Quote from: faunch on February 26, 2026, 08:20:47 PMQuote from: DuffMan on February 26, 2026, 04:14:23 PMI get that you want it to be free, Faunch, but it costs money to produce these streams. Do you think the schools should just eat the cost? How much would it actually cost you to go to the game?
I'm not saying that I like having to pay, but if the option is paying for a decent broadcast vs. watching a CSS Football stream, I'll gladly pay the $10-$15.
It kind of sucks that the streams for hoops and hockey are free all season and then they charge for the playoffs. I'm not that invested in this season's SJU hoops team to fork out the $$$ to stream it.
I wonder how much money they'll actually make of the basketball and hockey playoffs.
Agreed...I could probably be convinced to pay $100 for conference football if it got CSS to improve their ****-y production.
That's the rub right ... it's annoying when Concordia has a post in the press box blocking out the view anytime the play isn't in the middle of the field. But it's free, so how much can you really complain.
I'd probably be ok paying a fee if the entire conference slate was included, but only if the production value was consistent.
Flip side, I know Bethel pivoted to a fully student run broadcast, from camera's to announcers. Makes sense, it's "live reps" for the media communications students. But the reality is, you get a bumpy ride early in the year. Zoomed in too tight, replay running over the start of the next play, etc. Not sure how it works to have student run productions and also charge for the product.
In all seriousness, he's a great guy. Articulate, thoughtful, very buttoned up. Good reminder of the quality young men our MIAC programs produce regularly. Even if they made questionable choices of allegiance in their late teen years!