9-13-22 Regional Rankings are now up:
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-i/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-ii/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-iii/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-iv/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-v/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-vi/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-vii/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-viii/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-ix/
https://unitedsoccercoaches.org/rankings/college-rankings/ncaa-diii-men-x/
For Region I, I have to question ALL 8 teams being NESCAC teams. Surely there must be 1 or 2 other teams in the region that might merit inclusion?
Maybe W Conn over Williams (according to Massey) but otherwise it's pretty accurate in my opinion.
Quote from: paclassic89 on September 13, 2022, 07:58:23 PM
Maybe W Conn over Williams (according to Massey) but otherwise it's pretty accurate in my opinion.
Interesting. Today Massey has Wesleyan at 2 nationally. The college coaches rankings, though not as current, doesn't even have them in the list of 37 teams -- top 25 plus 12 receiving votes.
They jumped 21 Massey spots after their last win. The rankings were released before that game. These early season rankings are pretty much meaningless anyway