FB: Wisconsin Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:19:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

colinsteinke

Quote from: Patrick Coleman on September 14, 2026, 02:00:34 PM
Quote from: colinsteinke on September 14, 2026, 11:08:05 AMAn 8-2 UWW has about a 60% chance of making it in as an at large. I get that's not cut and dry, but it's also not 0. I think it ends up depending on if they beat UWP or UWRF (or both) and how Carleton ends up. But it's too early to say that the WIAC is only guaranteed two spots.

Though you are right. There are fewer AQs this year. And LaCrosse going 0-2 was not on my WIAC playoff team bingo card...they need to run the table to get in now, and they're not going to.

There are more AQs. There are fewer at-larges.

Thanks for the correction, Pat. Definitely should have my coffee before hopping on the boards.

AndrewB

8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

bleedpurple

Quote from: AndrewB on September 14, 2026, 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

I could see UW-W,UW-RF, and UW-P all going 1-1 against each other and running the rest of the table. What would that mean in terms of the playoffs?

AndrewB

Quote from: bleedpurple on September 14, 2026, 10:37:45 PM
Quote from: AndrewB on September 14, 2026, 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

I could see UW-W,UW-RF, and UW-P all going 1-1 against each other and running the rest of the table. What would that mean in terms of the playoffs?

9-1 is MUCH DIFFERENT than 8-2.   

Now I don't know who gets the automatic bid in that case.  But Whitewater would have the lowest NPI of the 3, IF ALL 3 are 9-1.

NCC2010

Quote from: AndrewB on September 14, 2026, 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

UWW will be right on the borderline at 8-2.  They will definitely be in at 9-1 at-large.  They need a combination of Carleton going 6-4 or better like last season plus depends on how many at-large teams go 9-1.

Per Logan's site, if Carlton finishes 6-4, Whitewater would have an average NPI of 65.464 which would have made them the 12th at-large team last year or the first team out this season (only 11 at-large bids this year). Obviously the NPI cut off will be different this year but it seems to be tracking for UWW to be very close to the edge at 8-2.

CarollFan

Quote from: NCC2010 on September 15, 2026, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: AndrewB on September 14, 2026, 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

UWW will be right on the borderline at 8-2.  They will definitely be in at 9-1 at-large.  They need a combination of Carleton going 6-4 or better like last season plus depends on how many at-large teams go 9-1.

Per Logan's site, if Carlton finishes 6-4, Whitewater would have an average NPI of 65.464 which would have made them the 12th at-large team last year or the first team out this season (only 11 at-large bids this year). Obviously the NPI cut off will be different this year but it seems to be tracking for UWW to be very close to the edge at 8-2.


Exactly. I think the challenge for 8-2 teams this year is not only less pool C spots but we might have more 9-1 pool C teams this year. For example last year Wheaton in second place in CCIW was 8-2. This year whoever ends up in second will be 9-1. Could same hold true for WIAC?

colinsteinke

Given that River Falls has to go to both UWW and UWP, I could easily see them being the 8-2 team and the third team in the playoffs. But I don't know if they've got the juice to go into Waverly and beat a Wartburg team that almost beat NCC last week. We still don't really know who River Falls is this year.

But an 8-2 River Falls team with losses at UWW and UWP likely gets in, assuming they beat Wartburg.

colinsteinke

Quote from: CarollFan on September 15, 2026, 10:14:00 AM
Quote from: NCC2010 on September 15, 2026, 09:57:41 AM
Quote from: AndrewB on September 14, 2026, 09:40:49 PM8-2 UWW won't make the playoffs if the loses are to River Falls and Platteville.  What Top 25 would they have beaten then? 

7 D3 victories:
Carlton
Keystone HA HA 😂
S Point
EU Claire
La Crosse
Oshkosh
Stout

Not 1 signature win, by Whitewater or any of these teams.

Welcome to the Culver's Bowl.

UWW will be right on the borderline at 8-2.  They will definitely be in at 9-1 at-large.  They need a combination of Carleton going 6-4 or better like last season plus depends on how many at-large teams go 9-1.

Per Logan's site, if Carlton finishes 6-4, Whitewater would have an average NPI of 65.464 which would have made them the 12th at-large team last year or the first team out this season (only 11 at-large bids this year). Obviously the NPI cut off will be different this year but it seems to be tracking for UWW to be very close to the edge at 8-2.


Exactly. I think the challenge for 8-2 teams this year is not only less pool C spots but we might have more 9-1 pool C teams this year. For example last year Wheaton in second place in CCIW was 8-2. This year whoever ends up in second will be 9-1. Could same hold true for WIAC?

Yea, there's a very real possibility that the second place team in the WIAC is 9-1. Heck, there's a chance for a three way tie at the top at 9-1, where some combination of UWW, UWRF and UWP all come out of that mix with one loss and none of them lose in non-conference. But we'll see after this weekend.

emma17

I think there's way too much talk of UWW losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.

CarollFan

Quote from: emma17 on September 15, 2026, 01:18:42 PMI think there's way too much talk of UWW losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.

Go Bears! 🐻⬇️
😁

AndrewB

Quote from: emma17 on September 15, 2026, 01:18:42 PMI think there's way too much talk of UWW NOT losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for First and second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.
;D

colinsteinke

Quote from: emma17 on September 15, 2026, 01:18:42 PMI think there's way too much talk of UWW losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.
Quote from: AndrewB on September 15, 2026, 02:49:42 PM
Quote from: emma17 on September 15, 2026, 01:18:42 PMI think there's way too much talk of UWW NOT losing.

UWRF and UWP can fight for First and second.

Side note- do you think the Denver Broncos did any tackling drills at all in their camp?
Maybe too much press clippings of their greatness.
;D


I notice you're suspiciously quiet about your alma mater...not confident PeteyBananas can get you over the hump?

AndrewB

Quote from: colinsteinke on September 15, 2026, 05:29:42 PMI notice you're suspiciously quiet about your alma mater...not confident PeteyBananas can get you over the hump?

It was a big win against Alma.  Great week to catch Coe.  Right after a physical loss to UW-RF.  The offensive should get better every week.  They just don't get the fan support because of the crappy stadium location.

But show Coach Rindahl this:
https://www.d3boards.com/index.php?topic=9752.0

colinsteinke

Quote from: AndrewB on September 15, 2026, 08:52:04 PM
Quote from: colinsteinke on September 15, 2026, 05:29:42 PMI notice you're suspiciously quiet about your alma mater...not confident PeteyBananas can get you over the hump?

It was a big win against Alma.  Great week to catch Coe.  Right after a physical loss to UW-RF.  The offensive should get better every week.  They just don't get the fan support because of the crappy stadium location.

But show Coach Rindahl this:
https://www.d3boards.com/index.php?topic=9752.0


You have a weirdly selective memory. In recent years they've played John Carroll and UMHB in non conference play, and traditionally, some of the WIAC schools have had trouble getting teams to be willing to play them.

You seem to be really hung up on Jace...are you just upset that UW0 hired PeteyBananas because they knew they wanted Jace to be the coach whenever Bullis decided to move on? Or what's the deal here?

I'm sure UWW would love to play UMU in non-conference if it makes sense, but do you think UMU is going to want to play a WIAC school for that game, when winning is at such a premium now for at-large bids?

AndrewB

Quote from: colinsteinke on Yesterday at 09:05:09 AM
Quote from: AndrewB on September 15, 2026, 08:52:04 PM
Quote from: colinsteinke on September 15, 2026, 05:29:42 PMI notice you're suspiciously quiet about your alma mater...not confident PeteyBananas can get you over the hump?

It was a big win against Alma.  Great week to catch Coe.  Right after a physical loss to UW-RF.  The offensive should get better every week.  They just don't get the fan support because of the crappy stadium location.

But show Coach Rindahl this:
https://www.d3boards.com/index.php?topic=9752.0


You have a weirdly selective memory. In recent years they've played John Carroll and UMHB in non conference play, and traditionally, some of the WIAC schools have had trouble getting teams to be willing to play them.

You seem to be really hung up on Jace...are you just upset that UW0 hired PeteyBananas because they knew they wanted Jace to be the coach whenever Bullis decided to move on? Or what's the deal here?

I'm sure UWW would love to play UMU in non-conference if it makes sense, but do you think UMU is going to want to play a WIAC school for that game, when winning is at such a premium now for at-large bids?

Don't both coaches have the same amount of WIAC conference titles?

But, to this Mount Union thing.

First, I don't think Mount Union will be afraid.  They have won 9 consecutive conferences championships, so they shouldn't have to worry about an at-large bid.

Second, it's been over a decade since these two teams have meet.

Third, Whitewater is the closest WIAC team to Ohio.  (Less travel for both teams)

Fourth, Whitewater wouldn't have to schedule a NAIA team. 

This is the perfect fit for a big non-conference game.