AMQuote from: ITH radio on October 04, 2016, 09:54:10 AM
hobart and sjfc seem to be very similar to me in that they've won several close calls and perhaps are underperforming compared to their true potential.
Agree on Sals vs Rowan - really only exciting matchup of the wkd at a national level. RPI could turn heads as Hobart isn't invulnerable and did lose to them last year to boot.
I don't know about this true potential. They were 7-4 last year. I don't know if it was the week 1 blow out that changed the perception of the outlook of the team but so far the Fisher fan's (except 1) have been extremely pleased with the team's effort this year. Last year Fisher scored 27 pts a game and averaged 340 yards of offense. This year they've scored 37 points, and have put up 429 yards a game. This year's offense light years better than last year's offense in terms of efficiency and execution. Offensively they're converting 55% on 3rd down as opposed to 35% last year.
Also going forward it's going to be hard to preform up to "true potential" when your starting QB and top 2 RBs are gone for an extended period of time. They have a freshman QB and a DE starting at RB for the next few weeks so we will see how the team responds vs Morrisville and Utica before the BYE.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 06, 2016, 03:30:41 PM
Cards,
Under performing according to who?
I dont see any team in the east that has put Mount Union like numbers on opponents.
I think that the E8 and the top of the LL is going to have some strong teams.
Salisbury looks strong but look at their schedule coming up- no easy feat there either.
5-0 is still 5-0
My only caveat to that is that Fisher's 5-0 had adversity and grit.....Something a team can build and rally upon!
Quote from: Bartman on October 06, 2016, 02:42:29 PMQuote from: Upstate on October 06, 2016, 01:04:31 PM+k for the comforting comment......I did some research and although I am disappointed on a relative basis, Hobart D is currently ranked 63rd nationally giving up 325 yards per game...Hartwick is 241st and giving up 534 ypg......wowQuote from: Bartman on October 05, 2016, 10:50:02 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 04, 2016, 06:12:27 PMFor whatever the AFCA Coaches poll is worth(not sure the coaches have much time to follow this during their season??) WNE is ranked 37th(8th in the East) and neither Rowan nor Utica received any votes. Perhaps this reflects a regional bias for NE coaches to vote for WNE, but it also shows no love for Utica or Rowan from any coach .I think WNE had solid "not in doubt" performances against Union and Springfield( mid level LL teams) and a 55-7 against Westfield St. as their OOC wins. Hard to really assess outcomes against the top teams from this sample, but I am sure they would be very competitive.Quote from: rams1102 on October 04, 2016, 12:57:00 PM
I have no real problem with the poll. I had Utica at #8 and WNE out but a very close to #10. My choice for Utica was they beat 2 ranked teams (ohio northern & Cortland). WNE had no big wins and yes I realize they can only play the teams on their schedule.
Yes, but they have beat those teams decisively and was never really in a battle with its opponents. Do I think WNE can beat Utica, Ohio Northern, and the current Cortland, Yes! Again, they have played very well.
On a more selfish matter of interest, the Coaches poll also shows that Hobart is ranked 16th (3rd in the East)...while I am happy to see this as a Statesman homer, I think this is a function of their brand on a National basis and being 5-0 as opposed to following the actual performance week to week........c'mon Defense pick it up >:( against RPI ...otherwise we look like Hartwick :'(
Don't beat yourself up for a very uncharacteristic Hobart defense...
Hobart could put 9 guys out there on Defense and still be better than Hartwick...
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) | 6-0 | 45 | 2 | at Utica |
2 Stevenson ( 2 ) | 5-0 | 44 | 3 | at Widener |
3 St. Lawrence ( 2 ) | 6-0 | 39 | 4 | Open |
4 Alfred | 5-0 | 34 | 5 | vs. Cortland State |
5 Rowan | 4-1 | 23 | 10 | at Southern Virginia |
6 Salisbury | 4-1 | 22 | 1 | at William Paterson |
7 Delaware Valley | 4-1 | 18 | 7 | vs. Wilkes |
8 Christopher Newport | 4-1 | 17 | 8 | vs. Montclair State |
9 Western New England | 5-0 | 10 | 9 | vs. MIT |
10t Albright | 3-2 | 7 | NR | vs. FDU-Florham |
10t Wesley | 3-2 | 7 | NR | at Kean |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 11, 2016, 09:45:01 AM
Week 6 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) 6-0 45 2 at Utica 2 Stevenson ( 2 ) 5-0 44 3 at Widener 3 St. Lawrence ( 2 ) 6-0 39 4 Open 4 Alfred 5-0 34 5 vs. Cortland State 5 Rowan 4-1 23 10 at Southern Virginia 6 Salisbury 4-1 22 1 at William Paterson 7 Delaware Valley 4-1 18 7 vs. Wilkes 8 Christopher Newport 4-1 17 8 vs. Montclair State 9 Western New England 5-0 10 9 vs. MIT 10t Albright 3-2 7 NR vs. FDU-Florham 10t Wesley 3-2 7 NR at Kean
Dropping Out:
Hobart
Also Receiving votes:
Widener 5
Hobart 4
Voting Distribution:
St. John Fisher (1,2,2,2,3)
Stevenson (3,1,1,4,2)
St. Lawrence (2,9,3,1,1)
Alfred (4,6,4,3,4)
Rowan (6,10,5,5,6)
Salisbury (7,3,6,6,NR)
Delaware Valley (5,7,NR,7,7)
Christopher Newport (8,5,8,9,8)
Western New England (9,NR,10,10,5)
Albright (NR,4,NR,NR,NR)
Wesley (NR,8,9,NR,9)
Widener (NR,NR,7,NR,10)
Hobart (10,NR,NR,8,NR)
Quote from: wesleydad on October 11, 2016, 11:59:45 AM
Ok, at this point I have to ask, what is the justification for having Albright at 4? I have a feeling about Wesley and could have easily put them 1, 2, or 3 and ahead of the 2 teams they lost to, but with 2 loses can not justify it yet.
Quote from: dlip on October 12, 2016, 11:34:12 AMDlip,
dlip is happy to see WNE getting some love (not just because they beat Union). Obviously coming from the NEFC there is a certain level of doubt (understandably so) that hangs over their head. However dlip was very impressed with their athleticism and composure. They have some real talent and if they can run the table they may prove to be quite a challenge come NCAA time!
Quote from: Bartman on October 12, 2016, 01:59:58 PMQuote from: dlip on October 12, 2016, 11:34:12 AMDlip,
dlip is happy to see WNE getting some love (not just because they beat Union). Obviously coming from the NEFC there is a certain level of doubt (understandably so) that hangs over their head. However dlip was very impressed with their athleticism and composure. They have some real talent and if they can run the table they may prove to be quite a challenge come NCAA time!
The Golden Bears should send you some nice game gear with their logo for your support.....I keep thinking that Jack Nicklaus should be their spokesperson. In any event, 2 very solid OOC wins against Springfield and Union is certainly respectable. I think they deserve top 10, but not sure about top 5 given the NEFC, but they may surprise someone in the playoffs....
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 11, 2016, 09:45:01 AM
Week 6 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 St. John Fisher ( 1 ) 6-0 45 2 at Utica 2 Stevenson ( 2 ) 5-0 44 3 at Widener 3 St. Lawrence ( 2 ) 6-0 39 4 Open 4 Alfred 5-0 34 5 vs. Cortland State 5 Rowan 4-1 23 10 at Southern Virginia 6 Salisbury 4-1 22 1 at William Paterson 7 Delaware Valley 4-1 18 7 vs. Wilkes 8 Christopher Newport 4-1 17 8 vs. Montclair State 9 Western New England 5-0 10 9 vs. MIT 10t Albright 3-2 7 NR vs. FDU-Florham 10t Wesley 3-2 7 NR at Kean
Dropping Out:
Hobart
Also Receiving votes:
Widener 5
Hobart 4
Voting Distribution:
St. John Fisher (1,2,2,2,3)
Stevenson (3,1,1,4,2)
St. Lawrence (2,9,3,1,1)
Alfred (4,6,4,3,4)
Rowan (6,10,5,5,6)
Salisbury (7,3,6,6,NR)
Delaware Valley (5,7,NR,7,7)
Christopher Newport (8,5,8,9,8)
Western New England (9,NR,10,10,5)
Albright (NR,4,NR,NR,NR)
Wesley (NR,8,9,NR,9)
Widener (NR,NR,7,NR,10)
Hobart (10,NR,NR,8,NR)
Quote from: wesleydad on October 12, 2016, 02:22:22 PMWesleydad,Quote from: Bartman on October 12, 2016, 01:59:58 PMQuote from: dlip on October 12, 2016, 11:34:12 AMDlip,
dlip is happy to see WNE getting some love (not just because they beat Union). Obviously coming from the NEFC there is a certain level of doubt (understandably so) that hangs over their head. However dlip was very impressed with their athleticism and composure. They have some real talent and if they can run the table they may prove to be quite a challenge come NCAA time!
The Golden Bears should send you some nice game gear with their logo for your support.....I keep thinking that Jack Nicklaus should be their spokesperson. In any event, 2 very solid OOC wins against Springfield and Union is certainly respectable. I think they deserve top 10, but not sure about top 5 given the NEFC, but they may surprise someone in the playoffs....
They deserve top 5 more than a 2 loss Albright team does!!! And I know Albright might crush them if they played them, but that is not the point. I am pretty sure Wesley would also crush them and I still have WNEW ahead of Wesley based on actual performance. When the season ends I believe that Wesley will be the best team in the east and if they get in the playoffs will win a game or 2, but right now I can't justify them being ranked at that level. Polls are fun and allow us to have conversation which makes the week go by faster while we wait for Saturday.
Quote from: Bartman on October 12, 2016, 06:53:01 PM
Hobart is 210th in yards penalized and the main reason we lost to RPI...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2016, 09:39:14 AMAnd it was the KICKER who was flagged with a facemask penalty....THE KICKER ??? :'(. This could be a special year for AU...good luck...if we are both fortunate enough to make the playoffs, I would love to play the Saxons again...like the old days..... I would enjoy hearing the Pep band liveQuote from: Bartman on October 12, 2016, 06:53:01 PM
Hobart is 210th in yards penalized and the main reason we lost to RPI...
I was sending Pep updates while he was at The Butter Field on saterday and when Hobart scored with 1:12 left I said, "RPI has only moved the ball on penalties, so this one's over." Of course a minute later I wrote, "And with that, a return to the 50 plus a facemask penalty." Just a brutal sequence for the pumpkinheads.
Quote from: Bartman on October 13, 2016, 10:35:17 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2016, 09:39:14 AMAnd it was the KICKER who was flagged with a facemask penalty....THE KICKER ??? :'(. This could be a special year for AU...good luck...if we are both fortunate enough to make the playoffs, I would love to play the Saxons again...like the old days..... I would enjoy hearing the Pep band liveQuote from: Bartman on October 12, 2016, 06:53:01 PM
Hobart is 210th in yards penalized and the main reason we lost to RPI...
I was sending Pep updates while he was at The Butter Field on saterday and when Hobart scored with 1:12 left I said, "RPI has only moved the ball on penalties, so this one's over." Of course a minute later I wrote, "And with that, a return to the 50 plus a facemask penalty." Just a brutal sequence for the pumpkinheads.
Quote from: Bartman on October 13, 2016, 10:35:17 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 13, 2016, 09:39:14 AMAnd it was the KICKER who was flagged with a facemask penalty....THE KICKER ??? :'(. This could be a special year for AU...good luck...if we are both fortunate enough to make the playoffs, I would love to play the Saxons again...like the old days..... I would enjoy hearing the Pep band liveQuote from: Bartman on October 12, 2016, 06:53:01 PM
Hobart is 210th in yards penalized and the main reason we lost to RPI...
I was sending Pep updates while he was at The Butter Field on saterday and when Hobart scored with 1:12 left I said, "RPI has only moved the ball on penalties, so this one's over." Of course a minute later I wrote, "And with that, a return to the 50 plus a facemask penalty." Just a brutal sequence for the pumpkinheads.
Quote from: Bartman on October 13, 2016, 10:35:17 AM
And it was the KICKER who was flagged with a facemask penalty....THE KICKER ???
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 13, 2016, 11:15:31 AMAgree,if it were the last man to save a TD, I would have no problem...but it was 20 yards away from the play..those extra 15 yards hurt with only 1 minute remainingQuote from: Bartman on October 13, 2016, 10:35:17 AM
And it was the KICKER who was flagged with a facemask penalty....THE KICKER ???
Frankly, to me that makes it understandable.
Kickers aren't taught to tackle, and they probably have it drilled into them that they are the last line of defense on a return (or close to it). I can't blame a kicker for thinking he's got to bring this guy down or it's a touchdown (I haven't seen the play, so maybe I'm reading it wrong) and using any means necessary
Quote from: Bartman on October 13, 2016, 03:34:36 PM
Tomorrow is the 45th anniversary of one of the best games Bartman ever witnessed with some of the best "small college" players ever....It was a day to remember small college football at it's best , now D3 football . Don Aleksiewicz(A-Z) dazzled the Geneva crowd (Kodak All American and 179 yards per game) as Hobart went ahead 21-7 at halftime scaring the Saxons..but AU scored the winner with 19 second left in the game to win 28-21 and eventually went 8-0 and won the Lambert Trophy led by their great coach Alex Yunevich. Donnie A-Z passed away 2 years ago, and was the most talented D3 running back I ever saw play.
FROM NY TIMES (10/14/1971)
College football upstate has been as crisp and attractive as one of those wonderful autumn days in the Finger Lakes region. There have been many shades of success, from the power of Syracuse and the all‐winning record of Cornell to the surprising achievements of little and unbeaten Alfred and Hobart. Colgate, Rochester, Ithaca, Union and St. Lawrence have sparkling teams and individuals like Cornell's Ed Marinaro and Ithaca's quarterback, Doug Campbell, brighten the scene.
Eastern College Football
The most important major college game of the year in the East could be the Syracuse‐Penn State contest Saturday at Syracuse. But just west of Syracuse, on the northern tip of Seneca Lake, about 7,000 persons will jam Boswell Field in Geneva Saturday to watch what they think is the most important game around: Alfred against Hobart.
Don Aleksiewicz, Hobart's running star, has a following somewhat smaller, but no less enthusiastic, than Marinaro's. Alfred maintains that its quarterback, Jim Moretti, is as good as Campbell or anyone else.
Hobart, which had an 0–8 won‐lost mark last year and had 10 straight losing seasons, has responded to new coaching with a 3‐0 record this season. George Davis, a 1951 Syracuse graduate, became the coach this year after many successful seasons at nearby Seneca Falls High School.
Aleksiewicz, known as "A‐ to‐Z," ran for 317 yards last Saturday in the victory over Hamilton. A year ago, he went 97 yards for a touchdown scamper when Hobart lost to Alfred, 31‐22.
Davis has Hobart working from the wishbone behind an unbalanced line, the famous line formation at Syracuse.
Alfred has enjoyed plenty of success in the 31 years that Alex Yunevich has coached there. The Saxons won seven of eight games last year and have taken four this fall.
"It's really not all the coach," Yunevich said. "We get too much credit, though we may also be blamed too much. But without those horses, no one does much. Give me those horses and we'll win.
"You see, Hobart has one of them in Aleksiewicz. He's the best running back around. You have to gang tackle him. He'll give you that old limp leg and you don't know where he went."
Yunevich calls Moretti, his quarterback, "the best bomb man I've ever seen anywhere —not just coached. I don't think anyone can throw longer than Jimmy."
"He's got some shortcomings but I'm not about to say what they are," the coach said. "Let them find out. That's their business, Of course, Jimmy wants to run sometimes and I keep telling him not to. He picks up 5 yards and thinks he's Red Grange. I die watching it."
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 13, 2016, 09:57:17 PMThanks for the correction on the Lambert Bowl and glad this brought back some great memories...I was there as well in the stands having ended my quiet football career due to injury the year before...although it was a tough loss for Hobart we knew we had a respectable program again after some tough years....45 years ago today 8-)
You are correct, 73.
The Lambert Trophy was for the top D1 team in the East (Penn State in 1971)
The Lambert Cup was for the top mid-sized team in the East (Delaware in 1971)
The Lambert Bowl was for the best small college team in the East (Alfred in 1971)
Wikipedia doesn't differentiate between "Cup" and "Bowl" but says the Lambert Cup is awarded to best D2 and D3 teams.
But we have the Lambert Bowl on display in the foyer of McLane Center along with a photo of Alex Yunevich, Joe Paterno and Tubby Raymond receiving their teams' respective trophies.
What a wonderful football heritage between Hobart and Alfred.....wish we could play!
Quote from: wesleydad on October 15, 2016, 05:58:16 PMAgree with all of this. I think it is difficult to pick one of the undefeated teams over another ....Alfred, Stevenson and SLU(sorry but not putting WNE in this group) .. and the one loss teams could all be lumped together and they all could move up if undefeated fall or lose one more...Salisbury, CNU,Rowan(weak win today), Del Val,SJF(bad loss today), Hobart.....WNE is tough to assess until playoff time but could be lumped in with the one loss teams. I think Wesley will beat Rowan next week, and will start to move up the board as other one loss teams fall.... Albright, Utica , Brockport,Widener(??) are 2 loss teams that will jump up if they win out
This is getting to be really tough. I am still keeping h2h in mind, but each week I see teams that are just not looking as good as they did earlier when they beat some of the other teams being considered for list. If I am right, it will all play out in the next 3 weeks and the teams that I think are the best in the MAC, Del Val, and the NJAC, Wesley will take care of business and warrant a return to the top of the poll. Fisher seems to have run out of time with all the injuries on offense to keep winning, leaving Alfred clearly atop the E8. St. Lawrence seems to be the class of the LL, but still has to beat Hobart. WNEW and Salve Regina just keep winning in the NEFC and deserve recognition. The NJAC is loaded with 4 teams, I am discounting Frostburg at this time, that could be at the top of the list, until Rowan struggles against SoVA, and CNU needs a miracle to get to OT to beat Montclair. The east is what it is, plenty of pretty good teams, with no great team at this time.
Quote from: Bartman on October 15, 2016, 09:02:49 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 15, 2016, 05:58:16 PMAgree with all of this. I think it is difficult to pick one of the undefeated teams over another ....Alfred, Stevenson and SLU(sorry but not putting WNE in this group) .. and the one loss teams could all be lumped together and they all could move up if undefeated fall or lose one more...Salisbury, CNU,Rowan(weak win today), Del Val,SJF(bad loss today), Hobart.....WNE is tough to assess until playoff time but could be lumped in with the one loss teams. I think Wesley will beat Rowan next week, and will start to move up the board as other one loss teams fall.... Albright, Utica , Brockport,Widener(??) are 2 loss teams that will jump up if they win out
This is getting to be really tough. I am still keeping h2h in mind, but each week I see teams that are just not looking as good as they did earlier when they beat some of the other teams being considered for list. If I am right, it will all play out in the next 3 weeks and the teams that I think are the best in the MAC, Del Val, and the NJAC, Wesley will take care of business and warrant a return to the top of the poll. Fisher seems to have run out of time with all the injuries on offense to keep winning, leaving Alfred clearly atop the E8. St. Lawrence seems to be the class of the LL, but still has to beat Hobart. WNEW and Salve Regina just keep winning in the NEFC and deserve recognition. The NJAC is loaded with 4 teams, I am discounting Frostburg at this time, that could be at the top of the list, until Rowan struggles against SoVA, and CNU needs a miracle to get to OT to beat Montclair. The east is what it is, plenty of pretty good teams, with no great team at this time.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Stevenson ( 4 ) | 6-0 | 49 | 2 | vs. #5 Delaware Valley |
2 St. Lawrence ( 1 ) | 6-0 | 39 | 3 | at Merchant Marine |
3 Alfred | 6-0 | 37 | 4 | at Hartwick |
4 Salisbury | 5-1 | 31 | 6 | vs. Kean |
5 Delaware Valley | 5-1 | 26 | 7 | at #1 Stevenson |
6 Rowan | 5-1 | 23 | 5 | vs. #8 Wesley |
7 Christopher Newport | 5-1 | 20 | 8 | at Frostburg State |
8 Wesley | 4-2 | 14 | 10t | at #6 Rowan |
9t St. John Fisher | 6-1 | 12 | 1 | Open |
9t Western New England | 6-0 | 12 | 9 | at Endicott |
Quote from: Bartman on October 23, 2016, 01:20:01 PM
Wesleydad, I think you are selling the Statesmen short. They have two wins against solid E8 opponents in Brockport and Ithaca, in fact I think Brockport should be in the top ten discussion. Frankly I am old school and will rank a one loss team over the two loss teams unless there is strong evidence of conference superiority and this year , I have little evidence to rank the MAC or NJAC over the LL in out of conference games other than games between themselves, while Hobart has 2 decent E8 wins. We probably have to agree to disagree but other than the top three, I agree it is a crap shoot but I think losing one more game is worse than close scores against decent competition. Plus, like Wesley ,the competition gets up for teams that have dominated more over the last few years( eg Union really gets up for Hobart) . While I don't think this Hobart team is as well balanced as Hobart teams from the recent past it has a grittiness to it that never gives up and a great leader in Sweeney that loves to have the ball in his hands at the end of the game and a defense that is getting better every week .Hopefully Hobart will prove it over the next two weeks with wins over WPI and SLU and another trip to playoffs. With great respect, Bartman
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Stevenson ( 5 ) | 7-0 | 50 | 1 | at King's |
2 Alfred | 7-0 | 40 | 3 | vs. Brockport |
3 St. Lawrence | 7-0 | 37 | 2 | vs. Union |
4 Salisbury | 6-1 | 35 | 4 | at Christopher Newport |
5 Wesley | 5-2 | 32 | 8 | vs. Montclair State |
6 St. John Fisher | 6-1 | 19 | 9t | vs. Ithaca |
7 Western New England | 7-0 | 15 | 9t | vs. Maine Maritime |
8 Albright | 5-2 | 12 | NR | at Widener |
9 Frostburg State | 6-1 | 10 | NR | vs. Rowan |
10 Hobart | 6-1 | 8 | NR | at WPI |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 24, 2016, 08:39:40 AM
Week 8 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Stevenson ( 5 ) 7-0 50 1 at King's 2 Alfred 7-0 40 3 vs. Brockport 3 St. Lawrence 7-0 37 2 vs. Union 4 Salisbury 6-1 35 4 at Christopher Newport 5 Wesley 5-2 32 8 vs. Montclair State 6 St. John Fisher 6-1 19 9t vs. Ithaca 7 Western New England 7-0 15 9t vs. Maine Maritime 8 Albright 5-2 12 NR at Widener 9 Frostburg State 6-1 10 NR vs. Rowan 10 Hobart 6-1 8 NR at WPI
Dropping Out:
Christopher Newport
Delaware Valley
Rowan
Also Receiving votes:
Delaware Valley 4
Rowan 4
Salve Regina 4
Husson 3
Brockport 2
Voting Distribution:
Stevenson (1,1,1,1,1)
Alfred (3,2,2,5,3)
St. Lawrence (2,3,3,8,2)
Salisbury (4,4,4,3,5)
Wesley (7,5,5,2,4)
St. John Fisher (5,NR,6,6,8)
Western New England (8,8,7,NR,6)
Albright (10,NR,NR,4,7)
Frostburg State (NR,6,8,NR,9)
Hobart (6,10,9,NR,NR)
Delaware Valley (NR,NR,NR,7,NR)
Rowan (9,NR,10,10,NR)
Salve Regina (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Husson (NR,9,NR,NR,10)
Brockport (NR,NR,NR,9,NR)
Quote from: Bartman on October 24, 2016, 08:29:26 PM
SOS(YTD) for Week 8 ERFP
1.Stevenson (87) 7-0
2.Alfred (80) 7-0
3.SLU (143) 7-0
4.Salisbury (114) 6-1
5.Wesley (41) 5-2
6.SJF (19) 6-1
7.WNE (144) 7-0
8.Albright (42) 5-2
9.Frostburg (154) 6-1
10. Hobart (26) 6-1
When taking the NCAA SOS into account seems like Fisher and Hobart should be getting a bit more love from the voters as one loss teams ???
Quote from: Bartman on October 25, 2016, 09:29:16 AM
OK, I think 3 of the top 10 will be upset this weekend, which ones?
Frostburg v. Rowan......70% chance ...shouldn't Rowan be favored?
SJF v. Ithaca .......40% chance
Hobart v. WPI .......40% chance
Alfred v. Brockport ....... 40% chance
Albright v. Widener ....... 33% chance
SLU v. Union ..........20%
Salisbury. CNU ............20%
Wesley v. Montclair.........10%
The Steve v. Kings .........2%
WNE v. Maine Maritime ..2%
Which three?
Quote from: D3MAFAN-MG on October 25, 2016, 09:51:24 AM+k to D3MAFAN for weighing in......I saw Brockport play live and they will give Alfred everything they can handle...I am close to picking an upset there just because it is the E8 and going undefeated is tough....Albright certainly could lose to Widener....Salisbury seems to be getting voter love in most polls, so an upset there would be huge for CNU........still thinking about my threeQuote from: Bartman on October 25, 2016, 09:29:16 AM
OK, I think 3 of the top 10 will be upset this weekend, which ones?
Frostburg v. Rowan......70% chance ...shouldn't Rowan be favored?
SJF v. Ithaca .......40% chance
Hobart v. WPI .......40% chance
Alfred v. Brockport ....... 40% chance
Albright v. Widener ....... 33% chance
SLU v. Union ..........20%
Salisbury. CNU ............20%
Wesley v. Montclair.........10%
The Steve v. Kings .........2%
WNE v. Maine Maritime ..2%
Which three?
Honestly, from watching many of the teams play, I think Salisbury, Alfred, and Albright have the higher chances of getting upset. Salisbury the past few years have been very prone on getting beat deep, especially one on one matchups. I think CNU is very upset that they loss to Frostburg and basically ruined their playoff run. Also, I think it is their homecoming and they have played very well at home. Now regarding Albright, I think they have been under the radar, but Widener is looking to play spoiler in front of their home crowd. I think if Albright has one of those early turnovers and does not establish the run to open up those deep crossing patterns, they can get "upset" here. Now Brockport is about two possessions from being undefeated, they still have a chance to win the E 8 and this would be a great week to do it and make a statement, if they can beat Alfred, they should win the remaining games. Although I think Pep and the crew will be backing them and the coaching staff will let them know within the E 8, the playoffs basically start now. Another team (although not rank in our ERFP) is Salve, they are on the up and up, but Endicott has played 3 of our top teams and has a chance to ruins Salve runs as they may be overlooking thinking about their November 5th match up with WNE.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 25, 2016, 02:06:28 PM
Getting thru the E8 unscathed is unheard of as of late.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 25, 2016, 02:15:33 PM
Yes forget unscathed!
Here is hoping that at the end of this crazy regular season the Fisher Alfred game is one for the ages and for all the conference marbles!
Quote from: Bartman on October 28, 2016, 02:37:40 PM
Brockport over Alfred ( I admit I will be rooting for Alfred to go all the way but I think Brockport matches up well)
Quote from: Bartman on October 28, 2016, 02:37:40 PM
ERFP 3 serious upsets and one crazy upset this week:
Ithaca over SJF (Ithaca and Fisher are trending in opposite directions and the Bombers are motivated for Coach Welch to go out with his head up)
Brockport over Alfred ( I admit I will be rooting for Alfred to go all the way but I think Brockport matches up well)
Rowan over Frostburg ( Rowan defense gets nasty)
I know you think it's Crazy upset:
Union over SLU ( the Dutchmen will be incredibly up for this game and SLU will lose due to some bad TO's ...and I promised Dlip ;D)
PS: Bartman is staying away from Wrigley Field this weekend to avoid mistaken identity
Quote from: Bartman on October 28, 2016, 02:37:40 PM
ERFP 3 serious upsets and one crazy upset this week:
Ithaca over SJF (Ithaca and Fisher are trending in opposite directions and the Bombers are motivated for Coach Welch to go out with his head up)
Brockport over Alfred ( I admit I will be rooting for Alfred to go all the way but I think Brockport matches up well)
Rowan over Frostburg ( Rowan defense gets nasty)
I know you think it's Crazy upset:
Union over SLU ( the Dutchmen will be incredibly up for this game and SLU will lose due to some bad TO's ...and I promised Dlip ;D)
PS: Bartman is staying away from Wrigley Field this weekend to avoid mistaken identity
Quote from: Bartman on October 29, 2016, 06:28:52 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 28, 2016, 02:37:40 PM
ERFP 3 serious upsets and one crazy upset this week:
Ithaca over SJF (Ithaca and Fisher are trending in opposite directions and the Bombers are motivated for Coach Welch to go out with his head up)
Brockport over Alfred ( I admit I will be rooting for Alfred to go all the way but I think Brockport matches up well)
Rowan over Frostburg ( Rowan defense gets nasty)
I know you think it's Crazy upset:
Union over SLU ( the Dutchmen will be incredibly up for this game and SLU will lose due to some bad TO's ...and I promised Dlip ;D)
PS: Bartman is staying away from Wrigley Field this weekend to avoid mistaken identity
OK, it must be the Bartman(Cubs fan) curse working on my upset picks....so I went 0-4 as Alfred had an exciting comeback against a well prepared Brockport team/ Fisher played very well in the second half against a tough Ithaca squad / Frostburg is for real as Rowan defense was outperformed /and the Dutchmen hung in there but the Saints were too much in the end....no more picks for me ::)
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Stevenson ( 4 ) | 8-0 | 49 | 1 | vs. Wilkes |
2 Alfred ( 1 ) | 8-0 | 43 | 2 | at Utica |
3 Salisbury | 7-1 | 37 | 4 | vs. #5 Wesley |
4 St. Lawrence | 8-0 | 34 | 3 | vs. #10 Hobart |
5 Wesley | 6-2 | 28 | 5 | at #3 Salisbury |
6 St. John Fisher | 7-1 | 22 | 6 | vs. Hartwick |
7 Frostburg State | 7-1 | 16 | 9 | at Montclair State |
8t Albright | 6-2 | 14 | 8 | vs. Misericordia |
9t Western New England | 8-0 | 14 | 7 | at Salve Regina |
10 Hobart | 7-1 | 8 | 10 | at #4 St. Lawrence |
Quote from: Upstate on October 31, 2016, 11:28:56 AM
Someone putting WNE and Salve at 5 and 7 is trying way too hard to pump up New England area football teams...
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 31, 2016, 09:55:14 AMWeek 8 Fan PollWeek 9 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Stevenson ( 4 ) 8-0 49 1 vs. Wilkes 2 Alfred ( 1 ) 8-0 43 2 at Utica 3 Salisbury 7-1 37 4 vs. #5 Wesley 4 St. Lawrence 8-0 34 3 vs. #10 Hobart 5 Wesley 6-2 28 5 at #3 Salisbury 6 St. John Fisher 7-1 22 6 vs. Hartwick 7 Frostburg State 7-1 16 9 at Montclair State 8t Albright 6-2 14 8 vs. Misericordia 9t Western New England 8-0 14 7 at Salve Regina 10 Hobart 7-1 8 10 at #4 St. Lawrence
Also Receiving votes:
Delaware Valley 4
Salve Regina 4
Brockport 1
Husson 1
Voting Distribution:
Stevenson (1,1,1,2,1)
Alfred (2,2,2,1,5)
Salisbury (5,4,3,4,2)
St. Lawrence (3,3,4,3,8)
Wesley (4,7,8,5,3)
St. John Fisher (7,5,9,6,6)
Frostburg State (8,9,6,7,9)
Albright (6,10,NR,10,4)
Western New England (9,8,5,8,NR)
Hobart (NR,6,10,9,NR)
Delaware Valley (NR,NR,NR,NR,7)
Salve Regina (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Brockport (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Husson (10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#5 Wesley at #3 Salisbury
#10 Hobart at #4 St. Lawrence
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 31, 2016, 01:15:13 PM
Husson.....really?
Husson?
With all do respect they are playing the teams on the schedule but clearly they are not a top ten regional team.
Everybody is entitled to their opinion, but lets face it folks the ECFC is WEAK!
Quote from: fisheralum91 on October 31, 2016, 01:15:13 PM
Husson.....really?
Husson?
With all do respect they are playing the teams on the schedule but clearly they are not a top ten regional team.
Everybody is entitled to their opinion, but lets face it folks the ECFC is WEAK!
Quote from: Bartman on November 05, 2016, 04:25:12 PM
3 of the Top 4 fall today. Congrats to Alfred as they stay undefeated and Hobart and Wesley will jump in the RR this week.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 05, 2016, 05:14:49 PMSorry Kaz00....the curse will be yours ...but the East needs a top undefeated teamQuote from: Bartman on November 05, 2016, 04:25:12 PM
3 of the Top 4 fall today. Congrats to Alfred as they stay undefeated and Hobart and Wesley will jump in the RR this week.
The ERFP curse lives! I think we've had 5 #1s lose this year.
No one vote Alfred this week!
Quote from: Bartman on November 05, 2016, 05:23:16 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 05, 2016, 05:14:49 PMSorry Kaz00....the curse will be yours ...but the East needs a top undefeated teamQuote from: Bartman on November 05, 2016, 04:25:12 PM
3 of the Top 4 fall today. Congrats to Alfred as they stay undefeated and Hobart and Wesley will jump in the RR this week.
The ERFP curse lives! I think we've had 5 #1s lose this year.
No one vote Alfred this week!
Quote from: Bartman on November 06, 2016, 07:23:41 PM
SOS and Losses as of 11/5 games(for your voting consideration):
Losses
4. Hobart 1
12. Wesley 2
27. SJF 1
35. Alfred 0
62. Salisbury 2
84. Albright 2
114. Frosty 1
125. The Steve 1
126. WNE 0
127. SLU 1
I just did last week's top 10
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 06, 2016, 07:41:30 PMQuote from: Bartman on November 06, 2016, 07:23:41 PM
SOS and Losses as of 11/5 games(for your voting consideration):
Losses
4. Hobart 1
12. Wesley 2
27. SJF 1
35. Alfred 0
62. Salisbury 2
84. Albright 2
114. Frosty 1
125. The Steve 1
126. WNE 0
127. SLU 1
I just did last week's top 10
Interested to see what the final SOS will be like after next week. Hobart and Wesley's rankings will drop after bringing in a 1-7 and 2-7 team into the fold respectively. Fisher and Alfred are obviously bringing 9-0 and 8-1 to the table for a further boost. We shall see.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 07, 2016, 06:31:17 AM
It's just St. John Fisher by the way. I'd be surprised if they dropped a spot from #3 to #4 after winning and after the #2 team last week lost. Maybe they get leap frogged by one team but I don't suspect they will be lept by two.
Quote from: tweisman5 on November 06, 2016, 11:01:25 PMThis is only the OWP, not the final SOS as it omits the OOWP for the final NCAA SOS...but I like the Hobart #2 ranking ;D
Here is my prediction for how the NCAA East Regional Rankings will look for Week 11:
(Overall Record) (#=SOS Rank, SOS digits)
1. Alfred (9-0) (59, 0.549)
2. Hobart (8-1) (8, 0.620)
3. Wesley (7-2) (11, 0.611)
4. St. Johns Fisher (8-1) (52, 0.559)
5. Salisbury (7-2) (82, 0.528)
6. Stevenson (8-1) (138, 0.493)
7. Western New England (9-0) (157, 0.478)
8. Albright (7-2) (82, 0.528)
9. Frostburg St. (8-1) (145, 0.486)
10. St. Lawrence (8-1) (184, 0.452)
The final week of regular season play will definitely shake up the final top 10 for the east. Based on several results, expect movement upon the teams on this list and possibly a team or two entering the final rankings. If only the NCAA released the final rankings.
Quote from: tweisman5 on November 06, 2016, 11:01:25 PM
Here is my prediction for how the NCAA East Regional Rankings will look for Week 11:
(Overall Record) (#=SOS Rank, SOS digits)
1. Alfred (9-0) (59, 0.549)
2. Hobart (8-1) (8, 0.620)
3. Wesley (7-2) (11, 0.611)
4. St. Johns Fisher (8-1) (52, 0.559)
5. Salisbury (7-2) (82, 0.528)
6. Stevenson (8-1) (138, 0.493)
7. Western New England (9-0) (157, 0.478)
8. Albright (7-2) (82, 0.528)
9. Frostburg St. (8-1) (145, 0.486)
10. St. Lawrence (8-1) (184, 0.452)
The final week of regular season play will definitely shake up the final top 10 for the east. Based on several results, expect movement upon the teams on this list and possibly a team or two entering the final rankings. If only the NCAA released the final rankings.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 07, 2016, 08:06:02 AMAgree the double leap seems a leap too far especially since Wesley has two convincing losses, although early in the year. I was surprised that Frank thought Hobart could leap Fisher, but Hobart does have the stronger SOS this week, although that should change after Alfred game.Quote from: tweisman5 on November 06, 2016, 11:01:25 PM
Here is my prediction for how the NCAA East Regional Rankings will look for Week 11:
(Overall Record) (#=SOS Rank, SOS digits)
1. Alfred (9-0) (59, 0.549)
2. Hobart (8-1) (8, 0.620)
3. Wesley (7-2) (11, 0.611)
4. St. Johns Fisher (8-1) (52, 0.559)
5. Salisbury (7-2) (82, 0.528)
6. Stevenson (8-1) (138, 0.493)
7. Western New England (9-0) (157, 0.478)
8. Albright (7-2) (82, 0.528)
9. Frostburg St. (8-1) (145, 0.486)
10. St. Lawrence (8-1) (184, 0.452)
The final week of regular season play will definitely shake up the final top 10 for the east. Based on several results, expect movement upon the teams on this list and possibly a team or two entering the final rankings. If only the NCAA released the final rankings.
In what world does St. JOHN Fisher get leapfrogged by 2 teams after putting up 68 on a division foe?
And where did you get the sos stats?
Hey- im all for discussion but that doesnt make much sense.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred ( 4 ) | 9-0 | 48 | 2 | vs. #3 St. John Fisher |
2 Wesley ( 1 ) | 7-2 | 44 | 5 | vs. William Paterson |
3 St. John Fisher | 8-1 | 39 | 6 | at #1 Alfred |
4 Hobart | 8-1 | 33 | 10 | vs. Rochester |
5 Stevenson | 8-1 | 23 | 1 | at Lycoming |
6 Frostburg State | 8-1 | 20 | 7 | vs. #8 Salisbury |
7 Albright | 7-2 | 18 | 8t | at Lebanon Valley |
8 Salisbury | 7-2 | 16 | 3 | at #6 Frostburg State |
9 St. Lawrence | 8-1 | 15 | 4 | at WPI |
10 Western New England | 9-0 | 12 | 8t | vs. Coast Guard |
Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2016, 08:09:28 PM
A team from a top 5 conference that is 9-0 being ranked 3rd is interesting...
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 08, 2016, 08:53:18 AM
I certainly hope we get a great game SatErday- no reason to think otherwise.
Coach Keyes best have his D running on all cylinders!
Safe travels to all headed down to Mayberry- unfortunately Mrs91 and I have to sit this one out.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2016, 09:03:05 PMEveryone's entitled to their opinion, but usually undefeated teams are ranked higher than those with 2 losses. Guessing it's one of those things where the voter thinks both WES and SALS would beat ALF H2H, which maybe they could...or maybe not.Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2016, 08:09:28 PM
A team from a top 5 conference that is 9-0 being ranked 3rd is interesting...
agree
Quote from: ITH radio on November 08, 2016, 09:50:45 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2016, 09:03:05 PMEveryone's entitled to their opinion, but usually undefeated teams are ranked higher than those with 2 losses. Guessing it's one of those things where the voters thinks both WES and SALS would beat ALF H2H, which maybe they could...or maybe not.Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2016, 08:09:28 PM
A team from a top 5 conference that is 9-0 being ranked 3rd is interesting...
agree
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 08, 2016, 09:41:43 AMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 08, 2016, 08:53:18 AM
I certainly hope we get a great game SatErday- no reason to think otherwise.
Coach Keyes best have his D running on all cylinders!
Safe travels to all headed down to Mayberry- unfortunately Mrs91 and I have to sit this one out.
Pep will be disappointed if the far side visitor stands (which, by the way, provide a top-notch view of the game minus one light pole) are not filled.
Come on, Fisher fans, the trip to Mayberry is just a hop (on I-390 south), a skip (over Rt. 36 south from Dansville), and a jump (onto I-86 west for one exit). Heck, we can even have Sheriff Taylor at the town line to usher you in so you don't get lost in the woods.
You should watch for deer, but be assured that Pep last Saterday took out the last of the kamikaze deer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbSFxlfuf9s) in our neck of the woods. It should be a safe enough place.
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: ITH radio on November 08, 2016, 10:28:27 AM
I think the good & bad re the East this year is that there isn't one team that's head and shoulders above the rest. Alfred, Hobart and Fisher all needed some luck to put away BP so it shows me these three teams are all pretty even. I think the fact Fisher and Hobart lost games they probably shouldn't shows that also. Husson played ALF close back in Wk 1 and WNE beat some LL teams handily that Hobart struggled a bit to put away. Then you have Stevenson dropping a game to a twolosswin team and the NJAC teams that have multiple losses. Of the 7 east entrants it would seem only Bridgewater is the "weak link" but they barely lost to Kean who ended up beating Rowan who beat Salisbury....
Ultimately what this says to me is the East will probably be lucky to get one team into the quarterfinals and when they do, it might be ugly, unless they end up against a JHU who I don't see as better than any champion from the NY/NJ/PA conferences. You never know though, one of the HOB/ALF/SJFC/WES entrants could go 2003 RPI and run to the final four. All depends on pairings in the end, but the parity in the East sure seems apparent IMO.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on November 08, 2016, 10:08:59 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 08, 2016, 09:50:45 AMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2016, 09:03:05 PMEveryone's entitled to their opinion, but usually undefeated teams are ranked higher than those with 2 losses. Guessing it's one of those things where the voters thinks both WES and SALS would beat ALF H2H, which maybe they could...or maybe not.Quote from: Upstate on November 07, 2016, 08:09:28 PM
A team from a top 5 conference that is 9-0 being ranked 3rd is interesting...
agree
Wesley maybe? Salisbury, very unlikely. Salisbury is one-dimensional and at times gives up the deep ball too easily. I was rooting for Salisbury up until this past weekend. I think Wesley exposed them and Alfred would do the same. Late in the third or early 4th, Salisbury coach called a play action pass (with the QB turning his back to the Defense) on 4th and forever. Teams that are well balance and have a respectable D (no even dominant) such as Alfred and Wesley would beat them 9 times out of 10. I do question Salisbury ranking at 2, I for one drop them to the bottom of the Top 10, because they can surprise other teams here and there, but that's all they have for themselves.
Quote from: boobyhasgameyo on November 08, 2016, 10:09:25 AMQuote from: AUPepBand on November 08, 2016, 09:41:43 AMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 08, 2016, 08:53:18 AM
I certainly hope we get a great game SatErday- no reason to think otherwise.
Coach Keyes best have his D running on all cylinders!
Safe travels to all headed down to Mayberry- unfortunately Mrs91 and I have to sit this one out.
Pep will be disappointed if the far side visitor stands (which, by the way, provide a top-notch view of the game minus one light pole) are not filled.
Come on, Fisher fans, the trip to Mayberry is just a hop (on I-390 south), a skip (over Rt. 36 south from Dansville), and a jump (onto I-86 west for one exit). Heck, we can even have Sheriff Taylor at the town line to usher you in so you don't get lost in the woods.
You should watch for deer, but be assured that Pep last Saterday took out the last of the kamikaze deer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbSFxlfuf9s) in our neck of the woods. It should be a safe enough place.
On Saxon Warriors!
I'm considering going Pep! But I'm trying to remember if I'm a jinx when I show up at Alfred. I think I've only seen Fisher win there twice.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 08, 2016, 01:08:25 PMLooking forward to the possibility of the Statesmen redeeming themselves for the past playoff flatulence against the Cardinals....and improving on the historical 11-7 performance since 1990(IF we beat the Yellow Jackets....an essential caveat).
Hobart - Fisher games are always "interesting" ::)
Quote from: Bartman on November 08, 2016, 02:59:49 PMI think it would be a game that the entire FA91 family would travel to!!!Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 08, 2016, 01:08:25 PMLooking forward to the possibility of the Statesmen redeeming themselves for the past playoff flatulence against the Cardinals....and improving on the historical 11-7 performance since 1990(IF we beat the Yellow Jackets....an essential caveat).
Hobart - Fisher games are always "interesting" ::)
Quote from: saxontad on November 08, 2016, 01:43:32 PM
Come on down 'cards. The more, the merrier (I hope)!!!
Quote from: AUPepBand on November 15, 2016, 07:15:43 AM
Will there be a Week 11 East Region Fan Poll?
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Alfred ( 3 ) | 10-0 | 48 | 1 | vs. Husson |
2 Wesley ( 2 ) | 8-2 | 46 | 2 | vs. #4 Stevenson |
3 Hobart | 9-1 | 34 | 4 | vs. (former) #1 (North) Mount Union |
4 Stevenson | 9-1 | 27 | 5 | at #2 Wesley |
5 Frostburg State | 9-1 | 21 | 6 | vs. #7 St. John Fisher |
6 Delaware Valley | 8-2 | 20 | NR | at #6 (South) Muhlenberg |
7 St. John Fisher | 8-2 | 17 | 3 | at #5 Frostburg State |
8t Brockport State | 7-3 | 15 | NR | vs. Washington & Jefferson |
8t Western New England | 10-0 | 15 | 10 | vs. Husson |
10 St. Lawrence | 9-1 | 12 | 9 | End of Season |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2016, 10:53:21 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred ( 3 ) 10-0 48 1 vs. Bridgewater State 2 Wesley ( 2 ) 8-2 46 2 vs. #4 Stevenson 3 Hobart 9-1 34 4 vs. (former) #1 (North) Mount Union 4 Stevenson 9-1 27 5 at #2 Wesley 5 Frostburg State 9-1 21 6 vs. #7 St. John Fisher 6 Delaware Valley 8-2 20 NR at #6 (South) Muhlenberg 7 St. John Fisher 8-2 17 3 at #5 Frostburg State 8t Brockport State 7-3 15 NR vs. Washington & Jefferson 8t Western New England 10-0 15 10 vs. Husson 10 St. Lawrence 9-1 12 9 End of Season
Dropping Out:
Albright
Salisbury
Also Receiving votes:
Salibury 8
Albright 6
Husson 5
Trinity 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (2,2,1,1,1)
Wesley (1,1,2,3,2)
Hobart (10,3,3,2,3)
Stevenson (8,8,4,4,4)
Frostburg State (9,7,5,8,5)
Delaware Valley (3,5,8,9,10)
St. John Fisher (6,6,9,6,NR)
Brockport State(5,4,NR,NR,9)
Western New England (NR,NR,7,5,6)
St. Lawrence (NR,NR,6,7,8)
Salisbury (4,10,NR,NR,NR)
Albright (7,9,NR,NR,NR)
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,7)
Trinity (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#4 Stevenson at #2 Wesley
(former) #1 (North) Mount Union at #3 Hobart
#7 St. John Fisher at #5 Frostburg State
#6 Delaware Valley at #6 (South) Muhlenberg
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2016, 10:53:21 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Alfred ( 3 ) 10-0 48 1 vs. HussonBridgewater State (MA)2 Wesley ( 2 ) 8-2 46 2 vs. #4 Stevenson 3 Hobart 9-1 34 4 vs. (former) #1 (North) Mount Union 4 Stevenson 9-1 27 5 at #2 Wesley 5 Frostburg State 9-1 21 6 vs. #7 St. John Fisher 6 Delaware Valley 8-2 20 NR at #6 (South) Muhlenberg 7 St. John Fisher 8-2 17 3 at #5 Frostburg State 8t Brockport State 7-3 15 NR vs. Washington & Jefferson 8t Western New England 10-0 15 10 vs. Husson 10 St. Lawrence 9-1 12 9 End of Season
Dropping Out:
Albright
Salisbury
Also Receiving votes:
Salibury 8
Albright 6
Husson 5
Trinity 1
Voting Distribution:
Alfred (2,2,1,1,1)
Wesley (1,1,2,3,2)
Hobart (10,3,3,2,3)
Stevenson (8,8,4,4,4)
Frostburg State (9,7,5,8,5)
Delaware Valley (3,5,8,9,10)
St. John Fisher (6,6,9,6,NR)
Brockport State(5,4,NR,NR,9)
Western New England (NR,NR,7,5,6)
St. Lawrence (NR,NR,6,7,8)
Salisbury (4,10,NR,NR,NR)
Albright (7,9,NR,NR,NR)
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,7)
Trinity (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#4 Stevenson at #2 Wesley
(former) #1 (North) Mount Union at #3 Hobart
#7 St. John Fisher at #5 Frostburg State
#6 Delaware Valley at #6 (South) Muhlenberg
Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Quote from: wesleydad on November 15, 2016, 11:52:12 AMI agree,Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Actually, no, Hobart at 10 calls into question the overall poll that that person puts in. Opinions are one thing, but have something to justify it. I would be glad to hear how the other 9 are better than Hobart.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 15, 2016, 12:57:29 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 15, 2016, 11:52:12 AMI agree,Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Actually, no, Hobart at 10 calls into question the overall poll that that person puts in. Opinions are one thing, but have something to justify it. I would be glad to hear how the other 9 are better than Hobart.
Opinion is one thing for sure.....Now back it up
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2016, 01:20:22 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 15, 2016, 12:57:29 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 15, 2016, 11:52:12 AMI agree,Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Actually, no, Hobart at 10 calls into question the overall poll that that person puts in. Opinions are one thing, but have something to justify it. I would be glad to hear how the other 9 are better than Hobart.
Opinion is one thing for sure.....Now back it up
I probably should have asked Logan for his permission to include his ratings as the final "voter" but Pep was running up against deadline:
http://loganahansen21.wixsite.com/hansen-ratings
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2016, 01:20:22 PMNo problem here Kaz....but now that I look at the Hansen predictions, Hobart has a 2 % chance of beating UMU, or 1 out of 50.....I wish these were real gambling odds, I think I would put a couple of bucks on that......GO BART......any takers 8-)?Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 15, 2016, 12:57:29 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 15, 2016, 11:52:12 AMI agree,Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Actually, no, Hobart at 10 calls into question the overall poll that that person puts in. Opinions are one thing, but have something to justify it. I would be glad to hear how the other 9 are better than Hobart.
Opinion is one thing for sure.....Now back it up
I probably should have asked Logan for his permission to include his ratings as the final "voter" but Pep was running up against deadline:
http://loganahansen21.wixsite.com/hansen-ratings
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2016, 01:20:22 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 15, 2016, 12:57:29 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 15, 2016, 11:52:12 AMI agree,Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Actually, no, Hobart at 10 calls into question the overall poll that that person puts in. Opinions are one thing, but have something to justify it. I would be glad to hear how the other 9 are better than Hobart.
Opinion is one thing for sure.....Now back it up
I probably should have asked Logan for his permission to include his ratings as the final "voter" but Pep was running up against deadline:
http://loganahansen21.wixsite.com/hansen-ratings
Quote from: D3MAFAN on November 15, 2016, 01:31:06 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 15, 2016, 01:20:22 PMQuote from: fisheralum91 on November 15, 2016, 12:57:29 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 15, 2016, 11:52:12 AMI agree,Quote from: Bartman on November 15, 2016, 11:33:31 AM
Kaz,
+k for running the poll and to the participants.....except the voter who put Hobart #10 ???, just kidding, everyone has a right to their opinion....Good luck to everyone in the playoffs this weekend.....
Actually, no, Hobart at 10 calls into question the overall poll that that person puts in. Opinions are one thing, but have something to justify it. I would be glad to hear how the other 9 are better than Hobart.
Opinion is one thing for sure.....Now back it up
I probably should have asked Logan for his permission to include his ratings as the final "voter" but Pep was running up against deadline:
http://loganahansen21.wixsite.com/hansen-ratings
That's blasphemy using that thing in the ERFP.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 20, 2016, 10:04:55 AM
Seems clear to me that Wesley and Hobart are the best teams in East after yesterday. Hopefully Alfred won't flame out down the stretch.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 20, 2016, 10:11:38 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 20, 2016, 10:04:55 AM
Seems clear to me that Wesley and Hobart are the best teams in East after yesterday. Hopefully Alfred won't flame out down the stretch.
Frostburg and Del Val had nice wins also. I hope Alfred shows better this week. They handled Fisher so I was surprised by the score in yesterday's game. Maybe the New England schools are better than thought? WNEW is going to be a good game for Alfred and then, if they win, they have to beat either Mount or Hopkins which will be no easy task.
Quote from: Bartman on December 04, 2016, 10:24:31 PM
Now that the Eastern teams have completed the season , any interest in a final poll? It could be interesting given the various playoff results. If not, no problem, I probably should be using my time better ;D
Quote from: D3MAFAN on December 06, 2016, 08:45:54 AMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2016, 10:24:31 PM
Now that the Eastern teams have completed the season , any interest in a final poll? It could be interesting given the various playoff results. If not, no problem, I probably should be using my time better ;D
I usually wait until the playoffs to decide the rankings. However, Wesley is my clear number 1 (as of today), however if MU makes the stagg and plays John Carroll in a rematch and wins by 3 scores, i'll reconsider.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on December 06, 2016, 08:45:54 AMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2016, 10:24:31 PM
Now that the Eastern teams have completed the season , any interest in a final poll? It could be interesting given the various playoff results. If not, no problem, I probably should be using my time better ;D
I usually wait until the playoffs to decide the rankings. However, Wesley is my clear number 1 (as of today), however if MU makes the stagg and plays John Carroll in a rematch and wins by 3 scores, i'll reconsider.
Quote from: wesleydad on December 06, 2016, 02:05:06 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on December 06, 2016, 08:45:54 AMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2016, 10:24:31 PM
Now that the Eastern teams have completed the season , any interest in a final poll? It could be interesting given the various playoff results. If not, no problem, I probably should be using my time better ;D
I usually wait until the playoffs to decide the rankings. However, Wesley is my clear number 1 (as of today), however if MU makes the stagg and plays John Carroll in a rematch and wins by 3 scores, i'll reconsider.
Based on how the teams played in the playoffs I think Wesley would probably beat any team in the East at this point. But it is hard to ignore the fact that Alfred went undefeated and Wesley has 2 losses, that has not changed. Having seen Wesley play Mount several times now I know that the game can spiral out of control real quick if you make mistakes because Mount will take advantage of them. The Wesley defensive effort against JCU was stunning to me since they had not played anyone that tough defensively all year. Could they duplicate that against other teams? Not sure. Who was the best team in the East all year, Alfred. Who is the best team in the East at this point, Wesley. Guess it all depends on what the end of the year poll is supposed to show. I figure that when the Lambert trophy comes out for the East that Alfred will win it and they should.
Quote from: wesleydad on December 06, 2016, 02:05:06 PMWesleydad,Quote from: D3MAFAN on December 06, 2016, 08:45:54 AMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2016, 10:24:31 PM
Now that the Eastern teams have completed the season , any interest in a final poll? It could be interesting given the various playoff results. If not, no problem, I probably should be using my time better ;D
I usually wait until the playoffs to decide the rankings. However, Wesley is my clear number 1 (as of today), however if MU makes the stagg and plays John Carroll in a rematch and wins by 3 scores, i'll reconsider.
Based on how the teams played in the playoffs I think Wesley would probably beat any team in the East at this point. But it is hard to ignore the fact that Alfred went undefeated and Wesley has 2 losses, that has not changed. Having seen Wesley play Mount several times now I know that the game can spiral out of control real quick if you make mistakes because Mount will take advantage of them. The Wesley defensive effort against JCU was stunning to me since they had not played anyone that tough defensively all year. Could they duplicate that against other teams? Not sure. Who was the best team in the East all year, Alfred. Who is the best team in the East at this point, Wesley. Guess it all depends on what the end of the year poll is supposed to show. I figure that when the Lambert trophy comes out for the East that Alfred will win it and they should.
Quote from: Bartman on December 11, 2016, 10:36:12 AMQuote from: wesleydad on December 06, 2016, 02:05:06 PMWesleydad,Quote from: D3MAFAN on December 06, 2016, 08:45:54 AMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2016, 10:24:31 PM
Now that the Eastern teams have completed the season , any interest in a final poll? It could be interesting given the various playoff results. If not, no problem, I probably should be using my time better ;D
I usually wait until the playoffs to decide the rankings. However, Wesley is my clear number 1 (as of today), however if MU makes the stagg and plays John Carroll in a rematch and wins by 3 scores, i'll reconsider.
Based on how the teams played in the playoffs I think Wesley would probably beat any team in the East at this point. But it is hard to ignore the fact that Alfred went undefeated and Wesley has 2 losses, that has not changed. Having seen Wesley play Mount several times now I know that the game can spiral out of control real quick if you make mistakes because Mount will take advantage of them. The Wesley defensive effort against JCU was stunning to me since they had not played anyone that tough defensively all year. Could they duplicate that against other teams? Not sure. Who was the best team in the East all year, Alfred. Who is the best team in the East at this point, Wesley. Guess it all depends on what the end of the year poll is supposed to show. I figure that when the Lambert trophy comes out for the East that Alfred will win it and they should.
I agree that Wesley was probably the best team at the end of the season, and I also agree that Alfred should get the Lambert Trophy. As far as the talent gap in D3, I have to say that it looks like there was no true elite team this year. I thought that may have been St Thomas , but they shot themselves in the foot with 8 turnovers in their final game. The OAC teams were very good, but not elite , the WIAC was down a bit because Whitewater was down(Oshkosh is very tough but not scary) and frankly while the Mount D stepped up against UMHB, it was still the same D that gave up 28,28 and 45....I think a big factor for the Mount D yesterday, was that the UMHB Oline was suspect and will be pushed around by the Wisconsin boys....the UMHB defense, however was awesome......wondering what your thoughts were since your Wesley team has had the best success in recent years.
Quote from: wesleydad on December 11, 2016, 10:56:25 AMThanks for your take, it was better to see more competitive playoff games this year, for sure. It is ironic that the top East leagues felt they were a bit down this year but certainly gave the top OAC teams a battle...especially Wesley in the JCU game.....winning would be more convincing, of course.Quote from: Bartman on December 11, 2016, 10:36:12 AMQuote from: wesleydad on December 06, 2016, 02:05:06 PMWesleydad,Quote from: D3MAFAN on December 06, 2016, 08:45:54 AMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2016, 10:24:31 PM
Now that the Eastern teams have completed the season , any interest in a final poll? It could be interesting given the various playoff results. If not, no problem, I probably should be using my time better ;D
I usually wait until the playoffs to decide the rankings. However, Wesley is my clear number 1 (as of today), however if MU makes the stagg and plays John Carroll in a rematch and wins by 3 scores, i'll reconsider.
Based on how the teams played in the playoffs I think Wesley would probably beat any team in the East at this point. But it is hard to ignore the fact that Alfred went undefeated and Wesley has 2 losses, that has not changed. Having seen Wesley play Mount several times now I know that the game can spiral out of control real quick if you make mistakes because Mount will take advantage of them. The Wesley defensive effort against JCU was stunning to me since they had not played anyone that tough defensively all year. Could they duplicate that against other teams? Not sure. Who was the best team in the East all year, Alfred. Who is the best team in the East at this point, Wesley. Guess it all depends on what the end of the year poll is supposed to show. I figure that when the Lambert trophy comes out for the East that Alfred will win it and they should.
I agree that Wesley was probably the best team at the end of the season, and I also agree that Alfred should get the Lambert Trophy. As far as the talent gap in D3, I have to say that it looks like there was no true elite team this year. I thought that may have been St Thomas , but they shot themselves in the foot with 8 turnovers in their final game. The OAC teams were very good, but not elite , the WIAC was down a bit because Whitewater was down(Oshkosh is very tough but not scary) and frankly while the Mount D stepped up against UMHB, it was still the same D that gave up 28,28 and 45....I think a big factor for the Mount D yesterday, was that the UMHB Oline was suspect and will be pushed around by the Wisconsin boys....the UMHB defense, however was awesome......wondering what your thoughts were since your Wesley team has had the best success in recent years.
Bartman, as I watched yesterday's games I got the same feeling. How far away is Wesley from Oshkosh? The games were basically the same, low scoring and some nice plays by the defense to keep it that way. How far away are the East teams that played Mount from UMHB? Mount was able to stop the vaunted UMHB offense, but could not stop Alfred's which if we were asked would have figured to be a step below UMHB's. UMHB got 3 turnovers and only scored 14, 7 on a fluke TD. Based on that I think the gap is closing and maybe 12 - 15 teams can compete with the big boys. Most of us Wesley fans thought this year's team was a step below the last few years teams, but were a blocked field goal away from going to the quarters and facing a beatable UWW team. After that who knows. If not for some great plays by the Oshkosh D backs yesterday JCU would have scored a couple more TD's. Was Mount down? UWW? Linfield? etc. or maybe the 8 - 15 ranked teams have made a step closer and can now make a game of it. I hope so, because this year's playoffs were much more fun than the past few years have been.
Quote from: Bartman on December 18, 2016, 06:32:25 PM
Final D3.com poll:(preseason in ( ) )
12 Alfred(53)
15Wesley(7)
19 Hobart(29)
20 Stevenson(30)
22 Western NE(NR)
23 Frosty(NR)
24 SLU(34)
25 SJFisher(31)
Getting Votes:
31 Trinity(NR)
34 Bridgewater St.(NR)
38 Del Valley(25))
39 Husson(NR)
40 Salisbury(23)
Preseason top 25-No Votes end of season
Albright(16)
Cortland(17)
That makes it 5 East teams in preseason Top 25 and 8 in the end of season poll...a good season for the region
Quote from: D3MAFAN on December 19, 2016, 10:59:57 AMThis does illustrate how difficult it is to predict the performance of D3 football teams. With the exception of Wesley,no final Top 25 team was picked in preseason . Did the East take a step forward( at least in the 10-25 rankings) or did the other regions take a step back for a year?A fun year, Happy New Year to everyone .Quote from: Bartman on December 18, 2016, 06:32:25 PM
Final D3.com poll:(preseason in ( ) )
12 Alfred(53)
15Wesley(7)
19 Hobart(29)
20 Stevenson(30)
22 Western NE(NR)
23 Frosty(NR)
24 SLU(34)
25 SJFisher(31)
Getting Votes:
31 Trinity(NR)
34 Bridgewater St.(NR)
38 Del Valley(25))
39 Husson(NR)
40 Salisbury(23)
Preseason top 25-No Votes end of season
Albright(16)
Cortland(17)
That makes it 5 East teams in preseason Top 25 and 8 in the end of season poll...a good season for the region
It was great to see those many teams in the rankings, although I felt some should have been higher up. I think Delaware Valley or Salisbury should have replaced St. John Fisher, because I don't think a few voters watch the ECAC bowl games. Hopefully next year the ER continues to become more competitive in region from top to bottom and nationally. However, I do see some big changes coming over the next few years with some teams taking the step back a perennial conference champs and 2nd place teams and others coming back on the scene (i.e. Frostburg and Bridgewater State). Hope everyone enjoy the wonderful weather and Holidays.
Quote from: Bartman on December 22, 2016, 10:24:47 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on December 19, 2016, 10:59:57 AMThis does illustrate how difficult it is to predict the performance of D3 football teams. With the exception of Wesley,no final Top 25 team was picked in preseason . Did the East take a step forward( at least in the 10-25 rankings) or did the other regions take a step back for a year?A fun year, Happy New Year to everyone .Quote from: Bartman on December 18, 2016, 06:32:25 PM
Final D3.com poll:(preseason in ( ) )
12 Alfred(53)
15Wesley(7)
19 Hobart(29)
20 Stevenson(30)
22 Western NE(NR)
23 Frosty(NR)
24 SLU(34)
25 SJFisher(31)
Getting Votes:
31 Trinity(NR)
34 Bridgewater St.(NR)
38 Del Valley(25))
39 Husson(NR)
40 Salisbury(23)
Preseason top 25-No Votes end of season
Albright(16)
Cortland(17)
That makes it 5 East teams in preseason Top 25 and 8 in the end of season poll...a good season for the region
It was great to see those many teams in the rankings, although I felt some should have been higher up. I think Delaware Valley or Salisbury should have replaced St. John Fisher, because I don't think a few voters watch the ECAC bowl games. Hopefully next year the ER continues to become more competitive in region from top to bottom and nationally. However, I do see some big changes coming over the next few years with some teams taking the step back a perennial conference champs and 2nd place teams and others coming back on the scene (i.e. Frostburg and Bridgewater State). Hope everyone enjoy the wonderful weather and Holidays.
Quote from: Bartman on August 31, 2017, 01:32:56 PM
Any interest in keeping this going in 2017?
Quote from: rams1102 on September 01, 2017, 12:48:53 PM
Kaz,
Count me in. I will send my Week #1 Poll in this Sunday/Monday. Can I put Montclair in the Top 10. LMFAO. Only Kidding. ;D
Dave !!!
Quote from: wesleydad on September 02, 2017, 06:10:15 PM
Good thing we did not have a preseason poll, would have just made us look bad. This week will be very interesting. Best team I saw was Brockport, I did not see the Frostburg win over Stevenson. I figure we will be all over the place with the voting.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 03, 2017, 05:31:50 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 02, 2017, 06:10:15 PM
Good thing we did not have a preseason poll, would have just made us look bad. This week will be very interesting. Best team I saw was Brockport, I did not see the Frostburg win over Stevenson. I figure we will be all over the place with the voting.
I watched that game, and they looked good. Most impressive team I think may have been Delval. Their defense looked very strong.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 03, 2017, 05:46:46 PMWesleydad,Quote from: ITH radio on September 03, 2017, 05:31:50 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 02, 2017, 06:10:15 PM
Good thing we did not have a preseason poll, would have just made us look bad. This week will be very interesting. Best team I saw was Brockport, I did not see the Frostburg win over Stevenson. I figure we will be all over the place with the voting.
I watched that game, and they looked good. Most impressive team I think may have been Delval. Their defense looked very strong.
I was at the Wesley/Del Val game and watched the Brockport game. My take is that Del Val benefited from Wesley mistakes, Wesley had 350+ yards and Del Val failed to score in the second half, only a safety whereas Brockport dominated the game and without mistakes could have scored 50+ so I put their win over the second highest ranked east team over Del Val's win over the first highest ranked team. But that is what I think is going to make the poll interesting. Some teams won, but struggled. Let the east region carnage start, earlier than normal.
Quote from: Bartman on September 03, 2017, 10:03:39 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 03, 2017, 05:46:46 PMWesleydad,Quote from: ITH radio on September 03, 2017, 05:31:50 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 02, 2017, 06:10:15 PM
Good thing we did not have a preseason poll, would have just made us look bad. This week will be very interesting. Best team I saw was Brockport, I did not see the Frostburg win over Stevenson. I figure we will be all over the place with the voting.
I watched that game, and they looked good. Most impressive team I think may have been Delval. Their defense looked very strong.
I was at the Wesley/Del Val game and watched the Brockport game. My take is that Del Val benefited from Wesley mistakes, Wesley had 350+ yards and Del Val failed to score in the second half, only a safety whereas Brockport dominated the game and without mistakes could have scored 50+ so I put their win over the second highest ranked east team over Del Val's win over the first highest ranked team. But that is what I think is going to make the poll interesting. Some teams won, but struggled. Let the east region carnage start, earlier than normal.
I agree with your assessment of the wins by Brockport and Del Val. I was totally impressed with Brockport and give them full credit even though the Hobart player and coaches performance was surprisingly below par , especially on defense and the Oline, and Sweeney failed to take full advantage of the 7 inch advantage that Shed had over his primary defender on key situations(threw one pick right into Sheds defenders chest in the end zone for an INT). I was impressed with Germinerio last year and I think he will be giving the E8 fits this year and they have the talent to be the best in the East as long as the Hobart win does not make them overconfident. I am interested to see how Hobart and Wesley rebound this weekend. Frostburg looked pretty solid out of the gate as well. I think you need at least 3-5 weeks to figure these teams out, so I will be guessing quite a bit in the early weeks of rankings.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) | 1-0 | 45 | NR | at Lycoming |
2 Frostburg State ( 2 ) | 1-0 | 42 | NR | vs. TCNJ |
3 Brockport State ( 1 ) | 1-0 | 39 | NR | vs. Ithaca |
4 Wesley ( 1 ) | 0-1 | 33 | NR | Open |
5t Albright | 1-0 | 30 | NR | at Misericordia |
5t Alfred | 1-0 | 30 | NR | Open |
7 Salisbury | 0-1 | 12 | NR | vs. William Paterson |
8 Cortland State | 1-0 | 9 | NR | at Framingham State |
9t St. John Fisher | 0-1 | 6 | NR | at #9t Hobart |
9t Hobart | 0-1 | 6 | NR | vs. #9t St. John Fisher |
9t Stevenson | 0-1 | 6 | NR | vs. King's |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 05, 2017, 10:30:38 AM
Week 1 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 1-0 45 NR at Lycoming 2 Frostburg State ( 2 ) 1-0 42 NR vs. TCNJ 3 Brockport State ( 1 ) 1-0 39 NR vs. Framingham State 4 Wesley ( 1 ) 0-1 33 NR Open 5t Albright 1-0 30 NR at Misericordia 5t Alfred 1-0 30 NR Open 7 Salisbury 1-0 12 NR vs. William Paterson 8 Cortland State 1-0 9 NR at Framingham State 9t St. John Fisher 0-1 6 NR at #9t Hobart 9t Hobart 0-1 6 NR vs. #9t St. John Fisher 9t Stevenson 0-1 6 NR vs. King's
Also Receiving votes:
Buffalo State 5
Rowan 3
Utica 3
Christopher Newport 2
Husson 2
RPI 1
Trinity 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (1,3,2,2,2)
Frostburg State (5,1,3,3,1)
Brockport State (4,2,1,6,4)
Wesley (2,6,6,1,7)
Albright (3,5,5,7,5)
Alfred (8,4,4,6,3)
Salisbury (6,NR,NR,4,NR)
Cortland State (NR,7,NR,NR,6)
St. John Fisher (NR,NR,7,10,10)
Hobart (NR,NR,8,8,NR)
Stevenson (7,NR,NR,9,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,8,NR,NR,9)
Rowan (NR,NR,NR,NR,8)
Utica (10,9,NR,NR,NR)
Christopher Newport (NR,NR,9,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#9t St. John Fisher at #9t Hobart
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 05, 2017, 11:47:20 AM
My question put so much more eloquently :P
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 05, 2017, 01:01:54 PM
Sorry for the mistakes; I was rushing to meet the Alfred Sun deadline since I was off yesterday. I fixed Salisbury's record and Brockport's opponent.
As for the Wesley #1, that is the Hansen rankings which will hopefully be replaced by a fifth voter next week. If I'm short and you'd like to be my alternate, please let me know.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 06, 2017, 03:51:48 PM
Kind of surprised there were zero votes for Springfield in Wk 1. I suppose that'll change if they can beat a tough Kean team. App is one of the better D3QB's I saw last season. Should be one of the better Wk 2 games in the nation, not just the east.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 06, 2017, 03:51:48 PMAgree they are deserving, certainly if they beat Kean
Kind of surprised there were zero votes for Springfield in Wk 1. I suppose that'll change if they can beat a tough Kean team. App is one of the better D3QB's I saw last season. Should be one of the better Wk 2 games in the nation, not just the east.
Quote from: Bartman on September 07, 2017, 12:11:35 PMQuote from: ITH radio on September 06, 2017, 03:51:48 PMAgree they are deserving, certainly if they beat Kean
Kind of surprised there were zero votes for Springfield in Wk 1. I suppose that'll change if they can beat a tough Kean team. App is one of the better D3QB's I saw last season. Should be one of the better Wk 2 games in the nation, not just the east.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on September 07, 2017, 12:52:49 PMQuote from: Bartman on September 07, 2017, 12:11:35 PMQuote from: ITH radio on September 06, 2017, 03:51:48 PMAgree they are deserving, certainly if they beat Kean
Kind of surprised there were zero votes for Springfield in Wk 1. I suppose that'll change if they can beat a tough Kean team. App is one of the better D3QB's I saw last season. Should be one of the better Wk 2 games in the nation, not just the east.
I was looking at that too. I was a bit late on my votes after a long labor day, but will definitely consider them after beating a sound WNE team.
Quote from: dlip on September 10, 2017, 09:32:52 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on September 07, 2017, 12:52:49 PMQuote from: Bartman on September 07, 2017, 12:11:35 PMQuote from: ITH radio on September 06, 2017, 03:51:48 PMAgree they are deserving, certainly if they beat Kean
Kind of surprised there were zero votes for Springfield in Wk 1. I suppose that'll change if they can beat a tough Kean team. App is one of the better D3QB's I saw last season. Should be one of the better Wk 2 games in the nation, not just the east.
I was looking at that too. I was a bit late on my votes after a long labor day, but will definitely consider them after beating a sound WNE team.
After the strong start the Pride should at the very least begin to receive votes this week. It will be interesting how it shakes out.
Quote from: Bartman on September 10, 2017, 10:11:11 AM
Brockport was picked by 50% of D3 staff pickers to be upset of the week(however,beat IC 31-0), I still see them as #1 in East after 2 impressive wins.Arguments for Del Val and Frosty as #1 are also valid until we see more from these teams.
Quote from: Bartman on September 10, 2017, 10:11:11 AM
Brockport was picked by 50% of D3 staff pickers to be upset of the week(however,beat IC 31-0), I still see them as #1 in East after 2 impressive wins.Arguments for Del Val and Frosty as #1 are also valid until we see more from these teams.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1t Frostburg State ( 3 ) | 2-0 | 44 | 2 | at Christopher Newport |
1t Brockport State ( 1 ) | 2-0 | 44 | 3 | at St. John Fisher |
1t Delaware Valley ( 1 ) | 2-0 | 44 | 1 | at Wilkes |
4 Albright | 2-0 | 32 | 5t | at Lycoming |
5 Wesley | 0-1 | 29 | 4 | at TCNJ |
6 Alfred | 1-0 | 27 | 5t | vs. Utica |
7 Hobart | 1-1 | 17 | 9t | vs. Shenandoah |
8 Salisbury | 1-1 | 10 | 7 | at Kean |
9 Springfield | 2-0 | 9 | NR | at Mount Ida |
10 Framingham State | 2-0 | 8 | NR | at Bridgewater State |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 11, 2017, 09:56:15 AM
Week 2 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Frostburg State ( 3 ) 2-0 44 2 at Christopher Newport 1t Brockport State ( 1 ) 2-0 44 3 at St. John Fisher 1t Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 2-0 44 1 at Wilkes 4 Albright 2-0 32 5t at Lycoming 5 Wesley 0-1 29 4 at TCNJ 6 Alfred 1-0 27 5t vs. Utica 7 Hobart 1-1 17 9t vs. Shenandoah 8 Salisbury 1-1 10 7 at Kean 9 Springfield 2-0 9 NR at Mount Ida 10 Framingham State 2-0 8 NR at Bridgewater State
Also Receiving votes:
Buffalo State 3
RPI 3
Stevenson 3
Christopher Newport 2
Voting Distribution:
Frostburg State (1,5,1,3,1)
Brockport State (2,2,2,1,4)
Delaware Valley (3,1,3,2,2)
Albright (4,4,5,4,6)
Wesley (7,3,6,7,3)
Alfred (5,9,4,5,5)
Hobart (6,7,NR,6,8)
Salisbury (9,6,NR,9,10)
Springfield (8,NR,10,8,9)
Framingham State (NR,NR,7,NR,7)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,8,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,9,10,NR)
Stevenson (NR,8,NR,NR,NR)
Christopher Newport (10,10,NR,NR,NR)
Quote from: wesleydad on September 11, 2017, 10:16:20 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 11, 2017, 09:56:15 AM
Week 2 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Frostburg State ( 3 ) 2-0 44 2 at Christopher Newport 1t Brockport State ( 1 ) 2-0 44 3 at St. John Fisher 1t Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 2-0 44 1 at Wilkes 4 Albright 2-0 32 5t at Lycoming 5 Wesley 0-1 29 4 at TCNJ 6 Alfred 1-0 27 5t vs. Utica 7 Hobart 1-1 17 9t vs. Shenandoah 8 Salisbury 1-1 10 7 at Kean 9 Springfield 2-0 9 NR at Mount Ida 10 Framingham State 2-0 8 NR at Bridgewater State
Also Receiving votes:
Buffalo State 3
RPI 3
Stevenson 3
Christopher Newport 2
Voting Distribution:
Frostburg State (1,5,1,3,1)
Brockport State (2,2,2,1,4)
Delaware Valley (3,1,3,2,2)
Albright (4,4,5,4,6)
Wesley (7,3,6,7,3)
Alfred (5,9,4,5,5)
Hobart (6,7,NR,6,8)
Salisbury (9,6,NR,9,10)
Springfield (8,NR,10,8,9)
Framingham State (NR,NR,7,NR,7)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,8,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,9,10,NR)
Stevenson (NR,8,NR,NR,NR)
Christopher Newport (10,10,NR,NR,NR)
I will start the conversation. What has Wesley done to remain #3? They lost the only game they played and their starting QB is out for the rest of the season. The backup has no track record of anything and just because Wesley has been able to replace QB's before does not mean this will work out as usual. Trust me, I think I know how good they are going to end up being, but at this point in the season I almost removed them from the top 10 and may have if a few teams had not lost this weekend. Not a big fan of using reputation as a barometer, rather like using the what have you actually done so far method. Also not sure about Hobart and Salisbury, but at least they did win this week. There are some pretty good 2-0 teams out there right now, but they lack the reputation.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on September 11, 2017, 10:24:31 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 11, 2017, 10:16:20 AM
I will start the conversation. What has Wesley done to remain #3? They lost the only game they played and their starting QB is out for the rest of the season. The backup has no track record of anything and just because Wesley has been able to replace QB's before does not mean this will work out as usual. Trust me, I think I know how good they are going to end up being, but at this point in the season I almost removed them from the top 10 and may have if a few teams had not lost this weekend. Not a big fan of using reputation as a barometer, rather like using the what have you actually done so far method. Also not sure about Hobart and Salisbury, but at least they did win this week. There are some pretty good 2-0 teams out there right now, but they lack the reputation.
Having had the opportunity to watch you guys in person and online. Similar to some of the Top 25 voters, Wesley has the best loss. The ability for you guys to reload is amazing and I think that having a bye-week and having 3 very winnable games over the next month will help this new QB. Wesley could easily be number 1, but to drop them below 5, just doesn't make sense to me, maybe if they lose to or have a close game with TCNJ, I would lower them on my ranking. How many teams other than Delaware Valley has beaten Wesley over the last 5 years, I can only think of Salisbury a few years back, but as I recall it took them a while to that.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 11, 2017, 10:16:20 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 11, 2017, 09:56:15 AM
Week 2 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Frostburg State ( 3 ) 2-0 44 2 at Christopher Newport 1t Brockport State ( 1 ) 2-0 44 3 at St. John Fisher 1t Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 2-0 44 1 at Wilkes 4 Albright 2-0 32 5t at Lycoming 5 Wesley 0-1 29 4 at TCNJ 6 Alfred 1-0 27 5t vs. Utica 7 Hobart 1-1 17 9t vs. Shenandoah 8 Salisbury 1-1 10 7 at Kean 9 Springfield 2-0 9 NR at Mount Ida 10 Framingham State 2-0 8 NR at Bridgewater State
Also Receiving votes:
Buffalo State 3
RPI 3
Stevenson 3
Christopher Newport 2
Voting Distribution:
Frostburg State (1,5,1,3,1)
Brockport State (2,2,2,1,4)
Delaware Valley (3,1,3,2,2)
Albright (4,4,5,4,6)
Wesley (7,3,6,7,3)
Alfred (5,9,4,5,5)
Hobart (6,7,NR,6,8)
Salisbury (9,6,NR,9,10)
Springfield (8,NR,10,8,9)
Framingham State (NR,NR,7,NR,7)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,8,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,9,10,NR)
Stevenson (NR,8,NR,NR,NR)
Christopher Newport (10,10,NR,NR,NR)
I will start the conversation. What has Wesley done to remain #3? They lost the only game they played and their starting QB is out for the rest of the season. The backup has no track record of anything and just because Wesley has been able to replace QB's before does not mean this will work out as usual. Trust me, I think I know how good they are going to end up being, but at this point in the season I almost removed them from the top 10 and may have if a few teams had not lost this weekend. Not a big fan of using reputation as a barometer, rather like using the what have you actually done so far method. Also not sure about Hobart and Salisbury, but at least they did win this week. There are some pretty good 2-0 teams out there right now, but they lack the reputation.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 11, 2017, 07:26:56 PM
I had Wesley #7. Based on the first two weeks they are not in the top 5 IMHO. At the end of the season they very well could be #1. Are they talented, Yes but appear to play to what they think they have to do to win. They thought Del Val would be a win and got surprised. Frostburg and Salisbury have the ability to knock them off. Every team in the top 1 can beat Wesley on any given day with the exception of Framingham. Let's see what the next few weeks will tell. They should cover the -27.5 at TCNJ. Let's see.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 11, 2017, 07:39:31 PM
Reputation is great until there is actual results to look at and then at that point bias has to go away.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on September 11, 2017, 10:24:31 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 11, 2017, 10:16:20 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 11, 2017, 09:56:15 AM
Week 2 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Frostburg State ( 3 ) 2-0 44 2 at Christopher Newport 1t Brockport State ( 1 ) 2-0 44 3 at St. John Fisher 1t Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 2-0 44 1 at Wilkes 4 Albright 2-0 32 5t at Lycoming 5 Wesley 0-1 29 4 at TCNJ 6 Alfred 1-0 27 5t vs. Utica 7 Hobart 1-1 17 9t vs. Shenandoah 8 Salisbury 1-1 10 7 at Kean 9 Springfield 2-0 9 NR at Mount Ida 10 Framingham State 2-0 8 NR at Bridgewater State
Also Receiving votes:
Buffalo State 3
RPI 3
Stevenson 3
Christopher Newport 2
Voting Distribution:
Frostburg State (1,5,1,3,1)
Brockport State (2,2,2,1,4)
Delaware Valley (3,1,3,2,2)
Albright (4,4,5,4,6)
Wesley (7,3,6,7,3)
Alfred (5,9,4,5,5)
Hobart (6,7,NR,6,8)
Salisbury (9,6,NR,9,10)
Springfield (8,NR,10,8,9)
Framingham State (NR,NR,7,NR,7)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,8,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,9,10,NR)
Stevenson (NR,8,NR,NR,NR)
Christopher Newport (10,10,NR,NR,NR)
I will start the conversation. What has Wesley done to remain #3? They lost the only game they played and their starting QB is out for the rest of the season. The backup has no track record of anything and just because Wesley has been able to replace QB's before does not mean this will work out as usual. Trust me, I think I know how good they are going to end up being, but at this point in the season I almost removed them from the top 10 and may have if a few teams had not lost this weekend. Not a big fan of using reputation as a barometer, rather like using the what have you actually done so far method. Also not sure about Hobart and Salisbury, but at least they did win this week. There are some pretty good 2-0 teams out there right now, but they lack the reputation.
Having had the opportunity to watch you guys in person and online. Similar to some of the Top 25 voters, Wesley has the best loss. The ability for you guys to reload is amazing and I think that having a bye-week and having 3 very winnable games over the next month will help this new QB. Wesley could easily be number 1, but to drop them below 5, just doesn't make sense to me, maybe if they lose to or have a close game with TCNJ, I would lower them on my ranking. How many teams other than Delaware Valley has beaten Wesley over the last 5 years, I can only think of Salisbury a few years back, but as I recall it took them a while to that.
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 12, 2017, 10:18:03 AMIMO Wesley still beats 6 of the top 10 fairly easily...Quote from: D3MAFAN on September 11, 2017, 10:24:31 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 11, 2017, 10:16:20 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 11, 2017, 09:56:15 AM
Week 2 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Frostburg State ( 3 ) 2-0 44 2 at Christopher Newport 1t Brockport State ( 1 ) 2-0 44 3 at St. John Fisher 1t Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 2-0 44 1 at Wilkes 4 Albright 2-0 32 5t at Lycoming 5 Wesley 0-1 29 4 at TCNJ 6 Alfred 1-0 27 5t vs. Utica 7 Hobart 1-1 17 9t vs. Shenandoah 8 Salisbury 1-1 10 7 at Kean 9 Springfield 2-0 9 NR at Mount Ida 10 Framingham State 2-0 8 NR at Bridgewater State
Also Receiving votes:
Buffalo State 3
RPI 3
Stevenson 3
Christopher Newport 2
Voting Distribution:
Frostburg State (1,5,1,3,1)
Brockport State (2,2,2,1,4)
Delaware Valley (3,1,3,2,2)
Albright (4,4,5,4,6)
Wesley (7,3,6,7,3)
Alfred (5,9,4,5,5)
Hobart (6,7,NR,6,8)
Salisbury (9,6,NR,9,10)
Springfield (8,NR,10,8,9)
Framingham State (NR,NR,7,NR,7)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,8,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,NR,9,10,NR)
Stevenson (NR,8,NR,NR,NR)
Christopher Newport (10,10,NR,NR,NR)
I will start the conversation. What has Wesley done to remain #3? They lost the only game they played and their starting QB is out for the rest of the season. The backup has no track record of anything and just because Wesley has been able to replace QB's before does not mean this will work out as usual. Trust me, I think I know how good they are going to end up being, but at this point in the season I almost removed them from the top 10 and may have if a few teams had not lost this weekend. Not a big fan of using reputation as a barometer, rather like using the what have you actually done so far method. Also not sure about Hobart and Salisbury, but at least they did win this week. There are some pretty good 2-0 teams out there right now, but they lack the reputation.
Having had the opportunity to watch you guys in person and online. Similar to some of the Top 25 voters, Wesley has the best loss. The ability for you guys to reload is amazing and I think that having a bye-week and having 3 very winnable games over the next month will help this new QB. Wesley could easily be number 1, but to drop them below 5, just doesn't make sense to me, maybe if they lose to or have a close game with TCNJ, I would lower them on my ranking. How many teams other than Delaware Valley has beaten Wesley over the last 5 years, I can only think of Salisbury a few years back, but as I recall it took them a while to that.
You can add CNU to the list. ;D
Quote from: Ralph Turner on September 13, 2017, 12:48:52 AM
I agree with bman. Wesley could beat everyone below it in the Region. If they lose another game in the next 3-4 weeks, then I would reconsider a #5 ranking. I think that they can re-assemble a team before crunch time against Salisbury and CNU. (8-1 and tri-champs?)
Quote from: ITH radio on September 14, 2017, 10:05:18 AM
Most interesting east games this wkd (as discussed in our Weds video pod) IMO include:
Fram St vs. BSU
RPI vs. WNE
FBS vs CNU
BP vs SJF in Courage Bowl
SUNY M vs USMMA
Quote from: ITH radio on September 14, 2017, 10:05:18 AM
Most interesting east games this wkd (as discussed in our Weds video pod) IMO include:
Fram St vs. BSU
RPI vs. WNE
FBS vs CNU
BP vs SJF in Courage Bowl
SUNY M vs USMMA
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 14, 2017, 10:50:42 AM91,
It will get ugly quickly and many of the Fisher faithful- me included- will have other things going on that evening.
Its a shame that Fisher has taken such a definitive step back...disheartening actually.
I know that 9 or 10 win seasons year in and year out arent supposed to be expected, but damn that Hobart game was atrocious.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 14, 2017, 04:18:12 PM
Yeah, rivalry games you never know how it'll go. BP "should" have won last season and didn't.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 14, 2017, 09:44:59 PMI saw the Brockport team live against Hobart and the last quarter and a half live against Ithaca(drove over after Hobart-Fisher). This team is playing better than the Mount Union team that Hobart played in the playoffs last year, their lines are comparable to the Mount, their QB is way better, RB is solid and WR are fast...the Mount linebackers were better but the Brockport DBs I think are solid. If Fisher has any chance they must punch Brockport early and get a solid lead and see if BrockP responds or gets nervous. Fisher should have scored twice against Hobart early but they fizzled out and failed to score, so they must convert early and make a statement .....easy to say...Good luck to both teams tomorrowQuote from: ITH radio on September 14, 2017, 04:18:12 PM
Yeah, rivalry games you never know how it'll go. BP "should" have won last season and didn't.
Not really. I mean yes, they blew a big lead, but there's no indication they were better than Fisher last season. This year, we have clear evidence that they are leaps and bounds better than the Cardinals (mainly because it looks like they're playing defense)
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Brockport State ( 4 ) | 3-0 | 48 | 1t | vs. Utica |
2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) | 3-0 | 44 | 1t | at Christopher Newport |
3 Delaware Valley | 3-0 | 42 | 1t | vs. Stevenson |
4 Wesley | 1-1 | 30 | 5 | at William Paterson |
5 Alfred | 2-0 | 23 | 6 | vs. Rochester |
6 Albright | 3-0 | 20 | 4 | vs. Widener |
7 Hobart | 2-1 | 18 | 7 | vs. Endicott |
8 Springfield | 3-0 | 14 | 9 | vs. WPI |
9 Framingham State | 3-0 | 12 | 10 | vs. Massachusetts Maritime |
10 RPI | 3-0 | 9 | NR | at Buffalo State |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2017, 03:02:11 PM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 3-0 48 1t vs. Utica 2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) 3-0 44 1t at Christopher Newport 3 Delaware Valley 3-0 42 1t vs. Stevenson 4 Wesley 1-1 30 5 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 2-0 23 6 vs. Rochester 6 Albright 3-0 20 4 vs. Widener 7 Hobart 2-1 18 7 vs. Endicott 8 Springfield 3-0 14 9 vs. WPI 9 Framingham State 3-0 12 10 vs. Massachusetts Maritime 10 RPI 3-0 9 NR at Buffalo State
Dropping Out:
Salibury
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 6
Salisbury 4
Stevenson 4
Buffalo State 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,1)
Frostburg State (1,2,4,2,2)
Delaware Valley (2,3,2,3,3)
Wesley (4,6,3,5,7)
Alfred (NR,4,9,4,4)
Albright (10,8,5,7,5)
Hobart (9,5,6,NR,6)
Springfield (6,7,NR,9,8)
Framingham State (5,NR,NR,6,10)
RPI (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Christopher Newport (8,9,10,NR,NR)
Salisbury (NR,10,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2017, 03:02:11 PM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 3-0 48 1t vs. Utica 2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) 3-0 44 1t at Christopher Newport 3 Delaware Valley 3-0 42 1t vs. Stevenson 4 Wesley 1-1 30 5 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 2-0 23 6 vs. Rochester 6 Albright 3-0 20 4 vs. Widener 7 Hobart 2-1 18 7 vs. Endicott 8 Springfield 3-0 14 9 vs. WPI 9 Framingham State 3-0 12 10 vs. Massachusetts Maritime 10 RPI 3-0 9 NR at Buffalo State
Dropping Out:
Salibury
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 6
Salisbury 4
Stevenson 4
Buffalo State 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,1)
Frostburg State (1,2,4,2,2)
Delaware Valley (2,3,2,3,3)
Wesley (4,6,3,5,7)
Alfred (NR,4,9,4,4)
Albright (10,8,5,7,5)
Hobart (9,5,6,NR,6)
Springfield (6,7,NR,9,8)
Framingham State (5,NR,NR,6,10)
RPI (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Christopher Newport (8,9,10,NR,NR)
Salisbury (NR,10,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Quote from: wesleydad on September 18, 2017, 07:10:06 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2017, 03:02:11 PM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 3-0 48 1t vs. Utica 2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) 3-0 44 1t at Christopher Newport 3 Delaware Valley 3-0 42 1t vs. Stevenson 4 Wesley 1-1 30 5 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 2-0 23 6 vs. Rochester 6 Albright 3-0 20 4 vs. Widener 7 Hobart 2-1 18 7 vs. Endicott 8 Springfield 3-0 14 9 vs. WPI 9 Framingham State 3-0 12 10 vs. Massachusetts Maritime 10 RPI 3-0 9 NR at Buffalo State
Dropping Out:
Salibury
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 6
Salisbury 4
Stevenson 4
Buffalo State 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,1)
Frostburg State (1,2,4,2,2)
Delaware Valley (2,3,2,3,3)
Wesley (4,6,3,5,7)
Alfred (NR,4,9,4,4)
Albright (10,8,5,7,5)
Hobart (9,5,6,NR,6)
Springfield (6,7,NR,9,8)
Framingham State (5,NR,NR,6,10)
RPI (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Christopher Newport (8,9,10,NR,NR)
Salisbury (NR,10,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
I like the spread. At least it looks like we are at least watching the results and not just mailing it in each week. I like the up and down movement as the teams either produce or dont. Still find it hard to believe that 2 people dont have framingham on the ballot.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 18, 2017, 07:10:06 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2017, 03:02:11 PM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 3-0 48 1t vs. Utica 2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) 3-0 44 1t at Christopher Newport 3 Delaware Valley 3-0 42 1t vs. Stevenson 4 Wesley 1-1 30 5 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 2-0 23 6 vs. Rochester 6 Albright 3-0 20 4 vs. Widener 7 Hobart 2-1 18 7 vs. Endicott 8 Springfield 3-0 14 9 vs. WPI 9 Framingham State 3-0 12 10 vs. Massachusetts Maritime 10 RPI 3-0 9 NR at Buffalo State
Dropping Out:
Salibury
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 6
Salisbury 4
Stevenson 4
Buffalo State 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,1)
Frostburg State (1,2,4,2,2)
Delaware Valley (2,3,2,3,3)
Wesley (4,6,3,5,7)
Alfred (NR,4,9,4,4)
Albright (10,8,5,7,5)
Hobart (9,5,6,NR,6)
Springfield (6,7,NR,9,8)
Framingham State (5,NR,NR,6,10)
RPI (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Christopher Newport (8,9,10,NR,NR)
Salisbury (NR,10,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
I like the spread. At least it looks like we are at least watching the results and not just mailing it in each week. I like the up and down movement as the teams either produce or dont. Still find it hard to believe that 2 people dont have framingham on the ballot.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 19, 2017, 05:35:50 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 18, 2017, 07:10:06 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2017, 03:02:11 PM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 3-0 48 1t vs. Utica 2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) 3-0 44 1t at Christopher Newport 3 Delaware Valley 3-0 42 1t vs. Stevenson 4 Wesley 1-1 30 5 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 2-0 23 6 vs. Rochester 6 Albright 3-0 20 4 vs. Widener 7 Hobart 2-1 18 7 vs. Endicott 8 Springfield 3-0 14 9 vs. WPI 9 Framingham State 3-0 12 10 vs. Massachusetts Maritime 10 RPI 3-0 9 NR at Buffalo State
Dropping Out:
Salibury
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 6
Salisbury 4
Stevenson 4
Buffalo State 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,1)
Frostburg State (1,2,4,2,2)
Delaware Valley (2,3,2,3,3)
Wesley (4,6,3,5,7)
Alfred (NR,4,9,4,4)
Albright (10,8,5,7,5)
Hobart (9,5,6,NR,6)
Springfield (6,7,NR,9,8)
Framingham State (5,NR,NR,6,10)
RPI (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Christopher Newport (8,9,10,NR,NR)
Salisbury (NR,10,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
I like the spread. At least it looks like we are at least watching the results and not just mailing it in each week. I like the up and down movement as the teams either produce or dont. Still find it hard to believe that 2 people dont have framingham on the ballot.
One of them be me. I think CNU and Salisbury beat Framingham. I'm voter #2. Could change after next week.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on September 20, 2017, 10:15:04 AMQuote from: rams1102 on September 19, 2017, 05:35:50 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 18, 2017, 07:10:06 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2017, 03:02:11 PM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 3-0 48 1t vs. Utica 2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) 3-0 44 1t at Christopher Newport 3 Delaware Valley 3-0 42 1t vs. Stevenson 4 Wesley 1-1 30 5 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 2-0 23 6 vs. Rochester 6 Albright 3-0 20 4 vs. Widener 7 Hobart 2-1 18 7 vs. Endicott 8 Springfield 3-0 14 9 vs. WPI 9 Framingham State 3-0 12 10 vs. Massachusetts Maritime 10 RPI 3-0 9 NR at Buffalo State
Dropping Out:
Salibury
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 6
Salisbury 4
Stevenson 4
Buffalo State 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,1)
Frostburg State (1,2,4,2,2)
Delaware Valley (2,3,2,3,3)
Wesley (4,6,3,5,7)
Alfred (NR,4,9,4,4)
Albright (10,8,5,7,5)
Hobart (9,5,6,NR,6)
Springfield (6,7,NR,9,8)
Framingham State (5,NR,NR,6,10)
RPI (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Christopher Newport (8,9,10,NR,NR)
Salisbury (NR,10,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
I like the spread. At least it looks like we are at least watching the results and not just mailing it in each week. I like the up and down movement as the teams either produce or dont. Still find it hard to believe that 2 people dont have framingham on the ballot.
One of them be me. I think CNU and Salisbury beat Framingham. I'm voter #2. Could change after next week.
CNU, yes! Salisbury, I am not sure, I watch a little of the Kean game and I think they are not as good as year's past. I guest I would know a little more about both teams in a couple weeks. Meanwhile our focus is on Mass Maritime, a team that we struggled to win against last year.
Quote from: bman on September 20, 2017, 11:00:08 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on September 20, 2017, 10:15:04 AMQuote from: rams1102 on September 19, 2017, 05:35:50 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 18, 2017, 07:10:06 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on September 18, 2017, 03:02:11 PM
Week 3 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 3-0 48 1t vs. Utica 2 Frostburg State ( 1 ) 3-0 44 1t at Christopher Newport 3 Delaware Valley 3-0 42 1t vs. Stevenson 4 Wesley 1-1 30 5 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 2-0 23 6 vs. Rochester 6 Albright 3-0 20 4 vs. Widener 7 Hobart 2-1 18 7 vs. Endicott 8 Springfield 3-0 14 9 vs. WPI 9 Framingham State 3-0 12 10 vs. Massachusetts Maritime 10 RPI 3-0 9 NR at Buffalo State
Dropping Out:
Salibury
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 6
Salisbury 4
Stevenson 4
Buffalo State 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,1)
Frostburg State (1,2,4,2,2)
Delaware Valley (2,3,2,3,3)
Wesley (4,6,3,5,7)
Alfred (NR,4,9,4,4)
Albright (10,8,5,7,5)
Hobart (9,5,6,NR,6)
Springfield (6,7,NR,9,8)
Framingham State (5,NR,NR,6,10)
RPI (7,NR,NR,8,9)
Christopher Newport (8,9,10,NR,NR)
Salisbury (NR,10,8,NR,NR)
Stevenson (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Buffalo State (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
I like the spread. At least it looks like we are at least watching the results and not just mailing it in each week. I like the up and down movement as the teams either produce or dont. Still find it hard to believe that 2 people dont have framingham on the ballot.
One of them be me. I think CNU and Salisbury beat Framingham. I'm voter #2. Could change after next week.
CNU, yes! Salisbury, I am not sure, I watch a little of the Kean game and I think they are not as good as year's past. I guest I would know a little more about both teams in a couple weeks. Meanwhile our focus is on Mass Maritime, a team that we struggled to win against last year.
I think there still will be some (anti)New England football bias in this region for some time. Until we see a team come out of NE and dominate, the thought that they can rate within the region (fair or not) is diminished...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 20, 2017, 12:04:37 PM
I will say, I was pretty anti NE for several years, but the quality of play has gotten better. As it relates to Framingham this year, I don't know. Cortland went 5-6 last season and although they are 2-1 now, the wins were skin of the teeth (last second FG against 0-3 Augustana, late stop against 1-2 Hartwick). The schedule gets much tougher the next three games (Brockport, Alfredm, and Buff State). That win by Framingham might not look great if the Red Dragons are 2-4
Quote from: D3MAFAN on September 20, 2017, 02:08:41 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 20, 2017, 12:04:37 PM
I will say, I was pretty anti NE for several years, but the quality of play has gotten better. As it relates to Framingham this year, I don't know. Cortland went 5-6 last season and although they are 2-1 now, the wins were skin of the teeth (last second FG against 0-3 Augustana, late stop against 1-2 Hartwick). The schedule gets much tougher the next three games (Brockport, Alfredm, and Buff State). That win by Framingham might not look great if the Red Dragons are 2-4
Agree Bombers, but it was a big win for the RAMS as we have had some close one's against them in the past. It's always good to get a notch on a team that you haven't beaten.
Quote from: Bartman on September 24, 2017, 10:33:23 AM
Time for Buff State to get some love from the voters, impressive comeback against RPI....setting up a nice game against the Saxons this week
Quote from: Bartman on September 24, 2017, 10:33:23 AM
Time for Buff State to get some love from the voters, impressive comeback against RPI....setting up a nice game against the Saxons this week
Quote from: rams1102 on September 24, 2017, 06:24:35 PMQuote from: Bartman on September 24, 2017, 10:33:23 AM
Time for Buff State to get some love from the voters, impressive comeback against RPI....setting up a nice game against the Saxons this week
They will be #10 in my Poll in a few minutes.
Quote from: dlip on September 24, 2017, 06:35:58 PM
The Bengals certainly belong from this point on in dlip's opinion until they prove otherwise. dlip also thinks Springfield should stay in spots 8-10 unless they lose (moving them up will be a tough call because the competition isn't really all that impressive from here on out).dlip would also consider keeping RPI maybe in the #10 spot (however CNU could also be deserving) as well as keeping Framingham alive and well in the mix. dlip would also jump Del Val over Frostburg having seen both play (albeit on streaming video). Del Val made Stevenson look like a ****ing Pee-Wee Pop Warner team with mis-matched equipment...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 25, 2017, 09:41:44 AM
One of the reasons that I don't do polls like this is that I struggle with the idea of crediting/dinging teams for minor things that result in wins and losses. "Just win" is fine when you're talking about making the playoffs, but to me a poll is about how good/strong a team is, and that's about more than W/L. I'm not saying I wouldn't draw conclusions from the game, but I don't know if I'd derive them from the results.
The big reason for this is that I simply don't trust D3 kicking. It's just a crapshoot for so many teams. And drawing conclusions from the results of kicking follies is something I don't do. Look at Buff State/Morrisville: Morrisville misses two XPs, so it's 33-28 instead of 35-28. As a result, when Buff State goes up 41-40, they go for two and fail. This opens the door for Morrisville to go for two at 46-41, which they make. Which looms large when Buff State misses the XP down 48-47.
Suppose for a second the game ended there. Morrisville State gets the win because the Rube Goldberg set of events they kicked off (pun intended) by missing two extra points resulted in their 7 touchdowns resulting in 48 points instead of 47. I don't think that makes them any better or stronger than the Bengals.
I mean, I just watched a replay crew overturn a sack and call a 12-men on the field penalty based on some guy being in the air as he crossed over the sidelines. I've come to the conclusion that some things that happen really aren't about how good your are.
Quote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 09:51:32 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 25, 2017, 09:41:44 AM
One of the reasons that I don't do polls like this is that I struggle with the idea of crediting/dinging teams for minor things that result in wins and losses. "Just win" is fine when you're talking about making the playoffs, but to me a poll is about how good/strong a team is, and that's about more than W/L. I'm not saying I wouldn't draw conclusions from the game, but I don't know if I'd derive them from the results.
The big reason for this is that I simply don't trust D3 kicking. It's just a crapshoot for so many teams. And drawing conclusions from the results of kicking follies is something I don't do. Look at Buff State/Morrisville: Morrisville misses two XPs, so it's 33-28 instead of 35-28. As a result, when Buff State goes up 41-40, they go for two and fail. This opens the door for Morrisville to go for two at 46-41, which they make. Which looms large when Buff State misses the XP down 48-47.
Suppose for a second the game ended there. Morrisville State gets the win because the Rube Goldberg set of events they kicked off (pun intended) by missing two extra points resulted in their 7 touchdowns resulting in 48 points instead of 47. I don't think that makes them any better or stronger than the Bengals.
I mean, I just watched a replay crew overturn a sack and call a 12-men on the field penalty based on some guy being in the air as he crossed over the sidelines. I've come to the conclusion that some things that happen really aren't about how good your are.
I think kicking is too important to place in this context. A good kicker makes a team better. CMS beat W&L last year on the strength of several 45+ yard field goals. JHU beat W&L because their kicker made a long field goal and W&L missed an XP that led to overtime. Kicking is part of the game. You can't just ignore the kicking game as not being relevant to whether a team is better than another.
I actually think kicker is one of the most important positions on the field. Coaches at all levels don't coach it because they don't know how. So few of them actually were kickers. Rather than hiring that extra assistant for linebackers, which is a position anyone who played defense can coach, they should hire someone to coach the punter and kicker. It would more than pay off. But since kickers are always considered the least football position on the field, despite usually being the position that scores the most points, we are stuck with really bad kicking at all levels but the pros, where the field has been winnowed down to the very, very best.
Quote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 09:51:32 AM
Coaches at all levels don't coach it because they don't know how...we are stuck with really bad kicking at all levels but the pros
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Brockport State ( 4 ) | 4-0 | 47 | 1 | at Cortland |
2 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) | 4-0 | 44 | 3 | at FDU-Florham |
3 Frostburg State | 4-0 | 42 | 2 | Open Date |
4 Wesley | 2-1 | 33 | 4 | vs. Southern Virginia |
5 Alfred | 3-0 | 30 | 5 | vs. #10 Buffalo State |
6 Albright | 4-0 | 20 | 6 | at King's |
7 Hobart | 3-1 | 19 | 7 | at Ithaca |
8 Framingham State | 4-0 | 18 | 9 | Open Date |
9 Springfield | 4-0 | 10 | 8 | vs. Norwich |
10 Buffalo State | 3-0 | 6 | NR | at #5 Alfred |
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 25, 2017, 11:52:57 AMQuote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 09:51:32 AM
Coaches at all levels don't coach it because they don't know how...we are stuck with really bad kicking at all levels but the pros
But this is my point. We have (generally) bad kicking, because most coaches don't treat it with importance. So what can we possibly hope to glean from it on a week to week level?
In Week 3 of 2015, Cortland hits a 38 yard FG. Later that day, they miss from 26. The next week, they hit from 37. The week after that, they're short from 33. There's no rhyme or reason to it. Maybe you're St. John Fisher the day Max Rottenecker hits from 50 and 37. Or maybe you're Cortland the day he misses from 41 and 22.
Quote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 09:51:32 AMI have to agree with both Bombers point and JK that especially in D3 ....kicking can be a great asset or liability...the variance in performance can be game changing with respect to field position and points and MUST be considered by a good coach. I know there has been quite a bit of analysis on these boards with respect to 1 point vs 2 point conversions as to probability due to D3 kicking inconsistency. As far as Hobart this year , we have a punter from Texas that knows how to punt in different wind conditions that will be a tremendous asset in October/November(All East last year). We now have a First Year place-kicker that is making the PATs(18-19) and has made a 40 yard FG(3-3 total)....PK is now an advantage, where last year it was inconsistent and had to be addressed for game decisions. Going into important close games, I think this can be a very important team asset ...especially in the playoffs if you make it that far. Rio Schmidt, our punter was a RB in HS and was able to convert on a fake punt against Mount Union in last year's playoffs....good coaches take kicking seriously....it is not more important than your collective Lines or your skill positions....but it I can be more important than your 4th or 5th OLineman when you need it....so it is just another factor in analyzing teams that , as Bombers said, is extremely variable at this level...but I have no problem playing the ranking game despite this factor...just because it is fun ;DQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 25, 2017, 09:41:44 AM
One of the reasons that I don't do polls like this is that I struggle with the idea of crediting/dinging teams for minor things that result in wins and losses. "Just win" is fine when you're talking about making the playoffs, but to me a poll is about how good/strong a team is, and that's about more than W/L. I'm not saying I wouldn't draw conclusions from the game, but I don't know if I'd derive them from the results.
The big reason for this is that I simply don't trust D3 kicking. It's just a crapshoot for so many teams. And drawing conclusions from the results of kicking follies is something I don't do. Look at Buff State/Morrisville: Morrisville misses two XPs, so it's 33-28 instead of 35-28. As a result, when Buff State goes up 41-40, they go for two and fail. This opens the door for Morrisville to go for two at 46-41, which they make. Which looms large when Buff State misses the XP down 48-47.
Suppose for a second the game ended there. Morrisville State gets the win because the Rube Goldberg set of events they kicked off (pun intended) by missing two extra points resulted in their 7 touchdowns resulting in 48 points instead of 47. I don't think that makes them any better or stronger than the Bengals.
I mean, I just watched a replay crew overturn a sack and call a 12-men on the field penalty based on some guy being in the air as he crossed over the sidelines. I've come to the conclusion that some things that happen really aren't about how good your are.
I think kicking is too important to place in this context. A good kicker makes a team better. CMS beat W&L last year on the strength of several 45+ yard field goals. JHU beat W&L because their kicker made a long field goal and W&L missed an XP that led to overtime. Kicking is part of the game. You can't just ignore the kicking game as not being relevant to whether a team is better than another.
I actually think kicker is one of the most important positions on the field. Coaches at all levels don't coach it because they don't know how. So few of them actually were kickers. Rather than hiring that extra assistant for linebackers, which is a position anyone who played defense can coach, they should hire someone to coach the punter and kicker. It would more than pay off. But since kickers are always considered the least football position on the field, despite usually being the position that scores the most points, we are stuck with really bad kicking at all levels but the pros, where the field has been winnowed down to the very, very best.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 25, 2017, 11:57:16 AMPretty consistent results. It makes sense to me as top 3 are one group, Alfred and Wesley have the next grouping; Albright,Hobart and Framingham have a grouping with Buff State and Springfield rounding it out. Even if you eliminate the high and low for bias(not that the high and low are wrong ) it only changes to 6. Hobart, 7. Framingham and 8. Albright. Still 8 undefeated teams with big dreams and 2 experienced 1 loss teams ready to pounce.
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 4-0 47 1 at Cortland 2 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 at FDU-Florham 3 Frostburg State 4-0 42 2 Open Date 4 Wesley 2-1 33 4 vs. Southern Virginia 5 Alfred 3-0 30 5 vs. #10 Buffalo State 6 Albright 4-0 20 6 at King's 7 Hobart 3-1 19 7 at Ithaca 8 Framingham State 4-0 18 9 Open Date 9 Springfield 4-0 10 8 vs. Norwich 10 Buffalo State 3-0 6 NR at #5 Alfred
Dropping Out:
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 5
Stevenson 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,4,1,1,1)
Delaware Valley (3,1,2,2,3)
Frostburg State (2,2,3,4,2)
Wesley (7,3,5,3,4)
Alfred (4,5,4,7,5)
Albright (5,7,8,8,7)
Hobart (6,8,6,5,NR)
Framingham State (10,6,9,6,6)
Springfield (8,NR,7,NR,8)
Buffalo State (9,10,10,NR,9)
Christopher Newport (NR,9,NR,9,10)
Stevenson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#10 Buffalo State at #5 Alfred
Quote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 12:13:10 PM
And how is that different from any other position on the field?
Quote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 09:51:32 AM
Coaches at all levels don't coach it because they don't know how
Quote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 03:28:22 PM
Shrug. Doesn't really make any sense to me, especially since the kicker typically scores more points than anyone on the field, making it a position to judge by, not discount, but if you are happy with your logic that's what counts.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 25, 2017, 03:57:17 PM
The best East Region games this wkd, IMO, are:
IC vs HOB
Buff St vs ALF
MIT vs USMMA
SLU vs WNE
ROW vs CNU
The above isn't in any particular order, but the GOTW, if I had to pick one, is Bengals-Saxons. Bombers-Bart is probably second given the history there.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 25, 2017, 11:57:16 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 4-0 47 1 at Cortland 2 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 at FDU-Florham 3 Frostburg State 4-0 42 2 Open Date 4 Wesley 2-1 33 4 vs. Southern Virginia 5 Alfred 3-0 30 5 vs. #10 Buffalo State 6 Albright 4-0 20 6 at King's 7 Hobart 3-1 19 7 at Ithaca 8 Framingham State 4-0 18 9 Open Date 9 Springfield 4-0 10 8 vs. Norwich 10 Buffalo State 3-0 6 NR at #5 Alfred
Dropping Out:
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 5
Stevenson 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,4,1,1,1)
Delaware Valley (3,1,2,2,3)
Frostburg State (2,2,3,4,2)
Wesley (7,3,5,3,4)
Alfred (4,5,4,7,5)
Albright (5,7,8,8,7)
Hobart (6,8,6,5,NR)
Framingham State (10,6,9,6,6)
Springfield (8,NR,7,NR,8)
Buffalo State (9,10,10,NR,9)
Christopher Newport (NR,9,NR,9,10)
Stevenson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#10 Buffalo State at #5 Alfred
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 25, 2017, 04:30:33 PMQuote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 03:28:22 PM
Shrug. Doesn't really make any sense to me, especially since the kicker typically scores more points than anyone on the field, making it a position to judge by, not discount, but if you are happy with your logic that's what counts.
Because we're looking at two different things.
You're looking at what a guy making a 45-yard field goal says about the offense. You're 100% right that a good kicker is a weapon for a team, but that's not what I'm talking about.
I'm looking at what a missed kick tells us about the team that was on defense.
If there's nothing the defensive team did to cause that missed kick—which often times there isn't—why would my opinion of the defensive team change based on the result?
Quote from: wesleydad on September 25, 2017, 06:48:49 PMWesleydad,Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 25, 2017, 11:57:16 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 4-0 47 1 at Cortland 2 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 at FDU-Florham 3 Frostburg State 4-0 42 2 Open Date 4 Wesley 2-1 33 4 vs. Southern Virginia 5 Alfred 3-0 30 5 vs. #10 Buffalo State 6 Albright 4-0 20 6 at King's 7 Hobart 3-1 19 7 at Ithaca 8 Framingham State 4-0 18 9 Open Date 9 Springfield 4-0 10 8 vs. Norwich 10 Buffalo State 3-0 6 NR at #5 Alfred
Dropping Out:
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 5
Stevenson 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,4,1,1,1)
Delaware Valley (3,1,2,2,3)
Frostburg State (2,2,3,4,2)
Wesley (7,3,5,3,4)
Alfred (4,5,4,7,5)
Albright (5,7,8,8,7)
Hobart (6,8,6,5,NR)
Framingham State (10,6,9,6,6)
Springfield (8,NR,7,NR,8)
Buffalo State (9,10,10,NR,9)
Christopher Newport (NR,9,NR,9,10)
Stevenson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#10 Buffalo State at #5 Alfred
It looks good to me. I am still holding out on putting Hobart in the top 10. Waiting for them to play a good game and this week may be a tell tale for me. Common opponents to compare to with Ithaca and some of the teams in the top 10. Not sure how Stevenson is getting any votes, they have been trounced twice now. Top 10 teams do not get trounced by 2 teams. They are not that good. Interesting that the RV group has dwindled to 2 teams.
Quote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 09:34:07 PM
And you think the defensive team didn't do anything to stop them at the 28 yard line versus the 15 yard line?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2017, 10:39:18 AMQuote from: jknezek on September 25, 2017, 09:34:07 PM
And you think the defensive team didn't do anything to stop them at the 28 yard line versus the 15 yard line?
Okay, let me to respond to this with an example of what I'm talking about.
Say in Week 1, St John Fisher is beating Ithaca 17-16 with a minute to go, and they stop them at the 33-yard line and Max Rottenecker makes a 50-yard FG, and the next week Cortland is leading Ithaca 17-16, and they stop them at the 5 yard line but he misses a 22-yard kick.
The outcome of the kicks result in Fisher being 0-1 and Cortland being 1-0, but when I'm trying to decide if the Red Dragons are actually better than Fisher, I have to ask myself: Did Cortland do something Fisher didn't, or is this ending simply the result of the week-to-week inconsistency of a D-III kicker?
Quote from: Bartman on September 26, 2017, 09:24:45 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 25, 2017, 06:48:49 PMWesleydad,Quote from: AUKaz00 on September 25, 2017, 11:57:16 AM
Week 4 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 4 ) 4-0 47 1 at Cortland 2 Delaware Valley ( 1 ) 4-0 44 3 at FDU-Florham 3 Frostburg State 4-0 42 2 Open Date 4 Wesley 2-1 33 4 vs. Southern Virginia 5 Alfred 3-0 30 5 vs. #10 Buffalo State 6 Albright 4-0 20 6 at King's 7 Hobart 3-1 19 7 at Ithaca 8 Framingham State 4-0 18 9 Open Date 9 Springfield 4-0 10 8 vs. Norwich 10 Buffalo State 3-0 6 NR at #5 Alfred
Dropping Out:
RPI
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 5
Stevenson 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,4,1,1,1)
Delaware Valley (3,1,2,2,3)
Frostburg State (2,2,3,4,2)
Wesley (7,3,5,3,4)
Alfred (4,5,4,7,5)
Albright (5,7,8,8,7)
Hobart (6,8,6,5,NR)
Framingham State (10,6,9,6,6)
Springfield (8,NR,7,NR,8)
Buffalo State (9,10,10,NR,9)
Christopher Newport (NR,9,NR,9,10)
Stevenson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Key Matchups:
#10 Buffalo State at #5 Alfred
It looks good to me. I am still holding out on putting Hobart in the top 10. Waiting for them to play a good game and this week may be a tell tale for me. Common opponents to compare to with Ithaca and some of the teams in the top 10. Not sure how Stevenson is getting any votes, they have been trounced twice now. Top 10 teams do not get trounced by 2 teams. They are not that good. Interesting that the RV group has dwindled to 2 teams.
Based on your logic, how do you make the case for Wesley to be in the top 10, if Hobart is not in the top 10? The two teams that Wesley have beaten are quite weak(TCNJ and William Patterson record is 0-8). Hobart's wins are against teams that put up a challenge to D3 football opponents and actually won 3 games ( Shenandoah and Endicott). I have always respected your judgement/opinion, but based on this logic both teams should be out of the top ten. You are probably dinging Hobart for the abysmal first half against Brockport, which I understand, however Hobart came back in the second half and slugged it out and was tied 20-20 at the end of the third quarter against a team I think will cause severe headaches for some top D3 teams by the end of the year. With all due respect, Bartman
Quote from: jknezek on September 26, 2017, 10:47:34 AMRight, this was my whole point: Why would my opinion on teams change meaningfully based on the admittedly unpredictable outcome of a kick when there's other things that are more informative?
I find it hard to believe that this will be your sole data point in deciding between the two teams.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2017, 12:09:35 PMQuote from: jknezek on September 26, 2017, 10:47:34 AMRight, this was my whole point: Why would my opinion on teams change meaningfully based on the admittedly unpredictable outcome of a kick when there's other things that are more informative?
I find it hard to believe that this will be your sole data point in deciding between the two teams.
Quote from: jknezek on September 26, 2017, 12:16:55 PM
That's your point? Who the heck would ONLY look at kicking? The point is, you don't ignore kicking. It's part of the game.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2017, 12:43:20 PMI think we have totally reached our quota on kicking discussions for the entire year :P :PQuote from: jknezek on September 26, 2017, 12:16:55 PM
That's your point? Who the heck would ONLY look at kicking? The point is, you don't ignore kicking. It's part of the game.
I never said I ignored kicking though. I think it maybe came across like I was saying teams can't differentiate themselves by virtue of having a strong or weak kicker. I didn't mean it that way.
I said (or meant to say) that because kicking at this level is so inconsistent, if the only real difference between two teams is a missed kick or two, the result of the game doesn't have much meaning for me in how I'd vote.
Quote from: Bartman on September 26, 2017, 02:19:35 PMFootball has kickers?Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2017, 12:43:20 PMI think we have totally reached our quota on kicking discussions for the entire year :P :PQuote from: jknezek on September 26, 2017, 12:16:55 PM
That's your point? Who the heck would ONLY look at kicking? The point is, you don't ignore kicking. It's part of the game.
I never said I ignored kicking though. I think it maybe came across like I was saying teams can't differentiate themselves by virtue of having a strong or weak kicker. I didn't mean it that way.
I said (or meant to say) that because kicking at this level is so inconsistent, if the only real difference between two teams is a missed kick or two, the result of the game doesn't have much meaning for me in how I'd vote.
Quote from: Bartman on September 26, 2017, 02:19:35 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2017, 12:43:20 PMI think we have totally reached our quota on kicking discussions for the entire year :P :PQuote from: jknezek on September 26, 2017, 12:16:55 PM
That's your point? Who the heck would ONLY look at kicking? The point is, you don't ignore kicking. It's part of the game.
I never said I ignored kicking though. I think it maybe came across like I was saying teams can't differentiate themselves by virtue of having a strong or weak kicker. I didn't mean it that way.
I said (or meant to say) that because kicking at this level is so inconsistent, if the only real difference between two teams is a missed kick or two, the result of the game doesn't have much meaning for me in how I'd vote.
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 26, 2017, 02:37:46 PM
Football has kickers?
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 26, 2017, 04:33:23 PM
+k Well played!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 26, 2017, 04:42:26 PMBombers,
Yes, moving on...
This IC/Hobart matchup will be very interesting when you consider:
Hobart has yet to play a road game
The Bombers have had an extra week to prepare
Ithaca's made some significant changes from the early weeks (Nabi being the obvious one)
Bart is still the favorite in my mind, but it's going to be a good one. Forecast is for upper 50s and rainy
Quote from: fisheralum91 on September 27, 2017, 10:53:38 AM91-
bartman
Mr and Mrs 91 went to the wineries this past weekend and ended up at some irish pub in geneva
had a nice time
good pub grub and couldnt remember if Bart was playing at home or away that day.....By the look of all the hobart swag in the bar I assumed home.... :P
Quote from: Bartman on September 30, 2017, 08:49:02 PM
It sucks when I have to be objective and vote Hobart off the island with 2 losses...CNU looks pretty strong after today
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 02, 2017, 01:33:36 PMI still think Hobart has a chance to tie for the LL and possibly get the tie breaker for the bid(must beat RPI and RPI must beat Ithaca), although they did lose against an improved IC team in Ithaca with a great Soph WR in Gladney and pretty good Frosh QB in Nabi... but it is their second loss. Perhaps they could be #10 but I think they have to earn their way back into the ERFP buy beating RPI by a good margin and win out. CNU deserves the nod this week.Quote from: Bartman on September 30, 2017, 08:49:02 PM
It sucks when I have to be objective and vote Hobart off the island with 2 losses...CNU looks pretty strong after today
I struggled with that as well, however, CNU looked pretty darn good, I only watch the bits a pieces, but Rowan looked stale and CNU appeared to be bigger, stronger and faster.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 02, 2017, 01:33:36 PMQuote from: Bartman on September 30, 2017, 08:49:02 PM
It sucks when I have to be objective and vote Hobart off the island with 2 losses...CNU looks pretty strong after today
I struggled with that as well, however, CNU looked pretty darn good, I only watch the bits a pieces, but Rowan looked stale and CNU appeared to be bigger, stronger and faster.
Quote from: Bartman on October 02, 2017, 01:50:42 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 02, 2017, 01:33:36 PMI still think Hobart has a chance to tie for the LL and possibly get the tie breaker for the bid(must beat RPI and RPI must beat Ithaca), although they did lose against an improved IC team in Ithaca with a great Frosh WR in Gladney and pretty good QB in Nabi... but it is their second loss. Perhaps they could be #10 but I think they have to earn their way back into the ERFP buy beating RPI by a good margin and win out. CNU deserves the nod this week.Quote from: Bartman on September 30, 2017, 08:49:02 PM
It sucks when I have to be objective and vote Hobart off the island with 2 losses...CNU looks pretty strong after today
I struggled with that as well, however, CNU looked pretty darn good, I only watch the bits a pieces, but Rowan looked stale and CNU appeared to be bigger, stronger and faster.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 02, 2017, 02:31:57 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 02, 2017, 01:50:42 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 02, 2017, 01:33:36 PMI still think Hobart has a chance to tie for the LL and possibly get the tie breaker for the bid(must beat RPI and RPI must beat Ithaca), although they did lose against an improved IC team in Ithaca with a great Frosh WR in Gladney and pretty good QB in Nabi... but it is their second loss. Perhaps they could be #10 but I think they have to earn their way back into the ERFP buy beating RPI by a good margin and win out. CNU deserves the nod this week.Quote from: Bartman on September 30, 2017, 08:49:02 PM
It sucks when I have to be objective and vote Hobart off the island with 2 losses...CNU looks pretty strong after today
I struggled with that as well, however, CNU looked pretty darn good, I only watch the bits a pieces, but Rowan looked stale and CNU appeared to be bigger, stronger and faster.
FWIW, Gladney is listed as a sophomore...nevertheless, he's a playmaker and has at least a couple more years.
[/quote
Thanks Pep, my mistake...I feel better now, Gladney will only play us 2 more times instead of 3. His 545 yards in 4 games this year, matches last year's full season. The only team to keep him under 140 yards this season was Brockport ( 6 catches for 35 yards). BTW,great win against Buffalo State.....
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Brockport State ( 3 ) | 5-0 | 47 | 1 | Open Date |
2 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 5-0 | 45 | 2 | at #9 Albright |
3 Frostburg State | 4-0 | 42 | 3 | vs. #4 Wesley |
4 Wesley | 3-1 | 34 | 4 | at #3 Frostburg State |
5 Alfred | 4-0 | 31 | 5 | at St. John Fisher |
6 Framingham State | 4-0 | 22 | 8 | at Fitchburg State |
7t Christopher Newport | 4-1 | 16 | NR | at Salisbury |
7t Springfield | 5-0 | 16 | 9 | at Coast Guard |
9 Albright | 5-0 | 15 | 6 | vs. #2 Delaware Valley |
10 Stevenson | 3-2 | 3 | NR | Open Date |
Quote from: ITH radio on October 03, 2017, 10:52:56 AM
I think CNU vs. Salisbury is a Top 5 worthy game (as far as East Region matchups go).
Even though they aren't top ten, RPI vs. HOB and SUNY vs. HUSS will have playoff implications as both are effectively conf / elimination type games for the LL and ECFC.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 03, 2017, 09:09:02 AM
Week 5 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Brockport State ( 3 ) 5-0 47 1 Open Date 2 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 5-0 45 2 at #9 Albright 3 Frostburg State 4-0 42 3 vs. #4 Wesley 4 Wesley 3-1 34 4 at #3 Frostburg State 5 Alfred 4-0 31 5 at St. John Fisher 6 Framingham State 4-0 22 8 at Fitchburg State 7t Christopher Newport 4-1 16 NR at Salisbury 7t Springfield 5-0 16 9 at Coast Guard 9 Albright 5-0 15 6 vs. #2 Delaware Valley 10 Stevenson 3-2 3 NR Open Date
Dropping Out:
Buffalo State
Hobart
Also Receiving votes:
Salisbury 2
Trinity 2
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,1,3,1,2)
Delaware Valley (3,3,1,2,1)
Frostburg State (2,2,2,3,4)
Wesley (4,5,4,5,3)
Alfred (5,4,5,4,6)
Framingham State (6,9,6,7,5)
Christopher Newport (9,8,7,8,7)
Springfield (8,7,8,6,10)
Albright (7,6,9,9,9)
Stevenson (NR,NR,NR,NR,8)
Salisbury (NR,NR,10,10,NR)
Trinity (10,10,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#2 Delaware Valley at #9 Albright
#4 Wesley at #3 Frostburg State
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 03, 2017, 11:17:35 AMQuote from: ITH radio on October 03, 2017, 10:52:56 AM
I think CNU vs. Salisbury is a Top 5 worthy game (as far as East Region matchups go).
Even though they aren't top ten, RPI vs. HOB and SUNY vs. HUSS will have playoff implications as both are effectively conf / elimination type games for the LL and ECFC.
I think Salisbury is a top ten team in the east, albeit in the 9-10 range right now. I think we will learn a lot about the four of Salisbury/CNU and Wesley/Frostburg this week. I think Del Val is going to handle Albright. Del Val has that killer instinct, and is putting teams away. If Frostburg wins I think their has to be some good thought about them being number 1 in this poll. A CNU win has to put them ahead of Framingham, and to be honest I think they should be ahead of them already.
Good stuff with this poll.
Quote from: dlip on October 03, 2017, 11:51:41 AMAgree with this dlip.......Stevenson ...not based on the current body of work
Buffalo State, Hobart, and RPI beat Stevenson 9 out of 10 times this season. They are not very good (dlip has watched them twice). IDHO they have no business being on this list. Last years achievements can only carry a team so far. wesleyday made a strong point to dlip recently regarding Stevenson's woes. He was right then and is right now. Just something to ponder Gents. ;D
Quote from: wesleydad on October 03, 2017, 11:49:04 AMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 03, 2017, 11:17:35 AMQuote from: ITH radio on October 03, 2017, 10:52:56 AM
I think CNU vs. Salisbury is a Top 5 worthy game (as far as East Region matchups go).
Even though they aren't top ten, RPI vs. HOB and SUNY vs. HUSS will have playoff implications as both are effectively conf / elimination type games for the LL and ECFC.
I think Salisbury is a top ten team in the east, albeit in the 9-10 range right now. I think we will learn a lot about the four of Salisbury/CNU and Wesley/Frostburg this week. I think Del Val is going to handle Albright. Del Val has that killer instinct, and is putting teams away. If Frostburg wins I think their has to be some good thought about them being number 1 in this poll. A CNU win has to put them ahead of Framingham, and to be honest I think they should be ahead of them already.
Good stuff with this poll.
I am not sure about Salisbury, they have not looked that good in the wins they have, this week will tell with them. I think they lose to CNU. I agree, if Frostburg beats Wesley in a more convincing fashion than Del Val did I will have no issue with them at 1. I think Wesley wins the game because I think Frostburg will have trouble scoring. The key will be the first quarter and does Wesley shoot themselves in the foot with turnovers like the Del Val game and have to dig out of a big hole. I think Del Val takes out Albright rather easily. The East has some nice games this week.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 03, 2017, 10:52:56 AM
I think CNU vs. Salisbury is a Top 5 worthy game (as far as East Region matchups go).
Even though they aren't top ten, RPI vs. HOB and SUNY vs. HUSS will have playoff implications as both are effectively conf / elimination type games for the LL and ECFC.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 03, 2017, 05:54:26 PMQuote from: ITH radio on October 03, 2017, 10:52:56 AM
I think CNU vs. Salisbury is a Top 5 worthy game (as far as East Region matchups go).
Even though they aren't top ten, RPI vs. HOB and SUNY vs. HUSS will have playoff implications as both are effectively conf / elimination type games for the LL and ECFC.
I agree, I have been keeping an eye on the SUNY vs. Husson game as this may be the conference championship and maybe an future opponent for either us or Springfield come playoff time continues in this direction in the NE.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 03, 2017, 05:54:26 PMQuote from: ITH radio on October 03, 2017, 10:52:56 AM
I think CNU vs. Salisbury is a Top 5 worthy game (as far as East Region matchups go).
Even though they aren't top ten, RPI vs. HOB and SUNY vs. HUSS will have playoff implications as both are effectively conf / elimination type games for the LL and ECFC.
I agree, I have been keeping an eye on the SUNY vs. Husson game as this may be the conference championship and maybe an future opponent for either us or Springfield come playoff time continues in this direction in the NE.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 04, 2017, 11:38:01 AMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 03, 2017, 05:54:26 PMQuote from: ITH radio on October 03, 2017, 10:52:56 AM
I think CNU vs. Salisbury is a Top 5 worthy game (as far as East Region matchups go).
Even though they aren't top ten, RPI vs. HOB and SUNY vs. HUSS will have playoff implications as both are effectively conf / elimination type games for the LL and ECFC.
I agree, I have been keeping an eye on the SUNY vs. Husson game as this may be the conference championship and maybe an future opponent for either us or Springfield come playoff time continues in this direction in the NE.
Agree, I have SUNY on my watch list since they are undefeated. This week will mean plenty if they win and others lose. I know the committee would like to have a NY team instead of a Maine team to place somewhere to play.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
Quote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2017, 11:45:48 AMThat means the Gulls jump over that SOLID #10 Stevenson ::)Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
I think Salisbury swaps with CNU and Wesley and Frostburg switch spots. I still like Brockport as #1.
Quote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 12:50:02 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2017, 11:45:48 AMThat means the Gulls jump over that SOLID #10 Stevenson ::)Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
I think Salisbury swaps with CNU and Wesley and Frostburg switch spots. I still like Brockport as #1.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2017, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 12:50:02 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2017, 11:45:48 AMThat means the Gulls jump over that SOLID #10 Stevenson ::)Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
I think Salisbury swaps with CNU and Wesley and Frostburg switch spots. I still like Brockport as #1.
I got Brockport, Del Val, Wesley, Frostburg. Went with the Del Val>Wesley>Frostburg line. I have a 2 loss team in my top 10, but it is not Stevenson. Alfred is tough as they are undefeated, but cant move them ahead of the top 4. Game with Brockport in a few weeks will tell where they are and with a win would have to move them to 2 behind Del Val. The east is stacking up to be very competitive and I know they dont do specific regions, but if Brockport and Del Val go undefeated and Wesley, Alferd, and Frostburgl have 1 loss add Framingham, Springfield, and Husson and that makes a pretty nice bracket. Never too early to start conjecture on the playoffs.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 09, 2017, 01:12:35 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2017, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 12:50:02 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2017, 11:45:48 AMThat means the Gulls jump over that SOLID #10 Stevenson ::)Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
I think Salisbury swaps with CNU and Wesley and Frostburg switch spots. I still like Brockport as #1.
I got Brockport, Del Val, Wesley, Frostburg. Went with the Del Val>Wesley>Frostburg line. I have a 2 loss team in my top 10, but it is not Stevenson. Alfred is tough as they are undefeated, but cant move them ahead of the top 4. Game with Brockport in a few weeks will tell where they are and with a win would have to move them to 2 behind Del Val. The east is stacking up to be very competitive and I know they dont do specific regions, but if Brockport and Del Val go undefeated and Wesley, Alferd, and Frostburgl have 1 loss add Framingham, Springfield, and Husson and that makes a pretty nice bracket. Never too early to start conjecture on the playoffs.
My Top 4 are the same and then Alfred, Springfield, Framing, Salis and CNU. Couldn't come up with #10 so I put in Hobart.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 09, 2017, 01:12:35 PMThe Statesmen appreciate your fine judgment after beating RPI 30-0 , but Weslydad is probably right to give the nod to Ithaca based on the H2H. I still think Alfred gets #3 based on undefeated status over Wesley and Frosty...I have to say I was impressed with Frosty despite the loss as I watched the entire game. Brockport No.1 and Del Val No.2 are solid in their positions , and I am looking forward to seeing if Brockport can be as dominant the rest of the way as I think their talent is.Quote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2017, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 12:50:02 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2017, 11:45:48 AMThat means the Gulls jump over that SOLID #10 Stevenson ::)Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
I think Salisbury swaps with CNU and Wesley and Frostburg switch spots. I still like Brockport as #1.
I got Brockport, Del Val, Wesley, Frostburg. Went with the Del Val>Wesley>Frostburg line. I have a 2 loss team in my top 10, but it is not Stevenson. Alfred is tough as they are undefeated, but cant move them ahead of the top 4. Game with Brockport in a few weeks will tell where they are and with a win would have to move them to 2 behind Del Val. The east is stacking up to be very competitive and I know they dont do specific regions, but if Brockport and Del Val go undefeated and Wesley, Alferd, and Frostburgl have 1 loss add Framingham, Springfield, and Husson and that makes a pretty nice bracket. Never too early to start conjecture on the playoffs.
My Top 4 are the same and then Alfred, Springfield, Framing, Salis and CNU. Couldn't come up with #10 so I put in Hobart.
Quote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 03:06:17 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 09, 2017, 01:12:35 PMThe Statesmen appreciate your fine judgment after beating RPI 30-0 , but Weslydad is probably right to give the nod to Ithaca based on the H2H. I still think Alfred gets #3 based on undefeated status over Wesley and Frosty...I have to say I was impressed with Frosty despite the loss as I watched the entire game. Brockport No.1 and Del Val No.2 are solid in their positions , and I am looking forward to seeing if Brockport can be as dominant the rest of the way as I think their talent is.Quote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2017, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 12:50:02 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2017, 11:45:48 AMThat means the Gulls jump over that SOLID #10 Stevenson ::)Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
I think Salisbury swaps with CNU and Wesley and Frostburg switch spots. I still like Brockport as #1.
I got Brockport, Del Val, Wesley, Frostburg. Went with the Del Val>Wesley>Frostburg line. I have a 2 loss team in my top 10, but it is not Stevenson. Alfred is tough as they are undefeated, but cant move them ahead of the top 4. Game with Brockport in a few weeks will tell where they are and with a win would have to move them to 2 behind Del Val. The east is stacking up to be very competitive and I know they dont do specific regions, but if Brockport and Del Val go undefeated and Wesley, Alferd, and Frostburgl have 1 loss add Framingham, Springfield, and Husson and that makes a pretty nice bracket. Never too early to start conjecture on the playoffs.
My Top 4 are the same and then Alfred, Springfield, Framing, Salis and CNU. Couldn't come up with #10 so I put in Hobart.
Brockport needs to really roll over some E8 teams to get their own NCAA bracket....which I think would be great
Quote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2017, 01:21:19 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 09, 2017, 01:12:35 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2017, 01:01:26 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 12:50:02 PMQuote from: Boxer7806 on October 09, 2017, 11:45:48 AMThat means the Gulls jump over that SOLID #10 Stevenson ::)Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2017, 11:17:41 AM
I am curious on how this poll is going to shape out this week, especially with my Gulls beating CNU and Albright getting beat very bad by Delaware Valley.
I think Salisbury swaps with CNU and Wesley and Frostburg switch spots. I still like Brockport as #1.
I got Brockport, Del Val, Wesley, Frostburg. Went with the Del Val>Wesley>Frostburg line. I have a 2 loss team in my top 10, but it is not Stevenson. Alfred is tough as they are undefeated, but cant move them ahead of the top 4. Game with Brockport in a few weeks will tell where they are and with a win would have to move them to 2 behind Del Val. The east is stacking up to be very competitive and I know they dont do specific regions, but if Brockport and Del Val go undefeated and Wesley, Alferd, and Frostburgl have 1 loss add Framingham, Springfield, and Husson and that makes a pretty nice bracket. Never too early to start conjecture on the playoffs.
My Top 4 are the same and then Alfred, Springfield, Framing, Salis and CNU. Couldn't come up with #10 so I put in Hobart.
My 2 loss 10 beat your 2 loss 10, that is why I have Ithaca at 10.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1t Brockport State ( 3 ) | 5-0 | 47 | 1 | vs. Morrisville State |
1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 6-0 | 47 | 2 | vs. King's |
3 Wesley | 4-1 | 40 | 4 | vs. Kean |
4 Frostburg State | 4-1 | 33 | 3 | at William Paterson |
5 Alfred | 5-0 | 30 | 5 | at Cortland |
6 Framingham State | 5-0 | 27 | 6 | at Plymouth State |
7 Springfield | 6-0 | 18 | 7t | at Merchant Marine |
8 Salisbury | 4-1 | 13 | NR | at Montclair State |
9 Albright | 5-1 | 6 | 9 | Open Date |
10t Christopher Newport | 4-2 | 4 | 7t | Open Date |
10t Stevenson | 3-2 | 4 | 10 | at Lebanon Valley |
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 10, 2017, 10:12:48 AMBombers, interesting post. 2016 was a Mount team that matured in the playoffs...Hobart was tied at the end of 3 quarters 20-20, but Mount took advantage of some turnovers and the wind....I think Mount has a special reputation and some excellent coaches and gets some "almost D1" recruits for various reasons. I also think the recruiting is brutal in the East for some of the best D3 players which necessitates recruiting out of state to areas where D3 teams are scarce for the # of HS players(Florida, California). As a result, the East is not a challenger at the Stagg anymore(maybe Brockport this year ?) but the top 5 Eastern teams can play with anyone in the 10-25 slots...
Regarding getting their own bracket, last year's Alfred team strikes me as a sobering example of where upstate NY football is right now.
The Saxons went 10-0 in what the esteemed experts on this site considered one of the toughest conferences in the league. They get to round three and face Mount. Alfred is at home. They get a pick 6 on the opening possession. Their 2nd-team AA QB goes off for 577 yards and six TDs
With just over 20 minutes left in the game, Alfred's played them basically to a dead draw. It's 35-33, and we're wondering if they're going to lament missing two XPs. And then Mount scores. And Alfred goes 3-and-out. And Mount scores again. Then Alfred scores, and Mount runs the onside kickoff back. And another three and out followed by another Mount score.
At the end of the day, Alfred threw everything they had at Mount Union and still lost by 25
I just wonder if there are too many D-III teams in this area/region, and the HS talent too spread out for these upstate NY teams to have the depth of talent needed to go toe-to-toe with some of these big boys. The closest we've had was the 2006 Fisher team that only lost by 12 to Mount. But even that was short-lived (witness the next three times the two teams played)
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 10, 2017, 09:08:35 AM
Week 6 Fan Poll[tr]
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 5-0 47 1 vs. Morrisville State 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 6-0 47 2 vs. King's 3 Wesley 4-1 40 4 vs. Kean 4 Frostburg State 4-1 33 3 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 5-0 30 5 at Cortland 6 Framingham State 5-0 27 6 at Plymouth State 7 Springfield 6-0 18 7t at Merchant Marine 8 Salisbury 4-1 13 NR at Montclair State 9 Albright 5-1 6 9 Open Date 10t Christopher Newport 4-2 4 7t Open Date [/b]
10t Stevenson 3-2 4 10 at Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Trinity 3
Hobart 1
Husson 1
Ithaca 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (2,1,1,3,1)
Delaware Valley (1,2,2,1,2)
Wesley (3,3,4,2,3)
Frostburg State (4,4,5,5,4)
Alfred (6,5,3,6,5)
Framingham State (5,6,6,4,7)
Springfield (10,7,7,7,6)
Salisbury (8,8,9,9,8)
Albright (NR,NR,8,8,NR)
Christopher Newport (9,NR,NR,NR,9)
Stevenson (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,9,10,NR,NR)
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Ithaca (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
Quote from: Bartman on October 10, 2017, 10:31:48 AM
The Steve hangs in there. Why? I looked at the stats on their game against Del Val and they were even on yards, moved the ball on Del Val defense but they had 3 turnovers ....not sure if this means anything....but The Steve supporter must feel it does....personally, I think there are other 2 loss teams that are better...but I am voting for Trinity until I am convinced a 2 loss team is worthy...JMO......Also, I have Alfred at #3 as they are still undefeated..but I understand the Wesley/Frosty voters view in their ranking...
Quote from: dlip on October 10, 2017, 11:29:42 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 10, 2017, 09:08:35 AM
Week 6 Fan Poll[tr]
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 5-0 47 1 vs. Morrisville State 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 6-0 47 2 vs. King's 3 Wesley 4-1 40 4 vs. Kean 4 Frostburg State 4-1 33 3 at William Paterson 5 Alfred 5-0 30 5 at Cortland 6 Framingham State 5-0 27 6 at Plymouth State 7 Springfield 6-0 18 7t at Merchant Marine 8 Salisbury 4-1 13 NR at Montclair State 9 Albright 5-1 6 9 Open Date 10t Christopher Newport 4-2 4 7t Open Date [/b]
10t Stevenson 3-2 4 10 at Lebanon Valley
Also Receiving votes:
Trinity 3
Hobart 1
Husson 1
Ithaca 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (2,1,1,3,1)
Delaware Valley (1,2,2,1,2)
Wesley (3,3,4,2,3)
Frostburg State (4,4,5,5,4)
Alfred (6,5,3,6,5)
Framingham State (5,6,6,4,7)
Springfield (10,7,7,7,6)
Salisbury (8,8,9,9,8)
Albright (NR,NR,8,8,NR)
Christopher Newport (9,NR,NR,NR,9)
Stevenson (7,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,9,10,NR,NR)
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,10)
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR)
Ithaca (NR,10,NR,NR,NR)
This has got to be just to bust wesleydad's balls lol ;D
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 10, 2017, 10:12:48 AM
I just wonder if there are too many D-III teams in this area/region, and the HS talent too spread out for these upstate NY teams to have the depth of talent needed to go toe-to-toe with some of these big boys. The closest we've had was the 2006 Fisher team that only lost by 12 to Mount. But even that was short-lived (witness the next three times the two teams played)
Quote from: Bartman on October 10, 2017, 10:51:26 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 10, 2017, 10:12:48 AMBombers, interesting post. 2016 was a Mount team that matured in the playoffs...Hobart was tied at the end of 3 quarters 20-20, but Mount took advantage of some turnovers and the wind....I think Mount has a special reputation and some excellent coaches and gets some "almost D1" recruits for various reasons. I also think the recruiting is brutal in the East for some of the best D3 players which necessitates recruiting out of state to areas where D3 teams are scarce for the # of HS players(Florida, California). As a result, the East is not a challenger at the Stagg anymore(maybe Brockport this year ?) but the top 5 Eastern teams can play with anyone in the 10-25 slots...
Regarding getting their own bracket, last year's Alfred team strikes me as a sobering example of where upstate NY football is right now.
The Saxons went 10-0 in what the esteemed experts on this site considered one of the toughest conferences in the league. They get to round three and face Mount. Alfred is at home. They get a pick 6 on the opening possession. Their 2nd-team AA QB goes off for 577 yards and six TDs
With just over 20 minutes left in the game, Alfred's played them basically to a dead draw. It's 35-33, and we're wondering if they're going to lament missing two XPs. And then Mount scores. And Alfred goes 3-and-out. And Mount scores again. Then Alfred scores, and Mount runs the onside kickoff back. And another three and out followed by another Mount score.
At the end of the day, Alfred threw everything they had at Mount Union and still lost by 25
I just wonder if there are too many D-III teams in this area/region, and the HS talent too spread out for these upstate NY teams to have the depth of talent needed to go toe-to-toe with some of these big boys. The closest we've had was the 2006 Fisher team that only lost by 12 to Mount. But even that was short-lived (witness the next three times the two teams played)
Quote from: unionpalooza on October 10, 2017, 12:09:37 PM
I'd be really interested in other folks take on this question - the failure of the Eqst to compete at the very top of D3. It's not always been that way - the East used to have a Stagg Bowl participant most years during the 80s and 90s before dropping off a cliff in 1999. I had mostly assumed it came down to recruiting competition and program density - for example, NY has something like 18 and Mass 24 programs, versus 11 in Ohio and 5 in Wisconsin. But are there other factors? Admissions? Facilities?
Quote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 03:06:17 PM
Brockport needs to really roll over some E8 teams to get their own NCAA bracket....which I think would be great
Quote from: unionpalooza on October 10, 2017, 12:09:37 PM
I'd be really interested in other folks take on this question - the failure of the Eqst to compete at the very top of D3. It's not always been that way - the East used to have a Stagg Bowl participant most years during the 80s and 90s before dropping off a cliff in 1999. I had mostly assumed it came down to recruiting competition and program density - for example, NY has something like 18 and Mass 24 programs, versus 11 in Ohio and 5 in Wisconsin. But are there other factors? Admissions? Facilities?
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 10, 2017, 09:56:09 PM
Not even remotely close. Ohio has 21 D3 football schools; Wisconsin has 17. Compared with state populations, Wisconsin has greater 'program density' than Mass, and vastly greater than NY.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 10, 2017, 09:56:09 PM
Not even remotely close. Ohio has 21 D3 football schools; Wisconsin has 17. Compared with state populations, Wisconsin has greater 'program density' than Mass, and vastly greater than NY.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 11, 2017, 10:57:04 AMBombers, Thanks for increasing the quality of the data by citing the most up to date survey that I used from 2013(I told you I only did it in a half hour)......By the way, it is interesting to note that HS Football participation is down from 2013 to 2016 by about 3% , while overall sports participation is up about 2% nationally(injury concerns, funding?). NYS football participation is down about 10% from 2013 to 2016. As Bombers points out, the other options for top D3 players that want to stay in NY are pretty rich because I know they lose some decent top talent to the 8 FCS and 2 D2 schools where in Wisconsin those kids are probably playing in their great D3 system.Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 10, 2017, 09:56:09 PM
Not even remotely close. Ohio has 21 D3 football schools; Wisconsin has 17. Compared with state populations, Wisconsin has greater 'program density' than Mass, and vastly greater than NY.
You're smarter than this, Ypsi. College football teams do not draw players from state populations. They draw them from high school football teams. We can find the 11-man* numbers right here.
http://www.nfhs.org/ParticipationStatistics/PDF/2016-17_Participation_Survey_Results.pdf
(http://www.nfhs.org/ParticipationStatistics/PDF/2016-17_Participation_Survey_Results.pdf)
*Let's not play the gotcha game with some kid who played 8 man or who never played before college
Wisconsin had 25,206 players. For the 17 D-III schools, plus Wisconsin-Madison, that's 18 teams. 1 team for every 1,400 players
New York had 31,470 players. For the 18 D-III schools, plus 3 FBS, 8 FCS, and 2 DII, that's 31 teams. 1 team for every 1,015 players
Now, this doesn't get into anything about the quality of said players. But there's something else being shown in this data. If you're a HS football player in Wisconsin, your in-state options are the Badgers or a D-III school. But there's a massive gulf between the talent level of a typical D-III player and someone who can stay on the roster of an elite FBS program. All these players would have other options in NY if they wanted to stay in state. Kids in Wisconsin don't.
Quote from: Bartman on October 11, 2017, 11:32:07 AM
As Bombers points out, the other options for top D3 players that want to stay in NY are pretty rich because I know they lose some decent top talent to the 8 FCS and 2 D2 schools where in Wisconsin those kids are probably playing in their great D3 system.
Quote from: wally_wabash on October 10, 2017, 12:58:00 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 03:06:17 PM
Brockport needs to really roll over some E8 teams to get their own NCAA bracket....which I think would be great
This is interesting. My first wild guess at four top seeds...Mount Union and UMHB are total no-brainers. UW-O also probably in there if they run the table (definitely not a done deal). But then some of the other usual suspects have lost games. St. Thomas lost. Linfield lost. Hopkins has lost. There's definitely opportunity.
So undefeated Brockport/Alfred could be at the top of a region. Delaware Valley has made a strong case so far (and if Wesley runs out the NJAC, that chip is very strong for the Aggies). North Central is certainly in the conversation. Wartburg has an interesting profile. W&J is in play (but probably not CWRU). There are a lot of reasonable ways to go regarding a fourth #1 seed right now.
Quote from: bman on October 11, 2017, 04:40:40 PMExactly....+kQuote from: wally_wabash on October 10, 2017, 12:58:00 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 09, 2017, 03:06:17 PM
Brockport needs to really roll over some E8 teams to get their own NCAA bracket....which I think would be great
This is interesting. My first wild guess at four top seeds...Mount Union and UMHB are total no-brainers. UW-O also probably in there if they run the table (definitely not a done deal). But then some of the other usual suspects have lost games. St. Thomas lost. Linfield lost. Hopkins has lost. There's definitely opportunity.
So undefeated Brockport/Alfred could be at the top of a region. Delaware Valley has made a strong case so far (and if Wesley runs out the NJAC, that chip is very strong for the Aggies). North Central is certainly in the conversation. Wartburg has an interesting profile. W&J is in play (but probably not CWRU). There are a lot of reasonable ways to go regarding a fourth #1 seed right now.
...so Wally,since you said "reasonable" what you're saying is that the NCAA will pick none of these options... ;)
Quote from: Bartman on October 11, 2017, 09:03:45 PM
Might want to consider SOS in future votes:
Voting Distribution: SOS
Brockport State (2,1,1,3,1) .602
Delaware Valley (1,2,2,1,2) .558
Wesley (3,3,4,2,3) .471
Frostburg State (4,4,5,5,4) .585
Alfred (6,5,3,6,5) .549
Framingham State (5,6,6,4,7) .4091
Springfield (10,7,7,7,6) .513
Salisbury (8,8,9,9,8) .497
Albright (NR,NR,8,8,NR) .614
Christopher Newport (9,NR,NR,NR,9) .589
Stevenson (7,NR,NR,NR,NR) .528
Trinity (NR,9,10,NR,NR) X
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,10) .593
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR) .647
Ithaca (NR,10,NR,NR,NR) .649
Quote from: wesleydad on October 11, 2017, 09:19:26 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 11, 2017, 09:03:45 PM
Might want to consider SOS in future votes:
Voting Distribution: SOS
Brockport State (2,1,1,3,1) .602
Delaware Valley (1,2,2,1,2) .558
Wesley (3,3,4,2,3) .471
Frostburg State (4,4,5,5,4) .585
Alfred (6,5,3,6,5) .549
Framingham State (5,6,6,4,7) .4091
Springfield (10,7,7,7,6) .513
Salisbury (8,8,9,9,8) .497
Albright (NR,NR,8,8,NR) .614
Christopher Newport (9,NR,NR,NR,9) .589
Stevenson (7,NR,NR,NR,NR) .528
Trinity (NR,9,10,NR,NR) X
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,10) .593
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR) .647
Ithaca (NR,10,NR,NR,NR) .649
Wesley's SOS will move way up since their schedule is back loaded. Surprised that Albright is that high. Brockport will drop a bit. In the end I go with the eye test. I have watched more games on the computer this year than I ever have. Sucks not making games but the plus is seeing more teams.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 12, 2017, 12:20:47 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 11, 2017, 09:19:26 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 11, 2017, 09:03:45 PM
Might want to consider SOS in future votes:
Voting Distribution: SOS
Brockport State (2,1,1,3,1) .602
Delaware Valley (1,2,2,1,2) .558
Wesley (3,3,4,2,3) .471
Frostburg State (4,4,5,5,4) .585
Alfred (6,5,3,6,5) .549
Framingham State (5,6,6,4,7) .4091
Springfield (10,7,7,7,6) .513
Salisbury (8,8,9,9,8) .497
Albright (NR,NR,8,8,NR) .614
Christopher Newport (9,NR,NR,NR,9) .589
Stevenson (7,NR,NR,NR,NR) .528
Trinity (NR,9,10,NR,NR) X
Hobart (NR,NR,NR,NR,10) .593
Husson (NR,NR,NR,10,NR) .647
Ithaca (NR,10,NR,NR,NR) .649
Wesley's SOS will move way up since their schedule is back loaded. Surprised that Albright is that high. Brockport will drop a bit. In the end I go with the eye test. I have watched more games on the computer this year than I ever have. Sucks not making games but the plus is seeing more teams.
Agreed, with the 10 team NJAC, it will go back up, especially considering Salisbury has not played either Frostburg or Wesley yet. Albright is high because they have played an undefeated Del Val that played you and they have played a 4-1 Salisbury team.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 12, 2017, 03:18:04 PM
The trouble with SOS is what it always is: How good are the teams that make up that SOS?
In terms of pure wins and losses Rochester (2-3) is "better" than St. John Fisher (0-5), but when you factor in that Rochester's wins are over Alfred State and Becker (0-10 combined), and the fact that Alfred beat Fisher 21-14 but topped Rochester 45-7, how many of us would consider Rochester the better team?
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 12, 2017, 03:46:17 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 12, 2017, 03:18:04 PM
The trouble with SOS is what it always is: How good are the teams that make up that SOS?
In terms of pure wins and losses Rochester (2-3) is "better" than St. John Fisher (0-5), but when you factor in that Rochester's wins are over Alfred State and Becker (0-10 combined), and the fact that Alfred beat Fisher 21-14 but topped Rochester 45-7, how many of us would consider Rochester the better team?
Well if UR would schedule St. John Fisher (drop W&J) again for a tenth game, we could have the answer to that question in a jiffy!
Quote from: dlip on October 12, 2017, 04:46:28 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 12, 2017, 03:46:17 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 12, 2017, 03:18:04 PM
The trouble with SOS is what it always is: How good are the teams that make up that SOS?
In terms of pure wins and losses Rochester (2-3) is "better" than St. John Fisher (0-5), but when you factor in that Rochester's wins are over Alfred State and Becker (0-10 combined), and the fact that Alfred beat Fisher 21-14 but topped Rochester 45-7, how many of us would consider Rochester the better team?
Well if UR would schedule St. John Fisher (drop W&J) again for a tenth game, we could have the answer to that question in a jiffy!
Honestly to dlip this would almost be a waste of time for SJF. U of R just couldn't put a product on the field that really had a chance of beating the Cardinals and it certainly took away from any excitement the Courage Bowl was trying to generate from a football standpoint.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 15, 2017, 08:07:02 AMWell I think we can finally put the Stevenson debate to bed...
The last 3 spots are really tough this week. Plenty of 1 or 2 loss teams to pick from, just not sure who should go in.
Quote from: bman on October 15, 2017, 10:24:26 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 15, 2017, 08:07:02 AMWell I think we can finally put the Stevenson debate to bed...
The last 3 spots are really tough this week. Plenty of 1 or 2 loss teams to pick from, just not sure who should go in.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 15, 2017, 08:07:02 AMI think the top 4 are easy( I still think Brockport has kept #1) , then what? Springfield because they are undefeated....but their schedule is not that challenging this year, then there are a whole bunch of 1 and 2 loss teams that you can make a case for....I kept voting for Alfred as #3 since they were undefeated, but now when I look at their schedule to date and their loss to the Red Dragons, how strong is the argument to separate them from the other 1 loss or even 2 loss teams(including Cortland)?.....I feel like not even looking at last weeks poll and reviewing it fresh.....I am sure there will be a lot of variability in the bottom five this week ???
The last 3 spots are really tough this week. Plenty of 1 or 2 loss teams to pick from, just not sure who should go in.
Quote from: Bartman on October 15, 2017, 04:52:30 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 15, 2017, 08:07:02 AMI think the top 4 are easy( I still think Brockport has kept #1) , then what? Springfield because they are undefeated....but their schedule is not that challenging this year, then there are a whole bunch of 1 and 2 loss teams that you can make a case for....I kept voting for Alfred as #3 since they were undefeated, but now when I look at their schedule to date and their loss to the Red Dragons, how strong is the argument to separate them from the other 1 loss or even 2 loss teams(including Cortland)?.....I feel like not even looking at last weeks poll and reviewing it fresh.....I am sure there will be a lot of variability in the bottom five this week ???
The last 3 spots are really tough this week. Plenty of 1 or 2 loss teams to pick from, just not sure who should go in.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1t Brockport State ( 3 ) | 6-0 | 47 | 1t | vs. Hartwick |
1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 7-0 | 47 | 1t | Open Date |
3 Wesley | 5-1 | 41 | 3 | vs. Rowan |
4 Frostburg State | 5-1 | 35 | 4 | vs. Montclair State |
5 Springfield | 7-0 | 28 | 7 | vs. Catholic |
6 Salisbury | 5-1 | 25 | 8 | vs. Southern Virginia |
7 Alfred | 5-1 | 15 | 5 | vs. RPI |
8t Albright | 5-1 | 6 | 9 | at Stevenson |
8t Plymouth State | 6-1 | 6 | NR | at Massachusetts Maritime |
10t Framingham State | 5-1 | 5 | 6 | vs. Westfield State |
10t Hobart | 5-2 | 5 | NR | at Union |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 16, 2017, 10:02:22 AM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 6-0 47 1t vs. Hartwick 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 7-0 47 1t Open Date 3 Wesley 5-1 41 3 vs. Rowan 4 Frostburg State 5-1 35 4 vs. Montclair State 5 Springfield 7-0 28 7 vs. Catholic 6 Salisbury 5-1 25 8 vs. Southern Virginia 7 Alfred 5-1 15 5 vs. RPI 8t Albright 5-1 6 9 at Stevenson 8t Plymouth State 6-1 6 NR at Massachusetts Maritime 10t Framingham State 5-1 5 6 vs. Westfield State 10t Hobart 5-2 5 NR at Union
Dropping Out:
Christopher Newport
Stevenson
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 4
Trinity 4
Widener 4
Cortland State 2
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,2,1,1,3)
Delaware Valley (2,1,2,2,1)
Wesley (3,3,3,3,2)
Frostburg State (4,4,4,4,4)
Springfield (5,6,6,5,5)
Salisbury (6,5,5,8,6)
Alfred (7,9,8,6,10)
Albright (NR,NR,9,7,NR)
Plymouth State (9,NR,NR,NR,7)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,10,8)
Hobart (NR,8,NR,9,NR)
Christopher Newport (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Widener (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 16, 2017, 11:04:55 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 16, 2017, 10:02:22 AM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 6-0 47 1t vs. Hartwick 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 7-0 47 1t Open Date 3 Wesley 5-1 41 3 vs. Rowan 4 Frostburg State 5-1 35 4 vs. Montclair State 5 Springfield 7-0 28 7 vs. Catholic 6 Salisbury 5-1 25 8 vs. Southern Virginia 7 Alfred 5-1 15 5 vs. RPI 8t Albright 5-1 6 9 at Stevenson 8t Plymouth State 6-1 6 NR at Massachusetts Maritime 10t Framingham State 5-1 5 6 vs. Westfield State 10t Hobart 5-2 5 NR at Union
Dropping Out:
Christopher Newport
Stevenson
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 4
Trinity 4
Widener 4
Cortland State 2
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,2,1,1,3)
Delaware Valley (2,1,2,2,1)
Wesley (3,3,3,3,2)
Frostburg State (4,4,4,4,4)
Springfield (5,6,6,5,5)
Salisbury (6,5,5,8,6)
Alfred (7,9,8,6,10)
Albright (NR,NR,9,7,NR)
Plymouth State (9,NR,NR,NR,7)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,10,8)
Hobart (NR,8,NR,9,NR)
Christopher Newport (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Widener (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
As always the bottom is a huge cluster (watch your mouth). However, I am curious on the Widener vote at 7. Haven't watch them play since the early loss to Rowan, but have they improved much since? I know the MASCAC has a couple team on the rise and one neutral. This all makes for an interesting end of the season run for many teams.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 16, 2017, 11:04:55 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 16, 2017, 10:02:22 AM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 6-0 47 1t vs. Hartwick 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 7-0 47 1t Open Date 3 Wesley 5-1 41 3 vs. Rowan 4 Frostburg State 5-1 35 4 vs. Montclair State 5 Springfield 7-0 28 7 vs. Catholic 6 Salisbury 5-1 25 8 vs. Southern Virginia 7 Alfred 5-1 15 5 vs. RPI 8t Albright 5-1 6 9 at Stevenson 8t Plymouth State 6-1 6 NR at Massachusetts Maritime 10t Framingham State 5-1 5 6 vs. Westfield State 10t Hobart 5-2 5 NR at Union
Dropping Out:
Christopher Newport
Stevenson
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 4
Trinity 4
Widener 4
Cortland State 2
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,2,1,1,3)
Delaware Valley (2,1,2,2,1)
Wesley (3,3,3,3,2)
Frostburg State (4,4,4,4,4)
Springfield (5,6,6,5,5)
Salisbury (6,5,5,8,6)
Alfred (7,9,8,6,10)
Albright (NR,NR,9,7,NR)
Plymouth State (9,NR,NR,NR,7)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,10,8)
Hobart (NR,8,NR,9,NR)
Christopher Newport (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Widener (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
As always the bottom is a huge cluster (watch your mouth). However, I am curious on the Widener vote at 7. Haven't watch them play since the early loss to Rowan, but have they improved much since? I know the MASCAC has a couple team on the rise and one neutral. This all makes for an interesting end of the season run for many teams.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 16, 2017, 11:37:39 AMThat makes no sense. They don't belong near the top ten at this point...Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 16, 2017, 11:04:55 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 16, 2017, 10:02:22 AM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 6-0 47 1t vs. Hartwick 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 7-0 47 1t Open Date 3 Wesley 5-1 41 3 vs. Rowan 4 Frostburg State 5-1 35 4 vs. Montclair State 5 Springfield 7-0 28 7 vs. Catholic 6 Salisbury 5-1 25 8 vs. Southern Virginia 7 Alfred 5-1 15 5 vs. RPI 8t Albright 5-1 6 9 at Stevenson 8t Plymouth State 6-1 6 NR at Massachusetts Maritime 10t Framingham State 5-1 5 6 vs. Westfield State 10t Hobart 5-2 5 NR at Union
Dropping Out:
Christopher Newport
Stevenson
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 4
Trinity 4
Widener 4
Cortland State 2
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,2,1,1,3)
Delaware Valley (2,1,2,2,1)
Wesley (3,3,3,3,2)
Frostburg State (4,4,4,4,4)
Springfield (5,6,6,5,5)
Salisbury (6,5,5,8,6)
Alfred (7,9,8,6,10)
Albright (NR,NR,9,7,NR)
Plymouth State (9,NR,NR,NR,7)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,10,8)
Hobart (NR,8,NR,9,NR)
Christopher Newport (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Widener (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
As always the bottom is a huge cluster (watch your mouth). However, I am curious on the Widener vote at 7. Haven't watch them play since the early loss to Rowan, but have they improved much since? I know the MASCAC has a couple team on the rise and one neutral. This all makes for an interesting end of the season run for many teams.
Looks like Widener replaced the Steve vote and took spot 7. They only have 1 loss but have been unimpressive in their victories. They still have Stevenson and Del Val left so they may just move on up.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on October 16, 2017, 10:02:22 AM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 6-0 47 1t vs. Hartwick 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 7-0 47 1t Open Date 3 Wesley 5-1 41 3 vs. Rowan 4 Frostburg State 5-1 35 4 vs. Montclair State 5 Springfield 7-0 28 7 vs. Catholic 6 Salisbury 5-1 25 8 vs. Southern Virginia 7 Alfred 5-1 15 5 vs. RPI 8t Albright 5-1 6 9 at Stevenson 8t Plymouth State 6-1 6 NR at Massachusetts Maritime 10t Framingham State 5-1 5 6 vs. Westfield State 10t Hobart 5-2 5 NR at Union
Dropping Out:
Christopher Newport
Stevenson
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 4
Trinity 4
Widener 4
Cortland State 2
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,2,1,1,3)
Delaware Valley (2,1,2,2,1)
Wesley (3,3,3,3,2)
Frostburg State (4,4,4,4,4)
Springfield (5,6,6,5,5)
Salisbury (6,5,5,8,6)
Alfred (7,9,8,6,10)
Albright (NR,NR,9,7,NR)
Plymouth State (9,NR,NR,NR,7)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,10,8)
Hobart (NR,8,NR,9,NR)
Christopher Newport (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Widener (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
Quote from: UfanBill on October 17, 2017, 12:59:50 AM
I've watched these New England teams. Union has played almost all of them before. They do not beat the Liberty League. The best team in New England by far is Springfield. Your poll reflects that correctly. Last year Springfield finished 5-5...FOURTH PLACE in the LIBERTY LEAGUE.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 17, 2017, 12:59:50 AMQuote from: AUKaz00 on October 16, 2017, 10:02:22 AM
Week 7 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 6-0 47 1t vs. Hartwick 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 7-0 47 1t Open Date 3 Wesley 5-1 41 3 vs. Rowan 4 Frostburg State 5-1 35 4 vs. Montclair State 5 Springfield 7-0 28 7 vs. Catholic 6 Salisbury 5-1 25 8 vs. Southern Virginia 7 Alfred 5-1 15 5 vs. RPI 8t Albright 5-1 6 9 at Stevenson 8t Plymouth State 6-1 6 NR at Massachusetts Maritime 10t Framingham State 5-1 5 6 vs. Westfield State 10t Hobart 5-2 5 NR at Union
Dropping Out:
Christopher Newport
Stevenson
Also Receiving votes:
Christopher Newport 4
Trinity 4
Widener 4
Cortland State 2
Western Connecticut 1
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (1,2,1,1,3)
Delaware Valley (2,1,2,2,1)
Wesley (3,3,3,3,2)
Frostburg State (4,4,4,4,4)
Springfield (5,6,6,5,5)
Salisbury (6,5,5,8,6)
Alfred (7,9,8,6,10)
Albright (NR,NR,9,7,NR)
Plymouth State (9,NR,NR,NR,7)
Framingham State (10,NR,NR,10,8)
Hobart (NR,8,NR,9,NR)
Christopher Newport (8,10,NR,NR,NR)
Trinity (NR,NR,7,NR,NR)
Widener (NR,7,NR,NR,NR)
Cortland State (NR,NR,NR,NR,9)
Western Connecticut (NR,NR,10,NR,NR)
OK, Just a rant here. I read this board with great interest and my disagreement with some pollsters who rank MAC or NJAC third or fourth place teams every week is hard for me to keep quiet about. But that's not my issue here. As a Union fan I was anxious to see how many votes the 6-1 Liberty League leading Dutchman might receive....ZERO...nobodies interested... Alright, fellow LL member Hobart continues to get support. They earned it...LAST YEAR. Union plays Hobart this week so who's better this year will be determined on the field. I see one pollster thinks Western Connecticut deserves votes ahead of Union. Sure they're 5-1 but they lost to Mass. Dartmouth and speaking of last year, Union beat them 28-13. Plymouth State ??? two people actually believe they're a better team than Union or even Curry or Husson. Oh yeah they just beat over rated Framingham...but they also lost to W.Conn. I've watched these New England teams. Union has played almost all of them before. They do not beat the Liberty League. The best team in New England by far is Springfield. Your poll reflects that correctly. Last year Springfield finished 5-5...FOURTH PLACE in the LIBERTY LEAGUE.
Quote from: Bartman on October 17, 2017, 09:54:51 AM
Ufan,
I love your passion and agree many of the teams that received votes would lose to Union. I am sure the SOS(your favorite stat)/weaker schedule is a reason some would rationalize. Now if you beat Hobart this Saturday , that will be very interesting for next weeks poll and how it will be viewed by others. If you do beat Hobart I think Union should go from no votes to top ten and If RPI beats Alfred that will be huge for the LL and bring some respect to the conference . I think since Ithaca joined the LL this year, we have started to cannibalize each other a bit like the old E8(Brockport will beat back the cannibals this year)
This poll should be good locker room motivation for the Dutchmen.
Quote from: Upstate on November 19, 2014, 07:40:40 PM
West Conn looks to have a good pass rush with their DL. Will be interesting to see if they can get after Fisher's QB Speaking of...
If Fenti plays, Fisher by 27...
If Fenti and Nigolian play, Fisher by 35...
If Catan gets the start, Fisher by 17...
If Catan starts and Nigolian plays, Fisher by 24...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2017, 12:42:02 PM
I think there's a middle ground with these NE schools.
I think, often, their supporters pin a little too much on the "Look how close they played [NY team X]" Framingham, for example, got a lot more mileage out of almost beating Ithaca and Cortland than I think most teams get when they're perceived to be punching up a weight class.
But I think NY fans often dismiss them out of hand, and don't give them enough credit when they do hang tough. When Fisher was getting ready to play West Conn in the 2014 ECACs, we got this gem:Quote from: Upstate on November 19, 2014, 07:40:40 PM
West Conn looks to have a good pass rush with their DL. Will be interesting to see if they can get after Fisher's QB Speaking of...
If Fenti plays, Fisher by 27...
If Fenti and Nigolian play, Fisher by 35...
If Catan gets the start, Fisher by 17...
If Catan starts and Nigolian plays, Fisher by 24...
This is the sort of dismissive attitude that, justifiably, angers NE fans. That these NY teams can just name the score.
In truth, I'd like to see a little more of the following:
1. NE teams winning more of these games
2. NY fans being a little less smug about the whole thing
Overall, I still believe that the NY schools are, for the most part, better. But the gap has absolutely closed.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 17, 2017, 01:24:21 PM
I love D3 Football, I run the NJAC Pick e'm, I'm a Montclair homer but not nearly as versed as most of the posters here. Anyway here goes:
My thoughts are that most are in agreement with the Top 5. Brock, Del, Wes, Frost and Spring. Of these 5 depending on the seating's may all get a first round win / buy, maybe Brock, Del or Wes may win a second round game and do not go beyond there. Only my opinion.
How 6 through 10 play out will always be conjecture and a lot of good reading from the posts. ;D
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 17, 2017, 01:26:54 PM
I agree, but its the perception thing. They same type of perception the rest of the DIII looks at the ER. Not saying that we don't have the data to back up the notions, but we have to do better with facts. Framingham State took a huge step this year by winning a key earlier season game against a good solid E 8 team. Again, the saying goes to be the best, you have beat the best. It all started with scheduling, you have to gain experience, which is what many teams in the NE are doing.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2017, 02:13:18 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 17, 2017, 01:26:54 PM
I agree, but its the perception thing. They same type of perception the rest of the DIII looks at the ER. Not saying that we don't have the data to back up the notions, but we have to do better with facts. Framingham State took a huge step this year by winning a key earlier season game against a good solid E 8 team. Again, the saying goes to be the best, you have beat the best. It all started with scheduling, you have to gain experience, which is what many teams in the NE are doing.
Right, but what's the perception been? That we can't win anything. Fisher giving Mount all they could handle in '06, Ithaca outscoring the entire OAC against Mount in '07, Fisher being down 8 to UMHB in the 4th, Hobart and Mount tied in the 3rd last year...it doesn't matter. We don't win the games.*
*Except for that time that Buff State beat Whitewater, when UWW was down
Curry's wins over Team Boltus and Ithaca were significant for that very reason, but those were 10 years ago. There needs to be something more than "Team X hung with Team Y" Framingham's win over Cortland may be that, if the Red Dragons go, say 8-2.
Quote from: bman on October 17, 2017, 06:15:59 PM
and until we see the NE teams making a dent in the playoffs (and not the ECACs), that perception is reality...
Quote from: UfanBill on October 17, 2017, 07:46:27 PM
Thanks guys that...my post did exactly what it was designed to do. It put Union into the sphere of consciousness of all of you. The Dutchmen have to step it up even further to beat Hobart this Saturday. I'm certainly in agreement with that. If they get the victory over the Statesmen, they will have earned a spot in the poll and you guys will all know it. ;D
Quote from: ccd494 on October 17, 2017, 10:00:53 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 17, 2017, 07:46:27 PM
Thanks guys that...my post did exactly what it was designed to do. It put Union into the sphere of consciousness of all of you. The Dutchmen have to step it up even further to beat Hobart this Saturday. I'm certainly in agreement with that. If they get the victory over the Statesmen, they will have earned a spot in the poll and you guys will all know it. ;D
Well, then whither Husson?
Interestingly, Husson was getting someone's vote until this week, when Husson only beat Castleton State by 49. They are now not getting any.
I don't know if Husson is one of the ten best in the East, but it's weird to get a "put Union in the top 10!" groundswell without discussing Husson's viability.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2017, 12:42:02 PM
I think there's a middle ground with these NE schools.
I think, often, their supporters pin a little too much on the "Look how close they played [NY team X]" Framingham, for example, got a lot more mileage out of almost beating Ithaca and Cortland than I think most teams get when they're perceived to be punching up a weight class.
But I think NY fans often dismiss them out of hand, and don't give them enough credit when they do hang tough. When Fisher was getting ready to play West Conn in the 2014 ECACs, we got this gem:Quote from: Upstate on November 19, 2014, 07:40:40 PM
West Conn looks to have a good pass rush with their DL. Will be interesting to see if they can get after Fisher's QB Speaking of...
If Fenti plays, Fisher by 27...
If Fenti and Nigolian play, Fisher by 35...
If Catan gets the start, Fisher by 17...
If Catan starts and Nigolian plays, Fisher by 24...
This is the sort of dismissive attitude that, justifiably, angers NE fans. That these NY teams can just name the score.
In truth, I'd like to see a little more of the following:
1. NE teams winning more of these games
2. NY fans being a little less smug about the whole thing
Overall, I still believe that the NY schools are, for the most part, better. But the gap has absolutely closed.
Quote from: ccd494 on October 17, 2017, 10:00:53 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 17, 2017, 07:46:27 PM
Thanks guys that...my post did exactly what it was designed to do. It put Union into the sphere of consciousness of all of you. The Dutchmen have to step it up even further to beat Hobart this Saturday. I'm certainly in agreement with that. If they get the victory over the Statesmen, they will have earned a spot in the poll and you guys will all know it. ;D
Well, then whither Husson?
Interestingly, Husson was getting someone's vote until this week, when Husson only beat Castleton State by 49. They are now not getting any.
I don't know if Husson is one of the ten best in the East, but it's weird to get a "put Union in the top 10!" groundswell without discussing Husson's viability.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 17, 2017, 12:42:02 PM
I think there's a middle ground with these NE schools.
I think, often, their supporters pin a little too much on the "Look how close they played [NY team X]" Framingham, for example, got a lot more mileage out of almost beating Ithaca and Cortland than I think most teams get when they're perceived to be punching up a weight class.
But I think NY fans often dismiss them out of hand, and don't give them enough credit when they do hang tough. When Fisher was getting ready to play West Conn in the 2014 ECACs, we got this gem:Quote from: Upstate on November 19, 2014, 07:40:40 PM
West Conn looks to have a good pass rush with their DL. Will be interesting to see if they can get after Fisher's QB Speaking of...
If Fenti plays, Fisher by 27...
If Fenti and Nigolian play, Fisher by 35...
If Catan gets the start, Fisher by 17...
If Catan starts and Nigolian plays, Fisher by 24...
This is the sort of dismissive attitude that, justifiably, angers NE fans. That these NY teams can just name the score.
In truth, I'd like to see a little more of the following:
1. NE teams winning more of these games
2. NY fans being a little less smug about the whole thing
Overall, I still believe that the NY schools are, for the most part, better. But the gap has absolutely closed.
Quote from: Upstate on October 18, 2017, 01:39:41 PM
To be fair...Catan played while Nigolian was limited and only had two targets early during the game and I believe left due to aggravating an injury...They won by 14...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 30, 2016, 01:14:33 PMQuote from: lewdogg11 on November 17, 2014, 10:51:11 AM
SJF/Western Ct is a crappy matchup. Let's hope Fisher doesn't sulk about it and at least puts up 50 in the first half and then let's their young kids play.Quote from: ECoastFootball on November 17, 2014, 10:49:05 AM
Fisher is going to beat West Conn by 50.Quote from: Upstate on November 17, 2014, 10:52:13 AM
Was thinking this but didn't want to say it...
Fusco goes for 250 if the coaches let him...Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 17, 2014, 11:43:53 AM
Fisher either wins by 40 or 7.Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 18, 2014, 09:09:09 AM
The one question that I will pose (while agreeing that one more game is great for the seniors) is what is the value of a monkey stomp other than giving your younger guys a look for next year?
Quote from: Upstate on November 26, 2016, 06:54:40 PM
I guess we just expected more from AU I guess...
They're the first team ever to run the E8 and go 10-0. They were run up and down the field on Defense today vs a team from a New England conference.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 17, 2017, 07:00:13 PMQuote from: bman on October 17, 2017, 06:15:59 PM
and until we see the NE teams making a dent in the playoffs (and not the ECACs), that perception is reality...
I don't agree with that, I am all for ECACs. As a fan of team who has made a deep run in the playoffs only to lose to UWW. I will say as of late when was last time any ER team made a dent in the playoffs past the 2nd round. Many NE teams face the #1 or #2 ER team 1st round and make an early exit. I think at this point as they continue to play top ER teams and be competitive they will eventually win some big playoff games and OOC games. But it really starts with early season scheduling and winning those games. If majority of the teams in the NE conference only schedule within NE , which results in "Team NE" usually getting sent to the #1 or #2 team in ER or Mount (mainly due to travel). You have to include ECACs, I know Salisbury does, it's another argument to make a statement.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 17, 2017, 07:00:13 PMSorry, forgot 1 thing I said I'd mention (and to answer this) 9 time in the last 9 years...A true East team has made the quarterfinals (meaning they made it past the 2nd round), 17 of the last 18 years.Quote from: bman on October 17, 2017, 06:15:59 PM
and until we see the NE teams making a dent in the playoffs (and not the ECACs), that perception is reality...
I don't agree with that, I am all for ECACs. As a fan of team who has made a deep run in the playoffs only to lose to UWW. I will say as of late when was last time any ER team made a dent in the playoffs past the 2nd round. Many NE teams face the #1 or #2 ER team 1st round and make an early exit. I think at this point as they continue to play top ER teams and be competitive they will eventually win some big playoff games and OOC games. But it really starts with early season scheduling and winning those games. If majority of the teams in the NE conference only schedule within NE , which results in "Team NE" usually getting sent to the #1 or #2 team in ER or Mount (mainly due to travel). You have to include ECACs, I know Salisbury does, it's another argument to make a statement.
Quote from: bman on October 18, 2017, 03:14:09 PM
I also have to look back to how the conferences compare when in the (NCAA) playoffs...why? Because that is a conference's 1 or 2 team going up against another conference's 1 or 2 team.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 18, 2017, 04:29:40 PMQuote from: bman on October 18, 2017, 03:14:09 PM
I also have to look back to how the conferences compare when in the (NCAA) playoffs...why? Because that is a conference's 1 or 2 team going up against another conference's 1 or 2 team.
If we want to see how NE schools do against the top 2 teams from NY conferences, every such game is relevant, not just the NCAA games. And there are plenty of competitive games every year
Alfred 35, Husson 28 in 2016
Fisher 35, Springfield 21 in 2016
Hobart 12, Springfield 7 in 2016
Hobart 35, WPI 31 in 2016
St. Lawrence 28, WPI 21 in 2016
RPI 28, WPI 21 in 2015
RPI 17, Springfield 14 in 2015
Cortland 61, Framingham 49 in 2015
Hobart 28, Curry 18 in 2014
Hobart 28, WPI 14 in 2014
Norwich 10, St. Lawrence 7 in 2014
St. Lawrence 21, Springfield 7 in 2014
St. Lawrence 20, WPI 7 in 2014
St. Lawrence 14, Norwich 3 in 2013
Springfield 21, St. Lawrence 20 in 2013
Salve Regina 17, Union 14 in 2012
Springfield 31, Alfred 8 in 2012
Hobart 27, WPI 13 in 2011
Salve Regina 25, Union 22 in 2011
Alfred 35, Springfield 28 in 2010
Norwich 25, St. Lawrence 14 in 2010
RPI 6, Endicott 3 in 2010
WPI 24, RPI 10 in 2010
Union 21, WPI 17 in 2009
Springfield 45, Hartwick 31 in 2008
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 18, 2017, 04:32:52 PM
That was my argument. You have to include all data. I know playoffs means a lot, but everyone doesn't make the playoffs. You have to include those ECAC games etcetera. That's like saying Salisbury is not good because we have only beaten Wesley like once in the last 12 years. (Gut wrenching to type). However, there have been plenty of nail biters in those years.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 18, 2017, 04:32:52 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 18, 2017, 04:29:40 PMQuote from: bman on October 18, 2017, 03:14:09 PM
I also have to look back to how the conferences compare when in the (NCAA) playoffs...why? Because that is a conference's 1 or 2 team going up against another conference's 1 or 2 team.
If we want to see how NE schools do against the top 2 teams from NY conferences, every such game is relevant, not just the NCAA games. And there are plenty of competitive games every year
Alfred 35, Husson 28 in 2016
Fisher 35, Springfield 21 in 2016
Hobart 12, Springfield 7 in 2016
Hobart 35, WPI 31 in 2016
St. Lawrence 28, WPI 21 in 2016
RPI 28, WPI 21 in 2015
RPI 17, Springfield 14 in 2015
Cortland 61, Framingham 49 in 2015
Hobart 28, Curry 18 in 2014
Hobart 28, WPI 14 in 2014
Norwich 10, St. Lawrence 7 in 2014
St. Lawrence 21, Springfield 7 in 2014
St. Lawrence 20, WPI 7 in 2014
St. Lawrence 14, Norwich 3 in 2013
Springfield 21, St. Lawrence 20 in 2013
Salve Regina 17, Union 14 in 2012
Springfield 31, Alfred 8 in 2012
Hobart 27, WPI 13 in 2011
Salve Regina 25, Union 22 in 2011
Alfred 35, Springfield 28 in 2010
Norwich 25, St. Lawrence 14 in 2010
RPI 6, Endicott 3 in 2010
WPI 24, RPI 10 in 2010
Union 21, WPI 17 in 2009
Springfield 45, Hartwick 31 in 2008
That was my argument. You have to include all data. I know playoffs means a lot, but everyone doesn't make the playoffs. You have to include those ECAC games etcetera. That's like saying Salisbury is not good because we have only beaten Wesley like once in the last 12 years. (Gut wrenching to type). However, there have been plenty of nail biters in those years.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 19, 2017, 09:22:41 AM
Please opine on all things being equal, what other factor you would consider...
My issue is that you only looked at a certain subset of games.
In 2014, MASCAC Champion Framingham was competitive against the NJAC champion, and in 2015, they were competitive against the E8 champion. This year, Framingham beat the likely E8 runner-up. The fact that those games didn't occur in the playoffs doesn't change that they're games against the other conference's top team.
Quote from: bman on October 19, 2017, 10:07:42 AM
I think I am really crappy at making a point (I guess I should never be an attorney). My point (and only point I was trying to make) was that once you consider ALL the factors (the games you mention INCLUDED) and still can't make a decision, then the conference bias matters.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 19, 2017, 10:27:36 AMQuote from: bman on October 19, 2017, 10:07:42 AM
I think I am really crappy at making a point (I guess I should never be an attorney). My point (and only point I was trying to make) was that once you consider ALL the factors (the games you mention INCLUDED) and still can't make a decision, then the conference bias matters.
Sure. But since your original post only specified and showed NCAA playoff games, that's where the confusion was.
I'm disputing that perceived conference strength is relevant. I'm simply saying that the perception needs to move from:
New England teams can't compete with New York teams, and fans of NY teams should look down their nose at the matchups
to
New York teams are better on the whole than New England teams, but fans of NY teams shouldn't act like all their team has to do is show up and they'll win by 40.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 19, 2017, 11:29:54 AMWell, we see that in the playoffs all the time. ;)
This is a good discussion. I try not to use conference bias in my picking of teams, but in the end I go with what I think to be true that conference A is better than conference B therefor I would rank the team from A above the team from B if all points are equal. I go out of my way to look for teams that are doing well in the supposedly not top conferences and include them in my poll because they deserve it and with no common point of reference how do we know that a 1 or 2 loss team in the top conference is better than the undefeated team in the weaker conference.
Quote from: bman on October 19, 2017, 11:49:26 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 19, 2017, 11:29:54 AMWell, we see that in the playoffs all the time. ;)
This is a good discussion. I try not to use conference bias in my picking of teams, but in the end I go with what I think to be true that conference A is better than conference B therefor I would rank the team from A above the team from B if all points are equal. I go out of my way to look for teams that are doing well in the supposedly not top conferences and include them in my poll because they deserve it and with no common point of reference how do we know that a 1 or 2 loss team in the top conference is better than the undefeated team in the weaker conference.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 19, 2017, 02:52:50 PMQuote from: bman on October 19, 2017, 11:49:26 AMWell, we see that in the playoffs all the time. ;)
[/b]
Quote from: Bartman on October 20, 2017, 09:03:34 AM
Although my attention this weekend will mostly be on my Statesmen and their mission to take down the league leading Dutchmen, I am very interested in whether The Steve will beat Albright and vindicate the earlier votes for The Steve ......Albright may be distracted after all the national attention :o
Quote from: Bartman on October 20, 2017, 09:03:34 AM
Although my attention this weekend will mostly be on my Statesmen and their mission to take down the league leading Dutchmen, I am very interested in whether The Steve will beat Albright and vindicate the earlier votes for The Steve ......Albright may be distracted after all the national attention :o
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 19, 2017, 04:04:13 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 19, 2017, 02:52:50 PMQuote from: bman on October 19, 2017, 11:49:26 AMWell, we see that in the playoffs all the time. ;)
[/b]
Do we really? Come playoff time the 1 and 2 loss teams in the strong conferences are not in the playoffs because they did not win the AQ or get an at large bid. So what we see is the top team from the strong conference against the top team from the weaker conference. If that game is not close it may be no different than the result of the AQ vs the other teams in the strong conference with the 1 loss being to the AQ team. I have no issue putting Trinity in my top 10. They were ranked 50 by D3 in all of D3 and are undefeated. Many of the teams D3 ranked ahead of them have at least 1 loss. I had no problem putting W. Conn at 10 with 1 loss since they easily beat Plymouth who beat Framingham who beat Cortland who just beat Alfred who beat several others in the discussion. I tried to change the 3, 4, 5 that I had all from the NJAC just because I dont think any league should have 3 teams that high even if they may be the 3, 4, and 5 best teams in the east, but everyone else keeps losing so I did not have much choice. I think I have a pretty good idea of how this will end up, but I will not vote it that way until it plays out that way.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1t Brockport State ( 3 ) | 7-0 | 47 | 1t | at Buffalo State |
1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 7-0 | 47 | 1t | vs. Lebanon Valley |
3 Wesley | 6-1 | 41 | 3 | at Montclair State |
4 Frostburg State | 6-1 | 35 | 4 | at Southern Virginia |
5 Springfield | 8-0 | 28 | 5 | Open Date |
6 Salisbury | 6-1 | 26 | 6 | vs. Rowan |
7 Union | 7-1 | 12 | NR | Open Date |
8 Husson | 6-1 | 10 | NR | at Anna Maria |
9t Framingham State | 6-1 | 7 | 10t | at Mass-Dartmouth |
9t Plymouth State | 7-1 | 7 | 8t | vs. Westfield State |
Quote from: d3fan142511 on October 24, 2017, 11:13:43 AM
Here comes New England Football!!! Union with a huge win and great turnaround for the program. Last 3 weeks of season should be fun in the East with alot of Big Games.
I know Husson Lost to WNE but i find it hard that some poll members have them below Union even with a H2H win.
Quote from: d3fan142511 on October 24, 2017, 11:13:43 AM
Here comes New England Football!!! Union with a huge win and great turnaround for the program. Last 3 weeks of season should be fun in the East with alot of Big Games.
I know Husson Lost to WNE but i find it hard that some poll members have them below Union even with a H2H win.
Quote from: d3fan142511 on October 24, 2017, 12:12:05 PM
I think the Union Husson Round 2 would be an amazing game! Have a friend who plays for Union so i am big time supporter for them. Not sure you can use the Union has a better win then Husson since clearly Union is better then Hobart this year and Husson beat them.
Would Union meet the miles restriction to play Husson? Wish there was not one. A Husson vs Brockport and Union vs Springfield Match up Round 1 would be a fun one and 2 games i think the NE schools can win.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 24, 2017, 11:58:46 AMQuote from: d3fan142511 on October 24, 2017, 11:13:43 AM
Here comes New England Football!!! Union with a huge win and great turnaround for the program. Last 3 weeks of season should be fun in the East with alot of Big Games.
I know Husson Lost to WNE but i find it hard that some poll members have them below Union even with a H2H win.
As a Union fan and having watched their game with Husson, I have no real problem if Husson was ranked ahead of Union, they beat them. I can say that in that season opener in Maine, Union played even with Husson but made some mistakes...9 penalties, a missed FG and 3 turnovers, one of which was on the Husson goal line. If that game was played again (and it might be) I think Union would win. They learned a lot from that game and they've cleaned up those mistakes. That L may have been the BEST thing that happened to them.
I'm still having issues understanding pollster #3 who still votes for 2nd and 3rd place MAC and NJAC schools ahead of league leaders in other conferences.
Quote from: dlip on October 24, 2017, 12:28:03 PMQuote from: d3fan142511 on October 24, 2017, 12:12:05 PM
I think the Union Husson Round 2 would be an amazing game! Have a friend who plays for Union so i am big time supporter for them. Not sure you can use the Union has a better win then Husson since clearly Union is better then Hobart this year and Husson beat them.
Would Union meet the miles restriction to play Husson? Wish there was not one. A Husson vs Brockport and Union vs Springfield Match up Round 1 would be a fun one and 2 games i think the NE schools can win.
dlip thinks BP would beat Husson by at least 10 points. dlip really likes Husson, a lot, however, to dlip, that match up could get ugly.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2017, 12:54:02 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 24, 2017, 11:58:46 AM
I'm still having issues understanding pollster #3 who still votes for 2nd and 3rd place MAC and NJAC schools ahead of league leaders in other conferences.Quote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2017, 12:54:02 PM
not sure which voter I am but I have no problem having Frostburg and Salisbury ahead of league leaders who also have 1 loss. I had them ahead of them when all were undefeated so with all things being equal I will still have them ahead. I tried to move the NJAC down, just could not find anyone with 1 loss to put ahead of them. I only have Del Val in from the MAC, can't put Widener in with that 6-0 loss to Rowan who has turned out not very good.
Wesleydad, you're one of only five pollsters for the ERFP. I'm identifying who each of you might be by using the "Voting Distribution" part of the poll which I assume breaks down each of the five pollsters rankings. My, and others, issue all season is with Voter #3 (though he's not #3 each week, that varies). I have NO issue with his or anyone's rankings 1-6 but #3 has in order: #7 Widener(5-2, currently 2nd in the MAC) #8 CNU(5-2, 4th in the NJAC) #9 Framingham(6-1, tied 1st MASCAC with) #10 Plymouth St. (7-1). Curious why he puts Plymouth ahead of W. Conn(also 7-1, tied 1st MASCAC) since W. Conn beat Plymouth. He clearly thinks 5-2 teams from his favored conferences, MAC & NJAC are better than Liberty League leading Union, not to mention Husson and Trinity. This is the same guy who voted repeatedly for Stevenson which defied logic. Now he can vote for whomever he chooses but I'd like to see him step forward and give us a clue about his arguments. Fortunately the other 4 pollsters, including you and Bartman, are more impartial. Thanks to all pollsters who included Union in the ERFP this week. You placed the Dutchmen even higher than I had hoped.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2017, 12:54:02 PMAnd Widener has yet to play Del Val and Stevenson. They could be a 3 loss team at the end...Quote from: UfanBill on October 24, 2017, 11:58:46 AMQuote from: d3fan142511 on October 24, 2017, 11:13:43 AM
Here comes New England Football!!! Union with a huge win and great turnaround for the program. Last 3 weeks of season should be fun in the East with alot of Big Games.
I know Husson Lost to WNE but i find it hard that some poll members have them below Union even with a H2H win.
As a Union fan and having watched their game with Husson, I have no real problem if Husson was ranked ahead of Union, they beat them. I can say that in that season opener in Maine, Union played even with Husson but made some mistakes...9 penalties, a missed FG and 3 turnovers, one of which was on the Husson goal line. If that game was played again (and it might be) I think Union would win. They learned a lot from that game and they've cleaned up those mistakes. That L may have been the BEST thing that happened to them.
I'm still having issues understanding pollster #3 who still votes for 2nd and 3rd place MAC and NJAC schools ahead of league leaders in other conferences.
not sure which voter I am but I have no problem having Frostburg and Salisbury ahead of league leaders who also have 1 loss. I had them ahead of them when all were undefeated so with all things being equal I will still have them ahead. I tried to move the NJAC down, just could not find anyone with 1 loss to put ahead of them. I only have Del Val in from the MAC, can't put Widener in with that 6-0 loss to Rowan who has turned out not very good.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 24, 2017, 04:59:53 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2017, 12:54:02 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 24, 2017, 11:58:46 AM
I'm still having issues understanding pollster #3 who still votes for 2nd and 3rd place MAC and NJAC schools ahead of league leaders in other conferences.Quote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2017, 12:54:02 PM
not sure which voter I am but I have no problem having Frostburg and Salisbury ahead of league leaders who also have 1 loss. I had them ahead of them when all were undefeated so with all things being equal I will still have them ahead. I tried to move the NJAC down, just could not find anyone with 1 loss to put ahead of them. I only have Del Val in from the MAC, can't put Widener in with that 6-0 loss to Rowan who has turned out not very good.
Wesleydad, you're one of only five pollsters for the ERFP. I'm identifying who each of you might be by using the "Voting Distribution" part of the poll which I assume breaks down each of the five pollsters rankings. My, and others, issue all season is with Voter #3 (though he's not #3 each week, that varies). I have NO issue with his or anyone's rankings 1-6 but #3 has in order: #7 Widener(5-2, currently 2nd in the MAC) #8 CNU(5-2, 4th in the NJAC) #9 Framingham(6-1, tied 1st MASCAC with) #10 Plymouth St. (7-1). Curious why he puts Plymouth ahead of W. Conn(also 7-1, tied 1st MASCAC) since W. Conn beat Plymouth. He clearly thinks 5-2 teams from his favored conferences, MAC & NJAC are better than Liberty League leading Union, not to mention Husson and Trinity. This is the same guy who voted repeatedly for Stevenson which defied logic. Now he can vote for whomever he chooses but I'd like to see him step forward and give us a clue about his arguments. Fortunately the other 4 pollsters, including you and Bartman, are more impartial. Thanks to all pollsters who included Union in the ERFP this week. You placed the Dutchmen even higher than I had hoped.
Agree, which is why I have Trinity, Husson, Union, and W. Conn in my poll. Battled with the order of the last 3 and went with it because Husson beat Union. W. Conn has the bad loss so I put them at 10.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 25, 2017, 11:38:36 AMQuote from: UfanBill on October 24, 2017, 04:59:53 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2017, 12:54:02 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 24, 2017, 11:58:46 AM
I'm still having issues understanding pollster #3 who still votes for 2nd and 3rd place MAC and NJAC schools ahead of league leaders in other conferences.Quote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2017, 12:54:02 PM
not sure which voter I am but I have no problem having Frostburg and Salisbury ahead of league leaders who also have 1 loss. I had them ahead of them when all were undefeated so with all things being equal I will still have them ahead. I tried to move the NJAC down, just could not find anyone with 1 loss to put ahead of them. I only have Del Val in from the MAC, can't put Widener in with that 6-0 loss to Rowan who has turned out not very good.
Wesleydad, you're one of only five pollsters for the ERFP. I'm identifying who each of you might be by using the "Voting Distribution" part of the poll which I assume breaks down each of the five pollsters rankings. My, and others, issue all season is with Voter #3 (though he's not #3 each week, that varies). I have NO issue with his or anyone's rankings 1-6 but #3 has in order: #7 Widener(5-2, currently 2nd in the MAC) #8 CNU(5-2, 4th in the NJAC) #9 Framingham(6-1, tied 1st MASCAC with) #10 Plymouth St. (7-1). Curious why he puts Plymouth ahead of W. Conn(also 7-1, tied 1st MASCAC) since W. Conn beat Plymouth. He clearly thinks 5-2 teams from his favored conferences, MAC & NJAC are better than Liberty League leading Union, not to mention Husson and Trinity. This is the same guy who voted repeatedly for Stevenson which defied logic. Now he can vote for whomever he chooses but I'd like to see him step forward and give us a clue about his arguments. Fortunately the other 4 pollsters, including you and Bartman, are more impartial. Thanks to all pollsters who included Union in the ERFP this week. You placed the Dutchmen even higher than I had hoped.
Agree, which is why I have Trinity, Husson, Union, and W. Conn in my poll. Battled with the order of the last 3 and went with it because Husson beat Union. W. Conn has the bad loss so I put them at 10.
I'm voter #2. My 1-6 was pretty simple. Had Husson #7 because of the H2H w/Union and the same with Plymouth #9 because of the H2H w/Framingham. If they played today I would take Union over Husson and not sure about the other match-up.
Quote from: Bartman on October 25, 2017, 12:12:53 PM
The science of the bottom 5 of top 10 rankings in the ERFP this year is difficult .... I may be looking at which uniforms or mascot I like the best ;D
Quote from: Bartman on October 25, 2017, 12:12:53 PM
The science of the bottom 5 of top 10 rankings in the ERFP this year is difficult .... I may be looking at which uniforms or mascot I like the best ;D
Quote from: UfanBill on October 25, 2017, 06:05:53 PM
Thanks for identifying yourself as voter#2 rams1102. Wesleydad has also graciously admitted that he is #4. #5 seems to support the NYS leagues so I think I know who that is. Don't misinterpret me. It is not required that anyone divulge their identity or rankings. I just want the poll to be more objective. In doing some research on the history of the ERFP board by going back to it's beginning in 2007, I see that it was started by pg04, an admitted Brockport supporter. I don't know if he's still involved. The present compiler is UKaz00, an Alfred guy. I assume he's a voter. Originally there were 10 pollsters and the rule was only one per team so it was required for all to state their allegiance. All 10 pollsters were identified but their rankings have always been secret unless divulged by themselves. This is done by showing only the voting distribution. Over the years pollsters/voters have come and gone and now there are only five. I'm not sure if more are desired or solicited. It would undoubtedly make for a better poll if there were ten or more. I have some interest as may others.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 25, 2017, 06:05:53 PM
Thanks for identifying yourself as voter#2 rams1102. Wesleydad has also graciously admitted that he is #4. #5 seems to support the NYS leagues so I think I know who that is. Don't misinterpret me. It is not required that anyone divulge their identity or rankings. I just want the poll to be more objective. In doing some research on the history of the ERFP board by going back to it's beginning in 2007, I see that it was started by pg04, an admitted Brockport supporter. I don't know if he's still involved. The present compiler is UKaz00, an Alfred guy. I assume he's a voter. Originally there were 10 pollsters and the rule was only one per team so it was required for all to state their allegiance. All 10 pollsters were identified but their rankings have always been secret unless divulged by themselves. This is done by showing only the voting distribution. Over the years pollsters/voters have come and gone and now there are only five. I'm not sure if more are desired or solicited. It would undoubtedly make for a better poll if there were ten or more. I have some interest as may others.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 30, 2017, 01:04:26 PMRams,
My top 3 remained (B-Port, Del Val & Wesley) then I slid Salisbury into #4 and Frostburg from #4 to #5 then (Spring, Husson, Union, Fram & Plymouth). A lot of good games this week and a lot of movement to probably come in the Poll.
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Brockport State ( 3 ) | 8-0 | 48 | 1t | vs. Alfred |
2 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 8-0 | 47 | 1t | at Misericordia |
3 Wesley | 7-1 | 40 | 3 | vs. #5t Salisbury |
4 Frostburg State | 7-1 | 34 | 4 | vs. Kean |
5t Salisbury | 7-1 | 27 | 6 | at #3 Wesley |
5t Springfield | 8-0 | 27 | 5 | at Maine Maritime |
7 Husson | 7-1 | 17 | 8 | vs. Alfred State |
8 Union | 7-1 | 12 | 7 | at Ithaca |
9t Framingham State | 7-1 | 6 | 9t | vs. Western Connecticut |
9t Plymouth State | 8-1 | 6 | 9t | at Fitchburg State |
Quote from: Bartman on October 30, 2017, 01:30:03 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 30, 2017, 01:04:26 PMRams,
My top 3 remained (B-Port, Del Val & Wesley) then I slid Salisbury into #4 and Frostburg from #4 to #5 then (Spring, Husson, Union, Fram & Plymouth). A lot of good games this week and a lot of movement to probably come in the Poll.
Curious on your moving Salisbury to #4 (which is your opinion , and may end up being right when they play Frosty) , but I watched the Wesley / Frosty game and if I did not know the score, I would have given the edge to Frostburg. They had over 500 yards against a traditionally tough D3 defense and controlled the ball for 37 minutes of the game. Now, Wesley won this tight contest , so no argument, but this was Frosty's only lost. Salisbury lost a close game to Albright, which is no Wesley...just my opinion.....the next 2 weeks will be very interesting
Quote from: rams1102 on October 30, 2017, 05:16:13 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 30, 2017, 01:30:03 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 30, 2017, 01:04:26 PMRams,
My top 3 remained (B-Port, Del Val & Wesley) then I slid Salisbury into #4 and Frostburg from #4 to #5 then (Spring, Husson, Union, Fram & Plymouth). A lot of good games this week and a lot of movement to probably come in the Poll.
Curious on your moving Salisbury to #4 (which is your opinion , and may end up being right when they play Frosty) , but I watched the Wesley / Frosty game and if I did not know the score, I would have given the edge to Frostburg. They had over 500 yards against a traditionally tough D3 defense and controlled the ball for 37 minutes of the game. Now, Wesley won this tight contest , so no argument, but this was Frosty's only lost. Salisbury lost a close game to Albright, which is no Wesley...just my opinion.....the next 2 weeks will be very interesting
My thought was that Salisbury is improving. Montclair beats SoVA by 20+ and expected to see Frostburg really roll them. They did not. I think the loser of the Wesley / Salisbury game could very well be out of the playoffs. I'm sure things will be corrected after Saturday's games. Those were my thoughts as I was voting.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 30, 2017, 05:16:13 PMThanks for your perspective...the next couple of weeks will be interestingQuote from: Bartman on October 30, 2017, 01:30:03 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 30, 2017, 01:04:26 PMRams,
My top 3 remained (B-Port, Del Val & Wesley) then I slid Salisbury into #4 and Frostburg from #4 to #5 then (Spring, Husson, Union, Fram & Plymouth). A lot of good games this week and a lot of movement to probably come in the Poll.
Curious on your moving Salisbury to #4 (which is your opinion , and may end up being right when they play Frosty) , but I watched the Wesley / Frosty game and if I did not know the score, I would have given the edge to Frostburg. They had over 500 yards against a traditionally tough D3 defense and controlled the ball for 37 minutes of the game. Now, Wesley won this tight contest , so no argument, but this was Frosty's only lost. Salisbury lost a close game to Albright, which is no Wesley...just my opinion.....the next 2 weeks will be very interesting
My thought was that Salisbury is improving. Montclair beats SoVA by 20+ and expected to see Frostburg really roll them. They did not. I think the loser of the Wesley / Salisbury game could very well be out of the playoffs. I'm sure things will be corrected after Saturday's games. Those were my thoughts as I was voting.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 30, 2017, 08:12:38 PM
I'm really getting into the ERFP this season. Undoubtedly because for the first time in a decade my Dutchman are relevant. Nice job voting this week to all the pollsters. As I said last week I have no issue with Union ranking behind Husson. I'm even OK with our MAC voter placing Widener at #7. They'd be on my poll...Stevenson, Albright and CNU while all fine teams, have proven unworthy. Not sure why Plymouth St. is getting more support than W.Conn since the Colonials won the H2H. (one got it right) Speaking of head to head. there are an incredible number of league champion determining games this Saturday. The aforementioned W.Conn plays Framingham...Alfred/Brockport....Salisbury/Wesley...WNE/Curry...Trinity/Amherst and Union/Ithaca. The schedule makers sure hit a homerun this week. We know we'll have some surprises. I can't wait.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 30, 2017, 08:12:38 PMMust be nice to be relevant :'(. Hobart still has a chance for the runner up bowl (with help from Union )...oh, what could have been with a faster start at Union....I officially no longer feel sorry for the old struggling Dutchmen .....the" rival hate" is back on for next year at the Boz >:(.....but I still need you to win out this year
I'm really getting into the ERFP this season. Undoubtedly because for the first time in a decade my Dutchman are relevant. Nice job voting this week to all the pollsters. As I said last week I have no issue with Union ranking behind Husson. I'm even OK with our MAC voter placing Widener at #7. They'd be on my poll...Stevenson, Albright and CNU while all fine teams, have proven unworthy. Not sure why Plymouth St. is getting more support than W.Conn since the Colonials won the H2H. (one got it right) Speaking of head to head. there are an incredible number of league champion determining games this Saturday. The aforementioned W.Conn plays Framingham...Alfred/Brockport....Salisbury/Wesley...WNE/Curry...Trinity/Amherst and Union/Ithaca. The schedule makers sure hit a homerun this week. We know we'll have some surprises. I can't wait.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2017, 08:23:11 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 30, 2017, 08:12:38 PM
I'm really getting into the ERFP this season. Undoubtedly because for the first time in a decade my Dutchman are relevant. Nice job voting this week to all the pollsters. As I said last week I have no issue with Union ranking behind Husson. I'm even OK with our MAC voter placing Widener at #7. They'd be on my poll...Stevenson, Albright and CNU while all fine teams, have proven unworthy. Not sure why Plymouth St. is getting more support than W.Conn since the Colonials won the H2H. (one got it right) Speaking of head to head. there are an incredible number of league champion determining games this Saturday. The aforementioned W.Conn plays Framingham...Alfred/Brockport....Salisbury/Wesley...WNE/Curry...Trinity/Amherst and Union/Ithaca. The schedule makers sure hit a homerun this week. We know we'll have some surprises. I can't wait.
Ufan, I agree. H2H W. Conn beats Plymouth who beats Framingham. Would look like Framingham should be out of the 3. I got W. Conn, Brockport, Wesley, WNE, Trinity, and Union. Gotta stick with my top 10.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 31, 2017, 12:36:55 AM
The Regional rankings come out this week. They almost always reflect who is thought to be the teams that will make the tourney. Of course I know the tourney brackets don't necessarily follow RR any more. Here's what I've got
1)Del. Vly..
2)Brockport
3)Wesley
4)Springfield...they like undefeated teams
5)Frostburg
6)Salisbury
7)Widener
8)Husson
9)Union
10)Plymouth St.
10t)W.Conn
...others...Curry,Ithaca,RPI,Alfred,WNE,Salve Regina & MIT are waiting in the wings if the others slip up. Either WNE, Curry or Salve is going to make the tourney as CCC champ so they will move up.
I just checked, the NEWMAC doesn't automatically get a bid this year but if Springfield is 10-0 they get in. A 8-2 MIT no way.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on October 31, 2017, 12:13:53 PM
My Rams are hoping there are a lot of slip ups and Cortland somehow wins the E 8.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 31, 2017, 12:48:22 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 31, 2017, 12:13:53 PM
My Rams are hoping there are a lot of slip ups and Cortland somehow wins the E 8.
HUH?...Wishful thinking D3MAFAN...Cortland has 2 league losses and CAN NOT win the E8. It's going to go to the Brockport/Alfred winner. I guess Cortland MIGHT get some at large consideration if they beat Utica and Ithaca to finish 7-3 but it's extremely unlikely.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 31, 2017, 12:48:22 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on October 31, 2017, 12:13:53 PM
My Rams are hoping there are a lot of slip ups and Cortland somehow wins the E 8.
HUH?...Wishful thinking D3MAFAN...Cortland has 2 league losses and CAN NOT win the E8. It's going to go to the Brockport/Alfred winner. I guess Cortland MIGHT get some at large consideration if they beat Utica and Ithaca to finish 7-3 but it's extremely unlikely. What's also unlikely is any chance your Rams have at the MASCAC title since they lost to Plymouth St...If Plymouth beats Fitchburg Saturday they finish 7-1 and even if Framingham beats W. Conn. the Panthers would get the bid. If W. Conn wins they get the bid since they beat Plymouth.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 31, 2017, 12:36:55 AMOK, I think I did pretty well with my Regional Rankings prediction. The one glaring difference is that the NCAA doesn't value the MAC or NJAC runner up as a potential pool C team except Frostburg. That's interesting because Salisbury not Frostburg is the NJAC team that doesn't have a league loss presently. No need to fret for the Seagulls though since they play both Wesley and Frostburg in the next two weeks. Surprisingly MAC team Widener gets no love but maybe that's because they have 2 losses. If they beat Kings and Del.Vly. they'll win the MAC bid and Del.Vly. would be at the mercy of a Pool C. Union needs to win to stay in since a loss to Ithaca would eliminate the Dutchmen. Even if Union beats RPI wk.10, Ithaca would have the H2H...if Ithaca beats Union and RPI beats Union (assuming they beat Rochester this week), then RPI wins the LL with their win over Ithaca. Then there's New England...well let's let Saturday sort it out.
The Regional rankings come out this week. They almost always reflect who is thought to be the teams that will make the tourney. Of course I know the tourney brackets don't necessarily follow RR any more. Here's what I've got
1)Del. Vly..
2)Brockport
3)Wesley
4)Springfield...they like undefeated teams
5)Frostburg
6)Salisbury
7)Widener
8)Husson
9)Union
10)Plymouth St.
10t)W.Conn
...others...Curry,Ithaca,RPI,Alfred,WNE,Salve Regina & MIT are waiting in the wings if the others slip up. Either WNE, Curry or Salve is going to make the tourney as CCC champ so they will move up.
I just checked, the NEWMAC doesn't automatically get a bid this year but if Springfield is 10-0 they get in. A 8-2 MIT no way.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Quote from: fisheralum91 on November 01, 2017, 04:24:26 PM
Congrats Dlip---Long over due!
Quote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Quote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2017, 12:29:45 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Frank and James, thanks for this but James at the 12:02 mark you touch on Framingham St., specifically asking "is their loss worse than Curry's to Union" well YES since their loss was to Plymouth St .and if Plymouth beats Fitchburg this Saturday they will win the bid regardless of a Framingham win over W.Conn. A W.Conn win gives them the bid, and the Rams are begging
You also harp on the NJAC, talking about Frostburg's chances without ever mentioning Salisbury who actually also has a clear path to the NJAC crown...leaving Wesley and Frostburg on the outside.
Quote from: Frank Rossi on November 02, 2017, 12:59:32 AMAlright yes, strange things can happen but it's unlikely that PSU loses toQuote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2017, 12:29:45 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Frank and James, thanks for this but James at the 12:02 mark you touch on Framingham St., specifically asking "is their loss worse than Curry's to Union" well YES since their loss was to Plymouth St .and if Plymouth beats Fitchburg this Saturday they will win the bid regardless of a Framingham win over W.Conn. A W.Conn win gives them the bid, and the Rams are begging
You also harp on the NJAC, talking about Frostburg's chances without ever mentioning Salisbury who actually also has a clear path to the NJAC crown...leaving Wesley and Frostburg on the outside.
WestConn must win on 11/10 vs. Westfield St. also. They cannot seal the conference this weekend unless PSU loses and they win. PSU seals the MASCAC if WestConn loses and PSU wins. Framingham St. only can win if PSU loses Saturday and FSU wins out.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2017, 12:29:45 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Frank and James, thanks for this but James at the 12:02 mark you touch on Framingham St., specifically asking "is their loss worse than Curry's to Union" well YES since their loss was to Plymouth St .and if Plymouth beats Fitchburg this Saturday they will win the bid regardless of a Framingham win over W.Conn. A W.Conn win gives them the bid, and the Rams are begging
You also harp on the NJAC, talking about Frostburg's chances without ever mentioning Salisbury who actually also has a clear path to the NJAC crown...leaving Wesley and Frostburg on the outside.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Quote from: ITH radio on November 02, 2017, 12:28:06 PMQuote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2017, 12:29:45 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Frank and James, thanks for this but James at the 12:02 mark you touch on Framingham St., specifically asking "is their loss worse than Curry's to Union" well YES since their loss was to Plymouth St .and if Plymouth beats Fitchburg this Saturday they will win the bid regardless of a Framingham win over W.Conn. A W.Conn win gives them the bid, and the Rams are begging
You also harp on the NJAC, talking about Frostburg's chances without ever mentioning Salisbury who actually also has a clear path to the NJAC crown...leaving Wesley and Frostburg on the outside.
I'm pretty sure I mentioned it was a surprise Salisbury was left off the list. Their SOS and loss to Albright in Wk 1 however gives me a lot of confidence that the Wolverines will win the game this weekend. Guess we'll see.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2017, 12:29:45 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Frank and James, thanks for this but James at the 12:02 mark you touch on Framingham St., specifically asking "is their loss worse than Curry's to Union" well YES since their loss was to Plymouth St .and if Plymouth beats Fitchburg this Saturday they will win the bid regardless of a Framingham win over W.Conn. A W.Conn win gives them the bid, and the Rams are begging
You also harp on the NJAC, talking about Frostburg's chances without ever mentioning Salisbury who actually also has a clear path to the NJAC crown...leaving Wesley and Frostburg on the outside.
Quote from: D3MAFAN on November 02, 2017, 01:12:41 PMFascination? Hey I'm just stating facts. Your Rams need a lot of help. Maybe you still have your panties in a bunch because I said Framingham was overrated after their win over Cortland, a team that now has 3 losses by the way... A rebuilding Union played a MASCAC opponent last year, beating W.Conn 28-13. They're 2-0 against Plymouth, though a long time ago. They have never played Framingham. Bring it on.Quote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2017, 12:29:45 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 01, 2017, 03:51:21 PM
Our reactions to the 1st ranking:
https://www.facebook.com/D3Huddle/videos/1467491873349953/
Frank and James, thanks for this but James at the 12:02 mark you touch on Framingham St., specifically asking "is their loss worse than Curry's to Union" well YES since their loss was to Plymouth St .and if Plymouth beats Fitchburg this Saturday they will win the bid regardless of a Framingham win over W.Conn. A W.Conn win gives them the bid, and the Rams are begging
You also harp on the NJAC, talking about Frostburg's chances without ever mentioning Salisbury who actually also has a clear path to the NJAC crown...leaving Wesley and Frostburg on the outside.
Holy mother...What is it with your fascination with the RAMS this season, you have harp and babbled about us all season. Regarding Curry being ranked and not my RAMS is totally understandable based upon the current RR. Please do win over the next few weeks, hopefully the committee can give you what you been asking for all season, a game against the MASCAC.
Quote from: dlip on November 01, 2017, 04:02:25 PMSpeaking of overrated... I'm a HUGE Union fan and I agree with Dlip that it's great to see Union get any rankings since I've seen the rise and fall and now possible rise again of the program. Having Union enter the ERFP at #7 week 8 was sensational BUT I admitted then that they were overrated and wk. 9 they fell behind Husson to where they should be. Having Union ranked #7 in the first NCAA Regional Rankings is also surreal. While the rankings make sense I'm not so delusional that I think Union is better than say Frostburg or Salisbury or WNE. They're just currently undefeated in the Liberty League. The big difference is they don't need help. If they lose then they fall and are out. Simple as that.
dlip is just ****ing orgasmic seeing Union in any ranking whatsoever! He could give a **** of the ranking's validity and specifics as long as it's a positive ranking. Man this has been an enjoyable year and a half ride!
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 9-0 | 47 | 2 | vs. #9t Widener |
2 Brockport State ( 3 ) | 9-0 | 46 | 1 | at St. Lawrence |
3 Wesley | 8-1 | 42 | 3 | vs. Christopher Newport |
4 Frostburg State | 8-1 | 35 | 4 | at #6 Salisbury |
5 Springfield | 9-0 | 29 | 5t | vs. MIT |
6 Salisbury | 7-2 | 22 | 5t | vs. #4 Frostburg State |
7 Plymouth State | 9-1 | 16 | 9t | Open Date |
8 Husson | 8-1 | 14 | 7 | vs. Mount Ida |
9t Framingham State | 8-1 | 8 | 9t | vs. Worcester State |
9t Widener | 7-2 | 8 | NR | at #1 Delaware Valley |
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 06, 2017, 11:10:02 AM
Week 10 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1 Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 9-0 47 2 vs. #9t Widener 2 Brockport State ( 3 ) 9-0 46 1 at St. Lawrence 3 Wesley 8-1 42 3 vs. Christopher Newport 4 Frostburg State 8-1 35 4 at #6 Salisbury 5 Springfield 9-0 29 5t vs. MIT 6 Salisbury 7-2 22 5t vs. #4 Frostburg State 7 Plymouth State 9-1 16 9t Open Date 8 Husson 8-1 14 7 vs. Mount Ida 9t Framingham State 8-1 8 9t vs. Worcester State 9t Widener 7-2 8 NR at #1 Delaware Valley
Dropping Out:
Union
Also Receiving votes:
Western New England 3
Ithaca 2
RPI 2
Amherst 1
Voting Distribution:
Delaware Valley (2,2,1,2,1)
Brockport State (1,1,3,1,3)
Wesley (3,3,2,3,2)
Frostburg State (4,4,4,4,4)
Springfield (5,5,5,5,6)
Salisbury (9,6,6,7,5)
Plymouth State (7,8,7,8,9)
Husson (6,7,9,9,10)
Framingham State (NR,NR,8,6,NR)
Widener (8,NR,NR,10,7)
Western New England (NR,NR,NR,NR,8)
Ithaca (NR,9,NR,NR,NR)
RPI (NR,10,10,NR,NR)
Amherst (10,NR,NR,NR,NR)
Key Matchups:
#4 Frostburg State at #6 Salisbury
#9t Widener at #1 Delaware Valley
Team | Record | Points | Last Rating | Next Week |
1t Brockport State ( 3 ) | 10-0 | 47 | 2 | vs. #8t Plymouth State |
1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) | 10-0 | 47 | 1 | vs. Western New England |
3 Wesley | 9-1 | 41 | 3 | vs. #7 RPI |
4 Frostburg State | 9-1 | 33 | 4 | at #3 (West) Wittenberg |
5 Springfield | 10-0 | 31 | 5 | vs. #10 Husson |
6 Salisbury | 7-3 | 21 | 6 | at #8t Ithaca |
7 RPI | 8-2 | 11 | NR | at #3 Wesley |
8t Ithaca | 7-3 | 10 | NR | vs. #6 Salisbury |
8t Plymouth State | 9-1 | 10 | 7 | at #1t Brockport State |
10 Husson | 9-1 | 9 | 8 | at #5 Springfield |
Quote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 09:59:30 AM
I know Husson plays zero good teams in conference, and they are usually just a shrug of the shoulders addition to anyone's poll when teams in better leagues are struggling, but it's amusing to track their ratings.
Week 1- beat Union 20-7, 2 points (not listed in voting distribution)
Week 2- beat Dean 44-12, no votes
Week 3- bye, no votes
Week 4- lost at WNE 20-14, no votes
Week 5- beat Endicott 28-7, no votes
Week 6- beat SUNY-Maritime 35-17, 1 point (10th place vote from voter 4)
Week 7- beat Castleton 49-0, no votes
Week 8- beat Gallaudet 48-21, 12 points (8, 7, NR, 8, NR)
Week 9- beat Anna Maria 70-13, 17 points (6, 7, 7, 10, 8)
Week 10- beat Alfred State 63-0, 14 points (6, 7, 9, 9, 10)
Week 11- beat Mt. Ida 42-14, 8 points (NR, 6, 7, NR, NR)
Quote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2017, 10:08:48 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 09:59:30 AM
I know Husson plays zero good teams in conference, and they are usually just a shrug of the shoulders addition to anyone's poll when teams in better leagues are struggling, but it's amusing to track their ratings.
Week 1- beat Union 20-7, 2 points (not listed in voting distribution)
Week 2- beat Dean 44-12, no votes
Week 3- bye, no votes
Week 4- lost at WNE 20-14, no votes
Week 5- beat Endicott 28-7, no votes
Week 6- beat SUNY-Maritime 35-17, 1 point (10th place vote from voter 4)
Week 7- beat Castleton 49-0, no votes
Week 8- beat Gallaudet 48-21, 12 points (8, 7, NR, 8, NR)
Week 9- beat Anna Maria 70-13, 17 points (6, 7, 7, 10, 8)
Week 10- beat Alfred State 63-0, 14 points (6, 7, 9, 9, 10)
Week 11- beat Mt. Ida 42-14, 8 points (NR, 6, 7, NR, NR)
Husson moves in because other teams kept losing. Once there are only a few teams with 0 or 1 losses it becomes hard to say that Husson could not beat them. They did go undefeated. Say Salisbury played their schedule, would they receive votes going undefeated. I have no issue with them getting votes. I have more of an issue with Salisbury and Ithaca getting votes with 3 losses. Do I think both teams would beat Husson, probably, but that is not what this is. If it is that type of poll then I would have Wesley first since I think they will beat both Brockport and Del Val if they play them. But that would look stupid since Del Val already beat Wesley H2H.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2017, 10:08:48 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 09:59:30 AM
I know Husson plays zero good teams in conference, and they are usually just a shrug of the shoulders addition to anyone's poll when teams in better leagues are struggling, but it's amusing to track their ratings.
Week 1- beat Union 20-7, 2 points (not listed in voting distribution)
Week 2- beat Dean 44-12, no votes
Week 3- bye, no votes
Week 4- lost at WNE 20-14, no votes
Week 5- beat Endicott 28-7, no votes
Week 6- beat SUNY-Maritime 35-17, 1 point (10th place vote from voter 4)
Week 7- beat Castleton 49-0, no votes
Week 8- beat Gallaudet 48-21, 12 points (8, 7, NR, 8, NR)
Week 9- beat Anna Maria 70-13, 17 points (6, 7, 7, 10, 8)
Week 10- beat Alfred State 63-0, 14 points (6, 7, 9, 9, 10)
Week 11- beat Mt. Ida 42-14, 8 points (NR, 6, 7, NR, NR)
Husson moves in because other teams kept losing. Once there are only a few teams with 0 or 1 losses it becomes hard to say that Husson could not beat them. They did go undefeated. Say Salisbury played their schedule, would they receive votes going undefeated. I have no issue with them getting votes. I have more of an issue with Salisbury and Ithaca getting votes with 3 losses. Do I think both teams would beat Husson, probably, but that is not what this is. If it is that type of poll then I would have Wesley first since I think they will beat both Brockport and Del Val if they play them. But that would look stupid since Del Val already beat Wesley H2H.
Quote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 12:05:58 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2017, 10:08:48 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 09:59:30 AM
I know Husson plays zero good teams in conference, and they are usually just a shrug of the shoulders addition to anyone's poll when teams in better leagues are struggling, but it's amusing to track their ratings.
Week 1- beat Union 20-7, 2 points (not listed in voting distribution)
Week 2- beat Dean 44-12, no votes
Week 3- bye, no votes
Week 4- lost at WNE 20-14, no votes
Week 5- beat Endicott 28-7, no votes
Week 6- beat SUNY-Maritime 35-17, 1 point (10th place vote from voter 4)
Week 7- beat Castleton 49-0, no votes
Week 8- beat Gallaudet 48-21, 12 points (8, 7, NR, 8, NR)
Week 9- beat Anna Maria 70-13, 17 points (6, 7, 7, 10, 8)
Week 10- beat Alfred State 63-0, 14 points (6, 7, 9, 9, 10)
Week 11- beat Mt. Ida 42-14, 8 points (NR, 6, 7, NR, NR)
Husson moves in because other teams kept losing. Once there are only a few teams with 0 or 1 losses it becomes hard to say that Husson could not beat them. They did go undefeated. Say Salisbury played their schedule, would they receive votes going undefeated. I have no issue with them getting votes. I have more of an issue with Salisbury and Ithaca getting votes with 3 losses. Do I think both teams would beat Husson, probably, but that is not what this is. If it is that type of poll then I would have Wesley first since I think they will beat both Brockport and Del Val if they play them. But that would look stupid since Del Val already beat Wesley H2H.
I'm just more amused that Husson will get into people's polls, win a game by 63, and move down. Like I said, I get why, Husson is just checking the "Blew out bad opponent" box game after game, and teams will do something more impressive around them. It's just humorous to compare Husson's results and the poll results week to week. They don't necessarily correlate into "Do well, move up, Do bad, move down"
Quote from: D3MAFAN on November 14, 2017, 12:46:19 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2017, 10:08:48 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 09:59:30 AM
I know Husson plays zero good teams in conference, and they are usually just a shrug of the shoulders addition to anyone's poll when teams in better leagues are struggling, but it's amusing to track their ratings.
Week 1- beat Union 20-7, 2 points (not listed in voting distribution)
Week 2- beat Dean 44-12, no votes
Week 3- bye, no votes
Week 4- lost at WNE 20-14, no votes
Week 5- beat Endicott 28-7, no votes
Week 6- beat SUNY-Maritime 35-17, 1 point (10th place vote from voter 4)
Week 7- beat Castleton 49-0, no votes
Week 8- beat Gallaudet 48-21, 12 points (8, 7, NR, 8, NR)
Week 9- beat Anna Maria 70-13, 17 points (6, 7, 7, 10, 8)
Week 10- beat Alfred State 63-0, 14 points (6, 7, 9, 9, 10)
Week 11- beat Mt. Ida 42-14, 8 points (NR, 6, 7, NR, NR)
Husson moves in because other teams kept losing. Once there are only a few teams with 0 or 1 losses it becomes hard to say that Husson could not beat them. They did go undefeated. Say Salisbury played their schedule, would they receive votes going undefeated. I have no issue with them getting votes. I have more of an issue with Salisbury and Ithaca getting votes with 3 losses. Do I think both teams would beat Husson, probably, but that is not what this is. If it is that type of poll then I would have Wesley first since I think they will beat both Brockport and Del Val if they play them. But that would look stupid since Del Val already beat Wesley H2H.
At the end of season, I have no problem with both Salisbury and Ithaca in. I still think that the poll is very reasonable, I'm pretty sure my rankings look like what is presented above. I think both Delaware Valley and Brockport are still the clear #1 & #2 and would beat everyone below them 6 out of 10 times. I say that because of QB play. Also, I believe their defenses are very skilled, also each team has played through adversity at some point in the season. I really do like Ithaca as they finished very strong. I think Salisbury could have been easily our at-large this year or even won their conference based on looking at box scores. I think the remaining teams are toss ups.
Quote from: dlip on November 14, 2017, 03:35:21 PMQuote from: D3MAFAN on November 14, 2017, 12:46:19 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2017, 10:08:48 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 09:59:30 AM
I know Husson plays zero good teams in conference, and they are usually just a shrug of the shoulders addition to anyone's poll when teams in better leagues are struggling, but it's amusing to track their ratings.
Week 1- beat Union 20-7, 2 points (not listed in voting distribution)
Week 2- beat Dean 44-12, no votes
Week 3- bye, no votes
Week 4- lost at WNE 20-14, no votes
Week 5- beat Endicott 28-7, no votes
Week 6- beat SUNY-Maritime 35-17, 1 point (10th place vote from voter 4)
Week 7- beat Castleton 49-0, no votes
Week 8- beat Gallaudet 48-21, 12 points (8, 7, NR, 8, NR)
Week 9- beat Anna Maria 70-13, 17 points (6, 7, 7, 10, 8)
Week 10- beat Alfred State 63-0, 14 points (6, 7, 9, 9, 10)
Week 11- beat Mt. Ida 42-14, 8 points (NR, 6, 7, NR, NR)
Husson moves in because other teams kept losing. Once there are only a few teams with 0 or 1 losses it becomes hard to say that Husson could not beat them. They did go undefeated. Say Salisbury played their schedule, would they receive votes going undefeated. I have no issue with them getting votes. I have more of an issue with Salisbury and Ithaca getting votes with 3 losses. Do I think both teams would beat Husson, probably, but that is not what this is. If it is that type of poll then I would have Wesley first since I think they will beat both Brockport and Del Val if they play them. But that would look stupid since Del Val already beat Wesley H2H.
At the end of season, I have no problem with both Salisbury and Ithaca in. I still think that the poll is very reasonable, I'm pretty sure my rankings look like what is presented above. I think both Delaware Valley and Brockport are still the clear #1 & #2 and would beat everyone below them 6 out of 10 times. I say that because of QB play. Also, I believe their defenses are very skilled, also each team has played through adversity at some point in the season. I really do like Ithaca as they finished very strong. I think Salisbury could have been easily our at-large this year or even won their conference based on looking at box scores. I think the remaining teams are toss ups.
That's a pretty bold statement (not criticizing just pointing out) when you have Wesley sitting there below them both. Del Val beat them once, the first game of the season, but to dlip, he doesn't know of more than maybe 3-4 teams (maybe 5 or 6 at the most) in the nation that could beat Wesley 6 out of 10 times. With that said, both Del Val and Brockport have been impressive. With Germinerio healthy dlip believes Brockport to be the better of the two. However when it's all said and done dlip would not be surprised in the least bit to see Wesley as the last ER team standing.
Quote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 02:38:35 PM
Oh, I'm not saying Husson is misranked, I just find it interesting that the actual results of Husson's games don't affect where they are voted in any way.
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 17, 2017, 10:24:36 PMQuote from: ccd494 on November 14, 2017, 02:38:35 PM
Oh, I'm not saying Husson is misranked, I just find it interesting that the actual results of Husson's games don't affect where they are voted in any way.
Don't forget that while Husson is winning, their opponents are playing games as well. Past results can be diminished or elevated based on later results.
And every voter isn't beholden to ranking teams only on record, which is what I think makes the rankings fun.
Quote from: Machiavelli on December 01, 2017, 01:43:31 PM
No need for a final pole. Here ya go.
1 Brockport St
2 Delaware Valley
3 Frostburg St
4 Wesley
5 RPI
6 Ithaca
7 Salisbury
8 Husson
9 Alfred
10 Springfield
33 Plymouth St.
QuoteFrostburg could jump above both Delaware Valley/Brockport or fall below Wesley because they had an easier draw in the first two rounds and Wesley beat them.
Quote from: gordonmann on December 01, 2017, 03:39:51 PMQuoteFrostburg could jump above both Delaware Valley/Brockport or fall below Wesley because they had an easier draw in the first two rounds and Wesley beat them.
Beating Wittenberg and W&J on the road in the first two rounds is easier then beating RPI at home and losing to Brockport?
Quote from: AUKaz00 on November 14, 2017, 08:39:47 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 10-0 47 2 vs. #8t Plymouth State 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 10-0 47 1 vs. Western New England 3 Wesley 9-1 41 3 vs. #7 RPI 4 Frostburg State 9-1 33 4 at #3 (West) Wittenberg 5 Springfield 10-0 31 5 vs. #10 Husson 6 Salisbury 7-3 21 6 at #8t Ithaca 7 RPI 8-2 11 NR at #3 Wesley 8t Ithaca 7-3 10 NR vs. #6 Salisbury 8t Plymouth State 9-1 10 7 at #1t Brockport State 10 Husson 9-1 9 8 at #5 Springfield
Dropping Out:
Framingham State
Widener
Also Receiving votes:
Western New England 6
Hobart 3
Alfred 2
Framingham State 2
Widener 2
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,2)
Delaware Valley (1,2,2,2,1)
Wesley (2,3,3,3,3)
Quote from: Bartman on December 03, 2017, 06:05:40 PM
I think it would be interesting to do a final poll post playoffs and post season games. There is no doubt Brockport is #1 and Delaware Valley is a close #2.I really hope Brockport can pull off a win against UMHB, but it is a tall task. Frankly, if Del Val had not made the comeback, I really would have questioned the strength of the MAC and maybe the NJAC, although Frostburg did well in their 2 wins but the Mount Union performance did not help the East. So, I think there is a performance gap between the top 2 eastern teams and Frostburg and Wesley, but these are still the top four. After that, I think Springfield , Salisbury and Plymouth State did not help themselves in the post season, while Husson, Ithaca and Alfred all showed well. RPI played well against Wesley, but I am still not sure how good this Wesley team was, especially compared to the past teams. So , I think the post season would really change my vote on the 5 thru 10 positions....not lobbying to do this now, but it is revealing to see teams play out of conference at the end of the year.
Quote from: D3viewer on December 02, 2017, 03:58:02 PMQuote from: AUKaz00 on November 14, 2017, 08:39:47 AM
Week 11 Fan Poll
Team Record Points Last Rating Next Week 1t Brockport State ( 3 ) 10-0 47 2 vs. #8t Plymouth State 1t Delaware Valley ( 2 ) 10-0 47 1 vs. Western New England 3 Wesley 9-1 41 3 vs. #7 RPI 4 Frostburg State 9-1 33 4 at #3 (West) Wittenberg 5 Springfield 10-0 31 5 vs. #10 Husson 6 Salisbury 7-3 21 6 at #8t Ithaca 7 RPI 8-2 11 NR at #3 Wesley 8t Ithaca 7-3 10 NR vs. #6 Salisbury 8t Plymouth State 9-1 10 7 at #1t Brockport State 10 Husson 9-1 9 8 at #5 Springfield
Dropping Out:
Framingham State
Widener
Also Receiving votes:
Western New England 6
Hobart 3
Alfred 2
Framingham State 2
Widener 2
Voting Distribution:
Brockport State (3,1,1,1,2)
Delaware Valley (1,2,2,2,1)
Wesley (2,3,3,3,3)
I heard Brockport's sole motivation these last few weeks was to prove this #1voter wrong. Mission accomplished.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 18, 2017, 03:04:37 PM
2006? Fisher (4), Wesley (7), Springfield (10)
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on December 18, 2017, 04:38:26 PM+1 Mr Ypsi.Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 18, 2017, 03:04:37 PM
2006? Fisher (4), Wesley (7), Springfield (10)
Except Wesley was still South region in 2006.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on December 18, 2017, 04:38:26 PMMr. Yipsi good catch. Wesley has made the top ten 12 of the last 15 years. The next "real" Eastern team is St. John Fisher with 3 of the last 15 years in the top ten(which is why the Cardinal fans are depressed this year), while Del Val, Hobart and Rowan have all been in the top 10 twice in the last 15 years, with DelVal making it this year. Other than Wesley, the top ten is rarified air for the East.Quote from: Bombers798891 on December 18, 2017, 03:04:37 PM
2006? Fisher (4), Wesley (7), Springfield (10)
Except Wesley was still South region in 2006.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 10, 2018, 03:53:18 PM
In the previous it appears that you spelled my user mane incorrect. I think it is corrected. I'm doing this to re-confirm.
Quote from: d3fan142511 on August 21, 2018, 01:09:03 PM
Sorry about that:
9 should have been Widener
Quote from: bman on August 21, 2018, 01:36:27 PMQuote from: d3fan142511 on August 21, 2018, 01:09:03 PM
Sorry about that:
9 should have been Widener
Nah, no worries. Rams misspells Widener purposefully. Not sure if its to get under my skin (I find it humorous) or if there is another reason....he's mute on the subject...
Quote from: rams1102 on August 21, 2018, 01:58:14 PMQuote from: bman on August 21, 2018, 01:36:27 PMQuote from: d3fan142511 on August 21, 2018, 01:09:03 PM
Sorry about that:
9 should have been Widener
Nah, no worries. Rams misspells Widener purposefully. Not sure if its to get under my skin (I find it humorous) or if there is another reason....he's mute on the subject...
I'm not mute I'm Polish. Correction made. ;D I hope Kaz is ready to do the ERFP again this year.
Quote from: dlip on August 21, 2018, 08:05:56 PMDlip , it looks like our Union Dutchman will have their hands full with five of the East's best teams on their nine game schedule...RPI, Ithaca, Springfield, Husson and Hobart. Some would call it daunting. I say it's an opportunity.
1.) Brockport
2.) Wesley
3.) RPI
4.) Frostburg
5.) Ithaca
6.) Alfred
7.) Stevenson
8.) Salisbury
9.) Springfield
10.) Del Val
Honorable Mention: Husson, WNE, Widener, Hobart
Quote from: UfanBill on August 26, 2018, 04:07:55 AMQuote from: dlip on August 21, 2018, 08:05:56 PMDlip , it looks like our Union Dutchman will have their hands full with five of the East's best teams on their nine game schedule...RPI, Ithaca, Springfield, Husson and Hobart. Some would call it daunting. I say it's an opportunity.
1.) Brockport
2.) Wesley
3.) RPI
4.) Frostburg
5.) Ithaca
6.) Alfred
7.) Stevenson
8.) Salisbury
9.) Springfield
10.) Del Val
Honorable Mention: Husson, WNE, Widener, Hobart
Quote from: ITH radio on August 30, 2018, 11:55:43 AM
What did you guys think of our Top 12 from the preseason show?
Quote from: ITH radio on August 30, 2018, 11:55:43 AM
What did you guys think of our Top 12 from the preseason show?
Quote from: wesleydad on September 04, 2018, 09:43:14 AM
Sorry about the way it looks. When I insert the information it looks fine and then when I post it it looks like this. I will work on the format, not the most tech savvy person, but I will clean it up.
The top 4 are pretty much the same for all. The next 4 again pretty much the same for all. The final 2 as usual are all over the place. Some outliers, but all in all it looks good after week 1.
Quote from: dlip on September 04, 2018, 03:26:43 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 04, 2018, 09:43:14 AM
Sorry about the way it looks. When I insert the information it looks fine and then when I post it it looks like this. I will work on the format, not the most tech savvy person, but I will clean it up.
The top 4 are pretty much the same for all. The next 4 again pretty much the same for all. The final 2 as usual are all over the place. Some outliers, but all in all it looks good after week 1.
+k wesleydad! dlip agrees with UfanBill, great job! Also just great to see Union receiving votes. Whether or not dlip thinks they should be there is irrelevant. Again, coming from where we were just three years ago just to see Union getting some love in any way makes dlip ****ing orgasm ;D!
Quote from: Machiavelli on September 08, 2018, 10:25:38 PM
After Union's convincing win today, if anyone needs their walls painted a gross version of vanilla-ish/white, reach out directly to Dlip. If you need some bird crap looking spackle on your windshield, wait til next week after the Springfield game.
Quote from: Machiavelli on September 09, 2018, 08:13:14 AM
Woah dude. Step back from the ledge. I'm busting balls. I didn't say anything personal. It was a joke about your barf worthy comment.
Phew, glad we cleared that one up.
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 11:53:42 AMI'd have to disagree with you on this one. While Springfield may very well roll through the very weak NEWMAC they are not top 10 in the East worthy regardless of their QB situation. I was at the Union vs Springfield game Saturday. To be a top 10 team you have to perform on both sides of the ball and in all facets of the game. Springfield is a one trick pony. With proper QB play they run the option very well but they have NO passing attack. Evidence being that even when behind in the 2nd half against Union they attempted only 2 passes. For the season they are a pitiful 1-9 for 14 yards :o yikes! Defensively they're OK but they could not contain Union's passing attack, maybe because in practice they have nothing comparable from a scout team perspective to practice against. Add to it that the NEWMAC champ does not get an automatic NCAA bid this year and they are not worthy IMHO.
Depending on the injury situations with Springfield QBs, I think they are still a Top 10 East team. I have them at 9. I know from experience losing a QB, yet alone two in one game and change the dynamic of a game or season.
Quote from: UfanBill on September 19, 2018, 02:02:23 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 11:53:42 AMI'd have to disagree with you on this one. While Springfield may very well roll through the very weak NEWMAC they are not top 10 in the East worthy regardless of their QB situation. I was at the Union vs Springfield game Saturday. To be a top 10 team you have to perform on both sides of the ball and in all facets of the game. Springfield is a one trick pony. With proper QB play they run the option very well but they have NO passing attack. Evidence being that even when behind in the 2nd half against Union they attempted only 2 passes. For the season they are a pitiful 1-9 for 14 yards :o yikes! Defensively they're OK but they could not contain Union's passing attack, maybe because in practice they have nothing comparable from a scout team perspective to practice against. Add to it that the NEWMAC champ does not get an automatic NCAA bid this year and they are not worthy IMHO.
Depending on the injury situations with Springfield QBs, I think they are still a Top 10 East team. I have them at 9. I know from experience losing a QB, yet alone two in one game and change the dynamic of a game or season.
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 05:57:55 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 19, 2018, 02:02:23 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 11:53:42 AMI'd have to disagree with you on this one. While Springfield may very well roll through the very weak NEWMAC they are not top 10 in the East worthy regardless of their QB situation. I was at the Union vs Springfield game Saturday. To be a top 10 team you have to perform on both sides of the ball and in all facets of the game. Springfield is a one trick pony. With proper QB play they run the option very well but they have NO passing attack. Evidence being that even when behind in the 2nd half against Union they attempted only 2 passes. For the season they are a pitiful 1-9 for 14 yards :o yikes! Defensively they're OK but they could not contain Union's passing attack, maybe because in practice they have nothing comparable from a scout team perspective to practice against. Add to it that the NEWMAC champ does not get an automatic NCAA bid this year and they are not worthy IMHO.
Depending on the injury situations with Springfield QBs, I think they are still a Top 10 East team. I have them at 9. I know from experience losing a QB, yet alone two in one game and change the dynamic of a game or season.
Trust me I know what the option attack is and what it can and can't do. I watched, lived, and watched it again. I've seen the good, bad, and ugly of it. All I am saying is that when an "Option team" loses its two starting QB's in a key game, it effects not only the offense, but the defense as well, especially when that is your identity as a team. When you hear teams like Springfield and Salisbury, you think about the option. Running the option allows for you to control time of possession on occasions. Also, with the 3rd string QB in, I am sure the O Coordinator could not run the full "passing" attack, he probably only knew 4 to 5 plays (10 running the opposite direction).
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 05:57:55 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 19, 2018, 02:02:23 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 11:53:42 AMI'd have to disagree with you on this one. While Springfield may very well roll through the very weak NEWMAC they are not top 10 in the East worthy regardless of their QB situation. I was at the Union vs Springfield game Saturday. To be a top 10 team you have to perform on both sides of the ball and in all facets of the game. Springfield is a one trick pony. With proper QB play they run the option very well but they have NO passing attack. Evidence being that even when behind in the 2nd half against Union they attempted only 2 passes. For the season they are a pitiful 1-9 for 14 yards :o yikes! Defensively they're OK but they could not contain Union's passing attack, maybe because in practice they have nothing comparable from a scout team perspective to practice against. Add to it that the NEWMAC champ does not get an automatic NCAA bid this year and they are not worthy IMHO.
Depending on the injury situations with Springfield QBs, I think they are still a Top 10 East team. I have them at 9. I know from experience losing a QB, yet alone two in one game and change the dynamic of a game or season.
Trust me I know what the option attack is and what it can and can't do. I watched, lived, and watched it again. I've seen the good, bad, and ugly of it. All I am saying is that when an "Option team" loses its two starting QB's in a key game, it effects not only the offense, but the defense as well, especially when that is your identity as a team. When you hear teams like Springfield and Salisbury, you think about the option. Running the option allows for you to control time of possession on occasions. Also, with the 3rd string QB in, I am sure the O Coordinator could not run the full "passing" attack, he probably only knew 4 to 5 plays (10 running the opposite direction).
Quote from: UfanBill on September 20, 2018, 12:25:23 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 05:57:55 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 19, 2018, 02:02:23 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 19, 2018, 11:53:42 AMI'd have to disagree with you on this one. While Springfield may very well roll through the very weak NEWMAC they are not top 10 in the East worthy regardless of their QB situation. I was at the Union vs Springfield game Saturday. To be a top 10 team you have to perform on both sides of the ball and in all facets of the game. Springfield is a one trick pony. With proper QB play they run the option very well but they have NO passing attack. Evidence being that even when behind in the 2nd half against Union they attempted only 2 passes. For the season they are a pitiful 1-9 for 14 yards :o yikes! Defensively they're OK but they could not contain Union's passing attack, maybe because in practice they have nothing comparable from a scout team perspective to practice against. Add to it that the NEWMAC champ does not get an automatic NCAA bid this year and they are not worthy IMHO.
Depending on the injury situations with Springfield QBs, I think they are still a Top 10 East team. I have them at 9. I know from experience losing a QB, yet alone two in one game and change the dynamic of a game or season.
Trust me I know what the option attack is and what it can and can't do. I watched, lived, and watched it again. I've seen the good, bad, and ugly of it. All I am saying is that when an "Option team" loses its two starting QB's in a key game, it effects not only the offense, but the defense as well, especially when that is your identity as a team. When you hear teams like Springfield and Salisbury, you think about the option. Running the option allows for you to control time of possession on occasions. Also, with the 3rd string QB in, I am sure the O Coordinator could not run the full "passing" attack, he probably only knew 4 to 5 plays (10 running the opposite direction).
Not to start a pissing match here but why should I "trust" you when I can trust my own eyes and the stats. With 1st string QB Chad Shade playing Springfield does not throw the ball. He's 1 for 7, 14 yds. Saturday the 3rd string QB, actually a RB, was 0-2 in the 2nd half when playing from behind. If they get behind they are not equipped, especially if their opponent can control their running game.Remember the premise is...are they a top ten in the East worthy team. Are they the best team in New England?...maybe. Are they better than say Alfred, Cortland, Del. Vly, Rowan, Stevenson, Hobart, etc.?...No chance.
Quote from: UfanBill on September 26, 2018, 05:53:09 PM
Little to no disagreement on placings in the Fan Poll this week apparently means no banter. With league play getting into full swing in the next couple weeks I'd expect that to change.
Four conferences, the NJAC, MAC, LL and the E8, dominate the poll but there are four other conferences to keep an eye on. As a voter in this poll I have to consider trying to determine the best team in New England. For now I have given that position and a #10 vote to Western Connecticut of the MASCAC. They're 3-0 with wins over two of the stronger teams in New England,,,Plymouth State and Salve Regina. Other teams on my radar are Framingham and Mass- Dartmouth of the MASCAC and MIT, USMMA and Springfield of the NEWMAC, which has no automatic tourney bid again this year thus relegating them to Pool B. Husson the ECFC favorite, with 2 losses already, will still probably emerge with that conferences pool A bid. Then there's Western New England, the defending champ and favorite in the CCC. The fourth New England league and the strongest ??? the NESCAC, has the only New England team currently receiving votes in the D3football top 25. That team is Trinity(Ct). To those who might not know the NESCAC plays a closed schedule and does not participate in the NCAA tourney.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 08, 2018, 07:12:55 PM
Total
1 50 Brockport
2 45 Frostburg
3 38 Wesley
4 36 RPI
5 29 Salisbury
6 24 Del Val
7 20 Alfred
8 11 Ithaca
9 10 Montclair
T10 5 MIT
T10 5 W Conn
orv 4 Union
Vote Breakdown
Brockport 1 1 1 1 1
Frostburg 2 2 2 2 2
Wesley 3 3 3 5 3
RPI 4 4 4 3 4
Salisbury 5 5 5 4 7
Del Val 6 7 7 6 5
Alfred 7 6 6 7 9
Ithaca x x 8 9 6
Montclair 9 8 9 x 8
MIT 8 10 x x 10
W Conn 10 9 x 10 x
Union x x 10 8 x
Key East Region Games this week
9 Montclair St v 5 Salisbury
1 Brockport v 7 Alfred
Lyco v 6 Del Val
8 Ithaca v orv Union
Merchant Marine v Springfield
Voters
Wesleydad, The Osprey, Rams 1102, UfanBill, MANDGSU
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 08, 2018, 08:14:46 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 08, 2018, 07:12:55 PM
Total
1 50 Brockport
2 45 Frostburg
3 38 Wesley
4 36 RPI
5 29 Salisbury
6 24 Del Val
7 20 Alfred
8 11 Ithaca
9 10 Montclair
T10 5 MIT
T10 5 W Conn
orv 4 Union
Vote Breakdown
Brockport 1 1 1 1 1
Frostburg 2 2 2 2 2
Wesley 3 3 3 5 3
RPI 4 4 4 3 4
Salisbury 5 5 5 4 7
Del Val 6 7 7 6 5
Alfred 7 6 6 7 9
Ithaca x x 8 9 6
Montclair 9 8 9 x 8
MIT 8 10 x x 10
W Conn 10 9 x 10 x
Union x x 10 8 x
Key East Region Games this week
9 Montclair St v 5 Salisbury
1 Brockport v 7 Alfred
Lyco v 6 Del Val
8 Ithaca v orv Union
Merchant Marine v Springfield
Voters
Wesleydad, The Osprey, Rams 1102, UfanBill, MANDGSU
Seriously, as much as I sh!t on them, how in the world is MIT and WConn in front of Union here? I know people will play the 'but they beat Endicott and Endicott beat Hobart and they beat Union' chain of events but really? Have we learned nothing in all these years? These New England Teams stink! I wish they didn't. I'm a New England guy and I want them to be better. But they stink. If Union or Ithaca or whoever gets another loss in a less than stellar fashion, maybe, but at this point, MIT and WConn shouldn't be here. Yes, it's pulling at strings at the 10 spot, but everyone knows it's true that a .500 team in the LL or E8 goes undefeated in these other leagues and whoever is ranking them is doing it because they feel bad.
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 08, 2018, 09:25:19 PM
Honestly, I'm in total agreement with your strength of conf. argument. However, these teams will wind up in the NCAA regional rankings if they continue to remain undefeated.
The NJAC will start to beat up each other and more spots will open up. Union would need to win this week just to stay in the conversation.
This is what it is folks.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 08, 2018, 09:50:26 PM
It happens to be Union we are talking about now but IDBHO another couple of teams from the E8, LL, MAC, and NJAC could/should be in the poll.
This ****ing topic comes up all the time. The regional rankings simply don't reflect the "best" teams in the region...at least not in the East with the NE contingent. Also IDBHO the ERFP is starting to follow that pattern where "...we just throw a bone to one or two from NE," while we know damn well from years of experience that very rarely if ever do they belong. Yes they are undefeated and yes there is usually one or two that can step up annually, but that is ****ing it. This year it doesn't look like there is really even one. Dlip isn't biting on West Conn or MIT.
Dutch Boy will go as far to say he'd be willing to bet if Hobart (who is not the Hobart we have been used to even with the win over Union) and Endicott played 10 games this season the Pumpkinheads would win 7/8 of them...as long as they played before Halloween. It's time to stop the charade. ****, Dutch would love to see NE get better across the board...they still are just not there...yet...or maybe ever, who the **** knows???
Quote from: Oline89 on October 09, 2018, 11:06:45 AM
These are all excellent points, but let's talk Ithaca. They have one signature win, Alfred. At what point does the "good loss" argument start losing its leverage? In my opinion, good losses to Brockport and RPI have to be supported by at least 2 signature wins. If they beat Union next week, I could see a top 10 ranking, but will they advance past Alfred (even if Alfred has a "good loss" to Brockport)? Finally, what about Cortland? 4-1, with a "good loss" to Alfred. I guess it will take until they have a good loss to Brockport to crack the top 10, since their next 3 games are against the weakest teams in the E8. Good discussion
Quote from: UfanBill on October 09, 2018, 10:19:39 AM
Mach, I agree with you, but respectfully not you, DutchBoy. Union lost a hard fought, one point game to Hobart thus moving them down the poll. Not out IMO. The Dutchmen have already beaten handily the two best teams from New England last season, Husson and Springfield. They also beat W. Conn. convincingly in 2016. In my mind they are superior. I have been searching for "the best team' in New England for weeks and have been giving my #10 vote to W. Conn. MIT is my next in waiting. In this week's poll I actually wanted to vote for a three way tie at #7, Union, Ithaca & Alfred but was overruled by the poll compiler, Wesleydad. As for regional rankings keep in mind that three New England teams will get Pool A's and be regionally ranked. MIT/Springfield of the NEWMAC will have to hope for a Pool B. Right now the ERFP has 4 teams from the NJAC getting votes. Do you really think Montclair is better than Hobart, Cortland or Union? The poll is skewed because three pollsters are NJAC/MAC guys (who don't see NY and NE teams) with no one representing the E8 or most of NE.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2018, 11:48:25 AMQuote from: UfanBill on October 09, 2018, 10:19:39 AM
Mach, I agree with you, but respectfully not you, DutchBoy. Union lost a hard fought, one point game to Hobart thus moving them down the poll. Not out IMO. The Dutchmen have already beaten handily the two best teams from New England last season, Husson and Springfield. They also beat W. Conn. convincingly in 2016. In my mind they are superior. I have been searching for "the best team' in New England for weeks and have been giving my #10 vote to W. Conn. MIT is my next in waiting. In this week's poll I actually wanted to vote for a three way tie at #7, Union, Ithaca & Alfred but was overruled by the poll compiler, Wesleydad. As for regional rankings keep in mind that three New England teams will get Pool A's and be regionally ranked. MIT/Springfield of the NEWMAC will have to hope for a Pool B. Right now the ERFP has 4 teams from the NJAC getting votes. Do you really think Montclair is better than Hobart, Cortland or Union? The poll is skewed because three pollsters are NJAC/MAC guys (who don't see NY and NE teams) with no one representing the E8 or most of NE.
Ufan, I think you drastically underestimate the knowledge that the other voters have of the east teams by your above statement. I am well aware of the strength of each conference. I hated having 4 NJAC teams in my poll, tried for weeks to not do that as I believe that no league should have more than 3, but the are undefeated, Hobart, Cortland, and Union are not. I dont expect Montclair to stick around, but as of right now why aren't they a top 10 east team. The MAC is not good, Del Val is the only team that you can consider. The LL had Ithaca, 2 losses now, and Union, who was at the bottom of the list for most people, both loss this week. Why should they stay in? The E8 has Brockport and Alfred in, who else should be considered from the E8? I have no issue putting MIT and W Conn in at the bottom, they are undefeated and someone mentioned a chain that makes them possibly better than Hobart. As a follower of Wesley for many years now, I know how bad these NE teams are as Wesley has played them in the first round of the playoffs several times and crushed them. But in recent years some of these teams have won first round games against other east teams, so to make a blanket statement that they are all bad is wrong.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 09, 2018, 01:07:11 PM
What is the most impressive win by a NE team this season?
Dutch Boy totally agrees that West Conn and MIT really aren't worthy at this time, even considering the Endicott chain of events. If anything the Endicott win over Hobart and then their loss to whomever the **** actually proves that Hobart win wouldn't be repeated if the teams played again. 7/8 out of 10 times Hobart wins that game. Especially after a reconfigured defense and impressive performance against a still unknown team in Union.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 01:24:40 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 09, 2018, 01:07:11 PM
What is the most impressive win by a NE team this season?
Dutch Boy totally agrees that West Conn and MIT really aren't worthy at this time, even considering the Endicott chain of events. If anything the Endicott win over Hobart and then their loss to whomever the **** actually proves that Hobart win wouldn't be repeated if the teams played again. 7/8 out of 10 times Hobart wins that game. Especially after a reconfigured defense and impressive performance against a still unknown team in Union.
Endicott over Hobart. Hands down.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2018, 01:49:27 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 01:24:40 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 09, 2018, 01:07:11 PM
What is the most impressive win by a NE team this season?
Dutch Boy totally agrees that West Conn and MIT really aren't worthy at this time, even considering the Endicott chain of events. If anything the Endicott win over Hobart and then their loss to whomever the **** actually proves that Hobart win wouldn't be repeated if the teams played again. 7/8 out of 10 times Hobart wins that game. Especially after a reconfigured defense and impressive performance against a still unknown team in Union.
Endicott over Hobart. Hands down.
Dutch and Mach, can you all just join the "Fan" poll? This is all good discussions and all. The more votes the better the spread.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 09, 2018, 11:06:45 AM
These are all excellent points, but let's talk Ithaca. They have one signature win, Alfred. At what point does the "good loss" argument start losing its leverage? In my opinion, good losses to Brockport and RPI have to be supported by at least 2 signature wins. If they beat Union next week, I could see a top 10 ranking, but will they advance past Alfred (even if Alfred has a "good loss" to Brockport)? Finally, what about Cortland? 4-1, with a "good loss" to Alfred. I guess it will take until they have a good loss to Brockport to crack the top 10, since their next 3 games are against the weakest teams in the E8. Good discussion
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 01:24:40 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 09, 2018, 01:07:11 PM
What is the most impressive win by a NE team this season?
Dutch Boy totally agrees that West Conn and MIT really aren't worthy at this time, even considering the Endicott chain of events. If anything the Endicott win over Hobart and then their loss to whomever the **** actually proves that Hobart win wouldn't be repeated if the teams played again. 7/8 out of 10 times Hobart wins that game. Especially after a reconfigured defense and impressive performance against a still unknown team in Union.
Endicott over Hobart. Hands down.(Really?)
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 12:14:03 PM
And again, if this were Framingham, or even Husson at this point, i'd be ok with it. But when is the last time WConn or MIT beat anyone? I know WConn beat a 3-7 Hartwick last year by 1 which is super impressive and MIT only lost to a powerhouse playoff Springfield team by 36 last year, but come on!
Back in the day, Curry eventually earned their respect. Framingham has also earned some respect. And(I guess) Husson over the past few years. I need to see some consistency out of New England teams(or BIG wins of which there are ZERO) in order to take them a little seriously and think they can crack a top 10 poll.
I'm still baffled about the '4 teams from a conference' comment. If there are 4 teams(or more) from a conference, better than top teams from other conferences, then they are BETTER! There's no over/under on the # of good teams from a particular conference.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 08, 2018, 07:12:55 PM
Total
1 50 Brockport
2 45 Frostburg
3 38 Wesley
4 36 RPI
5 29 Salisbury
6 24 Del Val
7 20 Alfred
8 11 Ithaca
9 10 Montclair
T10 5 MIT
T10 5 W Conn
orv 4 Union
Vote Breakdown
Brockport 1 1 1 1 1
Frostburg 2 2 2 2 2
Wesley 3 3 3 5 3
RPI 4 4 4 3 4
Salisbury 5 5 5 4 7
Del Val 6 7 7 6 5
Alfred 7 6 6 7 9
Ithaca x x 8 9 6
Montclair 9 8 9 x 8
MIT 8 10 x x 10
W Conn 10 9 x 10 x
Union x x 10 8 x
Key East Region Games this week
9 Montclair St v 5 Salisbury
1 Brockport v 7 Alfred
Lyco v 6 Del Val
8 Ithaca v orv Union
Merchant Marine v Springfield
Voters
Wesleydad, The Osprey, Rams 1102, UfanBill, MANDGSU
Quote from: wesleydad on October 09, 2018, 09:55:17 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
Which is why I have no issue with MIT or W Conn on the list.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 10:06:46 PMThis , I believe to be true....in the East, the drop-off from BPort,Frosty and Westy to the rest of the good teams is not as steep as the rest of the country....but it is still a drop . The only seriously competitive team in NE is the Red SoxQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
I know this was likely, at least partially, tongue in cheek. We all know the East hasn't had a 'top tier' consistent team since the 90's Rowan teams. I think Wesley has taken a step back(a small step) since joining the NJAC. Brockport MIGHT be close now(but for how long?) But realistically, we just haven't had one in forever.
However, I'm a firm believer that the East is MUCH more competitive and deep as a whole than every other region. Our mid-tier teams(your 6-12 or whatever) would do just fine in most other conferences across the country. Probably finish in the top 3rd of them. Everyone thinks the OAC is so great because of Mt Union, but most non-Mount teams would be mediocre at best in the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC.
In summary, don't smoke crack.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 10:06:46 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
I know this was likely, at least partially, tongue in cheek. We all know the East hasn't had a 'top tier' consistent team since the 90's Rowan teams. I think Wesley has taken a step back(a small step) since joining the NJAC. Brockport MIGHT be close now(but for how long?) But realistically, we just haven't had one in forever.
However, I'm a firm believer that the East is MUCH more competitive and deep as a whole than every other region. Our mid-tier teams(your 6-12 or whatever) would do just fine in most other conferences across the country. Probably finish in the top 3rd of them. Everyone thinks the OAC is so great because of Mt Union, but most non-Mount teams would be mediocre at best in the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC.
In summary, don't smoke crack.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 10, 2018, 08:22:42 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 10:06:46 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
I know this was likely, at least partially, tongue in cheek. We all know the East hasn't had a 'top tier' consistent team since the 90's Rowan teams. I think Wesley has taken a step back(a small step) since joining the NJAC. Brockport MIGHT be close now(but for how long?) But realistically, we just haven't had one in forever.
However, I'm a firm believer that the East is MUCH more competitive and deep as a whole than every other region. Our mid-tier teams(your 6-12 or whatever) would do just fine in most other conferences across the country. Probably finish in the top 3rd of them. Everyone thinks the OAC is so great because of Mt Union, but most non-Mount teams would be mediocre at best in the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC.
In summary, don't smoke crack.
Hell, here is my top 10 in the full spirit of the fan poll page.
0. Williams
1. Brockport
2. Frostburg
3. Wesley
4. Salisbury
5. Mt. Ida
6. RPI
7. Del Val
8. Cortland
9. Jersey City State
10. Montclair
11. Union
12. Ithaca
In all seriousness, maybe it should be a rule that the top NE team has to be ranked #0 until week 7. Then you are allowed to put them in the top 10.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 10, 2018, 08:22:42 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 10:06:46 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
I know this was likely, at least partially, tongue in cheek. We all know the East hasn't had a 'top tier' consistent team since the 90's Rowan teams. I think Wesley has taken a step back(a small step) since joining the NJAC. Brockport MIGHT be close now(but for how long?) But realistically, we just haven't had one in forever.
However, I'm a firm believer that the East is MUCH more competitive and deep as a whole than every other region. Our mid-tier teams(your 6-12 or whatever) would do just fine in most other conferences across the country. Probably finish in the top 3rd of them. Everyone thinks the OAC is so great because of Mt Union, but most non-Mount teams would be mediocre at best in the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC.
In summary, don't smoke crack.
Hell, here is my top 10 in the full spirit of the fan poll page.
0. Williams
1. Brockport
2. Frostburg
3. Wesley
4. Salisbury
5. Mt. Ida
6. RPI
7. Del Val
8. Cortland
9. Jersey City State
10. Montclair
11. Union
12. Ithaca
In all seriousness, maybe it should be a rule that the top NE team has to be ranked #0 until week 7. Then you are allowed to put them in the top 10.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 10, 2018, 01:05:26 PM
I can't top Utah's perfection when it comes to the ERFP, but here's my, more serious, take for the current landscape, even throwing in some extras:
1. Brocky
2. Frosty
3. Wesley
4. RPI
5. DVC
6. Salisbury
7. Ithaca
8. Alfred
9. Cortland
10. Montclair
11. Hobart
12. Union
13. Christopher Newport
14. Framingham St.
15. MIT
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 10, 2018, 08:22:42 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 10:06:46 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
I know this was likely, at least partially, tongue in cheek. We all know the East hasn't had a 'top tier' consistent team since the 90's Rowan teams. I think Wesley has taken a step back(a small step) since joining the NJAC. Brockport MIGHT be close now(but for how long?) But realistically, we just haven't had one in forever.
However, I'm a firm believer that the East is MUCH more competitive and deep as a whole than every other region. Our mid-tier teams(your 6-12 or whatever) would do just fine in most other conferences across the country. Probably finish in the top 3rd of them. Everyone thinks the OAC is so great because of Mt Union, but most non-Mount teams would be mediocre at best in the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC.
In summary, don't smoke crack.
Hell, here is my top 10 in the full spirit of the fan poll page.
0. Williams
1. Brockport
2. Frostburg
3. Wesley
4. Salisbury
5. Mt. Ida
6. RPI
7. Del Val
8. Cortland
9. Jersey City State
10. Montclair
11. Union
12. Ithaca
In all seriousness, maybe it should be a rule that the top NE team has to be ranked #0 until week 7. Then you are allowed to put them in the top 10.
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 10, 2018, 03:04:39 PM
Some more to chew on. Looking at another division in the same organization. Does UCF deserve to be "ranked" higher than OK, MI, LSU, Miami, FL, etc....???
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 10, 2018, 04:31:33 PMQuote from: TheOsprey on October 10, 2018, 03:04:39 PM
Some more to chew on. Looking at another division in the same organization. Does UCF deserve to be "ranked" higher than OK, MI, LSU, Miami, FL, etc....???
Here's what I will say about UCF. If they go 13-0, and then 12-0, and can't make a four-team playoff, we'd all be better off ending the charade and just making the Power 5 teams the only ones eligible. If the only way for them to make the playoff is to reel off three undefeated seasons in a row, that's just stupid.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 10, 2018, 01:28:24 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 10, 2018, 01:05:26 PM
I can't top Utah's perfection when it comes to the ERFP, but here's my, more serious, take for the current landscape, even throwing in some extras:
1. Brocky
2. Frosty
3. Wesley
4. RPI
5. DVC
6. Salisbury
7. Ithaca
8. Alfred
9. Cortland
10. Montclair
11. Hobart
12. Union
13. Christopher Newport
14. Framingham St.
15. MIT
I think this is the best ranking list I have seen to date. Assuming the point of this poll is to rank the best teams in the East, not the teams most likely to be selected by the NCAA to play post season
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 10:06:46 PMBumping this because I agree. I think joining a conference is hurting Wesley when it comes to on field competition. I think the roster limits and lack of travel as an incentive has hurt the pool of players Wesley brings in. Wesley sells itself on two things: its track record and the coaching staff. They don't have good facilities compared to other Division III schools and the school itself isn't exactly prestigious.Quote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
I know this was likely, at least partially, tongue in cheek. We all know the East hasn't had a 'top tier' consistent team since the 90's Rowan teams. I think Wesley has taken a step back(a small step) since joining the NJAC. Brockport MIGHT be close now(but for how long?) But realistically, we just haven't had one in forever.
However, I'm a firm believer that the East is MUCH more competitive and deep as a whole than every other region. Our mid-tier teams(your 6-12 or whatever) would do just fine in most other conferences across the country. Probably finish in the top 3rd of them. Everyone thinks the OAC is so great because of Mt Union, but most non-Mount teams would be mediocre at best in the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC.
In summary, don't smoke crack.
Quote from: thewaterboy on October 11, 2018, 10:09:19 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 09, 2018, 10:06:46 PMBumping this because I agree. I think joining a conference is hurting Wesley when it comes to on field competition. I think the roster limits and lack of travel as an incentive has hurt the pool of players Wesley brings in. Wesley sells itself on two things: its track record and the coaching staff. They don't have good facilities compared to other Division III schools and the school itself isn't exactly prestigious.Quote from: Caz Bombers on October 09, 2018, 09:22:14 PM
if we're not going to include the NESCAC (and we might as well keep on not), then there aren't ten good teams in the East to rank.
Hell, there might not even be five.
I know this was likely, at least partially, tongue in cheek. We all know the East hasn't had a 'top tier' consistent team since the 90's Rowan teams. I think Wesley has taken a step back(a small step) since joining the NJAC. Brockport MIGHT be close now(but for how long?) But realistically, we just haven't had one in forever.
However, I'm a firm believer that the East is MUCH more competitive and deep as a whole than every other region. Our mid-tier teams(your 6-12 or whatever) would do just fine in most other conferences across the country. Probably finish in the top 3rd of them. Everyone thinks the OAC is so great because of Mt Union, but most non-Mount teams would be mediocre at best in the LL, E8, NJAC and MAC.
In summary, don't smoke crack.
Being independent was hard on Wesley financially, but I think they benefited because the coaching staff could sell a usually interesting and very tough schedule and bring in a larger group of kids. It wasn't uncommon to have a recruit's friend come along and become an unexpected contributor to the team. Now, you don't really have that.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 10, 2018, 05:12:09 PMQuote from: Oline89 on October 10, 2018, 01:28:24 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 10, 2018, 01:05:26 PM
I can't top Utah's perfection when it comes to the ERFP, but here's my, more serious, take for the current landscape, even throwing in some extras:
1. Brocky
2. Frosty
3. Wesley
4. RPI
5. DVC
6. Salisbury
7. Ithaca
8. Alfred
9. Cortland
10. Montclair
11. Hobart
12. Union
13. Christopher Newport
14. Framingham St.
15. MIT
I think this is the best ranking list I have seen to date. Assuming the point of this poll is to rank the best teams in the East, not the teams most likely to be selected by the NCAA to play post season
Dutch Boy believes Del Val is quite overrated this season. Losing what they did and considering their listless schedule this far, he believes they should be at 8,9, or 10. He really believes that Salisbury, IC, Alfred, Cartland, and even Montclair would beat them right now. Granted they have an excellent reputation but they are almost literally half the team they were last season.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 11, 2018, 11:06:05 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 10, 2018, 05:12:09 PMQuote from: Oline89 on October 10, 2018, 01:28:24 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 10, 2018, 01:05:26 PM
I can't top Utah's perfection when it comes to the ERFP, but here's my, more serious, take for the current landscape, even throwing in some extras:
1. Brocky
2. Frosty
3. Wesley
4. RPI
5. DVC
6. Salisbury
7. Ithaca
8. Alfred
9. Cortland
10. Montclair
11. Hobart
12. Union
13. Christopher Newport
14. Framingham St.
15. MIT
I think this is the best ranking list I have seen to date. Assuming the point of this poll is to rank the best teams in the East, not the teams most likely to be selected by the NCAA to play post season
Dutch Boy believes Del Val is quite overrated this season. Losing what they did and considering their listless schedule this far, he believes they should be at 8,9, or 10. He really believes that Salisbury, IC, Alfred, Cartland, and even Montclair would beat them right now. Granted they have an excellent reputation but they are almost literally half the team they were last season.
At this point in the season, 5 or 6 games, I can not put any 2 loss team on my ballot which is based on performance to this point. Ithaca is likely going to end up top 10 at the end of the season, well unless they lose another game and maybe Hobart will too, but right now they are not based on actual results, not what I think they will do. I think Wesley is better than Frostburg based on what I saw at the game, but the result was a Frostburg win. Alfred is the tough one since they lost to Ithaca, which is their only loss so far. If they lose to Brockport this week they will drop behind Ithaca on my ballot. Hobart has a lot of work to do with the loss to Endicott. Is RPI the 4th best team in the East, probably not, but based on where they started the season and the fact that teams ranked ahead of them lost they move up to 4. The group of undefeated teams that just started to make the poll came from well off of it. Some of the 1 loss teams were on it to start and are just coming back on. I don't use past years performances for this years poll. I started with the D3 rankings and then tweeked it a bit, has Wesley ahead of Frostburg until this week, as an example, and then went from there. That is how I go about it, obviously others look at it differently. That is why the more voters the more accurate the poll would be.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 14, 2018, 01:08:37 PM
I did a start over this week, looking at all the undefeated, 1 loss, and 2 loss teams. The top didnt change much, but i moved things around the bottom 5. Will be interesting to see all the ballots.
Quote from: Bartman on October 16, 2018, 12:04:53 PM
Wesleydad...correction , this week is Hobart v. RPI
Quote from: Upstate on October 16, 2018, 02:04:50 PM
What? Fisher didn't get any votes?
This poll is so unrealistic!
But seriously can't disagree with much on here, I really think Frostburg is a sleeper to win a bracket this year!
I'd love to see Port and them in different brackets to see What happens.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 11, 2018, 10:20:01 AM
You know I always wondered if this hurt Ithaca as well. Independents can schedule d2 teams (or even d1 teams) and that can be a good sell for players looking to show off their stuff against d1 talent in terms of recruiting. With Marpet and Garcon and others, players might be able to look at a d3 independent who plays top schedules as a good option. On the other hand you need to work hard to fill out those schedules and it also is going to cost you. And in Ithaca's case, the d2 teams they used to play (AIC, Mercyhurst, CW Post) have bigger conferences with less room for non league schedules.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2018, 01:13:14 PM
As far as 1 thru 7 total agreement. My 8,9,10 were Alfred, Montclair & W. Conn. I did think about Cortland. I also wanted to see my Red Hawks in the Top 10 before we squared off against Frostburg. ;D You never know and that's why we play the game. Salisbury was a game we could have won but say La Vi. Too many penalities and 4 picks usually equals a loss. Let's see if we can upset a Division 2 Team this Saturday. 2 loss teams will not dance unless they win their Conference.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 16, 2018, 04:14:24 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2018, 01:13:14 PM
As far as 1 thru 7 total agreement. My 8,9,10 were Alfred, Montclair & W. Conn. I did think about Cortland. I also wanted to see my Red Hawks in the Top 10 before we squared off against Frostburg. ;D You never know and that's why we play the game. Salisbury was a game we could have won but say La Vi. Too many penalities and 4 picks usually equals a loss. Let's see if we can upset a Division 2 Team this Saturday. 2 loss teams will not dance unless they win their Conference.
You DO realize, regardless of records, that Cortland would beat W. Conn by like 40 right? W. Conn is 6-0 barely beating a bunch of absolutely abysmal teams.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 16, 2018, 04:42:00 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 16, 2018, 04:14:24 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2018, 01:13:14 PM
As far as 1 thru 7 total agreement. My 8,9,10 were Alfred, Montclair & W. Conn. I did think about Cortland. I also wanted to see my Red Hawks in the Top 10 before we squared off against Frostburg. ;D You never know and that's why we play the game. Salisbury was a game we could have won but say La Vi. Too many penalities and 4 picks usually equals a loss. Let's see if we can upset a Division 2 Team this Saturday. 2 loss teams will not dance unless they win their Conference.
You DO realize, regardless of records, that Cortland would beat W. Conn by like 40 right? W. Conn is 6-0 barely beating a bunch of absolutely abysmal teams.
Here we go (Mario - Mario Kart Voice).
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 16, 2018, 04:14:24 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2018, 01:13:14 PM
As far as 1 thru 7 total agreement. My 8,9,10 were Alfred, Montclair & W. Conn. I did think about Cortland. I also wanted to see my Red Hawks in the Top 10 before we squared off against Frostburg. ;D You never know and that's why we play the game. Salisbury was a game we could have won but say La Vi. Too many penalities and 4 picks usually equals a loss. Let's see if we can upset a Division 2 Team this Saturday. 2 loss teams will not dance unless they win their conference.
You DO realize, regardless of records, that Cortland would beat W. Conn by like 40 right? W. Conn is 6-0 barely beating a bunch of absolutely abysmal teams.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 16, 2018, 02:33:38 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 11, 2018, 10:20:01 AM
You know I always wondered if this hurt Ithaca as well. Independents can schedule d2 teams (or even d1 teams) and that can be a good sell for players looking to show off their stuff against d1 talent in terms of recruiting. With Marpet and Garcon and others, players might be able to look at a d3 independent who plays top schedules as a good option. On the other hand you need to work hard to fill out those schedules and it also is going to cost you. And in Ithaca's case, the d2 teams they used to play (AIC, Mercyhurst, CW Post) have bigger conferences with less room for non league schedules.
I mean, part of it is simply that IC was scheduling those teams when they had fewer options in upstate NY. Look at IC's 2015 schedule:
Fisher was a club team, Hartwick didn't have football, Utica didn't have football. Morrisville was a JUCO. Union and IC didn't get along. Hobart and IC got into a thing involving football and lacrosse (I forget who fired first) and didn't play.
You also got rewarded for playing and beating those teams.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 16, 2018, 08:52:49 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 16, 2018, 04:14:24 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2018, 01:13:14 PM
As far as 1 thru 7 total agreement. My 8,9,10 were Alfred, Montclair & W. Conn. I did think about Cortland. I also wanted to see my Red Hawks in the Top 10 before we squared off against Frostburg. ;D You never know and that's why we play the game. Salisbury was a game we could have won but say La Vi. Too many penalities and 4 picks usually equals a loss. Let's see if we can upset a Division 2 Team this Saturday. 2 loss teams will not dance unless they win their conference.
You DO realize, regardless of records, that Cortland would beat W. Conn by like 40 right? W. Conn is 6-0 barely beating a bunch of absolutely abysmal teams.
Look, you're probably right but consider this...last season Cortland and W. Conn. had a common opponent, Framingham. W. Conn. lost to Framingham by 4, 39-35. Cortland lost by 15, 29-14. Just sayin'.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 16, 2018, 10:05:46 PM
And FYI, I know you can do what I did above at enough levels to spin just about anything in your favor. It's like always bringing it Back to Bacon. But I challenge anyone to find a 100 point(on the dot) Delta with any team getting votes in the ERFP poll vs any team in the universe not getting votes. You can't.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 17, 2018, 11:43:08 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 16, 2018, 10:05:46 PM
And FYI, I know you can do what I did above at enough levels to spin just about anything in your favor. It's like always bringing it Back to Bacon. But I challenge anyone to find a 100 point(on the dot) Delta with any team getting votes in the ERFP poll vs any team in the universe not getting votes. You can't.
Mach, chill... I said "you're probably right" about Cortland beating W. Conn. by 40. My point is don't completely discount their abilities. W.Conn. was a former NJAC member(2004-12) so the culture includes playing "up". They have a good shot at being in this year's tourney and besides, they have a really cool winged roof stadium. ;D
Quote from: Bartman on October 16, 2018, 05:43:10 PM
For the ERFP consideration, SOS stats for this week:
SOS(thru 10/13)
1 60 Brockport .579
2 54 Frostburg .537
3 46 Wesley .472
4 43 RPI .583
5 32 Salisbury .419
6 28 Ithaca .644
7 26 Del Val .582
T8 11 Cortland .497
T8 11 Alfred .554
10 8 MIT .446
orv 6 Montclair .492
orv 5 W Conn .476
No votes, 2 loss teams:
Hobart .617
Union .617
Endicott .592
The SOS will be an important factor for NCAA Regionals and should be considered by the ERFP voters . I'm thinking Salisbury may be over-ranked
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 20, 2018, 09:54:57 PM
Ya'll can say what you want about WConn, but they will stay in my poll this week. Watched their homecoming game from the fourth quarter through 4 OTs and they rallied from 14 down to beat Bwater St by a two point conversion 50-48. Very entertaining end of the game and #2 McKinnon?? would be a great player on any squad!!👍
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 21, 2018, 08:36:44 AM
Wesley stays in poll for me. It would almost not look right.🦉
Mach.-- your beating a dead horse. 🐎 WConn will only be challenged by Fram. St., otherwise their playoff bound. This situation hasn't changed in a long time. ⏳
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 20, 2018, 09:54:57 PM
Ya'll can say what you want about WConn, but they will stay in my poll this week. Watched their homecoming game from the fourth quarter through 4 OTs and they rallied from 14 down to beat Bwater St by a two point conversion 50-48. Very entertaining end of the game and #2 McKinnon?? would be a great player on any squad!!👍
Quote from: UfanBill on October 17, 2018, 11:43:08 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 16, 2018, 10:05:46 PM
And FYI, I know you can do what I did above at enough levels to spin just about anything in your favor. It's like always bringing it Back to Bacon. But I challenge anyone to find a 100 point(on the dot) Delta with any team getting votes in the ERFP poll vs any team in the universe not getting votes. You can't.
Mach, chill... I said "you're probably right" about Cortland beating W. Conn. by 40. My point is don't completely discount their abilities. W.Conn. was a former NJAC member(2004-12) so the culture includes playing "up". They have a good shot at being in this year's tourney and besides, they have a really cool winged roof stadium. ;D
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 21, 2018, 04:33:27 PM
Dutch doesn't feel West Conn or MIT belongs. West Conn for all the previously stated reasons and then some...MIT beats Coast Guard 13-0...? Listen, not that Dutch Boy's poll is iron clad, but are we doing a poll that attempts to parallel the regional rankings that we all love so much or are we attempting to use our insider knowledge, as fans, ex-players, ex-Wanna-be-players (Dutch Boy's category), etc, to accurately rate who "we" believe to be the best, most competitive ten teams playing football in the east?
If the later is the case than Dutch Boy hopes that we all know, as a result of our observations and experiences around the D3 football landscape that records, especially here in the east (and certainly other regions as well) do not always accurately reflect how good a team is. **** look at UMU? Would MIT give them a game? One criteria says yes, they are both undefeated...every other criteria Dutch Boy can ****ing think of says no. We just need to decide which direction we want to go?
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 21, 2018, 03:38:56 PMQuote from: TheOsprey on October 20, 2018, 09:54:57 PM
Ya'll can say what you want about WConn, but they will stay in my poll this week. Watched their homecoming game from the fourth quarter through 4 OTs and they rallied from 14 down to beat Bwater St by a two point conversion 50-48. Very entertaining end of the game and #2 McKinnon?? would be a great player on any squad!!👍
Is that the same Bridgewater State team that beat Buffalo State, 30-29? One can argue that Western Connecticut has NOT LOST A GAME and that we can't really prove that the Colonials wouldn't beat the Notre Dame Fightin' Irish but...three E8 teams tamed the Bengals, 65-7, 41-7 and 51-7 on successive Saterdays. Just sayin'.... :D
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: wesleydad on October 21, 2018, 05:45:34 PMQuote from: AUPepBand on October 21, 2018, 03:38:56 PMQuote from: TheOsprey on October 20, 2018, 09:54:57 PM
Ya'll can say what you want about WConn, but they will stay in my poll this week. Watched their homecoming game from the fourth quarter through 4 OTs and they rallied from 14 down to beat Bwater St by a two point conversion 50-48. Very entertaining end of the game and #2 McKinnon?? would be a great player on any squad!!👍
Is that the same Bridgewater State team that beat Buffalo State, 30-29? One can argue that Western Connecticut has NOT LOST A GAME and that we can't really prove that the Colonials wouldn't beat the Notre Dame Fightin' Irish but...three E8 teams tamed the Bengals, 65-7, 41-7 and 51-7 on successive Saterdays. Just sayin'.... :D
On Saxon Warriors!
Pep, love you, but didnt alfred just lose to utica? hard to argue they should be in over W Conn.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 21, 2018, 05:44:17 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 21, 2018, 04:33:27 PM
Dutch doesn't feel West Conn or MIT belongs. West Conn for all the previously stated reasons and then some...MIT beats Coast Guard 13-0...? Listen, not that Dutch Boy's poll is iron clad, but are we doing a poll that attempts to parallel the regional rankings that we all love so much or are we attempting to use our insider knowledge, as fans, ex-players, ex-Wanna-be-players (Dutch Boy's category), etc, to accurately rate who "we" believe to be the best, most competitive ten teams playing football in the east?
If the later is the case than Dutch Boy hopes that we all know, as a result of our observations and experiences around the D3 football landscape that records, especially here in the east (and certainly other regions as well) do not always accurately reflect how good a team is. **** look at UMU? Would MIT give them a game? One criteria says yes, they are both undefeated...every other criteria Dutch Boy can ****ing think of says no. We just need to decide which direction we want to go?
as this continues to be argued are we still using alfred and hobart as our comparisons? Both 3 loss teams, but some think they are still in the top 10. are you kidding me? I have less issue with W Conn being in then I do with those that think a 3 loss team is still worthy of a top 10 position. I have no issue dropping Wesley out, their 2 loses compared to other 2 loss teams are not as good. Do I think they crush W Conn or MIT, probably but they just lost to Rowan who barely beat So Va and TCNJ, are those teams any better than W Conn or MIT. We are talking about the 9 and 10 spots in a region. I would rather have a team that is unbeaten in those spots than teams with 2 or 3 loses. after the first 5 teams we are drawing straws as to who is in. I still think Wesley is the second best team in the east, but the results dont bare that out. This is not a what do I think will happen thing, this is a what did actually happen thing. Thanks Dutch for joining the voting, at least you put up.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 22, 2018, 06:00:04 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 21, 2018, 05:44:17 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 21, 2018, 04:33:27 PM
Dutch doesn't feel West Conn or MIT belongs. West Conn for all the previously stated reasons and then some...MIT beats Coast Guard 13-0...? Listen, not that Dutch Boy's poll is iron clad, but are we doing a poll that attempts to parallel the regional rankings that we all love so much or are we attempting to use our insider knowledge, as fans, ex-players, ex-Wanna-be-players (Dutch Boy's category), etc, to accurately rate who "we" believe to be the best, most competitive ten teams playing football in the east?
If the later is the case than Dutch Boy hopes that we all know, as a result of our observations and experiences around the D3 football landscape that records, especially here in the east (and certainly other regions as well) do not always accurately reflect how good a team is. **** look at UMU? Would MIT give them a game? One criteria says yes, they are both undefeated...every other criteria Dutch Boy can ****ing think of says no. We just need to decide which direction we want to go?
as this continues to be argued are we still using alfred and hobart as our comparisons? Both 3 loss teams, but some think they are still in the top 10. are you kidding me? I have less issue with W Conn being in then I do with those that think a 3 loss team is still worthy of a top 10 position. I have no issue dropping Wesley out, their 2 loses compared to other 2 loss teams are not as good. Do I think they crush W Conn or MIT, probably but they just lost to Rowan who barely beat So Va and TCNJ, are those teams any better than W Conn or MIT. We are talking about the 9 and 10 spots in a region. I would rather have a team that is unbeaten in those spots than teams with 2 or 3 loses. after the first 5 teams we are drawing straws as to who is in. I still think Wesley is the second best team in the east, but the results dont bare that out. This is not a what do I think will happen thing, this is a what did actually happen thing. Thanks Dutch for joining the voting, at least you put up.
Isn't this, your preference, the same thing as going by what one "thinks?" We'll have to agree to disagree, which is cool. However last word Larry has to say that if a poll is used to show the best teams and let's say you are 90% Wesley would monkey stomp West Conn and MIT (which you have said), why should record take precedence over that? If we are almost certain that one team is better than another, based on the level of their play and the competition they face, why should they not be included? There in lies the rub fellas.
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 22, 2018, 08:43:30 AM
Or the East Region Poll of what Mach wants...🏈
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 21, 2018, 10:34:55 PM
I've shown up at the 50 at the Stagg Bowl every year since then, but have yet to see Western Connecticut State.
This was back in 1999. Western Conn ran the table in the regular season, going 10-0, got a first-round bye (hey, it was the first year of the new system, the committee didn't know any better, but we advocated for Lycoming being moved into the East bracket). They then lost to Montclair State and went one-and-out.
Western Conn did go to the playoffs in 2001, lost 43-14 to Rowan in the first round.
Poster's name was Rodman. Every once in a while I hear from Jim Stout, one of the founding members of the D3football.com staff, with a Rodman sighting. Rodman would be in his late 30s by now.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:03:48 AM
So a few of these could be interchangeable, but this is totally legit. The good news is WestConn might crack the ERFP Top 25 for me(but it still feels forced):
1 Brockport
2 Frostburg St.
3 RPI
4 Salisbury
5 Wesley
6 Delaware Valley
7 Ithaca
8 Montclair St.
9 Rowan
10 Cortland
11 Christopher Newport
12 Stevenson
13 Framingham St.
14 MIT
15 Merchant Marine
16 Springfield
17 Endicott
18 Hobart
19 Misericordia
20 Western New England
21 Alfred
22 Utica
23 Morisville St.
24 Husson
25 Western Ct.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 22, 2018, 11:27:13 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:03:48 AM
So a few of these could be interchangeable, but this is totally legit. The good news is WestConn might crack the ERFP Top 25 for me(but it still feels forced):
1 Brockport
2 Frostburg St.
3 RPI
4 Salisbury
5 Wesley
6 Delaware Valley
7 Ithaca
8 Montclair St.
9 Rowan
10 Cortland
11 Christopher Newport
12 Stevenson
13 Framingham St.
14 MIT
15 Merchant Marine
16 Springfield
17 Endicott
18 Hobart
19 Misericordia
20 Western New England
21 Alfred
22 Utica
23 Morisville St.
24 Husson
25 Western Ct.
Alfred beats 14-20
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:28:25 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 22, 2018, 11:27:13 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:03:48 AM
So a few of these could be interchangeable, but this is totally legit. The good news is WestConn might crack the ERFP Top 25 for me(but it still feels forced):
1 Brockport
2 Frostburg St.
3 RPI
4 Salisbury
5 Wesley
6 Delaware Valley
7 Ithaca
8 Montclair St.
9 Rowan
10 Cortland
11 Christopher Newport
12 Stevenson
13 Framingham St.
14 MIT
15 Merchant Marine
16 Springfield
17 Endicott
18 Hobart
19 Misericordia
20 Western New England
21 Alfred
22 Utica
23 Morisville St.
24 Husson
25 Western Ct.
Alfred beats 14-20
I don't disagree. I think you can throw 13-23 in a hat and pull them out.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 22, 2018, 11:34:50 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:28:25 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 22, 2018, 11:27:13 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:03:48 AM
So a few of these could be interchangeable, but this is totally legit. The good news is WestConn might crack the ERFP Top 25 for me(but it still feels forced):
1 Brockport
2 Frostburg St.
3 RPI
4 Salisbury
5 Wesley
6 Delaware Valley
7 Ithaca
8 Montclair St.
9 Rowan
10 Cortland
11 Christopher Newport
12 Stevenson
13 Framingham St.
14 MIT
15 Merchant Marine
16 Springfield
17 Endicott
18 Hobart
19 Misericordia
20 Western New England
21 Alfred
22 Utica
23 Morisville St.
24 Husson
25 Western Ct.
Alfred beats 14-20
I don't disagree. I think you can throw 13-23 in a hat and pull them out.
...and not 24 or 25?
Quote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2018, 11:51:23 AM
I get it. But just for fun I will figure out where Wesley should be. My original thought is that they are the second best team in the east. They beat Del Val so no matter what happens they stay ahead of Del Val. They lost to Frostburg and Rowan so I have to put Frostburg and Rowan ahead of them based on actual results. So with just these 4 and Brockport I would my rankings would be Brockport, Frostburg, Rowan, Wesley, and Del Val. Now looking at Rowan they lost to Frostburg and CNU, so that means I have to put CNU ahead of Rowan, etc. etc. etc. I dont think Rowan is better than Wesley, but they did beat them. I just find it hard to keep Wesley as a top 3 or 4 team when they have lost twice, just like I can't move Rowan into the top 10 even after they beat Wesley because they lost to Frostburg and CNU, who I don't think should be in just because Rowan beat Wesley and they beat Rowan.
Now I can say that I put Montclair in with 2 loses ahead of Wesley because in my opinion their 2 loses, competitive to Frostburg and Salisbury are better than Wesley's loses to Frostburg and Rowan. I have Ithaca ahead of both of them based on who they lost to, Brockport and RPI, being better loses than either Montclair or Wesley. I also took another look at Stevenson, with loses to Frostburg and Del Val, but could not have them jump Wesley based on common opponents.
After moving things around, you will be glad to know that W Conn gets bumped out of my top 10.
I like the conversation, nice to hear other opinions since we all already know our own.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 22, 2018, 11:38:15 AM
I'm pretty unimpressed by Alfred this season. The Cortland win was nice, and they had a shot against IC. But 4-3, with wins over Thiel (0-8 and one of the worst teams in the country), and Buff State (1-6, and non competitive in most of those losses) doesn't do much for me.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 10:19:24 AM
The Rodman days were some of the best days. Very early on, but what a character. DIdn't have the staying power of HollaDawg or 'Gro, Reg etc, but he was probably one of the more memorable. Who Dat Said Gon Beat WESCONN!!! Osborne St. Pub 4-Eva
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 22, 2018, 12:32:02 PM
Will definitely never pay the bills.
Also, though, no tears shed when Jim Jones' mom left the board. :)
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 22, 2018, 12:57:04 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 22, 2018, 12:32:02 PM
Will definitely never pay the bills.
Also, though, no tears shed when Jim Jones' mom left the board. :)
Nice!!! On a completely unrelated note, I hope to hear you again on the D3Hoops coverage of the tourney out in Vegas. You guys were outstanding last year.....................even Ira. :)
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:39:17 AM
Look, Union smoked both Husson and Springfield and I had to leave them off because of a few tough losses. Make no mistake, Husson and Western Ct. only crack my top 25 because of record. It's contrary to my points earlier, but we're talking stretching to put them at 24 and 25 now, not 9 or 10.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 22, 2018, 03:26:11 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:39:17 AM
Look, Union smoked both Husson and Springfield and I had to leave them off because of a few tough losses. Make no mistake, Husson and Western Ct. only crack my top 25 because of record. It's contrary to my points earlier, but we're talking stretching to put them at 24 and 25 now, not 9 or 10.
Mach, again you're being ridiculously unreasonable. To leave Union out of your top 25 is a joke. So the three teams in your 25 that have three losses are better than Union? Not to mention Husson and Springfield who Union stomped? I'm voting RPI #3 because I have integrity and am unbiased even though as a Union guy I hate the Engineers. You've lost all credibility with me.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 03:40:16 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 22, 2018, 03:26:11 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:39:17 AM
Look, Union smoked both Husson and Springfield and I had to leave them off because of a few tough losses. Make no mistake, Husson and Western Ct. only crack my top 25 because of record. It's contrary to my points earlier, but we're talking stretching to put them at 24 and 25 now, not 9 or 10.
Mach, again you're being ridiculously unreasonable. To leave Union out of your top 25 is a joke. So the three teams in your 25 that have three losses are better than Union? Not to mention Husson and Springfield who Union stomped? I'm voting RPI #3 because I have integrity and am unbiased even though as a Union guy I hate the Engineers. You've lost all credibility with me.
Bill, you're 100% right Union should be in there and I didn't leave them off on purpose. Union and Hobart should be on there. I was more or less making a point but I left 3-4 loss teams out.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 22, 2018, 11:03:48 AM
So a few of these could be interchangeable, but this is totally legit. The good news is WestConn might crack the ERFP Top 25 for me(but it still feels forced):
1 Brockport
2 Frostburg St.
3 RPI
4 Salisbury
5 Wesley
6 Delaware Valley
7 Ithaca
8 Montclair St.
9 Rowan
10 Cortland
11 Christopher Newport
12 Stevenson
13 Framingham St.
14 MIT
15 Merchant Marine
16 Springfield
17 Endicott
18 Hobart
19 Misericordia
20 Western New England
21 Alfred
22 Utica
23 Morisville St.
24 Husson
25 Western Ct.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 22, 2018, 11:38:15 AM
I'm pretty unimpressed by Alfred this season. The Cortland win was nice, and they had a shot against IC. But 4-3, with wins over Thiel (0-8 and one of the worst teams in the country), and Buff State (1-6, and non competitive in most of those losses) doesn't do much for me.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 06:13:08 AM
Dutch Boy agrees and this is exactly his previous point. As unimpressive as Alfred has been he still believes wholeheartedly they defeat the likes of MIT and West Conn in a sound manner.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 23, 2018, 10:05:37 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 06:13:08 AM
Dutch Boy agrees and this is exactly his previous point. As unimpressive as Alfred has been he still believes wholeheartedly they defeat the likes of MIT and West Conn in a sound manner.
Let's not forget, the year that Alfred went 12-1, they were:
-Tied with Husson in the 4th quarter at home
-Trailing Bridgewater in the 4th quarter at home.
They played three New England teams that year, all at home, and won by 7, 6, and 6 (in overtime).
I don't disagree that the NY schools are a step above the NE schools, on the whole. And they do win a majority of the games. But the games have been more competitive than they're made out to be.
Quote from: AUPepBand on October 23, 2018, 11:17:55 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 23, 2018, 10:05:37 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 06:13:08 AM
Dutch Boy agrees and this is exactly his previous point. As unimpressive as Alfred has been he still believes wholeheartedly they defeat the likes of MIT and West Conn in a sound manner.
Let's not forget, the year that Alfred went 12-1, they were:
-Tied with Husson in the 4th quarter at home
-Trailing Bridgewater in the 4th quarter at home.
They played three New England teams that year, all at home, and won by 7, 6, and 6 (in overtime).
I don't disagree that the NY schools are a step above the NE schools, on the whole. And they do win a majority of the games. But the games have been more competitive than they're made out to be.
Spot on, Bombers.
Pep's initial post on the issue presented both sides of a a long-standing argument of "who is better? an undefeated team with a weaker schedule or a one- or two-loss team that has played a stronger schedule but faltered a bit?" Pep concludes that most fans (excepting of course Bombers798891 who amazes Pep with his objectivity and fair and balanced observations) are biased depending upon which side of the argument their team currently resides.
Historically, in 1971, University of Bridgeport (8-1) was selected over Alfred (8-0) to face an undefeated Hampden-Sydney team in the Knute Rockne Bowl, a predecessor to the NCAA D3 playoffs. Pep argued at that time that the committee was wrong in selecting a one-loss team over his undefeated Saxons. Bridgeport defeated Hampden-Sydney and every team they played in 1972 including another Knute Rockne Bowl win.
In the opening game of the 1973 season, Alfred hosted Bridgeport and the Purple Knights prevailed, 14-8. Mind you, it was two seasons later, but the programs were evenly-matched and it made for a great game. But the Purple Knights prevailed in "The Pit" in front of a crowd of more than 7,000 partisan Alfred fans.
Pep concludes that the argument can only be settled on the field...and as Bombers has clearly presented, the best of New England are competitive with the best of NY. Thank God we've got the NCAA Tournament where it is settled on the field.
On Saxon Warriors!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 23, 2018, 10:05:37 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 06:13:08 AM
Dutch Boy agrees and this is exactly his previous point. As unimpressive as Alfred has been he still believes wholeheartedly they defeat the likes of MIT and West Conn in a sound manner.
Let's not forget, the year that Alfred went 12-1, they were:
-Tied with Husson in the 4th quarter at home
-Trailing Bridgewater in the 4th quarter at home.
They played three New England teams that year, all at home, and won by 7, 6, and 6 (in overtime).
I don't disagree that the NY schools are a step above the NE schools, on the whole. And they do win a majority of the games. But the games have been more competitive than they're made out to be.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 12:03:48 PM
His main point is that because of record they should not be ranked higher than teams we believe, or most believe, with a fair amount of certainty, they would lose to in a head to head match up.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 23, 2018, 02:57:31 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 12:03:48 PM
His main point is that because of record they should not be ranked higher than teams we believe, or most believe, with a fair amount of certainty, they would lose to in a head to head match up.
Why not? Rankings aren't even based on actual H2H results. In fact, it's basically impossible to do them that way.
In Mach's ranking for example, Alfred is 11 spots below Cortland, but 1 spot ahead of Utica. Utica, meanwhile, is 1 spot ahead of a Morrisville team that handled them with ease. Christopher Newport made Rowan look like a JV team, at Rowan, and is two spots below them.
(I don't find anything at fault with Mach's rankings, I'm just using them as an example)
Quote from: wesleydad on October 23, 2018, 05:33:15 PMAfter all the good and legitimate debate here, I wanted to look at Hansen's composite of all the rankings and it is pretty darn close to the ERFP. I think the Hansen composite is more likely an indication of the strength of the teams( actual results, strength of opponents and other statistical factors ...so "good loses" count) and hurts undefeated teams like MIT and West Conn if their schedule is weaker. I think both polls are pretty good, and we will never know without the rest of the season and the playoffs, but I think the Hansen composite is probably closer to a true power ranking...IMHO. Thanks for the discussion by everyone, pretty interesting stuff from a bunch of nerdy D3 Football fans.
Let the debate end or begin, here it is.
Total Hansen Composite D3 Polls/Rankings
1 60 Brockport 1. Brockport
2 54 Frostburg 2. Frosty
3 48 RPI 3.Wesley ( The Rowan loss was a forgivable game fart?)
4 39 Salisbury 4. RPI
5 33 Ithaca 5. Ithaca
6 27 Wesley 6. Cortland
7 21 Cortland 7.Salisbury
8 19 Del Val 8. Hobart ( This implies improvement recognition, SOS strength,LL bias?, despite Endicott loss)
9 10 Montclair 9.Alfred (beating Cortland is big and maybe bias to E8)
10 8 MIT 10. Montclair( a legitimate recognition)
orv 5 W Conn
orv 3 Rowan
orv 3 Alfred
Vote Breakdown
Brockport 1 1 1 1 1 1
Frostburg 2 2 2 2 2 2
RPI 3 3 3 3 3 3
Salisbury 4 4 5 4 4 6
Ithaca 7 7 6 5 5 5
Wesley 9 8 4 6 7 4
Cortland 6 6 7 10 6 9
Del Val 5 5 8 7 x 10
Montclair 8 x 10 x 9 7
MIT 10 9 x 8 10 x
W Conn x 10 9 9 x x
Rowan x x x x 8 x
Alfred x x x x x 8
Key East Region Games this week
Montclair v Wesley
Salisbury v Rowan
Voters
Wesleydad, The Osprey, Rams 1102, UfanBill, MANDGSU, Dutch Boy
Quote from: Bartman on October 23, 2018, 06:16:56 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 23, 2018, 05:33:15 PMAfter all the good and legitimate debate here, I wanted to look at Hansen's composite of all the rankings and it is pretty darn close to the ERFP. I think the Hansen composite is more likely an indication of the strength of the teams( actual results, strength of opponents and other statistical factors ...so "good loses" count) and hurts undefeated teams like MIT and West Conn if their schedule is weaker. I think both polls are pretty good, and we will never know without the rest of the season and the playoffs, but I think the Hansen composite is probably closer to a true power ranking...IMHO. Thanks for the discussion by everyone, pretty interesting stuff from a bunch of nerdy D3 Football fans.
Let the debate end or begin, here it is.
Total Hansen Composite D3 Polls/Rankings
1 60 Brockport 1. Brockport
2 54 Frostburg 2. Frosty
3 48 RPI 3.Wesley ( The Rowan loss was a forgivable game fart?)
4 39 Salisbury 4. RPI
5 33 Ithaca 5. Ithaca
6 27 Wesley 6. Cortland
7 21 Cortland 7.Salisbury
8 19 Del Val 8. Hobart ( This implies improvement recognition, SOS strength,LL bias?, despite Endicott loss)
9 10 Montclair 9.Alfred (beating Cortland is big and maybe bias to E8)
10 8 MIT 10. Montclair( a legitimate recognition)
orv 5 W Conn
orv 3 Rowan
orv 3 Alfred
Vote Breakdown
Brockport 1 1 1 1 1 1
Frostburg 2 2 2 2 2 2
RPI 3 3 3 3 3 3
Salisbury 4 4 5 4 4 6
Ithaca 7 7 6 5 5 5
Wesley 9 8 4 6 7 4
Cortland 6 6 7 10 6 9
Del Val 5 5 8 7 x 10
Montclair 8 x 10 x 9 7
MIT 10 9 x 8 10 x
W Conn x 10 9 9 x x
Rowan x x x x 8 x
Alfred x x x x x 8
Key East Region Games this week
Montclair v Wesley
Salisbury v Rowan
Voters
Wesleydad, The Osprey, Rams 1102, UfanBill, MANDGSU, Dutch Boy
Quote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2018, 11:51:23 AM
I get it. But just for fun I will figure out where Wesley should be. My original thought is that they are the second best team in the east. They beat Del Val so no matter what happens they stay ahead of Del Val. They lost to Frostburg and Rowan so I have to put Frostburg and Rowan ahead of them based on actual results. So with just these 4 and Brockport I would my rankings would be Brockport, Frostburg, Rowan, Wesley, and Del Val. Now looking at Rowan they lost to Frostburg and CNU, so that means I have to put CNU ahead of Rowan, etc. etc. etc. I dont think Rowan is better than Wesley, but they did beat them. I just find it hard to keep Wesley as a top 3 or 4 team when they have lost twice, just like I can't move Rowan into the top 10 even after they beat Wesley because they lost to Frostburg and CNU, who I don't think should be in just because Rowan beat Wesley and they beat Rowan.
Now I can say that I put Montclair in with 2 loses ahead of Wesley because in my opinion their 2 loses, competitive to Frostburg and Salisbury are better than Wesley's loses to Frostburg and Rowan. I have Ithaca ahead of both of them based on who they lost to, Brockport and RPI, being better loses than either Montclair or Wesley. I also took another look at Stevenson, with loses to Frostburg and Del Val, but could not have them jump Wesley based on common opponents.
After moving things around, you will be glad to know that W Conn gets bumped out of my top 10.
I like the conversation, nice to hear other opinions since we all already know our own.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 23, 2018, 10:44:23 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 23, 2018, 06:16:56 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 23, 2018, 05:33:15 PMAfter all the good and legitimate debate here, I wanted to look at Hansen's composite of all the rankings and it is pretty darn close to the ERFP. I think the Hansen composite is more likely an indication of the strength of the teams( actual results, strength of opponents and other statistical factors ...so "good loses" count) and hurts undefeated teams like MIT and West Conn if their schedule is weaker. I think both polls are pretty good, and we will never know without the rest of the season and the playoffs, but I think the Hansen composite is probably closer to a true power ranking...IMHO. Thanks for the discussion by everyone, pretty interesting stuff from a bunch of nerdy D3 Football fans.
Let the debate end or begin, here it is.
Total Hansen Composite D3 Polls/Rankings
1 60 Brockport 1. Brockport
2 54 Frostburg 2. Frosty
3 48 RPI 3.Wesley ( The Rowan loss was a forgivable game fart?)
4 39 Salisbury 4. RPI
5 33 Ithaca 5. Ithaca
6 27 Wesley 6. Cortland
7 21 Cortland 7.Salisbury
8 19 Del Val 8. Hobart ( This implies improvement recognition, SOS strength,LL bias?, despite Endicott loss)
9 10 Montclair 9.Alfred (beating Cortland is big and maybe bias to E8)
10 8 MIT 10. Montclair( a legitimate recognition)
orv 5 W Conn
orv 3 Rowan
orv 3 Alfred
Vote Breakdown
Brockport 1 1 1 1 1 1
Frostburg 2 2 2 2 2 2
RPI 3 3 3 3 3 3
Salisbury 4 4 5 4 4 6
Ithaca 7 7 6 5 5 5
Wesley 9 8 4 6 7 4
Cortland 6 6 7 10 6 9
Del Val 5 5 8 7 x 10
Montclair 8 x 10 x 9 7
MIT 10 9 x 8 10 x
W Conn x 10 9 9 x x
Rowan x x x x 8 x
Alfred x x x x x 8
Key East Region Games this week
Montclair v Wesley
Salisbury v Rowan
Voters
Wesleydad, The Osprey, Rams 1102, UfanBill, MANDGSU, Dutch Boy
Wesley cant be 3 with 2 loses, Hobart and Alfred cant be in with 3 loses. 1 good loss is ok, 2 is eh, 3 is not good not matter what.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 03:50:42 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 23, 2018, 02:57:31 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 23, 2018, 12:03:48 PM
His main point is that because of record they should not be ranked higher than teams we believe, or most believe, with a fair amount of certainty, they would lose to in a head to head match up.
Why not? Rankings aren't even based on actual H2H results. In fact, it's basically impossible to do them that way.
In Mach's ranking for example, Alfred is 11 spots below Cortland, but 1 spot ahead of Utica. Utica, meanwhile, is 1 spot ahead of a Morrisville team that handled them with ease. Christopher Newport made Rowan look like a JV team, at Rowan, and is two spots below them.
(I don't find anything at fault with Mach's rankings, I'm just using them as an example)
...because DB's interpretation of this poll is that it is meant to represent the BEST teams in the East Region. The best based upon our (those who avidly follow D3 ball) observations and knowledge when it comes to D3 ball played in this region of the country. Now, if that interpretation is incorrect (which this has always been DB's interpretation of the poll) than that is where DB could certainly be off here. With that said his interpretation is also his preference as he can't stand polls in which teams that "everyone on the planet knows are not very good" are ranked higher than teams that everyone knows would defeat them at least 8 out of 10 times. Of course he also knows this can be said at times about polls in many sports...maybe minus D1 hockey (where the knowledge of teams from weaker conferences is obvious).
Take a look at the most recent D1 poll from USCHO.com:
1 Notre Dame
2 St. Cloud State
3 Minnesota Duluth
4 Ohio State
5 Minnesota
6 Providence
7 Minnesota State
8 Cornell
9 Denver
10 Penn State
11 Union
12 Michigan 1-2
13 Princeton
14 Wisconsin
15 Bowling Green
16 Massachusetts
17 North Dakota 1-2-1
18 Northeastern 2-2
19 Western Michigan 3-2
20 Quinnipiac 3-0
Now obviously there is a much smaller pool to choose from in D1 hockey as opposed to D3 football but the Atlantic Conference is similar, DB's believes, to the NE conferences in D3 FB. You often have a top team or two in that conference that ****ing runs through it yet very rarely, if ever, makes a big mark (minus RIT making a run a few years back). Yet notice North Dakota at 1-2-1 ranked ahead of Quinnipiac at 3-0 and there isn't an Atlantic Hockey team to be found anywhere. This is the correct ranking regardless of records. Now usually by mid-season or the end of the season possibly one team from the Atlantic will begin to get votes or maybe crack the top 20. However dlip can't remember if a team from that league has EVER cracked the top 10 minus RIT a few years back AFTER the tourney was over.Dont' see RPI here
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 23, 2018, 11:03:23 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2018, 11:51:23 AM
I get it. But just for fun I will figure out where Wesley should be. My original thought is that they are the second best team in the east. They beat Del Val so no matter what happens they stay ahead of Del Val. They lost to Frostburg and Rowan so I have to put Frostburg and Rowan ahead of them based on actual results. So with just these 4 and Brockport I would my rankings would be Brockport, Frostburg, Rowan, Wesley, and Del Val. Now looking at Rowan they lost to Frostburg and CNU, so that means I have to put CNU ahead of Rowan, etc. etc. etc. I dont think Rowan is better than Wesley, but they did beat them. I just find it hard to keep Wesley as a top 3 or 4 team when they have lost twice, just like I can't move Rowan into the top 10 even after they beat Wesley because they lost to Frostburg and CNU, who I don't think should be in just because Rowan beat Wesley and they beat Rowan.
Now I can say that I put Montclair in with 2 loses ahead of Wesley because in my opinion their 2 loses, competitive to Frostburg and Salisbury are better than Wesley's loses to Frostburg and Rowan. I have Ithaca ahead of both of them based on who they lost to, Brockport and RPI, being better loses than either Montclair or Wesley. I also took another look at Stevenson, with loses to Frostburg and Del Val, but could not have them jump Wesley based on common opponents.
After moving things around, you will be glad to know that W Conn gets bumped out of my top 10.
I like the conversation, nice to hear other opinions since we all already know our own.
Ya lost me-- Wesleydad. ??? ???
Great job on doing this poll. Very good discussion. It's about to get more interesting!! 😎
Quote from: wesleydad on October 24, 2018, 12:38:51 PMQuote from: TheOsprey on October 23, 2018, 11:03:23 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2018, 11:51:23 AM
I get it. But just for fun I will figure out where Wesley should be. My original thought is that they are the second best team in the east. They beat Del Val so no matter what happens they stay ahead of Del Val. They lost to Frostburg and Rowan so I have to put Frostburg and Rowan ahead of them based on actual results. So with just these 4 and Brockport I would my rankings would be Brockport, Frostburg, Rowan, Wesley, and Del Val. Now looking at Rowan they lost to Frostburg and CNU, so that means I have to put CNU ahead of Rowan, etc. etc. etc. I dont think Rowan is better than Wesley, but they did beat them. I just find it hard to keep Wesley as a top 3 or 4 team when they have lost twice, just like I can't move Rowan into the top 10 even after they beat Wesley because they lost to Frostburg and CNU, who I don't think should be in just because Rowan beat Wesley and they beat Rowan.
Now I can say that I put Montclair in with 2 loses ahead of Wesley because in my opinion their 2 loses, competitive to Frostburg and Salisbury are better than Wesley's loses to Frostburg and Rowan. I have Ithaca ahead of both of them based on who they lost to, Brockport and RPI, being better loses than either Montclair or Wesley. I also took another look at Stevenson, with loses to Frostburg and Del Val, but could not have them jump Wesley based on common opponents.
After moving things around, you will be glad to know that W Conn gets bumped out of my top 10.
I like the conversation, nice to hear other opinions since we all already know our own.
Ya lost me-- Wesleydad. ??? ???
Great job on doing this poll. Very good discussion. It's about to get more interesting!! 😎
Osprey, just showing that you cant just go by what you think, results have to count for something.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 27, 2018, 02:15:40 PM
Early upset Alert:
WPI leads the mighty MIT 7-0 at the half.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 28, 2018, 08:10:06 AM
W Conn or Amherst???? at 10. After yesterday why not?
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 08:30:03 AMQuote from: wesleydad on October 28, 2018, 08:10:06 AM
W Conn or Amherst???? at 10. After yesterday why not?
Throwing in the towel on Wesley this year? 3 1 point losses is just brutal. After yesterday, the Rowan loss looks so much worse and makes way less sense. I still think Wesley rounds out the bottom of the Top 10 though.
Yesterday DOES make me think the NJAC is pretty strong this year. Frosty is a beast, Salisbury might be as well, Montclair is a lot better than many gave them credit for, and Wesley is having a down year but is still better than most of the region. Wesley at 4 in the NJAC is bananas though and feels so strange.
All that said, it also makes me feel the MAC is way down this year. I don't think there is any shame in having 4 NJAC teams in your top 10. I think they all deserve it.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 10:26:36 AM
I just sent in my ERFP, so I thought I would share it and get some discussion started. My #10 pick should stir up the Prince. ;D
1. B-Port
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Salisbury
5. Ithaca
6. Montclair
7. Cortland
8. Wesley
9. Del-Val
10. W. Conn
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 12:57:14 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 10:26:36 AM
I just sent in my ERFP, so I thought I would share it and get some discussion started. My #10 pick should stir up the Prince. ;D
1. B-Port
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Salisbury
5. Ithaca
6. Montclair
7. Cortland
8. Wesley
9. Del-Val
10. W. Conn
It's all good. Some people just like throwing one away. Clearly you're in that camp. When Framingham puts the boots to them, I'm ok with you putting them at 10. But just say, 'you were right'.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 01:49:23 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 12:57:14 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 10:26:36 AM
I just sent in my ERFP, so I thought I would share it and get some discussion started. My #10 pick should stir up the Prince. ;D
1. B-Port
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Salisbury
5. Ithaca
6. Montclair
7. Cortland
8. Wesley
9. Del-Val
10. W. Conn
It's all good. Some people just like throwing one away. Clearly you're in that camp. When Framingham puts the boots to them, I'm ok with you putting them at 10. But just say, 'you were right'.
Who would you put as #10? Now be fair. ;D I will have the game in my NJAC Pick E'm contest this week.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2018, 02:20:09 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 01:49:23 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 12:57:14 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 10:26:36 AM
I just sent in my ERFP, so I thought I would share it and get some discussion started. My #10 pick should stir up the Prince. ;D
1. B-Port
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Salisbury
5. Ithaca
6. Montclair
7. Cortland
8. Wesley
9. Del-Val
10. W. Conn
It's all good. Some people just like throwing one away. Clearly you're in that camp. When Framingham puts the boots to them, I'm ok with you putting them at 10. But just say, 'you were right'.
Who would you put as #10? Now be fair. ;D I will have the game in my NJAC Pick E'm contest this week.
You guys are all wacked. Here is the top 10. Don't even argue about it:
1. WConn
2. Salisbury
3. Frosty
4. RPI
5. Cortland
6. Montclair
7. Ithaca
8. Rowan
9. Wesley
10. Brockport
(I may have mixed two teams up by mistake, but this list is final.)
Quote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 02:31:26 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2018, 02:20:09 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 01:49:23 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 12:57:14 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 10:26:36 AM
I just sent in my ERFP, so I thought I would share it and get some discussion started. My #10 pick should stir up the Prince. ;D
1. B-Port
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Salisbury
5. Ithaca
6. Montclair
7. Cortland
8. Wesley
9. Del-Val
10. W. Conn
It's all good. Some people just like throwing one away. Clearly you're in that camp. When Framingham puts the boots to them, I'm ok with you putting them at 10. But just say, 'you were right'.
Who would you put as #10? Now be fair. ;D I will have the game in my NJAC Pick E'm contest this week.
You guys are all wacked. Here is the top 10. Don't even argue about it:
1. WConn
2. Salisbury
3. Frosty
4. RPI
5. Cortland
6. Montclair
7. Ithaca
8. Rowan
9. Wesley
10. Brockport
(I may have mixed two teams up by mistake, but this list is final.)
Rowan at #8 and no Del-Val. ???
Quote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2018, 03:04:19 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 02:31:26 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on October 28, 2018, 02:20:09 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 01:49:23 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 12:57:14 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2018, 10:26:36 AM
I just sent in my ERFP, so I thought I would share it and get some discussion started. My #10 pick should stir up the Prince. ;D
1. B-Port
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Salisbury
5. Ithaca
6. Montclair
7. Cortland
8. Wesley
9. Del-Val
10. W. Conn
It's all good. Some people just like throwing one away. Clearly you're in that camp. When Framingham puts the boots to them, I'm ok with you putting them at 10. But just say, 'you were right'.
Who would you put as #10? Now be fair. ;D I will have the game in my NJAC Pick E'm contest this week.
You guys are all wacked. Here is the top 10. Don't even argue about it:
1. WConn
2. Salisbury
3. Frosty
4. RPI
5. Cortland
6. Montclair
7. Ithaca
8. Rowan
9. Wesley
10. Brockport
(I may have mixed two teams up by mistake, but this list is final.)
Rowan at #8 and no Del-Val. ???
1. The results are final. I told you that.
2. I said don't argue about it.
3. I don't consider the MAC teams in my poll.
4. I forgot about Del Val and would have put them at #8 if I remembered them and didn't lie about my 3rd point to cover myself.
5. In all seriousness, this should be a good playoff bracket in the East. I think every team has a shot. Not sure about Del Val to be honest. I don't take a lot of stock in week 1 losses, so they might be able to pull off a big upset as well. RPI will probably play "a good game" but lose to someone much better than them. Frosty and Salisbury will lose by 70 points if they play Mt. Union in the semifinals or quarterfinals, but what the hell do I know, I pretty much only watch games on my computer. But I can tell that Ithaca's linebackers always have the biggest arms and biceps in the country. Those guys are the only guys I can tell a difference in when I watch these games, and that includes a lot of Nescac games (who's teams linebackers and dbacks always appear small)
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 09:55:48 PM
Judging by the new Top 25, Salisbury caught a lot of people's attention this week
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 08:39:00 PM
So the question of 'Who would I put at 10?' made me think what my Top 10 would be this week, even though I spelled out how many from each conference. Wesleydad, feel free to use mine for the poll if you want. Here goes:
1. Brockport
2. Frosty
3. Salisbury
4. RPI
5. Montclair St.
6. Cortland St.
7. Wesley
8. Ithaca
9. Delaware Valley
10. Christopher Newport
Now remember I'm an RPI guy and this week Salisbury jumps them for me. I think Salisbury's body of work thus far is just more impressive. But it's entirely possible they lose 2 in a row to end the year. But if they win both, the top 25 voters drastically missed a team. I think if they go 1-1 and play tough games, they should land around 15-18 and get in the playoffs. But as we've seen way too many times with teams that play that type of offense, they have very little room for error. A turnover or an early deficit can bury an option team.
RPI is coming into their own. I fear the Union game as it's more of a headache now and can severely hurt them heading into the playoffs for many reasons. But if they can run the table, it could set them up for a favorable first round matchup and a chance to win 2 possibly. If they lose to Union, I wouldn't be surprised if they get fed to Brockport.
I wasn't sure about Montclair all year, but now I think they are legit.
I'm still not sold on Cortland and they also could drop 2 to end the year.
Wesley's loss to Rowan is strange, but they are 3 safeties short of being ranked like 5th in the country.
Ithaca played to the final play with the beast of the east and had 2 chances to beat RPI on the final play when they decided to run a double reverse screen throwback Statue of Liberty from the 2 yard line.
I respect the he!! out of the Delaware Valley program but I think they are a paper tiger this year. I actually struggled not putting them behind CNU. They'll be back, but this isn't their strongest team ever.
And last but not least, who would I put at 10??? There are a lot of worthy candidates to this point, but CNU lost to both Montclair and Salisbury by just 3. I think they were the easy choice after a little thought. Maybe they got a hall pass getting cancelled with Frosty but who knows how that game shakes out. Can't assume a loss.
So that's my thinking. Even though there are a ton of big games left, I think most of these teams stay here through the end of the year because they are just better than the rest.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 29, 2018, 10:50:11 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2018, 08:39:00 PM
So the question of 'Who would I put at 10?' made me think what my Top 10 would be this week, even though I spelled out how many from each conference. Wesleydad, feel free to use mine for the poll if you want. Here goes:
1. Brockport
2. Frosty
3. Salisbury
4. RPI
5. Montclair St.
6. Cortland St.
7. Wesley
8. Ithaca
9. Delaware Valley
10. Christopher Newport
Now remember I'm an RPI guy and this week Salisbury jumps them for me. I think Salisbury's body of work thus far is just more impressive. But it's entirely possible they lose 2 in a row to end the year. But if they win both, the top 25 voters drastically missed a team. I think if they go 1-1 and play tough games, they should land around 15-18 and get in the playoffs. But as we've seen way too many times with teams that play that type of offense, they have very little room for error. A turnover or an early deficit can bury an option team.
RPI is coming into their own. I fear the Union game as it's more of a headache now and can severely hurt them heading into the playoffs for many reasons. But if they can run the table, it could set them up for a favorable first round matchup and a chance to win 2 possibly. If they lose to Union, I wouldn't be surprised if they get fed to Brockport.
I wasn't sure about Montclair all year, but now I think they are legit.
I'm still not sold on Cortland and they also could drop 2 to end the year.
Wesley's loss to Rowan is strange, but they are 3 safeties short of being ranked like 5th in the country.
Ithaca played to the final play with the beast of the east and had 2 chances to beat RPI on the final play when they decided to run a double reverse screen throwback Statue of Liberty from the 2 yard line.
I respect the he!! out of the Delaware Valley program but I think they are a paper tiger this year. I actually struggled not putting them behind CNU. They'll be back, but this isn't their strongest team ever.
And last but not least, who would I put at 10??? There are a lot of worthy candidates to this point, but CNU lost to both Montclair and Salisbury by just 3. I think they were the easy choice after a little thought. Maybe they got a hall pass getting cancelled with Frosty but who knows how that game shakes out. Can't assume a loss.
So that's my thinking. Even though there are a ton of big games left, I think most of these teams stay here through the end of the year because they are just better than the rest.
Salisbury has Wesley and Frosty as their last 2 games. We will see,and as of today you can easially flip RPI and Salisbury. We will see when W. Conn plays Framingham this week.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 29, 2018, 11:50:27 AM
Throwing this out there for discussion since it shows up all over the country. After how many loses does a H2H win lose its luster. Case in point Wesley and Del Val. Wesley defeats Del Val in week one. Wesley has lost 3 games, albeit by only 1 point each time, while Del Val has run the table. Several Voters have Wesley still ahead of Del Val in their polls. With that in mind, why isn't Rowan ahead of Wesley? They both have 3 losses, yet Rowan beat Wesley, so there H2H does not count? Rowan's 3 loses are to Frostburg, Salisbury, and CNU, getting rolled in each one. Wesley's loses are to Frostburg, Montclair, and Rowan. Based on that shouldn't Rowan get the nod over Wesley. I think Wesley is better, but they lost to Rowan and the teams currently have the same record. I am ok with 1 blip on the way, but I can't keep a team ahead of someone based on H2H after the winning team has lost 3 times and the loser has not lost since. I go with 1 loss does not void H2H result, 2 losses depending on how they happen may void it, but 3 losses and there is no way I keep the original winner ahead of the original loser. That is why we all get to vote.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 29, 2018, 11:50:27 AM
Throwing this out there for discussion since it shows up all over the country. After how many loses does a H2H win lose its luster. Case in point Wesley and Del Val. Wesley defeats Del Val in week one. Wesley has lost 3 games, albeit by only 1 point each time, while Del Val has run the table. Several Voters have Wesley still ahead of Del Val in their polls. With that in mind, why isn't Rowan ahead of Wesley? They both have 3 losses, yet Rowan beat Wesley, so there H2H does not count? Rowan's 3 loses are to Frostburg, Salisbury, and CNU, getting rolled in each one. Wesley's loses are to Frostburg, Montclair, and Rowan. Based on that shouldn't Rowan get the nod over Wesley. I think Wesley is better, but they lost to Rowan and the teams currently have the same record. I am ok with 1 blip on the way, but I can't keep a team ahead of someone based on H2H after the winning team has lost 3 times and the loser has not lost since. I go with 1 loss does not void H2H result, 2 losses depending on how they happen may void it, but 3 losses and there is no way I keep the original winner ahead of the original loser. That is why we all get to vote.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 29, 2018, 11:50:27 AM
Throwing this out there for discussion since it shows up all over the country. After how many loses does a H2H win lose its luster. Case in point Wesley and Del Val. Wesley defeats Del Val in week one. Wesley has lost 3 games, albeit by only 1 point each time, while Del Val has run the table. Several Voters have Wesley still ahead of Del Val in their polls. With that in mind, why isn't Rowan ahead of Wesley? They both have 3 losses, yet Rowan beat Wesley, so there H2H does not count? Rowan's 3 loses are to Frostburg, Salisbury, and CNU, getting rolled in each one. Wesley's loses are to Frostburg, Montclair, and Rowan. Based on that shouldn't Rowan get the nod over Wesley. I think Wesley is better, but they lost to Rowan and the teams currently have the same record. I am ok with 1 blip on the way, but I can't keep a team ahead of someone based on H2H after the winning team has lost 3 times and the loser has not lost since. I go with 1 loss does not void H2H result, 2 losses depending on how they happen may void it, but 3 losses and there is no way I keep the original winner ahead of the original loser. That is why we all get to vote.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 29, 2018, 01:09:04 PM
I continue to think that Brockport in totality is the best East team, they have a great defense, great balance offense, and a great QB. This is the formula you will need to compete after Round 2 of the playoffs. Then their is the 2nd tier teams in the East. I think Frostburg has the grit to beat any team on any give day or field. They have been well tested and survived the close one's. I think RPI continues to win when all odds are against them. Salisbury really surprised me this past weekend with its dominance over Rowan. The Defense was lights out, the offense looked dominate, still haven't been able to capitalize on 1 on 1 pass situations or PAs, still have room for improvement. Then we have Cortland that's been firing on all cylinders, I think weather played a huge factor this past weekend. Really looking forward to their game against Brockport. Now Delaware Valley may be somewhat of a conundrum to many, but I think they have been playing lights out since their opening loss to Wesley, that was a tough environment to play in. I think Delaware Valley has responded and the young team has grown each week. I have Montclair, Wesley, and West Conn (who played Salve on the Road similar to Montclair win at home over Salve). I know this past weekend just ended, but this weekend is shaping up to be one great slate of games.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 29, 2018, 12:12:16 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 29, 2018, 11:50:27 AM
Throwing this out there for discussion since it shows up all over the country. After how many loses does a H2H win lose its luster. Case in point Wesley and Del Val. Wesley defeats Del Val in week one. Wesley has lost 3 games, albeit by only 1 point each time, while Del Val has run the table. Several Voters have Wesley still ahead of Del Val in their polls. With that in mind, why isn't Rowan ahead of Wesley? They both have 3 losses, yet Rowan beat Wesley, so there H2H does not count? Rowan's 3 loses are to Frostburg, Salisbury, and CNU, getting rolled in each one. Wesley's loses are to Frostburg, Montclair, and Rowan. Based on that shouldn't Rowan get the nod over Wesley. I think Wesley is better, but they lost to Rowan and the teams currently have the same record. I am ok with 1 blip on the way, but I can't keep a team ahead of someone based on H2H after the winning team has lost 3 times and the loser has not lost since. I go with 1 loss does not void H2H result, 2 losses depending on how they happen may void it, but 3 losses and there is no way I keep the original winner ahead of the original loser. That is why we all get to vote.
Unfortunately it's never that easy or cut and dry by this point in the season and you have to evaluate wins/losses. If Rowan was remotely close to Salisbury, they would've gotten respect from me but they got crushed. Delaware Valley hasn't beaten anyone yet this year, the conference looks down, and I wouldn't be surprised if Widener knocks them off.
I truly believe Wesley is 6 points away from being ranked 5 or 6 in the country. They could end with 5 losses though too. If they drop one more I probably can't put them above 10. It's an unexact science for sure.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 29, 2018, 01:09:04 PM
I continue to think that Brockport in totality is the best East team, they have a great defense, great balance offense, and a great QB. This is the formula you will need to compete after Round 2 of the playoffs. Then their is the 2nd tier teams in the East. I think Frostburg has the grit to beat any team on any give day or field. They have been well tested and survived the close one's. I think RPI continues to win when all odds are against them. Salisbury really surprised me this past weekend with its dominance over Rowan. The Defense was lights out, the offense looked dominate, still haven't been able to capitalize on 1 on 1 pass situations or PAs, still have room for improvement. Then we have Cortland that's been firing on all cylinders, I think weather played a huge factor this past weekend. Really looking forward to their game against Brockport. Now Delaware Valley may be somewhat of a conundrum to many, but I think they have been playing lights out since their opening loss to Wesley, that was a tough environment to play in. I think Delaware Valley has responded and the young team has grown each week. I have Montclair, Wesley, and West Conn (who played Salve on the Road similar to Montclair win at home over Salve). I know this past weekend just ended, but this weekend is shaping up to be one great slate of games.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 29, 2018, 03:54:05 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 29, 2018, 12:12:16 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 29, 2018, 11:50:27 AM
Throwing this out there for discussion since it shows up all over the country. After how many loses does a H2H win lose its luster. Case in point Wesley and Del Val. Wesley defeats Del Val in week one. Wesley has lost 3 games, albeit by only 1 point each time, while Del Val has run the table. Several Voters have Wesley still ahead of Del Val in their polls. With that in mind, why isn't Rowan ahead of Wesley? They both have 3 losses, yet Rowan beat Wesley, so there H2H does not count? Rowan's 3 loses are to Frostburg, Salisbury, and CNU, getting rolled in each one. Wesley's loses are to Frostburg, Montclair, and Rowan. Based on that shouldn't Rowan get the nod over Wesley. I think Wesley is better, but they lost to Rowan and the teams currently have the same record. I am ok with 1 blip on the way, but I can't keep a team ahead of someone based on H2H after the winning team has lost 3 times and the loser has not lost since. I go with 1 loss does not void H2H result, 2 losses depending on how they happen may void it, but 3 losses and there is no way I keep the original winner ahead of the original loser. That is why we all get to vote.
Unfortunately it's never that easy or cut and dry by this point in the season and you have to evaluate wins/losses. If Rowan was remotely close to Salisbury, they would've gotten respect from me but they got crushed. Delaware Valley hasn't beaten anyone yet this year, the conference looks down, and I wouldn't be surprised if Widener knocks them off.
I truly believe Wesley is 6 points away from being ranked 5 or 6 in the country. They could end with 5 losses though too. If they drop one more I probably can't put them above 10. It's an unexact science for sure.
I have typed and deleted my opinion on the rankings a dozen times, but here is my best effort. If this season was taken in a vacuum (forget about Wesley's dominance for the past decade) does a 5-3 team, who is tied for 5th in their 10 team conference, deserve a top 10 ranking in the East? If they do, then the NJAC dominates the rest of the conferences in the East by a wide margin.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 30, 2018, 10:59:49 AM
Any thoughts on what the Regional Rankings will look like? I believe its going to be:
1. Brockport (8-0)
2. Frostburg (8-0)
3. RPI (8-0)
4. Salisbury (8-0)
5. Delaware Valley (7-1)
6. Cortland State (7-1)
7. Western Conn (8-0)
8. Merchant Marine (7-1)
9. Misericordia (7-1)
10. Montclair State (6-2)/Western New England (7-1)
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 30, 2018, 11:02:57 AMDespite their one loss, I can't imagine that Misericordia makes the top 10. They have a very weak SOS, since they don't play the top two teams in the MAC. Although I am having trouble figuring out who the last team ould be. I like Montclair state and WNE over MisericoridiaQuote from: MANDGSU on October 30, 2018, 10:59:49 AM
Any thoughts on what the Regional Rankings will look like? I believe its going to be:
1. Brockport (8-0)
2. Frostburg (8-0)
3. RPI (8-0)
4. Salisbury (8-0)
5. Delaware Valley (7-1)
6. Cortland State (7-1)
7. Western Conn (8-0)
8. Merchant Marine (7-1)
9. Misericordia (7-1)
10. Montclair State (6-2)/Western New England (7-1)
(https://organicodorremoval.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/vomit-odor-removal-nj.jpg)
Quote from: Oline89 on October 30, 2018, 12:45:57 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 30, 2018, 11:02:57 AMDespite their one loss, I can't imagine that Misericordia makes the top 10. They have a very weak SOS, since they don't play the top two teams in the MAC. Although I am having trouble figuring out who the last team ould be. I like Montclair state and WNE over MisericoridiaQuote from: MANDGSU on October 30, 2018, 10:59:49 AM
Any thoughts on what the Regional Rankings will look like? I believe its going to be:
1. Brockport (8-0)
2. Frostburg (8-0)
3. RPI (8-0)
4. Salisbury (8-0)
5. Delaware Valley (7-1)
6. Cortland State (7-1)
7. Western Conn (8-0)
8. Merchant Marine (7-1)
9. Misericordia (7-1)
10. Montclair State (6-2)/Western New England (7-1)
(https://organicodorremoval.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/vomit-odor-removal-nj.jpg)
Quote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
The other debate, does a 3 loss team belong in? Based on the voters it seems so. I don't get it, but perception seems to be trumping reality.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
The other debate, does a 3 loss team belong in? Based on the voters it seems so. I don't get it, but perception seems to be trumping reality.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 30, 2018, 01:43:39 PM
Our take (really Frank's projection) is:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. Sals
4. RPI
5. DVC
6. Cort
7. W CT
8. Mont
9. IC
10. WNE
Quote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2018, 01:50:53 PMQuote from: ITH radio on October 30, 2018, 01:43:39 PM
Our take (really Frank's projection) is:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. Sals
4. RPI
5. DVC
6. Cort
7. W CT
8. Mont
9. IC
10. WNE
So here's something I've wondered, that I'm sure has been asked, answered in the past, but I can't recall:
If Cortland loses to Brockport to fall to say, 9th, and then again to IC, does the committee consider that a win against a RR opponent? Or does IC essentially harm their own case by knocking Cortland out of the rankings? (Not that losing to them is preferable, of course)
Quote from: wally_wabash on October 30, 2018, 02:01:52 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2018, 01:50:53 PMQuote from: ITH radio on October 30, 2018, 01:43:39 PM
Our take (really Frank's projection) is:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. Sals
4. RPI
5. DVC
6. Cort
7. W CT
8. Mont
9. IC
10. WNE
So here's something I've wondered, that I'm sure has been asked, answered in the past, but I can't recall:
If Cortland loses to Brockport to fall to say, 9th, and then again to IC, does the committee consider that a win against a RR opponent? Or does IC essentially harm their own case by knocking Cortland out of the rankings? (Not that losing to them is preferable, of course)
As I understand it, the only teams that count as ranked teams are the teams that are ranked after the conclusion of play in Week 11 in what used to be secret rankings (the final rankings did get released last year, which is fantastic). So yes, if Ithaca beats Cortland, Cortland probably falls out of the top 10 and won't count for Ithaca as a ranked opponent. That's the downside of not using a once ranked, always ranked system.
Quote from: wally_wabash on October 30, 2018, 01:54:05 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
Ithaca is president of the good loss club. 13-7 vs. presumed East #1 Brockport and 10-9 to presumed East #3 RPI. I'd say their SOS advantage over WCSU would put Ithaca ahead of WCSU if WCSU picks up a loss. The SOS advantage plus 0-2 vs RROs E1 and E3 is significantly better than 0-1 vs. RRO E8/9/10 (kind of a best case scenario for Framingham).
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 30, 2018, 02:08:44 PM
Wally do you think Merchant Marine gets considered with their SOS?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2018, 02:20:21 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on October 30, 2018, 01:54:05 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
Ithaca is president of the good loss club. 13-7 vs. presumed East #1 Brockport and 10-9 to presumed East #3 RPI. I'd say their SOS advantage over WCSU would put Ithaca ahead of WCSU if WCSU picks up a loss. The SOS advantage plus 0-2 vs RROs E1 and E3 is significantly better than 0-1 vs. RRO E8/9/10 (kind of a best case scenario for Framingham).
Wally, can you expand a bit on how the committee tends to view RRO records?
Like, I know it all depends where the teams are ranked, but in general, is there a point at which an extra loss/losses trumps fewer games/wins? As an extreme example, if a team went 0-3 against like E1, E3, E7, and another team went 1-0 against say, E10, what's looked at as a better result?
Quote from: wally_wabash on October 30, 2018, 02:56:55 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2018, 02:20:21 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on October 30, 2018, 01:54:05 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
Ithaca is president of the good loss club. 13-7 vs. presumed East #1 Brockport and 10-9 to presumed East #3 RPI. I'd say their SOS advantage over WCSU would put Ithaca ahead of WCSU if WCSU picks up a loss. The SOS advantage plus 0-2 vs RROs E1 and E3 is significantly better than 0-1 vs. RRO E8/9/10 (kind of a best case scenario for Framingham).
Wally, can you expand a bit on how the committee tends to view RRO records?
Like, I know it all depends where the teams are ranked, but in general, is there a point at which an extra loss/losses trumps fewer games/wins? As an extreme example, if a team went 0-3 against like E1, E3, E7, and another team went 1-0 against say, E10, what's looked at as a better result?
Three losses seems to be the tipping point where it doesn't really matter any more who you lost to or by how much. Win percentage is a primary criteria and when the win percentage hits 0.700, you're basically out of the rankings and definitely out of the at-large picture.
We've heard committee chairs tell us in different ways over the last few years that results against ranked opponents are not created equal. So at large teams that are both 0-1 vs. RRO may be differentiated if one team lost to S1 and another team lost to W9. I think it also matters to some committee members if the games were competitive- if a team is 0-2 vs. E1 and E3 (hypothetically, of course!) and those games were close and competitive, they may help a bit more than if that same team didn't have those two results but did have a narrow win over E9. But the mileage on that is going to differ for each individual member of the advisory committee and then again for the members of the national committee.
A couple of extreme examples of when you can have too many "good" losses:
- In 2017, UW-Whitewater lost tight games against N5, W8, and a not-quite-as-close game against W1. They also beat W7. They were not ranked in the final set of rankings.
- In 2015, North Central lost in OT to W7, lost to E1 by one point when Joe Callahan converted a 2-point try with 7 seconds left, and by 8 to N2. North Central did get ranked, but were ranked behind several one loss teams with curmmy SOS's and poor or nonexistent results vs. RROs.
Going back to 2014, the only three loss teams that have been (officially) ranked at any point are:
2014 - Rowan (E9)
2015 - North Central (N10)
2016 - Salisbury (E10)
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 30, 2018, 02:53:56 PM
If MMA gets an at large bid, the system is severely flawed and we are all much worse off for being fans of D3 football.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
The other debate, does a 3 loss team belong in? Based on the voters it seems so. I don't get it, but perception seems to be trumping reality.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 30, 2018, 02:53:56 PM
If MMA gets an at large bid, the system is severely flawed and we are all much worse off for being fans of D3 football.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 03:25:02 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
The other debate, does a 3 loss team belong in? Based on the voters it seems so. I don't get it, but perception seems to be trumping reality.
This would be a damn shame and another representation of how the system DOES NOT select the best teams on occasion. You might as well just have the head of the selection committee call over Swanstrom and just punch him in the face...that would probably be much easier for him to handle.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 30, 2018, 03:38:17 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 03:25:02 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 30, 2018, 12:46:51 PM
If things break Ithaca's way, Cortland loss to Brockport and 2 Salisbury loses, and they may be the first team on the board from the East with 2 loses. It will be interesting to see how the committee ranks some of the smaller/weaker conferences. If W Conn loses to Framingham, W Conn only has 1 loss, does the committee keep them ahead of Ithaca? Looking forward to the East Regional Rankings to see how it plays out.
The other debate, does a 3 loss team belong in? Based on the voters it seems so. I don't get it, but perception seems to be trumping reality.
This would be a damn shame and another representation of how the system DOES NOT select the best teams on occasion. You might as well just have the head of the selection committee call over Swanstrom and just punch him in the face...that would probably be much easier for him to handle.
Dunno about this -- I understand losing to Brockport because they've been pretty much crushing people for a season and a half. But I don't think a loss to RPI is automatically excused the way a loss to Mount Union, UMHB and Brockport are.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2018, 04:40:56 PM
I agree with Pat here. Look, RPI is probably going to go 9-0. But the Engineers, record and ranking aside, feel to me like exactly the caliber of team that a playoff-caliber team needs to be able to beat at home. They're good, and they're beatable.
Frankly Ithaca's wins, while also not coming against RR teams, haven't exactly been a tour de force show of strength.
In their best win, at Alfred, they played a god-awful first half of football in every way, trailing 13-0. They needed a red zone stand to get out of St. John Fisher, of all places.
They're not even putting in 60 great minutes against the dregs of the league. In the Rochester game, the Yellow Jackets made 5 red zone trips, and three trips inside the 10. Credit IC's defense, sure. But when RPI got Rochester, they dominated them. Rochester got 4 first downs on its second drive, and three the rest of the game.
There's always a reason right? Nabi's been hurt for some of these games, Gladney's been hurt for others, and when they finally get them on the field at the same time, the weather is terrible and who can move the ball in a mud pit, anyway. But the line between reason and excuse is really thin when you're 8-2 as opposed to 9-1
Look, I'm an IC fan, and they have arguably the best defense in the region. And we've all seen what the Nabi-Gladney-Vito trio can do when it's clicking (witness the first half of Cortaca 2017).
There's a better Bombers team lurking somewhere in this one, but we haven't seen it yet
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10. Don't give a **** if it's all defense that does it. Also, That O would look a lot better against West Conn than probably any other decent team on their schedule minus SLU, Roch, and maybe Vincent.
DB understands this is the way it is regarding the system but why the **** is it so hard to understand/admit that there are always teams not selected in regional rankings and even the NCAA that are a good deal better than some teams selected. The number of losses, while obviously used as criteria for selection doesn't make a team automatically worse than a team with less losses from a weaker conference. It's not ****ing brain surgery. That's DB's only real point. That teams like West Conn are almost always not as good as the 2nd, 3rd, and sometimes 4th best teams in the NJAC, E8, LL, and sometimes the MAC.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
Quote from: UfanBill on October 31, 2018, 12:52:39 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2018, 04:40:56 PM
I agree with Pat here. Look, RPI is probably going to go 9-0. But the Engineers, record and ranking aside, feel to me like exactly the caliber of team that a playoff-caliber team needs to be able to beat at home. They're good, and they're beatable.
Frankly Ithaca's wins, while also not coming against RR teams, haven't exactly been a tour de force show of strength.
In their best win, at Alfred, they played a god-awful first half of football in every way, trailing 13-0. They needed a red zone stand to get out of St. John Fisher, of all places.
They're not even putting in 60 great minutes against the dregs of the league. In the Rochester game, the Yellow Jackets made 5 red zone trips, and three trips inside the 10. Credit IC's defense, sure. But when RPI got Rochester, they dominated them. Rochester got 4 first downs on its second drive, and three the rest of the game.
There's always a reason right? Nabi's been hurt for some of these games, Gladney's been hurt for others, and when they finally get them on the field at the same time, the weather is terrible and who can move the ball in a mud pit, anyway. But the line between reason and excuse is really thin when you're 8-2 as opposed to 9-1
Look, I'm an IC fan, and they have arguably the best defense in the region. And we've all seen what the Nabi-Gladney-Vito trio can do when it's clicking (witness the first half of Cortaca 2017).
There's a better Bombers team lurking somewhere in this one, but we haven't seen it yet
Dissatisfied with his the Bombers offense showed against St. Lawrence and Rochester? I've got a solution for you. Cut the grass at Butterfield ...or better yet, get in the 21st century, get turf ! .
Quote from: Oline89 on October 31, 2018, 08:56:08 AMQuote from: UfanBill on October 31, 2018, 12:52:39 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 30, 2018, 04:40:56 PM
I agree with Pat here. Look, RPI is probably going to go 9-0. But the Engineers, record and ranking aside, feel to me like exactly the caliber of team that a playoff-caliber team needs to be able to beat at home. They're good, and they're beatable.
Frankly Ithaca's wins, while also not coming against RR teams, haven't exactly been a tour de force show of strength.
In their best win, at Alfred, they played a god-awful first half of football in every way, trailing 13-0. They needed a red zone stand to get out of St. John Fisher, of all places.
They're not even putting in 60 great minutes against the dregs of the league. In the Rochester game, the Yellow Jackets made 5 red zone trips, and three trips inside the 10. Credit IC's defense, sure. But when RPI got Rochester, they dominated them. Rochester got 4 first downs on its second drive, and three the rest of the game.
There's always a reason right? Nabi's been hurt for some of these games, Gladney's been hurt for others, and when they finally get them on the field at the same time, the weather is terrible and who can move the ball in a mud pit, anyway. But the line between reason and excuse is really thin when you're 8-2 as opposed to 9-1
Look, I'm an IC fan, and they have arguably the best defense in the region. And we've all seen what the Nabi-Gladney-Vito trio can do when it's clicking (witness the first half of Cortaca 2017).
There's a better Bombers team lurking somewhere in this one, but we haven't seen it yet
Dissatisfied with his the Bombers offense showed against St. Lawrence and Rochester? I've got a solution for you. Cut the grass at Butterfield ...or better yet, get in the 21st century, get turf ! .
Couldn't agree more, setting of the stadium is beautiful, great view of the lake, but the field was unplayable last weekend. If ITH wants to play a fast pace offense, no huddle offense they have to upgrade the turf. The mud, slop, high grass, and giant pitch to midfield works great if the plan is dominant defense, ground and pound offense and stopping other fast moving offenses
Quote from: Caz Bombers on October 31, 2018, 09:28:04 AM
Not sure Ithaca can or should turf Butterfield. Unlike many other schools at this level that have to have massively multi-use stadia, we already have a turf facility for soccer/field hockey/lacrosse to use. Also, I think the grass has to stay for the track and field throwing events. Can't imagine you want a javelin bouncing off those little packed pellets.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 31, 2018, 08:56:08 AM
Couldn't agree more, setting of the stadium is beautiful, great view of the lake, but the field was unplayable last weekend. If ITH wants to play a fast pace offense, no huddle offense they have to upgrade the turf. The mud, slop, high grass, and giant pitch to midfield works great if the plan is dominant defense, ground and pound offense and stopping other fast moving offenses
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 31, 2018, 08:42:05 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
That Curry team had been the cream of New England for 7-8 years consecutively and had playoff experience and were starting to become a wagon at that time. They were recruiting well and had great coaches. They can NOT be compared to this year's West Conn who can barely beat horrible teams.
To that, they also lost the following week to Cortland 42-0.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 31, 2018, 08:42:05 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
That Curry team had been the cream of New England for 7-8 years consecutively and had playoff experience and were starting to become a wagon at that time. They were recruiting well and had great coaches. They can NOT be compared to this year's West Conn who can barely beat horrible teams.
To that, they also lost the following week to Cortland 42-0.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 10:37:53 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 31, 2018, 08:42:05 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
That Curry team had been the cream of New England for 7-8 years consecutively and had playoff experience and were starting to become a wagon at that time. They were recruiting well and had great coaches. They can NOT be compared to this year's West Conn who can barely beat horrible teams.
To that, they also lost the following week to Cortland 42-0.
A Cortland team Ithaca had whipped 35-13 in the last week of the season, no less
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 10:54:16 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 10:37:53 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 31, 2018, 08:42:05 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
That Curry team had been the cream of New England for 7-8 years consecutively and had playoff experience and were starting to become a wagon at that time. They were recruiting well and had great coaches. They can NOT be compared to this year's West Conn who can barely beat horrible teams.
To that, they also lost the following week to Cortland 42-0.
A Cortland team Ithaca had whipped 35-13 in the last week of the season, no less
Mach's post says exactly what DB would say. The purple drank built that program up and was clearly the top of the heap of NE. They really opened the door for what seems like some growth from some other NE teams since then, (Salve, WNEU, Husson, Framingham). However those few schools tend to be the exception in NE and when they come out of NE come playoff time (as well as during the regular season) they usually lose to other ER teams.
Listen Buffalo St defeated Whitewater a couple years back? Upsets happen. How many times would they have defeated UDub if they played 10 times??? Maybe once, tops, probably zip. Use common sense here a bit. As stated in the past DB really does enjoy NE football and wants to see the level of play grow there across the board (and it has improved a bit IDBHO). Yet to start saying that simply based on a teams record against weaker opponents that they should be included in the TOP ten of the ER over a team with 2-3 loses that everyone on the planet knows is better...is ****ing stupid, IDBHO.
Using all the information we have, and using our best judgment the strongest teams in the ER, regardless of record, should be in the poll.
Quote from: dlippiel on November 17, 2008, 08:34:39 PM
Please please please I know we would all love to see another Cortaca, **** I would attend, but please please Ithaca and Cortland do not look past these two NEFC teams. Please throttle them both and send them back to New England so the NCAA idiots look more like idiots than they already do. I know PSU got the bid and for that they belong (obviously) but the one loss Curry is a joke. That is unless they win or even keep it close. Let's take care of business first and then talk Cortaca #II. I wrote this on the NJAC board, thought it should be said.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 01:34:38 PM
Rankings are out:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. CORT
6. SALS
7. WCT
8. USMMA
9. IC
10. WNE
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 10:54:16 AM
Mach's post says exactly what DB would say. The purple drank built that program up and was clearly the top of the heap of NE. They really opened the door for what seems like some growth from some other NE teams since then, (Salve, WNEU, Husson, Framingham). However those few schools tend to be the exception in NE and when they come out of NE come playoff time (as well as during the regular season) they usually lose to other ER teams.
Listen Buffalo St defeated Whitewater a couple years back? Upsets happen. How many times would they have defeated UDub if they played 10 times??? Maybe once, tops, probably zip. Use common sense here a bit. As stated in the past DB really does enjoy NE football and wants to see the level of play grow there across the board (and it has improved a bit IDBHO). Yet to start saying that simply based on a teams record against weaker opponents that they should be included in the TOP ten of the ER over a team with 2-3 loses that everyone on the planet knows is better...is ****ing stupid, IDBHO.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 01:34:38 PM
Rankings are out:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. CORT
6. SALS
7. WCT
8. USMMA
9. IC
10. WNE
Quote from: wesleydad on October 31, 2018, 01:38:27 PMQuote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 01:34:38 PM
Rankings are out:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. CORT
6. SALS
7. WCT
8. USMMA
9. IC
10. WNE
Wondering what puts Merchant Marine ahead of MIT since MIT has the H2H victory. You can see that the committee was grasping for number 10 going with WNE. Several other 2 loss teams probably should be in that spot.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 01:34:38 PM
Rankings are out:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. CORT
6. SALS
7. WCT
8. USMMA
9. IC
10. WNE
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2018, 12:52:25 PM
Hey I'm just going to share a post in here and let you guys keep talking. :)Quote from: dlippiel on November 17, 2008, 08:34:39 PM
Please please please I know we would all love to see another Cortaca, **** I would attend, but please please Ithaca and Cortland do not look past these two NEFC teams. Please throttle them both and send them back to New England so the NCAA idiots look more like idiots than they already do. I know PSU got the bid and for that they belong (obviously) but the one loss Curry is a joke. That is unless they win or even keep it close. Let's take care of business first and then talk Cortaca #II. I wrote this on the NJAC board, thought it should be said.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 01:45:50 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 10:54:16 AM
Mach's post says exactly what DB would say. The purple drank built that program up and was clearly the top of the heap of NE. They really opened the door for what seems like some growth from some other NE teams since then, (Salve, WNEU, Husson, Framingham). However those few schools tend to be the exception in NE and when they come out of NE come playoff time (as well as during the regular season) they usually lose to other ER teams.
Listen Buffalo St defeated Whitewater a couple years back? Upsets happen. How many times would they have defeated UDub if they played 10 times??? Maybe once, tops, probably zip. Use common sense here a bit. As stated in the past DB really does enjoy NE football and wants to see the level of play grow there across the board (and it has improved a bit IDBHO). Yet to start saying that simply based on a teams record against weaker opponents that they should be included in the TOP ten of the ER over a team with 2-3 loses that everyone on the planet knows is better...is ****ing stupid, IDBHO.
This is the problem I have. It's not the idea of the one off, "I think Ithaca is better than W. Conn in 2018" or whoever.
It's treating the idea that New England teams can't compete with New York teams as some sort of axiom, and questioning how could anyone think otherwise, and then we're all stunned because the first team to go 10-0 in the big, bad E8 needed overtime to beat two-loss Bridgewater at home, and a goal-line stand to sneak past Western New England.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 01:50:17 PMQuote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 01:34:38 PM
Rankings are out:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. CORT
6. SALS
7. WCT
8. USMMA
9. IC
10. WNE
So, if you're IC, is it possible to be the first Pool C team in the East?
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 30, 2018, 11:02:57 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 30, 2018, 10:59:49 AM
Any thoughts on what the Regional Rankings will look like? I believe its going to be:
1. Brockport (8-0)
2. Frostburg (8-0)
3. RPI (8-0)
4. Salisbury (8-0)
5. Delaware Valley (7-1)
6. Cortland State (7-1)
7. Western Conn (8-0)
8. Merchant Marine (7-1)
9. Misericordia (7-1)
10. Montclair State (6-2)/Western New England (7-1)Quote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 01:34:38 PM
Rankings are out:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. CORT
6. SALS
7. WCT
8. USMMA
9. IC
10. WNE
(https://organicodorremoval.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/vomit-odor-removal-nj.jpg)
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 03:34:07 PM
That's not the case...IDBHO you are cherry picking. Read post above. If you still have a problem than we agree to disagree...
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 03:50:22 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 03:34:07 PM
That's not the case...IDBHO you are cherry picking. Read post above. If you still have a problem than we agree to disagree...
You literally wrote that "Everyone on the planet knows" that the NY teams are better than the NE teams. How is the world is that not an axiom?
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 10:54:16 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 10:37:53 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 31, 2018, 08:42:05 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
That Curry team had been the cream of New England for 7-8 years consecutively and had playoff experience and were starting to become a wagon at that time. They were recruiting well and had great coaches. They can NOT be compared to this year's West Conn who can barely beat horrible teams.
To that, they also lost the following week to Cortland 42-0.
A Cortland team Ithaca had whipped 35-13 in the last week of the season, no less
Mach's post says exactly what DB would say. The purple drank built that program up and was clearly the top of the heap of NE. They really opened the door for what seems like some growth from some other NE teams since then, (Salve, WNEU, Husson, Framingham). However those few schools tend to be the exception in NE and when they come out of NE come playoff time (as well as during the regular season) they usually lose to other ER teams.
Listen Buffalo St defeated Whitewater a couple years back? Upsets happen. How many times would they have defeated UDub if they played 10 times??? Maybe once, tops, probably zip. Use common sense here a bit. As stated in the past DB really does enjoy NE football and wants to see the level of play grow there across the board (and it has improved a bit IDBHO). Yet to start saying that simply based on a teams record against weaker opponents that they should be included in the TOP ten of the ER over a team with 2-3 loses that everyone on the planet knows is better...is ****ing stupid, IDBHO.
Using all the information we have, and using our best judgment the strongest teams in the ER, regardless of record, should be in the poll.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 03:29:00 PM
Pencilneck that's from ****ing 2008 :P...that's a damn decade ago. The utter stupidity of your post dork is only outdone by the time it took you to go back and find that. Back then DB made sense maybe one out of every 20 posts...he's learned a lot since then.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 31, 2018, 04:15:35 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 03:29:00 PM
Pencilneck that's from ****ing 2008 :P...that's a damn decade ago. The utter stupidity of your post dork is only outdone by the time it took you to go back and find that. Back then DB made sense maybe one out of every 20 posts...he's learned a lot since then.
It only took dlippin' two minutes to find it because I know how the board works. Just answering the question that was posed earlier.Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 08:37:58 AMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 30, 2018, 06:31:16 PM
Certainly all good points here...but again Ithaca defeats West Conn 9 out of 10 times...maybe 10 out of 10.
What were your thoughts before Ithaca/Curry '08?
Quote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 03:58:27 PM
Even the best of them end up losing to E8/NJAC/LL/MAC schools.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 31, 2018, 04:52:38 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on October 31, 2018, 03:58:27 PM
Even the best of them end up losing to E8/NJAC/LL/MAC schools.
You're missing the point here, Dlip. They do lose to them. They also beat them, and (this is key) even in losses, play them competitively frequently enough, that I disagree with what I believe to be the blanket dismissal of their credentials against the NY teams based on conference affiliation alone.
Quote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 07:12:31 PM
Well, interesting wrinkle in this year's NeWMAC is MIT could win the title but Usmma gets the ncaa bid.
Quote from: TheOsprey on October 31, 2018, 03:42:41 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 30, 2018, 11:02:57 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 30, 2018, 10:59:49 AM
Any thoughts on what the Regional Rankings will look like? I believe its going to be:
1. Brockport (8-0)
2. Frostburg (8-0)
3. RPI (8-0)
4. Salisbury (8-0)
5. Delaware Valley (7-1)
6. Cortland State (7-1)
7. Western Conn (8-0)
8. Merchant Marine (7-1)
9. Misericordia (7-1)
10. Montclair State (6-2)/Western New England (7-1)Quote from: ITH radio on October 31, 2018, 01:34:38 PM
Rankings are out:
1. BP
2. FSU
3. RPI
4. DVC
5. CORT
6. SALS
7. WCT
8. USMMA
9. IC
10. WNE
(https://organicodorremoval.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/vomit-odor-removal-nj.jpg)
Ditto!
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AM
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Quote from: Bartman on November 01, 2018, 08:48:58 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Your theory will meet reality this weekend as Endicott plays WNE and WestConn plays Framingham
Quote from: Oline89 on November 01, 2018, 08:37:51 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Just to BS a little. Let's start with just the East. If you were to design an 8 team bracket, entering the "best teams". Which conferences would you remove from automatic bid (pool A) and place in the Pool C. It seems this scheme would get rid of automatic bids to lesser conferences, but if a team really did shine (wins their conference, plus has nice win/good loss in OOC) they have a chance to compete in NCAA. Winning the conference is still a great acheivement, but getting your teeth kicked in the next week by Mt Union/Brock/UWW ain't much fun .
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AM
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 11:36:06 AMQuote from: Oline89 on November 01, 2018, 08:37:51 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Just to BS a little. Let's start with just the East. If you were to design an 8 team bracket, entering the "best teams". Which conferences would you remove from automatic bid (pool A) and place in the Pool C. It seems this scheme would get rid of automatic bids to lesser conferences, but if a team really did shine (wins their conference, plus has nice win/good loss in OOC) they have a chance to compete in NCAA. Winning the conference is still a great acheivement, but getting your teeth kicked in the next week by Mt Union/Brock/UWW ain't much fun .
Tough question because CCC and MASCAC have a lot of former NEFC teams, all which I think have paid their dues, but that doesn't mean they deserve anything. NEWMAC is a lot of E8/LL defectors or Independents. ECFC should NOT get an AQ for sure. CCC would be next out based on how I think they would fare. NEWMAC has some historically strong programs there that just aren't that good anymore. I'd rank them like this:
1. NEWMAC
2. MASCAC (mostly because of Framingham and Bridgewater's relatively recent history and proof of competitive competence - NOT because of WConn)
3. CCC
4. ECFC
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 01, 2018, 12:00:15 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 11:36:06 AMQuote from: Oline89 on November 01, 2018, 08:37:51 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Just to BS a little. Let's start with just the East. If you were to design an 8 team bracket, entering the "best teams". Which conferences would you remove from automatic bid (pool A) and place in the Pool C. It seems this scheme would get rid of automatic bids to lesser conferences, but if a team really did shine (wins their conference, plus has nice win/good loss in OOC) they have a chance to compete in NCAA. Winning the conference is still a great acheivement, but getting your teeth kicked in the next week by Mt Union/Brock/UWW ain't much fun .
Tough question because CCC and MASCAC have a lot of former NEFC teams, all which I think have paid their dues, but that doesn't mean they deserve anything. NEWMAC is a lot of E8/LL defectors or Independents. ECFC should NOT get an AQ for sure. CCC would be next out based on how I think they would fare. NEWMAC has some historically strong programs there that just aren't that good anymore. I'd rank them like this:
1. NEWMAC
2. MASCAC (mostly because of Framingham and Bridgewater's relatively recent history and proof of competitive competence - NOT because of WConn)
3. CCC
4. ECFC
I pretty sure you know this, but taking away a bid from an eligible conference wouldn't guarantee another at-large bid to another ER team.
Quote from: Dutch Boy on November 01, 2018, 02:10:49 PM
Didnt this entire discussion begin with our questioning the legitimacy of West Conn and MIT getting a 10 spot in the ERFP? Well we know MIT isn't worthy, after the loss to WPI and this weekend will tell us a tad more about West Conn, Mach will be doing play by play. So really your left with three, possibly after this weekend two teams from NE that could be ER top ten worthy. Endicott, who has a win over a young but feisty Hobart team, West Conn, who has an impressive win over absolutely nobody BUT has a 0 in the loss column, and Framingham, who got mauled by Cortland but messed up Endicott who beat Hobart. So if dlip is correct, and if not please correct him, right now, the best OOC W a NE team has is against the third place LL team who may be 500 in the league after this weekend.
Ok, dlip just wants to be clear about the facts when he only really will consider West Conn as a top ten team IF they defeat Framingham and will consider Framingham IF they beat West Conn even with the shellacking they took from Cortland. Also Endicott could be considered but they lost to Framingham.
Ok, ****'s cool...
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 12:02:52 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 01, 2018, 12:00:15 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 11:36:06 AMQuote from: Oline89 on November 01, 2018, 08:37:51 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Just to BS a little. Let's start with just the East. If you were to design an 8 team bracket, entering the "best teams". Which conferences would you remove from automatic bid (pool A) and place in the Pool C. It seems this scheme would get rid of automatic bids to lesser conferences, but if a team really did shine (wins their conference, plus has nice win/good loss in OOC) they have a chance to compete in NCAA. Winning the conference is still a great acheivement, but getting your teeth kicked in the next week by Mt Union/Brock/UWW ain't much fun .
Tough question because CCC and MASCAC have a lot of former NEFC teams, all which I think have paid their dues, but that doesn't mean they deserve anything. NEWMAC is a lot of E8/LL defectors or Independents. ECFC should NOT get an AQ for sure. CCC would be next out based on how I think they would fare. NEWMAC has some historically strong programs there that just aren't that good anymore. I'd rank them like this:
1. NEWMAC
2. MASCAC (mostly because of Framingham and Bridgewater's relatively recent history and proof of competitive competence - NOT because of WConn)
3. CCC
4. ECFC
I pretty sure you know this, but taking away a bid from an eligible conference wouldn't guarantee another at-large bid to another ER team.
That wasn't the question though. :-)
Quote from: Oline89 on November 01, 2018, 02:58:06 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 12:02:52 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 01, 2018, 12:00:15 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 11:36:06 AMQuote from: Oline89 on November 01, 2018, 08:37:51 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Just to BS a little. Let's start with just the East. If you were to design an 8 team bracket, entering the "best teams". Which conferences would you remove from automatic bid (pool A) and place in the Pool C. It seems this scheme would get rid of automatic bids to lesser conferences, but if a team really did shine (wins their conference, plus has nice win/good loss in OOC) they have a chance to compete in NCAA. Winning the conference is still a great acheivement, but getting your teeth kicked in the next week by Mt Union/Brock/UWW ain't much fun .
Tough question because CCC and MASCAC have a lot of former NEFC teams, all which I think have paid their dues, but that doesn't mean they deserve anything. NEWMAC is a lot of E8/LL defectors or Independents. ECFC should NOT get an AQ for sure. CCC would be next out based on how I think they would fare. NEWMAC has some historically strong programs there that just aren't that good anymore. I'd rank them like this:
1. NEWMAC
2. MASCAC (mostly because of Framingham and Bridgewater's relatively recent history and proof of competitive competence - NOT because of WConn)
3. CCC
4. ECFC
I pretty sure you know this, but taking away a bid from an eligible conference wouldn't guarantee another at-large bid to another ER team.
That wasn't the question though. :-)
An ulterior motive for bringing up this subject is that on other boards/podcasts, there are concerns about the limited number of Pool C bids. One solution was to limit Pool A bids to conferences with 8 or more teams. In the East, that would eliminate the E8 and LL, two of the stronger conferences in the East....
Quote from: gordonmann on November 01, 2018, 03:42:19 PM
Setting a winning percentage floor would really hurt the quality of non-conference scheduling. You're basically telling teams they better not lose a non-conference game because that will render conference play close to meaningless.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2018, 03:04:21 PM
Or it would encourage them to consolidate for football.
Quote from: gordonmann on November 01, 2018, 03:47:55 PM
Yeah, I realized it doesn't render conference play meaningless so I amended the statement below. But I think of a team like Del Val who plays Wesley every year or whatever other NJAC team is game to play them.
There's a decent chance they are going to lose that game. So then they have to go undefeated to earn an automatic bid? If they lost a game to a good team in conference and won the bid, they'd have to go into Pool C where they basically have no shot to make the playoffs?
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2018, 03:57:53 PM
My long-proposed solution has been to borrow the "earned access" model from Division II, where a conference winner gets in, so long as they are in the top eight of their region's final ranking. However, I'd set the standard a little lower since Division III is much larger, and say perhaps the top 15 is more appropriate. And in addition, I'd ensure that no conference gets its bid clawed back more than two years in a row, so every student-athlete at every Division III football school clearly has an opportunity of some sort in their career.
I'm not sure we'd have reclaimed any bids from last year's playoffs, but years where we have 6-4 Randolph-Macon or 7-3 Benedictine are definite opportunities to pull that back.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2018, 04:22:57 PM
WNE wouldn't have its bid pulled under my proposal.
Quote from: gordonmann on November 01, 2018, 03:42:19 PM
Setting a winning percentage floor would really hurt the quality of non-conference scheduling. You're basically telling teams they better not lose a non-conference game.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2018, 03:04:21 PM
Or it would encourage them to consolidate for football.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 01, 2018, 06:17:36 PMQuote from: gordonmann on November 01, 2018, 03:42:19 PM
Setting a winning percentage floor would really hurt the quality of non-conference scheduling. You're basically telling teams they better not lose a non-conference game.
It is possible for every team in a league to just be mediocre in any given season. Case in point...2010 Liberty League. St.Lawrence won the automatic qualifier despite being only 5-5. They lost all 4 OOC games. RPI was second best 4-2, 6-4. St. Lawrence was noncompetitive in the tourney against MTU losing 49-0.
Quote from: Oline89 on November 01, 2018, 06:38:50 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 01, 2018, 03:04:21 PM
Or it would encourage them to consolidate for football.
The problem is that you are now limiting two of the best conferences to one bid, thereby diluting the pool even more. The weaker teams that left the LL/E8 go out form their own conference and get an automatic bid, with a weaker team. I like your proposal of conference winner, as long as they are in the regional top 10 or 15.
Quote from: TheOsprey on November 01, 2018, 08:36:20 PM
I'm good with conf. champs getting into the playoffs. However, there should be a SOS min. avg. that qualifies a team. It makes schools find better competition. I always rooted for CNU, when their ooc opponents were Rowan, Wesley, and others. They would be 1-2, or 0-3 before they began USA play and win most years. Not sure their SOS #'s, but ya would think it was strong.
Quote from: ccd494 on November 01, 2018, 09:27:39 PM
I'm torn between (1) rolling my eyes, (2) asking why you care which team it is that loses by 20 in the first round so much and (3) asking whether the logical conclusion to "ONLY THE TOP TEAMS" is just a four team round robin tournament between Mount Union, Whitewater, Mary Hardin-Baylor, and a rotating fourth team based upon the year's results.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 02, 2018, 07:56:26 AM
Games we've secured rights to for tmw's D3BlitzER show:
WNE vs. EC
NIC vs. SALV
GAL vs. HUS
CORT vs. BP
SLU vs. RPI
DVC vs. KINGS
STE vs. LYCO
MIS vs. ALB
USMMA vs. CUA
MMA vs. SC
AMH vs. TRIN
WES vs. SALS
ROW vs. MONT
FSU vs. KU
Lake Erie vs. TMU
Hey Hobart and NU - get back to us!
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2018, 09:01:17 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 01, 2018, 09:27:39 PM
I'm torn between (1) rolling my eyes, (2) asking why you care which team it is that loses by 20 in the first round so much and (3) asking whether the logical conclusion to "ONLY THE TOP TEAMS" is just a four team round robin tournament between Mount Union, Whitewater, Mary Hardin-Baylor, and a rotating fourth team based upon the year's results.
I've sort of changed my tune on the AQs. Used to hate them, now I'm fine with them.
That said, to point #2: When I did want to see the at-large pool expanded to get "better" 8-2 teams in over say, the 6-4 AQs or the AQs from lousy conferences, I didn't argue for that because I thought those teams were actually going to beat say, UMHB, Mount, Whitewater, etc. Stronger teams are stronger teams, whether they're likely to pull off the upset or not. There's nothing wrong with wanting to create a stronger overall playoff field, even if it doesn't change the end result.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 02, 2018, 09:24:04 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2018, 09:01:17 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 01, 2018, 09:27:39 PM
I'm torn between (1) rolling my eyes, (2) asking why you care which team it is that loses by 20 in the first round so much and (3) asking whether the logical conclusion to "ONLY THE TOP TEAMS" is just a four team round robin tournament between Mount Union, Whitewater, Mary Hardin-Baylor, and a rotating fourth team based upon the year's results.
I've sort of changed my tune on the AQs. Used to hate them, now I'm fine with them.
That said, to point #2: When I did want to see the at-large pool expanded to get "better" 8-2 teams in over say, the 6-4 AQs or the AQs from lousy conferences, I didn't argue for that because I thought those teams were actually going to beat say, UMHB, Mount, Whitewater, etc. Stronger teams are stronger teams, whether they're likely to pull off the upset or not. There's nothing wrong with wanting to create a stronger overall playoff field, even if it doesn't change the end result.
Roll your eyes all you want. The concept isn't about 'who is going to get beaten by 20', it's about a really good team having a great year at 8-2 or 9-1 with a tough schedule and getting the shaft because 10-0 Husson plays a bunch of Pop Warner teams and would lose to said 8-2/9-1 team by 40. That's the discussion. Giving everyone a shot is all fine and good. But when it's your squad that gets left off the playoff list, you'll probably look at it differently.
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 02, 2018, 09:05:05 AMQuote from: ITH radio on November 02, 2018, 07:56:26 AM
Games we've secured rights to for tmw's D3BlitzER show:
WNE vs. EC
NIC vs. SALV
GAL vs. HUS
CORT vs. BP
SLU vs. RPI
DVC vs. KINGS
STE vs. LYCO
MIS vs. ALB
USMMA vs. CUA
MMA vs. SC
AMH vs. TRIN
WES vs. SALS
ROW vs. MONT
FSU vs. KU
Lake Erie vs. TMU
Hey Hobart and NU - get back to us!
Are you sure this is enough content? :)
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 02, 2018, 09:44:39 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 02, 2018, 09:24:04 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 02, 2018, 09:01:17 AMQuote from: ccd494 on November 01, 2018, 09:27:39 PM
I'm torn between (1) rolling my eyes, (2) asking why you care which team it is that loses by 20 in the first round so much and (3) asking whether the logical conclusion to "ONLY THE TOP TEAMS" is just a four team round robin tournament between Mount Union, Whitewater, Mary Hardin-Baylor, and a rotating fourth team based upon the year's results.
I've sort of changed my tune on the AQs. Used to hate them, now I'm fine with them.
That said, to point #2: When I did want to see the at-large pool expanded to get "better" 8-2 teams in over say, the 6-4 AQs or the AQs from lousy conferences, I didn't argue for that because I thought those teams were actually going to beat say, UMHB, Mount, Whitewater, etc. Stronger teams are stronger teams, whether they're likely to pull off the upset or not. There's nothing wrong with wanting to create a stronger overall playoff field, even if it doesn't change the end result.
Roll your eyes all you want. The concept isn't about 'who is going to get beaten by 20', it's about a really good team having a great year at 8-2 or 9-1 with a tough schedule and getting the shaft because 10-0 Husson plays a bunch of Pop Warner teams and would lose to said 8-2/9-1 team by 40. That's the discussion. Giving everyone a shot is all fine and good. But when it's your squad that gets left off the playoff list, you'll probably look at it differently.
First, I know how it feels getting left out the playoffs to lesser teams, however players have no control over what coaches and administration does. The coaches and administration wants to do what's best for its players. So if a team goes undefeated, I would never leave them out. As I mentioned above, in what i would do to eliminate administration and coaches from only doing what's necessary to acquire bids is to set a SOS floor and minimum win, that would help eliminate some of those bad teams from participating, because if a team is truly bad, they aren't going to go undefeated and if they do, they'll get exposed. If you were to set of SOS floor, then you'll have a good amount of teams going into Pool C and not making it anyway. There are ways to fix the system without excluding team and giving them a valuable entrance to the playoffs without counting them out because of affiliation. If that was the case DIII should move to the FBS model and only take the best 8 teams and have its subjective data account for 90% of the points.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 02, 2018, 09:24:04 AM
Roll your eyes all you want. The concept isn't about 'who is going to get beaten by 20', it's about a really good team having a great year at 8-2 or 9-1 with a tough schedule and getting the shaft because 10-0 Husson plays a bunch of Pop Warner teams and would lose to said 8-2/9-1 team by 40. That's the discussion. Giving everyone a shot is all fine and good. But when it's your squad that gets left off the playoff list, you'll probably look at it differently.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2018, 12:16:23 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 02, 2018, 09:24:04 AM
Roll your eyes all you want. The concept isn't about 'who is going to get beaten by 20', it's about a really good team having a great year at 8-2 or 9-1 with a tough schedule and getting the shaft because 10-0 Husson plays a bunch of Pop Warner teams and would lose to said 8-2/9-1 team by 40. That's the discussion. Giving everyone a shot is all fine and good. But when it's your squad that gets left off the playoff list, you'll probably look at it differently.
Say what you want about Husson but it must be noted that they are moving from the pathetic ECFC to the much tougher CCC next season. They are limited by geography but have taken the challenge. They should be commended. Remember they won a NCAA tourney game against Springfield last season and showed well competitively the next week in a 37-15 (not 40 point) loss to Delaware Valley.
Quote from: ccd494 on November 02, 2018, 03:11:42 PMQuote from: UfanBill on November 02, 2018, 12:16:23 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 02, 2018, 09:24:04 AM
Roll your eyes all you want. The concept isn't about 'who is going to get beaten by 20', it's about a really good team having a great year at 8-2 or 9-1 with a tough schedule and getting the shaft because 10-0 Husson plays a bunch of Pop Warner teams and would lose to said 8-2/9-1 team by 40. That's the discussion. Giving everyone a shot is all fine and good. But when it's your squad that gets left off the playoff list, you'll probably look at it differently.
Say what you want about Husson but it must be noted that they are moving from the pathetic ECFC to the much tougher CCC next season. They are limited by geography but have taken the challenge. They should be commended. Remember they won a NCAA tourney game against Springfield last season and showed well competitively the next week in a 37-15 (not 40 point) loss to Delaware Valley.
Exactly. Husson has never shied away from ANYONE. Before helping form the ECFC they approached every conference within 500 miles and every conference told them to pound sand. Husson, against all odds really, built a successful program and earned an invitation to a better conference and immediately leaped at it.
Husson has also never lost by 40 in a playoff game (last year's 22 point loss to DelVal is the biggest playoff loss in Husson's history). This year's team isn't as good as last year's, but they still scheduled competitively in the non-conference.
And, like I said, if you're a true believer in "ONLY LET TEAMS IN THAT CAN WIN!" none of us belong in the playoffs. The last true eastern team to win was 1991. The horse you are astride isn't very high.
Quote from: ccd494 on November 02, 2018, 03:11:42 PM
And, like I said, if you're a true believer in "ONLY LET TEAMS IN THAT CAN WIN!" none of us belong in the playoffs. The last true eastern team to win was 1991. The horse you are astride isn't very high.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 03, 2018, 10:09:50 AM
2nd annual D3BlitzER goes live at 11:50 am ET. We have 10 games slated for noon including:
CCC - WNE vs. Endicott
CCC - NIC vs. Salve
LL - SLU vs. RPI
LL - IC vs. HOB
ECFC - GAL vs. HUS
NEWMAC - MIT vs. NU
NEWMAC - MMA vs. SC
NEWMAC - WPI vs. CGA
NJAC - WES vs. SALS
MAC - STE vs. LYCO
POOL B - Lake Erie (0-8 D2) vs. TMU
1 pm games are:
NJAC - FSU vs. KU
NJAC - ROW vs. MONT
MAC - DVC vs. KC
MAC - MIS vs. ALB
NESCAC - AMH vs. TRIN
2 pm or the "Grand Finale"
CORT vs. BROCK
Quote from: Bartman on November 03, 2018, 07:07:42 PM
Cortaca winner going to the dance after today, or does a 3 loss Wesley or Salisbury have a better shot?
Quote from: rams1102 on November 03, 2018, 07:27:40 PMQuote from: Bartman on November 03, 2018, 07:07:42 PM
Cortaca winner going to the dance after today, or does a 3 loss Wesley or Salisbury have a better shot?
Does anyone consider Montclair? 7-2 , Strength of Schedule #24 @ .572 lost to the Gulls by 2 & Frosty by 7 on a bomb with 3 minutes to go against a rookie safety and beat Wesley by 1 in their house. Just asking. All I hear is crickets.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2018, 07:57:50 PMQuote from: rams1102 on November 03, 2018, 07:27:40 PMQuote from: Bartman on November 03, 2018, 07:07:42 PM
Cortaca winner going to the dance after today, or does a 3 loss Wesley or Salisbury have a better shot?
Does anyone consider Montclair? 7-2 , Strength of Schedule #24 @ .572 lost to the Gulls by 2 & Frosty by 7 on a bomb with 3 minutes to go against a rookie safety and beat Wesley by 1 in their house. Just asking. All I hear is crickets.
The problem for Montclair is you'd have to put them over a Salisbury team they lost to
Quote from: rams1102 on November 03, 2018, 08:11:40 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on November 03, 2018, 07:57:50 PMQuote from: rams1102 on November 03, 2018, 07:27:40 PMQuote from: Bartman on November 03, 2018, 07:07:42 PM
Cortaca winner going to the dance after today, or does a 3 loss Wesley or Salisbury have a better shot?
Does anyone consider Montclair? 7-2 , Strength of Schedule #24 @ .572 lost to the Gulls by 2 & Frosty by 7 on a bomb with 3 minutes to go against a rookie safety and beat Wesley by 1 in their house. Just asking. All I hear is crickets.
The problem for Montclair is you'd have to put them over a Salisbury team they lost to
You have a point even though only by 2 points. :(
Quote from: Oline89 on November 04, 2018, 03:02:28 PM
So what is the latest thinking on the last at large bid for NCAA? Does the winner of Cortica (at 8-2) come out ahead of Muhlenberg at 9-1?
Quote from: Oline89 on November 04, 2018, 03:02:28 PM
So what is the latest thinking on the last at large bid for NCAA? Does the winner of Cortica (at 8-2) come out ahead of Muhlenberg at 9-1?
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 11:26:24 AMQuote from: Bartman on November 01, 2018, 08:48:58 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 06:41:44 AMMach,
This Bombers/DB battle is a little off kilter. It all depends who we're talking about from New England here. Who in New England do I think can give a good game in the playoffs this year?
-Framingham St.
-Endicott
Who will get blown out if they make it?
-Western CT
-MIT
-Western NE
-MMA
-Springfield
-Husson
-Suny-Maritime
-Galaudet
Some teams have had the taste, more than once, of competing and sometimes being successful against good competition. Others either aren't there yet, or have no idea what they are in for. Others are just not that good but find themselves in conferences where it's harder to not be successful than it is to lose. Is it possible for the bottom list to make a game competitive in the postseason? Sure, I guess it could happen. But I don't anticipate it and I wouldn't put my money on it.
Your theory will meet reality this weekend as Endicott plays WNE and WestConn plays Framingham
In theory, yes. Endicott and WNE could be close against one another. i think Endicott is better prepared to play out of conference though. They've been doing it competitively for several years now.
Framingham will destroy WConn.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 05, 2018, 12:10:56 PM
I think Husson will probably end up on the road at RPI for Rd 1 and should be a tough out. The Engineers would win, but I don't think it's a blowout based on the talent and experience the Eagles have this season.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 05, 2018, 12:16:09 PMQuote from: ITH radio on November 05, 2018, 12:10:56 PM
I think Husson will probably end up on the road at RPI for Rd 1 and should be a tough out. The Engineers would win, but I don't think it's a blowout based on the talent and experience the Eagles have this season.
That appears to be the case. If Framingham State wins the MASCAC (which they should), they'll be at Brockport. Hopefully they perform much better. On a side note, ITH what were your thoughts on SUNY-Maritime vs. Hampton? How would Hampton stack against some of the DIII Elites?
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 05, 2018, 11:32:37 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 01, 2018, 11:26:24 AM
Framingham will destroy WConn.[/b]
Wow, what an amazing prediction. Framingham definitely destroyed West Conn and Endicott and WNE was very close game.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on November 05, 2018, 06:59:02 PM
Does it matter what the scoring margin is in a game after you give up the first 28? Winning the rest of the way by six isn't particularly meaningful.
Quote from: jamtoTommie on November 05, 2018, 07:23:08 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 05, 2018, 06:59:02 PM
Does it matter what the scoring margin is in a game after you give up the first 28? Winning the rest of the way by six isn't particularly meaningful.
Western Connecticut's 1st team might be better than Framingham's 2nd and 3rd string?
Quote from: UfanBill on November 05, 2018, 10:30:05 PMQuote from: jamtoTommie on November 05, 2018, 07:23:08 PMQuote from: Pat Coleman on November 05, 2018, 06:59:02 PM
Does it matter what the scoring margin is in a game after you give up the first 28? Winning the rest of the way by six isn't particularly meaningful.
Western Connecticut's 1st team might be better than Framingham's 2nd and 3rd string?
Hey I have no dog in this fight but why is everyone down on W. Conn? I watched this game. It was a league championship game. Trust me when I tell you that Framingham had their starters in most of the way. Give W. Conn. some credit here. They fought very hard to get back in it. A valiant effort but nearly impossible to overcome a 28 point deficit. The better team won.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 06, 2018, 05:48:59 AM
Not for nothing here Bill, but according the the box score, Framingham was up 41-6 at halftime. Outside of some Tom Brady type of comeback stuff, does it really matter what happened after that point with a 48-26 Final?
Framingham smoked WConn. That is fact, there's no sense in trying to say otherwise. As far as 'why is everyone so down on WConn'? It's because some brainiacs had them pegged in the Top 10 of the ERFP but ALL of the evidence, record vs their CYO schedule, pointed to them being below average, which is exactly what they are. It just took until their 9th game for some people to understand that. And even then, we're celebrating only losing by 22.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on November 06, 2018, 08:46:44 AM
As a Falcons fan, I'm pretty much banned for life from mentioning "The game was over" before the clock hits 0, but Mach is dead on. 41-6 at halftime? Come on.
Who cares how the touchdowns were scored? If anything, the fact that they allowed a blocked punt and pick six back-to-back just indicates to me that they got dominated in all three phases of the game (the two other kicks they had blocked and the four other turnovers they had back that up)
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 07, 2018, 06:15:28 AMMach,
Wesleydad,
As mentioned last week, feel free to use these in the poll:
1. Brockport
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Montclair St.
5. Wesley
6. Salisbury
7. Cortland St.
8. Delaware Valley
9. Ithaca
10. Christopher Newport
Quote from: Bartman on November 07, 2018, 09:50:34 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 07, 2018, 06:15:28 AMMach,
Wesleydad,
As mentioned last week, feel free to use these in the poll:
1. Brockport
2. Frosty
3. RPI
4. Montclair St.
5. Wesley
6. Salisbury
7. Cortland St.
8. Delaware Valley
9. Ithaca
10. Christopher Newport
You are selling Ithaca way short on this assessment. For example, Wesley lost to Rowan...come on man.....Cortland lost to Alfred...come on man....you are not thinking logically.....you "mach" others for their judgements on NE....now you should hide in shame for your flawed logic....or explain yourself sir
Quote from: Oline89 on November 07, 2018, 03:31:06 PM
I need a guru to explain to me why MIT is now #7, after un-ranked last week. They beat Norwich (3-5 record). What else happened?
Quote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2018, 03:39:44 PMQuote from: Oline89 on November 07, 2018, 03:31:06 PM
I need a guru to explain to me why MIT is now #7, after un-ranked last week. They beat Norwich (3-5 record). What else happened?
They should have been 7 last week since they have a H2H win against Merchant Marine who was 7 last week. I think it is the committee correcting their mistake.
[/quote
If they lose to Springfield this weekend, I assume they disappear again, and Merchant Marine gets the pool B bid.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2018, 03:39:44 PMQuote from: Oline89 on November 07, 2018, 03:31:06 PM
I need a guru to explain to me why MIT is now #7, after un-ranked last week. They beat Norwich (3-5 record). What else happened?
They should have been 7 last week since they have a H2H win against Merchant Marine who was 7 last week. I think it is the committee correcting their mistake.
Quote from: rams1102 on November 07, 2018, 05:02:31 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 07, 2018, 03:39:44 PMQuote from: Oline89 on November 07, 2018, 03:31:06 PM
I need a guru to explain to me why MIT is now #7, after un-ranked last week. They beat Norwich (3-5 record). What else happened?
They should have been 7 last week since they have a H2H win against Merchant Marine who was 7 last week. I think it is the committee correcting their mistake.
Are the hew ERFP Rankings coming out for week #10?
Quote from: wesleydad on November 10, 2018, 03:10:33 PM
The East is not very good this year. 1 team may be competitive after the first round. If the East teams were sent all over instead of a sort of east region Brockport could be the only team that would win a game. Frostburg looks average against Salisbury today. RPI gets smoked by Union. Just not a good season for the east.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on November 10, 2018, 03:42:29 PMThere is no question that RPI is not a good 9-1 team(Taking nothing away from the win by Union today). Ithaca is probably the best out of the LL despite the 10-9 loss to RPI , but then ,Hobart a 5-4 team was a very tough out for IC last week. The top 4 teams in the LL were pretty close this year. So, either it was a bad year for the East(except Brockport ...and we will see if that is true very soon) or there were a whole bunch of good teams , but only one stood out clearly untouched in every game. Everyone says how good the NJAC is compared to the other conferences , but I am not so sure we have enough data to say definitively that is true. Perhaps Frosty and Brockport will win a few and the East should look good. Maybe DelVal and RPI will surprise in the playoffs, but I doubt it. Bottom line, the observation that the East was down this year is probably valid. The irony would be Brockport winning the Stagg Bowl.Quote from: wesleydad on November 10, 2018, 03:10:33 PM
The East is not very good this year. 1 team may be competitive after the first round. If the East teams were sent all over instead of a sort of east region Brockport could be the only team that would win a game. Frostburg looks average against Salisbury today. RPI gets smoked by Union. Just not a good season for the east.
I tried to tell y'all that last month and got scolded for it. RPI was almost the worst 10-0 team I've ever seen, so I guess that makes them one lousy 9-1 team.
Quote from: Bartman on November 10, 2018, 04:13:50 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on November 10, 2018, 03:42:29 PMThere is no question that RPI is not a good 9-1 team(Taking nothing away from the win by Union today). Ithaca is probably the best out of the LL despite the 10-9 loss to RPI , but then ,Hobart a 5-4 team was a very tough out for IC last week. The top 4 teams in the LL were pretty close this year. So, either it was a bad year for the East(except Brockport ...and we will see if that is true very soon) or there were a whole bunch of good teams , but only one stood out clearly untouched in every game. Everyone says how good the NJAC is compared to the other conferences , but I am not so sure we have enough data to say definitively that is true. Perhaps Frosty and Brockport will win a few and the East should look good. Maybe DelVal and RPI will surprise in the playoffs, but I doubt it. Bottom line, the observation that the East was down this year is probably valid. The irony would be Brockport winning the Stagg Bowl.Quote from: wesleydad on November 10, 2018, 03:10:33 PM
The East is not very good this year. 1 team may be competitive after the first round. If the East teams were sent all over instead of a sort of east region Brockport could be the only team that would win a game. Frostburg looks average against Salisbury today. RPI gets smoked by Union. Just not a good season for the east.
I tried to tell y'all that last month and got scolded for it. RPI was almost the worst 10-0 team I've ever seen, so I guess that makes them one lousy 9-1 team.
Quote from: Bartman on November 10, 2018, 04:13:50 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on November 10, 2018, 03:42:29 PMThere is no question that RPI is not a good 9-1 team(Taking nothing away from the win by Union today). Ithaca is probably the best out of the LL despite the 10-9 loss to RPI , but then ,Hobart a 5-4 team was a very tough out for IC last week. The top 4 teams in the LL were pretty close this year. So, either it was a bad year for the East(except Brockport ...and we will see if that is true very soon) or there were a whole bunch of good teams , but only one stood out clearly untouched in every game. Everyone says how good the NJAC is compared to the other conferences , but I am not so sure we have enough data to say definitively that is true. Perhaps Frosty and Brockport will win a few and the East should look good. Maybe DelVal and RPI will surprise in the playoffs, but I doubt it. Bottom line, the observation that the East was down this year is probably valid. The irony would be Brockport winning the Stagg Bowl.Quote from: wesleydad on November 10, 2018, 03:10:33 PM
The East is not very good this year. 1 team may be competitive after the first round. If the East teams were sent all over instead of a sort of east region Brockport could be the only team that would win a game. Frostburg looks average against Salisbury today. RPI gets smoked by Union. Just not a good season for the east.
I tried to tell y'all that last month and got scolded for it. RPI was almost the worst 10-0 team I've ever seen, so I guess that makes them one lousy 9-1 team.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 11, 2018, 07:20:31 AMQuote from: Bartman on November 10, 2018, 04:13:50 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on November 10, 2018, 03:42:29 PMThere is no question that RPI is not a good 9-1 team(Taking nothing away from the win by Union today). Ithaca is probably the best out of the LL despite the 10-9 loss to RPI , but then ,Hobart a 5-4 team was a very tough out for IC last week. The top 4 teams in the LL were pretty close this year. So, either it was a bad year for the East(except Brockport ...and we will see if that is true very soon) or there were a whole bunch of good teams , but only one stood out clearly untouched in every game. Everyone says how good the NJAC is compared to the other conferences , but I am not so sure we have enough data to say definitively that is true. Perhaps Frosty and Brockport will win a few and the East should look good. Maybe DelVal and RPI will surprise in the playoffs, but I doubt it. Bottom line, the observation that the East was down this year is probably valid. The irony would be Brockport winning the Stagg Bowl.Quote from: wesleydad on November 10, 2018, 03:10:33 PM
The East is not very good this year. 1 team may be competitive after the first round. If the East teams were sent all over instead of a sort of east region Brockport could be the only team that would win a game. Frostburg looks average against Salisbury today. RPI gets smoked by Union. Just not a good season for the east.
I tried to tell y'all that last month and got scolded for it. RPI was almost the worst 10-0 team I've ever seen, so I guess that makes them one lousy 9-1 team.
I think the East is better than what we think this year. I think due to there being 3 or 4 teams in the LL, NJAC, and E 8 that could have easily been conference champ, it may appear to be a "down' year, but sometimes that a good sign and a testament to the conferences. I know we all want to see a conference champ be able to beat all their opponents by 28 points and then go onto the playoffs, but that doesn't always work out, may the tough challenges will help them in the those close games and maybe we get two teams again to the Final 8 and 1 into the final 4 and hopefully the stagg and win. I will be rooting for the East the whole way.
Quote from: Bartman on November 11, 2018, 10:24:41 AM
I think there were a bunch of pretty good teams in the East, and I really enjoyed the competitive league races. While I wish Frosty and BPort all the best to represent the East, I also thank all of the great D3 student athletes and coaches that gave it their all every practice and every game....their efforts and experience will help all of them in life post football.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2018, 12:23:39 PM
Final rankings. I still do not get votes for Wesley, they have 4 losses. I get it that it was by only 5 points, but they lost. Do I think on any given day they could beat anyone in the poll, yes, but actual results have to count and they have 4 losses.
I think Brockport makes the semis. I think Frostburg loses to Hopkins. I think Del Val beats Muhlenberg but loses to John Carroll. I dont see anyone else winning a second game.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2018, 12:23:39 PMI think Wesley's name still bears weight. I think that UWW's name was the reason for its quick ascent in the top 25 this season. Same idea IMO.
Final rankings. I still do not get votes for Wesley, they have 4 losses. I get it that it was by only 5 points, but they lost. Do I think on any given day they could beat anyone in the poll, yes, but actual results have to count and they have 4 losses.
I think Brockport makes the semis. I think Frostburg loses to Hopkins. I think Del Val beats Muhlenberg but loses to John Carroll. I dont see anyone else winning a second game.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 14, 2018, 01:36:50 PMFrostburg may be the best defense Hopkins has seen, but I also think Hopkins has the best offense that Frostburg has seen.
I actually think we will see both Frostburg and Brocport in the Quarters. I think Brockport easily wins the 1st two rounds. Frostburg will have a challenge with Hopkins, but Frostburg will be the best defense that Hopkins will see all year. Wesley is a conundrum, I didn't have them ranked, because of the mulitple losses, but as aforementioned, they had the potential to play with anyone. I do think Delaware Valley will make a good game if they were to play Carroll in the 2nd round, but I think if Carroll starts to run the ball between the tackles, it is going to be a long day for the Aggies. Now regarding the rest of the poll, it would have been nice to see Montclair, Cortland, and LL participate in the ECAC's, but that's the nature of some DIII programs. I don't think the rankings change if all the higher seeds win this week in their post season games. We will know more come week two of the playoffs on who is real and who is not.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 14, 2018, 12:56:25 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2018, 12:23:39 PM
Final rankings. I still do not get votes for Wesley, they have 4 losses. I get it that it was by only 5 points, but they lost. Do I think on any given day they could beat anyone in the poll, yes, but actual results have to count and they have 4 losses.
I think Brockport makes the semis. I think Frostburg loses to Hopkins. I think Del Val beats Muhlenberg but loses to John Carroll. I dont see anyone else winning a second game.
Why do you think Frostburg loses to Hopkins?
I think Hopkins is better than Salisbury, who could/should have beaten Frostburg. I think Frostburg has taken a small step back from last year. Frostburg gave up 34 to Wesley and 35 to Salisbury so they are going to give up points, will they be able to score enough to win. Hopkins is dangerous to play. They have shown steady improvement from the early loss. The X factor is Cox. He has pulled victory from the jaws of defeat several times this year and very well could do it again.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2018, 03:47:06 PMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 14, 2018, 12:56:25 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2018, 12:23:39 PM
Final rankings. I still do not get votes for Wesley, they have 4 losses. I get it that it was by only 5 points, but they lost. Do I think on any given day they could beat anyone in the poll, yes, but actual results have to count and they have 4 losses.
I think Brockport makes the semis. I think Frostburg loses to Hopkins. I think Del Val beats Muhlenberg but loses to John Carroll. I dont see anyone else winning a second game.
Why do you think Frostburg loses to Hopkins?
I think Hopkins is better than Salisbury, who could/should have beaten Frostburg. I think Frostburg has taken a small step back from last year. Frostburg gave up 34 to Wesley and 35 to Salisbury so they are going to give up points, will they be able to score enough to win. Hopkins is dangerous to play. They have shown steady improvement from the early loss. The X factor is Cox. He has pulled victory from the jaws of defeat several times this year and very well could do it again.
Quote from: Oline89 on November 14, 2018, 04:34:36 PM
Not so sure about this. Hopkins has blown out the teams they are supposed to blowout and had a close game against the best team in the CC.
Quote from: Bobcats47 on November 14, 2018, 10:45:16 PM
The hate for frostburg is strong in here
Quote from: Oline89 on November 15, 2018, 09:38:44 AMQuote from: Bobcats47 on November 14, 2018, 10:45:16 PM
The hate for frostburg is strong in here
Hate? nah, but you are leaving the pack....new home: http://www.d2messageboard.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1
Quote from: Bobcats47 on November 14, 2018, 10:45:16 PM
The hate for frostburg is strong in here
Quote from: Dutch Boy on November 15, 2018, 11:27:00 AM
dlip anticipates a tough game between Frostburg and Hopkins. Of course he'll be pulling for Frostburg to advance. Also, he is a bit skeptical on just how good Brockport is this year. Obviously they are a very good team but dlip is asking himself if they are on that elite tier. He thinks not, but is hopeful. ****ing East needs, at the very least, B-Port to make the semi's and show well...or else it's the same old ****.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 15, 2018, 12:16:17 PMQuote from: Dutch Boy on November 15, 2018, 11:27:00 AM
dlip anticipates a tough game between Frostburg and Hopkins. Of course he'll be pulling for Frostburg to advance. Also, he is a bit skeptical on just how good Brockport is this year. Obviously they are a very good team but dlip is asking himself if they are on that elite tier. He thinks not, but is hopeful. ****ing East needs, at the very least, B-Port to make the semi's and show well...or else it's the same old ****.
I just hate when some 2nd, 3rd/ or 4th best teams from some of the other conferences talk as if they would easily come to the East and win, not realizing they would most likely face the same result against the UWW and Mount teams...smh.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on November 15, 2018, 03:36:53 PM
I don't know what to tell you guys anymore, but it's just not true. We ARE the weakest, significantly so. Our best teams can't beat the best elsewhere. Our 2nd level can't beat their 2nd level. Our middlin' teams can't beat much of anybody. Our crap is by far the crappiest.
Forget the Purple Powers and the Johnnies, which of that Bethel/JCU/North Central/HSU/Witt/UW-2nd Best group wouldn't, on a neutral field, slap the f*** out of every East team besides Brockport and Frostburg (put your hand down Del Val) and beat those two at least fairly convincingly.
Prove me wrong on the field, fam. All recent history says we suck. Only your hopes and dreams and feelings say otherwise.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on November 15, 2018, 03:36:53 PM
I don't know what to tell you guys anymore, but it's just not true. We ARE the weakest, significantly so. Our best teams can't beat the best elsewhere. Our 2nd level can't beat their 2nd level. Our middlin' teams can't beat much of anybody. Our crap is by far the crappiest.
Forget the Purple Powers and the Johnnies, which of that Bethel/JCU/North Central/HSU/Witt/UW-2nd Best group wouldn't, on a neutral field, slap the f*** out of every East team besides Brockport and Frostburg (put your hand down Del Val) and beat those two at least fairly convincingly.
Prove me wrong on the field, fam. All recent history says we suck. Only your hopes and dreams and feelings say otherwise.
Quote from: Bobcats47 on November 15, 2018, 05:01:10 PM
Just curious. Other then Brockport and Frostburg, how many other schools in the playoffs are public schools.
Quote from: HScoach on November 15, 2018, 08:16:37 PM
On the subject of regional strength, here's my historical outsider view of the East: very solid but lacking an elite team.
Top to bottom the West is the best. Very strong at the top with the WIAC and MIAC champs with very good depth below them. Second is North due to the historic depth of the CCIW plus being home to The Machine. The South is typically top heavy with MHB and a bunch of pretty good. To me the East is probably better than the South from 2 thru 8 but lacks a flag bearer like MHB. The last would have Rowan in the 90's but that's a LONG time ago.
Slay me if you'd like, but that's my 2 unsolicited cents.
Quote from: HScoach on November 15, 2018, 08:16:37 PMI think this is a very fair assessment. There are a whole bunch of good teams in the East, but not "elite" teams. The ones that have punched their way into the final eight have been great but not that frequent, and Brockport getting to the final four was exciting last year. Heck, I felt Hobart gave Mount Union everything they could handle two years ago in Geneva(maybe not the best UMU team but still final four). I am totally cool with it, I love the competition in the Liberty League and the rivalry with some of the teams in the E8. I think the NESCAC may have the sport in perspective, but it would be interesting to see how good they really are outside of the conference. The tradeoffs to a team or two to get to the Elite level on a consistent basis is most likely not in the cards for our schools . So, after saying this, Brockport will probably win the Stage Bowl this year :o ;D
On the subject of regional strength, here's my historical outsider view of the East: very solid but lacking an elite team.
Top to bottom the West is the best. Very strong at the top with the WIAC and MIAC champs with very good depth below them. Second is North due to the historic depth of the CCIW plus being home to The Machine. The South is typically top heavy with MHB and a bunch of pretty good. To me the East is probably better than the South from 2 thru 8 but lacks a flag bearer like MHB. The last would have Rowan in the 90's but that's a LONG time ago.
Slay me if you'd like, but that's my 2 unsolicited cents.
Quote from: HScoach on November 15, 2018, 08:16:37 PM
On the subject of regional strength, here's my historical outsider view of the East: very solid but lacking an elite team.
Top to bottom the West is the best. Very strong at the top with the WIAC and MIAC champs with very good depth below them. Second is North due to the historic depth of the CCIW plus being home to The Machine. The South is typically top heavy with MHB and a bunch of pretty good. To me the East is probably better than the South from 2 thru 8 but lacks a flag bearer like MHB. The last would have Rowan in the 90's but that's a LONG time ago.
Slay me if you'd like, but that's my 2 unsolicited cents.
Quote from: HScoach on November 15, 2018, 08:16:37 PM
On the subject of regional strength, here's my historical outsider view of the East: very solid but lacking an elite team.
Top to bottom the West is the best. Very strong at the top with the WIAC and MIAC champs with very good depth below them. Second is North due to the historic depth of the CCIW plus being home to The Machine. The South is typically top heavy with MHB and a bunch of pretty good. To me the East is probably better than the South from 2 thru 8 but lacks a flag bearer like MHB. The last would have Rowan in the 90's but that's a LONG time ago.
Slay me if you'd like, but that's my 2 unsolicited cents.
Quote from: HScoach on November 16, 2018, 12:59:53 PM
Dad: Thanks for the referral, but you have been very drunk every time we've chatted.....
Quote from: WRMUalum13 on November 16, 2018, 06:30:31 PM
Okay question for you East region folks,
Why did everyone in today's quick picks choose muhlenburg to beat Delaware Valley? The top 25 poll has them ranked 10 spots ahead of Muhlenburg, I'm just a little confused by the disconnect? Any thoughts?
Quote from: WRMUalum13 on November 16, 2018, 06:30:31 PM
Okay question for you East region folks,
Why did everyone in today's quick picks choose muhlenburg to beat Delaware Valley? The top 25 poll has them ranked 10 spots ahead of Muhlenburg, I'm just a little confused by the disconnect? Any thoughts?
Quote from: WRMUalum13 on November 16, 2018, 06:30:31 PM
Okay question for you East region folks,
Why did everyone in today's quick picks choose muhlenburg to beat Delaware Valley? The top 25 poll has them ranked 10 spots ahead of Muhlenburg, I'm just a little confused by the disconnect? Any thoughts?
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 17, 2018, 08:33:32 AM
I actually don't expect Del Val to just get beat, I expect them to lose by a bit.
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 17, 2018, 11:29:44 AM
Has no one noticed a score is posted for the Brockport game ?? ???
Quote from: Dutch Boy on November 17, 2018, 08:41:13 PM
Dlip is saying this now...while this is no knock on Framingham B-Port is not going anywhere. What dlip means by this is that they will present no legitimate threat to any top tier team during these playoffs and IF they make the semi's they will not show close to as well as last year...and last year they lost 24-0. Of course dlip hopes to **** he is wrong but he thinks not.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on November 18, 2018, 11:48:16 AM
Ithaca played, sort of. Lost to Utica.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 24, 2018, 03:06:23 PMFrankly, this just makes the LL and E8 the best of the East as NJAC and MAC fell at the end, IMO. I think the coaching staff of RPI will be well prepared for Hopkins so they can rebuff their forecasted crushing . The teams with the most CoSID regional scholars are playing each other next week......the Nerd Bowl .
Last team standing wins. RPI is the best team in the East this year. The best of a large group of good teams that could beat each other on any given Saturday. I think they get crushed by Hopkins next week.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 17, 2018, 05:02:06 PM
So earlier in the week I was told by some toolbox butt clown that my opinions and information I share on this site are worthless due to the low number of games i've been able to see this year. Well, butt clown, how do you like me now?
Let's see...
-What in the world happened to Western Connecticut? I thought they were hosting someone this week...Weird.
-I said Del Valley wasn't great this year. They weren't.
-I said MIT flat out stinks. They were down 42 zip at halftime...
-I said Framingham was the best in New England. Today they showed this to be spot on.
-I did make a comment about Husson that maybe was a little off, they were tougher than I gave them credit for, but still not very good.
Not trying to puff my chest because I don't even need to based on today's results. But, Mr. Butt Clown, check your stats next time. Mach knows his football. You're just a wet underpant dripping fan of one school. Take a hike or understand your role. Or just go chase down your AD at the next women's hockey game and wine like a little b!tch some more.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on November 24, 2018, 03:28:48 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 17, 2018, 05:02:06 PM
So earlier in the week I was told by some toolbox butt clown that my opinions and information I share on this site are worthless due to the low number of games i've been able to see this year. Well, butt clown, how do you like me now?
Let's see...
-What in the world happened to Western Connecticut? I thought they were hosting someone this week...Weird.
-I said Del Valley wasn't great this year. They weren't.
-I said MIT flat out stinks. They were down 42 zip at halftime...
-I said Framingham was the best in New England. Today they showed this to be spot on.
-I did make a comment about Husson that maybe was a little off, they were tougher than I gave them credit for, but still not very good.
Not trying to puff my chest because I don't even need to based on today's results. But, Mr. Butt Clown, check your stats next time. Mach knows his football. You're just a wet underpant dripping fan of one school. Take a hike or understand your role. Or just go chase down your AD at the next women's hockey game and wine like a little b!tch some more.
You might just be the most ignorant, millennial, conceited, ass clown that I've ever seen post on any of the D3 Boards. You must lead a lonely life. Do something truly impressive in life (vs. hitting a couple of D3 football points spot on) and then come back and impress us. I've got an algo that has me +83.4% YTD trading leveraged and non-leveraged ETN's and options. You were right about a couple D3 football teams and are calling out (in your millennial tone) another poster. Go home and hunker down in mom's basement clown!!
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on November 24, 2018, 03:28:48 PMJMCozen,Quote from: Machiavelli on November 17, 2018, 05:02:06 PM
So earlier in the week I was told by some toolbox butt clown that my opinions and information I share on this site are worthless due to the low number of games i've been able to see this year. Well, butt clown, how do you like me now?
Let's see...
-What in the world happened to Western Connecticut? I thought they were hosting someone this week...Weird.
-I said Del Valley wasn't great this year. They weren't.
-I said MIT flat out stinks. They were down 42 zip at halftime...
-I said Framingham was the best in New England. Today they showed this to be spot on.
-I did make a comment about Husson that maybe was a little off, they were tougher than I gave them credit for, but still not very good.
Not trying to puff my chest because I don't even need to based on today's results. But, Mr. Butt Clown, check your stats next time. Mach knows his football. You're just a wet underpant dripping fan of one school. Take a hike or understand your role. Or just go chase down your AD at the next women's hockey game and wine like a little b!tch some more.
You might just be the most ignorant, millennial, conceited, ass clown that I've ever seen post on any of the D3 Boards. You must lead a lonely life. Do something truly impressive in life (vs. hitting a couple of D3 football points spot on) and then come back and impress us. I've got an algo that has me +83.4% YTD trading leveraged and non-leveraged ETN's and options. You were right about a couple D3 football teams and are calling out (in your millennial tone) another poster. Go home and hunker down in mom's basement clown!!
Quote from: Bartman on November 24, 2018, 03:38:17 PMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on November 24, 2018, 03:28:48 PMJMCozen,Quote from: Machiavelli on November 17, 2018, 05:02:06 PM
So earlier in the week I was told by some toolbox butt clown that my opinions and information I share on this site are worthless due to the low number of games i've been able to see this year. Well, butt clown, how do you like me now?
Let's see...
-What in the world happened to Western Connecticut? I thought they were hosting someone this week...Weird.
-I said Del Valley wasn't great this year. They weren't.
-I said MIT flat out stinks. They were down 42 zip at halftime...
-I said Framingham was the best in New England. Today they showed this to be spot on.
-I did make a comment about Husson that maybe was a little off, they were tougher than I gave them credit for, but still not very good.
Not trying to puff my chest because I don't even need to based on today's results. But, Mr. Butt Clown, check your stats next time. Mach knows his football. You're just a wet underpant dripping fan of one school. Take a hike or understand your role. Or just go chase down your AD at the next women's hockey game and wine like a little b!tch some more.
You might just be the most ignorant, millennial, conceited, ass clown that I've ever seen post on any of the D3 Boards. You must lead a lonely life. Do something truly impressive in life (vs. hitting a couple of D3 football points spot on) and then come back and impress us. I've got an algo that has me +83.4% YTD trading leveraged and non-leveraged ETN's and options. You were right about a couple D3 football teams and are calling out (in your millennial tone) another poster. Go home and hunker down in mom's basement clown!!
I am laughing mao at this one, +k......methinks you can dish it out, now can Mach take it? No worries, he is pulling on his slide rule after the Engineer's win today....and probably could care less...this has amused me greatly
Quote from: ITH radio on June 11, 2019, 12:36:05 PMHoping for Wesley to be resurgent this season. They return a lot of key pieces on both sides of the ball. They also will be a year removed from losing Coach Drass, which shook the program to the core.
So which teams do you think are going to be on the rise in 2019?
Quote from: rams1102 on August 13, 2019, 01:14:37 PM
Are we still going to do the East Region Fan Poll? I hope Wesleydad will do it again this year. I'm starting to play around with my list. Is the B-Port QB coming back and how will that effect the team? It's always a fun event.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 13, 2019, 01:14:37 PM
Are we still going to do the East Region Fan Poll? I hope Wesleydad will do it again this year. I'm starting to play around with my list. Is the B-Port QB coming back and how will that effect the team? It's always a fun event.
Quote from: MANDGSU on August 14, 2019, 10:04:46 AMI am interested as wellQuote from: rams1102 on August 13, 2019, 01:14:37 PM
Are we still going to do the East Region Fan Poll? I hope Wesleydad will do it again this year. I'm starting to play around with my list. Is the B-Port QB coming back and how will that effect the team? It's always a fun event.
I'm always interested in the fan polls, so count me in.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 21, 2019, 12:58:53 PM
I just sent a PM to wesleydad checking if he plans to do the East Region Fan Poll this year. Curiour minds would like to know. If any of the Wesley Crew talkd to wesleydad please ask him. Thanks.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 26, 2019, 12:59:24 PM
If the East Region Fan Poll is to continue, we need to get a volunteer to take charge of it. I cannot do it with my work and doing the NJAC Pick-Em. I hope we can get a volunteer.
Quote from: rams1102 on August 27, 2019, 12:53:34 PM
Please PM wesleydadand ask him if he used a template and he can e-mail it to you. If doesn't have one an open format works for me. We could all post our Top 10 and start with a Pre-Season top 10. This will definitely lead to good conversation.
Quote from: wesleydad on August 27, 2019, 03:06:13 PM
I did not have a template, not tech savy enough for that. I used excel and put everyone's votes down and then manually totaled them up; then I copy and pasted the list.
Quote from: MANDGSU on August 28, 2019, 11:36:16 AM
This is my top 10 ERFP - Preseason
1. Delaware Valley
2. Wesley
3. Montclair State
4. Union
5. RPI
6. Hobart
7. Salisbury
8. Alfred
9. Brockport
10. Ithaca
I'm willing to take on the ERFP in the current year, so feel free to pm your preseason top 10. I'll push to get them out on Monday evenings or Tuesday mornings.
Quote from: MANDGSU on August 27, 2019, 03:07:51 PMQuote from: wesleydad on August 27, 2019, 03:06:13 PM
I did not have a template, not tech savy enough for that. I used excel and put everyone's votes down and then manually totaled them up; then I copy and pasted the list.
Thanks Wesleydad, I'll see if I can come up with something. Hope all is well.
Quote from: CNU85 on August 29, 2019, 10:40:27 AM
Man, I'd love to take part in the poll this year. But I will be distracted. My daughter is getting married in October - twice - (to the same guy!). One ceremony is in VA and the other in Australia. I will be pre-occupied a tad. But I will lurk.
Quote from: Bartman on September 03, 2019, 11:06:26 AM
Top 10 for ERFP:
1. Brockport
2.Ithaca
3.Wesley
4.Delaware Valley
5.Montclair St.
6.Hobart
7.RPI
8.Utica
9.Union
10. Alfred
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 03, 2019, 11:43:18 AM
2019 Preseason East Region Fan Poll
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Wesley (1) - 43
2) Montclair State - 37
3) Delaware Valley (2) - 36
4) Brockport (2) - 33
5) Ithaca - 30
t6) RPI - 20
t6) Hobart - 20
8) Union - 16
t9) Salisbury - 12
t9) Alfred - 12
Dropped Out: N/A
RV) Utica (8), CNU (5), Stevenson (2), Springfield (1)
Quote from: CNU85 on September 03, 2019, 12:03:10 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 03, 2019, 11:43:18 AM
2019 Preseason East Region Fan Poll
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Wesley (1) - 43
2) Montclair State - 37
3) Delaware Valley (2) - 36
4) Brockport (2) - 33
5) Ithaca - 30
t6) RPI - 20
t6) Hobart - 20
8) Union - 16
t9) Salisbury - 12
t9) Alfred - 12
Dropped Out: N/A
RV) Utica (8), CNU (5), Stevenson (2), Springfield (1)
You take an early lunch!! haha. I will try to remember next week!
Quote from: UfanBill on September 03, 2019, 01:49:19 PM
So I'm the only one that gives ANY respect to any team from New England in the pre-season poll. Somebody has to emerge as the best team in New England. To be clear there are four NCAA berths that will be awarded as automatic qualifiers. Will any NE team make a run in the playoffs? Not likely BUT the one team that probably has the best chance is Springfield. After being top 25 ranked going into last season and starting last year with two impressive wins their season took a nosedive when starting QB Chad Shade and backup Davis Wells were both knocked out in the 2nd quarter against Union. For a team that relies about 99% on the QB to run their option attack this was catastrophic. Their passing stats from last year were a mind numbing 17/54 with 8 interceptions for a total of 325 yards...yes, this is for the season! They must know they have to pass the ball more efficently, right? We'll see. Historically their option is unstoppable and maybe it will return to dominance again this year.
Forward to 2019...Shade, Wells and RB Hunter Belzo, who took over as QB last year, are all back. you can expect the Pride will be cranking up their running attack. With some scores to settle, they lost to Union, USSMMA and MIT, it would be no surprise to me to see them atop the NEWMAC and playing mid November. Early OOC games against crosstown rival WNE, Kean and Union will get them ready to roll. They MAY be in my top 10 to stay.
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 03, 2019, 04:21:33 PMQuote from: UfanBill on September 03, 2019, 01:49:19 PM
So I'm the only one that gives ANY respect to any team from New England in the pre-season poll. Somebody has to emerge as the best team in New England. To be clear there are four NCAA berths that will be awarded as automatic qualifiers. Will any NE team make a run in the playoffs? Not likely BUT the one team that probably has the best chance is Springfield. After being top 25 ranked going into last season and starting last year with two impressive wins their season took a nosedive when starting QB Chad Shade and backup Davis Wells were both knocked out in the 2nd quarter against Union. For a team that relies about 99% on the QB to run their option attack this was catastrophic. Their passing stats from last year were a mind numbing 17/54 with 8 interceptions for a total of 325 yards...yes, this is for the season! They must know they have to pass the ball more efficently, right? We'll see. Historically their option is unstoppable and maybe it will return to dominance again this year.
Forward to 2019...Shade, Wells and RB Hunter Belzo, who took over as QB last year, are all back. you can expect the Pride will be cranking up their running attack. With some scores to settle, they lost to Union, USSMMA and MIT, it would be no surprise to me to see them atop the NEWMAC and playing mid November. Early OOC games against crosstown rival WNE, Kean and Union will get them ready to roll. They MAY be in my top 10 to stay.
Don't talk to me about option. I struggle with my bipolar-ism love/hate for it...One day it can score 50+ on a good team and the next day can only scoring 10 points against a quality team, then the next day scoring 40 against a quality team and then only 10 against a sub-par team. Sometimes I'm not sure if I would rather want to go 8-2, average 500 rush and 30+ points a game to lose to the two best teams on schedule or go 250 yards rushing and 250 passing and go 6-4. At least you know what you are getting with the 8-2 team, while the 6-4 season, you'd look good losing. Then there is the saying that only 3 things can happen when you pass the football, two of them are bad and one is good.
Quote from: UfanBill on September 03, 2019, 01:49:19 PM
They must know they have to pass the ball more efficently, right?
Quote from: ITH radio on September 05, 2019, 11:27:31 AM
I'm with you on DVC. I think they'll win most of their games, but wouldn't be surprised if they didn't win the MAC this season.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on September 05, 2019, 11:38:46 AMQuote from: ITH radio on September 05, 2019, 11:27:31 AM
I'm with you on DVC. I think they'll win most of their games, but wouldn't be surprised if they didn't win the MAC this season.
They lost the motherlode on offense as well as a few underclassmen they were counting on to replace them. I hear the defense could be really good but that the offense will struggle, especially early on.
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 05, 2019, 11:44:18 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 05, 2019, 11:38:46 AMQuote from: ITH radio on September 05, 2019, 11:27:31 AM
I'm with you on DVC. I think they'll win most of their games, but wouldn't be surprised if they didn't win the MAC this season.
They lost the motherlode on offense as well as a few underclassmen they were counting on to replace them. I hear the defense could be really good but that the offense will struggle, especially early on.
I'm really a defensive minded person and I'll take a defense that can keep you in any game always over an offense that has returning starters.
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 11, 2019, 09:35:52 AM
1. Delaware Valley (1,1,1,1,9)
2. Wesley (1,2,2,2,6)
3. Ithaca (2,2,3,3,4)
4. Hobart (3,3,4,4,5)
5. RPI (3,5,5,6,9)
6. Union (4,5,7,8,-)
7. Salisbury (6,6,7,7,10)
8. Utica (4,5,8,-,-)
8. Alfred (6,7,8,8,10)
10. Cortland (7,10,-,-,-)
ORV: Stevenson (9,9,-,-,-); Montclair State (8,-,-,-,-,); WPI (9,-,-,-,-); Endicott (10,-,-,-,-); WNE (10,-,-,-,-)
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on September 11, 2019, 09:40:55 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 11, 2019, 09:35:52 AM
1. Delaware Valley (1,1,1,1,9)
2. Wesley (1,2,2,2,6)
3. Ithaca (2,2,3,3,4)
4. Hobart (3,3,4,4,5)
5. RPI (3,5,5,6,9)
6. Union (4,5,7,8,-)
7. Salisbury (6,6,7,7,10)
8. Utica (4,5,8,-,-)
8. Alfred (6,7,8,8,10)
10. Cortland (7,10,-,-,-)
ORV: Stevenson (9,9,-,-,-); Montclair State (8,-,-,-,-,); WPI (9,-,-,-,-); Endicott (10,-,-,-,-); WNE (10,-,-,-,-)
I understand if you don't want to 'out' poster #5......................but can you please list his Top 10 in order. I need a good chuckle :)
Quote from: MANDGSU on September 11, 2019, 09:53:02 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 11, 2019, 09:40:55 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 11, 2019, 09:35:52 AM
1. Delaware Valley (1,1,1,1,9)
2. Wesley (1,2,2,2,6)
3. Ithaca (2,2,3,3,4)
4. Hobart (3,3,4,4,5)
5. RPI (3,5,5,6,9)
6. Union (4,5,7,8,-)
7. Salisbury (6,6,7,7,10)
8. Utica (4,5,8,-,-)
8. Alfred (6,7,8,8,10)
10. Cortland (7,10,-,-,-)
ORV: Stevenson (9,9,-,-,-); Montclair State (8,-,-,-,-,); WPI (9,-,-,-,-); Endicott (10,-,-,-,-); WNE (10,-,-,-,-)
I understand if you don't want to 'out' poster #5......................but can you please list his Top 10 in order. I need a good chuckle :)
I'm assuming you are wondering about the Delaware Valley #9 spot. Considering that Delaware Valley has lost quite of few players, especially offense, similar to how people were down on Brockport in wk 1, I think that is the voters thought, IMHO. I think the same thing holds true with RPI.
Quote from: Machiavelli on September 11, 2019, 10:04:29 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 11, 2019, 09:53:02 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on September 11, 2019, 09:40:55 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on September 11, 2019, 09:35:52 AM
1. Delaware Valley (1,1,1,1,9)
2. Wesley (1,2,2,2,6)
3. Ithaca (2,2,3,3,4)
4. Hobart (3,3,4,4,5)
5. RPI (3,5,5,6,9)
6. Union (4,5,7,8,-)
7. Salisbury (6,6,7,7,10)
8. Utica (4,5,8,-,-)
8. Alfred (6,7,8,8,10)
10. Cortland (7,10,-,-,-)
ORV: Stevenson (9,9,-,-,-); Montclair State (8,-,-,-,-,); WPI (9,-,-,-,-); Endicott (10,-,-,-,-); WNE (10,-,-,-,-)
I understand if you don't want to 'out' poster #5......................but can you please list his Top 10 in order. I need a good chuckle :)
I'm assuming you are wondering about the Delaware Valley #9 spot. Considering that Delaware Valley has lost quite of few players, especially offense, similar to how people were down on Brockport in wk 1, I think that is the voters thought, IMHO. I think the same thing holds true with RPI.
So voter 5 ranked both Brockport AND RPI at 9?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2019, 10:32:49 AM
I wanna talk about the two voters who have Utica as the top team in the Empire 8.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2019, 10:32:49 AM
I wanna talk about the two voters who have Utica as the top team in the Empire 8.
Quote from: Bartman on September 11, 2019, 12:19:29 PM
Sorry I missed this week My vote would have been:
1. Ithaca
2.Wesley
3. Hobart
4. Del Val
5.RPI
6. Brockport
7.Salisbury
8.Union
9 Utica
10. Cortland
By the way, Hansen has Wesley, D3 Football has RPI, and Compuphterratings has Hobart as #1 in the Region. Who the Frig knows until week 3 or 4.
Quote from: Ice Bear on September 11, 2019, 10:45:29 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2019, 10:32:49 AM
I wanna talk about the two voters who have Utica as the top team in the Empire 8.
Ice Bear wants to know what you have, at this point to disprove Utica being the top team in the E8 this season...at this point?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2019, 01:58:36 PMQuote from: Ice Bear on September 11, 2019, 10:45:29 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on September 11, 2019, 10:32:49 AM
I wanna talk about the two voters who have Utica as the top team in the Empire 8.
Ice Bear wants to know what you have, at this point to disprove Utica being the top team in the E8 this season...at this point?
*Shrug* nothing. It's week 1. It's all gut feel. But I'm skeptical because we've seen this movie before with Utica. 2012, 2014, 2016, all years where we thought maybe they were finally going to turn a corner to be consistently a player in the conference. And in 2013, 2015, and 2017, it just doesn't happen.
Alfred and Cortland have simply been more consistent programs, and to me, that earns them the benefit of the doubt, considering none of them played an opponent of any real consequence last week, and all won impressively.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on September 11, 2019, 04:11:02 PM
Demetri Martin is playing a show next week in the area and my local radio station was interviewing him, specifically about the film Taking Woodstock he starred in (because the station is in the actual Woodstock) but all I could think was ASK HIM ABOUT ICE BEAR
Quote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2019, 11:10:48 AMWesleydad, Always great to get your perspective. Good luck against Delaware Valley. I am very interested to see this result as well as how Brockport progresses this year. The Brockport defense is still very good despite the score of the Hobart game....I wouldn't count them out yet, although their season will depend on the Oline development( they have some size , for sure) and whether Hellwig is healthy and can put the ball into the hands of some outstanding athletes in Hubbard and Ortiz.
I think the poll makes sense. There are questions everywhere. I would not have Wesley 1 if I was voting until I see how they deal with the new QB situation. Ithaca and Hobart look really good, both on paper and on the field last week. Del Val has to replace their offense, so who knows what they have. This week will clear up the Wesley/Del Val debate, unless it is a barn burner. I think the top 4 are clearly ahead of the rest, well if Del Val makes a good showing this week. The top of the east could be very strong this year, not sure if it is the compete at the national championship level, but certainly the second tier. CNU found out what it is like to play a national contender type team in NCC and the gap is large for most teams.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2019, 11:10:48 AMGood point here... and CNU is a very, very solid team. I think they will push for the top spot in the NJAC this season.
I think the poll makes sense. There are questions everywhere. I would not have Wesley 1 if I was voting until I see how they deal with the new QB situation. Ithaca and Hobart look really good, both on paper and on the field last week. Del Val has to replace their offense, so who knows what they have. This week will clear up the Wesley/Del Val debate, unless it is a barn burner. I think the top 4 are clearly ahead of the rest, well if Del Val makes a good showing this week. The top of the east could be very strong this year, not sure if it is the compete at the national championship level, but certainly the second tier. CNU found out what it is like to play a national contender type team in NCC and the gap is large for most teams.
Quote from: RowanPhan on September 12, 2019, 01:16:33 PMQuote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2019, 11:10:48 AMGood point here... and CNU is a very, very solid team. I think they will push for stop spot in the NJAC this season.
I think the poll makes sense. There are questions everywhere. I would not have Wesley 1 if I was voting until I see how they deal with the new QB situation. Ithaca and Hobart look really good, both on paper and on the field last week. Del Val has to replace their offense, so who knows what they have. This week will clear up the Wesley/Del Val debate, unless it is a barn burner. I think the top 4 are clearly ahead of the rest, well if Del Val makes a good showing this week. The top of the east could be very strong this year, not sure if it is the compete at the national championship level, but certainly the second tier. CNU found out what it is like to play a national contender type team in NCC and the gap is large for most teams.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2019, 11:10:48 AM
I think the poll makes sense. There are questions everywhere. I would not have Wesley 1 if I was voting until I see how they deal with the new QB situation. Ithaca and Hobart look really good, both on paper and on the field last week. Del Val has to replace their offense, so who knows what they have. This week will clear up the Wesley/Del Val debate, unless it is a barn burner. I think the top 4 are clearly ahead of the rest, well if Del Val makes a good showing this week. The top of the east could be very strong this year, not sure if it is the compete at the national championship level, but certainly the second tier. CNU found out what it is like to play a national contender type team in NCC and the gap is large for most teams.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on September 13, 2019, 08:20:42 AMQuote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2019, 11:10:48 AM
I think the poll makes sense. There are questions everywhere. I would not have Wesley 1 if I was voting until I see how they deal with the new QB situation. Ithaca and Hobart look really good, both on paper and on the field last week. Del Val has to replace their offense, so who knows what they have. This week will clear up the Wesley/Del Val debate, unless it is a barn burner. I think the top 4 are clearly ahead of the rest, well if Del Val makes a good showing this week. The top of the east could be very strong this year, not sure if it is the compete at the national championship level, but certainly the second tier. CNU found out what it is like to play a national contender type team in NCC and the gap is large for most teams.
Welcome back Wesleydad. I hope that things are ok!
**********Below posted on June 12, 2019....................and my mind has not changed in the three months since:**********
DelVal will be in a massive rebuilding year this coming season so I don't see them as one of the better teams in the East.
The DelVal vs. Wesley game should be interesting. DelVal loses their four year starter at QB (Darden), their top three receivers (with all at least 6'4".......Ellis, Graham and Stewart), stud kick returner and punt returner Stewart (4 TD's last year), three of their five mulit-year starter offensive linemen and their all conference fullback/hback. I think they struggle mightily to move the ball against a loaded Wesley defense. And when they do, DelVal also loses their four year punter, All-American Steven Adams (currently in an NFL rookie camp, and getting CFL looks) who was an amazing weapon at the D3 level. Wesley knows first hand what it is like to be subpar at kicker and/or punter.
DelVal brings a lot back on defense, but Wesley does on offense, including a lightning quick back (Lee), big, fast WR's and a huge offensive line. After DelVal winning the first two and Wesley winning last year, I'll set the line at at Wesley -9.5. DelVal covers, but Wesley wins to tie the recent series (last four seasons) up at 2-2. No team, with the exception of Mount Union, Mary Hardin Baylor, Wisconsin Whitewater and maybe one or two I'm missing, beats Wesley 3 out of 4 games (this season's seniors were freshman during game one of the series).........certainly NOT DelVal.
I don't have a MAC prediction yet, but I don't see DelVal running the table, nor winning the MAC for a third straight year.
I think that Wesley, Salsbury and Rowan catch a huge break with the departure of Frostburg.
A little birdie also tells me that this season's game might be the end, for now, of the Wesley vs. DelVal series. I have no clue who Wesley replaces them with.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on September 13, 2019, 08:20:42 AM-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from: wesleydad on September 12, 2019, 11:10:48 AM
I think the poll makes sense. There are questions everywhere. I would not have Wesley 1 if I was voting until I see how they deal with the new QB situation. Ithaca and Hobart look really good, both on paper and on the field last week. Del Val has to replace their offense, so who knows what they have. This week will clear up the Wesley/Del Val debate, unless it is a barn burner. I think the top 4 are clearly ahead of the rest, well if Del Val makes a good showing this week. The top of the east could be very strong this year, not sure if it is the compete at the national championship level, but certainly the second tier. CNU found out what it is like to play a national contender type team in NCC and the gap is large for most teams.
Welcome back Wesleydad. I hope that things are ok!
**********Below posted on June 12, 2019....................and my mind has not changed in the three months since:**********
DelVal will be in a massive rebuilding year this coming season so I don't see them as one of the better teams in the East.
The DelVal vs. Wesley game should be interesting. DelVal loses their four year starter at QB (Darden), their top three receivers (with all at least 6'4".......Ellis, Graham and Stewart), stud kick returner and punt returner Stewart (4 TD's last year), three of their five mulit-year starter offensive linemen and their all conference fullback/hback. I think they struggle mightily to move the ball against a loaded Wesley defense. And when they do, DelVal also loses their four year punter, All-American Steven Adams (currently in an NFL rookie camp, and getting CFL looks) who was an amazing weapon at the D3 level. Wesley knows first hand what it is like to be subpar at kicker and/or punter.
DelVal brings a lot back on defense, but Wesley does on offense, including a lightning quick back (Lee), big, fast WR's and a huge offensive line. After DelVal winning the first two and Wesley winning last year, I'll set the line at at Wesley -9.5. DelVal covers, but Wesley wins to tie the recent series (last four seasons) up at 2-2. No team, with the exception of Mount Union, Mary Hardin Baylor, Wisconsin Whitewater and maybe one or two I'm missing, beats Wesley 3 out of 4 games (this season's seniors were freshman during game one of the series).........certainly NOT DelVal.
I don't have a MAC prediction yet, but I don't see DelVal running the table, nor winning the MAC for a third straight year.
I think that Wesley, Salsbury and Rowan catch a huge break with the departure of Frostburg.
A little birdie also tells me that this season's game might be the end, for now, of the Wesley vs. DelVal series. I have no clue who Wesley replaces them with.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 15, 2019, 02:13:34 PM
I don't know - Salisbury beating UWO makes me think the Gulls could take down the Wolverines potentially. CNU and Montclair, who I was high on in the preseason, don't seem to have it, so the NJAcs a two team race imo.
Quote from: NYfootball on September 17, 2019, 09:41:30 AM
Here goes:
6) Utica (looking for offense rhythm, D and ST looks solid)
7) Union (can a get a challenge for $100 Alex?)
8) Cortland (see Union)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 17, 2019, 10:17:30 AMQuote from: NYfootball on September 17, 2019, 09:41:30 AM
Here goes:
6) Utica (looking for offense rhythm, D and ST looks solid)
7) Union (can a get a challenge for $100 Alex?)
8) Cortland (see Union)
I feel like what you wrote for Union and Cortland should also be true for Utica.
St. Lawrence and Buff State went a combined 3-17 last year, with wins over: Norwich (who has already topped St. Lawrence), Hartwick (who is not on Buff State's schedule), and Rochester.
The only game I think either team will win this year (aside from the game against each other, obviously) is the Rochester game.
Quote from: Oline89 on September 17, 2019, 04:03:29 PM
My game of the week is definitely IC- Alfred. Is the early bye week good, to work on timing and install more of the offense. Or, does it just feel like week one again, having not played at game speed for 2 weeks?
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 17, 2019, 07:21:33 PM
Nobody's wondering about Utica at 3 eh?
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 17, 2019, 09:23:55 PM
As 88-91 points out, they're 2-0 isn't of any note compared with anyone else's. That's all. After they beat RPI then we can talk. :)
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 18, 2019, 08:45:08 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 17, 2019, 09:23:55 PM
As 88-91 points out, they're 2-0 isn't of any note compared with anyone else's. That's all. After they beat RPI then we can talk. :)
Seriously. I get that early season polls are all guesswork, but it's especially hard in this region, because it's just not as strong, and a lot of the OOC competition isn't very good. Also, Utica's yet to play a road game.
They'll get their chance to impress me. They just haven't yet. No one in the E8/LL really has yet.
Quote from: Oline89 on September 18, 2019, 09:08:42 AM
Preseason if you heard Hobart was going to beat Brockport by 26
Quote from: Oline89 on September 18, 2019, 09:08:42 AM
Also, how about Salisbury beating a traditional power in UWO?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on September 18, 2019, 10:23:53 AMQuote from: Oline89 on September 18, 2019, 09:08:42 AM
Preseason if you heard Hobart was going to beat Brockport by 26
We're not in the preseason now.Quote from: Oline89 on September 18, 2019, 09:08:42 AM
Also, how about Salisbury beating a traditional power in UWO?
Salisbury's not in the E8/LL
Quote from: gordonmann on September 17, 2019, 12:28:25 PM
It's a minor note, but Kean scored a TD against Del Val when Del Val's third or fourth string quarterback threw an interception inside his own 20 and then the Kean running back got a favorable call from one yard out against Del Val's second or third string defense.
Kean's top unit wouldn't have scored against Del Val's top unit either.
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 18, 2019, 10:37:57 AM
Except You've been recently stating Utica is suspect because the teams they beat were bad last year and "we've seen this from Utica before". Now a few days later it's "who knows at this point". Those don't go together very well. Are you saying we have more evidence two weeks in than preseason that's valuable information, or is it just noise for now?
Quote from: pumkinattack on September 18, 2019, 09:08:49 AM
Don't have a poll until week 4 then. But its not impossible to index teams a little, you've been making this claim on Utica for two weeks and now saying it's reasonable to have them at 3? Clearly an outlier in the small sample size of voters. Nobody really knows ho good or bad a result is until like week 8 for the most part. Rowan could be the best 0-3 team in the country, god willing, after next week. Union used to play a tough OOC and be like 1-3, 2-4 and finish with a winning record.
Quote from: CNU85 on September 19, 2019, 11:07:46 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 18, 2019, 09:08:49 AM
Don't have a poll until week 4 then. But its not impossible to index teams a little, you've been making this claim on Utica for two weeks and now saying it's reasonable to have them at 3? Clearly an outlier in the small sample size of voters. Nobody really knows ho good or bad a result is until like week 8 for the most part. Rowan could be the best 0-3 team in the country, god willing, after next week. Union used to play a tough OOC and be like 1-3, 2-4 and finish with a winning record.
Good points about OOC games. CNU tries to schedule as tough an OOC schedule as possible. CNU is now 0-2 for the 5th time in program history. The previous 4 times, they made the playoffs. The caveat -- the previous 4 times have been in the weak USA South. Also, many of those teams that made CNU 0-2 in the past are now NJAC Conference games. Doubtful that playoffs are in the picture this year.
Quote from: Ice Bear on September 19, 2019, 12:13:23 PMQuote from: CNU85 on September 19, 2019, 11:07:46 AMQuote from: pumkinattack on September 18, 2019, 09:08:49 AM
Don't have a poll until week 4 then. But its not impossible to index teams a little, you've been making this claim on Utica for two weeks and now saying it's reasonable to have them at 3? Clearly an outlier in the small sample size of voters. Nobody really knows ho good or bad a result is until like week 8 for the most part. Rowan could be the best 0-3 team in the country, god willing, after next week. Union used to play a tough OOC and be like 1-3, 2-4 and finish with a winning record.
Good points about OOC games. CNU tries to schedule as tough an OOC schedule as possible. CNU is now 0-2 for the 5th time in program history. The previous 4 times, they made the playoffs. The caveat -- the previous 4 times have been in the weak USA South. Also, many of those teams that made CNU 0-2 in the past are now NJAC Conference games. Doubtful that playoffs are in the picture this year.
Ice Bear has been thinking about SOS/OOC games this week.
In the past Ice Bear has hammered the likes of Rensselaer and others for soft ass OOC scheduling. Ice Bear sees his beloved Garnet now doing this for the second consecutive year. Ice Bear used to hate it...now Ice Bear likes it.
Ice Bear says it gives his top players some initial exposure to game speed and the opportunity to have some success as well as to gain confidence while playing in small portions of the game. Ice Bear says when they are taken out early it not only prevents injury (less time on the field exposed to the ****ing physical toll football takes) but also provides important game experience to young players. Ice Bear says as a former athlete there is nothing like game experience.
Ice Bear does worry about the figurative "punch in the mouth" the team may receive when faced with a much higher level opponent for the first time (see Union's loss to a pumped up Hobart last season).
Ice Bear is in favor of this early season "cupcake" scheduling for his Dutchmen as of now. Ice Bear keeps saying it but the ****ing wounds of our program's nose dive are still fresh. More So than when Ice Bear used to wake up in his own slop after many night's of boozing swaring it off until the very second he felt better and was back at it.
Ice Bear expects more from the Pride on Saturday but feels the Dutch SHOULD still take this game by at least 10-14 points. If they lose we know where they really stand. If they win we still know very little until Hobart.
Ice Bear is happy.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 25, 2019, 11:51:11 AM
fan poll running slow. interested to see how it breaks down this week. Seems like plenty of ok teams in the east, but few if any real good ones.
Quote from: wesleydad on September 25, 2019, 11:51:11 AMI think Wesley is plenty capable of being really good. They just need to sort out their QB situation. Defense is above average and their skill players on offense are just as good as they have ever been.
fan poll running slow. interested to see how it breaks down this week. Seems like plenty of ok teams in the east, but few if any real good ones.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 25, 2019, 01:08:51 PMAnother Jersey guy.
I think Mullin is the guy now. Should be a different team w/ him, but time will tell.
Quote from: ITH radio on September 25, 2019, 01:08:51 PMYeah, after Saturday I would agree. If not I'd imagine they'd turn to the freshman (a D1 recruit).
I think Mullin is the guy now. Should be a different team w/ him, but time will tell.
Quote from: rams1102 on September 26, 2019, 01:28:36 PM
There is no doubt that Ithaca is the #1 Team in the East. One can still argue 2-5 but this will definiitely play out by the end od week #5. My order was different but the Top 5 Teams are still there. My order was Ithaca, Wesley, Del Val, Hobart and Salisbury. The fun is defending your picks.
As I said on the NJAC Board the next 2 games will make or break the season for my Red Hawks. To many times they appear not to keep their head in the game and play down to their competition and lost to So VA. If they won that game they would probably be in the 6-7 or maybe higher. They have a ton of players returning and a good QB for the first time in a while. I feel that they have a good shot to beat Hobart but they must play 110-60 and be smart. Then comes Salisbury who had a nice win over Oshkosh. That's why we play the games. We will now see.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 01, 2019, 01:25:16 PM
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Ithaca (5) 1 57
2) Wesley (1) 3 49
3t) Hobart 2 45
3t) Salisbury 4 45
5) Delaware Valley 5 38
6) Cortland 7 28
7) Union 6 19
8) WPI t8 16
t9) St. John Fisher NR 10
t9) RPI t8 10
Dropped Out: Endicott (2) and Alfred (1)
RV) Utica (5), Brockport (3), Endicott (2), Alfred (1)
Key Game(s): Hobart (3t) v. Union (7) , Cortland (6) v. Utica (RV), Brockport (RV) v. St. John Fisher (t9)
Voters: MANDGSU, RAMS1102, DUTCH BOY, Ufanbill, NYFOOTBALL, Bartman
Quote from: Oline89 on October 01, 2019, 03:00:18 PM
Interesting how a loss moved SJF up, and a win moved RPI down.....
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 01, 2019, 04:11:08 PMQuote from: Oline89 on October 01, 2019, 03:00:18 PM
Interesting how a loss moved SJF up, and a win moved RPI down.....
How so? Given the results and the quality of opponent, that's what I would expect. Obviously, RPI was just going through the motions and likely could have named the score. But I would be much more impressed by what I saw from Fisher
Quote from: Oline89 on October 01, 2019, 04:29:55 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 01, 2019, 04:11:08 PMQuote from: Oline89 on October 01, 2019, 03:00:18 PM
Interesting how a loss moved SJF up, and a win moved RPI down.....
How so? Given the results and the quality of opponent, that's what I would expect. Obviously, RPI was just going through the motions and likely could have named the score. But I would be much more impressed by what I saw from Fisher
I am all for it! I appreciate the voters that are posting teams that they actually feel are the top ten at this moment. I don't think the national polls reflect the same sentiment. Is there an example of a team that won, and dropped down in the top 25? Did Ithaca this week?
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 01, 2019, 01:25:16 PM
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Ithaca (5) 1 57
2) Wesley (1) 3 49
3t) Hobart 2 45
3t) Salisbury 4 45
5) Delaware Valley 5 38
6) Cortland 7 28
7) Union 6 19
8) WPI t8 16
t9) St. John Fisher NR 10
t9) RPI t8 10
Dropped Out: Endicott (2) and Alfred (1)
RV) Utica (5), Brockport (3), Endicott (2), Alfred (1)
Key Game(s): Hobart (3t) v. Union (7) , Cortland (6) v. Utica (RV), Brockport (RV) v. St. John Fisher (t9)
Voters: MANDGSU, RAMS1102, DUTCH BOY, Ufanbill, NYFOOTBALL, Bartman
Quote from: Ice Bear on October 02, 2019, 01:25:17 PM
Ice Bear is impressed with WPI beating the Pride. Not that the pride are world beaters as this appears to be a down year for them, yet WPI continues to make strides and after defeating RPI IB feels good including them in his poll.
Preseason and Week #1 Ice Bear has Wesley as the top dog...after watching the Del Val game and the Endicott result he has them at #5. That may even prove to be a bit too high for the Wolverines.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 01, 2019, 05:16:36 PM
I was actually asking the question, didn't mean to come off sarcastic. Pretty sure Pat Coleman mentioned in the D3 podcast yesterday that he dropped Ithaca on his ballot.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 06, 2019, 05:34:02 PM
Decided to post this for all to see.
I'm extremely happy with Union's H-U-G-E win over Hobart and they continue to move up. Cortland jumps ahead of Del Val, why ??? because they haven't lost yet and are destroying the opposition. I expect the Red Dragons to win the E8. i know I'm showing no respect to the MAC but have they earned any? Wilkes is 4-0 but they haven't played anybody good or even dominated the bad teams they have beaten.
1) Ithaca......the best in the East but they have 4 tough games to win
2) Wesley....very thin ground right now
3) Salisbury..think they'll be moving up
4) Union.......things are coming together nicely
5) Cortland...eventual #1 seed in the East?
6) Del. Val.....easy road ahead?
7) Hobart......from here on out I'm a big fan
8) Brockport..they still have opportunity
9) WPI..........could go 10-0
10) RPI..........can't forget them just yet
Quote from: UfanBill on October 06, 2019, 05:34:02 PMBy the way, there is no way Union should not be in the top 25 D3.com poll after the 16 point win over Hobart , at least #22.......while Wesley and Salisbury may actually be overrated after their squeaky wins over Rowan and MSU ...unless the NJAC is a true power conference....oh, but Hobart beat Rowan and MSU as well ....Union should really get more love IMO
Decided to post this for all to see.
I'm extremely happy with Union's H-U-G-E win over Hobart and they continue to move up. Cortland jumps ahead of Del Val, why ??? because they haven't lost yet and are destroying the opposition. I expect the Red Dragons to win the E8. i know I'm showing no respect to the MAC but have they earned any? Wilkes is 4-0 but they haven't played anybody good or even dominated the bad teams they have beaten.
1) Ithaca......the best in the East but they have 4 tough games to win.....AGREE
2) Wesley....very thin ground right now...if you can call a 5-0 year a down year. Not surprised by barely beating Rowan, the best 0-5 team in the country
3) Salisbury..think they'll be moving up... I actually thought MSU would beat them this week, almost 27-24
4) Union.......things are coming together nicely....Best team Hobart faced, very strong, Union is back, so no more complaining about old lousy years
5) Cortland...eventual #1 seed in the East? Could still be #1 by end of year, but Brockport and Alfred may disagree
6) Del. Val.....easy road ahead? Not overly impressed with the MAC this year
7) Hobart......from here on out I'm a big fan...we need all the fans we can get, unfortunately, I cannot return the favor ;)
8) Brockport..they still have opportunity..Hobart got them on the right day, I think they will beat Cortland
9) WPI..........could go 10-0, underrated? depends on RPI success and strong finish
10) RPI..........can't forget them just yet Still defending LL champs
Quote from: Bartman on October 07, 2019, 02:01:18 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 06, 2019, 05:34:02 PMBy the way, there is no way Union should not be in the top 25 D3.com poll after the 16 point win over Hobart , at least #22.......while Wesley and Salisbury may actually be overrated after their squeaky wins over Rowan and MSU ...unless the NJAC is a true power conference....oh, but Hobart beat Rowan and MSU as well ....Union should really get more love IMO
Decided to post this for all to see.
I'm extremely happy with Union's H-U-G-E win over Hobart and they continue to move up. Cortland jumps ahead of Del Val, why ??? because they haven't lost yet and are destroying the opposition. I expect the Red Dragons to win the E8. i know I'm showing no respect to the MAC but have they earned any? Wilkes is 4-0 but they haven't played anybody good or even dominated the bad teams they have beaten.
1) Ithaca......the best in the East but they have 4 tough games to win.....AGREE
2) Wesley....very thin ground right now...if you can call a 5-0 year a down year. Not surprised by barely beating Rowan, the best 0-5 team in the country
3) Salisbury..think they'll be moving up... I actually thought MSU would beat them this week, almost 27-24
4) Union.......things are coming together nicely....Best team Hobart faced, very strong, Union is back, so no more complaining about old lousy years
5) Cortland...eventual #1 seed in the East? Could still be #1 by end of year, but Brockport and Alfred may disagree
6) Del. Val.....easy road ahead? Not overly impressed with the MAC this year
7) Hobart......from here on out I'm a big fan...we need all the fans we can get, unfortunately, I cannot return the favor ;)
8) Brockport..they still have opportunity..Hobart got them on the right day, I think they will beat Cortland
9) WPI..........could go 10-0, underrated? depends on RPI success and strong finish
10) RPI..........can't forget them just yet Still defending LL champs
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 07, 2019, 03:56:50 PMMANDGSU,Quote from: Bartman on October 07, 2019, 02:01:18 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 06, 2019, 05:34:02 PMBy the way, there is no way Union should not be in the top 25 D3.com poll after the 16 point win over Hobart , at least #22.......while Wesley and Salisbury may actually be overrated after their squeaky wins over Rowan and MSU ...unless the NJAC is a true power conference....oh, but Hobart beat Rowan and MSU as well ....Union should really get more love IMO
Decided to post this for all to see.
I'm extremely happy with Union's H-U-G-E win over Hobart and they continue to move up. Cortland jumps ahead of Del Val, why ??? because they haven't lost yet and are destroying the opposition. I expect the Red Dragons to win the E8. i know I'm showing no respect to the MAC but have they earned any? Wilkes is 4-0 but they haven't played anybody good or even dominated the bad teams they have beaten.
1) Ithaca......the best in the East but they have 4 tough games to win.....AGREE
2) Wesley....very thin ground right now...if you can call a 5-0 year a down year. Not surprised by barely beating Rowan, the best 0-5 team in the country
3) Salisbury..think they'll be moving up... I actually thought MSU would beat them this week, almost 27-24
4) Union.......things are coming together nicely....Best team Hobart faced, very strong, Union is back, so no more complaining about old lousy years
5) Cortland...eventual #1 seed in the East? Could still be #1 by end of year, but Brockport and Alfred may disagree
6) Del. Val.....easy road ahead? Not overly impressed with the MAC this year
7) Hobart......from here on out I'm a big fan...we need all the fans we can get, unfortunately, I cannot return the favor ;)
8) Brockport..they still have opportunity..Hobart got them on the right day, I think they will beat Cortland
9) WPI..........could go 10-0, underrated? depends on RPI success and strong finish
10) RPI..........can't forget them just yet Still defending LL champs
I have no problem with your assessment. I had a chance to watch the Montclair vs. Hobart game and the Salisbury vs. Montclair game. I'd say that although Salisbury squeaked by, I think overall Salisbury was the better team. I think Montclair did a much improved job not turning the ball over, against Salisbury than it did against Hobart, which is why I shot Union up on my ballot above said teams. However, playing the comparative scoring, I'd could say that WPI dominated Springfield much more than Union did and WPI should be higher. Sometimes playing familiar foes are different than playing new opponents. Another example would be UW-W v. C-M and that being a close match, while C-M was just thrashed by St. Thomas. UW-W beat UW-EC, which beat St. Thomas. St. Thomas is familiar with C-M and that showed this past weekend. I think the same thing holds true with Salisbury and Wesley games against Montclair and Rowan, respectively. Again, with the Common opponent H2H results, I have no problem with it being Union>Hobart>Wesley>Salisbury or some other combination thereof with Union being atop.
Quote from: Bartman on October 07, 2019, 02:01:18 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 06, 2019, 05:34:02 PMBy the way, there is no way Union should not be in the top 25 D3.com poll after the 16 point win over Hobart , at least #22.......while Wesley and Salisbury may actually be overrated after their squeaky wins over Rowan and MSU ...unless the NJAC is a true power conference....oh, but Hobart beat Rowan and MSU as well ....Union should really get more love IMO
Decided to post this for all to see.
I'm extremely happy with Union's H-U-G-E win over Hobart and they continue to move up. Cortland jumps ahead of Del Val, why ??? because they haven't lost yet and are destroying the opposition. I expect the Red Dragons to win the E8. i know I'm showing no respect to the MAC but have they earned any? Wilkes is 4-0 but they haven't played anybody good or even dominated the bad teams they have beaten.
1) Ithaca......the best in the East but they have 4 tough games to win.....AGREE
2) Wesley....very thin ground right now...if you can call a 5-0 year a down year. Not surprised by barely beating Rowan, the best 0-5 team in the country
3) Salisbury..think they'll be moving up... I actually thought MSU would beat them this week, almost 27-24
4) Union.......things are coming together nicely....Best team Hobart faced, very strong, Union is back, so no more complaining about old lousy years
5) Cortland...eventual #1 seed in the East? Could still be #1 by end of year, but Brockport and Alfred may disagree
6) Del. Val.....easy road ahead? Not overly impressed with the MAC this year
7) Hobart......from here on out I'm a big fan...we need all the fans we can get, unfortunately, I cannot return the favor ;)
8) Brockport..they still have opportunity..Hobart got them on the right day, I think they will beat Cortland
9) WPI..........could go 10-0, underrated? depends on RPI success and strong finish
10) RPI..........can't forget them just yet Still defending LL champs
Quote from: Bartman on October 07, 2019, 05:35:01 PM
ICE , Thanks for picking Bartman up....got to the game late and missed the 14-0 start , ran out of Bailey to see an ENT to try to get the cannon ringing out of my ears....still putting drops in .....I thought about going to the Hockey game to see one of my favorites, The Terriers , beat up on the Dutchmen(which they did) ........Bartman will be back in two years with a team that will be filled with future NFL players and we should all have a friendly tailgate ;D
Quote from: Bartman on October 07, 2019, 02:01:18 PMQuote from: UfanBill on October 06, 2019, 05:34:02 PMBy the way, there is no way Union should not be in the top 25 D3.com poll after the 16 point win over Hobart , at least #22.......while Wesley and Salisbury may actually be overrated after their squeaky wins over Rowan and MSU ...unless the NJAC is a true power conference....oh, but Hobart beat Rowan and MSU as well ....Union should really get more love IMO
Decided to post this for all to see.
I'm extremely happy with Union's H-U-G-E win over Hobart and they continue to move up. Cortland jumps ahead of Del Val, why ??? because they haven't lost yet and are destroying the opposition. I expect the Red Dragons to win the E8. i know I'm showing no respect to the MAC but have they earned any? Wilkes is 4-0 but they haven't played anybody good or even dominated the bad teams they have beaten.
1) Ithaca......the best in the East but they have 4 tough games to win.....AGREE
2) Wesley....very thin ground right now...if you can call a 5-0 year a down year. Not surprised by barely beating Rowan, the best 0-5 team in the country
3) Salisbury..think they'll be moving up... I actually thought MSU would beat them this week, almost 27-24
4) Union.......things are coming together nicely....Best team Hobart faced, very strong, Union is back, so no more complaining about old lousy years
5) Cortland...eventual #1 seed in the East? Could still be #1 by end of year, but Brockport and Alfred may disagree
6) Del. Val.....easy road ahead? Not overly impressed with the MAC this year
7) Hobart......from here on out I'm a big fan...we need all the fans we can get, unfortunately, I cannot return the favor ;)
8) Brockport..they still have opportunity..Hobart got them on the right day, I think they will beat Cortland
9) WPI..........could go 10-0, underrated? depends on RPI success and strong finish
10) RPI..........can't forget them just yet Still defending LL champs
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 08, 2019, 12:16:49 PMPat,
Union is ahead of Hobart. Beating No. 21 doesn't guarantee you entry into the poll, because you're going to knock 21 down in the process. Not every voter was even voting for Hobart in Week 4, so for eight of the 25 voters, Union's win isn't even against a ranked team.
From the LL, Ithaca is on every ballot, Union is on nine, Hobart is on 3 and RPI is on 2. Further games will consolidate this.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2019, 10:22:45 AM
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Ithaca (5) 1 59
2) Cortland (1) 6 47
3) Wesley 2 44
4) Salisbury 3t 43
5) Union 7 39
6) Delaware Valley 5 34
7) Hobart 3t 22
8) Brockport NR 18
9) WPI 8 10
10) RPI 9t 8
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 09, 2019, 11:50:21 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2019, 10:22:45 AM
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Ithaca (5) 1 59
2) Cortland (1) 6 47
3) Wesley 2 44
4) Salisbury 3t 43
5) Union 7 39
6) Delaware Valley 5 34
7) Hobart 3t 22
8) Brockport NR 18
9) WPI 8 10
10) RPI 9t 8
I guess I could see Cortland stealing a top vote from IC based on the Utica win, and perhaps a re-evaluation of IC's defense after the Fisher/Port game. I think they'll be 1-2 heading into Cortaca
Quote from: Ice Bear on October 09, 2019, 12:44:27 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 09, 2019, 11:50:21 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 09, 2019, 10:22:45 AM
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Ithaca (5) 1 59
2) Cortland (1) 6 47
3) Wesley 2 44
4) Salisbury 3t 43
5) Union 7 39
6) Delaware Valley 5 34
7) Hobart 3t 22
8) Brockport NR 18
9) WPI 8 10
10) RPI 9t 8
I guess I could see Cortland stealing a top vote from IC based on the Utica win, and perhaps a re-evaluation of IC's defense after the Fisher/Port game. I think they'll be 1-2 heading into Cortaca
Ice Bear says good point bombers (you make plenty of those on a weekly basis) however Ice feels that the Bombers warrant a unanimous #1 position at this point above the Apples.
Ice says Corteca would be even cooler (if that's possible) if both teams are undefeated and champs of their respective leagues...of course Ice wants no such thing to happen...but it would be great for the game, the fans, and both schools.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 08, 2019, 12:16:49 PMUnderstood. Now, whoever voted for Trine after getting drubbed 51-0 by an 3-1 Hope team, should have their voting privileges revoked ;D
Union is ahead of Hobart. Beating No. 21 doesn't guarantee you entry into the poll, because you're going to knock 21 down in the process. Not every voter was even voting for Hobart in Week 4, so for eight of the 25 voters, Union's win isn't even against a ranked team.
From the LL, Ithaca is on every ballot, Union is on nine, Hobart is on 3 and RPI is on 2. Further games will consolidate this.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 14, 2019, 01:44:34 PM
I have Alfred as my #10 and was not easy. ;D
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 09:45:45 AM
Just awaiting one more ballot. If I don't receive it by noon, I'll add in Hansen, similar to next week.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:09:31 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 09:45:45 AM
Just awaiting one more ballot. If I don't receive it by noon, I'll add in Hansen, similar to next week.
Just my lonely opinion, but nobody biases against the East more than Hansen. You already have a few pollsters from the LL, so I don't want to jump in and inadvertently affect the poll....
Quote from: jamtod on October 15, 2019, 10:23:58 AMQuote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:09:31 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 09:45:45 AM
Just awaiting one more ballot. If I don't receive it by noon, I'll add in Hansen, similar to next week.
Just my lonely opinion, but nobody biases against the East more than Hansen. You already have a few pollsters from the LL, so I don't want to jump in and inadvertently affect the poll....
The statistical analysis is biased against the east is quite the bold take.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 15, 2019, 10:21:00 AM
It's not a national poll -- doesn't matter where the algorithm ranks the East nationally in a regional poll!
Quote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:33:03 AMQuote from: jamtod on October 15, 2019, 10:23:58 AMQuote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:09:31 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 09:45:45 AM
Just awaiting one more ballot. If I don't receive it by noon, I'll add in Hansen, similar to next week.
Just my lonely opinion, but nobody biases against the East more than Hansen. You already have a few pollsters from the LL, so I don't want to jump in and inadvertently affect the poll....
The statistical analysis is biased against the east is quite the bold take.
Not that bold at all, it is built into his algorithm. Just ask him.
Quote from: jamtod on October 15, 2019, 10:50:08 AMQuote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:33:03 AMQuote from: jamtod on October 15, 2019, 10:23:58 AMQuote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:09:31 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 09:45:45 AM
Just awaiting one more ballot. If I don't receive it by noon, I'll add in Hansen, similar to next week.
Just my lonely opinion, but nobody biases against the East more than Hansen. You already have a few pollsters from the LL, so I don't want to jump in and inadvertently affect the poll....
The statistical analysis is biased against the east is quite the bold take.
Not that bold at all, it is built into his algorithm. Just ask him.
I've discussed this with him before. It's true that past playoff results are built into the algorithm (calculations, actually) though.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 11:03:57 AMQuote from: jamtod on October 15, 2019, 10:50:08 AMQuote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:33:03 AMQuote from: jamtod on October 15, 2019, 10:23:58 AMQuote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:09:31 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 09:45:45 AM
Just awaiting one more ballot. If I don't receive it by noon, I'll add in Hansen, similar to next week.
Just my lonely opinion, but nobody biases against the East more than Hansen. You already have a few pollsters from the LL, so I don't want to jump in and inadvertently affect the poll....
The statistical analysis is biased against the east is quite the bold take.
Not that bold at all, it is built into his algorithm. Just ask him.
I've discussed this with him before. It's true that past playoff results are built into the algorithm (calculations, actually) though.
https://twitter.com/RyanLasal_RSN/status/1183744486578556928
Quote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:35:15 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 15, 2019, 10:21:00 AM
It's not a national poll -- doesn't matter where the algorithm ranks the East nationally in a regional poll!
I just don't put full value in an algorithm that by design biases against the region that you are trying to rank.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 10:35:15 AMQuote from: Pat Coleman on October 15, 2019, 10:21:00 AM
It's not a national poll -- doesn't matter where the algorithm ranks the East nationally in a regional poll!
I just don't put full value in an algorithm that by design biases against the region that you are trying to rank.
Quote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:25:36 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
These two statements seem to sort of run counter to each other. The only way for a team's standing to go up or down is if they...do something they're almost never given the chance to?
And just to clarify, I don't really have an issue with IC's ranking, or the East's in general. But I can't remember the last time IC even played a team from another region. Either Frostburg in 2014 or Moravian in 2013, I'd guess?
Quote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:35:23 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:25:36 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
These two statements seem to sort of run counter to each other. The only way for a team's standing to go up or down is if they...do something they're almost never given the chance to?
And just to clarify, I don't really have an issue with IC's ranking, or the East's in general. But I can't remember the last time IC even played a team from another region. Either Frostburg in 2014 or Moravian in 2013, I'd guess?
I used this analogy on that Twitter thread someone posted earlier, but I view my model like a heads-up poker tournament that started in 1997. Everyone had the same number of chips at the beginning, and then by playing against each other, some rooms (regions/conferences/whatever) of the casino have people with larger purses than other rooms. If I'm in the East region, I can increase my own personal pot by outperforming my opponents, but for my room's total purse to increase, someone in that room (it doesn't have to be me) has to get more chips from some other room. Then, when they come back to my room, there's more total chips for everyone.
Quote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:53:58 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:35:23 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:25:36 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
These two statements seem to sort of run counter to each other. The only way for a team's standing to go up or down is if they...do something they're almost never given the chance to?
And just to clarify, I don't really have an issue with IC's ranking, or the East's in general. But I can't remember the last time IC even played a team from another region. Either Frostburg in 2014 or Moravian in 2013, I'd guess?
I used this analogy on that Twitter thread someone posted earlier, but I view my model like a heads-up poker tournament that started in 1997. Everyone had the same number of chips at the beginning, and then by playing against each other, some rooms (regions/conferences/whatever) of the casino have people with larger purses than other rooms. If I'm in the East region, I can increase my own personal pot by outperforming my opponents, but for my room's total purse to increase, someone in that room (it doesn't have to be me) has to get more chips from some other room. Then, when they come back to my room, there's more total chips for everyone.
Right. Except it's not heads up poker if you never play against someone whose chips you can take
Quote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 12:13:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:53:58 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:35:23 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:25:36 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
These two statements seem to sort of run counter to each other. The only way for a team's standing to go up or down is if they...do something they're almost never given the chance to?
And just to clarify, I don't really have an issue with IC's ranking, or the East's in general. But I can't remember the last time IC even played a team from another region. Either Frostburg in 2014 or Moravian in 2013, I'd guess?
I used this analogy on that Twitter thread someone posted earlier, but I view my model like a heads-up poker tournament that started in 1997. Everyone had the same number of chips at the beginning, and then by playing against each other, some rooms (regions/conferences/whatever) of the casino have people with larger purses than other rooms. If I'm in the East region, I can increase my own personal pot by outperforming my opponents, but for my room's total purse to increase, someone in that room (it doesn't have to be me) has to get more chips from some other room. Then, when they come back to my room, there's more total chips for everyone.
Right. Except it's not heads up poker if you never play against someone whose chips you can take
But if I you and I are in the same room, and play against each other frequently, and you go play in a different room, I can take some of your winnings from you the next time we play!
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 01:49:48 PMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 12:13:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:53:58 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:35:23 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:25:36 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
These two statements seem to sort of run counter to each other. The only way for a team's standing to go up or down is if they...do something they're almost never given the chance to?
And just to clarify, I don't really have an issue with IC's ranking, or the East's in general. But I can't remember the last time IC even played a team from another region. Either Frostburg in 2014 or Moravian in 2013, I'd guess?
I used this analogy on that Twitter thread someone posted earlier, but I view my model like a heads-up poker tournament that started in 1997. Everyone had the same number of chips at the beginning, and then by playing against each other, some rooms (regions/conferences/whatever) of the casino have people with larger purses than other rooms. If I'm in the East region, I can increase my own personal pot by outperforming my opponents, but for my room's total purse to increase, someone in that room (it doesn't have to be me) has to get more chips from some other room. Then, when they come back to my room, there's more total chips for everyone.
Right. Except it's not heads up poker if you never play against someone whose chips you can take
But if I you and I are in the same room, and play against each other frequently, and you go play in a different room, I can take some of your winnings from you the next time we play!
Correct me if I'm wrong, if Team A loses to Team B 7 out of the last 10 years. However, Team A beats Team B in year 11 and both share similar record, Team B could possibly be still rank higher? Going a little deeper, if Team C beats Team B 10 out of 10, but in the current year have a worst record than both Team A and Team B, Team C still has a chance to be ranked higher. So essentially, as mentioned the ranking is basically a rolling total of data from 1997 and should not be used for current events, because current events are weighted very low.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 15, 2019, 01:18:15 PMHansen looking at Oline, as he reconsiders the D3 football ranking algorithm?
(https://nypdecider.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/rounders-john-malkovich.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=646&h=431&crop=1)
Quote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 02:11:05 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 01:49:48 PMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 12:13:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:53:58 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:35:23 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:25:36 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
These two statements seem to sort of run counter to each other. The only way for a team's standing to go up or down is if they...do something they're almost never given the chance to?
And just to clarify, I don't really have an issue with IC's ranking, or the East's in general. But I can't remember the last time IC even played a team from another region. Either Frostburg in 2014 or Moravian in 2013, I'd guess?
I used this analogy on that Twitter thread someone posted earlier, but I view my model like a heads-up poker tournament that started in 1997. Everyone had the same number of chips at the beginning, and then by playing against each other, some rooms (regions/conferences/whatever) of the casino have people with larger purses than other rooms. If I'm in the East region, I can increase my own personal pot by outperforming my opponents, but for my room's total purse to increase, someone in that room (it doesn't have to be me) has to get more chips from some other room. Then, when they come back to my room, there's more total chips for everyone.
Right. Except it's not heads up poker if you never play against someone whose chips you can take
But if I you and I are in the same room, and play against each other frequently, and you go play in a different room, I can take some of your winnings from you the next time we play!
Correct me if I'm wrong, if Team A loses to Team B 7 out of the last 10 years. However, Team A beats Team B in year 11 and both share similar record, Team B could possibly be still rank higher? Going a little deeper, if Team C beats Team B 10 out of 10, but in the current year have a worst record than both Team A and Team B, Team C still has a chance to be ranked higher. So essentially, as mentioned the ranking is basically a rolling total of data from 1997 and should not be used for current events, because current events are weighted very low.
That's kinda correct and kinda backwards, actually. That scenario can easily play out, depending on the other 8 games those teams played. If you're trying to build a predictive system, trying to rank teams strictly according to the rule of thumb "teams should be ranked ahead of teams they beat" is actually just about the worst system. In my (now defunct) prediction tracker, the "Nutshell Retrodictive Rankings" was designed with that premise, and it ranked dead last in predictions each season I tracked.
In my model, about half of a team's rating is directly attributable to their last 4 games, and then 1/4 to the 4 before that, and 1/8 to the the 4 before that, and on & on... So, a single random game from a previous season will make up about 1% to 2% of a team's current rating, but you add up a lot of those games over the course of a decade plus, and if an entire region consistently plays poorly against outside opponents over that whole span, that can add up to a lot of adjustments.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 03:19:14 PMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 02:11:05 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 01:49:48 PMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 12:13:16 PMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:53:58 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:35:23 AMQuote from: Bombers798891 on October 15, 2019, 11:25:36 AMQuote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 11:10:55 AM
With that in mind, how should you compare a team from the UMAC, a very bad conference in the Midwest, to a team from the E8, a very good conference in the Northeast? Or a team from the ECFC to a team from the WIAC? They never play each other!
Or do I devise a system that...only increases their standing relative to the rest of the country if they actually do better against the rest of the country?
These two statements seem to sort of run counter to each other. The only way for a team's standing to go up or down is if they...do something they're almost never given the chance to?
And just to clarify, I don't really have an issue with IC's ranking, or the East's in general. But I can't remember the last time IC even played a team from another region. Either Frostburg in 2014 or Moravian in 2013, I'd guess?
I used this analogy on that Twitter thread someone posted earlier, but I view my model like a heads-up poker tournament that started in 1997. Everyone had the same number of chips at the beginning, and then by playing against each other, some rooms (regions/conferences/whatever) of the casino have people with larger purses than other rooms. If I'm in the East region, I can increase my own personal pot by outperforming my opponents, but for my room's total purse to increase, someone in that room (it doesn't have to be me) has to get more chips from some other room. Then, when they come back to my room, there's more total chips for everyone.
Right. Except it's not heads up poker if you never play against someone whose chips you can take
But if I you and I are in the same room, and play against each other frequently, and you go play in a different room, I can take some of your winnings from you the next time we play!
Correct me if I'm wrong, if Team A loses to Team B 7 out of the last 10 years. However, Team A beats Team B in year 11 and both share similar record, Team B could possibly be still rank higher? Going a little deeper, if Team C beats Team B 10 out of 10, but in the current year have a worst record than both Team A and Team B, Team C still has a chance to be ranked higher. So essentially, as mentioned the ranking is basically a rolling total of data from 1997 and should not be used for current events, because current events are weighted very low.
That's kinda correct and kinda backwards, actually. That scenario can easily play out, depending on the other 8 games those teams played. If you're trying to build a predictive system, trying to rank teams strictly according to the rule of thumb "teams should be ranked ahead of teams they beat" is actually just about the worst system. In my (now defunct) prediction tracker, the "Nutshell Retrodictive Rankings" was designed with that premise, and it ranked dead last in predictions each season I tracked.
In my model, about half of a team's rating is directly attributable to their last 4 games, and then 1/4 to the 4 before that, and 1/8 to the the 4 before that, and on & on... So, a single random game from a previous season will make up about 1% to 2% of a team's current rating, but you add up a lot of those games over the course of a decade plus, and if an entire region consistently plays poorly against outside opponents over that whole span, that can add up to a lot of adjustments.
Ah I see. So going back to my example. Wesley has beaten Salisbury 7 out 10 and UWW has beaten Wesley 7 out of 7 and UWO has beaten UWW 2 out of 5, thus UW-O being ranked higher than Salisbury currently although current H2H says otherwise. I get the poker room theory as Wesley has been taking Salisbury poke chips over the years but given most to UWW, while UWO has taken some of UWW poke chips, thus accumulating more than Salisbury over that time as both teams have accumulated chips from their respective conference opponents.
Quote from: Oline89 on October 15, 2019, 03:24:45 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 15, 2019, 03:19:14 PM
Ah I see. So going back to my example. Wesley has beaten Salisbury 7 out 10 and UWW has beaten Wesley 7 out of 7 and UWO has beaten UWW 2 out of 5, thus UW-O being ranked higher than Salisbury currently although current H2H says otherwise. I get the poker room theory as Wesley has been taking Salisbury poke chips over the years but given most to UWW, while UWO has taken some of UWW poke chips, thus accumulating more than Salisbury over that time as both teams have accumulated chips from their respective conference opponents.
That is where the debate ensues. Is a 2019 UWO team "better" than the Salisbury team? Based on game theory (Hansen), the 2019 UWO team should win a head to head matchup.
Quote from: HansenRatings on October 15, 2019, 12:13:16 PMAppreciate that you take the time to do this, and thanks for sharing some of the insight into your model, and your awesome explanations. +K
But if I you and I are in the same room, and play against each other frequently, and you go play in a different room, I can take some of your winnings from you the next time we play!
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 15, 2019, 01:18:15 PM
(https://nypdecider.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/rounders-john-malkovich.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=646&h=431&crop=1)
Quote from: rams1102 on October 16, 2019, 01:14:06 PM
The only difference in my Poll and the new standings is that I had:
3. Cortland
4. Del Val
5. Union
Not sold on Union as #3. I know you can only play the cards dealt but the last 3 games of their schedule will really tell when they play Ithaca, Utica and RPI. In any event they are having a great season. I think at the end of the year there will be some disappointed Teams not making the Dance. There will definitely be a lot of great discussions to come.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 17, 2019, 01:47:37 PM
Nothing wrong in being a homer especially when your team is undefeated. Wesley won I think in double OT and really should have lost IMHO. Also My Top 5 have 3 NY Teams and my top 10 have 6 NY Teams. Then the NJAC & MAC are 3 Teams. I can't understand why you think I feel they are stronget than the NY leagues. I don't. Thats why we can agree to disagree. :)
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 21, 2019, 05:55:48 PM
While I wait for the last ballot...here is my projected East Regional-Ranking. My apologies if I your team is forecast to lose, this is strictly based upon current rankings. I also posted this in the 2019 Pool C discussion.
Hobart may end of regionally ranked at 8-2 at end of the year. Currently I think the East Region may end up:
1. Ithaca (10-0) (3-0)
2. Salisbury (9-0) (1-0)
3. Wesley (9-1) (2-1)
4. Cortland (9-1)(0-1)
5. Union (9-1) (1-1)
6. Delaware Valley (9-1)(1-1)
7. WPI (10-0) (0-0)
8. Endicott (9-1) (0-1)
9. Hobart (8-2) (0-2)
10. Stevenson (8-2) (0-2)
Currently, Union has a .459 and that may not be enough considering the other regions.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2019, 11:54:57 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 21, 2019, 05:55:48 PM
While I wait for the last ballot...here is my projected East Regional-Ranking. My apologies if I your team is forecast to lose, this is strictly based upon current rankings. I also posted this in the 2019 Pool C discussion.
Hobart may end of regionally ranked at 8-2 at end of the year. Currently I think the East Region may end up:
1. Ithaca (10-0) (3-0)
2. Salisbury (9-0) (1-0)
3. Wesley (9-1) (2-1)
4. Cortland (9-1)(0-1)
5. Union (9-1) (1-1)
6. Delaware Valley (9-1)(1-1)
7. WPI (10-0) (0-0)
8. Endicott (9-1) (0-1)
9. Hobart (8-2) (0-2)
10. Stevenson (8-2) (0-2)
Currently, Union has a .459 and that may not be enough considering the other regions.
Plus Union will be behind Wesley on the board. If Wesley wins out they will have a decent SOS and a 2-1 record against regionally ranked teams. They would almost surely come off the board and maybe quickly giving Union a shot to get in. That list would make a pretty good bracket. Maybe the East will be true east if Ithaca wins out. Would make for some good first and second round games.
Quote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2019, 11:54:57 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 21, 2019, 05:55:48 PM
While I wait for the last ballot...here is my projected East Regional-Ranking. My apologies if I your team is forecast to lose, this is strictly based upon current rankings. I also posted this in the 2019 Pool C discussion.
Hobart may end of regionally ranked at 8-2 at end of the year. Currently I think the East Region may end up:
1. Ithaca (10-0) (3-0)
2. Salisbury (9-0) (1-0)
3. Wesley (9-1) (2-1)
4. Cortland (9-1)(0-1)
5. Union (9-1) (1-1)
6. Delaware Valley (9-1)(1-1)
7. WPI (10-0) (0-0)
8. Endicott (9-1) (0-1)
9. Hobart (8-2) (0-2)
10. Stevenson (8-2) (0-2)
Currently, Union has a .459 and that may not be enough considering the other regions.
Plus Union will be behind Wesley on the board. If Wesley wins out they will have a decent SOS and a 2-1 record against regionally ranked teams. They would almost surely come off the board and maybe quickly giving Union a shot to get in. That list would make a pretty good bracket. Maybe the East will be true east if Ithaca wins out. Would make for some good first and second round games.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 22, 2019, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2019, 11:54:57 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 21, 2019, 05:55:48 PM
While I wait for the last ballot...here is my projected East Regional-Ranking. My apologies if I your team is forecast to lose, this is strictly based upon current rankings. I also posted this in the 2019 Pool C discussion.
Hobart may end of regionally ranked at 8-2 at end of the year. Currently I think the East Region may end up:
1. Ithaca (10-0) (3-0)
2. Salisbury (9-0) (1-0)
3. Wesley (9-1) (2-1)
4. Cortland (9-1)(0-1)
5. Union (9-1) (1-1)
6. Delaware Valley (9-1)(1-1)
7. WPI (10-0) (0-0)
8. Endicott (9-1) (0-1)
9. Hobart (8-2) (0-2)
10. Stevenson (8-2) (0-2)
Currently, Union has a .459 and that may not be enough considering the other regions.
Plus Union will be behind Wesley on the board. If Wesley wins out they will have a decent SOS and a 2-1 record against regionally ranked teams. They would almost surely come off the board and maybe quickly giving Union a shot to get in. That list would make a pretty good bracket. Maybe the East will be true east if Ithaca wins out. Would make for some good first and second round games.
Then there's this: What if Union beats Ithaca and finishes 10-0. Or wins the LL but finishes 9-1 losing to Utica. What if Cortland beats Ithaca after losing to Brockport? Salisbury wins the NJAC but stumbles against say CNU? Misericordia somehow wins the MAC? You could have a whole bunch of teams finish 9-1. What would the seeding look like? Point is a lot can still happen. Love thinking and talking about this stuff.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 22, 2019, 02:27:38 PMQuote from: wesleydad on October 22, 2019, 11:54:57 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on October 21, 2019, 05:55:48 PM
While I wait for the last ballot...here is my projected East Regional-Ranking. My apologies if I your team is forecast to lose, this is strictly based upon current rankings. I also posted this in the 2019 Pool C discussion.
Hobart may end of regionally ranked at 8-2 at end of the year. Currently I think the East Region may end up:
1. Ithaca (10-0) (3-0)
2. Salisbury (9-0) (1-0)
3. Wesley (9-1) (2-1)
4. Cortland (9-1)(0-1)
5. Union (9-1) (1-1)
6. Delaware Valley (9-1)(1-1)
7. WPI (10-0) (0-0)
8. Endicott (9-1) (0-1)
9. Hobart (8-2) (0-2)
10. Stevenson (8-2) (0-2)
Currently, Union has a .459 and that may not be enough considering the other regions.
Plus Union will be behind Wesley on the board. If Wesley wins out they will have a decent SOS and a 2-1 record against regionally ranked teams. They would almost surely come off the board and maybe quickly giving Union a shot to get in. That list would make a pretty good bracket. Maybe the East will be true east if Ithaca wins out. Would make for some good first and second round games.
It's definitely a possibility. With Husson out of the picture, it definitely helps. As every team that are current conference leaders can travel without flying, this saves the NCAA money. Nevertheless, Delaware Valley, Wesley, and Salisbury all can travel South to play teams such as Averett, R-MC, Bridgewater, and Muhlenberg. Similar to last year, you can easily for the first two weeks mix the Mid-Atlantic with East to Northeast teams and go as far as west to Case Western and Mount Union. If Ithaca ends up with a #1 seed based upon my projections, they can mix it up a tad and have Salisbury (current "#2" in East) switch with Muhlenberg (current "#2") in the South and play Ithaca in the 3rd round. Then Salisbury would travel (similar to 2011 going to UWW) to Mount Union, which is under 500 miles (saving the NCAA money) or otherwise a flight would be needed to travel to UMHB or UWW/SJU. As you may recall in 2011, if the SCIAC, NWC, and UMHB only needing flights, you can have the SCIAC/NWC winner of round 1 play a team like Wesley (wouldn't it be poetic justice if Wesley were to fly to Linfield for 2nd round match).
Quote from: Caz Bombers on October 22, 2019, 06:11:49 PMI'm curious (and I'm actually curious, haven't seen a NESCAC football game in years), what would make you think that? 1-4 seems pretty lofty. Yes, they are undefeated in the NESCAC, but they have won 4 games by a total of 13 points, and squeaked by 0-6 Colby 27-26. Do you think the level of play in the NESCAC is that high? Obviously, no way to tell, but 1-4 would seem to say you do.
on the likelihood of how they might fare on neutral fields against the rest of us, I would put Middlebury anywhere from 1-4.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 23, 2019, 05:48:41 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 22, 2019, 06:11:49 PMI'm curious (and I'm actually curious, haven't seen a NESCAC football game in years), what would make you think that? 1-4 seems pretty lofty. Yes, they are undefeated in the NESCAC, but they have won 4 games by a total of 13 points, and squeaked by 0-6 Colby 27-26. Do you think the level of play in the NESCAC is that high? Obviously, no way to tell, but 1-4 would seem to say you do.
on the likelihood of how they might fare on neutral fields against the rest of us, I would put Middlebury anywhere from 1-4.
Quote from: Caz Bombers on October 23, 2019, 06:27:29 PMQuote from: Doid23 on October 23, 2019, 05:48:41 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 22, 2019, 06:11:49 PMI'm curious (and I'm actually curious, haven't seen a NESCAC football game in years), what would make you think that? 1-4 seems pretty lofty. Yes, they are undefeated in the NESCAC, but they have won 4 games by a total of 13 points, and squeaked by 0-6 Colby 27-26. Do you think the level of play in the NESCAC is that high? Obviously, no way to tell, but 1-4 would seem to say you do.
on the likelihood of how they might fare on neutral fields against the rest of us, I would put Middlebury anywhere from 1-4.
yeah, I kinda do. NESCAC teams tend to be a cut above in the vast majority of other sports, stands to reason they're getting a similar relative talent edge in football as well.
Quote from: Mr. Ypsi on October 23, 2019, 06:56:46 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 23, 2019, 06:27:29 PMQuote from: Doid23 on October 23, 2019, 05:48:41 PMQuote from: Caz Bombers on October 22, 2019, 06:11:49 PMI'm curious (and I'm actually curious, haven't seen a NESCAC football game in years), what would make you think that? 1-4 seems pretty lofty. Yes, they are undefeated in the NESCAC, but they have won 4 games by a total of 13 points, and squeaked by 0-6 Colby 27-26. Do you think the level of play in the NESCAC is that high? Obviously, no way to tell, but 1-4 would seem to say you do.
on the likelihood of how they might fare on neutral fields against the rest of us, I would put Middlebury anywhere from 1-4.
yeah, I kinda do. NESCAC teams tend to be a cut above in the vast majority of other sports, stands to reason they're getting a similar relative talent edge in football as well.
Due to their success in (most) other sports, I also SUSPECT they would probably fare quite well in football. BUT ... there is not one molecule of evidence one way or the other. Until the NESCAC presidents decide to actually join D3 in football, the only logically sound policy is to just ignore their existence in making comparisons.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 23, 2019, 08:02:04 PM
The NESCAC was formed back in 1971. Most of you know Union was a member from inception and dropped out (the reasons weren't clear but probably involved hockey :o) in 1977. Union's biggest football rival is of course RPI but back in the day they also had rivalry games with Williams and Hamilton. They played Middlebury and Trinity into the '80s. I've been to games at all those schools...But that was then, this is now. The NESCAC schools have tremendous endowments (example: millions from Williams alum George Steinbrenner) which allows them to treat their athletes top class. Many have superior athletic facilities. Do they have better players? You could make that assumption. They certainly have the pieces in place to recruit the best.
The NESCAC board on this website gets a lot of action. Read it sometime. Many of the posters have been contributing for years. Infrequently I'll go on it, usually to ask a question or get an opinion and have always been respectfully received. Maybe because many are "old curmudgeons" like me. ;D
I've asked the NESCAC board about their feelings of not participating in the tourney. There's mixed response. Some would relish the opportunity, some are worried about "playing too many games" and damaging the academics but all are quite content to go with whatever the administrations decide and be satisfied with it. There is some movement on the scheduling side. Last year the NESCAC added a ninth game and now play a balanced schedule. This year they mixed up that schedule changing dates of rivalry games that had stood for years. Maybe they'll join the rest of D3 someday.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 24, 2019, 12:43:51 AM
Of course, the big difference between football and the rest of the NESCAC sports is that they can compete for a National Title, and Football can't. I think that makes a huge difference in the athletes you get. NESCAC is the gold standard for lacrosse, but if they couldn't compete for a 'Ship, I don't think they would get the same level of talent. Don't get me wrong, I respect NESCAC, and they are certainly great academic institutions, and the old school part of me digs that winning a league title in football means something.
Quote from: Doid23 on October 24, 2019, 12:43:51 AM
Well, they were always good at other sports, even back in the 80's. So it would stand to reason that they were the same in football. They had their way with Union in the 70's, until U ascended into one of the top programs in the east in the 80's, and then, not so much.
Of course, the big difference between football and the rest of the NESCAC sports is that they can compete for a National Title, and Football can't. I think that makes a huge difference in the athletes you get. NESCAC is the gold standard for lacrosse, but if they couldn't compete for a 'Ship, I don't think they would get the same level of talent. Don't get me wrong, I respect NESCAC, and they are certainly great academic institutions, and the old school part of me digs that winning a league title in football means something.
But I'd imagine that they would struggle today with the perennial east powers, such as Ithica, Cortland, Wesley, Del Val, etc. so it would be really hard to convince me that they could be ranked 1-4 in the East. Top 10, maybe. Unfortunately, we will never know.
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 24, 2019, 01:27:17 PM
Any argument involving D-I is a red herring. But I also think the NESCAC could compete at the D-III level, but wouldn't walk in as a competitor. Lack of spring practice, and a truncated training camp gives players generally fewer reps. They play fewer games but 36 over a four-year career instead of 40 is not as big a gap as it was when they played 32. Basketball competed at the D-III level, but it took a few years and was not automatic.
In addition, football in D-III in this part of the country doesn't have a ton of national contenders outside of the NESCAC, unlike hockey and lacrosse, which I use because they are similar sports in terms of big rosters. I do recognize, yes, that NESCAC rosters are not particularly New England-centric. However, I would certainly include an unbeaten NESCAC team among my top 10 in the East most years, and a 9-0 NESCAC team might make my final Top 25 ballot.
It is really hard to compete nationally with a roster of 75.
Quote from: Nescacman on October 24, 2019, 09:56:59 PMInteresting post, Nescacman, +K.
NESCACMAN here from the "NESCAC Board"....please don't be too harsh on us, although we played in the NESCAC, we were recruited by Union and have a very close bond to that school (we were even in Philly to see them win the Frozen 4....#rolldutchmen!):
A few points that may or may not be of interest:
1. The NESCAC isn't just competitive in other D3 sports, one could certainly argue that it is the best D3 sports conference in the country. 5 of the top 14 teams in last years Leerfield Cup were members of the NESCAC (Williams, Middlebury, Tufts, Amherst, Wesleyan). Bowdoin was 18th.
https://nacda.com/documents/2019/6/11//DIIIJune12Overallupdate.pdf?id=3667
2. NESCAC Presidents will never agree to participate in the D3 football play-offs until the Ivy League Presidents agree to participate in the FCS play-offs. Just the way it is.
3. We don't know how NESCAC football would do in 2019 against the upper echelon of D3, but several of the "better" programs in the 'CAC field JV teams that play the better non-NESCAC JV programs in New England. We know for certain that the NESCAC JV teams hold their own and often win. Not a great point of reference, but it is something.
4. If the 'CAC Presidents ever did allow their football teams to play in the play-offs, I can guarantee that they would give the ADs the tools necessary to be successful (directly or though Alumni donations). That would include larger rosters. We would be first in line to write a check.
Hope that is helpful...
Quote from: Doid23 on October 24, 2019, 10:13:09 PMQuote from: Nescacman on October 24, 2019, 09:56:59 PMInteresting post, Nescacman, +K.
NESCACMAN here from the "NESCAC Board"....please don't be too harsh on us, although we played in the NESCAC, we were recruited by Union and have a very close bond to that school (we were even in Philly to see them win the Frozen 4....#rolldutchmen!):
A few points that may or may not be of interest:
1. The NESCAC isn't just competitive in other D3 sports, one could certainly argue that it is the best D3 sports conference in the country. 5 of the top 14 teams in last years Leerfield Cup were members of the NESCAC (Williams, Middlebury, Tufts, Amherst, Wesleyan). Bowdoin was 18th.
https://nacda.com/documents/2019/6/11//DIIIJune12Overallupdate.pdf?id=3667
2. NESCAC Presidents will never agree to participate in the D3 football play-offs until the Ivy League Presidents agree to participate in the FCS play-offs. Just the way it is.
3. We don't know how NESCAC football would do in 2019 against the upper echelon of D3, but several of the "better" programs in the 'CAC field JV teams that play the better non-NESCAC JV programs in New England. We know for certain that the NESCAC JV teams hold their own and often win. Not a great point of reference, but it is something.
4. If the 'CAC Presidents ever did allow their football teams to play in the play-offs, I can guarantee that they would give the ADs the tools necessary to be successful (directly or though Alumni donations). That would include larger rosters. We would be first in line to write a check.
Hope that is helpful...
I actually don't have a problem with NESCAC football not participating in playoffs, like I said, makes winning the league title, which is achievable, very important. This is especially true given how top heavy this era of DIII football is, and how uneven the resources and commitment is even in the Top 25.
But since the league title is all that matters, I do wish that like the Ivy's, NESCAC would play some OOC games against other non-NESCAC teams. I'm sure playing Lafayette, Holy Cross, Georgetown, Colgate, etc, is good for the Ivy programs, and i'm sure the players and fans enjoy the different teams.
Quote from: Nescacman on October 24, 2019, 09:56:59 PM
NESCACMAN here from the "NESCAC Board"....please don't be too harsh on us, although we played in the NESCAC, we were recruited by Union and have a very close bond to that school (we were even in Philly to see them win the Frozen 4....#rolldutchmen!):
A few points that may or may not be of interest:
1. The NESCAC isn't just competitive in other D3 sports, one could certainly argue that it is the best D3 sports conference in the country. 5 of the top 14 teams in last years Leerfield Cup were members of the NESCAC (Williams, Middlebury, Tufts, Amherst, Wesleyan). Bowdoin was 18th.
https://nacda.com/documents/2019/6/11//DIIIJune12Overallupdate.pdf?id=3667
2. NESCAC Presidents will never agree to participate in the D3 football play-offs until the Ivy League Presidents agree to participate in the FCS play-offs. Just the way it is.
3. We don't know how NESCAC football would do in 2019 against the upper echelon of D3, but several of the "better" programs in the 'CAC field JV teams that play the better non-NESCAC JV programs in New England. We know for certain that the NESCAC JV teams hold their own and often win. Not a great point of reference, but it is something.
4. If the 'CAC Presidents ever did allow their football teams to play in the play-offs, I can guarantee that they would give the ADs the tools necessary to be successful (directly or though Alumni donations). That would include larger rosters. We would be first in line to write a check.
Hope that is helpful...
Quote from: middhoops on October 25, 2019, 09:07:53 AM
For what it's worth, I've never met a nescac fan who would not vastly prefer to play out of conference games. Here in Vermont, Middlebury played Norwich in what was annually THE game of the year. We old guys miss that event, badly. Would we trade the Bates game for Norwich? Hell, yeah!
nescacman is right about any future change, unfortunately. The presidents of conference schools do not want football culture to dominate in any way.
Given the developing storyline of head injuries and the fall off in high school boys participation in football, etc., some believe that football may be approaching its last days in the conference.
Quote from: Ice Bear on October 25, 2019, 07:34:35 AMQuote from: Nescacman on October 24, 2019, 09:56:59 PM
NESCACMAN here from the "NESCAC Board"....please don't be too harsh on us, although we played in the NESCAC, we were recruited by Union and have a very close bond to that school (we were even in Philly to see them win the Frozen 4....#rolldutchmen!):
A few points that may or may not be of interest:
1. The NESCAC isn't just competitive in other D3 sports, one could certainly argue that it is the best D3 sports conference in the country. 5 of the top 14 teams in last years Leerfield Cup were members of the NESCAC (Williams, Middlebury, Tufts, Amherst, Wesleyan). Bowdoin was 18th.
https://nacda.com/documents/2019/6/11//DIIIJune12Overallupdate.pdf?id=3667
2. NESCAC Presidents will never agree to participate in the D3 football play-offs until the Ivy League Presidents agree to participate in the FCS play-offs. Just the way it is.
3. We don't know how NESCAC football would do in 2019 against the upper echelon of D3, but several of the "better" programs in the 'CAC field JV teams that play the better non-NESCAC JV programs in New England. We know for certain that the NESCAC JV teams hold their own and often win. Not a great point of reference, but it is something.
4. If the 'CAC Presidents ever did allow their football teams to play in the play-offs, I can guarantee that they would give the ADs the tools necessary to be successful (directly or though Alumni donations). That would include larger rosters. We would be first in line to write a check.
Hope that is helpful...
Ice Bear says +k for a very solid post. Ice digs on the Cac. Ice considered Bowdoin (he often wonders how it would have been there) and loved the feel of that campus, the Middlebury campus, and Hamilton. With that being said he is fairly certain his ass would have been thrown out of Brunswick Maine in a very short time.
Again, all good thoughts here and Ice just kind of wishes the Cac teams would play one or two OOC games during the regular season. He also agrees with Doid that the league championship being the primary focus is cool. Ice remembers the Ephs playing U in FB and regularly defeating his beloved Dutchmen...that is until Mr. Bagnoli took the reins and shortly there after the Ephs were no where to be found lol ;).
Quote from: UfanBill on October 25, 2019, 02:11:53 AM
Thanks for adding your input Nescacman. Maybe others from your board will also contribute. One thing though...I see your current karma is way slanted to the negative. You must ruffle the feathers of the old guard of the NESCAC. What are you, some kind of "rabble-rouser"? +k for that ;D
Quote from: unionpalooza on October 25, 2019, 09:43:57 AMQuote from: Ice Bear on October 25, 2019, 07:34:35 AMQuote from: Nescacman on October 24, 2019, 09:56:59 PM
NESCACMAN here from the "NESCAC Board"....please don't be too harsh on us, although we played in the NESCAC, we were recruited by Union and have a very close bond to that school (we were even in Philly to see them win the Frozen 4....#rolldutchmen!):
A few points that may or may not be of interest:
1. The NESCAC isn't just competitive in other D3 sports, one could certainly argue that it is the best D3 sports conference in the country. 5 of the top 14 teams in last years Leerfield Cup were members of the NESCAC (Williams, Middlebury, Tufts, Amherst, Wesleyan). Bowdoin was 18th.
https://nacda.com/documents/2019/6/11//DIIIJune12Overallupdate.pdf?id=3667
2. NESCAC Presidents will never agree to participate in the D3 football play-offs until the Ivy League Presidents agree to participate in the FCS play-offs. Just the way it is.
3. We don't know how NESCAC football would do in 2019 against the upper echelon of D3, but several of the "better" programs in the 'CAC field JV teams that play the better non-NESCAC JV programs in New England. We know for certain that the NESCAC JV teams hold their own and often win. Not a great point of reference, but it is something.
4. If the 'CAC Presidents ever did allow their football teams to play in the play-offs, I can guarantee that they would give the ADs the tools necessary to be successful (directly or though Alumni donations). That would include larger rosters. We would be first in line to write a check.
Hope that is helpful...
Ice Bear says +k for a very solid post. Ice digs on the Cac. Ice considered Bowdoin (he often wonders how it would have been there) and loved the feel of that campus, the Middlebury campus, and Hamilton. With that being said he is fairly certain his ass would have been thrown out of Brunswick Maine in a very short time.
Again, all good thoughts here and Ice just kind of wishes the Cac teams would play one or two OOC games during the regular season. He also agrees with Doid that the league championship being the primary focus is cool. Ice remembers the Ephs playing U in FB and regularly defeating his beloved Dutchmen...that is until Mr. Bagnoli took the reins and shortly there after the Ephs were no where to be found lol ;).
Indeed. I remember fondly the very last Union-Nescac game in 1991. A blowout win over Hamilton, and chippiest game I've ever seen live. Hamilton scored in garbage time and taunted the Dutchmen, so Bagnoli put the first team back in and pasted them some more. He was fun.
That was a great team in 91. Not as great as Ithaca, alas.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 25, 2019, 09:22:07 AMQuote from: middhoops on October 25, 2019, 09:07:53 AM
For what it's worth, I've never met a nescac fan who would not vastly prefer to play out of conference games. Here in Vermont, Middlebury played Norwich in what was annually THE game of the year. We old guys miss that event, badly. Would we trade the Bates game for Norwich? Hell, yeah!
nescacman is right about any future change, unfortunately. The presidents of conference schools do not want football culture to dominate in any way.
Given the developing storyline of head injuries and the fall off in high school boys participation in football, etc., some believe that football may be approaching its last days in the conference.
Has the NESCAC adopted the 'Jazz Hands' approach to clapping like the University of Oxford? Clapping certainly has it's triggers for me. I've been known to go way out of character when i'm participating in or surrounded by excessive clapping and/or celebration by shotgunning beers and headbutting my friends. Clapping is pure evil, as is football.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/oxford-students-vote-to-replace-clapping-with-silent-jazz-hands-w25dsspd0 (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/oxford-students-vote-to-replace-clapping-with-silent-jazz-hands-w25dsspd0)
Quote from: unionpalooza on October 25, 2019, 09:43:57 AM
Indeed. I remember fondly the very last Union-Nescac game in 1991. A blowout win over Hamilton, and chippiest game I've ever seen live. Hamilton scored in garbage time and taunted the Dutchmen, so Bagnoli put the first team back in and pasted them some more. He was fun.
That was a great team in 91. Not as great as Ithaca, alas.
Quote from: gordonmann on October 25, 2019, 12:44:48 PM
As a Hartford State alum, that name always makes me smile. :)
Quote from: Nescacman on October 25, 2019, 11:14:10 AM
We love ruffling feathers...especially feathers of certain alums that attended the NESCAC version of Alabama, Hartford State (aka Trinity College)...some might call us a troll on that board... ;D
Quote from: Pat Coleman on October 25, 2019, 04:35:01 PMQuote from: Nescacman on October 25, 2019, 11:14:10 AM
We love ruffling feathers...especially feathers of certain alums that attended the NESCAC version of Alabama, Hartford State (aka Trinity College)...some might call us a troll on that board... ;D
Is uploading a 0K jpg supposed to help in that regard? 🤔
Quote from: gordonmann on October 26, 2019, 11:40:31 AM
I want one, but I'll need you to help me with the math at the cash register.
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 27, 2019, 08:10:24 PM
RPI still getting too 25 votes.
Quote from: UfanBill on October 27, 2019, 09:05:48 PMQuote from: Machiavelli on October 27, 2019, 08:10:24 PM
RPI still getting too 25 votes.
Huh???... NO
Quote from: Machiavelli on October 28, 2019, 06:56:48 AMMach, your tongue has settled well in you cheek ;)
Ahhh it was a darn joke. But I still wouldn't have been surprised.
Quote from: Bartman on October 28, 2019, 01:51:02 PMWho has Union beaten? Salisbury is #2.... you can make the case for Union at #3, but not above an undefeated Salisbury, who has wins over UWO, and a 6-1 Wesley, who has beaten Del Val (leader of the MAC).
Doing my poll, I think Ithaca is a clear No.1, Salisbury and Union are either 2 0r 3 ...after that, I don't think it is a clear field after watching a bunch of these teams either live or online. Cortland is a wobbly undefeated team as they have had a hard time putting middle of the pack teams away without a great defense, Wesley looks like an escape artist in some of their wins(see Montclair St....although MSU is a solid team), Delaware Valley has been on a positive trend but MAC is tough to evaluate and DelVal lost to a less than awesome(compared to history) Wesley, Brockport looks improving since week one(this is the first time I ranked BPort over Hobart, mainly because Hobart has 2 losses but I am not sure this is logical)...WPI and Endicott or possibly Alfred round out the top ten...When I look at the national poll, it is clear that the pollsters do not see the East the way I do by keeping Cortland, Wesley and DelVal above an undefeated Union...at least the East has a top 10 and a number of top 25...the end of season and who gets into playoffs and playoff performance will be interesting....If Union drops Ithaca this weekend, that will really make things interesting ( 30% chance of Union upset IMO).
Quote from: thewaterboy on October 28, 2019, 01:57:07 PMQuote from: Bartman on October 28, 2019, 01:51:02 PMWho has Union beaten? Salisbury is #2.... you can make the case for Union at #3, but not above an undefeated Salisbury, who has wins over UWO, and a 6-1 Wesley, who has beaten Del Val (leader of the MAC).
Doing my poll, I think Ithaca is a clear No.1, Salisbury and Union are either 2 0r 3 ...after that, I don't think it is a clear field after watching a bunch of these teams either live or online. Cortland is a wobbly undefeated team as they have had a hard time putting middle of the pack teams away without a great defense, Wesley looks like an escape artist in some of their wins(see Montclair St....although MSU is a solid team), Delaware Valley has been on a positive trend but MAC is tough to evaluate and DelVal lost to a less than awesome(compared to history) Wesley, Brockport looks improving since week one(this is the first time I ranked BPort over Hobart, mainly because Hobart has 2 losses but I am not sure this is logical)...WPI and Endicott or possibly Alfred round out the top ten...When I look at the national poll, it is clear that the pollsters do not see the East the way I do by keeping Cortland, Wesley and DelVal above an undefeated Union...at least the East has a top 10 and a number of top 25...the end of season and who gets into playoffs and playoff performance will be interesting....If Union drops Ithaca this weekend, that will really make things interesting ( 30% chance of Union upset IMO).
Quote from: UfanBill on October 28, 2019, 02:59:14 PM
I'm a Union fan and I currently have them #4 behind Ithaca, Salisbury and Cortland. Union has history against not only Ithaca of course but also Salisbury and a 2017 loss to Cortland in the NY Bowl the last time they played. Who have they beaten? Fair question...at the time ranked teams Husson, Springfield and RPI to end last year, ranked Hobart...10 in a row, 16 of 18...granted they do have a weak SOS but you can only beat the teams you play. Ithaca is going to be a huge challenge. Last year the Bombers surprisingly dominated the Dutchmen 24-0 in a game where nothing was right for the Dutchmen and now they have to go to Butterfield where they've never won. All I can say is bring it on! I have tremendous respect for all those programs.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 28, 2019, 04:56:22 PMI agree that Union is probably at #4, but I'm confused as to why people have DelVal so high, when Wesley beat them @ DelVal, and whose only loss was to Salisbury by a TD @ Salisbury. I know they've had some close games, but those two data points are pretty important.
Ithaca #1 and Salisbury #2 are no brainers.I have Union #4 and no disrespect who have they beat. This week vs Ithaca will tell. I have Del Val #3 and B-Bort #5. These teams keep getting better every week. I dropped Cortland to #6 with the performance at Fisher then followed by Wesley, WPI, Endicott and WNE. Right now I see 2 strong teams and a few more will hopefully develop coming up to the dance.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 28, 2019, 05:39:41 PMThis group does a great job compiling the weekly fan poll, I appreciate all the effort that goes into it!
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Ithaca (6) 1 60
2) Salisbury 2 54
3) Union 3t 45
4) Cortland 3t 42
5) Delaware Valley 5 32
6) Brockport 7 31
7) Wesley 6 29
8t) Hobart 8 11
8t) WPI 8t 11
10) Endicott 9t 9
Dropped Out: Alfred
RV) Alfred (2), Stevenson (2), WNE (2)
Key Game(s):
Ithaca (#1) v. Union (#3) , Endicott (#10) vs. WNE (RV), Cortland (#4) v. Brockport (#6), SUNY-Maritime (NR) v. Gallaudet (NR)
Voters: MANDGSU, RAMS1102, DUTCH BOY, Ufanbill, Oline89, Bartman
QuoteI agree that Union is probably at #4, but I'm confused as to why people have DelVal so high, when Wesley beat them @ DelVal...
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 28, 2019, 05:39:41 PM
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Ithaca (6) 1 60
2) Salisbury 2 54
3) Union 3t 45
4) Cortland 3t 42
5) Delaware Valley 5 32
6) Brockport 7 31
7) Wesley 6 29
8t) Hobart 8 11
8t) WPI 8t 11
10) Endicott 9t 9
Dropped Out: Alfred
RV) Alfred (2), Stevenson (2), WNE (2)
Key Game(s):
Ithaca (#1) v. Union (#3) , Endicott (#10) vs. WNE (RV), Cortland (#4) v. Brockport (#6), SUNY-Maritime (NR) v. Gallaudet (NR)
Voters: MANDGSU, RAMS1102, DUTCH BOY, Ufanbill, Oline89, Bartman
Quote from: rams1102 on October 29, 2019, 01:16:40 PM
I agree with wesleydad that opinion plays a large part. As of today 1&2 are a lock. The Pollsters who played the game or had a son who played can be more objective. I kicked the round ball in College so I am more opionated. The LL and the E8 will play out by the next 3 games. Now here is question. How many Teams in the Top 10 Today have the ability to go 3 deep in the NCAA's and list them. Here I go : Ithaca, Salisbury, B-Port, Del Val and Wesley as of Today.
Quote from: rams1102 on October 29, 2019, 01:16:40 PM
I agree with wesleydad that opinion plays a large part. As of today 1&2 are a lock. The Pollsters who played the game or had a son who played can be more objective. I kicked the round ball in College so I am more opionated. The LL and the E8 will play out by the next 3 games. Now here is question. How many Teams in the Top 10 Today have the ability to go 3 deep in the NCAA's and list them. Here I go : Ithaca, Salisbury, B-Port, Del Val and Wesley as of Today.
Quote from: Ithaca798891 on October 29, 2019, 04:06:47 PM
Salisbury is a tough team to figure. It's all matchups. They could go up against an otherwise meh team that is disciplined enough with the right personnel upfront, and have a hard go of things.
Quote from: Ice Bear on October 29, 2019, 03:30:16 PMQuote from: rams1102 on October 29, 2019, 01:16:40 PM
I agree with wesleydad that opinion plays a large part. As of today 1&2 are a lock. The Pollsters who played the game or had a son who played can be more objective. I kicked the round ball in College so I am more opionated. The LL and the E8 will play out by the next 3 games. Now here is question. How many Teams in the Top 10 Today have the ability to go 3 deep in the NCAA's and list them. Here I go : Ithaca, Salisbury, B-Port, Del Val and Wesley as of Today.
Ice is not overly high on his Dutchmen in relation to the top 2/3 in the region and/or the top 25 on a national level (he thinks everyone knows that from his posts throughout the season thus far). With that said he really disagrees with the two bolded teams on the list. IIBHO Union and Cortland would defeat the likes of Del Val, Wesley, and maybe B-Port (although Ice believes there has been a resurgence there since getting pasted by Hobart, whom Union defeated mind you). Del Val and Wesley have no shot at winning three games in the tourney...B-Port couldn't do it last year with Joe G. Ice would rank these three in the the following order: B-Port, Wesley, and then Del Val (the MAC is really down this year IIBHO). Union and Cortland would be ahead of all three.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 29, 2019, 04:47:32 PMQuote from: Ithaca798891 on October 29, 2019, 04:06:47 PM
Salisbury is a tough team to figure. It's all matchups. They could go up against an otherwise meh team that is disciplined enough with the right personnel upfront, and have a hard go of things.
I would love to see DelVal's defense, finally healthy all year, play Salisbury. THAT would be an intriguing matchup. The Nobile brothers are pretty decent.
Quote from: MANDGSU on October 30, 2019, 12:35:34 PMI agree. I have followed another option team for over 15 years (Navy) and they'll beat more talented teams all the time, but they'll struggle against teams who are simply bigger especially on the DL (big guys beat up little guys).Quote from: jmcozenlaw on October 29, 2019, 04:47:32 PMQuote from: Ithaca798891 on October 29, 2019, 04:06:47 PM
Salisbury is a tough team to figure. It's all matchups. They could go up against an otherwise meh team that is disciplined enough with the right personnel upfront, and have a hard go of things.
I would love to see DelVal's defense, finally healthy all year, play Salisbury. THAT would be an intriguing matchup. The Nobile brothers are pretty decent.
I agree with these comments. Since Salisbury runs a "unique" system that heavily relies on the run, teams with a stout front seven will always cause trouble for the scheme, since passing the ball naturally is not as strong and certain years is non existent. However, if you have any weak link in the front seven or lack discipline, it will demoralize you.
Quote from: unionpalooza on November 03, 2019, 09:28:48 AM
OK, so you all are way better at this then me, but trying to begin to think through what the NCAA's East field looks like. I'm assuming the ECFC hangs on to its autobid in this transitional year, and the East autobids look like (in rough but by no means precise ranking based on what we know now):
1. Salisbury (NJAC)
2. Union (LL)
3. Brockport (E8)
4. WNE (CCC)
5. MIT/WPI (latter takes title if Springfield beats MIT)
6. Framingham/Bridgewater St. Winner (MASCAC)
7. Dean (ECFC)
The two realistic Pool C contenders are a one-loss Wesley team and a one-loss winner of Ithaca-Cortland. Assuming a crowded Pool C field as always, and only one makes the cut, who takes it? Wesley has the benefit a win over RR and playoff team Del Val; the Cortaca winner will (by necessity) only have a win over a maybe-still-RR but out of the playoffs team. I'd think Wesley would get the nod there.
Of course, always possible that the Cortaca winner matches favorably with a 1-loss Pool C contender in the South like Wilkes or Susq. (I don't know enough to take a guess at the number/strength of North and West Pool C contenders, though assume there are plenty. North Central, JCU or BW on the North, MIAC/ARC/SCIAC/WIAC runner-ups in West, etc. And of course, some other potential contenders out of the South.)
Quote from: Bartman on November 03, 2019, 03:43:05 PM
I have the first nine teams set for my vote, but the tenth is a tough one this week, so I am putting in Middlebury at 8-0.As far as the order, I find it easy to rank the LL and E8 teams because of some of the common games. Although I am ranking Brockport and Cortland above Hobart because they are 1 loss teams and Hobart is a 2 loss team, even though Hobart did beat BPort 33-7 and Brockport beat Cortland, so I am not sure this traditional logic should apply. The MAC, specifically DelVal and the NJAC with Salisbury and Wesley are hard for me because I saw Hobart beat MSU 17-3 and Salisbury and Wesley barely escaped with 3 point wins against MSU, although Salisbury beating a 5-2 WIAC team is a very credible out of region win. Bottom line is , I am moving Union up to #1, keeping Salisbury at #2 and moving Ithaca to #3.....after that I am pretty much sticking with 1 loss over 2 loss although I am ranking Hobart at 8 and entering WNE as No.9.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 03, 2019, 03:32:22 PM
SUNY M got the Pool A yesterday. Dean can play in a NE bowl as the ECFC champs but is ineligible for the Ncaas. Privateers likely go to Alliance.
Quote from: Ice Bear on November 03, 2019, 04:08:14 PMQuote from: Bartman on November 03, 2019, 03:43:05 PM
I have the first nine teams set for my vote, but the tenth is a tough one this week, so I am putting in Middlebury at 8-0.As far as the order, I find it easy to rank the LL and E8 teams because of some of the common games. Although I am ranking Brockport and Cortland above Hobart because they are 1 loss teams and Hobart is a 2 loss team, even though Hobart did beat BPort 33-7 and Brockport beat Cortland, so I am not sure this traditional logic should apply. The MAC, specifically DelVal and the NJAC with Salisbury and Wesley are hard for me because I saw Hobart beat MSU 17-3 and Salisbury and Wesley barely escaped with 3 point wins against MSU, although Salisbury beating a 5-2 WIAC team is a very credible out of region win. Bottom line is , I am moving Union up to #1, keeping Salisbury at #2 and moving Ithaca to #3.....after that I am pretty much sticking with 1 loss over 2 loss although I am ranking Hobart at 8 and entering WNE as No.9.
Ice also added the Golden Bears to his ERFP this week. Ice has'um at #10. Ice just can't bring himself to rank any NESCAC teams. Not because he doesn't believe they "could" be in the top 10 but because there is not one iota of evidence to support it. He gets it though Manbart and is coo wit it.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 03, 2019, 07:00:25 PM
My projected East Region Rankings:
1. Salisbury (#7)
2. Union (#14)
3. Ithaca (#17)
4. Wesley (#12)
5. Brockport (ORV)
6. Cortland (ORV)
7. Delaware Valley (#13)
8. Western New England (NR)
9. Hobart (NR)
10. Stevenson (NR)
Quote from: Ithaca798891 on November 03, 2019, 07:13:02 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 03, 2019, 07:00:25 PM
My projected East Region Rankings:
1. Salisbury (#7)
2. Union (#14)
3. Ithaca (#17)
4. Wesley (#12)
5. Brockport (ORV)
6. Cortland (ORV)
7. Delaware Valley (#13)
8. Western New England (NR)
9. Hobart (NR)
10. Stevenson (NR)
Can't see IC ahead of a Wesley with a Del Valley win. Or Cortland ahead of Del Valley. This would be a fantastic situation for IC. Would stay ahead of Wesley and could have 2-1 RR. Hobart's win over Port looking huge for IC.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 03, 2019, 08:44:40 PM
ERFP wk.9
1) Salisbury....still ahead of the rest, should go 10-0
2) Union.........2nd best and closing, still have 2 tough games that don't matter much
3) Ithaca........Joe G is the real deal but they needed more
4) Del. Val......even though they lost to #6 I thought they were the better team
5) Brockport..got to give them credit, back in the dance?
6) Wesley......too many close wins to be higher
7) Cortland....had it until they didn't, Cortaca tickets anyone?
8) WNE.........huge win for a very solid program
9) Hobart......stay in the post season picture
10) Stevenson..proving to be the real MAC #2
Quote from: Ithaca798891 on November 04, 2019, 08:26:42 AMQuote from: UfanBill on November 03, 2019, 08:44:40 PM
ERFP wk.9
1) Salisbury....still ahead of the rest, should go 10-0
2) Union.........2nd best and closing, still have 2 tough games that don't matter much
3) Ithaca........Joe G is the real deal but they needed more
4) Del. Val......even though they lost to #6 I thought they were the better team
5) Brockport..got to give them credit, back in the dance?
6) Wesley......too many close wins to be higher
7) Cortland....had it until they didn't, Cortaca tickets anyone?
8) WNE.........huge win for a very solid program
9) Hobart......stay in the post season picture
10) Stevenson..proving to be the real MAC #2
As much as I'd love this to be the actual ranking, I just don't see Wesley being behind a Del Valley team they beat on the road. Close calls and all. I also can't see IC at three
Hobart really holds the key to a 2-bid LL. The Statesmen pretty much have to be in the rankings to give IC that second win. (And that's assuming Cortland stays put if they lose to IC. Suddenly, that doesn't look so set in stone either)
Quote from: Bartman on November 04, 2019, 08:25:43 AM
I can see ranking Salisbury No.1 , and the WIAC win may be the tie breaker over Union. What I don't see is the D3.com poll that ranks Wesley and Delaware Valley over an undefeated Union after ranking Ithaca No.8 the week before.....of course the reason is you never move from no.20 to the top 10. Having watched Wesley and DelVal online, I think they are very good teams, but I don't think they could have done what Union did on Saturday against Ithaca. In any case, we have some great teams in the East this year, I just think the LL is having a special year. If Ithaca wins out, I would think they would be a PoolC , but based on the National poll voters opinions, my judgement may be too LL biased and the spot will go to Wesley. The Regional rankings will be interesting this week.
Quote from: Oline89 on November 04, 2019, 08:46:35 AMQuote from: Bartman on November 04, 2019, 08:25:43 AM
I can see ranking Salisbury No.1 , and the WIAC win may be the tie breaker over Union. What I don't see is the D3.com poll that ranks Wesley and Delaware Valley over an undefeated Union after ranking Ithaca No.8 the week before.....of course the reason is you never move from no.20 to the top 10. Having watched Wesley and DelVal online, I think they are very good teams, but I don't think they could have done what Union did on Saturday against Ithaca. In any case, we have some great teams in the East this year, I just think the LL is having a special year. If Ithaca wins out, I would think they would be a PoolC , but based on the National poll voters opinions, my judgement may be too LL biased and the spot will go to Wesley. The Regional rankings will be interesting this week.
In the National poll, how can Johns Hopkins possibly be still receiving votes? They have 3 losses and tied with Dickinson in their league!
Quote from: hazzben on November 04, 2019, 10:46:16 AMQuote from: Oline89 on November 04, 2019, 08:46:35 AMQuote from: Bartman on November 04, 2019, 08:25:43 AM
I can see ranking Salisbury No.1 , and the WIAC win may be the tie breaker over Union. What I don't see is the D3.com poll that ranks Wesley and Delaware Valley over an undefeated Union after ranking Ithaca No.8 the week before.....of course the reason is you never move from no.20 to the top 10. Having watched Wesley and DelVal online, I think they are very good teams, but I don't think they could have done what Union did on Saturday against Ithaca. In any case, we have some great teams in the East this year, I just think the LL is having a special year. If Ithaca wins out, I would think they would be a PoolC , but based on the National poll voters opinions, my judgement may be too LL biased and the spot will go to Wesley. The Regional rankings will be interesting this week.
In the National poll, how can Johns Hopkins possibly be still receiving votes? They have 3 losses and tied with Dickinson in their league!
Recency bias?? I'm guessing some pollsters are probably used to JHU being a Top 25 team and maybe get sloppy at the tail end of their ballot.
Quote from: Ithaca798891 on November 04, 2019, 08:26:42 AMQuote from: UfanBill on November 03, 2019, 08:44:40 PM
ERFP wk.9
1) Salisbury....still ahead of the rest, should go 10-0
2) Union.........2nd best and closing, still have 2 tough games that don't matter much
3) Ithaca........Joe G is the real deal but they needed more
4) Del. Val......even though they lost to #6 I thought they were the better team
5) Brockport..got to give them credit, back in the dance?
6) Wesley......too many close wins to be higher
7) Cortland....had it until they didn't, Cortaca tickets anyone?
8) WNE.........huge win for a very solid program
9) Hobart......stay in the post season picture
10) Stevenson..proving to be the real MAC #2
As much as I'd love this to be the actual ranking, I just don't see Wesley being behind a Del Valley team they beat on the road. Close calls and all. I also can't see IC at three
Hobart really holds the key to a 2-bid LL. The Statesmen pretty much have to be in the rankings to give IC that second win. (And that's assuming Cortland stays put if they lose to IC. Suddenly, that doesn't look so set in stone either)
Quote from: Oline89 on November 04, 2019, 11:07:29 AMQuote from: hazzben on November 04, 2019, 10:46:16 AMQuote from: Oline89 on November 04, 2019, 08:46:35 AMQuote from: Bartman on November 04, 2019, 08:25:43 AM
I can see ranking Salisbury No.1 , and the WIAC win may be the tie breaker over Union. What I don't see is the D3.com poll that ranks Wesley and Delaware Valley over an undefeated Union after ranking Ithaca No.8 the week before.....of course the reason is you never move from no.20 to the top 10. Having watched Wesley and DelVal online, I think they are very good teams, but I don't think they could have done what Union did on Saturday against Ithaca. In any case, we have some great teams in the East this year, I just think the LL is having a special year. If Ithaca wins out, I would think they would be a PoolC , but based on the National poll voters opinions, my judgement may be too LL biased and the spot will go to Wesley. The Regional rankings will be interesting this week.
In the National poll, how can Johns Hopkins possibly be still receiving votes? They have 3 losses and tied with Dickinson in their league!
Recency bias?? I'm guessing some pollsters are probably used to JHU being a Top 25 team and maybe get sloppy at the tail end of their ballot.
Recency bias is a great term, and one I wish didn't exist....explains a lot about why certain historical teams consistently show up in the top 25, even though there are some "newer" teams that deserve it.
Quote from: Nescacman on November 04, 2019, 11:42:46 AM
Congratulations to former NESCAC member Union on winning the Liberty League title and getting the auto-bid into the NCAA D3 Football Tourney...
Wish we could see Middlebury and possibly, Wesleyan, compete against the big boys, but our illustrious NESCAC Presidents aren't quite ready for that...
Maybe someday.... :)
Quote from: Nescacman on November 04, 2019, 11:42:46 AM
Congratulations to former NESCAC member Union on winning the Liberty League title and getting the auto-bid into the NCAA D3 Football Tourney...
Wish we could see Middlebury and possibly, Wesleyan, compete against the big boys, but our illustrious NESCAC Presidents aren't quite ready for that...
Maybe someday.... :)
Quote from: Ice Bear on November 04, 2019, 12:11:04 PM
Ica says how the **** did he just get smited...is the Karma sniper back amongst us?
Quote from: Ice Bear on November 04, 2019, 12:11:04 PM
Ica says how the **** did he just get smited...is the Karma sniper back amongst us?
Quote from: Ithaca798891 on November 05, 2019, 09:02:30 AM
One thing I try to remember is that teams aren't static.
This doesn't dismiss Hobart because of win over Brockport in Week 1. It simply makes me believe that Brockport has improved as the season has gone on, and it probably playing better now than they were in Week 1 (and Week 2, honestly). I don't necessarily play the "Who would win if they played today?" game, because Hobart doesn't need to beat them twice. But I do take note of a team's improvements (or their deterioration) as the season goes on.
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 05, 2019, 09:09:00 AMQuote from: Ithaca798891 on November 05, 2019, 09:02:30 AM
One thing I try to remember is that teams aren't static.
This doesn't dismiss Hobart because of win over Brockport in Week 1. It simply makes me believe that Brockport has improved as the season has gone on, and it probably playing better now than they were in Week 1 (and Week 2, honestly). I don't necessarily play the "Who would win if they played today?" game, because Hobart doesn't need to beat them twice. But I do take note of a team's improvements (or their deterioration) as the season goes on.
I also think Hobart might need to change their offense or playcalling up? Are they too predictable? I noticed in the Ithaca game they tried 2 or 3 screens that were your standard RB screen that didn't seem that hard to pick up. Only saying this because maybe the Brockport game everything is new and then after that they didn't mix it up enough.
Quote from: Oline89 on November 05, 2019, 09:22:57 AMQuote from: Jonny Utah on November 05, 2019, 09:09:00 AMQuote from: Ithaca798891 on November 05, 2019, 09:02:30 AM
One thing I try to remember is that teams aren't static.
This doesn't dismiss Hobart because of win over Brockport in Week 1. It simply makes me believe that Brockport has improved as the season has gone on, and it probably playing better now than they were in Week 1 (and Week 2, honestly). I don't necessarily play the "Who would win if they played today?" game, because Hobart doesn't need to beat them twice. But I do take note of a team's improvements (or their deterioration) as the season goes on.
I also think Hobart might need to change their offense or playcalling up? Are they too predictable? I noticed in the Ithaca game they tried 2 or 3 screens that were your standard RB screen that didn't seem that hard to pick up. Only saying this because maybe the Brockport game everything is new and then after that they didn't mix it up enough.
Hobart's offense has been an issue all year. The reason they crushed B Port was the defense. Starting QB was knocked out in the first quarter and the backup (now the starter) runs a completely different offense (RPO vs drop back passer) and was not ready game 1. The Hobart D gave the offense field position all game. IMO the difference in Bport is that they coaching staff changed the offensive approach to match their QB (plus the senior QB is back now, allows for a new wrinkle).
Quote from: Bartman on November 05, 2019, 08:39:32 AM
I like the results of this poll but it is contrary to the D3.com and the AFCA polls. The basic difference is where do you rank Del Val(MAC) and Wesley(NJAC) vs Union(LL) and Ithaca(LL) and to some extent Brockport(E8)? There is no right or wrong here because there are no head to head interleague games between these Eastern Region teams except for the Wesley win over DelVal. There are some games amongst the leagues and Hobart is a bit of a lab rat. Hobart beat Brockport 33-7(this seems to be discounted to some extent as an early season event) and Hobart beat a common NJAC opponent Montclair St. 17-3 but lost to Ithaca (34-0) and Union (23-7). To me, based on these results I see the LL as better than the E8 and comparable to the NJAC . I also see the Montclair St win by Hobart( Wesley beat MSU in OT) as the only data to make me see our ERFP as a better judgement of the rankings, a single data point that can easily be critiqued . I hope the NCAA gives the East a bracket that will entertain us and showcase these teams against one another .
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 11:56:45 AM
Regional Rankings Out:
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Quote from: Ice Bear on November 06, 2019, 12:00:46 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 11:56:45 AM
Regional Rankings Out:
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Ice says Wilkes getting in there at #10.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 06, 2019, 12:16:06 PMQuote from: Ice Bear on November 06, 2019, 12:00:46 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 11:56:45 AM
Regional Rankings Out:
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Ice says Wilkes getting in there at #10.
Very interesting bottom, and the fact that they have Wesley at 2. If wilkes loses to stevenson this week they drop out and the loser of the ithaca/cortland game may drop out. The bottom teams will be very important for the poll C candidates. Wesley is 1-1 and Endicott is not likely to jump back in. if the ithaca cortland loser drops out the winner would only be 0-1 against RR teams. Will Hobart jump in to make Ithaca 1-1. going to be fun watching this play out over the next 2 weeks.
Quote from: wesleydad on November 06, 2019, 12:16:06 PMQuote from: Ice Bear on November 06, 2019, 12:00:46 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 11:56:45 AM
Regional Rankings Out:
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Ice says Wilkes getting in there at #10.
Very interesting bottom, and the fact that they have Wesley at 2. If wilkes loses to stevenson this week they drop out and the loser of the ithaca/cortland game may drop out. The bottom teams will be very important for the poll C candidates. Wesley is 1-1 and Endicott is not likely to jump back in. if the ithaca cortland loser drops out the winner would only be 0-1 against RR teams. Will Hobart jump in to make Ithaca 1-1. going to be fun watching this play out over the next 2 weeks.
Quote from: Ithaca798891 on November 06, 2019, 02:12:00 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 06, 2019, 12:16:06 PMQuote from: Ice Bear on November 06, 2019, 12:00:46 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 11:56:45 AM
Regional Rankings Out:
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Ice says Wilkes getting in there at #10.
Very interesting bottom, and the fact that they have Wesley at 2. If wilkes loses to stevenson this week they drop out and the loser of the ithaca/cortland game may drop out. The bottom teams will be very important for the poll C candidates. Wesley is 1-1 and Endicott is not likely to jump back in. if the ithaca cortland loser drops out the winner would only be 0-1 against RR teams. Will Hobart jump in to make Ithaca 1-1. going to be fun watching this play out over the next 2 weeks.
Ithaca really needs Hobart getting RR. Cortland losing to Port not only knocked down the Red Dragons, it meant Hobart would be behind Port as well.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 02:20:04 PMQuote from: Ithaca798891 on November 06, 2019, 02:12:00 PMQuote from: wesleydad on November 06, 2019, 12:16:06 PMQuote from: Ice Bear on November 06, 2019, 12:00:46 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 11:56:45 AM
Regional Rankings Out:
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Ice says Wilkes getting in there at #10.
Very interesting bottom, and the fact that they have Wesley at 2. If wilkes loses to stevenson this week they drop out and the loser of the ithaca/cortland game may drop out. The bottom teams will be very important for the poll C candidates. Wesley is 1-1 and Endicott is not likely to jump back in. if the ithaca cortland loser drops out the winner would only be 0-1 against RR teams. Will Hobart jump in to make Ithaca 1-1. going to be fun watching this play out over the next 2 weeks.
Ithaca really needs Hobart getting RR. Cortland losing to Port not only knocked down the Red Dragons, it meant Hobart would be behind Port as well.
WPI and Wilkes at the bottom definitely leaves room for more subjectivity as the committee started out with winning percentage and started working from there. If things were to stay consistent. Ithaca wouldn't have a RR win to hang its hat on. If both Wilkes and WPI fall out, you can see both Cortland and Hobart at the bottom giving Ithaca 2-1 RR wins a SOS and possibly jumping Wesley as 1st in the ER board. I think at the end of the day, that's the best solution for the ER committee to place it's teams to do what's best for region. No way does WPI get an at-large spot with no RR wins and SOS at .457. Not saying that they couldn't make a run like RPI...
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 06, 2019, 02:29:40 PM
I'm having a difficult time believing that WPI and Wilkes are going to survive in these rankings next week. I had those two slotted not just out of the rankings, but behind Endicott, the Fram, and Alfred. I know there can be a pretty broad interpretation of SOS, but Wilkes and WPI are 100 or more points in deficit to 2 loss teams that were not ranked today and that difference is significant.
Quote from: Oline89 on November 06, 2019, 02:49:44 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 06, 2019, 02:29:40 PM
I'm having a difficult time believing that WPI and Wilkes are going to survive in these rankings next week. I had those two slotted not just out of the rankings, but behind Endicott, the Fram, and Alfred. I know there can be a pretty broad interpretation of SOS, but Wilkes and WPI are 100 or more points in deficit to 2 loss teams that were not ranked today and that difference is significant.
So where do you think Hobart lands next week, with Wilkes win or loss at Stevenson?
Quote from: Bartman on November 06, 2019, 02:49:03 PM
So if Wesley and DelVal , one loss teams, are ranked above an undefeated Union probably based on SOS, how can Hobart , with one more loss than Wilkes and WPI but ranked 6th in the nation for SOS and a win over a ranked team not be ranked at all?....the logic is inconsistent...and will hurt Union and Ithaca if Hobart is not ranked ......RR judgements are very flawed IMO
Quote from: Oline89 on November 06, 2019, 02:49:44 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 06, 2019, 02:29:40 PM
I'm having a difficult time believing that WPI and Wilkes are going to survive in these rankings next week. I had those two slotted not just out of the rankings, but behind Endicott, the Fram, and Alfred. I know there can be a pretty broad interpretation of SOS, but Wilkes and WPI are 100 or more points in deficit to 2 loss teams that were not ranked today and that difference is significant.
So where do you think Hobart lands next week, with Wilkes win or loss at Stevenson?
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 06, 2019, 04:23:03 PM
I think if the Committee does what it needs to do, East Region will have two teams in. Here is my mock Bracket
1. Muhlenberg vs. MIT
2. Salisbury vs. Framingham State
3. Union vs. Western New England
4. Delaware Valley vs. Ithaca
1. UMHB vs. Redlands
2. Chapman vs. Linfield
3. Bridgewater (Va.) vs. Wesley
4. B-SC vs. Huntingdon
1. Mount Union vs. SUNY-Maritime
2. Wheaton (Ill.) vs. Hanover
3. Case Western vs. Wabash
4. Brockport vs. Susquehanna
1. UW-Whitewater vs. Hope
2. Wartburg vs. Aurora
3. St. Johns vs. Martin Luther
4. Bethel vs. Lake Forest
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 07, 2019, 11:08:37 AM
My second stab gives Wheaton a #1 Seed. Switch up some of the West/North pods. Also, gives the SCIAC teams all home games. This also prevents some conference rematches in the 2nd round outside of travel pod.
1. Mount Union vs. SUNY-Maritime
2. Salisbury vs. Framingham State
3. Union vs. Western New England
4. Brockport vs. Susquehanna
1. UMHB vs. Linfield
2. Chapman vs. Huntingdon
3. Redlands vs. BS-C/Berry
4. Delaware Valley vs. Ithaca
1. Wheaton (Ill.) vs. Hanover
2. Muhlenberg vs. MIT
3. Bridgewater (Va.) vs. Wesley
4. Bethel vs. Lake Forest
1. UW-Whitewater vs. Martin Luther
2. Wartburg vs. Hope
3. St. Johns vs. Aurora
4. Case Western vs. Wabash
Quote from: tf37 on November 07, 2019, 11:54:12 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 07, 2019, 11:08:37 AM
My second stab gives Wheaton a #1 Seed. Switch up some of the West/North pods. Also, gives the SCIAC teams all home games. This also prevents some conference rematches in the 2nd round outside of travel pod.
1. Mount Union vs. SUNY-Maritime
2. Salisbury vs. Framingham State
3. Union vs. Western New England
4. Brockport vs. Susquehanna
1. UMHB vs. Linfield
2. Chapman vs. Huntingdon
3. Redlands vs. BS-C/Berry
4. Delaware Valley vs. Ithaca
1. Wheaton (Ill.) vs. Hanover
2. Muhlenberg vs. MIT
3. Bridgewater (Va.) vs. Wesley
4. Bethel vs. Lake Forest
1. UW-Whitewater vs. Martin Luther
2. Wartburg vs. Hope
3. St. Johns vs. Aurora
4. Case Western vs. Wabash
So you believe #6 NCC (third RR and top Pool C from the North) will not be selected? Even though their only loss is to a 1 Seed and have an RRO win, I am interested in your thought process there.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 07, 2019, 03:46:37 PMQuote from: tf37 on November 07, 2019, 11:54:12 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 07, 2019, 11:08:37 AM
My second stab gives Wheaton a #1 Seed. Switch up some of the West/North pods. Also, gives the SCIAC teams all home games. This also prevents some conference rematches in the 2nd round outside of travel pod.
1. Mount Union vs. SUNY-Maritime
2. Salisbury vs. Framingham State
3. Union vs. Western New England
4. Brockport vs. Susquehanna
1. UMHB vs. Linfield
2. Chapman vs. Huntingdon
3. Redlands vs. BS-C/Berry
4. Delaware Valley vs. Ithaca
1. Wheaton (Ill.) vs. Hanover
2. Muhlenberg vs. MIT
3. Bridgewater (Va.) vs. Wesley
4. Bethel vs. Lake Forest
1. UW-Whitewater vs. Martin Luther
2. Wartburg vs. Hope
3. St. Johns vs. Aurora
4. Case Western vs. Wabash
So you believe #6 NCC (third RR and top Pool C from the North) will not be selected? Even though their only loss is to a 1 Seed and have an RRO win, I am interested in your thought process there.
Tf37,
This bracket is based upon what I think rankings are going to be at the end of the year and not now. I see B-W jumping NC-C if they win out having the same winning percentage and higher SOS and St. Thomas or Gustavis ending up on final WR giving Bethel a RR win. Additionally, Hobart and/or Cortland being on the ER, giving Ithaca a RR win, Linfield winning out and remaining on WR rankings. Then that would put them at the table against what I believe a comparable Ithaca (1-1), Wesley (1-1), Redlands (1-1) and Bethel (1-1), and Susquehanna (0-1), but you'd still be behind B-W. Regardless, I think at the end of the Day it will come down to Susquehanna, B-W, and NC-C. If Johns Hopkins makes it onto SR rankings, then Susquehanna is (1-1). I think it's the CNU game that may end up hurting NC-C. What NC-C could consider is common opponents with Wesley. The committee may or may not look at point differential. If Wesley squeaks by CNU say 13-10, I'd think the committee would take a hard look at that. I definitely did last week when Salisbury played CNU.
Now taking those potential and subjective factors into consideration, that's my reasoning. Do I expect things to work this way, highly unlikely. I want NC-C in the bracket because of how they went out schedule and always are willing to schedule out of region.
Quote from: tf37 on November 07, 2019, 04:07:47 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 07, 2019, 03:46:37 PM
Tf37,
This bracket is based upon what I think rankings are going to be at the end of the year and not now. I see B-W jumping NC-C if they win out having the same winning percentage and higher SOS and St. Thomas or Gustavis ending up on final WR giving Bethel a RR win. Additionally, Hobart and/or Cortland being on the ER, giving Ithaca a RR win, Linfield winning out and remaining on WR rankings. Then that would put them at the table against what I believe a comparable Ithaca (1-1), Wesley (1-1), Redlands (1-1) and Bethel (1-1), and Susquehanna (0-1), but you'd still be behind B-W. Regardless, I think at the end of the Day it will come down to Susquehanna, B-W, and NC-C. If Johns Hopkins makes it onto SR rankings, then Susquehanna is (1-1). I think it's the CNU game that may end up hurting NC-C. What NC-C could consider is common opponents with Wesley. The committee may or may not look at point differential. If Wesley squeaks by CNU say 13-10, I'd think the committee would take a hard look at that. I definitely did last week when Salisbury played CNU.
Now taking those potential and subjective factors into consideration, that's my reasoning. Do I expect things to work this way, highly unlikely. I want NC-C in the bracket because of how they went out schedule and always are willing to schedule out of region.
That is a far take, but I don't believe the B-W / JCU winner will jump NCC in the North. I think the fact that Hope is above both of them points to that. And their final SOS should be fairly close.
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 07, 2019, 07:21:35 PMQuote from: tf37 on November 07, 2019, 04:07:47 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 07, 2019, 03:46:37 PM
Tf37,
This bracket is based upon what I think rankings are going to be at the end of the year and not now. I see B-W jumping NC-C if they win out having the same winning percentage and higher SOS and St. Thomas or Gustavis ending up on final WR giving Bethel a RR win. Additionally, Hobart and/or Cortland being on the ER, giving Ithaca a RR win, Linfield winning out and remaining on WR rankings. Then that would put them at the table against what I believe a comparable Ithaca (1-1), Wesley (1-1), Redlands (1-1) and Bethel (1-1), and Susquehanna (0-1), but you'd still be behind B-W. Regardless, I think at the end of the Day it will come down to Susquehanna, B-W, and NC-C. If Johns Hopkins makes it onto SR rankings, then Susquehanna is (1-1). I think it's the CNU game that may end up hurting NC-C. What NC-C could consider is common opponents with Wesley. The committee may or may not look at point differential. If Wesley squeaks by CNU say 13-10, I'd think the committee would take a hard look at that. I definitely did last week when Salisbury played CNU.
Now taking those potential and subjective factors into consideration, that's my reasoning. Do I expect things to work this way, highly unlikely. I want NC-C in the bracket because of how they went out schedule and always are willing to schedule out of region.
That is a far take, but I don't believe the B-W / JCU winner will jump NCC in the North. I think the fact that Hope is above both of them points to that. And their final SOS should be fairly close.
Agree with this. I think if there was concern about the strength of NCC's profile, they could have been ranked below Hope (as we did in our mock rankings last week) and then you'd have the table set for BW or JCU to slide ahead with the week 11 result. JCU still has to get through Heidelberg this week, which I don't think is a layup for them btw.
The one spot where I think North Central can really be damaged (outside of their own trap-ish game this weekend) is if WashU gets clipped in the last two weeks and they lose their RRO win. The Bears should be ok, and should be plenty motivated to send Coach Kindbom out on the highest of notes, but that's a thing to watch for. I do think JCU and BW are playing for a spot at the table in the 4th or 5th round of Pool C selection and the winner winds up in a last in/first out situation.
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 07, 2019, 09:12:14 PM
Didn't mean any disrespect to IWU or North Central or the CCIW in general. Let's distill what I meant into simple, easy to digest fragments:
- North Central is the best non-champion in the North region
- North Central is demonstrably better than Illinois Wesleyan and should beat them, probably comfortably, on Saturday
- If North Central is looking ahead to the tournament or otherwise not focused singularly on this game, Illinois Wesleyan- while not as good as North Central- is good enough to beat the Cardinals if the Cardinals don't have their act together. For precedent, please refer to Concordia-Moorhead v. St. John's (2019).
I apologize to any other Trap Game Strict Constructionists out there that I may have offended with my careless and irresponsible use of that particular colloquialism.
Quote from: wally_wabash on November 07, 2019, 09:12:14 PM
Didn't mean any disrespect to IWU or North Central or the CCIW in general. Let's distill what I meant into simple, easy to digest fragments:
- North Central is the best non-champion in the North region
- North Central is demonstrably better than Illinois Wesleyan and should beat them, probably comfortably, on Saturday
- If North Central is looking ahead to the tournament or otherwise not focused singularly on this game, Illinois Wesleyan- while not as good as North Central- is good enough to beat the Cardinals if the Cardinals don't have their act together. For precedent, please refer to Concordia-Moorhead v. St. John's (2019).
I apologize to any other Trap Game Strict Constructionists out there that I may have offended with my careless and irresponsible use of that particular colloquialism.
Quote from: Ice Bear on November 08, 2019, 12:17:09 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 07, 2019, 09:12:14 PM
Didn't mean any disrespect to IWU or North Central or the CCIW in general. Let's distill what I meant into simple, easy to digest fragments:
- North Central is the best non-champion in the North region
- North Central is demonstrably better than Illinois Wesleyan and should beat them, probably comfortably, on Saturday
- If North Central is looking ahead to the tournament or otherwise not focused singularly on this game, Illinois Wesleyan- while not as good as North Central- is good enough to beat the Cardinals if the Cardinals don't have their act together. For precedent, please refer to Concordia-Moorhead v. St. John's (2019).
I apologize to any other Trap Game Strict Constructionists out there that I may have offended with my careless and irresponsible use of that particular colloquialism.
Ice Bear says this impressive word play is only expected from the NESCAC board. Wally, Ice says you should repost this over there to remind "those people" that there are some bright spots outside of the NESCAC world. That was some Wu-tang swordsmen type **** right there. :)
Ice gives a +K to WW!
Quote from: Saxon73 on November 08, 2019, 02:16:41 PMQuote from: Ice Bear on November 08, 2019, 12:17:09 PMQuote from: wally_wabash on November 07, 2019, 09:12:14 PM
Didn't mean any disrespect to IWU or North Central or the CCIW in general. Let's distill what I meant into simple, easy to digest fragments:
- North Central is the best non-champion in the North region
- North Central is demonstrably better than Illinois Wesleyan and should beat them, probably comfortably, on Saturday
- If North Central is looking ahead to the tournament or otherwise not focused singularly on this game, Illinois Wesleyan- while not as good as North Central- is good enough to beat the Cardinals if the Cardinals don't have their act together. For precedent, please refer to Concordia-Moorhead v. St. John's (2019).
I apologize to any other Trap Game Strict Constructionists out there that I may have offended with my careless and irresponsible use of that particular colloquialism.
Ice Bear says this impressive word play is only expected from the NESCAC board. Wally, Ice says you should repost this over there to remind "those people" that there are some bright spots outside of the NESCAC world. That was some Wu-tang swordsmen type **** right there. :)
Ice gives a +K to WW!
Saxon73 ((and this is my first and probably last ever third person post)) appreciates this verbal exchange. There have been comments in the past that the Alfred posters were prone to unusually precise and accurate grammar and spelling. This may be attributed to the general aged wisdom of the three usual suspects or their background. Pep of course has confessed many times to his journalism background; SaxonTad's profession involves word smithing, ((he can divulge if he so desires)) and Saxon73 has the coveted Glass Science degree in which most posters would likely recognize the inherent technical precision and accuracy therein. I believe no one of us three were football players, ((although Saxon73 was all conference in a different sport,)) Saxon73 is in wonderment as to why, with the distinguished history of Alfred football, there are not posts from actual former players.
Saxon73 feels akin to Ice Bear and Union College although he decided to choose the Alfred program, however his younger brother did go to Union and went on to the local word smith college minutes from Shocktown. To add a little background in the spirit of Pep's historical magnificence, the first instructors for what became Alfred University were Union College graduates.
By coincidence, Saxon73 worked in Indiana for some time in a town on the Wabash river, not far from Wabash College and Saxon73 experienced the supreme hospitality of the people of the the Midwest. Saxon73 can compare this to his life experience having grown up near Utica NY and after college lived also in Myrtle Beach SC, State College PA, Albuquerque NM and Milford Ct.
Approaching 69 years of age, Saxon73 hopes the younger, more exuberant posters will continue to enjoy the opportunity Pat Coleman has established, which enables such an opportunity to meet and share thoughts, feelings and experience of D3 sports.
May each and all posters relish today's experience and carry on.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 14, 2019, 11:13:42 AM
So here is my updated take:
1. Mount Union (N1)(#1) vs. SUNY-Maritime (NR)(NR)
2. Muhlenberg (S2)(#5) vs. Framingham State (NR)(NR)
3. Wesley (E2)(#12) vs. Western New England (E6)(NR)
4. Union (E4)(#14) vs. Brockport (E5)(#22)
1. UMHB (S1)(#2) vs. Huntington (NR)(NR)
2. Chapman (W2)(#13) vs. Linfield (W7)(#19)
3. Delaware Valley (E3)(#11) vs. Central (W5)(#25)
4. Redlands (W3)(#18) vs. Berry (S6)(#23)
1. Salisbury (E1)(#7) vs. NEWMAC CHAMP (NR)(NR)
2. Wheaton (Ill.) (N2)(#4) vs. Hanover (N9)(NR)
3. Case Western (S5)(#20) vs. Wabash (N7)(NR)
4. Bridgewater (Va.) (S3)(#21) vs. Susquehanna (S4)(#16)
1. UW-Whitewater (W1)(#3) vs. Martin Luther (NR)(NR)
3. North Central (Ill.) (N3)(#6) vs. Monmouth (W8)(NR)
2. St. Johns (W4)(#8) vs. Aurora (N6)(NR)(NR)
4. Hope (N4)(ORV) vs. Wartburg (W6) (#24)
Quote from: UfanBill on November 14, 2019, 01:49:27 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 14, 2019, 11:13:42 AM
So here is my updated take:
1. Mount Union (N1)(#1) vs. SUNY-Maritime (NR)(NR)
2. Muhlenberg (S2)(#5) vs. Framingham State (NR)(NR)
3. Wesley (E2)(#12) vs. Western New England (E6)(NR)
4. Union (E4)(#14) vs. Brockport (E5)(#22)
1. UMHB (S1)(#2) vs. Huntington (NR)(NR)
2. Chapman (W2)(#13) vs. Linfield (W7)(#19)
3. Delaware Valley (E3)(#11) vs. Central (W5)(#25)
4. Redlands (W3)(#18) vs. Berry (S6)(#23)
1. Salisbury (E1)(#7) vs. NEWMAC CHAMP (NR)(NR)
2. Wheaton (Ill.) (N2)(#4) vs. Hanover (N9)(NR)
3. Case Western (S5)(#20) vs. Wabash (N7)(NR)
4. Bridgewater (Va.) (S3)(#21) vs. Susquehanna (S4)(#16)
1. UW-Whitewater (W1)(#3) vs. Martin Luther (NR)(NR)
3. North Central (Ill.) (N3)(#6) vs. Monmouth (W8)(NR)
2. St. Johns (W4)(#8) vs. Aurora (N6)(NR)(NR)
4. Hope (N4)(ORV) vs. Wartburg (W6) (#24)
Really ???...very creative how you managed to find a path for all your favorites to the semi's. Come on man. ;D
Quote from: wesleydad on November 14, 2019, 02:35:14 PMQuote from: UfanBill on November 14, 2019, 01:49:27 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 14, 2019, 11:13:42 AM
So here is my updated take:
1. Mount Union (N1)(#1) vs. SUNY-Maritime (NR)(NR)
2. Muhlenberg (S2)(#5) vs. Framingham State (NR)(NR)
3. Wesley (E2)(#12) vs. Western New England (E6)(NR)
4. Union (E4)(#14) vs. Brockport (E5)(#22)
1. UMHB (S1)(#2) vs. Huntington (NR)(NR)
2. Chapman (W2)(#13) vs. Linfield (W7)(#19)
3. Delaware Valley (E3)(#11) vs. Central (W5)(#25)
4. Redlands (W3)(#18) vs. Berry (S6)(#23)
1. Salisbury (E1)(#7) vs. NEWMAC CHAMP (NR)(NR)
2. Wheaton (Ill.) (N2)(#4) vs. Hanover (N9)(NR)
3. Case Western (S5)(#20) vs. Wabash (N7)(NR)
4. Bridgewater (Va.) (S3)(#21) vs. Susquehanna (S4)(#16)
1. UW-Whitewater (W1)(#3) vs. Martin Luther (NR)(NR)
3. North Central (Ill.) (N3)(#6) vs. Monmouth (W8)(NR)
2. St. Johns (W4)(#8) vs. Aurora (N6)(NR)(NR)
4. Hope (N4)(ORV) vs. Wartburg (W6) (#24)
Really ???...very creative how you managed to find a path for all your favorites to the semi's. Come on man. ;D
Doesn't that mean Wesley would possibly have to beat your favorite team to get there? or don't you think your team is good enough to do the same thing?
Quote from: Bartman on November 16, 2019, 05:07:33 PM
Union kicks ass, looks like the best team in the East to me.
Ithaca beats a solid RedDragon team ...Germinerio looks like Colin Kaepernick as Ithaca should move up poll, but not enough for NCAA
Hobart hopes for the invite to the NYS MegaBowl
Brockport drops in my poll based on Morrisville win over BPort today.
Wesley, Salisbury and WPI with lopsided wins
Delaware Valley with a squeaker over Widner...is Del Val that good?
Stevenson blanks Lycoming
Endicott finishes 8-2
Intersting to see MANDGSU projections
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 16, 2019, 09:31:06 PM
There weren't any other true grudge match rivalry games today. Del Val/Widener was definitely the big one. Del Val proved their dominance in the East today. I don't think anyone in the East can touch them...
Quote from: Jonny Utah on November 16, 2019, 09:36:28 PMActually , I think IC should be penalized for hogging the ball so much. Just a bunch of TOP pigs.
Dude. Ithaca has over 44 ****ing minutes of TOP today. If they don't get a pool c based on that alone the whole system is ****ed.
Quote from: Bartman on November 17, 2019, 12:03:15 PM
That Oshkosh win by Salisbury looks very huge now with the Whitewater loss last night, I have to keep Union at #2 in the East, fair and square.
Quote from: unionpalooza on November 17, 2019, 05:54:23 PMAgreed. Union made out OK (despite the ridiculous #4), but good god, did Redlands and Chapman get hosed.
Wow. I award this selection committee no points, and may god have mercy on their soul. This is literally a dumpster fire of decisions.
Redlands finishes as the West two seed and - they get a plane ride to the overall number one?
Chapman is the West 1 and gets ... to go on the road against St. John's in round two?
Undefeated Union is a 4 seed but one-loss WNE is a 2 (Or maybe 3)? Wesley and Del Val are orphaned in the North why?
Though listening to Catanzaro's savvy commentary on the broadcast (he sounded like he was pining for a Mt. Union grad assistant slot), I can see how these guys did not ace the rocket science.
The good news is Union faces a Case Western, then Salisbury, then probably the Mules. I will take us in all those game. But a number of good times got screwed.
Quote from: Bartman on November 17, 2019, 07:48:28 PM
I think that Union is a #3 seed, Salisbury #2 seed, Muhlenberg #1 and WNE is #4 in this bracket. I don't think Muhlenberg is seeded below Slaisbury, but I could be wrong based on the order of the other brackets. In any case, this is a great bracket for Union and I am sure they were bumped up in the last RR over Wesley and Delaware Valley, both one loss teams and sent off to the Mount Union bracket. Union should have no complaints, and I think the committee was pretty fair to the East with the exception of Del Val that probably figured they would have a home game in week #1.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 17, 2019, 07:57:11 PMOk, Mea culpa, good luck to # 1 seed Salisbury .Quote from: Bartman on November 17, 2019, 07:48:28 PM
I think that Union is a #3 seed, Salisbury #2 seed, Muhlenberg #1 and WNE is #4 in this bracket. I don't think Muhlenberg is seeded below Slaisbury, but I could be wrong based on the order of the other brackets. In any case, this is a great bracket for Union and I am sure they were bumped up in the last RR over Wesley and Delaware Valley, both one loss teams and sent off to the Mount Union bracket. Union should have no complaints, and I think the committee was pretty fair to the East with the exception of Del Val that probably figured they would have a home game in week #1.
Salisbury is definitely #1 in the bracket with Muhlenberg having the #2 Seed, I think Union is the #3 Seed and WNE #4. I think Union switched with WNE as Case Western Reserve couldn't travel to WNE. I think if Brockport had won, Brockport would have had home game against Case and Union would have hosted WNE.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 18, 2019, 02:30:03 PM
15 games Saturday featuring ER teams:
NCAA Rd 1:
SUNY @ Sals 63-7
CWRU @ Union 31-13
MIT @ MUHL 55-6
BP @ WNE 28-24
Fram St @ WES 31-18
DVU @ BRID 28-24
ECACs:
W&J @ IC 34-20
WESTM @ MO STATE 48-31
RPI @ GCC 35-24
NY:
HOB @ COR 28-24
MAC-CC
WILK @ SUSQ 42-14
JHU @ STE 31-30
F&M @ MIS 35-17
NE:
WCT @ WPI 30-14
DEAN @ END 48-14
Quote from: ITH radio on November 18, 2019, 02:30:03 PMCorrected. You should know better ;)
15 games Saturday featuring ER teams:
NCAA Rd 1:
SUNY @ Sals
CWRU @ Union
MIT @ MUHL
BP @ WNE
Fram St @ WES
DVU @ BRID
ECACs:
W&J @ IC
WESTM @ MO STATE
RPI @ GCC
New York State MegaBowl:
HOB @ COR
Quote from: Bartman on November 19, 2019, 09:28:35 AM
Are we continuing with the ERFP this week?
Quote from: ITH radio on November 19, 2019, 12:06:02 PM
Not sure what to say about this....
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Will definitely address on ITH HC segment
Quote from: ITH radio on November 19, 2019, 12:06:02 PM
Not sure what to say about this....
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Will definitely address on ITH HC segment
Quote from: Statesmen4Eva on November 19, 2019, 01:37:26 PM
I feel like this was an addition to prop up Del Val and Wesley. That addition gives them a combined 2 RR wins. With the lack of respect for the other East conferences getting these 2 seeded as high as possible might have been a priority. How they were the next at-large on the board after Wesley with no RR wins and SOS below both Hobart and Ithaca is beyond me.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 19, 2019, 01:43:09 PMQuote from: Statesmen4Eva on November 19, 2019, 01:37:26 PM
I feel like this was an addition to prop up Del Val and Wesley. That addition gives them a combined 2 RR wins. With the lack of respect for the other East conferences getting these 2 seeded as high as possible might have been a priority. How they were the next at-large on the board after Wesley with no RR wins and SOS below both Hobart and Ithaca is beyond me.
We'll never know, but i'm pretty sure Hobart and Ithaca would both beat Stevenson and Western New England by more than 3 TD's. But i'm pretty sure both would beat up on Del Val too, so it is what it is.
Quote from: ITH radio on November 19, 2019, 12:06:02 PM
Not sure what to say about this....
https://www.ncaa.com/rankings/football/d3/regional-rankings
Will definitely address on ITH HC segment
Quote from: @d3jason on November 19, 2019, 03:18:04 PM
Not looking to start a fight and certainly respect the programs at Union, Ithaca and Hobart, etc, but there is an easy way for Union and other LL teams to back up chatter about being ranked behind MAC and NJAC top ones and twos....
Schedule them.
Salisbury and Wesley always need games. Delaware Valley have never been afraid to take tough out of conference games. Stevenson played at Frostburg last year and Bridgewater this year. (Plus, I love going to NY state in September ;D) Good Luck to everyone.
Quote from: @d3jason on November 19, 2019, 03:18:04 PM
Not looking to start a fight and certainly respect the programs at Union, Ithaca and Hobart, etc, but there is an easy way for Union and other LL teams to back up chatter about being ranked behind MAC and NJAC top ones and twos....
Schedule them.
Salisbury and Wesley always need games. Delaware Valley have never been afraid to take tough out of conference games. Stevenson played at Frostburg last year and Bridgewater this year. (Plus, I love going to NY state in September ;D) Good Luck to everyone.
Quote from: @d3jason on November 19, 2019, 03:18:04 PMWell Hobart scheduled MSU and Rowan, and won both games. You can ask the Red Hawks how Hobart compared to Salisbury and Wesley. Not sure what our schedule is the next few years, but the NJAC teams were very physical . The top 3 LL league teams did not lose any OOC games. Union may have had a light OOC schedule, although it seems to have prepared them well, while Hobart with one of the top SOS schedules lost to Union and Ithaca. Not conclusive evidence, but having watched the games that common opponent ,MSU ,played against Salisbury and Wesley, I think Hobart would have competed very well, and probably Union and Ithaca would have been as successful. We shall see how Union competes in the NCAAs and if they play Salisbury it will be put up or shut up time and common opponent connections will mean nothing. I am hoping this happens. I also agree with wishing the best of Luck to all of the East in the playoffs.
Not looking to start a fight and certainly respect the programs at Union, Ithaca and Hobart, etc, but there is an easy way for Union and other LL teams to back up chatter about being ranked behind MAC and NJAC top ones and twos....
Schedule them.
Salisbury and Wesley always need games. Delaware Valley have never been afraid to take tough out of conference games. Stevenson played at Frostburg last year and Bridgewater this year. (Plus, I love going to NY state in September ;D) Good Luck to everyone.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 19, 2019, 06:52:03 PM
A decade ago Union regularly scheduled MAC and NJAC teams. Their 2009 schedule shows games with Muhlenberg, Salisbury and Susquehanna.(they were a LL member 2007-09) They'd previously scheduled Gettysburg, Dickinson, F&M, Carnegie Mellon, TCNJ and Montclair. Then things changed. I remember seeing the 2011 schedule and saying..."who are these guys, Salve Regina?" then Western New England and W. Conn. I now believe the scheduling changed to correspond with Union's recruiting "hot bed"...New England. This can be confirmed by looking at this year's roster. Union has 45 players from New England and only 6 from New Jersey(5) and Pennsylvania(1).
With that being said I personally would like to see the Dutchmen back in Penn. and NJ, even Ohio. Coach Behrman is a John Carroll grad so maybe a game against the Blue Streaks is on the horizon.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 19, 2019, 06:52:03 PMEmmett Forde of Hobart, DPOTY for the LL, is from South Boston , sure glad he was not one of the Dutchmen 's NE recruits.
A decade ago Union regularly scheduled MAC and NJAC teams. Their 2009 schedule shows games with Muhlenberg, Salisbury and Susquehanna.(they were a LL member 2007-09) They'd previously scheduled Gettysburg, Dickinson, F&M, Carnegie Mellon, TCNJ and Montclair. Then things changed. I remember seeing the 2011 schedule and saying..."who are these guys, Salve Regina?" then Western New England and W. Conn. I now believe the scheduling changed to correspond with Union's recruiting "hot bed"...New England. This can be confirmed by looking at this year's roster. Union has 45 players from New England and only 6 from New Jersey(5) and Pennsylvania(1).
With that being said I personally would like to see the Dutchmen back in Penn. and NJ, even Ohio. Coach Behrman is a John Carroll grad so maybe a game against the Blue Streaks is on the horizon.
Quote from: Bartman on November 20, 2019, 08:39:22 AMQuote from: UfanBill on November 19, 2019, 06:52:03 PMEmmett Forde of Hobart, DPOTY for the LL, is from South Boston , sure glad he was not one of the Dutchmen 's NE recruits.
A decade ago Union regularly scheduled MAC and NJAC teams. Their 2009 schedule shows games with Muhlenberg, Salisbury and Susquehanna.(they were a LL member 2007-09) They'd previously scheduled Gettysburg, Dickinson, F&M, Carnegie Mellon, TCNJ and Montclair. Then things changed. I remember seeing the 2011 schedule and saying..."who are these guys, Salve Regina?" then Western New England and W. Conn. I now believe the scheduling changed to correspond with Union's recruiting "hot bed"...New England. This can be confirmed by looking at this year's roster. Union has 45 players from New England and only 6 from New Jersey(5) and Pennsylvania(1).
With that being said I personally would like to see the Dutchmen back in Penn. and NJ, even Ohio. Coach Behrman is a John Carroll grad so maybe a game against the Blue Streaks is on the horizon.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 20, 2019, 08:48:26 AMTrue, the Dutch have no place in South Boston especially on St. Patrick's DayQuote from: Bartman on November 20, 2019, 08:39:22 AMQuote from: UfanBill on November 19, 2019, 06:52:03 PMEmmett Forde of Hobart, DPOTY for the LL, is from South Boston , sure glad he was not one of the Dutchmen 's NE recruits.
A decade ago Union regularly scheduled MAC and NJAC teams. Their 2009 schedule shows games with Muhlenberg, Salisbury and Susquehanna.(they were a LL member 2007-09) They'd previously scheduled Gettysburg, Dickinson, F&M, Carnegie Mellon, TCNJ and Montclair. Then things changed. I remember seeing the 2011 schedule and saying..."who are these guys, Salve Regina?" then Western New England and W. Conn. I now believe the scheduling changed to correspond with Union's recruiting "hot bed"...New England. This can be confirmed by looking at this year's roster. Union has 45 players from New England and only 6 from New Jersey(5) and Pennsylvania(1).
With that being said I personally would like to see the Dutchmen back in Penn. and NJ, even Ohio. Coach Behrman is a John Carroll grad so maybe a game against the Blue Streaks is on the horizon.
Union folk wouldn't dare step foot in South Boston.
Quote from: Machiavelli on November 19, 2019, 01:43:09 PMQuote from: Statesmen4Eva on November 19, 2019, 01:37:26 PM
I feel like this was an addition to prop up Del Val and Wesley. That addition gives them a combined 2 RR wins. With the lack of respect for the other East conferences getting these 2 seeded as high as possible might have been a priority. How they were the next at-large on the board after Wesley with no RR wins and SOS below both Hobart and Ithaca is beyond me.
We'll never know, but i'm pretty sure Hobart and Ithaca would both beat Stevenson and Western New England by more than 3 TD's. But i'm pretty sure both would beat up on Del Val too, so it is what it is.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on November 20, 2019, 11:21:18 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 19, 2019, 01:43:09 PMQuote from: Statesmen4Eva on November 19, 2019, 01:37:26 PM
I feel like this was an addition to prop up Del Val and Wesley. That addition gives them a combined 2 RR wins. With the lack of respect for the other East conferences getting these 2 seeded as high as possible might have been a priority. How they were the next at-large on the board after Wesley with no RR wins and SOS below both Hobart and Ithaca is beyond me.
We'll never know, but i'm pretty sure Hobart and Ithaca would both beat Stevenson and Western New England by more than 3 TD's. But i'm pretty sure both would beat up on Del Val too, so it is what it is.
If Hobart and Ithaca would "beat up on Del Val", don't leave out Wesley as another team that both would "beat up" on.......since DelVal and Wesley played a 4 overtime game this year. I saw Ithaca crap the bed twice this year. THAT Ithaca team would not only NOT beat up on Del Val or Wesley...............they might just get "beat up" themselves, even with the great Joey G........the next D3 player to make the NFL (or so he's telling everybody who will listen........and those who won't) ;)
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on November 20, 2019, 11:21:18 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 19, 2019, 01:43:09 PMQuote from: Statesmen4Eva on November 19, 2019, 01:37:26 PM
I feel like this was an addition to prop up Del Val and Wesley. That addition gives them a combined 2 RR wins. With the lack of respect for the other East conferences getting these 2 seeded as high as possible might have been a priority. How they were the next at-large on the board after Wesley with no RR wins and SOS below both Hobart and Ithaca is beyond me.
We'll never know, but i'm pretty sure Hobart and Ithaca would both beat Stevenson and Western New England by more than 3 TD's. But i'm pretty sure both would beat up on Del Val too, so it is what it is.
If Hobart and Ithaca would "beat up on Del Val", don't leave out Wesley as another team that both would "beat up" on.......since DelVal and Wesley played a 4 overtime game this year. I saw Ithaca crap the bed twice this year. THAT Ithaca team would not only NOT beat up on Del Val or Wesley...............they might just get "beat up" themselves, even with the great Joey G........the next D3 player to make the NFL (or so he's telling everybody who will listen........and those who won't) ;)
Quote from: wesleydad on November 20, 2019, 11:56:08 AMThe top 6 teams in the East all have a chance to show us how competitive the East really was this year. Wesley has Framingham St, which they should beat if the good Wesley shows up. If Delaware Valley beats Bridgewater that should quiet some MAC critics. Then we can have a rematch before the sacrifice game to Mount Union. Salisbury is the only one with an easy Week 1 game, Union has to play #20 Case Western which will be no easy out, and Western NE will meet a very tough Brockport Defense which I believe will beat WNE in a low scoring game and move on to play Muhlenberg. The Muhlenberg game will be very interesting to see whether their ranking was justified against either WNE or Brockport in the second round. This Salisbury bracket is very entertaining and competitive, and I wish Del Val and Wesley were placed in it so we could have had some better comparison clarity between the LL, NJAC, MAC and E8. Mount Union is waiting for the East's best....again.
I am hoping that round 2 brings the top 4 teams together. It will certainly clarify who should be number 1. I don't think Hobart or Ithaca would beat up on either Del Val or Wesley. Neither team seems to get beat up on by anyone they play outside of the top 3 or 4 in D3. Those of us who have been around here long enough know that the top of NJAC, MAC, LL, and E8 are tough outs if you have to play them and usually when the teams play each other the games are extremely competitive. Union is good this year, if they win this week they will get a chance to prove how good they are against the top seed in the bracket.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 19, 2019, 06:57:33 PM
Well Union grab a great receiver from under Salisbury, Wesley, Stevenson, Delaware Valley, etc...nose.
Quote from: Bartman on November 20, 2019, 12:35:55 PMThe BPort WNE matchup should be awesome. There was a rumor that the BPort QB may be injured, if that's the case, the Defense will need to really step it up. IF QB is healthy, Bport wins going away....Quote from: wesleydad on November 20, 2019, 11:56:08 AMThe top 6 teams in the East all have a chance to show us how competitive the East really was this year. Wesley has Framingham St, which they should beat if the good Wesley shows up. If Delaware Valley beats Bridgewater that should quiet some MAC critics. Then we can have a rematch before the sacrifice game to Mount Union. Salisbury is the only one with an easy Week 1 game, Union has to play #20 Case Western which will be no easy out, and Western NE will meet a very tough Brockport Defense which I believe will beat WNE in a low scoring game and move on to play Muhlenberg. The Muhlenberg game will be very interesting to see whether their ranking was justified against either WNE or Brockport in the second round. This Salisbury bracket is very entertaining and competitive, and I wish Del Val and Wesley were placed in it so we could have had some better comparison clarity between the LL, NJAC, MAC and E8. Mount Union is waiting for the East's best....again.
I am hoping that round 2 brings the top 4 teams together. It will certainly clarify who should be number 1. I don't think Hobart or Ithaca would beat up on either Del Val or Wesley. Neither team seems to get beat up on by anyone they play outside of the top 3 or 4 in D3. Those of us who have been around here long enough know that the top of NJAC, MAC, LL, and E8 are tough outs if you have to play them and usually when the teams play each other the games are extremely competitive. Union is good this year, if they win this week they will get a chance to prove how good they are against the top seed in the bracket.
Quote from: jam40jeff on November 19, 2019, 11:11:50 PMQuote from: ADL70 on November 19, 2019, 03:19:06 PM
I wonder if Saxton has some sort of injury, as the last few games his passes don't seem to me to his usual zip.
I've been wondering the same thing. He's been throwing off his back foot a lot and doesn't look as mobile as he did earlier in the season. He's sure doesn't look like he's 100%.
Quote from: Oline89 on November 20, 2019, 02:18:43 PMQuote from: Bartman on November 20, 2019, 12:35:55 PMThe BPort WNE matchup should be awesome. There was a rumor that the BPort QB may be injured, if that's the case, the Defense will need to really step it up. IF QB is healthy, Bport wins going away....Quote from: wesleydad on November 20, 2019, 11:56:08 AMThe top 6 teams in the East all have a chance to show us how competitive the East really was this year. Wesley has Framingham St, which they should beat if the good Wesley shows up. If Delaware Valley beats Bridgewater that should quiet some MAC critics. Then we can have a rematch before the sacrifice game to Mount Union. Salisbury is the only one with an easy Week 1 game, Union has to play #20 Case Western which will be no easy out, and Western NE will meet a very tough Brockport Defense which I believe will beat WNE in a low scoring game and move on to play Muhlenberg. The Muhlenberg game will be very interesting to see whether their ranking was justified against either WNE or Brockport in the second round. This Salisbury bracket is very entertaining and competitive, and I wish Del Val and Wesley were placed in it so we could have had some better comparison clarity between the LL, NJAC, MAC and E8. Mount Union is waiting for the East's best....again.
I am hoping that round 2 brings the top 4 teams together. It will certainly clarify who should be number 1. I don't think Hobart or Ithaca would beat up on either Del Val or Wesley. Neither team seems to get beat up on by anyone they play outside of the top 3 or 4 in D3. Those of us who have been around here long enough know that the top of NJAC, MAC, LL, and E8 are tough outs if you have to play them and usually when the teams play each other the games are extremely competitive. Union is good this year, if they win this week they will get a chance to prove how good they are against the top seed in the bracket.
Quote from: UfanBill on November 20, 2019, 01:49:13 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 19, 2019, 06:57:33 PM
Well Union grab a great receiver from under Salisbury, Wesley, Stevenson, Delaware Valley, etc...nose.
Could it be that that "great receiver" Andre Ross Jr. set his academic sights a little higher? He was valedictorian of his class at National Collegiate Prep in DC.
to quote Ross Jr...
"I chose Union because of the smaller class sizes, which lead to a more personal relationship with professors. The environment of Union is inviting and I needed to step outside of what I was used to."
Quote from: Ice Bear on November 20, 2019, 12:10:55 PMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on November 20, 2019, 11:21:18 AMQuote from: Machiavelli on November 19, 2019, 01:43:09 PMQuote from: Statesmen4Eva on November 19, 2019, 01:37:26 PM
I feel like this was an addition to prop up Del Val and Wesley. That addition gives them a combined 2 RR wins. With the lack of respect for the other East conferences getting these 2 seeded as high as possible might have been a priority. How they were the next at-large on the board after Wesley with no RR wins and SOS below both Hobart and Ithaca is beyond me.
We'll never know, but i'm pretty sure Hobart and Ithaca would both beat Stevenson and Western New England by more than 3 TD's. But i'm pretty sure both would beat up on Del Val too, so it is what it is.
If Hobart and Ithaca would "beat up on Del Val", don't leave out Wesley as another team that both would "beat up" on.......since DelVal and Wesley played a 4 overtime game this year. I saw Ithaca crap the bed twice this year. THAT Ithaca team would not only NOT beat up on Del Val or Wesley...............they might just get "beat up" themselves, even with the great Joey G........the next D3 player to make the NFL (or so he's telling everybody who will listen........and those who won't) ;)
Ice Bear says first things first. While your belief that Del Val and Wesley would not get smoked by the likes of IC and Hobart may certainly be accurate, Ice believes it is, using the week #1 game as your talking point is not a good one IIBHO. That week one game was a ****ing mess. Both teams looked like absolute ****. They looked like **** to the point where even taking into account it was week #1, many of us who watched the game wondered if Wesley really had fallen off a cliff from where they usually once were as both of their QB's couldn't hit a red ****ing barn with a basketball. We knew Del Val was young and lost a ton but that performance by Wesley was quite shocking.
Ice says now obviously both teams have improved throughout the year however it "seems" to Ice that even some of the Wesley posters question how good this team is. While Ice disagrees that Hobart and IC would beat up Wesley and Del Val he certainly understands the reasoning one may have to make a statement like that (that the two traditionally top notch ER teams may not be their best this season).
As far as Joe G goes...he won't ever play a down in the NFL but there may be other options for him. Ice recalls a pretty damn good QB from Hartwick some years back, Jason Boltus. He spent some time on a CFL roster (and played some Ice believes). From what Ice has seen in person and watching games on video Joe is as good as Jason or pretty darn close.
Also be very careful calling this kid out as an egomaniac. Ice learned this lesson earlier this season. Unless you've heard Joe say those things first hand Ice would recommend going easy. Didn't you call a bunch of us out earlier in the year for referring to a very general transfer situation that we didn't know the specifics of? Also, if Joe does have that attitude and/or belief, while Ice wouldn't like it from a character perspective at all, isn't that what an underdog kid from a D3 school might need to make the next level? Ice would prefer a Joe Callahan approach which seemed super classy, mature, and soft spoken but that certainly doesn't always work when striving for such a huge dream.
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on November 21, 2019, 04:13:30 PMQuote from: UfanBill on November 20, 2019, 01:49:13 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 19, 2019, 06:57:33 PM
Well Union grab a great receiver from under Salisbury, Wesley, Stevenson, Delaware Valley, etc...nose.
Could it be that that "great receiver" Andre Ross Jr. set his academic sights a little higher? He was valedictorian of his class at National Collegiate Prep in DC.
to quote Ross Jr...
"I chose Union because of the smaller class sizes, which lead to a more personal relationship with professors. The environment of Union is inviting and I needed to step outside of what I was used to."
Chaneling my inner Ice......................JM thinks that for an aspiring accountant, regardless of the school, a debit is a debit and a credit is a credit. Tiny DelVal (and tiny Lycoming) had higher first time pass rate percentages on the CPA Exam than Pitt, Villanova, Lehigh, Bucknell, Lafayette and a host of others. One was #5 and the other #7 out of the 77 colleges and universities in 2017. One can not challenge one more on debits and credits. Kind of the same thing on a percentage basis of the number of students who get into Med/Vet/Dental school. DelVal has a high percentage of pre-professional science majors who head off to one of those three schools.
JM has never bought the argument about the "settting academic sights a little higher" as JM has hired and fired students from the Ivies, the Patriot League and the NESCAC.............while having had tremendous success with students from schools such as East Stroudsburg, Bloomsburg, Holy Family and other schools that would not meet the "high academic sights" bar.
JM spent time on Wall Street and down in D.C. and some of the most pompous folks I've ever met had the most beautiful resume imaginable.................and it was all down hill from there. :)
Quote from: Ice Bear on November 21, 2019, 07:45:09 PMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on November 21, 2019, 04:13:30 PMQuote from: UfanBill on November 20, 2019, 01:49:13 PMQuote from: MANDGSU on November 19, 2019, 06:57:33 PM
Well Union grab a great receiver from under Salisbury, Wesley, Stevenson, Delaware Valley, etc...nose.
Could it be that that "great receiver" Andre Ross Jr. set his academic sights a little higher? He was valedictorian of his class at National Collegiate Prep in DC.
to quote Ross Jr...
"I chose Union because of the smaller class sizes, which lead to a more personal relationship with professors. The environment of Union is inviting and I needed to step outside of what I was used to."
Chaneling my inner Ice......................JM thinks that for an aspiring accountant, regardless of the school, a debit is a debit and a credit is a credit. Tiny DelVal (and tiny Lycoming) had higher first time pass rate percentages on the CPA Exam than Pitt, Villanova, Lehigh, Bucknell, Lafayette and a host of others. One was #5 and the other #7 out of the 77 colleges and universities in 2017. One can not challenge one more on debits and credits. Kind of the same thing on a percentage basis of the number of students who get into Med/Vet/Dental school. DelVal has a high percentage of pre-professional science majors who head off to one of those three schools.
JM has never bought the argument about the "settting academic sights a little higher" as JM has hired and fired students from the Ivies, the Patriot League and the NESCAC.............while having had tremendous success with students from schools such as East Stroudsburg, Bloomsburg, Holy Family and other schools that would not meet the "high academic sights" bar.
JM spent time on Wall Street and down in D.C. and some of the most pompous folks I've ever met had the most beautiful resume imaginable.................and it was all down hill from there. :)
Ice Bear ****ing loves this...especially as a Doid who may be looked at by some on the Union campus as being one step removed from being a ****ing Neanderthal lol.
A huge +k for the third person talking and over response JM. Great ****.
Ice wishes your Gulls the very best come Saturday...although they may not need it as we may see the Gulls deliver a double Monkey Stomp.
Quote from: MANDGSU on November 25, 2019, 09:36:02 AMOK,makes sense, big week for the LL,NJAC,E8 and the MAC...good luck to all
Just a reminder, we are holding off on our final votes until end of playoffs.
Key Game(s):
Salisbury (#1) vs. Union (#2), Muhlenberg (S#2) vs. Brockport (#8), Wesley (#3) vs. Delaware Valley (#4)
Quote from: MANDGSU on December 02, 2019, 11:49:32 AM
We witness some surprising fireworks this pass(t) weekend and not so much from others. The Good thing is we still have two east region teams in the final eight. Some tough games, according to Massey, Salisbury has a 15% chance and Delaware Valley a 13%.
Key Game(s):
Salisbury (#1) vs. Muhlenberg (S#2) and North Central (N#3) vs. Delaware Valley (#4)
Quote from: wesleydad on December 02, 2019, 11:56:28 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on December 02, 2019, 11:49:32 AM
We witness some surprising fireworks this pass(t) weekend and not so much from others. The Good thing is we still have two east region teams in the final eight. Some tough games, according to Massey, Salisbury has a 15% chance and Delaware Valley a 13%.
Key Game(s):
Salisbury (#1) vs. Muhlenberg (S#2) and North Central (N#3) vs. Delaware Valley (#4)
I think Salisbury has a much better chance of winning than Del Val does. Both teams are playing really good squads, but I would give the Gulls a 50/50 shot where I would have Del Val at a 1 in 4 shot.
Quote from: MANDGSU on December 02, 2019, 11:49:32 AM
We witness some surprising fireworks this pass(t) weekend and not so much from others. The Good thing is we still have two east region teams in the final eight. Some tough games, according to Massey, Salisbury has a 15% chance and Delaware Valley a 13%.
Key Game(s):
Salisbury (#1) vs. Muhlenberg (S#2) and North Central (N#3) vs. Delaware Valley (#4)
Quote from: jmcozenlaw on December 06, 2019, 02:03:45 PMQuote from: wesleydad on December 02, 2019, 11:56:28 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on December 02, 2019, 11:49:32 AM
We witness some surprising fireworks this pass(t) weekend and not so much from others. The Good thing is we still have two east region teams in the final eight. Some tough games, according to Massey, Salisbury has a 15% chance and Delaware Valley a 13%.
Key Game(s):
Salisbury (#1) vs. Muhlenberg (S#2) and North Central (N#3) vs. Delaware Valley (#4)
I think Salisbury has a much better chance of winning than Del Val does. Both teams are playing really good squads, but I would give the Gulls a 50/50 shot where I would have Del Val at a 1 in 4 shot.
Wesleydad.........you are being far too kind. I give them about a 1 in 100. Playing the team who just put 59 on Mount Union, on the road, and now coming back home. I've got NCC by 34.
Quote from: wesleydad on December 07, 2019, 10:17:34 AMQuote from: jmcozenlaw on December 06, 2019, 02:03:45 PMQuote from: wesleydad on December 02, 2019, 11:56:28 AMQuote from: MANDGSU on December 02, 2019, 11:49:32 AM
We witness some surprising fireworks this pass(t) weekend and not so much from others. The Good thing is we still have two east region teams in the final eight. Some tough games, according to Massey, Salisbury has a 15% chance and Delaware Valley a 13%.
Key Game(s):
Salisbury (#1) vs. Muhlenberg (S#2) and North Central (N#3) vs. Delaware Valley (#4)
I think Salisbury has a much better chance of winning than Del Val does. Both teams are playing really good squads, but I would give the Gulls a 50/50 shot where I would have Del Val at a 1 in 4 shot.
Wesleydad.........you are being far too kind. I give them about a 1 in 100. Playing the team who just put 59 on Mount Union, on the road, and now coming back home. I've got NCC by 34.
Not kind at all. Del Val has a strong defense and can get pressure sending 4. They will play to keep everything in front of them. If they can make NCC put drives together instead of big plays they will be in it. I am not sure how their D compares to Wheaton's but if it is close they can win this game.
Quote from: Bartman on December 04, 2019, 05:46:25 PMWell I got the winning teams right but I thought the offenses would be more productive based on last week. Congrats to Delaware Valley and Salisbury for putting up a good fight today. Seasons to be proud of. Going forward I am a total Mules fan with Coach Mine(Hobart 2003) and DC Kory David who will get them past NCC with defense and just enough offense. Muhlenberg is an East team in my opinion, so I'm all in . With Mt. Union and Mary Hardin Baylor out, my prediction for the Stagg Bowl: St John's vs. Muhlenberg.
Salisbury vs. Muhlenberg should be a great game, but Kory David is the DC for Muhlenberg and will definitely have a plan to use his athletes against the Seagulls. In addition ,if Union could pass against the Seagulls, the Mules have even a better passing game. My guess is Muhlenberg 52 Salisbury 45.
NCC has an incredible offense that should challenge Del Vals defense. This game will be a great barometer on the strengths of the East v. Central. I hope the Aggies pull it off, but I think NCC 42 and Delaware Valley 28...hope I'm wrong.
Quote from: Bartman on December 07, 2019, 05:43:09 PMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2019, 05:46:25 PMWell I got the winning teams right but I thought the offenses would be more productive based on last week. Congrats to Delaware Valley and Salisbury for putting up a good fight today. Seasons to be proud of. Going forward I am a total Mules fan with Coach Mine(Hobart 2003) and DC Kory David who will get them past NCC with defense and just enough offense. Muhlenberg is an East team in my opinion, so I'm all in . With Mt. Union and Mary Hardin Baylor out, my prediction for the Stagg Bowl: St John's vs. Muhlenberg.
Salisbury vs. Muhlenberg should be a great game, but Kory David is the DC for Muhlenberg and will definitely have a plan to use his athletes against the Seagulls. In addition ,if Union could pass against the Seagulls, the Mules have even a better passing game. My guess is Muhlenberg 52 Salisbury 45.
NCC has an incredible offense that should challenge Del Vals defense. This game will be a great barometer on the strengths of the East v. Central. I hope the Aggies pull it off, but I think NCC 42 and Delaware Valley 28...hope I'm wrong.
Quote from: Bartman on December 07, 2019, 05:43:09 PMQuote from: Bartman on December 04, 2019, 05:46:25 PMWell I got the winning teams right but I thought the offenses would be more productive based on last week. Congrats to Delaware Valley and Salisbury for putting up a good fight today. Seasons to be proud of. Going forward I am a total Mules fan with Coach Mine(Hobart 2003) and DC Kory David who will get them past NCC with defense and just enough offense. Muhlenberg is an East team in my opinion, so I'm all in . With Mt. Union and Mary Hardin Baylor out, my prediction for the Stagg Bowl: St John's vs. Muhlenberg.
Salisbury vs. Muhlenberg should be a great game, but Kory David is the DC for Muhlenberg and will definitely have a plan to use his athletes against the Seagulls. In addition ,if Union could pass against the Seagulls, the Mules have even a better passing game. My guess is Muhlenberg 52 Salisbury 45.
NCC has an incredible offense that should challenge Del Vals defense. This game will be a great barometer on the strengths of the East v. Central. I hope the Aggies pull it off, but I think NCC 42 and Delaware Valley 28...hope I'm wrong.
Quote from: UfanBill on December 20, 2019, 04:59:09 PM
"Idiots" :o...Hey Utah, you've hurt my feelings...and right in the middle of the Holiday Season. We work so hard on the ERFP. ::) Coal and -k for you. ;D
Quote from: Bartman on December 26, 2019, 09:00:08 AM
As we fade into D3 Football hibernation , is there a final poll for 2019 for the ERFP?
Quote from: Machiavelli on December 27, 2019, 09:36:10 AMBut TOP just isn't enough for me....I need so much more ::)Quote from: Bartman on December 26, 2019, 09:00:08 AM
As we fade into D3 Football hibernation , is there a final poll for 2019 for the ERFP?
I think JU already provided that.
Quote from: FANOFD3 on January 07, 2020, 07:56:06 AM
Rank Team Previous Points D3.com
1t) Salisbury (3) 1 57 Del Val
1t) Delaware Valley (3) 4 57 Salisbury
3) Union 2 46 Wesley
4) Wesley 3 35 Union
5) Hobart 7 32 Brockport
6) Brockport 8 30 Ithaca
7) Stevenson 9 22 Stevenson
8) Ithaca 5 15 WNE
9) WNE 6 12 WPI
10) WPI t10 10
Dropped Out: Cortland State
RV) Middlebury (3), Montclair State (2), Cortland State(1)
Voters: MANDGSU, RAMS1102, DUTCH BOY, Ufanbill, Oline89, Bartman, Massey Ratings*, Hansen Ratings*
*Massey Ratings and Hansen Ratings replaced Dutch Boy and RAMS1102 for final rankings.
Thank You to all the voters that participated in this years ER rankings. Enjoy the remaining of the year and watch D3 Sports.
Quote from: Bartman on January 07, 2020, 06:21:45 PM
Thanks for finishing this FANOFD3. It was interesting to see how our local voters placed the teams vs. D3.com. The top 4 were pretty close in both polls, the rest of the D3 poll is not as knowledgeable as the ERFP (IMO). Hobart didn't even get any points in the D3 poll, of course , I might not be totally objective ;)Quote from: FANOFD3 on January 07, 2020, 07:56:06 AM
Rank Team Previous Points D3.com
1t) Salisbury (3) 1 57 Del Val
1t) Delaware Valley (3) 4 57 Salisbury
3) Union 2 46 Wesley
4) Wesley 3 35 Union
5) Hobart 7 32 Brockport
6) Brockport 8 30 Ithaca
7) Stevenson 9 22 Stevenson
8) Ithaca 5 15 WNE
9) WNE 6 12 WPI
10) WPI t10 10
Dropped Out: Cortland State
RV) Middlebury (3), Montclair State (2), Cortland State(1)
Voters: MANDGSU, RAMS1102, DUTCH BOY, Ufanbill, Oline89, Bartman, Massey Ratings*, Hansen Ratings*
*Massey Ratings and Hansen Ratings replaced Dutch Boy and RAMS1102 for final rankings.
Thank You to all the voters that participated in this years ER rankings. Enjoy the remaining of the year and watch D3 Sports.
Quote from: FANOFD3 on May 21, 2021, 06:45:29 PM
With Covid season ending and some schedules being released. I would be interested to have two pre-season polls. A "Too Early" and one right before the season start. Thoughts?
Quote from: UfanBill on June 08, 2021, 02:12:54 PMQuote from: FANOFD3 on May 21, 2021, 06:45:29 PM
With Covid season ending and some schedules being released. I would be interested to have two pre-season polls. A "Too Early" and one right before the season start. Thoughts?
"Too early"???...It's never too early to discuss D3football. This year's season in the East will be interesting, unpredictable and possibly shocking. With a handful of teams participating in Fall/Spring football did they get a jump on everybody else ??? or did the teams that just practiced fall and spring, without taking their game out of house, perfect their schemes? Then there's the question about just who is going to be on respective rosters this fall. Will most of last year's seniors take advantage of their Covid year? Have a lot of them moved on? Who transferred out to show up on a rival roster? Did younger players arrive that will seize key spots? Remember teams have 2 years of recruits added to their rosters. What about coaching changes? Schedule changes? Remember some programs have been lost. Wesley being the most prominent. ALL big questions.
At first glance the same powerful programs will probably still be on top but somewhere someplace a team has outworked, out recruited and out prepared to change and improve on what they've done in the past, and will surprise.
I'd be privileged to participate in the ERFP again this year.
Quote from: UfanBill on June 08, 2021, 02:12:54 PMI resonate with this post. So many interesting topics, questions, and threads heading into the 2021 fall football season. I more so think about these questions and topics as they relate to Rowan, but I bet they are relevant to all the programs.Quote from: FANOFD3 on May 21, 2021, 06:45:29 PM
With Covid season ending and some schedules being released. I would be interested to have two pre-season polls. A "Too Early" and one right before the season start. Thoughts?
"Too early"???...It's never too early to discuss D3football. This year's season in the East will be interesting, unpredictable and possibly shocking. With a handful of teams participating in Fall/Spring football did they get a jump on everybody else ??? or did the teams that just practiced fall and spring, without taking their game out of house, perfect their schemes? Then there's the question about just who is going to be on respective rosters this fall. Will most of last year's seniors take advantage of their Covid year? Have a lot of them moved on? Who transferred out to show up on a rival roster? Did younger players arrive that will seize key spots? Remember teams have 2 years of recruits added to their rosters. What about coaching changes? Schedule changes? Remember some programs have been lost. Wesley being the most prominent. ALL big questions.
At first glance the same powerful programs will probably still be on top but somewhere someplace a team has outworked, out recruited and out prepared to change and improve on what they've done in the past, and will surprise.
I'd be privileged to participate in the ERFP again this year.
Quote from: ITH radio on June 17, 2021, 12:43:21 PM
The weird part is getting us long-time fans to think outside the "East-North-South-West" boxes.
Region 1, as proposed now, would consist of:
CCC, ECFC, MASCAC, NESCAC (non-NCAA playoff, obviously), NEWMAC and MAC
Region 2 would be:
E8, LL, NJAC and CC (so no longer a "south" conf)
Region 3-6 has a breakout of the other conferences with UMHB likely being moved into Region 3 (mostly SE schools from the SAA, ODAC, etc), Region 4 including UMU / OAC, Region 5 (CCIW) and Region 6 (a super region of sorts with the MIAC, WIAC and NWC in it).
Going to be an interesting shift to say the least.
Quote from: ITH radio on June 17, 2021, 01:37:35 PM
np - just emailed it to you
Quote from: FANOFD3 on July 14, 2021, 01:47:11 PM
Open Dates:
Anna Maria - 9/4 (Wk1), 10/9 (Wk 6)
Gallaudet - 9/4 (Wk1), 9/11 (Wk2), 9/18 (Wk 3), 10/30 (Wk 9)
SUNY-Maritime - 9/4 (Wk1), 10/23 (Wk 8)
Misericordia - 9/4 (Wk 1), 11/13 (Wk 11)
Alvernia - 10/9, 10/23 (Wk 8)
Widener - 10/9 (Wk 6), 10/30 (Wk 9)
West Conn - 10/9 (Wk 6), 11/13 (Wk 11)
Plymouth State - 9/25 (Wk 4), 10/9 (Wk 6)
Curry - 9/25 (Wk 4), 10/23 (Wk 8)
UNE - 9/25 (Wk 4), 10/16 (Wk 7)
MIT - 9/18 (Wk 3), 10/9 (Wk 6)
Merchant Marine - 9/11 (Wk 2), 11/6 (Wk 10)
Salisbury - 9/18 (Wk 3), 10/9 (Wk 6)
Rowan - 9/18 (Wk 3), 10/9 (Wk 6)
TCNJ - 9/18 (Wk 3), 10/30 (Wk 9)
Kean - 9/18 (Wk 3), 11/6 (Wk 10)
Playing Matchmaker -
Widener vs. Alvernia - 10/9, as both teams are within same conference and will give both 8 conference games.
West Conn vs. Plymouth State – 10/9, as both teams are within same conference and will give each team that 8th conference game.
Misericordia vs. Gallaudet - 9/4, good opening game for new head coach that was recently at Gallaudet
SUNY-Maritime vs. Curry – 10/23, good matchup on similar quality teams and is day trip.
MIT vs. Anna Maria – 10/9, I 90 Classic
Gallaudet vs. Merchant Marine – 9/11, a good matchup of similar quality teams.
Salisbury/Rowan/TCNJ vs. Gallaudet – 9/18
MIT vs. Kean – 9/18, Kean only has 9/18 available and MIT is the filler
Rowan vs. Anna Maria – 10/9, good matchup for both teams trying to get to playoffs.
The NJAC teams are pretty much out of luck unless some other Region 3,4,5 or 6 team(s) have availability. UNE open dates can't accommodate non-conference opponents and will need help from Region 3,4,5, or 6.
Quote from: RowanPhan on August 30, 2021, 01:08:27 PM
NJAC shrinking by 1 team didn't help. NJAC shrinking by 3 teams over the last few years without replacements doesn't help scheduling.
Quote from: FANOFD3 on August 30, 2021, 01:19:21 PMQuote from: RowanPhan on August 30, 2021, 01:08:27 PM
NJAC shrinking by 1 team didn't help. NJAC shrinking by 3 teams over the last few years without replacements doesn't help scheduling.
Yea, losing those members definitely didn't help. I thought we would do something with Newport News Apprentice, but they got gobbled up by the ODAC (Kudos to them). I would love to hear from a few of the NJAC coaches with 9 games and see how the losses of Southern VA, Wesley, Frostburg, and other NJAC teams over the last decade had effected their scheduling and how the coaches had responded to and reach out to for games.
Quote from: Oline89 on August 30, 2021, 03:00:41 PMQuote from: FANOFD3 on August 30, 2021, 01:19:21 PMQuote from: RowanPhan on August 30, 2021, 01:08:27 PM
NJAC shrinking by 1 team didn't help. NJAC shrinking by 3 teams over the last few years without replacements doesn't help scheduling.
Yea, losing those members definitely didn't help. I thought we would do something with Newport News Apprentice, but they got gobbled up by the ODAC (Kudos to them). I would love to hear from a few of the NJAC coaches with 9 games and see how the losses of Southern VA, Wesley, Frostburg, and other NJAC teams over the last decade had effected their scheduling and how the coaches had responded to and reach out to for games.
Both LL and E8 only have 7 teams, that means every team needs to schedule 4 OOC games. NJAC would seem the perfect fit to fill out the schedules
Quote from: ITH radio on September 22, 2021, 10:36:41 AM
DVU is on a bye week. Lyco plays Stevenson this wkd.
Quote from: FANOFD3 on October 12, 2021, 09:25:56 PMI sent mine in Monday, assume you got it.
Don't forget your Ballots..
Quote from: Bartman on October 13, 2021, 04:27:22 PMQuote from: FANOFD3 on October 12, 2021, 09:25:56 PMI sent mine in Monday, assume you got it.
Don't forget your Ballots..
Quote from: FANOFD3 on October 14, 2021, 12:31:31 PMJust to confirm, we should incorporate PAC teams in this weeks poll?
Here is the R1R2 Fan Poll for week 5. We were short 1 voter this week to due personal obligations.
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Delaware Valley (2) 1 54
2) Johns Hopkins (3) 2 53
3) Union (1) 3 43
4) Salisbury 5 37
5) Cortland 7 32
6) Susquehanna 6 31
7) Ithaca 4 30
8) Muhlenberg 8 21
9) RPI 10 10
10) Hobart 9 16
Dropped Out: None
RV) Ursinus (3), Dickinson (1), Trinity (1), USMMA (1)
Key Game(s):
John's Hopkins (#2) v. Muhlenberg (#8) , RPI (#9) v. Hobart (#10), Brockport (NR) v. Utica (NR), Wilkes (NR) v Widener (NR), Endicott (NR) v. Husson (NR)
Voters: FANOFD3, Massey, D3Football.com, ITH, Oline89, Bartman, Mole
Edit: Remember for next week that the PAC has been added to R1/R2, which definitely throws a wrinkle into the Pool C Category. I think logistically for playoff consideration, it makes since as PAC members play R1/R2 teams frequently.
Quote from: Bartman on October 17, 2021, 09:07:41 AMQuote from: FANOFD3 on October 14, 2021, 12:31:31 PMJust to confirm, we should incorporate PAC teams in this weeks poll?
Here is the R1R2 Fan Poll for week 5. We were short 1 voter this week to due personal obligations.
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Delaware Valley (2) 1 54
2) Johns Hopkins (3) 2 53
3) Union (1) 3 43
4) Salisbury 5 37
5) Cortland 7 32
6) Susquehanna 6 31
7) Ithaca 4 30
8) Muhlenberg 8 21
9) RPI 10 10
10) Hobart 9 16
Dropped Out: None
RV) Ursinus (3), Dickinson (1), Trinity (1), USMMA (1)
Key Game(s):
John's Hopkins (#2) v. Muhlenberg (#8) , RPI (#9) v. Hobart (#10), Brockport (NR) v. Utica (NR), Wilkes (NR) v Widener (NR), Endicott (NR) v. Husson (NR)
Voters: FANOFD3, Massey, D3Football.com, ITH, Oline89, Bartman, Mole
Edit: Remember for next week that the PAC has been added to R1/R2, which definitely throws a wrinkle into the Pool C Category. I think logistically for playoff consideration, it makes since as PAC members play R1/R2 teams frequently.
Quote from: Bartman on October 18, 2021, 06:25:39 PM
I took a completely fresh look at the 2021 year data by looking at SOS(++ for higher rating), wins against ranked or RV opponents(++) , wins against winning teams(+), close losses against ranked teams(+) and losses against unranked teams(-), and this is what my incredibley precise and scientific model produced this week:
All 6-0:
1. Ithaca(4 SOS win over Hobart(RV) and Brockport 4-2 win
2.Del Val(51 SOS, win over 4-2 Lycoming)
3.Wash & Jeff( lowest 174 SOS but a win over a ranked opponent in John Carroll(24..ranking deserved?))
4.Susquehanna(100 SOS Win over 4-2 Lycoming)
5.Union(138 SOS Win over 4-2 Utica)
6.Cortland(141 SOS Win over 4-2 Brockport)
All 5-1:
7.Hobart(65 SOS, win over RV RPI and close loss to Ithaca #16)
8.Muhlenberg(117 SOS, win over #23 Johns Hopkins, not close loss to Ursinus)
9.Salisbury(118 SOS sorta close loss to Whitewater #3)
10.Johns Hopkins(127 SOS, not close loss to #18 Muhlenberg)
Quote from: FANOFD3 on October 18, 2021, 09:49:49 PM
My updated Regional Rankings
R1:
1. Delaware Valley - (6-0) SOS (.557) (1-0)
2. Merchant Marine (5-0) SOS (.504) (1-0)
3. FDU-Florham (4-2) SOS (.659) (1-2)
4. Widener (6-1) SOS (.466) (1-1)
5. Catholic (5-2) SOS (.507) (1-1)
6. Endicott (6-1) SOS (.543) (0-1)
7. Lycoming (4-2) SOS (.592) (0-2)
8. Bridgewater State (4-2) SOS (.505) (0-1)
9. Salve Regina (5-1) SOS (.446) (0-0)
10. Wilkes (5-1) SOS (.364) (0-1)
R2.
1. Ithaca (6-0) SOS (.661) (3-0)
2. Susquehanna (6-0) SOS (.509) (1-0)
3. Cortland (6-0) SOS (.469) (1-0)
4. Union (6-0) SOS (.474) (0-0)
5. Washington & Jefferson (6-0) SOS (.445) (0-0)
6. Hobart (5-1) SOS (.541) (0-1)
7. Salisbury (4-1) SOS (.498) (0-1)
8. Muhlenberg (5-1) SOS (.500) (1-0)
9. Brockport (4-2) SOS (.675) (0-2)
10. Johns Hopkins (5-1) SOS (.488) (0-1)
Bold - Pool A Leaders
Quote from: IC798891 on October 21, 2021, 09:23:53 AMQuote from: FANOFD3 on October 18, 2021, 09:49:49 PM
My updated Regional Rankings
R1:
1. Delaware Valley - (6-0) SOS (.557) (1-0)
2. Merchant Marine (5-0) SOS (.504) (1-0)
3. FDU-Florham (4-2) SOS (.659) (1-2)
4. Widener (6-1) SOS (.466) (1-1)
5. Catholic (5-2) SOS (.507) (1-1)
6. Endicott (6-1) SOS (.543) (0-1)
7. Lycoming (4-2) SOS (.592) (0-2)
8. Bridgewater State (4-2) SOS (.505) (0-1)
9. Salve Regina (5-1) SOS (.446) (0-0)
10. Wilkes (5-1) SOS (.364) (0-1)
R2.
1. Ithaca (6-0) SOS (.661) (3-0)
2. Susquehanna (6-0) SOS (.509) (1-0)
3. Cortland (6-0) SOS (.469) (1-0)
4. Union (6-0) SOS (.474) (0-0)
5. Washington & Jefferson (6-0) SOS (.445) (0-0)
6. Hobart (5-1) SOS (.541) (0-1)
7. Salisbury (4-1) SOS (.498) (0-1)
8. Muhlenberg (5-1) SOS (.500) (1-0)
9. Brockport (4-2) SOS (.675) (0-2)
10. Johns Hopkins (5-1) SOS (.488) (0-1)
Bold - Pool A Leaders
If you're IC, you're definitely rooting for Hobart to beat Union, right? It seems like it would be better for their Pool C if they had two results against 9-1 LL teams than one 8-2 and one 10-0.
Quote from: IC798891 on October 21, 2021, 09:23:53 AMQuote from: FANOFD3 on October 18, 2021, 09:49:49 PM
My updated Regional Rankings
R1:
1. Delaware Valley - (6-0) SOS (.557) (1-0)
2. Merchant Marine (5-0) SOS (.504) (1-0)
3. FDU-Florham (4-2) SOS (.659) (1-2)
4. Widener (6-1) SOS (.466) (1-1)
5. Catholic (5-2) SOS (.507) (1-1)
6. Endicott (6-1) SOS (.543) (0-1)
7. Lycoming (4-2) SOS (.592) (0-2)
8. Bridgewater State (4-2) SOS (.505) (0-1)
9. Salve Regina (5-1) SOS (.446) (0-0)
10. Wilkes (5-1) SOS (.364) (0-1)
R2.
1. Ithaca (6-0) SOS (.661) (3-0)
2. Susquehanna (6-0) SOS (.509) (1-0)
3. Cortland (6-0) SOS (.469) (1-0)
4. Union (6-0) SOS (.474) (0-0)
5. Washington & Jefferson (6-0) SOS (.445) (0-0)
6. Hobart (5-1) SOS (.541) (0-1)
7. Salisbury (4-1) SOS (.498) (0-1)
8. Muhlenberg (5-1) SOS (.500) (1-0)
9. Brockport (4-2) SOS (.675) (0-2)
10. Johns Hopkins (5-1) SOS (.488) (0-1)
Bold - Pool A Leaders
If you're IC, you're definitely rooting for Hobart to beat Union, right? It seems like it would be better for their Pool C if they had two results against 9-1 LL teams than one 8-2 and one 10-0.
Quote from: FANOFD3 on October 24, 2021, 02:25:07 PM
My updated Regional Rankings - Week 8 (Only did 9 as it was mentioned that rankings would only consider 6-9, as such Region 1 and 2 have the most schools.) The curious thing about Region 1, we may end up with 1 or 2 three loss teams ranked at the end of the year and maybe 3 from MAC.
R1:
1. Delaware Valley (7-0) SOS (.536) (1-0)
2. Merchant Marine (7-0) SOS (.502) (0-0)
3. Lycoming (5-2) SOS (.565) (0-2)
4. Salve Regina (7-1) SOS (.496) (0-0) Salve owns tie-breaker in CCC (https://www.cccathletics.com/secure/content/administrative/tiebreakercriteria) (http://(https://www.cccathletics.com/secure/content/administrative/tiebreakercriteria))
5. Wilkes (6-1) SOS (.383) (0-1)
6. Endicott (6-2) SOS (.552) (0-1)
7. Bridgewater State (5-2) SOS (.415) (0-1)
8. Framingham State (5-2) SOS (.430) (0-0)
9. Anna Maria (5-1) SOS (.358) (0-0)
Region 2 was the most difficult as there were many teams on the outside with 1 loss (Johns Hopkins, RPI & Grove City) and 2 losses (Brockport and Carnegie Mellon). Regarding Hobart and Salisbury being in front of Union and Muhlenberg, this is using objective data and looking at who you have played and having to use SOS eventually. I pegged W&J above Muhlenberg, because I expect John Carroll to be ranked in R 4.
R2.
1. Ithaca (7-0) SOS (.585) (3-0)
2. Cortland (7-0) SOS (.488) (1-0)
3. Susquehanna (7-0) SOS (.475) (1-0)
4. Hobart (6-1) SOS (.533) (0-1)
5. Salisbury (5-1) SOS (.527) (0-1)
6. Union (7-0) SOS (.449) (0-0)
7. Westminster (5-2) SOS (.500) (1-1)
8. Washington & Jefferson (6-1) SOS (.484) (1-1)
9. Muhlenberg (6-1) SOS (.451) (0-0)
Bold - Pool A Leaders
Quote from: UfanBill on October 25, 2021, 03:17:38 PMQuote from: FANOFD3 on October 24, 2021, 02:25:07 PM
My updated Regional Rankings - Week 8 (Only did 9 as it was mentioned that rankings would only consider 6-9, as such Region 1 and 2 have the most schools.) The curious thing about Region 1, we may end up with 1 or 2 three loss teams ranked at the end of the year and maybe 3 from MAC.
R1:
1. Delaware Valley (7-0) SOS (.536) (1-0)
2. Merchant Marine (7-0) SOS (.502) (0-0)
3. Lycoming (5-2) SOS (.565) (0-2)
4. Salve Regina (7-1) SOS (.496) (0-0) Salve owns tie-breaker in CCC (https://www.cccathletics.com/secure/content/administrative/tiebreakercriteria) (http://(https://www.cccathletics.com/secure/content/administrative/tiebreakercriteria))
5. Wilkes (6-1) SOS (.383) (0-1)
6. Endicott (6-2) SOS (.552) (0-1)
7. Bridgewater State (5-2) SOS (.415) (0-1)
8. Framingham State (5-2) SOS (.430) (0-0)
9. Anna Maria (5-1) SOS (.358) (0-0)
Region 2 was the most difficult as there were many teams on the outside with 1 loss (Johns Hopkins, RPI & Grove City) and 2 losses (Brockport and Carnegie Mellon). Regarding Hobart and Salisbury being in front of Union and Muhlenberg, this is using objective data and looking at who you have played and having to use SOS eventually. I pegged W&J above Muhlenberg, because I expect John Carroll to be ranked in R 4.
R2.
1. Ithaca (7-0) SOS (.585) (3-0)
2. Cortland (7-0) SOS (.488) (1-0)
3. Susquehanna (7-0) SOS (.475) (1-0)
4. Hobart (6-1) SOS (.533) (0-1)
5. Salisbury (5-1) SOS (.527) (0-1)
6. Union (7-0) SOS (.449) (0-0)
7. Westminster (5-2) SOS (.500) (1-1)
8. Washington & Jefferson (6-1) SOS (.484) (1-1)
9. Muhlenberg (6-1) SOS (.451) (0-0)
Bold - Pool A Leaders
Regional Rankings???...OK, I'll take the bait and respond. While I applaud your efforts, elevating Hobart up to #4 ahead of Union and Salisbury in your guesswork Regional Rankings, based mostly on the bogus NCAA SOS numbers is an exercise in futility. To me the SOS numbers mean nothing at this point, same for trying to project Regional Rankings before teams play the meat of their schedule. Much can , and will, happen in the next three weeks. That's why the NCAA has stopped releasing RR until after week #9 (or #10 TBD), which initially will not even be numerically ranked, but alphabetically. ??? See https://www.d3blogs.com/d3football/2021/10/22/bonus-podcast-youll-see-a-change-in-regional-rankings/ As for results against other RR opponents. Ithaca's win over Bridgeport St. looks good now but will Bridgeport even win the MASCAC. They have a winner take all with Framingham coming up and Brockport will probably not be RR in the end ....and Union with no current RR wins has a W over Springfield which I suspect will ultimately win the NEWMAC thus becoming RR'd. I'm sure there are others that will shake out.
Pat and his D3football staff have said that they will release a projected Regional Rankings soon. We'll see how that compares. Of course we'll have additional on the field results by then. ;)
Quote from: UfanBill on October 25, 2021, 03:17:38 PMQuote from: FANOFD3 on October 24, 2021, 02:25:07 PM
My updated Regional Rankings - Week 8 (Only did 9 as it was mentioned that rankings would only consider 6-9, as such Region 1 and 2 have the most schools.) The curious thing about Region 1, we may end up with 1 or 2 three loss teams ranked at the end of the year and maybe 3 from MAC.
R1:
1. Delaware Valley (7-0) SOS (.536) (1-0)
2. Merchant Marine (7-0) SOS (.502) (0-0)
3. Lycoming (5-2) SOS (.565) (0-2)
4. Salve Regina (7-1) SOS (.496) (0-0) Salve owns tie-breaker in CCC (https://www.cccathletics.com/secure/content/administrative/tiebreakercriteria) (http://(https://www.cccathletics.com/secure/content/administrative/tiebreakercriteria))
5. Wilkes (6-1) SOS (.383) (0-1)
6. Endicott (6-2) SOS (.552) (0-1)
7. Bridgewater State (5-2) SOS (.415) (0-1)
8. Framingham State (5-2) SOS (.430) (0-0)
9. Anna Maria (5-1) SOS (.358) (0-0)
Region 2 was the most difficult as there were many teams on the outside with 1 loss (Johns Hopkins, RPI & Grove City) and 2 losses (Brockport and Carnegie Mellon). Regarding Hobart and Salisbury being in front of Union and Muhlenberg, this is using objective data and looking at who you have played and having to use SOS eventually. I pegged W&J above Muhlenberg, because I expect John Carroll to be ranked in R 4.
R2.
1. Ithaca (7-0) SOS (.585) (3-0)
2. Cortland (7-0) SOS (.488) (1-0)
3. Susquehanna (7-0) SOS (.475) (1-0)
4. Hobart (6-1) SOS (.533) (0-1)
5. Salisbury (5-1) SOS (.527) (0-1)
6. Union (7-0) SOS (.449) (0-0)
7. Westminster (5-2) SOS (.500) (1-1)
8. Washington & Jefferson (6-1) SOS (.484) (1-1)
9. Muhlenberg (6-1) SOS (.451) (0-0)
Bold - Pool A Leaders
Regional Rankings???...OK, I'll take the bait and respond. While I applaud your efforts, elevating Hobart up to #4 ahead of Union and Salisbury in your guesswork Regional Rankings, based mostly on the bogus NCAA SOS numbers is an exercise in futility. To me the SOS numbers mean nothing at this point, same for trying to project Regional Rankings before teams play the meat of their schedule. Much can , and will, happen in the next three weeks. That's why the NCAA has stopped releasing RR until after week #9 (or #10 TBD), which initially will not even be numerically ranked, but alphabetically. ??? See https://www.d3blogs.com/d3football/2021/10/22/bonus-podcast-youll-see-a-change-in-regional-rankings/ As for results against other RR opponents. Ithaca's win over Bridgeport St. looks good now but will Bridgeport even win the MASCAC. They have a winner take all with Framingham coming up and Brockport will probably not be RR in the end ....and Union with no current RR wins has a W over Springfield which I suspect will ultimately win the NEWMAC thus becoming RR'd. I'm sure there are others that will shake out.
Pat and his D3football staff have said that they will release a projected Regional Rankings soon. We'll see how that compares. Of course we'll have additional on the field results by then. ;)
Quote from: FANOFD3 on October 27, 2021, 12:17:01 PM
Here is the R1R2 Fan Poll for week 8. We are back to 7 voters. We have some big games this week, that will either make the playoff picture murkier or clearer...Also in NESCAC land we got a battle of unbeatens....
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Delaware Valley (5) 1 66
2) Ithaca (1) 4 52
3t) Union 3 46
3t) Susquehanna 5 46
5t) Cortland 6t 44
5t) Salisbury 8 44
7) Muhlenberg 6t 34
8) Johns Hopkins (1) 9 19
9) Hobart 10 12.34
10) W&J 2 7
Dropped Out: None
RV) Ursinus (3), Wesleyan (2), Grove City (1) USMMA (.33), Trinity (.33)
Key Game(s):
Ithaca (#1) v. RPI (NR) , Union (#3) v. Hobart (#9), Susquehanna (#3) v. Johns Hopkins (#8), W&J (#10) vs Grove City (RV), Merchant Marine (RV) v. Springfield (NR), Trinity (Conn.) (RV) vs. Williams (NR)
Voters: FANOFD3, Massey, D3Football.com, Oline89, Bartman, Mole, and ITH
Quote from: FANOFD3 on October 27, 2021, 12:17:01 PM
Here is the R1R2 Fan Poll for week 8. We are back to 7 voters. We have some big games this week, that will either make the playoff picture murkier or clearer...Also in NESCAC land we got a battle of unbeatens....
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Delaware Valley (5) 1 66
2) Ithaca (1) 4 52
3t) Union 3 46
3t) Susquehanna 5 46
5t) Cortland 6t 44
5t) Salisbury 8 44
7) Muhlenberg 6t 34
8) Johns Hopkins (1) 9 19
9) Hobart 10 12.34
10) W&J 2 7
Dropped Out: None
RV) Ursinus (3), Wesleyan (2), Grove City (1) USMMA (.33), Trinity (.33)
Key Game(s):
Ithaca (#1) v. RPI (NR) , Union (#3) v. Hobart (#9), Susquehanna (#3) v. Johns Hopkins (#8), W&J (#10) vs Grove City (RV), Merchant Marine (RV) v. Springfield (NR), Trinity (Conn.) (RV) vs. Williams (NR)
Voters: FANOFD3, Massey, D3Football.com, Oline89, Bartman, Mole, and ITH
Quote from: Bartman on October 28, 2021, 07:24:16 AM
The NESCAC have a great season going. I wish they would suspend the decision to play outside the league, at least one game like the PAC does. It's tough to vote for a team like Trinity without any comparison other than GPAs or SATs ???
Quote from: The Mole on October 28, 2021, 09:09:35 AM
totally agree, it would give a better comparison having that 10th. Like most conferences, there is a top, middle and bottom tier. There is a ton of competitive balance in NESCAC this year--the bottom tier has improved (maybe not in record but in terms of better games). Would love to see 10th as season ending crossover bowl game with Liberty/UAA affiliated teams or first "scrimmage" against a reasonable geographical opponent: Williams vs Union, Wesleyan vs CGA, Middlebury vs Norwich, UNE vs Bowdoin, Husson vs Colby, Trinity vs Springfield, Amherst vs WNE, Hamilton vs Utica, Tufts vs Endicott, Bates vs Plymouth State.....probably will not happen but fun to surmise!Quote from: Bartman on October 28, 2021, 07:24:16 AM
The NESCAC have a great season going. I wish they would suspend the decision to play outside the league, at least one game like the PAC does. It's tough to vote for a team like Trinity without any comparison other than GPAs or SATs ???
Quote from: Ice Bear on October 28, 2021, 10:37:40 AM
Ice Bear says this won't work as ... Williams stopped playing Union in the 80's once Bagnoli got Union rolling.
Quote from: IC798891 on October 28, 2021, 03:43:28 PMQuote from: Ice Bear on October 28, 2021, 10:37:40 AM
Ice Bear says this won't work as ... Williams stopped playing Union in the 80's once Bagnoli got Union rolling.Ice BearIC798891 says this won't work as ...WilliamsUnionstopped playing Unionrefused to play Ithaca in the 80's onceBagnoliButterfield gotUnionIthaca rolling.
FTFY ;) ;D ;) ;D ;) ;D
Quote from: FANOFD3 on November 03, 2021, 09:55:48 AM
Here is the R1R2 Fan Poll for week 9. We had some big games in Week 8 that lived up to the billing. We gained some clarity in some conferences, but it got murkier in others. We have some clarifying elimination games this weeks and possible games that will allow teams to clinch. Who's In!
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Delaware Valley (5) 1 56
2) Union 3t 45
3) Cortland 5t 44
4) Salisbury 5t 42
5) Muhlenberg 7 38
6) Johns Hopkins (1) 8 31
7) RPI NR 23
8) Ithaca 2 22
9) Susquehanna 3t 13
10) W&J 10 10
Dropped Out: Hobart
RV) Hobart (3), Ursinus (2), Williams (1)
Key Game(s):
Delaware Valley (#1) v. Wilkes (NR) , Union (#2) v. Ithaca (#8), Johns Hopkins (#6) v. Susquehanna (#9), W&J (#10) vs Carnegie-Mellon (NR), Lycoming (NR) v. Widener (NR), Gallaudet (NR) vs. Anna Maria (NR), Castleton (NR) vs. Alfred State (NR), Framingham State (NR) vs. Bridgewater State (NR), Williams (RV) vs. Wesleyan (NR)
Voters: FANOFD3, Massey, D3Football.com, Oline89, Bartman, and Mole
Quote from: The Mole on November 08, 2021, 08:22:16 AM
1. Del Val
2. Muhlenberg
3. Salisbury
4. Hopkins
5. Cortland
6. RPI
7. Ithaca
8. Union
9. Carnegie Mellon
10. Williams
Quote from: Oline89 on November 08, 2021, 11:24:35 AMQuote from: The Mole on November 08, 2021, 08:22:16 AM
1. Del Val
2. Muhlenberg
3. Salisbury
4. Hopkins
5. Cortland
6. RPI
7. Ithaca
8. Union
9. Carnegie Mellon
10. Williams
Tale as old as time, appreciate the NESCAC vote, but until they play outside teams....
Quote from: FANOFD3 on November 11, 2021, 12:01:08 PM
Here is the R1R2 Fan Poll for week 10. We only had 5 voters this week. With the 2nd Regional Rankings out, we have some games that will have all eyes from around the country!
Rank Team Previous Points
1) Delaware Valley (4) 1 47
2) Cortland 3 40
3t) Salisbury 4 38
3t) Muhlenberg 5 38
5) Johns Hopkins (1) 6 31
6) RPI 7 23
7) Ithaca 8 22
8) Union 2 14
9t) Susquehanna 9 6
9t) Carnegie Mellon NR 6
10) Hobart NR 5
Dropped Out: W&J
RV) Ursinus (3), Williams (2)
Key Game(s):
RPI (#6) v. Union (#8) , Cortland (#2) v. Ithaca (#7), Springfield (NR) v. Catholic (NR), Case Western Reserve (NR) vs Carnegie-Mellon (#10), , Merchant Marine (NR) v. Coast Guard (NR), and Williams (RV) vs. Amherst (NR)
Voters: FANOFD3, Massey, D3Football.com, Oline89, and Mole