I think parity is the word for the men's side of USA South this year.
Most conference brackets have one team with a six or eight seed that no one wants to play, I don't think there's going to be a better seeded team in the USAC comfortable with their pairing when this is said and done.
To weigh in on the ongoing ... discussion ... on the poll voting:
As someone who had a vote for a couple of seasons while covering the South Region, Dave is dead on. There is a ton of information to sort through even with the capsule summaries of who won against who in the last week. If anything I think I tended to lean away from the South if I was in doubt if a team was a 17 or a 20, and many times found the voters from other regions had thought better of the South team than I had when the poll came out and that team was a 15 or 16 that week.
I think most conscientious poll voters realize they may have a regional bias and if anything overcompensate for it by being harder on teams they know well than they are on the ones they only know from streaming or stat sheets in the dark old days of the green screens and VAX.
As I haven't posted these up this season, here are a couple links. be judicious, it's five free stories in a 30-day time period.
Averett 78, MC 75 http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/scots-comeback-bid-falls-short-against-averett/article_498f9e23-ca46-57d9-9956-332cbfcdb7ab.html
Methodist 91, MC 76 http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/methodist-storms-back-to-down-mc-men/article_cf1b20c5-22e6-5d72-8b2b-11a4386df01a.html
Greensboro 91, MC 76 http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/scots-slide-continues-with-home-loss-to-greensboro/article_a4ca749a-96c2-573b-836a-05b5993edfe2.html
Covenenat 91, MC 87: http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/covenant-knocks-off-maryville-men/article_db07bdea-105e-5808-852f-b919e0a616ee.html
Most conference brackets have one team with a six or eight seed that no one wants to play, I don't think there's going to be a better seeded team in the USAC comfortable with their pairing when this is said and done.
To weigh in on the ongoing ... discussion ... on the poll voting:
As someone who had a vote for a couple of seasons while covering the South Region, Dave is dead on. There is a ton of information to sort through even with the capsule summaries of who won against who in the last week. If anything I think I tended to lean away from the South if I was in doubt if a team was a 17 or a 20, and many times found the voters from other regions had thought better of the South team than I had when the poll came out and that team was a 15 or 16 that week.
I think most conscientious poll voters realize they may have a regional bias and if anything overcompensate for it by being harder on teams they know well than they are on the ones they only know from streaming or stat sheets in the dark old days of the green screens and VAX.
As I haven't posted these up this season, here are a couple links. be judicious, it's five free stories in a 30-day time period.
Averett 78, MC 75 http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/scots-comeback-bid-falls-short-against-averett/article_498f9e23-ca46-57d9-9956-332cbfcdb7ab.html
Methodist 91, MC 76 http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/methodist-storms-back-to-down-mc-men/article_cf1b20c5-22e6-5d72-8b2b-11a4386df01a.html
Greensboro 91, MC 76 http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/scots-slide-continues-with-home-loss-to-greensboro/article_a4ca749a-96c2-573b-836a-05b5993edfe2.html
Covenenat 91, MC 87: http://www.thedailytimes.com/sports/covenant-knocks-off-maryville-men/article_db07bdea-105e-5808-852f-b919e0a616ee.html