FB: Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:19:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

colinsteinke

Quote from: Patrick Coleman on Yesterday at 02:00:34 PM
Quote from: colinsteinke on Yesterday at 11:08:05 AMAn 8-2 UWW has about a 60% chance of making it in as an at large. I get that's not cut and dry, but it's also not 0. I think it ends up depending on if they beat UWP or UWRF (or both) and how Carleton ends up. But it's too early to say that the WIAC is only guaranteed two spots.

Though you are right. There are fewer AQs this year. And LaCrosse going 0-2 was not on my WIAC playoff team bingo card...they need to run the table to get in now, and they're not going to.

There are more AQs. There are fewer at-larges.

Thanks for the correction, Pat. Definitely should have my coffee before hopping on the boards.

AndrewB

8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

bleedpurple

Quote from: AndrewB on Yesterday at 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

I could see UW-W,UW-RF, and UW-P all going 1-1 against each other and running the rest of the table. What would that mean in terms of the playoffs?

AndrewB

Quote from: bleedpurple on Yesterday at 10:37:45 PM
Quote from: AndrewB on Yesterday at 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

I could see UW-W,UW-RF, and UW-P all going 1-1 against each other and running the rest of the table. What would that mean in terms of the playoffs?

9-1 is MUCH DIFFERENT than 8-2.   

Now I don't know who gets the automatic bid in that case.  But Whitewater would have the lowest NPI of the 3, IF ALL 3 are 9-1.

NCC2010

Quote from: AndrewB on Yesterday at 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

UWW will be right on the borderline at 8-2.  They will definitely be in at 9-1 at-large.  They need a combination of Carleton going 6-4 or better like last season plus depends on how many at-large teams go 9-1.

Per Logan's site, if Carlton finishes 6-4, Whitewater would have an average NPI of 65.464 which would have made them the 12th at-large team last year or the first team out this season (only 11 at-large bids this year). Obviously the NPI cut off will be different this year but it seems to be tracking for UWW to be very close to the edge at 8-2.

CarollFan

Quote from: NCC2010 on Today at 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: AndrewB on Yesterday at 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

UWW will be right on the borderline at 8-2.  They will definitely be in at 9-1 at-large.  They need a combination of Carleton going 6-4 or better like last season plus depends on how many at-large teams go 9-1.

Per Logan's site, if Carlton finishes 6-4, Whitewater would have an average NPI of 65.464 which would have made them the 12th at-large team last year or the first team out this season (only 11 at-large bids this year). Obviously the NPI cut off will be different this year but it seems to be tracking for UWW to be very close to the edge at 8-2.


Exactly. I think the challenge for 8-2 teams this year is not only less pool C spots but we might have more 9-1 pool C teams this year. For example last year Wheaton in second place in CCIW was 8-2. This year whoever ends up in second will be 9-1. Could same hold true for WIAC?

colinsteinke

Given that River Falls has to go to both UWW and UWP, I could easily see them being the 8-2 team and the third team in the playoffs. But I don't know if they've got the juice to go into Waverly and beat a Wartburg team that almost beat NCC last week. We still don't really know who River Falls is this year.

But an 8-2 River Falls team with losses at UWW and UWP likely gets in, assuming they beat Wartburg.

colinsteinke

Quote from: CarollFan on Today at 10:14:00 AM
Quote from: NCC2010 on Today at 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: AndrewB on Yesterday at 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

UWW will be right on the borderline at 8-2.  They will definitely be in at 9-1 at-large.  They need a combination of Carleton going 6-4 or better like last season plus depends on how many at-large teams go 9-1.

Per Logan's site, if Carlton finishes 6-4, Whitewater would have an average NPI of 65.464 which would have made them the 12th at-large team last year or the first team out this season (only 11 at-large bids this year). Obviously the NPI cut off will be different this year but it seems to be tracking for UWW to be very close to the edge at 8-2.


Exactly. I think the challenge for 8-2 teams this year is not only less pool C spots but we might have more 9-1 pool C teams this year. For example last year Wheaton in second place in CCIW was 8-2. This year whoever ends up in second will be 9-1. Could same hold true for WIAC?

Yea, there's a very real possibility that the second place team in the WIAC is 9-1. Heck, there's a chance for a three way tie at the top at 9-1, where some combination of UWW, UWRF and UWP all come out of that mix with one loss and none of them lose in non-conference. But we'll see after this weekend.

emma17

I think there's way too much talk of UWW losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.

CarollFan

Quote from: emma17 on Today at 01:18:42 PMI think there's way too much talk of UWW losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.

Go Bears! 🐻⬇️
😁

AndrewB

Quote from: emma17 on Today at 01:18:42 PMI think there's way too much talk of UWW NOT losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for First and second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.
;D