NCAA Rule Changes

[Ron Boerger]

The NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel approved the experimental video review challenge for conference games only this fall.

Under the rule, coaches will have one video review challenge. If the challenge is successful, the coach will retain the right to challenge one more time for the rest of the match.

If the challenge is unsuccessful, the coach loses the right to challenge for the rest of the match.

In overtime, if coaches have a challenge remaining, they can initiate a video review. Officials also can initiate video reviews in overtime to make sure a call is right, provided the affected team does not have a challenge remaining.

Coaches can initiate video review challenges in the following scenarios:

Fighting/violent behavior.
Violations on penalty kicks.
Straight red cards (not second yellows).
Denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity/stopping a promising attack.
Offside.
Potential mistaken identity.
Determining the location of a foul that was called on the field against the defending team near or in its penalty area.
Referees can initiate video reviews to determine whether the entire ball passed over the goal line for a goal, as well as to decide timing issues.

They also adopted two other rules put in place by the IFA Board:

One will eliminate a red card being issued for nondeliberate handling of the ball in the penalty area that denies a goal or goal-scoring opportunity. Inside the penalty area, red cards should be reserved for deliberate, cynical handling that denies a goal or goal-scoring opportunity.

The other rules change amends encroachment by teammates of the kicker or goalkeeper during a penalty kick.

Referees should penalize the encroachment only if the player at fault prevents an opponent from playing the ball, challenges an opponent for the ball and then scores or prevents a goal, attempts to score or prevent a goal, or creates or stops a goal-scoring opportunity.

[EnmoreCat]

If there was consistent, high quality filming taking place at every game, then this could be a good idea.  But right now, based on what I have seen, that's not the case.  On average it may improve a few decisions, but ultimately, if it's going to be the same human being that made the original one, I suspect the general happiness with officials is unlikely to get much more than a marginal bump.

[Kuiper]

This isn't a rule change, but on "2025 season eve," I thought it might make sense to remind parents, players, and fans that the NCAA has issued several NCAA's points of emphasis for referees for the 2025 season.  Here are my short summaries, annotated with my comments

1. Coaching and Team Area Decorum.

Behave.  Seriously.

Kuiper reactions:

a. Substitutes should remain in the team area behind the coaches except when warming up = Coaches planning to have their players distract or intimidate their opponents should send a ton of them over near the goal to warm up in a very loud and bizarre fashion like students behind the basket when the opponent is shooting free throws in basketball

b. Coaches and players should direct their remarks to their own team and not address opponents or officials = instead of calling the ref a moron, yell to your own player "I know the ref is a moron and that last call was nonsense, but you'll just have to find a way to overcome it."

c. Coaches who leave the team area to argue with officials or confront opponents risk ejection = Find another reason to leave your team area - such as your player suffering an apparent injury - and then, after checking on them, offer a word or two to the referee or the opposing coach on your way back to your team area

d. Know the difference between NCAA soccer rules and the IFAB Laws of the Game (e.g., coaches were incorrectly ejected for holding on to the ball to delay restarts and reaching out to touch balls that were still in play) = Wait, you mean, under NCAA rules, a coach CAN hold a ball to delay a restart and CAN reach out and touch a ball that is still in play? Who wrote these rules for the NCAA?  Coaches?

2. Handling the Ball.

It's "handling," not "hands."  It has to be deliberate, except if it goes in the goal off your hands. 

Kuiper reaction:  Parents will still yell "hand ball" anytime a ball hits a player's hands no matter how many times you explain this rule.

3.  Player Misidentification for Misconduct Issued and Need for All Officials to Confirm
the Box Score

Referees - if you're going to go to the trouble of carding a player, the least you can do is write down their number correctly

Kuiper reaction:

There have been 58 protests over the last three seasons for cards charged to the wrong individual?  Yikes!

4.  Proper Implementation of Misconduct Cards on Penalty Kicks.

If the last man back is "attempting to play the ball" and commits a foul in the box on the striker going for a goal it's a yellow, not a red. 

Kuiper reaction:

Wait until your opponent gets into the box and is about to shoot and THEN commit your foul

5.  Timekeeping

They are still worried about time wasting in the last few minutes of a game.

Kuiper reaction:

I'm not sure I've seen a player on a losing team commit a misconduct foul in the last 5 minutes to deliberately stop the clock (as opposed to stopping a breakaway or out of frustration).  I guess it would be more satisfying than pretending to be injured.

[SKUD]

So the points of emphasis are don't let Amherst be themselves?

[stlawus]

"They are still worried about time wasting in the last few minutes of a game."

stlawus reaction: re-institute overtime