Thank you so much. That is what I was looking for; the "formula" someone posted the the other thread you referenced.  The representation point you make is frustrating, but it is what it is. I guess I just saw 1 specific (and 1 blended) example where an AA awardee was named to an AA team in a position he does not play...that's one of the largest frustration with this year's picks

I promise, I searched for answers before posting. If this topic has been addressed and someone can point me to the thread, I am happy to search there.

First, congrats to the awardees for 2025 season. Lots of deserving recipients; however, several of the awards do not seem to make sense (statistically or in context of the award).

Yes, I know a) there will always be those on the outside looking in, and b) awards like this are extremely subjective, and c) there is no way the voters can see all performances. That said, a simply search on a team's website can shed a lot about positions the player plays and game stats. That simple step could help inform on b & c, above.

Can anyone provide any insight into what the voters are looking for with individual awards (at least on the men's side). Any USC voters on this thread care to weigh in?

Thanks.