Quote from: Gregory Sager on March 05, 2026, 05:44:22 PMQuote from: Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan) on March 05, 2026, 03:04:51 PMQuote from: Jake Feldman on March 05, 2026, 02:53:01 PMQuote from: Gregory Sager on March 05, 2026, 12:53:24 PMQuote from: Ryan Scott (Hoops Fan) on March 05, 2026, 12:32:21 PMNeither the SCIAC nor the NWC would ever consider UCSC. It doesn't make sense for either of them.
They can all schedule UCSC as they see fit without being required to do so.
This. UCSC is unlike any of the SCIAC schools in two important ways: 1) it's a state school, and the SCIAC consists of private schools; and 2) it's in northern California, and, as the name of the conference indicates, the SCIAC is is in southern California. The Banana Slugs are a five-hour drive away from the nearest SCIAC campus.
The NWC is the same in both respects, except that the distances are even further between UCSC and the Oregon- and Washington-based NWC schools.
So it looks like they either can go D2/NAIA to cut travel budgets but add scholarships, or stay in C2C and struggle to compete with the Mary Washingtons, Christopher Newports, and Salisburys, all while adding further strain on the overall school budget for possible travel expenses. The SCIAC would be most logical for them, since the LA area is 300 miles away, but I recognize your point.
The UCSC student body passed an additional fee on themselves a few years back to keep athletics.
They could probably raise a chunk of athletics money just by aggressively marketing Banana Slugs merch.
You can get a t-shirt here (I'm tempted): https://sideline.bsnsports.com/schools/california/santacruz/uc-santa-cruz-athletics