In response to bballfan44...
The way the NEAC balloting goes is that all coaches vote on All Conference selections, the players with the most points get 1st team, and so on.
Since it is entirely up to the coaches who see the players play conference games, they only have that and a stat print out to base their voting on.
Everyone will agree Salls is a talented ball player, however everyone who has seen Cazenovia's field/scoring methods will agree that his numbers are skewed. Playing on a terrible grass infield, simple groundouts become base hits, and with a short porch all the way around, almost anyone can put one out.
Also, personality and sportsmanship come into play when voting for All Conference. I have heard alot of complaints about the way Salls acts.
Voting is completed before the conference tournament, and while Cazenovia has hosted the last two years, they have never finished higher than 3rd, so maybe the coaches got it right, Cazenovia and Salls are just an average team.
The way the NEAC balloting goes is that all coaches vote on All Conference selections, the players with the most points get 1st team, and so on.
Since it is entirely up to the coaches who see the players play conference games, they only have that and a stat print out to base their voting on.
Everyone will agree Salls is a talented ball player, however everyone who has seen Cazenovia's field/scoring methods will agree that his numbers are skewed. Playing on a terrible grass infield, simple groundouts become base hits, and with a short porch all the way around, almost anyone can put one out.
Also, personality and sportsmanship come into play when voting for All Conference. I have heard alot of complaints about the way Salls acts.
Voting is completed before the conference tournament, and while Cazenovia has hosted the last two years, they have never finished higher than 3rd, so maybe the coaches got it right, Cazenovia and Salls are just an average team.