Quote from: raiderguy on September 18, 2007, 01:19:56 AM
Voice,
It was great to meet you Saturday night. Hope to see you again in the future.
I am not sure what game Ozzie 679 saw but WW had Gremlins in their huddle all night. I have to say it was WW turnovers that "gave" SCSU points and without that and receiver #8 who will forever be known as "STONEY", the game would have been much closer and a possible WW win. You can never factor the If's and But's.....but let's face it SCSU was not exactly slamming the door on WW. Calling off the dogs? Didn't really see that.
WW had their own problems like 1st and goal at the 1 only to have a FG blocked at the 5......Good defense for SCSU give them credit. WW did you ever think of using Beaver as a decoy. That would be the only play call issue I had.
Having a punt bounce into the WW player at the SCSU 45 etc, etc. I would not be too happy at your teams showing against a DIII team. You got by.
I would say Jones was a bit of a disappointment too. He was pressured a lot but he threw passes long just for the sake of throwing long. Who was going to catch them? JMHO.
Wow. Excuses excuses. I'm not sure how WW "gave" SCSU turnovers. The INT on the opening drive was a great catch by the LB. And 2 of the 3 fumbles were caused by gang tackling and big hits on the ball carrier. I love when people blame a loss on turnovers like they were some kind of mental mistake and fail to recognize that there is a defense out there working its ass off to force those turnovers.
As for calling off the dogs, I wouldn't exactly call it that, but SCSU definitely did relax into a prevent defense. They were up by more than 3 TDs going into the 4th quarter. WW had 3 first downs and a grand total of 63 yards in the first half.
I also love how some of you try to downplay SCSU's win by bashing your own team. Way to support your guys. Good grief.