FB: New England Small College Athletic Conference

[MapleBBQChicken]

NPI would be a good tiebreaker going forward IMO considering it is how the NCAA determines their field

This is definitely a logical take. My vote moving forward would be NPI or the Rose Bowl rule (whoever went least recently).

However, if the conference's goal is to get as many teams in as it can, it should could give the autobid to the team with the worst NPI, increasing the chances that the others get at-large bids. This method would be unfair to the teams and transparently self-serving, but I've heard stupider things in sports. Anyway, let's tuck that debate away until the offseason.

If anyone has any insider info on the time and place of the tie-breaking name draw, please let us know. Congrats to the three champs!

[SpringSt7]

Based on the fact that there are 3 teams at 8-1 that are in the range of an at large bid, I don't think the NESCAC needs to engage in anything nefarious to game the field on bids. If there were 3 teams at 7-2 it seems like only one would make it. It is pretty rare to get a 3 way champ. They should do things the right way

[MapleBBQChicken]

Agreed, just pointing out something that I found amusing. Rooting for everyone in the playoffs.

[Conts Fan]

I have to imagine there are more than a few fans around the country who aren't happy to see NESCAC jump into the playoffs and immediately suck up three playoff spots.

[BergAlum2]

I have to imagine there are more than a few fans around the country who aren't happy to see NESCAC jump into the playoffs and immediately suck up three playoff spots.

Yeah, I noticed ya'll are set to take 3.  Wish I understood how NPI is calculated, because intuitively I would think not having any out of conference games would hurt the teams in the NPI rankings, but seems like it doesn't?   That being said, I will follow your teams with some curiosity to see how they fare