FB: Southern California Intercollegiate Athletic Conference

Started by admin, August 16, 2005, 05:20:13 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

olddog

Last Week

Nothing changed for UR, I was correct about the inverts and back end, other than the DBs being week this year. Its the same movie over and over. Short field etc...UR is not getting the same players....I wont be an old guy and keep repeating myself.

The big surprise for me was CU.... A good message for all players there are three facets to the game and Chapman was the victor because of it. Nice win for the SCIAC

Both leagues are down, looks like L & C and GF maybe in the NW mix too and CLU looks to be getting better.


NWC50

Quote from: olddog on Yesterday at 05:01:17 PMLast Week

Nothing changed for UR, I was correct about the inverts and back end, other than the DBs being week this year. Its the same movie over and over. Short field etc...UR is not getting the same players....I wont be an old guy and keep repeating myself.

The big surprise for me was CU.... A good message for all players there are three facets to the game and Chapman was the victor because of it. Nice win for the SCIAC

Both leagues are down, looks like L & C and GF maybe in the NW mix too and CLU looks to be getting better.


The Linfield kicker missed 3 field goals, including a 25 yard kick to tie the game at the end. CU was lucky to win that game.

olddog

Quote from: NWC50 on Yesterday at 10:26:49 PM
Quote from: olddog on Yesterday at 05:01:17 PMLast Week

Nothing changed for UR, I was correct about the inverts and back end, other than the DBs being week this year. Its the same movie over and over. Short field etc...UR is not getting the same players....I wont be an old guy and keep repeating myself.

The big surprise for me was CU.... A good message for all players there are three facets to the game and Chapman was the victor because of it. Nice win for the SCIAC

Both leagues are down, looks like L & C and GF maybe in the NW mix too and CLU looks to be getting better.


The Linfield kicker missed 3 field goals, including a 25 yard kick to tie the game at the end. CU was lucky to win that game.

I used to think like you but, in a game with good teams, you have to make the plays. LF failed and deserved to take the "L". One can not miss on opportunities.

If they had a rematch sure LF would be a 3 point favorite, but its why they play and forum like this are just for fans.

wildcat11

Linfield's special teams have been bad the past 2 seasons and it bit them on backside against a solid team. Like dog said, 3 phases to a game and while you may not win a game via special teams, you can for sure lose one.

Chapman made the plays.

olddog

Quote from: wildcat11 on Today at 12:32:32 PMLinfield's special teams have been bad the past 2 seasons and it bit them on backside against a solid team. Like dog said, 3 phases to a game and while you may not win a game via special teams, you can for sure lose one.

Chapman made the plays.

Same coach as in the past?  or just the kickers. A good kicker makes your special team coach look good.
That punt block in the endzone took to long to get off, regardless of the blocking being horrible. I am sure they have a "tight" call where the front takes a half second longer to block before they get the back line.