FB: American Rivers Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:19:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Schipper Strong

Quote from: Fannosaurus Rex on October 20, 2025, 05:15:27 PMHooray it is finally Central v Wartburg week and both teams are undefeated. This kind of reminds me of trying to handicap a stakes race. You know the talent is there, but you don't know which horse is ready to run a really big race. It looks like the track should be dry and fast.  I think to win, Central will have to get off to a fast start and avoid mistakes. Wartburg doesn't look like a team you want to play catch-up against. If this was a research paper, I would footnote Professor Obvious here.
Central has tended to get off to a slow start and make mistakes early so far this year. Maybe I should say that was the case with the two key city teams. They played phenomenal against RMC. Best full game I have seen in a long time. They do tend to play better when they think the odds are against them, which bodes well. They rely on the run more this year than most, which does not bode well against WB. Hoffman is back so that will be good. Last year was a close defensive game ending 10-6 Wartburg. Odds definitely favor Wartburg, but I was surprised to see some stats had us dead even. Home field and recent history say Wartburg wins. Since Wartburg broke Central's win streak record, I think Central should be the team to end it, poetic justice and all.

HansenRatings

Quote from: MediaGuy on October 20, 2025, 05:52:16 PM
Quote from: doolittledog on October 20, 2025, 05:00:23 PMSort of off topic for the current season.  But...any new rumors or news for potential new conference members in the near future?
Around the time that Luther announced their departure, I saw somewhere that Monmouth and Northwestern St Paul were names mentioned, but not in any official capacity...from a travel perspective, possibly Augustana would be an interesting invite

I think that was from me. I had a source that told me those two had both officially previously petitioned the conference for membership, but no word on whether they were the top candidates from the ARC's perspective. I believe DriftlessDuhawk mentioned that a "travel partner" would be a sticking point among the "Olympic sports" for adding a school outside the current footprint, so adding someone like Northwestern without a travel partner seems unlikely. Monmouth isn't bad for travel. The Dubuque & CR schools can get there in ~2 hours, and Wartburg/Central/Simpson can get there in 3-1/2 ish. BVU and NWU, though...
Follow me on Twitter. I post fun graphs sometimes. @LogHanRatings

DriftlessDuhawk

Quote from: Fannosaurus Rex on October 20, 2025, 05:15:27 PMHooray it is finally Central v Wartburg week and both teams are undefeated. This kind of reminds me of trying to handicap a stakes race. You know the talent is there, but you don't know which horse is ready to run a really big race. It looks like the track should be dry and fast.  I think to win, Central will have to get off to a fast start and avoid mistakes. Wartburg doesn't look like a team you want to play catch-up against. If this was a research paper, I would footnote Professor Obvious here.

Loras kind of showed the game plan for beating Wartburg last week. The Duhawks completely abandoned the run game and tried to build their entire game plan around 4-6 yard outs and sit routes. Wartburg pretty much allowed it to happen all day, too, which allowed the Duhawks to take a 13-6 lead into the half. The Wartburg defense is just so stout. They do not miss tackles! If Central is to pull off the upset, they will have to be ok living in that 4-6 yard range and just not expect much from their run game.

Wartburg's front 4 is one of the best D3 front 4s I have ever seen. Wartburg brought 5, maybe 3-4 times the whole game and immediately got pressure on each play. Their defense is set up so well that when those 4 players are on the back 7 may as well not even worry about the running backs unless they are catching the ball out of the backfield.

Fannosaurus Rex

Well that is discouraging. Central hasn't had much of a running game for several years now.  This year it has been much better. So maybe somehow it can contribute to a Central win Saturday.
"It ain't what ya do, it's the way how ya do it.  It ain't what ya eat, it's the way how ya chew it."  Little Richard

HansenRatings

Quote from: DriftlessDuhawk on October 21, 2025, 06:50:21 PMimmediately got pressure on each play

This amuses to me, because I watched the first half and thought, "They're not getting pressure as much as they usually do."

The front four's ability to pressure QBs, even on 1-step (what we used to call 3-step) drops is the biggest difference between last year and this year. Teams have kind of known for a couple years now that the "don't even try to run" plan is your best bet against this D. Simpson has done it the last couple years (more successfully last year than this year), as has Central. Simpson last year ran the ball 13 times and dropped back 69 times.
Follow me on Twitter. I post fun graphs sometimes. @LogHanRatings

DriftlessDuhawk

I was more so saying that when Wartburg chose to bring 5, they got pressure very quickly. I would have to go back and watch the first half again but it didn't feel like they brought 5 more than just a handful of times in the first half. They went to biltz a few more times in the second half in an attempt to speed up the Loras qb.

Not having to bring additional pressure often is a huge compliment to the Wartburg front. I will say I was impressed by how well the Duhawk offensive line held up for most of the game, especially with multiple starters out. That being said, when you tell an Oline they aren't going to have to run block and most of the passes should be coming out in under 2 seconds, it does make things easier.

doolittledog

We were planning on making the road trip down to Indianola this weekend.  Simpson is the only Iowa school in the ARC I have never visited and my wife liked the choices of post game meals/drinks within close proximity to their campus.  But we've been a little busy lately and decided watching from the comfort of our couch with a whole bunch of appetizers in front of us sounded like a better plan. 

This is a big one for the Spartans.  UD has looked decent, but hasn't really put a full game together this season.  Simpson seems to be making that push up the conference ladder to being a contender.  Something to prove for both schools this weekend. 
Coach Finstock - "There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that and everything else is cream cheese."

Schipper Strong

Congratulations to Wartburg on the win Saturday. Once again you were the better prepared team. 😢 Central did not seem to have either an offensive or defensive game plan which was very disappointing. It doesn't seem like we are able to make in game adjustments either. We made good adjustments at the half against UD, Loras and Wartburg, but we can't seem to adjust on the fly.

I am sure this is one of those "you can't win no matter what you do" situations and I have never played football, so those of you with game experience can give me your thoughts. Why when you are down 21-0 do you go for a field goal instead of the TD? To me it says we do not want to get shut out instead of we want to win. Then why do you do it a second time wheni  down 21-3? Yes, I know we made it and added a TD to get the game to 8 points, but you can't really expect that Wartburg won't score again.

I actually think 28-13 wasn't a disastrous outcome and give the players credit for that. I did not catch that our leading receiver was injured in the second quarter, but that is part of the game. I was just giving Wartburg too much credit for keeping him extremely well covered. Right now Central has to step it up just to get by a surging Simpson and a very tough Coe team.

HansenRatings

Quote from: Schipper Strong on October 27, 2025, 03:53:26 PMCongratulations to Wartburg on the win Saturday. Once again you were the better prepared team. 😢 Central did not seem to have either an offensive or defensive game plan which was very disappointing. It doesn't seem like we are able to make in game adjustments either. We made good adjustments at the half against UD, Loras and Wartburg, but we can't seem to adjust on the fly.

I am sure this is one of those "you can't win no matter what you do" situations and I have never played football, so those of you with game experience can give me your thoughts. Why when you are down 21-0 do you go for a field goal instead of the TD? To me it says we do not want to get shut out instead of we want to win. Then why do you do it a second time wheni  down 21-3? Yes, I know we made it and added a TD to get the game to 8 points, but you can't really expect that Wartburg won't score again.

I actually think 28-13 wasn't a disastrous outcome and give the players credit for that. I did not catch that our leading receiver was injured in the second quarter, but that is part of the game. I was just giving Wartburg too much credit for keeping him extremely well covered. Right now Central has to step it up just to get by a surging Simpson and a very tough Coe team.

The first field goal was on 4th & 14. You're stuck in a pretty rough spot there, even if you wanted to be aggressive. You're going to need 4 scores to win no matter what (3 scores to tie), so that attempt was defensible. The second field goal, on a 4th & 4 from the 8 yard line, was quite a bit less defensible. You're down by 3 scores, and you kick a field goal to end up still down by 3 scores?

Much less defensible than those field goal decisions was the timeout usage by Central in the second half. They used two timeouts on 3rd downs in the 3rd quarter, both while they were still down by 3 scores. You might need those later. The last timeout might have been the worst of the bunch, though. Down by 15 with under 4 minutes left, and calling a timeout to discuss your playcall for a 4th down? You have the ball... you cannot waste your timeouts in that situation when you are in control of the play clock. You have to save them for when the other team is in control of the play clock.
Follow me on Twitter. I post fun graphs sometimes. @LogHanRatings

Fannosaurus Rex

I will defend the time-outs by noting that five yards are too hard to get against Wartburg so you don't want to give them up to a delay of game penalty. It is much harder to defend not being able to get the right people on the field and a play called in the allotted time. It looked to me like Central was the team with the big game jitters. It is not what this old fan is used to seeing.
"It ain't what ya do, it's the way how ya do it.  It ain't what ya eat, it's the way how ya chew it."  Little Richard

HansenRatings

Quote from: Fannosaurus Rex on October 28, 2025, 02:30:32 PMI will defend the time-outs by noting that five yards are too hard to get against Wartburg so you don't want to give them up to a delay of game penalty. It is much harder to defend not being able to get the right people on the field and a play called in the allotted time. It looked to me like Central was the team with the big game jitters. It is not what this old fan is used to seeing.

It's considerably harder to gain five yards with 0:00 on the scoreboard than it is at any other point in the game.
Follow me on Twitter. I post fun graphs sometimes. @LogHanRatings

doolittledog

This years Dubuque team reminds me of the 2017 team.  2016 UD had a potent offense and brought back decent numbers but for whatever reason, 2017 was a struggle for that offense.  2025 is playing out the same way for the Spartans.  If it's not snowing Saturday morning I'll break out the lucky mower and see if that works its magic. 
Coach Finstock - "There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that and everything else is cream cheese."

Schipper Strong

Okay, going back a week here as I really flushed it after posting and others responded to my message and I never checked back. I can see going for the field goal that was 4th and 14 I guess, but the second one really was indefensible to me. Not when you know the ball is going back to the team you are already trailing by 18.

The two timeouts because we couldn't get a play in on time is an inexcusable issue again with the coaching. Yes they prevented delay of game calls, but it should never have gotten to that situation.

I think we have a great coaching staff, but this year they have let the team down. The loss to Wartburg wasn't horrendously lopsided in the end, but we were not ready for that game at all. We did not play with any confidence and the coaches being able to get plays in on time shows they were not prepared. We have had issues getting started in several games this year and I just don't understand it. I give the other teams credit for playing well to start the games against us, but something isn't clicking this year. We better work it out as neither Simpson or Coe will be easy.

Schipper Strong

#45193
Today's game was better. In a stark change Central was not the team struggling at the half. UD had the lucky mower going for them. Wartburg must have still been riding a high from beating Central last week. Clearly Coach Winter had a good halftime talk for that.

Cody Klein was really pushing Grunder for more playing time today. He had a phenomenal game when he got a touch he really made the most of it with three great rushing touchdowns today. We are going to have to give him more chances. I know it was BV, but they could not stop him, though they held Grunder in check better than most. Edit: I just read the recap. I am not sure phenomenal is sufficient for Cody Klein's game today. Ten carries for 212 yards and 3 touchdowns! Wow!

Fannosaurus Rex

This being Central v Simpson rivalry week, I am doing some research to come up with a Simpson insulting witticism.  I find it interesting to learn that the seventh president of Simpson College was named, Another Simpson. Another served from 1892 to 1898. I believe large families were common back then. It makes me wonder if Another had a younger sibling what their name might be? If I was their father, it would be Andanother for a girl and Notanother for a boy.
"It ain't what ya do, it's the way how ya do it.  It ain't what ya eat, it's the way how ya chew it."  Little Richard